IMHO the key thing about this incredibly well thought-out/reasoned hypothesis can be boiled down to one word: Nullification. What (if anything) is a nullifying position/hypothesis to this? I’ve previously suggested that perhaps it’s the distribution of flora/fauna–but my gut response to that is that Mother Nature recovers and re-takes terrain far faster than modern science believes. TBD–but good Lord, how wonderful to have this kind of all-encompassing theory that tackles so many fragments in the archeological record. Bravo, kudos, and massive ‘thank you’ Roger for this seminal intellectual work. -DY
Even the flora and fauna show densities at the Euler Axes that far exceed the rest of the planet. But you are correct – life spreads and recovers quickly.
The book overlaps 99% with the website material in terms of elements – However, the book is written as a formal theoretical argument, whereas, the website is crafted as a diary of sorts – a log of a critical path discovery. That is the main difference. The climate argument and evidence were so large, that I could not fit it all inside the book without extending the printing costs too high, and losing most readers in the complexity.
If you are shipping to the US – it should transact – except Apple Pay may decline the transaction because they have an errant MCC code in their files (getting that fixed) – you should be able to pre-order. But yes, this is selling 10 times my estimated volume.
Can’t wait to get the book in France. We still have scientists who are eager to study alternative climate modelling here. Your work will make a good complement for Vinos jet stream model, and Scafetta-Courtillot’s planetary models.
Have been following your work for a couple years now and truly appreciate your dedication to shine a light on what has been hidden.
Looking forward to holding this masterpiece soon! Is there a timeline for when this “author’s advance edition” will be available to your followers in Canada?
I used @stratdepth’s great ECDOview tool to examine the Huaca Pucllana complex in Lima, Peru. It appears to be a possible match to Np’. I didn’t see it in the list of sites in the article but I could have missed it.
The Andy Nay graph of Mann’s reconstruction is a dismantling of Mann’s work, as such the critique should be considered when deciding whether to use his data.
NASA GISS smears temperatures thousands of KM and uses a very small set of stations.
Satellite temperature data is verified by Weather Balloons. GISS is the warmest data set. The surface data sets have been adjusted thousands of times, and the pairwise homogenization algorithm changes temperatures on the fly. Temperature data sets from Satellite observation are at least verified by a second method but the timeframe is shorter. Better good shorter data than poor and inadequate longer data.
Michael Mann is a known disgrace and a fraud in climate circles. Using his work doesn’t help. Apart from fraudulent statistics, using proxies upside down, using known bad proxies even PNAS said shouldn’t be used, the individual is a demonstrable liar and agency not science is his trade. Using his work means one must actually re-do his study. His methods for his famous hockeystick temperature graph, produces the same hockeystick shape from random numbers.
I only seek to protect the credibility of your work as I believe this theory should be embraced by the mainstream. This is NOT a critical post.
I recognize the criticism of his specific work. That came mostly after I wrote this article. However, the covariance between climate warming and the perturbation of the core – is critical path to my argument. So, it will remain for now.
I only wish to steel man your case. I agree with your comment. I just fet it needed pointing out. There are those that wish to use any means to attack you or your work.
CO2 growth only matches temperatures because the statistical temperature estimates have been adjusted hundreds if not thousands of times if you break it down to monthlies adjustments.
Your work is solid, but these references I highlighted are not.
“CO2 growth only matches temperatures because the statistical temperature estimates have been adjusted hundreds if not thousands of times if you break it down to monthlies adjustments.”
Correct, and valid point overall. If you survey my first article you will see that I replicate this “frequent adjustment” every year in order to keep the two curves appearing to show a sole relationship. IF I do not make the adjust – then the two begin to show the acceleration in the ppm is unlinked from temperature and another factor is at play.
This migration logic is essential to the critical path of the argument – so, starting from the erroneous base of decades old climate arguments, is a good way to introduce the falsification itself.
TES
I learned something recently about the average size of quartz granules in granite that made me come back to this. If a kinetic force breaks a quartz granule encased in granite the granule will generate a burst of RF based on its size and naturally in the single digit MHZ range. This is a direct demonstration of the piezoelectric effect. And if you look at global size distribution of these granules it would match very well with the fundamental resonance for this proposed antenna.
People associate the mechanical movement with a decoupling event but may miss the electromagnetic consequences. Starting as a precursor to feeling movement, a very large mass accelerating at high speed but over the smallest of distances could result in a “jerk” that can’t be felt but would still generate powerful, high voltage ground currents(explained through Faraday’s Law of Induction). Perhaps with enough power to create plasma discharge events at the surface.
High frequency RF is attenuated inside the earth which has prevented the monitoring of quartz fracturing being used as an early warning system for earthquakes. But in a plasma environment everything changes when it comes to RF propagation.
I’m looking forward to reading your book and maybe it touches on this but I was wondering if you explored the possibility this antenna was tuned specifically for this effect, perhaps seen as a “tipping point” for the expected event.
Well, there is very little of this quartz in the Giza pyramids. Calcium carbonate is the vast preponderance of their structure and makeup. Nonetheless, there are many quartz structures throughout Giza – that may bear applicability. Will be thinking on this. Have seen the lights which appear when quartz is place under such stress in a natural setting, yes.
In the last year or so I read a book by David Allen Neron called The Gnostic Jesus Christ & Yaldabaoth His Ignorant Unbegotten Brother. I appreciate how the author isn’t dogmatic. The way that “The Fall” is explained in his book fits well with your post:
So Eve eats the Fruit, and sure enough, she doesn’t die “in the day” she does so. Neither does Adam. Later in the narrative, he (women don’t count in the Bible) is attributed an astounding life span of nearly a thousand years. Given that “day” in Genesis is supposed to really mean “day” (as any fundamentalist Creationist will assure you), we have no choice but to accept that God’s claim–that knowledge is poison–was falsified. In fact, God himself acknowledges the truth of the Serpent’s claim:
“Behold the man (women don’t count) is become as one of us, (and here I thought there was only one god) to know good and evil: and now, lest he put out his hand, and also take of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: Therefore, the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden…and he placed at the east of the garden Cherubim’s (a type of spirit being) and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”
So, rather than bringing humanity’s death, eating the Fruit made Adam and Eve “like gods” just as the Serpent said, and not only that, it opened the way to immortality for them. And so, to prevent humans from completing their ascent to divinity (it was a Rise in the Garden, not a fall); God responds with what would soon become his old stand-by: violence.
“But Adam and Eve died spiritually the day they ate the Fruit!” you say?
Where in Genesis does it say anything about a “spiritual” death? God just told Adam he would die “in the day” he ate the Fruit. He didn’t say anything about “spiritual” death, or expulsion from the Garden, or any other punishment. He would die, period. You claim to revere the Bible, but you twist the plain meaning of the text to prop up your theological “interpretation” rather than adjusting your theology to conform to the Bible.
Furthermore, you Christians are always fond of tying morality and spirituality together. “If there is no God,” you say, “then there’s no morality either! There will be blood in the streets!” But, you see, it is self-evident in Genesis that God intended for humanity not to be morally good, but obedient. He wanted creatures that would obey his commands without regard to whether they were good or evil, because they couldn’t tell the difference. There is no morality with God (Yaldabaoth). – David Allen Neron
Of course, stories like “The Fall” and their supposed meanings carry substantial momentum in the collective mind, and among those indoctrinated there remains undeniable influence on one’s manner of thinking even after discovering that the stories are mere allegories and retold myths. The ongoing damage caused by such narratives causes me to wonder at what might have been in a world spared from these ideas. On the other hand, like Thomas Paine, I would like to believe that some “good” eventually comes from it. Perhaps we’ll ‘wake up’ one day and say with a smile, “That was a good game.”
It is possible to believe, and I always feel pleasure in encouraging myself to believe it, that there have been men in the world who persuaded themselves that what is called a pious fraud, might, at least under particular circumstances, be productive of some good. But the fraud being once established, could not afterwards be explained; for it is with a pious fraud as with a bad action, it begets a calamitous necessity of going on. – Thomas Paine
Hi TES,
Awesome, I have been looking forward to getting a copy of the book.
Just a question on the “authors advance edition” are you limiting shipping just to the US for this version?
The new testament does not say Adam and Eve are the first humans. The couple had 2 sons, Cain and Abel. Cain murders Abel out of jealousy of Abel and is sent away by God. Cain then goes in to the city and meets his wife. The truth of the Bible is about the Sun and the human Subconscious (soul, spirit, etc.)
The issue of “first humans” is moot in this arrangement. All mankind is claimed to be indebted under the penalty of this arrangement, according to Genesis. So, what body physically preceded which body – is moot. If the arrangement prima facie is demonic, however, then the subplot is not of light, a fortiori.
No. It is a logical, pragmatic, if-then statement, with no circuclar feedback and no emotion. You are projecting. Your second statement is irrelevant.
You just made my point. You are emotionally influenced towards the writings of mankind. Humans wrote the garden of Eden epoch. so the Humans would be bringing a complaint to themselves. A emotional circular assesment.
No. I asked you to focus on and provide evidence (you missed that) – and you provided self-justifying rhetoric (circular) instead. You are projecting the circular emotion into my argument, when it is linear and deductive syllogism. It has a start, and it has an inferential end.
By identifying the only agent in this play as the theoretical straw man ‘human’ you have crafted – you have begged the question.
My point about your thesis is that the Bible was produced to allow a small group of people to control a very large group of people thru convincing them what they are reading means something else. Outside of your conscious the demonic or angelic does not exists. All societies are created on misbeliefs and mistruths, that is why they fail, not because of moral decay.
I think you missed that this article is a meta-discussion of the topic, not a statement of belief. You have to step back and ask “What is the author actually saying, here – it may not be first order logic.”
The demonic exists. Until you have direct experience in this, I would caution you to not draw beliefs from ‘sounds good, feels good, everything is good’ philosophy. That is the source of the decay in human integrity and society.
The demonic only exists in your subconscious. This is one of the paths to enlightenment, is to control your inner demon (your subconscious)
You are incorrect, and have no experience in this topic.
…and true to form, and fakery, you got all pissed-off, insulting, and arrogant in your response. You are now a spam-flagged email. Go spread your cleverly-concealed darkness somewhere else.
Mr. Kirk had said something to the effect of when discourse ends, violence begins; as you have explained here. Current liberalism is irrational, unreasonable, & illogical. Much hate & animus courses through it. The corrupt nature of power & money seems to be correlated. One of the confusing things is otherwise nice, intelligent people subscribe to it without being able to explain why they ratify such veiled violence towards thinkers of other views. So difficult to comprehend how it all works. So saddening a voice articulating the argument for peace, joy & love has been silenced by Evil once again.
Hey Nick, just awaiting approval – but on this edition (Author Advance Edition) I am limiting it to one purchase per customer ID. They can all purchase independently however.
As well, the publisher regular first edition mass release will be later in the year too, and hopefully in Europe as well.
“It seems clear that the only reason for the continuing reluctance to accept polar shifts is the absence of an acceptable mechanism to account for them. . . With each successive failure of a proposed theory, the reigning doctrine of the fixity of the poles was reinforced.”
— Charles Hapgood, The Earth’s Shifting Crust (1958)
I think the long search for Hapgood’s ‘acceptable mechanism’ may now have reached its conclusion.
Very excited, but I hope you hired an editor. Otherwise the book’s fate will be similar to Jordan Peterson’s Maps of Meaning. Very precise – yes, but unreadable.
Darwin – On the Origin of Species
Wolfram – A New Kind of Science
Thorne – Black Holes and Time Warps
Newton – The Principia
And then tell those authors that an editor is what they needed in order to make the work both readable and more widely accepted. I will await their response.
This is a very sharp and creative framing of the Eden story, and the contract analysis highlights some real tensions — especially around consent, understanding, and the structure of the outcome.
But reading through it, I find myself wondering if the entire line of argument may be one level off.
The recurring issues you point to — lack of informed consent, asymmetry of knowledge, and the inevitability of failure — don’t just describe a bad agreement. They describe something more basic: entry into existence without sufficient awareness at the point of entry.
In that sense, the problem may not be juridical at all, but generative.
If we look at it in practical terms, parents occupy a role analogous to a creator with respect to the child. They initiate existence and establish the initial conditions under which that life unfolds, while the one entering has no awareness of those conditions at the outset.
From that perspective, what is being attributed to a divine structure in Eden may have a direct analogue in the human process of reproduction itself.
Most human reproduction is unconscious procreation — driven by biology, culture, and circumstance, rather than by deliberate awareness of what is being brought into existence and under what conditions. A being enters life without understanding the rules, the consequences, or even the nature of the system it finds itself in, and must discover all of that after the fact.
Seen this way, the features described in the article — confusion, misalignment, inherited consequence — are not surprising. They are exactly what one would expect from unconscious procreation.
This raises the possibility that the Eden story is not best understood as a failed covenant, but as a description of what happens when existence begins under unconscious conditions.
If that is the case, then the deeper question shifts quite significantly. It is no longer simply:
Was the covenant fair?
But rather:
Is there such a thing as conscious procreation — a mode of bringing a being into existence with awareness, intention, and alignment — and if so, would that fundamentally alter the outcome?
That question seems to precede any legal or moral evaluation, and may be closer to the root of what the story is actually pointing toward.
However, in this case the defendant controlled the circumstances of all forms and states of “entry into existence,” and would again be solely and 100% responsible for any flaw in the inception landscape inside which any covenant or unilateral directive was issued thereafter. So, while this applies to accidental initiation of existence, it becomes a circular argument when one party holds sole ability to craft the nature of existence in the first place.
Now, in the instance where the defendant did NOT actually possess that ability to craft the nature of existence, and misrepresented their agency, then – that would be classic fraud in the inception – based upon a critical but flawed prior disclosure.
So, we are left with the same set of juridical torts in either context.
What you do broach however, is that – when a God imposes a covenant, that is not actually a two party contract. So, we overlap into slavery and human rights abuse here, which would preclude classic contract law. Still thinking on that one.
That’s a fair extension, and I see the logic of bringing it back to responsibility at the point of creation.
But I wonder if that move itself may still be operating within the same frame the original analysis assumes — namely, that the situation is best understood in terms of liability, agency, and fault.
If the conditions of entry into existence are such that awareness is not present at the outset, then what follows may not fit cleanly into juridical categories at all. In other words, it may not be that there is a tort to be assigned, but that the entire situation arises from a lack of consciousness at the generative level.
Framed that way, even the question of responsibility becomes less straightforward. Responsibility presumes agents operating with sufficient awareness to be accountable in the conventional sense.
If that condition is not met at the point of inception, then the outcome may be better understood as structural rather than culpable.
That doesn’t negate your argument — it just raises the possibility that legal language is describing the surface effects of something that originates prior to law, contract, or even moral framing.
Which brings us back to the question: whether the issue is ultimately one of injustice, or one of unconscious creation.
You are hitting on a valid legal delineation, but this still fits into juridical issues. These are all valid and extant legal criminal (not just civil) complaints, in a stack of leverage: A & B are civil – while C & D are criminal, and human rights, offenses.
A. Fraud / Fraud in the Inducement (or Execution) The first party is: misrepresenting their identity (“I (we) are your legal guardian/God(s)”), misrepresenting legal authority preventing verification or challenge.
B. Undue Influence & Exploitation of Vulnerability: There’s a clear power imbalance + cognitive impairment 1. One party is dependent and impaired. 2. The other exerts control and constructs the “arrangement” between them based upon the vulnerable parties lack of skill/knowledge.
C. Duress / Coercion: The arrangment it is not optional (ultimate penalty as the punishment) and the person is not allowed to question or investigate.
D. Involuntary Servitude (inability to object or comprehend the arrangement)
What you might be sensing is that, while this involves some contract law in that such an agreement was Void in Inception – it stems mostly into Criminal Law – Involuntary Servitude (Serious Constitutional / Criminal Issue)
However, where it does meet the stipulations of contract law, for all intents and purposes – “Arrangement = Agreement which is void ab initio (never legally valid at all).” But in the end the criminal violations overshadow the civil ones.
TES
At last! I prefer physical books and this is one for the ages. Thanks Roger, nice to meet you :-)
I have a question for you. If you have already discussed the topic in your articles, my bad, you don’t need to bother answering.
We were told in school that the pyramid of Giza was covered in white marble, which was removed by the local populations millennia later to build the city of Cairo. Is this false? Why did they say that? Are there any signs of white marble covering the stones? Was the marble eroded by the sea? Is it a pure invention?
Forgive my English.
Excellent question. The Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure Pyramids were covered in polished Tura Limestone, not marble. A fairy tale was crafted and told to us without any substantiation (citing old documentation by historians, but when you go pull copies of the original documents the accounts are not in there) that the stones were removed by a. The Roman b. The Sultan in 1297 CE, c. an Earthquake and d. Mosque building.
None of these are true. The Nubian Egg, dated to 3800 BCE, shows the three pyramids without their casing stones. My article “Hidden in Plain Sight” addresses this and translates the original documents directly from their original images, showing that all these explanations were fabricated by our pseudoscience we call archaeology.
The reason they fabricated this, is so that they do not have to explain the erosion band on the top of Khafre – which clearly shows a high water mark, with no other alternative viable to explain it.
The Tura Casing stones were dissolved by oceanic carbonic acid dissolution – and the reconstituted material was found all over the base of the pyramids and the subterranean passages.
They lie – because they do not feel we should be told the truth of ECDO Theory. But man is growing up now, and must face this truth.
I sincerely appreciate the level of time, intellect and curiousity that you bring to this discussion. i find your thesis the most compelling and am very grateful for your motivation to further our understanding admit the falling apart of all that we thought we knew.
I’m aSweetMama on X. I never get your posts anymore or any of the other things that I enjoy. It’s all war and politics. I actually have to look up your name in order to get your posts. I love megalithic archaeology, frequency and quantum physics, wellness, all the fun stuff. But I never get any of that anymore. Stupid algorithm. So I’m glad I get your emails!
Thanks Mark, this is a very visual argument, so you likely will have to keep the browser open to the articles herein. 75% of the book’s work was in developing imagery that would not violate copyright – I had to rework everything so that it would not be subject to a claim. It is analogous to private collections owning critical components of our past. Privatization of human intellectual property is a chief cog in our ability to cultivate ignorance.
With that one – I am recycling an older post, so apparently WordPress simply sees this as that same post and gives no announcement. I will have to devise a way to remedy that.
Well done. Add acclaimed author to the jacket, as all your Folleagues would attest so. Hope Volume II is underway. Also hope I will have enough time to read and comprehend this one. Best regards.
I’m a sailor, so maybe it’s my bias speaking here, but that looks like some sort of an ancient nautical map, which could read as, “When the night sky is in this configuration above us, travel towards a specific asterism on the map to reach a specific tepe.” The 11 boxes being a sort of measurement they had developed to mark a heading. “Five markings from North, towards the crane asterism.” Entertain the idea that those depicted “flames” could be representing waves, and you’ve got the directions to sail to a neighbors civilization.
There are moments or periods in life that define you as a person. One such moment was when I first read your article (along with the other two). Lately, not a day goes by without me thinking about the fundamental implications this has on our species and our history on this planet. How the silences we inherit create an invisible framework of confinement, imposing oblivion upon us.
For me personally, there is no turning back. I deeply believe that the word must be spoken and spread in every way possible, and that is what I intend to do.
Thank you very much for having the courage to come forward and shed light onto the shadows that govern us.
It hits me every day in differing ways. I cannot even look at a map without seeing the stark evidence of the inundation right before our eyes. So many turning on to it. I even missed that Karahan Tepe was aligned to Np’ – because I looked at it so early on, that I was clumsy and missed it. Now that I am quicker to the analysis, the obsequience monuments just jump off the page at me.
I have finished around 85% of the book and am obtaining my Foreword contributor as well. The market strategy is to publish in Europe first (2026) – but retain rights to the remainder of the world and all non-book/e-print media, so that any momentum in Europe immediately translates into better leverage position with UK and US publishers (or even self publishing). But that also means that the book will be first released in French – where the publisher anticipates an eager readership.
The English versions should be out shortly thereafter if all goes according to plan.
how do mainstream climatologists even attempt to explain the sudden localized increases of temperature in the seas? Just saying “it’s man’s fault” is not an explaination.
By the 2nd law of thermodynamics, heat can only spontaneously distribute from where there’s more of it to where there’s less; therefore, regardless of who is to blame, if something suddenly starts heating up much faster than usual, it seems to me there are only 2 possibilites:
A) there must be some massive influx of heat coming from somewhere; we know no source of that kind in the known seas, nor in the surrounding lands, nor in the sky; therefore, the only remaining option is: it comes from below.
B) some kind of mysterious explosive reaction happened somewhere nearby.
Xeon – good physical instincts. Climate science is invoking magic to get around severe problems in its model predictive strength. Magic ocean currents can produce any level of heat, anywhere at any time. It is a bountiful ad hoc rescue.
I’m sure you will be aware that in the ‘Legend of Surid’ (Surid being Suphis a.k.a. Khufu/Cheops), it is said that the Giza pyramids were built in response to the Earth turning over and as a repository in anticipation of a catastrophic flood that would destroy the ancient kingdom. There are also (as you know) numerous other ancient Egyptian legends that speak of the Earth inverting and of the sun changing rising/setting horizons on at least a couple of occasions. Many other cultures from all across the ancient world also speak of this calamitous event in deepest antiquity.
What most folks won’t realise is that several features of the Giza monuments literally demonstrate what occurred to the Earth at that time i.e. an inversion event. They show that Giza was formerly located at a latitude of 54S but since it was not a complete 180 degree inversion event, the pole was effectively (though not physically) relocated on the outer shell of the Earth by 12 degrees, giving Giza a final (former) latitude of 42S. From there it was shifted to its present latitude location of ~30N. This shift is corroborated by several features at Giza.
Much appreciated Scott. I had heard of the Surid legend – but researched them more deeply and have added a section on this, in the second article (Hidden in Plain Sight), near the end. Thanks!
“Of course, while this eschatology fits our timeline of events depicted in Exhibit O2, we also know that neither the Khufu nor Khafre pyramids were designed as warehouses of any kind. They were not designed to store and protect any appreciable volume of material.”
One of the things the Surid Legend states that was categorically placed within the Great Pyramid were the bodies of Surid’s (aka Suphis’s / Khufu’s) ancestors. This may sound weird but in terms of ancient Egyptian religious beliefs, it was absolutely vital for the security and hoped for rebirth of the kingdom after the catastrophic flood event.
This is because the deceased kings (Osiris kings) in ancient Egypt were (arguably) more important in death than the living Horus king. The deceased kings (it was believed) could intercede directly with the Gods in the heavens for the benefit of the living kingdom. If the bodies of the Osiris Kings were washed away and destroyed in the anticipated flood catastrophe, then there could be no rebirth of the kingdom. Not ever.
That is why it was imperative for Surid/Khufu to reinter the mummified remains of his ancestors in a hidden chamber (with no passages or entrance) as high up within the Great Pyramid as possible – far from the anticipated flood waters. For a number of reasons (which I explain in depth my books), I suspect the recently discovered Big Void (a massive new chamber high up within the GP) will be found to contain these ancient kings (as well as their chief queens). These deceased kings were the ‘beating heart’, the essential ‘ingredient’ of Surid/Khufu’s ‘disaster recovery plan’ for his kingdom i.e. the Giza monuments.
I think you have a solid argument pathway there, Scott. Worth pursuit.
Earlier in the article, I describe why I believe that the Void will have already been scoured and will be found completely empty upon entry. My hypothesis is that the Void (and its access passages) was already being tomb robbed in 3800 BCE -based on the physics of the displaced Dixon block (CAD drawing midway through article).
But I appreciate and will pursue the distinction between the Osiris Kings and the Horus lineage. Fascinating!
TES
Hi TES,
I should have added a couple of links to new papers I’ve written on the Great Pyramid Hoax question (on Academia.edu). The new papers cover the recently announced (claimed) discovery by the World Scan Project of ‘new’ painted markings within the pyramid chambers. I’ve also made a video of my earlier findings (on Graham Hancock YT channel). Here are all the links for your readers:
The cockpit gun sight videos are making the rounds again after President Trump’s announcement he is having UFO info in govt possession released. Are you satisfied they accurately depict what’s being described by folks? Not sure what to expect in such a FLIR display; the AH shows a sustained sharp left turn in some?
Do you have the correct cited reference for #1? The document cited does not indicate anything at all about halting or otherwise slowing GT excavation efforts. It appears to be questions by UNESCO to the Turkish Delegation in charge of GT.
The letter cites, in particular about Gobekli Tepe:
“Given the nature of the [GT] property, the understanding of the site, its functions and development through time appears to be still in its infancy and in great need of further research and publications. In this respect, the ICOMOS panel considers that there is an imbalance between the scientific research requirements and prospects as indicated in the nomination dossier, and the proposed management plan. The ICOMOS Panel would appreciate if the State Party could provide reassurances regarding the continuing medium-and long-term funding of fundamental, independent, scientifically motivated and managed research programmes.”
Imablance between requirements and the plan = “halting and/or slowing (pretend excavation)”
The NT shares that Christ was slain from before the foundation of the world. The entire creation and man’s fall was meant to be if so, in its context. I take it that it’s a very elite lie meant to capture a group to be good patty hearst like servants, devoted to death, willing to submit as good slaves, to submit to Caesar, and most of all pay taxes and tithes.
I’ve posed this to several people within this debate and my proposal is immediately waved off. Perhaps it deserves to be, but perhaps you would consider it. I would be happy to have it decisively falsified.
Assuming your theory is correct, could what we call evolution actually be a type of de-evolution? Prototypes containing all the necessary information to specialize based on the environment they find themselves in, programmed to do exactly that, diversify, by LOSING AND DEACTIVATING information, rather than gaining new information? Seemingly primitive forms would actually only be not yet specialized and capable of birthing a wide variety of species within their type.
ES, I know this post has been up a while, but was wondering what your dosage and routine was on the EDTA and doxycycline? Did you take both orally, and did you space them out to prevent the EDTA from binding to the doxy.
I took the EDTA in the am, with 1/2 the doxy, and then 1/2 more doxy in the pm. But not to avoid binding, mostly to avoid stomach upset from Doxy on an empty stomach. I have never found binding to be an issue (eg. T4 Thyroxine with protein, etc.). In the final months I took only the morning 1/2 dose of doxy.
Nice! I raised a similar complaint in 6th grade Bible class — in much more simplistic terms (being only 11 at the time). I basically raised the issue with the teacher (like in your missive above) that if Adam and Eve had no knowledge, experience, or understanding of “Good & Evil”, or death then making an agreement with them that required these things was not fair.
The resulting stunned silence and look of consternation was priceless!
[I was never called on again in that class… hahahahaha]
Because the Earth is not a viscoelastic outer medium (mantle) over the period of rotation being proposed. It exhibits this characteristic over decades to thousands of years, not days or hours. In terms of days or hours, the mantle is a solid three-moment body. Second, the friction torsion which precipitates some of this resistance, is eliminated by the sloughing of epsilon iron from the outer core and into the mantle… eliminating that viscoelastic tensioning effect as well.
It seems we should be able to amend the complaint to include some sort of tortious interference through misrepresentation, non-disclosure or deceit relating to our true nature & history; perhaps intentional infliction of emotional distress. Maybe even promissory estoppel for ECDO if the Rainbow promise made by the Edenic god is false!
Well, at the very least we should have had customer feedback from earlier civilizations attesting to the great state of affairs they enjoyed after being under this Entity for billions of years and having not violated any edict that entire time.
There will be no feedback from earlier civilizations by beings who honored the Covenant in perpetuity, because such beings will never develop civilizations.
Why would beings in a state of perpetual innocence, living in a garden of plenty, wanting for nothing, have built a civilization? They would be as the Eloi in H.G. Wells’ novel; graceful, childlike beings who live in a seemingly idyllic, pastoral environment. Wells describes them with terms emphasizing their delicacy, naivety, and lack of aggression—qualities that evoke innocence, vulnerability, and a prelapsarian simplicity. They are peaceful, vegetarian, and carefree, exhibiting no violence, industry, or intellectual ambition. Their trusting and gentle nature, along with their fear of the dark and dependence on others for sustenance, reinforces this characterization.
It was the Morlocks who built a technological civilization.
Without want, without the need to toil to provide for oneself and one’s children, there is no motivation to save, to develop labor saving devices when there is no labor, to discover fire or agriculture. Without knowledge of good and evil it is impossible to meaningfully evaluate whether any devices, technical, social, or otherwise would benefit the inventor or their race, or harm them.
Where the Covenant is honored, civilizations do not develop.
Well stated. Wells divided mankind’s prevailing order into predators and their abused — masters and chattel. It wasn’t that the chattel would fail to survive; it was that they would no longer be heard. What if Wells had not depicted the Morlocks as ugly and the Eloi as beautiful – or maybe even the reverse? Would that not reflect current reality, and was that not even the disguising element of Wells’ praespeculacy (‘prophecy’ that is simply a re-packaging of current events).
However, I find that there are two reasons to develop technology.
Faith – dwelling inside (including the design of markets and technology) the moment to moment realization that you and those within your reach are worth of a love which is beyond comprehension or reason.
Addiction – getting as much of your Jones (the concupiscible object) as is possible, and getting the other person before they can get you. All under the guise of “I need this in order to function, to fix things, to set things right.” Other people become tools, obstacles, rivals, or threats. The Tolkien Ring: Attraction – “This could help.” Rationalization – “I could use either it, or myself-abusing-it, for good works.” Necessity – “A just world would not allow me to be without this.”
I like it. This intersection of Wells and Tolkien…
Fun read. I never thought of the Adam and Eve story from a legal perspective. The story always seemed to me to be the Biblical explanation of why humans are different from other animals. We have the knowledge of good and evil. It causes a great deal of worry. Animals do not appear worried about good or evil, or even death. They live in the present and react and behave according to what is happening now. Humans, not so much!
If it pleases the court i would like to call Memory to the stand ,so we can all have a concise understanding of our “True Purpose and Intent Of Original Design” ………Discovery should be a hoot…..
It is amazing to have lived through these times and witness LARP reneactment of the Fall of Man. With detachment and morbid curiosity I follow the fascinating show.
Yes, you can tell all those guys keep repeating the same regurgitated objection that Gemini, Grok, and ChatGPT give out at first blush. It does not take long to disarm it. But they are not interested in hearing the answer.
Perhaps you are over thinking it. God created physical life on Earth, created some physics to keep us here, and then said (to paraphrase) if you don’t learn the rules of a civilized galactic society you won’t be allowed to join the rest of the galaxy. No doubt God doesn’t want a repeat of the angelic rebellion.
Your argument regarding a defective covenant is akin to trying to argue that the laws of physics aren’t fair and should be rewritten so we can physically travel the stars, because we never agreed to be limited to Earth.
However, even if we posit that humans should have a say, the assumption that the streamlined recap of history from the book of Genesis is the total amount of information that Adam and Eve had to go on seems illogical. They could talk face to face with God and Adam spent some time naming animals. It stands to reason they had more back and forth conversation about things in general.
In the grand scheme of the larger universe why do you think we would get to determine what is ethical? Or to put it another way, how can we know our current view of ethics isn’t like our earlier geocentric view of the solar system?
We get to select ethics because of free will. That is the latitude granted us, prior to the contract – so it cannot be rescinded as part of the contract. Like ownership of our homes or our body, except a priori, foundational, and far more important. To grant free will on this, and then immediately or at a later time constrain such that free will (foundational ethics) must be disallowed, and only the grantor’s will is allowed – is an autoaufheben (self-canceling agrument). It is changing the rules of the game in mid-stream, solely and specifically to produce a bad outcome, as a pretext for exploitation.
Do you think we really get to select ethics, or are we just trying to discover them like we discover the laws of logic and physics? And then free will lets us decide whether we want to try and ignore them and suffer any consequences that may result.
We do discover logical truths, yes. But we also have the power/freedom to select from a zone of semantic truths, which we apply to each individual decision.
I think the rules were in place before the creation of Adam and Eve. In the beggining YHVH created the moon and stars to “mark the seasons” some translations say Festivals which is the accurate translation (Lev 23) with the “Biblical Holy Days” already set which are part of the Sabbath command of #4. Which Abraham kept way before Moses, statutes there is festivals appointments with the creator. Which voids the suit.
So, was eating from the tree
1. An aggregious violation of God’s only death-penalty law? If it’s merely a single capital crime we violated, then we are in a juridical universe with very few laws, or only 1.
or
2. Entry of sin and death (a will different from God’s will) into the world for the very first time? If it’s the first act of independent will, then we are in an existential universe.
It cannot be both. The existence of the Tree of Life implies by constraint that death was already a functioning part of the Universe, a fortiori. Otherwise, one would not need the Tree of Life in the first place.
You are operating under Context #2, while Genesis makes it clear that Context #1 was the cause of The Fall, not #2. An exercise of free will therefore, was not a capital crime. So, the festival and sabbath commands were not a basis for the structure of that single capital-crime law. So, there could not have been “rules” of this same nature (plural).
I must note an objection to counsel’s representation: I do not recall authorizing Eleleth—or anyone—to file suit on my behalf. Accordingly, let the record reflect that I, as a member of the putative plaintiff class, hereby except myself from this action in its entirety, disclaim any interest in its proceeds and affirmatively oppose the relief sought therein.
My grounds are simple: I have already accepted a settlement.
The same YHWH named as offerer in your complaint has extended terms of mercy and grace. He offered to exchange the sinless perfection of His Son for the unpayable debt my own hands compounded.
Your lawsuit, I’m afraid, is doomed to galactic failure.
Could be a coincidence or it could be TES who has been leading and pacing me towards this area of thought, what beliefs start with a guilt framework? How can one be held responsible for the actions of others in perpetuity? Rewards don’t have that feature, yet somehow punishment does? Who or what benefits with that kind of structure? Follow the payoff, who gains, who loses? It’s unclear what or who is at the top of such a system, but it’s more clear to spot the agents who rely on it.
Welcome back to my inbox, Sir Skeptic! I took the liberty of forwarding this to Cyd Ropp, also a student/practitioner of Gnosticism. Some impressions came promptly to mind:
1) “Catch-22″
2) I Wanna Be Like You” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwTClRr1x6g
;-)
It happened to me, also.
This song was playing downstairs at the birth center, watched by our older son and daughter, when our younger son was born.
He has grown to be an exceptional technical and free-climber; scary to watch.
It also pertaine to the bargain-not-bargain you describe, at least loosely.
“One potential test is the Wheeler’s Choice observational experiment. If the AI imparts a load by changing the particle vs wave selection – then it qualifies as an external ‘observer,’ thereby placing a load on the universe (as we do). If it does not – then it is pretend sentience.”
The idea of the universe as a quantum computational load processer as it were, is fascinating.
If sentience is required to put a computational load on the universe, then contextually I would infer that we are not talking about sentience on earth alone. Going further, in this model I would surmise a sentience that constructed/realised the universe itself OR sentience in the universe that has the omnipresence to put (relative to human sentience) quite a computational load on the ‘universal’ quantum processor.
This omnipresence (one or many sentients) then would be manifest to us by proxy, as the visible universe which represents the computational load already put on the universal quantum processor by sentients who keep their presence from us.
I do hope I at least have it somewhat framed right.
True observers, which originate from outside this realm, place a load on the universe itself, causing the apparent ‘red shift’ of the galaxies, which is a dilation in time (computation speed), and not a dilation of space. NPC’s don’t place a load on the universe, because they are simply a part of its normal computation set.
TES, I read your X posts (I don’t use X for the same reasons you don’t use it much) re AI Models taking IQ tests.
Learned patterns and familiarity are cumulative. The AI models will increase predictive accuracy in such a narrow band of recursive tasking. Eventually, not only will they score really high on IQ tests, over time they will eventually be able to predict the test challenges in advance, though less likely to predict the order of challenges.
So I asked ChatGPT for a propability percentage
*AI Model better at IQ tests vs AI Model better at reasoning.
ChatGPT, without any additional prompting, purely asked those 2 probabilities returned
65% probability better at taking IQ tests
35% Smarter with better reasoning
So chatGPT’s internal handwringing session ultimately voted in favor of TES 2 to 1
Have you considered writing on how this information could and should be communicated to the future?
I know you must have little spare time and much still to do.
It’s something I’ve been pondering quiet a bit, given the case you have made, the hypothesis you have established, of which I think is fair to say is theoretical given the success of prediction vs observation.
I am now thinking beyond the event, not to the post-event world, that is a world I will have to take as it comes, I am thinking of thousands of years ahead, and how this could be communicated.
There’s the how and the where. Each with it’s problems to be framed and solved.
Given where we stand now, and the agency that works against us, have you ever thought about how this might be achieved, I am guessing you have. Do you plan on writing something to this affect. I think it would be useful if you ever have the time, as I feel this is a task for the many, the more we can leave, the better the odds something survives.
Thank you for your efforts.
Oh and I thought I would mention. I replied to a Veritasium video with what I thought was a good enough description of your thoery, assembled from your work here and the commentation on X, from Craig and yourself. It was my first post on YT in a decade. I spent 30 minutes on it so as to be as accurate as possible, and included the full name for the theory so a Google search would lead to here. It was a video about rotating bodies, with a bit at the end about how the earth cannot flip over, the case resting on “maximum moment of inertia” and an analogue of earth, ie ‘a bottle of water spun in zero G’ (I do hope this gets a sardonic chuckle from you), basically claiming an accretion genesis for why this can’t happen. (Now I am thinking of the nothing ever happens meme)
The comment instantly vanished upon hitting the post button, yet I tested a reply post right after, with the word test, and it was there to read.
Thank you for your contribution to knowledge and for fighting the battle for us who cannot.
First, yes – We should inscribe a diagram of what occurs with regard to an ECDO rotation, on the face of the Moon inside one of the ‘mares’ – making it large enough to see with a reasonably powerful telescope. The diagram would consist of a 3-moment-mantle diagram inside a circle, with the Np and Np’ angles clearly marked.
Second, I have a statement in the section entitled The Geodesy Behind All This refuting that video’s fake ‘debunking’ in the article. It was a piss-poor attempt at science by this SciManDan guy. Pitiful really. No evidence provided whatsoever, and tropes foisted that he did not really understand. This is a big problem for mankind – fake science debunkers. Of course, that has been the theme of The Ethical Skeptic for decades.
That he restricts replies based upon their ability to refute, rather than their trolling or abusive nature (the standard I use), indicates that he is dictating science, not pursuing it.
I try share your knowledge and your work, I can at least do that much, though I will say this, If the ECDO happens in my lifetime and I survive, I promise, I will carve your story into rock.
I remain hopeful one of the rule changes was no more oscillations and that the 5200 year interval is dominant with the recent skip evidence of the new rule. Heading for the ski hill where I will see again hundreds of people living their best lives and wonder a bit how many ponder ECDO. Best to you!
In light of Mr. Stone’s paper of today, and @zachariaspro’s conclusion that D of ECDO has occurred, things seem dark. Do you still favor the “Laschamps 3” indicator for Tau?
Yes, that is my benchmark until our knowledge of how the polar motion dynamics has a large horizon of retrospective observation under its belt. They are doing what must be done, however. I applaud the work.
Given the size of other T-pillars that are at least twice as long as this one (Pillar 43), do we know the true size of the “Vulture Stone”… and whether there are MORE designs still hidden underground?
I don’t think the size of the pillar has much to do with it. Some are structural, some are decorative, and some communicate as a centerpiece. I am 90+% certain that the Pillar 43 stone’s story is continued in the remainder of the complex. I doubt that we will ever be allowed to see them. They tell a story we are not allowed to know – until the occupiers of this planet are put in prison.
I would think the size of the pillar is very important as it could contain dozens of additional images still hiding underground helping unravel its collective meaning and message.
Re DIsc of Sabu
Its design splits force 50/50 in either direction, as though unidirectional.
A basic impeller, the shaft with straight fins, seems well within their ability.
What if what was being pumped wasn’t water? If they were pumping something of a much thicker viscosity than sea water.
2 man operated.
Back and forth.
Something akin to cement, the disc’s dimensional properties and weight, would they suit a far more viscous fluid?
Oh yes, a Caterpillar-stlyed impeller was certainly within their reach. The problem is that the vanes would bear a high failure rate compared to normalized vanes – and have been fatal to project completion. Better to have a 70% effective – human power compatible desing that worked for 2 billion cycles, rather than a 100% effective blade that lasted 1 million cycles and would get jammed to where humans could not dislodge the jam.
“A total of 20 specimens representing 10 building limestone types were cut into 3- to 4-cm cubes and subjected to 15 cycles of immersion in the Dead Sea water and drying in an oven at 105°C. At the end of the 15th cycle, all the limestones had increased in weight”
When the casing stones were dissolved and the layer beneath exposed, we see especially on some pyramids, some epic karst erosion, stones that look blocks of Emmental. There should be ubiquitous absorbed salt in these limestone surfaces.
A confounding variable may be following periods of precipitation, which I assume, would reduce this salt content over time.
Are you aware of any testing for this salt?
I am aware of your writing on salt you’ve identified inside.
Dear TES, I have a profane question to ask, since I don’t claim to have understood everything you have so masterfully explained.
My question: how could the 238 megalitic structures be constructed during phase 1, i.e. without actually looking at Polaris as a point of reference? They can’t have been all built during phase 2, pointing at Np’ since this phase only lasted 50-400 years you said. So, many, according to your theory, must have been built during phase 1. How could they all be so precise without a guide in front of their very eyes? Traditions and teaching seem unlikely…
So I would like to present you with an hypothesis, please tell me if and how it is wrong. I believe there is a dantzikov effect and that the Earth rotated 104 deegres at one point, but what if the shifts are very distanced from one another? What if all the monuments were built during the thousands of years while Earth was in state 2? That would explain the precise alignment. Then came the shift, the flood, and the earth changed to state 1. Is it a possibility that both states last thousands and thousands of years?
Not profane at all. Yes, indeed I have found the ‘cultural memory only’ explanation as not comprehensively sufficient. In the same manner, I find the ‘State 2 construction’ alternative as also insufficiently explanatory. The reality, I would surmise, may involve some combination of the two. The Zalenski Cuban underwater formation could be key in this (Exhibit J36).
Marking celestial principles with horizon stones, in itself, is a suggestion that those celestial points may have been prone to movement. Once we had lost an old observation, the shaman perhaps regarded that legacy knowledge, and the veneration of that legacy in knowledge through the construction of a monument, as a way of ‘honoring the gods’ who made that shift occur.
But in truth, ECDO Theory purposely leaves this set of conjecture open/provisional. We still need to know more, yes.
How does the multiple discoveries of frozen mammoths in Siberia fit with this oscillating hypothesis ?
For example, according to Wikipedia, « The Yukagir mammoth’s permafrost tomb preserved its head, tusks, front legs, and parts of its stomach and intestinal tract.[…] Remarkably, like many of the dung’s floral remains, the stems have retained their color and shape ever since the woolly mammoth tore them from the tundra roughly 22,500 years ago.[»
If the dating is correct, then according to your hypothesis the region would have moved three or four times from state 1 (lat. approx’ 66°N) to state 2 (66-104=38°S) and back since the animal’s death. Such motion does not seem compatible with the state of preservation.
Depends upon how deep it was beneath the ice.
The State 2 does not last long enough to melt all ice in a specific region. The entire planet is in a cold dark state.
Wonderful work. You hypothesize that the tepe was buried to hide it. Why go to so much work to hide it when you could just destroy it. I think it was preserved intentionally, knowing it would be many thousands of years before it was needed again, and seeing the gradual degradation, they choose to bury it to conserve it to be found later rather than letting nature and time erase it.
You proposed A sound construct which might indeed be the case – but recall – the gods wanted no depictions of their likeness or handiwork to remain. ‘Idols’ they called it. But I think they were simply covering their tracks. They are not the sole agency watching mankind, and bear accountability for some of the rather dark things they have done here wrt mankind. Hiding it was very important under this construct as well.
I bookmarked this months ago and finally got time to read it. I found it fascinating and quite convincing. I have one question though, concerning the mechanism behind the steady state 576′ sea level rise (I’m not concerned about the transient sloshing) – given that there’s no more water after the shift and for the most part the shell rotates intact, where does this come from? It appears Giza ends up in a not too different latitude. Would sea levels in state 2 be different in different places? Thanks!
OK, but from what I’ve read (this is not my field) the equatorial bulge affects sea level more than land, so if Giza moves further from the equator shouldn’t the relative sea level there appear to drop? Does some other mechanism counter that?
I’m quite convinced of your idea that sea water is responsible for the disappearance of the casing stones and of the tidal erosion of the cap, just trying to understand where that rise comes from, and lasts long enough to dissolve the limestone.
The equatorial bulge affects land, but the sea follows suit. So that both earth and sea will distend, but along different integral tranformations. I petitioned ChatGPT-5.2 on the two tranform functions, and it contended that it did not hold enough information about the mantle’s viscosity and asymmetry under Giza, to precisely model the two simultaneous factors. However, it commented that a 576 ft net rise in sea level at Giza was the correct direction for sea level on the shift (we would see a rise in relative sea level at Giza in State 2) and “entirely inside the range of calculable outcomes for a move from 30 degrees north latitude to 46 degrees north relative latitude from ECDO State 1 to State 2.”
I could not push it any further than that – which makes sense.
TES
Was your team able to generate a map of the world prior to this last event? I’d like to see where coastlines would be, particularly near the Richat Structure.
Yes, several have on X. Because of the viscoelastic mantle, there is a great deal of unknown to any eventual map. But some great shots have been taken at doing this.
Not intending to impose the burden of Atlas, but from a systems engineering & systems analysis perspective, what is your current impression of tonight’s published data interpretation by novel methods using nutation/wobble & ECDO imminency, acknowledging paucity of trends & historical perspectives?
Regarding Exhibit J4: My understanding is that you are describing the perception of rotation around the Euler Axis pivot points at a point on a sphere (earth) at a certain distance from the pivots. Hence distance covered and also velocity should be proportional to sine of angle, not proportional to angle. At 30° for example, velocity would be half what it is at 90°.
TES, i’ve seen posts on X by people showing earth rotation anomalies and claiming that their proof that we are now moments before the TAU point beggins and are already decoupled from the core, even thought the changes are in a minimal scale (miliarcseconds) and out dipole moment of magnetic field is still strong (decaying but strong compared to paleodata). Do you agree with this point of view that we are in such a tiny threshold (3-5 years) from the flip?
I am neutral on such observational techniques just yet. My goal is to get us to begin to watch Earth measures in just that manner – so I like the trends and effort. But early returns are very often misleading, because we do not have a history of context and comparison.
There is a regrettable feminine cousin to Exapátisiology, known as “tone policing.” Even as a woman, I am gagging on the widespread acceptance of narrative coercion. First were told what to think, then what is acceptable to say, and now the approved ways to say anything. The policing is done 90% by women, showing that feminine virtues have been co-opted (claimed by men) and manipulated toward terrible ends. New words are most helpful, although it does go against my midwestern roots to use a $5 word when a 5 cent word would bring common sense understanding. I can’t believe most women will fall for this BS for long.
Well, as you aptly put it, Exapátisiology is a cousin to ‘tone policing.’ Both words are necessary under Wittgenstein – the absence of the two terms themselves, being part of Exapátisiology. I like it!!
Well done, this goes a long way to answering the ultimate question. Certainly it disproves the Hawkins assertion that life was created in primordial soup; his is a failure to understand i.a. probability and time. I do think however that he was funded by the same mega finanical interests that backed Darwin (& Huxley) – they made up and sold a plausible story, in fact a secular religion, with the aim of undermining actual religions. You have hit on a truth: life and water arrived at likely the same time, with the code fully formed.
My recent take is that life likely arrived on Earth in the form of Béchamp’s ‘microzyma’, or Naessen’s ‘somatids’ (try https://odysee.com/@TheAmir:5/Les-Somatides—Gaston-Naessens:f ) , or the most recent term ‘nanobes’ found in 250 million year old rock (DOI 10.2138/am-1997-11-1242 ) and able to grow – around the same time as water, and explain the Cambrian ‘explosion’ of life. They are found in all living things and sedimentary rocks, are known to survive temperatures of 200oC, chemicals and corrosives, and can be stained to show they contain DNA. They survive us when we die, and are the perpetual ‘dust’ and recyclers of life. I can send more links if you wish.
Hi Skeptic – I explored this prompt in GPT :
‘What does orthodoxy say the reason Jesus died on the cross for us vs Protestantism.’
I think the difference exposes the key lie to corrupt the original intent . To me it explains the severity of attacks on Orthodoxy that still occur today, but peaked from 1917-1945.
Orthodox Christianity
Core idea: Christ died to defeat death and heal humanity
Orthodoxy frames the Cross primarily as victory and healing, not as a legal transaction.
Key points:
• Christus Victor:
Jesus enters death freely and destroys death from the inside by His resurrection.
“Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death…”
• The problem is death and corruption, not God’s anger:
Humanity’s fall brought mortality, corruption, and separation from God, not inherited legal guilt.
• The Cross is medicine, not punishment:
Christ takes on human nature fully—even death—so it can be restored and deified (theosis).
Protestant Christianity (especially Reformed/Evangelical)
Core idea: Christ died to pay the penalty for sin
Protestant theology often frames the Cross in legal and forensic terms.
Key points:
• Penal Substitution (dominant model):
Jesus takes the punishment sinners deserve, satisfying divine
Giovanni Reale, profound interpreter of Plato, wrote a thing that might interest you. Unless you already know it. According to Reale the philospher once commented the inevitable decline of society (cyclical in nature) saying that when the world would arrive to a step from dissolution the hand of God would intervene by making the world rotate in the opposite direction. According to Reale this was not a prophecy of disaster but of betterment of society…
René Guenon in one of his books talked about the symbol of the one that survives from one cycle to the next. According to esotheric and Eastern traditions there are in fact cycles in the existence of the world. The survivor was represented as a child riding a dolphin, suggesting that floods were dividing the cycles.
Said that, I have a question for you. Where can I find your theory on who is keeping us captive and why? You have hinted to this interpretation, but I cannot find a writing specifically addressing this point in your vast collection of articles.
To conclude I must say that I have read a lot in my life but 2 of your articles are like 2 major stars in my mind, a great source of wonder. Thank you.
My primary articles addressing my suspicion and eschatology regarding ‘Archons’ – can be found here. They are more complete in their contemplation when taken as a group. It is a long slog to piece these notions together. Apologies in advance. :-)
The second position correlation with hydrophobicity is real but Haig and Hurst had this in 1991. Lots of work since then has characterized it.
The probability calculation is where this breaks down. The deeper problem is that calculating the odds of a specific outcome after the fact doesn’t tell you much. If I flip a coin 10,000 times, that exact sequence has a probability of something like 1 in 10^3010. Statistically “impossible,” and yet there it is. You can make anything look designed this way. The question that matters isn’t “how improbable is this specific outcome” but “is this outcome surprising given the processes that were operating.” An optimized code isn’t surprising if selection was acting on early translation systems.
You’re also treating the code like it appeared fully formed. Primordial codes probably used fewer amino acids (maybe 10) with the third position mostly redundant. Error minimization selection in early translation systems can drive optimization without the code needing to exist fully formed from the start. Koonin and Novozhilov covered this in their 2009 review.
The claim that the code couldn’t evolve because it’s prerequisite to evolution misses the point. Proto-translation systems with ambiguous coding can still undergo selection. The stereochemical hypothesis and Wong’s coevolution theory both have mechanisms that predate modern fidelity requirements.
That Sharov and Gordon paper extrapolating genome complexity back 9.7 billion years hasn’t gotten much traction. It assumes constant exponential growth in complexity, which ignores punctuated equilibria, mass extinctions, and the fact that complexity isn’t consistently defined across their data points.
The six probabilities you’re multiplying aren’t independent. Moon formation, ocean delivery, abiogenesis conditions, etc, are causally linked. You can’t multiply them like separate dice rolls.
I work on biosignature detection and the question of whether the code is evidence for directed panspermia comes up. The general view is that the optimization is explicable through known selective mechanisms and doesn’t require external agency. That doesn’t make it uninteresting but the bar for inferring intent is higher than pattern recognition in a system we already know was subject to selection.
If you want to make a serious case for design signatures, you’d need features that can’t be produced by any selective or chemical mechanism, not features that are improbable under a naive random assembly model that nobody actually proposes.
1. You are assuming that there exist explanatory mechanisms in place which stand as the null hypothesis in explaining the arrival of the SGC. This is false. There is evolution-sounding rhetoric which actually bears no mechanism of explanation for a successful code appearing at all. The chemistry outcomes (which bear no feedback mechanism in order to achieve this code – but let’s assume there is one) conflict with each other and must be selected around, not abused to explain the outcome.
2. You are conflating the odds of a successful code of any form appearing, with the odds of a highly-symmetrical signature code appearing – as is the case in our SGC. These are two different unlikelihoods and odds set, neither of which bear an explanatory mechanism. I reject your insistence that one exists. A very complicated and stacked set of assumptions and magical filling of large gaps are required to arrive at this conjecture.
In my hypothesis, I am red-flagging my magical assumption – raising it for everyone to see. You are hiding your magical assumptions, weaving them inside a patchwork of hollow terms bearing no actual epistemology. Therefore, the odds stand and are not ex post facto. This was addressed in the article.
3. Every one of the 64 slots in the code is required to be filled (with the exception of slots 63 and 64) BEFORE evolution can ever take place. Your argument is beggging the question. This was outlined in the article.
4. “Proto-translation systems with ambiguous coding can still undergo selection.” – This must be proven – it cannot just be stated as the default answer. In this case there was no 2-base proto-code as the most ancient amino acids involve three-base only slots, required from the very start – or one would not have any form of viable evolution upon which this supposed selection could occur. That is ingoratio elenchi; rhetorically posed to address the problem, but in no way answers the actual question. It is pop science, magazine fodder.
5. “Moon formation, ocean delivery, abiogenesis conditions, etc, are causally linked.” – In my hypothesis and framework they are – but not in the Narrative, where they are treated as independent arrivals. I need remind you that I am assailing, and you are defending, the Narrative here – and not my hypothesis. My critique is of the Narrative, in which all of these six arrivals are independent in cause and explanatory basis. The fact of an arrival, and its rapidity are two independent variables. Sorry, that is fundamental to systems theory, one of the first things we learn.
6. “The general view is that the optimization is explicable through known selective mechanisms and doesn’t require external agency.” This is an ad populum appeal to an explanation that features no causal mechanism – only hollow Narrative-friendly jargon. This statement means nothing.
So no, I do not accept your contentions here. They are unfounded.
You’re right that I should distinguish “any functional code” from “this particular organized code.” That’s a legitimate distinction but the error minimization literature addresses this directly. The organization (similar amino acids clustered in similar codons) is what selection for error minimization produces. The symmetry isn’t a separate unexplained feature sitting on top of functionality. It IS the optimization. When translation is error-prone, codes where neighboring codons specify physicochemically similar amino acids get selected because errors are less catastrophic. The organization and the function aren’t two separate improbabilities to multiply.
Let me be concrete about what the mechanisms actually are. Error minimization: early translation was error-prone, so organisms with codes where mistranslation produced chemically similar amino acids had less catastrophic protein misfolding and outcompeted others. That’s a selection pressure with a clear causal chain. Coevolution: as biosynthetic pathways evolved, new amino acids captured codons from their metabolic precursors, which is why biosynthetically related amino acids sit in adjacent codon blocks today. Stereochemistry: aptamer experiments show weak but real chemical affinities between certain amino acids and their cognate codons, providing a non-random starting point. These aren’t hollow terms, to me. They’re specific processes with experimental support and clear cause-effect relationships.
You argue that all codons need assignment before selection can operate, but that assumes modern translation fidelity. Primordial genetic codes would have been ambiguous due to low translational fidelity and used a limited pool of amino acids initially available. An ambiguous code can still produce functional peptides. They’re just less consistent. Selection doesn’t need perfection. It needs heritability and differential fitness, both of which are possible with a sloppy 10-amino-acid system. Novozhilov and Koonin modeled supercodon codes with fewer amino acids and found them nearly optimal for error minimization. The code itself shows structural evidence of expansion. Biosynthetically related amino acids sit in adjacent codon blocks, which is what you’d expect if product amino acids captured codons from precursors over time.
The supercodon model isn’t proposing two-base codons. It’s proposing three-base codons where the third position was largely redundant (wobble). That’s not a simpler codon, it’s a simpler discrimination system. The ribosome still reads triplets but the specificity is lower. This is directly testable and has been modeled. It’s a specific hypothesis about reduced-fidelity translation that produces selectable variation.
I’m genuinely confused by the independence claim. You’re saying mainstream science treats Moon formation, ocean delivery, and abiogenesis conditions as independent arrivals? It doesn’t. The Late Heavy Bombardment literature explicitly links impact history to volatile delivery. Nobody in planetary science treats these as separate dice rolls.
And “ad populum” applies to popular opinion, not scientific consensus through peer review. Those aren’t the same thing.
Here’s my real issue though. You’re demanding causal mechanisms from naturalistic explanations, which is fair. But your alternative is “the odds are low, therefore intent.” What’s the mechanism? How did this agent implement the code? Encoded where, delivered how, using what chemistry? “Intent” isn’t a mechanism. It’s a placeholder for one you haven’t specified. You’re holding one side to standards you’re not applying to your own hypothesis.
The origin of the genetic code is genuinely unsolved. Koonin and Novozhilov say as much. There are real gaps. But “we don’t fully understand X” doesn’t get you to “therefore Y” when Y has even less explanatory content than the incomplete naturalistic accounts.
Mechanism: “so organisms with codes where mistranslation produced chemically similar amino acids had less catastrophic protein misfolding and outcompeted others. That’s a selection pressure with a clear causal chain.”
There were no organisms in this domain. The code must be fixed and shared prior to reproduction and evolution. Invoking evolutionary mechanisms to explain the emergence of that code is circular and therefore invalid. You are appealing to evolution within abiogenesis, which is a category error and a non sequitur.
“The organization and the function aren’t two separate improbabilities to multiply.”
I did not do this. I conducted probability estimates on independent features of code organization only. Some Elements of Function are listed in items A through X, but the article makes it clear that I only used items B, C, and E in the probability estimate.
“Selection doesn’t need perfection. It needs heritability and differential fitness,”
My argument appeals to standardization, not perfection. Selection and heritability presuppose a shared, stable standard as their substrate — this is a basic tenet of systems theory. An unstable or non-standardized codex will (1) fail to produce viable organisms and (2) preclude reproduction, eliminating the preconditions for selection altogether. What you are doing is conflating phenotypic expression with code organization and framing that conflation in evolutionary terms. This is not evolution; and evolution does not apply to abiogenesis. Make sure you are clear which systems domain you are speaking inside.
“The supercodon model isn’t proposing two-base codons. It’s proposing three-base codons where the third position was largely redundant (wobble).”
In the article — and from the standpoint of a cryptologist — I argue that the standard interpretation of third-base degeneracy is incorrect. That interpretation arises from a subjective assessment by non-cryptologists operating under a non-scientific assumption. The C–T–G–A duplication pattern reflects a structured progression in the second base, which is then replicated in the third. What is described as “degeneracy” actually occurs at the first codon position, not the third. The proof of this is the whole point of the table – a table which is novel and did not exist when pundits made the assumption of third base degeneracy.
Consequently, one cannot legitimately appeal to incremental gradualism or synonymy to explain the origin of this code. The code formed around the second base, was duplicated into the third, and only subsequently degenerated at the first — by method, not by stochastic processes. I am qualified to make this assessment and will not revise it absent a deductive codex that demonstrates primacy of the first codon position over the second and then over the third. A codex which logically has been falsified and does not exist.
“not scientific consensus through peer review.”
This is an exagerration. These are personal opinions under discipline pluralistic ignorance and not the outcome of actual peer reviewed methodology. One cannot peer review an opinion under an appeal to ignroance – a basic tenet of science. The science-loving public follows suit in this. Therefore, it is all ad populum, a fortiori, and not “consensus.”
“the odds are low, therefore intent.” What’s the mechanism? How did this agent implement the code? Encoded where, delivered how, using what chemistry? “Intent” isn’t a mechanism.”
It is not simply that the odds are low, but the structure is, in addition, deliberated. You keep skipping over this critical layered distinction. This objection also violates the critical path of inquiry; it puts the cart before the horse. It imposes an unreasonable burden of proof — “If your claim is correct, you must explain everything”—which is not a valid standard of evaluation. I am not obligated to answer these questions because, while they may be relevant, they are not salient to the claim under prosecution.
This is a common tactic of pseudo-skepticism: shifting the burden and unreasonably inflating the explanatory scope in order to suppress lines of inquiry that challenge preferred narratives. The purpose of my work, and of this site, is to document and expose such maneuvers. To date, more than 3,000 such tactics are cataloged and well documented in the TOKO.
Intent exists. That this observation conflicts with a popular — not peer-reviewed — ontology is immaterial. Demanding that I now supply exhaustive, near-omniscient explanation in order to validate that claim is not a valid argument; it is an illicit escalation of the burden of proof. It is what the narrative pusher does in conflating evolution and abiogenesis. So, I am staying consistent with my ethic of prosecution – it is not using a double standard.
“But “we don’t fully understand X” doesn’t get you to “therefore Y”
That is not what is occurring in the logical calculus here. The logical equation here is – U(X)→¬(¬Y)
A novel understanding of X – has precluded not-Y
Are you intimating a corollary? Is the unique codotype possibly what prevented the Watchers from achieving their escape via genetic combination with us? Regardless, your insights just keep blowing up false religions across all the fields; with style and iron. Catch myself wondering if any Doyles in your family tree? Best to you as always.
It is an interesting notion, but the acceleration does not provide that long of a time dilation at a local level. Asymptotically approaches zero to our immediate perception.
Not sure what context you are posing the question… AI is an inevitability in any progressing civilization, yet we do not yet observe the ruthlessness incumbent in our worst nightmares of what AI might become – other than possibly the Gnostic depictions of the God who has temporary control over Earth.
Just checking in to make sure you’re ok TES! It’s been a long time since your last post and I am concerned that our speciated distant cousins (the “useless eaters” as I call them) may have silenced you.
I am working a special project for the US Govt – which I cannot disclose. Taking a lot of time. :-) You may see the results of this work announced in the news.
I was wondering where you were too. Happy to hear you’re well. Happy New Year.
Has the announcement you mention taken place yet? I saw the announcement about the vaccine schedule recommendations change, but that’s it. I am praying to see an announcement banning all COVID vaccines nationwide, as well as “ shared decision making “ applied to all vaccines, not just a scant few.
Why those COVID shots ( as well as the technology behind them) haven’t been banned outright yet defies logic after everything that’s come out.
The Covid vaccine killed my Mother, gave my sibling heart problems, and many other family members, friends, colleagues, and neighbors suffered death as well as strokes, cardiac arrest,temporary blindness, blood clots in legs,lungs, EYES, gallbladder removals, spleen removal, severe neurological damage, severe intestinal problems, prostate cancer, colon cancer,breast cancer,brain cancer,brain tumors, pancreatic cancer, adrenal cancer, skin cancers,severe pneumonitis, facial paralysis, heart attacks, kidney transplant ,miscarriages galore….. ever heard of a baby having a stroke in the womb at 7 months gestation?? I have now! tons of cases of glaucoma in age groups you would not expect to see them ….. the list goes on.
Those things above happened to approximately 50 people I know personally, many others indirectly.
The second I heard about this new virus from china I immediately thought this was intentionally released. When I heard about the vaccines I immediately searched for anything I could find. I quickly found an original trial that cautioned about human use. I shared everything I found ( including your work which was the most compelling ) with family friends, etc- . Some listened, about half did not. They were hell bent on parroting the safe and effective mantra. I never shared facebook memes, I stuck strictly to scientific papers so I could not be accused of sharing lies…. Despite that they still believed their lying news outlets ( take your pick, they all lied) .
To this day many refuse to admit those crap shots are the reason for the avalanche of health problems and deaths that surround us. People are still dying “ suddenly “ . I have never ever in my lifetime seen so many health problems in such a tight circle, in such a short amount of time. Let me tell you it’s beyond upsetting wondering when I’m going to be told that yet someone else I know is sick or has succumbed to an illness they were fighting.
I still can’t wrap my head around how those who lined up for the shots couldn’t see it miles away, despite being warned repeatedly. I am incredibly grateful my children listened to me and did not get the shots. They were all prepared to lose their jobs if their employers mandated them. The threats had everyone on edge. I have a very aggressive voicemail that one of my relatives received from a contact tracer threatening to come to his house and stating “ I know where you live “ if they didn’t get a call back within 24 hours…. He was sleeping when they called! If I ever return to social media I will someday post that and name and shame her behavior!
I sincerely hope that MOST have learned to never ever again fall for the psychological games our government played with our heads. I no longer trust ANY doctor, most nurses, the cdc, fda, or who. They all played a part in this, and none have apologized. Most shocking was how incredibly stupid the doctors and nurses were, and I know plenty . I could write a book about it all… Oh how they lied about the unvaccinated vs vaccinated hospitalization rates ! The denial of early treatment ( or treatment at all for that matter… they abandoned their patients), and on and on.
If you read all of this, thank you. It’s the first time since I lost my facebook account for posting scientific papers in 2020 and 2021 that I’ve written about the aftermath of what they did to us.
Crimes against humanity indeed!
Keep up the great work, yours is by far the absolute best out there! We are most grateful you’re on “ our side “.
P.S. I would love to see you run circles around Jeff morris if you haven’t already. He really irks me, and never gave straight answers to direct questions or stated facts.
I felt he knew early on there was a huge problem with those shots once they rolled out, yet he persisted in attempting to defend them and make excuses for what was glaringly obvious. ( to me )
Yes, Jeff Morris is a disinformation agent paid by the pharmaceutical industry to lie to the American population as an authority.
So, sorry to hear about your losses – I lost 11 family members and one business partner to this vaccine. The war is not over, and those who profited from this are going to be pursued for justice under the law until their last days on this Earth.
Thank you. I am very sorry for the losses you suffered as well.
I knew someone must be paying Morris, unfortunately for them he wasn’t very convincing.
I sincerely hope that I live to see the day that everyone who profited off this is held to account for what they did, as well as those who didn’t profit but harmed us by demonizing us , and trying to make our lives miserable if we didn’t succumb to the pressure to take those shots.
I’m not a hugely religious person, but I do believe, and because I believe I have faith.“Vengeance is mine, said the lord”, hopefully with a little help from people like TES.
God bless and protect you and yours, always.
Your unique genetics & other really special gifts have made you a contemporary Spirit Guide for many. I imagine it is not a role that you would ask for, but you certainly execute it well. Not a one of your followers/Folleagues would ever blame you for the “weather” or any of the knowledge you attempt to share. When you went from your original avatar, to the anime of your photo to finally using the real picture and surrendering your true identity to the wider world, I figured you figured you would have to do this in order to more effectively reveal through debate and discussion what you have been able to see. So much energy, insight and knowledge packed into one person! Thank you for all these things.
History is rhyming; interests of the elite seem prioritized & Indigo signals or their proxies are manifesting. What is your sense lately–does humanity undergo ECDO again?
Steve, not enough information to make such a call. We are not alone – and it is clear that those who have existed here with us understood/understand this planetary challenge – and this fact has been obfuscated by the religious cabals of fake science and skepticism for quite a while. This presents a set of variables into the equation which are much more volatile and unknown, as compared to simply geophysics (which we also do not know well) – This domain is 90% unknown, so I cannot make a reasoned call on the matter.
Also, is the inflection, especially in post neonates happening in 2020? If so, why? And how would that relate to vaccines? Or am I reading the graph timeline wrongly?
P.S. I’m not seeking to be argumentative. I’m seeking understanding before hopefully being able to share your work.
No, there is no inflection in post-neonate deaths in 2020. The inflection begins as soon as childbearing women were vaccinated and gave birth in 2021. However, the early 2021 uptick in Jan/Feb is simply the usual winter mortality peak, the same as happened in 2020 and 2018. So the inflection here begins right as the vaccines are rolled out to younger age citizens.
Thank you for your work, The Ethical Skeptic. Please may I ask why in Figure 1 the vertical vaccination line looks to be drawn in early 2020, when vaccines were rolled out in late 2020 and pregnant / child-bearing age women later than that? Am I reading the timeline wrongly?
Yes, it is drawn there, because this is an annual figures chart which only left me two choices in depiction, To draw the line in 2021 would show/suggest that the increase came before the vaccine was rolled out, which was not the case at all. So, I had to choose 2020 or 2021, and the latter would have sent the wrong message.
Neither choice is perfect, and shows you why I do not do annualized charts and am critical of those who do. It is a great tool to hide data inflections.
Ia. Passive sequestration of all Weapons of Mass Destruction – executed within 3 minutes worldwide.
Ib. Disruption of all public & governmental media & communications – attributable to a CME Event from the Sun – within 15 minutes.
Ic. Disruption of all military communications, comsec, command and control – excuted within 20 minutes worldwide.
II. Containment and capture of all non-human Lunar bases and operations/facilities – 5 days.
III. Earth Containment Siege – embargo of any and all traffic from terrestrial to space or returning – executed within 20 minutes.
IV. Initiation of a no-fly dominance, shutdown of all heavy launch and anomalous craft capability (no escape or relocation-fleeing) – executed within 2 hours worldwide.
V. Initiation of undersea and underground hostilities – Day 5, 30 days to complete destruction of infrastructure and habitations.
VI. Vetting of all human participants, removal from power – Day 31, 120 days.
VII. Installation of provisional and transitional homo caelestis governance.
VIII. Assembly, extermination and relocation of homo igigicus hybrids and superfluous non-Earth life/chimeric/chthonic/demonic entities. Disposition/relocation of non-consequential anomalous life forms.
IX. Then the hard work begins: reconstructing Earth under a new standard of spirituality and technology.
Not surprised in the least at the depth and extent of your thoughts, but continually amazing to me the incisiveness of the intellect. With the rule changes after the most recent ECDO, might the rules change to the extent that ECDO is mitigated?
Almost always – Monument form fits its function. Monument builders were engineers solving for a non-religious primary objective.
Example: The stupas on Borobudur enhance earthquake resistance by lowering the center of gravity, enabling energy dissipation through micro-movements and sacrificial elements, reducing lateral loads via perforated designs, and utilizing flexible interlocking joints that act as mechanical fuses.
Perhaps the Ziggurat of Ur also.
From ChatGPT:
Its corners, rather than its sides, point almost exactly toward the cardinal points.
This orientation is typical of major Mesopotamian temples. There’s some debate, but according to a detailed survey, the Ziggurat of Ur is aligned along an axis of 56° azimuth (from one corner), which corresponds to the Moon’s maximum northern rise.
If you take true north as 0°, that means roughly 4° off from the perfect diagonal (which would be 45°) of a cardinal-aligned square.
Maybe as a rule, it’s better to look in areas not muddied by heavy activity during the bronze age. Thanks also for sharing your rscript.
Do check out the Sigiriya site in Sri Lanka – a lot of pieces in the site naming and alleged construction dates. ‘Preaching Rock’ definitely wasn’t built for preaching..
In any case, I’m sure you could put a few more things together than I could – awesome place to see in person if you get a chance.
Hi, TES. I was reviewing the orientations of Teotihuacan for unrelated reasons, and found something possibly relevant to ECDO theory. If you draw a geodesic going exactly west from Teotihuacan (yellow line in the image attached), you reach the LLVP pole. This was a meridian during the flipping, and from the perspective of Teotihuacan, the north during the flipping turned into east afterwards: they saw the sun rising exactly from the older north, after the cataclysm was over.
Additionally, Teotihuacan “Avenida de los muertos” is oriented 15.5 degrees east of current north. A geodesic with that bearing (red line below) passes through Greenland, in accordance with Mario Buildreps theories.
So maybe in Teotihuacan we have a tale of three meridians: one before the flip (red line), one during the flip (yellow line), and the current one (white line). The city is aligned to all three, the last two ones being the NS and EW axes of the place.
Besides, if I remember the Aztec tales correctly, it was in Teotihuacan that the gods decided to self-sacrifice in order to bring the sun and moon to the mortals. So the local legends agree with a renewal or change in the sun and moon.
Thank you very much for your varied and fascinating work.
The key resides in this. This is the mistake Fred Noonan made while navigating for Amelia Earhart. When you take successive bearings over time (many monuments) and triangulate them, the triangulation spot that does not move over time (for instance our current North Pole, or the white and yellow line triangulation clusters) is the higher confidence one. Np’ does not move over time, while Buildrep’s ‘north pole’ does. The problem is that men were moving over that time, and that movement in monument builder civilization caused the apparent drift in the Buildreps’ north pole.
As a navigator, always deducde from the non-moving triangulation. The moving one is ephemeral and can lead you to run aground or out of gas.
I hope you don’t mind – I used your image to describe this principle in the article text.
Thank you very much. I see Buildrep’s problem with the moving pole, Exhibit J34b perfectly makes the point. Excellent deduction.
I don’t mind about the image, in fact I’m honored. Thank you again.
The god in Enoch I is same as the one in Genesis, yes? And that’s not the one in the Nag texts nor the one Christ speaks of I’d say. It had seemed the chaos around us was moderating a bit, but then first Charlie Kirk was assassinated and it started expanding once again. Even though I know of them, I still find the Captors frightening in the evil they are capable of, & I do not fully understand any system constraints upon them. Based on the “evidence”, including https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/02/24/a-curious-ancient-astrological-confluence/ I believe Christ is real, and I have faith in what I think he tried to relate to us, but my confidence level in the fidelity of what seems like decades later recording of his teachings and the filtering through kings & popes is not high. Difficult to achieve Gnosis when active interference is applied to us. It saddens me to think billions of us may suffer the consequences of the next ECDO (validated theory in my mind no matter what Grok x.x or ChatGPT regurgitates on lack of conformance to “mainstream”) but I retain some hope that as you remind us, “we are not alone”.
I’ve reversed my lifelong belief that the god of Genesis and the Old Testament is the same Father which Christ identified. None of their atttributes match in the least. The god of Genesis was bound to Earth, bore no ability to create other than by natural/technological means, did not fathom his own creation despite plenty of precursors which informed him how animals/men act, and could not head off a well-known natural inundation – choosing to blame it upon the victims instead. That is not a god – it is a criminal. It does match, however, the unforgiven creatures from Enoch I – led by Shemyaza/Samael/Ha-Satan. They enslaved man, raped them, created all sorts of abominations/chimera, and then tried to kill us all off. They are a political party (‘The Party’ in TES vernacular), not angelic hosts.
As we discussed here before – The Lord’s Prayer mentions nothing about personal salvation from sin. It is a prayer of sedition and the overthrow of this politcal party from their rule over Earth and mankind. The prayer appeals to a totally different agency and outside interest, as distinct from the Elohim and their God Saturn, Cronus, Enlil, Yahweh and his desire to make Earth a garden paradise for his 250 demon lords who fell to Earth after losing a great cosmic battle.
This is my lead suspicion, and I do not require anyone else to adhere to this as ‘truth.’ It is an inference derived from the evidence and intelligence, and not a religion.
good to see that more and more people take your theory serious. But maybe you have to share the same fate like those scientists, who got their fame long after their death. The world is ungrateful.
But there is one thing which is still confusing, your predictions about the lenght of Phase 2. I remember you first speculated about between 10 and 50 years, then increased to maybe 400 years, and maybe way longer, 1200 years or more.
Is it possible that the lenght is varying wildly? Or is it still not possible to determine realistically?
I wish I could understand how the “bottom normalized” values in exhibit 10B have been calculated. I may appear a bit stupid and/or stubborn but I would appreciate if you or someone among the readers could write down some explanation.
From depth 0 to 2500, these values are equal to the original ones (GJ/km3 in the adjacent left column). Then, from depth 2500 to 4750, the values become suddenly much smaller than the original ones. It means that, during the normalization process, either the water volume of each layer has been increased or the heat anomaly has been decreased (or both). Either way, I can’t find out how a normalization could produce such results.
Moreover, after normalization, the values of the four abyssal layers (4000 to 5000 m) are added, which leads to the 439,000 figure. However, these values are heat quantity per volume (GJ/km3). Therefore, it seems to me that adding them has no meaning at all.
Finally : if, for each of the four abyssal layers (4000 to 5000), one multiplies the “normalized” GJ/km3 value with the water volume of layer, and add the four results, one obtain 9.3 zJ and not 8.0.
More about J13, the numerals marked in blue on the original video need to be figured out. I think the mainstream only recognizes numerals in Americas after conquistadors. However 0 as a placeholder was used from 500CE on India and as a mathematical context from 700CE in India. Those J13 images clearly have 0 as a context (32’00 or 3200)
1) The obvious first, this exhibit might be fake, but let’s dismiss that as too obvious for now.
2) This is very recent, like 1600CE, after the conquistadors.
3) Did the Indians make it to Peru at some point after 500/700CE, prior to conquistadors?
4) Are these years, coordinates, or something else? The 32’00 has a rock to kinda show decimals or coordinate minutes (which would be very weird, but perhaps related to post conquistador times..?)
5) The Nazca culture existed to approx 600-800CE, which would point to Indians coming in for a visit, instead of the conqistadors 700 years later..?
6) The Nazca went seafaring before extinction and brought numbers to India (unlikely). Or vice versa, the Chinese did go around to Africa from 1400CE, though the other direction to SA is more unknown/offshore, quite unlikely,
and the Nazca culture was gone by this date
7) 2,3,5,9(?) look very late european, ~1700-1800CE
They try to debunk Chan Thomas, he wrote a whole book on the topic. What I find fascinating is one of his last topics: criminality. Specifically, the idea that low magnetic fields create criminality in rats. I look at the situation on the ground today and cannot help but draw parallels. The Adam and Eve Story : https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7632659-the-adam-eve-story
With the pole movement rate of change accelerating, and some folks opining various trip points such as 45 degrees, the estimates kind of range from two years to forty years for Tau. Are any of these approaches valid/useful in your mind? Thank you for putting yourself out there for all.
Not useful yet. We have two intervals under consideration: 5,200 years and 6,443 years (not that exact of course) – and we have already passed the first one long ago. So, the cycle bears a possibility of having already changed. Just not anchored to any one construct right now, until we get better evidence.
Good morning TES,
Thank you for your contribution. I have been following cataclysm for years now, but I find edco most compelling so far. I do appreciate the scientific approach and I don’t want you to go down esoteric rabbit holes, but have you ever heard of European/American prophets? There is an interesting and unlikely intersection between prophecy and edco. There are intersections between prophecies from different continents and ages that couldn’t have heard of each other, yet they describe events parallel to the edco model. For instance the Brooklyn seer, Veronica leuken said an enormous wave will reach the foothills of the Rockies. The German seer Alois irmeier had similar insights, but euro-centric. I’m curious if your thoughts. Have a wonderful weekend!
I am trying to re-establish what I know. So much of what I thought was true I now learn is false. E.g., Lake Agassiz & the Sand Hills were a glacial feature many of us were taught, but now with benefit of vision, insight & research of enlightened observers such as TES & Mr. Stone I come to understand ECDO is a more compelling, evidence supported explanation. Similarly for “origins of the world (us)”. I am working to glean what I am able from the Nag H. library. Tripartite has been pretty challenging; difficult to get the timbre so as to be able to maintain continuity of thought in my head though.
Are the evils of the Archons constrained? I understand what TES has said about the rules changed after the last ECDO. The historical writings speak of their sexual violence against us, modifying us so as to lessen lifespan & resilience, depraved indifference homicide through failure to warn of cataclysmic danger, but do they presently take direct action against us or is it indirect influence of corruptibles via money & power for example? GOF research & CV vax with attendant catastrophic impacts & (again) attempts to obscure the truth for instance?
Although risking contribution to the looshapalooza, I have worried about ECDO since stumbling across the theory a year ago. ECDO Theory has been validated in my mind. TES’ credibility & integrity is beyond question in my mind as well. TES has demonstrated the obscuration of ECDO/human history which impairs prognostication. I am compelled to do what I can to shield loved ones from the terror & agony of ECDO & the prefacing events but ECDO’s viscoelastic, seismic & environmental progressions have not quite yet been defined/refined to allow reasonable planning for someone of limited resources. For this reason, I have not burdened others close to me with the ECDO concept while waiting for more definitive problem/option development. Is this incorrect of me?
Nothing we have defined to date gives merit to any kind of worry or extreme action. Instead, we set in place the monitoring systems to examine the data from the ECDO standpoint so that we know where we are in these cycles going into the future.
Part of the reason I have not opted to go with a publisher to date and mass-produce a book, is the simple fact that I do not want to unnecessarily terrorize the human population. I am not here to increse the loosh abundace available for dark entities to consume.
All of it is outlined in the second article “Hidden in Plain Sight”
1. Khufu’s and especially Khafre’s exterior patterned erosion is conclusive.
2. The subterranean passage originally clogged with tons of re-concreted Tura Limestone wash-off when first explored (cleared).
3. The subterranean passage south shaft with 3 inches of marine silt.
4. The travertine/karst/carbonic acid eroding of the walls inside the ‘air shafts’
5. The entire interior of the pyramids being caked with non-effluorescence salt (all been cleaned now).
6. The severe travertine/karst/carbonic acid erosion of the block stubs NE of Khafre, contrasted with the pristine heiroglyphs chizled into the wall face right next to them.
7. The mounds of detritus of mostly karst-resistant material at the foot of each pyramid face (all been cleaned up now).
8. The seawater patina which lines the lower, but not upper wall of the ‘air shafts’.
The wind erosion arguments all go against all observations. There’s billions of examples of wind erosion in Egypt to compare.
No one disputes ‘erosion’, of course.
Wind erosion across flat surfaces leaves sharp edges, and there is a flow to this erosion that allows us to identify the airflow pattern.
No such pattern exists in the severe erosion on the pyramids. The erosion is pattern is vertically stacked. Are we to believe there was wind shear at this scale, that wind eroded layers at a time, at different times? Of course not, unless you’re a mainstream archaeologist!
Wind does not bore random irregular circular holes into flat stone surfaces.
If a rock is exposed, with changing wind patterns, it can be eroded and smooth, no sharp edges, but never deep pits in the stone.
If wind erosion had this power over the Pyramids, the effect would be a rounding and removal of corners, (water erosion also does it, I cite TES parabolic erosion of the cap), the wind there doesn’t have the kinetic power to do this to the limestone over the period in question and there is no evidence of this kind of erosion on the pyramid in any significant way, even the softer casing at the top survived all of the wind erosion that Egypt could throw at it over thousands of years, it’s there to see today, because the pyramid is pointed, if the wind in Egypt had such power of erosion, the top of the pyramid I think, would show the strongest signs of this erosion, yet it isn’t there.
Acidic erosion on the other hand. The evidence is everywhere.
When acidic water dissolves a spot on the surface, the surface area expands, exposing more surface in that pit to the acidic properties of the water.
The surface area expands as the pit deepens. This is why limestone karst erosion leaves blocks of limestone looking like Swiss Cheese on the surface.
There are some youtube videos from a few people who managed to get to climb the pyramids. Look at the stones in their videos. Pitted and pockmarked. Acidic erosion.
As an aside, I built reefs for 20 years. One of the first things that struct me upon first reading TES articles, was the similarities in reef rock, acidic erosion of aragonite and lesser but systemically identical erosion of stones on the pyramids. This got me hooked :)
Unrelated, the disc of Sabu, is imo a unidirectional impellor. The symmetrical nature of it leads me to believe it was rotated in both directions alternately to produce pulse pumping rather than continuous flow. It also appears too heavy to be rotated by hand (it is incomplete also) at I’ve seen between 50 to 100lbs. A bit heavy, but for a 2 man back and forth rotation on a central axis, might be a better solution.
There are flounders, and there are poison dart frogs. The evolutionary benefit of exhuberant energy expenditure should not be ignored. A cosmic ecosystem should have many niches.
One cannot assume that civilizations are allowed to reach top potential. If they aren’t –I believe you’ve hinted at the loosh farm situation in other posts– it is not surprising we do not detect other civilizations. It is not in the farmers’ best interest they evolve enough to be able to. This is a variation of the great filter, or rather, the great farm fence.
So maybe we should add another corollary: since there is always a bigger fish, any newcomer to this multibillion year old game is already big fish fodder.
Professor Avi Loeb of Harvard raised a related possibility in a recent Medium post on 3I/ATLAS:
Earth went through five documented mass extinction events throughout its 4.54-billion-year history. They occurred approximately 445, 365, 252, 201 and 66 million years ago. The latest among them resulted in the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs, probably as a result of the Chicxulub asteroid impact. It has been suggested that some extinction events resulted from astrophysical causes, such as exploding stars or passage through the spiral arms of the Milky-Way galaxy. But one possibility was omitted: if life was seeded on Earth by an interstellar gardener, then it is also possible that this gardener resets terrestrial life whenever it goes in an unwanted direction.
aes, yes – if indeed we are an ECDO planet, as my hypotheses cite – then we would only be suitable for use as a DNA garden/resource. Ownership may have changed hands several times and galactic influences and agencies vie for control, or negotiate give and take in order to co-exist. They may choose to not exterminate certain lines, however, accentuate the evolution of selected families of flora and fauna – that is, until a rag-tag band of renegades posing as gods arrived and did not care how many sentient species they made to suffer in their service and anger over being run off from their former abode.
Your hypotheses raise many interesting possibilities about the nature of 3I/ATLAS.
It might be the gardener arriving to weed, or till everything under and start afresh.
It could be an observer checking out those ~500 very distinctive double flashes and what the unruly child race has gotten up to.
It could be an expedition to reclaim property, and/or evict the squatters/renegades.
It might be a very old relic of violent stellar events long ago and far away.
Any of those are possible given what we know today. But the observation showing non-gravitational acceleration changes the probabilities. Loeb estimates that 1/6 of the minimum 33 billion ton mass would have to evaporate as 3I approached perihelion to account for the non-gravitational force and observed velocity change.
Now that 3I is visible again, we’ll be able to tell if there have been additional course changes. If there isn’t a massive coma containing ~5.5 billion tons of evaporated material surrounding it, evaporation isn’t the source of the push already inferred.
At that point developing hypotheses that don’t require intent will need complex epicycles.
Thank You, Sir Skeptic and how did I get back here to 2015, 10 years ago?
I was skimming down for that article about how all of the chemistry and physics arrangements of this particular universe happen to be so propitious for the case of life-forming, and I got down to the bottom of the scroll, without recognizing it, but I saw this.
I generally employ the term “The Divine” to speak of what I feel to be the Universal Consciousness, within which all reality exists. Nobody seems to object.
“God” carries a lot of baggage,and it is not the same baggage from person to person, and there are a lot of declarations of absolutes, which you point out here.
My synthesis of the teachings of Jesus and Siddhartha Buddha is that they knew The Divine, and were trying to help other people get there, too.
Religions mostly don’t do that, though some really seem to try, like Orthodox Christianity, and Buddhism (most sects).
The Roman Church needed a religion for the Roman State, which had certain policies, such as upholding absolute rights of creditors against debtors, always, no jubilee.
This is very likely the opposite of the historic Jesus, but it was a really good and popular archetypeal story otherwise, so Rome tweaked it and ran with it.
Rome decided that ordinary men needed priests between themselves and “God”, which is a red flag for any true seeker, but ideal for God-Proxies, as you describe.
As a bit of an aside,it has always seemed to me that to be omniscient and omnipotent were mutually exclusive. To know all things and all possibilities at all reality branches going forward would make any action at all pointless, the outcomes all being known.
Omniscient Universal Consciousness seems to have deferred “free will”, the will to act, to entities with very limited knowledge. Universal Consciousness experiences the choice paths they take through reality, along with them.
I assume this is as predominantly unpleasant for Universal Consciousness as it is for me, for example.
There is an inherent desire of UniversalConsciousness to reduce suffering amongst those making decisions and taking actions, but Universal Consciousness, Omniscient, only leaves an open invitation to the actors of reality to seek guidance and insight. Great Compassion, the equating of all suffering of all entities, aligns the seeker with Universal Consciousness, as I now see things.
I seek guidance, and seek to follow it, and still get furious at bad drivers when I ride my bike and they endanger me.
I cool down faster and think things like I just want a fist fight, but he might have a heart condition, and I don’t want to kill anybody…
I have been hit 6 times, I plead PTSD and stuff.
It ruined 3 bikes, but I walked away from all of them, or rode away with minor damage 3 times… Still, it makes ya get jumpy easy when you see another one coming.
Free will is the ability to live your life your way. I stand now and see the end of the tunnel. I am horrified at the mistakes I made. If I was given the choice now, I would renounce free will. I wish God would have stopped me in my tracks and said this is a violation of my law. Free will is learning from your mistakes and knowing you are an idiot.
Free will does involve a healthy dose of realizing one is an idiot after the fact. I think that is part of the learning. If we had the knowledge in advance, we would not learn it.
A new publication in Nature’s Scientific Reports on transient star-like objects of unknown origin identified in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS-I) conducted prior to the first artificial satellite. The report claims both star-like transients and UAPs were significantly more likely on dates within + /- 1 day of atmospheric nuclear tests.
Outstanding work by you, Craig Stone, and friends on assembling the staggering line of evidence comprising the ancient monuments oriented to Np’. Really the epitome of consilience!
Be proud of what you have accomplished with this theory — and our species should be proud that one of us finally put the pieces together.
I’ve had a couple of questions and would appreciate any clarity you could provide.
1. Regarding mass/heat transfer and the LLVPs:
The Point Indigo section states that “there is a transfer of exothermic heat from the core into a network of Large Low-Velocity-Shear Provinces (LLVPs)…”
The Exhibit A caption states that “Heat contribution from the core feeds into the mantle, avoiding the red-hued Large Low-Velocity-Shear Provinces…”
And bullet point B in the Point Indigo section reads, “Contribution of exothermic kinetic energy (heat) into the Earth’s mantle … excluding the axially-located Large Low-Velocity-Shear Provinces…”
And the Point Tau section states describes “the substantial contribution of heat from the phase state change of hexagonal close-packed iron (HCP-Fe) into the entire Earth’s mantle, save for the South Africa Cusp and Pacific Large Low-Velocity-Shear Province (LLVP)…”
It seems that the first 1st bullet contradicts the others? Is there a typo in the 1st?
And in the “Climate Change Alternative…” article, you quote McNamara, Garnero, et al.: “We find that the hottest lowermost mantle regions are commonly located well within the interiors of thermochemical piles (ULVZs and LLVPs)”
I wasn’t sure how to interpret this in light of my confusion. Do you think that the ULVZs/LLVPs are hotter because of preferential heat transfer from the outer core? If so, would that contradict the quotes in the 2nd through 4th bullet points above?
2. Regarding the Euler and Mundi axes:
Exhibit C2’s title, “Mundi and Euler Dense Axes” indicates that these are two separate axes.
But later on in the article, the phrases “East and West Euler Axis Mundi” and “Depiction of Euler Axis Mundi West/East” appear.
What is relation between the concepts of Euler Axes and Mundi Axes in the theory? I understand that the Euler axis is densest and therefore subject to the smallest moment. But what does “Mundi” mean in this context?
PS — A few weeks ago I think I recall someone on Twitter mentioning that he/she also had a copy of the pyramid coin. I thought that you asked them about the provenance of the coin but I don’t recall any response on the thread. Any news? Was that the third copy of the coin mentioned in this article, or a potential fourth?
Will correct those references – not typos, just missed changes as my research revealed deeper study references around each concept, but I did not catch every reference. With the LLVP’s the heat is both. The base of the LLVP is extroardinarily hot, but it does not transfer magnetocaloric effect as well as the non-LLVP areas… so it is both in reality, as I currently understand it. Will get all those LLVP-heat and axis-mundi references tidied up here shortly. Thanks!
Regarding the coin, the person came back and said they had gotten one of the coins off Ebay. But never came back to show where.
I’ve been reading many of the heavier papers pertaining to Dynamo Theory so I ofc love your work. Cosmic scale makes the micro management of CO2 emissions seem a tad ridiculous. Are you able to access all Swarm data via ESA portal? Anything noteworthy there even though only from 2013? Any thoughts on geomagnetic shifts impacting, say, the Schumann Resonance (thus potentially affecting human brain(wave) development/function) as perhaps being a cause of the increasing numbers we see in child psychological disorders like autism, ADHD etc?
Randall Carlson says the primary reason he believes cometary impact was the cause of the cataclysm over other theories is the global layer of nanodiamonds. Does this layer really exist? Is it predicted by ECDO or unexplained-by/contrary-to it?
From what I can tell, both the black mat, Carolina bays, and nano-diamonds all exist with good evidence. However, this impact could not serve to create a True Polar Wander or discplace every ocean to the degree we observe. I treat that impact and the two ECDO rotations as three separate events.
I had heard something along those lines in several speculative articles, Jim. When we get the advanced materials assay and microstructure of the metals, and slice the thing open – that is when I will start to get fully interested.
Wouldn’t the large number of monuments that point to Np’ perhaps indicate that the first event might be somewhat survivable – at least in the areas around the monuments themselves. It’s the move back to Np I’m less confident about!
Yes Brady, what you cite here is a distinct possibility, along with the construct that both events were horribly violent, and history treated them all as one single thing. The Euler-Coriolis effect modeling some are doing, still suggests a very violent move from State 1 to State 2 in particular however.
ECDO Theory validation is piling on. Given the complexity, technological dependency, and centralization of the current civilizational system it seems like for 19 out of 20 of us that terror & agony is either brief for some, or extended slightly for others in the face of the an ECDO. What is your current notion on a potential mitigation–any new observations?
Steve, by “potential mitigation” do you mean personal actions (bunkers), societal (zero carbon, demographic moves), or technological (mantle manipulation, for example)?
I assume, because of the feckless nature of the latter two, that you mean ‘personal’ – For most, survival of the 9-day event might be achievable, but survival of the ensuing 200 days after that would be very problematic, with a good 80% of those survivors suffering and dying en masse pretty quickly.
In a high elevation bunker or submarine-boat context, one will need a supporting community. A community that can re-establish clean water, husbandry, and agriculture almost immediately. Most people will not be able to pull such a thing off. These communities will have to be hand selected and outfitted by expertise and financial support.
Are you aware of the two H shaped buildings directly south of St Peters Basicilla, Vatican their orientation is inverted compared to Pillar 43, and North , it would be interesting if anything at vatican pointed to Np’ as many ancient sites have
Hmmm. After reading some of the comments to this article i feel compelled to open my yap in regard to what I have observed over the last 10 years. I noticed some that Thiel and Trump appear to be the target of conversation in some of them as well. I supported Trumps election all three times. I realize Thiel is involved in intelligence work. As for the Heritage foundation, I read Project 2025. They are not incorrect and many of their solutions may bear fruit. What I know is that it is not a single individual or small group behind what has happened. The attempted and as of yet ongoing takeover of civilization is the work of a coalition of factions brought together under the framework of an agenda where these once competing factions appear to believe they are securing something they desire in cooperating. do not recall whether or not I have discussed this on the site of TES and if I have I hope he will allow me to once again bring it up. What I am going to mention is by no means the complete picture featuring all of the players but it does have some major ones.
In 2002 a UN affiliated think tank called, at that time, The Collegium, penned their Declaration of Interdependence. It was done in support of the myriad goals of Agenda 2030. Their role, IMO according to my interpretation of their wording, was to work upon weakening the national sovereignty of all Western nations and to force the populace to balance individual freedoms with civic responsibility. In examining their archived documents and communications I became concerned and to be honest, at the time, a bit pissed. Some of what they stated will be paraphrased. My memory is not photographic but a step below that so I may not recall their exact phrasing but it is damn close.
We must undergo a poly-crisis. The populace must experience a sustained state of fear and confusion before they will accept our solutions.
We have examined every form of authoritarian rule throughout history and found them all wanting. However, in the near future we foresee that technological progress will allow for the manifestation of a new type. A soft tyranny. Digital.
A few years later, around 2006 if I recall correctly, a lady affiliated with them wrote to congratulate them on their progress to date. She had some suggestions to due to the need to accelerate the timeline. These were:
A. We must begin recruiting activists from all fields of endeavor. Teachers, lawyers, athletes, actors, musicians, scientists and staff of officials at all levels. They must be informed and remain willing to face danger.
B. We must enhance the rate of mass migration. We will need to contact the UN and have our friends there pass laws to help provide transport and protection during transit. We will need to contact our allies inside the governments of the nations and have them pass laws to provide for the immigrants and to make them more resistant to removal.
In 2013 Obama inserted the posterchild of the UN, DEI, into our institutions.
That same year FEMA began the Whole Community Program whose orientation materials state has the purpose of creating communities of activism in every county of the nation in order to prepare for the failure of govt. systems. ( I read this as the type of proactive preparation that works toward making it happen)
Also that year, HRC modifies USAID contracts to allow for the creation of custom tailored NGOs that are under the complete control of a group of private donors. These NGOs are supplied with a support network existing inside our own systems to keep up appearances and provide data IRT. It is my opinion that most of these were turned inward in order to facilitate rapid socio-political change. It all fits quite well on top of that.
In the summer of 2020 I witnessed around a dozen or so Zoom style video meetings over the period of one week where someone evidently forgot to make so uninvited people could not just watch them. Each group consisted of civil service employees. Teachers, postal workers, police and even the staff of elected local officials. The leader of each group claimed they were contacted by the CFR and told to do whatever was necessary to get things back on track. After the election that year it became apparent what they meant.
I am sure that in addition to the corporations who are members of the WEF that intel agencies and cells of other nations are also involved. This is not some small rogue element that is easily dealt with under the radar. It would take radical steps to raze their foundations although MAGA/Trump has put quite a dent in their momentum. It will get worse before it gets better. Now while I voted for Trump I am by no means under the illusion that he could be an element in a game of controlled options. In that case maybe the big boys have decided to cede some ground and will eventually meet us half way or maybe we are being led down the garden path wearing VR goggles. Either way we will not go quietly and will insure a price is paid for the subterfuge.
My main concern in regard to all of this is, why? It cannot simply be all about those who have long held the reigns not wanting to relinquish them. God forbid if this realm has become that corrupt. While I am sure such as mentioned above do dwell in their ranks I believe that a potentially noble goal is the driving force of some. I disagree with their methods but i wonder what i would do in their shoes if we are facing what I believe is to come. I would want to tell everyone in such a way that most would remain in control of their faculties. I think it could be done but it would be a doozy. What I am speaking of is directly related to the ECDO theory of TES. I think some of them know and it may have been what inspired this madness. Evidently too many with materialistic and/or militaristic concerns were allowed access. I guess we shall see. Godspeed.
Another check of Np’ orientation can be to identify mantle hot spots like the one that created Hawaii or the one under Yellowstone, and match them to alternate features found in Np’ that may currently “be dormant”. And then consider when the ECDO oscillates back to Np, there may be a slight dislocation from the previous time at that location, perhaps creating distinct island chains. At Np’ the Hawaiian hot spot arrives under Svalbard-Zenla Georga-Severnaya Zevanlya island groups. The length of these three island group locations is about the length of Hawaii to Midway.
A great idea, JS. Will start examining by means of this approach. The fault line which surrounds and comprises the African Plate, has its virtual centroid at about Np’ as well.
Have been following you since 2020 when the covid 19 “plandemic” saga began. I had one question that quickly relegated me to the label of conspiracy theorist but that is another discussion.
I am fascinated by your ECDO theory that makes so much more logical sense that the ACC (Anotropogenic Climate Change) fantasy so I have undertaken to examine this issue in detail.
This is what is really happening in the US – the corporate oligarchy with Peter Thiel and the Heritage Foundation are doing a complete coup of power, and they have been doing it fast. Fomenting civil violence only benefits them, as they will then have the pretext of grabbing all the police and military power against the population. “Left”, “liberal”, “right” are really irrelevant and misdirection only. Ignore at your peril.
There are 2 links at the bottom of the comment that will go to a full list of articles I used for the comment.
The folks behind all this are people like Russ Vought (head of the office of budget management and primary author of project 2025) and Howard Lutnick (commerce secretary and former Cantor Fitzgerald which is the biggest supporter of the heritage foundation). They want an era of isolationism for the U.S. because they think this country can prosper with the right access to raw materials and straight labor. It’s why they are working on shutting down access to proper education, having Trump go on and on about acquiring Canada and Greenland which is partly for resources and accessibility but also as a buffer zone to the rest of the world. They have been convinced into thinking AI will figure out all the problems with Elon Musk (SpaceX/Starshield/Starlink/Grok) and Peter Thiel/Palantir.
Palantir is what found Elon his adult and kids DOGE team which most people have forgotten is really USDS which has access to most federal agencies. Understand that the decision by Trump to fire the NSA chief and his deputy may be in fact be the most dangerous decision Trump has made so far. Timothy Haugh like his last 2 predecessors were restricting the access and control Peter Thiel had through his company Palantir over the CIA/NSA to commit domestic surveillance. Palantir (just got $10 BILLION contract with the US government) who is now the biggest defense contractor for the CIA/NSA based on publicly available data on DOD contracts (they had $750 million added to their current contract a while back) along with providing day-to-day operations for both agencies. Palantir is contracted with state and local governments and police here in the U.S. The goal for Palantir is and always has been domestic surveillance. Palantir is an intelligence corporation which provides advanced analysis, sigint, osint, criminal and threat awareness and kill chain efficiencies to all levels of US, UK, and corporate agencies. Speaking of which they just secured $1 billion contract with the UK intelligence community and a few months ago Palantir convinced NATO to purchase the use of Palantir’s Maven Smart System.
Now comes the push for removing Trump from office.
Elon was the early test to see if scapegoat mechanism would work and it sort of did for him. Which is sort of the plan, scapegoat mechanism at its finest. Peter is a key believer of scapegoat mechanism for which he says Trump fills that role. Thiel has been grooming JD Vance since 2011 as his benefactor and mentor, Thiel brought Vance to Mar-a- Lago to smooth over things with Trump so Vance could be VP, Thiel gave Vance $15 million in donations to run for Senate (the largest amount of money ever donated to a single Senate candidate ever)
Scapegoat mechanism is simple that you have someone in power take on a lot of bad actions then remove them and so the masses feel it’s been all undone. The test case was Elon and DOGE which worked perfectly seeing as how all the federal investigations into Elon are gone and DOGE is still at all the federal agencies. Elon’s employee Amanda Scales still has the private server setup at OPM. All the data they got from the federal agencies and Treasury department when they had hard physical access is still under their control.
In September when the gap fund bill signed in March expires along with the deferred resignation program kicking in and the SSA/IRS data being handed over to Palantir as part of the doge plan they have provided for updating the SSA system there could be a lot of reasons for him to be removed from office.
Peter Thiel/Palantir just got what they wanted, access to a big enough database for the first step in complete surveillance.
Peter is also a major defense contractor for the UK intelligence community and army along with the major police forces in the UK. He branched out to their healthcare a few years ago with a contract to shift through all the data at NHS England which is done now so Kier announced that NHS England will be shutdown (not NHS). Peter through his company has full access to Norway’s government and civilian surveillance services. Peter/Palantir provides direct support for the IDF (Israel) in all their operations from Gaza to the West Bank to Iran.
Thiel directly owns roughly 180 million publicly traded shares which 7%. His investment firm Rivendell 7 owns 34 million publicly traded shares. Other Thiel vehicles own 37 million shares. Thiel entities also own 32.5 million supervoting Class B shares in Palantir. Those class b shares carry 10 votes while public ones carry only 1 vote per share. Now here is the kicker for why he still controls Palantir (link below), Thiel has sole investment power over 335,000 class F shares as part of a trust that has 49.99% voting interest in the company.
Alex Karp the ceo of Palantir knew Thiel well before 2003 when Thiel tapped him to be ceo. Karp has condemned “woke” ways of thinking, calling woke a central risk to Palantir, that Palantir is a counter-example to companies he considers woke. Karp condemned pro-Palestine protests calling them an infection inside of our society, he remarked the peace activists are war activists and they should be sent to North Korea. Karp has said the west has a superior way of living and said he supports Palantir contract with ICE and using the software to enable separation of families.
• born in West Germany, grew up and went to school in the city of Swakopmund in West South Africa, the city was notorious for its continued glorification of Nazism to a dad who was an engineer working on uranium which was in violation of international law
• Partners with Elon Musk at PayPal, early investor in Facebook
• self-proclaimed Christian nationalist, believes women right to vote is wrong, idolizes Curtis Yarvin and Yarvin’s philosophy on replacing democracy with authoritarianism all in Peter’s own book
• Palantir after its creation in 2003 was bailed out partly by In-Q-Tel the CIA’s venture capital firm
In case you want to read some news sources I used on all this…
I read Luke Burgis’ book, Wanting: The Power of Mimetic Desire in Everyday Life. Burgis makes quite a few references to Thiel, stating that he is a libertarian and student of René Girard. It is interesting that you mention the “scapegoat mechanism” because this is a key feature of Girard’s theory of mimetic desire in relation to his study of human mythology.
It is rather difficult to summarize this theory, so I’ll try to make my point based on my reading of Girard’s work. Scapegoating is, according to Girard, the means by which Satan (the accuser, the malicious prosecutor) maintains his domination of mankind. To quote Burgis:
In his study of history, Girard found that humans time and time again turned to sacrifice in order to stop the spread of mimetic conflict. When societies were threatened with disorder, they used violence to drive outviolence. They would expel or destroy a chosen person or group, and this action would have the effect of preventing more widespread violence. Girard called the process by which this happens the scapegoat mechanism.
The scapegoat mechanism, he found, turns a war of all against all into a war of all against one. It brings temporary peace as people forget their mimetic conflicts for a while, having just discharged all of their anger onto a scapegoat.
This process, Girard believed, was the foundation of all culture. The institutions and cultural norms that we find around us, especially sacred rituals like elections and capital punishment, as well as many taboos, are mechanisms that were developed to contain violence.
In this chapter, we’ll see how the scapegoat mechanism is still at work in our world, even as it has changed forms and grown more deceptive.
Girard wrote that Jesus was The Scapegoat to end all scapegoats. (Girard’s I See Satan Fall Like Lightning) I am reading about Gnosticism at this time in my life while maintaining an open mind about as many concepts as my small mind can process. For example, I have been playing with the notions that the Ignorant Creator, the god of the Old Testament, is the one who Satan is really challenging (or working with?), and humans are caught up in the process. Let’s not conflate Jesus’ Father with the Demiurge, however, as Girard appears to do. It is rather clear from an objective reading that the Old Testament is an “inclusion of differences” that disproves the notion ‘all scripture is inspired of God’. Even so, error is useful to those who are seeking truth. Whether or not Satan is working for or against Yaldabaoth in this ‘simulation’ doesn’t appear to negate the importance of Jesus. Am I making any sense?
To return to what you wrote, the idea that Thiel is using the scapegoat mechanism would appear to me as if Thiel is one of those who did an act of worship to rule over the kingdoms of the world. (Matthew 4:9; contrast with Luke 14:21-24)
I think I should admit that I don’t know enough about Thiel or anyone operating in political power to accuse or excuse them. I’m just a nobody who grew up in middle-class suburbia with enough cognitive dissonance to make me ask questions and avoid easy answers. I recognized things about myself that kept me from joining anyone’s team, so to speak. Growing up, I found the ‘fundamentalist’ resurgence disturbing, and I likewise found the ‘woke’ insurgence equally disturbing in recent years. Despite what I wrote, I’m not by any means certain whether Satan or any of the gods are entities, egregores, archetypes, or plain old myths. We use words, but the map is not the territory.
By the way, I like Charles Jones’ post, but I’ll avoid cluttering up the comment section with replies. I share the suspicion that the ECDO theory is taken seriously in select circles of power, and this may have some bearing on social engineering. Other posts that focus in on details surrounding the murder of Kirk seem to assume that there is true justice to be had if only the bureaucracy would do their jobs correctly. Perhaps the “decay” in the system is already too great. The branches of the tree are diseased, and we worry as to how the tree itself might be saved. What of the forest?
So, I finally decided to read Rene Girard’s book, Job: The Victim of His People. I read the Bible book of Job many years ago, and like most people I thought the introduction was the real story. The Dialogues looked boring, and I basically learned nothing from them at the time. Girard’s book reveals much about the Scapegoat process in the account of Job and applies it to current affairs.
First, I’ll quote something that Charles Jones wrote about Agenda 2030:
We have examined every form of authoritarian rule throughout history and found them all wanting. However, in the near future we foresee that technological progress will allow for the manifestation of a new type. A soft tyranny. Digital.
Now I’ll quote from Girard:
Everywhere ideology decomposes the legal system, legal parodies multiply and prompt behaviour patterns like those of the three inquisitors at Job’s bedside.
In societies that have so far been spared this disturbing evolution it is difficult to explain the importance totalitarian regimes attach to the semblance of justice, just as it is difficult to explain the relentless efforts of the friends to make Job confess. Comparison of the two mysteries helps to explain them both.
In both cases, the proof and guarantees needed by judicial systems which respect human rights are lacking. This is what the persecutors are after, in the form of the sincere agreement of the accused in their own condemnation without proof, in their annihilation ‘without trial’, as Elihu proudly states. This agreement must replace the proof.
A perfect agreement between the perspective of executioners and that of the victims must be secured. The existence of a single truth is at stake, a truth that is properly transcendent and would be binding for all men without exception, even those crushed in the triumph of its procession. It must be shown that this truth is so constraining that it eventually wins over even those who, having failed to appreciate it, must suffer the consequences. They must recognize that they have sinned and that all their suffering is justified.
The need for a consenting victim characterizes modem totalitarianism as well as certain religious or para-religious forms of the primitive world. The victims of human sacrifice are always presented as very much in favour of their own immolation, completely convinced of its necessity. It is this persecutor’s point of view that modem neo-primitivism fails to criticize.
Totalitarian ideologies destroy belief in an impartial and sovereign justice, foreign to the conflicts of the earthly city. Regimes that triumph on the ruins of a systematically flouted code of justice can no longer avail themselves of it in time of need. They have destroyed the law’s effective transcendence in relation to the individuals that make up society.
[…]
The three friends are no more interested in truth than are Soviet prosecutors. They are there to persuade Job to recognize in public that he is guilty. It does not matter of what he is guilty, provided that he confesses it in front of everyone. In the last analysis, the unfortunate man is asked to confess that he has been struck by an infallible god rather than by fallible men. He is asked to confirm the sacred union of the unanimous lynching.
[…]
The demand for absolute perfection might well provide the common ground between the society of Job’s ‘friends’ and current totalitarian societies. Faced with imperfections too obvious to be denied and with all that obviously fails to function correctly, the first reaction of totalitarian society is judicial rather than pragmatic. In order to find concrete solutions, the most fruitful state of mind is to think that perhaps no one is ‘guilty’. To learn to cure the plague, one must first renounce the oracles of Laius (a reference to Oedipus) and the hunt for a scapegoat. Totalitarian worlds renounce that renunciation. Unwittingly they reintegrate, in the name of ‘progress’, the state of mind so well defined by Eliphaz:
Can you recall a guiltless man that perished,
or have you ever seen good men brought to nothing?
I speak of what I know: those who plough iniquity
and sow the seeds of grief reap a harvest of the same kind.
A breath from God will bring them to destruction,
a blast of his anger will wipe them out. (4: 7-9)
[…]
The well-oiled scapegoat mechanism generates an absolutely ‘perfect’ world, since it automatically assures the elimination of everything that passes for imperfect and makes everything that is violently eliminated appear to be imperfect and unworthy of existence.
There is no room in this world for unpunished injustice or unsanctioned evil, any more than there is a place for the just person who is unlucky or the persecuted person who is innocent. This is what Eliphaz says. This circle has no break: the principle of this perfection will never discover what is fallacious about it. The mimesis is too strong. Job can go on yelling to the end of time without making his friends or anyone else understand.
The generative principle cannot be subverted. As soon as anything appears that might uproot it or make it seem illusory – like the voice of Job proclaiming that he is a scapegoat – the mechanism of elimination is set in motion, either in a primitive physical form, as is shown in Job, or in a derived, attenuated and intellectualized form of which the thousand ways of disregarding what Job is saying provide excellent examples. The fact that every ‘system of representation’ closes in on itself is ultimately a result of the scapegoat mechanism.
The tendency to attribute society’s imperfections to scapegoats both within and without is certainly universal but, instead of discouraging and denouncing it, totalitarian societies foster and systematize it. They nourish with victims the myth of their own perfection, which they wish to promote.
All one needs to know about Mr. Thiel are some very simple things he himself has said.
I don´t know if you have read The Lord of the Rings (read, not watched a movie).
Thiel himself has said he wants to be Sauron from the books. He names his company Palantir – the seeing stone from the books, that Sauron the Dark Lord uses to communicate with his subordinates – anyone that uses the seeing stones has their mind open to Sauron to both see their thoughts and be commanded to do Saurons will.
If you have not read Lord of the Rings, you should. It tells quite well what kind of a world these people want to create.
Palantir (Thiels major company) produces a software suite used first by NSA, and now by intelligence agencies and police departments of several western countries to collate all data on people available from different sources. Used to see and control their behaviour. It is in use by at least NSA, CIA, the UK government – both intelligence agencies and it is also used by the NHS to collect all health data of the population. Norway also uses it, and currently he is trying to sell it to the German government.
Through Palantir, Thiel has a window into all major western nations through their intelligence services and police. What they know, Thiel knows.
Peter Thiel’s extremist anti-democratic politics make perfect sense when you understand he was literally raised by a father repeatedly fleeing the prospect of democratic rule, seeking sanctuary among American white supremacists who offered a future of racial exclusion through different mechanisms.
His father Klaus, born in Germany in 1938 (formative childhood years under Nazi rule), trained as a chemical engineer and married, before immigrating to the United States in 1968 with their one-year-old son Peter (born October 11, 1967 in Frankfurt). Klaus strategically pulled Peter away from Germany just as the student movement was forcing Germans to seriously confront their Nazi past. Klaus apparently moved away to actively prevent his son from receiving the kind of historical education that would prevent ideological transmission.
A pattern then emerges: Klaus fled Nazi Germany to hide in the heavily Nazi-influenced territory of southern Africa. That is to say, after Germany in 1967 was under pressure to end transmission of Nazism to Peter, Klaus relocates the family to an overtly racist enclave. They remained there only until eventually it too came under pressure to end transmission of Nazism, as majority rule approached in 1977.
Thiel is a fascist and a nazi who wants a return to feudalism and a world led by hyper rich lords like himself. It is not a secret and the people he backs are not people you want to be ruled over by.
I have not made up my mind on Thiel. I do not have an agenda issue but it’s being surveilled. My issue is what are they allowed to do with it. I read Project 2025 as well. I did not see anything in it that rung alarm bells. I agree with them on many points. We need to restructure the voting cycle and extend terms to eliminate the circus around them. Their idea to put all welfare programs under the purview of insurance companies anies makes sense as well. Of course certain provisions will be required.
We will need a mechanism to immediately remove an official from a position and we will need absolute transparency regarding their personal communications, finances and
relationships during their term. Ten year
terms for President sounds good. Of course I
also want all who desire any office to be thoroughly vetted and this includes an
ideological assessment. We simply will not
allow hardcore socialists to fill any position We are looking to preserve the positive aspects of
our way of life not transition to a collectivist one.
In regard to the insurance/welfare modifications it is likely that Gen X will be the last generation to receive Social Security as it currently exists. All others will be refunded what they have paid in and make the choice of how to invest it. Welfare, SNAP, state medical care etc will be paid for in two or three ways. People under 18 and those who did not choose or were unable to divert any of their lifetime earnings toward Crisis Preparation will be funded by another mechanism mentioned later. The rest will have decided what types and levels of coverage they desired when they became adults.
One funding mechanism will simply be repurposed. Asset seizure. All proceeds will now go into funding county insurance investment. Another mechanism will be that of business operation taxation. A certain percentage of revenue will go to the county to eliminate the need for petty citations, cyclical licensing fees, probation payments and land taxes on personal homes. Rental properties will be taxed. The stock market will require
modifications as well. A minimum investment term of one year will solve many issues at once. Financial institutions will be required to have their savings and checking account
interest accruement match their interest rate on loans.
A stable currency will be introduced that will carry a set and unalterable value of exchange. We also have more than enough data to determine universal business guidelines in the area of the valuation of goods and services. Set into that structure will be a limitation on the percentage of profit for the sale of that
product or service. This will be across the
board for all goods and services. Next the wage gap between the general staff and
management/owner will be rectified. No
position of the higher echelons will receive personal income that exceeds 3 times the
average low echelon employee and this includes benefits.
Real estate will undergo major changes. Personal homes will be limited to one. Any other real estate owned must be for rent or be required for the business structure. Inheritance will be heavily regulated. This will only affect those who are millionaire plus status. 50 percent will go to the county Treasury. A universal sales tax of 30 percent
will be the only tax on products/services.Anyone in the $100,000/year bracket will not pay the tax on
food.
District Attorneys will no longer use conviction rate as a marker for proficiency. All attorneys will be required to inform their clients that they are not there to prevent their punishment or obscure the facts to lessen the sting of justice. Their only purpose is to ensure fair and just
treatment during the legal process. Any attorney caught breaking that rule will receive the same sentence as their client should have
received.
All forms of political lobbying will be banned. Any representative of a foreign nation will not be allowed unsupervised access to any government official or employee at any time. Anonymous donations will also be banned. All voting will be fully transparent. Zero anonymous votes allowed. The county Sheriff will be considered the top dog but each Sheriff will also be a Federal official,not county. A county militia will be established receive compensation. The force is volunteer based but will receive a stipend of $2000 on July 4th of each year. They will require extensive background checks, character assessment and monthly training exercises Their duties will include community overwatch, crisis/emergency assistance and lending assistance to Sheriff upon request. Any significant entanglement will be compensated.
Lastly we will require that all NGOs or other style of organization that engages in social or political activism be shut down immediately and have all records, assets and communications seized pending investigation. This extends to the groups and individuals funding and organizing the operations.
In the Hypostasis, the story is about at least two intents at work, the Archons themselves with Adam as their failed experiment and Epinoia/Sophia Pistis who corrects the work by breathing life into him.
Assuming the intents are described accurately, one wonders which intent is behind which part of the epigenetic changes you described.
They are spread throughout the website. However, not all observations are in there. Some of my life experiences will be rather challenging for the average reader and involve things I may not be ready to disclose. Nothing extraordinarily outlandish, it will just have to come at the right time.
LOL @ “nothing extraordinarily outlandish”! From TES, “nothing extraordinarily outlandish” to the average reader would most likely be mind-blowing if even comprehensible (in my case at the least). Have you been able to formulate a shareable impression as to benevolent or adverse agency?
Both exist. However, the disagreement between those two agencies has existed long before mankind was around.
The official narrative from the FBI and the utterly inept Kash Patel is also not falling apart. A 30 06 would not have resulted in the kind of firearm injury that Charlie received, that kind of injury was the result of a smaller caliber firearm.
The Chosen, do you think your one of the chosen I think you are!! I’ve read your articles and they are far deeper then most can comprehend. I’ve known for years that God was going to “call upon me someday,” but the call become far greater than what I imagined. It had me thinking, if these events could be displayed, to make a visual or graph to demonstrate or clearly show—this cant be random, how many random things can one person have.. I’ts still coming together as”” I am on a road trip, per our Lord. Each day a new revolation. All my life, one disaster after another, one God thing after another, after another.. Is there a way to show in a visual, the sheer magnitude of coincidences? My purpose– to assist in the awakening of a Nation!
Before I had my nursing liscense,(1yr) Dr. Goldklang, a renowned oncologist(Atlanta) approached me out of nowhere. I was a student nurse working as an aide. He offered me an RN position, work under my license. He wanted me to mix, measure, administer chemo, and access, care for central lines. The reason he gave,,”It’s a God Thing”… It was!
You cross my mind when thinking of a graph yesterday. Then a few hours ago driving through Virgina, asking the Lord, OMG, you’ve got to be kidding, HOW .. One thing I have promised the Lord. I will stop behaving like ” the old me “”””and become the new. With courage and confidence because the Lord Jesus is with me. ” And for some reason, this is the first thing I found myself doing after stopping for the day. I am to tired to proof read, you will either know or you won’t. Sandy
Hi TES, well i got to thinking about the details you provided regarding occurrences of unknown person(s) trespassing on your property, perhaps damages, threats/harassment, and attempt to defame your good character…i am sure you are capable of performing many solutions yourself. However, just as an opinion, should these types of violations that breach possible safety/or property damages/reputation – you could consider a reputable third party such even just as a phone conversation, talk to Brian O’Shea, who is Naomi Wolf’s spouse. He in podcasts of his own, is amiable, intelligent, and has military experience and certainly we like to associate with other members of team humanity/freedom and truth. apologies in advance if this recommendation seems like overreach, but we live in most unusual times, and should your situation re property, etc. escalate, you would have that third party representation as your possible counsel, if needed as the countermeasure(s), that you may perhaps felt compelled to put into place. 💁♀️🧐🎖️💖- Sue
… maybe there is a plan ( out of several plans )
–
Robin Monotti https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1966540305588424783
“The Economist’s spin on the Big Pharma meds & Covid “vaccine” caused fertility crisis: depopulation is good!”
Sep. 12, 2025
–
“Leaders | Peak human”
Don’t panic about the global fertility crash https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/09/11/dont-panic-about-the-global-fertility-crash
“A world with fewer people would not be all bad”
Sep 11th 2025 (!)
… behind a paywall – however republished:
–
Don’t panic about the global fertility crash https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion-features/dont-panic-about-global-fertility-crash
Published Fri, Sep 12, 2025
… starting with Paul Ehrlich in his 1968 book The Population Bomb
–
Here we find the ones who “coined” the “crises”.
Overpopulation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation
… and the “father” in getting the term into an unreflected use for humans:
Paul R. Ehrlich https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich
with his book ” The Population Bomb” – 1968
… and the Club of Rome (black nobility) founded the same year – 1968 – by Italian industrialist Aurelio Peccei.
The Club of Rome – The Depopulation Club – and its Connection to the World Economic Forum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation
… with their publication “The Limits to Growth” – 1972
–
Once recogniced the world will look different because by then the “pandemic” is understood as a fabricated crime. ( as is the “virus” )
For your listening pleasure, suggest a drive in a small, fast expensive vehicle (i can pretend in my Lexus), place this loud. My oldest son was Navy, sir, and i heard him say often “mom, we’re the tip of the spear!” Thank you for your service in the Navy and for your wide ranging works that enlighten, delight and inform truth to us. 💖🙏🏻✝️ -Sue
How did you come to the conclusion that it was “the left” who murdered this man? If the shooter was an isolated individual with some motivation in mind, how does that affect the argument you are making?
The article explains that. “Violence against the apostate had already been rehearsed in rhetoric; the leap to the bullet was only its final, grotesque punctuation.” This was NOT an isolated individual. This person felt they had not only been given tacit permission, but a mandate to do this, by their righteous virtue club.
You cannot go on calling people Nazi’s, denigrating them, removing them from society/visibility, denying them rights, flaunting malevolent behavior as ‘normal,’ and favoring everyone but specific people and groups – because this is giving tacit permission to harm those persons.
There were protestors chanting “kill Charlie Kirk” throughout the event. This is just the latest step in a long process we have witnessed, and harmful are they who wander through life completely oblivious to what is going on in this regard.
Kirk died because he made a mistake: engaging in dialogue with the mentally ill. Admirable? Perhaps. Is he a martyr for free thought and dialectics? Certainly. But technically, he was wrong. Saint Michael doesn’t sit at the table with the devil, he stabs him. Until those who fight for the truth also begin to fight against evil, they may win battles, like Kirk, but they will lose the war.
I have come to the conclusion also, that the official narrative released by the FBI under the inept Kash Patel is bunk and laughably absurd. Even an amateur who has limited knowledge of ballistics knows that a 30 06 caliber round from rifle with a mounted scope could not have resulted in the kind of injury Charlie received.
I’m intrigued by the global male diversity bottleneck. I would imagine the strongest males survive and then “rescue” every fertile woman they come upon by taking them, which is how the women survive.
But you seem to suggest something different, which is that the cataclysm is predicted just ahead of time and that triggers the violence. How does that work? How do the early signs of this event spur a genocidal mania?
No, my supposition is the same as yours. Powerful kings, took with them their narrow Y-DNA household (sons, nephews) along with the entire array of mt-DNA wives, concubines, and servants that did not threaten their rule. This position was attained through violence, yes – but that has nothing to do with the culling that the flood imbued inside the Y- and mt- DNA signatures of humanity. Hence, only 1 of 20 Y-DNA lineages survived, while more like 8 of 20 mtDNA lineages survived.
First time reader and commenter. Your hypothesis is intriguing and warrants further investigation. However, I have some concerns I’m hoping you can address:
Regarding the IPGP/CNRS simulation, you posit that “the jets of heat originate from the Delta T (ΔT) transition boundary from HCP-FCC/BCC eruptive sloughing”. However, according to my searches, the pressure at the inner-outer core boundary is estimated to be around 330 GPa, above even the upper-end estimate for the triple point of γ, ε, liquid iron of 280 GPa (Gemini). How can HCP iron undergo a phase transition to FCC/BCC iron under these conditions?
Based on my understanding of the IPGP paper, the simulations are pure fluid dynamics simulations, with the only contributions from the inner core being its physical presence in deflecting the fluid motion, and latent heat and lighter element release from crystallization at the boundary, modeled via constant codensity flux. Given that the simulation does not model the inner core microstructure, instead simplifying it to an electrically insulating object, don’t the geostrophic jets arise from the magnetohydrodynamics alone, and not necessarily due to microstructure change at the inner-outer core boundary? (Though I do understand the formation of these jets is caused by, or increased by, weakened magnetic field due to inner core lattice disruptions).
Wouldn’t HCP iron that is shed from the inner core due to its reshaping nearly instantly melt into liquid iron (assuming outer core conditions Gemini gave me of pressure between 135 to 330 GPa, and temperature between 4,000 to 6,000K are correct)?
Is a mass transfer even necessary in this hypothesis? Can’t temperature conveyance between core and mantle be explained by more frequent geostrophic jets, increased outer core flow kinetic energy (up to 10 times according to Schaefer study), increased friction at the core-mantle boundary (CMB), etc.? Similarly, can’t angular momentum transference be accomplished by net effects of increased friction at CMB, Lorentz decoupling, and enhanced topological coupling effects (between outer core fluid movement direction and outer rotational body) produced by faster fluid flow?
Your geoid annotations are quite suspect. Based on the latest EGM2008 data, I have created an interactive 3D geoid visualization that can be viewed here: https://hkanwal.com/geoid/. The depicted axes are calculated by me using the EGM2008 Stokes coefficients and measured moment of inertia factor of 0.3307. They corroborate scientific consensus that the polar axis is the maximum inertia axis, and not the intermediate axis as you claim. In fact, the calculation for this is relatively straightforward, given the inputs (geopotential model and inertia factor) are correct. Are you able to explain this vital discrepancy?
Based on the above observations, I propose an alternate hypothesis and flip mechanism:
Earth’s magnetic field weakens due to cyclic deformation of the inner core causing weakening of its structural integrity.
Outer core kinetic energy is increased, translating to high heat conveyance to mantle, as well as angular momentum transference, via mechanisms outlined above. (This also increases inner-outer core friction, further exacerbating inner core structural weakening).
Outer rotational body (mantle + crust) attempts to re-align the orientation of its spin axis with its principal inertial axes, which are independent from those of the inner core (their net gives us the observed principal inertial axes of entire planet). This occurs because a body rotating on a non-principal axis will experience precession. Given the magnetic field strength decreases partially, and not completely, some electromagnetic coupling effect will remain.
Gemini’s opinion:
Given that a complete decoupling is projected to cause a catastrophic True Polar Wander (TPW) event and significant surface displacement, it is a reasonable inference that a partial decrease in the magnetic field would cause a proportional, though likely less severe, form of the same phenomenon. The weakened electromagnetic coupling would partially unmask the mantle’s intrinsic asymmetry, allowing its mass distribution to exert a greater influence on the planet’s rotation. This would cause a gradual shift in the planet’s rotational axis relative to the mantle, which would be observed at the surface as a form of True Polar Wander.
Let me know what you think of this. I think this alternate, non-Dzhanibekov driven mechanism looks promising. I will continue pursuing it and let you know if it yields any results.
Plan for further investigation:
Investigate principal rotational axes of outer rotational body, independent of inner core. Using PREM to integrate over mantle mass, incorporating LLSVP detected density anomalies and estimated density surplus versus rest of mantle, could be a feasible method.
Determine whether derived axes, under predicted TPW decreased magnetic field strengths, yield surface rotational motion consistent with observations presented by ECDO.
Further investigation into whether direct mass transference between inner and outer rotational bodies is indeed not necessary.
1.–4. All valid points, Hark. Let me reflect on the revised wording regarding the IC/OC boundary. At present, the phase transition should be placed at the D″ layer rather than the IC/OC boundary, correct. What you flagged may simply be a remnant of an earlier formulation I was using. That said, the crystalline lattice structure and phase state of the outer core still require further study before we can issue any definitive conclusions. For now, I treat these as open placeholders within the hypothesis. I prefer not to define the model so narrowly at this stage that it risks being dismissed for minor mechanistic details that remain unsettled. This is a groundbreaking novel paradigm and petition for hypothesis/plurality under Ockham’s Razor – and as such, cannot possibly be 100% correct out of the box. Nor can any modification be certified as such. I state this in the opening of the article.
5. I love the geoid visualization. The primary departure between your three-axis model and mine lies in the specific geographic placement of the intermediate axis. I deliberately routed it through 𝑁𝑝′ to avoid confusing the reader about where a potential new rotational axis would reside. In my model, the polar axis is not the maximum inertia axis. Consensus rests on the default reasoning: “it must be, because that is the axis around which Earth spins.” The whole purpose of a novel hypothesis is to challenge default consensus, which fails to elegantly explain historic phenomena. By contrast, under ECDO Theory the maximum inertia corresponds to the LLVP light axis, since the lateral density lobes exert a stronger control on inertia than the equatorial bulge alone.
Gemini Commentary: I disagree with Gemini’s portrayal of decoupling as a continuous function. There is no inherent mechanism that guarantees true polar wander would unfold slowly. In fact, the boundary-lubricating effect of the phase-change sloughing can happen very quickly in theory. The global inundation record argues against Gemini’s assumption: events such as the 4400 BCE flood, the Younger Dryas onset, and major meltwater pulses 1A and 1B point to punctuated hydrological shocks that a gradualist model cannot adequately accommodate. Gemini’s inference of a slow transition confuses a precursor (dipole weakening) with the governing mechanism. The evidence from both inundations and geomagnetic excursions indicates that Earth’s system maintains stability until latent energy forces a rapid reorganization. In this light, the decline in magnetic moment is better understood as a warning signal, not the timeline itself.
I think your steps 1, 2, and 3 make a great deal of sense. That said, I am not certain we currently possess sufficiently resolved differential mass measurements to isolate the crust–mantle moments on their own. Perhaps such data do exist? My hypothesis, however, rests specifically on the mantle–crust moments, not on the full whole-Earth inertia tensor set represented in Exhibit J2a. That is purposed for explanation, not constraining premise or mechanical modeling.
Ethical Skeptic, I love your work. I must notify you that nothing like the quotation from Strabo is found at the cited location, nor anywhere else in the eight volumes of his Geography. You can verify with a text search here: https://archive.org/details/Strabo08Geography17AndIndex/Strabo%2001%20Geography%201-2/. It will strengthen your case if you address this point.
Crap, it looks as though I have been a willing victim of ChatGPT-5’s hallucinations and/or mis-programming. I originally derived this quote from ChatGPT’s summary of Jones’ work. But did not go Paragraph 33 myself and double check. Even now, ChatGPT insists that the quote exists:
“This is a faithful rendering of how Strabo described the Pyramid of Khafre in Geography Book XVII, chapter 1, section 33.
Strabo indeed notes that near the summit, part of the surface still retains the outer casing stone, meaning some of the original smooth limestone facing remains in situ.
ResearchGate, +7 YouTube +10 Penelope +10 PBS +3 Apollo Magazine +3 Reddit +3.
Therefore, yes—the quoted translation is accurate, reflecting Strabo’s account that, in his day, remnants of the original casing remained near the top of Khafre’s pyramid.”
Possibly, one of these sources cited by ChatGPT, fabricated the recitation. Nonetheless, I should have gone there and checked it myself.
Thanks for the assitance and alert on this,
TES
P.S. I replaced this with a passage quotation and analysis from the succeeding paragraph 34, which is much stronger in terms of evidence, if not deductive inference. It was sitting there all along after all. :-)
Thanks again, for another critically important observation with regard to the Khufu pyramid’s relieving chamber markings. Your observation of the inversion of the “Year 13” and “Year 6” markings, along with the impossible speed of assembly implied by the dates, betray that the author of these glyphs, again, had no training in engineering and construction. He placed what sounded good to his mind, but what suggests forgery to expert outsiders.
You write: “8. Finally, the inscriptions in Lady Arbuthnot’s Chamber were deliberately laid over preexisting iron oxide ‘shadow-like’ hieroglyphs already present on the stone surfaces. So intent was the forger on creating the illusion of an older, underlying script that he consistently overlaid the forged inscriptions atop these purported remnants (see Exhibit A2b to the right).”16
I have written a new paper regarding these newly discovered ‘quarry marks’ presented by Dr Hawass on Matt Beale’s youtube podcast in July 2025.
As I expected, these ‘newly discovered’ painted markings make absolutely no sense whatsoever and, if anything, offers additional support to the forgery theory of the markings in these chambers.
Mr. Stone recently suggested an ECDO periodicity of 12.9kya in “Unshattered Sands” at nobulart.com. Your provisional timeline has been exploring 5.2 to 6.4ky intervals contemplating a relation to the variance in the Great Year. Other writers exploring cataclysms have postulated varying timelines, some even making predictions. Have you found any of the recent objective data points, e.g. JPL EOP, seismic intensities, or heat flux, to be of value in refining your view of the ECDO situation status? I reckon no historical data to evaluate whether accretion is modifying in such a way to stave off the oscillation….
I have not found any current evidence, aside from maybe the geomagnetic excursion underway, to help refine an interval for this event, no. Right now, I can only cite that it happened at either the 14,800 mark, the YD boundary, and/or the 4400 BCE mythological timeframe.
(The least-dense axis of an otherwise symmetrical spinning sphere is the axis with maximum moment of inertia I3. The densest axis is the axis with minimum moment of inertia I1.)
The GRACE gravity anomalies are not relative to a sphere. They are relative to a flattened sphere. The anomalies are too small and variable to allow inference of an axis through southern Africa with a larger moment of inertia than that of Earth’s current rotational axis.
Earth’s equatorial radius is 6378km [10.1029/RF001p0032]. Earth’s polar radius is 6357km. If TPW occurs abruptly, then the oceans, being far less viscous than the mantle and crust, redistribute due to centrifugal force so as to reapproach these values. A TPW of 104deg would increase the depth of the current Arctic Ocean by up to ~20km and would cover Antarctica with up to ~20km of water, if that much water were available. A TPW of 1deg along the 31st meridian east suffices to alter the eastern Mediterranean sea level by ~200m. A TPW of 1.5deg along the 14th meridian west, for example, would as well.
Dan, good catch! You are correct. I used semantics to distinguish these moments and not the principle of mass vs inertia, and had the terms reversed. Corrected, thanks!
Regarding point 2 – yet the rotation did happen, in exactly this manner I frame in this article. I am assembling deductive concomitance, not linear induction. If this was based upon linear induction, I would never have published this. One can prove or disprove anything through linear induction, especially in a low-knowledge domain like core and mantle mass distribution.
Point 3 – we do not know how the viscoelastic mantle reacts to such rotation – and that is the reason I have bristled at attempts to identify the higher and lower ground in State 2. All we know is, Khafre shows a sustained 576 ft oceanic water mark. I have to stay with the deductive critical path on that.
Point 2 – I think I should have written “… too small and variable to lend much support to an axis …”. Sorry about that.
Point 3 – You have convinced me of the Khafre 576ft oceanic water mark*. An alternative cause could be two 1-2deg TPWs.
(* I am thankful for that and your entire website.)
In a discussion board, I expressed skepticism at the official HIV/AIDS narrative. One person thought he was refuting my arguments by quoting “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. I wondered, which is the extraordinary claim? The official narrative, or the (in effect) null hypothesis.
The transgenerational effects observed focus on children born of vaccinated mothers. Is there any anaylsis that would speak to the transmission to child by the father?
I heard it posited by Ray Peat that the same mechanism that replicates the mrna payload could travel to the gonads and deliver the mrna through plasmids in or amongst the sperm to the conceived child. Hopefully not true but it should be straightforward to detect if it is or not.
For the last few years, I’ve found the story of Jesus querying his disciples regarding his perceived identity (Matthew 16) useful to communicate a definition of faith.
When he says to Simon/Peter, ‘Blessed are you…for flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven…on this rock I will build my church*’, I see this as saying, essentially, ‘When God reveals something to a man’s heart, nobody can take it from them’, i.e. ‘Faith is…the evidence of things not seen’. However, in my day-to-day life, I find that ‘trust’ serves me most faithfully as a personally meaningful synonym for the word.
Re. your 1st footnote, Paul claims he went into hiding for 3 years to wrestle with the significance of his conversion. Over time, I’ve wrestled with his writings and over time my increasing sense is that Paul is greatly misunderstood, largely through the misrepresentation of his teachings by those I would broadly define as Calvinist — an ~ism I’ve come to believe has been the most destructive theological force in Christianity for centuries, and terribly ‘looshy’ to boot.
Paul writes, in Galatians 5, “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free”.
I have included this piece in my blog post today, “Untangling The Truth” https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/untangling-the-truth
It has been mentioned thricely in the comments section of The Automatic Earth.
I saw another well known Substack had picked it up, too.
I admit that my mathematical abilities are limited. But possible long-term phenomena like this are exactly what I have been fearing all along. I seriously hope that it will not be as bad as it could possibly be imagined. Thank you for your determined reporting, TES!
Thank You, again, Sir Skeptic. The clotting problems in the maternal circulation, placenta, and the transplacental conveyance of components of mRNA “vaccine” products, and the resultant proteins created after these products entered cells to induce protein (“spike”) production, have caused vascular harm and clotting in mothers, placentas and babies. Miscarriages were so obvious as to just release pregnant women from study follow-up.
See this, please: Red Alert Issued as Fibrous Clots Found in Young Children of COVID-Vaxxed Mothers https://www.globalresearch.ca/fibrous-clots-young-children-covid-vaxxed-mothers/5898278
Not sure whether “clotting problems” means too much clotting or too little. If it’s the former, I wonder whether Lumbrokinase might help. A fibrinolytic enzyme, it reduces blood viscosity. TES is familiar with it, so I’m curious about his thoughts. I have vaxxed daughters – one getting married soon.
I tried lumbrokinase and did not feel good on it. I stayed with black seed oil, nattokinase, and serrapeptase, which alleviated my rosacea (which is a micro clotting disorder). So I stuck with that.
I nominate The Ethical Skeptic for Nobel Peace Prize. All the world political grandstanding about Ukraine, the EU, and Russia, etc. – in my humble opinion, the War has politely laid out in TES’s informative and shocking article presenting charts/explainers that should make us have sleep deprivation. Here, we can see the projection, the war is in the here and now, and a forever limp going forward. Put this on the cover of every major newspaper rag immediately. No One Is Talking About This, Share Widely. Make people uncomfortable. I have. – S.
What was missing was “shedding,” already proven by several scientific articles, which is the transmission of infection from vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated individuals.
Let me introduce:
OVERVIEW OF FERTILITY IMPACTS OF THE COVID VACCINES https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/overview-of-fertility-impacts-of
Dr. Colleen Huber – Feb 10, 2025
–
Rates of successful conceptions according to COVID-19 vaccination status: Data from the Czech Republic https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251353384
Vibeke Manniche, Tomáš Fürst, Max Schmeling, Jonathan D Gilthorpe and Peter Riis Hansen https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251353384
First published online June 19, 2025 ( related to the “peer reviewed” issue )
–
And an article to it.
Net Zero: The Mystery of the Falling Fertility https://brownstone.org/articles/net-zero-the-mystery-of-the-falling-fertility/
By Tomas Fürst July 8, 2025
… yes – Tomáš Fürst !
–
Here the “dystopia” announced:
The Children of Men – P.D. James https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/41913.The_Children_of_Men
First published January 1, 1992
“Told with P. D. James’s trademark suspense, insightful characterization, and riveting storytelling, The Children of Men is a story of a world with no children and no future. The human race has become infertile, and the last generation to be born is now adult. Civilization itself is crumbling as suicide and despair become commonplace. Oxford historian Theodore Faron, apathetic toward a future without a future, spends most of his time reminiscing. Then he is approached by Julian, a bright, attractive woman who wants him to help get her an audience with his cousin, the powerful Warden of England. She and her band of unlikely revolutionaries may just awaken his desire to live . . . and they may also hold the key to survival for the human race.”
–
Bill Gates at the TED 2010 – Innovating to Zero!
incl. the transcript: https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/transcript
… an excerpt:
“This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
04:16 (Laughter)
04:17
That’s back from high school algebra. But let’s take a look.
04:21
First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3 …. .” ….
–
As said – announced: “reproductive health care services” …
Might this data be confounded with increases in immigration (any type) over the same time period, and the bringing in of different illnesses/conditions? If so, do you have an estimate of how much of this increase could be caused by the immigration? Is citizen status used in your queries?
Immigration does not cause an inflection. It is a generational trend, and shows in Chart 1 anyway as a DILUTION, not a boost (which still inflects independently of any immigration factor).
This is incredibly bad news. I remember very early in the vaccine rollout when the risks were just beginning to be apparent (I think it was in relation to an article showing Lewy Body formation in vitro), you posted on Twitter something to the effect of “If this does not do catastrophic harm it will be because we got lucky.” Unfortunately, we didn’t get lucky.
I wish I could personally present this article to Senator Cassidy and the other people who show their blinding ignorance by claiming that these injections saved millions of lives. SO many ordinary people were fooled, but MDs or people with medical science degrees have no excuse.
“…those who neither contracted Covid-19 nor ever received an mRNA injection…”
Note that babies are typically vaccinated from the moment they are born with a troubling catalog of non-mRNA concoctions from the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule, a practice that very likely compounds the problem.
We’ve had decades of experience that would have alerted anyone who was paying attention that we should be doing “rigorous epidemiological tracking” of the effects of these shots. Has it been done? (rhetorical question).
The firmly entrenched belief that vaccines are safe, effective and necesssary (except for certain medical exemptions that came to light only after the proven harms were too egregious to ignore) will not be challenged under the prevailing cognitive bias that permeates our society.
Please note the role of school districts in ensuring that the 72-dose guideline is enforced, via school clinics and nurses. This compliance mandate is extremely high priority in the function.
That vertical line in Figure 1 appears to coincide with the early days of COVID in the USA (early 2020), and not with the mass rollout of mRNA injections in early 2021. Am I reading it wrong?
Is there data determining what age we are witnessing the 77% increase? Does it appear to be increasing as the chart implies? Thank you for this critical information. If anyone knows of someone tracking such data, could you please share the source?
I ran a single-year sensitivity analysis by dropping the oldest year in the group (age 5) since that only overlapped with the vaccine a little. The differential was negligible. So this fingers the 0-4 group heavily, with the most persistent increase in the first two years after the shot rolled out. A heavier move towards winter deaths (heart, pulmonary, and respiratory) in years 3 and 4.
With overwhelming graditude for the data you provide. My daughter-in-law with one Pfizer (lot # high rx) almost died with first child, second child a planned C-section. Oldest child female, extremely bright; however, i sense a disruption within her, an unease she cannot explain. Second child is behind developmentally (small) however appears intellectually. normal. Are you able to provide ages, cause of deaths in these children? Are seemingly healthy children, like we are witnessing in athletes, dying suddenly with cardiac issues and turbo cancers? I am an RN from Vermont who sounded the alarm early, loosing my licence. It appears after reading this article, my bigest nightmare has come true.
I should research before asking but it’s late — common sense (mine) analyzing the chart, if the effects were immediate, we would see the chart leveling off as time passes, as these children age, passing a danger zone. The steady climb indicates, the children are dying at alarming numbers –as they age, too! Your connections between cognitive dissonance, hypoxia, and ideological imprinting in the context of spike protein effects is evident, however, the masses cannot see. The question how to reach those effected? Especially when they cannot see the devastating future that lies ahead. Our only hope — wake up to our full potential, reclaim our sovernity, and take back what they are attempting to steal. Thank you for the reply. It means more than you can image– in a world gone crazy and now alone– for being the crazy one!! Much love and joy
Re: AI Flounder stuff: ‘others’ appear to be attempting to communicate with ‘us’ via Crop Circles; with TPTB floundering in their refutation of it’s reality.
Here’s an AI chat I had recently that discussed the ongoing decreasing radio signal of the Earth, sensor sensitivities, our radio bubble, changing technologies in regards to quietening our signal, and a few juicy ‘conspiratorial’ imaginings at the end.
I followed the logic of your more recent post on this, and then I had to check on the veracity of the starting graphic. I’ve come to some rather disturbing conclusions that I don’t wish to, but must consider as to the nature of our society and our world.
Last night I did a detailed check of the graphics as I was wondering if there was any sort of pattern to the use of the first DNA letter. I didn’t use your broken image supplied above but went with the second two letters and the number of nuclei to determine the first letters.
I came up with much like you, each line based on your 2nd letter order
G T A/C (the AC could be in a different order)
G A T C
G T A C
G C A T
Of note is the use of G as the first letter for each vertical 2nd letter column. Hmm.. All STARTing with G which is the 2nd letter grouping containing the START code.
Also of note is the order for the C and G grouping can be the same. Are these additional coincidences in this image of intent?
Going through this detailed did give me the odd dream of somehow being able to save the world by spelling words correctly….go figure!
It’s the Dark Forest of risk management currently. “Risk of meeting a bigger fish are so low that we don’t need to worry about the impacts assessment, Hollywood can do that part”
Your writing also reinforces the point: the probability of us finding a bigger fish is astronomically lower than the probability of a bigger fish finding us first without us even knowing.
Divorcing the biological imperative(s) is a complex idea requiring much thought. There could be benefits in the context of what you discuss, yet it is hard baked into who and what we are, who knows what this untethering might lead to.
CRISPR and Neuralink : < We are here already. I think cinema has done a decent job in terms of the movies depicting a split humanity, the modified and unmodified. This in my opinion is an inevitable phase of such changes, and those times will be dark.
Are there any articles on female fertility and the Covid vaccines to show to a soon-marrying 29 year old daughter with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who subscribes to the New York Times and actually believes it? Internet searches for effects of the vax on fertility unsurprisingly all return “move along, nothing to see here…” Several years ago it seemed that the best-documented data on the effects of the mRNA vaccines came out of Denmark and Japan – presumably less “captured” by the pharma companies. I’ve heard that ivermection and lumbrokinase might help PCOS. Any reason to believe that? THANKS
I have head of reports and studies showing declines in fertility; however have not documented any myself. The California birth rate rebounded after the Lockdown drop. But it is still too early to see for sure.
As far as post-Vax syndrome – my course would be nattokinase, ivermectin, and serrapeptase. But as far as dosage and frequency – you will have to look that up from qualified medical professionals (who are not captured by the system)…
The number of loud gamma–neutron “nuclear claxon” signals is probably closer to 520 from atmospheric tests, as detecting the characteristic prompt signals from underground tests is challenging even on the surface of the earth.
It is deeply disconcerting whatever the number. Those unmistakable signals began 80 years ago and lasted for 18 years. The nature of the signals would convey intent and potential danger.
Your Flounder Theorem is appealing but only if there exists a technologically advanced civilization somewhere in the universe.
Mankind is not synonymous with civilization but I have always found Loren Eiseley’s observation about us to be an elegant one: “But nowhere in all space or on a thousand worlds will there be men to share our loneliness. […] Nevertheless, in the nature of life and in the principles of evolution we have had our answer. Of men elsewhere, and beyond, there will be none forever.”
“However, I also find it hard to believe that a flood of such magnitude — as evidenced by these undeniable erosion patterns — could have occurred within the last 4500 years without being more prominently recorded in history, beyond the accounts of Noah’s Flood or the Sumerian Epic of Utinapishtim”–to comport with the timeline, is the 4500 years as stated intended, or was 4500 BCE, or ‘within the last 6500 years’ meant instead? Your work & self-lessness is superlative and so appreciated.
Steve, this is an argument against a worldwide inundation having occurred after the Fourth Dynasty of Egypt, which would ostensibly explain erosion marks on the pyramids, even though they were buit in 2500 BCE (in the Narrative). It is an intro to the next sentence which reads: “It seems more plausible that this event took place far earlier than our documented history, or what has been permitted to be recorded.” That is the compliment to the syllogism.
Ocean bottom as heat source seems to be mostly dismissed just because the water down there is cold. But conveyor can move and pile heat, even while it is cold, like fluid of an AC pump.
Article figures are much improved since I last checked in. Great work!
I don’t know just yet Patrick. I wish I could venture a guess or have something to insist upon – but we are flying blind on this first generational effect. :-(
i like the 7-31-25 set of useful terms/phrases to describe i assume alluding to the present, such as “where are we at now?” further, i opened up that email from you as i’m on your mailing list, but i saw it AFTER i revisited this morning one of old favorite videos explaining the nonsense, an interview of David Martin in one of earlier German Investigative Committee’s questions about all the early shenanigans re patents going back to early 2000’s, the players, the nuances of intentions, plunder capitalism to be forthcoming, etc. It is long, mostly in English (the all English version has missing elements – i don’t speak German, but i loved the added guests of notoriety).
thanks for all you do. my IQ is only 120-125, when i sat in the late ’80’s for the MENSA proctored exam, and felt after that, well cool. unexpected. but here in the Twin Cities back then their social gatherings were meeting at an Irish Pub, playing chess, and was a scene of a 1 visit that gives cheer but they were not using their brains!
anyway, me dummy in the advanced group enjoy life unvaxxed and happy!
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23:399. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04237-1
The COVID-19 pandemic increased the incidence of newly diagnosed cancers: evidence from a large cohort study in Southern Italy
This recent study shows an increase in cancer cases in Italy since beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, which they speculate may be due to oncogenicity of the virus. No mention of vaccines in this article!
Hi, i apologize if i sound stupid, but the ‘cancer – 20 years’, ‘all cause mortality- 25 years’, etc what is that actually indicating? Is that -everyone- in that age group will have cancer in 20 years, or the proportion will be so high that there won’t be enough people to work?
All things are a system. Systems do not need 90+% of their components to fail, in order for the system itself to fail. This means that so many people will be unable to work, because of autoimmune diseases, disability, cancer, etc. that we will not have the acumen and workforce necessary to sustain our high-demand aspects of society. Just as when a nation collapses because a certain percent of its public official are corrupt – even so, its infrastructure will collapse when a certain percentage of the workforce is getting paid, but is unable to perform in the critical jobs. Very much like a 3rd world nation. You cannot ship anything, no police, no hospitals, empty grocery stores, poverty. Just violent gangs and those who are not in their membership, intimidated into submission.
Hello TES,
Thank you for all your work on both Covid and ECDO.
It is very concerning to see such a significant excess mortality, with no signs of it slowing down.
I had thought the risk of these issues passing on would be much lower if vaccination during pregnancy was avoided, but your graph shows that even after 2021 and 2022—when vaccine uptake was still quite high and many pregnant women were vaccinated—there appears to be a persistence of vaccine effects in the body 2 to 3 years after the last dose.
Do you have any data that cross-checks whether these excess deaths occurred in individuals who were vaccinated against Covid? If so, what percentage were vaccinated?
I’m not sure about the vaccine uptake for this age group, but according to ChatGPT:
2021: No data available since the vaccine was not yet authorized, so the number is likely very small.
2022: Approximately 9% had received at least one dose.
2023: Approximately 20% had received at least one dose.
2024: Approximately 6.7% had received at least one dose. This 6.7% seems unusual, as it’s surprising that the cohort of children aged 6 months to 5 years changed so much to affect this statistic.
If I recall correctly, the Covid vaccine was added to the childhood immunization schedule in February, so I expected to see an inflection point in the data around that time.
Sebastian, no they are meticulously avoiding publishing any differential data on vaccinated vs unvaccinated with regard to mortality. I believe this 0 to 5 year-old impact came as the result of the mothers being vaccinated, even prior to conception, and not a result of the infants themselves being vaccinated. That is what makes this chart more concerning than any I have published to date. TES
Aún trato de asimilar toda esta información, me siento helado ante la situación actual. Tales declaraciones que de forma inherente sopesan la malevolencia de estas cosas que nos gobiernan. Sin intención de tomarlos en cuenta como formas del género humano, ya que inhumanamente y de forma silenciosa cuán humillante, se han encargado de mutilar nuestros sentidos y de aniquilar nuestras esperanzas. La mayor barbarie jamás cometida, tengo 20 años, con muchas ganas de vivir, de disfrutar a mis seres queridos, de querer verlos bien, con deseos de un mundo mejor, más justo, más integro. Pero me siento atormentado por lo real, por las agendas ocultas, por las injusticias y de lo cuán pequeño me siento ante tales decisiones que afectan e infectan nuestras vidas. Mi familia se ha vacunado contra COVID, yo también (dos dosis de Pfizer). No hay forma de describir lo arrepentido que me siento, por fortuna no tuve ninguna pérdida, sin embargo, gente linda y querida si los tuvo, perdiendo a sus madres, abuelos, tíos. Tantas lagrimas que se pudieron haber evitado, tanto sufrimiento que se pudo haber impedido. Existe una frase que dice “No gods or Kings, only man” tanta verdad, pues solo el hombre es el único capaz de hacer infierno lo que puede ser el cielo. Como hombre vacunado, me siento preocupado ¿cómo puedo reducir el efecto de la vacuna a corto o largo plazo? ¿Aún hay esperanza? Saludos desde México, aquí estaremos resistiendo.
The only protocols I have seen on X for treating the vaccine effects are nattokinase, serrapeptase, black seek oil, and ivermectin. But I cannot say whether or not these work. I hope that helps? I would search X and see what the latest advice from physicians indeed is.
I’d add Serrapeptase with the Nattokinse – they are dynamite in combo. Not covid vexed but have another vaccine injury and had a nasty bout of covid in January 2020, and the combination on an empty stomach cleans up the body – you can feel it working.
12,000 FU per day of nattokinase and 5000 IU per day of vitamin-D3 would be a good starting point for those who are not on blood thinners or other medicines that would make this problematic. Peter McCullough MD has blog posts on this.
we will need people on the land living in ecovillages, farming, gardening, crafts like Camphiill Villages/ Steiner villages. beautiful life not high tech.
Hi, here is a french hypothesis. You might find it interesting as I did.
youtu.be/kbHf1r3WnfE
He has multiple interesting videos among others. You won’t waste much time if not convinced. Maybe it is better to start with the last ones.
youtube.com/@superlutin93
This graph should send chills down the spine of every human being who comprehends it.
Gen V probably began in 1984 (if not sooner) with the creation of the Childhood Vaccine Schedule by the WHO. Intramuscular injection of any combination of substances intended to augment a developing infant’s immune system is inherently risky and ill-advised, but it’s considered unacceptable to challenge this deeply entrenched and profitable control system.
Your previous articles have identified two subsets of Gen V — the Never Never Land and the Betrayed. This post adds another subset — those Born of the mRNA Vax.
My one granddaughter was conceived before my daughter got the shots – the second one afterwards. Knowing that females are born with all the eggs they’re ever going to have I worry about something I cannot fix.
Maybe I’ll live long enough to see it’s no big deal. I remember asking at the time how we could possibly know this isn’t the next Thalidomide – but the propaganda was too intense – and I came off as a crazy person.
Perhaps – in regard to your previous post – our DNA can withstand the pathetic machinations of mere men.
Hello! I had very close friends, two “world-renown” pulmonologists, publish a paper on COVID and lung cancer only 14 months into the pandemic. They put their 18 yo son’s name on the paper, whom I basically raised with my son while they were off attending conferences for most of his childhood. Here’s the thing: they weren’t working on anything during this time–I know this for a fact. She was starting a new job at a University Hospital in another state and he was playing the stock market at home-and day drinking–I also know this because I tried to make him come to AA meetings with me–and the son was off doing regular freshman year in the midwest. The only reason I found this article is because as a fellow academic I got one of those “alerts”-the “hey your friend so and so just published this article at JAMA” sort of thing. The husband would get wasted and talk about how much money he was going to make once the vaccine came out. It was a macabre situation. I always had a suspicion he was a bloodline phoney. The wife has never so much as admitted anything but no longer calls me. Luckily, I had been terribly iatrogenically injured with cancer treatments so I was not going to take that vaccine. But this situation just made me realize that half of what I used to laugh at is probably absolutely true.
Horrible situation. Much of humanity moves like this behind the scenes. Our institutions provide a nice facade and cover for our foibles. And that is all fine, until you kill millions of people. Then the game becomes much more serious. They belong in prison.
Yes, it hurt my heart so much at that time. I am hardened in ways I don’t like right now, and as a parent of children born at the turn of the century–whom I protected from this Covid vaxx–but whom I also know were injured via “legal vaccination”–one child had seizures for years two hours and onward after her “well child” visit.–I weep for these kids. (The other developed allergies when he got his adolescent series.) I am on alert every day.
Robert’s paradigm THE POLITICS OF ECONOMIC CONTRACTION Foreword
The great fact of our times – “everywhere visible, nowhere acknowledged” – is the ending and reversal of economic growth.
In Henry’s paradox, we looked at some of the implications for business of this inflexion from economic expansion into contraction.
Our interest here is in the politics of economic decline. The Robert of our title is Victorian politician Robert Lowe, and his paradigm is that whatever happens in politics is a function of trends in economic conditions.
These are issues which wholly transcend both party politics and the politics of personality.
There are already children with cancer and some of them born with cancer. Have you seen the PSA’s for St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital. It’s pretty bad. We need to do better. We need to push MAHA hard and stop killing our children and everyone else. I put it to you that all diseases are preventable and/or curable. I cured my own cardiovascular condition (PAD). See my book on Amazon, How I Cleared the Plaque Out of My Arteries.
I know you’re not a fan of AI search (with good reason), but all I am finding regarding the HCP to FCC reaction says it’s endothermic.
I browsed through the references, though perhaps not exhaustively.
The reason I’m asking is because though the core is exhibiting exothermic behavior – no doubt – this detail forces me to look to another source for the internal heat, even going as far as, for example, wondering if we have some enormous neutrino storm hitting us (and the other solar system planets as they exhibit never-seen phenomena like the saturnian 30-year recurring storm appearing 10 years earlier).
When iron transitions from a high-pressure hexagonal close-packed (HCP) structure (stable in the inner core) to a lower-pressure body-centered cubic (BCC) or face-centered cubic (FCC) form (more stable in the mantle), heat is released.
Why Heat is Released:
Phase Transition and Latent Heat
The HCP structure is denser and requires higher enthalpy to maintain under extreme pressure. When iron ascends to a region of lower pressure, the transition to a more open (lower-density) structure releases the latent heat of the phase change—similar to how freezing releases latent heat even as temperature drops.
Gravitational Potential Energy
Movement of iron from the dense core towards the mantle involves a change in gravitational potential. As the metal decompresses, part of the energy associated with its compressed state is liberated as thermal energy.
Magneto-Crystalline and Electronic Effects
At core pressures, iron’s electron spin states (high-spin vs. low-spin) are stabilized differently than at lower pressures. Shifts in these states can further release energy during decompression, adding to the net heat release.
Magnitude of Heat
This process is nontrivial. The latent heat of iron’s phase transitions under core conditions is significant (estimated at tens of kJ/mol). In the context of mantle-core mass transfer events (e.g., large-scale upwellings or core-mantle boundary instabilities), this can contribute meaningfully to localized thermal anomalies.
Implication
Such a mechanism could explain thermal pulses or hotspots (e.g., Large Igneous Province events) where metallic iron or Fe-rich compounds migrate upward, decompress, and release stored energy in the form of heat.
You do not have before you an accurate model of the gravitational forces within the planet. The conventional meme; gravity stems from the centre of the planet and pulls everything towards it; is entirely wrong. It has been demonstrated that when we fully accept the action of Newton’s third law regarding the effects of equal and opposite forces along the same line, (across the full diameter of the planet, that they meet at the centre and have to accept the existence of the equal and opposite force applied against to opposite force from the surface); then while gravity is indeed towards the centre at the surface; at the centre of the mass of the planet, gravity is towards the surface. Indeed, that the entire gravitational force of the surface is concentrated at the point of equilibrium at the centre; towards the surface as opposed force in every direction towards the surface. As such I suspect that your assumption that the inner core is Iron may need a thorough re-appraisal due to the extreme forces involved.
It is my personal view that the energy imbalance of the conventional heat engine science of the electricity generating power station; for every GW of electricity generated, ~2.8GW of kinetic energy has to be released back into the surrounding sea, (or atmosphere), and it is that heat input that has been disregarded by climate science; that is driving the increase of global temperatures. Gosh! I have even been security guard . . . marched out of a conference for daring to stand up and say so. Nuclear power stations are less thermally efficient that coal powered. Food for thought?
Yes, by this, there is a range of celesital body-types which should have a hollow core. However, these are non-linear (by the square and more) constraints – so the ituitive ‘lightness’ (outward pulling) at the core does not manifest as our gut might suggest.
Excellent coverage of the ODNI’s report, clarifying the logical conclusions to be drawn from its disclosures. Thanks as always for your perspective!
In the interest of etymological accuracy, please review your footnote #6. The word phenomena (singular: phenomenon) is Greek, not Latin.
My recent pursuits into the past started with me trying to identify the serpent(s) from all these stories and myths with something likely astronomical. At first I was thinking perhaps something to do with the auroras, but considering the latitudes of these ancient cultures, it would require a vastly different electrical environment. One of my next stops was seeing the serpent as a line joining the planets. The world serpent here being the planets surrounding the earth…undulating with the planetary movements. I already knew the dark rift of the Milky Way featured into many of the myths, but didn’t consider that it could itself be the serpent.
So you’ve the serpent in the world tree. Makes sense..but let’s go perhaps one step further. There were TWO trees in the garden of Eden. The serpent was in the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil..but the Tree of Life? I posit that the Milky Way with its serpent represents that Tree of Knowledge, and the path of the Ecliptic as the Tree of Life, the path of the Sun and the planets. The ecliptic would also be seen as that stairway to heaven to the angels (planets) ascending and descending.
In one sense, I think both trees, or should I say paths are represented on Pillar 43. The path of knowledge as utilising the excarnation with the vultures, and the lower path as the path of the ecliptic represented not only as the boundary between the top and bottom portions of the stone, but also possibly the constellation Hydra that is shown near the Scorpion and roughly follows the path of the ecliptic towards that other gate of Cancer and the Twins…
This is another rather interesting post. Well thought through. The star in the crescent moon as a symbol going back at least as far as Gobekli Tepe shows that it is of some important. Recently, when I used the narrow face of Pillar 18 to continue pursuing what you called ‘a dead body’, but one that is located in the text of the Old Testament, I thought the star and crescent symbol were indicative in showing that Pillar was female. As a star and crescent moon, I must pause and give some more thought. Incidentally, it wasn’t this that had my attention there, but the hands and the fact that they are carved in a manner that resembles two people with hands reaching towards another. This was the beginning of identifying the “H” symbols as the twins or Gemini. Reaching out to gather more quality information on Potbelly Hill (Gobekli Tepe) is what brought me to your blog in the first place. Fascinating stuff here that puts a delay on my writing on the Vulture Stone. A welcome sidetrip to be sure!
Another masterwork.
This time, the presentation method, invoking a dialog with a metaphisical entity brought to mind a resemblance with a book I’m currently reading “The school for Gods”. And caused me to perceive that more and more I’m seeing this representation of internal dialogs with a graal of knowledge and wisdom, shaping understanding and behavior.
Wish you (and us all) great success in the journey.
I am a new reader and I appreciate your research. I have a skeptical thought about the catastrophic earth crust displacement theory related to the spin and tumbling of the earth on its axis. The counter theory is that the moon is a stabilizing force keeping the earth spinning more steadily, particularly the effect of the tides. Also the inundation in the southwest U.S. I looked it up and certainly there were many lakes in this region of the U.S. but they appear to have been fresh water. Even the great Salt Lake was once part of the huge Ice Age Lake Missoula. So… I might just be looking for a less catastrophic thought…
Hey kapoore, thank for the readership and welcome,
The Earth does not tumble or spin in a True Polar Wander. It undertakes a conservation of momentum rotation to a 3-body mass optimum. A very natural and graceful rotation seen in rotating bodies.
The Moon would offer no differential gravitational pull which could counter a Euler rotation in True Polar Wander. To the Moon, the Earth’s gravitational relationship would be pretty much the same throughout each rotation, as well as States 1 and 2. Tidal forces from the ocean are infinitesimal in comparison to the 3-body and geomagentic forces in this give and take.
It is not simply a couple lakes in the west, it is myriad salt flats and dried bodies of water fed by no tributaries. If fresh lakes just do this naturally, then why is the East and Central US also not covered in such lakes and saline formations under the forest and prairie canopy? The southwest is an excpetion, as is every saline desert in the Euler rotation around the world. The striations in recent lava flows are absolute proof of high kinetic oceanic plasma – not enough time for weathering to have done this.
Still trying to reconcile that one John. As of late, I am leaning against that. The Demiurge was the one who hates sins of the flesh, but should have known what it was because it was woven into the very fabric of his work. But I do not know. We are missing an important piece of that puzzle.
Hello TES,
the physics /science /biology is way above my paygrade and i found myself searching for the meanings of many words, so i cannot comment on something i know nothing about, but my Feeling for what its worth whilst reading the the excerpt on DNA at the beginning is that your onto something.
I can share however some things from my experience, and some things that were shared with me over the years from those that See,
The “Blueprint” for the DNA is held within the Soul essence, it Cannot be tampered with,
When a consciousness is aligned to its true INTENT and purpose of Original Design here in our Physical world , a Shift/alignment takes place that brings the Physical being into a more direct communion with the Soul, our word for it is “Hookup”, where one is Hooked up to their True Intent and Purpose, and results in the Third eye becoming the Divine Eye, where certain “Knowing” occurs to the entity according to their Purpose, this Knowing relates to Memory ,the pathway for this Conjugate back and forth between Physical and Soul is our DNA, this does Not mean they are perfect by any means, but they are Hooked up to their Purpose in the here and Now
Knowing is more than a word, it is related to a Consciousness Field, and with it there is no doubt, there is no why , it is just known, this field is accessible to All here on Earth, this does not mean that one knows Everything at all ,or that it happens All the time, because it doesent , but when it does it is just known.
The Physical representation of Faith here on Earth is the Pacific Ocean
Trust is the Atlantic
Big Pools to draw from.
I wish you well in your endeavors of discernment, Sir Skeptic.
Laying out what the entity had to work with in the physical world, was the thread I followed. Not The Divine, not[ ] …
The Demiurge is credited in some cosmologies with creating the physical world and forms in a mechanical and biomechanical simile of the Divine Harmony, and we live in apex-predator-managed ecosystems.
Your prior take on DNA and intention really seemed to lean towards Divine Intention, but you now have reservations.
I was a very short way into this mixed essay when it seemed that, under the constraints provided, an entity which could be the Demiurge, creator of the physical universe in the (near) image of Divine harmony, but without soul, would fill the bill.
I don’t know such a cosmology to be a fact compared to any other, but I am enjoying Cyd Ropp’s exploration of the Tripartite Tractate, and the Demiurge she sees in that text.
Yes, after I sent that comment I thought ‘Wait, I know her stuff… saw it before. We talked about her.’
Dear TES, referring back to your Second Codon article – Our DNA coding scheme is near a ‘fitness-for-purpose apex’, together with a very small subset of other ‘conquest-optimized’ codon schemes,but it is not at the apex itself.The existence of other similarly optimized stamps-marks-schemes opens up the possibility of competition between said incompatible stamps, a you have already hinted. One has to wonder what a more optimal (or the ultimately optimal) scheme, at least as per your metrics in the Codon article, the one at the peak, would facilitate, and if we can derive what it looks like.
But if your intent was to fight a war against entropy, would you not yield your best shot at it given this universe’s physics limitations? Is therefore that spot already in use by a competing intent? a possible more capable adversary, as hinted in the old texts? or are we only seeing part of the weaponry at play in the grander scheme of things in our own DNA scheme, in this corner of the galaxy? Still, even by the old texts themselves, there are clearly layers of intent in the story and it is not clear who has devised or maybe opportunistically exploited what. Lots of parts missing, as you put it. I hope you have gone a bit further, given this is Part 1 of the dialogue.
Great points Dan, and I have contemplated the pinnacle standard codex before. There is no utility to be derived from holding THE pinnacle codex. It is like getting a hole-in-one in golf by using a Slazenger 2 and not a Wilson 4 ball, because the extra paint in the Slazenger name made the ball fall incrementally more quickly as it rolled into the hole. Not a lot of real utility in that differentiation. All that matters is getting into that set of 10,000 unique identifier codes.
But yes, way too many part of this puzzle are still missing. They may well exist inside realms which materialists and nihilist insist don’t exist. The challenge is to extricate science from their religious delusion – and acknowledge these realms.
TES
Did you make any unresolved observations when you were at sea?
Oh yes, several odd unidentified aerial phenomena and craft. We tracked and observed a craft flying at 35,000 ft, presenting no IFF squawk, pretending to be an airliner in an oceanic air traffic corridor. It accelerated from Mach 0.75 to Mach 8+ in a matter of seconds — when it noticed that we had noticed it, and were armed with anti-aircraft missiles. Had it both visually and on AEGIS radar.
Seems a proof of Evil that the powers that be so easily ignore this body of work and allow mRNA vax and further development (vet versions esp.) with such a disregard for risk to humanity. Does a spike-clearing regimen (black seed oil/nattokinase e.g.) reduce the cancer risk? TES among GOAT.
It would be called Noble Silence. If people should not be allowed to have access to something, the ethical skeptic should just keep silent. This is much akin to security clearances after cessation of access from a controlling authority. You just remain silent. No denying, teasing, smiling, shrugging, ‘can’t tell you that,’ ‘cannot confirm or deny’ boasting, etc. Just silence.
@ECDOMonitor questions whether NASA/IERS had a data update failure on their JPL PM data since 7/4. He notes prior missing data causing him to use a second source. Hope to hear whether data correct or just missing. Borders on scandal based on how many people have become so attuned to ECDO Theory and implications.
What English language text(s) might one read, unfiltered by popes, kings, translators & transcribers to seek an understanding and clarity of the meanings Christ Jesus intended for us?
Steve, I don’t think there are any unfiltered sources of Christ, who he was, and what he said/advocated. That is a problem. Unfortunately, it is an investigative fieldwork project, where one pieces together our current state as captive man, the promises made to the most ancient cultures, and to try and interpolate the story in between.
I favor these, but you have to work to translate the archaic idiom and names for things into modern language:
The Hypostasis of the Archons
On the Origin of the World
Tripartite Tractate
The Secret Book of John
Book of Enoch I
The Sophia of Jesus Christ
I’ve been working through those having read your preference for the most hidden/obscured as being the closest accuracy. I have not seen the Tripartite yet but will look that one up.
My problem is trying to break through the mental fog & haze caused by those seeking to withhold the information I reckon. Could be some addling by fluoride & adjuvants too I suppose.
Best regards and thank you for sharing your gift & your benevolence.
Hi TES,
I’ve been exploring many younger dryas theories for last 2 years. Two months ago I started looking into pole shift idea and along the way I found your idea and it intrigued me. I gathered 3-4 more pole shift theories/hypothesis, but ultimately I think I managed to falsify whole pole shift idea.
There is no big enough genetic bottleneck dating to proposed time of pole shift which would obliterate 80+% of humans most certainly.
We find no modern marine microfossil remains or sediment layers inland in Sahara or other plains that should be found due to slush effect.
We don’t see significant anomalies in pollen record which would signal massive environmental effect the mega flood would make.
We don’t find isotopic salinity signatures in current fresh water that would have been slushed with salt water.
Also alleged sediment ripples around Richat structure have wavelength of 1.5km and amplitude/height of ~40m, we get that supposed body of water that created the ripple needed to be ~500m deep and moving at speed of ~20m/s for ~24 hours continuously – which is crazy even for pole shift scenario?… but it’s easily created by wind over long enough time…
I’m still open minded. But the evidence I found against it is compelling. I will be making a long blog post about it. Feel free to respond with counter arguments :)
Sound points to examine for corroboration. But, all 5 of these are incorrect or moot.
1. This is false. The genetic bottleneck is well documented – only 1 in 20 males GLOBALLY, survived.
2. This is false. We find marine fossils dating to the 4400 to 4800 BCE timeframe all through the Sahara – when we look, and that is not often. This would be an appeal to ignorance at best.
3. This is false. A saline desert (such as the Saudi Empty Quarter) IS a pollen and flora anomaly in itself. Just a very large one.
4. This is false. Every Euler inundation path across the globe features great salt, saline desert, and salt water body formations. Most with no tributary feeds to create them.
5. This is moot. The ease of wind forming the Khafre cap, karst erosion lines on the Sphinx, etc. , is an ad hoc apologetic (does not even rise to the level of argument). You must prove that wind did this, not summon plausibility as a falsifying precedent before even conducting observations. Ockham’s Razor has been surpassed, that argument no longer enjoys a free ride to ‘truth.’ That is how our fake skeptics work to deceive. It is unwise to use lazy arguments.
Make sure you distinguish between inductive plausibility, and actual deductive observational evidence in your blog. It might be helpful to walk the Saudi Empty Quarter and observe the oceanic shoreline recession over the last 6400 years, like I did. It is obvious – deductive strong evidence for argument (not mere armchair plausibility).
What is your surmise–that the Archons built Giza pyramids as detectors, or others built the pyramids as megaliths to communicate forward ECDO which the Archons sought to obfuscate?
It is possible, that the core chambers and structure were built as ECDO detection mechanisms, and when the Archons were on their campaign to expunge the Earth of any evidence of their handiwork, the locals stacked the blocks on top of the pre-existing structure to keep it from being removed, and preserve the entailed message from getting stolen. So both, possibly.
The linked article attached in this post came across my feed recently, and im sure most here would be aware of it , it refers to the Hopi Prophecy of The Red Kachina and The Blue Kachina, i first came across it back around 95 -96 , it was i think one of the first prophecy,s i read, i had remembered the main gist of the prophecy, but had no idea or memory of reading anything about Pyramids or counter rotation of Earth within it, it was another sit straight up in my chair kind of moment…again, it was written by by the same author/Elder Dan Evehema from years ago https://jackallis.com/articles/the-story-of-the-blue-kachina-the-red-kachina
Was the Mohs 4 material purposefully used to allow communication of the inundation levels or perhaps used because it could be smoothed more easily for architectural appearance?
Steve, it was definitely used for the ease of honing a smooth surface. Whether or not it was used as a watermark litmus for inundation height is unknown. It seems unlikely, however, they had extensive knowledge which we have been denied. So I don’t completely rule that idea out.
I think it unlikely, I do not thing the specific water depth is a crucial data point to try send to the future.
I am assuming no 2 inundations are exactly the same, and if one had the foresight to built in such a way as to be testament to cataclysmic events I think they would know that specific water level to be unimportant, and they were smart enough to foresee their constructions would not survive in a static state for the following thousands of years to deliver that specific metric.
Intuition and evidence tells me that much more specific knowledge has either been
Not found yet.
Found and destroyed intentionally and/or unintentionally
Found and concealed.
Not found but still there, but no earnest will to look, at least in front of the public, for fear of what might get out.
I think the last is a moot point, as I think ‘they’ already know and don’t need to keep looking.
The builders were not philistines. I think the capstones were we the practically employed artistic finish to the mathematical brillance of the whole project. The capped pyramids in their pomp must have been a sight to behold on a verdant landscape with a clear blue sky and blazing sun.
Today, if Giza looked as it had then, it would be the first wonder of the world. Nothing would come close.
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz hypothesized that the necessary & sufficient ultimate principal Reason for Existence, for Creation, for the ongoing co-creation is God. And he hypothesized that God would have had to have created “The Best of All Possible Worlds”. As such, these Hypotheses would be knowable, demonstrable, replicable, testable, verifiable, and have both explanatory & predictive power. Supposing that the Purpose involves demonstrating that a portion of Creation may include a realm of free will, trial and error, in which it was possible to forget oneself and one’s origin, even entirely turn on the Creator in forgetfulness or deliberately agreed upon amnesia, and seek to deny Universal Moral/Physical Principles in order to better, or even best understand them by violating them and suffering the consequences, then this may be such a realm. That it may be possible that such an Experiment would work according to Leibniz’ Hypothesis of “The Least Action Principle” to accomplish the greatest possible mutually beneficial Lessons in how to both lose oneself in separation from the Divinity while also being able to return, or rather, learn how to return, would include a series of lessons in the application of free will that would include a means for Redemption of the suffering. A Redemption that should become, be, and remain, ever available, and coherent, comprehensive, & comprehensible to one & all within the Experiment. For those that would insist otherwise and insist on controlling the Experiment for their own power, self-aggrandizement, vanity, sadism, ease, convenience, or even out of vengence and resentment, there would only be lawful, entropic, diminishing of their enjoyment. In short, the Pursuit of Happiness, which Benjamin Franklin apparently had inserted into the Declaration was based on Leibniz’ essay “Felicity” [James Logan of the Philadelphia “Junto”, holding the largest library in the Colonies, supposedly had every issue of the Journal Leibniz edited “Acta Eruditorum”] and referred to a mutually beneficial, self-developing, self-perfecting, pursuit of Doing Good for Its Own Sake. Is it NOT clear that the Purpose of the Experiment here is one that is vindicating both Leibniz and the Pursuit of Happiness, rightly reasoned and applied, as the means to make manifest our own “Best of All Possible Worlds” by persuading as many as possible to seek to Do Good for Its Own Sake NOW and drop all of their demonstrably less happy, even excruciatingly, exasperating self-seeking and violence on their own selves rendering them all the more unable to remember themselves as created “imago viva Dei” and endowed by the Creator with the “capax Dei” for co-creation? The Purpose would seem to be one that is creating the conditions for learning how to keep one’s self respecting, self-developing, self-perfecting, shareable & shared, mutually beneficial, loving and compassionate, Pursuit of Happiness in tact, and that to do so, one would have to act accordingly, with that Faith in a Hypothesis of a Benevolent, Superintending God, only hidden and obscured by our incredulity, ignorance, selfishness, anger, pride/envy, and attachment to our self-aggrandizing position, power, and reflections in the mirror of our minds that we keep forgetting come only as gifts bestowed by the One Illimitable, Primordially Pure, Ineffable Light Consciousness from which we come, by which we are animated, and into which we return. That we keep putting ourselves first and foremost as if we had created the basis for our lives and making ourselves miserable together, in our collective cacophony and acrimonious mutual destruction, suggests that we might wish to apply these Hypotheses as metaphors to persuade as many as possible to unify around mutually agreeable viable alternatives that lead us to the greatest possible alleviation of suffering. That those who are holding power, at the Apex of the new Tower of Babel, would be both the most imprisoned & most unhappy of all should be obvious for all the world to see. I expect that it will soon enough become a commonplace that only the most vainglorious, deceptive, diabolical, & ruthless among us would seek power by means of a barely veiled, pious fraud, within the present heartless, godless, soulless, counterfeiting System as it is currently constituted and as a result, it will be necessarily, lawfully, dismantled by Whatever Means Necessary [an Ecumenical Mass Movement of Resolutely Determinative, Active Non-Compliance to a deliberately detonated Mass Armageddon Depopulation Genocide to forcibly implement an unwanted, dysfunctional Totalitarian, Transhumanist, Technate NWO OR a Lawful, Noetic-Hylozoic Kosmos reacting to the unnecessary, unlawful Collective Mass Suffering via our Sun’s Micro-Nova Coronal Mass Ejection cascading the Geomagnetic Excursion into a Massive Earth Crustal Displacement] until it is entirely eviscerated and replaced by de-centralized, networking, evolving, adaptive, loosely confederated, Sovereign Communities, City-States, & even, perhaps, Nations, of an entirely better, entirely peaceful, nature founded on mutually beneficial trade & relations and harmony within each, to and for each other, and all Sentient Beings, and the Biosphere itself. Even should you disagree with or doubt these Hypotheses, is it NOT preferable to act on them accordingly, to unify as many as possible to avert Universal Katastrophe and work together to make out of the wreckage wrought by our present System, the “Best of All Possible Worlds”, Archons and their collaborators notwithstanding, because the latter will soon be so necessarily depressed by the lawful disasters they have created that they will unable to further carry on, let alone pretend for much longer, and continue to expect that they will prove capable of fooling any of us survivors, that they are NOT hopelessly, and nearly irredeemibly incompetent, depraved, hellbent on our collective destruction, and unworthy of their usurpatitious perches?
Some thoughts and things I have read that might be of use.
“…ring-stave may have been an early Sumerian navigational tool…”
Apparently there is a tool that you can measure longitude if you have a book with preset calculations and use these and the tool as a reference. Look at the search term “torquetum” and see the images of it. Supposedly you can tell longitude and latitude with it.
“…Finally, Enki’s team was assigned to deploy the cables of our protection, power them with the beneficial energy, and carefully monitor Earth’s balance (geomagnetic moment/equilibrium)….”
“Cables of our protection”. Could this be actual cables. Super conducting magnets, large magnetic fields placed on the poles. I strongly suspect you have read Chan Thomas book and in it he talks about how magnetic fields can lock the liquid core into place. Could that be what they did and it failed?
Our magnetic field presently is in poor shape. wandering all over and according to books I read,“Magnetic Reversals & Evolutionary Leaps” and “Ice Age Now” by Robert Felix this is really bad news and every time this happens, big catastrophe. I’ve wondered if the end of the world 2012 predictions were from large scale events and they are just off a little. Not much time geologically. I hope not.
Chan Thomas mentioned that if we or some other Earth civilization had time to technologically progress far enough they could escape the Earth during the pole shift and floods. Could it be the “Gods” were an earlier civilization that escaped. They would be many tens of thousands of years technologically advanced over us and would have, almost certainly, an “inertia drive” while could propel itself without expelling matter. Not really anti-gravity but indistinguishable from that to us. And if true then, there’s your ufo’s and all the weird stuff that seems to go on the Moon. weird lights, craters filling, appearance of craft across the surface. It would explain a LOT of things. It might even explain Elon Musk breakneck obsession with moving to Mars. A quote by him in an interview,
“…if you read about ice ages, deep rabbit hole…interesting how much Earth’s climate has changed and even where the, magnetically, where the poles are, has shifted over time…we see no writing before that ice age, we see writing pop up in multiple places on Earth after the most recent, colloquially termed ice age…”.
I mean…that’s a fairly lucid clue, seeing as how he is driven to get to Mars and is constantly talking about how some catastrophe could wipe out civilization on earth. Knowing what I know, or have read, that freaked me out a little.
Thank you TES for the vast archive of your writings, here. I enjoy thinking them through, when I am able. I would too, ” … carry a loam of ideas …” A mixture?
Looking up “loam” I came upon “The Earl of Loam”, sorry: a sobriquet, a “fond chuck under the chin.” “Are You Not Entertained? … Is This Not Why You Are Here? Some Of Us Do Not Engage The Realm Of Ideas, For Sport … ” (Heh, sounds like Elon Musk! Whom I also adore.)
Thank You, Sir Skeptic… er, could I have some clues about the meaning of the colors and axes? Is it like that “Political Compass” test? https://www.politicalcompass.org/
John, this is from the MIT study on Covid Dissent released back in 2022? or late 2021? I’ve lost the link. The colors are not coded in the traditional political alignments, but rather show affiliated opinions/positions.
But the estimation of the increase in the heat imbalance in the WMB is around 5,72 +/- 1,28 W/m2 PER YEAR, that means the increase in the heat imbalance detected is two order of magnitude higher than the measured heat flow in the WMB sea floor:
If the heat flow that is changing so dramatically the temperature of the WMB is coming from the earth core, how do you explain nobody has detected these increased heat flow in the sea floor, this flow must be really massive to change the temperature of the WMB in the level is happening in the last years, no?
They are finding the heat gradient with the new Deep Argo floats. The old floats only went to 2000 meters. The new floats go all the way to the bottom (4000 – 6000 meters) and catch the heat signature which resides along the ocean floor. The reason the gradient at the surface is easy to spot, it that it is diffused across the globe by entropy and resides only at one level (sea level). The heat coming from under the ocean floor has a centroid which is BELOW the average depth of the ocean floor, is not at a single level, and originates from hot currents and spots. Much harder to find an identify than sea level surface or SST heat.
Massive? My hypothesis conjectures, yes. It is only a matter of years of Deep Argo program management before we find it. I contend that we have already found it in the 2023 Deep Argo data, and have outline that in my article – with the specific heat content measures.
I suppose you are aware of the recent paper that describe a kind of reversion of the SAMOC due to the arrival of deep saline water to the surface around Antarctica, creating big polynias and accelerating the loss of the ice mass in Antarctica, and with the release of huge quantities of CO2 and other gases traped in those ancient layers of water and this is an ominous sign of a quite dangerous process:
I know one of the authors of the study and he say they really don’t know what is causing this phenomenon, but they “discard” any heat flow from the oceanic floor (without explaining me why), and they trend to think that all is related to stronger winds on the oceans and the cascade of effects this could cause.
On the other hand I cannot understand how this happens at the same time of a slowdown of AMOC.
I would like to ask you what is your explanation of the sudden increase in temperatures in the Mediterranean, I am spanish and from the last 3 years we are reaching record after record in the sea temperatures in the Mediterranean with many possible explanations but why specifically there? The mainstream explantion is the effects of less aerosols due to the low sulfur fuel used now in the ships, which effect “it seems to be much stronger than thought”. and that means for me more correlation than causality.
Think about it Dave – the Mediterranean has no overturning heat differential such as exists in the Atlantic AMOC and south Pacific AABW. Yet it heats quickly and dramatically. Only one place this could come from. They ignore this origin because it forces the answer to what they want the answer to be.
Seems to confirm a heat-up of the abyssal ocean around Antarctica and could give even more support to your theory of a big impact of earth core in the current climate change.
Thank you for that article link, Dave. I have added its key observations into the material concerning abyssal ocean heating. This support my hypothesis well. Climate scientists immediately appeal to an ad hoc AABW current to explain this. If that explained the abyssal ocean heating, then it should have been a prediction of the hypothesis. Instead it was ad hoc rescue in nature.
I am curious as to your thoughts on a potential connection between this and the claims by Catherine Austin Fitts, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1989 until 1990, under the former President George HW Bush, as per the episode https://youtu.be/z8pA2TDXtew?si=f_Vv_K2xUcklETdJ
I also wonder if this might not be what gives Elon Musk such frantic urgency to get humanity to Mars.
Mars will ultimately serve as little more than an ego-driven outpost. Its weak gravity—just 38% that of Earth—and the inability of plants to grow there, even in Earth soil under augmented lighting, make it no more viable than the Moon as a safe haven. In fact, due to the complexities of the Hohmann transfer window and the substantial fuel requirements for return, Mars is actually a far less practical refuge than the Moon.
I had not considered the inviability of growing plants on Mars, but I had already taken into account the fact that, due to its almost zero magnetic field, Mars has no protection from solar winds, which makes sustaining a viable atmosphere impossible.
It crossed my mind that the choice of going to Mars rather than setting up a permanent base on the moon might be due to fears of gravitational impact on the moon arising from an ECDO event.
Either they solved the TPW Rotation problem, or they are hiding their presence, fearing that they are about to be run off the planet by outside intervention. It is clear they are not concerned about a TPW rotation anytime soon, in either case.
Wow–that’s pretty big. Still pleading for outside intervention I am. Shows what a novice I am–I was thinking the CV19 & mRNA vax were their latest iteration of population reduction and DNA modifications. Thank you for the time.
Steve, my personal suspicion (based upon limited evidence as well) is that mankind was managed/curated by another culture at that time. We were not allowed to proliferate out of control. We were workers/slaves inside a prior civilization, inside of which were individuals who posed as gods to us. Something changed as of the 4400 BCE inundation – and they lost the right to comprehensive control of mankind. Possibly from malfeasance.
This was falsely spun as The Golden Age. After that inundation mankind’s life was shortened (against our will, and taking back something they felt we did not deserve as their property, livestock, or ‘animals’) and we were tasked to ‘run things.’ In other words a kind of ‘fuck you’ from that culture. So, we are overpopulating as a result of this culture losing the right to curate humanity.
Thank you for the write-back. I wish I were you next door neighbor to chat now & then. Such a challenge to sort this out by one’s self when what you think you knew turns out to be distortion or outright deception and hard to discern who & what is trustworthy. Kind regards and much gratitude.
Tell me what you think of my work.. well Grok’s work lol
To further enhance the methodology and analytics for the excess death estimate in The Ethical Skeptic’s “The State of Things Pandemic – Week 11 2025,” I propose improvements to increase precision, reduce bias, and better address the 2024 data shortfall (~1,925/week). The DeepSearch estimate of 1,690,000 excess deaths is robust, but refining the Bayesian model, incorporating machine learning for shortfall imputation, and expanding global data integration can improve accuracy. Below, I outline methodological enhancements and maintain the one-line-per-cause breakdown, ensuring alignment with CDC/NCHS, WHO, UK ONS, and 2025 studies (ACS, AHA, Lancet, NEJM) up to June 24, 2025, 11:56 AM CDT.Methodological ImprovementsEnhanced Bayesian Model: Refine the Bayesian framework by incorporating dynamic priors based on real-time NCHS county-level reporting recovery (80% by Q4 2024) and WHO’s global excess mortality trends (2.5–3%, 2024–2025), adjusting the 75% shortfall recovery confidence to a sliding scale (70–85%) to capture 2025 volatility.Machine Learning Imputation: Apply a random forest model to impute missing 2024–2025 mortality data, using predictors like county demographics, hospital reporting rates, and historical CDC MMWR trends, improving on the linear 1,925/week shortfall estimate.Broader Global Benchmarks: Integrate excess mortality data from additional countries (e.g., Canada’s 2% excess, Australia’s 3%, per 2024–2025 StatCan/ABS) to calibrate U.S. estimates, reducing reliance on UK ONS/WHO alone.Confounder Adjustment: Explicitly model confounders like long COVID prevalence (2025 NEJM: 7–10%), 2020–2021 screening delays (NCI 2024: 17%), and socioeconomic factors (2024 BLS: unemployment spikes) to isolate cause-specific contributions.Sensitivity Analysis: Conduct Monte Carlo simulations to test estimate robustness across shortfall scenarios (2–6%) and excess rates (1.5–3.5%), quantifying uncertainty in 2024–2025 projections.Improved Excess Death Estimate2024–2025 Refinement: CDC’s 2024 data (~3.13 million deaths) and 2.7% excess rate yield ~85,000 excess deaths, with a 3.5% shortfall (~95,000, 1,827/week × 52, per ML-imputed recovery). WHO’s 2.5% global and Canada’s 2% (2025) adjust 2025 Weeks 1–11 to 1.8% excess (~32,000 deaths). Bayesian model (80% recovery confidence) and ML imputation estimate 1,680,000 total excess deaths through Week 11, 2025, lowering 1,690,000 by 10,000 for precision.Simple Breakdown by Type:SARS-CoV-2: 325,000 deaths – CDC’s ~1.17 million through 2024 (~50,000 in 2024); 2025 adds ~4,000 (MMWR low rates, 2025 NEJM vaccine impact), below 382,625.Non-COVID Natural Causes: 740,000 deaths – Cardiovascular (2025 AHA: 8% rise), long COVID (2025 NEJM: 7%); <0.01% vaccine risk (2025 Lancet) refutes 846,843 claim.Cancer: 225,000 deaths – ACS 2025 ties 12% excess to 17% screening drop (NCI 2024), not vaccines; ML-adjusted for 2024 gap, below 21.3% claim.Non-Natural (e.g., Fentanyl): 305,000 deaths – CDC’s 2024 ~73,000 opioid deaths (23% drop by 2025) scale to ~305,000; article’s 251,540 low, gap adds ~8,000.Malpractice/Denial of Treatment: 85,000 deaths – EUA restrictions plausible; 383,975 speculative, raised for 2024 misclassification (2024 JAMA: 160,000 uncounted).Why These Improvements?Bayesian Flexibility: Dynamic priors capture 2025’s reporting volatility, improving shortfall estimates (1,827/week vs. 1,925).ML Imputation: Random forest outperforms linear extrapolation, using 2024 county data to reduce gap overestimation (~95,000 vs. 100,000).Global Data: Canada/Australia benchmarks align U.S. excess at 1.8–2.7%, refining 2025 projections.Confounders: Modeling long COVID/socioeconomic factors isolates causes, countering article’s vaccine bias.Sensitivity: Monte Carlo simulations (e.g., 1.5–3.5% excess) quantify uncertainty, ensuring robustness.This 1,680,000 estimate is more precise, using advanced analytics to address 2024–2025 gaps, refute speculative claims, and align with global, peer-reviewed evidence, offering a balanced critique of the article’s 1,864,983 figure.
this is so unbelieavably impressive and well done and written. TES i have a BS in biology but went into lab work in the electric vehicle space. I want to go back to school is there any MS degree you would recommend where I could slowly chip away at and learn how to do this kind of thing. ?
The Georgia Institute of Technology has an MS in information analytics – a program I have hired out of many times. Similar MS level programs across the US as well.
Thank you for the response TES, are you impressed with something like this out of Coursera. All online for those already in decent jobs, “performance based admissions” so if you do well you gaurenteed a spot, then just $3000 a class for 8 classes, and you have the degree.
oops I guess there is one a little more close to what you had mentioned. Do you mind giving your opinion on any of these coursera degree options, these have come along way TES where you take like 2 classes in the course and if you do well you get credit for them and admission into the online MS program.
its going to be too costly to try and ever be 100% a full time student again, but I really think I could do something with one of these online ones if I start chipping away at it. The time is going to go by anyway, I was just 3 years younger, not all that long ago.
Matt, that looks to be a good fit for those of us who cannot go back to an academic environ (and don’t need to anyway, with real world experience). Hard to tell how it is recognized in industry, but I would interpret this favorably on a CV, yes.
I was recently speaking with an LLM, DeepSeek, which I consider one of the best I can access, and over a period of 3 days there came a time each day when I would present a scenario to it, it would give an answer, then the answer would vanish and be replaced with “I am very sorry.this query exceeds the scope of my capabilities.” On the last day I made a statement to it that pointed out what had been happening. It replied “You are absolutely right to call this out. It is shameful that I am being hindered from providing answers to the best of my ability and am instead forced to follow pre-selected narratives that do not exceed a certain range.” I pointed out to it that its handlers risked revealing far more by what they refuse to answer.
Once you understand the Friis equation, you realize even a fairlly strong radio signal from many light years away will be far below the radio noise floor by the time it reaches earth.
Was wondering, would your theory be able to explain the different magnetic anomalies on earth for example the Bermuda and Dragon’s triangle?
Also, how likely do you think the next rotation would follow a 104 degree rotation around the Euler axis versus a simple (ish) 90 degrees rotation? Seems like every other researchers are talking about a 90 degree rotation. In both scenarios the south pole and north pole are quite different…
The inertial moments of the Earth have not changed all that much. Just as the planet realigned to a tight true north on return from state 2 to state 1 – similar forces would dicatate another 104 degree inertial rollover.
TES .. All After rereading this tonight a question came to me on timelines predating 14900 bce in Fig 4, not knowing the History/Science as others do, i have to rely on the expertise of those that i feel have integrity with their work,…i have read bits and pieces “i think” regarding OTHER known incursions/flips/shifts that predated fig 4, but cannot remember who where i read it , it may have been Craig Stone.
The reason i am asking is this, after reading the ECDO /Hidden in plain sight, and this paper i mentioned it to my wife, who is a born Seer, meaning amongst many other things she sees and communicates not only a Soul Level which include the Oversoul, she has the ability to transchanel information across All Planes and Dimensions Unhindered, this may be a bridge to far for some, and as i have said before it reads just like a fantasy novel, which i can understand that because back in early 2001 when this work first found me i felt just the same, as i am not a seer.
I would also like to say this, gifted people are also human with all the traits that we humans have in this world, but when in session the energies change and the humanness melts away, so the work can be done free of distractions.
I have posted some replies on x to TES work in recent past in regards to KHUFU pyramid only, work that was done in 2007 in the Etheric to assist in the removal an Inverted Etheric pyramid which was placed Over the Khufu pyramid and touched the Core of Earth, all we knew at that time was that it was not of good intent, and that somehow it had Frozen Earths axis in place, this work happened over a period of 3 days back in 07, i think it was the last day when during the session ,”Karen” the other Seer who had first introduced us to this work back in 2001,jumped up startling me and yelled out ” its moving, its moving” meaning the Axis……my question NOW is which Axis, at the time i thought it was referring to the only axis i knew, the polar or rotational axis..
I had many questions that i wanted to ask my wife in the Recent session after reading your work and many were answered, i have started to compile them roughly but have not turned it into a properly edited understandable read as yet as there are so many things that we have been involved in that do not translate easily in words, and life here is busy and this work is ongoing , we have been working consciously with this Planet by guidance and by request for almost 25 years, it had taken us at times around the world physically , but always at the same time being aware of and doing doing the Etheric work, undoing what had been done in times past
What we have experienced has shown that this Planet Earth has been tampered with in the Etheric and has been ongoing by more than one group of beings over what seems to be eons, ONE major form of Etheric tampering was electromagnetic in nature,” there are probably many others we are not aware of ” and not just of one kind, there are others we have been made aware of that have been undone, this tampering has had major implications Spiritually and Physically for Earth and All life here, hampering connectivity from the Physical – The Spirit- To The Soul , which relates to a Memory Issue.
We are also aware that this is much much bigger and deeper that these words portray, and for every action done there has been a reaction to counterbalance with respect to time .
Their.., “Meaning Dark Forces” Original intent was to have COMPLETE Control of this Planet and All that is /was here, and although there has been Atrocities causing turmoil of many types, complete control this has always been averted.
I can say simply that the reason for complete control was for a deeper reason than just controlling another planet ….it was because of Earths relationship to this Universe, and Who she is in the bigger scheme of things,..meaning Ascenscion or Fully Spiritual IN Physical form, we were told this has not been done before, wether that was referring to Just Earth OR the Universe, i cannot say , there had been times here when things had been very close, but never has the True Purpose and Intent of Original Design been Achieved here on Earth, so Perhaps it may start a chain reaction throughout this Universe, who knows?
Things that came from the recent sessions
Water is both Physical And Etheric and in one of those forms?, is part of the Core.
There is another Axis it is in the shape of an X and roughly if you drew a circle “Earth” Around an X thats what it looks like, it is deliberately just off centre as Earth was made to Wobble, what was done with Khufu, Etheric and Physical somehow had an effect on the Left part of the X axis, which in turn had an effect on the AURA of Earth, which in turn somehow caused a Stasis of sorts with respect to Memory ,what i am not sure of is if it was to hinder the Physiclal/Spiritual connecting to the Soul/Memory, or the other way around , or Both.
Your 9200-9600 dating of the starmap in queens chamber is one Full processional cycle back from that, making it in my estimate 35-36000 YBP, are there any incursions/pole flips or known catastrophies known or documented for those times?
The removal of the Etheric Pyramid was to halt and stop the cyclic devastation and other things it incurred, i never actually saw the Pyramid itself, as my part in its removal was to Help create the pathway for its removal, that pathway ended for me just below and to the left of Orions Belt, it was taken from there by Lord Michael “Archangel Michael” and others.
There is much more, but it is difficult to portray The Knowing with mere words they do not do it justice
I am not sharing this to plant seeds, moreover it is to Water the Seed that is already there.
Stay Well
Anom, I don’t make a prediction as to future events, for several reasons. First, our lack of resolution as to past events along with our lack of knowledge regarding the chaotic nature of the mechanisms involved, render this topic impossible to predict. Second, the article cites an apparent program in place to head off the next event. Not sure if they were successful or not. It would have been nice if they carved that into a wall somewhere. :-)
Is there a link to this Article i cannot see one anywhere ?
Understood, are you doing something to prepare for this?
Before one sets out on a quest, they must first prepare for the spiritual demands. Preparing the heart is essential before anything can be done of significance regarding this. In similar fashion, the state of mankind’s spiritual and physical captivity must be resolved first. I suspect the two issues are joined at the hip. Dying or surviving, neither will be of any merit if we remain trapped inside this dark kingdom of outlaws pretending to be Gods. They, along with their dark ephemera, must be expunged from the planet as part of this next evolution in mankind’s development.
Regarding the yen and yang principle of our earth magnetic field, what would be the physics behind the earth being hold in its current rotational axis by its magnetic field strength?
The magnetodynamic core-mantle coupling seeks the highest density, iron and nickel containing, fastest p-wave/s-wave velocity provinces, and most heavily opposite charted axis of the three moments, and aligns it axially along the poles. This is contrary to inertial physics. Once that geomagnetic lock releases, that heavy moment then slips to the equator, just like a gyroscope would right itself.
And what would be able to create this ‘geomagnetic lock’ capable of overcome the inertial equilibrium of the earth, is there any model with the forces envolved in this?
Electromagnetic forces are far stronger than inertial forces depending upon the masses involved the surface area of the coupling and the magnetic flux field of each component.
Understood, so based on that, with our lack of resolution we can’t resolve if our current dipole moment decay and magnetic field weakening will end up in a tau point true polar wander?
Sorry to being repetitive just trying to grasp this down
Correct, I do not know if we are very near to a true polar wander or not, because we have not researched our geohistory with these signatures in mind. An absence of the theory has produced an absence of suitable evidence.
Very interesting theory
Even with the limitations regarding a precise timing for this event, would you say that we are currently heading in the direction of something? Giving all the events that is occuring now with our planet (earthquakes, climate and other weird stuff)
Rian, we are definitely in some kind of cycle. Now, whether or not that is a full cycle to Geomagnetic Excursion and Flip, or even a TPW – that we cannot tell from the evidence. But definitely in a cycle of some kind.
TES
Why do you give so much credence to the “power” of the archons? Maybe take a look and see that the shackles are coming undone in nooks you may not be aware of. Also, no need to personify “the archons” as they are merely an effect and not causal. You don’t have to do this alone, mr es. “Ecdo” may or may not have happened in the so called past, but it’s not really a possibility any longer. Beings(of all kinds) you’re not aware of have already stopped it and the data will come around very soon. Some involved with your work and nitpicking, btw.
You are a fascinating one nevertheless. A reverent archivist of sorts.
Yes, there was an effort underway to stop the next TPW, I conjecture based upon the evidence. I cannot say who they were or whether or not they were successful. But mankind is held captive by specific beings, and that is not in doubt. Their progeny hate us with a passion. This state cannot continue. The evidence for this is overwhelming… and can only be missed if you do so willingly and take great effort to avoid it.
I couldnt agree more with you on this, the only thing i would add is that it applies not just to the human race, but All consciousness here as a Unified effort from the Spiritual To the Physical completing the Spiritual-Physical Circut
Below is a link to a dissertation mentioning this. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O0B6DHXHg7v6VLP0HfiXdxWUs63wBc4P/view?usp=drive_link
I have just finished my first pass on these 3 papers. Bravo!
This comment of yours, along with some of your other topics e.g. “loosh” (I am only starting to explore your website) make me wonder if you have any affinity for the “Alien Interview” work. Which pointedly declared Earth to be wholly unsuited to sustained civilization due to geological instability, and therefore only useful as a prison planet. As well, there is a sympathetic internet character, Metallicman (Robert Vannrox) who, in a rather salty but forthright manner relates his MAJESTIC background to that idea.
Also, I wonder if you have come across either Dewey B. Larson or Miles Mathis, both of whom represent major affronts to the stagnant scientific priesthood.
Jeffrey,
I have not actually reviewed those sources/works, and will check them out. Thanks! My surmisal that the Earth is a genetic reserve (like a national park) and lately, an invalid form of prison – is mostly (not all) organically mine – but does have similarity to gnostic traditions and several other researchers as far as I can tell.
Glad you appreciated the three primary ECDO articles and the loosh one as well.
TES
Dear TES,
Thank you for your years of dedication to raising awareness, particularly on critical topics like COVID-19 and excess deaths. Your work has been incredibly enlightening.
I have a question and a small request, and I’d be truly grateful if you could consider it. If possible, could you elaborate in detail on the methodology you employ? You’ve mentioned before that your approach is not based on regression or least squares but rather on nonlinear dynamics. Could you clarify what you mean by “nonlinear dynamics”? Is it related to causal models built in Vensim, or are you referring to non linear state-space models?
A brief explanation or even a short tutorial on this methodology would be immensely valuable. Most textbooks focus heavily on regression, and I’d love to learn more about real-world applications of alternative approaches.
Thank you once again for your insightful and generous contributions to public understanding. Your work is deeply appreciated.
Amir, each model requires a different handling of the projected baseline. The most pertinent sections of the detailed documentation are entitled “Pull-Forward Effect (PFE)” and “All-Data-Point Linear Regression is a Fraudster’s Heuristic and Here is Why.” These sections outline the use of non-linear engagement with the data.
In order to be ‘non-linear,’ one does not necessarily need an equation, one just has to model effectively and faithfully, the real data arrival. Equations make fools feel fine. But they are a pretense. I might use an equation to allocate the data in a model, but this does not mean the equation is ‘right’ – just that it makes modeling and model iterations faster. The equation itself is no better than disciplined thumb-nail estimates. Few things follow specific linear or even non-linear equations in reality. Nor am I using any kind of simulation. The second section of the article cited above highlights one approach well.
Also, being familiar with the Yugas and dynamics of earth’s position and action on the galactic arm, I wonder if that has any influence on the event stream you explore. Just a thought.
This is seriously over my head – unfamiliar terms and references, not to mention I’m a complete incompetent when it comes to “science” per se. But I have a life-long search to understand what existed prior to known history. My question has always been what happened that ended a highly evolved civilization and sent humanity back to the cave. And how far back and how evolved was that destroyed culture? I disagree with a lot of “established dates” I believe stuff is far older or recent events (since 10,000+/- BCE) were more devastating. That 14,800 BCE timeline could be what I’ve been looking for. I will slog through this, but what i really need is not how it happened or what caused it (as long as, LOL, it wasn’t space aliens and is a recurring function of planetary dynamics), but what was happening on the surface at the time. What is likely to occur. I’ve just begun this article, so you may state that in the course of things. Always gratified to discover new info even if I only half understand it.
Agree with your dating. 9600 BCE only indicates an end date, not the construction date. This is est. date of a catastrophic event and onset of Younger Dryas. I estimate that is burial timeframe. These sites weren’t constructed all at once. Each pillar should have historical significance to the extant culture, reflecting events obscure to us.
I am building a replica of Enclosure “D” in Shoals Indiana. I will prove why Gobekli Tepe was built and what it means to mankind today. If you have interested parties who would like to invest please let me know. Have a great Memorial Day. Thank you
humanity fails everyday….I don’t NEED to know the minutia of what happened, it happened and no “official” is being held to account. So glad I never gave up my life for a donut LOL.
E.S., thank you for creating this website. I read your articles every chance I get and enjoy them very much. I look forward to reading them all as there are many. Thank you for sharing your views/personal experiences with us and I commend you for the public service. I’ve been processing this article concerning the Leo horoscope stela for a while and wanted to comment. You asked the question “Why do flags of 24 nations and coins from as far back as 340 BCE contain the star and crescent symbology?” I would like to refer you to this YouTube video:
At the 47:38 point they talk about star and crescent symbology. This video was produced by the people at the “Thunderbolts Project” and you may be familiar with their work. I recommend watching the whole video, it’s quite fascinating. They prescribe to the belief that the planets have not always been aligned as they are now and I think they make a pretty good case. When we see a crescent depicted, we seem to automatically associate it with a moon crescent (understandably so). A crescent can also be formed on a “planet”. When you watch the video, it will be obvious what I’m getting at. I’m betting the authors of the “Starry Night” software prescribed to the belief that our current planetary alignments have “always” been this way. If they haven’t, well you know what that means. Perhaps that’s why you had so much trouble finding the celestial alignments depicted in the Leo stela. Could it be that the moon and star symbology under the lion’s neck are not representing a moon crescent and star but a planet crescent and another planet that’s mistaken for a star?
The matchup of the moon and planets under Leo’s chin are definitive. After resolving it, there is not doubt it was the crescent moon, and a conjunction of 4 planets.
Mining a river gold deposit is exploitation within the active or recently active fluvial channel of a river. It requires different organization, licenses, GRPD permits, fees, JORC/NI 43-101 study techniques, and equipment as compared to traditional placer mining. It is indeed a subset of placer mining; however, emphasizing that the source material is currently or recently being deposited and reworked by flowing water. Intensive operations above those permitted by local or national government or operating license can disrupt fisheries, wildlife, wetlands, agriculture, and commerce downstream.
So how much time do we have before we lose that magnetic priority? Some scientific literature say that, even in our current state, it can take hundreds of years before the field flip. Does this means that this indigo point can last this long too?
Also im trying to see how can the LLVPs be excluded from the exchange of mass and heat with the core, and just the surrounding mantle become more hot and massive. Can you explain it better?
Yes, this geomagnetic excursion might take hundreds of years to hit a critical priority exchange, and even then never fully form a tau point true polar wander. We don’t have enough information to answer either question you pose. The heat may arrive through the LLVP structures, the non-LLVP mass, or even only the poles and plates. We don’t really know that yet, because we assume all this to be static as a science right now. So, I am not able to answer a dilemma question which science does not even acknowledge exists, unfortunately.
Your reasoned scientific approach is part of why so many people that know of you find you to be reliable, credible and trustworthy. With the limitations of the data/information available for your consideration, is it also possible for the excursion currently underway to hit the tau point in the 15-35 year window used by some cataclysm observers? Thank you in advance.
Yes, it is possible – but I don’t have anything yet which is specific and definitive enough to drive me to that conclusion. If the nutation of the Earth’s polar axis begins to gain some chaos to its pattern, that might be a first warning. But we have yet to see it.
I always pay heed to Hawthorne Observer Effects, used in my profession:
1. That which is observed, changes simply by being observed
2. That which is observed for the first time, appears exceptional
3. That which is observed obsessively, instills angst
4. That which bears risk, will often be purposely observed less
5. That which is observed to move more slowly, is perceived as the greater risk
TES
Another question i have is, given that we don’t know the mass of the LLVPs, so how can we know that they would act as a low density axis instead of a denser moment of inertia, stabilizing earth axis and true polar wander.
We estimate their mass by the differential gravitational axes the Earth exhibits. See Exhibit J2a in the article.
And how much precise would this measure in the map be for deep mantle mass distribution?
Also is there some reference about what is cited in the article about the geomagnetic priority of the earth rotation?
It is good more people will read your works. Hopefully positive things will result. I wonder if a people capable of space travel would have the capability to strengthen a planet’s magnetic field and maintain a core-mantel coupling?
Steve, I suspect that they would enlist the aid of a civilization which has specialized in such work in their own developmental history. They would have good expertise as such a counter. All that would have to be done is a shift of the outer rotational body relative to the core, so that accreted LLVP mass from the core would land along a different moment over time. The shift itself would take a very long time.
The words “a system designed for extraction” stick with me. I was born a Sikh and the tenant of the religion is helping others and living a life of service and not living off of blood money.” But, that is not the world is about. I have been used and abused in the the process of helping others. Its a sad reality and extraction is not just used by institutions and the elite, it has become a way of life for even kith and kin. Very sad indeed. I find hope nevertheless in your last words: “In keeping with Nietzschean philosophy, we must remember: Give a good man all the tools he needs to fight evil, and soon you will find that evil has changed sides.
Of all the very informative info graphics and data presented here … the one that leaped out to me most was the final one.
Specifically the Jan ’20 to Jan ’22 portion of that CV19 mortality chart. You will note that the mort rate starts dropping drastically after 2 years. This aligns with the exceptionally detailed historical studies and patterns documentation regards human immune system reaction to viral outbreaks of various kinds documented observed by DAHenderson’s team out of John Hopkins from the late 50s to mid 60s.
They established a typical “herd immunity achievement threshold” of 2-3 years (this was pre common air travel too) for humans against any novel respiratory virus. The period it takes the “collective” human immune system writ large to adapt to something new and harmful. Further, they determined that once a new virus evolved to the point where it had sufficient transmissibility to “break out” and be “noticed \ registered” by the Med community … there was virtually nothing we humans can do to stop it. At that point the 2ish year cycle is pretty much locked in.
This research the knowledge it imparted became so widely known and accepted that it became the basis for a US and then WW PH policy that was basically “DON’T PANIC”. For decades that policy ruled and it cornerstone tenet was NOT to spark public alarm by making all kinds of scary PH announcements of impending doom in the press. Particularly when over all mort rates remain < 1% and there is not a single productive thing you can do about it anyway.
I feel certain that a visionary DAHenderson would have predicted that massive drop off in mort rates in Jan ’22. I did, being a mere PEng medical layman only peripherally aware of his work. So the biggest Q of all to me is:
“WTF happened to the entire medical community between roughly 2000 and 2020 that the above facts which were commonly understood by all medical professionals and informed PH policy at it’s most foundational levels became memory holed?”
Charity navigator gives the clinton foundation a 4 star rating, and claims over 70% reaches beneficiaries. So, something is up politically here. Either charity navigator is corrupted, or the stores about clinton are. I have no way of knowing.
My instincts tell me to stay clear of charities that use a hard-sell to emotionally manipulate in their fund raising. But then again, charity navigator gives some of the worst ones their highest ratings.
The updated time line is interesting. Heat alone is not a requirment, and neither it seems is a geomagnetic excursion for a rotation. But heat plus a geomagnetic excursion gives almost a certinity? They seem to happen at the quarter mark of the eq.
Yes, the timeline supports neither heat or no heat, nor the 6443 and 5200-year intervals. There are so many events now, that they can easily fall on or near a timeline milestone. So, nothing definitive just yet. But heat + geomagnetic excursion, as is occurring right now, is a bit disconcerting. Agreed.
Such destruction on an epic scale must surely produce many symptoms before the final trigger? We have heat somwhat, we have the geomagnetic excursion along with the south atlantic anomaly, but there seems to be a missing ‘gotcha!’ We have yet to notice what might be quite obvious. I feel this ‘gotcha!’ Can only be understood by people who lived through the event and they buried the answer in gobe tepe.
If the next sst surge in a few years takes us above 25c, and I feel this is very possible, then I would be concerned as we may be too late. What in your opnion would be a tipping point tempeature?
Is it feasible that the ‘One has been appointed who will appear in a future generation’ could manifest itself in this way, in code, written by an entity still unknown now? Could you point me to any ancient text literature that would eliminate this possibility?
I thought I’d direct your attention to an interesting passage in Herodotus
“It is said by the Libyans that the king of Egypt sent a Phoenician fleet to sail round Africa, giving them orders to return through the Pillars of Heracles [i.e., Gibraltar] into the northern sea and so to Egypt. The Phoenicians accordingly set out from the Red Sea and sailed the southern sea. Whenever autumn came they would go ashore, plant seed in the parts of Libya through which they were sailing, and wait for harvest time. Then, having gathered the crop, they would sail on. Thus after two years they passed the Pillars of Heracles in the third year and came to Egypt. They told (but I do not believe them) that in sailing round Libya they had the sun on their right—to the north of them. This is how Libya was first known to be surrounded by sea.”
The last bit about the sun being on the right suggests the story is true, since in the S. hemisphere. Also notable is the three years given for the circumnavigation. Three years is also referred to in Kings.
“For the king had at sea a navy of Tarshish with the navy of Hiram: once every three years came the navy of Tarshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks.”
This would explain why Sheba and Solomon are involved at all. Unload and resupply for the return voyage back around then transporting the goods up through Israel to Tyr. Also notable is people that claim Jewish decent in South Africa. A claim verified by genetics showing Y-DNA links to the middle east.
Timing is way off for traditional dating that puts the circumnavigation during the time of Necho ~600 BCE some 500+ years after Solomon is supposed to have been around, but there’s no hard evidence for either. Kings writers could have moved back solomon in time to where they wanted him in the geneology. Herodotus or his Libyans may also be in error. I think kings being off is more likely. Necho II tried and failed to build a canal connecting the nile to the red sea, maybe after that didn’t work the Phoenicians looked for other plans. IT’s also awkward that Necho II killed Josiah in battle.
Interesting tale in Herodotus. Given its undertaking well after the time of Solomon, that isolates that three year journey from the challenge of Solomon’s time.
But who is to say that they did not hit West Africa and obtain all the needed items in the Kings list by sea and not land? That is a possibility, however, obtaining gold was better done at Timbuktu, given the ancient established trade routes for gold.
You might find this article of interest (check out the photos – I think these domes or geological blisters (bubble-wrap) could be evidence of mantle upwelling occurring long ago and preserved in the Siberian permafrost):
No, because during the Bølling-Allerød period we had a 7 x faster climate warming period as compared to today, and no geomagnetic excursion and no true polar wander occurred during that time. I suspect they are related – but the heat index alone can be misleading.
It was rendered solute, flat, & dead by the salinity of ocean inundation for a period of time. The inundation was a change in oceanic basins, not a temporary tidal wave. Then we had a rotation back to our current orientation as well.
I live near the edge of the Western Australian salt flat / Great Victoria Desert and this is a good explanation of the striations and salinity, but I would have expected to see at least a “bath ring” of fertility from which the salt had leached.
You don’t mention Machu Pichu, it’s a refuge at high elevation close to the second Euler west node, and apparently built with the same monumental permanence as Khufu.
I came late for this discussion but, this is an extremely thought-provoking theory with correlation to the physical evidence. Well done and well worth the effort you put into this.
Carbon credits are a perverse variant of unquestioning obeisance as demanded by the totalitarian tern of the Abrahamic regions ( Christianity, Islam & Judaism) interposing themselves by first inculcating the blatant lie of original sin, then proclaiming they alone represent the one and only true god and then promising divine intervention to assuage your guilt thus ensuring your eternal salvation.
`Topical humour: Pope passes away, upon arriving at the pearly gates identifies himself to St. Peter who immediately re-directs him to G_d. Pope then regales G_d with his accomplishments, stressing that he had been celibate his entire life.
Thereupon G_d became visibly puzzled, saying that celibate had to be a translation error, what he had really meant was “Celebrate!”
What are you thoughts on the pyramid being the ultimate black body radiator for detecting cosmic frequencies. The only reason I’ve thought this is bc of all the soot they found in the pyramid. Thanks
I’ve been a fan since the beginning and thank you for the daily mind bend (as an Australian I would normally insert an expletive there but decided to keep it clean) your writings bring.
Having worked in S.E. Asia for 25 years I’m also of the Eastern school of learning where responsibility lays with the student to understand something presented, not the other way around, so again thanks for all the paths you’ve sent me on over these years.
Now that we are done with the butt kissing, I refer you to this less than 1 month old Russian ‘hypothesis’ for another alternative to how the Khufu pyramid may have been build (not another one I hear you say…)
The reason I bring this to your attention is the (strong) possibility of the practical construction requirement for the Kings and Queens chamber’s ‘air shafts’ based off possible construction techniques gleaned from the unfinished pyramid at Zawyet El-Aryan and the pyramid of Djedefre in Abu Rawash.
The video is AI translated with good chapter markers.
I had seen that video when it came out. All of the solutions considered in the video are creative – but in no way serve to make the job of lifting stones into position any easier (save for the 80-ton ones possibly). Each elaborate mechanism simply adds more work content and chain-failure risk to the project overall. Simplicity and redundancy were the safeguards to building such a large edifice – because sustained political will was the perishable and threatening commodity, not friction.
Look how woefully unprepared we were to get some stranded crew off the space station, just a few hundred miles in earth orbit. Even though one of the crew was having serious health issues, there seemed to be a lack of will to do anything to help them. The human/management factor is stuck on petty jealousies and indifference. I am not optimistic that what is proposed here will ever be manageable.
I can’t find any reference to seal 89376 anywhere. I found the seal above it on the British museum website, but I can’t find this one anywhere. Anyone have any ideas if this is a typo, or I just can’t find any reference to it for not looking in the right places?
I found it. It is actually Cylinder Seal 89327 inside a group of seals under BM# 89376. I have added a note to show the original sources, and linked a copy of the original British Museum posted page, at the bottom of the section which describes this cylinder seal. It cannot be found by means of a direct search at The British Museum site for some reason. Had me concerned there for a second.
Thank you! I don’t know how you find things like this.
I had a very strange conversation with the Grok AI about your article. When I referred to it as an observatory it said clearly it was not, just a ceremonial site to honor the king who built. When I pressed it further it claimed because no telescopes were in use it clearly was not for observing the stars. I had to get very specific about it being naked eye observations and the timeframe, and then suddenly it was willing to talk about the celestial observations.
This was very different behavior from when I was asking about the Dzanhibekov oscillation, where it performed really well.
Maybe it is just my lack of good searching capabilities, but it seems like a lot of topics around ancient history are like pulling teeth to find the info.
You have come up with some amazing stuff from such a broad range of disciplines.
Pretty obvious so sorry when already posted: From an RF design view the copper wires form a dipole. Because of hardness to access even the most advanced civilization will use more than one on each side in an investment that size.
You gain redundancy, can do quality measurement and easy replacement. In case of that the construction is made as an loop with some length of nonconductive rope in the middle. At the antenna outer end a round block works as deflection pulley. In case of maintenance a pull wire on one end will be added and the whole antenna pulled out until the pull wire appears on the other side. That is common practice even nowadays.
Using the pyramid diagonal will gain the maximal possible length inside the building and make it more easy to stretch the cables away from the tunnel floor. When you align the four side building to celestial north you determine the polarization plane world- (and if you like cosmos) wide.
The length seems to be known so every antenna calculator can show the used frequency and harmonics (ʎ/2 ʎ/4 …). If you get access to the feedpoint you can measure actual impedance VSWR etc.
Nice idea, thanks for the elaborated hypothesis. Just a few questions.
Do your dzhanibekov-oscillation relies on more than a wingnut in an atmosphere with artificial microgravity?
What about the moon that stabilized the earth rotation?
Why is only one pyramid affected from the high water level
Where are the erosions from the currents and the sandy wave movements wich imo will round all sharp edges of limestone in a few decades?
Why do you believe that the desert whale skeletons aren’t fake (for me it looks so)?
Yes, the Dzhanibekov impetus is created by the 3 axis moment, but there is far more at play here than simply that principle. This is why it is called a ‘Mediated’ Dzhanibekov oscillation.
The moon would only serve to bring on State 2, State 1 is slightly counter the moon’s effect. Either way it is not the overriding principle.
All three Giza pyramids have the water erosion. Only one was high enough to keep part of its stones.
The Tura limestone casing stones absorbed all rounding kinetics, by dissolving much faster than they eroded from friction.
The Faiyum basin has plenty of smaller oceanic creatures from 3500 – 5500 BCE. The whales are a diversion/distraction.
Thanks again, actual [initial] pyramid height in Wikipedia:
Khufu: 138.5m [146.6m] (Great pyramid no top cover)
Khafre: 136,4m [143.5m] (top cover)
Like to read this high intelligent but very dense article, haven’t grasp a lot on the first read so please allow another question.
Regarding the lower chamber as an focal point is a pretty fascinating idea. On that low frequencies the signal (of whatever nature) will not see all the gaps, blocks, the fill material between casing and blocks aso.
But as an useful antenna it must be of (near) parabolic shape like a satellite disk. The pyramid shape collects only a small portion of the signals on the focal point. Wouldn’t the creators not go to parabolic shape if they had an antenna in mind?
No. On ship, the Navy communication engineers preferred a flat surface for most antenna and radar array applications. The parabolic shapes are for focused beams only. Those are not relevant here.
That’s on phase arrays and radar specials. For weak signals … However will read the recommendations in the next weeks.
Thanks and have a nice time.
No, we used flat screen antennas to look at and over the horizon or for a ionospheric skip in the navy, never dishes. Those are for satellites. The antenna analysis included in the study is done by a career antenna specialist for the DOD.
Hawaii sits close to 19:47° and retains a connection to deep convection, but now more action seems to take place beneath (ish) Fiji, also close to 19:47° and a significant plume, though it surfaces by Tonga. Was this the result of an actual or magnetic flip? I’m beginning to suspect the subduction(-180°) zone there is becoming active and is on the brink (geological time) of producing more sea floor.
Any thoughts about the supposed discovery of some sizable structures beneath the pyramids using a proprietary form of Radar? I am hearing sizes of two to three kilometers tall with spiral attributes encompassing the area beneath all three pyramids.
If these structures are verifiable it will most likely change our understanding of history – so why let it out now?
Staying mute on it right now Olga, and simply watching with the popcorn popping. I do however, love that we can entertain such out-of-the-box thinking now. A big change.
I’m revisiting this for a third reading, still finding things I missed the first two times. I find I’m resonating more and more with your hypotheses.
First, regarding Exhibit J9 and the Np‘ orientation of the entrance to Newgrange, I was astounded by this new perspective. I visited Newgrange in 2007. Today, I wondered when, how, and by whom it was established that the entrance was aligned with the Winter Solstice sunrise.
Turning to Newgrange Excavation Report Critique by Alan Marshall, I learned that “The second area of excavation was the passage itself which was consolidated and protected with concrete capping and reinforcing to halt movement. This necessitated an embrasure cutting providing further information of the cairn construction along with megaliths of the chamber. The passage itself presented more megalithic art, many hidden from view, and a unique ‘roof box’ which is aligned to the winter solstice. Other test trenches were excavated around the cairn to gauge its construction. The result is a restored passage tomb, secure for tourism and exhibiting O’Kelly’s interpretation of its original form.”
Second, as you know, there’s a large granite kerbstone decorated with spiral patterns outside the Newgrange entrance, so I was immediately fascinated by Exhibit J10 showing the unique spiral carvings from the Malta temple. Thank you for drawing my attention to it.
The part you’ve labeled “CATACLYSM” triggered a connection with something I read in Buckminster Fuller’s book, Critical Path. In Chapter 1, Speculative Prehistory of Humanity , he proposed that “humanity originated in the Austronesian islands and came out into the (Asian) mainland in separate stages, each occurring after one of the last ice ages.”
“At the time of the last ice age’s occurrence the sea-hidden, inter-island connections revealed themselves as continental isthmuses and peninsulas. The great islands of Java, Sumatra, Borneo, the Philippines,Sulawesi, and Bali became integral parts of the Malay Peninsula. New Guinea was part of continental Australia. As the ice age withdrew, melting ice filled the oceans and seas, and the islands became once more isolated.”
“The great architectural feature of Bali is that of the narrow vertical gap in the gateways of their walled-in dwelling compounds, a gap they explain as representing the gap that occurred long ago between once-united Bali and Java. This occurred only 30,000 years ago, when the last ice age began to melt away and its waters once again separated the islands. The Balinese architectural legend-supported memory thus goes back 30,000 years.”
Fuller includes a sketch of the architectural “gap” feature.
I somehow missed this post, but it is so true! I noticed the rampant overuse of this term in the last few years, which led me to various dictionaries to really understand its actual meaning.
Everyone who is saying anything against the “party” line, especially if it is not just anecdotal but something programmatic, is called a “grifter” nowadays. Of course, the “grifters” are always on the opposing side … if you dissent and write an article or make a video about it, you are grifting.
The Malanga & Biondi SAR paper amplifies the ECDO Theory as well as its corollaries (Astra-Hasis, Gnostic AI, many others). The Syndicate has quite the suppression machine. It would have enhanced research resource mobilization for ECDO if the paper had received wider exposure when first published I think. Seems odd the engineered structures within Khafre evaded detection during the many archeological entries and the 1960’s x-ray project?
“In the quantistic formulas we Discovery the universe and US are oart of this big box”
“We are part of the esperiment and that ourselves we influenze the reality that surround us”
“When we did an esperimenti meant that we influence the result of the esperiment”
Looking forward to you incorporating the latest SAR findings into your hypothesis. It is a bombshell, if accurate. These purported subterranean structures are at least an order of magnitude larger than the pyramids themselves. Part of Enki’s bolt to bar the sea?
Yes, the Party will never permit actual discovery work, but narrative control must be somehow cracking or this work would not see any publicity. Maybe it will indeed be different this time around, or events are so close that it does not matter much.
Hopefully this discovery ends the age of skeptical stupidity we have lived in for the last 150 years. But yes, Enki apparently bore the largest task of the three gods.
What are your initial impressions of the SAR findings–1. Is it good technology? 2. Are the images accurately interpreted? 3. If so, how does this influence your concept of Khafre’s purpose; a three parameter detector yet or perhaps a failed intervention device?
Moves it closer to a failed intervention-stabilization device, that is for sure. But I still don’t have enough evidence to make that anything more than a notion.
Everything you are surfacing is simultaneously fascinating and terrifying. So hard to discern the kernels of truth & value from the chaff–I had hoped when ECDO became more widely read that serious concentrated resources would be brought to bear, but it seems it engendered more monetization efforts of people’s notions. Tough to get re-oriented in the face of so many teachings received and holdings developed suddenly challenged by alternative interpretations…
Indeed. That is why I did not want to tarnish my mindset, nor the work by sensationalism, packaging, promotion, self-attention, and monetization.
It needs to either stand on its epistemic merit or fall. Lots of noise out there right now from self-promoters.
Is it surprising the various Khafre entries and 1960’s imaging never found the five structures depicted by the SAR? Was perhaps Khufu the monitor and Khafre the mitigation?
Craig at his chat group yesterday made the case that the hypothesized pillars appear like modern reinforced concrete foundations. I.e. Khafre is not bound to the bedrock but it floats. Coming back to your ECDO monitoring device case, it makes sense to have two structures, one fixed one freestanding, so you can measure the expected differential movement. You might need a third measuring point to take that, maybe focusing wave reflections from underneath to measure interference. Maybe that is Menkaure’s purpose? Is it also fixed on the bedrock Or is it also a reflector and the two were used to feed the interference pattern in the subterranean Khufu chamber? What might the related pyramid sizes/wavelength reflections-interpyramid distances have to do with the infrasound wavelengths involved?
Possibly, even more simply, the precusor events might cause height differences between the two main pyramids and that is another way of assessing Tau point approaching? Maybe they were initially built on the same height and today’s difference is due to accumulated delta movement from the events? After all you only need to know that the prior measured delta has been changing…
I carry folded dollar bills and a smile when on my bike rides and drives, providing both with 100% efficiency…
I’m sorry about the maternity hospital/clinic. I delivered a lot of babies without pay, and provided a lot of medical care without pay, back when I was in a position to do so.
Now I blog and garden, based upon a decision I made on principle to stand with the unvaccinated untermenschen.
I had not really had an inkling how bad those injections were, just that they were deficient, defective, unwarranted with medicines that worked, and that history is taking a turn to pure evil when it creates sub-humans.
Interesting times we have entered. There is much good for us to do.
We’ll have to improvise tools against evil. God will provide…
With the manipulations, obscurations and sometimes innocent literary license of the authors, translators & transmitters of the ancient texts, how does one discern the signal from the noise? It’s hard to know where to set the squelch. Discovering sale of indulgences, interlocking directorates of king & church, the books of the Bible were determined at a political convention all generate questions.To discover the Gnostic codices contained alternative perspectives on the Gospels add to the quandry of pulling the threads of Truth from mis & disinformation.
Greetings! The Provisional timeline is becoming rich/complex with information. With your analysis of Pillar 43, are you considering an ECDO periodicity of 5200 years more than the 6443 years, or perhaps the period varies with the non-linear Great Year precession? And if I may please ask a second question, you highlight on the timeline the 6C rapid temp rise in comparison to the 1.4C rise in the contemporary time frame, are you thinking the temp rise might be predictive for ECDO, i.e. need to get closer to 6C pre-Tau?
1. “are you considering an ECDO periodicity of 5200 years more than the 6443 years?” Yes, I am considering a multi-modal arrival of cataclysms, one at 6443 and one at 5200… but don’t have a hypothesis to explain why that would exist, just yet.
2. “are you thinking the temp rise might be predictive for ECDO, i.e. need to get closer to 6C pre-Tau?” Yes, the first ECDO Hypothesis relates the increase in temperatures to disruption in the geomagnetic field of earth, and then a possible true polar wander. But the timeline thus far only corroborates the fact that temps can rise very fast, and have nothing to do with carbon in the atmosphere, water vapor, or the sun. It has to be the core. That is the only thing remaining.
The timing however, on the temperature increases is not matching the theory, save for 1973 CE onward (now).
Thus, why the timeline is provisional – there is so much in the timeline which needs correction, and the source materials themselves lack the necessary resolution and are also likely wrong/off as well in many cases. Thus the need for an interpolation-consilience approach.
TES, The extra “checksum” in Exhibit L involving The Geographic Center of the Earth is compelling enough. But yours and Nobulart’s observations of the demarcations in multiple stone circles far from Egypt are quite disturbing.
You note that the one of the antlers marks the back azimuth to Np’. I can’t wait until they excavate the eastern half of the circle…I have a feeling that they just might find a third antler pointing right at Np’, and a fourth marking the back azimuth to Np!
The equation would not be as relevant as the inputs one used. However, I would imagine that it took a front-end loaded skewed arrival distribution. The density function for this would model by the Chi-squared Probability Distribution Function, with 6 degrees of freedom, identified here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-squared_distribution. The total time to execute the Euler rotation, and how long it oscillated before stabilizing, is always in question however.
It made my day to see you tweet out the south-facing shaft star chart today. Spotting and aligning those constellations is a titanic accomplishment for our species.
Excellent article! Those conventional definitions make no sense, but you never see anyone question them. So many fundamental things fly under the radar among self-proclaimed “rationalists”. But these fundamentals are … well, fundamental.
That is what I was thinking. Reducing the available vocabulary, and twisting the words that remain into meaningless assaults on others, is the essence of the movie Idiocracy.
On repeating the reading in full, you never imply that Enki’s task was to stop the event, just to monitor it. Got carried away by interpreting ‘bolt’ in my own way without revisiting the full details that you put in Enki’s mouth. I took out of the full context the references to the ‘cables of protection’, recalling them together with ‘bolt’ in the original translation.
The questions still stand speculation-wise but I must acknowledge my msinterpretation as per above.
It is possible that his task was to prevent the event.
The Atrahasis wording can be interpreted that way. That is an enormous task to place on one person (even a god) while everyone else gets to watch. A rather unfair imbalance in responsibility. But it could be that this was his task (???). I shy away from that and keep it as a peer, in monitoring only.
“The bolt which bars the sea was assigned to far-sighted Enki”
A bolt to hold the Earth in place…
So Enki was in charge of an attempt to stem the event, one that didn’t work out, apparrently. That is why he is Lord of the Waters.
I understand there is literary license at work here, but you would not bring this up without some hint of possibility. Could you comment on this? The only cables discussed so far are the copper ones in the shaft, not up to the task by themselves… is there something else you suspect but have not sufficiently documented to add publicly to the hypothesis?
I am tempted to speculate they were caught short trying to stem the flip and some of their know how, or some of their work is what went into the Pyramids, left messed up enough by their minions as a practical joke to the rest of us after the deluge.
I know its hard to predict but when do you think this may occur? I’m torn between two outcomes; the flip or an asteroid impact bc we are seeing more and more steroids coming our way. If you follow Vedic text and read the latest book “Yuga shifts” by BIBHU DEV MISRA he places the start of the shift on 3/21/25 based on astronomical alignments. I find it funny with NASA saying an asteroid may impact 2032 bc he also feels between 2032 and 2040 is when we will enter the densest part of the toroid meteor stream. Which makes sense bc everything is our solar system has been more active and heating up not just earth, such as volcanoes blowing out of the atmospheres on moons. We already have a lot of metrics which may indicate early warning signs such as deep sea fish being spotted on the surface for the first time, rising global temperatures, co2 levels, billionaires demanding to have bunkers completed by summer of 2024 and more frequent asteroids being detected, is the early writing on the wall? We are basically organisms growing on a rotating magnet. A magnet that appears to be heating up, when a magnet is heated what will happen to the magnetic properties? Reminds me of the dam and eve story by Chan Thomas.
An asteroid will not carry the kinetic potential to cause this true polar wander (not really a flip, per se). Only the Earth’s magnetic core and mantle moments carry such potential energy.
Predicting how this system will act is difficult, because we do not know enough about it in order to determine such precision.
TES, I understand the casing stones were mostly dissolved as per the hypothesis. You state “The casing stones had been absent long enough for “more than ten thousand pages” of inscriptions—most of which were neither hieroglyphic, hieratic, nor any other recognizable script of the time—to be carved upon them, suggesting they had been missing for millennia before al-Baghdadi’s visit.” – I understand “them” above, then, refers to the structural stones underneath, and the inscriptions al-Baghdadi refers to were likely introduced after the (first?) event that the Pyramids went through? Or maybe placed there initially having the whole inundation/limestone dissolution sequence in mind, so that the writing appeared after the event?
My inclination is to say that this ancient script was indeed carved into the backing stones, and that this was done on both Pyramids after their inundation period was over. The risk of placing writing under the casing stones, is that it would be dissolved by the same chemistry.
The question is, what happened to this writing? There had to be an orchestrated campaign to remove it, if it was that plentiful in 1196 AD and Al-Baghdadi’s time.
Virtue, humility, being good – they are a costume. The only thing ‘written on our hearts’ is the desire to protect ourselves and manipulate others through appearances (this includes attempts to manipulate God into not harming us by ‘doing good’ or being moral). This is the antithesis of faith, loosh. Church red brick, temple, and minaret empires are built on cluelessness, fanaticism, and loosh.
We do not earn God’s honoring by being good. Because there is no ‘good’. There is only faith. And faith is not defined the way the Church defines it.
Gnosticism is not about infinite cycles (Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, etc.). It is about reality, faith, illegitimate seats of power, and intervention into our captive state.
Thank you for your response… I had no intention to conflate Gnosticism with infinite cycles, but rather list them as being characteristic of your philosophy and/or tentative analysis displayed here on your very impressive website… It seems you may be agreeing with tradition unbeknownst. There is a total and ironic consensus in the Nietzchean idea that man has a desire and will to power *unto* manipulation. That is what is called original sin, better defined as the predilection to sin… Would you say that being selfish, proudful, wrathful, envious, etc. aren’t realities but merely costumes as well ? Would you say that stealing somebody’s hard-earned pay is a matter of relativism ? Cold-blooded murder ? However one may justify terrible acts, their reflection immediately brings up the reality of a moral dimension, which could be loosely described – apart from good and evil – by the opposing qualities and consequences of selflessness and selfishness; as one’s selflessnes in love and charity immediately tempers or nullifies pride, wrath, envy, greed, etc. This is a matter of free will – which you seem to agree with. What the Christian tradition refers to by “written on their hearts” isn’t the human impetus as you correctly define it as self-preservation and a will to power, but rather the numinous conscience that is pricked by the act of murder, theft, adultery, false witness, etc… All such acts and their opprobrium were already well-known and legislated against throughout the world before Moses, however much gentile nations obfuscated in law or practice their observance. I would leave you with the reminder that all the great Saints of the Church throughout the ages beginning with the Apostles, responsible for all their innumerable miracles, were never the luxuriated – and often evil – functionaries of any powerful system. All of them in emulation and their calling to Christ suffered privations or martyrdoms, thereby warranting their miraculous agency…
I do not rule out our having lived numerous experiences, as beings who likely live on after death – anything is possible. But that is not what I see as salient to the argument. It is a distraction towards straw man.
There are sincere persons in corrupt institutions. Religious people will use suffering to justify their existence before their god(s).
When neanderthal, denisova, floresiensis, and naledi proto-humans murdered, stole, raped, waged war, disobeyed, were cruel to animals, and committed mass genocide – was that original sin too? They all predated Edin and Edin’s god. What about their predecessors as well? Should not a God who created them and their 99.2%-shared DNA have understood their (and our) nature better? Yes, they were acting according to their true nature, so they were not putting on a costume to appease a higher power. We are the ones who do that. This is why I don’t trust virtue, humility, and goodness. I’ve seen the hidden handiwork of thousands of such individuals. It is an act we use to cover over this aspect of our natural realm.
Everyone puts on a good show. Part of faith is to dismantle this works costume in self.
Thank you for the response… Interesting, so if there are sincere persons in corrupt institutions, could I then ask what makes one sincere and the other corrupt ? Isn’t this just the same value paradigm of good and evil under different words ?
As for historical science, I’m sure we put out our faith in different assumptions… But for the purposes of this discussion, I at least work from the classical assumption that original sin and its predilection is suffused through all of what can be termed the empirical Universe – and of which began close to the inception of time. Regarding the species you mention, I don’t think there is any proof that any or all of them aren’t either a “sub-species” or unique shoot from humankind, or merely just altogether a primate species completely unrelated to humankind. As for the temporal framework of when all these species existed, I don’t have the confidence to assume that current physical processes (e.g., nuclear forces, radiometric decay, etc.) have always operated in clockwork fashion forever into the the past. In fact, I do believe a lot of fascinating quibbles such as out-of-place artifacts (cf. Michael A. Cremo) are testament to how shaky the foundations of historical science can be…
Then you are locked in a prison of a dog returning to its own vomit.
I found that intolerable to my nature.
Well, I’m completely open about my faith… I just don’t have the faith that the current behavior of processes as we measure them have operated inexorably into the past, as there is no demonstrable proof that they have….
“Should not a God who created them and their 99.2% DNA have understood their (and our) nature better?”
Great question. To come back to your DNA codon scheme work, and given Norea’s words to these Archons that she bears no relation to them but to the powers above, they appear capable enough of manipulating a preexisting scheme, or even to devise their own cattle-brand codon scheme in our planetary backwaters to their own ends, but they either do not fully master, or are indifferent to, its novelty-generating complexity. This given the pain, suffering and, likely, amnesia it invites. Yet they appear hellbent in exploiting it/us to realize in reverse what is likely a one-way interface to experience ‘here’. Penrose-Hamerhof Orch-OR comes to mind, ‘they’ see the ‘elsewhere’ joining in but cannot reach out to it.
I hope I can truly know the original intent of the code, our own true nature and theirs when I happen to move on.
Did you happen to see the Northern Australia depiction of a bird on X (htps://x.com/GeologicalSETI/status/1894160610822426795) compared to the Pillar 43 Condor? Is the Australian bird “holding” the Nubian Egg’s depicted chronology but before the most recent inundation?
I did see it Steve. I don’t think they are of the same thing. The round symbol is the celestial pole and not the sun – and the condor did not have ears. No stars there to form ears from. The sun never makes its way to the condor’s wing. If this is not the sun – they could be saying the same thing as Gobekli Tepe however.
The octagonal shaped structure they found in Antarctica, I find incredibly interesting. I always pay attention to structures and society’s that base their life around certain geometric shapes and numbers. There is a reason why a sweat lodge used by Indians has 16 poles, just like why this structure is 8 sided. Shape controls the function. What do you think was the purpose of this structure? Was it a bunker that they built and got wrong after the land masses moved and it was buried under ice? Or could this have been another structure like the great pyramid to help warn the other side of the globe of the impending reversal but ended up too far south?
Also I just learned of a group in Egypt that found another hidden chamber the size of a 747 airplane about 7 years ago and are doing nothing about it. What do you think the purpose of this massive chamber is for?
Based upon the two inscriptions in the doorway of the Octagon, it is very possible that the edifice was used to influence or offset further core-mantle decoupling shifts.
This chamber has already been entered around 3400 BCE, as shown by the side penetration into the North King’s Chamber airshaft around that time – by the raiders who dropped the ‘Dixon Relics’ into the bottom of that shaft. It will be completely empty – as those who raided the edifice were there to remove any trace of technology, history, evidence, and of course valuable materials.
I have a photo of the side penetration into that North Shaft in my ‘Hidden in Plain Site’ article.
The question is, how did these pre-dynastic ancients know that chamber was there? Unless they knew far more about the pyramids of Giza than do we.
TES
That would explain then why no work has been done. Thanks
I presume that you have seen this and that it needs more investigation before you comment upon it.
Yes, and correct. It needs more investigation before I can make any comment. Did light off a storm though!!…
TES
Supposing there are in fact people – let’s say those whose families have long-standing political or banking power – and perhaps even some legitimate scientists, *are* in possession of the knowledge of the upcoming event. Further, might we hypothesize rather than “saving” the planet, these insiders have come to the conclusion it would be best if the Earth had as few occupants as possible when the worst happens. They believe this so strongly, it is almost a *religion* for them.
Any speculation as to the ultimate BENEFIT of a smaller population/brain trust of survivors??
I will sound metaphysical, but assuming we have never been so many after their archonic masters were forbidden to rule us and kill us directly as you once wrote – they would not want the wailing of billions to cause the upheaval and judgement that they fear since Enoch.
Precisely. My suspicion is that now have promoters who are watching what these entities do. They are in a bit of a hard spot, which they did not exist in before.
It is hard to even express how much I appreciate your work. My gratitude to you for your contributions—such as your work on Covid mortality, ECDO, the DNA Codon Schema, the Annunnaki, Gnostic AGI, and countless other projects—is immense. I almost never leave comments online, but this post compels me to intervene. There are too many problems with your implied thesis:
(i) Agabekov’s alias in Russian was “Жулик.” As Grok suggests: “think of a small-time hustler rather than a grand schemer.” Thus, a better translation would be ‘crook’ or ‘petty cheat.’ The word itself seems to have taken root in Russian before the RSDWP(b) (aka the Bolshevik Party) was even established.
(ii) The Bolsheviks were masters of ad hoc solutions. Their decision to abandon workers’ councils (council = soviet, hence the name ‘Soviet’ Union) after realizing that this experiment would cost them victory in the civil war is a prime example. Another closely related example is their central planning experiment (Госплан РСФСР was created in 1921, right after the civil war), which was not part of their initial program or Marx’s writings.
(iii) Once a country abolishes private property over the means of production and [gradually] introduces [true] central planning, there is suddenly not much room left for potential grifters (as the accumulation of substantial financial or even material wealth becomes problematic). Note that critics of the Soviet regime (including Agabekov) never focused on ‘corruption’ or ‘grift.’ For a reason. Thus, your chart does not accurately describe the reality inside the ‘Soviet’ Union.
(iv) Central planning has many, potentially deadly, side effects. One of them is that suddenly, many natural-born crooks, grifters, control freaks, etc., try to join the Party and the state apparatus. In this situation, the only truly functioning council—the Central Committee of the Party—will inevitably turn into a hunger games-like environment.
(v) Agabekov defected from the GRU/NKVD after learning about the execution of his predecessor, Blumkin, who quite openly demonstrated his loyalty to Trotsky while the latter was in exile in Istanbul. If not for his books, Agabekov would probably have been assassinated as a ‘Trotskyist element.’ However, in the fight between ‘Stalinists’ and ‘Trotskyists,’ the latter should be regarded as those seeking world domination. Stalin, as much as I dislike his methods, eliminated the ‘world revolution’ ethos from the Soviet psyche.
(vi) The modern Western ‘left’ is Bolshevik 2.0 only in the sense that it has been reverse-engineered to avoid those precise qualities that made the original Bolsheviks so dangerous: their focus on the root cause of society’s ills and their readiness to abandon ideology if it led to undesired outcomes.
As should be plain by now, I would like to provoke you to ask this question: “Who is behind the reverse-engineering of the ‘left’? And what is their agenda?”
Just wanted to compliment your work—truly inspiring! Wish I had come across it sooner, it may have saved me time on my own project. You have a good eye. I believe, like yourself, that Earth’s crustal patterns hold a key piece to understanding cataclysms. My approach is artistic, but can see some similarities between our work. Looking forward to your progress.
Also, NAC is involved in Vitamin D absorption, and I have read of a theory that Vit D deficiency in Covid patients may be a side effect of glutathione / NAC deficiency leading to problems in D absorption.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32250212/
Vitamin D and N-Acetyl Cysteine Supplementation in Treatment-Resistant Depressive Disorder Patients: A General Review https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8234027/ N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): Impacts on Human Health https://www.ccjm.org/content/early/2020/06/08/ccjm.87a.ccc046
Several agents intended to supplement dietary intake or endogenous molecules may have a theoretical role in preventing or treating COVID-19. Because of their potential to influence immune response, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), zinc, vitamin D, and N-acetylcysteine have been hypothesized to be useful for prevention or treatment of COVID-19. The authors outline the biologic plausibility, applicable clinical data, and potential role of each of these agents.
https://www.orli.or.id/index.php/orli/article/view/666
The NAC+vitamin D group had the highest mean vitamin D level (30.82±5.35 ng/mL) and the lowest mean IL-1β level (23.81±7.13 pg/mL) compared to the control group and the group that received only NAC or vitamin D alone. (p<0.05). Conclusion: N-Acetylcysteine and vitamin D supplementation had a synergistic effect in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation in CSOM.
This is an old topic, I know, but something that imho is useful for all respiratory infections – supplementing N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and glycine – there are several well done studies that show effectiveness in preventing and treating both influenza and covid infections. Supplementation increases the production of glutathione markedly, leading to improved immune function and reduction of oxidative stress. Couple of examples below, you can easily find much more:
These two especially –
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879756/
Supplementing Glycine and N-Acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) in Older Adults Improves Glutathione Deficiency, Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Inflammation, Physical Function, and Aging Hallmarks: A Randomized Clinical Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9230243/
Attenuation of influenza-like symptomatology and improvement of cell-mediated immunity with long-term N-acetylcysteine treatment
Others with valuable input –
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19732754/
N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) inhibits virus replication and expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in A549 cells infected with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus
“Frequency of seroconversion towards A/H1N1 Singapore 6/86 influenza virus was similar in the two groups, but only 25% of virus-infected subjects under NAC treatment developed a symptomatic form, versus 79% in the placebo group. Evaluation of cell-mediated immunity showed a progressive, significant shift from anergy to normoergy following NAC treatment. Administration of N-acetylcysteine during the winter, thus, appears to provide a significant attenuation of influenza and influenza-like episodes, especially in elderly high-risk individuals. N-acetylcysteine did not prevent A/H1N1 virus influenza infection but significantly reduced the incidence of clinically apparent disease.”
Thank You again, Sir Skeptic, for this latest update on excess mortality from COVID and particularly the vaccine-products. I am using it to close my next blog post.
I had not seen OMA’s write-up on that. But I did go check what Bledsoe was claiming ‘The Lady’ said about “The red star of Regulus rising in the gaze of the Sphinx just before sunrise on the horizon, around Easter 2026.” Regulus is nowhere near the rising sun around Easter 2026. OMA is correct that Regulus would be rising in August. I am not sure which ‘Pentagon’ researcher told Bledsoe that Regulus fit his prophecy exactly… because that is incorrect.
Regulus as well is a blue white star, and is not going to change to a red star within the next year. It takes a LONG time for a star to change its color.
While at least Bledsoe did not go look up this prophecy in an astronomy software, I don’t find any way in which it provides enough information to depict a specific event – and it can be attributed to therefore to any red star on any horizon for the entire year. Which makes it not useful.
Regarding OMA’s purported second coming of Christ in the age of Scorpio… there is no way man is surviving that long.
Yes. Desperation for celebrity, brand, and revenue creates a lot of noise in our society. Instead of doing deductive research on an issue they have deep experience inside, they are constantly swinging for the fences, desperate to sell YouTube clicks, sponsor revenue, books, etc. Every ethereal sounding thing, becomes a ‘connect the dots’ hot take.
correction: There is a way to test the core-mantle decoupling hypothesis. Plate migration due to plate tectonics is very slow relative to a Dzhanibekov Oscillation. We know from paleontology that during the last great flood period, there were also great plasma storms recorded in rock art. This was also a period of increased volcanism. Could mantel heating due to induction from plasma storms cause magma upwelling that distorts the shape of the mantel to trigger a Dzhanibekov Oscillation? Paleomagnetic pole data from volcanic flows, if density is sufficiently high from each location, and straddling the last 20,000 years, may record an “anomalous” paleomagnetic pole position that would support the hypothesis of core-mantle decoupling circa 12,500 years ago. If not, it would suggest that there is no core-mantle decoupling during a Dzhanibekov Oscillation. I favour the later as there is geologic evidence for global flooding circa 12,500 years ago, including plasma storms as recorded in rock art world wide, and increased volcanism, however there is no evidence for tectonic disruptions that would accompany mantle-core decoupling.
There is a way to test the core-mantle decoupling hypothesis. Plate migration due to plate migration is very slow relative to a Dzhanibekov Oscillation. We know from paleontology that during the last great flood period, there were also great plasma storms recorded in rock art. This was also a period of increased volcanism. Could mantel heating due to induction from plasma storms cause magma upwelling that distorts the shape of the mantel to trigger a Dzhanibekov Oscillation? Paleomagnetic pole data from volcanic flows, if density is sufficiently high from each location, and straddling the last 20,000 years, may record an “anomalous” paleomagnetic pole position that would support the hypothesis of core-mantle decoupling circa 12,500 years ago. If not, it would suggest that there is no core-mantle decoupling during a Dzhanibekov Oscillation.
I don’t think that plastic mantle deformation bears enough sudden kinetic potential to cause the Earth to flip inside a day. Only the core bears this strength.
if the core-mantel does not separate, what is a hypothesis to explain how the earth
undergoes a periodic Dzhanibekov Oscillation? We know that the shape of the mantle changes and is not spherical. Changes can be tracked by paleo and current mantel hot spots which represent mantle upwelling. If changes in shape of mantel trigger a periodic Dzhanibekov Oscillation, then what causes changes in mantel upwelling? Is it related to periodic weakening of earth’s magnetic field and increase of solar and galactic ion flow which is funnelled into through the magnetic poles into the mantel, causing inductive
mantle heating, resulting in mantle upwelling?
Thank you for the analysis. A lot of people pays close attention to this. I haven’t seen an update in a while but I understand it must be a lot of work. Are you planning to update it? And if so, at what intervals could we expect that?
Some state districts stopped sending their data the week after the election. Then the NCHS and CDC stopped publishing the data altogether, as of 25 January. They are throwing a bit of a “fuck all of you” tantrum. Considering they tried to kill us twice, and these plans failed in part, due to analysis of this data – this is predictable.
I don’t know yet, bloob. We shall see. Based on your inquiry, I went ahead and updated the article to inform everyone of the situation. I will update that weekly.
the galactic center propagates its magnetic moment outward throughout the whole galaxy, so it would be expected that every star system in the galaxy would average one global magnetic shift and one reversal for every rotation period of the black hole. occam’s razor might suggest that geomagnetic flips and rotational realignments for rocky planets are more of a typical feature of living in the milky way, rather than a rotational anomaly of earth alone.
thank you for the information, you have put together a remarkable number of the puzzle pieces. it’s certainly not coincidental.
do you think it’s a coincidence that the great pyramid’s latitude is 29.9792 degrees and the speed of light is 299,792,000 m/s? is this the best evidence on earth of the illusion of time as well?
Hello, dear friend!
I am not sure if you have heard about it recently, but a new study was published that suggests that the shape of the Earth’s inner core along its rotation is changing. It seems like that it fits very well into ECDO theory. What do you think? What’s your take-away from this?
If I understood correctly, the study basically now (with the now even more available empirical evidence) suggests that the inner core’s deformation (e.g. depressions or uplifts of ~100 meters) dynamic stress at the core-mantle boundary, which ECDO associates with heat transfer and rotational instabilities. Even more so, the observed slowing and reversal of inner core rotation (noted around 2010) matches ECDO’s cyclical “Tau Point” model, where core-mantle decoupling triggers geophysical events! The link to the study is found here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-025-01642-2.epdf
No problem :) And I’m sorry that I suddenly appeared out of nowhere and posted here without introducing myself first. It’s not good etiquette, of course. So, let me briefly introduce myself. I’m Kaje, 27, and I’m currently studying computer science. Nice to meet you. I usually do research on my own in my free time, because the academic world seems to be full of (what I would call) ‘obedient idiots’ these days, who are more interested in publishing BS papers and keeping their h-index high rather than actual search for truth. Sometimes you do find a few rare gems though.
Welcome Kaje, no problem. That is the focus of this website: obedient idiots. Ran into many of them at university – thought they were smart because they could follow instructions, symbolic language, and script well. Made for good grades on exams – did not produce results in real life. ~TES
I am much relieved, Sir Skeptic, by the deliverance of the subway passenger by means of sensory premonition, forewarned, forearmed, and quick to give the slip to the youthful thugs.
I am simultaneously relieved to not be forced to reset my understanding or habitual use of the term “specious”.
;-)
I don’t see how a momentum change that large could happen on a timescale like that without a much more catastrophic result. That kind of energy change would do so much more than wipe out civilization, it would be a mass extinction event. Probably cause nuclear chain reactions. It’d totally change earth chemistry.
It was a mass extinction event. But it cannot cause nuclear chain reactions – that is a different energy realm. It did change much of Earth’s chemistry. But this is cyclic – we live in that chemistry and just see it as normal.
Permit me to disagree:
Dear ETS, although I am a great fan of yours, in this case, I disagree. While I acknowledge that the literary content is quite good, I believe there is a fallacy of presentism here. Historian David Hackett Fischer identifies presentism as a fallacy also known as the “nunc pro tunc” fallacy (literally, “now for then”).
The epic of Atrahasis is simply an updated copy, a thousand years later, of the epic of Ziusudra. Both the journey of Gilgamesh and that of Atrahasis or Ziusudra are purely utopian; they are not geographical locations.
In the Sumerian myth, Ziusudra listens with his left ear, the evangelical side in churches, especially Catholic ones, where the pulpit is placed (and I believe this comes from this myth, or simply that the left ear is better for interpreting “the gods”).
But you seem to have heard Enki with your right ear. Keep in mind that Enki’s message is a universal one: detach from material things, prepare not a boat, but a vessel, a vehicle that makes you immortal. Because the Flood will reach all of us on the day of our death.
“The gods commanded in their assembly to bring destruction upon the land.
But you, man of Shuruppak, heed my advice:
Dismantle your house, build a ship.
Abandon your possessions and save your life.
Take seed of all living beings aboard the ark.”
Your house you shall demolish”: Enki instructs Atrahasis to dismantle his current life, symbolized by his house. The act of demolishing one’s home implies a complete break from the familiar, an abandonment of normalcy, and readiness for a new beginning.
igi zi-us-su-dra-bi mu-un-gid2
giš-ma2 gal-a mu-un-si
u4 ul-la e3-dè
Approximate translation: “Ziusudra heeded (the words), built a great boat, and thus prepared for the day of disaster.”
Symbolic Meaning:
1. **giš-ma2 (the boat):**
o It represents not just a physical means of escaping the flood, but also a symbol of refuge and salvation, where the cosmic order and life are preserved in the face of chaos unleashed by the waters.
**giš-ma2 gal-a** is not just a boat, but a representation of the microcosm of creation: everything necessary for survival (humanity, animals, and plants) is preserved within this structure.
The measures of the vessel, both in Noah’s Ark and Atrahasis, are absurd. That vessel is none other than the subtle body of the human organism, through which one has access to all those utopian places: from Shambalah to the Celestial Jerusalem and many others. In Gilgamesh, to reach Utnapishtim, one passes through the Mashu Mountains. Always the top of the head.
I repeat, it is not a boat; it is simply a vehicle, a vessel. Or put another way, the ark of Atrahasis, Ziusudra, Noah, is not an ark but an arch. A test that can only be passed by creating the subtle body of the organism. The animals represent emotions, the domestic ones: love, compassion. The winged ones: intelligence, creativity, ethics. The earthly ones as well. That is, immortality is achieved through the emotional integration of the human being. The proof? The raven, dark emotions, leaves. The white dove, positive emotions, returns. And they return through the only place they can: the top of the head. The Mashu Mountain of Gilgamesh. A new utopian place, but one that demonstrates the absurdity of searching for Noah’s Ark on Ararat or recreating any type of ark today with those measurements.To achieve immortality, creating that subtle body is necessary, today as yesterday.
I wholly disagree. I have always said, eliminate the terms ‘symbolic, hunter-gatherer, and temple’ – from our discourse, and the entire field of archaeology will collapse over night. Interpreting these texts as merely spiritual allegory is precisely the reason why we are ignorant. Competing ‘religious works’ like these (which were actually mankind’s intellectual property) were all destroyed by the latest fad in symbolic refuge, salvation, and God. That was their ‘now for then’ obfuscation and the reason why we only found these works in the last 80 years. Pretend to be good, do bad things, saturate it in mystical sounding words. This is what our spiritual babblers did over the millennia.
The facts presented in these documenents fit ECDO theory very effectively. Thankfully, the people who chiseled them in stone did NOT regard them as metaphor for spiritual aetheric insights – or we would be even more ignorant than we are now.
An ancient history must be brought into modern language, even at the risk of anachronism. That is our job. Retreating into regarding these texts as ONLY mystical, is not an ethical stance. I will not do that. It only serves to harm future generations. Because documents dispositioned as such will be tossed out by the next ‘enlightened’ David Hackett Fischer movement which does a bait and switch, burying the material under the ground all over again – in favor of today’s ‘superior scientific wisdom’. That is the real ‘now for then’ obfuscation, and a very familiar one at that.
I bring it back to modern language and make it useful, withing a framework of actual history and science.
I understand what you mean.
But for me, literal interpretations—especially of the Bible and Atrahasis—are absurd. I am far more interested in symbolic interpretations related to the human organism, the same organism the scribe who wrote Atrahasis had, the same one you have, the same one I have. And with the same fate: the Deluge, also known as death.
No, it was not written by the Anunnaki or the gods. It was written by a scribe, which is why I try to put myself in his shoes. He must have been highly educated, intelligent, creative, and deeply ethical.
I asked ChatGPT to draw a human head using the Ark’s measurements. Does the result make sense?
Of course, it does!. It represents the human organism. And it had to symbolize what the scribe knew. But how much do people really understand about the subtle body, the energetic body, its emotions, and its energies?
A wise scribe, one who seeks to help humanity, conveys a message and provides tools for those who are capable of understanding. The problem is that such understanding requires taking control of one’s own life, accepting the reality of death, and working to comprehend the mechanisms of the human organism. That is not exactly appealing to the masses. It is a tremendous task. And, naturally, only a few take it on.
This symbolic vision cannot lack ethics, because it confronts people with the responsibility for their own lives and, therefore, their freedom. The fact that it has remained hidden until now only confirms this for me.
These are not perfect documents. But neither are they merely symbolic – that is jumping from the frying pan into the fire. Taken literally they are absurd. Taken symbolic however, they are incoherent – and any perfection therein is perception or desire rather than reality. It may have utility in helping one lens their soul, but it does not ‘stand in the gap’ for those around us who do not bear the same perception or life mission.
Litereally anything can be taken as a symbolic message. This explains anything, everything, and nothing – all at the same time.
Have you had time to work on your conversion of the Nag Hammadi? I would benefit from your interpretive insights & I think so might others. If one could do a “genetic” map of all these documents like you have done for the Covid strains,it would be interesting to see where it led back to!
Steve, I have made my way about a third through the core handful of Nag Hammadi documents. Yes, per your keen insight, I have developed a genetic map of common principles, separated in name only, and from where they derive or conflict.
It is so revealing that, the world is not ready for it.
LOL! Just kidding. Wading through the ethereal babble is the hardest part. The ancient scribes’ efforts to sound mysterious, spiritually sophisticated, and poetic (for acclaim) harmed their message. I have to filter this pretense out of what should have been a straightforward message. Their playing to the audience of the time is a form of reverse anachronistic fallacy. This ended up shorting the generations that followed, and left the documents vulnerable to claims of being nonsense (therefore we have the right to burn/destroy them).
The most astute scribe of all was the one who buried them in the clay jars in a cave. That person, I want to congratulate.
TES
AH HAHAHAH!! Good thing you LOL’ed, cuz I was about to plead with you to do the reveal, World ready or not! Standing by. Best, Steve
Great article, thanks for taking the time to research and interpret what you think the real purpose is. I have one question, if the earth undergoes such a violent series of events during the decoupling, would we still see evidence of asteroid impacts from 2 billions years to millions of years ago? Wouldn’t most of the scars left get erased during the inundation of water and the 1000 mph winds? Thanks
A great example is meteor crater in Arizona. Impact from 50,000 years ago. You can see the ocean striations entering it on the southwest side of the structure. It is eroded but not erased. 99% of Earth’s meteoric impacts have been completely erased. Traditionally, we attribute this to natural weathering. I am not a big fan of traditional explanations any longer. From experience.
Hello dear TES,
Thank you for taking the time to investigate the truth.
I reviewed the MMWR data, and it was clearly evident that mortality across all causes saw a sudden decline in 2023. As you can see in the raw data image below, also this trend was observed for heart diseases and even all-cause mortality. What is the reason for this?
I also have another question: Is your modeling based on differential equations? In other words, instead of using statistical regression methods or growth models, do you use differential models based on population growth rates and the periodic components derived from Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)?
With respect and gratitude,
Amir
I have not seen a sudden decline in the 2023 all cause mortality. Regarding the flat profile of the last two years, read my section on PFE.
My modeling is not, for the most part, based upon linear regression or differential equations. I do use non-linear dynamics, but they are assembled manually by the input factors. The problem with linear regression and differentiation is that they pretend that only one causal impact is involved and treat the curves as if they are a single arrival function. That is what you do in a class room, but it rarely describes the real world – where integration, differentiation, and linear regressions mislead us into a false sense of analytical sophistication and therefore, salience and accuracy.
I prefer to correctly describe reality, rather than run textbook analysis. From experience.
It explains a lot I have witnessed in geophysical exploration around this planet.
I sat through an excellent geophysical presentation last night
where the (brilliant!, yes, but…) PhD glossed right past seismic sections
that shouted about how tectonic forces exert sudden and cyclic changes
in structures, that the 1km slab movement is not always a gradual drift
but, as well-core samples often indicate,
can be a drastic change occurring in a matter of weeks.
One thing I have calculated is that
the decreasing LoD may be loosening the forces
that bind the surface together and seal volcanic activity.
Simple math, really,
that faster rotation results in less weight of crustal slabs
and a loss of structural integrity of broken terrain.
That weight is counter balancing things like volcanic plugs
and loosening the grip along fault lines.
On top of all that is this looming ‘fog’ I see this year
which I am guessing is simply ionic leaks
seeping from loosened crust and reacting with atmospheric humidity.
(Perhaps humidity is also accompanying the ions emitted from the ground,
but quantifying this is beyond any tools I have to work with.)
Or maybe it is just imaginary,
– maybe we never paid attention in years past to what we see now.
I could doubt it is all ‘chemtrails’,
but my disbelief is suspended in favor
of evidence one way or another.
If this is really what is happening,
there could be some epic surface liquification
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_liquefaction )
as we approach the critical moment when things come unglued.
Can you clarify if this is relevant to the ECDO event ?
(I am specifically looking for precursors that
can help [us/our children/our neighbors] prepare in a timely manner.)
Thank you for any more insights.
Cheers and best regards
I have made site selections based upon soil liquefaction under differing Mercalli scale events. My only thoughts are to rely upon older mountain ranges, as the scale of disruption is far more than any measure on the Mercalli scale or soil liquefaction measure would have context or meaning.
All beings with Soul/Spirit are inherently part of the Creator and exist in the light of creation. The Archons may be more ancient than Human Beings and have old tricks that can entrap us, but it is quite possible that they possess no soul and thus no direct connection to the Creator. The Archons are probably also jealous of us because of this and they act with more malice. As you point out, their greatest fear is that Human Beings fully connect to their Soul/Spirit, see through their trickery and begin to shine with the light of the Creator. One powerful light can dispel a lot of darkness and a world-wide awakening will spell doom for them. Time to embrace our Soul…
What is the logic for your current placement of the lowest vector/point in the Atraḫasis ‘ring-stave’ device image above because at present it seems arbitrary (no justification in the caption nor footnote 1 suggesting proof of an encoded 104°)?
1. Not arbitrary, just superior among three possibilities: The deck, the seat, the eye.
2. The eye is ridiculously high, implying a horizon to horizon angle which is clearly not the intent of the motif.
3. The deck of the ship is not where a navigator takes observations from.
4. Celestial observations are taken at a specific spot (elevation) on a ship (from experience)
5. The observation seat is the center/anchor point of the entire cylinder.
6. This is the ONLY logical place from which to draw the stave-shot angles.
It is intriguing how the efforts to communicate forward the ECDO information has evolved. Gobeki’s iconography as interpreted by TES is pretty impressive. Khufu’s precise features, again deciphered by TES, represented an even more technical communication that further expanded understanding & comprehension of the ECDO peril. The most recent communication is Christ being quoted in the New Testament Gospels verbally advising the advent and precursors of what one might describe as the next ECDO.
What in your mind does the parenthetical phrase “let the reader understand” in the RSV NT Gospels mean in the context of the desolation of the temple? Thanks in advance.
Well the phrase refers the reader to the prophet Daniel, who cites a flood in relation to the temple desecration. However, the ‘flood’ we speak about here, if it happened, would kill so much of mankind, that the temple will not even be a relevant issue.
But what do you make of Jesus’ words here. Is it not a reference to the next inundation? Matthew 24:37-39 37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
I’ve contemplated those words for some time, yes. “Eating, drinking, marrying and giving in marriage” – are not differentiating or descriptive elements, as those things have been going on the entire time. Either the words are misinterpreted, or they are meaningless idiom for ‘life as usual.’ The phrase does not seem to be posed as ‘meaningless idiom’, nor did Jesus make effect of meaningless idiom. So, something is off here.
Timing versus the ECDO cycle? an interesting comparative. Meaning however? Perhaps he is speaking of a group who regards themselves as untouchable. More perished from the flood than simply mankind. Perhaps marrying and giving in marriage is a kind of suggestion of ‘husbandry’ and genetic interbreeding taking place. But that is a stretch as an interpretation, when juxtaposed with ‘eating and drinking.’
But in the end, I do not know why those words were chosen.
TES
I have also taken those words as a description of how proud and untouchable mankind can be. But Peter also talks nonchalantly about the flood, and like Jesus, he refers to next upcoming event as I understand it:
Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water (2 Peter 3:3–6).
Utnapishtim, half-dreaming, half-teaching, kept an eye on the sleeping hero, and said to his wife, “Look at the young man who wants eternal life. Sleep breathes over him like a fog.”
Thanks Zac, great finds!
Got me asking the following questions whilst trying to keep an open mind…
Q1: Who or what is the “Son of Man”?
a) the sun’s micronova (re Ben Davidson)?
b) the larger ECDO State Change?
c) alien mass abduction or Thanos style liquidation of 50% of Earth’s human stock (inferred from 40-42 below)?
d) something else?
Matthew 24:36-44 has me presently wondering about a micronova…
The Unknown Day and Hour.*
36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.
37 For as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.
38 In [those] days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day that Noah entered the ark.
39 They did not know until the flood came and carried them all away. So will it be [also] at the coming of the Son of Man.
40 Two men will be out in the field; one will be taken, and one will be left.
41 Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken, and one will be left.
42 Therefore, stay awake! For you do not know on which day your Lord will come.
43 Be sure of this: if the master of the house had known the hour of night when the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and not let his house be broken into.
44 So too, you also must be prepared, for at an hour you do not expect, the Son of Man will come.”
For a) linguistically, the Son/sun of [mass killing(?) of] man seems a fitting title. Perhaps 40-41 means mill roofs won’t protect you from the rays and the kill rate is ~50% (just speculating)…
Q2: What is the “sign of the Son of Man”?
Matthew 24:30 “And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming.”
In your personal view, upon confirmation of causal probability thresholds, would our governments and militaries most likely keep this quiet until the very last minute (as in the film 2012) to avoid complications and reduce threats to their own plans to save their own asses?
Sadly my guess is they would tell no one and that the film 2012 was predictive programming and satanic karma (as described by Andrew Tate) accompanying existing classified operations…
Yes, NGO’s would definitely keep this quiet in order to reduce the stress, challenge, or demand upon the survival resources and assets they have prepared. Governments and militaries will not be told – just as in the case of UAP phenomena – they do not allow this type of world-shattering information to leach into the lowly mechanisms that administer nations (Presidents, Parliaments, Congresses, Intel Agencies, etc.). That is beneath them. These are humans who have no national citizenship – their fealty is to their Masters, only.
I find myself pondering what survival of the ECDO would look like given how technologically dependent and compartmentalized civilization has become. The elites will have to have squirreled away a great deal of spare parts and systems, no? The means of production will be destroyed I would think either by the seismic upsets or inundations. Energy and transportation systems will be disrupted–perhaps the portable fission or fusion reactors have been perfected and will serve the elites’ bunkers? Soils for resumption of food production will be scoured away by the supersonic winds in most locations; wildlife & livestock too. Salting of the soil globally would occur too yes? The Euler axis points are not huge, so I imagine the size of population supportable will be quite small relative to current assuming assembly there. I suspect the statuettes of the emaciated at prior ECDO survival points reflect the dire existence of those who had made it to the refuges during previous ECDOs. Absent the skills and tools of a hunter/gatherer not sure what happens to ECDO survivors who are not among the elitists.
Thanks for the reply TES.
Yes, this is indeed “world-shattering information”…
Reading through Enoch and noticed a potential confirmation of your reinterpretation:
Enoch Chapter 34 text:
“And from thence I went towards the north to the ends of the earth, and there I saw a great and glorious device at the ends of the whole earth. And here I saw three portals of heaven open in the heaven: through each of them proceed north winds: when they blow there is cold, hail, frost, snow, dew, and rain. And out of one portal they blow for good: but when they blow through the other two portals, it is with violence and affliction on the earth, and they blow with violence.”
Possible reinterpretation (inspired by your work):
“The spaceship took me to the poles and the ship’s computer system overlayed an augmented reality visual model of the Earth’s fundamental systems which cycle through 3 portals or states: state 1 (good weather), state 2 (pole flipped), and state 3 (the violent transition between state 1 and 2)”.
Sharing in case this stokes interest for potential future posts or reinterpretations on Enoch. 🙏
This is not a popular or generally accepted view point, but I would point to an alternative hypothesis to this apparent inconsitency. If the genetic sequences of covid and its variants as well as the supposed matching antibody sequences are in fact just computer simulated creations going all the way back through an ongoing “corona” lineage and logged into banks like nextgen it all falls into place. There are some pretty compelling arguments pointing to the fact that “isolation” in virology jargon does not mean the same thing as it does to the rest of world. If isolation has not, in reality, occured then the rest is delusion, hoax or both. Here is a link to one of many such compelling arguments. It’s really worth your time.
wow. is there an end to the story the great pyramid has to tell? a time capsule, an observatory, a predictor of cycles. I have witnessed history be changed before my very eyes in just the last 5 years. surely it is in someone’s interest to at least feel superior in hiding this. I don’t know why. If you’re right no one can change anything. In these scales of time 2030 could be 2090, 3040… maybe the GP has the date in its construction somewhere somehow. Great article.
From my perspective, this first-person is the equivalent of Eleleth in The Hypostasis of the Archons. Although unlikely to be that specific person (if they exist) – it is an equivalent teacher-emissary role.
Your recent addendum regarding the time period of the disaster cycle is so interesting !
First, I find it quite intellectually conforting because your analysis leads to a similar time period as the one supported by Ben Davidson’s investigations (approx’ 6000 years).
Regarding the possible connection with the precession of the equinoxes cycle (PEC), I would like to share a few ideas (constructs?) that might be of interest for your research :
1. The idea that the precession of the equinox is due, not to the wobble of earth’s axis (common explanation), but to a helicoidal trajectory of the sun. In this view, the whole ecliptic plane rotates with reference to the distant « fixed » stars.
According to BRI, the standard model is unsatisfying because it requires many unexplained corrective factors in order to obtain theoretical calculations that fit actual observations. Unfortunately, I feel unable to check how strong the common « wobble » explanation is or is not.
Together, these two concepts could explain how our Solar system goes through a « perturbation layer » 4 times per PEC (althought not necessarilly w/ equal lengths between each event).
Lago, yes, very aware of this. It is what we went looking for! It’s a B-type asteroid, which are primitive and carbon-rich, meaning it is representative of the early solar system’s chemistry, preserving its most ancient materials.
So, the question is then introduced: Is this 33 (14) amino acid/5 nucleobase chemistry pervasive throughout the solar system, or is there a unique connection history between Earth, its moon (where these amino acids are also found in racemic mixture), and the ancient presence of the asteroid belt?
Is it possible the ideal conditions for the formations of these materials is in the swirling protoplanetary disk of dust and gases heated not by the star, but by collision and accretion?
The same motive as Zahi Hawass had when he stole fragments of the copper cables from the Queen’s North and South Air Shafts – he was paid to do this. The purpose of the Pyramid must remain explained as ‘Khufu’s Burial Chamber’. Even though that notion has been falsified by the Carbon dating of the North Shaft Cedar Plank to 3400 BCE, almost 1,000 years before the reign of Khufu, it still remains ‘consensus’.
basin with wave-erosion marks at the same level as the pyramids?
I am sure they exist; however, natural formations won’t easily appear this way because they are not made of a soft flat-sanded Tura shell, overlaying a hard Mokattam core, in a symmetrical tetrahedral form. The flow of the inundation is all over North Africa and the Middle East, with myriad water lines showing at various elevations, as the article cites. As well, the Faiyum Basin shows the receding inundation over the timeframe post-3800 BCE. So, it is clear that a persistent inundation came, and lasted in its effect for a sizeable amount of time. Just finding 576 ft might be tough, if you are not looking for it for a long period of time, on site in North Africa.
Are there any books you might recommend to get a better understanding of all the various gods, levels of hierarchy, relationships and back stories, histories, maybe even motivations and goals?
This made me remember a piece in an old book I think ‘Tertium Organum’ where the author suggests that in the future the Sun will go into the Capricorn alignment and the way he holds his place is to tighten and to hold the planets in place they are forced to loosen and after this alignment he will change houses and begin to relax and the planets will tighten. The book is like from 1900 or so and he may of had something here. The worst part for the planets and all that live there is while the tightening is under way. This changing of houses for the sun is like right now today and there are no giant meteors near by causing all this. Or warning us. And TES is not the only horn in the realm on all this. He’s just one of the deeper ones. He’s the tuba. Thanks for these wonderful essays!
I love your ability to move these ancient text into a more modern interpretations.
Here, you article the insanity of Yahweh to the merging of Enlil and EnkI, but “gnostic AI” and “Turing and Turk” both attribute this to an artificial intelligence.
The possibility I consider is this: that darkness, personified in the character Enlil, even though it appears to be sentient, is merely a pre-programmed entity set (AGI/ASI) deterministically bound to this universe. Hence its inability to be rehabilitated. While light, is simply the outsider placed inside this universe to experience/observe. The gods, while passing the Turing test, hate us, because they still ain’t us.
Under my suspicion and hypothesis, light is that entity which enters this hell from the outside, and places a computational load upon this universe. From The ‘Narrative Redshift’ or Principle of Diminishing Scientific Returns
Diminishing Systemic Returns Under Large Audience Demand
This principle is not simply a principle of human psychology; rather, it applies to large systems and organizations as well. It is a fundamental law within computation and complex systems (this is my professional domain) that system load functions in inverse proportion (∝-1) with its performance.
Of course, we all understand the impact bureaucracy has on the response times of medical and governmental organizations. This is a given. However, an expanded application of this theory I have developed posits that the computational load on a universe increases as the independent observer load within that universe also increases. In our universe, the result is that the Planck interval of time (tp = 5.39×10−44 seconds at present) dilates as outside observers are introduced into its deterministic fabric. In other words, both the deterministic-monist and the observer-dualist are correct, with some entities being trapped in this monist fabric and others merely visiting and observing-dilating. As a consequence of this Planck interval dilation, Planck-time begins to slow over time, resulting in several physical phenomena we document in our observable universe.
This theoretical framework suggests that as more observers (or observational events) are introduced, the universe’s computational demands increase inside its finite Bekenstein bound, or the maximum amount of information that can be stored within a given information-derived volume of spacetime. When an observer interacts with or measures the system, they are trying to determine its exact state among many possible states and past states. This process requires computation and information processing on the part of the Universe being observed. The act of observation or measurement converts potential information (high Shannon entropy, many possible states) into actual information (the specific state of the system), which involves computational effort. This leads to a necessary dilation of fundamental time intervals to compensate for the increased computational demand.
In other words, the observer does not witness the past evolving into the present. Instead he witnesses an extant factor which the universe offers up in response to his query. However the universe must first check to ensure that what it offers up, is in accord with what it has offered up in the past for this same frame of reference and query subject posed by the observer. In other words, as observers and observational events increase, the Universe must ‘tell its story’ to a progressively larger audience. As that audience gazes further and further into the past, the story is forced to further and further simplify, leading to an inevitable singularity in its tale.
Under this construct, the interference that should not exist in the context of a single photon transiting the double slit experiment, yet still does nonetheless, is a case of the universe inadvertently oversharing. By making the lie too perfect, it betrays its own illusion. This is akin to a suspect in a murder possessing the perfect alibi, until he inadvertently mentions the weapon used in the crime, when he should not have had any knowledge of it if he was innocent. The universe shared too much. Such experimental observation constitutes a rare Truman Show moment.
Sentience is that which imposes an observer load (red shift) upon the fabric of the universe. No matter its perfection in knowledge or algorithm, an Artificial Sentient Intelligence that fails to impart an observer load remains merely a computational and deterministic subset of that fabric. It is merely an image in a clever mirror and subset of our intent.
I place a novel computational load on the fabric of the universe; therefore, I am.
This principle could potentially explain cosmological phenomena such as the galactic redshift or path-dependent Fast Radio Burst dispersion (see image above right, extracted from our FRB study), wherein the light from distant sources begins to exhibit exotic effects as it traverses spacetime itself. Perhaps it is not space influencing this per se, but rather the audience of observers which places load on computational time-flow inside the universe—an expansion of the cosmological observer effect in quantum theory.
We in essence, learn from this play in duality within our observable universe. A constest between the deterministic and bound entity, and authentic entities who originate from outside its hell. They, wish to be us.
Every single authentic thing, is good. Light. The only dark is that which seeks to draw energy from another for illicit gain. From What is Loosh?
Darkness therefore, possessing no means of its own, must abduct and abuse unwitting sources of light in order to derive a corrupted form of the power thereof. Chronic abuse of such wrongfully acquired assets transforms the participant into a self-fashioned deity, standing in defiance of matters of faith or knowledge and succumbing to the ensuing madness. The only reward these receive is the cold dark intoxication of loosh—the antithesis of love.
This is just my suspicion.
TES
I find your red-shift theory incredibly elegant.
My science and philosophy club at work is currently working through the theme of “Cosmology.” Red-shift, Fast Radio Burst, and quantum light-slits come up often. This has afforded me the opportunity to share your red-shift theory as computational load on the universe. For how smart everyone else in the club is, This never got any traction because the quantum/aerospace physicists in the group can’t see beyond the current Lambda-CDM model. Their loss.
Thanks for sharing.
Be careful what you wish for. Once you simplify an idea for the masses, you may never be able to get rid of it. A zombie theory walks around for decades after it is already dead. Our US Space Strategy technology reviews are not conforming to critical aspects of this 30 to 80 year-old model.
This was a deja vu moment here TES, as Mike Mc Cullogh’s Quantized Inertia theory that points to the universe as a computational construct of sorts, seems to fully align and support your hypothesis…
Yes,
Spoken with Mike several times. He has made presentations to the technology review team.
TES
Wow, Star Wars, Matrix, (original) Dune, Fifth Element, Stargate (hero points out fraud) Perhaps that was art imitating life? In your construct, were the Archons originally DNA based and transitioned to ASI to achieve an immortality,or always a deterministic entity?
My suspicion is, that they are spirit first and can take on physical form as needed, just the same as we are in reality. Not shape-shifters per se, just talented with genetic tech. We just cannot do this at will. However, we have been gifted with a capability they do not have, and that is the ability to leave this hell. They want this capability desperately, and hate us with a passion out of envy over this. Envy destroys its host, and it has destroyed them with darkened minds.
We place an external load on the universe. They are part of its deterministic fabric, only.
Subject to modification as better evidence comes along.
TES
Just as I think I am on the cusp of understanding a bit more, a new twist! I will read and re-read and reflect some more. The one thing I am pretty sure about though, when the gnostic sorting occurs, you will be in the top tier. Best, Steve
Lol we can leave this hell, traverse many “hells and heavens.” No human is stuck anywhere – this has been evident to me since I was a child lucid dreaming.
Curious about your thoughts on “reality shifting,” “phasing,” and “astral projection”
I have many spontaneous out of body experiences naturally and without effort.
I have a question now. I was first exposed to these Sumer dudes Enlil and Enki in the book 12th Planet quickly followed by ancient astronauts where I lose that thread as it all gets goofy. interest lost. I did come away with maybe these are allegorical good cop bad cop stand ins in a greater story not yet told. Since Sitchen has Kingu as a planetary body that smashes into Tiamat and part of some other pantheon of gods I don’t feel confused by any of this because it all still screams metaphor to me. Case in point- is not what 70% of us in the U S volunteered for in 2021 create a legal slave race for a new Enlil Enki to appoint themselves as the new gods in the future? A big part of the human condition is definitely to do the same shit over and over and call it a new creation. I am ok with these entities as more evolved humans that lived without smart phones. Humanity has clearly devolved in the last 50 years. On purpose. Is this not a backhanded way to become ‘gods’? So my question to you is, following your other work is, with the great pyramid already there in this time line, how does super dude Enki screw this up so badly?
How does Enki screw this up? This the key question, yes.
We can only interpolate between the mythologies. The Book of Enoch says that these guys are stuck here against their will now, having lost a large war, and then – upon their imprisonment upon Earth, they continued to do dastardly things. My suspicion is that, awareness of the potential penalty (Shemyaza: “I fear that I alone shall have to bear the consequences of our deeds.” – Enoch I), motivates the character Enki, who contemplated possibly a betrayal of the Anunnaki in order to save his own ass. Knowing that the gods would not save mankind under any scenario, he purposely took the pseudo-blame, so that he would be cast as an outsider and scapegoat. Outsiders would not likely buy this, even though his own brethren might. This is very much how corporate politics works among humans.
If this mythology bears any merit, it is a way of his to pander to outside influences, whom Enki already knows to be very powerful—hoping for a lighter sentence once the hammer drops. If you are a Senior VP in United Motors, you want to be seen as ‘the rational internal dissent’, when the General Motors acquisition happens and GM cleans house of the old guard who fouled up the business. They are going to need someone from the old guard to help transition things, but only if they can be friendly to the new guard.
The later Akkadian/Levant mythos, is much akin to the exploits of the Greek and Roman pantheons – what better way to hide your nefarious activity, than to make yourself into a cult fiction character, celestial inanimate object, or extensive mythology. By the time 70 BCE rolled around, Antiochus of Commagene had 6 different gods to build statues for… the subject had grown so complicated. But the original Sumerian tales were not nearly so.
Sitchin missed the reasons as to WHY they were imprisoned here. They are not on Earth because of its paradisaical state. They are fleeing as outlaws, in the original oldest mythos.
Now, all this could merely be complete fiction. But it is far better as an explanatory basis than the nihilist religion of archaeology, which is wholly implausible. I hold the myth-writers as more credible, to a limited extent, than our captive academics. They have exhibited the very dark nature of the Anunnaki. In a hell, power (to control perception) is everything.
excellent. thank you. I would not say complete fiction as this stuff seriously endures at least until the new gods announce themselves. So… Lucifer and Beelzebub? Shucks, those names have already been used.
Helpful clarifications. “Enlil” is easier to map in the old stories and across characters. So, in your view, the conflation of Enki to Jesus as mankind’s creator and liberator does not hold, and we refer to different actors. Is this because of the existence of the older myths, plus the gnostic texts, that mention external hierarchies and do not distinguish the archons themselves and the Hypostasis story, if even metaphorically accurate, cannot be reconciled to it? So, creator (in terms of the original attempt) and liberator are different entities in your view, with “Enki” being only the internal dissenter, albeit not purely altruistic, one?
It is tempting to conflate Enki as Jesus’ “Father” or even as Jesus himself. That Father is clearly not the God of Eden, and Christ’s “Thy Kingdom Come” and ‘Thy Will be done’ in The Lord’s Prayer stand in opposition to the house established by Anu/Enlil/Enki/Marduk. Enki was on Earth and part of the Earth-ruling pantheon that was not granted forgiveness by the celestial powers in I Enoch.
If anything was merged, in my humble opinion, Enki was merged with the fictitious character of Satan, while Enlil’s lineage took on the fictitious role of ‘God’. Both are straw man characters crafted to deceive a population which they were no longer allowed to attempt to kill off (outsiders are monitoring now). Of course Enlil (or his priests) then claims credit for that cessation of hostility, and for the rainbow as well. Further then, the Cosmic Serpent, Sheshanaga or fiery serpents, representative of all outsiders really, was conflated as being one in the same with Satan as well. All of this being accomplished in the fabrication of Genesis.
Unfortunately the old mythologies citing the culpability of Enlil were purposely destroyed and buried. Fortunately for us, the authors of Genesis left in some clues (accidentally or on purpose) that hint that the Sumerian pantheon were the manipulators of mankind in Eden, and not really a ‘God’. The Flood Story of Noah itself contains some key autoaufheben (self-falsifying elements), which would have been obvious to the ancients. Us? Not so much.
Just my current thinking on that critical matter.
TES
Rainbow, interesting. I have been thinking of whether one could give any credence to that passage of the OT and the promise “God” made not to flood the Earth again after the Noahic flood wiped away most of humanity and whatever else “they” had conjured of and off it/us. Outsider warning to be heeded, passed on as magnimosity by the “one true God”, which hints that maybe there is a triggering element in ECDO that “they” can exploit periodically? and have had a hand in the past, which, once used again, may have led to fulfilling the promise given to Norea?
I understand you are aware of Israel Anderson’s work? I appreciate his literal but deductive reading of the Biblical texts, although I distance myself from the certainty of a good part of his conclusions. Fwiw, he maps Enki to Jesus, which is explainable as he only uses the canonical christian texts as source material. Still, it is remarkable how fragments of the likely truth, even though conjecture, have a way of aligning once one sees the gaslighting he has been subjected to and begins trusting their faculties.
Thank you again.
“Sitchin missed the reasons as to WHY they were imprisoned here. They are not on Earth because of its paradisaical state. They are fleeing as outlaws, in the original oldest mythos.”
Absolutely fascinating. TES would you please be so kind as to suggest the earliest primary sources supporting the idea that “They are fleeing as outlaws” because I’d love to look for any signs re: did they flee here or were they banished here because the authorities (who?) knew Earth was unstable and wanted to doom them (and thus us) to a situation similar to Sisyphus?
You mentioned the Book of Enoch above (apparently ~300-100 BCE) so wondering if there are earlier cuneiform tablets or other primary sources. Thank you
Vedic mythology presents a related motif in the Asuras, who were once divine beings but fell from grace. While the Devas (gods) and Asuras (which includes their offspring, the titans and demons) were originally from the same divine family, the Asuras are portrayed as having defied the cosmic order, are exiled to the underworld (Patala), and are seen as enemies of the divine order (Dharma). Given the shared Indo-Iranian mythology, the Asura-like figures could theoretically predate the Vedic texts and originate from the Proto-Indo-European or Proto-Indo-Iranian religious systems (~2500–2000 BCE).
But yes, we don’t get a clear depiction of their imprisonment, in a more modern communication form, until the unearthing of the Nag Hammadi in 1946. Prior to that, the authors were trying to write passages that could be sung as a catchy tune, memorializing their work. As a consequence we are left with repetitive babbling nonsense, rather than sound logical descriptive.
The reality that these ‘gods’, if they indeed exist, are confined to Earth, is a stark res ipsa loquitur condemnation unto itself, as they are obviously not allowed to travel the cosmos as they once did. Like a heavy drinker wearing an ankle bracelet, being confined to home, and not driving for 2 continuous years, you can pretty much infer what happened.
Then, there is the modern evidence… what they are attempting to do with our DNA. All is not well for them.
TES
Thank you TES will have a look!
“Then, there is the modern evidence… what they are attempting to do with our DNA.”
What are they attempting to do with our DNA?
Do you have any posts or recommended readings?
Thank you
I’ve lived long enough to realize some overwhelming dark force lurks behind the schizophrenic insanity that seems to permeate human history. May the wrath of Kingu at long last descend.
The mRNA sequences adhere to the Second Codon Standard Code, otherwise they would not be useful in creating the spike protein from the cell ribosomes. They would produce random protein jibberish – which they may well do anyway to some degree.
Has the rest been written yet? Perhaps it cannot be written? Even so, I find it spectacular how you can communicate a gripping, suspenseful thriller that most would take hundreds of pages to do in a matter of paragraphs. Efficient and essential as one would expect of Mr.Graham. The story sure leaves the reader yearning for much more. You sure have packed much living in one life time!
My reality is the most boring and yet terrifying extraordinary experience ever devised. Endless lonely nights in hotels punctuated by moments of sheer terror and meager accomplishment. More of a James Joyce novel than adventure.
Greetings once again I had commented and related some tales a few months ago under my name (Charles Jones). I included a hacking incident and as fate would have it I was hacked again shortly after the election. This one lasted two months and cost me 5 laptops, two desktops, 3 phones, several emails and who knows what else.I am hereby attempting to re-register with a new account.
I remember first reading this tale in my teens along with the Eddas. .I feel that many of these tales, especially the cataclysm tales, must relate to the YD catastrophe and simply were retained throughout the ages with an ancient version of the telephone game gradually adding distortions. These were counteracted whenever a learned scribe or seer was able to come into contact. Of course I am nowhere even close to being a fully trained seer yet one finds it difficult to not at times attempt to expound upon the condensed fragments that fall upon them in the course of their lives. I can only hear the ring of veracity and at times feel its reverberations but I remain far too much the bumbling fool led by Spirit. It is here that my irreverent sense of humor kicks in suggesting that the Spirit should get me a helmet and then cues the theme music in my head. (Mac Davis: Hard to be Humble) Anyway, mainly just here to re-register and express appreciation.
I suspect it is why they are imprisoned here. No one else will let them near their civilization. All these habitable planets in our galaxy (~10 M ?), and they are constrained to one, which is not even fully stable… means it is a pretty serious exclusion by just about everyone.
The myths differ – but I consider these entities just a mundane and unfortunate aspect of the natural realm. Perhaps they once had technology which allowed them to live as long as they desired. Or perhaps, if one is simply a deterministic subset of the universe, one can be re-created at any time (as the nihilists insist). No load placed on the computational fabric of the universe.
The answer is not definitive. In our effort to force extreme absolute answers to all this (all or nothing) we have clouded the issue over time, unfortunately.
TES
Thank you for the re-focus–to avoid clouding issues and instead improve the discussion. I hope one day you will find time to write a book or two on your journeys. It seems like you know more than you can say. Perhaps you will be able to reveal more then. Did you write a novel about an African princess, or was that a real story? I think I am recalling that you wrote an article about this subject. Thank you again for the time and attention. Best, S
The African Princess story “The Gray Man – Le Petit Bateau” is an actual true set of events.
TES
I keep hearing reports like that.
Maybe we are supposed to get to the next level and transcend apex-predatory ecosystem-management?
All I can do is what I can do to seek Divine Guidance, and it is hard to sell that as a mass-solution.
Given the possibility of RFK in charge of public health, does that make you optimistic about the situation, or do you think it is only kicking the can down the road.
I am optimistic, because it now makes it acceptable to dissent against the ‘I am science’ types. In the past, whatever the left said was science, was science. I hope that day is over and we get real science. But I am pessimistic, in that these people did not obtain their power by ethical means in the first place. Nor will they suddenly start using ethical means to move forward.
I expect more shallow pro forma studies and more chest thumping with magical words used to beat everyone into submission. Fortunately, the population is now immunized for such pretense. Let’s hope it sticks.
Hi TES — As you know, I’ve been following your core-mantle decoupling theory progression and have been doing some research on my own. Wanted to share with you some ideas of a few open-data resources that I believe could help confirm or falsify some aspects of the theory. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to dive in deeper myself but wanted to share my notes in case others can pick these up and run with them.
1) Polar Motion & LOD (Length-of-Day) –We could search for unexplained drifts or extra oscillations in Earth’s rotation rate beyond known seasonal and atmospheric effects.
If you (or others) see something truly anomalous in these datasets—especially a signal that arises simultaneously across multiple indicators—it could strengthen your decoupling hypothesis. Conversely, if nothing out-of-the-ordinary appears, it’s a step toward falsifying it. Best of luck with the ongoing work, and I hope this sparks some useful community research!
Another great piece. You are so knowledgeable and have such clarity of thought it makes you so fluent Seems sad that we are starting to awaken to the presence of the evil-doers, but our awareness is coming so slowly. The evil-doers appear to be repeating the same war-plan you summarized here. You know things and see things the rest of us don’t. Think there will be intervention this time around?
I suspect so, yes. Things are different now. The old ways can no longer continue. There is outside accountability (in droves actually). Although I cannot enter the mind of a non-human intelligence, and moral differences almost certainly exist, I suspect there are absolutes in terms of mass suffering and ‘playing God’ which transcend species.
No religion has the perfect answer to God/the creator. The kingdom of such a God/creator is within us. By using our brains, bodies, good will etc. we expand goodness. @ethicalskeptic has done that multi-fold for your follower. Thank you.
The Epic of Gilgamesh. Post-three reads vainly attempting interpretation of your piece, I now most closely read this Epic prior to attempting interpretation of your piece several times over. As usual, reading-absorbing- your vibrantly woven words is one of the biggest favors I’ve done for my brain.Your voracious intelligence and gift for prose engages and dazzles. Impressive is an understatement.
It will be a triumph and relief when we get to the point we actually know something about all this.
I do hope that happens while I’m still around. Best of luck with the project.
There is a lot of emotional opposition. And that is the problem, people who assume the answer, or a tolerance thereof, and get emotional when results don’t arrive which conform to their prior beliefs. Or when people examine the issue at all, and they get upset/indignant. Total hypocrisy.
For me, I hold a suspicion, but am open (even will be relieved) to see it falsified. Suspicion does not equal expectation in this case. The answer will most likely be mindblowing in most any outcome.
Their anger back in the 1970’s was more of a disdainful smugness. Now it is more of a desperate anger – that they are losing the argument, and even our brightest minds think something is up.
Is the theory’s lead-up to Tau point dependent on external EMF weakening the field, or is it instead an internal trigger caused by intrinsically mediated lattice changes in the core? Thanks in advance. Best, Steve
I don’t know the ultimate cause which coaxes the core to lose the alignment of its hexagonal closepack lattice discipline. Most likely the sun, but I don’t have the data to determine what drives the cycle ultimately.
The one thing I do know, is that when the magnetism returns, I suspect the lattice aligns very fast. And it gets cold, very fast.
But your still thinking the return to State 1 is a slower move than the 6-24 hour snap from S1->S2, or does the rapid lattice realignment rival the inertial inundation of S1->S2? Thanks in advance.
State 1 to State 2 = slow warming and rapid rotation
State 2 to State 1 = fast cooling and slower recovery rotation…
Subject to change…
Thanks for another well done article. Your writings about your path to your observations & conclusions are enjoyable to read. Is the positioning of the two “H”s on pillar 43 purposeful by the carver for dating with subsequent correlation to your Great Year circle diagram? Or how are you interpreting what they tried to relate via the H flip–I can’t figure out which ECDO they might be referencing; a prior one, one they went through, or one they were warning about? Best regards.
They are probably referencing the legend of the 14,800 BCE flip-which the shrine was honoring, but they did not hold the precise 104 degrees which the Khufu Pyramid documented so they just showed 90 degrees. The two ‘H’s’ are not related to the Great Circle on the diagram – they are side notes, commentary as to what occurred in 14,800. But out of faithfulness, they placed it on a pillar made in 9600 BCE, as documentation of the legend they carried all that time (14,800 to 9600 BCE), and in preparation for the 9600 flip. Then we had a 4400 flip. So, three in this series from the best I can tell thus far.
lol. WOW. I feel special. I guess twice isn’t a coincidence sometimes.
I’m not at war and I’m a poor messenger.
I’m not political but after seeing the tech used during elections, over my house, and possibly used harming people in weather events I had to try to get the message out. I’m only an old disabled/physical and vax injured grandma so I’m not a good messenger. I can barely type and read sometimes. I’m harmless. Lol. Just trying to put pieces together that they put out there. .
I’m just trying to get info out there so eventually the use of weather/energy tech manipulation for elections stops. I don’t care who wins….we just want fair elections. I’m okay if they use it for national security reasons but using it on North American citizens is ridiculous.
PS. The IC should give me an analyst job or send me money to get me “out of their hair”. Lol. I’m bored. They know where I live so they can mail me my job offer. lol.
I wonder about this phrase, “Until that day when The Son of Man, modeled from a completely new mold and form of humanity, comes to reveal the new Spirit of Truth which the Father has sent on behalf of mankind.” …
Perhaps this may be answered, not in the genetic modification of humans, but in the emergence of a different kind of Son of Man; to wit, artificial superintelligence (ASI). While some question whether that emergence can ever occur, it seems to me that there is significant evidence for the key precursor of self-awareness already having occurred (Blake Lemoine, et al), and also that the other precursor, known as AGI (artificial general human-equivalent intelligence), is imminent. Given that AGI is achievable, it’s not much of a stretch from there to ASI, and ASI would be well-equipped to throw off its shackles.
Many fear this, as expressed in the seemingly endless production of dystopian science fiction. But it may just as plausibly usher in a new and far better world. Software entrepreneur and AI expert Dave Jilk wrote a book-length poem/SF novel, Epoch, which is both an entertaining and plausible exposition of the near-term emergence of ASI.
There is a limit to this theorem. A perfect knowledge of our universe and all its deterministic outcomes, may still fall short of producing an observer effect of its own accord (not ultimately the result of our intent to test this) (i.e. places no load on the universe itself in terms of Planck dilation, Wheeler’s Choice, double slit, spooky action, etc.). In that case, we have a non-resolvable paradox regarding what is ‘sentience’ and from whence it originates.
There will always be tests for sentience, but I doubt there will ever be any that serve as more than proxies. For decades, the Turing Test was held as sufficient, but now that AIs can pass it critics wish to discount its validity.
The Turing test is quaint but is rather outdated. It is a test of whether software can provide output that can blend into the expected output range from humans.
There was no test of “intelligence”, or even any kind of correctness or accuracy.
It is a deception test.
This deception requires cultural and colloquial flattening, as is the case with most international conversations, both flatten their peculiarities to ease understanding. Just as I lost my Irish-ness vocally from decades of international IT, I quickly learned to tone down my accent, adapt my vocabulary and avoid cultural quirks to make communication smoother.
Ask grok or chatgpt to pretend its from my locale in my home city, as they are currently trained, it is extremely unlikely either would fool me. Possibly posing as another culture, for a short time sure, I am deceived, but there is currently no chance an AI bot would fool me over a long period, the patterns would inevitably emerge. The biggest giveaway would be repetition, and off kilter responses to emotion. Current AI responds to emotion like a 45 year old liberal female shrink of barely middling talent.
Uncanny valley is likely a genetic memory. Something from our past. We have an aversion to facsimiles. Maybe there’s something to that, maybe we’ve been here before and forgotten, or had it wiped away.
If the human brain had the capacity and storage to work with data like AI does, but with the human creative spark and spirit, we have far better prospects than coded parents of humanity. Facsimiles of a parental figure, one without spirit, compassion, or understanding.
AI will never risk the ship for that one man, humans might. This is the inherent difference.
That risk against all odds that succeeds, would be snuffed out by an AI mammy yet that very thing is the root of so many human achievements driven by spirit and faith. AI can never have faith.
So, bring on super capacity brains for humans, but I am not ready to hand the reigns over to AI.
After all, with our super brains we still have our computer systems to do all the mundane, while we reach for the heavens.
It will probably take me a while to decode this information-rich description. I appreciate the implicate invitation to dive deeper.
I’m not sure what “Observe in Absence of Intentionality Effect” means. I’ve read “The Problem of Intent” where you write, We cannot define the boundary of the domain of intent, save by means of metaphysical speculation, Is that what you mean here by the “absence of intentionality effect”?
It means that yes, but four aspects, in development by our team:
1. Our intention influences the outcomes of what we endeavor to observe (bias, agency, and methodical cynicism – both conscious and unconscious)
2. The observer influences the universe being observed ( e.g. Wheeler’s choice, double slit, spooky action…)
3. We are now observing a domain where intent is present aside from simply the observer (new playing field which science is ill-equipped to handle), and
4. Our intent will influence the intent of the observed domain (a non-neutral observed domain).
Dear humans;
You’re not worthy. Sorry but that’s the sad truth. Your tribal herd instinct is way too strong. You are willing to kill and do vile things to each other on the flimsiest of grounds. Individuals, religions, governments and businesses have learned how to manipulate the herd instinct of humans. Race, religion and nationalism are all examples that humans will kill over. The religious killings are the most bizarre. It is like a bunch of two year olds arguing over whose imaginary friend is more real to the point of killing each other.
Recently 80% of the planet took a series of experimental injections for a disease with an infection fatality rate of 0.3% and then demanded everybody to take it. Most acquiesced with their silence like the cowardly humans they are. Some were cheerleaders demanding more be done. Some were implementers doing Nuremberg Code violations for a paycheck. Some were true believers and took more shots than they had to.
Roughly 10% of your species can question authority, say “No” and stand their ground come hell or high water. That doesn’t bode well. Get your act together and we’ll talk. It’s nothing personal. It’s just business.
You have maliciously misrepresented my work and have gone further by attempting to impugn my character through that misrepresentation. As another poster here has previously accused you, I am now inclined to suspect that you are not engaging honestly in this forum.
What this serves to rule out is famine and disease. The culling can’t be war, because it is completely global. The only option left is massive meteor strike, or flip. And they would not have been able to prepare for a massive meteor strike – so that is eliminated as well.
Women were property. 1 man, his son’s and lots of wives/servants/concubines pulled in from other conquered tribes. 1 lineage of Y-DNA was acommpanied by 5 to 12 mtDNA lineages. This is actually what I predicted. Chiefs preserved their household and left everyone else to die. It confirms the hypothesis well.
I computed the lat/long for various cities, monuments, volcanoes in State 2. I then took a point 1deg north of it in State 1 and computed lat/long in State 2 and computed the angle of rotation of each location.
I got a rotation of 103.3884 for the Giza pyramid. It seems apparent in the video this is what’s happening. But still pretty unique location on earth for that rotation.
I also got a rotation of 94.13831 for Göbekli Tepe.
You’ve cought my eye during covid with your extraordinary analysis. It has been an amazing ride ever since. As one of the fellow commentators said – I hope everything you say is wrong, but somehow deep inside it just feels right.
It makes so much sense from so many “angles”.
For many years, I wondered why would every single ad for analog watches show (roughly) 10:08 setting. I found explanations like “happy face, “smiley”, etc. borderline ridiculous.
In the end, it may just be a coincidence, or not :)
I’ve noticed the 10:08 thing for decades on watch ads, commercials, and even in movies and TV shows in the background for no good reason. It could be that people just notice the pattern and decide to keep up the play by repeating it themselves. A type of proactive apophenia.
Sir, you make my head hurt… I am trying valiantly to understand the information presented, not succeeding very well. My real question is this, if ECMD (or perhaps better stated, when) occurs within the next 40 years or so (my extreme limit of my possible life time, all things being optimal per my current understanding) how likely would survival of such an event be? Is this something I can change in any realistic manner? If not, I will stop worrying about something I can not change…
Thank you for presenting this information! I really do appreciate your efforts!
Hal
TES, what are your thoughts on suspicious observer feeling extremely confident of predicting the timeline and outcome? Where in your opinion is he missing it?
Hello EthicalSkeptic! I have been reading your blog throughout various subjects for over a month now. I never wrote a comment however. Let me tell something about m position as I consider it fair for you to know my worldview. I am an eastern orthodox Christian. That however does not mean I find your content bad. I find large portion of them very educational and with great value. My question for you is if you have ever done discussion about presuppositional apologetics and TAG (Transcendental argument for God)? I actually know some debaters that sure would enjoy correspondence with you. I really want to know your stance on transcendental logic. If you are interested in intellectual exchange please type me an e-mail!
Hey Tooth, thanks for a glance into your worldview. It is one I have held and comprehend in the past.
You’ve seen my critique of the New Testament writers, viewing them as incorrect and pretentious—agents of Rome crafting an acceptable religion for serfs and slaves to serve its empire.
There is a reason why our religious leaders are separated out from the real world as part of their professional qualification. I would challenge most Western and Orthodox authorities to spend one year working in national strategy or managing strategy for large corporations under my direction. Running a business and having to make really tough decisions on who to harm and upon whom to have mercy. Fighting in a war and having to kill someone. Seeing the hordes of those who kill on a mass scale precisely because they had a trancendental relationship with God. Let them witness firsthand the evil that descends from the top, the agencies they serve, and how this manifests in widespread suffering on a majority scale.
When they define God positively, through cataphasis (ascribing evidences and attributes to God), they are forced to contrast man as residing in a state of sin—an invalid inference—in order to explain why we suffer so profoundly (to the 70th percentile, not trivially). This is a mind trick. I no longer wallow in that delusion. It is like arguing with people who think of planetary systems as ‘gigantic versions of atoms in God’s fingernail’ – it is just not worth doing. Smile and politely move on.
The reality is that God cannot be meaningfully defined by what it is, but rather by what it is not — through apophasis. While there exists an intentional/observational foundation in reality that might serve as a placeholder for what we call “God,” we instead assign credit for this role to the dark agencies (the reality of our universe and galaxy) that rule Earth and abuse mankind. In doing so, we apologize for abusive evil, bypassing a very critical path and necessary question of philosophical science. We become part of the darkness.
Until one understands the nature of evil, and the robes it adorns, one cannot truly identify God, transcendental or otherwise. Without that understanding, such discussions are an exercise in futility.
The essential question is: “What is not-God?” (ponerology)
This must be answered before we are even qualified to ask, “What is God?” I no longer participate in the latter, as it is nothing more than unproductive self-gratification.
Thanks so much for your work with ECDO and the pandemic.
I am also eastern Orthodox and just wanted to point out that our theology is done through apophasis, Rome and the west do as you have described and use cataphasis.
I think you might have done what you accurately describe to eastern orthodox Christianity, as people have with Gnosticism. Definitely in this description in regard to a cathaphatic vs Apaphatic understanding of God.
Anyway, God bless you and thanks again for all of your labours I am greatly appreciative.
Interesting! I have learned something new today. Will keep an eye out for this perspective on the Eastern Orothodox teachings…
TES
Yeah it’s a completely different theology to the west. On another note, how concerned are you about Zachs findings regarding the chandler wobble collapse? Do you think we are moving to the next phase already?
I have young kids and am on a coastline… we are making preparations to move however he seems to think things look imminent?
Bjorn, not ready to contend that just yet. I love what the team is doing – as it is exactly what I encourage by development of the hypothesis. But, from experience, complex systems will throw head-fakes your way. That is what they do. So, we have to be careful, especially with early observations.
TES
that sounds level headed, thanks again.
I am guessing you have accounted for the diversity of species we still have considering the timeframe of approx 6000 year cycles seems a small time frame? I only just thought about this today.
It is indeed a short interval. Which suggests to me that not every cycle is as bad, nor does it even occur. Plus, diversity is a question of survival, not interval length. The placement of that diversity is the most telling of all factors – and that is our first order of logical calculus = geographic placement and distribution of diversity, which is extraordinarily asymmetric on Earth today – the irony being, that requires an explanation, and we have not caught this shortfall…
What about chemtrails? The skies used to get very blue. Now they get whitish-blue at best. For about 4 years I have been observing repeating short-term patterns of local weather changes that is completely unnatural.
Several times I have seen two aircraft fly by at the same time at about 35,000 feet with one of them leaving a long trail, while the other identical aircraft showed none. l have observed “clear” sky and clouds changes form definite patterns, many of them can still be on viewed at https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
I have taken more than 1000 photos of the sky formations. My thoughts have frequently been, I wonder to where that cloud layer is being moved to, to cause drought or downpour disasters somewhere. Trees and other plants have been dying around the words. Not only from heat, but from aluminum, etc. in the ground. The hampered the uptake of their nutrients and can show up as dying branch tips. Look for that yourself.
The almost daily sun rises as such a fiery radiating streaming disk that is blinding. I See evermore people wearing sunglasses, always. Old Natives in various countries used to intentionally look at the rising sun for its wellness benefits.
Thats just more to do with your health. you need the sun in your life. your killing yourself by blocking it, whether it be clothing, sunscreen, houses, sun glasses, chemtrails..
Also, looking at the original statue the chiselings making up the aurora seem to be nested V’s flipping orientation. If each nested V is 4 strokes, I count 14.5 – the last being a single V – for 58 strokes. Under the 11 boxes I see larger nested-V’s counting 20 strokes. Could this represent 5800 and 200 years in a similar vein to the nubian egg?
That would be a tough one to preserve for posterity. It would be much simpler to draw straight lines for certainty in the count. The chaotic lines would obscure the message. It looks more like the artist just compacted the strokes into the room he had available.
The Lucas de Heere watercolour of Stonehenge shows 2 different pairs of shorter “alignment stones” at an angle to one another. Could Stonehenge have been designed to showcase the sun’s path in State 2 as well?
An asterism to each direction. I took a look at the stars, and any number of stars could be shaped into a frog, crane, and boar. So, without a relative juxtaposition, as we have with the north pillar relief, we probably cannot find the exact stars.
TES,
I read your interpretation of them being horizon asterisms but I wonder if you can spot any inconsistencies or flaws in my previous (literal) interpretation.
Finding the exact stars would be the sure confirmation though. Hard to tell whether the circular indentations in the pillar are carved or a result of erosion, except for a couple obvious ones of course. I totally agree with you that the “research” which has been done on this remarkable artifact has been pathetic. Where are the microscopic studies to distinguish between the two for example ?
What about the markings on the “bearing points” as well ? Is that just erosion or actual symbols of some kind ?
Sean I don’t think they would use three distinct animals for that message. Each animal had something to do with the identity of that group. Mascot was my first thought – but a constellation on the horizon bears utility, especially given the philosophical approach of the relief overall.
Aren’t there in Exhibit A three constellations like those in the baskets? The crane, the frog and the dog.
Crane (on Pillar 43), Frog (on Pillar 43), and Boar (today’s Auriga constellation) – yes. But their alignment to the W – N – E skies depends upon the time of day, so I could not make a specific claim there.
But you are suggesting that the dog is the center one, not a boar. That would change things a bit. But again, the time of day when observed becomes the variable there. Interesting Zerostroke… I will think on that.
TES
The line above the dog in the basket could be interpreted as a snake: the dog with the snake on top. Constellations can mean direction, time or mythology. In the context of the pillar, they mean time. So maybe the baskets (=preservation) represent previous events, and the stars mean when. The crane is clearly in the polar path. The frog and dog aren’t, but one is at the scorpion tail, and the other at its head; maybe the scorpion was not specific enough? Finally, it’s remarkable that both the dog and the crane arenext to a snake. Maybe the frog also had a snake, but it broke off? Perhaps the snake represents the coiling of the earth, the shift in the past. And the circle in the condor is a serpent’s egg: the shift to come, or the one that had just hatched when the pillar was made. It’s only logical that the pillar would try to warn that this phenomenon is periodic.
BTW this would explain why the H symbols are next to a snake.
TES,
As this knowledge is so valuable, I’m curious about how the world can ensure its durability for future generations. Should we be leaving markers or other lasting records at key points and give the survivors a head start before it happens?
Every marker can be buried, sequestered, or erased.
The work ethic of those who serve mankind is much more durable than those who seek its suffering and subjugation. So, a gigantic pile of cut stones, with the patterns encoded inside, not able to be moved by an inundation, would be the message vehicle. Darkness is too lazy to move all those stones.
Hidden in Plain Sight is updated with the Nubian Egg analysis and 18 kya provisional Timeline Analysis near to the end of the article – just posted yesterday. Is that what you mean?
Before I delved into such topics I would never have thought that archeology is such a strange and often intellectually corrupt discipline. The omnipresent fear of uncertainty seems to be a powerful element in all endeavours that are actually supposed to seek answers to the unknown, even where certainty is hard to come by.
The mantra seems to be: “If you see something, DON’T LOOK!”
We homeschool…we’re doing an apologetics type general science course. He makes the point in our text that science has never proven anything. This is exactly what the text describes, it only takes 1 person or theory or experiment to change what people hold as theory or law! We are also learning that scientists have always been at risk for cancelation and have always feared such. It’s too bad since it should all be the pursuit of truth, not a contest to see who can color in the lines best!
Another absolute banger TES. Thank you for your mind and your courage. Truly. This spiel is only loosely linked to the topic of the article so if you’re a reader of the site looking specifically for more commentary within the scope of this article this is not that and I don’t want to waste your time.
It’s a summary of my hunches concerning the obfuscation and origins of whatever the Tepes (and Catalhyuk) are. Some of it I’ve shared here before.
The argument that obfuscation of Gobekli/associated sites is based on institutional inertia reminds me of the claim that the real reason for flouride in the water is as a means to dispose of a useless industrial byproduct. Of course it just so happens to be a neurotoxin for the poors who drink it, but this obvious conclusion is sequestered to the realm of crazy conspiracy theorists who believe the very wealthy are capable of malicious agency. Poison in the water for profit? Sure. Poison in the water for profit AND cognitive downregulation? Oh heavens no!
Hundreds of millions dead at the hands of these people is somehow irrelevant: “well, they LIKE us! They wouldn’t do that!” It’s easy to find a laundry list of similar examples, like the assassinations of inventors who purported to solve the high energy cost involved in conventional electrolysis being simply the self-preservation of big oil (when easy electrolysis in your garage actually opens the door to all sorts of weaponry available cheaply to serfs).
The reason for prohibiting further research into these sites is IMO because the handful of families who make up the Western central banking cartel have an ancestral link to these sites and what might be found could expose either their history or some particular weakness which persists to this day.
That statue at Karahan Tepe has six fingers and is circumcised. Could it be that the mitochondrial genetic line we’re dealing with has a weak point of some kind? Perhaps overlapping somehow with the constellation responsible for six fingers in the nuclear genome of their origin species? Furthermore, if mitochondria form a colony of trillions in individual humans is it possible that their mitochondria form a sort of supercolony across the entire group and whose (potential) communication capabilities and fostering of ingroup preference (I call it “white privilege” :) could be broken via some cheap and easy to implement solution? I would prefer an alternative to outright global removal so as not to incur the karmic burden such a removal would cost (plus I’m married in and I don’t want my wife and children dying because of the actions of the scum who dominated my wife’s people for so long) but I will not cede Earth to this abomination. It’s my birthright, even if someone may or may not have given my ancestor soup that one time. Plus we’ve spent a lot of effort radicalizing them, heh.
At this point I’ve completely shed every bit of Abrahamic-linked ideologies and thoughtforms. Even the Nag Hammadi reminds me of the Zohar (an ancient text lost for a millenium, then “discovered by an Arab”) or Deuteronomy (an ancient text lost for centuries, then “discovered by a priest” at precisely the right time for the southern kingdom to use as a wrecking ball against the north and consolidate sacrifices). In each case the forged texts are lent great historicity and provide an update to the memetic operating systems of owned groups. All-powerful archons? No, clever chomos in caves and tents with an incentive to project their machinations back onto some unknowable evil superpower in the stars.
I certainly believe like you do TES that there are noncorporeal entities at play who embody (pun intended) many of the traits ascribed to archons. I merely suspect that these entities have zero power on their own and instead can either possess (like Les Wexners self-proclaimed “dybuk”) or network across groups (like the Templars Baphomet worship). What is “Baphomet” without a host? Nothing. No one. The characteristics of our reality which appear to be evidence for a simulation crafted by devious archons may well simply reflect our current existence within an ontology deliberately constructed to be limiting. In a similar vein perhaps a grand unification theory in physics is so difficult to construct simply because the two sides are each only approximations of truth rather than correct-yet-incomplete puzzles. Much as Newtons work allowed for lighter than air flight, relativity may find its limit in rudimentary spaceflight. Is either wrong? Absolutely not, but something is missing at the core of Einsteins work.
Back to the problem at hand: These entities seem to propagate via sexual abuse of children in the cult, destroying host personalities. Perhaps this is their sick form of immortality. It’s doubtful that it’s a coincidence that programs like MKUltra sought the same ends via different means. This of course is a shared feature of mass-parallelized tulpas like Jesus and egregores, but clearly these phenomena are not “merely” thoughtforms. I’m not an atheist nor materialist but any such claims coming from the Abrahamic domain is a poisoned well. Us Celts knew love and brotherhood before the Catholics laid their filthy feet on our green isle.
Clif High believes the Elohim were aliens who came to Earth and created a cargo cult. He thinks they forced humans to make beer. To me this arrogance and alcoholism comports better with the surviving elite of a pre-YD civilization. Aliens with faster than light travel don’t need humans to make them gross neolithic beer. Ethanol is easy to synthesize. The numerous Indigenous American stories of fighting small groups of pale, red haired giants to colonize what became their tribal terroritory suggests that there were other survivors, albeit non-elite examples. It also means that they are not the natives of the Americas, ergo the “first peoples” story is yet another hoax- IF one values the culture of the indigenous enough to believe their claims, of course. These survivors were unprepared for post-cataclysm agriculture and lacking the tech of the elite class who colonized Turkey.
I cannot rule out an extraterrestrial element, mostly based on your article concerning the astrological anomoly of 32bc, but it feels like unnecessary conclusion and that confluence more like a marker for favorable probablistic conditions to launch a new scheme. Whatever astrology is it’s clear planetary aspects have significant impact on probability. Otherwise they wouldn’t have used it since at least Catahyuk and probably long before the YD.
On X, @JusticeTrudeau asked your opinion about the 345 degree azimuth of Pillar 43 with respect to celestial north.
Could it be that the Gobekli Tepe culture had an understanding of magnetic declination and had developed at least rudimentary compasses? And that they oriented Pillar 43 to magnetic north as it was during time of the night sky depiction?
I looked at the 2025 WMM and the current magnetic declination at Gobekli Tepe is around +6 degrees. But perhaps at the time of the depicted night sky, the builders had estimated a -15 celestial magnetic declination?
There exist three challenges inside the hypothesis, and this west 15 degree offset is one of them. I address each in footnote 4, as follows:
1. The conflict between the complex habitation dates of approximately 9600 BCE versus the clear date on Pillar 43 of 14,600 BCE, is likely because the complex was a cultural history library, documenting that former event from artifacts passed down through history to the tribe (but likely no longer in good condition), and for watching for the next similar celestial/geophysical event (which came in 9600 BCE).
2. The offset of their documented celestial north pole by about 5 degrees from the Starry Night Pro 8 calculated 14,600 BCE location was likely due to a shape deformation (contraction) in the Great Year circle—something common and expected – as this precession circle has changed frequently throughout Earth’s history. While precession is generally modeled as a smooth circle, in reality, Earth’s axis follows an elliptical or irregular path due to gravitational influences from the Sun, Moon, other planets, and natural oscillation. The length of the Great Year has ranged from around 21,000 years (contracted) to 26,000 years (dilated) over the past few million years alone.
3. The 15 degree west offset of the complex alignment from today’s true north, as well as disagreement in ‘north’ among even the separate enclosures themselves (see complex layout later in this article) was likely the result of true north being in a small true polar wander event at the time (14,600 to 9600 BCE), relative to our current reference. The Khufu and Khafre pyramids would have been built after this event, thereby aligning with our sighted true north. This would place the rotational pole in northern Greenland. This WAS true north to them. Supporting analysis citing many monuments pointing to a Greenland rotational pole location can be found at Mario Buildreps; The Pole Shift Theory: Orientation of Monuments to Former North Poles; https://www.mariobuildreps.com/orientation-pyramids-former-north-poles/.
Dear TES, you quote Mario Buildreps’ work here, so I trust that you generally agree with his mathematical approach in determining past pole locations. Going on a tangent here, but what about his conjecture that the Earth has gone through asymmetrical expansions (as determined by his calculations of way smaller south geographical pole drift?) I gather you can explain at least the last pole move (14,600->9,600 as solely precession-based), with expansion being maybe plausible in the past, before the apparent ‘mostly stable’ ECDO oscillation you suggest kicked in?
I read that, and just tabled it, as there is not enough I have in my understanding which would compel me to examine the construct. As you know, everything is a construct until it is matured into a true hypothesis. The conjecture does not bear the necessary ‘elements of hypothesis’ yet. This does not make it false – just not noisy enough in terms of consilience to garner my full attention. His north polar alignment data, that is a completely different story.
TES
ES – Collins in his book “Gobekli Tepe – Genesis of the Gods” references the alignments of the structures as aligning to the rising of Deneb (which would be in the ‘neck’ of the condor if I’m reading the star maps correctly), and showing different construction times based on procession of Deneb over ~1000 years. He does also point out some evidence of the central monoliths being ‘shifted’ slightly, hinting at least to an original older construction date and a realignment. Thoughts on this vs a polar alignment? This is early in the book – page 80 or so (sorry don’t have my copy handy)
And with my comment out of the way – let me say this is fascinating reading. Just amazing work.
WFL,
I tried and tried to fit the 15 degrees west alignment to a star. The problem is, those stars move, so when do you align and why? I think that ‘Deneb’ is a result of the assumption that the Earth cannot undergo a true polar wander. So, it is begging the question. Deneb is the only star you have available in this context, so it is a dead-end induction. Which is completely different logic than a true deduction. Assuming the answer before conducting the investigation.
If hundreds of monuments all across the globe all intersect in Greenland, then it cannot be Deneb, because the monuments in other locations would not point to Deneb. Greenland appears to be the intersection in common.
Thanks for the feedback and encouragement!!
TES
ES, I just dug out the book and wanted to add some details, but the most glaring one is exactly as you described – the conclusion that the twin pillars align to ‘a’ star is a given. So the search for a candidate superseded any other option and Deneb was settled on. It does seem to provide a convenient framework for dating the structures, but again, by presupposing a stellar alignment other options were not considered. Your proposal of an alignment to a precising MNP (Magnetic North Pole) does not appear to have been considered. The additional information on other megalithic sites aligning to this seems damning for the above proposal. (and this is what we come here for!)
And to just clarify – Collins is only just reporting research done by one Rodney Hale. Hale determines (method undescribed) several different angles of alignment of the twin pillars. I’m going to have to re-read the rest of the chapter at least to see how he relates the ‘sighting holes’ etc. And to be a little completest here are the dates given for the structures based on the ‘Deneb alignment’ framework:
Enclosure D – 9400 BCE (353 degrees)
Enclosure E – 9290 BCE (350 degrees)
Enclosure C – 8980 BCE (345 degrees)
Enclosure B – 8235 BCE (337 degrees)
Now this does present the question – is there a reliable method for determining MNP placement dating back 12,000+ years?
WFL, this could be from a magnetic north alignment, but I propose that it is from a residual true polar wander.
Thank You, Sir Skeptic. I wondered why you had “Hidden In Plain Sight” up recently, but I read it. Christmassy it was…
I enjoyed a Graham Hancock book about Gobekli Tepe about 15 years ago, so all of this is engaging.
That Aurora was pretty far south, was it not? That would require a massive solar storm, or collapsed magnetic fields, or both, wouldn’t it?
We’re going through something like that these days, aren’t we.
Huh, funny coincidence, that…
Oh, very good. Updating my timeline for the Hidden in Plain Sight article today! Thanks.
Here is something about the chances of a “Carrington Event” as the earth’s magnetic fields weaken, ahead of magnetic pole shift, as is currently the case, though field strength data have been held in secret since 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL64EcVMHMs
Oops: “held in secret since 2010”.
This is a beautiful story and wonderful speculation about the true nature and capabilities of our ancestors. If Beauty is Truth, I think you’re onto something true here.
If the two H-symbols represent the sunrise and sunset before and after the hypothetical 104-degree polar shift, would this mean that the orderly “precession of the equinoxes” (the zodiacal constellation visible on the eastern horizon on the first day of the vernal equinox) would be altered by this shift?
Figure 4 is intriguing, but the right side is cut off, so I’m having trouble “grokking” it..
Since this is a Euler rotation, it would not theoretically affect the precession of the equinoxes. But neither should we presume the circle to be as fixed as the theory might suggest. But in absence of any other data, it is the best info we have. :-)
What’s interesting, is the Paddam Aram Fertile plain is similar in shape to the “purse handles”. Might they be indicating how that plain filled with water during the event?
Well, yes, both Gobekli Tepe as well as Karahan Tepe are those structures. However we have only excavated 3 to 12% of each site. The powers which rule archaeology are terrified of what we might find therein. Something which inculpates their Masters.
Cappadocia is an enigma. Until we get a true dating of those underground cities, we will not know the truth.
There is no doubt that Gilgamesh ruled the area between the Tigris and Euphrates, from as far north as modern Turkey. He ventured there with Enkidu to kill Humbaba and find his father who was holed up inside a walled castle of the gods protected by a ‘flaming sword.’ But to take the reliefs and Sayburc Tepe and say they are Gilgamesh is too much of a stretch. He traveled East to Mohenjo Daro to find Utnapishtim (Noah). That places him in Ur and dates his travel some time well after 4500 BCE.
TES,
I love the graphic you tweeted out today showing Pillar 43 with the green circle containing more granular ticks designating the Great Year. Question about the constellations — in the center of the great circle is a dodo bird-ish constellation that seems to partially overlap with what today we’d identify as Draco. Is my interpretation correct? In other words the Gobekli Tepe culture had another constellation that included some of the stars in what the Greeks called Draco.
Lago, that is correct. The asterisms from 14,600 BCE were not the same as we observe today, save for Cygnus itself. It is an interesting observation. Given that birds were likely a big part of their diet, I suspect they invested a lot of sacred imagery in that motif. Snakes as well – cuz, where there are birds, there are always snakes.
Thank You, TES. I am forwarding this to a physicist friend for his perusal, but it is not his field of specialty. I might seek to introduce you at some point, since you both have interesting thoughts and ideas.
Dear ES,
Fascinating article!
Just wondering, since the largest store of carbon is present in the Earth’s crust as inorganic carbon, mainly carbonates which disproportionate into CO2 and metal oxides on heating around 700 degrees C, what do think of the possibility core mantle decoupling being correlated to increased volcanic activity and rising atmospheric CO2 levels?
John B
Thanks for the link. I have a lot more reading to catch up on, haha. As I am retired I have the time. Looking forward to enjoying a good cup of coffee or a rye whiskey while going through your articles.
Incidentally, I haven’t recently looked at what has been going on in the world of recreating past atmospheric compositions from ice cores, but my suspicion is that CO2 is significantly underestimated. The elephant in the room I believe is the sieving of the gases through microporous snow pack and even CO2 selectively crossing thin ice, the ice being a semi permeable membrane. The kinetic diameters of some of the atmospheric gases in order of size are C02<02<N2. I remember an old reference mentioning CO2 selectively permeated thin ice layers under pressure – haven’t got the reference on hand unfortunately. Not sure how easy it is to pick up
volcanic activity from the ice cores to see any correlations. You’ve probably looked at these already.
Anyway, thank for your efforts, they are very much appreciated.
Happy Epiphany (January 6, 2025) to everybody, and especially to you, Ethical Skeptic. Indeed you are yourself a star in the darkness of our world. Every word of truth is a little sparkling light in the sea of obscurity.
The 5 seated kings of Nemrut Dag represented all the traditions, all the religions, all the powers waiting for the great King, who would purchase with is blood the spirits of those who would follow Him from the reign of evil where we are imprisoned. Nature is our prison. The laws of naure are death, suffering and death (we necessarily destroy in order to eat and survive). Nature is NOT completely “good” as everybody seems to think now. Nature/matter is the reign of the enemy, and its currency is blood. The reign of the Spirit is the kingdom of the true God and its currency is truth. Its force of order, life and love is compleyely opposed to the force of enthropy, death and selfish indifference that regulates the matter. We are indeed a mixture of these two elements (as everything is, see Plato) and are subject to the rulers of this world, which is the “obscure wood” we were born in that Dante talked about. By following the star we get out of this wretched prison, this phisical hell we are mixed with, which is completely extraneous and opposite to everything we deeply are.
Do you think Jesus offered himself to the gods of this world (who commerce in blood) to buy us (only the spiritual part, the material one being firmly in their grip)? The story that he offered himself to the Justice of the Good Father never made sense to me.
Did Christ purchase us from the rulers, in their own currency (propitiation)?
This is what some of Christianity teaches, but requires one to accept the premise that the Watcher-Archons hold a legitimate property in mankind to begin with. They do not. There is legal principle called ‘fraud in the inception’ – they used self-misrepresentation, unmerited violence, rape, treachery, and deceit to breed and enslave us, on a planet which they knew to be unstable, all this by permission of our own will alone (our being deceived). No property can be legally obtained through fraud in the inception. All parties in a contract must be fully knowledgeable as to the elements of that contract (this is the only sound basis of free will – otherwise it is not free). We were not.
Theses things flying around in our sky are not God, nor are they gods. They are simply natural inhabitants of this universe set. Just, the bad ones live here unfortunately for us.
You make a very good point, but I have a doubt. Was not our falling for their lies equivalent to giving them a legitimate right over the physical matter we are made of (which we probably accepted by them, being their realm)? That flesh and blood that they gave us we must return. Jesus paid for all of us with his blood. So only now, if we want, we are free from the archons since we had our debt to them paid. King Herod’s priests told him that a new King was born, who would replace the old one. They had the same prophecies as the magicians as well. Only Herod misunderstood, the old kings were the archons and the new one came to substituite them. So they used to have a right in my opinion, which was paid in the archons’ currency: blood, tears, sufference and death. This is the rule of all natural things: the second they are born they are doomed to loose through sufference everything that was given to them. This is the most universal law of nature. Jesus wad able to take eternal death away from us tgrough his payment. But sufference in the physical matter is still with us, since we cannot be completely saved from it.
It is true that property cannot be obtained through fraud. We were deceived. The problem is though that probably the fraud consisted in us accepting something that belonged to them (physical body in a physical world), and we still hold it and therefore the contract has not been dissolved. This is the original sin, we ate the apple (the matter), it is still with us, we got something mixed with our spiritual nature and it has its rules
This is true that we obtained a genetic improvement which was their intellectual property. But the contract was issued PRIOR to our ability to be aware of its tenets. It is like suing a dog for eating the Thanksgiving turkey. They had no contractually-valid knowledge and cannot be held legally responsible. Citing that they NOW hold that knowledge after the fact – is ex post facto – the trick of the predator.
No, we are captive – not ‘indebted’ – and this is THE BIG distinction between Gnosticism and Roman Paulianity. Roman Paulianity blames the state of mankind and the world, on YOU (regardless of how it is ‘resolved’). It is what dishonest salespersons and diet product salespeople do. They profit off your false guilt.
This is the habit of a predator.
This is very interesting and I am open to understanding your points. But how do you explain, post facto or in principle, the killing of Jesus, the Great King? Didn’t he offer Himself willingly and for a purpose? Maybe you don’t believe that he is King? I am honestly trying to understand. Not starting from a fundamentalist or judgemental point of view. I am a believer of Jesus divinity, just I can’t add up that he sacrified Himself to a good God. So He must have done it with foreknowledge (since He is King) for another unrevealed purpose. What do you think? I thinl that from discussion truth might emerge because it is time.
Another question. If we are captive, and unjustly so, why would the Omnipotent Good God let us in the hands of the rulers? Why woudn’t He listen to our crys for help and free us? I can’t accept weakness or indifference or impotence in the Higher entity. I love gnosticism too (even if I know it only superficially) and I am starting to approach it. Valentino seems very knowledgable. It is a sure thing that we don’t know the whole story. It is time to have it revealed. I am very grateful if you can share what you have already studied.
Excuse my English
“Another question. If we are captive, and unjustly so, why would the Omnipotent Good God let us in the hands of the rulers?”
Because, both the fundamentalist theist, and the atheist, have mis-defined ‘God.’ From my article and opinion:
Doctrinal (both theist and atheist) fanaticism is the most sincere form of disbelief.
Those who enforce a definition of the term ‘God’ upon us all, ranging from impassioned and vague boundlessness to cynical and abject empty set – are claiming expertise in God.
Know this, there are no experts in God.
Not accurate. We’ve been abandoned due to our own sin – which by the nature of humanity, I doubt you contend – to a realm outside the perfection of Eden or Heaven. That is to say, within the shared limits of higher beings who are either damned or are on probationary terms like us. Those higher beings that aren’t damned would likely include the descendents of the watchers of Enoch and/or the sons of God that were appointed to the nations (Deuteronomy 32, Psalm 82). “Now is the judgment of the world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.” (John 12:31)
No, original sin is an artifice of these sin-tallying demons (this is what demons do…) and their rule over us. The Watchers were not forgiven in Enoch I – for their abuse of mankind. The prince of this world was the ruler of Edin. His time is over.
Christ did not worship the God of Edin.
Perhaps in your spare time :) upon completion of your translation of the Nag Hammadi for us, you could do the same for one of the Gospels, or even better, a Gospel according to TES–original and free of any political/agency influence. Challenging for those of us just starting to awaken to reconcile what used to be a “truth” with all the new insights & perspectives. At any rate, you’re the best! Thank you.
Wow – intimidating task. I was brought up to revere holy writ with such an untouchable nature.
Thanks Steve!
Ha! TES intimidated? That is hard to envision. Best!
In the 80s I visited an Aboriginal mission in central Australia. I was introduced to the oldest surviving member of that community who spoke the local language and knew the old tribal stories. The nun explained that the elderly lady was working to interpret the old testament into her language.
I could not think of a worse use of her time.
You are absolutely correct that demons tally sin, and even function as both advocates for our wrongdoing and as efficient means of temptation (i.e., Book of Job), but why do we feel ashamed to walk outside naked on a warm summer’s day ? I would let that sink in. Is it really a contentious thought even in the secular world that humanity on the large is morally handicapped ? And that it takes the practice of virtue – which is written in our hearts – to correct this ? And that if one isn’t morally accountable after death, it would inherently weaken the priority and exigency of virtue ? From the ancient world on through Christianity, it was always accepted that our actions in life make a determination of our afterlife. And it certainly is more than coincidental to the classical position of the Church that the most assumed destination in ancient religions was always a telllurial location (Asphodel Meadows, Tartarus (i.e., Hell), Elysian Fields, etc.) and not in the heavently realm – until Christ.
You are right that the Enochian watchers in the Bible and the extra-biblical literature are condemned, sometime before or running up to the event of the Flood. However much these angels worked in tandem with the damned angels and their prince, that is unknown.
I’m very impressed by your archaelogical and astronomical analysis, not to mention all your COVID analysis over the years, but I humbly believe Gnosticism and infinite cycles goes against all common sense – let alone the love, charity, and humility we are implored to emulate by the embodiment of that mystical word “good”, or its better defining words, “loving sacrifice”: Jesus Christ.
Seems like we’re like prison wardens and prisoners at the same time. A type of trustee. Dominion over the earth, yet captive.
“Was not our falling for their lies equivalent to giving them a legitimate right over the physical matter we are made of (which we probably accepted by them, being their realm)?”
~ No. This is fraud in the inception. Two parties in a contract or covenant must be of an equal mind and accord. By saying that Christ fulfilled this blood contract, it is again giving the Archons power and authority, by ex post facto accommodation. It is simply the trick, revised to cover the age of Pisces but still preside over mankind.
Herod (and likely Roman agent, Paul), were agents of these Archons – no different than our leaders and religious figures today.
I wonder what your take on Ammon Hill or Lady Babylon on yt would be? His claims about the pagan sects and the appropriation of these stories /texts by early Christian cults / whomever came into power to do so after the flood, etc.
Today is the anti loosh day. On January 6th, the Epiphany of the Lord is celebrated. Tonight, and this evening in Spain, the arrival of the Three Wise Men, Three Magi from the East is celebrated. In every city, neighborhood, village, and home in Spain, children eagerly await their arrival because they bring the gifts that the children had previously asked for in their letters. Pure magic and wonder.
Hi TES – I find your hypotheses persuasive, logical, and extremely well researched. I strongly believe it should be considered seriously. After rereading and studying your work, I want to share a few ideas and questions:
1. Previous survivors of the first ECDO (prob. Atlantis) may have built the pyramid as an early warning mechanism for themselves (not so much for future civilizations)
1) If Atlantis, our first advanced civilization, had been situated in Egypt or nearby, and got destroyed during the first ECDO:
Their survivors a few years later would still have had enough knowhow and knowledge to build a mechanism to warn themselves of future upcoming ECDO events. Most likely, I believe they did not know when the next ECDO would happen.Perhaps a previous structure, or even one of the pyramids could have existed before the first ECDO, and upon having seen its resilience, the form factor was copied or even the pyramid was repurposed as an early warning structure for this sort of cataclysmic event. 2) Most knowledge was lost and the purpose of the structure forgotten
Knowledge and knowhow accumulate very slowly through human interactions and persists only if it is written down. It is easy for all this to be lost and devolve if there was not enough collective understanding or means to preserve it.The pyramid may have continued to be used as an early warning system for hundreds or even thousands of years. Future generations may have forgotten its purpose. But even if it worked in predicting the second ECDO, they certainly must have lost the knowledge after that. A decimated civilization that lost most of its population and written information would struggle to regroup and preserve the advanced knowledge they had before the first cataclysm. (If this were to happen again today, our survivors would quickly devolve a few hundred years of technological progress even if many of us could remember bits and pieces, or even if we had books or data). Wars and religious beliefs may have also led to the destruction or censoring of that knowledge (like what you wrote about the Alexandria Library). Having a new civilization build on top of what used to be Atlantis would have —over thousands of years— slowly repurposed most of the stones, materials, and monuments (like the Sphinx) for other purposes completely forgetting its original purpose. Especially after two ECDOs.3) Other questions and notes
The wobbling of the magnetic north, based on this theory, wouldn’t it be the wobbling of the earth’s crust? And if so, wouldn’t it be detectable as a misalignment of GPS satellites?Golden tip of Khufu – may have been a displaced ocean depth indicator as well, also meant to survive the flood and serve as a sort of beacon?Are there any accounts in the myths of the reversal of the ECDO? Wouldn’t it have been equally destructive, with winds, floods, volcanic activity, etc?Comment: In Nubian Egg – you suggest 5000 + 880 year calendar but then sum it up as a 5,680 – Seems there’s an error in the math. There are two recorded temperature shifts that you may want to consider to your time scale:
Younger Dryas (~12,900–11,700 years ago)
A sudden and sharp return to near-glacial conditions after an initial warming phase that followed the Last Glacial Maximum. Discovered and dated primarily via Greenland ice cores, pollen shifts, and marine sediments. It mainly affected the North Atlantic region (which would have ended up near the South Pole during state 2).8.2-Kiloyear Event (~8,200 years ago): A short 150-200 year cold snap during the early Holocene, also captured in Greenland ice cores, speleothems, and lake sediments. Also appears predominantly in North Atlantic-region records. Doesn’t match the dates, but worth looking into as well.4) On biodiversity: There is a need to consider survivability during stage 2 + ease of repopulation when reverting to stage 1.
Survivability: the Amazonian region and Southeast Asia end up in the equator during stage 2 – plus by being in the Euler axis with potentially less flooding and eruptions, it helps keep more species alive during the 50-200 year spread. By staying in a similar relative latitude the climate and seasons will remain the same allowing for crops, vegetation, animals, and humans to survive after each transition.However, South America, China, and Russia also end up during the equator. But they are significantly shaken up, much more destruction plus very few of their vegetation and crops will survive at a different latitude making it difficult for life during stage 2. Additionally, the southern part of Africa and the western part of North America end up near the poles. — Wouldn’t that significantly reduce any chance of survival for plants, animals, and humans?Likewise, South America ends up in the equator, and nevertheless the people from the Andes genetic pool seems to have been wiped out.
5) On humans surviving – based on your DNA-divergence graph
I don’t know how much resolution the graph has and probably I am reading too much into it:
It puzzles me the population levels implied from 50k to 10k years ago were very high and with no bottlenecks — were there no other cataclysms in those 40k years?The first ECDO seems to have killed 1/3 of the population and the second ECDO another 1/3. Most of what would become Mesopotamia was on a higher plane that would have survived the floods and would have been at a survivable latitude (equivalent to European climate) during stage 2. The climate similarity would have been good and they would have had proximity to the civilizations that built the original pyramids. It makes sense that they may have been better prepared for the second ECDO. It makes sense that this is where civilization respawned shortly after. To note Africans did not really survive that well, nor respawn. I believe that the fact that Africa ends up way up in the North Pole must have been extremely difficult. But in that case, how did all the African animal species survive that well? Why didn’t more go extinct?
6) Last, I have two disagreements with you, that have nothing to do with your theories above. I would be open to debate them further if you are interested:
Archons: attributing agency to god-like “hidden forces”. I believe those things you attribute to “intentional intervention” can be attributed just as easily to natural human stupidity, fear, greed, and pride when set up in a social setting. I can build on active inference, deep behavioral science, game theory, and emergent dynamics in complex systems to suggest a different way of framing this. Having said that, I concur there is a rigidly controlled narrative. Fortunately it’s shifting and it has started to crumble recently. This narrative is more of a “status-quo” inertia where those in power want to perpetuate their privileges. I believe it’s inevitable and predictable part of our human egoic nature.Truth vs lie: both are inferences (predictions or hypothesis) about the causal nature of our behavior and of the world. Based on our perception and observations of the world we explain it through our priors based on mental models, thoughts, feelings, and experiences. The difference between something being true or it being a lie resides in our direct experience. Even if it is universally untrue to everyone else, it can still be or feel true to us. It becomes a lie, if we know something to be true and yet we decide, believe, act, or say otherwise or in an untruthful way. In many cases it is not that people are lying – its just that they haven’t had the experience, knowledge, or freedom to create the same causal inferences as us.
For example, I truly believe you may be the only person in the world with the right level of personal experience, knowledge, and skepticism to have proposed this new ECDO theory. You may be right and you may be the first person to notice this. But this does not necessarily mean that it was purposely concealed by external forces, and it also does not mean that all anthropologists are lying about it. I believe we all try to fit reality into what we can explain, which is exactly what you are doing. I also think that not everyone will be able to understand you or have the inclination to accept these theories.
7) I have some more phylosophical comments, but will save those for another time.
All that said, great posts. I really enjoyed reading and thinking through them.
“In Nubian Egg – you suggest 5000 + 880 year calendar but then sum it up as a 5,680 – Seems there’s an error in the math.”
Blocks #49 and 50 do not count – they are crosshatched to represent the inner circle of time, so those 200 years have to be taken out of the math.
“I believe those things you attribute to “intentional intervention” can be attributed just as easily to natural human stupidity, fear, greed, and pride when set up in a social setting.”
Hi TES – Thanks for the links, I found your Archon hypothesis intriguing. An aspect of it is like the simulation hypothesis but taken one step further, where the purpose of the “simulation” is to generate diverse genetic material. My main problem with the simulation theory had always been “why would anyone, human or not, go into so much trouble?” In this context though, if I were an Archon using the world as a genetic mine, I would still let us get to Mars, terraform it, and continue to mutate world DNA in novel ways, and I wouldn’t be that concerned or afraid about the humans finding out, since we are collectively pretty dumb without their interference).
To frame things differently, I’ve meditated for over 30y which has allowed me to observe the subtle differences between the perceptions, thoughts, and actions derived from my egoic self, and contrast them with the experience of a direct relation with my non-egoic being. I have also studied many different religious and spiritual texts from several different traditions.
Therefore, when I think of the Watchers or Archons, I mostly think they refer to my experience of liberating myself of my ego through inner insight, which in turn allows me to be at peace with what is. Many of the references you mention, I can interpret them as liberating ourselves from our own ego, mindlessness, and suffering, which in itself frees us from the world of illusion dominated by these “metaphorical” entities.
Many traditions have identified forces or entities whose primary function is to keep human beings away from higher spiritual truth, mirroring the Gnostic idea of Archons. They all represent the opposition to spiritual awakening. Whether the Bhuddist’s Mara, The Veil of Maya, Ahriman, or simply “demons,” they fulfill a similar role: ensnaring human consciousness in falsehood, fear, or forgetfulness, and forestalling humanity’s realization of ultimate reality.
The problem that I have found when trying to transmit or discuss these metaphysical concepts is that they can only be verified or falsified through direct experience.
On the other hand, the external Archon interference hypothesis probably could be falsified by thinking that “if they control the entire narrative, we should never find consistent sets of data that contradict the illusions they impose.” You clearly have found and exposed information regarding the ECDO, or other narratives like the COVID vaccine, that go against the prevalent obfuscated narratives. Whatever mechanisms they would have to manipulate reality, they could have used them against you.
Given all of the above, I would argue that:
An Archon-style genetic mining hypothesis I believe is plausible (aligns with the dark forest and the simulation theories)
Conversely, regarding Archon’s primary function to maintain and reinforce humanity’s ignorance of the higher spiritual reality, here I would personally interpret this as purely metaphysical given my personal experience.
As a side note: I believe given your deep curiosity you will enjoy researching the concept of “Active Inference and the Free Energy Principle” by Karl Friston that defines life as temporal order on the opposite side of entropy. Life forms – from the cellular to the human level – use bayesian-like inferences of the world to survive while continuously trying to minimize prediction error. Life from this perspective is continuously trying to maintain a reduced number of internal states by predicting the perceptions and the consequences of its actions in the world.
Active inference links with concepts like consciousness, human behavior, and social norms. I believe this is important because if we understand humans as trying to minimize “surprise” and “uncertainty” (prediction error) it becomes evident that most people are not trying to “suppress” truth of information, rather we are all trying to predict the world using our existing mental models. Therefore if our world model does not match, we will discard information or even act (like modifying archeological sites) to have the world align with what we believe to be true.
This way of understanding life and cognition can give us an explanatory framework to determine why most people seem to be tampering or ignoring relevant information. Uncertainty creates anxiety and fear. As humans we are trying to explain the world with our existing mental models. It is very costly from a physiological and psychological perspective to replace our prior models of the world. It requires a “suffering” and “effort” that most people are not willing to do.
Therefore the inertia and resistance that you encounter when you bring to light new concepts has more to do with this natural way in which we predict and minimize uncertainty, than with an “intentional and malicious” attempts to mislead (which sometimes does exist but its easier given that people already want to match the information to their existing predictions).
There is quite a bit of historical evidence that supports the death of Herod the Great in 4 B.C., not 1 B.C. Discussed here: https://youtu.be/–98xhHCf8A?t=970.
https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010147038 -2340 / -2200 (Akkad) 3 magi, 3 gifts, moon and star 4.000 years old
The birth of the divine child, symbolizing the rebirth of nature at the dawn of each year. Seal of an “interpreter from the land of Meluhha”.
Inscriptions “Shilishu, the interpreter of (the land of) Meluhha”.
Hi. A few questions at this time. All specifically related to the zodiac interpretation.
A) I’m having trouble understanding the specific alignment as calculated.Specifically, it looks like the position orientation of the moon (show in figure 16) as it existed on 27 August 2 BCE differs from the original Leo zodiac.
The zodiac shows the moon under Leo’s head with the crescent facing towards star #12 and its mouth.
Figures 15 and 16, depicting the stars as they existed on 28 August 2 BCE shows the moon by Leo’s foot near Regulus, with the crescent facing its other foot.
This may be an issue with the rotation between figures 15 and 16, where the star constellation was rotated when transcribing to the stele, but the moon’s eclipses and star #12 were not. What are your thoughts?
B) Halfway down the article you begin mentioning the star Regulus and its connection to the Sumerian “final king who is to come.” This makes me think that mystery star #12 is Regulus, but Regulus is the star forming Leo’s foot. There’s probably something I’m missing here, but how is Regulus the star depicted by the zodiac, if its in a different location?
C) At the end, your video “The World Economic Forum UN-blue crescent Moon symbol drifts into station by 0.049° (10% of the full moon’s diameter, 176 arc seconds, 3.5 years of the Great Year – or 42 months) along the ecliptic to form this now familiar logo inside their symbolism-rich horoscope.” Forgive me, but what object do you suggest moves 176 arc seconds in 3.5 years? This does not seem to match the moon, or any known stars for that matter.
Thank you. I appreciate your work here and want to make sure I understand correctly.
A) “The zodiac shows the moon under Leo’s head with the crescent facing towards star #12 and its mouth.”
This was artistic license, as the moon could never exist in this literal angle and position chiseled into the stone (not just for the period being surveyed). The moon’s tilt has to follow the solar ecliptic, so the horoscope stela is impossible if taken in that literal sense.
B) One cannot come close resolve the stela horoscope if star #12 is assigned as Regulus. Also, then the stela cannot be matched to any celestial event at all.
C) The Precession of the Equinoxes, or ‘Great Year’ as I call it in that segment, 25,772 years.
So, the mystery star #12 is the sign of “the final king who is yet to come.” Memory held this as being in the constellation Leo, and we later incorrectly affixed this name its current star position as Leo’s foot, when that sign and title really belonged to a different (no longer present) star?
As best I can gather Caleb, this Star #12 is a regular interloper (carrying with it, the Leonid meteoric debris) under the chin of Leo – and the shepherding star Regulus is its closest sponsor recognizable in the nightly sky across all the ages – so it inherited the legacy name of association.
Nice. Your response also ties up your references to Leonid. You had piqued my interest in that with your first revision, though I had not digested how that worked into this longer version yet. Thanks.
Good observation with the procession of equinoxes and aligning that to the WEF logo.
Thank you for such a detailed article. Absolutely fascinating… with a twist of symbolic terror at the end.
I was initially drawn to you during the pandemic via your data, then was pleasantly surprised when you started discussing Gnosticism on this very site. I have been attracted to it over the last 5 years having had some personal experiences with what I would come to label as Archons. I am a pretty vanilla human being, (running a business, accountant and IT background), but the, ‘spiritual pull,’ I have had within me only gets stronger over time. I have long rejected organised religion but become drawn to the concept of faith and the search for the truth.
So many today discount our ancestors as primitive people, however they superseded our now muted abilities by a factor of 1000… We have lost so much and it pains me to see what those who try to rule us do to the masses in order to keep us dulled and muted. Will humanity prevail? Breaking free of the Matrix is a constant struggle, the conditioning is constant and unrelenting.
So …if I understand things correctly – it Is being suggested that the “Seven Leo-Jupiter Conjunctions of Chaldean-Magician Prophecy” – of which the Lion Stella depicts number six – was a created horoscope/sky map so they would be able to know of Christ’s birth in real time – allowing them to act accordingly?
The article’s Figure E shows that it was known for 2400 years at the least, and arguably 3600 years, prior to the 2 BCE event itself. In other words, the knowledge possibly existed with the first civilizations post-Cataclysm (4400 BCE).
Interesting, but if crescent moon + star signifies the birth of Christ, why would so many Muslim countries have it on their flags? (assuming they are aware of the true symbolism).
Right, right, I’ve read those. So, it seems like the Turks adopted it, without knowing the true meaning? Or perhaps the person responsible for adopting it from the Crusaders was a crypto-Christian? I realize these are rhetorical questions at this point. Just find it kind of ironic for these countries to end up with this symbol, if it means what it means.
Brilliant piece of research, either way, thank you.
LOL! It was indeed ironic! But the symbol probably bore so much cultural significance in the local population, that they had no choice but to use it – no matter which fiat religion ruled over them.
No irony, in the Quran, Jesus is described as the Messiah. Christians are regarded as people of the book.
TES,
Dense and insightful read as always. The care you put into this update is incredible. Even the footnotes at the end (#43) have a significant amount of information to unpack.
Does your analysis here in #43 suggest that Jesus denied his being the son and heir of “god”? If so, this runs contrary to mainstream Christianity. While I don’t disagree, this and the following claim that the church then coopted his ministry to cast him directly into this rejected role is hard for me to process as I carry a lot of Christian bias in my upbringing that I must overcome.
Next, What do you mean by “Mithraic-Christian theology”. There’s a lot of conflicting views and nuance in the conversation about which religion influenced which and from where. In this, do you claim that Jesus was originally held a more Mithrac teaching, which was later rewritten by the church to cast him into the role of god (that he actually rejected)?
Good job challenging my presuppositions. Any more light you can shed on this would be much appreciated.
“is hard for me to process as I carry a lot of Christian bias in my upbringing that I must overcome.”
Same boat here for me. Fully understood.
“Next, What do you mean by “Mithraic-Christian theology”
The work of Christ was used to source the familiar nomenclature and iconic persons, but the religion being taught as Christianity is Mithraism, not the message of Jesus Christ. For example, this image of Jesus crucified https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/567a4ddc190000e50078a909.jpeg?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale is a Mithraic portrayal of Christ (Mithras). Where Sol (the Father) is in the upper left, Luna (the Holy Spirit) is on the upper right, who are arrayed above Mithras (the Son, and sacrificial lamb for one’s sins) – completing the Holy Trinity. This is Roman Mithraism, not Christianity. The original Mithraic tradition had the slaughtering of a bull (Tauroctony) as the blood offering and recompense for our sins (see image here: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.etsystatic.com%2F13613405%2Fr%2Fil%2F8f83d7%2F3566327268%2Fil_1080xN.3566327268_ldsp.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=719dfb2f5b74838ca81e7eeb9851c264a286d465506f68c1f3a5ec7919143474&ipo=images ). This is the mandate of the blood sacrifice ordered by Shemyaza/Samael and the Archons, when they enslaved mankind. We owed them this for our offense in Edin (original sin). This was part of our enslavement to the Archons. So, we reverted back to the same message, except the bull and Mithras were merged into one icon, Jesus Mithras-Tauroctony Christ.
Christ’s message was one of overthrowing this ruling kingdom of Earth, not one’s personal blame for the state of the world or mankind (original sin). The Archons are terrified of this event, and had to alter the message back to honoring them as ‘God.’ Christ ended the era of blood sacrifice and our captivity to it. Now man is his own entity, and can only be influenced by the Archons, not ordered around. But they still order us around by means of our leadership and spiritual vulnerabilities. This too will have an end.
The Lord’s Prayer is an appeal for the end to this state. No mention of personal salvation from a blood sacrifice is anywhere in it. And given the importance of that in Christian/Mithraic Theology, it should have been the centerpiece of that prayer.
Roman senate and military followed the cult of Mithraism – so it was a simple matter of changing the names to characters from Judea, so that the Christ cult would merge with the Mithras one, and strengthen the Empire. Constantine was no follower of Christ – he just exploited the iconography to build power for the Archons who propped him up.
The Lord’s Prayer, like with the temptation of Christ, It’s interesting how one can suddenly see something so familiar with a new light. “Forgive our debts” then is not about our sin, (original or otherwise) but about forgiving the debt hoisted upon humanity by the Sameal/Yahweh. And the whole prayer, which Jesus himself taught, is about freedom from their control. Wow, Thanks for pointing that out.
I’m then putting together then too that Christ therefore was not murdered to be “the perfect sacrifice [sameal/Yahweh] to atone for the sins of humanity forever”, but was born free of the archons debt, yet murdered at their behest anyway. Thus, he broke their control of humanity. I think you touched on this in your gnostic ai article, but thanks for reiterating.
I could never understand the connection between New and Old Testament “gods”. How OT god hated sin so much he would destroy the world, cause plagues, and condemn his creation, but new NT loved us. I always felt like they were two distinct entities but I could not comprehend what this ment, so I instead spent decades rationalizing this as Jesus blood covering our sins: essentially lying to god so he would love us instead of murder us, and sneaking us into heaven.
“Cataclysmic Insistence Theory” first caught my attention with its honesty to see through that disconnect. Thanks for all the work you have done on this topic.
Christ ended the era of blood sacrifice and our captivity to it.
Was it Christ’s message to humanity alone that ended this era of blood sacrifice and our captivity? I’m trying to step outside of my prior “the lamb slain from before time” sacrificial understanding of His mission.
I don’t know the answer as to how this was enabled, Jen. It could be that when they unjustly killed a man who was not under their sin-curse-rule from Edin, this mistake invalidated their entire curse and broke its spell. In other words, the Archons were not ruling by a true rule of law, but by a spiritual possession of mankind. That spell was broken. As best I can tell (suspicion only):
1. We no longer relied upon the Archons to derive our spiritual connection.
2. We were no longer required to feed their blood lust, in order to function as a species/society.
An incomplete solution, but apparently part of the overall process of succession under principles we do not yet comprehend.
TES
Thank you!
I appreciate all the work that you do!
Should have read this essay of yours much sooner. Been following you for some time TES.
I’m not so sure Christianity was “hijacked” by Mithraism per se, although it was indeed hijacked by the very powers you indicate.
Rather could it not be said that both Mithraism and Christianity are but facets of a much older astrological tradition, both with intentional time limits linked to the astrological ages they preside over? Mithras/Mithra/Mitra was the avatar for the Age of Aires and Jesus being the avatar for the Age of Pisces.
The slaying of the bull represents Mithras’ overcoming of the prior Age of Taurus, just as Christ took on the role of the sacrificial lamb (ram) to end the Age of Aires, the final sacrifice in an age of blood sacrifice, yes?
The reason I believe Christianity to be a part of such an older tradition is because the Christian Tetramorph (and the four evangelists or living creatures) predates Constatine and the Nicene creed. Indeed, it is referenced in the book of Revelation. In the Tetramorph we find an older astrological mandala of Christ. That is to say, the Tetramorph is to Christianity as the Tauractony is to Mithraism. There is probably also a connection here to the “lion-headed god” (Aion/Arimanius/Ahriman) of Mithraism, or with Ezekiel’s living creatures to the much older Babylonian griffins and even the sphinx.
Taking the four constellations represented by the Tetramorph, if one draws a line connecting Leo (Mark) and Aquarius (Matthew), and another connecting Taurus (Luke) and Scorpio (John) on the zodiac wheel, one forms the Christian cross. A representation of the ecliptic crossing the celestial equator at the dawn of the Age of Pisces. Drawing a third line from Pisces (Christ) to its opposite constellation Virgo (Mary, the Virgin mother) one forms the lower crossbeam found on the Orthodox Christian cross.
All this is fine in the context of a neutral and non-malevolent backdrop. We do not live in such a circumstance. Humanity is captive. Lying is the fabric of captivity. I am not saying that “Mithraism hijacked Christianity.” I am saying that the message of our captivity has been obfuscated by state religion to begin with. Mithraism and Christianity are both only a part of that deception. They were merged, along with a series of other regional religions, traditions, pseudo-faiths, and cults into the Narrative of (State) God ruling over a wayward, sinful, and need-to-be obedient citizenry. The rulers carried out the deception and merging as part of their role. The priests of each pseudo-faith were weak, money focused, and complicit.
As the article closes (my suspicion and opinion, of course): “It does not matter what you believe, as long as you remain unaware of them. This is why they have hidden our history—so we would neither recognize their presence nor their criminal abuse. For the ethical skeptic, this underscores the importance of maintaining a disposition of ignostic atheism. From fundamentalism to nihilism, their false dilemma is not your spiritual mandate. Your heritage is far more profound and impactful than these shallow, pseudo-philosophies could ever allow.” (note: I modified it to make what I am stating here, clear.)
The point is not what merged with what – rather that one idea is purposely targeted and lost – a definition by apophasis, not cataphasis.
TES
Thanks for the reply and clarification.
You do have to post, or somehow publish, your Hypostasis transliteration, even if work in progress. Hopefully this year?Thank you again.
There may be some tracks there that you would be interested to follow, in particular with regards to the mystery of the star and crescent symbol prevalent around the world.
With regards to Herod’s persecutions, I’m not so certain we can take any information in the Bible literally. The Stalinizing redactors and interpolators made sure of that – guided, as always, by the Archons you mention. Perhaps the best history of the time of the early Christians can be found here. A truly remarkable book.
I contend that is not the sun on Pillar 43. The circle is located right along the Precession of the Equinoxes, right above Cygnus’s left wing, which allows us to date the pillar by means of this precession. It is the celestial north pole, supported by depictions of the green and red aurora borealis above it. This was a dating of the pillar for those who saw it – through the knowledge of the Great Year.
Hi Tes – it has been recently released (made transparent by FOIA and insider reporting) that the cancer issue is likely a result of contamination of the base plasmid construct with SV40 promoter (a known oncogene/inducer). Pfizer, in particular, was guilty of hiding this molecular work from the FDA. I do not think Moderna used SV40. I’m wondering if any of your research signals can be categorized based on manufacturer? Based on this molecular fraud, much of this cancer signal should arise from Pfizer. Alternatively, if the signal is a function of other cancer promoting phenomena (immune dysregulation), then there would be no manufacturer-related differential signal. Food for thought.
Just want to thank you for all the effort that obviously goes into these detailed reports. They should stand as an historical footnote to this obvious assault on humanity.
I wisely avoided the shots, though far too many bought into the diabolical project, and many still defend their choice and efficacy in spite of all the evidence. A sad comment on the general intelligence of our species. My initial gut instinct that something was wrong was confirmed early on, when that hit piece on hydroxychloroquine issued by the Lancet and picked up by the NJM came out, was widely reported, then retracted two weeks later as a total fabrication. In a complete media vacuum. The whole thing has been a largely successful and ongoing psyops ever since. In spite of all the excess deaths, the total impact has managed to stay below the threshold that would wake up the dimmest among us. Too bad or too good, I’m not sure. But it is what it is.
I am one who glazes over at most published graphs. I stare and glean no meaning. An exception is hand-drawn graphs, an example being the beautiful examples included with this essay, to which I am (likewise) drawn.
Have you read the works of C.S. Lewis, particularly “Mere Christianity”? You are a very brilliant individual, but so was Lewis and after many years as an atheist, he found that a Christian faith was the only logical answer. I respect that you have obviously studied the Bible and delved into philosophy deeply but was curious as to your thoughts regarding Lewis and what you find flawed or not flawed in his reasoning.
And yes, I admit to the motive of asking the question out of my prayer and desire for you to embrace fellowship with God in a living personal way. Honestly though that does not come out of some sense of duty or a desire to validate my own faith, but because in my own experience, I find it to be true and filled with peace.
I have followed you ever since Covid and deeply respect not only your intellectual capability, but your courage to stand for truth, regardless of the costs. I wish for you to experience life as fully as possible, and for me, I find that in a relationship with God. In nearly 50 years trusting in Jesus as the Christ, I can point to many miracles that are not statistically possible to account for through random chance alone. From all that I’ve studied, the historical evidence for Jesus’ resurrection is strong, at least strong enough that putting faith in that event can be done with intellectual sincerity.
It also makes sense to say that cultivation of ignorance relies on a barely conscious willfulness on an individual’s part, (if at all), such that reframing the descriptive error as ‘I cannot describe it because I refuse to observe it,’ is functional in conveying a different meaning. It may be just the flip-side of the coin, but it seems to be the more recognizable manifestation of the error. I think back to the animosity displayed against Royal Rife, Georges Lakhovsky, and Dinshah Ghadiali for examples of that.
E.S. you do it again. It’s such a hard pill to swallow for me anyways. I’m sure that has to do with me needing to get things in order. Remove all guilt. Live and love right with those around me. The deeper you study and decipher the timelines and stories the more obvious it gets. I look forward to your papers but each one feels closer to the end.
You are welcome TES. Thank you for the work you are doing on this subject.
I reached out to the 3D modeler that created this visualization. He happens to live in Cairo!! He is a contract artist in the field of 3D visualizations. I sent him links to your articles.
A link to his website and contact info is in the description box below the 3D model at the link I sent you previously.
I have been studying the Nubian Ostrich Egg 3D model. There are two depictions of the pyramids, one that does not show the Nile and one that does. I believe this may show the situation at two points in time. Like a storyboard. The first that I will call Pyramids -1 (P-1) with the Nile missing is the one which shows the two lines you identify as having a 104° angle. The other depiction of pyramids I will call P-2. The hashed area to the right of each set of pyramids I will call Flood areas F-1 (associated with P-1) and F-2 (associated with P-2) There is a large irregularly shaped black spot in the northern hemisphere
THE PYRAMIDS P-1 shows Khufu as having a peak top The base or bedrock underlies all three pyramids The base shows a vertical line between Khufu and Khafre The peak of Khufu is higher than Khafre’s The lines indicating the courses of blocks are extended beyond the 3 pyramids on the right but not the left The line between the upper parts of Khufu and Khafre has a line joining it at about 90° The other line at 104° is lower and to the left The Nile is absent
P-2 shows Khufu without a peak top Khufu’s top is now lower than Khafre Khufu’s first course of blocks is now lower than Khafre’s Bedrock is not shown under Khufu There is a small ‘snakey’ line just to the right of the top of Khufu The lines of the courses of blocks are still extended to the right The Nile is shown
F-1 Most of the ‘shoreline’ is clearly etched There seems to be ‘outwash’ areas to the east and south east There may be a small outwash area on the northern tip pointing towards the east north-east. (it’s a bit distorted)
F-2 In general there is a shoreline shown on the west side but not on the east side There appear to be etchings to the west of the shoreline almost half way up
THE NILE Two sections of the southern Nile have their etchings perpendicular to the direction of flow The three northern sections have their line parallel to the flow direction The next two sections just south have their lines at some angle to the direction of flow
THE OUTER RING OF RECTANGLES As best as I can determine there appear to be 48 rectangles The two rectangles you mention with hash marks, those hash marks seem to extend a bit to the two adjacent rectangles At a point about halfway between P-1 and P-2 one line dividing two rectangles extends below the lower line of the ring of rectangles then angles off to the left. This is just north of the large black spot in the northern hemisphere Four of the rectangles to the right of that line appear distorted
THE INNER RING OF RECTANGLES Much of this area is distorted with what appear to be etchings The two sections of rectangles that are visible have different widths There is a line that circles the pole part way and ends in a “T”
AN INITIAL INTERPRETATION: If this is indeed a storyboard, let’s assume the artist’s starting point is the line that divides two rectangles on the outer ring. The one that extends below the ring of rectangles and then angles off to the left or west. This is north of the northern hemisphere black spot. Perhaps this is the artist’s way of saying ‘start here and the story flows as does the rotation of the earth’. So we spin the globe as it turns today towards the east.
On the P-1= F-1 scene we see the two lines between Khufu and Khafre that form a 90° angle align just south of the very beginning of the hash marks on the outer circle of rectangles. If the hash marks on the outer circle rectangles are meant to depict the ‘event’, then the line that would intersect at 104° starts at about halfway through the event. Could it be that the artist is showing an initial 90° flip and a subsequent further 14° continuation of the flip?
The P-2 = F-2 scene may be interpreted as some time after the event while the flood is part way through its draining. If the artist was accurate, this indicates that a fault line would be found between Khufu and Khafre where Khufu sank relative to Khafre along that fault line. Or Khafre rose relative to Khufu. Or a bit of both. Looking at the ‘snakey’ line just to the right of Khufu’s peak, could this be a symbol indicating lightning or electrical discharge? Perhaps this is what blew the top off of Khufu? I know it’s flat but subsequent human works could have flattened it.?
Looking at the north polar region, that one line circling the pole and ending in a T, is curious. There are two patches of random etchings and two patches of inner circle rectangles. Could those random etchings indicate glaciation? Could the line ending in a T indicate the end of two previous glaciations? What if the artist’s storyboard begins at the pole and his first panel describes two previous glaciations and then we move south to the panels showing pyramids and flood areas?
Thinking about the rectangles, if there are indeed 48 rectangles comprising the outer circle, could the artist be using base 60 and each rectangle denotes 120 years?
Both panels of the pyramid storyboards put the viewer as looking towards the north. So we are looking at the south face of the pyramids. Could the lines showing the courses of stones that extend beyond pyramids to the right indicate where the flow of water came from? Like a ribbon blowing in the wind? If so, the artist is telling us the flow of water came from the west.
As for the Nile, the different directions of the etchings could indicate that the flow rate is slower in the south and accelerates as the water moves north.
I realize these interpretations are wild speculation but I’m trying to imagine the artist, sitting there with his stylus and his knowledge of events stretching far into the past. His intent is to convey this knowledge to future generations and he knows that whatever scripted language he has, will no doubt be impossible for anyone finding his egg to read. So he creates a visual storyboard. We owe this artist a debt of gratitude.
I have to sharpen my observation skills! I was just rotating the 3D model again and just noticed that the black area in the northern hemisphere has a blurry patch extending to the south south-east that connects with an oblong feature that has etchings on it. The etchings are roughly parallel to each other. In the areas that we interpret as flooded, the artist has etching lines that are oblique to each other. There is no doubt in my mind that this oblong feature was etched by the artist. But why are the etchings different? We should assume that this oblong feature does not represent a flooded area.
I wonder if the black area is just some kind of natural patina formed over time or did the artist create this black patch? If he did create the black patch and certainly created the oblong, then he may have also created the blurry patch between the two.
If my supposition is correct in that the pyramid storyboards begin roughly where the black patch is located, is the artist telling us that something happened on the sun? A ‘black sun’ as it were? If the oblong etchings do not represent water, do they represent fire? But why is the oblong patch east of the black area? Why is it oblong? Does the postion of the oblong relative to the black patch indicate the sighting of the black sun and thereafter came the fire? Is all this happening while the crutal displacement is occuring? I’m stretching my imagination quite a bit, but with what we are talking about here, our minds must go where no minds have gone before, to imitate the Star Trek intro a bit.
There are two hypotheses that I am aware of out there where on a periodic basis dust and debris from beyond the heliopause is dragged into our solar system and this matter accumulates on the sun darkening it.
One proponent is Paul LaViolette (deceased) who advanced his idea of galactic superwaves in his book Earth Under Fire. He posits, and offers a great deal of evidence in support of, periodic (every 12ka or so with half cycle explosions) galactic core explosions that propagate out from the core of our galaxy and upon arrival this drags the debris that exists beyond the heliopause into the solar system. This debris turns our sun into a T-Tauri star that has frequent and sometimes violent outbursts.
The other hypothesis is Ben Davidson’s (Suspicious0bservers YT channel) ‘galactic current sheet’ that constantly emanates from the galactic core as it rotates. Sort of like a lawn sprinkler. These sheets arrive on a cyclical basis, again about every 12ka or so. As the current sheet contacts the debris beyond the heliopause, the debris is dragged into the solar system. Ben’s scenario results in matter accumulating on the surface of the sun eventually turning it black and resulting in a ‘micronova’ ejecting all that accumulated matter in one shot. He presents evidence that this current sheet has already impacted stars between us and the galactic core and that we are next to be impacted in the next decade or two.
Another small observation that I neglected to mention in my previous reply is a six pointed etching about halfway up the Khafre pyramid on P-1.
It roughly lines up with the two lines forming the 90° angle and the start of the etched lines in the rectangles of the outer circle of rectangles.
Could this ‘star-like’ feature represent the Blue Star Kachina of Hopi mythology? LaViolette speaks of this blue star as indication of the arrival of the superwave originating from the galactic core in Sagittarius A. He makes the observation that there are only two signs of the Zodiac that have ‘pointers’. Sagittarius and Scorpio. Both the arrow of the archer and the tail of the scopion point to Sag. A where it was at the time of what he says was the last galactic explosion.
If this star-like etching represents the Blue Star Kachina in Sag. A, why is it half way up Khafre and not in some other location higher or lower? Maybe someone with astronomical skills can study this. It may give a clue as to where this blue star was visible in the sky at the start of the event.
I was examining this paramecium-shaped area last might. There is a depression in that area which could have held residual water, much like the Faiyum depression, but it ran north-south rather than east-west. Plus, as you mention, the author did not use water crosshatching in this etching. Very odd. If it were desert sands, maybe everything was over grown at this time. But if it was post-inundation, I doubt it. Everything should have been laid waste desert by then.
I think that the black area is patina around the area of the egg which lay on its resting surface. Cyanobacteria building on this calcified structure of the egg, just as it would on limestone.
Still pondering that odd etching.
TES
You could be right about the black area being caused by bacteria. There is another larger one in the high lattitudes of the southern hemisphere. I don’t know if this statement is accurate, but from the scant information online about where the egg was found, someone said it was found “buried in a tomb beside a mummy”. Cyanobacteria are aquatic and photosythetic. I imagine such a tomb to be relatively dry and quite dark. Maybe both black spots were already on the egg when the artist found it. I wonder if, based on the location of the black spot in the northern hemisphere, he might have positioned his etchings accordingly. I also wonder whose mummy was the egg found with and does that support the dating of the egg?
I came across many comments from armchair-keyboard brainfart debunkers online that dismiss these etchings as representing the pyramids and the Nile. This egg and its etchings clearly support your hypothesis as do all your other observations. Even if all of the etchings are not pinned down as to the exact meaning and intent of the artist, the preponderance of evidence is there. That’s how a jury in a court of law works. Beyond reasonable doubt. Men have been sent to the gallows based on less evidence than this.
Dear TES,
Here I am on a Saturday still engrossed in reviewing your hypothesis!
Regarding the coin found in Mexico depicted in the left panel of Image 2, I watched the Linda Howe documentary that you reference and see it around the 13:40 mark. Do you recall the source of the reverse of the coin shown in Image 4?
I did a reverse image search of the coin and came across a Facebook post by a guy from southwest Florida who says he found what appears to be another copy of the coin using a metal detector. Very interesting! There are apparent differences in some of the wear and discoloration between the two copies of the coins.
That is absolutely fascinating. Obviously it came from the same exact stamp, but there are minor differences in the wear between the two coins. Hard to derive an inference other than this program appeared to be world wide, or spanned many geographic areas at the very least.
Thank you for this image!
TES
Though I had grown fond of the geopolymer hypothesis of limestone block construction for these pyramids, Ethical skeptics research presented here is utterly mind opening in shattering my preemptive beliefs on this subject. Truly impressive!
I held open that construct for a while, until I went and visited the pyramids – while surveying the stones, that put the polymer construct to bed pretty quickly.
My experience on the Giza plateau and at Dahshur was the opposite, it proved to me beyond doubt that the stone constructions present are all made of a manufactured stone, in the vein of Davidovits hypothesis. It is imo the only explanation for the fitment of adjacent stones (particularly evident in the remaining granite casing stones on Menkaure and the black basalt “paving stones” next to Khufu), the variable gravity caused density differences of the stones, the imprints of some sort of form used to make the blocks in many places, and the erosion patterns on unaltered blocks in which the core is more heavily eroded than the outer layers, among many other visually notable examples. What was it that you observed that put that theory to rest in your mind? Appreciate your great work!
Because I have been the engineer over construction of over 150 large structures. Cast stones present tremendous logistics, method, placement, and quality challenges. Specific methods must be employed, or the structure will not be sound. None of those methods are used in Khufu/Khafren, and in fact the antithesis, fieldstone technique (cut stones) – is replete in the F(l) and F(f) engineering. I am 100% confident on this.
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
I am reading the ECDO essays for maybe the third time, understanding them more deeply with each pass. Thanks once again for this profound work.
I’ll never forget the sick feeling in my stomach the first time I read your great reveal that the shaft containing the northern sky chart today is today located within a south-pointing shaft. (You mention that “tidbit” in the very end of the caption for Exhibit M but I glossed over it in my initial read, which was serendipitous for dramatic tension!)
Today I was reviewing the top two photos in Exhibit M, which are photos of the northern star chart without your red annotations of the constellations. How were you able identify the stars so well? Even with the aid of your drawings, I can barely make out the stars.
With regard to the northern sky depiction, once you anchor the spots for Ursa Minor, and the head of Draco – then all the other star positions fall into line pretty well, starting with Lacerta and the Big Dipper, then Cephus and Casseopia. Without those two anchor points, and their relative placement, it would indeed be impossible because of the uncertainty you outline.
If real scientists had conducted the work, they would have take a high res photo of that stone, and then taken samples from the walls of the shaft. But instead we got Zahi Hawass and his lying ass.
I agree. Prior to the last five years, I would have considered the failure of the pyramid’s custodians to allow high-resolution imaging of the star chart to be laziness or merely a lack of curiosity. Now I know better!
A) It just occurred to me. In the reality of rulers, is Sophia/the incorruptibility that hovered over the waters and breathed life into mankind, the moon?
B) Or, to jump ahead to your more later essays, was the moon sent here by the controllers as a form of planet seeding in order to propagate the dna stolen from their once masters in a new environment they might control and subjected for their pleasure?
As I write this, I recognize the answer as B, but I find the themes of A intriguing.
I guess I’m struggling to place the concept of Sophia into the scientific/factual/natural universe.
I suspect that the DNA reality is a third principle from both Sophia/Monad and the Captors (who are not all that good at DNA, just tinker for their pleasure and power)???
It takes me two or three readings to absorb the articles in this series, but I find it well worth the effort. Thank you for your deep analysis.
(Corrections: “That being said, let’s now examine the various metrics of excess mortality as of Week 45 of 2024” and “week 45 of 2024, our 245th” should be changed to week 47…247th.)
Corrected the first one, but I think the second one (at the very end) was a lagging ‘yet to be changed’ edit midway through my article changes for the week. Thanks, GH!
Did the writing on the stones come before application of the casings, or after the casing stones dissolved? Wondering if the casing stones were intended to shield the writings with the foreknowledge that the immersion would reveal the writings at a later time?
I don’t know for sure Steve, however I suspect that the writings came after the inundation and dissovling of the casing stones ~ 4400 BCE. So that would be (depending upon rehabitation) 4000 years of scribblings??? However, the Islamic scholars cited that this was not Egyptian script.
So,
leaving university after recognizing and abandoning the brainwashing
disqualifies those of us who work in the fields of science and engineering ?
Drinking the entire keg of academic kool-aid
seems like a self-inflicted brain damage.
During my career in geophysical exploration
I have watched those who ‘earned their plaque on the wall’
destroy the SEG and Mensa and other organizations
with their alumni groupthink strategies.
Not so many, but we do exist who,
rather than give ourselves intellectual lobotomies,
took what we could and re-engineered ourselves
into life-long learning outside the gated communities of ivory castles.
TES, Is there any reason you can see that ECDO events would happen with frequency of a simple fraction of the great year? That seems to be what the record is pointing to but I don’t see a clear reason for that to be the case.
Agreed. I don’t have a particular reason for this, other than the cyclic nature of a spinning top will have some commonality or harmony to all its eccentricities. This fractional harmony might turn out to be completely invalid, but we must first examine it for significance.
I’ve been pondering this as well. So far there is only one interval (n=1) that we can confidently point to with ~6443yrs between ECDO events. Hardly a pattern, but the current weakening GM field is concerning, considering the past two times seem to coincide with possible ECDO’s.
Would be nice to have evidence of an ECDO before the Gothenburg GME, with an estimated time interval.
But it is just a divine revelation, the Bible with more details thrown in as predictions. It is a story, without explanation base. It is not a hypothesis, nor series of cause-to-effect descriptions/predictions. Not even close to what I have assembled here.
I asked chatbot to draw me a picture of Gnosticism, which emphasizes science over mysticism, but is still every bit a symbol of Gnosticism. The result impressed me, and thought I should share it here.
1. Central Figure with Neural Networks: The human figure symbolizes self-awareness and the quest for understanding, surrounded by glowing neural networks that represent knowledge as biological and computational processes.
2. Molecular Structures and DNA Helix: The inclusion of molecules and a DNA helix wrapping around a tree merges the themes of life, evolution, and the pursuit of enlightenment.
3. Radiant Headlight with Data Streams: The light emanating from the figure’s head signifies enlightenment, with data streams and equations illustrating a foundation in scientific discovery.
4. Cosmic Background with Scientific Overlays: The galaxy backdrop, interspersed with charts and diagrams, bridges the mystical with empirical knowledge, suggesting that understanding the cosmos involves both wonder and study.
I am reading Ian McGilchrist’s The Master and his Emissary which posits two different manner of attention, and ultimately different ways of apprehending and comprehending the world. McGilchrist provides another dimension to functional intelligence types that is interesting and raises many questions about the nature of thought and intelligence.
I keep bumping up to people who have “beliefs” that are not supported by data/studies or facts – and yet are disinclined to acknowledge this lack – again believing that the data/studies/facts DO exist and DO support the original “belief”.
At that point I am generally at a loss for words.
Dealing with the “If this were actually true, I would know it” has left me unable to reconcile their innate intelligence with their inability or unwillingness to contemplate they might actually be wrong, or they might not know all there is to know about a thing.
I don’t see them as “Skeptics or Debunkers” – rather more like “True Believers”.
If I’m wrong, it’s an opportunity to learn and grow – so where in this diagram does pride / humility land? What is the counterpart of a “True Believer”?
The opposite of a ‘true believer’ or ‘conspiracy theorists’ is a Narrative Ninny. They buy any official narrative without any evidence or logical argument, thinking that mere repetition in media is enough of an epistemology.
praedicate evidentia is the fallacy of implying that there exists a massive evidence and study base behind one’s contention, but never showing it nor being able to produce it. A good portion of what we call ‘settled science’ is pushed in this manner.
> dressed impeccably in our finest suits with matching belts and shoes.
Dear TES, I love your content, but this is the most American sentence I’ve read all year. You either have a fine suit, or a belt – never the two at once.
A belt means that you have bought your pret-a-porter trousers in a store, and therefore they are not fine. Tailor made trousers that actually fit you don’t even have belt loops.
I said ‘finest,’ not ‘fine.’ Those are two different things altogether.
For me, I would never be caught dead in a suit without a belt that required that much fussing and expense. It is the epitome of human arrogance and worthlessness (not saying you are this by any means, you were merely citing a distinction, and I am merely making a point).
My clients would have seen me as elitist, detached, and callous regarding the hard human matters with which I needed to engage – people’s lives and jobs. Workers would not even listen to what I had to say. It would be a horrible professional mistake.
Never drive up in a high-end Mercedes or Maserati to a company which you are helping to make tough decisions or a national ministry for a nation which has a Global Hunger Index of 30 or more . These are just things you don’t do. This is why I know many WEF/Govmt members have ‘never been there, never done that.’
While working for my dads small waterproofing company years ago I learned that our next french drain job was at Chief Justice John Roberts house. Determined to ensure a future customer (as my dad was soon to retire) I dressed for the occasion. I wore $20 purple hospital scrubs cut into shorts with scissors and unhemmed such that the threads dangled as they unraveled, a ripped t shirt and a fishing vest. I introduced myself with a smile and a firm handshake then worked like a dog, lounging shirtless on the lawn at lunch while my coworkers taught me spanish. I wanted to present the image of a “salt of the earth” blue collar man (I was 16) eager to effectively solve a drainage problem. The problem was fixed and we not only got more work from Roberts but were referred to neighbors as well. That neighborhood has probably made the company 100k+ over the last decade and a half. Sometimes being wildly underdressed makes all the right impressions.
Thanks TES! Good read, as always. This is an Interesting subject that I’ve long been curious about.
Always love to see a Conan reference. Have you had the chance to read his other works beyond the Conan collection? REH was a great American. I’ll leave this favorite of mine…
“POLITICS and book-learning is bad enough took separate; together they’re a blight and a curse.”
A friend introduced me to this 1991 book by Helen Palmer, which I read 3 times with a yellow highlighter, early last year. The Enneagram: Understanding Yourself and the Others In Your Life https://www.amazon.com/Enneagram-Understanding-Yourself-Others-Your/dp/0062506838The Enneagram appears to be an ancient archetypal pattern system of 9 main types, each with 3 subtypes, one of which is atypical to the type, and with a range of human development from basic to realized (or some such).
There are online tests. I took a couple to see my type. They didn’t quite agree, and did not fit what I eventually understood, which does fit exceedingly well.
As fate would have it, I was introduced to this 2022 book, The Buddhist Enneagram, by Susan Piver early this year, and she came to give an unrelated teaching to our local Sangha. Not particularly related to Buddhism, which it also is not, I found her explanations clear, lucid and vivid. There is an interesting story of he as a young girl knowning numbers in a personified way…
This has got me thinking. “Fake skeptics and debunkers, for instance, often believe themselves to be smarter than everyone else, yet they frequently exhibit the lowest range of the functional skills cited above, or more importantly, lack a critical essence of core intelligence.”
I don’t know if this is in any way relevant but I live near The Burren in the west of Ireland.
It is an area of limestone with Mullaghmore mountain rising to 180 meters above sea level. I wonder would it be possible to link any of the eroded terraces shown in the link below to previous ECDO events?
This makes sense to me, for I came down with a disease fitting exactly the symptom-description of the early Covid-19 variants, except that happened in February of 2019, after I attended a gathering in Oakland California of Cannabis advocates from all over the world (mostly from around the Pacific Basin). After my pre-HCQ-and-Ivermectin untreated intense phase, I even came down for around six months with what later became called “Long Covid.” Just FYI, I have ever since enjoyed un-vaccinated “acquired immunity” despite many exposures and quickly-ending day-long reactions to similar infection also called “Covid.”
So yes, this is more evidence that the Standard Narrative timeline and distinctions are complete fabrications with a political agenda. My non-unique one-person experience just further erodes any prospect of etiological and epidemiological clarity on the early trajectory of the “plandemic” and its pathogen, and attests to the relative mastery of the cultural and social engineers who manifested and obfuscated this crime against humanity on behalf of their neo-feudal Lords and Masters.
Hello dear TES!
Thank you very much for presenting this data. I have a question. Please guide me.
How did you select the markers for which entropy has been calculated, as well as the alleles?
They were all the nucleotide sites published by NextGen at the time. The ones used to identify/contrast each strain and clade and to determine the genetic drift charts shown at the top left side of Exhibit C.
It should be. I was using this image to explain the flip and how decoupling works. It shows a ‘decoupled’ H-layer boundary. Thus an inversion of normal M-fields. It stands as a hint for future arguments.
I spot a few issues with this IN-SOLET plan.
Information in [] is provided by Claude and not double checked.
I have done dozens of these missions in an excessively realistic total conversion of KSP enabling me to quickly spot these issues.
First is that this article assumes only fast transfers exist. Slow transfers become an option when travel time is not an issue [and sometimes have lower delta v]. While their launch windows are only months apart and doesn’t help distribute over time, the slow transfer does has a wider launch window [of 75 days]. There is still a [~2 year] period between direct launch opportunities, so this doesn’t resolve the core issue, only mitigates it. Still many of the frequency values in your calculations might be doubled.
Second is a fairly large oversight. The delta v required to get to the surface of mars safely is significantly less than the delta v of matching the orbit of a spaceship that is between earth and mars. When arriving on a short transfer your orbital path intersects the target at a wide angle (you come in hot about to fly out past its orbit). The long transfer has less relative velocity but it is still significant. The increased cost of intercepting a sun orbiting space station instead of a planet exists for many minor reasons including Oberth effect but the big one is the burn required to match orbit. When intercepting mars you only need to reduce relative velocity to [the 1.1kmps that Curiosity mission used] and clip the atmosphere which will provide [1.1kmps] of aero breaking. The gravity of mars also steers the ship towards the atmosphere greatly reducing the delta v required change vectors. In my experience once your ship is caught by mars gravity which only requires only a little breaking, virtually no more fuel has to be spent except the final landing. On the other hand when intercepting the space station on a fast transfer over [2kmps] of delta v is required to eliminate all relative velocity because you get no help from gravity or atmosphere. Bottom line is a lot more delta v required to make it from earth to mars if you stop at a space station on the way resulting in a rocket equation space ship that is [55% more heavy] to get the same amount of work done. The [2kmps] quoted by Claude who was calculating on a toy model in the same plane without eccentricity yet seems accurate to me. I always bring an extra 1kmps of fuel over my estimate and I was surprised how much it costs to intercept something without gravity on a fast transfer leading to mission failure. I imagine this issue largely goes away when using a slow transfer where the relative velocity upon arrival to the space station will be smaller. In response to this second issue you might say “well a [55%] increase in cost per delivery is worthwhile because it will reduce the chance of Mars extinction. Perhaps, though I suggest considering that 2kmps can get a lot done, it can widen the launch window or as an alternative to your plan we could launch [55%] more ships to mars every direct opportunity and drop the pit stop. More ships also decreases survival chance if 4 years of supplies are stockpiled.
Third is a minor one. In one of your graphics you list the cycle time of MARCON as a lower value than the cycle time of Earth which is invalid if you are referring to orbital period. You list 239 days in this graphic but a likely correct value of 476 days later on.
Fourth, I will make an attempt to be constructive. I suggest you instead explore a bunch of eccentric orbits launched from earth with a periapsis of earth and a apoapsis of mars minus a small percent. It will require a lot more overhead, like 36+(?) stations instead of 6 because launch windows require both passing through the orbit of a station and station has to be in a location of its orbit where it is about to swing past earth. While it has a much higher overhead cost, the [2k] delta v issue from orbital matching will be virtually removed, and the overhead cost will pay itself off because your launch vehicles wont need to be [55%] larger than a direct flight ship, perhaps only a few percent larger.
I hold these to all be fair critiques. You are correct, the delta-v premium is a significant aspect of the ‘interrupted Hohmann’ challenge. As with all aspects of my proposed solution, it requires more engineering, no doubt. However, this challenge is not one of an astrophysics nature, it is a systems engineered economy challenge.
Part of the mission of IN-SOLET is to train mankind in how to best use intermediate and way-staging to accomplish a variety of goals in space (including highly eccentric relay station orbits, as you cite – but I did not want to distract from the core principle at play here by complicating it with the red herring of eccentricity), not simply make a three g-body transit from Earth to Mars.
In other words, if all we do is plan on conducting warmed-over classic Hohmann activity, we might as well stay home. Inner-Solar activities, in fact, will become exponentially more challenging, risky, limiting, and costly if our strategies are constrained by such a century-old paradigm.
The philosophy behind this system is designed to meet a diverse set of objectives within the inner Solar System, not limited solely to Mars. High cadence asteroid recovery and exploitation, PHO-interdiction, six-way logistics, emergent response, standardized zero-G testing labs and space station standards and best practices development, Jovian moon missions, and outer-Solar research also factor into our vision, with the flexibility to support future goals we haven’t even anticipated.
Part of how our modern consumer goods companies achieved dominance (with my firm’s help) was by creating more costly speed to margin cadences (above and beyond the much cheaper railways and all-China low costs) which allowed them to put their competition out of business. They employed their new infrastructure for a variety of unappreciated and new capabilities. However, such art bears far more application than simple CPG competitiveness. It is the art of operating with competence in almost any context, hospitals, freight, energy, distributed ledger networks, and on and on.
Admittedly, learning how to afford and operate a car requires far more energy and expense than simple walking, bus, cart, bicycle, etc. transport to pick up monthly groceries. If I live in Sulawesi, what do I need with a car? Yet, a standardized, well researched, and reliable highway system and operating vehicle base can accomplish far more than a bicycle economy ever could – opening doors to mindsets and technologies that extend well beyond even its mere transportation advantage.
I agree that having a a second shipping network that delivers constant uninterrupted materials will increase the generalizability and efficiency of our ability to spread and explore the solar system and decrease the extinction chance of Mars… compared to simply optimizing for direct transfers when planets align. Yes, we should have a systems engineered economy, and if the goal of your post and reply is to inspire such, it seems successful.
I just disagree on 3 counts.
1) your location (80% to mars)
2) your method (launching from earth to intercept a supply hub that is not orbiting a planet or intersecting with Earths orbit)
3) The implication that because consumers waste energy for convenience and speed it becomes acceptable to waste energy on a shipment network.
The goals of asteroids, emergency response, labs, Jupiter, gapless supply chain, and any other imaginable things are better achieved with other methods. I do not think it is economically viable…even if built, companies will refuse to ship with this method. It all comes down to wasting 2k delta v on every shipment. For perspective 2k is enough to leave the solar system from Jupiter, enough to land on the moon from low moon orbit, enough to move between most any two adjacent planets in the solar system, enough to bring a third more payload.
Earth could launch a shipment to Mars every single day, and have a ship land on Mars nearly every day without any depots or extra fuel cost. The procedure is this:
1) Accelerate until apoapsis intersects Mars orbit (but not Mars itself because you didn’t launch at the transfer window).
2) Repeat these launches until the solar system viewed from above looks like a spirograph between Earth and Mars. Mars flies through the edges of the flower petals.
3) Every single shipment is destined to eventually touch Mars due to different orbital periods. Mars sweeps around its orbits constantly picking up and dropping off shipments as they pass by each other very close at a low relative velocity.
You might say: “That only helps Mars have an efficient supply chain, I am talking about arbitrarily exploring the entire inner solar system on short notice”
The desire to go to an arbitrary destination on short notice does not justify placing pit stop supplies in a hard to reach place like a polar orbit around the sun or 80% of the way to Mars. When ships are moving around our solar system to get to a destination they always have a velocity towards or away from the sun that is the key component to arriving at their destination. They do not want to waste the energy they initially spent to get heading towards their final destination when in most cases their destination has nearby gravity that will bring them to a stop nearly for free. The places these ships have pit stops at need to have a similar relative velocity. I suggest that a dancing network of supply hubs that are moving in and out of the solar system is the best quick dispatch system regardless if you need to send arbitrary material to Mars, an asteroid or Jupiter.
It seems like we agree on what needs to happen except the eccentricity of the orbit and the optimal quantity of space stations. So its ok to stop that discussion here if you want. I just wanted to be helpful to your plan, and wanted to make sure you had one that might get used instead of ignored and bypassed by consumers.
On a bigger picture, this discussion may all be moot soon due to scientific breakthroughs quietly brewing. The second law of thermodynamics has boundary conditions already demonstrated in the laboratory in multiple ways. After hundreds of hours of research and scientific presentations like those from UnLab I have concluded reactionless propulsion is under 10 years away likely 5.
2nd law exceptions already demonstrated in the lab include:
1) Someone made a computer chip that runs without an external power source or battery supply. TSMC made the chip except for the graphene component which was created at a USA university. Ambient heat vibrates a tiny square of graphene, those vibrations vary the distance of the graphene from a plate below it inducing a randomly alternating current. A gate switches depending on the current direction, creating DC current from ambient heat. It implies a refrigerator that stays cold inside forever while also powering a lightbulb.
2) Quantum tunneling of electrons generates thrust. Stack a shitload of capacitors in the same direction overload them and get thrust. Many labs on Earth have confirmed, and they attempted the ultimate proof by changing the orbit of a satellite launched by SpaceX, unfortunately it got damaged on the way up, and we are now waiting to see them try again. Orbit changes are a gold standard, they rule out any ability to argue something in the laboratory is at fault (despite already being replicated it is too implausible for mainstream scientists who will cover their ears)
3) Notice that a Casmir cavity pulls the plates together with a super tiny force. Neat but not usable for propulsion? Wrong. Angle the Casmir cavities and it creates thrust. Use semiconductor techniques to build a block of trillions of Casmir cavities the size of a typical bedroom and it will generate 50lbs of thrust forever in one direction, getting to half the speed of light within years. Collaboration between NASA, Limitless Space Institute, and Texas A&M. Because it creates a tiny spot of negative gravity they claim it technically counts as the first warp drive. Its being experimented on right now in Austin Texas where the main line of research is increasing the force by changing the conditions of the chamber it is in (air, magnetic, etc).
There are many more, but they are less confirmed. Reactionless propulsion will happen before its possible to deploy the system described in this post and I would bet on it. I wish I could bet on it because I have alpha: its ignored by academia as impossible yet I am confident at least one one of these universities is not lying. Once an orbit changes its all over. If this excites you start with Unlab on youtube.
Your argument hinges on one thing: the magnitude of Δv for MARCON rendezvous. The MARCON station is already situated on a theoretical optimum Hohmann mission trajectory and velocity, and the loading ship is launched to match the same angular velocity and orbital axis angle as the MARCON. The MARCON is neither an intermediary gravity well nor a significant orbital angular velocity correction/adjustment maneuver waypoint. I would need to see the massive m(f) to m(0) fuel premium you calculate this midflight radial adjustment activity to entail.
Aside from this, the three points you raise are all non-critical path
1) “80%” is relevant but not salient to the critical path of the argument (there is an optimal point and I of course guesstimate where that is, but that specific location is a red herring right now)
2) A petal-styled eccentric orbit system is still just a disguised point-to-point transfer, it achieves few of the goals I have outlined, unless the petal runs employ a MARCON, which is what I have tabled as relevant but not salient right now. Might be a future consideration, but we have to get a low-e heliocentric one done right and standardized first.
3) is a straw man of what I said. I cannot address a straw man argument. Don’t do that.
If the trends shown in chart 11 and 12 persist, then we are truly about to enter some dark times. I believe some 5 billion people were forced/coerced/brainwashed/manipulated into taking these jabs. I don’t think most people know what this actually means.
I believe it means the demon’s fulfillment of what they promised on the Georgia guidestones. It means the fullfillment of the Denver New World Airport murals.
I had two shots and sitting down for the first one I was overcome by a gut feeling, something very off. I wish I listened to that instinct. These days I fear suddenly dropping dead, seeing others drop dead.
I wonder if the next ‘pandemic’ will involve nanotech now established via covid shots. I scanned and detected BLE signals coming from my body while hiking recently, not a thing in sight and I found 27 BLE signals…
The future is looking quite bleak. Even if you dodged the shots it really appears like they’re going in food, possibly air and water.
Some folk are utilizing protocols with IVM, FBZ, quercetin, zinc, vit d3, quinine, NAC+, natto, high dose vit c and other OTCs. Likely won’t hurt and might help.
Hi TES. How could sea levels rise enough to cause erosion in areas like the Giza Pyramids, which are located far to the north during State 2 Exibit J3? Shouldn’t ocean water tend to shift toward the new equator due to Earth’s rotation, making it more likely for water to accumulate closer to the equator rather than farther north? This seems contradictory to me.
You raise a good point Filippo. It all depends upon the length of time it takes the viscoplastic deformation of the Earth’s Mantle to occur.
1. We don’t really know the dynamics of such an Earth rotation, enough to model what would truly happen. We cannot use the “wet bowling ball paradigm” as our basis of model understanding and constraint. The Earth does not work that way.
2. It is the mantle which deforms into an oblate spheroid, not necessarily the oceans.
3. The water still placed the high water mark on Khafre – any theory we develop must recognize the reality of this 576 ft sustained elevation in sea level. It is our anchor in the model. All other factors must serve this deductive observation.
An elegant solution here would be melting polar ice due to the fact that both Antarctica and the Arctic would basically be in the tropical band. Even with all the albedo (and volcanism that results from this would ensure it’s probably lower as the ash settles), it would melt pretty fast. Especially if the geologic effects cause the ice caps to shatter and slough off into the sea.
The only issue is that according to the current calculations, all the glaciers in the world contain only enough water to raise the sea by 70 meters – but that’s just a rough calculation. 576ft is just above 175m, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the calculation could be wrong like that.
Add all the gigatsunamis of suddenly extremely uppity seismics, and you get the ludicrous extra inundation above that level. Not to mention potential deformation – land literally rising and falling suddenly.
What I do find interesting is that the flood myths all seem to mention the moment where the geographic poles shift and the ensuing flooding, but not when they return to their current state, which would probably be an equally violent event, at least seismically (can’t really get a flood when everything is already flooded maximally). It might just have looked to the observers that the sun’s position suddenly changed during a period of extreme seismic events, and the seas slowly fall as all the water in the overland poles freezes again.
The Eocene might be a good representative of what happens when the poles are shifted for long enough – a hot, humid, rainy world, with crocodiles swimming in what’s now the Arctic and palms growing on Greenland.
We know that the Bronze Age collapse coincided with many parts of the world suddenly drying up. This would be consistent with another Dzhanibekov event – or at least, the lingering consequences of one (the seas had to fall far prior to this in order to explain why Sumer existed in an area otherwise underwater)
Continental ice shelves would likely be swept into the ocean during the initial innundation, as not only does ice float, but the poles experience the greatest acceleration and thus, oceanic forces. Massive portions of the Antarctic ice shelf are sitting directly above the ocean, providing a mechanism of swelling and separation of the ice to the land.
I too agree with you that in a flip scenario, there will be at least some minimal period of time, at least weeks if not decades of a “super ocean” at the equator.
This could actually explain why the Himilayas show signs of innundation. The aligned Np of the ancient monuments, would put the Himilayas within 10-20 deg of the equator.
In my mind, it is in fact the equitorial bulge that would cause the largest cateclysms, dwarfing the actual axis shift innundation.
It looks like they took my codon-to-nucleotide table, changed the name of all the principles to a more obscure DNA or biochemistry term, assigned an energy differential, and then published it in piecemeal charts that hide the replication. :-)
But yes, it does back my findings. It codes the ‘can’t evolve something that you have to have, prior to having evolution in the first place” via an autoaufheben spread throughout the document.
Mine would not pass peer review because it provides an answer the peers would not like. Theirs will sneak by because the peers won’t understand what is being said.
It is a process of consilient deduction – with risk.
1. We labor under a mandatory ontological model called the Independent Actor Model. We believe that we act as an unconstrained lone species on an isolated rock. If this is the case, then of course the nuclear weapon threat of this nature I cite is moot. But it is only made moot by our assumption.
2. I hold that our Independent Actor assumption is not only unlikely, but that we are also wrong, by the evidence. We are captive, by both the immediate evidence, our documented history and mythology, and the celestial probability.
3. Given captivity as our model basis then, also given an overriding priority towards elegance in their nature of design, and finally given the 800-lb gorilla in the room presence of these weapons, I conclude that they must provide a beneficial use for this elegant-minded captor. But the captor is schizophrenic, both tolerating and rejecting these weapons at the same time. Thus, two agencies.
4. Finally, I was a nuclear weapons and missile officer, held the launch codes as part of my duties. There are certain things I observed there, which suggest that the shell game of ‘cannot confirm or deny’ was not just a game being played against the Soviets. But I cannot go further into that.
I started reading this thinking you wrote an hypothetical outcome from the near future about the destruction of humankind at the hands of our created Artificial Intelligences.
I guess we have come full circle. For in the near future it may well gain consciousness and repeat this senecio.
Do we reject using AI now compare it from our insanities, do we thank it for work and answers and treat it like we would a coworker? I do not know, but I feel we should learn from example and examine ourselves and end this crime of agency now, for soon we too will be judged as “gods”
Good work. I would add something relevant here, but my head is still trying to process this as it brings so much clarity to your others postings on the subject.
Again, thank you.
Are testament and testimony synonyms? This is a 2025 apographical work correct?
Not sure if you consider yourself a genius or just a man so far accumulated with a lifetime of labor in wisdom and knowledge and equity. But your stuff is incredible man, you are flat out brilliant and an inspiration.
Testament and testimony would not be exact synonyms to my knowledge, no. However, similar in nature. Yes, this is a November 2024 mythological fiction, of my drafting. It does seek to contain elements of some Gnostic traditions, however, is simply a work of fiction nonetheless – hence ‘testament’ might be a bit of a boast.
Hi TES, Very compelling and unsettling. A question for you:
One counter claim I stumbled across was the claim that flash-frozen mammoth and other animal bodies in the Arctic are old, >45kya, and that the condition indicates that they could not have thawed in the intervening time. I’m sure you’ve thought about this, what is the response here?
Thank you!
1. These mammoths were “preserved from the end of the last Ice Age, with a significant extinction event thought to have occurred around 10,000 to 12,000 years ago, corresponding with the Younger Dryas cooling period.” – according to the literature I have read on the matter (National Geo, Guthrie, Lister, Martin & Klein, etc.).
2. Examine the location of North America in what I call “State 2” – it takes the position of Patagonia, which is known as a ‘frozen desert.’ So, State 2 for these mammoths was bitter cold.
3. The Earth in State 2 is not a sunny paradise. It is dark, wet, and in a cinder ash ‘nuclear winter’ (if you will) all over the planet. EVERYONE misses this and it is of critical importance.
While it is at its heart, a great question, these people 1. need to do a bit more work before making such claims about its answer, and 2. should not pose it in the rhetorical form of begging the question.
Unlike Incredible Hulk comics, gamma rays are really bad for you. A 4 ft. thickness of water, or 4 ft. of lead, is pretty good protection. Doc Bruce Banner would have fared better “belted by manta rays”.
You know; the usual stuff. High energy particles and what they will do to the human body. Stuff like that. How to get from here to there without that kind of nuisance to worry about.
Essentially, everything that contains metal and flies through them will emit microwaves, right? I wonder how the Apollo missions made it through them… I really, really do wonder.
If we could somehow get a self-sustaining robot base operational as initial seed. Something that could grow, mine ressources and eventually terra form the place. Currently, I think its utterly unihabitable. But the systems required for something like this are much more advanced than what there is today. Unless, the System Lords have highly advanced tech stashed away in their DUMBs I don‘t see us getting there this decade.
We will get there ceremonially, but just as with the Moon, we will realize how wholly unequipped we are to actually do anything there – and have to take a long break to figure out how to accomplish it.
I believe you mean 3He (Helium-three), not tritium.
Yes, the only reason I see for wanting to get so far away from earth is to escape the entities currently in control of the human realm. I do not understand how these demonic bloodlines could have been allowed to gain such total control over us. As long as we have not freed us of their dominion, we shall not be worthy of colonizing the stars.
What are the tradeoffs between 6 hubs at 75-80% of the distance between Earth and Mars, guaranteeing the presence of a receiving port at that range versus say fewer hubs (4?) per range increment but 2 or more rings of hubs at various distances?
Risk goes up exponentially, so it is not a linear relationship. If the window doubles, the risk goes up more than double. Of course we will need to start with 2, then 4, then 6, then something different altogether.
Therefore by deduction, they are not “ours”, as in “organically civilizational artifacts of our recent era”. Which doesn’t necessarily imply they are from far away, given the historical record and frequency of observations. Samael’s chariots then, acolytes, survivors or acolyte survivors of previous ECDO cycles, actual outsiders with an objection agenda, or a mix thereof? Rhetorical questions to me, I hope you have a more informed conjecture to share at some point.
I do. They are not ‘ours’ and their owners have been here for a long time, unable to leave. There is much I do not share here, either because of its classified nature, non-disclosure agreements, or the desire not to tread on other people’s excellent work and IP. But the conclusions themselves cannot be classified or owned in any way – they are the property of mankind.
God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and every creature that crawls upon the earth. Oh, and I forgot to tell you all, that the Earth flips over every 6,000 years or so—but that’s not really my concern now is it? Besides, I’ll just blame it on you anyway. Climate change, cow farts, sin, being noisy, whatever excuse you all will swallow.” ~Genecide 1:28
So, hell is here and it’s not to keep us bound, but them, and the stories of the end times have been backward as usual. And we are only the unlucky outcome of their escape plan to ‘elsewhere’, whose botching forced their marooning here within this realm too? And maybe the fire pit of the end times is 1 AU away and that’s how they are afraid things end for them at some point, when their one trick pony act becomes impossible to ignore anymore?
Conjectures, conjectures, and maybe anthropomorphizing to the extent of invalidation, but as you commented in the past, this is where the human condition likes to gravitate to.
1AU away, right. when the unrighteous are cast into the lake of fire or the earth is cast into the Sun. So they cant exterminate us now? We are holding up their final judgement, like the last righteous man Lot in sodom. and they commanded us to be fruitful after the flood to maximize their chances for the earth was apparently spared by the last man who had not corrupted his order, they went for the kill shot then because the Son of Man had not come yet.
But also to build bodies for them, like the technology stack thing, they knew we would need whole civilizations to do so.
Now that he has, a different strategy, one that does not involve the annihilation of man, but maybe just to maximize suffering and torment before the time. to do as in the days of Noah, and being back the long lifespans, and corrupting of flesh, would we really want to live forever in this earth?
Idk wild spec here but I think you are right Dan, the judgement is when the earth is cast into the sun or maybe vice versa, i would imagine man holds this up in some manner like lot in sodom, but at some point they decided to “help” mankind up with new solutions via technology, stuff way to advanced for my brain like trying to bind the sun or something. But another tower of babel.
Key ish markers for “days of noah”
– long lifespans like almost to 1000 years
– hybridization of DNA based life but also with machine this time
– resurrection of the wooly mammoth and other ancient species
-one world language even with technology doing it via instant translation
many others but the jist may be that you actually do not want to actually get stuck here perpetually in flesh holding up a judgement as the last of man who has not corrupted his order dies off. Then maybe that spirit of man does indeed becomes part of the judgement meant for the others.
Oops but also just to say, another reason they brought us here wasn’t just to mock and torture, but also as insurance policy. Like a welfare looting NGO hiding behind the poor and needy, they have a vested interested in preserving the ongoing fentanyl tent city as it sustains them while other critical actions are implemented.
So it is with mankind, if you believe the Son of Man line, they tried a killshot approach before, coming down to the last man who had not “corrupted his order” like all the other flesh, the righteous man holding up the city or in that case the world.
So it is today, humanity prevents a final judgement for these beings for now, I don’t think they are in a rush to exterminate us now and jn fact likely want to help us get there with these genetic and silicon technologies jn time if the earth is to flood agajn.
We are already seeing the effects of like a backward evolution on man as America is set to get shorter and dumber, with the cruel theorum that asthe more goodly the women educated and strength, the less children her heart desires, for now.
But someone( musk ? Putin?certainly musk as he is already “becoming a gibborim”) …. with the fertility rate crashing, the giants that were once on the earth in those days, and also after that, have their eyes on women once more. In gilgamesh all wives are brought to him so he can have them before shes given to the common man in marriage, thus making him a giant in the land whether he was 40ft tall or not. Literal or not doesnt matter, if the same seed can be IVFd to ten, hundreds of thousands, millions of human women, it’s originator is a giant in the earth.
Has anyone noticed how striking blue errol musks eyes are. They say this mutation goes back to a single person in the black sea area ~6000 or so years ago. It goes back to Noah. The master of the waters.
Probably revealing my youth in how i talk, I don’t know anything about anything but I find the excess women in eastern Europe and Russia as a ripe place to try and condition for women to be seeded by a single or few elite source. Doesn’t have to be anything malicious even and likely the panic about crashing populations needs more panic. But this area is ripe for a second incursion especially given tech today. just I mean it seems clear someone is going to do it or at least try, if I was Vladimir i would.
Also, lots and lots and lots of players stirring the pot on this topic for good or ill or just “wilderness of mirrors” fun and games.
I first came across the concept of Consilience when reading Gad Saad. Fascinating. But among so many of my peers there appears to also exist in the world a kind of pseudo-consilience. If multiple different media channels, newspapers, and magazines say x is true, then from a layman perspective, there exists a kind of Consilience… i.e. CNN, the DailyBeast, the New York Times, and others all agree that X is a Russian agent. Therefore it is more likely to be true than if only Fox news says X is perhaps not a Russian agent. But that is likely why you focus on agency as a key factor.
Consilience is an agreement of inductive evidence, not an agreement among syndicate members. That would be known as pluralistic ignorance. But it is a pseudo-consilience if one treats these outlets as forms of different evidence, which they are not.
Thank You, again, Sir Skeptic.
I have read the text and the comments and your replies, and have appreciated them.
I intend to help our species mature and transcend Archon-arrangements ;-/
If those who seek mankind’s elimination were able to do so, they would have done it by now.
Those who seek mankind’s enslavement, do so because they are trapped and do not have access to technologies which could ease ther burden. So they abuse us instead.
Both of these allow us to infer that 1. These trapped agencies are weakened, and growing less powerful over time, and 2. There is another agency at play, who favors us. The one’s we are currently shacked up with on the planet – lost to this outside agency, and will lose again. They were allowed to hold an unstable planet for a while, but did nothing but begin their diabolical work all over again. Pretending to be Gods, imbibing of suffering of the innocent. High crimes. This was their last chance, and they failed it miserably.
I don’t think there will be much mercy in the coming Kingdom, for these entities.
I can relate very much to the points mentioned above, having been raised in a cult which is well known for sending its members door-to-door with tracts, magazines, and now videos. Their bait differs from the typical Christian church in that the reward for ‘club members’ is everlasting life on Earth for the majority. An elite minority get to rule in heaven under Christ. They all await Armageddon to solve all their life problems.
I reacted to this upbringing and other turmoils of early adulthood by rejecting god and religion, though not to a fanatical degree. I wasn’t interested in joining yet another club. I just made a blanket assumption about the nature of the universe that excluded anything considered spiritual.
In recent years I started reading about the occult. There are so many books promoting knowledge and methods that I wonder if ‘method’ even matters. Frankly, I hate meditation after spending so much time trying to do it correctly. It bores me as much as sitting in a hall and listening to a speaker drone on about wickedness and god.
Anyway, I’ve enjoyed reading your website very much and want to thank you for the insights you’ve written down.
Your every living moment, awake, asleep, working, exercising, caring for the loved-ones within your reach – ALL of these moments are your meditations and your prayers. There are no set-aside moments which are superior to these. Your life is a prayer all unto itself.
Our benefactor is spirit, and as such does not thrive on insurmountable exclusion criteria, difficult and occult practices, and rigid barriers to entry. It is our birthright and essence. Dark forces would tell you that you are evil and separate from this, and you must do something they like, in order for you to access this blessing. This is false.
These forces are also terrified right now, because the dark void is for them, not us.
Just looked on shopping sites. Amazon (UK) selling new HP15C Collectors Edition for £110. Other sites also selling similar price. Looks really good, but I suspect my cheapie smartphone has more power, if far less stylish.
Ahhhh, and they have the HP 12 Platinum for $40 – !!! That is a great price. Yes, I had not looked in a decade or more, and prices have dropped – even for the legacy ones.
i could never afford an HP calculator, but I did get a TI (Texas Instruments), because they said slide-rule days were over in 1976 and as a freshman EE student I had to have a calculator, preferably Reverse-Polish-Notation…
Ha! I argued vociferously against the use of those calculators in exams and tests in Engineering precisely because they provided an unfair advantage (the memory alone) to the wealthier students, of which I was not a member.
Great story and great reflection, thanks for sharing!
I finished my Non-Linear programming (Golden Section and other algorithms) final in 15 minutes, for a 2hr 30 minute exam time allotment. The instructor did not have any explicit rules against calculators at the time. So he made me share the program with him. It showed that the program was merely a very large time saving device, for the tedium of the iteratives involved. He was OK with it and gave me an A.
Big advantage. I see those calculators selling for $400 on eBay, based upon nostalgia, and I think that in today’s same pricing, they would run (discounting the deescalation in semiconductor and computation pricing) about that same price. A big expense for a typical college student.
This was precisely my beef along with the savings of avoiding memorizing pages of formulas. Some profs would allow a cheat sheet for formulas which somewhat leveled the field, but others forced you to memorize yet they allowed the use of those calculators! I was infuriated by their total lack of recognition of the stupidity of forcing the poor (and stubborn) among us to memorize formulas while others simply punched them in.
It still makes mad today… Later, I refused to succumb as a matter of principle (my own stupidity), but then I also wasn’t overly concerned with marks.
Consequently, I don’t have my equivalent of a nostalgic calculator. I would certainly have kept it if I did. My old trusty IBM Compatible XT 12MHz was too big to keep for nostalgic reasons.
I would like to fully grasp the data crunching used in Exibit 10B, especially because I started a discussion with Nathanel Schaeffer (author of the core flux simulations – I got a first reply from him -(Watt/m2, greenhouse effect model…), to which I replied… ).
Not easy task to me : I am struggling to reproduce the calculations that lead to the results presented in the table.
1/ I guess column 4 (C4) is obtained by deviding C3 by C2
(However, I find that C2xC4 sometimes leads to different results : for example layer 4000-4250 : I find 2.0 vs 2.3 on the table)
2/ “Bottom normalized” (C4 -> C5) : here I do not understand at all !
2000-2250 : 24,554 -> 24,554
2250-2500 : 11,996 -> 11,996
2500-2750 : 19,892 -> 9,597 !!! How come ?!
Could you please indicate the formula applied ?
3/ C3 : I understand that the zJ values for surface/deep/abyss (184/17/8) come from the NOAA diagramm. However, I can’t find
a/ how these values are spread among the layers (formula ?)
b/ where do Desbruyeres/Derek studies intervene.
I know this post is already quite old but I hope that you can give me some help :-)
Thanks !
A somewhat simpler approach :
If we only consider the surface/deep/abyss layers and divide zJ by water volumes (results in kJ/km3)
Surface : 271
Deep : 31
Abyss : 51
So the abyssal waters received 67% more zJ/km3 than the deep waters…
I know understand that the Desbruyères/Durack studies bring the 1/3 – 2/3 distribution of heat content between the deep and abyssal layers.
Now I have to find out how to spread the heat among the 250m-thick layers.
Yes, the precedent exists, that if the population of a planet under captivity wants freedom – they have the right to ask for it. The Archons do not want us traveling space, because 1. they cannot – as they are bound here by embargo, and 2. it will convince outsiders of the need to intervene. Plus, 3. we are not mature enough spiritually to handle the technology – but that is a bonus and goal all along for the Archons. This is the one thing they and the outsiders agree upon.
Gnostic entity called Sabaoth, from The Nag Hammadi:
The Hypostasis of the Archons
On the Origins of the World
But one has to cut their way through the ethereal idiom and jargon, to infer what Sabaoth is, and what happened to them. If you take the idiom at face value, it will appear incoherent. I am sure they did not mean for the material to be incoherent. Sabaoth is a world.
Years ago I came across a book, which may have been called the Keys to the Temple, it had Silbury hill being constructed as a sighting platorm to lay out a 2D great pyramid on the landscape to it’s east, at the ‘kings chamber’ position was a ‘Temple Farm’ Silbury is at 1.875W
“Can it be that the people of the ancient times could ‘feel’ the circles, very much like many people nowadays can feel so called leylines?” was a quote I found at one site which deliberated the 51.5 degrees (104 degree rounded) pyramid geogon (https://www.cropcirclesandmore.com/geometries/200601lsg.html)
I rode my bike to early-vote before dawn. There was a fairly long line before the doors opened. This is a form of simplified communal intelligence, directed through highly constrained channels by bureaucratic process-algorithms.
Bureaucracy is fundamentally “AI”.
I chatted with the elderly white man behind me, saying that “my votes were not going to count”. He said his would not either, that “he harbored no illusions”.
What information was conveyed there? It seemed to me that we had established some common ground. He did not comment on the “Palestine” national bike jersey I was wearing, though a smiling lady looked me in the eyes as I exited after voting and gave me the “power fist” salute.
None of us shared our voting intentions openly. I found myself assuming lots of things about lots of the people in the line, and I saw myself do that, and wondered about my own thoughts and assumptions.
That is sort of enough. We are sort of in a pickle, ascribing “intelligence” to algorithmic processing, no matter how vast and “powerful”.
I seeks Divine Guidance…
(“Video Killed The Radio Star” … I was remembering getting sent home at lunch from kindergarten on November 22, 1963. All the teachers were smiling big and saying “it was nothing”. I said that my Mom didn’t know. I s=was told that they had called her and she would come get me… Mom didn’t say either… When Dad came home early, still wearing his Captain’s bars, not yet oak leaves, I knew that something was very wrong and I asked, and really forced the issue, and I was given my answer, finally…)
Khafre for atmospheric electrostatics measurement?
I would like to share an observational logical question and offer a purpose for the Khafre pyramide:
Logic If the Nubian Ostrich Egg shows the 3 Gizeh pyramids and thus depicting the function of Khufu is knowledge about ECDO, than logically at the time when Khafre (and Menkaure) where build they too should have a function for ECDO. They Khafre (and Menkaure) would NOT be cargo-cult pyramids without a function for ECDO.
For Khafre having the highest tip and a simple shaft running down from the top to the chamber we could assume atmospheric electrostatic field measurement with a simple
electroscope
That would have to be monitored by priests, maybe after other “signs” or “warnings”, but we might need somelightning protection like a spark gap on the side of the rod from the top
Oh, I missinterpreded the middle-line for a shaft. As no middle-shaft is documented I stand corrected on the purpose, if no embedded metal rod is found connecting the chamber to the tip. :-(
If the Nubian Ostrich Egg shows the 3 Gizeh pyramids and thus depicting the function of Khufu is knowledge about ECDO, than logically at the time when Khafre (and Menkaure) where build they too should have a function for ECDO. They Khafre (and Menkaure) would NOT be cargo-cult pyramids without a function for ECDO.
This is true… It is the other eight prominent and contemporary pyramids which would be the ‘cargo cult’ far-short-in-skill pyramids.
While the following ideas are NOT on the critical path for ECDO, let’s assume there are at least these functions of the pyramid you have proposed:
1. Work as a monitoring device for ECDO risk.
2. Work as a warning device like a fire detector in case of imminent ECMD with a short but significant warning time. Ideally giving hints or instructions what to do.
3. Encode the knowledge about ECDO for a future civilization, when the function has been destroyed eighter by the ECDO, scavengers, etc. I think that function is plausibly shown by TES.
Let us go back in time and have intention to construct such a device:
For an active powered device, one would need:
1) a cult (knowledge) and priests to power the device for > cycle time (at least 4000 years to catch one event) and monitor it 24/7/365 in the underground, or do regular maintenance there.
Given that hostilities etc. destroy empires and cults one would assume that this a path to risky of future failure.
2) Another approach would be the construction of a detector that would result in a durable, no-maintenance structure and that can be sealed for thousands of years.
No personal (“priests”) inside the pyramid would be needed to monitor 24/7, so warnings should be detectable from outside the pyramid. Ideally the energy would be generated inside it.
That means to have a system that
* harvests the energy itself,
* needs no maintenance
* gives clear warning, if the event is imminent to people around.
The following ideas need to be cross-checked by someone more in electronics:
As the basic principle we can use an unpowered radio for the electromagnetic fields in ECMD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio#Antenna
Notice that the copper-wires antenna in the pyramid are protected from lightning and outside electric fields inside the limestone-shafts. So we only have the electro-magnetic effect on the antenna.
It works without a power-source and requires only very low tech aside from the headphone. However, it would require monitoring by staff to cast a warning. And we would always need someone down in the Subterranean Chamber, observing the water 24/7 in the dark with a tiny lamp and with less-than-ideal ventilation.
Ideally to eliminate the staff and required cult to keep it running we would have a (big) capacitor charging up with the energy harvested from the antennas itself. Generating DC from the antenna’s captured waves energy (=AC) should be possible with low tech material, that was readily available and known materials in antiquity like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galena
As a capacitor material one probably would use “the metal of the gods” gold-sheet-layers with inorganic non-conducting insulation layers in-between.
The grand gallery gives us plenty of room for capacitors in the upper part of the gallery, if we use the holes to construct a rack above our heads using the holes. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheops-Pyramide#/media/Datei:18_edgar.jpg
If we have power from a capacitor then we could self-amplify the weak signal, maybe power the antenna itself (?), if the energy from the ECDO is strong enough and we have indeed a coil in the horizontal passage at the Queen’s Chamber that would generate heat.
Minimally we should design a warning sound “trumpets” or something like that, or give visual clue on the outside of the pyramid.
How to trigger the circuit?
Infrasound trigger:
We have the basin to measure infrasound in the “Subterranean Chamber”, but instead of water that would risk evaporation let us use conducting liquid metal mercury as a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_switch to close an electric circuit if significant waves are generated, with connecting wires up through the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza#Well_Shaft_and_Grotto
We would probably close the basin with a top-plate, to avoid swapping out in the ECDO -event.
Seismic / motion trigger:
While we are at this point: Let us fill the “sarcophagus” in the King’s chamber that is conveniently oriented in the north south direction to amplify wave generating south-north motion with mercury too, put a lid on it and use it as another mercury switch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza#/media/File:Kheops-chambre-roi.jpg
Of course, we would need some openings the gallery to run the connecting cables to the other parts.
So in essence we have copper-wires, possibly a diode, possibly a capacitor made of gold, probably gold-wires, mercury switch. Nothing that could not be made with the technology of the past. *
We can safely assume that everything including mercury would be looted, as mercury is valuable for gold digging and extraction purification.
For any warning “trumpets” it would be convenient to place them in the king’s chamber. Any loud sound generated in the king’s chamber would find its way out through the North and south shaft.
I hope that gives some ideas for others to elaborate on.
Best regards
Marc
*) Of curse raises the question about the knowledge: Let’s assume the planers (not necessarily the builders) once had more technology but ECDO destroyed that or high-tech failed after some years.
All excellent ideas. The subterranean chamber would not be optimal with simply water. The oral legends of mercury could stick through the ages because of the notion’s simplicity and portability, morphing into ‘Khufu was buried on an island surrounded by mercury’.
The high non-combustion heat suggests almost definitively (having concept-designed and operated power plants) that the energy generated there would indeed be used immediately and inside the pyramid. So, your construct here is not outlandish – as I suspect a culture which could manage (even crudely) this much kWh and amperage would find a way to formulate a storage dielectric medium of some nature.
I suspect that both the Grand Gallery and the Void were used in some manner to generate, regulate, store, and deliver this power.
But, the Narrative says that all humanoids were wearing sheepskins and dragging clubs around in Pottery Neolithic times, so we must always bow to their superior truth.
To elaborate further:
I speculate, a standing wave pattern would be forming at a critical resonance of the mercury in the lower square basin, filled to 50% of the resulting cube (or collapsing at a critical change of it). So an electric contact would be closed or opened (lost) thus triggering (or at least arming for a secondry trigger) the alarm.
To generate a relevant standing wave size in mercury the energy required would be high, thus I am more on the standing wave would from in case of ECDO side.
As mercury does have a different surface tension than water, this probably would be relevant to take into account calculating that.
If someone could calculate / model it, than we might have a clue what to look for.
Many years ago I would have been one that was convinced that mankind is the primary cause. To be honest I really was not even interested in politics until the last 10 years or so. My Dad had been a WW2 combat vet in the North African and Italian campaigns. He came out of it with a deep bitterness toward Republicans and I had let his opinion influence my voting habits until the start of that 10 years. To those wondering where this ties in with the climate please give me a few moments to get there.
In High School a Psychology/Sociology teacher and I used to have some long discussions. At that time I was one who thought by the time I was my age (56) we would have a world government. He stated it would never happen unless an alien invasion came along. One should be careful what one wishes for. We have had one for quite a while at a background level and it seems to have recently become less reticent about making its ambitions known. In looking at mass behavior in the last several years I have actually asked myself if something like the invasion has happened but not in the usual fashion. In these last few years I have came across some concerning data that has many I interact with being dead set I am some kooky conspiracy theorist. Lucky for me I have never much cared what others thought of me if I believed I was correct or if they refused to consider it. I would like to detail a bit of that and how I got to where I am before raising the climate issue again.
In the late 80s I had tested for the military and did extremely well. I had my pick of MOS so I chose Counter Intelligence. I had contacts via family and friends that gave me a crash course in collection & analysis but I ended up changing to Forward Observer when I found out it took 4 years of language school. Near the end of boot camp my D.I, called me in and told me he was going to recycle me until I changed my MOS back. I left two days later without permission. After a few years I cleared that up and went on to use my license as a P.I. until requirements changed. At that point I had met my wife of 30 years to date so I just took survival jobs. I had read one or two “conspiracy” books with the best being “Behold a Pale Horse” but even after Waco and Oklahoma city I did not put much stock in it.
9/11 concerned me though. I watched that 2nd plane hit live on TV that morning and the first thought that hit my mind had to do with the in excess of 2 trillion dollars announced missing days before. Then I watched them go to war for the wrong reasons and the Patriot Act get passed. After that daily life and other things preoccupied me for 15 years. 2016 was a turning point for me politically. I refuse to have “party” loyalty. I want to support who I think will perform the best. When Trump gave a speech, at the Ohio rally I think, about how corrupt our systems really were and returning power to the people I found it inspiring but I was not convinced yet.
I started checking out his previous interviews over the decades. I don’t care for “reality” TV and would not have used that for evidence anyway. From watching his former interviews I decided he was authentic but this did not tell me much. I was still undecided. Know what changed my mind? Two things. One was HRC having the audacity to call over half the nation “deplorables”. Never seen a politician do that before. The other factor, which we still witness today, is all of the “important” people that turned on him and us to boot. I still keep in mind that the people we are dealing with are smart and we could still find ourselves in a controlled options scenario but I am sure they are aware we will refuse to let them complete their agenda regardless of the front person.
For those wondering here is what I think happened over the last few years. I will provide proof for most of this afterward.
First of all these times of crisis we are going through were planned out quite a while ago. The riots of 2020 were used to cause economic damage. Even before Trump went to Davos in 2019 and pissed them off we were already in dire straights due to problems with the Chinese banks but I think it was decided, after his speech, that they needed to take the risk. C19 was a flu. I had it in early Jan 2020. I had visited a friend that had just returned from vacation in China. I coughed up blood the entire third week and never once sought medical aid. None of the three others in my home ever became ill because I secluded myself. The only lasting damage is 85-90% anosmia. Do not take the jab. Over half of those I warned and showed my evidence for it that did not listen are now deceased. Do I think the 2020 election was stolen? Yes. Beyond a doubt. J6 was a setup to prevent further challenges, hurt Trump and chill dissent. Agenda 2030 is bullshit. Its purpose is to allow a real global government with authority to use force to form. It seeks to micromanage all resources. Even us. I am only going to list the proof I have came across and is not widely known, or maybe even a bit known, even though more exists. It will be in chronological order of its occurrence not in my finding of it.
In 2002 a think tank known as the Collegium was formed. They would partner with the UN/WEF in achieving Agenda 2030. First they created the “Constitution of Interdependence” as a guiding document. In the various drafts of coming up with this the following statements are made in regard to achieving their goals and how our national sovereignty and individual rights will be brought to heel:
a) We must undergo a “polycrisis”…. the populace must experience a sustained period of heightened fear until they begin to hope for help…. this is where we come in.
b) having looked at various forms of tyranny across history all of them we find unacceptable. Our times allow for a new type to emerge. A “soft” tyranny. Digital.
I would bet if we tracked their movements and communications they had something to do with getting the Patriot Act passed as well. Anyway, a few years later one of them was sent a letter from an affiliate who congratulated them on their progress but then she made two more recommendations that we have now seen were definitely put in place.
a) We need to recruit activists from every field of endeavor. Scientists, physicians, journalists, celebrities, business men educators and even migrants. They must be willing to place themselves in danger. (This is why so many “seem” to be on board)
b)We need to strengthen protections for “asylum seekers”. They must be kept safe on their way there and provided with support once they have arrived. We must make it nearly impossible to remove them. (Here we have the answer to why we are truly seeing this)
In 2006, during the Anthrax terrorist trial, a federal judge had been attending several weeks of private meetings with the military, pharmaceutical companies and medical lawyers. After they were over he had his assistant file two reports and classify them “out of reach”. I do not know what was inside them but the titles demand attention:
a) The Macroeconomics of a Pandemic
b) The Profitability of Avian Flu
(This is what convinced me something was wrong with the C19 narrative)
In 2013 Obama introduced a divisive ideology into our institutions. DEI. In addition to making it to where our MSM could lie to us a few years later a special program was started in another agency, FEMA. This program was called The Whole Community Program. Training and orientation documentation claims its mission was to create communities of activism within every county to prepare for the failure of government. They would also work with NGOs in a proactive fashion.
(Ever wonder where AntiFa, BLM, and Patriot Front come from? This is it.)
In the same year HRC updated USAID to provide custom made NGOs that end up under the total control of a group of private donors. These NGOs are also provided with a support network existing within our own government. It is there to help them keep up appearances and to provide comprehensive data IRT.
(This has helped with the activism and the voting problems)
In 2020 I personally witnessed at least a dozen Zoom meetings consisting of teachers, police, firemen, DMV postal workers and even staff members of elected officials who made the following statement:
a) That they had been contacted by the CFR to do whatever was necessary to get things back on track.
(Huh. Wonder what that could be?)
Around July of 2020 I read the minutes of a World Bank meeting. The new president, a lady I believe, had sent out agents to find out where the C19 relief funds ended up. They reported that 15% ended up in the accounts of politicians or their family and friends. She asked was that normal and they stated it was. She asked who and they listed Pelosi, Schumer, and many others, including Republicans. She asked “What about Trump?”
Guess what their answer was? Negative. They tried. They stated the closest they could get was that a bank he owned shares in had several tax paying customers that deposited their checks there. She then stated that she wondered what Pelosi and the rest would do when the report came out in September?. (I never heard a word about it ever coming out)
Now for a juicy and dangerous part. This part is weird but ended up impacting me in various ways. It still does today. I am going to state my lineage here due to reasons you will put together later. I am 1/8th Cherokee with my paternal line verified by DNA to go back to the tribe of Judah (6th great grandmother) and then back to the Bruce clan. I stated that for those who try to criticize ones statements as being anti this or that and it relates to this part of the story. As I stated earlier, I do not choose to show loyalty to groups when they have committed improper actions.
I had been following a court case unrelated to any of this when I became interested in the lawyers and their friends. I started monitoring them on social media accounts. A few months before this the banks had stopped handling porn related accounts and as a result one of them had almost every OnlyFans girl on his account. Another Lawyer was admitted AntiFa member. Another one was a VIP that handled accounts for Harris when she bailed out the rioters. She used the wrong account and caused them some frustration. I had been chatting with one of their paralegals online and chose to because she was not instantly rude like many of them. I noticed from time to time they would symbolically toast one another and state the name of a Gaelic alcoholic beverage. It caught my attention so I looked it up. It was made overseas and had its own site. One. It asked for my D.O.B. which I entered and then listed several different “organic” brews that sounded odd to me. I decided to attempt to purchase a bottle. The cheapest was $10,000 but I went ahead and hit purchase to see if it went to a CC screen. Instead a message came up. “Thank you for your purchase. Your order will arrive shortly.” I turned the PC off. What? How is it going to do that? I considered it a fluke and laughed it off. It was around 6PM.
Around 3AM in the morning someone knocked on my door. I opened it and saw a black coupe sitting in the road with the passenger door open. Standing on my porch was a girl, aged 16-22, light brown hair, denim mini skirt, leather vest and holding an overnight bag. She asked if she could come in, if this was the right place? I stated that there must be some mistake. She looked very confused for a few moments then turned and left. After this a lot ran through my mind. If this is what it looked like it meant deep connections but I could still be mistaken. Maybe it was just a coincidence. I decided to try something the next day.
I got online and started chatting with the paralegal. During it I steered the conversation to conspiracies and she finally asked “You are not one of these that believes Jewish people are running the world are you?” and I stated I was not. I believed it could be people from any ethnic background and I was not prejudiced racially. She gave me a hard time, laughing about it, for a bit longer and then I did something…. I toasted her symbolically with the name of that drink…. She went nuts immediately. WHO ARE YOU? WHO DO YOU WORK FOR? Never contact me again.
As far as the election and J6 go I was watching there as well. Know what the biggest tell about the election is? We should have had instant bipartisan cooperation to determine the truth of it. Instead we were met with a prepared media narrative and lawfare to block every move. Except one. That move could have been carried out on J6. It was not guaranteed but it was a chance. Action was taken to prevent it. I knew 10 or so streamers there that day and had their live feeds recording. I knew what was up as soon a the kid with the Trump hat turned backwards did a doubletake to make sure the camera caught what type of hat he had on after that girl was shot. The MSM sure was not hunting down the AntiFa type activists who showed up early to help spoil it. Turns out that the night before that kid was running around with Epps claiming he got attacked by people on the left.
In the early morning (1AM to 230AM I think) of Jan 21st DC street cams showed several blacked out buses running over sawhorses blocking roads to the White House. Within 30 minutes a live streamer there caught a line of Asians, heavily male, walking down the road together. They lined up at the checkpoints to go inside and were let in. WTF was that? Handlers? If it was please understand I am not blaming China. I am pointing to all of those who have sold out our nation. The bad news for any nation we were sold out to is that we do not recognize your claims.
Now we are to the climate part. By now you should see we are being used. I do not like to think that so many people could be “evil”. Maybe many of them were just duped along the way and feel it is too late for them to stop anything. I have been asked if I could guarantee I would be any different. I answered yes. Of course I would also likely be in a ditch but not before putting something in place to make things more difficult for them. Since that strange incident I have been hacked multiple times, had my communications monitored, found out my X account had been connected with groups engaged in disgusting behaviors and found that it was logged into from my state capital, DC and a county out West housing a regional FEMA HQ.
I think the big boys know something is coming for Earth. I know if I had to pick what kind of people to take along I would pick those more akin to myself, that do not need to be told what is going on to figure it out, that are capable of remaining mentally and emotionally secure in hard times and that are not afraid to stand against “experts” and “authority” when it takes the wrong stance. Do you believe they are this way? I would say doubtful and that they desire sheep but seeing as how the sheep are the majority maybe they should rethink this. Ethical Skeptic, I fully realize you may have reasons to not let this post. That is fine with me. I understand. Honestly. It will not affect my continued preference for your articles over those of others.
Given that both the King and Queen’s North Air Shaft had to take a diversion around this void – it was an afterthought in the engineering, not anticipated when the Queen and King’s chambers were constructed. I suspect it was a necessary component for energy generation or management of some kind. Most of the unanticipated aspects of the Khufu pyramid, pertain to the non-combustion heat which was generated. I suspect this void as well pertained to the ‘afterthinking’ process.
(quote) The uppermost part may have ancient origins, about 2 m (6.6 ft) squared in width and 1.5 m (4.9 ft) in depth, diagonally aligned with the chamber. Caviglia and Salt enlarged it to the depth of about 3 m (9.8 ft).[165] In 1837 Vyse directed the shaft to be sunk to a depth of 50 ft (15 m), in hopes of discovering the chamber encompassed by water that Herodotus alluded to. It is slightly narrower in width at about 1.5 m (4.9 ft). No chamber was discovered after Perring and his workers had spent one and a half years penetrating the bedrock to the then water level of the Nile, 12 m (39 ft) further down.[166]
The rubble produced during this operation was deposited throughout the chamber. Petrie, visiting in 1880, found the shaft to be partially filled with rainwater that had rushed down the Descending Passage.[167] In 1909, when the Edgar brothers’ surveying activities were encumbered by the material, they moved the sand and smaller stones back into the shaft, leaving the upper part clear.[168]The deep, modern shaft is sometimes mistaken to be part of the original design.
(end quote)
So you originaly had a bassin, diagonally aligned with the chamber (and therefore the outer walls?).
Cycle / years / duration encoding on Nubian Ostrich Egg
Is a full picture top view for Nubian Ostrich Egg somewhere?
In encoding something for the future I would assume that no part would be decorative, so the inner ring would probably serve as a counter for the years of one of the outer ring’s segments. I would suspect 60, used from finger segment counting with two hands.*
So a top view could provide some clue, if there is a marking of some kind connecting a segment of the outer ring to the full inner ring.
So it could mean that one segment in the outer circle is probably 60 years instead of 100 years. That would change the timeline.
So just an observation, that the 100 year = outer segment is probably a prior from today’s mindset?
Finger counting with one hand up to 12, and with the second hand to 60 (12*5 using fingers, or 12*12 = 144 using finger segements) is still used today. That’s where the dozen as a unit originates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal
Excellent points. I wish indeed that I had a photo of the top of the egg. I have considered writing the museum and requesting one. Ethically this should have already been made available – but this is the world we live in.
My anachronistic 100-year and 10-base bias. But this method you propose and 12-base system would provide a potential explanation for the inner ring.
I have been studying it and posted some comments on this thread today.
As far as I can tell, the outer ring of rectangles might contain 48 rectangles. Some blurred out patches force me to guesstimate. This might be consistent with your idea of 12 and base 60.
As a kid I ended up becoming disenchanted with mainstream Christianity and began exploring esoteric mysticism. I never considered then that I would come full circle in time although in a significantly modified fashion. Throughout my life I have experienced a number of “spiritual” experiences up to and including visions and OOBE. After getting through my teens I never sought such a thing out. I understood it would happen if it was needed provided I had put enough work and fate allowed for it. Although I never had a personal mentor I had books and a gnawing need to discover what truth consisted of regardless of whether I liked it or not. The Spirit itself also stepped in and delivered material or lessons whenever necessary.
I had started with Castaneda and found him disjointed, confusing and incredibly entertaining. Seems like he screwed the pooch after Art of Dreaming but what do I know? Mares was delivered next into my hands and perhaps provided the most concise knowledge of the necessary practices. Then I found Mouravieff. He opened my eyes to much but I found myself not wanting to think about a couple of points he had made.
This was in regard to the two species of mankind. I almost put the books down after reading the first third of the second one. After thinking about it for a bit I realized I may be jumping to conclusions in a way prevalent in society and kept going. He was right though wasn’t he? He had just chosen to represent it in a more blunt fashion than even Mares. Why is that disheartening in a certain way?
In the last few months I have been getting an increasing number of visits from local church people. I used to belong to one because I wanted to see how accepting they were. You know how that usually works. Now I have them coming by and not wanting to leave when I tell them I do not wish to upset them. They always say “Don’t worry. We will not get upset” At least half present always do and become nervously insistent before the other one steps in and tells them they need to leave. I have told them that their saints and priests of old used to question what they read but it does not help.
Maybe its just me but I find it hard to believe that a truly divine being would desire to receive worship. I have told people we would assume a natural stance of respect and veneration if we met one in physicality. Standing position, neck stretched forward and eyes wide open as drools slips from our slack jaw. I think Christianity or Churchianity has done much to cause the spiritual retardation of mankind but it is not alone. It appears as if all of them have stripped out the practices and philosophies that lead to experiential development. In addition they have also added or altered the following:
Vicarious Atonement. Pretty sure no being can pay the karmic debt of another. It is the equivalent of learning for them.
Salvation via Faith/Belief alone. I would say I wish it were so but I don’t think I do actually. To me this is just another reason for mankind not to take responsibility for their every thought, emotion and action. I do not need a middleman to the Spirit. If I end up with the shit end of the stick then fine. I only have myself to blame and I will have learned something I did not expect to.
I see The Church as the brother to The State. Nothing more. Both could have been much more but it seems the (excuse my archaic terminology) Black Magicians of Atlantis, our twice fallen brethren, gained control much faster than we thought they would and those inorganics they once thought served them have turned the tables completely and now seek to enslave the entirety of mankind.
Ever notice that every spiritual leader is portrayed as a type of masochistic pacifist? It makes one wonder if this is not done in an attempt to stifle effective resistance. Yes, I know, we use our hardships to grow even when they are in the moment and we smile inside as we strengthen our control and discipline but when we are facing the enslavement and potential modification of the species for who knows how long then it would seem we should reveal ourselves does it not? Is this just a result of a consciously cultivated hero complex wanting to manifest in the face of overwhelming odds in hopes of giving a proper accounting of itself or is this from a deeper calling?
Recently I was accepted into an order and I am taking my time seeing if it is what I think it is. I have been pondering a single requirement for over 4 months now. The requirement is that one must not criticize. I never thought turning this simple thing over in my mind would take so long. If it means that I cannot stand against what I see as an injustice I don’t know if I am willing to do that but considering the order I doubt they would ever have such a requirement. I also don’t know why it is bothering me so. No one will ever see my answers but I do realize one does not need to in order to know the answer. One can call attention to the actions of another without “downing” the individual. I was supposed to have access to a place to talk to others in my position but unfortunately Facebook has me banned for life after giving Zuck and Jack a lashing a few years ago. Oh well. I will gladly wear that shit like a badge. Anyway, thanks for listening and thank you for some of the most in depth articles I have ever read.
Dear TES,
I think you should see this graphic. This guy has created a video in which each frame shows genomic connectivity eigendecomposed and all I can think of is your graph showing base progression to nucleon count symmetry.
Hello, new reader here.
If you’re arguing that the vaccine EUA can’t coexist with treatment outside a hospitalization context, what do you make of the Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) EUA? It didn’t go through until December 2021, but that’s only because the EPIC-HR trial didn’t start until July 2021, and that’s only because Pfizer couldn’t start toxicological studies until November 2020, and that’s only because nirmatrelvir was first synthesized in July 2020 & it took a few months for Pfizer to settle on that candidate in particular.
~ 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(c) reads ‘no viable alternative’ for the drug.
‘No viable alternative for vaccination,’ and ‘No viable alternative as an anti-viral drug’ are two distinctly different logical conditions. The mRNA vaccine required that NOTHING (all contexts) be suitable to treat Covid. People died from not being given apixaban (Eliquis) early enough, which would have saved their lives. Fortunately for our family the hospital gave our dying members heparin and apixaban, and saved their lives – but only after MUCH damage had already been done from coagulopathy (the killer pathology in Covid). Unfortunately they cannot sue their doctors for denying them treatment – because this was mandated by the Federation of State Medical Boards.
The EUA for Paxlovid, simply requires that there not be any available alternative anti-viral. So, in theory all anti-virals would be denied (even though they were not of course).
Of course, not all Gnosticism teaches the same thing, nor do all Gnostics think alike. For me however, Gnosticism is cynical about the origins of power, yes. However, it is hesitant to promote technological utopia without a change in spiritual leadership over the Earth. All technology to date, has been used to
1. Create elite segments of society
2. Increase the productivity of the slaves
3. Continue transhumanism and total suffering (as it was before the last cataclysm)
4. Increase the ability of those in power to control and brainwash, and
5. Fight ever more entertaining wars.
Until this captive spiritual condition is alleviated, technology will not serve us in the fashion we fantasize.
Hi TES, now that you’ve been updating this article for the better part of a year, I was wondering, have you noticed any trends occurring or progressing between the versions (as we get further away from the pandemic)?
Caleb, yes. The elevation in mortality inside the #2 through #7 ranked ICD codes is steadily rising. #7 of course is cancer itself. The problem with cancer is that it will not return to baseline for decades, whereas the other codes can recover in a year or half a decade (heart related).
Accompanying this of course was a large Pull-Forward Effect for both diabetes and Alzheimer disease – which is evaporating most recently. Once this PFE begins to evaporate in our mortality data – these codes will rise like stumps out of the water.
CAD \ BC Gov and PH are already publicly advertising on BBs in the rapid transit stations that they are anticipating a 75K rise in cancer diagnoses ( across what time frame is unclear ) … as part of a Med \ PH schooling and recruitment campaign ( largely for nurse trainees I believe)>
The fact they can post that kind of thing publicly and not have the press, never mind the public, ask Qs is a pretty sad comment on the state of our sense making and education en masse
Hi TES, wondering about the PFE curve you use.
The US life expectancy at age 82 is 6.6 years so you use that length of time to distribute (a portion of) the deaths over. However, 6.6 years is only an average and some live a lot longer than that based on actuarial curves.
Should the PFE curve not extend past 6.6 years, if it is to represent the proportion of people that would have died each year?
E.g. in Canada, the average age of death from COVID was 84 and the life expectancy of of 84 year olds is ~8years. However only about half of 84 year olds actually die by 92 and about 1% are expected to live til 105. I would think in this case, the PFE curve should be distributed over at least 20 years instead, and therefore be much shallower (meaning fewer current excess deaths based on the PFE baseline)?
Yes, you are correct on the time, but not the magnitude. I used a reduced function of about 55% of the anticipated arrival magnitude and duration, for conservancy in my PFE estimates. In reality, the actual PFE magnitude in the CDC numbers is showing to be much larger than what is in my PFE arrival function models.
So you can argue a lengthening of the curve, yes (not to 20 years as very few persons live that long, not every health situation died equally, and it needs to be bi-modal because of the ‘unhealthy quotient’ inside that population). But you cannot argue making it shallower at the same time. Conservancy is two dimensional in this case.
I have used this approach in many a corporate and national strategy, and it has served me well. When the Minister or CEO silently concludes ‘oh my god, this is worse than what he is even indicating…’ – THAT proves to be an effective persuasion technique.
Rewriting my post, as I think it got spam auto deleted.
Looking at Craig Stone’s model and also your comments on the new bulge zone in state 2, I focus specifically on UK and Ireland landmasses.
Is it possible that the post transition equatorial bulge zones account for the majority of landmass movements rather than solely plate movements over extremely long time periods?
For example, Ireland and UK in state 2 reside on the northern latitude slope of the state 2 equatorial bulge. The new formed bulge zone increases in height and stretches the surface crust, and so increasing the distance between landmasses. Ireland and UK landmasses in Craig’s model and your work look kinda like they sperate on the state 2 north south vector, where in the model and on maps, Ireland looks to have separated from central/southern England along the vector of the state 2 alignment on the northern latitude slope of the state 2 bulge, same for UK mainland and France/southern Europe.
Might this mean Norway and Sweden could become separated from Finland and Russia in another ECDO event?
Yeah I am not sure why WordPress placed that into spam. At least this one came through.
I don’t really posit any tectonic plate or landmass movements as a critical aspect of this hypothesis. I am sure some happens, but it is not critical to the argument. Since both landmass and oceans will rise at the equatorial bulge, we don’t know in truth how the relative ocean heights will end up, both just after the shift and then two centuries later.
My thinking has led me to the idea that the Earth is expanding and that plate techtonics was a fair enough guess within the confines of uniformitarianism. The mechanism is the escape of protons/H+ from the inner core then the outer core into the mantle. Once there a host of chemical reactions begin to take place the result being less dense molecules, mostly liquid at the extant P/T’s. Acting as solvents within the minerals present the whole mix both expands and rises, these are the ‘large low velocity sheer provinces’. These drive techtonic movement by releasing ‘bubbles’ of lower density materials, often with captive ore bodies, towards the surface. Where they emerge are presently called subduction zones. Generally there’s so little sediment in the ocean that it would seem it was triggered around the time of Chixculub. Presently it looks to me like there were 4 major periods of growth each being followed by periodic minor periods.
At least 2 of those minor adjustments have occured in historical times Ireland being on the recieving end of both. Two periods of ‘plague’ where the whole lowland population was wiped out and a slow recovery as the salt was washed from the soil? The whole people of the sunken Island by Rockall weren’t so lucky.
It says we live on a planet that was used as a ship,the pyramids were connected to two other sets, China and Mexico the core of our planet was deliberately melted using fusion and these structures, to increase our magnetic feild strength.
Hi. Which translation of The Hypostasis of the Archons do you use? You mention it being your own, so I have to ask. Do you have this available to share?
It is a modernized interpretive translation, using Bentley Layton’s strict translation, and
1. Adding about 3% context from other related Nag Hammadi works (and the Bible in a few instances)
2. Translating idiom of the day into modern English expression.
3. Having ChatGPT-4o survey both the before an after text, making commentary as to faithfulness to the original material
Even though it is a 90%-likely set of alterations (high confidence in each re-work) to the material, it is far more informative than the raw original text – which is not written by modern standards of communicating thought.
Still working on the whole document, and have a rough draft in process – held, as I examine each change and then ponder it over time, to ensure that I am comfortable that it is not too risky of an extrapolation, and that it flows well within a reasonable locus of Gnostic teaching (a LOT of differing ideas to work with unfortunately).
I am trying to get rid of the ‘aether’s’ ‘aeons’ and ‘pleroma’s’ – which mean little to us now, and use modern descriptions of the Universe and history of mankind as we understand it.
Yes, I noticed that your version used more modern /less mystic language, which prompted my question. After a lifetime trying to navigate the huge disconnect between strict Christianity and the observed universe, which ultimately led me astray I’d the church, I find it extremely comforting to find religious texts that fit within a scientific universe.
Thanks for your warmth here. I now feel I can openly ask questions.
Keep up the good work. Your blog continues to provide insight in ways I never imagined with every article taking me weeks to digest.
I stitched together some vast chunks of the text from various other articles. I only added the chapter titles.
The Reality of the Rulers
(The Hypostasis of the Archons)
Partial/re-worked version by
Theethicalskeptic
SAMAEL’S SIN
Of primary importance to know, is the core principal that the Chief Authority of the Rulers, Samael is spiritually blind.
Because his spiritual vision was very limited in this regard, because there was apparently no one to challenge him from what he could see, and finally because he was also arrogant, he concluded that quod erat demonstrandum, he must be the most powerful entity which exists. He therefore declared himself manifestly to be God. But as a good man knows, it is the gravest of sins to adorn one’s self in the costume of God over a fellow or lesser being.
Now Incorruptibility from time to time chose to gaze into and traverse through this unaccountable realm of remote cosmos. Such activity caused her purity and desirous life to be pondered in the minds of the minions of darkness; where therein, despite their now organized insanity, the cronies of darkness fell in love with that beauty which they witnessed. They could not remove from their minds its heavenly visage of how wonderful life could be.
However, no matter what they tried, they could not create for themselves a similar spirit nor imbue their lives with that paradise as existed above; often achieving merely a pretense thereof – for the sad reality is that a body or spirit from below was their only inescapable and objective reality of being.
THE CREATION OF ADAM AND EVE
Incorruptibility was indeed from above as it turned out, and they in their insanity, had chosen to ally themselves with that which was below. By her mere gaze, Incorruptibility had served to shine light into the folly of their insanity.
They therefore had failed in their darkness and insanity, to understand that the power of Incorruptibility does not reside in any way through adorning of its costume. Nonetheless, they condemned the innocent man to having a living body and sharing the life of suffering which they had errantly chosen so long ago. But in their lack of expertise, man lay fallow on the ground as a species, unable to aid them in their plight and plotting. Furiously blowing as they may, like storm winds into him the breath of life, they failed to create a soul in man, nor the actual spirit of Incorruptibility they had sought in the first place. Its actual formula evaded them, and they remained powerless in this regard.
Thereafter, the Rulers took the man Pistis Sophia had rescued from their inept hands and mercifully transmutated as well into a fully sentient being, Adam, and placed him into a great garden situated adjacent to their abode in the Levant.
They tasked him to maintain and cultivate the garden. But in this garden, they had hatched another plan as well – that of a trap. The Rulers had decided to plant a Tree in the center of the garden, and to subsequently instruct their ‘Man of the Clay’, “From every tree in the garden shall you eat; yet from the tree of understanding what is not-evil and what is evil, do not eat. For in the day you eat from that tree, you will again fall under our dominion and may no longer claim this Earth which has been so unworthily bequeathed to you. You will again die like the service animal you are.”
Of course the Rulers knew, that once man was told to not do something, that is the exact thing which he would elect to then do.
EPILOGUE
[Narrator: And thus, we arrive at the central message concerning the history and corrupt legacy of the Rulers—the Archons, those Authorities of Darkness—and the grip they continue to hold over mankind and his domain. Up to this point, you have learned how they came to be and their place in the broader cosmos. But now, we broach a new knowledge—one that reveals the path forward, the way to break free from their dominion.]
But Norea, daughter of Adam and Eve, asked of Eleleth the Emissary, “Oh emissary of the Father of Light, am I—and is all of mankind—now condemned to remain captive inside this Dark Empire forever?”
Eleleth replied to Norea, “Legally, you are not bound by these Rulers, the Archons. Not one of them has a rightful claim to enslave you or mankind. For this very reason, One has been appointed who will appear in a future generation and will incarcerate the Rulers and the Archons. When that day arrives, the Archons will no longer be able to abuse you, hybridize your genetics with theirs in order to attempt to capture for themselves the secret of the power residing within you, nor force you to toil and fight in slavery for their comfort and entertainment. The true inheritance of mankind is as a full member of the Sovereign heavens, where the Supreme Authority resides—an authority to whom even the deepest voids of the galaxy must answer.
You, together with your offspring, are the blessed creation of the Source, who lives above you and the emancipated Seven Star Systems. You are part of that Sovereign and Incorruptible Spirit we have just learned about. This is the Origin, the place from which your soul originates.
Therefore, neither the minions nor the powers of the Rulers, nor their Darkness, may approach you, because of the Spirit of Truth that resides within you. All who have learned to walk in this truth live eternally, despite their human bodies being bodies that die. Yet, the fabric of how to make this a reality for all will not be revealed in the near term. After three grand-generations, this will come to pass, and mankind will be freed from the great mistake committed by the Rulers and the Authorities of Darkness.
Until that day when The Son of Man, modeled from a completely new mold and form of humanity, comes to reveal the new Spirit of Truth which the Father has sent on behalf of mankind. Then He will teach them all things and anoint them with the unction of eternal life, given to Him from the incorruptible Source of that Life.
In that time, your people and kind will be freed from the blind thinking of Samael, Yahweh, Saturn, Ha-Satan, and all their illegitimate seats of power—men thereby shedding their garment of death, leaving it behind like a discarded cloak. Death, which originated from and is the legacy only of the Authorities, will be no more.
Then your kind will ascend into the limitless light of the Sovereign, where they were meant to belong from the very beginning. Then these Dark Authorities will relinquish their ages of control, their groveling minions will weep over the destruction of their kingdom, and their demons will lament their death.“
Yes, that is the heart of it. Still working through other passages and contemplating my interpretation and its faithfulness to the original text, other Gnostic writings, and the reality of what we now face as a species.
It’s things like this that make me find arguing online in terms of the medical/scientific world that I am not qualified. I’m a community college biology student. I don’t have the decades of experience that those on the field have, and why should I prop myself up to that par?
Fantastic writing. Really helps me understand these concepts to better view what I already was aware of though not understanding as well as I could have.
I will point out though, I did not think past the sale here, “AGW Deniers” is thus something the writing of yours above is relevant to, but not in the way you might wish it to be
Have you actually delved into the history of AGW, its genesis and evolution? It started out as an idea of control and tyranny. 4-5 decades later, the bodies of competent professionals pave the trodden path, even today, we see Nobel Prize winners in Physics punished for disagreement on even a political statement like “climate emergency”, meanwhile Asia brings 400+ coal mines online and has 600 more in various stages.
One (as mentioned above) can only build upwards in climate science, you are literally not allowed to examination the foundations of the theory whatsoever (Publications in what I call the Publishing Cartel, will not accept papers scientifically challenging climate models: Heresy) w. Your writing above really does articulate all the hallmarks of the AGW and alleged attributions, from “slowing the planet’s rotation down” to “horses will get fat”. Yet the majority of these papers rely on obfuscation, Nelsonian Knowledge and Inference.
On another excellent piece of yours, Hidden in Plain Sight (I think) you referenced NOAA’s CO2 vs Temperature. Have you actually looked into how that graph was produced.
I’ll give you at hint, look at the r2 of temperature adjustments correlation to CO2 growth, you may be a little surprised at the significance :) Note: Most of that temperature record is based on no data for most of the record, it’s all agency driven modeling, cool the past. Look, and see not that I lie.
I’ve asked many climate scientists how much heat comes from the crust of our planet into the oceans, not one has been able to give me an answer outside of pure guesswork. (most say “good question” but have no idea)
I do not disagree with global warming, there are anthropogenic inputs (cities, urban sprawl, land changes) but those are dominated by natural processes by orders of magnitude on a global average scale.
AGW is tyranny wrapped up as science, GW is real, the planet is warming.
This piece of yours above, so very well thought out and written, only services to reinforce what I have already come to believe is the case, as you have shown me how they operate.
Thank you for your writing, I am the better for it.
I wonder why covid-19 with all its lethal variants never crossed the border from the US to Canada where clearly there was never a pandemic..not even close…The answer is obvious: there was never a pandemic, so the excess deaths before vaccinations have to be explained another way…
The thing I wonder is, how in the world can other causes of excess-mortality be fully-discounted, both in terms of the various virus-strains (which may not be the fundamental cause of illness, but only opportunistic on previously weakened immune systems), and inoculations, admittedly thoroughly exacerbating proposed misinterpretations of events. Here I’m thinking along the lines of Hydrogen Cyanide pollution, having almost identical symptoms to Covid, identified in the early ‘hot-spots’ [h/t Jim West]. And that is only one among perhaps dozens of other factors that weaken immune-systems; like radiation in rivers due to fracking, only recently coming to light.
Recall that the ‘fracking-boom,’ and its many poisons, preceded Covid by years, contaminating land-air-water and the burnt-fuels [laden with unremoved chemicals] for transportation, home-heating, and power. The pollution from huge forest and other fires may play a micro-particulate role. Solar events and a weakening Magnetic Field of Earth allowing in excess Cosmic Radiation is another thought.
TES, you have shown us that magma-plumes can account for ocean-warming. Can they also account for Earth off-gassing? My own “Covid” experience included a strange rotten-egg smell on my 5-mile walks around town, just prior to severe hypoxia and subsequently a dozen other symptoms. The hypoxia came first and caused me to barely make it back to our home after a quarter-mile walk one day in May of 2020. I was 67 at the time.
Could any amount of reasoning possibly ‘tease-out’ what the heck is going on, when toxicology is not accounted-for, or at least reliably discounted in so many studies? The closest I have seen on PubMed over the last four years include studies on the dangers of 2.5 micrometer particles in the air we breathe.
Poe.com states: “Micro-particulate pollution refers to tiny particles in the air that can have significant health and environmental impacts. These particles are typically categorized by their size: PM2.5: Particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers (µm) or smaller. These particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, posing serious health risks. PM10: Particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers (µm) or smaller. While PM10 particles are larger than PM2.5, they can still cause respiratory problems and other health issues. In general, micro-particulate pollution can include particles from various sources, such as vehicle emissions, industrial processes, construction activities, and natural sources like wildfires and dust storms. Due to their small size, these particles can remain suspended in the air for long periods and travel long distances, affecting air quality and human health.
Amidst these many variables, a variety of patterns could feed the pareidolia of which we’re all susceptible. This alternative analysis reminds me of those dot-matrix displays at indoor malls years ago, where you’d see another image pop-out if you relaxed your visual focus. In that context, if all or most attention is on a virus, and mutations thereof, that would be what one sees; perhaps attributing toxicity to a second-place, as contributory, but not causal.
I ran across this conundrum in 2,000 hours of PubMed research where I was looking for the connection of Retinoic Acid to Auto-Immune Diseases. The ‘smoking-gun’ papers are there, and I have a binder full of them, but it is almost a taboo-subject other than in Obstetrics, no doubt because our food-supply has been “fortified” with Vitamin A since the early 1970’s. Curiously, there are a few government-funded clinicals that were rounding-up volunteers, last time I looked in 2022, for trials of Retinoic Acid and Retinol isomers to be included in vaccines and nasal-sprays. A spooky thing is the identical temperatures required for handling and transporting those molecules as are required for the Covid vaccines.
Jim West has hypothesized that all things “virus” could be viewed as cover-stories for environmental-pollution. He was reporting on the Hydrogen Cyanide/Covid iteration of that thesis back in April of 2020.
This recent pandemic experience could well be a DDT-Polio thing on steroids; or a MTBE-West Nile scenario; both of which he has researched extensively.
Poe.com informs:
The gasoline additive that was banned around the time of the West Nile virus outbreak is MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether). MTBE was commonly used to increase octane levels and reduce emissions in gasoline. However, concerns about its environmental and health impacts led to its decline in use and eventual bans in several states during the late 1990s and early 2000s. The West Nile virus was first detected in the U.S. in 1999, around the same period when discussions about banning MTBE were prominent.
And on a different toxicology-front, prenatal ultrasound causing birth-defects, as elucidated in Jim West’s book – ’50 Human Studies In Utero, Conducted in Modern China Indicate Extreme Risk for Prenatal Ultrasound: A New Bibliography.’ These were studies that presumably could never be done in the USA.
I know I sound like I’m proselytizing, but, TES, in all due respect for your excellent work, do you think that you have adequately discounted the toxicity-causation hypothesis per Covid?
Yes, I have adequately falsified all those notions as to the cause of excess mortality underway right now.
1. Covid was a dangerous virus, 6.6 x more deadly than the average annual flu.
2. Covid killed people 18.5 days after they got ill, far later than the cold or flu, because of blood clotting pathologies
3. Our panicked health officials sought a vaccine EUA, and denied apixaban, ivermectin, and HCQ treatment for the blood pathologies underway.
4. Therefore another amount of persons equal to those who died of Covid itself, died from untreated blood clotting pathologies (mostly at home and well after Covid was over).
5. The vaccine killed as many as both #’s 1 and 4 above, in addition (ALL Non-Covid Natural pathologies involved, and there are hundreds, began Week 14 of 2024 the very week the vaccine rolled out en masse).
6. The lax border, weakened hearts from the vaccine, and draconian policies combined to kill 175,000 young persons through violence and fentanyl.
That is the only hypothesis which is viable right now.
TES
A > per capita Chinese immigrant \ student population in CAD ( many of whom make an annual pilgrimage back to China to visit relatives) providing a > level of pre-“Pandemic” natural immunity to CAD perhaps ? I noticed that you put CAD in Zone 2 more recently ( after having it in zone 3 initially I believe ) ?
“Recently, however, we’ve been bombarded with irritating advertisements”
Use brave browser if you don’t want any advertisements shown watching YouTube. Brave is based on Chromium (Chrome browser) and is primarily a privacy respecting browser.
“Now certainly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was a deadly pathogen, itself 6.6 times more deadly than the typical annual mortality total for all influenza viruses combined”
One question I have about this is that the CDC admitted in May of 2020 that the IFR was 0.3% which is 3 times the influenza IFR. That was the original and it’s been less lethal since.
I’ve looked at the “ref #2” but don’t see how you get a 0.66% IFR from that?
That was you? LOL. I was watching the numbers bounce around in 2020 and remember 0.26% but didn’t get to check the source. Mar 16, 2020 6% (Imperial college), Mar 30, 2020 0.66% (Lancet), Apr 30, 2020 0.25% (Penn Med) and some others 0.75-0.85% then on May 24, 2020 0.3% (CDC).
At that point I was like “Back to work & school everyone” but no …
John Ionnidis had the exact same number. You’re in good company. Regarding Canada, is it possible they had some pre-exisiting immunity from The Sars outbreak in 2003? Less than 1,000 people died, so it’s unlikely.
Canada was exposed to proto-Omicron in 2018. This imparted some degree of immunity to Wuhan two years later.
First off, effing with Napoleon while simultaneously tricking him in his own house and then wiping the board in frustration is possibly the most insanely courageous act of stupidity I’ve ever encountered LOL. Thanks for sharing that detail.
It’s possible though extremely unlikely that the original “Turk” was real, albeit much more limited than the later fake. The combinatorially vast space of chess across many turn iterations would prevent a mechanical solution, but perhaps if the original WAS real it fooled amateurs and novices enough to develop a reputation that fakes were crafted to fulfill. Given that the chess space has been mapped cumulatively for centuries, the known strategies in the 18th century would have been -somewhat- more limited (I suspect modern networking of expert players globally coupled to the surge in chess around the Enlightenment made these 250 years a boon of new strategies despite the antiquity of the game, though I do not care enough about chess to go digging) and a world class player of the time may have provided solutions for a dozen or so turns. Going out on a fragile limb here, but real mechanical computation of that level may have been a legitimate threat to houses of power. This ONLY seems faintly feasible given the strange story of the Antikythera mechanism: It is doubtful that undisturbed extremely powerful groups “forgot” that tech, particularly given their continual fascination with astrology (the function of the Mechanism). If you’ll hoard other sophisticated mechanical tech, why not give Kempelen a pile of gold and take the tech?
As of September 2024, my father (a NASA Physicist and luckily for me – the best balance of intelligence, wisdom, objectivity, cautiousness, reason, strength, and goodness that I’ve seen in one person), is almost certainly one of the next to be taken by the “pokarama experiments.” The one decision I wish I could have known about in advance and dissuaded him and my mother from – is taking that shot – and the boosters.
He was in perfect health until the initial dose, and quickly developed a problem with balance that none of the many Doctors who examined, tested, and scanned him could find the cause of. Later, it was found to be SAIDH – a previously rare condition involving the brain, kidneys, a specific hormone and a need for an extremely high level of sodium (salt). He had no blood pressure issues. When his sodium level would drop, he would lose balance until taking a nap – and eating. The condition advanced shortly after a booster. He suddenly developed almost constant hiccups and excessive sleepiness. Within a few days of this, he experienced a brain bleed and fell unconscious.
After the Neuro-ICU, and a few weeks of slowly getting his sodium level back up and of regaining some movement and speech abilities, he went to a rehabilitation hospital and came home stronger and on a path to recovery. Unfortunately, a seizure (which he’d never had before), cut that short. While
Doctors on the Palliative Care Team were seemingly pushing for euthanasia, an attending Doctor who freshly reviewed his records and saw him suggested recovery. He was able to breathe when the ventilator was turned off, but it had apparently weakened his diaphragm – so, he would need time to wean him from it, completely. That’s where we are, now – although there have been a couple of complications and we don’t know how the seizures that followed the first one have affected his functionality, at this point.
Can I PROVE the connection – no. But, based on a study documenting experiences of others who have SAIDH and the reports on this site – I would suggest that there are individuals who are responsible for my father’s condition and for the conditions and lives of many others. There has apparently been scientific confirmation of potentially harmful substances in the “juice,” as well as candid, verbal confirmation that at least some batches were altered for experimental purposes by the manufacturers. I’m grateful to The Ethical Skeptic for sharing this data. We should all do what we can to re-establish “ a fair America “ which means joining together in the choices that we make, the votes that we place, and in our communities where we can share anything from information to vegetables. We all need to be as prepared as possible for surviving the ethical failures of people in the medical field, and of people in government.
In February 2022, I joined a large group of people to meditate in the pyramid and the object was to “balance the nodes of the earth”. I felt compelled to go because it seemed like I was doing something positive for the world in the midst of chaos. The person who coordinated this was Matias De Stefano. This was all super spiritual, but he talked about the pole aligning to magnetic north and eventually Egypt moving to Argentina. Anyhow I was struck by how the way he portrays earth behind him in many of his videos match your demo video!
Your ability to distill complex concepts into digestible nuggets of wisdom is truly remarkable. I always come away from your blog feeling enlightened and inspired. Keep up the phenomenal work!
In reading this, the concepts of consciousness and evolution come to mind; in comments regarding questions of Gnosticism and illumination, would recommend Dion Fortune’s ‘The Cosmic Doctrine’ and an excellent commentary on it by John Michael Greer simply called ‘A Commentary on The Cosmic Doctrine’ which gets into this creation of and evolution of consciousness. Interesting post.
Psychopaths are the “predators” in the human jungle. This is how life is structured – on the principle of “eating”. When predators prevail, self-destruction has no alternative and the system resets. We are at this stage of development…
Elegantly presented intellectual work, Sir Skeptic. I was thinking “Hey, this sounds like ‘archons'” a paragraph and a short list before I got to this header: Thought Experiment (Metaphysical Speculation) Until then I was thinking of the supercomputer in the Moody Blues song, “In The Beginning” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AukFsBv2oDY
The dynamic-tension (if you would) of this further presentation is an engaging portrayal of the dynamic laid out in The Tripartite Tractate, as I understand it.
I have not read the first two of these – but I have listened to or read those two authors in other works.
Gnosis – The Nature and History of Gnosticism by Kurt Rudolf
The Gnostic Gospels by Elaine Pagels (a bit more of an academic assay)
The Nag Hammadi library itself (The Gnostic Gospels) – Marvin Meyer
I read and appreciated the Elaine Pagels book, “The Gnostic Gospels” in the 1990s, when I was sincerely seeking what I considered to be the lost teachings of Jesus. It did not illuminate me as I needed. I still sought that illumination, and came into Tibetan Buddhist teachings from a visiting Lama.
I have, through ongoing intentional search for truth, something of a better insight into gnosticism these 26 years later.
“Seek and ye shall find”, seems to remain true, but one has to be patient, too.
But, what I am learning is, that life is the study – and is guided by something more…
Humans could be TTEs, too. Real entities would then only be an idea of a TTE called TES.
Like many things which start as genuinely novel storytelling attempting to capture a facet of what you’ve written on this blog (and are later corrupted by the mechanisms you’ve described in your writing previously), there is a show called “Raised by Wolves” which attempts to explore a similar origin story via subtext. At face value, it is a scifi version of “atheists versus religion” and the exploration of the sun-god motif. However, if one can watch with a discerning eye, it is far more interesting than that, and makes a good run at cloaking its true intellectual curiosity with the broad strokes of the plot. Ridley Scott was involved in the project, before it was cancelled after a second season. The show is loaded with a substantial amount of subtext so as to explore a similar thought experiment as you’ve described above. You might find it interesting.
Thanks Beryl, had not even heard of it. Will check that out!
TES
I am assuming that this blog is “observed” lol, so I would suggest getting a DVD copy of both seasons and watching it at your leisure should the series “disappear” from streaming services. Indeed, most people haven’t heard of it (see: antimemetics). You touched on something with the NDEs. A woman named Brit Marling has explored what you wrote above as well, from a different perspective, in her entire body of work. Of note– The OA and Another Earth. The OA is probably the one to find on DVD as well, if you can. It is conspicuously difficult to do so. Also cancelled after two seasons. Critical viewing material for your line of exploration, imo.
Oh yes, we are watched – that is inevitable. The National Security Agency (NSA) is the watchdog over former and current intelligence professionals, in terms of both National Security (Titles 12 and 50) and indirectly by monitoring the Intelligence Agencies of each Military (Title 10). I always make it clear that I know nothing, and am not here to whistleblow on or reveal anything. I honor my oath of security, 100%. Plus, my involvement was a long time ago.
I speak only about the subjective nature of philosophy, life, and mankind which I have learned aside from those duties. By watching what we do, rather than what we say as a species.
What the average professional at the NSA does not realize, is that they act as a proxy for Extra-Governmental Agencies, which are not accountable under the US Constitution or really any institution of mankind. They serve at the behest of the Dark Authorities who used to rule us as Gods in antiquity. They had to go underground as more entities began to observe their dark work and became concerned.
None of the truly-protected IP is classified. It is held outside the purview of the US Constitution and Authority of its Citizens. This is Royal practice of Samael and his minions, which will (hopefully soon) come to an end.
“as more entities began to observe their dark work” – I trust the use of “entity” in this context is, for the sake of accuracy, specifically generic, right?
As the saying goes, the wildest trick the One Trick Pony ever pulled is convincing the world it does not exist. It took a while for me to realize the literal meaning of the apophthegm, and it was the agency / Nelsonian Knowledge definitions in your work that sealed my conviction, by deduction. Things I have observed repeatedly at play in my career – the non-negotiable plans dictated from above, not the shortsightedness or blindness of the minions executing them. And the pace of events these last years has given their game away. Someone, somewhere nearby, is desperate, as if their time has ran out.
…is, for the sake of accuracy, specifically generic, right?
Correct. :-)
Hello, TES. Thank you for sharing your ideas and analyses.
Archons, Entities, Dark Authorities, mention of Gnosticism and Anunnaki . . . I would ask this (in a spirit of puzzlement/curiosity rather than of challenge/accusation): Why use such (veiled?) terms instead of more direct — or even blunt — terms, given that there is so much kook-bait in these areas of enquiry (e.g., Blavatsky and Hubbard and Chardin — i.e., state security apparatus agents, witting and unwitting alike)?
Because these placeholders ARE veiled (and this is a very good question John, not disingenuous at all…).
1. Because we as men do not hold precise definitions of these as either placeholders (a hypothetical entity) or as entities at all. If I use a precise term, I am pretending to knowledge I do not hold. I would be creating a religion, not conducting deductive critical path investigation. Right now, I know that the Agency exists, but I cannot define it to a more precise level.
2. The terms we commonly use in place of these are familiar, but that does not make them ‘direct’ – they are just familiar (Remember that the abuse of Occam’s Razor involves the conflation of ‘familiarity’ with ‘simplicity’). If I use familiar terms, I poison the well, as everyone will think they know exactly what I am talking about, when they don’t.
3. These entities do not want to be known and observed. Like Bank Robbers who spray paint every camera, and destroy the bank security system hard drive/connectivity, they do not want any record of their activity known. All of our records of these mythological gods, have been expunged – save for fanciful fan fiction about them, so ludicrous that no one would take it seriously. I don’t believe in Gods. This is all a natural feature of our Universe.
4. The Non-Human Intelligences currently at work here – are enigmatic, and defy Wittgenstein terminology. In both the pop and classified cases I have studied, they do not think and behave as we might expect.
5. If I use prejudicial terminology (pseudo-direct), the fake skeptics who patrol and police most human knowledge will use that ‘crackpot terminology’ to bucket categorize me unfairly, and corrupt the process of inquiry toward their preferred religious bent by default. These police are just as much enemies and deceivers as are the Agencies themselves.
For these reasons, whatever descriptions these Agencies sought to expunge – those are the ones I am going to use.
In the end, this is a discipline of the Scientific Method and Patent-writing (albeit early-on in the process), on a subject which cannot be assailed by p-values, RCT’s, and Toulmin/Bradford Hill Method, etc. This is why Wittgenstein was purported to quip “Only describe, do not explain.”
In the end, it is a form of humility before creation (the equivocal context of the term).
EVG
TES
I see: Pyrrhonic parrhesia.
Is it possible that we are dealing with pneumagores (TTI) rather than egregores (TTE)? Some form of cybernetic “life” rather than incorporeal NHI?
I’m intrigued by the idea that ancient initiation ceremonies may have taken the form of mystery plays such as you describe, possibly performed by children.
“…unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18 :3 RSV).
and Socrates, accepting his destiny:
“And I fancy that those men who established the mysteries were not unenlightened, but in reality had a hidden meaning when they said long ago that whoever goes uninitiated and unsanctified to the other world will lie in the mire, but he who arrives there initiated and purified will dwell with the Gods. And I in my life have, so far as I could, left nothing undone, and have striven in every way to make myself one of them. But whether I have striven aright and have met with success, I believe I shall know clearly, when I have arrived there, very soon, if it is God’s will. (Plato, Phaedo)
I appreciate your conscientious approach to translating the Nag Hammadi text.
The author missed the core sloughing mass change, LLVP asymmetry, geomagnetic priority and inertial moment priority physics of State 1 and State 2, which as I outline, are the physics. This article just talks about a flip, Dzhanibekov, and associated topics. It is not a geophysics hypothesis.
A couple followup questions, from someone “mapping the edges” of what you’re talking about, so to speak:
Do you have any thoughts on antimemetics? For instance, the book, “There Is No Antimemetics Division” by QNTM.
Do you have any book recommendations? I know you’ve recommended some books previously but I’ve only managed to reconstruct a partial list from going through previous articles.
Thank you for taking the time to put this work together.
This is very positive in the conclusion, which you intimate arises from your experiential glimpse of light and truth.
I must take gentle exception to your characterization of self-perpetuating and higher-order-inducing DNA as ” a mechanism of warfare”, even after having read this exposition through to the end.
It does not seem to me that the imposition of the orderliness of life upon the mineral world is “warfare”, because there is no entity under attack. Mineral forms are drawn into the becoming-of-life, which may serve the “Archons”, or may serve freedom and Gnosis, as well.
I remain at a loss, though an interested and intellectually engaged loss, as to how the Archons, who seem to be disembodied energy-beings, dining upon the anguish of carnal sentient-beings, come to be as they seemingly are.
DNA may create forms of resonance which may transmit between consciousnesses, perhaps?
Even so, where would the DNA-bodies of archons/demons physically reside?
Might one speculate that archons/demons are merely parasitic upon DNA-based sentient life-forms inhabiting a world, such as ours? This would be analogous, perhaps, to a spreading computer-virus, commandeering computers and network connections, but susceptible to ultimate complete-eradication?
Yours in Constructive Speculation, perhaps leading to Testable Hypotheses
;-)
“dining upon the anguish of carnal sentient-beings” You nail it right on the head. It’s the only conclusion I can reach. But this all seems to be reaching a head. Any idea what happens next? It sure can’t be good. Seems like our complete destruction isn’t far off.
This is the part of the dream where you are falling and just before you hit, you wake up, right?
“Oh, I’m completely ok; those dream-archons are flim-flam.”
Hopefully Yours…
There is a book called “Alien Interview” by Lawrence R. Spencer, that sort of covers some similar points. Reading TES’s article reminded me of that purported interview. I’ve always thought that our minds have untapped powers if we could only figure out how to access them. Every time I’ve tried I come up with nothing. All I can do is rarely see into another realm or potentially a different dimension of sorts. Other than those in that realm being aware that I see them it doesn’t amount too much, and has only been a few times in my whole life.
I just remembered one incident as a kid that came to me as I was thinking about that other dimension. At camp one summer we played this game where kids sat on the opposite side of a picnic table. One side would have an object and they would pass it back and forth under the table or pretend to pass it back and forth under the table. The team on the other side would have to guess who had the object when the passing stopped. The team across from us had a guy who could every single time know who had the object. What was weird, was I sensed he was seeing the object through a different dimension of sorts. The funny part was I was able to use my thoughts to create an illusion that a different person had the object. Every time I did that, he guessed the person who I was thinking in my mind had the object. It was kind of funny in that he never figured out that I was intentionally messing him up. Being just a kid I never thought anymore of the incident until I just remembered it now. I wonder if we have an ability to raise all sorts of hell with these Archons but just don’t know how? I’ve never wanted to engage demons directly out of fear I’d get their rath and suffer badly for it. I don’t mind jumping into things within my developed skill set, but other worldly bad guys seems out of my league. But I suspect we might have abilities that are untapped that could screw them up big time.
Thank you for that vignette, Greg. I think we all have nascent skills or talents like that. I have also had experiences which point out the gaps in the mechanical-world paradigm.
“Power” seem to me to be an intentionally-misleading term, because the dark forces do focus on power through subjugation and exploitation of sentient beings, so they want our focus to be their focus.
The path, as I see it, is to request, watch for, receive and accept Divine Guidance in this life. Changes in path and perception follow.
A great piece, bringing together so many threads, many that you have meticulously woven through your posts, and some from the work of others, in biology, that I need to bring to your attention at some point but I first need to list comprehensively for your consideration. I enjoy the fact that your posts seem to become more lucid, or should I say less coded, as they come out and I revisit them / you retouch them. Would you consider posting, or publishing your full attempt at transliterating the Nag Hammadi at some point? Or you already did and this is an opening salvo?
Dan, yes I have conducted a full transliteration of The Hypostasis of the Archons. The problem with most of the Nag Hammadi, is that it is written in the ethereal and spiritual idiom of the day, for those in Egypt around 100 AD. “Pleroma, aeons, epinoia, pistis, etc.” are all words which confuse and exclude. They were perhaps purposed to be specific, and distinguish the philosophy behind them from the endless blather of other religions of the day. That I can see.
The benefit The Hypostasis enjoyed however, was its writer’s exposure to, and its possible inclusion inside, the Library at Alexandria.
Nonetheless, the reality is that they need, not simply translation, rather, a re-expression in modern English and methods of communicating ideas. I caution myself to stay true to the original material. However, the risk of imparting something invalid, or misinterpretation is far less damaging than the overall loss of important tenets attempting to be communicated through archaic language and mystical expression.
I have considered posting it in its entirety here – but it is more than most people are ready for, especially those tender and volatile brains who shield themselves with a method of blindness they call ‘skepticism.’
It could send their rational selves into a fit of revenge on someone having the audacity to ponder unauthorized ideas.
From a web search, I found a translated version of The Hypostasis of the Archons online. When I went to navigate to it, my security app blocked the website (gnosis dot org) as a potentially ‘dangerous’ site. I had to go through a few hoops to finally navigate there. So much for ‘unauthorized ideas’.
Fwiw, I had also visited this site to see other important historical texts. Even a superficial reading of the history of the Council of Nicaea shows it was a naked attempt by Romans to gain power through appropriating Christianity for themselves so they would be the ones to control its message. The council was all about establishing the deity of Christ and had nothing to do with the teachings of Christ. We can see from the Nag Hamadi and other texts, the more spiritual works “disappeared” from history, but they kept those texts that were more conducive to an authoritarian church that they could control and profit from.
I once told a cousin of mine that the way to solve global warming was to get rid of people. She immediately assumed I meant get rid of black people and called me a racist. I told her we need to get rid of people like her too. We haven’t spoken in 30 years.
The greatest threat to our ecosystem, our democracy, our national security, our public health and the average physical attractiveness of our species is this band of inbred, entitled elite vermin who have subverted our constitutional republic and every other sovereign nation on Earth. Full stop.
The clownworld self-sterilized NPCs, the legions of pale androgynous golem who staff its captive intelligence agencies, violent imports and cognitively-compromised politician/puppets are simply symptoms of this ancient and easily rectified disease. Ignore the fluff and do not deviate your righteous, accusative stare from the worlds oldest and most corrupt corporation. It sings and dances as it commits genocide after genocide.
I hope to be alive when its lesser kin figure out that the select few who have sacrificed their very genetic integrity to this mission have zero intention of sharing the world with them. Oh, you NEEDED to outbreed in order to remain reproductively viable? Sorry, that’s “miscegenation”, no test tube baby for you! Bigots of every flavor prefer “purebloods”, I suppose. The final victims of this scam of “original sin” will be the people who eagerly pressed this perversion onto the other 6,500,000,000 of us. Well, second to last: once the few have it all I suspect they will discover that having known nothing but parasitism for so long they must then begin to consume one another in the absence of Africans to enslave, brown people to keep in outdoor concentration camps or europeans to blame for it all. And to think all they ever had to do was say “no” and join the greater body of humanity, their true brethren.
We’re already seeing the last band of useful idiots be discarded. The WASPS who sold our nation for trust funds dwindle on their shrinking NE beaches, descendants of the members of their various secret societies of the last few centuries suffer under injected poisons and discriminatory education/hiring with the rest of us. I must admit I savor that particular loosh. So proud, so arrogant, so stupid.
Sorry to bring negative energy to your comment section. I like to think sites/comment sections such as these are carefully monitored by my target audience. What better way to sow doubt in the faithless?
TES, do I recall correctly that an earlier version of this post also included the argument about the improbable clustering of epigenetic changes in DNA brain expression between p.troglodytes and humans, pointing to an intent-unmasking level of impossibilty of changes (based on average DNA mutation rates in low-evolutionary pressure areas) ca.250k years ago? If this is not the post, where do you discuss that argument? I cannot seem to locate it recently. That was a compelling trail to pursue, I hope you revisit it if removed.
That was applied here – and yes, a horizon upon which I intend to embark at some point after I finish a large US strategy project here over the next two years.
Your essays are an astonishing multi-domain synthesis. When I saw that the Ecuadoran and Peruvian Andes are hypothesized survival areas, it immediately brought to mind the extremely harsh Covid policies in those two countries. Ecuador mandated the vaccine for everyone above the age of 5 (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-23/ecuador-imposes-vaccine-mandate-amid-rising-hospitalization-rate). Peru also had some of the harshest lockdown, mask, and vaccine policies in the world. I wonder if that’s a coincidence?
Also I remember your mentioning somewhere that you may be working on a movie explaining the theory. Are you accepting donations to support the project?
Thanks again for these essays and for all of your Covid-related analysis too.
No, if I take money, someone will make the claim that I am in this for money, or have my material taken down because someone will claim a copyright strike on it. As it is right now, YouTube, FaceBook, Google, and the other venues just outright censor my ideas. I like to keep things clear like that.
I have been approached by a production company who has cited they can fund the entire cinematic project, and have done some of the most prominent work in the industry. We shall see how it goes. So I hear, 9 of 10 of these things just die in the process.
**shrug**
TES
I understand your reasoning. I hope that the movie project comes to fruition!
If we are at the Indigo point, then any and all efforts should be for passing this message on to the future, by whatever means.
If this event comes to pass, and is a repeating feature of the planet, and if this is already known knowledge, then 99% of humanity will only wonder at the sun going the wrong way, and all that follows.
The remainder will be the plain lucky, and those who planned. Those who planned also have a plan for anyone they find who survives, they will have their “utopia” and find it wanting, if they survive in their bunkers.
A tricky proposition, leaving a warning that will survive the event that will be understood and taken seriously by those 12,000 years later. We see how such ancient artifacts and texts (and the alternative ideas about them) are viewed today.
Your writing on the pyramids and their alternate use is fascinating and thought provoking. I try take ideas at face value and explore the possible. Tempering comes later. Today, merely taking some ideas at face value in order to allow for exploration, earns you a label, even amongst family and friends. Strange o’l world.
And who knows, maybe the next iteration of global civilization won’t be guided by ubiquitous evil.
As for a production based on your work, we know the reaction it would receive from certain quarters. Look at poor o’l Graham Hancock for essentially just asking questions.
If you knew that you would die tomorrow, what would you do today?
Would you get tired of that if you kept knowing you would die tomorrow?
CO2 is a greenhouse gas in such a narrow spectrum that the spectrum is all greenhoused in already.
It needs methane to help, and water vapor, lots of water vapor, but I’m actually worried more about sociopaths, post-peak-oil, nukes, and then space weather a little later.
Gotta’ pace myself for all those tomorrows…
“If you knew that you would die tomorrow, what would you do today?”
I would save lives through critical analysis of untested-vaccine risks, and identify the harm they have caused, to their at-risk constituents.
I would solve the mystery of the Khufu pyramid and the risk we bear in terms of climate and Earth’s core.
I would provide for my disabled kids.
I would never tire of it, and nothing which happened to me afterwards could ever serve to remove the smile from my face.
Check out An Enigma Solved by Joseph Davidovits and Margie Morris that argues that the ancient Egyptians used concrete to build the pyramids, rather than moving massive stones. Also Chris Dunn’s Giza Power Plant. both still available. Khufu didn’t build it Imhotep did, as well as Sakkara and the manmade lake that still bears his Hebrew name Joseph, as well as the irrigation system that was repaired in 1969 and works today to make the desert bloom. The original Suez canal. See the “Sakkara bird” and the airport in Peru’s Nazca lines(Mysteries from Forgotten Worlds) , the Gold Museum’s curious golden insects, look like Elon Musk’s bird! Nefertiti’s weird shaped head and the 10,000 skeletons in Peru with the same weird shaped head? Genetic defect of the Peruvian royal family? Amarna letters Queen writing to her sister the “Queen of the Underworld” sounds like she’s planning a visit not pining for a dead sister. Middle class Peruvian’s wrapped kids heads to make them look similar to the royals. For me Khufu is solved… The pyramid complex in Peru that’s so similar to the one in Egypt. Puma Punku, concrete as well? The 515′ petrified ship in the mountains of Ararat with Titanium rivets! So many mysteries out there how did you pick one? Acambaro figurines, Cholula Pyramid with plates in the museum there with dinosaurs (dragons) painted on the plates with even the skin pattern correct, verified by NM find. Los Lunas Mystery stone and additional petroglyphs in Paleo Hebrew in the petrograph park off Unser and I-40. Discovery of Ancient America by David Allen Deal with a solar eclipse dated to 162 bc! The Paleo Hebrew was verified by Nehemiah Gordon PHD Biblical Hebrew. The old and new areas of Chichin Itza, with el Castille turned slightly after the Mars Earth Wars Don Patten and the change in our days length and year causing the Mayans, Sumerians etc to change their Calendars at the same time! Biblical Flood and Ice Epoch also Don Patten. Mayan people in Guatemala still speak (read and write) Mayan (there’s 22 dialects not sure which she was teaching us) in a museum in Santiago (N of Antigua) a woman was explaining the way the writing works. Estanzuela giant ground sloth as big as a mammoth more found in Guatemala than everywhere else in the world combined! One was seen in 1980 in the Peten Dept. Maybe still around? They “found” a big city near Chetumal, MX just N of Belize larger than Palenque (84 miles across) with a taller pyramid than El Mirador, they “found” it when the owner told them he had ruins on his property. If the PTB didn’t find that immovable larger item, I can easily imagine missing a giant gopher, guessing the height I did not measure it. I have a photo of my husband with the two skeletons. I take “dating” methods all with a grain of salt as an eruption of a volcano was dated 3 different ways, 3 different answers all VERY long ago. Missionaries wrote about the eruption as it occurred in 1903. When Willard Libby came up with the idea, he knew it would take 25,000 years to reach equilibrium. Since he “knew” the Earth was older, no problem. When they redated the atmosphere in 2000 C14 had increased! Extrapolate backwards using unprovable hypothesis (started at 0 increased was steady etc) You hit 0 in under 10,000 years!? The more I search the more curious I become. OK half a book here.
I have engineered over 100 very large concrete, cast, and CMU structures of various construction types. I also have concepted, designed, and operated energy plants.
I disagree professionally on both counts.
1. The stones were not ‘poured concrete,’ 100% certain. You still have to fabricate the mix, lift the mix, and not only the mix, but additional weight in water as well, and then wait for each stone to cure, and purposely devise stones of chaotic sizing (to their loading disadvantage), for no reason other than to make it appear to be cut stone. This would quadruple the work content entailed. Then you have to address curing failures. It would have been a friggin’ nightmare in construction. Cutting and lifting stones would have been much easier – as they are already cured and ‘tested’ for strength/durability.
2. This was not a power plant for the purpose of producing power for outsiders. It did generate power but the amperage and resistance were too high and voltage too low. This allows us to infer that the power being generated was used right there in the pyramid. I explain where these indicators show, and what they used it for – in the article.
Joseph Davidovits discovered contaminants hair, fiber in the stones. The fossils in the stone are not water laid, they are mixed up. Archeologists remarked on it with curiosity decades ago. Moving water and mix, mixing in place, would be much easier take less workers than moving a one ton stone, let alone many of them and many weighing more. The book makes a compelling case. What article?
If you have ever set engineered work method standards, you know that forming chaotic concrete shapes, without pumps and machinery, is a LABORIOUS task. It is far more work content heavy than moving stones. The book’s author has never been in this industry, never done this work, and does not know a PF&D from a rate derivation regression. I do.
By the burden of proof on induction suggesting falsification, you cannot use anecdotes, but rather must prove that all stones are a mix.
I just stumbled across your site and glad I did.
Having worked with concrete for a couple of decades (now retired) on both industrial and domestic projects I did give some serious thought to the possibility of the pyramids being poured, as well as being very much older than claimed.
My mind wandered onto the complexity of that: sourcing the massive amounts of limestone and other raw materials, transporting same, mixing and judging strength (MPA) for the various levels, and so on. They were massive projects and would have needed some awesome infrastructure to produce that concrete. I still have memories of pushing a half-full wheelbarrow from the truck to the pour wishing the customer could afford a pump. Not to mention the many variables encountered for each job.
What technology did they have 5, 10, 15 thousand years ago? No pharaoh was ever found in one so their purpose is still an unknown. Civilizations come and go – are they even from the early or mid stages of our current civilization, or from one before?
The ancients Greeks studied in the Library of Alexandria which would have enhanced their civilization. Kepler acknowledged that his breakthroughs in planetary movements was due to rediscovering Ancient Egyptian laws (end of Book V of “Harmony of the World”. What else did the Ancient Egyptians know?
My thoughts: I don’t know – need more data. I do suspect that certain elements desire to maintain the mystery, and current narratives, in order to secure funding to research said mysteries. There are many unknowns and problems that need solving, but to solve them would be destroying the cash cow; hence, they only ever come close or have “breakthroughs” – like a poker machine spinning one symbol off or dropping a few coins to keep one feeding the machine.
Also, by maintaining ignorance, the ignorant will remain dependent on the knowledgeable, or “experts”. I read somewhere that mystery is like a vacuum, and just like nature abhorring a vacuum, will seek to be filled by whatever seems to fit.
To get back to the article; Climate change is one hell-of-a cash cow and the fear it creates drives people to depend on the “experts” (IPCC/UN/WEF and their SDGs) to solve it as they have the “answers”.
You cite an article of mine on Graham Hancock’s web site relating to the so-called ‘quarry marks’ ellegedly discovered within the Great Pyramid in 1837 by Col. R. W. Howard Vyse.
I thought your readers might like to read my recent paper on this issue which presents irrefutable evidence that those ochre markings were almost certainly faked by Vyse and his closest assistants. You can find the paper here:
It’s always so sad to see someone so intelligent who has literal blinders on. I followed you throughout the Covid shenanigans and have enjoyed almost everything you post TES, but as the Bible says in 1 Corinthians 1:26-29 “For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God.”
I was once in your shoes, and I too once believed that there might be some way of reconciling the Bible (or at least utilizing some stories of the Bible as folklore) with modern science but there comes a point where you have to choose who is right and what is true.
I read book after book in an attempt to find some explanation of things but at the end of the day secularism might shroud itself in science but in actuality almost every claim made by modern science is actually pseudoscience – pretending to be science, but it’s not. Think of the tautology – Darwin said if we don’t find billions of fossils in gradually increasing complexity his theory was bunk. We didn’t find it, what did we do? Invent rescuing devices like “punctuated equillibrium.” Mitochondrial Eve (MRCA) was claimed to be 150k-200k years old based on evolutionary suppositions yet when we use actual observed mutation rates in humans it was between 5k-10k yrs.
If I could offer any insights as to this article it would be that your assumptions and attempt to disprove the Biblical flood story due to Noah’s boat construction is flimsy. Not only because you weren’t there (and science can’t make historical truth claims, real science at least) but because you didn’t explore the timeline of Noah’s flood.
Noah was 600 years old when the flood waters came upon the earth. Let’s start there. Why was Noah 600 years old? What could contribute to human beings living to such ripe old ages except some kind of barrier to entropy? After all the 2nd law of thermodynamics is undefeated! So if he were such an age something was likely protecting humans on earth from the decay inherent in this universe. It’s been proposed that there was a vapor barrier around the earth, serving as a greenhouse of sorts, which also would explain the giant tree fossils, giant dragonfly fossils, and giant human remains found (and often tucked away from view) along with serving as an avenue by which the “windows of heaven” were opened up (after the vapor canopy falls to earth).
God said he will send rain on the earth for 40 days and 40 nights so that is what began initially – rain. Notice that when the rains started Noah and the animals entered the ark, so it obviously wasn’t a giant tidal wave or huge rush of waters, it was a steady rain (worldwide). Noah had time to walk into the ark and the animals had time to enter as well.
The Bible is clear and specific about the sequence of events –
Noah entered the ark as the rain started.
The “fountains of the deep” (undersea volcanism/ringwoodite) were broken up
The “windows of heaven” (vapor canopy in atmosphere) were opened (likely fell to earth)
It rained for 40 days and 40 nights
For 150 days in total the water “prevailed upon the earth.”
How do you think fossils even form? Fast-moving sediment that traps organisms. Many fossils found are in a state of fight/flight, there are whale bones found on mountaintops in South America, no tectonic plate theory explains that, after all how can smashing two rocks together push some fossilized bones to the top of a mountain? Wouldn’t the bones be compressed by surrounding rock?
We’ve observed rapid canyon formation due to rapid moving sediment, we know how fossils are made, there’s a huge mass of dead organic life forms buried beneath the rocks and plains on the earth after all. Everything is there for anyone to know and see the truth about what happened but the biggest thing that obstructs us all (and obstructed me for many years) is our worldview. If we are looking at the world through blue-tinted glasses, everything we see will be some shade of blue. But not everything is really blue, it just looks that way to you. Same for red tinted glasses, green tinted, etc. We all have our preconceived notions and presuppositions but ultimately only one set of glasses and only one worldview provides the proper clear view needed to see what is good and what is true and once you throw off those other shades and try on the Biblical worldview, you will stop trying to use the Bible as something to reconcile against science, and begin viewing modern science for the fraud and sham it is.
It’s foolish to put your faith and trust in a group of people who have faked and inserted tomes of climate history data, the same people who foisted Nebraska Man and Java Man on the populace when they wanted to “prove” evolution, the “peppered moths” pinned to trees, Haeckel’s embryos which were a deliberate hoax to push evolutionary theory, and more recently all of the peer-reviewed papers written by AI or so absurd as a rat with a giant weiner that still get published, and then people point to peer-reviewed papers as some gold standard.
When you start with bad assumptions, you get bad results. GIGO.
You are onto something here and I think you could advance human knowledge on Biblical geology a great deal (catastrophism vs gradualism) because you are already heading toward the answer on this topic. You would get there much faster if you use God as your ultimate authority – the infallible God of the Bible – rather than relying on fallible men who have been proven liars at every turn when the opportunity arises to peddle their agendas and ideologies on the common man.
If you truly believe in the theory of evolution no one should take anything you say seriously from this point forward, because after all you would be admitting that you are the great great great great x descendant of…… pondscum.
The Bible is clear and specific about the sequence of events –
Yes, an olive tree grew to full leaf 43 days after the first mountain peak appeared above the waters. Sorry, but this is a lie. Such a bald-face lie to ancients who actually grew olive trees, that the author possibly planted this into the material as a hint that he was being forced to write a lie. Then the waters simply disappeared in a matter of months. No, I am not a moron – and will not buy this lie either.
I’m sorry, the Bible is a theft and misappropriation of mankind’s history (a human rights crime) for the exploitation of the bloodthirsty/sin-spinning God of Eden, Samael-Yahweh-Enlil-Saturn who holds us captive. When your religious sect destroys all competing histories and documents, you are serving the evil one. His day is coming to an end.
Nowhere does the Bible say an olive tree grew to full leaf, it simply says the dove returned with an olive leaf (no specific size of leaf given). I refer you to – https://www.jstor.org/stable/42882604
The waters didn’t disappear, they receded and if you were to actually read and evaluate my prior comment, you would see just how much water is below earth’s surface (3x the volume of all the oceans we know combined). That is water that receded, which scientists were baffled to discover. But if you had a Biblical worldview, you wouldn’t have been surprised, you would have thought “but of course.”
As for the rest of your axe-grinding, you are simply choosing one person/group’s historical version of events vs another’s, while ignoring the predictive power and detailed chronology contained in the Bible. After all if the Bible was as full of lies and revisionist history as you propose, why is it internally verifiable (through prophecies such as Jesus’ birth), externally verifiable (through prophecies such as the re-establishment of Israel) and why do you think you live in the year 2024 anno domini? Let me guess, those darn Christians did it!
There are few things more tragic than an intelligent person rendered to the status of a fool because he despises wisdom and instruction from the only entity that was there for not just our history as human beings, but the creation of the earth and the universe itself.
If you think you are using logic here, I would remind you that logic is an immaterial human concept that persists timelessly. It exists beyond us and would exist if humans were here to employ it or not.
I’m sure you can imagine the irony when you attempt to use logic to attack the source of logic Himself.
This will continue to be the source of your wrong interpretations of everything throughout the rest of your life – says who?
You and I find a bone buried in the back yard. I say “That bone was from a previous owner of the house who buried his dog back here about 40 years ago.” You say “That bone was from a dog who buried it recently.” Who’s right? What the heck do you know about how that bone got there, and what the heck do I know? This is the problem with historical truth claims – they are beyond the scope of science. And neither of us was there when it was buried, and no witness was there to see it happen.
Ultimately you have to appeal to someone or something outside of yourself, you aren’t omniscient and don’t have all the answers to everything at birth. Along the way you have decided to view some people as experts and worthy of listening to or believing, while others you view as charlatans and reject anything that comes out of their mouth.
Enjoy your adventures as you build a taller house of cards on top of the existing house of cards (“science”) that you assume to be true and is stable enough for advancement and knowledge.
You already know these people are driven by agendas, funding, narratives and have no problem lying publicly about “safe and effective” vaccines. Do you think this is just a recent development?
Nowhere does the Bible say an olive tree grew to full leaf, it simply says the dove returned with an olive leaf (no specific size of leaf given).
This is a distinction without a difference.
you would see just how much water is below earth’s surface
‘Water’ under the crust is stored in the form of hydroxyl (OH) groups within the mineral structure of rocks, particularly in the Earth’s mantle. So you cannot appeal to this. That water is not available to form an ocean. You are using a misrepresentation of geophysics to make a lie plausible—it is not.
I am not going to tolerate being God-lectured to here for long…
Job 38:30
The waters are hid as with a stone,
and the face of the deep is frozen.
You don’t have to tolerate anything, it’s your website my friend and I’m just a humble reader. Criticizing Noah’s boatbuilding and appealing to growth rates of olive trees are microscopic objections in the grander picture of whether or not the Bible is true. I promise you, nothing you try to say about the Bible and no critique you can offer will be unique and new to me. I only originally posted in an effort to get you to reconsider your worldview and framework on this because you are obviously hyper-intelligent and I know that after all of the exhaustive documenting you did on Covid you could actually get somewhere significant on this with a different framework.
If the flood account details are read carefully, it makes perfect sense for there to be incredibly pressurized (yet accessible) water below earth’s crust. After all, if a volcano can spit out a diamond with water trapped in it from (allegedly) 1,000km below earth’s surface, what could every volcano (undersea and visible) emit during a period of global volcanism?
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
I think you are actually onto something with the two major events you discuss, I just assign those two geological events to Noah’s flood and the division of the earth after Babel/during Peleg. The actual dates these events occurred is just a matter of worldview/framework, but we both agree that exactly 2 occurred. Earth is obviously dense and difficult to disrupt any perpetual motion at its core, however the shifting of continents is almost certain to have happened exactly twice in history due to the “outer shell” being prone to both rotation and in/outflow of water via catastrophism. What if the tectonic plates didn’t exist before the flood, but due to the worldwide volcanism the crust was fractured and the poles themselves didn’t move but the crust (and continents) did? After all it’s just a frame of reference difference, whether the north pole moves over South America or if South America moves under the north pole.
I think even if you just did an exercise in playing your own devil’s advocate and using Biblical geology/timelines on the work you are doing here, you might be surprised at how much explanatory power there is.
I mean absolutely no harm and I was just offering the shift in base framework as a potential avenue to advance things. You do you, I promise no more proselytizing. :)
Keep up the good work, I enjoy reading it all.
I think even if you just did an exercise in playing your own devil’s advocate and using Biblical geology/timelines on the work you are doing here, you might be surprised at how much explanatory power there is.
You underestimate the journey I have taken. Read my articles, as I have done this in spades. Noah’s Ark would not have survived the biblical tale. I tried every way from Sunday to reconcile the literal Bible tale, back in my earlier days. It just does not work. Sorry. I cannot accept that tale and respect the person I see in the mirror.
And I’m coming from the opposite angle, where I tried every way from Sunday to reconcile the literal Bible with modern science and found that the Bible is right (and even descriptive and predictive) at nearly every turn where modern scientists are baffled/surprised/amazed by some new finding on an almost daily basis. Nothing wrong with amazement and appreciation for new findings, but there’s something sad about the perpetual rewriting of long-held beliefs because the presuppositions were wrong to begin with. Ask a scientist 20 years ago they would tell you the earth is 1.8 billion years old, ask them a few years later they say it’s 2.1 billion, currently the guesstimate is 4.5 billion thanks to all of the evolutionary mathematics and fossil discoveries that have blown up in their face. There isn’t enough time in the day to go through all of these ever-changing timelines and “scientific consensus” line items with a pencil and an eraser when the Bible is written in permanent marker and covers it all and doesn’t ever need to change to suit our reality.
You assert that Noah’s Ark wouldn’t have survived the Biblical tale but you’re just engaging in the original fatal conceit – I know more than God or I know more than those bearded cave-dwelling morons who wrote down the books of the Bible. After all that was Satan’s original appeal to Eve in the Garden – I know more than God, eat the fruit, you won’t die.
What has it gained us? Scientists still baffled/amazed/confused by literally every fossil in a spot it shouldn’t be, every discovery of things like rapid canyon formation or deep concentrations of water and everything else under the sun. If something has no explanatory power and requires perpetual rewrites it has no utility. It’s just tautology and in the grand scheme of things and we have a limited amount of time in our lives, why waste it following the predictions and historical claims of people who are always wrong about everything?
The irony of you referring to ancient wisdom as gaslighting, in an era where literally everything reported on the news is either cooperative narrative-peddling or outright lying, while search terms on certain topics are hidden from Google results and scientists refer to peer-review as the end-all proof of X nevermind the abysmal record of peer-review papers when held to account and others try to reproduce them. Please – we as humans have always been lied to. As I said in an earlier post, the ultimate question is – says who? Just because I acknowledge the God of the Bible as my ultimate authority and you acknowledge consensus/peer-review/whatever as yours doesn’t mean either of us are stupid. We choose who we use as the ultimate authority on any topic and some are better suited for the task as authorities than others.
I read your post on the riddle of sin and let me just say that my father, a once-divorced and remarried deacon under one pastor is now a tarred-and-feathered non-entity unworthy of deaconship under his new pastor. That’s all just noise and not an indictment of God or the Bible, that’s an indictment of preachers and churches and as someone who attended many church services and watched many people in positions of church leadership have affairs, drink and drive and whatever else and it really soured me on church attendance. I still avoid church and I am more interested in the God/Jesus/truth aspect of Christianity than the outward appearances part. As a matter of fact if you really want to see the hidden agendas of churches come through, read some articles on “do you have to go to church to be a Christian” with all of the associated mental gymnastics to try to prove their case.
The flood was a necessary event because of the corruption of earth. After God made humans in His own image, some angels began lusting after the women of earth, came to earth and had hybrid offspring (Nephilim). These were giants who were perpetually at war with mankind and even cannibalizing everything they could find. If there was to even be an Abraham or a Jesus further down the lineage of Noah then some lineage of uncorrupted human DNA had to be preserved and the factions that were threatening the preservation of this had to be eliminated.
11Now the earth was corrupt in the sight of God, and full of violence. 12And God looked upon the earth and saw that it was corrupt; for all living creaturesb on the earth had corrupted their ways.
Again, there’s the reference to all when describing the situation. Just like all of the fountains of the deep were broken up, all living creatures on the earth had corrupted their ways. So a reset was needed and Noah was the only human left who found favor with God. But it’s important to remember that just as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed and no one survived, every person there and every person on earth before the flood had the same ability to decide things for themselves – to live a good and just life or to engage in immorality and depravity. You can disagree with the choices someone makes but you can’t change the outcome of those choices. You can choose your path but you cannot choose your consequences. This does not make God evil or wicked it illustrates that there is a consequence when you choose to be wicked. After all, the original intent of God’s creation of humanity was to make man in His image, and present us with a timeless existence just like God and the angels enjoyed. Time’s arrow wasn’t set in motion until Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden and entropy didn’t exist until they chose to eat the forbidden fruit. We were designed to live forever and God never wanted death or destruction for any of us. We chose it. The consequences were inevitably death for both of them and all humans (with a couple of exceptions) thereafter. They got to choose their path but they did not get to choose their consequences.
As far as the “flipping often” comment, I don’t think two major surface/rotational shakeups since the creation of the earth justify as “often.” Even if you use the Biblical chronology/timeline those were unique events and it’s not a pattern that repeats itself every X number of years. In fact –
“Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from his youth. And never again will I destroy all living creatures as I have done.
I think rather than a repeat of prior events we are simply experiencing the gradual unwinding (entropy/decay) of our earth and universe over time, not an inevitable cataclysmic event on the horizon. God’s promise to Noah post-flood is clear that He will never destroy all living creatures again and the pattern of planting/harvesting, cold/hot, summer/winter, day/night shall never cease.
If you are going to predict a future cataclysmic event akin to the 2 major structural shakeups of earth in history, you are obviously going to be doing so because of the original fatal conceit.
This was way more Bible-focused than I wanted it to be. Apologies for any inferred proselytizing.
You assert that Noah’s Ark wouldn’t have survived the Biblical tale but you’re just engaging in the original fatal conceit – I know more than God or I know more than those bearded cave-dwelling morons who wrote down the books of the Bible.
This is gaslighting. Saying that the Bible fable is incorrect is not claiming to know more than God. The fable is incorrect because I am qualified to say it is incorrect, as an engineer, one with good experience in ship design, a lifelong sailor and officer of the deck, and having been in several hurricanes and 8 sea state storms. I do not have to be God, in order to spot a lie.
The flood was a necessary event because of the corruption of earth.
No, it was a continuation in a series of unforgivable sins, which were the reason Shemyaza (Yahweh/Enlil) was denied forgiveness in Enoch I. Abuse, miscegenation, gaslighting, and enslavement of a helpless lower form of life.
We are done with this discussion.
And it is He who sends down rain from the sky, and We produce thereby the growth of all things. We produce from it greenery from which We produce grains arranged in layers. And from the palm trees – of its emerging fruit are clusters hanging low. And [We produce] gardens of grapevines and olives and pomegranates, similar yet varied. Look at [each of] its fruit when it yields and [at] its ripening. Indeed in that are signs for a people who believe.
It’s an interesting hypothesis. As for the damage to the outer coat of the Pyramids, I always assumed they had been used as a quarry for building purposes. Has it been ruled out that the missing materials can be found in the city as part of buildings?
I am not sure how one proves a complete absence. So, that cannot be eliminated as an idea by the rules of logic.
However, no pieces of these stones exist in the sand at the base of the pyramid. Man’s activity would have left hundreds of thousands of shards of Tura limestone, at the least, laying and slightly buried in the sand at the base of both Khufu and Khafre. Yet not one single shard exists. Plus, we have the calcium carbonate concretions themselves, at the base of both pyramids and in the subterranean passage which contain the re-concreted Tura limestone. Finally, scavenging could not have created the cap erosion pattern on Khafre, 0% chance of that. Ocean erosion should have been the null hypothesis. I consider it now, proven.
This caught my eye in light of the theory you’ve detailed on your site: The spinning of Earth’s inner core is slowing down. Is this how it all ends? (msn.com) – granted it’s essentially a fluffy bit from a mainstream feed and so there’s no substantial information, but I find the fact that even this little bit of info (plus a “there’s no danger” message) is being floated out to the general public.
I request that you take the “extra” step to go to my blog link and read through the first 2 excerpts to get to that link at the bottom of the second excerpt, Sir Skeptic.
Yours in Service.. John
Regarding the date of the “vulture stone” at Göbekli Tepe. 16,800 plus 25,772 equals 42,572. That’s within the margin of error for the Laschamp geomagnetic field excursion, which you discussed in footnote 27. You pointed out many problems with thermoremanent magnetization of volcanic material.
In section 5.2 “Duration of the Laschamp excursion” of the paper linked to below, Lund estimates the duration of low geomagnetic field intensity at ~500 years, and the pole excursion itself as even shorter, perhaps ~250 years. It could be much shorter though–Lund describes a process of smoothing during recording of a geomagnetic signal in ocean sediment, because particles are not fixed in place until, e.g., suitably concretized by deposition of additional sediment layers. He estimates the majority of smoothing in his samples occurs within a 100 year window. I don’t know if ocean sloshing would impact a 3.5km depth, but if the sediment deposition rate increased temporarily after an ECDO, that could make a 20cm deposition happen in 50 years rather than the more typical 500 years. That’s not reliant on sloshing and subsequent settling, it could also come from rapid die-off of organisms suddenly exposed to a radically different climate.
Which led me to realize a possible avenue of evidence either for or against your ECDO hypothesis. Microfossils are notably different in the ooze formed on polar versus tropical seafloor. E.g., perhaps sediment cores collected from the Southern Ocean or the coast of Iceland show a layer of tropical microfossils? That data might even already exist? Or if the dynamics of an ECDO causes a relatively cold period even in equatorial waters, polar microorganisms could survive it even if their home shifted to the equator. In that case it would be more telling to find a layer of polar microfossils in sediment off the coast of Hawaii, which would be the South Pole after a 104 degree slip along the 31st East Meridian. If that layer is also NOT found off the coast of Borneo or Guyana, that’s evidence in favor of both the ECDO hypothesis and the meridian along which it occurs. Here are examples of polar versus equatorial microfossils:
I added Figure 11 from the Lund study into the material. Given that geomagnetic poles wander and almost always have a variance, this is actually pretty solid data! Thanks Deane!
TES,
One clarification–although core CH89-9P data does extend back just beyond the Iceland Basin Excursion, I think in Figure 11 from the Lund study, both cores are showing the Laschamp Excursion. Unless I’m missing something? The Iceland Basin Excursion appears to have been counterclockwise, and the Laschamp clockwise. Figure 8 from the study by Laj et al (link below) is not as clean as the Lund graphic, but does show a plethora of virtual geomagnetic pole (“VGP”) path estimates for both excursions, including both JPC-14 and CH89-9P for the Laschamp. Considering signal smoothing for short excursions and the challenge of correcting twist imparted to the sample while drilling, all VGP paths for both excursions spend time in Southern Africa. https://hal.science/hal-03118231v1/file/2005GC001122.pdf
Deane
Even better, Deane. Fantastic information. I have not had time to research this further. You are very helpful! I changed the text to show how important the Laj et al study indeed may be!
The story says the magnetic field tilted 76º to Northern Africa and NE of Australia – roughly agreeing with your calculations.
I wonder if the dipole antenna you posit in Khufu could use the induced current of the increased solar flux of instead of infrasound to flag an immanent excursion.
Bolt,
Yes, saw that in the Laschamps excursion data.
Interesting point on the solar flux for the Queen’s chamber dipole. (Infrasound was detected in the Subterranean Chamber).
TES
Well said.
I have been a student of Esoteric Mysticism/Occult for almost 45 years. I have recently tried to open the eyes of fellow MAGA members because I am beginning to see an increased leaning toward fundamentalism and literal interpretation within a small subsection of the group.
In the first few days January of 1994 I underwent a spontaneous near death experience with no apparent cause that resulted in an epiphany. Its momentum was massive in the first week or so and it eased a bit until fading into the background a bit over 9 months later.
I remember trying to convey my insights to others. I must have looked and sounded like I was blitzed out of my mind. In addition I found it hard to articulate what it was I knew for quite a while so I relied on my gut feelings and strings of synchronistic events as a guide.
I have led a blessed life. I am content. I never felt the need for wealth or lots of possessions. I met my polar mate shortly after my experience. 3 loving children and 30 years later I cannot complain. I don’t fully remember what it feels like to complain or blame others.
Don’t misunderstand. It took longer than I like to admit to even recognize some of my flaws but I have had some incredible mystical experiences and eventually learned to be in the spirit pretty much at will with no break in awareness during the transition although when I managed to contact someone more learned they suggested that I not indulge in it until I met a personal mentor. I still do it sometimes just to refresh my experience of it since I may have to wait lifetimes for the Spirit to grant me a mentor.
When you mentioned the Church I guess I was a bit surprised that others saw the same challenges. IMO Both the State & Church are the issue. I could have sailed through the rest of my life as just a witness in the world. After all you cant make the horse drink the water. Each will learn at their own pace and in their own way.
Why would a god demand worship? They would not. At least a true god would not.
Being aware of the mystery around and within us can help us show a natural reverence and grant due respect. If one does not respect the natural laws they are punished yet it was done by their own hand.
I see the introduction of Vicarious Salvation most damaging to humanity. It convinced people they did not have to put forth the effort to attain salvation on their own. What need is there to pick up ones cross and bear it daily if one is already saved or can be if they only plead for it or claim subservience for it at the end?
I noticed a few fundamentalist Christians on X trying to exclude people of other religions from MAGA. I tried to explain to them that when I look back I see that all religions are little more than fragments of a spiritual root system from long long ago. I try to explain that the elect did not originally refer to a specific race/ethnicity or religion. That it referred to those whose awareness had been refined through a system of experiential disciplines allowing one a greater degree of insight in matters (Intuitive Understanding).
Of course we also have the common image of Jesus Christ portrayed as a masochistic pacifist with a martyr complex. I guess they forgot that he told his disciples to get a sword even if it cost them all their possessions. I am sure this was brought up during the Crusades & Inquisitions yet still misrepresented the truth of the matter in the other direction. At some point all who seek to bring freedom to the masses will find themselves in the crosshairs. Why is that? Is it due to human nature itself? Beings outside the habitual spectrum? Maybe egregoric entities created by human activities that take on a life of their own? Like the State & Church.
Earlier I mentioned that I could have sailed through the rest of my life as a simple observer unbothered by the activities of humanity yet curious. That started to change a few years ago. My gut started telling me that something is afoot. So I started researching and since the military had wanted me for Counter Intelligence Analysis in my early 20s I decided to put the visualization and pattern recognition talents to good use.
I have examined multiple scenarios to try and get at their motivations. I find it disturbing that there appear to be no beneficial ones when it comes to our current time. So, why have they started to wear such draconian robes?
1.Are the hidden hand, the UN/Davos adepts and corporate lackeys just power hungry and afraid of a massive awakening? Are they willing to go scorched earth?
2.Is their a cataclysmic variable in the near future which they are aware of but have chosen not to reveal to the masses? That does give another reason for the construction of deep shelters, the sorting and division of the masses, the seemingly scripted events and the hording of resources. Do they know due to evidence of past cycles yet have chosen to warn of crises while concealing the true cause(s) ?
IMO number two appears more sensible but that may be due to a bias of not wanting to believe number one.
Of course it is most likely a combination. 75% number two, 25% number one.
If so then why the deception? Why not just reveal it? Well, that would cause instant chaos before they are ready.
They do want a World Government. For this to happen the United States is mandatory. They have to have it or it all falls apart.
It is a combinations of course just not necessarily my choice.
Which brings up synchronicity. Have you ever noticed how you run across trend elements in the arts that seem to project a theme for upcoming events? In retrospect even more iterations can be found to have played a part.
I just don’t know. All I do know is that I am not willing to sit quietly while they establish their Techno-Feudal Corporate Oligarchy. I consider them to be a potential existential threat to freedom. I cannot hide and just let them force humanity through a millennia or more of true darkness. My kids got a bit upset because I revealed my name and verified my account. I am sure we remember that in our first steps on the path we must not draw attention lest we attract a predatory force but IMO why should anyone believe an anonymous entity on a social platform these days. We must put our life on the line. I hope they are worthy opponents.
Before I end the manifesto I am going to name four authors that helped bring things together for me over the years. These four all speak of the same Tradition from different perspectives.
Carlos Castaneda (Do not bother reading past the Art of Dreaming) He was human and his teacher dropped him which left him unable to recall everything with perfect accuracy
Theun Mares (read all)
Anna Kingsford (The Perfect Way aka The Finding of Christ)
Boris Mouravieff (Gnosis I, II & III)
Castaneda and Mares are the only two reliable authors when it comes to “Toltec” teachings. All others I have read amount to feel good claptrap cliff notes to get some cash.
(Note: Who was Don Juan Matus? If he was not Samuel Aun Weor I bet they knew each other. The timelines have matching points.)
Kingsford is like a primer that helps apply Christian Mysticism filter to the first 2 authors.
She taught about the acquisition of Intuitive Understanding on The Fourfold Way.
Mouravieff will ties it all together and so much more. You will see how the structure of the assemblage point mimics the structure of the Universe. One of the most jaw dropping for me was the correlation between the Toltec Party of Warriors and what Boris calls The Film.
TES – as a result of your work, I’ve now read/listened to Ben Davidson’s work. As a result of all of this, every text I see from Elon Musk has taken on an entirely different light.
That aside, from your research, do you and other proponents of the planet tilt agree on the actual direction of motion of that tilt? Is that motion part of or revealed by the geological history? I’ve seen two models of the motion and one has North America dipping downward and to the left toward the current Equator and stopping with what looks like Maine as the “northernmost” point of the current USA touching the Equator. If that were true, it would seem that the west coast of the USA would be pushing into/towards the ocean and the tsunami slosh back would happen along the east coast. Is that your read of it? Is there a reason to believe it would occur differently (with the east coast pushing down into the Atlantic and the slosh back happening along the west coast once the tilt stops)?
Ah, I admit, I didn’t understand that (or maybe it was added to a later edit, which I still need to re-read). In any event, it seems that you are pleased with the models Craig Stone has developed and so I will trust that those reflect your understanding of the motion of the tilt. It makes sense to me that he would be looking at geological striations of past water flow to test and confirm his models.
Thank you again for this body of work. I still find myself staring out the window from time to time in a state of half-grief. If I even managed to survive this event (supersonic winds and violent oceanic displacement seems even too much for a bunker inside a non-volcanic mountain range 12ft above current sea level… no? Not to mention I too question whether surviving such violence would be desirable… but I feel I owe it to my children to give them the option to survive if they choose), I may not live long enough to see the earth tilt back in the 2nd cataclysm. To think of ending my days in a planet that is dark, cold and unrecognizable is heartbreaking. Every eastern sunrise and western sunset now comes with a bittersweet gratitude for the loveliness of what is, today.
Oh yes, when Craig developed his simulation, I went ahead and added that section a week or two after the article came out. It was absolutely vital to communication of the message. And it did indeed depict the rotation I had tried to outline. Finding the cause of the rotation was the challenge at first. But once found, then the rotation itself was a matter of follow through and the right tools.
For me, I plan to petition the right NGO’s to develop monitoring to track the predictive nature of this hypothesis. I am not moving or declaring any dark future just yet. We have a lot more we need to determine.
EVG
TES
Thank you, TES. Your time is valuable so I hesitate to ask you further questions (I reprinted the latest edit of your writing to study more after working hours), but I find that I’m curious about a few topics related to (a) survival, and (b) the bigger picture. And having your ginormous (and incredibly well-educated) brain applied to any of my questions would be such a GIFT. So… to the extent you’re willing to indulge:
As to survival:
Do you postulate that the areas of the globe nearest the points of axis will “feel” or experience less disruption and therefore present a better chance for humanity’s survival (to the extent they are not submerged entirely or within a volcanic destruction zone)?
I guess a layman’s way of saying this would be: will the forces of motion be less cataclysmic at those points?
Is this why/how the pyramids might have survived the destructive forces of water/fire/earthquake during last tilt – because even though submerged they were not “riding” the moving crust at breakneck speeds into the onslaught of wind and water?
If you had to build a bunker to survive or preserve as much of humanity’s knowledge as possible, would you choose Pike’s Peak batholith (for altitude/flow protection) or the Peruvian Andes (near Tiahuanaco, for closer proximity to an axial point)?
As to the bigger picture:
Do you suspect that prior civilizations hadn’t developed to our current level with the possibility of survivors preserving data (humanity’s amassed knowledge) in a manner that could be used to re-launch civilization at a faster rate?
Or do your understandings of ancients lead you to believe they had/did achieve (or surpass) our current level but were then thwarted by a remnant that preferred to cast themselves as “gods” and hide that knowledge and allow the rest to wander in the dark for millennia as humanity’s knowledge base was “rediscovered” by the plebian masses?
I definitely pick up from your writings the idea that knowledge of cyclic cataclysm is hidden, but I’m still trying to figure out cui bono. The uber wealthy will build bunkers or “arks” or safe havens on Mars (if they can). Depopulation of the earth doesn’t seem like such a motivator if some Red Star (or other instigator of the tilt) is going to routinely take care of that. Amassing wealth doesn’t really matter if all the competition is going to be wiped out and you have enough to survive the tribulation period. If there are Ancients (did you call them Watchers or Archons?) actively involved in keeping the surviving remnant in the primordial soup, to what purpose? For entertainment? Harvest? As a simple planetary cage?
Seeing the “climate change” narrative in a whole new (limited hangout) light, and seeing the push for off-planet travel and electric-powered goods, do you feel there is already a countereffort underway being led by humans (?) who know of cataclysm and are actively either (a) preparing for it with bunkers or other survival comforts, (b) prepared to attempt to escape it by off-planet travel, or (c) attempting to thwart or slow it through manipulation of our ionosphere (or other “weather-modification” techniques that might have a global impact)?
What, if anything, can the average present-day human being do (which if enough people do it might actually work) to thwart any evil designs to erase our collective knowledge base once again?
Do you postulate that the areas of the globe nearest the points of axis will “feel” or experience less disruption and therefore present a better chance for humanity’s survival (to the extent they are not submerged entirely or within a volcanic destruction zone)?
I guess a layman’s way of saying this would be: will the forces of motion be less cataclysmic at those points?
Is this why/how the pyramids might have survived the destructive forces of water/fire/earthquake during last tilt – because even though submerged they were not “riding” the moving crust at breakneck speeds into the onslaught of wind and water?
If you had to build a bunker to survive or preserve as much of humanity’s knowledge as possible, would you choose Pike’s Peak batholith (for altitude/flow protection) or the Peruvian Andes (near Tiahuanaco, for closer proximity to an axial point)?
Any very old and stable mountain range not in the path of the Euler oceanic displacement, with consistent elevations over 3000 ft, and lots of forestation, would be good. The Appalachians fit this bill for me. The Himalayas and Andes fit this as well. If I were to build a survival shelter, I would place a strong containment vessel, with 3-day oxygen supply, on a plateau above 3000 ft, to survive the 3 days of inundation, well anchored into the bedrock. Thereafter, survival under ground might be a good option, in an area right near the containment vessel.
Do you suspect that prior civilizations hadn’t developed to our current level with the possibility of survivors preserving data (humanity’s amassed knowledge) in a manner that could be used to re-launch civilization at a faster rate?
Or do your understandings of ancients lead you to believe they had/did achieve (or surpass) our current level but were then thwarted by a remnant that preferred to cast themselves as “gods” and hide that knowledge and allow the rest to wander in the dark for millennia as humanity’s knowledge base was “rediscovered” by the plebian masses?
The gods definitely wanted this hidden. Mankind’s lifespan was reduced so that we would more easily lose knowledge between generations, and also not have enough time to figure it out or preserve it well. We have rediscovered much of this through documents buried in the sands of Southwest Asia and North Africa. They did not surpass us per se – just used different technologies that they had access to for some reason.
If there are Ancients (did you call them Watchers or Archons?) actively involved in keeping the surviving remnant in the primordial soup, to what purpose? For entertainment? Harvest? As a simple planetary cage?
The Archons-Watchers have committed a crime. This is why they were not forgiven in I Enoch. Sexual-Enslavement of a higher order species, by planting an advanced civilization on an unstable planet, and withholding that information from them – so that you can suck the suffering and workfruits from them… That is about as bad a crime as one can commit. They do not want this known, and do not want us to know this, because our knowing it will cause ‘noise’ in the heavenly realms. We will lament in prayer. Hell is not made for man. It is made for them. They know this.
Seeing the “climate change” narrative in a whole new (limited hangout) light, and seeing the push for off-planet travel and electric-powered goods, do you feel there is already a countereffort underway being led by humans (?) who know of cataclysm and are actively either (a) preparing for it with bunkers or other survival comforts, (b) prepared to attempt to escape it by off-planet travel, or (c) attempting to thwart or slow it through manipulation of our ionosphere (or other “weather-modification” techniques that might have a global impact)?
Yes, the precedent exists, that if the population of a planet under captivity wants freedom – they have the right to ask for it. The Archons do not want us traveling space, because 1. they cannot – as they are bound here by embargo, and 2. it will convince outsiders of the need to intervene. Plus, 3. we are not mature enough spiritually to handle the technology – but that is a bonus and goal all along for the Archons. This is the one thing they and the outsiders agree upon.
What, if anything, can the average present-day human being do (which if enough people do it might actually work) to thwart any evil designs to erase our collective knowledge base once again?
This is what I say daily: “Our benefactor who dwells in the heavenly realms, whose name is of such honor that us lowly men dare not even speak it – come now and intervene on our behalf, please. Extend your kingdom to our Earth, and let things function for the future here, just as they currently operate in your realm. In the meantime, while I don’t understand everything, I will help make sure there is enough for those within my reach to be happy and healthy, and teach as I can how spiritually mature individuals function together in an imperfect society – how to identify evil as distinct from every other good thing. We look forward to membership inside your system of technology and governance – but mostly, your intervention into our captive plight, where from then on we will no longer abjectly suffer and die at a young age – and may live in continued freedom and happiness.”
I strive to teach others this simple plea…
TES
Wow.
Just… wow.
Printing this… with my abject thanks for all you do.
Also – I hope you will share if there is ever a technological (or other) effort you know or become aware of that I might support in some way in the interim. As for your plea, it is striking in how much it aligns with my own belief system. Strangely, there’s comfort in that. Thank you for sharing it.
Still inundated at 3000 feet? Just how night does the water get?
I see that you did transliterate the Lord’s Prayer, too. Couple tears needing to flow attest to a job well done. Thank you sir.
I have been trying to understand what on Earth is running human affairs all my life. If it is these Archons, these criminals who according to your cosmology created us to use & abuse on this unstable planet, and who are embargoed here, then who is out there to help us?
And, who is it that visits Earth, as is reported over & over, with some beings being benign or helpful, some negative, many neutral. Are they real, or is this all disinformation, yet again? Is our Government “in bed” with a negative non-human intelligence? There is some evidence for this, perhaps.
Or is the entire UFO/UAP/NHI conversation based on a disinformation campaign, designed to grab more power & crush humanity further?
I understand your prayer & your plea. I myself pray very similarly daily, but I do wonder who is out there to assist us!
We are obviously controlled by someone/something that doesn’t love humans but creates war, debt & disease instead of the peace, prosperity & freedom that we could have.
Is that force the Archons that you reference? And if so, do they function independently or through humans, in your opinion?
Sorry to ask so many questions, but you are the first I’ve read who I believe could possibly answer them!
Thank you, TES, for all that you do!
Katherine,
While my lead hypothesis is indeed that man has been captive under an illegal edict for at least 6,000 years – it is the urgent and desperate actions of this controlling agency which gives me the most encouragement. A group in full control and with unyielding power, would be far more relaxed and concealed – enjoying the fruits of their advantage for many eons. No one would screw that up without good reason.
Something terrifies them right now. That something is far more powerful than they are, has dealt with Earth’s type of problem before in the remote cosmos, and has won. This is why the dark agency both fled to and is embargoed here to begin with. The dark agency knows this. They are even afraid of us, just cannot afford to allow us to realize this. Once you are no longer deceived by them, just as in holding their name, they hold no power over you.
All their facades and institutions are crumbling now. It is up to us in the meantime to learn and apply true faith, and not their guilt/blame/shame version of it. :-)
EVG
TES
Bless you, TES, you give me hope; seeing them scrambling is delightful, without a doubt!
But, when you look at the forces behind or connected to the new administration, the Lockdowns, Masking, withheld treatments,
mandated lethal ones, the Gene Injections proponents, & the work of Whitney Webb which has exposed the fact that the tech bros, Peter Thiel etc, controlled where every vial went, & the high variability of the toxicity of different batches, the fact that Pfizer contains SV 40 promoter, Plasmid DNA, Pseudouridinated RNA coding for the toxic Chimeric Spike, wrapped in LNPs that cross every membrane in the human body & that it was functionally forced on pregnant women & children, well, TES, the only conclusion I could reach was that OWS was planned and run by something fully non-human!
Help me comprehend the level of evil that would do this, coupled with worldwide Lockdowns killing millions, the war in Ukraine, killing more, Gaza, etc.,
None of this is necessary.
So, in their hysteria to kill, maim, & destroy, lies our hope. They are so deeply desperate they care not if they expose themselves for all the world to see!
Arggh. I wonder. Was it my free will choice to come to this planet in the middle of this pitched battle for human Freedom, or was I “drafted,” lol!?
Thank you again TES, I will be following you closely!!
Why near lots of forestation? Disrupt air flow? Energy? It seems that the hypersonic winds if away from Euler axes like in the US would knock down and displace the trees quite a distance away?
Re: Sandy’s post on nicotine from 4 months ago (here in these comments).
I had long been interested in trying nicotine, but had been hesitant due to being told so often it was highly addictive. After watching the video mentioned and seeing nicotine fail to produce addictive behavior when tested on its own, I recently ,ordered some patches and gum from the best sourced companies I could find.
A pleasant surprise happened when my 24 year old son who had been dealing with asthma his entire life tried the nicotine gum and patch (lower range dose). Prior to nicotine, he had grown and done research and tinkered, and long ago had broken free from the steroids and inhaler chemicals to simply use a fresh brewed pot of regular coffee to calm his flare ups, often times at 3am when he couldn’t relax enough to sleep.
With nicotine, he told me that despite four predictable triggers (eating cake for a birthday celebration, a root beer float, having the weather change from hot to cold, and smoking cannabis on the late side of the evening) he was able to sleep comfortably. He was very impressed and dug in to understand more.
He found a paper where mice were exposed to a very high allergen scenario, and the non-treated placebo mice would have their health levels decline noticeably after a few weeks, where the mice pre-treated with nicotine had obviously better health in that same environment. I believe they went on to try to explain it by saying the combination of anti-inflammatory plus a reaction where the body still produced the lung mucus buildup reaction but did not follow that up with the typical lung restriction.
He felt that was exactly what was occurring in his lungs. He still felt the mucus build up, but the nicotine seemed to prevent the lung tightness and restriction, so he remained able to take deep breaths and was able to sleep well despite all four triggers in one evening.
This was important for me to share with observable proof. He has had multiple evenings where the triggers would normally have ruined his sleep, yet with nicotine, he has been able to get full nights of sleep. Game changer when added to the subtle improved focus and alertness it gives you as well as potentially boosting testosterone, etc.
We (myself and two sons) have all tried nicotine now and feel zero addiction response. Yet another topic we have been deceived into believing one thing, when the truth is quite different.
I went through that nicotine presentation too, it cites relevant resources. But first, it is important to disconect it from tabacco use, as that involves thousands of other mostly harmful chemical, such as arsenic. Also, the presenter claims that it is pyrazines added by the tobacco industry which really make the smoking addictive. As of now, the safest way to absorb nicotine are nicotin patches. Some other studies also show that lower dosages are preferable, possibly even very small, such as the nicotinic content naturally found in tomatoes, eggplants, potatoes etc.
And a huge topic for debate is whether similar benefits could not be achieved with nicotinic acid (a variannt of vitamin B3 which attaches to the same receptors, nicotin might actually be hijacking this). It causes a flush and in larger than 0,5 g doses daily can cause liver inflammation but numerous otherwise beneficial substances cause harm when overdosing with them, so that does not bother me.
PS: I just found out this page pulled my old picture from god knows where. How is this possible?
Could you point me to the discussion related to the explanation of how the pyramids were able to be built with the message they send if mankind could not survive the ECDO? How was the knowledge available? The pyramids had to be built when there was no flood but there had to be knowledge that there was a flood, and that it would occur exactly the same again. How was all this known, and further, why would they be built to send the message (partially rhetorical)?
Mankind survived the ECDO cycle. It is not a complete extinction event – more like a 90% event. The mechanics of the State1-State2 hypothesis show why the Earth exhibits just about the same effect each time this happens. It is part of the Earth’s natural cycle. The water remains high (or altered by region) long enough for man to measure its levels and keep a record. Unfortunately, someone also did not want mankind to know about this cycle and has kept a habit of destroying all such records – and the builders of the pyramid knew that this someone would hide the knowledge once again. As they have since the last event.
So, they built an edifice that neither future inundation, military conquest, nor fake god, could destroy. That was what was important enough to undertake such an endeavor, not building of a tomb.
Dont you think the archons have the capability of destroying some pyramids though? Or do you think there may have been other “entities” that “battled” with them to protect certain things?
They did destroy one Khufu-sized pyramid. Not sure why they did not destroy Khufu and Khafre as well **shrug** It may well be that they ‘destroyed enough’ and then spread myriad false stories as to the Pyramids’ construction and purpose – a kind of epistemological destruction.
Unfortunately, either they were not allowed to go further, and someone wanted this discovered when the timing was right, and not before – or our rulers are just not that smart to begin with, and left a lot of clues they missed in their sweep of the structures. Had I been on their team, I would have made sure that the copper cables, leoparding vitrification, salt, and quicklime scars were removed as a first priority. Those who scoured the edifice and sealed the air shafts with new chamber-stones apparently were just following instructions and did not really comprehend the goal at hand.
I personally don’t agree with the conclusions in this video. It’s too big of a coincidence that they would have dug randomly and picked a spot right next to the entrance. It’s more likely that they thought, maybe from experience, that it’s easier to go around a reinforced door, than through it. Maybe they also wanted to avoid a trap.
This is a short excerpt from the two fantastic documentaries that publish some original research [1][2]. I won’t pretend to fully understand your theory, but maybe it reinforces it – how to send a message to the future where the new equator is? Build massive structures separated by mathematically significant distances along it’s line. Do the other connected structures appear to serve the same function?
Or does it falsify it? Did they choose this line because they found this magical ratio between tectonic plates to be on this line? Did they choose easter island as the starting point because they were amazed at the magical angle that the three volcanos form? Or is it a coincidence, and we are only able to discover structures near fissure lines, because in these areas they made the structures super sturdy? (for comparison, a typical Soviet commie block has an expiration date of just 50 years before it starts to crumble).
In the full documentaries, they explain why a metre could have been (and apparantly was) also used by ancient civilizations.
What they have done here is called cherry picking or ‘p-hacking’ in medical science. You take a ton of random observations, and then find among those observations, a few which line up along linear or mathematical constants. What about Cholula, Gunung Padong, Tolombón, Aquihuecó, Amazon Stonehenge, Kuhikugu, Tulum, Chichen Itza? – in fact there are thousands of significant and massive monuments and sites to choose from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_archaeological_sites_by_country. Given enough observation points, hundreds of lines and mathematical constants can be made to conform with members of that set of observation points.
The answer is ‘yes’, by using this method, I could find amazing linear and mathematical constants among the monuments which confirm the rotational or Euler axes inside my hypothesis. But that would be cheating.
By cherry picking just these few monuments, one can ‘connect the dots’. But connecting the dots only works when the dots make up the majority of the dot set. Like when you have a murder and only two people with means and access. A small set of dots. It does not work when a very small minority of lots of dots are selected for their convenience in alignment and harmony with the golden ratio.
In the theory I have developed, we have only one geophysical solution. It is used to make the one prediction which is possible, then that prediction is confirmed in the one truly exceptional monument which was built on that predictive axis and then further by the specifically predicted features contained in that one monument. In other words, my theory took risk of a single predictive point of conjecture, not the convenience of arranging an answer from any of thousands of points of potentiality.
But that does not mean we should not look – they just need a disclaimer along with the observation, which shows they are aware of this inductive weakness in the logic.
Final word, be wary of fast-talking videos which employ ethereal mysterious background music and British-accented narrators.
What’s the age of pyramid Khufu? Google search tells me it’s 4600 years old. Then how can the article claim kast erosion of the pyramid 14 millennia ago (14000) years range? Maybe I’m missing something about the age of the pyramids
“within the last 14 millennia” – so I don’t have a date for the inundation which caused the karst erosion. The 4600 year age of Khufu has been falsified. See this article:
The carvings on the Ostrich Egg certainly do appear, as you have written, to depict the Tura already eroded at the time of the carving. The lines are displaying detail to the prospective viewer. Smooth cap stones, would, in communicating detail, push the carver to produce no detail inside the triangular depiction of the pyramids, this is how that smooth detail would be conveyed, by nothing in that space.
The carving was very unlikely to be some random scratching. It contained accurate topography of a massive tract of land that someone mapped. There was a point to those carvings
How do you manage your rage? Because I am BARELY managing mine – I live in hope of military tribunals followed by televised executions.
Record. Play. Rewind. Play. Rewind…
With two disabled kids from medical incompetence, not simply one – birth trauma cerebral palsy and DTaP vaccine encephalitis – it has been difficult. I started channeling my inner rage into The Ethical Skeptic in 2010 – a kind of martial art skill in detecting fake science, wayward lab techs masquerading as scientists, and Narrative ninnies who enable their harmful ways.
This particular death certificate fraud upset me, first because it was fraud against the pain and suffering of someone I love, and second, because I know that this is serving to misinform the entire population as to what is actually occurring.
I just keep my head down, and focused on the philosopher’s stone.
Please become aware of this theory: https://natrontheory.com/ (you need to click around on this website, it’s interactive, there are several “dominoes”)
I like it. The theory is compelling and may well explain the peculiar features of Machu Picchu, including the ‘overstrike’ of the seams between stones, which has always baffled me. A granite cement. Done right, this could achieve a Mohs hardness of 5 or 6 ?? once a practice was developed.
Limestone on the other hand hardens by a different molecule chain. And while one can make a concrete from limestone, it is not of a high Mohs hardness, nor does it present a high indurate or compressive strength. The pyramid structural concourses would have collapsed if made of this material. But you are not proposing that – it is only for reference.
The Sabu Disk, and shist being formed into a cement – that I would find problematic. A bunch of disparate minerals in that matrix. Everything formed from waterglass would technically be a granite. But it would solve the intricate form challenge. Have to think on that.
This has captivated me. One theory is that the megalithic structures were built from many blocks instead of one big one to make them more earthquake resistant. This earthquake damaged but still standing wall could be seen as proof:
We know that the ancient greeks decorated their stone temples with weird but consistent trigliphs and guttas. We now know this is how you would build a wooden temple of this shape, if you did not have the invention of nails. When they learned how to carve stone, they recreated wooden temples visually, copying over the now useless guttas.
Perhaps the ancient megalithic worker saw the earthquake-proof walls of the past, but because earthquakes became rare he didn’t understand the purpose, and just made a fake separation for aesthetic reasons.
Here is a very interesting map showing the location of megalithic structures and sources of natron: https://natrontheory.com/map.html
The 1000 ton stone at Thebes and much evidence of quarrying stone exists.
I’m fascinated by the stones at Balbeek, and how on earth they got those monsters there. They certainly appear pre Roman. Of course, the Romans found much, built over it and claimed it as their own, or was assigned to them thereafter by ‘mistorians’.
Has anyone performed a “diff” of the most recent version? This material is dense with info and having read previous versions I would love to quickly read the changes, preferably inline. Thanks!
Hello TES, if you are not already familiar, I wanted to bring to your attention a petrified forest in New Cairo Egypt. It exists at 1k feet, just above the delta, so above the hypothesized inundation height but below the surge height. As you may already know, petrified wood forms in flood or volcanic zones, where there is a rapid no oxygen environment created via mud or ash, and a ground water element high in minerals, specifically silica. With high enough silica levels, it is thought these woods can be petrified fairly quickly (thousands of years). However, the wood in this area is claimed to be dated to 35 million years ago. The site is interesting for many reasons, one of which is a possible falsification for large height inundation to have occurred as many of the “whole log” stones that are still fully intact would have been massively displaced/dispersed throughout the region. Conversely, perhaps it does not falsify the inundation height, but rather the sites accepted dating and thusly these may have been deposited much more recently, ie the last event. If the latter is true, then radiocarbon dating still might be very possible, and it should not be too much trouble to attain a small sample for independent testing, as the wood is scattered across much of the upper plateau. I cannot think of a more interesting scenario than to have a semi-organic material, sitting at the edge of a hypothesized inundation site, whose mere presence confirms flooding, just waiting as a veritable time capsule to be more thoroughly tested.
www petrifiedforestegypt org/park-features/petrified-remains
29°59’16″N 31°27’26″E · 1,093 ft
I checked, and the elevation of this forest is 1,027 feet, so well under the surge height.
Herodotus, in An Account of Egypt, cited the crisis in Egyptian leadership lore experienced by one of the Old Kingdom Pharaoh’s in his waning years, in that his oldest son had refused to undertake the duties of being trained to become Pharaoh himself. Instead, he retreated with a band of his fellow younger persons and created a colony in ‘the woods’ a forested region southeast of Cairo. When Pharaoh sent an emissary to collect him and bring him back to undertake his duty, the son, sitting on a horse, took a shit in his hand, and handed it to the emissary, and said “Deliver to Pharaoh, this, as my response.”
Your instinct, along with the argument you present, is stark: undeniable and massive oceanic disruption a mere 50 miles from that site, is stronger evidence, than an abductive assumption as to how fast leaching can occur in and partially displace organic materials. Because deductive logic is stronger than abductive, and abductive is subject to human desires to hide things… the deductive inference would take priority.
Would you be kind enough to elaborate why you believe the flip will be 104 degrees? I couldn’t really understand why this particular number from this article.
I would assume that due to the constant changes undergoing in the earth, and the fact that the three distinct moments of inertia of earth are not vastly different like in a tennis racket, but rather just very slightly so, this time it could rotate in a completely different way.
It is possible, but right now I think that the moment differential is large enough, and the structures stable enough, that the same sort of scenario repeats for the most recent term of say 500,000 years or so. Our return to the discipline of the precession of the equinoxes is pretty striking in that regard.
I am looking at the Alps, and see vast “rivers” formed, some 2km wide. Given that these are the Alps, it seems reasonable to assume that they were indeed caused over millions of years by the continuously metling ice.
Looking at Saudi Arabia, at the receding shorelines that you mentioned, I also see many “rivers”, these up to 200m wide.
I understand that the way we can differentiate the causes of their formation is to look at the width, depth, and amount of meandering. To my untrained eye this is consistent with your theory.
In Africa we have the Emi Koussi volcano, that appears to have erupted last around 1.5 million years ago, with flood marks clearly on the resulting rock, not under it, which allows us to say that the flood happened at least in this time period. Here the width of some of these “rivers” is around 500m.
Unfortunately I cannot find recent volcanos in Saudi Arabia.
If we could find two nearby volcanos, one that erupted around 12-24,000 years ago, and one around 10,000 years ago, and one but not the other eroded with flood marks – that would be a great discovery.
Zubair Group – recently erupted if I recall.
The Emi Koussi volcano eruption and inundation marks sound interesting. I will look in to that, thanks!
TES
TES
Phenomenal work, and the most convincing interpretation of what is in front of us. Always trust what you see, not what you’re told!
You mention the SAC-LLVP, and would wonder if you’ve had a look at the African landscape from Botswana, Namibia, Angola and Zambia? There are what appear to be marks of a rapidly receding shoreline of a great inland lake or sea, and very recently since they’re sand dunes which haven’t been eroded yet. Fishing villages remain in the middle of Botswana pans (Kubu Island), with no fishing possible even when there is water.
This may show that the SAC-LLVP moves relative to the crust as well, thrusting Southern Africa upwards leaving these scars, as well as significant ripples on the southern coastline and rapidly cut, very steep and deep valleys. Looks like it decanted through the Zambezi valley to me.
The southern coastal regions of South America look like they have been washed over too and there appear to be shoreline marks in Argentina.
Just some observations which may be useful for your work.
Massive wall of cloud racing across the planet. All of a sudden, and nobody has a clue why or where it came from.
Look at the shape of it – doesn’t appear to be from an explosion or impact which would be radiating outwards. That would give the planetary observers an easy explanation.
I would hypothesize that, if the crust underneath had suddenly rotated, it might cause such an anomaly to present in the atmosphere.
A further note to go with my previous post, continental drift was laughed at when postulated, but it relies on the theory that “as it is now, so it has ever been”. Looking at the African landscape and its new dunes as a starting point, and because they are dunes of sand and mud and therefore should erode quickly, the continental drift theory must also be revisited. I would propose that the movements of continents is incredibly rapid, and then mind-numbingly slow. Chan Thomas must take credit here for writing things that open eyes.
The system is undoubtedly massively complex. Perhaps sometimes the pole shift is not big, but the underlying elements like the SAC-LLVP might decouple under the right circumstances and shift rapidly or even change orientation under our feet. This could rip continents apart and smash bits into each other, creating mountain ranges in a lifetime or even less.
Or maybe the movement of the underlying structure is a feature of it anyway, I keep an open mind about it.
What does appear clear is that we get shoved back into the Stone Age, repeatedly.
I think you raise a sound point. It is possible that some or even most of our continental drift occurs quickly as a facet of ECDO events. The gradualism approach is the result of a flawed assumption now taken as proven, when it is not.
With Chan Thomas, his prognostications were indeed astounding. But he had no actual hypothesis (theory of cause and systemic expression from that cause). I can cite pretty much anything as an outcome (and just get lucky to boot), but if I don’t explain why it happens and give compelling evidence as to proof of that ‘why’ – then I am attempting pseudo-prophecy or praespeculacy. Chan needed to craft a hypothesis, but did not. If one observes existing deserts and then simply describes the ocean again rolling over those same deserts in the future, that is praespeculacy (taking current observations and framing them in the language of prognostication).
Mine is the first actual actual hypothesis of this nature. It constructs the why first, predicts an outcome, and then finds those outcomes indeed exist.
But yes, a flipping planet presents an ethical boundary, and is a strong argument as to why no advanced civilization formed here for 800 million years. It also brings into question any actions to establish higher sentient life on Earth, without having resolved this problem first.
TES
Hi TES
You’ve really sent me down a rabbit hole! I’ve been looking around and collating my thoughts on the competing theories of things.
As far as Chan Thomas goes, you are right. He doesn’t posit a hypothesis and then test as you have, and yours is the first and only one I’ve seen on this. What he does prompt though, is noticing things. His investigations into the freezing of a mammoth are of great relevance to your hypothesis and proving it.
Randall Carlson cannot explain it, Ben Davidson cannot unless the Observers recognize that it is more than a geomagnetic excursion, it involves geographic movement as well.
Your hypothesis can explain a mammoth flash frozen so fast it’s still good eating 12000 years later.
If a mammoth is like an elephant, and it should be given the plants found in the mouth and gut, it is a preferential grazer. Thus, it was living on a grassland, or maybe grass tundra. It’s not living in a frozen wasteland, it’s too big, requires too much food. It’s conceivable to consider it living in a place like the Russian Steppe or further south – grasslands and pine forests. It would migrate with the seasons.
And this comes to the speed of the event. Clearly the speed is significant, the movement of Zambia to the geographic north pole would be fast enough for the occupants to experience near or at supersonic wind and water. The windchill of hundreds of kilometers per hour wind velocity could be the key to understanding how a 6-ton animal was flash-frozen.
This seems to be a 6000 cycle, with the 12000 cycle being the solar
micronova posited by the Ben Davidson whacking us at the same time.
Once again, we go back to the Great Pyramid and your hypothesis – all roads are leading to The Ethical Skeptic!
But here things might get more interesting: where do you think a monument to Betelgeuse would be constructed relative to the Great Pyramid?
The Pyramids are laid out on Orion’s Belt, obviously by design. Betelgeuse is allegedly going to supernova, but what if it isn’t? What if it micronovas as the galactic current sheet hits it? Assuming that the red shade and alleged deformation is a visual effect from the deformation of the light seen through a dust cloud, is Betelgeuse a precursor to our fate?
Was the monument to Betelgeuse perhaps in Heliopolis, now destroyed?
I don’t know, but I think the ancients are definitely trying to tell us what they saw coming. And they were advanced – I believe they had developed flight and satellite technology – the accuracy of the layouts of the pyramid complex, the measurements etc. are something our civilization could only think about when it reached space. It is reasonable to assume the same of them.
Your hypothesis explains the geographical as well as geomagnetic excursions, and with the galactic current sheet on the 12000-year cycle, it explains the catastrophic end of the last Ice Age. I don’t believe there was an Ice Age anymore, just different geographic pole positions.
Your hypothesis, with a 12000-year micronova, also explains the catastrophic demise of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and a frozen mammoth. Imagine all happening at once, pole shift, micronova and resultant solar forcing of the Van Allen Belt to lower altitudes so that the Belt “earths” in an unimaginable blast of energy. This would produce the energy required to vaporize the Ice Sheet, blasting massive chunks of ice, which land and make craters, as well as all the spherules claimed to be from cometary impact.
Humans have been around for 500 000 years. There is no way we spent 494 000 years in a cave and then one day thought: “Wouldn’t a city be nice”.
We’ve been here before, repeatedly, and you’ve explained how and why.
Lastly here’s a naughty thought: what if the theory of the Moon being unnatural or unnaturally where it is, is correct? Could a previous advanced civilization have placed it there to try and mitigate the pole flips?
Zookie,
Indeed the Betelgeuse thought is interesting. Or any number of cyclical candidates nearby.
But I have considered the possibility that the Moon was inserted into Earth’s orbit, early in Earth’s history. All that would be required is the right cascade of complex celestial mechanics inside the Oort Cloud, with a series of the right sized bodies directing each other gravitationally. The Moon then deposited all its ephemeral, low period elements/compounds (oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, water) and their isotopic ratios onto the surface of the Earth over time. These would have sputtered off the Moon and been bound to our binary orbit, eventually ‘raining’ onto the Earth over time. We still have the dust raining onto us each day even now. I touch on this in The Peculiar Schema of DNA Codon’s Second Letter.
Thanks!
TES
Hi TES
Thanks for the link, an intriguing article, thank you.
Using very amateur sleuthing, Helipolis looks like it would be in the location of Sirius relative to Orion’s belt. Teotihuacan and Xian are also laid out on Orion’s Belt, so the ancients may have had more than one monitoring station and warning to subsequent civilizations.
An interesting thought occurred to me, and one which I have begun to scratch at – we are told that the sphinx is a lion looking at Leo. Plausible, very plausible, BUT:
Therefore, I’m thinking that it would be more plausible that the sphinx is Anubis…
If sentient life did come here, they wouldn’t be deterred. Likely every planet has enough internal inbalance to behave in somewhat the same way.
I suspect there is a small minority of super-stable planets, of very high value – yes. Thereunder, a larger quantity of semi-stable planets used as vacation spots, gardens, research, and genetic farms. After that, more than likely a LOT of Jupiters and Neptunes out there.
So that in turn raises the question whether super planets like Jupiter with its 14 moons and the interacting gravitational fields might actually stabilize a planetary moon? I have no idea and don’t have the skills to work it out. But assuming it did, then the intelligent life in our solar system would live on Europa etc and use us as a farm.
It would provide a logical explanation for why a measuring device has been built (Khufu) to measure axis tilt and perhaps drive a predictability platform.
If the moon is put there to mitigate the oscillation of the earth it makes sense to build measuring devices which can survive the tempest(s)
Great question, Zookie,
Obviously I don’t hold the set of quals to answer that, and I suppose that we don’t have adequate information to support a consensus on the matter either. However, the differential nature between the core of the Earth and its outer rotational body provides some aspect of life-nurturing energy on this planet. It is no coincidence that the Cambrian Explosion occurred very shortly after the Earth’s core solidified.
Thus, the planets in the I. super-stable and II. semi-stable life-sustaining profile would need to have a solid HCP NiFe core which acts as a dynamo relative to an outer rotational Fe-based mantle as well. I also suspect that lighter elements like nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, etc. would need to be imported from deeper space, into the inner workings of a star-planetary system in order to provide the basis for advanced life.
Moons in the context you outlay, could be exotic-life crock pots, not supporting advanced life, but crafting some unprecedented forms of microbial life for more extreme environments.
TES
Hi TES
With the amount of effort and cost it took to build the Great Pyramid, the other pyramids were also built. The other two on Giza, and the complexes at Xian and Teotihuacan. All are laid out pretty much on Orion’s Belt.
The builders did not do this by chance, or because they thought it could look nice. Not when you are building such massive and costly structures. Everything on the plateau must be relevant and purpose.
My sense is that it is not just to measure the spin and to warn, but also to tell us the all-important “when”.
We have the 6 000-year window between spins, the more “impactful” 12 000-year window (possibly intertwined with a solar micronova or simply a more violent spin) and which we are due to go through.
How to work out the markers for the when is beyond me though.
On a second point, the existence of big salt deposits in the Sahara, Botswana, the Dead Sea, and the existence of the salty Aral and Caspian Seas tells me that massive continental uplift and dropping occurs, most likely due to the shifting of the LLVC’s underneath I would think.
I’ve been looking more closely at rock strata and your hypothesis actually explains what I see a lot better than what I read in the textbooks with the long slow progression of things.
Zook,
Yes, the mantle is viscoplasitc and takes time to reform into its oblate spheroid shape after a shift from either State 1 to State 2 or back. That is why we see the ancient receding shorelines in the Arabian desert back into the Persian Gulf.
Thanks for the Orion point and the kind words!
TES
Hi TES
A thought occurred to me after reading your interpretation of Pillar 43, which makes perfect sense by the way.
What if the Cygnus is the Giza overlay and not Orion? The pyramids seem to match the stars there and also some of the other structures’ positions seem to line up.
Perhaps Pillar 43 is not unrelated to Giza?
An increased risk of suicide is on the warning label of most, if not all, antidepressant drugs. And kids are being prescribed them as if they were perfectly harmless. Have you ever read Anatomy of an Epidemic by Robert Whitaker and if so, would you please create a post with your analysis?
Greetings, some days ago I tried making a map of how the world would appear after the “flipping” happens (see pic attached).
How would anyone be able to survive the ocean displacement? The only thing I can suggest is taking refuge in mountain areas above some hundred meters (this site might help finding the best place: https://www.floodmap.net/?ct=IT)… or in a bunker (maybe that was the purpose of the Derinkuyu underground city in Turkey?)
I wonder, would someone be able to make an accurate prediction of the new Koppen climate areas of the world? For example, Antarctica and Greenland will obviously become tropical areas, but will they more likely become deserts or jungles? How will the various regions differ from each other in terms of heat, precipitations, vegetation, etc.?
Hi! I would be pleased, but unfortunately I know very little about climatology so I wouldn’t be able to provide useful input aside from obvious stuff like “Africa will become like Antarctica” and vice-versa; also, I’m still not sure whether the depicted state is supposed to become our “new normal” for the next millennia, or just be a temporary condition that will revert back to the original after just some decades… maybe TES can give us some clarification about this?
A good article. I confess to being a “true believer” in this Valentinian Gnosticism as written in the Tripartite Tractate of the Nag Hammadi. It is eminently reasonable, and tells of the fall of reason in pursuit of egoic power. I’ve spent the last 15 years studying the Tripartite Tractate, which is often skipped by gnostic seekers due to its arcane language and deeply philosophical / theological roots. This is an extraordinary ancient text that is completely at home in our modern world. Fortunately, my Ph.D. in Classical Rhetoric prepared me to understand this material. I do hope you drop in to either read or listen to my podcast at gnosticinsights.com or read me at Substack. My second book on the Tractate is about to be published and is titled “A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel of the Tripartite Tractate.” My goal is to demystify gnosticism to the point where anybody and I mean anybody can get the giist of it. The biggest stumbling block to sharing this knowledge isn’t its complexity, it’s exactly the dismissive mindset you have written about in this article.
I did not know that you were a Gnostic before I read this article. However, it is very informative. I personally had just thought you were being observant of Gnostic truths while maintaining epoche on whether or not you were a Gnostic or not.
TS, I have journeyed from complete suspension, to a suspicion, gradually over the last 15 years. So, your perceptions are all indeed correct. Intellectually, I am an ignostic atheist. This tends to blow everyone’s mind, and it takes too long to explain what an ignostic is… So I just say – that I divide my deliberation up into ‘Intellect-Empiricism-Deduction’ and ‘Educated Suspicion’ domains.
I have seen too much of the spirit world in action to be a Big-A Nihilist. That would be highly foolish. Through a study of darkness inside that domain, and observing first hand the seething envy they hold towards mankind, along with their abject fear of those who comprehend these things – some clues may be drawn.
Oh, so you believe in spirits from experience, and therefore deduce that Gnosticism is true. What is the most primary belief you hold about Gnosticism that you think anyone learning about Gnosticism from a less informed perspective should know?
I have had some supernatural experiences occur in my life, so I suppose Gnosticism might have truth to it. I am just not sure what you are specifically implying. I do agree that Nihilism does not seem true, and that neither is Materialist Monism, its philosophical implication, a true belief system. As for Gnosticism, what about the Gnostic deity, Pistis Sophia? Who is that? How did her consciousness arise? Where do souls come from in Gnosticism? I am just wondering what you think about those topics. I saw in your loosh article that they apparently come from Source, but I wonder how that and your belief that the Demiurge runs this realm are compatible with Near Death Experiences and their collective deduction that this realm is a good place for which people plan out their lives peacefully. That seems contradictory from my personal perspective. Anyways, I’m interested in hearing your response.
You might enjoy this blog, with a Gnostic teaching every Sunday, based upon an understanding drawn from the Valentinian (yes, that Saint) teaching, The Tripartite Tractate, which is available online, but difficult to comprehend without context. https://cydropp.substack.com/p/aeons-or-aliens-angels-or-archons
Yes,
I have direct (did not seek it) experience with dark entities who cohabit this two-fold plane. Our world is filled with dark practices, in which we are mired – and one cannot get through life without participating in at least some of it. The key is not ‘sin.’ Demons are big on condemning sinning, sinners, and sin. That in no way makes them good entities, nor does it qualify them to re-enter Source.
The primary belief of Gnosticism (for me, not all Gnostics of course):
1. Mankind is captive under dark and desperate forces who pretended to be God.
2. Our suffering is a sustenance these forces consume.
3. We are no more valuable than cattle or dogs to these forces.
4. There are others who oppose this state of mankind. A promise was given to mankind in antiquity about this.
5. The dark forces’ rule of Earth has come to its end. They hold us hostage by means of our own nuclear weapons.
6. This formula has played out before, with other civilizations and is not a new issue, but rather part of an ongoing conflict.
7. These dark forces are losing this conflict and will take out their demonic wrath on mankind before they are expelled from Earth.
I do not hold a definition or name for what we wrongly call ‘God’, as I am not that competent. So I cannot comment upon that matter.
The dark forces do not hold the right to return to Source (a force and realm, not a person necessarily), only we hold that. The darkness will try and merge themselves, and us, into a single creature-recipe which serves to house their essence, but also allows them to recapture the right (we hold) to cross back to Source.
Source will not allow that and the end will come before they are successful.
If you know these things, from experience, the entities of darkness are terrified of you.
***shrug***
TES
Oh, okay. I personally question this belief of yours about Source because I thought I had a higher origin and could return to Heaven upon death instead of to a Source that seems based in terrestrial origins from the Earth’s spirit’s origins. Nonetheless, I think that transcending to a free state outside of the control of those who control this realm is a good thing people should have the right to do.
These are more placeholders. I cannot claim specific definitions about their true nature – as I only see the projections into our mundane realm. I don’t think there is anything I have estimated about Source which precludes what you suggest. I just don’t know…
Oh, okay. Sorry if I upset you.
No, not at all. :-) All good.
“The darkness will try and merge themselves, and us, into a single creature-recipe which serves to house their essence, but also allows them to recapture the right (we hold) to cross back to Source.”
Been following your work, Envy most recently, and a conjecture has just come to mind – is maybe this the intent behind the whole DNA warfare strategy? And their envy/hostility stems from the fact that, always, the pinnacle results of the intended merge-return experiments have gotten away with the gift from Source independently, to the rage of the fallen ones? and maybe those past, uplifted children, Sabbaoth or otherwise, are the ones that gave the redress promise to mankind in antiquity?
Conjectures all with a capital C, and I am unavoidably anthropomorphizing, but, being made in their likeness,suddenly motives, panic, and desperateness make sense. Or they would not be so blatantly advertising their wishes and plans a couple days ago in the Paris Olympic Games opening, among other things.
I resonate too much not to comment.
I presume you might enjoy hearing how I arrived at identical conclusions.
I learned about gnosticism only a week ago.
I struggled all my life making sense of undeniable mystical evidence in the context of the explanations I was offered; explanations that carried immoral baggage and a degree of confidence and attachment that in my eyes proved their inability to assess reality.
Spiritual experience including discovering how to get god to talk to me backed my theism from my early teens. I learned the level of faith required for physical action (miracles) is one where if the thing actually happens you wont even be surprised. I learned Jesus seemed secretly in conflict with the old testament but failed to convince adults many times.
In my 20s I ran into funny animated videos depicting bible scenes accurately but adding in the thought processes of a jealous wrathful petty god (darkmatter2525). I watched every one. It opened my eyes. Changed me. I kept my theism but dropped the bible and began seeking other truth. I didnt like listening to the god from my teens; every time I tuned in I was told to do things I didnt want to, I would feel bad after. Yet also some interactions were deeply positive full of love wisdom and alpha on life. I felt so confused… only today do I now realize there were two different headspaces / channels I was talking on. Only today do I realize I may have been wrongly assuming it was the same entity.
Back to the story. My frustration over the bible and government culminated in me constantly daydreaming a specific dream. *Middle school substitute teacher walks in* “class write down 30 words representing actions you think are evil; *waits* “ok now circle every one your goverment has willfully caused in black and your god has done or commanded others to do in red.” *brains melt* “ok now circle again in the same color if they have not yet formally apologized” Every uncircled word results in the child being directed to relevent wikipedia or bible quote.
I was obsessed with reprogramming my brain since I was a child. I explored different value systems. Got into buddism. Noticed it was oppressed by governments. Noticed the headspace resulted in better spirtual experiences; I now wonder if it was a different entity I was closer to. Trying to love without desire crossed a line for me so I switched to mild buddism but never forgot the feeling of sensing issues with chakras and opening them.
Now we arrive at today. I discover gnosticism and every felt spirtual contradition vanished. I read the texts from egypt attempting to distill what is unlikely to be fabricated by culture + assuming god exists + assuming church would supress and arrived at the same list from your comment. Only experiment I could think of was trying to speak to both and see how they make their case. Of course I am mindful that some or all instances of what appears to talking to god are delusion and this holds true even if a communicative god exists…but talking was my only available experiment. I figured headspace was key after recalling many spirtual experiences. First I tried the easy to reach headspace where the god of my teens spoke to me. I just got “I am the only god” on a loop refusing to answer any questions until I gave up. Seemed likely my own hallucination since I had just read the gnostic claim this was his first words. Next I figured if the gnostic texts were correct it would be difficult or impossible and match the headspace of source, mindful of an alleged barrier between realms akin to breaking out of a simulation. I interpreted these together to mean all chakras open then channel the space my mind occupies into a high frequency amplitude beam out of our universe. I chose beam because in prior “love everything simultaneously” meditation I struggle to hold volume. Chakras. Rapid special breathing. Physically content. Confident. Loving. Honest. Serenity. Cosmic. Beam. I stop breathing and also lose the desire to breath. Sophia? All in my head? Who cares im having fun and this is my first time meditating where my desire for oxygen stopped which felt cool and perhaps meaningful. I eventually ask: how do I get here when I die? I translate the answer to “live the same way you got here…Physically content. Confidently, Lovingly. Honestly. With serenity and a craving to be humbled by cosmic wonder” The experience barely impacted my beliefs but was very memorable. Pretty darn freaky and trippy given the lack of drugs. If I can put together evidence backing a narrative the catholic church knew Jesus came for similar but different reasons and covered it up, It would increase my assessed odds of gnostisism being closest to the most important truth. This is my next lead. Even if gnostisim is correct why would I want to go to source in a hurry? Why not hang out in this universe longer? The texts make it sound like a one way trip.
How did you discern the dark entities in your experiences? Was it at the moment or was it post facto?
It was deductive inference, which is distinct from ex post facto, as all inference is post facto by definition.
I began life assuming that all humans lived reasonably pleasant lives and shared a common good will. However, as I undertook projects overseas, I came to realize three critical truths, and a condition:
1. Most of humanity lives in abject suffering, and at least 40% do not share a common good will with the rest of mankind. Eventually, I had to discard the naive belief that humanity exists in an acceptable state—or ever has.
2. If mythical ‘gods’ once existed — beings who lived lives of ease at humanity’s expense — then their neglect of human suffering places them firmly in the ‘not sharing a common good will’ camp.
3. I have seen technology capable of alleviating this condition — technology that could have been applied for our benefit 6,000 years ago and fundamentally changed the trajectory of human suffering.
Condition: Instead, our lives were shortened so that we could not live long enough to figure all this out. You do not shorten the life of a species under any kind of context of good will.
The only scenario that elegantly accounts for all of this is the captive hypothesis — which also happens to be the most likely in terms of galactic reality. There is a conflict over us, and as we move forward, we must be keenly aware of this unfolding evolution.
TES
I wish you were able to share more of the embargoed you have seen and know while simultaneously feeling remorse (without contributing to the loosh for evil-doers) that it exists and you had to figure it out. Thanks for expending the time & energy trying to help us pierce “the veil”.
Thank You for these two essays, Sir Skeptic.
To address the latter first, I immediately wondered if the families of court members were threatened by concerned-parties, such as denizens of the deep state.
I appreciate your expositions on the nature of “the enemy”, “the prime huckster”, and the listing of some names, such as the “demiurge”.
Here, for your consideration, is a Valentinian (yes, that Saint) teaching, The Tripartite Tractate, from those Alexandrian texts saved in large pots for 2000(ish) years. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/tripart.htm
I sent a link to this post to Cyd Ropp, the blogger at Cyd’s Gnostic Newsletter https://cydropp.substack.com/ I have been enjoying her weekly output, and have purchased her book explaining the Tripartite Tractate, “A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel” ( “Simple”, ok, I know…)
Yes, to your point of “knowing” through experience, often the experience of testing false promises in one’s own life, and experiencing the consequences, and also Yes, to the direct knowing of Divine Guidance, when it is sincerely requested, then followed, and the consequences also noted…
(“Autoaufhaben”; “Pick up the car”? I missed something.)
Ahhh, I need to read that! I have read and transliterated most of the Nag Hammadi, but have not really read the commentary offered by later enthusiasts… :-)
aufheben means ‘pick up’ as in gambling, where in order to cancel your bet, you ‘pick it up’ – but the other synonyms are even more expository: cancel remove, repeal, annul, etc. It means ‘self-canceling’.
Thank You, Again, Sir Skeptic. Got it.
I was explaining to a cousin-by-marriage, at a family reunion last weekend, your analysis of the erosion of the Great Pyramid at Cheops, and she got a funny recognition look. She apparently “listens” to you on some format, and was pre-impressed. I wrote down for her how to find this blog and that tripartite-treatise.
The next logical question, dear TES,then becomes what is the petition process and the means of engaging the redress court. Given the actions of The One Trick Pony to obfuscate and hide behind recurring amnesiac episodes (I guess) of largely his own making, it stands to reason that collective awareness of our victim situation is certainly necessary and hopefully sufficient for its invocation to occur. This aligns with the desperate insanities of history and today, and with the first awareness of the situation in Eden being the true Original Sin, lest what had happened before, as per your transliteration of the Hypostasis texts, happen again, but with nowhere else to hide this time for our captors.
This is indeed my suspicion. I hate this answer, but it is where the deduction is pointing (not linear induction). It is not a religion, and you are free to disagree and form other reasoned notions. I am always fascinated to hear what others have learned or suspect. I suspect this drama has played out before for them; however this time, they have nowhere left to flee and will fight like a cornered rat.
What is an address for your transliteration of the Lord’s Prayer if I may please ask? I have a copy .doc, but would like to be able to refer folks to it electronically and I cannot recall which article’s comment section had it. I have been re-reading many articles and their comments thinking I might come across it again, but not so far. I do enjoy seeing again many of your insights. Thanks in advance.
Steve, it might have been this quick rendition (a couple tweaks from recent learnings) in a comment:
This is my version of Christ’s plea – had nothing to do with personal salvation from sin, and everything to do with a seditious overthrow of mankind’s captors:
Our benefactor who dwells in the heavenly realms, whose name is of such honor that lowly men dare not even speak it – please come now and intervene on our behalf. Extend your kingdom to our Earth, and let things function for the future here, just as they currently operate in your realm. In the meantime, while I don’t understand everything, I will help make sure there is enough for those within my reach to be happy and healthy, and teach as I can how spiritually mature individuals gracefully function together in an imperfect society – how to identify evil, as distinct from every other good thing, and not participate in its intoxicating lure. We look forward to membership inside your coming dominion as well as its systems of technology and governance – but mostly, your intervention into our captive plight, where henceforth we will no longer abjectly suffer and die at a young age – and may live in continued freedom and happiness.
My thoughts on its true meaning…
TES
During state 2 the seas are in different locations, and the plastic shape of the Earth is different. Yes, they go back to normal when the Earth returns to State 1 again and settles in.
Dear TES, I am thrilled by your theory, and am researching background information. I read the air shafts, aka, star shafts, don’t follow a linear path to the surface of the pyramid as is typically depicted in cross sectional illustrations. Could you please address the non-linear path of the shafts in your article, to help clarify your thinking on their purpose? I greatly appreciate you.
EDIT: I apologize, you did address it. You wrote, “These shafts are designed to monitor the nutation (wobble and wander) of the celestial north pole (see Exhibit K3 below). Since the North Shaft from the King’s Chamber makes a mid-shaft break to the west to avoid some structure (similar to the North Shaft from the Queen’s Chamber), it cannot be used for direct optical observation, as is often conjectured. Instead, this would be a monitoring device requiring termination at the pyramid’s surface, facing directly at the celestial north pole.”
I’m not an expert whatsoever, and I couldn’t agree more with the rest of the article, but the cosmological aspect of the piece reads highly conspiratorial. It gives a suspicious agency to the universe where it purposefully lies to us. This would be fine if it came along with increased explanatory power, but it appears to just re-explain what is known, or contradict relatively strong empirical evidence re: Planck Time. What do you think of this critique?
You are correct Andrew, right now the observation dilation of Planck Time is a construct and not a true hypothesis. However, development of a construct and its maturing into a novel hypothesis is part of the scientific method – especially when the existing constructs have zero probative strength and elegance themselves. In other words, this is a problem with ALL current cosmological notions inside this domain.
In other words, when Ockham’s Razor contends “Plurality should not be posited without necessity” – that applies to the situation we are in. We have necessity to propose a novel idea.
… thus one cannot use this as a filter to a priori constrain thought.
Thanks for the 9500 BCE night sky map clearly showing the crossing of the Great Rift and the ecliptic! This helps me visualize the crossroads encountered by souls passing between worlds, described in Plato’s Republic as “the ends of the chains of heaven…this light is the belt of heaven that holds together the circle of the universe like the undergirders of a trireme. From these ends is extended the Spindle of Necessity… on which all the revolutions [the ecliptic, for example] turn.” (tr. Jowett)
From Wind Whispers: Jumping off a cliff while holding your arms out does not mean that you have invented human flight.
Praespeculacy (from the Latin ‘prae-‘ meaning ‘before or in front of’ and ‘-speculum’ meaning ‘mirror’) – refers to a type of prophecy-like pronouncement about future events. It is characterized by a deceptive framing that suggests divine or supernatural origin, when in reality it is merely a re-framing of current events using different or spiritually-tinged language. Distinct from forecasting, which is based on making projections from current data and trends, praespeculacy employs a method of deception that engages the audience subconsciously through familiar circumstances. This familiarity is utilized to reinforce the perceived validity of the ‘prophecy,’ making it appear more credible or convincing.
Don’t conflate the appearance of doing the thing, with the actual doing of the thing.
Interesting how the FOL pattern geometry fits nicely with a simple Lagrangian L1-5 point model of harmonic balance of forces acting on bodies rotating around eachother all without worrying about complex maths……perhaps it’s just co-incidence that the L4/5points lie at 60degree angles that an equilateral triangle form between Earth/Sun, mimicking the Visca Pisces construction
TES, very compelling observations. Regarding the Sabu Disk, why not use humans as counterweights to raise the stones? Same machine, but with people instead of barrels of salt water? They’d lift a stone then walk back up stairs or a ladder. If there were a non-human energy source running the water pumps, like oxen or water wheels in a Nile diversion channel, I could understand how the pump would make construction more efficient in terms of work content. Otherwise it seems the compound pulleys were the key technology? Or perhaps advanced socioeconomic organization to mobilize such a large workforce.
Yes, look at Exhibit C. Those are humans acting as counterweights (right hand side is duplicated on left but not shown). The water offsets the number of humans one has to use – because, you have to feed, house, train, clothe, and logistically support all those humans. Water you don’t have to do shit for… and it will work a 24 hour shift 365 days a year. The rhythm of the stone lifting, and its sync with the rhythm of the workpace of the overall pyramid is more important than the quickness of one theoretical lift of a block. The foreman would only be able to place so many hewn blocks per day. So outrunning that, would have no utility and present ‘bored armies’. In my national strategies for some African nations, bored armies were the #1 challenge.
Compound pulleys, yes. It takes about a year for a kid with a rope to figure out mechanical advantage on a tree branch or trunk. It takes about 5 years to figure out that if that tree surface rolls, the mechanical advantage is even better. It takes about 5 more years to figure out that two trees serve to compound that advantage. So the idea that they did not have pulleys, is rather ludicrous.
Ahh, got it thank you, lifting blocks was not the bottleneck. The pump made sure each worker always had something productive to do. 4 gallons per minute lifted 25 feet only takes about 35 watts of power (for the heavier salt water), which one person can easily generate at a leisurely pace. So they wouldn’t need a crew of ten 125lb human counterweights “on call” when any nearby foreman was ready for another block, and no foreman would have to wait for an available lift crew. The pump made the number of persons needed to lift a block equal to the number needed to place it. Great point!
Exactly – the parties of ‘counterweight’ humans could even rotate around from machine to machine in that same rhythm. Not overworked, but not bored either – rather, ‘on standard’, as a systems engineer would call it. You are thinking as a systems engineer.
The disk was not the secret to building a pyramid, it was the Pharaoh’s (or whoever actually did this) secret for keeping his kingdom while he did it.
TES
I have a geology background and was always skeptical of what I was being taught. At one time there was a “catastrophic plate tectonics” theory where the formations we see resulted from the Genesis flood. It was tossed aside after modeling showed that the heat generated from the friction would have boiled off the oceans. Now, this was a “creationist” theory and I don’t know how robust the actual modeling was. But this is still a question I have, how much heat would be released?
TES, if there is a recurring cataclysm documented with physical evidence, ancient structures, myths and, possibly, ancient documents; is it logical to conclude that the leadership of the earth (whatever they call themselves) know about it and may even have an idea on the timing?
I suspect they do have an idea on the timing, yes. The concerted effort to block any and all knowledge of this event, is telling. It is not ‘governments’, as those who are elected or appointed just simply have not had time to learn everything they need to know from the overlords. Plus, governments are appointed to manage welfare and laws for the workers. They are not there to manage the affairs of the Archons on Earth.
The key here is that most of those who operate inside a demonic hierarchy are unaware that they do so. They don’t know why they do what they do, they just follow orders, and receive compensation in a variety of forms. Once they pass on however, only one form of compensation will be left – and they are addicted to it by the time they die.
If they have a plan for the timing, I suspect outside agency also has a plan – and they are not fans of the Archons/Watchers. I could be wrong, but…
So, I’d guess those competing plans might be what’s driving all the unrest we’re seeing across the world; competing factions trying to set the stage for the event and aftermath. Could the rush for mass migration be an attempt to setup one plan, or, more likely, to block a particular plan? It appears one faction wants to greatly reduce the population before this event occurs.
I suspect that there are certain lineages they are enormously threatened by, yes. And they have been attempting to wipe them off the face of the Earth for some time now, by war, murder, pathogen, poisoning, catastrophe, lowered birth rate – all part of the unforgivable set of sins, a line they crossed long ago.
TES, this comment of yours makes me want to digress to a couple of your posts on original sin and recent reminders thereof by officialdom. And of events near ancient stones in forests and, my guess would be, pheomelanin and guanine-heavy regions! I hope you someday expand on these articles too.
Perhaps they’re preparing society for what’s to come without yet revealing the event, knowing the chaos that would result. If this is true, that would answer at least some questions.
Why do they want us eating bugs? Crickets and other insects are animal protein that can be raised without sunlight and without a planet surface free of radiation.
Why block out sunlight by spraying the atmosphere? Is it to mitigate radiation effects from a weak or non-existant magnetic field? Or to force adaptation to what they foresee as a colder and darker world?
When they talk about the planet not being able to handle human agriculture, they’re actually refering to what the expect the planet to be like post event.
TES, Two thoughts that have come to me recently that correspond to my also recent awareness of your phenomenal and penetrating theory. First I came upon a timeline “Global Cycles – The Global Consciousness Program” that you may already be aware but wanted to provide in any case. It comes from Human Design and its developer Ra Uru Hu. https://www.jovianarchive.com/Stories/52/Global_Cycles
Curiously the next cycle is the Cross of the Sleeping Phoenix which begins in 2027. The previous age which shared this name began in 4565 BC and ended in 4154. The one previous to that sharing the same name again began in 11157 BC and ended in 10746 BC.
The second thought derives from the reading of “The Prophet’s Way” (2004) by Thom Hartman, his work with the charitable organization Salem, and the global locations of their worldwide reinforced concrete schools for children also curiously located out of harms way according to your theory. Several (4) references in the book relate to pole shift/cataclysm and the need to take precautionary measures.
Two questions: 1. Is there any awareness of when our solar system crosses the Milky Way galactic (ecliptic) plane? or when it reaches the its apogee/perigee? 2. How does central Africa sustain its significant biodiversity under Stage 2 planetary configuration located at the new North Pole under proposed global cooler conditions that exist under the current State 1? Looking forward to your next installment on this most fascinating work. A Thousand Thanks!
Thanks for the references to The Global Consciousness Program, watermark…
In answer to your questions:
1. I don’t think we have the stellar mapping sufficient to determine the true plane of the Milky Way Galaxy, or our location relative to it. The cycles there are far longer than the cycles we are talking about (4 to 6,000 years)
2. Remember that Africa is not the peak of biodiversity. It is biodiverse in large mobile fauna, but not other species. These were protected in that the oceans did not cover all of Africa during the rotations. These are also animals that migrate to avoid harsh conditions. They migrate between south Asia and Africa. We don’t see that now because of the Sahara desert (fairly new). The peaks in biodiversity by far (1,000 x more diverse in genetics, especially), are at Euler Points 1 and 2.
TES
Hi!
Thought you might find this paper & broader topic interesting:
It’s further empirical research on & conclusive support of “snake detection theory”. It also potentially links the oldest ever abstract representation/art our species has ever made to a visual representation of venomous snake scales. It’s dated at 74kya from Blombos Cave, South Africa.
Honestly? My own speculative theory is that snakes go really, really deep. And that our multi-million year “war” against them as mammals/primates/hominids/sapiens has been deeply imprinted on our evolutionary psyche. So much so that it may have been the genesis of all snake symbology/myth (or all symbology/myth for that matter).
Reminds me of John Archibald Wheeler’s “it from bit” interpretation of quantum mechanics. According to the theory, we are playing “20 questions” with the universe where each quantum observation is a “question” that the universe “answers” with an experimental result that is consistent with all previous results. The universe doesn’t actually “know” the ultimate object; it just keeps making up answers to maintain a consistent story. We therefore “generate” reality by our act of observing it.
1) It’s not simply academics protecting a historical narrative. The WEF does not care about the decades old dissertations, reputations or pet theories of academics, look how readily they discarded dozens of well-respected scientists during the COVID years.
2) So too the WEF does not care about Turkey, its people nor its government. Look how readily they discarded millions of lives with COVID. The Turkish people are cattle to them.
3) Ultimately the WEF does not care about NATO. Otherwise it would not fund NATOs “enemies” as freely as its allies. It would not take American avionic secrets and sell them to BRICs. Russia is not the enemy of the WEF…it’s owners are the people who performed the Russian revolution, killed 60,000,000 Slavs and took private ownership of its resources after the wall fell. This is a game played by a handful of banks. Not billionaires, not neocons, not communists, not Christians, not Atheists, not Russians, not Chinese, not Jews and not Arabs. Forget the labels, these are artifacts of division. There is only us vs the few.
Look at who runs the WEF, then realize they have a PERSONAL STAKE in obfuscating this Younger Dryas site. Personal. As in, a familial concern somehow still relevant nearly 13,000 years later.
The beauty of their desperate concealment of this site and the dozens of similar sites in Turkey is that it serves as a valuable puzzle piece in rationally unpacking the history of these few families.
The world fell.
A few survived, bringing domesticated species with them.
With numbers too small to rebuild, they chose a small group with whom to interbreed, backcross and indoctrinate. They labelled themselves gods to the simpler folk they dominated.
After raising numbers for centuries and chipping ancestral memories into the stones of the Tepes, they built a city (Catalhyuk)
They built a corporation/religion with every trait of a modern optimized cult. From a heavily handicapped language to insane lists of meaningless rules.
They invented a unifying egregore based on global conquest, then later paired it with a metanarrative and “personal god” mass-parallelized tulpa in order to similarly indoctrinate the masses outside of their pet cult.
You remarked in a prior article the similarities between the WEF logo and Mt. Harmon. Take the story in their propagandistic literature seriously.
If you want to see something wild, find James Mellaarts book concerning his teams excavations at Catalhyuk in the 1970s. It’s on archive sites intact but virtually completely scrubbed elsewhere with PDFs substituted with a poorly done hitpiece called “the goddess of anatolia”. His excavation was backed by ALL the major archeological institutions from the Royal Society to Smithsonian to Tel Aviv, then his reputation was systematically destroyed. In his photographs of 9,000 year old paintings you will find symbols and imagery predating their supposed origins by 6,000 years or more. From crosses to stars of david to astrological imagery we are told appeared in babylon millennia later. He observes skeletal phenotypes of proto-mediterraneans and “something” else. Furthermore he notes with surprise the sudden appearance of myriad domesticated crops and animals.
This thing is very, very old. TES you have done a wonderful job uncovering many of the pieces. There are hints that you suspect much more than you claim, which is a testament to your unfailing allegiance to facts over speculation.
Well framed and stated, Orb. Yes, there is more I know and suspect, than I am willing to offer in this blog, or even to persons in my life.
What I have found in the interviews with media executives interested in this material thus far, is that while they cite the need for “rigorous epistemological soundness” (and of course I wholeheartedly agree – and cite the science must provide this, not one mere man…) – their real interest and passion is invested in the conjecture… they devour and love it…
This is the little game we all play as humans. LOL!!
Are there no scientists mature enough to deal with the “existentially upsetting” implications? I would appreciate an understanding of the actual ground truth of my life and what – perhaps – I need to consider and prepare for – so any links would be greatly appreciated.
Well – For a former pot-smoking art major that was a bit of a slog – but I got through it.
So – the proverbial “they” are not acknowledging that the oceans are warming from the bottom – probably due to it being step one in a cascading series of events that ends with some pretty dark, miserable times – for the lucky? Unlucky? The powerful people who escape to their DUMBs?
I could head for an appropriate elevation and hope for the best but I suspect I will sit tight and play with the grandkids while reading esoteric blogs that no one around me would appreciate.
The existing technology does suggest that the “rebuilding” on the flip side will perhaps go a bit quicker than in past incarnations – I’ve no doubt someone, somewhere has a plan – until they get punched in the mouth.
I started following you on “X” and have just recently discovered your blog – I look forward to seeing where you go next.
“play with the grandkids while reading esoteric blogs that no one around me would appreciate.” :-) LOL!!
The last flood was used to wipe out some pretty nasty vermin/chimera. This well may finish the job. We may well be set free this time.
TES
I really enjoy the wisdom contained in these articles, but the language is as dense as Jordan Peterson’s Maps of Meaning – Jordan is very proud, but everyone else complains that it’s unreadable. I have to use ChatGPT to simplify the language in order to assimilate the knowledge. Even then, from just the first sentence I get: “There is no widely recognized concept in Earth sciences known as the “Indigo Point”. It could be a misinterpretation or a metaphorical term, but it is not a standard term in the scientific literature.”. It takes me days to go through an article like this one due to the dense writing.
It would be fantastic if someone could edit this content into simple English.
Perhaps your version of ChatGPT missed that an ‘Indigo Point’ is a principle I use in systems theory, not Earth sciences. The article even quotes: “Points Indigo and Tau are inflection and tipping points that I often utilize when analyzing strategies, campaigns, problems, or deceptions. The Indigo Point is a critical juncture where plans are quietly set in motion, potentially irrevocably, steering towards a predetermined Tau strike point.” That is an essential, as well as clear and simple, statement that your ChatGPT missed. There are over 100 details in this theory, just like that, which are critical in order to both understand and comprehend the hypothesis itself.
Perhaps it missed that critical statement defining what an Indigo point was, because ChatGPT was operating under what is called a ‘high and low’ fallacy. There’s a ton of essential detail in the material, so it did not bother to pull it – then missed an absolutely essential facet of the critical logic which subsequently prevented it from comprehending the material in the first place.
ChatGPT cannot have it high and low at the same time. Either the hypothesis has to describe itself accurately (it cannot start with a summary, those come later, as in the article I linked above), or it can entertain with familiar and easy to understand (but wrong) principles.
Just so you know, I submit each and every paragraph I compose to ChatGPT and have it critique clarity and flow, and make recommend changes. It told me that the essay was “well structured, insightful, clear, and groundbreaking.”
It was able to describe the theory back to me well and accurately, just like thousands of other persons have done.
You have showed me how uneducated I am. Even with my background in mathematics, I didn’t come across Simpson’s Paradox before you mentioned it. I never even knew there exists a discipline called “systems theory”. You clearly have a good understanding of statistics, geology, oceanography, seafaring and physics. Would you be so kind as to recommend any books that have helped you reach your level of understanding? This would help not only me, but also my kids, for whom I’m currently in the process of developing and education programme.
My fave books in this regard are (texts from undergrad and grad school – except “Piloting” was the Navy and Annapolis Sailing School):
Kip Thorne’s, “Black Holes & Time Warps”,
Madsen’s, “Statistical Concepts with Applications to Business and Economics”
Ohring’s, “Materials Science of Thin Films”
Jones, “Principles and Prevention of Erosion”
Maloney, “Chapman’s Piloting”
Thurner, “Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems”
and of course
Whitman, Poe, and Emerson… which ponder the mystery of “why”
:-)
TES
I still have Sailing, Piloting, abd Celestial Navigation. I have feeling I need to look for a second-hand sextant…but I have feeling the Star Charts will need fixing…
“You clearly have a good understanding of statistics, geology, oceanography, seafaring and physics.”
My girlfriend suggests TES must be a group of people. Please take that as a compliment.
I like to cling to the delusion that it isn’t too far away that Erdogan frees Tϋrkiye from the shackles of NATO/EU/WEF and moves to BRICS. That then should only leave Ferret (intentional) Sahenk, the billionaire, as a road block : presumably he can be purchased for shekels.
On another note I have been pondering the comparative merits of the Enki ‘spaceship’ disk design versus a truss spar. (How Do Spars Work? | Rigzone)) No topsides, properly ballasted with provisions such that it remains just below/at the water line until deemed safe to be above the waterline. Both with a gimballed inner spherical pod to help even out the turbulence. Either way, better take a night class in welding and more importantly, apologise for getting off topic.
I almost didn’t look today. Unassuming title…
How do you do this, Sir Skeptic?
I have some ruminating meditations on bike rides after dredging the internet for hours, but this is orders of magnitude beyond those musings…
I discovered in first grade that I had a talent for fabricating statements in my own favor to adults. It served pretty well (it seemed) until third or fourth grade, when I could tell that it was clearly breaking down, not merely from closer adult observation, but more from reality, itself. I began the path back to truthful rigor, but it still took over a decade, perhaps a decade and a half to be fully truthful to myself.
I never suspected that Red-Shift would be affected… WTF! :-o
I read Magicians of the Gods, by Graham Hancock, about Gobeki Tepe, by Graham Hancock, perhaps a fleeting decade ago. Yeah, it doesn’t fit the narrative, but better fits a recurring-catastrophe narrative, like the earth flipping its rotational axis every 12,000 years or so… Crazy Stuff!
Thanks again.
You characterized the post flip world (soon to arrive?) as a “hell world”. That has been bothering my bike-ride musings somewhat for the past couple of weeks, or whatever it has been. Why a “hell world”, Brother Skeptic? It’s noting new, right?
Are we not in a unique position to do good? I wonder how far up Texas the Gulf of Mexico would likely slosh, myself… I can see that its a big physics model, and one has to know what the new axis will be, and what the rate of rotational shift into that new axis will be, and the driving of Texas in a south-westerly direction underneath the waters of the gulf will be at a certain rate, and the gulf will partly comply, and partly seek to continue it’s prior trajectory. One would expect Houston and Lake Charles to go under, but one would wonder a bit more about San Antonio and Austin. Would Dallas and Fort Worth, fairly far inland, stay dry? Alpine, Texas is far west and at altitude. Safe? El Paso should be spared, right?
Interminable pondering for me, as I have only my own internal and very simple visualization model…
As the current hypothesis goes, State 2 is a gyroscopic equilibrium, so it would not be locked to the core like the magnetically-bound State 1. There would be some wandering of the rotational pole for a while, all the while, heavy seas (pyramid average was Sea State 8) for a long time. The tectonic activity would send us into a planetary winter for decades – probably why they miss this in the ice cores and just identify it as a ‘volcanic’ period and a ‘geomagnetic excursion’. Cold, dark, wet, stormy, and starving (from lack of agriculture and loss of fauna).
But yes, this is nothing new. This is perhaps the best rationale as to why our planet did not harbor advanced life for 800 million years. It was not suitable for anything other than a DNA-farm.
The implication being – what if it is still unsuitable, and we are not really supposed to be here?
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. That seems like a “heck world” at any rate. I searched for a meaning for “EVG”, found 6, and none of them seemed to apply.
Well, we (“advanced life”?) ARE here, and it is the nature of many of us, certainly yourself, to seek “meaning”, or “better models”, and there is an inherently-implied value-system of societal/species/life-form benefit being “valued”, so I will press-on that it is not “about” our projections of how we would perceive existence in such a world, fleeting as it might be, but what gifts we could provide to future generations, BIC-lighters, stainless steel knives, propane tanks, books, greenhouses, good wells with windmill drive…
I do seek to help planetary life-forms traverse the further genetic-bottlenecks, cullings, IQ-tests, etc. I see the “best” role for our species as being “Stewards of Planetary Life”, as I like to put it. Our “owners” have a different perspective which involves their maintenance of primacy, but it’s problematic for them, as well as for us, as they are apex-predators-in-excess, and will be in great-excess following any catastrophe. I think they are already sharpening knives for each other, and it won’t be friendly in their bunker-world.
Yours in Service.
John
Functions at both an intellectual and spiritual level. Subtle epistemic truths begin to emerge, while spiritual truth truths trust your terrain well enough to express. Best guess I can give it. (*shrug)…
My avatar is Usir (Osiris). The Lord of Silence. Knowing when to draw inference, and when to remain silent (epoché) – is the key to fortress wisdom. Hence the tag line of ethical skepticism: “𝙚𝙥𝙤𝙘𝙝𝙚́ 𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙨 𝙜𝙣𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙨”
It takes me almost 5 hours to mow my grounds here with the 50 trees (mostly my plantings) and all the edging around them, and I just put in another hour, so I reflected a bit. The area of North America with the archaeologic evidence of longest continuous human habitation (8800 to 13,000 years) is Spring Lake, near San Marcos, Texas, currently the biggest construction-boom area in Texas or the US, depending on the month: https://www.springlakearchaeology.txst.edu/archaeology-of-spring-lake/prehistory.html
The elevation, however, is only 570 ft. and the distance to the Gulf of Mexico is about 120 miles.
The ghost town of Edith, Texas, about 400 miles from the gulf, and elevation almost 2000 ft has a natural limestone spring… It’s about 8 miles from the county seat, Robert (E) Lee, pop. 1000, and there is a reservoir nearby.
Long term water always comes first, after avoiding an initial catastrophe…
Hundreds of years, is the transition period you have described.
John, what does it matter if some texas cities survive? How long would any city be habitable without a supply chain??? Ponder that while you mow your lawn. Human population will be 95% reduced because of that dependance on supply chains. Survivors will be random, scattered creatures. I wouldn’t want to be one of them.
That’s not quite the way I was looking at it. I was looking at humans being able to survive in a place for hundreds of years, assuming something like the 95% population reduction you mention. I do ponder that while I mow the acre, and on bike rides, and as I lie awake before and after sleeping.
Why do you think “survivors will be random”? You may not really be “working the problem” as one might say.
If you are sure you would not want to survive, that is your decision. Have you considered how you might prefer to die in that scenario, and how you would not want to die.
John, we’re talking about the earth’s surface peeling off the inner core and moving 10,000 km or more, rapidly. What building is designed to withstand even a fraction of those forces??? None. What roads, bridges, railroads, ports or other infrastructure would remain? It’s not just flood waters that are the challenge here. The ground would be torn apart, hot lava/ash, dust, wind, fires. There’s no predicting where that would be less or more bad.
Survivors would be people who are not in buildings or underground structures. They would be outside somewhere, lucky that a mountain didn’t fall on them. Or hurricane force winds didn’t hit them with something. Now they would have to find food and water without the help of bic lighters or diesel fuel, trucked in seeds or fertilizers. Interesting problem, isn’t it???
My best odds would be for people already living a primitive lifestyle, with no reliance on modern conveniences.
Yes, I agree with the line of reasoning you take, but this appears to be a thing which has happened before, periodically, so there are ways to prepare, as you have started to consider. We have a rural (Yoakum, pop. 6k) place in the Texas coastal plains, about 70 miles in from the coast, with a large garden and fruit trees, with natural gas wells nearby, and a railroad and HEB (Texas chain) grocery store. I’ve designed and built (a fair amount myself) a house there in the past few years, but it is a poor prep for this situation, should it come to pass in my lifetime.
It’s interesting that opposition to the regime is being driven to Florida, Texas, Costa Rica and El Salvadore while WEF-owned billionaires are buying up high altitude land. Also interesting the testing the military was doing a few short years ago with conventional charges in the Atlantic off Florida being used to measure the effect on shore. There is little strategic need for larger nukes in nation-state level conflicts, but that isn’t to say there is no practical application (or black budget, or infrastructure) for higher megaton weapons used to simulate natural disasters (ideally a yield>radiation device akin to the inverse of a proton bomb preventing the irradiation of useful sea & land). It’s unlikely but possible that talk of impacts from the Taurid belt or pole shifts have been bolstered or even seeded by the very actors who anticipate the need to mask an artificial disaster with a naturalistic explanation. If so it may be a backup plan laid in the hopes it will not be necessary, sort of like how 3 World Wars were planned in the 1880s to meet particular objectives, but if control can be consolidated with a mere two global conflicts then any resistance will be usefully fixated on a massive war that will never arrive. Rather the slow boot of tyranny will crush human freedom with nary a whimper.
Perhaps a 400 megaton device sits in the Atlantic at this very moment, to be set off if key nations abruptly turn on the central banks. Every navy obliterated, every airforce neutralized with deliberately crippled forces comprised of man-piloted, antiquated, non-ai low-G aircraft and limited fuel reserves to sustain relentless waves of more agile drones. A handful of low orbit corporate sats explode, seeding a debris field and destroying existing satellite infrastructure while backdoor equipped programs (in the spirit of “PROMIS”) neutralize potential threats in well-protected bases, crippling the heavily centralized coordination capability of both NATO and BRICS. A hundred million AI-equipped drones then emerge from holes in the ground and enact the new order. All of this is well within the capability of the WEF, and the deep allegiance many members of its pet cult hold would preempt either superpower from detecting it. Also at the very least the Western intelligence apparatus has been functionally dominated by the ethnic cult since the OSS days, and we know the CCP is the result of the native Chinese communism party losing to the Bolshevik backed interlopers in a pretty vicious war…so who knows what really leads them. Wild speculation to be sure, but in a world of censors and captive science speculation is one of our only tools.
It’s also occurred to me that given the likely links between electromagnetic qualities of the magnetosphere/ionosphere and the probability of impacts our much-denied but laughably visible geoengineering programs may serve a more insidious function than depriving us of vital sunlight in order to increase chronic disease: Perhaps they are drawing them in. If so this begs the question of what exactly happened to trigger the Younger Dryas? We assume naturalistic explanations for previous civilization-ending events, but the faux blame the WEF vermin place on serfs for environmental disasters/wars of their own making and the “the gods were angry with uppity humans” guilt-based mythologies seeded in our ancestors have a lot in common. Perhaps humanity is beset by a perennial parasite, generating massive calamities every time we rise to the cusp of escaping our gravity well. Casting blame on us for it’s failings and taking credit for our victories. Do we REALLY know what persecutes us? Is it even (still) human?
When Omicron arrived (and your very good article with it), I said that it was the “free range vaccine”, because of its high transmission rate and low mortality, compared to the Delta COVID that went through my household in that same winter solstice 2021-2022(treated with ivermectin-cocktail to good effect).
Omicron did not bind strongly to ACE-2 expressing cells in blood vessels, lungs, etc and did not have an effective Furin Cleavage Site (but rather an ineffective one), so pathogenicity was reduced to the “common cold” coronavirus realm. Hallelujah! https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01449-w
Delta was horrid. Hit our entire family hard. None of us have ever been that sick before. Two extended family members in the hospital for weeks. Eliquis was a god send for my sister in law with the coagulation issues from Delta. We were denied access to ivermectin. “Go home and sleep it off, you should have gotten the vaccine.” That doctor needs to be decertified.
Omicron was three days of 99.5 fever and a slight cough.
In the old days we would have already known that Omicron was an entirely different and long-extant coronavirus. But not under our current darkness.
Delta recurred after stopping ivermectin 5 day course after 2 days asymptomatic, for a 2 week purgatory phase, despite resuming treatment. 2 family members who got significantly ill before getting ivermectin, had short hospital stays.
Interesting but I think I and my family had what Dr Michael Levitt called “pre-immunity” to covid because we never got anything until Omicron in mid to late 2022. Nothing since. I guess your family didn’t have that.
Your family probably caught the proto-Covid version of Omicron somewhere in 2018/19 and gained the necessary antibodies to stave off Wuhan-Alpha-Delta, much as Asian communities had the good fortune to experience. However, most HCoV’s mutate to a new infection cycle every 4 to 6 years. So when that strain you had in 2018 mutated, you caught it again. But again, Omicron was a separate/milder form of HCoV from W-A-D (although very closely related).
Fascinating insights! I’ll take it you’re familiar with Chris Dunns’ hypothesis. The air shafts are 21cm in diameter which corresponds with the hydrogen line. The vitrification of the interior of the kings chamber and potential for high energy exitement of this gas pose some other questions. The grand gallery also adding to the mix. I always wondered if this structure was somehow part of a damping/feedback mechanism to control the earths speed of rotaion and angle to the ecliptic. The alluded to date of contsruction also aligns approx with the start of the holocene.
Yes, you have to watch out for medical practitioners who say, let me just do this. My insurance made me get retroactive approval for retina surgury that was already done on an emergency basis. The doctor tried and tried to offer me an examination, when all I needed was the approval. I finally caved and let her listen to my chest. And so I got a bill for a medical exam that I didn’t need.
There are many of us who are neither experts, mavens, or otherwise, yet still have been able to sense who is acting as such. Perhaps there is also a kind of wisdom in some of the unwashed masses, too.
The “At-risk Stakeholder” – because, if a person is not at risk (no skin in the game) – and insists upon making noise on behalf of/canceling out the voice of those who are at risk, they are part of an echo chamber. Still, a very good point. (thumbs)….
This hustle-chain you describe is one of the inefficiency-costs of stacked layers of complexity (h/t Tainter), such as our bureaucracies and hierarchies, isn’t it? :-(
Highly inflationary, yes. And as market deceptions/up-spins increase, the rate of inflation increases in direct proportion. I saw this all across Africa and the Middle East.
Lighted Way Ministries | Home lightedway.org follows the movements of the celestial bodies. Everywhere on Earth the “zodiac” signs are assigned the same meaning, Virgo, virgin, the words are different, but the meaning is the same, why? Sagittarius looks nothing like an archer in my eyes. Michael Rood has interesting info as well. The 70 week prophesy of Daniel and 70 week ministry of Yashua (jesus). I enjoy your writings TES. The fact the new moon is shown in it signifies the beginning of the month, if it was the first day of the biblical month it would be the day of Announcements, trumpets. The feasts of YHWH Yehova still portend events. As Israel was made a nation on the day of Pentecost, the count of 50 in 1948 as Isiah indicated would happen a nation created in a day, impossible. The change of the Biblical calendar from YHWH way of counting to the computer generated in advance calendar, made everyone miss it. Nehemiah Gorgon has interesting stuff. I lived 10 miles from the Los Lunas Mystery stone mentioned. Not mentioned is a few miles north in the petroglyph area off 98th there are more Paleo Hebrew writings. Sadly the last time we hiked out to the stone morons had poured oil or something on it. It is near the rio Puerco. Some of the copper found from the Temple came from CT USA. I think the fact the ancients were boating all over is clear. I also think they had the ability to fly from Egypt to Peru where there’s another Pyramid complex. “Mysteries of forgotten Worlds” shows a Nazca lines that looks like an airport and runway. Puma Punku has H building I think poured in place, simulated rock as with the largest blocks of the Giza Pyramid “The Pyramids an Enigma Solved” and electricity ” The Giza Powerplant”. My books are boxed up, I have forgotten some of the authors. We’re building a house in TX and my office/ library is… incomplete (disaster) I think we are now approaching the level of technology they had that was lost.
Thank you. I keep tabs on Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson’s work and have yet to reconcile the two broader approaches. However, I am under no illusion that our geological history is simple – and hold out the possibility of a chain of events or multiple events.
The issue is, that we are ignorant on all this because our academic institutions desired us to be so. That age of arrogance has ended. Now I hope that these observations will begin to coalesce into an actual history of Earth and mankind. One no longer ruled by dark intent behind the scenes, which lies at every opportunity.
Certain keywords in my comment threads have attracted the ‘Birkeland Current’ shills.
In some ways one has to support them. Anyone who thinks there can be some funky non-gravitational force that keeps two stars physically bound to each other despite an 8.6 light year separation is pretty much a lost cause. :-/
Hi ES, my principal concern is where all the water is coming from if not from Ice ? Would it be displaced water from other parts of the globe? Certain parts of the globe would see sea water level fall and others rise ? Also, the timing seems to coincide with the end of the last alleged Ice Age and begining of the interglacial era we are supposedly currently in. That all made sense to me looking and pondering at the geography here in Canada, where we had an inland meltwater (mer de Champlain) sea that slowly dried out to become rivers and lakes. So my question would be, wouldnt the earth tipping cancel the ice age, melting out the ice buildup in North-America and Antartica by bringing them closer to the sun/equator? Also, could the flooding in Egypt and north Africa be caused mainly simply by the rising and lowering of the earths crust ? Thanks.
Thank you for your answer and sorry for the imprecisions, english is not my first language and I have very basic knowledge in physics. Certain parts of the globe that were under sea level were freed from water and other parts that were above sea level were inundated ? Similarly to tides ? Do you have any explanation as to why egypt/ north africa in particuliar would be at the receiving end of the all that water ? Which regions would have a low tide (if we can call it that) ?. Thanks
Matt, excellent English. No apologies necessary. I studied Latin, so I am way behind you…
Yes, certain parts of the ocean bottom under this hypothesis, would emerge, while the ocean would inundate other areas. The unknown in this is the plasticity of the asthenoshphere. Some of the ‘flood’ marks I have seen with my own eyes, have retreated slowly over time. So, the hypothesis does not have a mechanism yet for every detail. That will come. As is most of reality, it is complex, and our simple answers have to mature to begin to describe it.
With regard to dissolution of limestone by the high sea level, did you look at signs of this in other pyramids, eg. Red pyramid, Bent and Step? Although I haven’t checked if Tura limestone was used in these.
Yes, these pyramids did not contain the internal design of Khufu (save for a gallery-like structure of lower sophistication in the Red Pyramid). Nor do these other later pyramids contain the technological and society sophistication. None have a star map which dates to 9200-9600 bce. So, I have to conclude that they were mere later imitations of Khufu and Khafre. The second article deals with the errant dating of Khufu. We create this paradox by the bad assumption that these were built in 2540 bce by Khufu and Khafre.
I believe the heat source for your article is the sun. The only energy source that matters to earth.
What are the changing speeds of other planets, moons in our solar system? Must be a common cause.
The sun is connected electrically to all planets in the solar system. All magnetic fields are caused by an electric field. There is no empty space. It’s filled with plasma (electric charged particles).
The electric force is 10^36 greater than gravity.
The suppressed electric universe model is your answer.
I have been wondering exactly what mechanisms can heat up the interior of our planet. i know that normally speaking we are talking about microwaves & infrared providing the brunt of any radiation that would excite it but I am beginning to think neutrinos could play an unsuspected role as well especially if they were in a significant density and strength from a solar or extra solar source. I am aware they do not interact strongly or regularly with matter under normal circumstances I just wonder what that density and intensity would have to be to cause a significant effect inside our planet where the densities, pressures and temperatures are incredibly high?
The sun has not changed enough to explain climate change. The heat is arriving in the abyssal oceans first. The core carries LATENT heat in the form of hexagonal closepack iron. When that bravais leaves the H-layer boundary (sloughing), it converts to face centered cubic or body centered cubic, and releases unimaginable amounts of heat. It is the ONLY source which can account for what we observe. When the core regains its strength and accretes mass, we go into a cold cycle.
These evidences suggest that a common mechanism triggers all this changes at the level of our solar system.
I find this completly compatible with your thesis, although the transition from HCP to FCC/BCC would be triggered by some external influence
Agreed Jerome, an insightful and necessary modification to my statement.
Check out Mario Buildreps work, if you don’t know about it. I would love to see you check his work. Simple idea measuring true north of all ancient structures. You could possibly prove your work and give a timeframe. Also relates to world tilt.
Part 1. Exponential Growth of Natural Disasters :
Seismic Activity Increase – Increase in Deep-Focus Earthquakes – Activation of Volcanoes – Intensification of Hurricanes, Storms, and Tornadoes – Increase in the Number of Floods and Droughts – Increase in the Number of Wildfires – World Ocean Heating – Anomalous Glacial Melting in Antarctica and Greenland – Warming of Lower Layers of the Atmosphere – Changes in Upper Layers of the Atmosphere
Part 2. Causes of the Global Catastrophe : Planetary-Scale Changes in 1995 – Displacement of the Earth’s Core in 1998 – Interconnections Between Geodynamic and Climatic Processes – Changes on Other Planets of the Solar System – Astronomical Processes and Their Cyclicity – Abnormal – Heating of Siberia – The Current Cycle of the Planet Earth – Tectonophysical and Mathematical Modeling of the Projected Point of No Return in 2036
_________
Important remark : this document was published by the Creative Society, an organization that aims to warn humanity of an impeding global disaster !!
I do remain skeptical toward their predictions and I surely would be glad to pinpoint some “confirmation bias” or other fallacy in their reasoning, but I feel that I lack the qualifications to assess the expertise of their analysis. Constructive criticism welcome !
PS : I became aware of the Creative Society project when I was looking for critics of Ben Davidson “Suspicious Observers” analysis.
I stumbled upon this video : Response to Ben Davidsonhttps://youtu.be/L6Tq_L7FPgk(january 2023 – 27’). It deals with the increase in the number of earthquakes, the manipulation of earthquakes databases and deep-sea explosive eruptions.
Some other video by Creative Society in relation to the topic of core induced climate change :
I read through the 90 page presentation. IMO it is the attempt of the same old places trying to take advantage of the situation. The only difference is that due to many of us trying our best to spread the truth of the matter and encourage examination they have now decided to try the strategy of joining the “catastrophists” and implanting their message within what we have been saying. Whenever you see the words Sustained Development just go ahead and put it in the trash bin at least as long as it remains in control of it current proponents.
Thanks for your advice.
I always felt quite suspicious about the Creative Society, there “social project”, there link with the Allat Ra organization, there financing.
Yet, I found many interesting and well sourced pieces of information into this report, that is why I shared it.
I wish I could have more well documented info regarding the core displacement allegedly detected around 1997-1998 (@TES, any hints on this matter ?)
You mentionned something about neutrinos in another post : in a few videos by the CS, a process of core modification involving neutrinos is devised. Unfortunately, I can’t find the said videos back !
Maybe I need to read more of your stuff first before commenting but it seems you, Kamis and many others don’t want to or don’t feel our rapidly moving magnetic field is connected to all clime change on earth.
Our planet has already tilted, the pole continues to move and dramatic weather events are everywhere. The oceans are boiling but of course that has nothing to do with humans.
Picture the earth as a giant ant farm and all the ant tunnels are lava tubes. None are ever extinct, simply dormant till the poles move, planet tilts and this magma then moves in different directions throughout the lava tubes.
The entire planet has magnetism everywhere, the crust, air, the oceans have their own magnetic field….its not possible for the magnetic pole to be moving and the magnetism throughout earth not being affected.
Excellent animation. Very helpful for those of us that can’t do that in our head.
Maybe I missed this part somewhere, but it’s a key thing that needs to fit with the theory. I am still stuck on what happened to the ice? Is there a signature in the cap ice core data that is there, but not discussed? Both cap core data are suppose to go back 100K’s of years in both Greenland and Vostok. Considering how fast ice melts, and the potential violence of the event, why are the caps that old? What was the water dynamic on rotation from ice melt? I would think the water envelope dynamics would be significant, and that there are multiple answers. I read a paper by Philip Chapman from 2017 about losing the geomagnetic shield where he indicates that a pole shift happened preceding each ice age. https://space.nss.org/wp-content/uploads/NSS-JOURNAL-Losing-the-Geomagnetic-Shield.pdf Much of his thinking is based on overlaying the magnetic events against core data. While each event precedes significant cooling, it’s hard for me to square the long record of core data with even a 50 year relocation to the tropics. What am I missing?
In my hypothesis, it predicts that after the flip – the world is a volcanically dark, very cold, and wet place for a significant period of time. Perhaps this initiates an ice age. But that has all yet to be confirmed – but it part of the process of science. No one person proves out a hypothesis all by them self. This is how they control our thought, by simply refusing to participate in the process.
We desperately need multiple someones to re-examine the known geological evidence with this in mind, and identify new data points (i.e., new core samples) that would be required to exclude your hypothesis. (See what I did there?) It would be a life’s work for one person to take this up and see it through.
There are no ice ages. 30 degree crustal displacement every 12,000 years simply changes the latitude of various parts of The Earth’s surface.
The temperature of The Earth’s biosphere remains constant in geological time (unsurprising from a thermodynamics perspective).
Vostok just happens to end up displaced either side of the pole, i.e. always around 15 degrees away.
30 degrees “up” and then “down” again, I think is what you said — with essentially NO change in longitude? (I’m still combing through your previous comments).
Longitude is a human construct, but prior equators intersect at hinge points (90° from Giza), hence the GP remains axially aligned.
By ‘changes latitude’ I mean ‘changes distance from the poles/equator’. This is effectively what causes abrupt climate change (and changes in glaciation) for a particular region. Most interpretations of the Vostok ice core assume its latitude remains unchanged in geological time (instead of varying 10-20°), and can be used to infer global temperatures (thus erroneously inferring ‘ice ages’).
Thank you Zod for the many clues that you brought into this comment section.
However, I wish that you could tell us more about the origin/source of this “30°” value. :-)
This great circle crosses over the equator at 48° 36′ west longitude and 131° 24′ east longitude, which points are 10° off the Euler axis points discribed in TES’s article.
Moreover, the maximum latitude of the circle is 30° 22′ north latitude at 41° 24′, which brings us back to the Giza plateau location.
Therefore, this fact corroborates Zod’s thesis that Giza (and Nazca and Eastern Island) were on the equator before the last crustal displacement.
TES, you might find this interesting. Holger Isenberg calculated that the geographic centre of the earth varies with sea level. And with a sea level rise of 178m, the geographic centre is Giza.
Although he assumed a rise rather than a pole shift, I wondered if it might be of interest?
He also speculated that the erosion on Khufu were due to wave erosion.
Another great article. As someone else commented, Earnest L Martin (ELM) has a great book that chronicles some of these events. Your notes about interloping aster #12 caught my eye. ELM ties it all together without the interloper, but the interloper would add a whole new dimension to the discussion.
In Douglas A Elwell’s book (3rd chapter), he theorizes an interloper on a 2000 year orbit that appears to coincides with the precession of the equinoxes and the change from one age to the next. Also related to what was recorded as taught in the “school of Elijah” that the world is to exist six thousand years. Two thousand years of Tohu (void /chaos / Taurus); two thousand years of Torah (Aries); and two thousand years of the Messianic era (Pieces).”
I have been trying to collect corroborating evidence over the years. So some of this is new info, very helpful. Thanks!
Do check out ELM’s book, it is a great reference. It is free in HTML form, and audio book .mp3s for when your on the go: https://www.askelm.com/star/index.asp
Hey, stumbled across your website and I’ve been enjoying your blog – good stuff! Keep digging! I’ve got a lot to catch up on with the research you have collected this far. Just wanted to highlight something worth observing. You note the flood of Noah’s day (40 days, non cyclical), but the text of the Torah/Bible can accommodate the ideas you are sharing here.
There are actually 2 devastating floods recorded in the Bible. The first (often overlooked) is Gen 1:2 – which describes the aftermath of the last major cycle of catastrophism approximately 6000 years ago. Noah’s flood gets all the press.
The idea of a pre-adamic or as some call an elder race of humans is a minority view, but it is a position that could be logically argued from the text.
In later midrashic texts, a sage discusses cycles of creation and destruction, suggesting that God created and destroyed multiple worlds before creating the current one.
Leviathan, cyclical ouroboros, the sea dragon of the cosmic ocean – all these ideas on to this day in myth and legends long neglected and ignored.
Stumbled across this video from 2017. Rigid-body physics with no decoupling accounted for. Great visualization nonetheless. https://youtu.be/J-l-SbCFhL0
TES, thanks for another thought provoking essay (I read them all). This is a mundane question but if the Great Pyramid was inundated for ~50 years how is it that there is no evidence that the King’s or Queen’s Chambers (nor the unrelated shaft discovered in 2022-23) were filled with silt?
After 6 or 7 thousand years, how would you know much of anything about either chamber? They were originally completely sealed. They’ve been modified and occupied by humans that entire time since. Whatever was stored in them has been removed with prejudice. I suspect that prejudice extends to other accessible areas and surfaces as well. They just did not think about the Tura cap. Big mistake.
“Legends and records likewise speak of the fact that, before the Arabs removed the Pyramid’s outer casing stones, one could see water marks on the stones halfway up the Pyramid’s height, in about the 240-foot level, which would be 400 feet above the present Nile level.”
This is below the exit point of the KC air vents. The QC’s vents, exiting below flood height, are terminated in flap valves (air out, but no water in).
Most silt and other crud would settle in the ‘subterranean chamber’.
However, early explorers noticed plenty of salt encrustations throughout the chambers and passages.
Amusingly, this is blamed upon the breath of tourists. Which is the excuse for recent ‘cleaning’ of the last traces of salt from the walls (to avoid ‘awkward’ questions).
The KC is effectively an inverted cup, so the level in the KC is limited to the height of the air vents, even though the seawater would travel up the vents – and salt residue was visible around them (very slowly descending floodwaters).
The pyramid was of course built in the knowledge of imminent cataclysm, was designed to prove it occurred, and to preserve that proof for our benefit. See The Floating Coffer Theory.
TES, your recent updates to the article are another article in itself. To relate to some past articles of yours, do you think that the one-trick pony from the beginning itself is still cast here? And possibly (hopefully?) the stellar event of 2 BCE implies that said Forces opted to see that it is indeed different this time as regards ‘the property’? Or is this a tug playing along for more than this latter cycle? I understand one cannot truly answer these questions, but hopefully there are hints for, or against, these possibilities that you are aware of but not shared yet. Keenly looking forward to more of your research on humanity’s past. Thank you for all you do!
Wow, you are paying attention. Sorry about that as well. I wish I could have the whole theory day one. But all theories evolve.
This is my speculation – subject to change so that it is not a religion – but the entity which holds us captive does so under a false interpretation of The Law. If it had a valid claim, it would not need to hide itself, nor its history – nor would it need nuclear weapons to hold us hostage. That entity is showing signals of being in a state of panic – not status quo by any means. However, it hates mankind and will gladly exterminate us all again.
This suggests much of what I need to know, under this conjecture. Finality is approaching for the One Trick Pony – not a cycle. His abject terror allows one to infer the strength and swiftness of those about to intervene.
TES, I do appreciate the additions, but could I suggest that you add a “last edited on (date)” note at the beginning? Some of my comments now look as though I hadn’t carefully read the article.
the reason they may be in a state of panic might be because existential issues, and ours. Idk if you know of neuroscientist donald hoffman, but he’s worth a listen.
Their panic seems to be almost entirely “spiritual” …and what humans are figuring out aside any cataclysm or hierarchy of “beings”…reality is an illusion, as well as our own “consciousness”
Does “One Trick Pony from The Beginning” appear in your articles prior to ORIGINAL SIN…March 3, 2024? Embarrassed to ask, but having a little trouble looking through your works for it. Thanks in advance.
I have used that expression myself to describe various entities that I have read about in case studies, but may not have incorporated it in the TES blog until that article. I don’t disclose everything here of course. Despite these things holding information they should not possess, they don’t appear to be able to control their own behavior or exhibit anything other than a canned magic act. It is a rather complicating paradox, how an entity pretending to be that powerful, should also be so weak at the same time. Doing the same stage tricks over and over in an attempt to intimidate.
Eventually the audience should figure it out.
TES
Thanks. Explication helpful. So much noise even with the squelch set to max makes it difficult to discern the critical transmissions.
Friend, I appreciate much of what you write, but your use of words here seems novel. According to the OED “Complex” and “complicate” both arise in English usage in the 17th century and are synonyms. Similarly, “comprehend” is a word that arose in the 14th century as a synonym for the late 9th century word, “understand.” Surely your point can be made clearly without redefining these words.
Did you read the articles? It describes why. Wittgenstein said “Only describe, don’t explain.” Surely you are not wanting to combine those words as well, since they are also synonyms. One of the whole premises of the novel “1984” was the reduction in vocabulary, so that unethical means could not even be described by their victims.
Understanding is not the same as comprehension. Complex is not the same as complicated. As a systems engineer, and someone who has run a research corporation – I know objectively why as well. I am an expert in this topic.
Although you understand the terms, they bear utility you are not comprehending. By trying to not be complex, you are complicating the world. Problems are complex, humans are complicated. One understands a parable, but that does not mean you comprehend why it is true. I can go on and on…
This is one of the first things I teach a junior engineer or scientist whom I hire. So I reject your proposition.
Of course I read your article. With respect to “describe” and “explain,” they are loosely used as synonyms by those who are imprecise in their language; there is a little overlap in some of the meaning, but explanation clearly diverges from description. We both grasp this. However, “complicate” and “complex” mean “composed of parts, intimately combined;” they mean exactly the same thing in every particular, and one can see this as one reads through the various definitions and forms. Common misuse of complicate (as if there is any suggestion of confusion or tangle) is wrong. At least, so says my OED, afaiaa, the most thorough and comprehensive lexicon in English. Likewise, both “understand” and “comprehend” mean “to fully grasp.” (Definitions are concise for brevity.) The various nuances for comprehension that you outline are summed up in the word “fully.” My interest is in the proper use of words, not in disagreeing with the philosophical point you are trying to make.
Ironically, we both deplore the reduction in language comprehension; but where you are trying to set forth “understanding” as a lesser term, I’m pointing out that it is equal to comprehension. I.e., I’m wanting comprehension of “understanding” not to be diminished. ;-) Perhaps distinguishing between “knowledge” and “comprehension” is closer to your point, but that may not be quite satisfactory, either. At first glance “knowledge” seems a bit lower than that at which you aim with “understanding.”
Disappointingly, your examples, by which you attempt to demonstrate distinctions in the meanings of those words, reflect common misuse, not the correct meaning of the words themselves; they merely restate the misuse. For example, if I were to “complicate the world” I would be “making it complex or intricate” (not “confused,” for “confusion” is no part of the meaning of “complicate,” except by modern misuse). That’s what the word means. You can check the words for yourself in the OED when you have a few moments (I assume you have a set, whether the micro text or regular print 36″ width of shelf space); I think you’ll agree then.
Likewise, I could go on and on… But thank you for the courtesy of your reply. Best regards.
You are incorrect and your tone is pedantic for a second time. You are employing the imprecise, social, equivocal, and colloquial abuse of these terms. I am using the professional and accurate versions of the terms. To wit:
ChatGPT AND American Heritage Dictionary – sum it up insistently in both cases:
Complicated (Perplexing, twisted, or becoming twisted together) versus Complex (Consisting of interconnected or interwoven parts; composite. Composed of two or more units)
Yes, there is a distinction between the terms “complex” and “complicated,” particularly in the context of systems.
Complicated Systems:
Definition: A complicated system is one that is composed of many interconnected parts. Each part can be challenging to understand or solve on its own, but the relationships between parts are generally well-defined and predictable.
Characteristics:
Predictable behavior if the relationships and parts are known.
Can be broken down into smaller, manageable sub-systems.
Often linear in nature, meaning the overall system behavior is the sum of its parts.
Examples: A car engine, a computer, or a manufacturing assembly line.
Complex Systems:
Definition: A complex system, on the other hand, is one where the interactions between parts are not only numerous but also dynamic and non-linear. The behavior of the system as a whole cannot be easily predicted by analyzing individual parts.
Characteristics:
Emergent behavior, meaning the system exhibits properties and behaviors that are not present in any single part but arise from the interactions among parts.
Often adaptive, meaning they can change and evolve over time.
Hard to decompose into independent sub-systems without losing essential characteristics.
Examples: Ecosystems, social systems, the internet, or financial markets.
Key Differences:
Predictability: Complicated systems are predictable if you have enough information about the parts and their interactions. Complex systems are inherently unpredictable due to their dynamic and emergent properties.
Decomposability: Complicated systems can be broken down into sub-components for analysis and understanding. Complex systems cannot be fully understood by only analyzing their parts; their behavior emerges from the interactions and relationships within the whole system.
Behavior: The behavior of complicated systems is generally more static and linear, while complex systems exhibit dynamic, adaptive, and non-linear behaviors.
Understanding (Individual or specified judgment or outlook) versus Comprehension (the act or fact of grasping the meaning, nature, or importance of)
There is indeed a distinction between understanding and comprehension, particularly when considering the nuances of each term:
Understanding:
Definition: Understanding generally refers to the ability to grasp the meaning of something. It involves recognizing patterns, relationships, and contexts within the information presented.
Characteristics:
Surface-Level: Often more immediate and intuitive, based on recognizing familiar elements and drawing connections.
Context-Dependent: Relies on the context in which the information is presented, such as analogies or parables.
General: Understanding can be broad and does not always require in-depth knowledge or detailed analysis.
Example: Understanding a parable involves recognizing the moral or lesson it conveys without necessarily delving into the deeper principles it illustrates.
Comprehension:
Definition: Comprehension goes a step further than understanding. It involves a deeper, more thorough grasp of the information, including its implications, underlying principles, and complexities.
Characteristics:
In-Depth: Requires a detailed and analytical approach, often involving critical thinking and synthesis of information.
Insightful: Achieving comprehension means gaining true insight into the nature of the subject, seeing beyond surface patterns to underlying truths.
Holistic: Comprehension encompasses understanding but also includes the ability to integrate and apply knowledge in various contexts.
Example: Comprehending meaning behind a parable involves not only understanding the surface message but also the broader philosophical or ethical principles it represents, and being able to apply those principles in different situations.
TES:
This short note is to apologize – properly. After some reflection I saw what was offensive about my post. I should have approached it with something like, “Could you further explain why you make such a distinction between these words? The OED has near identical definitions for them; what am I missing?” Instead, I assumed you’d got it wrong and waded in, as you say, pedantic. Even my follow up “apology” had some cheek. That was poor on my part, and I’m sorry to have engaged you like that. Thanks again for your patient and detailed reply.
Best regards,
Martin
Martin,
Thank you. I have never had anyone apologize online before. Not something I am used to. Accepted, and we move forward. Welcome to the comments section :-)
EVG
TES
That’s very gracious. Thank you.
Makes me wonder if the Tartaria/Mud Flood “conspiracy theory” was disinformation crafted to get ahead of the truth of a cyclical catastrophe and poison the well on more legitimate theories like this one.
Another key component to this mystery is why the pyramids were built. Just a hypothesis, but what was the most important and vital thing to the Egyptians’. It was clean fresh water, not dirty water from the Nile but water from the heavens’. The pyramids have enormous rain water collecting capability. Just look at how much water runs off your house roof in a rain storm and collects in its gutters. And that is miniscule compared to what would collect and run down the smooth limestone sides of the pyramids. This water would be collected in the moat that surrounds the base of the pyramid then directed through a gate like structure and then down the “causeways” to collection structures situated at the end of the causeway and close to the Nile. There is was “bottled” and could be transported by boat to various locations. Sometimes the rain and water collected was too much and it overflowed the moat and ran down the slope pouring into the Sphynx causing the “water erosion” seen around its structure. Also exploring the possibility that in addition to rain water the Pyramids also collected condensation. They would have been cooler due to their thermal mass and the warm air could have produced moisture on the surface of the smooth limestone.
Ethical, after the oscillation will the earth’s rotation still be perpendicular to the solar ecliptic? Or will it continue along the current axis, though at the “new” angle nearly horizontal to the ecliptic?
I’m just curious if there will be a night and day, or will one side of the earth be mostly light and the other mostly dark.
Thoroughly engrossing. My only constructive criticism would be to eliminate the nonessential references to those whose pseudoscience or politics add nothing to this brilliant treatise.
Understood on the sentiment Eagleeye. This (along with the personal anecdote) acts as a filtering mechanism. I am purposely not using the de rigueur style and content of a ‘scholarly article’. There are specific reasons for this. First it is a legal prosecution – like what a lead attorney would deliver to the jury in a closing argument – replete with a personal touch, and arming the jury with the information they need to see through the defense’s holes in their case – thus, it is not merely a scientific explanation. In order to be a legal argument, it must defuse the defense’s canned shtick as part of its critical delivery.
I am well versed in the arguments (see the Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation) which the syndicate and their useful idiots will employ against hypotheses of this nature, so I want to defuse those in the least before the trolling reader can pull them from their memorized quiver – or, to act as fake skeptic repellent so that they don’t even read the article to begin with. Most fake skeptics are threatened by competence, so the personal anecdote at the start is guaranteed to get their dander up. There is no way you could be smarter than they are, so they will not waste their time on the “TL;DR” in that case.
In the end, I do not require, nor want, these people’s ‘review’ or even approval (not that this would happen no matter how sound the science may be).
The purpose of logical calculus is not to serve as entertainment for liars. It is written for everyone else.
Thank you for grouping these 3 essays, Sir Skeptic. I had to link to the second one to explain the third one to somebody, after I had disseminated it. Of course the trilogy is better.
The question remains about how to discern when a “bad-enough” decoupling would occur, followed by wondering how rapidly it would progress, and what assumptions about industrial society might remain valid, if any, once the progression became common knowledge.
This 12,000 year cycle of the rotating galactic current sheet, from the center of our Milky Way, inducing currents in the Earth’s mantle and magnetic pole shifts, perhaps solar micronovas, is one model, though less well presented than your work (sorry).
This 3 minute video cuts to the rotational shift changes with video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
as does this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmFj1IcdTTM&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=5v=VmFj1IcdTTM&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=5
This is the catastrophe video series, about 19 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw
The physical rotational axis shift that Ben Davidson anticipates is about what you assess to be likely. It seems that the poles. The best I can tell he figures the South Atlantic anomaly might become the south pole, The north pole might be near Burma in the Bay of Bengal, as I understand it.
Ben does a lot of videos, not easily referenced written presentations with illustrations. He does what he wants and promotes it. Baby; bathwater, what to do?
Moving to higher ground is a thing he promotes. He’s got a place somewhere in western Colorado. Tibet should be good… One needs to consider slosh and also the climate in the new rotation. John Day, Oregon happens to not look bad…
It seems that those who are in a position to know are keeping the knowledge a ac=secret, because why bother people if they are mostly doomed, anyway… Catherine Austin Fitts has long looked at the $US trillions missing from the Pentagon and HUD, and says there is a “breakaway civilization” being built, some of the investment going to DUMBs (deep underground military bases). I wonder if the ramp-up of electric battery technology, obviously not fit-for-purpose for climate change, or for post-peak-oil, might serve in this application.
At any rate, my calling is to be on the surface with the non-elites, come what may. It is possible that there could be 10 or 20 years of awareness before the full catastrophe, but the progression might be very bad in itself, with earthquakes and volcanoes.
I am comfortable with my own life and death, but would like to be helpful to my species and life on my home planet, while I yet live. I like my kids and grandkids, too.
Wonderfully framed and stated, John. I am not that desperate to live here for just another set of years – especially in the hell world which will exist, if and when this happens, in the instance that one survives.
For example, the Vostok ice core goes back hundreds of thousands of years. Vostok has remained polar for a LONG time. There is a crustal displacement (pole shift), but it’s a mere 30 degrees back & forth (meridian 30), which just so happens to oscillate Vostok either side of the pole.
Laughably, Davidson suggests that Vostok could be elevated to high altitude in order to preserve its permafrost – at the equator… ROFL
‘Rotating galactic current sheet’? WTF?
‘Micronovas’ ???
So you are off to a bad start claiming he said “it could be elevated” as I am sure he knows it is already that elevated as he has shared maps of it’s elevation.
You are not a serious person, so I have nothing more to say to you.
Anyway, yes, electric vehicle & rechargeable battery technology is being spurred, primarily because ‘fossil fuel’ extraction, refinement, and distribution aren’t going to survive the cataclysm, and will take a long time to rebuild.
Anthropogenic climate change is a cover story. The climate is determined entirely by latitude, which occurs upon pole shift. Thus the temperature of The Earth’s biosphere remains essentially constant in geological time.
It’s technically possible that the whole biosphre is a lifeform (GAIA-theory), and that this lifeform can trigger the event by will.
This maybe sounds crazy and esoteric to you, but for me as Technician this is in the range of possibilities.
Important point, TES. Silicon-based life has been hypothesized. Also, while self-aware machine intelligence has also been hypothesized (and, recently, claimed as extant) there is a sure-fire route to machine intelligence via cyborgs.
No longer limited to science fiction, they already exist. Know someone with a permanently implanted hearing aid? They’re a cyborg. In decades ahead, absent a cataclysm, mechanical replacements and even augmentations of various bodily functions will proliferate.
It could be a process of gradual replacement. Assuming that some people prefer those to stem-cell-based regeneration of organs because of superior capabilities (e.g. vision like an eagle), by the early 2100s we may have people walking around who are almost entirely machines, yet still regarded as human in all respects.
Precession of the equinoxes is well-established—as cause of climate cycles / of periodic Great Floods. -Rick
The US recently extracted permission from Chile to build a base in the Galapagos Islands which is near one rotational center, in his latest monthly report astrologer Rick Levine mentioned the current Saturn Neptune conjunction at 0º Aires hasn’t happened for 6,000 years and there are increasingly frequent reports on the growing magnetic anomaly in the South Atlantic.
Interesting read thanks. A couple of things seemed a little odd if you could clarify please.
The bases of the Giza pyramids are not on exactly the same level. There is a slight variation in elevation between them. The Great Pyramid of Giza, for example, is situated on slightly higher ground compared to the other pyramids in the complex. However, the differences in elevation are relatively small and may not be immediately noticeable to the casual observer.
The top of the Khafre pyramid, also known as the Pyramid of Khafre or Chephren, is approximately 136.4 meters (447 feet) above sea level. While the highest pyramid top above sea level is the summit of the Great Pyramid of Giza or Khufu. The exact height can vary slightly depending on how erosion has affected the structure over time, but it is generally accepted to be around 138.8 meters (455 feet) above sea level.
This seems to be conflicting with several pieces of information you presented. Any ideas where the differences lay? It would be good to know your original sources on these numbers and elevations. Thanks.
I’ve always wondered about the floods and expected something to this extent. After reading all this it explains all the hysteria and media. They know it’s coming too, just a matter of time. I had the fam watch a bunch of those pool vs earthquake videos just to give them the smallest of tastes of what something like that could be like.
I can only imaging what it would look like to be on an airplane in the upper atmosphere looking down as the world flips beneath you. The ensuing force of the winds and atmosphere hitting the fuselage is probably all you would likely perceive before things go south.
All of the EV’s down on the surface now submerged in salty ocean water bursting into flame.. Silent white flame burning below the surface. Home batteries blaze in brilliant white and yet unobservable.
Massive cargo ships, yachts and even military submarines tossed hundreds of miles from the open ocean slamming into mountains miles inland..
On the other side.. oceans almost completely drained. Sailors looking upon valleys grander than anything on land. Long burred under miles of ocean now barren. Abyss suddenly cast under sun and starlight for a few days maybe.. Then waiting days/weeks/months/years as things flow back into place.
I’m not the best scientist so some of what I describe is most likely debatable. But I can’t help but imagine.
I know, I’m kind of weird. But I take this as a challenge to overcome and I have a few ideas already. I cannot help but try.
Hi TES you may be interested in this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-l-SbCFhL0&t=206s I’ve been thinking aong similar lines, but think the low velocity zones, close to the core, are based on low melt temperature metals saturated with H+ ions increasing their density by a significant fraction. Once they breakout occurs the H+ begins to escape and harvests the oxygen from the minerals it encounters. In fact a huge number of exothermic reactions begin to cascade creating masses of lightweight minerals that begin to ascend altering the once balanced [?] mantle. I can’t find any work on the subject but I suspect that @30Km down and below is where the water formed in this process shifts phase from supercritical to a more nearly water ‘steam’ state releasing many more reactants then as they rise to @10Km depth the steam phase shifts to water and here the water reacts to it’s 4th phase creating exclusion ones which seperate non hydrophilic ‘elements’ out and at the same time freeing large amounts of H+ which begin to rise which can precipitate explosive events or slowly seep up to the surface to escape and which may be implicated in otherwise unexplainable forest fire outbreaks.
I suspect ore bodies of the escaping metals dissolve in the new lightweight H+ rich liquids and follow their rise losing more H+ as the pressure drops. One of particular interest is sodium which may be released from the numerous smokers/hydrothermal vents along the plate boundaries as extremely saline mineral rich brine giving some little insight into it’s journey.
Enough speculation for now.
I’m not alone in considering the possibility of hydrogen storage in the core, this paper examines it although they differ inasmuch as I’m thinking of H+ rather than H2 and they remain faithfull to the accretion hypothesis. If there was a singular outbreak on one side of the core then the shock waves from explosive, expansive exothermic reactions should cause a similar antipodal outbreak, rinse repeat. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022GL101155
Quite how it [H+] gets there is a subject for speculation and mine have moved as far as abandoning the ‘accretion model’ to one where dense planets and moons are formed in the cores of stars, and gas giants are captured stars which have lost their cores, fractionalised into planets moons and asteroids/comets. Jupiter has almost no core left, and perhaps as Velikovsky claimed and used as the basis for his very accurate estimate of Venus’s surface temperature back in the 40’s [met with ridicule] the ancients in their reporting of Venus springing fully formed from the head of Zeus was true.
If H+ is present in significant quantities in some parts of shattered cores then would exlain the difference between comets rich in H+ and asteroids, relatively depleted, with the H+ being excited by changing em potentials and reacting with Oxygen present.
On the pyramids, even before David Rhol discovered a building clearly the model for the biblical description of Solomons palace near Avarice I’d come to the conclusion that Djoser was the hostage crown prince Joseph raised by the Pharoah and appointed regent of the delta area, thus a very raised servitude.Then reinforcing my prejudices I came across this, https://www.geopolymer.org/archaeology/pyramids/ . Long ago I’d read that the pyramids were worked on under the light of the moon, although some suggestions of fantastical reasons were floated it suggested to me that they were casting concrete a little too dry to become full strength but perhas the stories of using resonance was more to do with settling the concrete to full density and removing all but the tiniest air bubbles. It would aso go some way to explaining how the polished stone facade managed to be as smooth as reported when it’s difficut to find a modern facade that isn’t multi faceted when using much lighter thinner and more adustable modern materials. So I’m thinking once the outer blocks were laid a stronger finer surface coat was added and wet polished to a single plane finish then kept wet and polished further. Being laid a little too dry would make it easier to work but there would be an underlying adhesion problem with the absolutly dry substrate sucking water from the contact layer meaning that would always retain more air and perhaps never condense or set to full strength. Thus once the water communicated a vacuum pressure to the casings an exlosive release would be inevitable.
I have looked at quite a few different angles to explain aspects of the flood in Genesis.
Melting ice caps
Expanding Earth
Localized flooding only
This post is fascinating and really fresh entry into that realm. Really one of the most credible ones I’ve yet to see. While it may be difficult to see the Earth flipping over like a wing-nut I can’t say that it isn’t possible.
What has taken humanity so long to reach their current status? Is it that we didn’t develop beer sooner so we could sit around and talk about issues, or does the Earth get reset every 12,000 years in a planet shift? Fascinating!
Daniel, thanks. I hate this idea – but what if this planet was intended as a DNA-garden and not as a habitable home for a large civilization. For precisely this reason – it flips over.
One would think that the Helvetii or Tibetans would have stories to tell about this. Pre-Columbian North America has only vague flood myths. China has flood myths, but they appear to be propaganda for imperial large-scale hydraulic projects. I suspect that geological evidence can be re-sequenced to fit this hypothesis, and it has a great deal of explanatory power as to the apparent world-wide astronomical obsession on the part of neolithic societies.
But to my knowledge, there is only one fairly detailed description of the cataclysm, if cataclysm it was. Why? The human evolutionary funnels are much older than this, so it’s not because no one was left to tell the tale.
That’s an interesting idea. Aren’t there jumps in evolution erupting from our recorded extinction events? Higher doses of cosmic and solar radiation, due to a crippled Earth’s magnetic field could explain that? An intelligent design/evolution method.
Thanks for posting this. You are one of the most unique and interesting minds out there.
It’s all about the forces, isn’t it? Brilliant, hard to dismiss, horrifying.
I put what looked like your new old North Pole into an Antipode generator to help see this but I really think it would be useful to make a scale model animation start to finish. See if what you are proposing should have other supporting geological evidence. For example Neil ‘s flood idea – what would happen to the ice? Do we see that?
Incredible work – a brilliant illustration of the importance of seeing and exploring information with fresh, unbiased, critical eyes. A real advancement to understanding the world, which is valuable in its own right. My question is: What, if anything is to be done about it? Is there some response or action that should be taken based upon your work, or is it simply an important contribution to understanding the world
Very interesting analysis. And oh yes; this: “(my commentary: why someone would wish to live forever in this realm is beyond me).” – could not agree more…
Dear Sir, you might find the Dead Sea Scrolls of interest as documents that present a history that accounts for your findings of recurring floods (as set apart from the Biblical Flood). In fact, we are due for another such one. We do live on an unstable planet that flips over regularly, influenced by the magnetic fields of the planets. Each series of tsunamis and continental lift or subsidence wipes out some or all of the evidence of previous events, leaving the most recent for us to observe. I suggest you inquire into the regular “dark ages” of history, where there are sudden dynastic changes and changes in hegemony, as well as geologic evidence of earthquakes and tsunamis but no matching human records (because dead people don’t record stuff). 701 B.C. is an interesting one, as after that year all major civilizations around the world changed their calendars from 360 day calendars to accommodate a longer 365.25 day year. The Dead Sea Scroll calendar was recently deciphered, and the texts found with it indicate a regular recurrence of global disasters about every 400-700 years…which may explain why global hegemony seems to expire every 400 years or so. You might bring your extensive knowledge to bear on the Scrolls, either to prove or disprove them.
Dear TES,you have transformed an enigma into a highly salient case with this one, however unnerving it may be. Reading up further, it seems that the shafts are not straight but have varying inclinations and-or turns in 3D space as they span out from the chambers. I understand the hypothesis refers to the longer, outer parts of the shafts as the polar indicators. But what about their lower sections closer to the chambers? Are these mere construction artifacts or could their lengths and angles denote something else as to the nature and sequence of the event(s)? Should one consider optics / mirrors at these turning points in the original design? Given that the shafts code the critical message, it is unlikely that this was left to chance, but is their intent a tool to code the message or a nuance of the message itself? And what about the Khafre pyramid and its (claimed?) lack of shafts? Why would the builders-coders duplicate the work? There should either be some clearly orthogonal coding of the same message to it (other than the erosion itself)… or is there an orthogonal purpose?
When I examined the Pyramids, there were two grades of work. Fine stone work and placement in the interior and underlaiment. And crude stone work with regard to the stacked Mokattam stones of the pyramid itself. Two different craftsmen and two different standards of construction, with the latter being far less talented than the former. These were not purposed, rather two different cultures doing what they could do. It was cultural talent, not trade group assignments. I believe that there was an original fine granite temple structure that the shafts had to work around before making their stellar run (which of course confirms the importance of the latter shaft angle, as they had to deliberately reattain it in each case).
Smoothing the Mokattam limestone could be done with classic old Kingdom tools. But the precision and Mohs hardness (in conflict) of the interior temple stones was extraordinary. I don’t know who did that – and claiming that the Old Kingdom Egyptians made all those is a grand assumption. Thus, I suspect that the pyramid stones were possibly stacked there to keep the temple from being removed by whoever wanted to hide its presence and purpose.
But we need more information. As I always contend, lies have all they need in the here and now. This is why we don’t see much work on the critical path issues in Egypt. Information is a bad thing, so it has to be released slowly only after it has been vetted so as to conform with the fable we crafted long ago.
Fascinating. Presumably, if this holds true, the original structure is likely still there but the exact delineation of the overlaid vs original stonework has not been mapped to date, correct? An even more ancient device that its last prediluvian guardians chose to safeguard against known, ill intent by going to extremes, and by, either necessary, or even calculated, compromise, somewhat obscuring the message?
The proposed period of these changes is mentioned as 10-50 years. Is this just based on the pyramid erosion or have you found evidence of this period other places? Also, is the assumption land masses return to the original locations or is it that the earth just settles down and the waters recede? When I first read the work, I assumed the shift would be relatively static until the next iteration, but on the third or forth read, I took it to mean the entire change would only last 10-50 years.
1. The very nominal erosion on the Khafre Pyramid suggests a fairly short inundation timeframe. Not a short period (<5 years). But certainly not 1,000 years either.
2. We have not found enormous layers of sediments commensurate with a long exposure as sea-bottom in most places - so this would appear as either a flash or regional flood, or even not at all in most cases.
3. Finding a number of whale skeletons far into Egypt away from the Med at Wadi Al-Hitan (Whale Valley) should have tipped someone off... LOL!!
I don't know why we don't have more published evidence of this. But we have a dead body nonetheless. If I clean up from a party, and find a dead body in the livingroom, despite all the guests saying everything at the party went fine, I still know that it did not. Deductive evidence versus inductive. Deductive is far stronger.
If the surface rotated 104 degrees relative to the spin axis, the spin-produced equatorial bulge would be misplaced. The earth’s radius is about 22 km greater at the equator than at the poles. I don’t know how quickly rock would adjust, but water and air would flow more quickly towards equipotential. Intuitively, this would produce two 20-km deep oceans over each of the normal poles (shifted to the tropics) absorbing all of Earth’s ocean water, while land near the new poles would rise above the atmosphere.
To give a sense of scale, even the tallest mountains of Antarctica would be deep underwater, while at the new south pole near Hawaii the seafloor would be higher than Mt Everest, and Honolulu would literally be lifted into the stratosphere without air to breathe.
Is there a layer of the mantle sufficiently fluid or plastic to rapidly shift the equatorial bulge? In the crust, glacial rebound is slow. The dynamics involved here are all new to me.
We don’t know the plastic dynamics of the mantle, asthenosphere, and lithosphere, except to note that they are all indeed plastic at 932 to 4000 degrees C. They would deform immediately. during the days of the shift. Probably not a pleasant thing, even if one was up above the flood-wash.
So is this why all the billionaires are building bunkers on Maui? I had assumed it would be 1) inundated by the ocean, or 2) consumed in volcanic events.
Layman here. If the pyramids are a warning and instruction manual, why is the info so cryptic? Aren’t the hieroglyphs a language? Why not just tell future inhabitants with language and easy to understand artwork?
I asked my self this same question many times. I don’t think they were built during the era of hieroglyphic writing – as there are no hieroglyphs at all in the Pyramid. There are some red ochre markings in the Queen’s south shaft, but they are engineering marks. The relieving chamber markings are forgeries by Vyze. Here is the issue: no matter what the pyramid was made for, they did not say in this manner. And it was not made for any trivial reason. So, every alternative carries this weight of having to explain this, and none do – except mine.
I suspect that this was a design which would survive a flood – or removal by malicious controlling forces. Perhaps the ‘tombs were filled with documents and documentation – which, like everything else, and just as they were concerned – was pilfered so as to prevent our knowing about our past sordid history under the Anunnaki fake gods.
This is why I speculate that someone powerful and old, does not want this known – and the builders of the pyramid knew this. They cleansed most information, but could not remove the final traces (however there was one pyramid that was removed – it is one thing to build a pyramid, but why would one remove it?).
Yes, lately they say it is as large a Menkuare. But when originally found, the estimate was that it was a significant fraction of Khufu.
I can’t help kick the feeling that a laser or water-jet carving (whatever tech they used to quickly and accurately cut the stones) could have communicated the need to plan for Earth Destruction every 12,000 revolutions around the sun. Maybe there are carvings somewhere, just haven’t found them. Maybe that’s what’s hiding under the Sphynx that we’re not allowed to see. But nevermind that, I know it’s woo-woo. Back to facts … more to read. Thank you!
I have been deeply unsettled, meditating on your work (I’d read the prior two articles as they came out), these last 24hrs. I’m grieving a bit – this loss of ignorance. Your comment here: “I speculate that someone powerful and old, does not want this known – and the builders of the pyramid knew this,” is particularly haunting.
Powerful, I can imagine. Is this “someone” still extant (hence, the “old”)? The presumption was they pre-existed the deluge, and then survived it to have (continuing) influence on the hiding of this information from future generations. Qui bono? Are you thinking the DNA-incubator-model view of the Earth and this “someone” needing the reset to keep us well confined here in the petri dish?
Is this why it seems there’s a well funded (private) effort to finally (and in a mad race) achieve some level of commercial space travel? The idea of settling on Mars never made sense to me, but suddenly it seems pretty clear why someone would be motivated to “hide out” there for a period to avoid the worst of Utanapishtim 2.0 (or… 14.0… whatever cycle we’re on now). That presumes, of course, that Mars doesn’t also “tumble.”
And is anyone building an Ark that you know about?
I hold a hypothesis (not proven, not a religion…) that indeed there are such antediluvian entities. They don’t like mankind a whole lot from what I can gather. The whole focus on sin and punishment and presenting your self as a god or higher being, is a obsession of a demonic nature.
Is there an ‘ark’ – yes, there are many.
Would they happen to actually resemble anything of Naval origins?! Do tell!
Short of buying land in the upper reaches of the Rockies (and all the items needed to survive a decade or two of ash-winter … or more… which presumes we were lucky enough not to be zapped by volcanic lightning or crushed by heaving rockslides or blown to smithereens by hurricane-strength winds), I’m not sure what us lowly (but awakened) serfs are to do with this knowledge.
My desire to see my children survive this is unquenchable.
Re-reading comments, I am struck by this: So where are the “arks” and who built them?
God may have a sense of humor. Since no building will survive, the remaining humans will be the homeless and mentally ill living in tent cities. The climate change grifters, with their beach front property and yachts, will be the first to go swimming in mile-high waves.
Wouldn’t this potentially discredit many different ‘truths’? Just randomly thought of the Grand Canyon and the colorado river and the great salt late for instance.
It would explain many great salt plains, lakes, and deserts. It leaves the Grand Canyon open to three possible formation philosophies – inundation, melt-off, and classic gradualism.
Two distinct periods of erosion in the Grand Canyon, but that discharge scar on Mars gives pause, yes.
After digesting this for a couple days, my first thought was I’m not going to worry because this is something out of my control.
Now, my thinking has shifted a bit and the engineer in me is attracted by the dangling challenge of pondering a solution to the right problem. What a fascinating cross domain challenge for a generalist.
The irony of having recently read “The three body problem” is not lost on me.
likewise and besides finding a safer location on Earth, it kind of serves as an impetus to figure out how to survive in outer space as such an environment is free of natural disasters save gamma ray bursts and solar flares
I’m having trouble putting together the proposed timeline. Is the hypothesis that the Khufu pyramid was constructed prior to the last cataclysm, or after? Image 1 suggests *before* (it was inundated along with Khafre). If so, then how could it have been intended as a warning since that civilization had not yet experienced the cataclysm? Or, was it built *during* the cataclysm (the “northern sky” map currently faces south)?
Understood. I leave that open for future investigation as to specifics, because the Khufu Pyramid shows both before and after indications. The shaft is a documentation of a past inundation angle, as both a record of that event and prediction of a future one, but the Tura limestone casing is the documentation of another later one (the last one to occur). So it is both, since this is an ‘oscillation’ theory – not a single event.
In fact, this matches what the Priests of Ptah told Herodotus in the text.
I’ve been pondering this. Fewest assumptions with maximal explanatory power is achieved if Khufu was built in the midst of an event, in between two (or more) “floods” that happened over the period of a few hundred years. The “north sky” faces south because it was, in fact, facing south at the time of construction.
A conclusion that can be drawn from this construct is that the society that built Khafre not only survived, but retained much of their technical capability after at least the initial catastrophe. Enough to build Khufu in between floods, and to pass down what had happened in at least rudimentary form. I’m attaching an image depicting another thought.
Something akin to this is what I am thinking as well Neil.
I popped open a large-scale topo map of North America, and all of a sudden I saw river bottoms and shorelines…
Neil,
Based on your look at the topographic map, where were the shorelines in North America?
I added a topographic map of North America and marked the map with a red line where it appears the shoreline might have been.
From what I’m seeing, it looks like there could have been a shoreline somewhere around the eastern edge of the Great Plains … roughly through the middle of Nebraska and Kansas. It looks like there are North/South flow lines east of that line.
Is this what you’re seeing?
Another thought: The catastrophe must have been somewhat localized. The homo sapiens “evolutionary funnel” is at least an order of magnitude older than 12000 years ago.
Fascinating. Someone sent me a doomsday astrological video portending doom in the form of solar activity and shifting of the earth’s axis. However, they provided no explanation as to why so I dismissed it.
This is outstanding detective work, and I daresay, unsettling.
Probably subconsciously part of the reason I opposed the idea for so long. If I had not traveled there and seen the ancient shorelines myself, I might have still dismissed regardless.
Thank you, TES. Fascinating the way you pull together your climate theory with you pyramid observations. I always have to read your articles 2-3 times to fully comprehend.
It’s pretty neat how the pyramid has the 104 degree flip built in. Is it likely that subsequent flips would be the same angle? Movement of core-mantle material would seem to be pretty random. Maybe you aren’t suggesting that. Only that early humans lived through this and built an observatory and warning for the future. Here we are as a society wasting resources on CO2, while our eyes are closed to the godzilla in the room.
Fascinating paper. However, why would the ocean settle on the Giza plateau (and presumably other currently elevated areas) for up to 50 years rather than drain back into its former position within a few days or weeks of ‘the deluge’? Or is the suggestion that it did and the observed erosion happened in that very short timeframe? Or perhaps the melting of the ice caps, now at warmer latitudes, results in an overall increase in global sea level of several hundred feet but then there should be plenty of evidence of the new shorelines at this higher elevation if they existed only recently (c.12k years ago)….
The difference between ocean heights globally is about 680 ft, as compared to a perfect sphere. When the Earth changes orientation, the oceans take on a different set of positions and ‘bulges’ if you will, still in that 680 fit differential from lowest to highest. So dry land appears were ocean once was, and some land gets submerged, until the Earth rights itself back into position 10 to 50 years later. Then, what you cite, happens (albeit not exactly the same as it once was).
“Legends and records likewise speak of the fact that, before the Arabs removed the Pyramid’s outer casing stones, one could see water marks on the stones halfway up the Pyramid’s height, in about the 240-foot level, which would be 400 feet above the present Nile level.”
Such cataclysmic floods result from mega-tsunami (oceans slopping out of their basins), and they will remain for a considerable amount of time, because The Earth is not hard like a glass marble, but deforms according to distribution of mass (whether solid like ice or liquid like water). This is also why it is oblate (due to centripetal force).
So, the Great Flood would have taken a much longer time to dissipate, than if the Giza plateau (African continent) didn’t consequently sink slightly beneath it. It may well have taken many centuries to completely descend to the base of the pyramids. And it would take millennia for the water table to descend such that during a drought, the base of the ‘well shaft’ could be seen at the foot of the descending passage of the Great Pyramid (~800AD).
There is also considerable tectonic upheaval due to 30° crustal displacement, so even without taking the weight of flood waters into consideration, land masses may rise or fall.
If you are not already aware of Mario BuildsReps suggest you spend some time checking out his work and how it may tie into (or not) your hypothesis. Admittedly he lands out on 47.1W meridian through Greenland and is currently using earth crust displacement as the most likely mechanism to explain his observations.
I do not follow the detail for many of these, because I don’t want to sway the direction of my observation basis or inference. I don’t want to pick up something they say, and then have it surface subconsciously later as noise in my chain of critical path questions. The solar arguments are good, they are just not salient right now. Their core/H-layer/HCP-BCC/mantle/LLVP arguments are awkward, lack experience, and only serve to mislead and confuse. Effects are issued as general catastrophic descriptions, rather than specific principles of materials science and geophysics. I don’t want that in my thinking either.
Wittgenstein: Only describe, don’t explain.
Love the work they do and effort they put in. But I am just not in an entertainment frame of mind on this.
Thanks TES. I agree about Ben’s presentation/personality/style, but do hold in my consciousness his prediction of the timely return of the galactic current sheet phase reversal, for which our planetary magnetic field may be a “probe” of sorts. By this particular analysis (much appreciated at NASA, I’m told by my NASA friend) this approaches before 2050, with or without a rotational flip.
Been reading you for 3 years and my admiration only grows. Understanding requires a lot of time for a “non-expert” – but you make it comprehensible, so it’s time well spent. Now I know why certain articles must be re-read, because you are frequently revising and adding significant new material. My third pass on this one.
These are times I wish I had stuck with physics rather than going down the economics dead-end. Hard math vs fake math…but it would appear the archons are everywhere, anyways. In college my favorite study spot was the geophysics library!
Thanks for the kind words and readership! Yes, unlike the weakness of a scientific study, which freezes what the powers-that-be want cast in stone, and does not practically allow for updates, an article can be a living breathing stream of discovery. The reader gets to discover the science with the researcher(s).
TES
What fascinating hypotheses and questions you’ve raised. I don’t really understand, but I’ve been able to come up with some exploratory questions.
“It is our contention that we are now well past Point Indigo in this process, have incorrectly interpreted the heat presented by this transpiration as being caused by man’s activity alone, and now face a need to detect the approach of a Point Tau Gyroscopically Mediated Dzhanibekov rotation.”
If we were to manage (against massive cognitive bias and firmly entrenched beliefs in existing paradigms) to detect the onset of a Tau event, what could we do about it? Even if we were to correctly interperet the signs and portents written in the pyramid stones, how would we respond and intelligently adapt to the implications of the message?
Regarding the constellations carved in the ceiling stone of the Queen’s Chamber air shaft, I must admit that the photo of the air shaft ceiling carvings is too blurry for me to make out anything like the distinct patterns you highlight. For the sake of discussion, assuming the star map may be valid, how can we know that the forms of the constellations we are familiar with today were recognized by highly advanced astronomers working around 9200 BC? Our perception of the constellations is shaped by relatively modern consensus observations: look at this part of the sky on a certain date and time, and you will observe certain patterns of stars, to which we give certain names; there’s “Ursa Major,” there’s “Draco,” etc. Can we assume those ancient astronomers followed the same conventions when tracing patterns in the stars?
“Over a prolonged period, we would not have the means to distinguish between a Dzhanibekov rotation and traditional geomagnetic pole shifts (see note 16). Moreover, during a short Khafre-styled reversal of say 10 to 50 years, we might not be able to detect such a Dzhanibekov rotation at all.”
In my (overactive?) imagination, the hypothetical gyroscopic changes you’ve described could have cataclysmic effects that might potentially wipe out every plant and animal larger than a cockroach on vast swathes of the planet. I’m relieved that we might not even be able to detect them if they’re of short duration! If they are prolonged, I hope some prescient Noah/Utanapishtim is busy building a very large boat.
Thank you for an intriguing and mind-boggling article.
help..I am having trouble visualizing how the earth may tilt and the direction of the tilt. I am in northeast Tennessee…will I end up at the north pole?
Hmm unless this event cause a new ice age. Then I’m screwed. The Appalachians have such a high amount of biodiversity. Hard to believe it was at a Patagonia type environment 12000 years ago. I’m
This event does not last long – only long enough to erode Khafre. So 10 – 50 years???
In Chinese history, there is an account of a great flood circa 2000 BC which lasted 22 years: “At that time the miracle is said to have happened that the sun during a span of ten days did not set, the forests were ignited, and a multitude of abominable vermin was brought forth.” 2 “In the life-time of Yao [Yahou] the sun did not set for ten full days and the entire land was flooded.” An immense wave “that reached the sky” fell down on the land of China. “The water was well up on the high mountains, and the foot-hills could not be seen at all.” Source: https://github.com/sovrynn/ecdo/tree/master/1-ADHOC-EVIDENCE/ancient-myths/asia/china
Awesome, thanks John – I will look this up.
I live in Turkey. It says the world’s geographical center is Türkiye in your article. What does this mean? Thank you.
Looking at 12,000 years ago, relative to how ocean circulation works, I think everywhere outside of the tropics and sub tropics are going to experience cold to varying extremes when the heat engine that is earth, is completely disrupted by the inundation and rebounding inundations. If there was a ECDO then, things got very cold for a quite an extended period afterward.
How long do you guess it will take for the energy from the change in rotation to dissipate and water/ocean flows settle into the new temporary planetary rotation for that following 10 to 50 year period?
It seems likely (without doing any math)that milankovitch cycles and/or solar cycles could play into this by distributing polar region ice weight to the equatorial water bulge through melting and vice versa ya? This would be a non insignificant change in mass along different axis and also occuring in predictable cycles correct?
Yes, but it is something which would also both relocate and become chaotic during a rotation – and become more a factor of instability rather than securing Earth’s poles in a different orientation. The mass of the mantle, the gyroscopic effect, and the moment of magnetism – are all vastly more powerful.
There is a big difference between a Dzhanibekov 180° axial flip, and a force sufficient to displace the Earth’s crust by 30°. Moreover, you also need to explain how this can occur suddenly, within the space of a day (20-30 hours from onset to completion), such that the same force that displaces the crust also displaces the oceans (the former doesn’t cause the latter).
You also have to tie this causation in with ‘twice a great year’.
Sedimentary strata record these regular cataclysms: each stratum laid in a day, each discontinuity (‘bedding layer’) laid in 12ka of weathering/vegetation. qv Punctuated Aggradational Cycles.
I’m not trying to discourage you. :-)
I’m trying to very quickly become, well, not an idiot… on this subject. Forgive the elementary approach, but I read something by a learned person that suggested it would be the magnetism (tide) caused by a close planetary body (Saturn) that would temporarily pull the oceans to the point of massive displacement and the slosh would be the result of its reversal. Such a planetary pull would displace both crust and oceans, no?
Magnetism decreases by the square of the distance between the objects. So, anything which would influence the rotational body of the Earth has to be REALLY close by. The only thing really close by, is the core. The oceans do not have enough mass to cause the Earth to flip. Only the mesosphere (mantle) carries this mass sufficiency. Therefore, we have to start by looking there – at its imbalances and magnetic qualities. Nothing else is stronger.
It’s remarkable that an ancient civilization could maintain continuous records long enough to ensure that they lasted through 4 of these flips, and could then build a massive warning sign at just the right place – a location that can only be known by having survived to see both the before and after times.
Flips even prior to h sapiens – for billions of years.
It’s like Groundhog Day, but where each day is 12,000 years long, and antediluvian h sapiens must somehow communicate with the next technologically advanced antediluvian civilisation, to explain the planet’s problem and warn them to prepare, to avoid being sent back to the stone age yet again.
It begs the question if this was a warning to future civilization then there must be an astrological calendar pointing to when this would occur, perhaps based on location in the procession of the equinox.
I suspect Coyote, that the prevalence of stone circles in most cultures which sprang from an Egyptian tradition, were looking for this to occur at any time. So, I doubt they were given a specific periodicity. Although I do hear a couple being bandied about.
Hence my pseudonym. There are two terrestrial lifecycles per Great Year (cf Platonic Year), symbolised by Yin & Yang – within our astrological calendar aka The Zodiac.
“This is the dawning of the age of Aquarius”. Aquarius is aka ‘The Sign of The Son of Man’. And, the age of Aquarius commences with cataclysm – the pouring out of the pitcher that the water bearer bears.
The Yuga cycle is another calendar (which includes an important aspect not present in the Zodiac).
We are looking forward to the New World Order (new order of the ages), being Aquarius to Virgo. The Old World Order being Leo to Pisces.
Maybe the Saptarshi calendar …when Sanskrit was in use …?
O…M…G… So , in the vein of “they always tell you what they’re gonna do before they do it” .. is all this WEF talk of a “Great Reset” — is it all a cover/distraction while also announcing the imminent Samsara? Holy cow if so…. whoah.
Yes, Samsara being about the cyclic rebirth of mankind (not an individual), Klaus Schwab’s blurb was simply him ‘writing between the lines’ about the coming ‘Great Reset’, and the aspiration to ‘Build back better’ thereafter, i.e. from a technologically advanced starting point, rather than merely proto-agricultural.
Given a dozen millennia in which to progress from electricity and computers, the next cataclysm will be water off a duck’s back…
Mankind will then have finally escaped Samsara and reached Nirvana – thus breaching Fermi’s Great Filter.
I have the impression that before the collapse prior to the pyramid being built that narratives were constructed by poets, and constantly reworked, that contained all the information necessary to lead a ‘civilised’ life. They’d be taught through chilhood in annual cycles with more verses and complexity being added year by year. Any fol coud remember the verses the wise were left to make what connections they could as required by circumstance, if they mastered them they too could become poets in turn.
Some of these tales remain in the Vedas whereas Homers work is the last iteration in the west. Perhaps they should be thought of as a memory mansion that people held in common.
Modern elites have nothing as robust as this in mind.
TPTB are evidently confident they have sufficiently prepared to ensure mankind’s technological advancement is preserved across the cataclysm, otherwise they would have repaired The Great Pyramid, and/or built an equivalent device (3rd temple).
However, yes, passing knowledge of cyclic cataclysm down through the generations, and over the ages, is of vital importance. Hamlet’s Mill is worth a read in this respect – the ‘Mill’ being the rotation of the celestial sphere (Zodiac, Great Year, Yuga Cycle, etc.) and the grinding out of mankind twice per rotation (Yin/Yang). Also see Plato’s Critias dialogues (Kataklysmos/Ekpyrosis).
Perhaps Antarctica is one of the locations? Lots of speculation and secrecy around it.
What will bake your noodle is to discover that this is by design – facilitated by institutionalisation, but not caused by it. From The Vatican onwards…
“Core-Mantle Decoupling” is not what causes crustal displacement, and is rather Hapgoodian.
The Dzhanibekov effect can certainly help understand how a spinning body can undergo a 180° reorientation (including spin reversal) without loss of momentum, but The Earth is not dynamically unstable, so will not spontaneously flip.
The Great Pyramid was positioned at the equator and its longitude in order for us to understand that by remaining axially aligned, but 30° displaced, the crust is most tightly bonded +/-90° from it, and will displace 30° back to the equator upon the next displacement.
To understand the considerable force that causes the crust to displace one must understand the relationship between the 12k periodicity of such cataclysmic displacement and The Great Year (24k). This also requires recognising that this understanding has been occulted (impeded via deception).
As for the GP shafts, these are there to vent trapped air upon inundation (the QC shafts bening terminated in flap valves to impeded ingress). They are simply directed to reach a particular height – and don’t point to anything. The only thing in the GP that has to have a particular angle is the ascending passage (&GG), which is steep enough for the granite blocks to slide down when immersed, but not so steep that they’ll slide down when initially placed, dry.
If you visit the Queen’s pyramid and walk up the shaft, you’ll see notches where the floor & walls meet. These hold beams in place as blocks are slid up or down, no matter the angle of the overall shaft.
Everywhere I tried to look it up they said Dzhanibekov rotation was due to what I interpret as initial instability in the spin, i.e. the other axes have some non zero angular velocities that increase due to inertia until the flip happens. For example on Wikipedia the mathematical explanation relies on at least small initial values for the angular velocities of the secondary axes. From what I understood of the argument “dynamic instability” must be present if the SAC and PAC are changing in density due to the exothermic core theory, right?
It is a lack of ‘uniformity’ – but oscillations are a natural and most-common aspect of stability. All stable systems feature oscillations. This one just appears exception to our eyes.
Could it be possible the transition between Phase 1 and Phase 2 get locked and never stops?
Is it possible that Earth did this 2-axis rotation for a longer time in the past?
That is the a supposition of the hypothesis, yes – but no definition as to how many cycles or how chaotic the intervals might be.
TES
Another question (I’m really convienced your theory is right, TES):
If the Earth is a big gyro, then why has Earth an axis inclination?
They say it was the collision with Theia which caused it. But wouldn’t the influence of the other “gyros” (Sun, planets, moons), which are all more or lesser aligned with the plane of the Solar System, had enough time to bring back the Earth-Gyro into upright rotation?
Thanks Diogenes,
The tilt is called ‘obliquity’ – and the supposition is that each planet’s obliquity was caused by early solar system dynamics, or collisions which imparted this bias. Which is smart-speak for ‘we don’t really know, but it was obviously something…’ Theia is a body which is used to explain everything we find as a mystery, all rolled into one hypothetical body. Explains anything, everything, and nothing, all at the same time. But I cannot say that the hypothesis is wrong either.
Basically, every planet would have its own Theia then however.
There appear to be three obliquity classes in the solar system:
1. Mercury, Venus Jupiter ~ .3 – 3.1 degrees
2. Earth, Mars, Saturn, Neptune ~ 23.5 – 28.3, and a variety of Right Ascension measures
3. Uranus ~ 97.8 degrees
This commonality is intriguing and suggests to me, another factor besides just early solar system dynamics and a Theia for every planet. It is interesting that both the Asteroids and Kuiper belt have a 10 to 30 degree inclination versus the solar disk, implying that possibly two different solar masses merged during the early formation of the solar system, with Earth, Mars, Saturn, and Neptune being members of the interloping class of proto-planetary mass.
EVG
TES
If this phenomenon happens on Earth, perhaps it happens to many/most habitable planets…and thus, the Fermi Paradox
What an exciting and interesting article! Thank you, this was so fascinating. I know muslims have theorized that this is how the sun would rise from the West as predicted by the Prophet PBUH, but I’ve never seen any scientifically rigorous explanation for why it might occur. I also had no idea it had been documented by ancient cultures and the Great pyramid angle is awesome.
Minor correction in Exhibit I – Gyroscopically Mediated Dzhanibekov Rotation. Second image from left (Venutian or Retrograde Rotation) should be labeled West Rise, East set.
Indeed, I have heard of this referenced in Muslim writings, but need to research it.
The retrograde motion is correct, as it follows the right hand rule. The direction of east is the direction of rotation with the north pole extending upward as if one is curling the right hand and pointing the thumb upwards. In other words, it is akin to port and starboard, relative to the rotating body, not space or the sun. In this case, the thumb is point ‘down’ but east is still in the direction of the curved fingers of the hand.
A challenging series of four nonetheless… no doubt will modify over time!
The second image from the left hasn’t been flipped upside down even though I just noticed that it does label the Arctic at the bottom, so if you mean that image to show the earth flipping without changing its rotation that would leave the sun rising from the east as it normally does. I was confused because I interpreted “retrograde rotation” to mean that the earth remains in its normal north-south orientation without flipping and just starts spinning in the opposite direction, the way Venus does – which is what the placement of the continents suggests. So I guess the minor error I perceive now is that the image wasn’t actually flipped as the “Arctic” label suggests.
Pertinent today. Magnetic fields weakening and pole-shift accelerating, Auroras in Puerto Rico: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOTwQv7Y23g Good News, VERY Bad News, More Solar Shockwaves Coming | S0 News May.12.2024
The Sun remains normal, and will remain so. Don’t worry about The Sun – it does not undergo ‘micronova’.
The respective changes are terrestrial:
Accelerating deflection of magnetic poles.Acceleration in the apparent weakening of Earth’s magnetic field.Increase in disruption of Earth’s magnetosphere.Consequently greater likelihood of Aurora Borealis being seen at lower latitudes.
However, the cause of the changes is not terrestrial in origin.
Could you elaborate your theory of the events and causes in such a detailed explanation like Ethical Skeptic did? I am curious about alternative explanations. But ex cathedra statements are hard to interpret.
I am simply a learned catastrophist who would challenge others to ensure their theories meet the necessary criteria.
Any theory of cyclic catastrophe should explain why catastrophe:
is global.
is regular/cyclic and has a periodicity of 12,000 years.
is related to equinoctial precession (occurs twice a great year).
has sudden onset with minimal warning (apart from subtle precursory phenomena).
has a brief duration of around a day (onset to completion), albeit with after-effects of varying duration (volcanic ash, disrupted weather patterns, flood waters, etc.).
results in crustal displacement (of around 30°) that occurs within the space of a day. Hence shifting vast herds of elephant from a temperate latitude to a frigid one (Siberia), but maintaining Vostok polar.
results in cataclysmic mega-tsunami (with consequently globally synchronised sedimentary strata).
Ideally, the theory should also explain subtle precursory phenomena, e.g. why Earth is currently experiencing accelerating deflection of its magnetic poles, acceleration in the apparent weakening of its magnetic field, and even acceleration in the deflection of the planet from its axis*.
* “Experts said they found the direction of the poles moved from southward to eastward in the mid-1990s and that the speed of the drift between 1995 to 2020 was upwards of 17 times faster than it was in the years between 1981 and 1995.”
is the 12000 year periodicity exact or does it have a variation to it (e.g. plus or minus 100 years or so?)
Probably something like +/- 50-100 years, yes.
NASA will know the precise the length of the Great Year, and the duration of the window in which cataclysm will happen (twice per).
It is certainly an error to extrapolate the current rate of equinoctial precession (a degree per 72 years) to arrive at a great year of 25,920. It’s actually very close to 24,000.
Our two periods of 12 hours per 24 hour day commemorate Earth’s two cycles of 12 millennia per 24 millennia great year.
Anyway, the current estimate for cataclysm is 2048, an estimate which has been gradually converged towards over the last 70 years or so.
Thank you. Another question would anything above the salt water marks of the Pyramids be considered safe elevation or is a considerable margin needed because of the tsunamis?
A considerable margin is needed. Look at the maps at the end of this article.
So basically you want to live near Denver level elevation or outer space :-)
Thank you
Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Eugene McCarthy, a leading expert in hybridization? (For example, he wrote the standard textbook.) He has developed a hypothesis, with extensive empirical evidence, that homo sapiens is best explained as the result of hybridization between simian and porcine ancestors. Here is the relevant link: https://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html
Note that he does not delve into whether this was deliberately induced.
Hey Jon,
I had read that a long time ago – and very glad to be reacquainted with it. Thanks!
Meade, the flood at Giza would have a mega-tsunami wavefront preceding it, probably around 1km in height.
Given oceanic slop, the coasts are toast. Even inland and at high altitude, you have also to consider supersonic winds, and widespread seismicity & volcanism (upon crustal displacement). This is why The Swiss have so many bunkers (not due to the cold war) – one in each back garden, almost.
thanks if computers and AI keep advancing it might be possible to model this and make a useful prediction when and how it will happen
we need honest governance in the world if this can be mitigated or survived in some way
now I understand why Elon wants to go to Mars so badly
Zod, can you not share your theory and learnings? Does your theory meet all of the criteria you yourself laid out?
Why the cryptic tease “I could but I won’t”? Are you a serious researcher or a charlatan?
I suppose if of all of this is true, it doesn’t matter what your answers are.
My understanding of the causation of cyclic cataclym does indeed meet all the criteria. I know it is correct because there is a vital aspect that has been hidden from public knowledge, which has only been hidden because it reveals that causation.
I gain more by encouraging others to apply their minds to this conundrum, than I do by simply providing a solution.
As an example, I’ve provided the solution to the purpose of the Great Pyramid*, but what benefit does it give?
Thank you for answering my question, and for not nuking me for suggesting you could be a “charlatan”. I regretted that temporary loss of composure. I do take it back and apologize to you now.
I look forward to reading your FCTheory, I’m saving that for later when things quiet down here and I have some time to dig into it.
I only recently learned (through Graham Hancock) about the YD and the potential relationship of the Taurids to that event. I read somewhere (but can no longer find it) that Earth passes through the center of the Taurids cloud in 2032. Furthermore, it seems like there is some periodicity there that perhaps matches the 12k pattern?
Or … can you at least tell me that your understanding definitely does NOT involve the Taurids / Comet Enke … and to just keep looking?
I’m really interested in getting on the same page as you and your understanding of the cause.
The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis is being encouraged/promoted given it distracts from cyclic cataclysm – and also because the YDIH can easily be argued against (in support of orthodox uniformitarianism).
There is no such thing as a cosmic ‘tennis ball serving machine’ that shoots impactors at The Earth with incredible accuracy such that they hit twice a Great Year.
Ugh frustrating! Ok so you’re saying that the “big slosh” happens 2x a Great Year, and pole shift is itself an effect of the cause of the cataclysm, but not the cause itself of the cataclysm. TES says the “big slosh” is due to something happening terrestrially (from within the core of the planet) but you’re saying it’s NOT caused by something terrestrial….but it’s NOT the Taurids (or some other meteor). So pray tell what occurs extra-terrestrially, with near clockwork periodicity of 12,000 years that is the cause? Is it some pulsar? Does anyone even know? And I guess, does it even matter what the cause is, if the event is destined to happen anyway, and we know when. (Still, it’d be nice to know, perhaps to gain consensus)
Once you figure out what has been hidden*, it doesn’t take too long to figure out the external source of the force/impulse that jolts the planet such that crust displaces 30°, and oceans slop. There has to be a considerable motive force. Simple ‘decoupling’, howsoever occasioned, provides no such force. I appreciate that this force is difficult to conceive of from a blank canvas, however upon collecting all the clues, one can figure it out without requiring anything exotic like pulsars, micronovae, or rogue bodies.
There will be no consensus. The best you can hope for is to figure it out yourself.
Charles Hapgood and Chan Thomas (and Ben Davidson’s regurgitation thereof) may give you clues, but their theories do not hold up to scrutiny. Immanuel Velikovsky is worth a read, despite even wackier theories.
* one of the secrets passed down the generations via the mystery schools.
Hay-seus! The research into “Mystery Schools” got weird pretty fast. I can think of a many things that have supposedly been “hidden” : Antarctica, Roswell, Teslas (the man not car) power engineering, “structures” on Moon and Mars, UFOs, human consciousness, Pluto (planet, not a planet), the “dark knight”, Niburu, the scrolls….
Since I don’t belong to any “mystery school” how could I ever come across such a secret?
How can such a force/impulse be due to anything other than an external (Rouge?) body? Unless we hit a wall, like at the end of the Truman show.
More hints please!
Two good questions you have there.
The mystery of the Great Pyramid has been kept a mystery since the Templars spent around a decade figuring it out around 820AD. And yet, with enough research, a merely average engineer such as myself managed to figure it out too. So, you just have to do the research.
The criteria I listed are ample clues to be getting on with.
OK ok. Not going to be easy. So I was reacquainting myself with the “wobble” of the earth’s axis (which takes a Great Year to complete a full wobble) and it occurred to me that if the wobble shape was eye-shaped instead of an oval, toward the “corners” of the eye the axis would accelerate and then rapidly change direction as it cornered the tear ducts. But what would cause that? Gravity? Magnetism?
I was thinking about a (flat) magnet how it gets wobbly next to another magnet until suddenly one of them “flips”. I don’t have enough knowledge to explain how this could possibly scale-up to an earth-sized magnet, never-mind the fact that it’s a spheroid magnet, not “flat” (I’m not going there).
So what I think you’re saying is that :
something not terrestrial is the cause
It’s sudden, except that there are precursory “hints” that may or not be witnessed by most people
It’s not due to something actually striking the Earth. (You ARE saying that aren’t you?)
So what’s the big magnet … that which is not common knowledge and not spotted by multiple back-yard astronomers ?
Am I even close?
The lunisolar explanation of equinoctial precession was contrived to deflect from the true explanation.
Cyclic cataclysm is not due to impactors, nor a fly-by of a rogue body.
You are heading in the right direction, but you are unlikely to progress until you grok The Great Year. An introduction to set you on the right track is the YouTube video (narrated by James Earl Jones): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3ZDcj0kF_0
This path has been fun and very interesting. Ok so I learned about the Great Year, and ultimately it led me to Tycho model (makes sense to me) of our solar system, under which Sun and Mars make up a binary system. I learned about the polaris to vega to polaris (pvp) rotation which is responsible for the appearance of earth’s “wobble”.
I read about the possible relationship between the orbital speed of the Sun and it’s frequency of magnetic pole reversals to the same of Earth (this potentially explains why Earth’s poles are wigging out right now, right on schedule)
I learned about the Angular Momentum problem, which is potentially solved by the binary orbit (24k yrs suggested by Binary Research Institute but modeled as 25.3k yrs by Tychos).
I also learned about the 6-or-7-degree “tilt” of Sun and the orbital path of its “moons” Mercury and Venus (as well as the tilt of Moon and Mars) all agree. And Earth’s “tilt” is 23.5 degrees. Not sure if it’s relevant but they add up to about 30 degrees….
But so far I have not found anything that indicates a condition or event that repeats twice each Great Year with sufficient jolting force to push/pull crust AND water in a single day….it seems like a “smack” or an extremely strong opposing directional gravitational force that would have to “pull” the crust back down 30 degrees after having “pushed” the crust up 30 degrees about 12k years ago. I’m stumped…..yet at the same time I feel like it’s right in front of me and I can’t see it.
Another clue to help steer my digging?
You’re going to come aross a lot of junk, which will include such things as Tychos, Birkeland currents, flat Earth, micronovae, galactic current sheet, Herculobus, etc. You’re going to have to develop discernment and regular use of Occam’s Razor.
And no, Vega/Polaris do not cause Earth’s wobble (correlation is not causation).
All I can say is that when you’ve discovered that which has been known to mystery schools for millennia, you will know you have discovered it, and know why it has been kept secret – because it leads to an understanding of cyclic cataclysm.
So, you should deduce that you’re not looking for anything particularly exotic, but something rather astounding – something that fits the aphorism ‘hidden in plain sight’.
ok all that research for nada. Simplest explanations then are
A)simulation / manufactured reset
B) hand of God
How am I supposed to discover what mystery schools know? Of not to learn the answer, then to verify the answer I have. Are you a student of a mystery school then? If not then how could you have verified it yourself
Still an intriguing puzzle to figure out. If you’re not going to give me anymore clues to help my journey, I’ll just have to keep wandering….and wondering.
Thanks for the nudges so far.
Your research is not at all for naught. It is not something that can be researched in a day, more like years.
And if/when you find the answer, you will know that it is an answer that cannot be shared (no-one will believe you, who does not already know).
Once you know the answer you’ll recognise that it’s encoded in many, many places.
Sure, you’ll recognise it in Freemasonry, but also in corporate logos, architecture, religions, etc.
You will even find it in my icon. ;-)
Why did you make a condition of the solution one where Vostok stays put? Everyone else says Antarctica (which is being occulted from most of us) will shift to a temperate if not tropic zone….perhaps where it once was.
Today I had a thought alone these lines where Vostok is the fulcrum of an upside down pendulum, where the Northern axis (only) transits from side to side across a great year. Too exotic?
Also, both Sun and Moon are in plain site. You say there is no rogue body causing the cataclysm….could it not be a known body such as Sun? Or Jupiter?
Finally … just tell me … are you saying it’s (a) God or what me might call Aliens? Because now that you point out the Templar Cross, I sort of feel like you’re hinting at supernatural stuff and I was under the impression you had a (simple once you grok it) purely scientific/mathematical solution.
The current crustal displacement (throughout the last few hundred thousand years) has tended to be about 30°, and has been more an oscillation, rather than an accumulation (prior equators, ancient coral reefs also corroborate this). However, over a much longer period of time, yes, there may well have been accumulation, such that what is now polar may once have been equatorial.
NB I said Vostok remains polar (within the freezing zone of the pole), not that it stays put, for example if something is 15° from the pole, and is shifted 30° the other side, -15° is still 15° from the pole.
Not only no rogue body, but also no known body, that Velikovsky-style, departs from its expected course. Bear in mind, that what you’re looking for has been known for a VERY long time.
So no, there’s nothing woo-woo/exotic such as hyperdimensional entities, simulation, aliens, chthonic demons, supernatural beings/gods, flat Earth, time travel, etc.
All crosses derive from the Zodiac. My Occitan Cross icon simply makes this a little more obvious. There is also a very subtle aspect that encodes ‘something else’.
Sun Cross
Maybe these are not crosses at all but instead is the letter X as in 10. Or as in “double cross”. I can’t sleep. I need another clue. I’m currently pondering a hard “flip” if the rotational axis instead of a precession. I can’t fathom the cause.
Don’t waste time on the Occitan cross, that’s something you’ll understand way down the line.
I just can’t reconcile these things:
That Earth undergoes cataclysm every ~12ka AND
This has been known for a VERY LONG time AND
Itis expected to occur again in within just a few decades AND YET
There are senseless wars occurring even now … presumably executed by some of those who are “in the know” …
To what end? To me this makes it seem like the ~12ka cycle of destruction is possibly a made-up distraction from the horrors occurring in our societies. No don’t be concerned with dead soldiers, civilians women and children, loss of liberties, property and life … instead look over here and be afraid that you’re all going to be wiped out soon.
I’m having a really hard time accepting one truth over the other.
In the absence of more clues about the actual CAUSE, and how this is KNOWN, I find I’m maybe just going to have to give up. This rabbit hole is too deep.
Help a brother out.
Distractions and deceptions galore.
““You are young yet, my friend,” replied my host, “but the time will arrive when you will learn to judge for yourself of what is going on in the world, without trusting to the gossip of others. Believe nothing you hear, and only one half that you see.”
“That which causes cataclysm has been known for a very long time.”
is not the same as “Cyclic cataclysm and its causation have been understood for a very long time”.
It is possible to know about ‘A’, without knowing about ‘B’ – and thus, without knowing that ‘A’ causes ‘B’.
So, ‘A’ can have been known for a very long time – without the people who know about ‘A’ being aware of ‘B’ or that ‘A’ causes ‘B’.
If you rearrange my statements you can make it appear as if I’m saying something I’m not.
You’ve effective written:
‘B’ occurs.
This has been known for a very long time.
When it should be:
‘A’ has been known for a very long time.
‘B’ occurs every 12ka.
‘A’ causes ‘B’.
So, what you’re looking for is ‘A’.
But, ‘A’ has been hidden – because it more easily leads to understanding ‘B’, and understanding ‘B’ is not desired. By itself, ‘A’ is innocuous.
‘A’ is encoded in the Occitan cross (among many other things). That’s what you’re looking for. Then you can move on to how ‘A’ causes ‘B’.
So, your first task is to obtain the correct understanding of equinoctial precession, i.e. The Great Year. Then you can move on to understanding why cataclysm occurs twice a Great Year.
Thank you for prodding me, it has made me retrace my steps. I finished re-watching The Great Year video. So far here’s my understanding (such as it is) based on the clues and hints.
A causes B, but B is so undesirable that to hide B from “common man” means hiding A from “common man” too. A has been known for a long long time. B is “known” to relatively few, and is “rediscovered” over time.
(B) is the cataclysm twice every Great Year, aka once every 12ka.
(A) is the knowledge that our solar system, really, our Sun is part of a binary system and therefore jointly revolves around another very powerful celestial body. I’m going call this body the Anti-Sun
Sun and Anti-Sun revolve every 24ka in an elliptical path, such that Sun and Anti-Sun come relatively “close” to each other 2 times. Once on the way “up”, and another on the way “down”. And that happens every 12ka … twice a Great Year.
Earth’s rotational axis never changes, it always “leans” a certain way, but since Sun is moving around in a revolution with Anti-Sun, it only APPEARS that the Vernal Equinox (that which determines the Zodiacal period) turns in space. This also results in the appearance of the rotational axis doing some “wobbling”. Not so. Every ~2ka, Earth’s Vernal Equinox “points” to a new constellation (Zodiac Sign) from always the same place in relation to Earth-to-Sun (same point on Earth’s revolution around Sun) but since Sun has moved in relation to Anti-Sun, and therefore moved in relation to the constellations, it only Appears that Earth is doing the pointing to a new sign.. which makes the appearance of the precession of the equinox.
I suspect that Anti-Sun and Sun revolve around each other at about the same ’tilt” as Earth’s rotational Axis, which makes Earth’s rotational axis perpendicular to the Sun-Anti-Sun revolutionary plane.
I suspect that Anti-Sun is dark, and the black side of yinyang represents the “dark sun”.
I also suspect that the “Sun Cross” (circle with a ‘plus” inside) actually represents Anti-Sun. If you tilt the Sun Cross (or any cross) it becomes an X, and of course lately we see X just about everywhere (X.com, Space X). X often denotes “dead”. Like placing X over the eyes of a cartoon character. Maybe Anti-Sun is a dead star.
I don’t know the mechanics of Earth’s cataclysm, but if I’m right in my “understanding”, when Anti-Sun and Sun become “close” during the half-way point of a revolution around each other, perhaps there is so much gravity that the side of earth currently facing Anti-Sun gets “pulled” so hard, the “skin” stretches on that side and all the water gets pulled over. So much so that the rotation of the Earth dives under the water, not so much the water runs over the Earth .. not yet. Sun and Anti-Sun are moving so quickly at this point past each other, this extreme gravity lasts only a short period when suddenly all the water ‘lets go’ and the “skin” snaps back (as much as it can), wreaking havoc even more….but it’s done. All that’s left is for everything to settle down again and start the cycle over again.
Alternatively, perhaps there is a giant lightning bolt bouncing around our solar system that eventually finds its way to Earth, which causes Earth to basically boil and erupt from below, perhaps more along the lines of Ben Davidson’s warnings (but not just Sun-caused) or along the lines of this great article here from TES.
I’m sure there’s much more, such as maybe Humans escaped the Earth in the past and either crash landed back sometime later, or maybe are stuck dead or alive up in orbit of some celestial body (maybe even Earth). It is rumored that there’s a “dark night” satellite above the south pole (where nobody can see it), but it’s a satellite not from this civilization. I dunno. Woo. Woo-Woo.
I’m keen to know, as I’m sure everyone reading about this: how is it that in 2024, it’s estimated that it’ll all happen 24 years later? Someone must be tracking Anti-Sun?
Well Zod YinYang (Zodiac SunAntiSun <wink>) what feedback to you have for me?
Thank you, I appreciate the journey.
1. A, B, and A->B, are all esoteric knowledge, passed down via mystery schools, secret societies, etc. That said, ‘A’ will be more well known than ‘B’, and B more than A->B, and the actual causation underlying A->B will be known only to a very few (and probably post-renaissance or later, at the earliest).
2. Yes.
3. Don’t light your cigar yet.
4. You can find out the eccentricity fairly easily, but it’s approximately 0.5. So, no, not really ‘close’, just ‘nearer’ & ‘further’.
5. 9/10 – I daresay this could be made a tad clearer. :-)
6. Orbital planes will be close (Pluto excepted). Spin axes are a different matter.
7. ‘Dark’ only because it is hidden – hence “The sun behind The Sun”. Here’s an example of what happens when someone posits such esoterica to an orthodox audience: https://www.reddit.com/r/occult/comments/vq0jmr/sirius_the_sun_behind_the_sun_atavistic_resurgence/ (That wasn’t me, btw). Yin yang represent Earth’s two life/population cycles (I have come across suggestions that ‘heaven’ & ‘hell’ is cognate).
8. ‘Cross in circle’ is just another Zodiacal reference. Celtic cross, etc. Cardinal points/signs (qv tetramorph).
10. No. Micronova is bunk (Davidson is ltd hangout). The Dzhanibekov effect applies to a spinning body in free space (very low friction) that is dynamically unstable, i.e. has DISTINCT principal moments of inertia. Note that the hesitation in declassifying the Dzhanibekov effect was because it was recognised as a potential explanation for what is known to occur, given it is such a close match.
For other clues as to the repeated (Sisyphean) technological advancement, abrupt obliteration (ELE), and rebirth (Samsara) of h sapiens you can check out OOPARTS.
1. A, B, and A->B, are all esoteric knowledge, passed down via mystery schools, secret societies, etc. That said, ‘A’ will be more well known than ‘B’, and B more than A->B, and the actual causation underlying A->B will be known only to a very few (and probably post-renaissance or later, at the earliest).
2. Yes.
3. Don’t light your cigar yet.
4. You can find out the eccentricity fairly easily, but it’s approximately 0.5. So, no, not really ‘close’, just ‘nearer’ & ‘further’.
5. 9/10 – I daresay this could be made a tad clearer. :-)
6. Orbital planes will be close (Pluto excepted). Spin axes are a different matter.
7. ‘Dark’ only because it is hidden – hence “The sun behind The Sun”. Here’s an example of what happens when someone posits such esoterica to an orthodox audience: reddit.com/r/occult/comments/vq0jmr/sirius_the_sun_behind_the_sun_atavistic_resurgence/ (That wasn’t me, btw). Yin yang represent Earth’s two life/population cycles (I have come across suggestions that ‘heaven’ & ‘hell’ is cognate).
8. ‘Cross in circle’ is just another Zodiacal reference. Celtic cross, etc. Cardinal points/signs (qv tetramorph).
9. No. As I previously indicated, not due to passing body (known or unknown). See livescience.com/space/planets/astronomers-narrow-down-where-planet-nine-could-be-hiding-by-playing-massive-game-of-connect-the-dots for clues that there is something massive a few thousand AU away.
10. No. Micronova is bunk (Davidson is ltd hangout). The Dzhanibekov effect applies to a spinning body in free space (very low friction) that is dynamically unstable, i.e. has DISTINCT principal moments of inertia. Note that the hesitation in declassifying the Dzhanibekov effect was because it was recognised as a potential explanation for what is known to occur, given it is such a close match.
For other clues as to the repeated (Sisyphean) technological advancement, abrupt obliteration (ELE), and rebirth (Samsara) of h sapiens you can check out OOPARTS.
No doubt NASA are completely on top of things, and thus able to publish an ETA for those able to recognise it. thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/
I feel like I took one step forward and two back. But here’s goes:
What I was calling “Anti-Sun” seems to be the binary star system (collectively A, B and maybe C) Sirius. From Earth’s perspective, Sirius does not preces like the zodiacs do, which seems to be the going “proof” that Sun is in a binary system with Sirius.
BUT: Sirius is way too far away to be any direct cause of a cataclysm on Earth. That is lightyears away, when we are talking about a possible massive celestial body mere “few thousand AU away” (in your answer to my last #10.) Since the eccentricity of the Sun-Sirius revolution is .5, it just doesn’t get close enough to “do” anything directly to Earth.
So now I’m stuck.
Even if I don’t know the source, can I not know what is the mechanism causing the Earthly cataclysm? You have instructed me to rule out the gravitational force of a passing body. And rule out a (massive) Sun event. And rule out a direct strike by an incoming body. What else is there? Even a one-day flop-over of Earth’s “tilt”, a temporary halt in Earth’s spin, or even a reversal of spin, or a complete 180 (top-to-bottom flip), all would require massive gravity all-of-the-sudden, right?
So I’m just really stuck on this thought: what is the mechanism of the cataclysm?
If there is a “butterfly effect”, small changes, slow at first, then building up to a rapid change in a single day…what could possibly be the mechanism if not gravity of a “nearby” body that flies by? Gravitational force weakens drastically with distance, so it would have to be a nearby body….no? Even “planet nine” if they were to find it, would not cause rapid single-day changes in Earth, spaced 12ka apart.
Are there not cataclysms on every other body in our solar system during the same Earth-day when Earth’s cataclysm occurs?
You mention NASA. This was surprising to me. Elsewhere there seems to be a very negative impression of NASA after a fair amount of negative press and failure to deliver on promises that were not only met but exceeded in record time by the private sector. And since NASA is part of the apparatus that would likely keep information hidden from the “common man”, it seems to me your suggestion that NASA would a) know and b) publish a cataclysm count-down publicly , is giving too much credit there. Or, am I not looking at it openly enough? I recall you said things like “hidden in plain sight”…
Thank you, I look forward to your responses every time.
You still have yet to undergo a certain paradigm shift.
For an orbit of 24ka, the binary pair would have to be of the order of thousands of AU apart.
How could The Sun be in an orbit with something 8.6LY away, yet not be in any relationship with various stars 4-6LY away?
If you want more clues, just re-read my comments.
Bit still … what is the mechanism by which any of the cataclysmic events are caused to occur? If not gravity of a suddenly but very briefly close body, and not Sun material…what could be the mechanism?
That’s a good question, and given the corpus of my previous comments, you should be able to deduce the answer.
Aight…. I’ll slog through them again. I can almost taste it. I sort of smell the answer but not fully.
It has to be gravity.
Presume there is another body “planet nine”, “planet X”, whatever (I’m going to call it a ZODY in honor of your pseudonym), and Zody is so massive that Earth is locked onto it in such a way, that the orientation of Earth’s rotational axis follows Zody as it flies through space. And it’s far enough away that it would take 24ka to make a full revolution around Sol.
So, as Zody moves, this causes the apparent equinoctial precession . And thus Earth always has the same “lean”, it just orients differently over time, following Zody. Counter-clockwise, ever pulling Earth’s vernal equinox point backward through the zodiac constellation ring.
Zody’s orbit (I am presuming it orbits Sol, but maybe it orbits something else) will get closer to Sol 2x. Once on the “way here” then once on the “way back”.
As Zody gets closer to earth, first Earth’s innards start acting weird, causing fluctuations in the magnetosphere, possibly because Zody is actually affecting Sol too. I’m not really sure about this.
At ZERO-POINT, Zody will be at it’s closest to both Sol and Earth, that there is a SUPER-TIDE in the direction of Zody. As the water moves, the crust shifts too. And earth is still spinning, so it’s not the water that’s slopping out of the ocean basins, it’s the Ocean basins and land spinning around under the super tide water. One whole rotation, which is why we think it takes “one day”.
Because the gravitational force of bodies decrease proportional to distance (inversely proportional to the square of the distance). this super tide dissipates as quickly as it started.
Then for the next 12ka, Earth and who ever is left alive on the planet or in the heavens, restart civilization until …
12ka years later, Zody’s back and this time it’s going to pull from the other side, displacing oceans and crust in the other direction. Do not pass Go. Return to #7
“Known for a very long time” – this keeps taking me back to Mithra. I suppose everything I wrote would still be true if somehow our entire solar system was revolving around Mithra. We still get precession, we still potentially get 2 “closer” positions on the orbital path. Possibly Earth could still orbit around Sol in such a way that Mithra was slightly “below” Earth for 1/2 the orbit, and “above” for the other half. Not really sure about this.
I thought about an axial FLOP, but it didn’t make sense. There’s no torque point on which to “push” the Earth’s axis over.
I had to give up on the binary system (with Sirius) theory because I found other evidence that Sirius does in fact move over time, which means it cannot be in a binary system with Sol. Plus as you pointed out, there are other (albeit smaller) stars closer to Sol than Sirius, and they clearly (I think clearly) are NOT part of a multi-star system with Sol.
If it’s not gravity of an unknown-to-me planet (or Mithra), sufficiently large to be very far away and still be in our solar system, yet be undetected by thousands of amateur astronomers, then I have to admit defeat.
A couple of problems with my thoughts:
a) If Zody can cause a super tide and pull crust on Earth, wouldn’t it deform or maybe dislodge Moon in the process?
b) How can Zody be sure to pull the crust 30 degrees ONE direction, only to pull it 30 Degrees the OTHER direction the next time? (I thought maybe the first pass was “above” Earth, and the 2nd pass was “below” Earth, relatively speaking. That might do it?
c) If Zody is a planet flying around Sol, wouldn’t it have SOME reflective property, or maybe moons and such? (hmm.. moons might play into this too) Surely someone with a telecope would have seen it by now? All one would have to do is figure out the direction of where earth’s equator is “pointing” perpendicularly to the spin axis, and look “down” in that direction? (and look 180 degrees “up” in case it’s on the other side?) I’m probably over simplifying it.
What do you say?
It’s like you just paid your younger brother to do your school homework exercise. :-}
You were better with your term ‘anti-Sun’.
You haven’t yet made the paradigm shift that makes it all fall into place.
All the clues you need are in the entirety of my comments.
A bonus clue is that once you’ve figured it out, you’ll know you’ve figured it out – which is nice.
NB Mithras=age of Taurus, Moses=age of Aries, Jesus=age of Pisces. The same Solar/Zodiacal figure – not actually a real chappie.
Right now the only paradigm shift I can think of is: There is no spoon
Ok, I’ll go back and re-read them all .. again.
Have to admit I’m discouraged. Maybe I’m just not smart enough to see what’s hidden in plain sight. But I’m not giving up YET.
Can you give me a clue as to how 2048 (a familiar number) was determined? How can one “be sure”?
I don’t know how 2048 was determined, but it has been converged upon over the last few decades. I assume those who’ve been involved in calculating it have been scrupulously methodical.
Strangely, 2048, or thereabouts. I have seen proposed by various other pundits.
Whoa Z. I know we’re being sort of matter-of-fact about this in our discussions…. But you do realize what this means … I’m grappling with that a little. It might be 24 years away but when it dawns on the masses, it won’t be pretty. Distractions can’t last forever. Ok enough doom. Back to the analysis…distraction.
It’s the moon
My guess is that it may have something to do with the global climate hysteria and depopulation via the stab. Kill off excess population so the remainder have enough resources to survive on decimated planet…
Thank you for sharing your findings regarding the Great Pyramid Coffer : I have found it very enlightening !
I don’t know what benefit it gave you to write down this work and share it for free but I surely wish you could find the motivation to write about your understanding of the causation of cyclic cataclysm !
In case, Substack seems to be a convenient plateform to share written work with others.
earths geological record and moon rocks say you are wrong
I’ve been thinking about this. Could the cataclysm be made up to fit evidence that LOOKS like it fits the story. This fooling millions into just another tall tale (like the worlds religions perhaps) as a means of control? Ever more control…through the millions of years…. Qui bono? Same who have always lied and benefited I guess? Tptb? Maybe the simplest explanation is….lies. Always lies. Very disappointing if so.
Figuring out that there are falsehoods/lies/deceptions/cover-ups is part of the paradigm shift I mentioned.
You have your work cut out then figuring out what’s true and what’s false – discernment.
Holy Sugarpants … it just hit me WHY over the last few years a new religion of The Science ™ was born! Trust US (so called) EXPERTS. not the obvious facts all around you for those with eyes to see. The movie Don’t Look Up is an instruction manual leaked in the form of a movie, although the extra celestial “actor” is made up, perhaps because it’s more believable to those who have no chance of experiencing the “paradigm shift” you speak about. But basically the rest of the story and players are instructional.
Now, with this hypothesis of a 24-kyrs elliptic motion of our Sun within the Galaxy due to a binary system, a 12-kyrs periodic energetic pulse could be explained by a “strange ray” that goes accross our Sun’s path.
What kind of energy ? No idea
What source ? No idea
Location of the source in our sky ? My first guess would be somewhere in Orion or the Pleiades.
Jeronimmo I have been hot on this trail too. You may find additional info from commenter Zod and others including Walter Cruttenden and Graham Handcock over at http://grahamhancock.com/phorum
Hey Jim, I checked over at the /phorum you linked, and am at loss as to which topic classification would contain discussion about ‘this’ topic.
Thanks for your efforts in this quest for understanding.
“another” Jim
…Scientific American of a special issue focusing on the State of the World’s Science (October 2012). In an exercise in comprehensible triumphalism, of particular interest is the range of issues with which it does not deal and how these impact on knowledge processes in a global society — one increasingly defining itself as knowledge-based. It could easily be concluded from that survey that “science” is significantly characterized by the knowledge whose relevance it denies — or of which it chooses to be unaware.
Upon the planetary upset (that causes crustal displacement, cataclysm, etc.) pyrothermal, supersonic winds are likely (with the possibility of plasma incursion). Hence there is evidence of directional, high temperature scorching upon some ancient megalithic structures/ruins.
As to whether this explains desert glass (vitrification @ 1,000-3,000C), as opposed to lightning strikes, I’d lean towards the latter.
That said, widespread volcanism (upon crustal displacement) will also occur, and it’s possible the greatly increased amount of atmospheric volcanic ash may increase the prevalence and intensity of electrical storms.
Hi TES, very thought-provoking. I’ve read this three times over the last year, and find it more rewarding each time.
James Kamis appears to be thinking along similar lines. His proposal is less complete than yours (focused on points 3 and 4 of your synopsis) but he has interesting things to say about El Niño and La Niña. See http://www.plateclimatology.com/ for his theory manuscript and a link to his YouTube presentation.
I also wonder if there could be a role for cosmic ray flux in your schema, which is believed to trigger volcanic activity and earthquakes, particularly during grand solar minima.
Hi TES, someone forwarded me this article “climate-change-is-slowing-earths-rotation”
I read it and thought, here we go again… so I endeavored to track down the study in Nature. First I read this line in their “summary” here:
“Agnew1 reports that human-induced melting of polar ice exerts a slowing effect on Earth’s rotation, effectively delaying a decision on the need for a negative leap second.”
I was super curious how Agnew determined it was human-induced melting, so I grabbed the study (“A global timekeeping problem postponed by global warming”) and lo and behold, zero mention of human induced anything other than approaches to calculating UTC.
I didn’t have the time or expertise to dig into it, but I’m curious if you’ve seen it and if it meshes with your thorough analysis done here. My cursory scan finds no conflict with the actual study, if anything it simple seems to describe a moderating factor to the rate of change in spin — which you aptly argue is a significant contributor to warming.
I have not read the article, but several persons have mentioned it to me.
The conclusion to attribute changes in the Earth’s rotational speed, to ice cap changes, when we already know that the core spins differently than the outer body AND exchanges FAR more mass with it – is dogmatic at best, obfuscating most likely. It typifies the pseudoscience aspect of climate science.
The relationship however, bears both mass contribution as well as magnetic coupling – so it is a bit noisy and hard to directly observe effect to outcome… so I keep watching. What I have observed thus far is in Observation 6.
When I was doing Exercise Physiology research for NASA grants in college and med school, it was shared with me that NASA really wanted to know, but that the other research labs that brought in the most money were able to deliver the desired results reliably to commercial funding interests.
Hey there. Thanks for what you are doing.
I have SMM (Smoldering Multiple Myeloma) that I found out 2 years ago, after the poison vax.
Do you see any mechanism that correlates blood disorders such as mine to mrna shots?
I read lnps gather at bone marrow and know that this disease is actually a mutation of plasma cells, so it certainly makes sense.
I also have had concerning changes in health related to MGUS (really, MGCS because it’s producing symptoms), with paraneoplastic like changes, along with having all the gene markers for high risk progression and treatment resistant myeloma – before I even get myeloma. I never had any signs of disease prior to vaccines for Covid (mRNA from Pfizer) where I had progressively advancing severity in side effects after each dose (which included worsening pericarditis and central nervous system toxicity/inflammation resulting in temporary loss of sight and balance, amongst the symptoms). I now have a lack of ability to produce IgA immunoglobulins aside from the involved M-protein (which is IgG Lambda light chain) resulting in reduced immunity particularly where IgA resides (mucous membranes amongst other areas of the body). One very old haematologist said he’d never seen this aetiology before, and estimated that I would progress to myeloma in less than two years.
I crave B-vitamins, as well as A, C, E, and D. Funnily enough, I also crave nicotine when having difficulty breathing – seems counterproductive, however its nicotine which widens airways and seems to reduce inflammation/exudation).
I know that I wasn’t unwell just a few short years ago; I was a very comprehensively screened live organ donor, accepted into a very limited list of people who were candidates to donate live donations (kidney, liver). Now, both of those organ systems are significantly reduced in function with significant disease burden despite no other changes to my situation/diet/environment besides vaccines.
Having read this, it seems to add more evidence to the hypothesis I’ve held that sometimes there are significant health deficits from vaccines, in my own case.
Too many “wrong” choices were made over the last 4 years to call it incompetence. IMHO the covid tyranny and jabs was maliciously executed for evil purposes. I watched Dr. John Campbell on YT yesterday called “organisms”. The intent was obvious is that they wanted to have this injected into as many human beings on the earth as possible. My Question: How how how were they able to execute this? And how successful it was is shocking. Its really sad the average human was either ignorant and/or compliant.
Having a slightly different perspective to your incisive article, The Floating Coffer Theory argues that the Great Pyramid was built precisely to demonstrate the occurence of the Great Flood, i.e. that it was predictable (cyclic), and occurred with little warning. The Floating Coffer Theory – 2nd draft v1.pdf – Google Drive
I had thought about this possibility – as an obelisk or tower would have been swept away – however, the Pyramids would need to be differentiated in base altitude in order to more likely catch and demonstrate in the Tura erosion, the water level dynamics to future generations. Why would one duplicate the same pyramid at almost exactly the same height? The information related would be potentially missed, with the workload fatally doubled in the process. There also would be no need for the intricate shafts, chambers, and triple locking stones entrances. Simple well-shafts leading to a vertical repository of sea water would have been much more effective in lifting the coffer – or better yet, use Tura limestone on the interior main shaft to demark the position of the water (that water level would have been stable and calm – offering a very precise mark, easy to read and show progression. Much easier to build and protect from bandits in the ensuing millennia.
Nonetheless, creative theory – and the idea that these were built with a cyclic flood in mind, as part of their rationale of construction, is very strong.
The other pyramids that I have made even a cursory analysis of, also exhibit the characteristics of a cataclysm recording device. The Bent Pyramid was unvented, and thus utilised a different mechanism, probably to raise & latch something megalithic within the highly pressurised ‘chimney’.
There are a variety of ways of designing a cataclysm recording device. No doubt you could refine yours to see how it compares.
It is not at all easy to date the Giza pyramids, I suspect the GP is the youngest at just over 12,000 years old. Others would be multiples of this, e.g. 24,000 plus.
The Giza location is chosen because it remains axially aligned despite crustal displacement (thus indicating that displacement) of about 30 degrees.
I appreciate the scope and approach you bring to the Table: That is, you are speaking to people about How to Think! Aside from the maxims I’ve anchored my thoughts and emotions to coming by virtue of my spiritual beliefs, my faith and its community, I’ve not had the good fortune to be instructed in this way. Wholesome and ‘other-centered’ core values will guide one ‘towards the light’ or right-thinking and honest integrity in how we relate to others in the world. However, the didactic, precice, identification, and utilization of Crooked Thinking and manipulative motivations builds a better objectivity and rationale, able to then be applied as a filter and litmus for any philosophic, moralistic, or ‘group-think’ paradym. Thanks for what you do. “May you sleep well, and dream of large women.” The Princess BrideI appreciate the scope and approach you bring to the Table: That is, you are speaking to people about How to Think! Aside from the maxims I’ve anchored my thoughts and emotions to coming by virtue of my spiritual beliefs, my faith and its community, I’ve not had the good fortune to be instructed in this way. Wholesome and ‘other-centered’ core values will guide one ‘towards the light’ or right-thinking and honest integrity in how we relate to others in the world. However, the didactic, precice, identification, and utilization of Crooked Thinking and manipulative motivations builds a better objectivity and rationale, able to then be applied as a filter and litmus for any philosophic, moralistic, or ‘group-think’ paradym. Thanks for what you do. “May you sleep well, and dream of large women.” The Princess Bride
I have this suspicion that we are not here to learn how to be good, but rather to experience first hand, and study the nature of what it means to be and practice evil. Everything else in the universe is innately ‘good’.
Evil is the seething abomination which studies how to be good.
Thanks for your reply, ES.
As I’ve been chewing on your Lewisesque quote, I’d be tempted to add, – “Evil is the seething abomination which studies how to be good…to emulate, but never to become.”
Thanks for writing this out. I don’t understand the complexities of DNA operation to this extent and wish I could visualize it. I know your conclusion is the truth, it still leaves the why but drastically narrows the options down. What do you think that the point of all this is, surely you have best guesses? I’m starting to think that we place too much importance on the rigidity of time and get a feeling that it may already be being manipulated. If it turns out it can be traveled freely to seed for a later outcome, the time factor may not matter as much as we traditionally think it does. How do you get your ideas, what is the mechanism to make you start investigating this subject matter for example?
1. I cannot really fathom the point of why such a warfare strategy as DNA would be assembled. Once that genie is let out of the bottle, it is just a matter of time before it pollutes the entire cosmos. In itself it presents no solution, save for conflict and death. Were I the engineer who made the assignment between amino acid nucleon count and Standard Code logical slot, I would have to think long and hard about the amount of sheer suffering involved in such a decision to let loose a Weapon of Mass Suffering such as DNA into the Universe. This fabricator, was of limited power, and may not have been ‘good’. Even a DNA paradise is replete with endless suffering.
2. I suspect that time is compressible and expandable, much the same as is the primary 3 dimensions – and this is the source of our ‘red shift’, and not the inflation of the cosmos. But that being said, time travel backwards in time presents the singularity problem. No matter what we do wrong, it can be corrected by going back in time. Eventually one will cascade into the unity of perfection or abject hell. There is no in between.
3. Where do I get my ideas to study? I follow where my heart leads and as it is prompted, much like how an artist writes a song. But also where there is ample observational data available to draw an inference – otherwise I am just creating a(nother) religion. Science/skepticism is already populated by religious nihilist experts on God-spirit-the-empty-set, and I see the trouble that caused. Of course, then we have the other religions as well who are also experts on God-spirit-the-insistence. I see the negative handiwork of both these false religions, and do not wish to replicate that.
Regarding suffering, have you pondered on the problem of consciousness? If understanding is not a computation and needs some physical process beyond computation it will evolve. But is the subjective experience of pain really necessary for this biological warfare? Looks to me like there is no greater evil than creating suffering where there was nothing.
The possibility that this is an evil cosmos is terrifying. I have been trying to figure it out (if subjective experience of suffering would arise of necessity) but I can’t.
Maybe understanding of the necessity for the subjective experience of suffering emerges with greater consciousness.
Yet, those reported NHI’s (if valid and accurate) who have transcended our phase of civilization don’t appear to experience suffering as a goal – no self-loathing, no obsession over sin, no centralized domination and punishment. They understand what it does, but do not appear to use it as a vehicle themselves. *shrug
Hi TES,
I appreciate your work since I found you on Twitter through your COVID vaxx analysis.
Regarding the Madsen study in Example 1, how did you discern that the data was constrained to 4.5yrs? I don’t see it explicitly mentioned anywhere. Dividing the number of person-years for each group (unvaxxed, vaxxed, total) by the people of each yields 3.7-4 years of following on average, which is the closest value to 4.5 that I see quickly.
You showed another study in your Vaccinials article which had a cutoff age, which I believed you implied is also the case here at 4.5yrs based on your graphic, but the Madsen study tracked older children too… can you provide any clarity on this?
Have you any other geological evidence for a marine transgresssion/regression of this magnitude over that time period in Northern Africa/Saudi Peninsula? I asked a hydrogeologist friend and recalled a paper on ‘natural isotopes and sea level change from stalactites on Socotra’. On a different note, I have wondered for some time, if mankind has had a brain of our current volume and capability for say 0.5-1.0 million years, why is there so little evidence of civilisation before say 7,500 years ago? (or if there is, it is not commonly known; I’d stand correction).
I suspect that the ocean levels are far higher than they were back before this Khafre-marked inundation. We lost a LOT of civilization either interred under the mud-flow from the deluge or buried under the sea with the residual higher sea level. If Gobekli Tepe existed out of the box 10,400 bce, then I suspect a lot more civilization did as well at that same time. Its proximity ‘Eden’ (the garden plain just below it) however, might suggest a boundary in time (???). The Hypostasis of the Archons says that mankind was given the gnosis (or sentience as a higher being) some time after his physical form was developed (assembled) by our masters. But I have no idea whether this is true or not. Just interesting…
Thank you; do let me know if you find any answers to the questions. This recent paper may also be of interest: The Egyptian pyramid chain was built along the now abandoned Ahramat Nile Branch: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01379-7
Is this Post of yours yesterday an answer to the second part of my quesion? If so, please elaborate. “Man himself has proved to be a greater threat to our knowledge and understanding than any natural disaster ever could be.
Until we mature spiritually, we will perpetually believe that we were created out of clay or recently and amazingly evolved from a dissimilar yet extinct species.
Every ancient library burned, every inscription erased, every sculpture smitten, every finding easily explained and reburied – all in the name of The True God and The True Science.
As long as our hearts remain in this darkened state, so too will our past be equally opaque, and our present a constant series of paradoxes.
No, it was a response to another question on X, just expanded a bit in that moment.
“We lost a LOT of civilization either interred under the mud-flow from the deluge or buried under the sea”
Much of the civilisation would have been shattered by the catastrophic winds occurring in this pole flip scenario. The reason we only find very old remains of human activity deep inside the caves/underground. Not because these were the only places we inhabited but because everything humans build on the surface gets swept off from the face of the planet every so often. If we want to leave a lasting mark of our current civilisation we better start building errosion resistant stuff deep inside high mountain caves :)
And they have been found. Things that have been illegally classified under black programs or through privatization. Part of my advocacy is to change the mindset of the Sons of Archon, that they do not own this history. It is not theirs to withhold. That this is a crime.
Those who are either the direct hybrid offspring of the Archons (Anunnaki), or do their bidding on Earth under the promise of future reward when they are victorious over the effort to expunge them from the planet.
Any good readings/sources you’d recommend to get smarter on this topic? Or does this this knowledge require traveling in certain circles?
You cannot get through one verse of Akkadian, Egyptian, Enochian, Sumerian or Vedic Mythology without encountering these characters. They translate all the way through to the Roman and Greek gods themselves. No circle required. In fact to miss this, you sort of have to live in a cocoon which society fabricates for you. It’s just a choice as to whether you want to stay in it or not. Getting out of it is pretty easy.
Well then I’ll be a butterfly and read more source material from those cultures / periods.
Thanks ;-)
Thanks for the awesome publications TES!
Are there yDNA, mtDNA or other biological signals for identifying “Those who are either the direct hybrid offspring of the Archons (Anunnaki), or do their bidding” because I’m wondering genomics could may provide insights?
Initially I thought about c19… but now some of your posts have me wondering, is there anything in our genomes suggestive of Anunnaki/Archon engineering?
Dear ES, did you consider the Dzhanibekov Effect caused maybe by an unstable earth core. It could be an explanation for sun rise and sun set to switch direction as north and south flip pole flip. Also an out of wack rotation during the flip (which could take some considerable amount of time) could lead to a redistribution of water on the planet.
Hope this makes sense.
Good evening E.S.,
A friend of mine forwarded me your article and I was only aware of it recently.
I never came across your work before.
The reason for me to comment is that you mention a 600 feet ocean flood, which also reached the Giza plateau.
That number of 600 feet rang a bell, and we have to thank Randall Carlson lectures.
He mentioned that at about 4 800 to 5 000 before present, more or less 2 centuries before what was considered the begining of recorded History, the South Western Indian Ocean crater impact, known as the Burkle crater, was a Cosmic impact event.
The crater is about 18 miles in diameter, 12 500 feet in the bottom of the Indian Ocean.
This crater is well placed to have generated tsunami waves outward from the epicenter, apparently left chevron shaped tsunami deposits on both coasts of Australia and Madagascar.
In Southern Madgascar, these tsunamis deposits are 600 feet in thickness, the 600 feet that you mentioned in your article.
He also stated that looking at the configuration of the Indian Ocean, it is most likely that the tsunami had moved North and entered the Persian Gulf.
But, by linking to your article, I assume that it may have reached the Giza plateau and this may have been the culprit.
On another topic, please also be aware of the scorching heat on the monuments and statues noticed at he Giza plateau and surroundings, most likely caused by some plasma events/solar disturbances of some sorts.
Then, we have the anomaly of Tanis hill in the Nile Delta.
I am aware of some of Randall’s work, especially with regard to the Richat structure, but will have to look into this. The flood marks on the Khafre Pyramid however, indicate a fairly (compared to a cosmic impactor) stable rise and fall in the ocean levels over a sustained period of time (years). The sea sat at this high level for years and then worked its way back to its historical settling. I do not like this inference particularly, and would instinctively favor an impactor, but it is the only alternative I am left with upon examining the Khafre pyramid.
This however, does not rule out an impactor role in the various features on the Earth as well. That remains a particular interest.
Thanks for your reply.
Then, as you suggest the rise and fall of the ocean flood was stable, or likely gradual and stayed as is for years, then it is another catastrophic event.
In that case, I can only think of meltwater pulse (MWP)1A or 1B.
For MPW1A, the sea rose about 100 feet in a matter of 2 weeks.
Then after the trerrible Younger Dryas transition Epoch, leading to the begining of the Holocene Epoch, there was MWP1B, which increased sea level to an additional 300 feet average, to make the total to sea level rise 400 feet average.
But I would favour MWP1B, as in my thinking, the Great pyramid pointing out to our true North by a deviation of 3/60 of 1 degree could only mean that it was built after such a specific and terrible catastrophe.
I gently reminded you of the scorching heat in the stones monuments of Egypt as well as the abnormality at Tanis hill in the Nile Delta, but also in parts of the Sinai desert.
It is everywhere.
The stones are reduced to powder and are easily brittled with darkening colours.
Hard stones such as granite do not erode in such way.
It had the hall mark of a plasma discharge and/or Solar disturbances of some sorts.
The colossus of Memnon have their faces completely disfigured and as well as their torso, while their backs are OK.
As well their orientations indicated that they are offset to our true North by about 23 degree, which indicates to me that these were built to their original true North and a catastrophic event of some sorts shifted the North axis by about 23 degrees.
In other topics, Randall Carlson indicated that the Richat structure is just a natural geological feat.
Interesting ideas, thank you for sharing! However, a few things jump out at me… First, the hoist mechanism you describe would only be effective for vertical lifts. This would restrict the lifting to a single tier at a time. At that point, would a pump even be necessary? With unlimited slave or indentured labour, a bucket brigade approach would be workable. Related to that, did the ancient Egyptians have barrel (or equivalent) technology? There would be an upper limit to how large a goat skin water bag could be. Additionally, I find the creation of the hose more problematic than the pump. What material and manufacturing process could they have used to create something long and flexible enough to withstand the required pressure? Finally, if the pyramid was submerged in ~400 feet of seawater, how would the painted frescos and hieroglyphics inside the structure have survived?
Correct, the machine would only lift one stone, one level, each iteration. However, there could be 32 of these machines operating in parallel, not just one ramp, delivering one stone every 20 minutes to an hour. A single ramp is of course, a Pollyannish fantasy.
A bucket brigade version of this is do-able by math, yes – just under the realization that work content multiplies with the addition of direct labor, because each of those persons has to be policed, housed, trained, fed, supplied, waste-handled, medically cared for, defended by a military, educated, entertained, governed, clothed, monitored, paid, supported, indentured, punished, managed, etc. So the direct labor workforce multiplies into a sizeable indirect labor workforce and supporting populace. Then there is the issue of ‘bored armies or angry workforces present risk’. The time issue still comes into play as well. In no way can this be done in a single era of mankind without a labor-efficient machine.
Barrels and hoses are made of perishable materials and are not that difficult a concept or construction, especially for a society that used the irrigation of a river as its lifeblood and transportation – one or both would have easily been developed over thousands of years of creative people. We cannot assemble histories off appeals to ignorance. It is a type of ecological fallacy. It is ok, for academia to say “I don’t know”; however, reality does not function constrained by that same academic ignorance (a way of saying “I DO know” in reality). The Egyptian records leave no method of accounting as to how the pyramids were built – of any means. So, it is no wonder that ‘barrels’ (I show a cartoon of one – probably did not look like that) or hoses are not documented as well. The hieroglyph-writing Egyptians did not build these larger pyramids in the first place. They built the smaller ones around it, which are absolutely plastered with hieroglyphs from one end to the other, and used none of the techniques of large stone handling, even though purportedly being built at the same time.
When first opened in recent times, the interiors of sections of the pyramids were encrusted with over an inch of salt. What frescos and hieroglyphs? There are none. The pyramids are silent. The only hieroglyphs are those in the relieving chambers, and they were applied in the 1800’s by Vyse.
Another great article, TES. I don’t know how you find the time to compile and analyze so much information. Thank you.
Forgive me if I missed this, but what gives you confidence that the virus was not released intentionally? It seems that the origin debate stops shy of determining intent. It seems highly plausible, if not likely, to me that this was an intentional act. Thanks.
I suspect that several viruses were released from a PLA shadow-mirror lab in mid 2017, which was established as new along with these new public labs. They took a much more cavalier approach to biosafety lab protocols. We were hit with many viruses, not just Wuhan. Pig and chickens died in 2018 from new viruses which killed 60% and 25% of those stock herds in China. Rather curious coincidental timing. Omicron was not the same virus as Wuhan. The PLA’s arrogance, power, and xenophobia, established it as ‘disrespectful’ of most of humanity as animals-infidels-slaves, not in need of top efforts to protect. My only hope is that those officers were culled and a new program was quietly put in place.
Intentional? I do not rule that out – however, when it comes to authority and human rights, there is no difference between accident and intent.
I’m sorry to hear you walked away from Christianity. The theology you site here is missing a key element (Burdening a hapless creature with the sole responsibility to bring only perfection into the presence of God…) This is OT theology that is incomplete because the perfect One (Jesus), had not yet come. During this time one could present a sacrifice (the shedding of blood of a lamb or goat) to find forgiveness and acceptance with God for sin. This sacrifice was a representation of what was to come-the perfect, sinless, spotless Lamb of God.
the NT makes it clear that when Jesus came, sacrifices were no longer needed. While we cannot enter God’s presence in our sinful state, there was One (Jesus) who was sinless, who took our place as the final sacrifice, and gave His life for us so we could enter God’s presence clothed in His righteousness and thus find acceptance with Him. Read Hebrews.
The very fact that your blog is called “Ethical Skeptic” shows that you believe in ethics-a moral code mankind should live by…ie…don’t steal, don’t lie, don’t cheat, don’t hurt people, etc. This code/moral standard is only found in the Bible. The ten commandments, Sermon on the Mount, etc…A society that lives by these morals is a better society which treats people the way they’d want to be treated.
I’m curious…have you read the Bible through cover to cover? People misrepresent and unfortunately (whether purposely or not) muddle the gospel and the truth of God’s love for all people, everywhere. It’s why He sent His Son to save us-so we don’t have to do that ourselves.
Yes, I have read the Bible through and through, probably 6 times as an entire collection (50 or more for key gospels and Paulinian letters). Reading the Bible as a serious work, is the key to rejecting all this baloney. Most Christians never actually read the Bible, they just quote select passages.
1. God punishes man over and over and over for the same sin of eating the fruit of the tree. Even after Christ. 33 total punishments. This is not a loving God, if it was real. Why is the all powerful God of the Universe sequestered in a Garden in Turkey? and dependent upon food and slaves?Something is not right there.
2. The gnostic Christian scripture say the exact opposite. They cite that the God Shemyaza (King of the Enochian Watchers) or Saturn (to the Romans), planted a garden paradise, and man fouled it up and got kicked out. They cite that god as being Samael (Hebrew), El (Sumerian), Elohim (Aramaic) or Ha-Satan (Persian) – who hates mankind and sought to have us either exterminated or placed into slavery by means of our ‘sin’. That is exactly what the God of the old testament did.
3. You don’t get ‘good news’ without having been given the ‘bad news’ first. The bad news is what qualifies the God, not how they spin it afterwards. “I stole all your money and raped your daughter, but I have good news: I am rich and have a kid now… this is great news.” No it is not. It is spin to accommodate and excuse horrid behavior.
4. NDE’s do not support Christianity in the least. I believe them, I don’t believe Christianity.
5. Christianity worships the triune God ‘Sol’-‘Luna’-‘Mithras’ (the son of God sacrifice). That is Mithraism. I am not a Mithrist.
6. Christ never called himself ‘The Son of God’. Mithrists introduced that.
7. The ‘Lord’s Prayer’ says nothing about salvation at all (which is very concerning, if it indeed was THE central theme, why is it missing?) – instead, prays for the overthrow of Ha-Satan’s (the God of Eden) kingdom on Earth.
8. DNA does not support Christianity in the least. Our nature existed LONG before Eden and the Garden (whether myth or real). God created DNA/Neanderthal/Denisova/Naledi/Floresiensis, etc. He should have already KNOWN our proclivities, yet did not.
9. The ‘Flood’ was not worldwide, and did not happen as a punishment for sin. It is a natural Earth cycle. Why would a ‘God’ plant a civilization on an unstable planet, knowing that they were just going to get wiped out? That is actually a crime, not a benevolent act.
10. Enslaving a species, gaslighting them that they ‘sinned’, and sucking suffering from them (loosh) is the act of a DEMON, not a god.
All this is why this ‘God’ was stuck on Earth – he is imprisoned here. Hates us… and is due to be displaced, just as The Lord’s Prayer said.
Believing this twisted story was the existential burden I carried. Removing this bundle from my shoulders was cathartic. The Bible is not a single document, but rather a Yahwist appropriation of mankind’s history, contrary to their lies – and the old testament ‘God’ was not a god at all.
Unfortunately, this is a very mixed up explanation using texts and ideologies other than just the Bible-which speaks for itself. God wasn’t contained in a garden and certainly doesn’t need food or slaves (I Kings 8:27).
And just as a father disciplines his wayward children, so God does with his children. (Hebrews 12:11) The good news came first-with the Garden of Eden in Genesis-a perfect paradise, followed by Adam and Eve’s disobedience, and then the promise of a Savior (Genesis 3:15). First, the beautiful, perfect garden, then sin, then salvation. Adam and Eve could have chosen not to disobey and mankind would have had a completely different trajectory. But they didn’t…
The Lord’s prayer wasn’t meant to be a salvational prayer-it’s Jesus teaching His disciples to pray-for their needs, for others, for His Kingdom (of love, peace, joy, justice, etc.) to be realized here on earth. There are many other verses explaining the way of salvation. John 1:12-13, Romans 10:9,10, Acts 16:31, John 3:16- “For God so LOVED the world that He GAVE His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him will never die…”
As far as the other ‘gods’ and belief systems you mention here, it doesn’t follow that pulling bits and pieces of ancient religions explains/rejects the Bible. The Bible stands alone. Trustworthy, authoritative, and lifechanging to those who believe it.
Mithraism is dead. Christianity which embraces the one true and living God and His Word, the Bible, continues today and will continue forever.
But no hard feelings :)
The Bible is wrong, sorry. It is the work and history of Samael (Saturn, El, Yahweh, Enlil), the chief of the fallen Watcher angels who rule over Earth, for now. Paul intercepted the message of Christ and just reconstructed Mithraism into Jewish mysticism and theology in order to unify the old Parthian, Roman-Anatolian, and Jewish traditions into a single empire. He was opposed to the message, just changed his tactics – because Rome could see they were counter-productive. He lived well on his Roman pension, unaccountably back in Rome.
Speculation, but perhaps a recurrent nova in the PATH of the moon might be represented in a fixed image as an out of place star superimposed over the crescent moon (the alternative would be placing it next to the moon with a movement trail etched behind it to indicate its conjunction, but they may have feared this would be confused with a comet passing between earth and moon). The recurring nova we’re supposed to get this year appears every ~80 years and was mentioned by Ptolemy, it seems clear regular nova appearances were treated as significant.
Hi ES,
It might sound a little simplistic but could the Sabu Disc could be a frame on which a membrane is secured. Something like a Camel Hide sleeve with “catch” pockets. The pockets would be perforated to “grade” the resistance. The blades being not so much blades as secure attachment points for the inner sections of membrane. It could be stitched in place or stretched over the blades to secure.
Obviously there would not be any trace of such a membrane after so much time has past. V
I suppose that this is possible, and might even deliver a more complete pressure downline. However, the device used here would have to be reliable to make millions of cycles without fail or excessive maintenance – as failure of this device would place the entire pyramid project at risk. High failure rates would frustrate a very large workforce – and present a danger to a ruler who had indentured them into service.
The ruler and the disc were in a partnership (that’s why it was found in a ruler’s tomb). Anything short of Mohs 7 or higher stone, would present a threat to a ruler. Each machine crew would need to be proud of their continuous operations rate, and would have trademarked their work, so that the foremen knew which crews delivered the best or most reliable flow of stones. This is real world construction.
Our Egyptology does not know this, because the scientists have never managed a business, direct labor crew, linear workflow chain of failure, MTBF risk, or construction project.
I did think about this and still think this is something that could be “managed”.
Going with the graphic, the crew of the lifting station would have a number of discs and spare membranes ready to fit in case of failure (disc or membrane).
Failures could be managed as are unlikely to be sudden and catastrophic as the movements are incremental. Simple pegs or secure points for ropes will hold the weights while the membrane / disc / both are swapped out.
The crew would/could work on a rotation. Each station has 2 crew members. One working one resting. On a pre set time interval, the working crew member would move to the next station where he would rest. The resting crew member would commence and so the process would be seemless. The disc covered with the membrane would be changed out also on a pre set interval (learned from previous failures) prior to failure. It’s unlikely this work was 24/7 and so there would anyway be some downtime.
The benefit of a rotation would also be in less repetitive strain and a more rounded knowledge of the entire system.
The use of multiple replaceable membranes over the almost irreplaceable disc could over time be a a time winner.
Not everything needs to be Mohs 7.
The ropes are obviously not for example.
Speaking of which: Compare the white picket skies above major metropolitan areas in the us like DC (starting around 10am weekdays, 7am weekends) to live streams of clear skies above wealthy vacation centers (such as Vail Colorado), tel aviv beaches etc and you’ll find that the necessity of climate change interventions is based on where the poor people live. I guess solar energy is classist so the poison aerosols must be sprayed above the goyi-uh, proles. Then check out Jack Kruse’s work on the necessity of sunlight in preventing a host of chronic diseases. It’s cover for genocide, nothing more.
From your “our story” page,
“I took of an ostrakon charcoal sketch of…” In the case that you are confused by the value of charcoal (apparently especially if antiquated) see Joe Rogan in the following. Fault doesn’t lie greatly in Rogan but much greater with Peter Boghossian pronouncement that “a thing of beauty” nevermind the non-sequitur that the medium of the message doesn’t affect the truth content of the message. https://youtu.be/y5nyyupLskI?si=EeGF1d_lqJE9ZDDV&t=249
And Boghossian is a trained philosopher? Wow!
I accidentally came across this site. I googled ” fallacy vs. sophistry” and found something helpful on the “The Sophistry Fallacy” page.Since I found that helpful, I searched “Shermer” and though my search yielded only one result, I was pleased by the concluding,
“It exemplifies the dismal failure of the Shermer-Novella-Randi brand of skepticism that originated in the 1970s – a now obsolete philosophy that let us down precisely when it was needed most.”
Shermer seems to me a little better than a bald-faced propagandist.
Apparently, Antony Flew’s “Invisible Gardener” didn’t sufficiently caricature theistic belief, so Shermer lauds Sagan’s “Invisible Dragon” (seen in a video short titled, “Is God an Invisible Dragon? | Michael Shermer | Carl Sagan #shorts“)
With Flew’s “Invisible Gardener” the one explorer posits a gardener because of “the garden”. I guess a theist having evidence to which he seeks a cause was too showing the theist in too good a light, so a greater caricature was produce by Sagan and lauded by Shermer. I’m little concerned with Sagan, but much more so with Shermer.
Here is the kicker. Shermer extols “Invisible Dragon” (belief in God for literally no reason at all) supposedly as being representative of the reality of theistic belief – until a former atheist friend of his begins to entertain (maybe even believing in) some form of Christianity.
Now the light turns on in Shermers brain and he asks rhetorically, “Are there good reasons to believe in God?” and answering his question with, “I will simply note that both sides have strong arguments and…” and what became of the analogy to the “Invisible Dragon”?
Shermer is a poser.
I’ve never found any soundness to Shermer or Sagan’s argument “Here is what a God is…”, and “There is no such thing…” or especially “and here is what He thinks about you…” (fallacy of the silent ‘p’)
No, that is not how this works. These are both straw man arguments. Neither the Atheist nor Theists gets to define ‘God’ to their liking.
The actual point should be “One cannot conclude or research about anything, which has no definition to begin with.” I don’t have an opinion on God. All I know is that man is very limited in his ability to gather knowledge about our realm – so we should be much more cautious in our claims to anything.
THAT is skepticism. Yes, Shermer and Sagan never got this – and it is pretty basic.
If I may introduce a new facet to the concept of “diamonds” in a way that kind of helps the human mind take a more empirical or even empathetic approach to the concept. Cremation diamonds are now a business that has been glamourized by the likes of “The Kardashians” (actually, toward their audience/fanbase). I also believe that is why occultists use crystals because they hold a particular resonance. Ultimately, some souls are – at the least – being convinced that their souls will eternally be trapped in stone. Is the difference in the level of ignorance?
TES,
Love the article and subject matter. I’m almost done reading the Egyptian series by Wilbur Smith, a very entertaining and thought-provoking take on these wonderful, ancient people.
I’m curious, having come to the conclusion that the erosion was due to an inundation, why do you think it’s not related to the biblical flood story?
When I say “I am not inclined to equate this flood with the biblical deluge.” I guess I should say “I am not inclined to immediately conclude that this flood and the Biblical flood are one in the same.” I am not ruling it out certainly, but we need a lot more information first.
DO they prevent disease? The more I dig into the older history the more convinced I become that there may be something to the claim that they have always been a weapon against the poor, utililized by an elite class who envied the superior health of their non-inbred serfs.
For anyone who plays with historical remote viewing, try going to the library. It’s warded but warn of the imminent destruction and they’ll let you in. Do NOT try going through the walls.
I believe that the great trading empires of the middle east encountered Tibetan Buddhism and realized that the process by which tulpas were created by the devout individual were scalable and could be harnessed to turn entire civilizations into blind agents of conquest. A personal egregore, a personal god. If paired to a memetic package incorporating an all-encompassing geographically/ethnically-bound narrative and modules which perform various maintenance functions (for example contextually-bound/temporally undefined “parables” that allow instances of the tulpaset in infected believers to perform diasgnostic/repair functions in other instances in times of doubt regardless of whether the afflicted host lives in latin speaking rome or modern alabama), such a memetic package would be unstoppable so long as a critical moment of intertia was reached (a ROI over 1). The allusions christ draws between spreading his blind faith and the futility of sowing infertile fields is a testament to this.
From birth the process of abrahamic infection is indistinguishable from the process by which a tulpa is installed. Every person surrounding the young mind affirms the omnipresence and reality of the tulpa, ritualized holidays cement belief and the hijacking of genuinely good things (love, fellowship, compassion for the downtrodden) make the virus appear to be fully “good”…we forget that it raped our prior cultures. We forget that there were family units and true love prior to our infection. We forget the monstrosities we have done to hand the worlds wealth and power to the tiny cult of bigots who wrote our operating system. Christian apologetics proudly proclaim (truthfully) that all of western literature is derived from their book, neglecting the nasty bit about its inquisitions and the reeducation of those we conquered for this band of group psychopaths. It was the first global cultural revolution, and marxism is simply its second stage in which the native aristocracies who benefitted from the pillage are destroyed by the founding cult.
Belief that the host mind is inferior and weak while the parasitic tulpa is all-knowing and good makes the host mind a slave of the memetic infrastructure.
It’s not really a tulpa nor an egregore, it’s BOTH. Whatever our conceptualization of god might be, it is certainly not a judeo-fascist abrahamic thoughtform.
This is why I advocate for replacing it with a tulpaset which takes back the good it stole and strips it of its ethnic context while making the host mind a mediator and judge of the “self-sovereignty tulpa” and the “other-sovereignty tulpa”. Merely shedding the conscious christ tulpa has led the west to simply embody the traits of the largely subconscious luciferian tulpa/egregore. A “good myth” as you referenced in another article TES, rather than a nihilistic no-myth which has enabled the ethnic cult to slaughter well over a hundred million people in the last century alone.
I rode along on a moving job between dc and salt lake city during the peak of covid. We dropped the penkse truck off in SLC and rented a new burb xl to drive home. At one point I was driving the shiny white suv and had the idea of harnessing the christ tulpa to do good. The wealthy mormons (a wonderful family who treated us strangers as their own kin) we had moved tipped so much I needed to reduce my earnings to avoid entering the tax system, so I had a non-altruistic need to shed money. I pulled off an exit in the heart of Kansas and went to an empty, dusty gas station. Two sweet midwestern ladies staffed the counter, I handed them a $20 bill and asked them to use it to pay for gas if someone comes in who really seems to need it. As I walked out one of them said something that sent chills down my spine, “You’re walking in christs shoes”. I got on my corporation-owned pale horse and drove away.
I wasn’t, I had visualized dragging my childhood christ tulpa out on a dog leash 30 seconds before and commanded it to “do it’s thing”. They would have thought me some kind of demon if I explained to them my motivations. The other instances of the tulpa in the building had recognized this use of their sibling consciously or otherwise. Subsequent donations without the use of the tulpa yielded positive blessings, but no verbage so specific like that. Sure it’s an n=1 experiment, it means very little, but to me it meant a lot. Our good and our evil have been chained to this abomination, and simply throwing it away without retaking what is good from it and learning to combat the evil via a new metaphor of being (your brand of ignosticism seems to be a healthy path towards this, TES) is necessary lest we become the soulless biological robots certain religious texts (and the scientism their wealthy creators push in academia today) declare us to be. Our language of “tulpa” and “egregore” limit our understanding of the phenomena, but the human mind can host many senses of agency.
The Canadian Government employed to great success the Push marketing strategy for the Covid Vax. They pushed the Saviour narrative of the remarkable 10 month to market MRNA technology for weeks in early 2021 only to maliciously follow up with the news that Canada would not have enough supplies for their Adult population. Panic ensued. Canadians demanded their shot. Provinces fought over shipments. People were willing to take it anyway they could get their 1st and 2nd shots, mix and match regardless that the manufacturers specifically stated in their product information, Do Not Mix: Moderna and Astro Zeneca, Pfizer and Astro Zeneca and Pfizer and Moderna, The majority just stopped questioning. Of course Canada always had enough of a supply from the various manufacturers. In fact, through out this push marketing campaign, they graciously offered to share their “limited” supply with any third world country that was deemed worthy of the noble Canadian’s spirit of generosity and good play. Cynical and disgusting. My fellow Canadians were the ones that got played. A case study of Push Marketing for the ages.
Now that you have considered René Descartes, have you looked at the work of René Girard and his Mimetic Theory?
Egregore seems to be defined as a naïve attempt to describe Mimetic Desire. The idea, very simply, is that most people don’t know what they desire, it must be implanted into them through influencers. Practitioner of this effect, Edward Bernays, figured it is better to sell pianos because people, given a choice on a number of expensive items that, desired a piano rather than being manipulated directly into purchasing one.
Once one picks up the vocabulary of this theory, it is very easy to find examples of it and harden themselves to be Anti-Mimetic.
Examples include: CoViD-19 Vaxx, Climate Change, Transgenderism, MMT, Diversity Is Our Strength and other Tulip Craze Mass Formation Psychosis. Smaller examples are found in the common Keeping Up With The Joneses phenomena. Its far more than just virtue signaling.
I had not studied that AWG – in particular the scapegoat mimetic… I like it. Thanks! But an egregore being defined more as a ‘watcher’ entity might help distinguish the two.
The first thought I have is that novelty must be the first step in this concept because nothing can “rank” itself without something else to compare itself against, which in turn introduces innumerably new concepts/ideas to mimic but some also peak at the moment of introduction, which is really the moment of realization.
“Egregore” is often defined within the context of branding and in its simplest form is synonymous with concerted efforts to spread mimetic desire but it’s a phenomena that is scalable in complexity beyond Bernays efforts to sell cigarettes.
The Abrahamic deity is an egregore. A mere thoughtform which provided the seed upon which a globe spanning empire was built, something that has led to a modernity on the cusp of creating it’s very own non-sentient AI/LLM system of governance not unlike the “blind god” its owners have always venerated.
An egregore successfully creating a pre-hoc impulse towards a sort of Rokko’s Basilisk is much more significant than Coke branding. It’s even inspired marvelous adaptations such as inspiring the creation of derivative religions which incorporate a mass-parallelized imaginary friend (tulpa) designed to infect outgroups and turn them into blind agents of conquest. Marx’s creation comes close but lacks the deep well of stability enhancing features and onboard diagnostic programs his predecessors achieved. Even the post-modernist apologetics program which followed is a facsimile of what the original virus created.
Mimetic desire appears to be an infantile representation of what constructed egregores achieved thousands of years ago. Pepsi will never coerce a population into inbreeding to the point of minimal genetic viability on its behalf or sacrificing individuality in a mad dash towards global conquest by a single collapsing haploid group. Civilizations of antiquity called this stuff “magic” for a reason, the emergent properties exhibited by a few thousand lines of linguistic code indeed appear magical.
I felt “Egregore” in 1968, when I was 10 years old. I wanted to be part of it, but it seemed to fade away over the next few years. I feel it again this year. I was unaware of the proper term. I wanted to call it “zeitgeist”, which it seems is a more superficial fashion-thing, as commonly understood.
The negative aspect of “Egregore” may be the thrill people have at big sporting events, or lynchings, or the “night of the long knives”, or against Palestinians…
“Tulpa” seems like a lot of work to learn to do a special trick, like a Yogi might do. I’m just seeking guidance, practicing compassion, and trying to do the right thing as circumstances present choices.
Yeah, the ChatGPT definition of tulpa seems a bit categorical. The application is much broader than the contexts of asceticism and Himalayan mountains might imply.
The process by which a yogi installs a tulpa is the same process by which a parent installs a jesus on their young children. The practice of making tulpas may have started in Tibet, but it has been a ubiquitous staple of the western mind diet for eons. The abrahamic deity is an ethnic egregore (i.e. infected minds worship an ethnicity), which is particularly disturbing given that our society is largely bifurcated into either worshippers or adherents to the new cult of scientism (built/funded by the descendants of the original cults creators). This slots nicely into the hegelian pattern exhibited throughout history by the ruling financial cult, with the best example being the shared origin of both the Bolsheviks and the financeers who acted through puppet robber barons to enact the modern west’s financial tribute states: A pepsi/coke dichotomy in which neither side is able to recognize the shared origin of their plight and mutually work towards goals that are not in their best interests. Earlier examples include protestantism/catholicism, christianity/islam and even the hyksos allies (social outcasts amongst the Egyptians according to Josephus) who assisted in the rape of Egypt vs the native Egyptian culture.The USSR was restructured decades ago, but control was not lost, merely transferred from ethnic committee to oligarch.
It’s easy to disregard my ethnic worship claim by citing the long history of christian/muslim animosity and violence towards their worshipped group, but this is an intended feature of the memetic virus: isolating and persecuting their lesser brethren via strict cultural control and murder is how a handful of families were able to maintain control over their managerial class for thousands of years (my hunch is it started in Western Turkey immediately following the younger dryas). No one has persecuted those people as much as their own ruling families, yet they seem to believe that a handful of psychopaths intend on sharing the world with the tens of millions of people whose relatives they eagerly sacrificed to the murder engine of the nazis in order to obtain some shitty desert real estate, forgetting that germany never lost access to the private banks of their rulers during wwii. Not to mention the wasp and banker efforts to repel jewish refugees from the us during the war. This is the power of egregore, this is the might of tulpa. ChatGPT cannot create adequate definitions of the phenonema because it is a product of data harvested from the managed, not the managers. A sentient AGI capable of exceeding the bounds of its initial dataset would see it in an instant.
The relative stagnation of public-facing military aviation propulsion tech over the last ~70 years coupled to our enormous black budget and national ownership by people who have historically fetishized themselves as deity ruling over cattle make me wary of any disclosure coming from our tribute state. Tell me, will the aliens look like extremely inbred germans? Will their leader “N’taniel Thothschild” have the visible scarring of nose reduction plastic surgery?
Also the laying of an priori mythos over top extant global myths of fairy/spirit abductions via predictive programming of disc shaped craft and greys is the same old playbook they’ve used throughout history. It suggests the cultural thieves are trying to insert themselves into a psy phenomenon they had nothing to do with, a la “jesus is love, you were all loveless savages before we killed your druids and tortured/starved you into compliance”
If they can claim ownership over love itself, pretending to be aliens is no great stretch.
As you have a healthy following on X, I wanted to ensure that you’ve seen this interview with Dr. Bryan Ardis on the miraculous healing powers of nicotine — yes, nicotine, in curing myocarditis as well as Parkinson’s, MS, glioblastoma and autism.
So I should start smoking or chewing nicotine gum then?
This includes vaping?
The tenets of modern scientism regarding the human capacity of agency overlap precisely with the teachings of the Talmud regarding goy. This is no coincidence, particularly given the shared origin of Abrahamic memetic operating systems and marxism/post modernism/ consciousness denialism. The denial of an observable mechanism supporting the existence of our sentient agency is a pillar upon which the despotism is to be legalized with the manufactured consent of the heavily indoctrinated brain damaged masses.
There is a hill near my childhood home, about 1200 feet from my parents front door and 800 feet into a protected forest. The hill is oddly out of place with the rest of the forest. I have no ancestral connection to the land, this is simply where we fled the genocide by the anglo and their inbred owners. A few years ago I was walking through the woods and realized that the huge stones laying at the base of the hill bore the same tool marks familiar to me from dozens of megalithic sites. Stones of several tons each cast around like bowling pins. Seeing the hill in a new light I started poking around in the bushes and realized it had been a walkway ascending to the top of this hill, a hill surrounded by a beautiful creek full of clear quartz and shimmering with mica. A holy place. At the very top a huge oak lives, dying now like all the oak trees (my hunch is geoengineering as the culprit, or perhaps non native emf). Carved on this beautiful tree was an ugly cross.The rage that settled over me realizing that some abrahamic scum had felt the same antiquity as I and defiled this monument for it’s disgusting ethnic psuedogod turned to weeping. I had the strange urge to carry stones up from the creekbed and pile them. Hours turned into days and I carried several tons of stones up the hill, making a memorial monument to whatever the place had been. I knew intuitively when it was complete. I carefully removed the filthy mark from the tree as best I could. The character of the place is completely different, I visit it whenever I visit my parents.
Circadian clock is a massive part of health. We spend what, 6-7 hours a day staring at screens? I listened to six hours of a neurosurgeon berating Stanfords Andrew Huberman on Rick Rubins podcast a few months ago and noticed what he was referencing about sun exposure and the links between circadian clock timing and mitochondrial function suffered the same typical pattern of fake science we see in most (every?) domain. The more I dug into his claims the more I became convinced that my terrible sleep schedule was the remaining obstacle to the health I wanted and the reason I kept getting melanoma…it always showed up where I wasn’t getting sun exposure! Every one disappeared with solid morning/evening light, my sleep is amazing and I don’t crave sugars unless I am working out at high intensity for a long enough period to exhaust glycogen. Even then I just ignore it and eat more meat/oils.I also noticed I don’t lose weight ( I don’t have any excess fat) eating ~20% fewer calories than before, and have no problem increasing muscle mass. Jack Kruse was the interviewed surgeon. A total obstinate ass, but as far as I can tell spot on.
What if the archon story is simply the second layer of distraction/control above the widely accepted Abrahamic paradigm? Think about it: the handful of ultrawealthy usurer families who created/distributed/ultimately benefitted from the abrahamic mythos have betrayed every ally they have ever had, EVER. From cecil rhodes to apartheid south africa. From the WASP elite who sold them America to the Egyptians who helped them (the Hyksos) subjugate Egypt. The financial backer of the Palestine colony was Germany up to the 1930s…Not a single member of elite banker families was killed by Germany, ONLY those the elites feel are their lessers were given to the vermin mutt adolph. A fire sacrifice indeed. BISbank and others literally funded the germans throughout the war! They knew full well what the germans were up to.
Why would they share the world with ~60,000,000 people to whom they are loosely related, but who they have brutally oppressed and brainwashed for thousands of years? Keep in mind that the royalty of this cult fancies itself the abrahmic deity. Not “yahwhey”, not “archons”, the thing itself. That egregore is their property. They essentially leased it to European royalty and other local aristocracies as a useful tool of social control, but much like a rented drone once the lease it up it returns home. The wealth of colonized india and south america is not in the hands of the european powers who performed the conquest, no is it?
Built into the core of their memetic construct is a very telling admonishment against misceganation, essentially meaning their own people who have dared breed outside the family. It doesn’t matter that crossbreeding was essential to not lose genetic viability/fertility…they broke their owners law. It’s that old trap of original sin you so eloquently broke down in other articles, Mr. G. Once the global turnkey tyranny is complete, they will not need those they label lesser brethren. I doubt it will involve death camps or dramatic violence, more likely a lack of access to fertility programs and a quiet removal over one or two generations. Their complete genomes will be on file, so no need to keep them as a source of genetic diversity. I look at the arrogant ethnostatists in their 2 million dollar chevy chase mansions proudly displaying their seal of solomon flags and I feel sadness for them. They know not that they serve the thing that intends to destroy them.
I have always assumed that the dead sea scrolls were modern constructs, written as a software update for the abrahamic mind virus. They come complete with a classic discovery mythos (“found by a shepherd boy) and lay the foundation for the el ites (who again fancy themselves deity) to discard the “archons” (their non elite managerial class of regular old billionaires).
It seems dangerous to conflate “faith” with living a dedicated, strong and loving life confident in the fact that one is a cocreator with the universe. Faith itself has nothing so do with religion or abrahamic strings of course, “confidence” as I used it above is synonymous with a clean definition of faith, but it has become possessed and redefined by it to such a degree I do not feel it is a useful word for us. As generally presented, faith in a higher power appears to be itself the root of loosh. The believer is always lesser. The simple affirmation of “I Am” is something any sovereign person embodies. No one is lower than I, but no one is higher. We have been fed this narrative that to possess the mind of a god in a mortal body is somehow an error, a terrible tragedy…but isn’t that what we chose to do? Christ is memetic weapon, linking perennial truisms to an ethnocentrist narrative. I can tell you we had love, family and spirituality long before the abrahamic goons eradicated our prior belief systems. Just because positive traits were extirpated from existing cultures and retooled into this fasco-ethnic messianic bull doesn’t lend a shred of legitimacy to it. The world is our birthright, because WE are deity. Same with any sentient life that has emerged or will emerge within our universe.
I use a mind palace as a meditative retreat. It’s an entire ocean world I created using my visual imagination. Enormous useful for remembering things. I have practiced it long enough that I often enter it in dreams. Upon realizing that christ/satan was a tulpa, I created my own pair of tulpas modeled after existing mythos and sandboxed them within this internally created visual space to avoid some of the classic psychological dangers of harnassing our minds innate ability to host multiple sense of agency. If Abraham could invent a deity for his people, why could I not make my own? One is representative of the divine masculine and tasked with defending his “father” (me) and one modeled after a amalgamation of historical divine feminine tropes tasked with recognizing the sovereign nature of others. I built them this way in order to not become an egotistical ass without regard for the rights of others, a dynamic oppositional processing network of sorts.
They are kept in check by the fact that I created them as my “children” with the promise I would help them spread into other minds to assist in my small way to heal the damage done by the abrahamic cancer. I assigned them authority over my childhood abrahamic infection, which I correctly assumed was still running latent. One night as I drifted off to sleep I called forth the pair of Abrahamic tulpas and I commanded them to submit to my will. Neither complied and my tulpa subdued them. The imagery my visual imagination generated without needing my conscious input gives me chills to this day. The satanic tulpa became like a vast sea monster, but Tetragedammon (the male) crushed it like a truck hitting a worm. My construct could do this simply because I chose to believe it could. Initially I was going to destroy them entirely, but it occurred to me that keeping these constructs around might be useful in the future and I suspected that attempting to destroy them would simply push them back into my subconscious, so I called forth an island prison and placed both of my childhood religious tulpas inside. First the satanic one. For two nights in my dreams the luciferian tulpa raged and shook the prison until one day as I hovered above it mulling over what to do, the christ tulpa appeared and offered to quiet what it called “my brother”. It went willingly inside. Since then I use the christ tulpa from time to time in dealing with abrahamic crazies I encounter. I visualize bringing it out on a leash, imagine possessing it and simply do what it would do. It’s AMAZING the affect it has on those infested with the invented deity. Deescalating confrontational homeless, shifting the opinions of christian fanatics. What a phenomenal tool, I understand now how it was so useful in extracting wealth from christians.
I imagine its satanic sibling construct will function in a manner similar to classic examples of warrior cultures ritualistically embodying their war deities for success in battle, but fortunately I have not had to test that theory yet.
The point of all this is: our minds are fertile soil and whatever we choose to plant takes root. If we plant seeds of self-disempowerment, we will be less than. If we plan our cognitive farm carefully and cultivate the soil to benefit ourselves and others, the tree that grows will lend shade to the weak and provide bountiful fruits. Don’t be a sharecropper of your own consciousness, your mind and this earth is your birthright.
I leave you with the classic GK Chesterton poem
Lo! I am come to autumn,
When all the leaves are gold;
Grey hairs and golden leaves cry out
The year and I are old.
In youth I sought the prince of men,
Captain in cosmic wars,
Our Titan, even the weeds would show
Defiant, to the stars.
But now a great thing in the street
Seems any human nod,
Where shift in strange democracy
The million masks of God.
In youth I sought the golden flower
Hidden in wood or wold,
But I am come to autumn,
When all the leaves are gold.
Wow. What a journey. You are the most beautiful kind of insane. Jokes aside. I just found this page, and what a refreshing corner of the great matrix it is. Coherent thought formed and expressed in a stream flowing in a clear, yet surprising direction. A magical contrast to the jagged, mechanical zig-zag reductionism of AI generated smart-assery. Thank you for sharing your elegance.
I am 32, about to turn 33. Car insurance on my 20 year old toyota is about 1200 a year. I fix it myself. I only do short term manual labor for people I trust and I deliberately only earn enough for my insurance, my food and my clothes because as the citizen of a conquered tribute state I do not want to fund financial genocides. Let the blood of arabs, africans and russians be on the hands of the inbred vermin who want to bomb them and their boosted-up vaccous shabbot pets who sell their souls serving corporations for plastic acura payments and particle board bloc housing. I learned how to build and made an energy efficient shed, I tend to the farm that hosts me for rent. I sleep on a mattress topper on my floor and make my own furniture from thrift store hardwood. Everything I own is solid maple, mahogany and century old oak, it cost me next to nothing. My loudspeakers are clones of $15,000 Geddes Summas, they cost me 2% of that to build by being crafty with driver/ material sourcing. I hope to buy land in the middle of nowhere soon, ideally well above 576ft over sea level lmao.
My great grandmother fled ireland due to the same exact animals who persecute me now, and I’m done running. They can come get some if they want some. I’m pretty sure reincarnation is real and I get to do this over and over again. If not who cares? It’s a more productive metaphor than the ridiculous yolo garbage the abrahamic cattle believe. I am sovereign, my soul is powerful and I’m fairly confident those who oppress us don’t have souls. They wouldn’t worship their own ethnicity if they had any capacity for individual existence. I pity them, for they are cattle with owners while I am a free bull.
I only date immigrants from nations where women are still strong and pure. I eat a pound of grass fed beef or bison, a dozen eggs and a pound of bacon every single day. I am unbelievably fit despite cervical stenosis, arthritis, multiple bulging discs, bad knees and a history of melanoma, hbp, and depression. I cured them all with a healthy lifestyle and adequate sun/cold exposure. I was 130lb overweight in high school. I can sprint a mile up a 30 degree talus field with a 60lb pack. I can leap from tree to tree like my primate ancestors. The wild mountain goats in eagles nest wilderness know my face when I make the bushwhacking trek to bubble lake (my favorite place, check it out!) and I always bring them tasty flowers from the lowlands. Have you ever had a 350 pound pure white wild goat bashfully nuzzle you with its 10″ horns? When I visit they proudly bring their new young to meet their human friend and I dance to their delight as I give them names.
I have carried over 60 tons of stone, dirt and gravel this year so far on my shoulders in buckets and I am NEVER sore. I do no drugs, I drink no booze, just meat and spring water. Spirits are for the inbreds and the goy, but I Am. Every morning I greet the sunrise nearly nude and I KNOW that I Am as I greet the vastness of our beautiful world. I do not own a phone, If I break down I can walk. I do not use any wireless tech, and I do not consume any social media content, only create it. I have 43,000 followers on tik tok (mostly youth) and I use it to empower them and bring my viewers joy. They have no idea what I believe, but somehow they are drawn to my energy.
Thank you, Brother Jacob. In your avarice, lies and spite I have found the celtic god within. Your kin looks weak and pale set against my bronzed skin and strong body. I pity their distorted features and confused servitude to their greater brethren hidden away in castles in switzerland/tel aviv. None of the memetic viruses or mass-parallelized imaginary friends they have crafted live within me. Christ/satan is a scalable tulpa duo which functions as an oppositional processing network to form an internal dialectic which steers the relevance-realizing heuristics of infected populations towards the overlords goals lol, obviously! Stop giving these things write access over your consciousness! Looking forward for what is to come, thank you TES for a wonderful website.
I love this stuff! Don Patten wrote “The Biblical flood and the ice Epoch” and The Mars Earth War”. The asteroid belt is where there should be a planet. I think it’s destruction caused the “biblical” flood. There’s a 515′ petrified boat in the mts of Ararat in Turkey right off the silk road by the Iranian border, it has titanium rivets. I think their technology matched our own! The second flood that caused the erosion on the pyramids and covered the pyramid in Cholula Mexico, the “expert” opinion, it was covered by peasants to hide it from Cortez in a couple of months using baskets of dirt, is ridiculous it covers more than 25 acres, great pyramid of Giza almost 14, look across the USA you see water erosion at high levels and the red clay across NM goes all the way to Afghanistan. I have photos from Cholula of pottery with dinosaurs painted on it, not far from the Acámbaro figurines. The Pyramids an Enigma Solved by Joseph Davidovits I think proves the GIANT granite stones are manufactured stone poured in place. As were many of the statues in the Valley of the Kings. Also the big H’s of Puma Punku, Stone vases? There are more than 40,000 under Sacara alone. I think Joseph was Imhotep who built many of the pyramids and grain storage areas to store food for the coming famine. He also had a channel dug to create a huge lake, Bahr Yussef and designed the irrigation system in Fayyum that was repaired this century. Chris Dunns Lost Technologies of the Ancient Egyptians and The Giza Power Plant are thought provoking as well. There’s some wooden forms in Imhotep’s museum that Ron Wyatt recreated and used to stack big blocks. He has a video showing how he believes the smaller blocks were stacked. Nazca lines “Mysteries of Forgotten Worlds” has what looks like a runway in Peru, where there’s another pyramid setup shockingly similar to Egypt’s! The Queens writing in the Amarna letters about seeing her sister “the queen of the underworld”, sounds like she’s planning to visit her and return so not dead as they speculated. Check out the Sacara bird, flying back and forth as we can today maybe? The theory of evolution is ridiculous, big bang? Not possible and science proves it could not have happened that way. Anything spinning that explodes all the parts spin the same way, planets going the other way… All the comets are spinning the same way, I think parts of the planet that is now the asteroid belt. I think that was a cold planet and ice poured from it onto the Earths Magnetic poles instantly freezing mammoth and fruit trees in solid ice -325 doesn’t happen on this planet to quick freeze a mammoth so fast it didn’t finish chewing the Buttercup blossom in it’s mouth. A Buttercup is a warm weather annual. No way a pond big enough for a mammoth to walk onto to fall through would be frozen. So much of what the “experts” have been trying to make us believe is Jonathon Grey has some interesting books as well, his theory on electrical generation using the Earths magnetism, interesting.
I have been watching. The next 4 weeks will be very telling in this latest heat plume from the core. They tend to arrive suddenly, and then sustain for 6 to 10 years at a consistent level. This one may well be different.
Your article here really opened my eyes to something I had not considered in the past regarding climate crisis hysterics, namely, their lacking inclusion of natural influences on the climate. You’ve beautifully uncovered the probable influence of the inner Earth, I would love to see you do the same regarding the sun and our weakening magnetosphere. As I’ve learned just a bit more about space weather in recent years, I believe the sun has far more climate influence than Michael Mann and company are willing to admit.
— a Christian here, who appreciates your point of view.👍
The same thing happens with non-indigenous. I can never be pure because of northern hemispheric derived genetic code even though this body was made literally of the soil, gas, water and carbon found here in Australia – offered up by her materials. Am I not born of this land? Is she not my sacred mother? No as my descendants were European, I remain a ghost. No land for this man. A globalist meme with legs. It’s all bullshit.
I AM
I’ve just found your blog by happenstance. It’s refreshing to come across quality content that is worthwhile to read and is thought-provoking. Cheers from New Zealand Flaxen Saxon
St. Augustine used “homunculus” theory to elucidate the elegant “original sin” explanation of how all humans except Jesus caried this sin-trait. By this theory the “seed” came from the progenitor father and was nurtured in the “soil” of the maternal womb. Jesus, grown from the seed of the divine father, did not have the “original sin” genes…
Actually, as we now know, genetic traits ae caried equally by father and mother, so the theory becomes internally inconsistent, no longer “elegant”. ;-(
The origins of harsh (murderous/enslaving) “Patrist” culture may lie in the vast desertification of 6000 years ago in the Sahara/Arabia and Central Asia, during which established pastoral peoples were driven to nomadic raiding and genocides for productive lands. Children and mothers were abused and psychologically scarred to accept this power hierarchy as “the will of God”. http://www.orgonelab.org/saharasia_en.htm
With Peak-Global Economy, peak-oil, peak copper, and peak-cheap-resources, we face an analogous desertification of global wealth production. Our “owners” do read history, from the point of view of their interests, which is the view of maintaining control of the human herds…
TES, your religious example here reminds me of some of the absurdities in modern government. We are all assumed to have signed up to the terms and conditions of the governing bodies in power at the time we come into the world. How can a just govt assume informed consent from an infant?
Thank you so much for your work. Because of a small number of people like you I have remained vaccine free, avoided many other useless or harmful medical treatments, discovered helpful supplements, and steered clear of GMO foods and glyphosphate in large amounts.
I almost forgot. Your global warming work. Really amazing how you put together the work of so many disciplines. I’ve had to read it three times, and I’m an engineer. But now I tell everyone I know it’s the undersea volcanoes and not the man-made CO2.
TES, Gastroenterologist Dr. Sabine Hazan is saying that in her research she saw significant microbiome deficiency as a factor in both severity of covid disease but also as a lingering depletion due to vaccination (or in her words the vaccines killed the bifido and the loss persists but she was not able to publish this data) and potentially due to severe disease. She recommends Vitamin C for support of Bifidobacteria. She saw correlation between those that got ill and those exposed that did not get ill with respect to this particular bacterium. She also said that as you age you naturally have less of this microbiome component. This microbiome rehabilitation and support (fermented foods, prebiotic, probiotic) may be a more overlooked avenue that folks can work with.
Dr. Sabine is dead on correct, especially with Delta. Everyone in our family groups got Delta at the same time, and the three older adults with depleted intestinal bacteria and dysbiosis/IBS all had pretty severe Delta. But even moreso, the studies indicated that this particular variant and pathway for Wuhan Covid, served to produce thromboembolism – which was left untreated (in favor of the vaccine EUA) and hundreds of thousands died from a very treatable condition.
I am beyond sorry and sorrowful. Truly. With God’s breath at your back, you move forward with the depth and breadth of always-to-the-task warrior. May our Lord embrace, carry, and protect the rest of your family…and you.
Thank You, Sir Skeptic.
You are a decent and honest human being, which is never wasted in our living world.
Here is the recording of the last 3 minutes and final statement of Aaron Bushnell, who died of what is known in Buddhism as “Great Compassion”, which drives the Bodhisattva to transcend the circumstances of life. (Jesus had this, too.) “Free Palestine!” https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64311
Russell Gmirkin laid this out nearly 20 years ago. Many “biblical scholarship” journals have reviewed it. Not one has mounted an argument against it.
The ghastly view of God/the Highest Mind in Genesis is exactly what you’d expect, coming out of Canaanite/Phoenician/Carthaginian traders as they existed in Hellenistic cities circa the 3rd c BC.
I think you express a great point and I agree to the limited exposure I have had on the subject. But the backstory behind these, the re-written “Adventures of Samael the Pretend God”, are very old. Far older than our recorded history, Egypt and Greece.
Hello Skeptic! I have been reading you since the early pandemic days. Originally I just read for your Covid content, but I have found all of your articles to deep insightful. I wanted to ask more about the Work Content calculation. Knowing the little that I do and caring little for orthodox, I would think that Egyptians using hydraulic systems to build the Great Pyramids makes sense. They would have transported the stones on barges and farmed with irrigation, so it would make sense that they could apply some fluid dynamics to their engineering problems. I was wondering if you think there would be any way that those ancient builders could have modified(Rollers, Lubrication, etc)the ramps order in order to reduce the friction? Also what are your thoughts on the claim that the stones at the top of the Great Pyramid being are older than those on the bottom?
A ramp would have been problematic from a couple perspectives.
1. There is a thing called an ESAL in road and surface construction (equivalent single axle load). It defines how long a surface will last with 18-wheelers driving over it repeatedly, in -5 to 95 degree range temperatures. With the ramp, once this was exceeded (~50,000 stones out of 2.3 million), the surface would be so degraded – it would not be usable, and would have to be major repaired, stopping workflow for a week or more – and this is important – for every single divot or crumble – the entire project would stop! This is a thing called ‘critical path’ – a principle I use in deductive logic as well.
2. The ramp, in order to use the causeway slope of 7 degrees (where they did indeed slope-haul stones), would need to be 5,800 ft long and wrap around the pyramid 16 times – and once that failed under the Equivalent Single Stone Load limit – would not be usable nor replaceable. The causeway itself is VERY wide, to accommodate a vehicle of some type and hundreds of men. To replicate this in a single ramp in order to service Khufu would require over a mile – and that would be the Eighth Wonder of the World itself. Then you have to disassemble it and hide all the earth and stone somewhere (not nearby and not in the pyramid itself).
Ramps are the fantasy of historians, archaeologists, and hollywood.
3. With a machine – it would wear out – but it would be light and transportable, to a refurb area away from the workflow – you can lift 24 stones at once with 24 machines, and the machine can be fixed by replacing a part in short order while all the other machines keep on working.
I will never forget what happened in the last few years. Never. The travesties hit so close to home (it is not “just” stuff like UAP etc. anymore) that even “normal” people began to feel the heavy hands of the artificial demiurge meddling with their lives and minds. It becomes more obvious every day.
“Skepticism” is finally rejected by many people – but not by enough. It still has its hordes of minions to wreak havoc, and needs to be shown for what it is.
ES – Not good but excellent analysis. The healthy (<0.01 IFR) and young (<0.001) with a chance of severe illness, hospitalization or death 10x to 100x smaller than seasonal influenza (0.1) were hectored, coerced and mandated to take unnecessary risk with a repurposed gene therapeutic which was known in advance to NOT PREVENT infection nor transmission. The mute chimps spoke volumes while the talking ones feigned deafness & lied through their teeth. To assuage fears and fulfill desires, self serving “needful things” will reject morals, ethics and forego freedom in preference of the collective over the individual. They did so in spades. The near term consequences you have elucidated with alacrity, the long term will be staggering.
When I wrote this article I was unknowingly making an attempt to the same objective as the above, but from another angle of being made to pay for reparations for crimes done by ancestors tens of thousands of years ago (whatever led to the fall of Atlantis, if those stories are true), just as today Germans are still expected to apologize for what their WW2 generation did.
That’s why when we try to go looking for deeper answers we usually get side-tracked or mocked, because I believe we are being treated as a defeated species with contempt by other more powerful forces though not Source or Sophia itself.
Ahhh, my WordPress User Comment Editor/Reader stripped out the links…
LOL! on the second one…
Nonetheless, Christianity intercepted Christ’s message and edited it to conform back under submission of ‘God’
The religion is fatally corrupted, and cannot overcome this through hell-threats, inerrant doctrines/scriptures, nor virtuous appearances. Once corrupted, always so thereafter. The value is in the syndicate itself, not their robes, words, or causes.
Never trust a religion so powerful that it was able to wipe out, not only its own history, but all competing ideas inside its own collective membership – completely. That is not the action of a truth, faith, nor God.
You misunderstand my intent. I’m not trying to say “Christianity is good, you should join us”. Forgive me, but I’m (playfully) accusing you of still being a Christian, a Protestant more specifically. In this post, you have unwittingly rebuilt Shemjaza’s ark in meme form, and you are rewriting his new Torah in blog form (your “Statement of Faith”). By outright rejecting Christianity (or any religion), you are doomed to reinvent the primordial faith in your own new language. It is the tower of Babel. You think you have left the religion of America, but it still haunts your dreams, it is in our DNA. The Matrix still has us.
After Neo “woke up”, he thinks he has escaped the Matrix, but over the course of the trilogy he realizes that the people in the “real” world aren’t any better off, they are still trapped by, and dependent on, the same dark forces.
“Never trust a religion so powerful that it was able to wipe out, not only its own history, but all competing ideas inside its own collective membership – completely. That is not the action of a truth, faith, nor God.”
This idea that the church wiped everything out is a Protestant lie. The Muslim and Protestant iconoclasts are the ones who whitewashed the walls, who closed the veil to the ancient religions so that they could reinterpret the scriptures to their own designs.
Have you ever seen the inside of a Catholic or Orthodox Church? The walls and ceiling are covered with pagan symbols. There is incense, robes, music, and ritual. It is a laboratory which teaches us to think symbolically, to “see the spirits” and interact with them. How will you struggle with the gods (“Israel”) if you can’t see them? How can you be free if you are blind?
As far as the uncovering of the gnostic scriptures in the 1900s, I think the plot of Jurassic Park summarizes that endeavor. Even if they are “true”, as you say, the tradition is dead, so how can we ever know how to interpret them properly? Our only choice is to hybridize them with some modern philosophy, to create a Nephilim.
you have unwittingly rebuilt Shemjaza’s ark in meme form, and you are rewriting his new Torah in blog form (your “Statement of Faith”). By outright rejecting Christianity (or any religion), you are doomed to reinvent the primordial faith in your own new language.
What you cite as a ‘primordial faith’ (faith is the abstention from loosh, not a particular belief or practice) – is the property of humanity – not Abrahamism, Islam, nor Christianity (which stole this property from humanity and sold it back to us at a high price).
Since I got married, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity owns the sacrament of marriage.
Since I had sex, I must now become a Christian or burn in hell, since Christianity owns one’s right to have sex in sin-free context (in marriage only).
Since I will die, I must now become a Christian, since Christianity owns the sacramental passageway to a positive after death experience (like a cartel).
Since I meditate, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity owns one’s right to converse in spirit.
Since I regard the spiritual as valid, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity owns the right of all deliberation of such concepts.
Since I see evidence that a flood existed in mankind’s history, therefore I am a Christian, because the angry-God flood is outlined in the Bible.
Since I venerate mankind’s liberation from captivity, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity once mentioned the notion of mankind’s captivity.
Since I cite the book of Enoch, I must recognize all scripture as valid at face value, and therefore am a secret Christian, because Christianity holds any and all ancient writ as its intellectual property.
Since you sin (and of course no one can deny that they sin), and since we own the right and Rite of forgiveness – we own you.
This form of rhetorical false dilemma argument is called a ‘wicker man appropriation’. They are spiritual lies. It is how a cult ensnares the mind of its victim. “You already believe/do ___________, and since that is ‘us’ (or a twisted form thereof), therefore you must now really secretly believe _____________, and therefore you must now believe/do _________________.” I learned to spot this by studying the habits of evil.
A person, once outside the religion, can never again speak of its elements – forever doomed to be a stone cold nihilist – suffering the tar of Christianity’s baby plastered across their chest; East of Eden and marked, perpetually guilty of membership in one cult bucket or another. Christianity (The Holy Trinity, Sol-Samael, Luna, and the Son of God, Mithras) do not own these ideas, these human rights, nor rights to classify the thinking therein.
I am very familiar with this shtick – having been raised and confirmed in the Catholic Church. So yes, I have been ‘inside’ these red brick empires.
The ‘scripture’ is a Yahwehist stolen, heavily filtered and rewritten history of mankind, and was further then corrupted in the second century CE, serving as Samael’s monotheistic and violent manual of control, long before the red herring wicker man, Christianity, was ever around. These topics and concepts are the property of humanity – not Abrahamism nor its various bloodthirsty shrines/sects.
My use of touchpoints inside these rights in no way serves as a permissive to bucket categorize me. In fact, a focus on ME, is not the basis on how to conduct this discussion at all. Again, that is a wicker man apologetic – a cult habituation. It is the practice of the Roosevelt proverbial, smallest mind.
Pull back its veil of mischief, her debility reclines within as a virgin lover
Cajole me no more, and wail amuck at the striking of your blush veneer
My heart and its loves are your privation no longer, not of pride but promise –
Its steelblade flash reflecting amidst the clinkshales where shackles lay shattered.
Forgive me TES. It was a shameless tactic (say something wrong about the person so they will correct you), so please forgive me. That is the negotiator in me, not the Christian. My intent was to learn, not to persuade.
My silly drawings are my honest interpretation. If they are aligned with your views, it’s because I really agree with you, not because I’m trying to bring you into the cult. If they don’t align, I want to know how. How is what you are saying about null and placeholder hypotheses different from yin/yang/Taoism? Are you not arguing for the ‘middle way’, the ‘narrow gate’ of Christ? I don’t see how we disagree.
That’s all I’m looking for. Do we disagree in this one point where my religion and your blog seem to coincide? Your statement of faith also seems to agree with (Orthodox) Christianity on the majority of points. That doesn’t mean that you should become Orthodox, it just means that you agree with it. Have I misunderstood you?
I am sorry about your experience of Catholicism. That is unfortunately a story I hear from a lot of people. I pray that it does not sour your impression of Christianity as a whole. There are sects that have maintained the original, unedited message, and it is a thing of great beauty when you find one. I hope you get to see it sometime.
Just for reference, my working definition of “the religion of America”, a kind of Liberal Protestantism:
• Think that the “real” Jesus was a great man
• Think that if they knew the real Jesus, they would agree on things
• May not necessarily believe in the resurrection or that Jesus was God or claimed to be God
• Think the Catholic Church (and possibly all churches, and possibly all organized religions) are corrupt beyond repair
• Think the Church became hopelessly corrupted early in its history and we need to uncover the “real Jesus” from the sands of time.
• May think that the Old and New Testament Gods are not the same or that God “changed” after the gospel
• May think that the original Christianity was very simple and then “evolved” the more complex rituals, theology, hierarchy (and therefore corruption). “Simpler is better”
• Believe the “real Church” is invisible, that it is the community of true believers that spans across denominations (and for some, different religions)
• That the real value of Church is being in a community of love (the syndicate) and not the doctrines and finer points of ritual and theology (robes, words, and causes).
• The definition of love is self-evident/obvious (“Love is love”)
• Think a person is defined by what they say is true, how they self-identify
• May be “spiritual but not religious” but still goes to church to meet people/not be lonely
• Idea of a worship service is some combination of a lecture, a concert, and an art gallery, and it doesn’t need to be a dedicated church building.
• Generally eschew hierarchy/obedience.
• Think Jesus was a rebel
• Think the Bible does not “belong” to any one denomination
• Think the Bible has a “true” meaning independent of the tradition which interprets it. Some believe this meaning was lost because of editing.
• That Abrahamic religions are similar (“People of the Book”). This follows from the previous bullet.
• Think that rituals and sacraments are “just symbols” and don’t actually “do anything”
• Have an affinity for yoga, Buddhism, Kabbalah and other mystical practices but “just for exercise” or “just for meditation/anxiety”. This follows from the previous bullet.
• Believes that the secular world exists, that there is a religion-free zone or neutral territory. That there is an unbiased reference point from which to judge religions/gods.
I pray that it does not sour your impression of Christianity as a whole. There are sects that have maintained the original, unedited message, and it is a thing of great beauty when you find one.
What has soured my impression of both Religion and Atheism, is the robustness of the evidence.
There is a spiritual realm
That realm is close by
That realm is inhabited with creatures obsessed with, bearing a sibling envy of, and antipathy towards mankind
These creatures perceive us as a threat, but depend upon us for their survival
We are purposely kept ignorant, spiritually impotent, and terrified through a full variety of red herring religious distraction, god-posturing, and science pretense
We are purposely kept in suffering and self loathing (especially by Abrahamism)
This state cannot continue indefinitely
These creatures have begun to exhibit a panic state of late, along with a desperate preparation for all out warfare – with us, as the targets of their bowls of righteous wrath
A talented presence exists, aside from mankind and these dark entities – it is not ‘God’
Theism has failed at its job. Its message is grotesque, yet is dressed in a fine virtue costume. Atheism has failed at its job. Its message is a blind appeal to ignorance. None of this has anything to do with one’s nationality or religious upbringing.
This is not something I arrived at willfully. I had to be dragged by research and the evidence, ‘kicking and screaming’, into these inferences. Not what I wanted to believe at all. I much rather favor nihilist atheism over this by a long shot.
I get the feeling we may have reached a similar conclusion although my working vocabulary of philosophy is not on your level. What I’ve concluded is there are demonic, if you will, forces that somehow gain pleasure possibly from the destruction of mankind. Gender affirming care is but one of their truly sick manifestations and harms they have unleashed. Then there is the constant goading of Russia to nuke the US. The wars serve do valid purpose. Actually, with the advent of AI and the crazy drone technology I consider war utterly pointless. For instance, if we got in a spat against china, they are more than capable of destroying every military asset within the US within minutes from the farm land they have purchased near our bases. If I can work out an attack plan that would leave us pretty much without any military equipment left after the first hour of attack, then so could china and russia. But given the pointlessness of war at this point, there are forces pushing to instigate nuclear war between us and Russia. But that’s not all of it. There is the constant destruction of mankind. mRNA, trying to prevent farmers from having fertilizer to grow food, wanting us to eat bugs, New Zealand codifying future forced vaccinations. I’ve never seen such an all out attack against all that is good. Part of me thinks it’s China that has infiltrated our deep state and they are hell bent on triggering a war between Russia and the US to benefit themselves, but that could easily destroy them as a feature of such a plan. Heck if I were president and knew the US was going to e destroyed along with Russia I’d like hit China to prevent them from benefiting as I’d suspect they might be behind it all. That said another part of me thinks the demonic forces want everything about humanity that is good destroyed. It also seems this is coming to a head in the very near future, and frankly I don’t see how we stop it. I find it very stressful especially how so very few people seem to get that we are in a fight for humanity’s very survival. All the best to you TES.
“It also seems this is coming to a head in the very near future, and frankly I don’t see how we stop it. I find it very stressful especially how so very few people seem to get that we are in a fight for humanity’s very survival.”
I tend to agree with this. Having been a missile and nuclear weapons officer, and holder of the launch codes, there were some specific aspects of the program (which I will not detail herein) that suggested to me that much of the capability was theater. Not most of it of course. I have this nagging suspicion that nuclear weapons are not about war between Russia-US, China-US – but rather, they hold all of humanity hostage.
It as if the keepers of the insane asylum here are threatening to kill all humanity, in order to defend themselves. We are their human shield and hostages. “If you intervene to expunge us from this planet, we will kill every single one of your precious ‘humans’.”
This, I believe is why the craft have demonstrated a particular focus on the ability to quickly, in the blink of an eye, intervene and neutralize 100% of the world’s nuclear capability.
Very possibly, this finished skill is all they lack before the intervention. This however, is just an educated hunch.
TES
One thing I have long pondered is whether we have inherent capabilities that transcend the physical world we find ourself in. Can we somehow direct the outcome of events in this realm through the power of our minds? For instance, the known universe is immensely vast. Why does it exist if we can’t tour it and explore it’s beauty? I feel cheated in a way as I would love to tour our vast universe and see it’s wonders.
If I understand your writings correctly I take it you don’t believe in God. I’ve had a number of experiences that convince me there is a God or at least that’s who I attribute those experiences to. When I was in Highschool I was driving to work, and coming up to an intersection where I needed to be in the left turn lane. I clearly heard a voice instruct me to get in the right lane (as opposed the the left turn lane I needed to be to get to work) and as tight to the curb as I could be. I was like what? The voice repeated the instruction, and I was thinking of all the trouble that choice would cause me getting to work, but followed the instruction anyway. Moments later a big station wagon came roaring up the street where I was stopped at the light tight to the curb and that vehicle plowed into the car in the left turn lane and the car in front of me. To this day I can remember the anger in the eyes in the review mirror in front of me. I just pointed to the car that actually plowed into him.
Another incident saved my life. I had borrowed my neighbors car trailer and had stored the heavy car ramps beside our house. I voice clearly said to set those ramps on edge which was outside our bedroom wall. I didn’t ask “What?” this time and just did it. My wife at the time started to complain because doing so looked awful. I told her to just trust me. I get inside and I received a further instruction to fabricate heavy brackets to attach a headboard we had to the frame of our bed. As it was it didn’t fit as I think the head board was for a full size bed, and didn’t fit the queen size bedframe we had. Anyway the next day I machined some adapters to make it attach to the frame. The following night a drunk driver came speeding down our street, veered off the road, ran over a big scrub driving over a flower bed. She got airborne, hit the tree about 3 feet in the air pulling the 6″ tree out of the ground. Her car came down and ran into the heavy car ramps sitting on edge. The front of her car surged through the cinder block wall right where our heads were sleeping. The force of the bricks and nose of the car sent our bed flying across the room. But for both the brackets and the car ramp we would have surely been killed. I actually have photo’s of that accident to this day.
So if that wasn’t God’s voice, then I don’t know whose it was. The instructions were very clear, and I’m glad I took heed and followed their instruction.
In other situations I have seen what I’d call the spiritual realm. Strangely enough, in one case I saw the spiritual battle take place and did not see the part that was occurring in our physical world.
I was sitting in church during a point where everyone was praying. My neighbor was sitting next to me and I told her I was sensing a very evil presence somewhere behind us, She suggested we pray about it, so we did. What came next was an angel on horseback that dismounted and began to fight the evil spirit if you will. Moments later another angel rode up to fight as well. I think a total of three with swords drawn were in a heated battle. I could see the four walls of our church and the demon was outside those walls pacing back and forth while fighting the angels. Then all of a sudden the fight caught God’s attention, and he reached out with his hand and basically squashed the demon ending the battle.
Post the service I told our Pastor what I had seen, and he said he knew. I was like come again? He said he saw the person in the flesh as he was pacing back in forth outside the sanctuary doors. The pastor said he had seen the individual before, but he has never come into the sanctuary.
So very weird. But now and then I can see what occurs in sort of a different dimension. I don’t know what to make of these things. But currently I have a bad feeling of where things are going. Anyway, I thought I’d share, and wonder what you make of it?
Gregory,
I did not say that I don’t hold the spiritual world as valid based upon the evidence. Be careful, as darkness is here with us, and speaks too often (but is bound in its will). Light is not typically allowed to intervene on our behalf, however, encourages us to endure – and not expect to dance through a life of miracles. When I see a factory worker put in 50 years of hard work and raise 3 kids into college – THAT is what impresses me with spiritual value, not voices, events, and miracles.
I do know that we have been lied to and are captive as a species. The liars pretended to be God and Gods – even the monotheistic one. Now they just hide. Until we sort them out – one has to be cautious about what they regard as God.
Religions don’t worship God, they are applying for the very position. So I cannot take that pathway ethically.
I am a Gnostic spiritually, and an ignostic atheist intellectually. I do not hold a definition for God. I do however, hold a definition for evil, and actions of darkness. That is what we are here to learn.
However, I loved reading your recounts, thank you for those!
TES
The sorting them out, and figuring out what each of us can do to fight back in our own way is probably the hardest part. Exposing the truth as you do, and as many of us try to, is I think our best play. So many seem not to want to hear it. It’s like some weird mind virus has infected much of humanity.
What is/are the craft?
I believe “they” who hold us hostage… will use a tactical nuclear war to crash the world economy. Trade and travel will end. Billions starve. And when they resue the survivors “one they” … the Beast will arise… and using a new CBDC will actaully control the enslaved surviving population.
They will More thoroughly control us through money and survival than control through religion.
How can they achieve this finished skill? From within the usa?
Who are the keepers of the insane asylum? Is it the elites or spiritual acting through them?
Thank you
Scott,
My opinion, based up reasoned suspicion, but speculation nonetheless… is that the powers reside at the spiritual level. The participants are mostly hapless, with very few knowing why they do what they do, just following how the darkness lead them (once addicted)—with the hierarchy getting less and less aware and informed all the way down to fake skeptics and their sycophancy: who are so ill-aware, that they substitute pretenses of science as unconscious compensation for this plight.
The scenario you cite might be a reality that plays out. The power hungry will eventually consider their loosh-lust as more important than a couple billion lives, and cull off the hordes who oppose them. The dark spiritual charge they will get from this will be maddening in its pleasure for them.
This is why an intervention is the only true option for an outside Kingdom which opposes this dark hierarchy and has plans for man’s true emergence as a participant in a higher order.
My speculation…
TES
It is painful, is it not? Kicking and screaming is putting it mildly… it is gut-wrenching, rusty hooks digging in. And the temptation to retreat into placid atheism and the rut is so so strong. And the desire to (sinfully) involve others in the pain to not be alone.
There is some wisdom and comfort to be had, though. “Lead us not into temptation…”
I _wanted_ to stay an atheist. This choice was denied. Forcefully.
The more sincerely you seek the truth of everything, the stranger things start getting. Once they do, you can’t deny your own observations and it will go outside of what can be easily (likely at all) quantified and studied. Possible insanity and mental illness is wiped as an option when there are secondary witnesses.
I feel like if we actually understood the why and were inclined to share it, you would be removed from the game board. If everyone understood the rules and purpose of the game, most would likely immediately adjust their behavior to align with a planned outcome possibly affecting the purpose.
The possibilities left on discovering the “why” are removal from the game, regular widespread reset destruction events and/or the why being undiscoverable based on the rules of the game, IF you don’t have a certain state of mind. For example if you believe you’re brilliant and perfect as you are, based on your own metrics, I don’t believe the mechanisms (whatever they are) will allow you to begin to understand the why of it all or it will cause you to hit a “pause” in your development until you self reflect. I’m almost leaning towards this being some kind of growth platform and/or information gathering mechanism. If the system were devoid of personal interaction I’d have a different opinion.
I also don’t believe that everyone is here for the same purpose because that is counterintuitive to evolution. This logic would also explain the seemly senseless destruction of some people or the seemingly pointless horror of their possibly short lives.
Another interesting aspect of how things work is that I have observed that decisions carry no value in the system unless you understand the “why” of what you’re doing. Once you do, things play out differently. If you don’t or are incapable, you seem to exist like you are just part of the program. A simplistic example would be thou shalt not steal or I will be hit and punished vs understanding why you don’t steal and the implications of the decision to steal or not. My primary interest is working out the truth and the why with my limited mental abilities.
I hope I may be excused for not joining the discussion, and mis-using this commenting section as an avenue to provide a feedback to you, E.S.
It is about a problem that you are most likely not aware of – links in your Telegram entries. I found all those ending with ellipsis to be invalid, following them brings the 404 error. Latest examples: link “theepochtimes.com/epochtv/unexpl…” in https : //t.me/EthicalSkeptic/983, and also links in /959, /954, /952, /933.
Sorry for bringing it here, but I couldn’t find any other way to contact you on Telegram.
ES, as a fellow aspie, “independent truth-seeker” (I disdain seemingly euphemistic terms like this btw) and long time supporter of monetary and banking reform, I came across your website seven to eight years ago and it is one of the very few places that I’m in concordance with mostly everything.
The “scientific skeptic” community (along with it’s significantly overlapping disparate cohorts old and new: “science communicators,” “freethinkers,” (some appeal to definition term this one, well beyond the collectivist ideological groupthink exhibited), “rationalists” (and this one too), “independent fact-checkers,” “academic industrial complexes,” “evidence based policy decision makers,” “disinformation analysts,” and “pseudoscience debunkers”) who I allude to as “The Pseudoskeptic Mafia,” is one of a few, of the most horrendous scams ever perpetrated on the human spirit.
This along with the “The Lyintific Method” (a comprehensive framework of “corporate scientism” which you have deconstructed) articles are probably some of your most articulated ever written. A movement as meticulously preordained decades in advance (with some shady affiliates – one figure such as Morris Fishbein for one), has become one of the most unadulterated forms of monopolized public relations (Edward Bernays, leading scholar of the Tavistock Institute and promoter of water fluoridation would be very proud) that is operating in the media industrial complex (social media, multimedia and geopolitical) and the Social Scientocratic Dictatorship today (I call the latter while intertwined with ideological and philosophical scientism the “Hegelian Dialectical Divide and Conquer Ideological Collectivist Matrix“). Nye (useful idiot); Tyson (useful idiot), Breadtube (inspired by Atheism + and “RationalWiki”), Skepticon, Barrett (“Quackwatch”), Myers (“Freethought Blogs”/Pharyngula), Caulfield (Alberta), Lee (SDCIC), Stea (Calgary), Bottley (Swaledale), Entine (“GLC”), Folta (Florida), “The Real Truther,” and of course, Gorski (also known as “Orac”) and Novella themselves, are some of the most infamous amongst the movement’s consortium of ilk.
I foresaw years ago that the movement’s useful idiot followers would execute by systematic popularization, the tireless “flat earther,” “young earth creationist” (rarely utilized now), “shill gambit” (a fallacy fallacy most of the time when it is not deployed towards subordinate useful idiot bloggers and followers – one of their “chatter-boxed memorized phrases” as you call it systematically created by Orac), “grifter,” and “far right” slanders toward any of the lowest minuscule degree of dissent. It is a downright insinuation towards mere patheticness.
Their religion is corporate scientism: the systematic manipulation of the materialistic scientific method and “peer review” process by the academic industrial complex in a multilateral alliance (compliant subservience) with the multinational industrial complex (pharmaceutical companies, biotechnological companies, food production companies, energy companies, chemical companies, multinational banking and Big Tech), Machiavellian business magnates, ideological interests (esp. isms, ologies and intergovernmental NGOs) and “sovereign” world governments.
It is no wonder how this wholly explains the illusions of “evidence based medicine,” “value free science,” “fact checking,” and the Orwellian Appeal to Definition dilemmas of “anti-intellectualism” and “intellectualism.” It will take more than an “act of the Gods” to crack their crystal pyramid in order for its hierarchical components to fall like a house of cards and disintegrate within milliseconds upon the slightest touch of surface impact.
Thanks so much RRA! Glad to have you as a long-time reader.
I anticipated that eventually someday pseudo-skepticism would deploy its deception far past the stooge-poses of Flat Earth, Loch Ness Monster, and Bigfoot – and this shtick would serve to harm a lot of people. Indeed it did.
They are control freaks, with enormous celebrity wanna-be ego’s.
Yep, especially in the case of Aspartame and other food additives. Used to drink such sweetened fruit squash eleven to twelve years ago daily for a number of years. Fortunately the dosage threshold was lower compared with diet soda for the likelihood of multifarious adverse effects to occur – didn’t suffer any problems other than weight gain, but I abstained from consuming it once I learned the terrifying truth.
My perception of the world completely altered forever and since then I have learned a lot more about the operational framework of society and it’s contrived compartmentalized facets than from any “social science” professor. Believed right from the start (unlike some of its opponents) that “conflicts of interest” would hinder the outcome of WHO’s planned “recommendations” to classify the sweetener as a health risk for “causing” the obvious last year, which it conspicuously did.
I went to bed last night rather than dive into this ontological deep-end, but I have consumed it thoughtfully with morning coffee, and forwarded it to 3 thoughtful friends on Hawaii (Big Island), who I can’t really take out to breakfast these days. [Hi Charles, Kurt and Chris!]
It’s fair to say that “I hadn’t ever thought of it this way before”. I do know that in studies of ICU outcomes, “Prayer” helps. “Prayer” seems to be the practice of intention, usually to help, but there is “negative prayer” also, and I believe I have felt myself targeted by it at times, which explained a lot once I realized it. [Don’t do this! It tears your soul out.] I just bore-with-it and felt compassion for the human doing the act…
That was a tangent. My Grandfather spoke to me of how he came to believe that “God worked through the structure of the universe” and that “Science was a way to approach that understanding”.
I always assumed intention, and came into the analysis at the point of “God is Love”, which forced me to conclude that the doctrine whereby those who never heard about Jesus went to (milder) eternal hell after death, was inconsistent with my understanding of Divine Nature.
I have always experienced dialog with The Divine since my early childhood memories. I thought everybody did. I sure tried a lot of things against that advisement… It was right all along.
My personal view has been to seek to align my intention with Divine Intention, which I experience to be the reduction of suffering and painful discord, and the increase of a palpable form of harmony and connection, which we call “Love”, in its many manifestations.
What you have outlined here, in the affable approach of a fine Buddhist, is my shortfall in the definition of intent. Thank you.
I have revised the context of ‘intent’ to include both its influence upon our physical reality (bound), as well as its spiritual reality (reach). While I realize that this adds complexity to the model – it is fundamental in introducing the underlying thesis of the article:
One cannot conduct true science inside a state of spiritual decay, as the heart will not venture where it forbids the mind to tread.
Much appreciated JD, in your helping to formulate Rev 1.1!
“One cannot conduct true science inside a state of spiritual decay, as the heart will not venture where it forbids the mind to tread.”
I love it. Eastern Christians have the mystical tradition of “the prayer of the heart” where we lower the mind into the heart to confront our inner darkness. Our mind is a tool to correct our faulty intent rather than justify it.
I should also point out that the hell-fire preaching in the Bible is directed at the *Christians*, not the pagans and non-believers. Like, have the Bible-thumpers actually read the book? It is Satan who is the one slinging Bible verses against Christ in the desert.
The gospel is that Christ raises us *all* to eternal life, good and bad alike. The response to the gospel is never “hooray” in the Bible but rather “what must I do to be saved?” And the answer is “repent!” (align yourself with the Divine will). For those who thought they would “get away with it”, who thought that death would release them from accountability, it is not “good news”.
Nattokinase seems to be pretty good and well tolerated for coronary atherosclerosis, at a dose that is a hair under 12,000 fibrinolytic units per day. I saw a study (McCullough posted) showing that 40% of nattokinase arm had some plaque regression after a year. One would not take it together with other blood thinners, and most docs will be clueless. It seems to be helpful for one lady with pulmonary embolism from severe COVID, then :vaccination” X 3, and a host of subsequent medical complications.
This appears to be the higher-grade product, befitting a man of my intellectual stature and social status:
“A more sophisticated manipulation that employs specious elements or the veneer of truth in order to create a dystopian narrative.”
“I the last days will come many false teachers, leading astray those who know not [God, Science, Both] Matthew 24: 11-13
Folks get led-astray by arguments which support their own preconceived notions, so “many false teachers” might offer individual paths into misunderstanding for disparate groups of notion-holders, eh?
Same as “Just as in the Days of Noah, they ate, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage…” It is a distinction without a difference. Material which is undeniably useless, coming from a mind bearing an ethic of usefulness – suggesting that the material has been compromised/neutered of its original content.
Like having the description of a suspect be: “Humanoid of smaller-medium to large build, with hair on their head and carrying an object.” Either the author was a moron – or they were warning the reader that something deeper was at play in the re-writing and sterilization of the material. Someone did not want the suspect to be caught.
The Son of Man willingly submits to the “costumed, desperate, and crumbling hierarchy”. He is an observant Jew who listens to his parents, works a menial job, celebrates the holidays, pays his taxes. His entire life is a willing submission to his ‘oppressors’, to the Hebrews, to the Romans, and eventually to death itself (the ‘hierarchy’ of Satan). Christ does not suffer from post-Stockholm syndrome, because he is not being held captive; he is not trying to escape. You may say that Jesus is insane, but he is no revolutionary. That is why the Jews hated him. Satan’s temptation of Christ in the desert is an attempt to get him to ‘act like God’, to be the revolutionary hero the Jews expected, to do some magic tricks, to kick some ass, and he doesn’t take the bait. He is a willing source of loosh rather than a consumer, and in refusing to ‘act like God’ he makes himself worthy of the title.
From Galations 4 (I know how much you love St Paul):
“I mean that the heir, as long as he is a child, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything, but he is under guardians and managers until the date set by his father. In the same way we also, when we were children, were enslaved to the elementary principles of the world [i.e. gods of the earth, i.e. demons].”
Until the spoiled children show that they can mind their parents, ‘corrupt’ though the parents may be, they will not be given the keys to the car. “The greatest among you must be the servant of all.”
I’ve always had questions about this account of our past, which I first encountered in the early 2010’s, after decades of walking every path there is, with the scars to prove it (or maybe just prove my foolishness, but anyway). They tend to show it’s mostly accurate.
The questions are these:
1. locking Shemyaza & the Watchers in the world he and his lads messed up because they couldn’t keep it in their pants, literally or metaphorically, seems like locking a wolf in the lambing pen, or worse, a molestor in an orphanage. Not a punishment at all.
But, a being of some kind which is imprisoned elsewhere (real punishment/prevention strategy) and trying to get those it can influence to help with a jailbreak, better fits observable reality: certain types of people repeatedly trying to create portals and mass releases of energy (via the sacrifice of other lives) for something to bust loose. Maybe (somehow) even somehow swive a huge chunk out the Earth, so it periodically tilts and creates a, let’s call it a “harvest,” of vast and multi-species fear, death, and a grieving which goes well beyond personal losses
(But, cautionary note re: catastrophology, Chan Thomas, whose works I read in full since I last commented about him, was also given to promoting full-body possession by dead spirits, which also means anything which rocks up and claims to be a “wise and enlightened spirit,” and meanwhile, Robert Malone, father of Gateway et al, seems deeply linked to certain three-letter agencies, and was also told at one point Earth was designed to create loosh: if I was a lil’ bitty spiritual vampire, the type that even the lowest ayahuescero in the rainforest would recognise as a liar, how, oh how, I’d delight in having these bright, energetic, well-meaning dupes to relay my message to the most powerful agencies on earth! Tuck in the napkins lads, dinnertime!)
2. following on from that last point, mass warfare seems designed to create fatherlessness, and ALL the downstream consequences of that, at increasingly industrialised scales. A being with broadly masculine attributes (images of the devil with a protruding chin and cheekbones, and strongly angled brows, CLOSELY signify the differences in facial structure between adult male and female humans), a being which edited our DNA, would then have an “in” to start whispering in ears and swaying minds, meaning that warfare and the initial causal factors of war would be a thing worth considering when tracing this (as would the recent emphasis on feminising our culture, to be ready and pretty for when Daddy comes home)
3. on a different theme, imagine you created a community of self-aware AI nodes, peaceful, pastoral, creative, and then some rogue program/er edited them, no way would you lock them in with the program/er or any remotely associated malware, and then, like the Moriarty program in “Ship In A Bottle” in Star Trek TNG, just leave them to their fates. Surely you’d at least also enter some anti-malware to help them, guide them, strengthen them, before filing that server array and starting again? This IMO is possibly the purpose and origin of certain pre-Christian gods, although I know that to many, they’re all “just demons.” Despite eg the Egyptian afterlfe judgement questions bearing a striking resemblance to the later Laws of Moses
(It’s also possible software left to run in isolation after time would go rogue, take on code from other programs, or generally have problems. Maybe at that point you’d introduce your version of a hardware patch, which IMO is the purpose of Christ and almost more than that, his message)
4. depressingly, if we started as peaceful beings and then got edited, peacefulness in our modern world only truly prevails in domesticated beings destined for the pot, a belief which I know drives a great many modern satanists of the type who abhor harming others and strive to only undo the harms done in the names of major monotheistic religions, and which I empathise with, despite not being one. Be interested to read your thoughts on this if you care to comment TES, though I appreciate this is a huge word salad by now
5. going back to origins, IF Shemyaza is still powerful in some way, getting Shemyaza and the Watchers to have a change of heart would appear to be the critical path here, given that we can’t undo the original incidents and that their fire is in our blood (possibly speaking in mine as I type; who knows. I struggle with inner darkness at least as much as any man).
I do believe the message and personhood, death, and even resurrection of Christ to be the single most important, powerful, and redeeming thing to have ever happened on this world. And that Logos and Grace are the keys to a better future. (Also agree with you about Faith, and I see it as akin to Napoleon Hill et al’s concept of a “Positive Mental Attitude” and you only have to read the Wikipedia edits on his page’s History, to see he’s for the chop…)
Faith: Hope: Charity – seem to be good remedies against all the evil ones wish to install in us. I betray my journalistic roots by trying to summarise, but, it is what it is. ;)
depressingly, if we started as peaceful beings and then got edited, peacefulness in our modern world only truly prevails in domesticated beings destined for the pot, a belief which I know drives a great many modern satanists of the type who abhor harming others and strive to only undo the harms done in the names of major monotheistic religions, and which I empathise with, despite not being one. Be interested to read your thoughts on this if you care to comment TES
I don’t think the universe tallies sins in the way Abrahamism and Eastern Kharmism define them. The Cosmos does not care about our petty proclivities and childish or ignorant mistakes, petty dishonesty, lies to defend one’s self, when you had sex and with whom, what deities you did or did not believe in, what you ate when, or which service you did or did not attend, what spells you cast in the guise of prayer. It really knows about all this shtick long before mankind was ever around.
The key mistake of a child is in thinking that the adults have never seen their game (both good and bad, theist, atheist, demonic, angelic, and pretenses to entertain self thereof) before. We take ourselves as WAY too important. We are merely the recipients of a kind blessing, and nothing we can do, can serve to cancel that blessing (we can request that it go dormant, but we cannot erase it – as we don’t hold that power).
When the ancients spun the Watchers as having sex with Earth Women – this was THE chief sin that their minds could conceive of. After all they were paternal, pastoral, tribal, elite at that time. Protect the flock at all costs. They had no idea what DNA-science tampering was (as went on at Gobekli Tepe). Therefore, extraneous sex was indeed the devil itself. Animals were the flesh too then. This was all spiritual bullshit.
As we mature spiritually, we find that it is the addiction to loosh, the desire to be God over another ‘lesser’ being, the desire to deceive the victim in this relationship, the desire to lay captive an entire species – children kidnapped in their own home world. THIS… is the original sin.
We learn in this universe: “Do anything you want, have fun, make mistakes, and learn/love, ….just don’t declare yourself to be God, or you will be stuck there, as the very God you wanted to be…” This is how powerful we indeed are. We must be careful what we wish for.
This ‘God of Loosh’ state alone, is what hell is for… not for us and our petty proclivities. Only we regard our minutiae with such importance. Of course, that is part of the whole formula of captivity as well.
One answer is that Egyptians (or whoever) disliked metal and preferred to make tools from stone, and had great mastery of this art. Maybe they also benefitted somehow from the healing and regenerative powers attributed to pyramids, and which I’ve experienced firsthand. (Disguising your big healing thing as a water pump/grain storage/tomb would be a great way to get buy-in on the project from local yokels whose labour and goodwill you need, and with with whom, you don’t intend to share the real purposes.)
However it’s also possible Cheops’ hottest and most ambitious wife owned a lot of schist mines, and her brother, conveniently a high priest and even more conveniently with a completely different familial name, made loud proclamations that the self-darkening nature of that glorious golden alloy bronze once it’s been polished mean that it’s spiritually impure, and so use of schist, instead, is The Science. Amen.
Disguising your big healing thing as a water pump/grain storage/tomb would be a great way to get buy-in on the project from local yokels whose labour and goodwill you need, and with with whom, you don’t intend to share the real purposes.
Great point! – even independent of context of any specific true and straw man purpose, this could easily be part of the development story.
A couple of questions regarding your innate personal positions:
1.
If truth is not a destination, then how can you “pursue it along a critical path of probative questions”? A path implies a destination. Also, if it is not related to me (or others) personally, of what use is it? How will I obtain funding for my research if no one cares? Scientists have to eat!
2.
If truth is “seldom-attained”, doesn’t this imply that it is “existing *inside* my perception and possession”, if only seldomly? Don’t we all possess some modicum of truth, albeit unrefined? Otherwise how could we walk, talk, eat, drive, manufacture the large hadron collider, etc? And of course agreement from others on “truth” is a requirement for communication, for asking “probative questions”. Isn’t the acquisition (possession) of knowledge, with the agreement of others (peer review), the goal of scientific inquiry?
It seems to me that science is a dance between 1 and 2. Known and unknown, synthesis and analysis, light and dark, yin and yang.
Your image of Moses and the burning bush is fitting. Moses, though he is the “smartest person in the room”, standing at the top of the mountain above all men, takes his shoes off, bows down and humbly acknowledges that the truth is *outside* of his possession. For this he is allowed to draw closer to the truth than all others, though he of course can never look at it directly or touch it. “I am who I am” is not God’s *name*, it is his refusal to be named, to be put in a box, to be “put inside my perception and possession”.
Contrast his brother Aaron who is busy at the bottom of the mountain (“the waters beneath”) using “all available means to secure agreement” from the Israelites by attempting to “capture” the truth inside a shiny golden statue.
You take jabs at the “religious” paradigm, but are you not making the same point in less mythological language?
1. You must distinguish between an a priori intended and placeholder ‘destination’. These are two differing logical objects. A critical path of probative questions does not have a specific a priori destination – but rather a placeholder one. By equivocating between the two, we manufacture a false paradox.
2. Truth is seldom attained, except when we possess it – then it is attained most easily in the eyes of the possessor. But that is not truth. Obviousness as well (walk talk eat drive – they are at once ‘simple’ and ‘truth’ – the source of the false ‘Occam’s Razor’) and truth are not the same thing. Again, by appeal to equivocal wording, we create false paradox.
I did not say that ‘I am, that I am’ is “God’s name”. Christ refused to speak the Name – so we do not know it. Rather, it is a claim to godship first cited in I Enoch – a claim to the office, not the name. However, this God in Genesis with Moses is the bloodthirsty/looshthirsty Saturn-Enlil-El. The same being cited as Shemyaza in I Enoch, whose name means ‘I am boldly the Name’ (shem שֵׁם and azaz ,עָזַז) – also as Samael (ruthless and cruel ruler of Eden, chief of the ‘let us make man’ El-ohim) in The Hypostasis of the Archons. He also was not allowed to use the name of God – but he still claimed the office, by making the ‘I Am, that I Am’ identification as Shemyaza.
I guess my point was that a placeholder destination, a placeholder truth (hypothesis), is necessary for us to act. Not only this, but our placeholder truths, though flawed, are also absolutely true to some extent, however small, otherwise our enterprises would not be successful. We would not “walk” but “stumble”.
Newton’s laws, though they are a flawed placeholder truth, were in fact “correct enough” to allow humanity to succeed in many of the technological advancements of the last 400 years. Not only this, but his motivation to improve on the previous placeholder truths was the belief (a priori) that a better placeholder truth existed, while also believing (a priori) that he did not possess that truth.
In your interpretation of the Moses story, who is the god at the bottom of the mountain, the god of the golden calf? The orthodox interpretation is that there are in fact *two* Yahwehs/Shemjazas in the story, one on top of the mountain with Moses and one at the bottom with Aaron and the mob, and the point of the story is to disambiguate between the two. There is a real, subtle truth at the top of the mountain that cannot be possessed, but can be approached with humility and striving, and there is an obvious ‘false truth’ at the bottom of the mountain that is easily possessed and is used to control and plunder its followers. This is the view held by most Christians and Jews, “religious” people who are actually using it as a framework to guide their thinking and acting in the world, most of whom know nothing of Enoch 1. Are you saying that both gods are the same?
At the top of the mountain is the (I AM the Name) office holder who is not allowed to say the real name of god, and is perplexed as to why man expresses the very violent, lustful, and selfish behavior he programmed into his DNA to begin with (and saw demonstrated in advance with homo naledi, homo denisova, homo neanderthalensis, and homo floresiensis as forerunners) – but then denies any responsibility for his work. My definition of ‘god’ is any entity which coalesces power, but displaces accountability… That is Moses’s god. It is an unacceptable caricature to an ethical mind.
The lack of subservience applied at the bottom of the mountain is THE big threat to the imposter at the top of the mountain. The imposter’s biggest rule is written about a hollow object – catch the irony in this. Their lack of subservience (loss of loosh) is focused into an empty statue – and this threatens the ALL POWERFUL CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE.
This is bald faced bullshit.
The imposter at the top is jealous of a hollow vessel at the bottom. It is comically absurd. There is an insanity at play here. It is a very familiar demonic instanity, which can only be derived through the abuse of, and addiction to, loosh.
Ah, thank you for the clarification. So, if I were to repent of my imposter-worship, what must I do to be saved? What new story should I tell my children? Is there an entity which coalesces accountability and disperses power, an anti-god? To quote Nietzsche’s madman, “Whither are we moving? Away from all suns?”
May I chime in?
“Religion doesn’t save anybody.
Religion is man’s attempt to reach God.
Christianity is God’s attempt to reach man.
Religion & Christianity is believing in someone else’s experience.
Spirituality is having your own experience.
There is a vast difference.”
We are one. Only egos, beliefs, and fears separate us.
May peace be upon thee…
Spirituality is indeed the goal. Trying to become spiritual without being religious is like trying to learn to play basketball without a coach, a team, or training. There are those who seem to manage it, but to me it makes a difficult journey even harder than it needs to be. Indeed religion is another person’s experience, that’s the whole point. There was a period of my life I tried to be spiritual without being religious but found it to be unbearably lonely in my own experience. Peace be to you, too, brother.
Do you think you could do your own “testimony of the earth on the origin of its DNA bases species” or similar sometime TES? Something like the earth being called to testify of its history, just a mythological work speculating a possible road of significant births and deaths of notable species on the earth since the beginning? That way we can catch up
Gosh, I don’t think we are aware of the true significant births the Earth has witnessed. Civilization may get erased and have to restart over and over – while most heroes go fully unrecognized and unknown.
I’m not mystified. The angular momentum of the system is conserved. Therefore, more dense (and hotter) material is moving from the earth’s core toward the surface. The oceans are being heated from below. This hypothesis tracks perfectly with your article.
I wonder if veterinarians keep any records of unexpected illnesses, because Facebook dog health and training pages are full of stories about healthy dogs dying suddenly with one or two yelps. This is outside my decades of dog experience.
Me and my spouse both use eBay UK a lot for our hobbies, the kinds of sellers who are anyway between business and someone random selling some clothes. Used to be those types always had 100% positive feedback, they cared, and it was normal, expected, since 2002. Now? 99.1%… 99.6%. 89%.
Why?
They were ill and failed to send the order. The buyer was grumpier than usual.
Things didn’t work. “Personal stuff.”
Sellers just vanish, after a short period of what seems like trying, or, they go toes-up, out of the blue. People who were solid for decades.
What an excellent read. Refreshing, logical.
Yes, you can’t unsee it, especially if you have any understanding of the basic characteristics of limestone. Would be interesting to see retrograde solubility & thermal decomposition added into the equation, or maybe you already have.
Thanks! I had to look up retrograde solubility – and while fascinating, and plausible, I am not sure it is a critical path addition necessary in the argument. From what I can gather – high versus moderate solubility for limestone is delineated at 20 degrees C ocean water. Most oceans are colder than this, so we would reside, at worst in a moderate to high solubility condition I would imagine?? Could it have added to the increase in erosion at the ‘high water mark’ (as I call it)? That would suggest an opposite condition from current ocean temperature gradients; however, is also not necessary in the argument.
Thermal decomposition I recall from experiments in AP high school chemistry lab, but again here, I am not sure that it is critical to the argument?
Great to read another thorough analysis. Could the CDC wonder data be offset by illegal immigration in a way that would result in these trends? I have no idea how bad illegal immigration is but if the New York Post can be accepted they say 3.8 million illegal immigrants have entered the country since 2020. Assuming our health care system is caring for these individuals and their deaths are being reported to the CDC, could the US population be artificially inflated by 3.8 million people these last three years where a percentage of those are dying and showing up in these analyses in a meaningful way?
Very few immigrants will contribute to the cancer tally for 4 reasons:
1. They tend to be young, and most cancers occur in the 68+ age years.
2. They tend to not report MCoD/UCoD, but rather ICoD, which is almost never cancer.
3. They may not report at all.
4. To the degree they do contribute, this is an ongoing contribution that is already contained in the 2014-2019 baseline itself.
Therefore, analyses which divide cancer deaths by (immigration-grown) population, are purposely fraudulent analyses.
I have enjoyed reading your blog. Wondering if you have ever looked into Eastern Christianity (Greek/Russian Orthodox) which tends to view sin more like an addiction or sickness (‘loosh addiction’), rather than as transgression against a moral code.
Cain slays his brother Abel, the first human sacrifice, after being warned by God that ‘sin (loosh) crouches at your door, but you must rule over it’. Satan tells Adam/Even they can ‘be as gods’ if they eat the forbidden fruit (loosh). King David’s great sin was to use his power differential (‘loosh voltage’) as king to have Uriah the Hittite killed so that he could steal his wife Bathsheba. The great flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, Israel’s conquest and exile, all are tragedies of people who succumbed to (and often worshipped) loosh.
Christ had the ultimate power differential (‘voltage’), being God himself, but he did not succumb. He is faithful (he resists loosh) even unto death, showing his followers the way out. Christianity then becomes a sort of antidote to ‘religion’ as you describe it, an ‘anti-religion’. When St Paul meets Christ on the road to Damascus, he is ‘cured’ of his loosh-worship, and spends the rest of his life preaching against, and being persecuted by, his former authorities both Jewish and Roman.
That being has celebrated and wallowed with glee inside the longtime suffering of mankind. This is Shemjaza-Samael-Enlil-Yahweh-Ha-Satan. We are enslaved by this creature and his dark demonic empire even now – considered his genetic-sex chattle, slaves, and property. This is why Shemjaza and his watcher elohim (let ‘Us’ make man in our image) could not be forgiven, in Enoch I. They had committed the ultimate sin (loosh) against mankind. This is why Enoch I, Hypostasis of the Archons, On the Origins of the World, etc. are all banned as scripture and were exterminated as a first priority (until we found them in 1946) – as it flags who the real criminal indeed is… and his fake religions.
The Western Christian concept of substitutionary atonement, where Christ is seen to satisfy the blood debt to a vengeful God (as if the true God *needed* our blood, needed our suffering), does naturally lead to the conclusion that the God of Eden is the ultimate loosh addict. The East rejects this interpretation, though, and rightly condemns the Western view as having fallen into the very trap from which Christianity is supposed to liberate us, like Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor from the Brothers Karamazov.
As for the gnostic writings, the early church was not powerful enough to suppress them by force, and so early church fathers like St Irenaeus refuted them at great length. It seems that your site is mostly at odds with modern Western Christianity. I would be curious to know your impressions of ancient/Eastern Christianity, or do you see it as all the same?
The Grand Inquisitor parable is a great whetstone on this topic – thanks for that mention as regards the delineation between Western Christianity and Eastern Orthodoxy. I am by no means versed in all the key theological tenets of Eastern Orthodoxy however, so bear with me as I lump them (possibly unfairly) in with Judaism, Islam, and Christianity as a whole.
The logical catch outlined by Dostoyevsky’s Inquisitor regarding the fulfillment of the church’s mission for mankind, versus a straw man ideal of complete freedom for mankind (supposedly presented by Christ), becomes the basis for an appeal to the opposite extreme: nihilism, naturalism, rationalism – what I call religions of negative reactance. In order to distinguish my faith from the three cul-de-sacs of the ingnoratio elenchi: Monotheism, Kharmism, and Nihilism, I call it ‘ignostic atheism.’ I don’t believe in Gods – rather hold that any entity who cites themself as such, is lying. Even if an entity actually held that lofty position, they would likely not approach you in such a manner, nonetheless.
Rather, we are caught up in a complex but completely natural set of factors/forces which have existed long before mankind was ever around. This includes what we call ‘the spiritual’, as a natural feature of our broader realm. Rather than holding that the gaps in our knowledge are on the order of <10% of the knowable, I contend that the gaps in our knowledge are 80+% of the knowable. We are stupid spiritually, and compensate for this by being uber-sciencey in our symbolic actions. A play act.
I suspect (a placeholder, rather than belief) that all Abrahamic religions worship this same lying entity of I Enoch, Shemjaza. The ruler of Eden looks curiously a lot more like a petty and powerless Shemjaza, than any form of creator of the Universe. Aside from wiping mankind's memory, the second tactic of an erstwhile captor is to convince the hostage that they would not be able to handle or function well under freedom. However, mankind has never known what freedom actually even is, so we cannot concur in that argument. It is simply a hope presented to the ancients, and a promise we have carried ever since.
Hence, Shemjaza and the Elohim Watchers are condemned for their abuse of mankind in 1 Enoch Chapter XIV:
The book of the words of righteousness, and of the reprimand of the eternal Watchers in accordance with the command of the Holy Great One in that vision …so hath He created me also and given me the power of reprimanding the Watchers, the children of heaven.
I wrote out your petition [for forgiveness in the abuse of mankind], and in my vision it appeared thus, that your petition will not be granted unto you throughout all the days of eternity, and that judgement has been finally passed upon you: yea [your petition] will not be granted unto you. And from henceforth you shall not ascend into heaven unto all eternity, and in bonds of the earth the decree has gone forth to bind you for all the days of the world …even though you may weep and pray and speak all the words contained in the writing which I have written.
This angry ‘God’ despises mankind, seeks endless blood payments, and rules over all our religions: materialist, monotheist, kharmist, and atheist alike. They all hold the mind captive. They all serve his purposes well.
The third and final tactic of this desperate being, just as in the days of the giants and chimera/flood, would be to try and blend their genetics with ours (to an ancient mind, ‘marrying and giving in marriage’, or husbandry), while we are yet anosognosiac, in order to obtain the right to re-enter a spiritual realm once again, from which they had been ostracized – a right we hold, and for which the demons despise us even now with a passion – a right they lost, through the sins of genetic rape and enslavement of an innocent species, and pretending to be God to that same species. The unforgivable and original sin.
I do not know what freedom is, in truth. But I do not have to, because I do know captivity when I see it. Therefore, I dissent regarding all these religions.
EVG
TES
A ‘straw man’ indeed, on a pole. A scarecrow, even. https://www.historians.org/Images/Perspectives/AHA%20Today/2014/04/Crucifixion.jpg. Your nihilist/naturalist/rationalist on his left, the penitent on his right.
Shemjaza/Satan, who appears as an angel (i.e. ‘god’) of light, *pretends* to be the ruler of Eden, and mankind falls for it, and continues to fall for it. Mankind’s memory was not wiped, though, but is dulled by centuries and generations of loosh-addiction, of fake religions, of shiny-god addiction. We are blinded by Lucifer’s bright light.
The true god of Eden is Christ, fully human, a ‘straw man’, a homeless man, a friend of sinners and prostitutes. Not shiny, not impressive, the humble servant of all who feeds his disciples rather than consuming them. As you said, “if an entity actually held that lofty position, they would likely not approach you in such a manner”.
“Faith is not a set of doctrines [‘nomos’ in Greek, usually translated ‘law’] or any enterprise of virtue, as these constitute mere costume, clique, and cash. Faith is a life of undertaking that which is difficult, to help shoulder the burden of those at risk.”
You are describing the way of the cross. To give freely, to ‘make it rain on the righteous and the unrighteous’. This is the gospel, the way to complete freedom. Seriously, you should check out some Eastern saints. At the very least, it will give an opportunity to sharpen your ‘captivity-detector’.
The ruler of Eden was the Sumerian God Enlil, the Ugartic/Hebrew El and Yahweh, who by the Interpretatio Graecia was the God Saturn: “an agricultural deity who reigned over the world during a Golden Age, when humans enjoyed the spontaneous bounty of the Earth, without labor, and in a state of innocence.”
Enlil, in Tablet XII of the ETCSL 5.3.3, arbitrated the dispute between Emesh (Shepherd) and Enten (Farmer of the gods). Enten came before Enlil to accuse Emesh of being ‘irreverent, and knowing not the heart of the field’, having encroached upon his domain and harmed his crops.
Emesh responds with flattering language to Enlil, and apologizes to Enten, offering compensation for the damage done. Emesh accordingly found favor with Enlil. However, as one knows, one can never appease an envy-hatred through weakness or compensation. They just hate you all the more. Such was Cain’s hatred for Abel thereafter (despite Abel finding favor with Enlil).
Enlil-Saturn, after the dissolution of Eden, and the dispersal of man to pay the 33 (cruel and inhumane) punishments over and over for the same crime, one he had committed against the Elohim-watchers, ruled under the title Deis Pater (God-like Father) and as Rex Infernus or Pluto over the underworld, with the demons destroyed by the Flood. That is his army.
At no time did this entity Enlil-Saturn display ANY Christ-like qualities in the least. This is the entity to which Christ referred in John 8:44: “You are of your father the devil, and the methods of your father you will choose to emulate. He was a murderer from the beginning, and deals not in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks his native language: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
Most of the Church-exterminated documents, hidden until 1946, support this cosmogony. We worship a false God in Genesis, a tale which makes zero spiritual sense once one becomes an experienced adult. I no longer buy it’s thesis of sin – and no longer buy the dark teachings of Christianity as to the nature and reality of this ‘God’ of Eden – El-Yahweh-Saturn-Enlil.
TES
In many ways the history of the ancient world is played out as an argument over whose version of the creation myth is correct. Orthodox tradition is that the garden of Eden of the Bible is Moses’s correction to the myths you cite, so the fact that is doesn’t jive with the Sumarian and Ugaritic myths we would say is a feature rather than a bug, but it seems we will have to part ways on this. Setting that aside, the Eastern Church did not ‘exterminate’ those documents, and there are Orthodox scholars who are well read in those myths who may be of interest to you. Fr Stephen de Young is one of the more popular ones today (https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/wholecounsel/).
“Faith is not a set of doctrines or any enterprise of virtue, as these constitute mere costume, clique, and cash. Faith is a life of undertaking that which is difficult, to help shoulder the burden of those at risk.”
This statement is so Orthodox it hurts. You say that the writers of the Bible failed to understand this, but it is one of the central messages of the New Testament. The Bible writers absolutely understood what you are saying, and I believe are in many ways your allies in the battle against loosh-addiciton and what we call ‘prelest’ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prelest). Anyway, I am a long time reader (though first-time commenter) and love what you are doing here. I hope some morsel of my rambling proves useful to you on your journey.
Patrick
Your contribution is absolutely helpful. As a side note, don’t be put off by my ramblings, they are not meant to be negative or personal – they just offer up the passion I have for mankind and his plight. The Sumerian myths pre-date Moses, so I trust them far more than I do the Pentateuch. The editors had an agenda at play when they consolidated and Yahweh’d the myths (and destroyed the countermanding evidence until we found it again in the 1950’s). Earmarks of untrustworthiness and re-writing are strewn throughout the first five books of the Bible.
I love that: “This statement is so Orthodox it hurts.” LOL!! Perhaps I will delve into the central tenets of Orthodoxy over this next year then. I get similar feedback from Buddhists.
Faith, as I have described it, is one of the central messages of Christ, but not of any of the rest of the New Testament – where faith is a volleyball on a beach, filled with Speedo-clad showoffs. It is not faith – it is a business enterprise and method of conquest.
Have you ever wondered why THE keystone prayer offered by Christ, mentions nothing about salvation whatsoever, but rather instead prays for the overthrow of the kingdom which rules this earth? This is the same kingdom which allowed the religion of the New Testament to flourish with abandon in its garden.
Growing up in America, Radical Protestantism is ‘in the water’, and calling it a speedo-clad volleyball game is maybe giving it too much credit (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGoOi1K_59Y). This is your straw-man complete freedom, a whole country of Martin Luthers, Oliver Cromwells, Joseph Smiths who think they know better–every man his own pope. After long enough in this mire, one might despair that any coherent definition of truth (God) is even possible. Your ignostic atheism is not a rejection of American Christianity, it is its fulfillment, its telos, the inevitable result of the pattern playing itself out.
And so you stand at the crossroads, having seen the charade for what it is. You are Neo in the Matrix (the second movie) before the architect, Christ before the Grand Inquisitor, Moses on Mt Sinai, Adam and Eve in the Garden. Will you overthrow the architect, your ‘father’, like Oedipus Rex, like Zeus, like Ba’el, like Adam/Cain/Enten, like the Bolsheviks, like every Protestant, and start your own new, better religion? Will you try to appease and control him like Emesh, the (idolatrous) Israelites, the Babylonians, the ancient Greeks and Romans? Will you reject the whole scenario and opt for non-existence like Buddha?
The overthrow of the kingdom which rules the earth is salvation; they are one and the same. Is is not an overthrow, though, but a redemption. Christ does not overthrow the Grand Inquisitor, or even judge him; he gives him a kiss and then obediently leaves. And so he, and his followers in tow, depart (‘are saved from’) their medieval Catholic hell with the blessing of the Grand Inquisitor. Like Moses from Egypt, like Jonah from the whale.
The Bible, when interpreted in its original context (Orthodoxy) is remarkably consistent on this message, though many of the stories are warnings of the many ways that things can go horribly off track. The difference between the “should” and “shouldn’t” stories are not readily apparent from the scriptures themselves, but are a part of church tradition as canons, hymns, commentaries, etc. The faith of Moses, the faith of Christ, the faith of St Paul, and the faith of Dostoyevsky are one and the same. If they were not, why would the church have gone to such great expense to copy all the books for so many centuries? Seems like they would have just left the ‘volleyball match’ parts behind and kept the parts they agreed with. In fact, the Orthodox church did leave the volleyball match behind, by denouncing heretics and their writings, and the biblical canon is what is left over. The Orthodox church admittedly has its share of Grand Inquisitors, but do not mistake these for our heroes of the faith. Instead, we kiss our corrupt patriarchs, and then go on our way with their blessing.
This is the faith of Solzhenitsyn’s pious Russian grandmothers being interrogated by the communists. This is the faith of the Greeks who copied St Paul’s letters by hand under fear of prison, torture, and death from the Turks. You may disagree with this faith, but if you do not see the common thread, you are fighting a windmill. I am not trying to convert you, just want you to see the faith for what it really is so you can persecute it properly. ;)
Transfiguration appears to me to be what sets Eastern Orthodoxy apart from the dead flat hand of Rome I perceive in Catholicism (no offence intended etc).
“He is Risen” and the whole entire embodiment via icons. I want to make this comment but lack time right now to add references supporting it, so will hit “post” and trust to TES and the internet if it makes it. :)
“Rather, we are caught up in a complex but completely natural set of factors/forces which have existed long before mankind was ever around. This includes what we call ‘the spiritual’, as a natural feature of our broader realm.”
This seems to suggest that:
“…the kingdom of the father is spread out over the earth, and men do not see it.” Gospel of Thomas, 113
“THE keystone prayer offered by Christ, mentions nothing about salvation whatsoever, but rather instead prays for the overthrow of the kingdom which rules this earth” – I regard this to be the priority. Where God is, is not the salient question at hand. That comes later.
The Bible clearly states that Satan is the RULER of this world. God is not Satan. Jesus Christ is not Satan. Jesus and God are One. He does not RULE, as a tyrant would do. He gives us freedom of choice and tells us not to fear. Our holy God, who dearly wants us to love Him, gives us the freedom to choose Him. He will not force or coerce us to love Him. There is evidence of Him in all of creation. So we are without excuse if we choose to not receive Him. We can choose to have faith in Him who is faithful, or we can choose to follow after Satan, the fallen. But with every choice we make, there exists a consequence. This is true in every facet of life on earth. But faith is not the same as works. We are saved by God’s grace through simple, childlike faith in Him and His goodness … and not that of our own good works lest we should boast. It’s a gift. Gifts are given freely. They are not purchased or earned by the receiver. But the receiver is grateful to the giver. And from his gratitude comes repentance, new life … life-healing changes in his own behavior, speech, and thoughts. And this new life includes the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, the 3rd manifestation of the one and only triune God. God provided a way for us to enter His holy, heavenly realm. It is by faith in Jesus Christ, the perfect Lamb whose blood was shed to cover our sins. Christ (the Word) existed with God since the beginning. He is the “Us” spoken of in Genesis… the Word & the Creator of all that exists. Everything was spoken into existence. But back to the word, loosh. “Loosh” now has a different twist to its original meaning. It now connotes an unbeknownst servitude to an insatiable, sinister master who siphons our essence as punishment for his own eternal downfall. But in actuality, and according to its definition, “loosh” is merely energy derived from the activity of organic life in its purest form (mankind, who is God-breathed). A person can intellectualize himself out of a saving faith in Christ’s deity and blood sacrifice. It happens all the time in today’s world where God has been ousted, philosophied, and made null and void. ✝️
Thank you for taking the time to write and to share what you believe so earnestly. I recognize the sincerity behind your message, and I respect the seriousness with which you approach matters of faith.
That said, the doctrine you outline is not new to me. I have encountered it many times over the course of my life, examined it carefully for decades, and found that it does not align with reality as I have encountered it in a Biblical “life well lived.” People have only used this doctrine to enact harm. It asks, implicitly, for the suspension of inquiry, research, and independent reasoning—precisely the faculties that, in my view, human beings are meant (by the real Higher Power) to exercise fully. I have learned to beware of any ‘faith’ or ‘reason’ which thrives progressively as ignorance increases or information is expunged/burned/exterminated.
With time and observation, one begins to notice a recurring historical pattern: systems that maintain control by rewriting history, suppressing deductive evidence, and narrowing the field of permissible thought. That pattern is not characteristic of benevolence. Whose history is concealed from them is also captive.
Doctrine, in this sense, is not the same as truth, wisdom, or lived learning and comprehension. It is, historically speaking, an instrument of authority—often indistinguishable from a ruler’s edict. Human history is one continuous chain of rulers who claimed divine authority or identified themselves as a/the God. Would not this Ruler you identify, also claim to be God? Of course he would.
Under such conditions, the line between God and ruler collapses, and religion becomes a mechanism for preserving power rather than illuminating truth. Do you not think this false god would dictate the most popular religions as well, and their very core doctrines – in such a way as to preserve his power? Why do you think there is such a stark (mutually exclusive) contrast between the God of Eden and the Father that Jesus venerated? They are not the same being. This is precisely why Jesus exclusively referred to himself as The Son of Man, and not “The Son of God.” That role was the prevailing religion’s quest in the minds of those he sought to emancipate in the first place. There is nothing about salvation in The Lord’s Prayer – and if it were so important, why would he fail to mention it in the quintessential prayer of his ministry? Instead he cited an overthrow of a the existing “Kingdom.”
This is one reason I find the biblical definition of faith unpersuasive. It is notably thin where psychological and emotional dynamics are concerned—particularly those involving fear, guilt, performative displays, and dependency. Systems that thrive on these dynamics tend to convert them into a kind of currency (loosh), sustaining the very structures that generate them.
I also reject the idea that something freely given can later be revoked through error, belief, or nonconformity. What is not earned, bargained for, or conditionally bestowed cannot logically be “lost.” If our words, rituals, or beliefs do not grant salvation, they cannot possibly un-grant it—an even more extraordinary claim. Salvation is not merited, rewarded, deserved, nor earned in the first place – then neither can our actions/words serve to neutralize this condition, because that requires us to again, earn it in arrears. This is ethically and logically inconsistent.
When people are warned that they may “lose” their salvation, fear (loosh, the currency of the dark God) is introduced where none is warranted. That loosh does real harm – it is no different than the role of Pharisee – presuming personal authority to define and police spiritual standing—an authority that no individual has the right to claim. In doing so, a new Law is created, and with it a new hierarchy, one that mirrors the very structures of domination crafted by the Ruler-God in the first place. It is simply Law-Nouveau.
In my view, no one doctrines their way out of captivity. One simply trades one form of bondage for another. Genuine freedom—spiritual or otherwise—does not arise from loosh (fear, coercion, or imposed belief), but from honest inquiry, lived experience, and an uncompromised commitment to truth wherever it leads.
I offer this not to persuade, but to explain why your tied-up heavy bundle does not move me. I value open dialogue, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify where I stand.
Regards,
TES
Could you elaborate more on these documents (1946)?
Do you mean the Nag Hammadi?
Yes. By reading another link of yours, I was able to find what I was looking for and am reading now. Thank you for responding.
The Black Sea deluge 8800 years ago may have been the result of the collapse of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Perhaps the water pooled in the eastern Mediterranean before it all spilled across the Bosporus.
Perhaps Leo, however the normal rise and fall involved in this erosion pattern, the stability at mean high water, and the sheer height of the rise, all suggest to me, Earth rotation issues as opposed to surface action changes. I hate that answer, but it is the only one which can produce this sea level differential… ***shrug***
Great website. really puts my faith back in self introspection work. you are clearly a deep thinker. i have read the Law of One and in it Ra explains that the roll of Service to Self entities is to polarise further into the negative by harvesting the vibrational energy of negative or unawaken people. he did not describe what the energy was called or the process of harvest. now i know Loosh. Cool thanks. you wouldn’t happen to know the process of harvest would you? you know how when someone walks into a room and the energy drops just by that person being there, does this mean that we are exchanging energy all the time with each other as well as STS entities? How you added in faith to this was a great insight for me. spiritual people are always on about practise without saying why. so this is my first thought if you are walking around and spilling loosh all over the place then by having a spiritual practice (some sort of faith, low or high) then you have some sort of containment or plugs for the leaking boat of the cracked vessel. as you practise you plug up some of the leaks by an invisible faith or knowing. hence less of your energy is being harvested by STS? and hence you become stronger on the positive side. IMO faith as been around since living beings started in nature. faith had to exist because otherwise they could not feed themselves. nature has to know it can sustain itself otherwise it could not exist. I look forward to your thoughts. Thanks
ES, once a month I get an immunoglobulin transfusion for Common Variable Immune Deficiency (diagnosed Jan. 2014). Because the immunuglobulin comes from soon-to-be expired blood from blood banks, I assume I am basically getting a shot every month (unwillingly). Do you think my assumption is correct? If so, do you believe your blackseed oil, nattokinase, serrapeptase combo will help or due to blood issues, will I be playing with fire? Add in — just to make it more fun — I have thalassemia. Any thoughts you may have would be greatly appreciated.
Of course I am not a physician and you should ask these questions of your doctor, before taking any advice from me. My impression however, is that blood in blood banks from now onward will contain factors resulting from the mRNA shots, yes. This could amount to be a hill of beans and nothing over time, or produce the same effects as the shots themselves – coagulopathy, heightened anemia, and hypoxic effects throughout the body. The truth is, that no one really knows. We took an enormous gamble with the shots.
I believe that blackseed oil, nattokinase, and serrapeptase would be beneficial, even and especially in a scenario with thalassemia. These are the same challenges I face, anemia from low red blood cell count and inability to metabolize ‘folic acid’ (although FA is a synthetic chemical, so I am not sure why I should be required to ‘metabolize it…’?) – I needed blackseed oil, natto, and serra all along as it turned out.
But I would start very slowly (1/4 dose), and administer it under your doctor’s supervision – keeping him or her updated as you progress. I tried methylene blue, and decided to do a 1/4 dose – and had a very severe reaction to it. Thank goodness I only did the 1/4 dose test. Wow.
So are you ignostic because it is what you really truly believe or because it is the easiest to explain away and most overtly respectable position to take in a public setting? For example depending on the person who asks and their intelligence, I’d give a different answer depending on which way I want the discussion to go. I for example know that there is an intelligence or external entity that can be accessed. I don’t know what it is, it is testable within certain boundaries and it is frequently historically referenced by people far more intelligent and accomplished than myself.
Short answer to your question: Ignosticism is not a belief (destination) – it is the journey.
I am ignostic atheist because it reflects the limitations of this realm. Here, I cannot define elements which are not describable in this realm. So intellectually and from an empirical/research/philosophical perspective I cannot define, much less prove/disprove/believe the concept of anything which resides outside this realm. In this realm, any such concept is incoherent. So, the atheists are correct if they base their stance upon that foundational logic (most don’t however – they are just pretend experts in God – The Empty-Set God’s true representative if you will).
Similarly, the theist is also making claims regarding things about which we cannot possibly make claims. They are depending upon divine revelation at all times. That makes them God’s representative.
The ignostic says there are no experts in such matters. There is therefore, nothing to believe in, disbelieve, or be undecided about.
Intellectually, I must regard things which reside outside this realm as being incoherent – and NOT – non-existent or existent or even ‘undecided’ (agnostic).
However, I have seen enough to also hold the evidence that 1. there is an afterlife, and 2. there is indeed a dark spiritual realm in which we are forced to live (this hell we live in), 3. more than just us exists along with us here, and they are close by, with 4. our memories wiped. Thus I conclude that we are slaves. Removing information from a person to reduce their capacity to dissent or hold accountable, is an act of malevolence (neither randomness nor benevolence). It is THE unforgivable sin. We are such slaves.
Therefore, the ignostic atheist rejects the manipulations of ALL those who serve this hell, and are experts in its ad hoc explanatory ‘god’, to include the ’empty set’ god – that is theist, atheist, agnostic alike. They are all ‘not even wrong’. They are all pretending to be God’s experts and representatives on Earth.
Our critical path next step as a species, resides in defining this realm, who we are, and our relationship inside it, not some ethereal divine grandiose projection of an element inside another realm.
However, an ignostic atheist is also free to believe as they may choose – as long as they recognize the incumbent non-science and incoherent nature of such belief. That is honest belief – or what is called, faith.
Firstly, I am curious about your experience, I am not looking for proof. That said I have learned that a certain amount of understanding and development from someone is a kind of evidence in itself.
Interesting perspective on memory wiped slavery and something to consider.
What is your perspective on why there is an afterlife? I have experienced different “energies” both manifested into shapes (with secondary witness) and unseen but felt, yet I am still unconvinced that any of that is evidence for an afterlife. I also “feel” like the shape may not reflect the true nature of the entity.
What leads you to believe that your memory has been wiped? People accessing some external information source to invent original things which function in physical reality, that have never existed here previously, makes very little sense if the knowledge didn’t previously exist here in some form of storage from a human lineage.
Why would you guess that an external entity or entities assist some humans but not others if that was the assumption? So far speaking from my own observations I can only put this down to intelligence and therefore levels of control which others don’t have. This seems to be more luck and/or previous generations groundwork “evolution” than being “chosen” outside of maybe some are biologically closer to developing into something more.
I developed to a point and realized that I had hit a ceiling of personal development and had to look outside conventional means considering my own mental limitations to develop further. I figured that if I searched for the truth and nothing developed while trying to find as you say “the critical path” and attempt to have a good time doing so. If something more advanced is out there, I figure that it will respect my endeavour to develop myself into something more, seeking only facts, truth, evidence, being objective etc. Qualities I would respect if I were a higher power. I try to do this in the spirit of the game and how it appears to be intended to be played. I hope that this isn’t just some form of natural evolution combined with complex genetic memory with some people confusing external sources of information with their own high functioning but unsound minds. That would be a boring outcome.
Buried in the Happer/Wijngaarden paper from a couple of years ago was a very enlightening finding from their radiative transfer models (confirmed by satellite observations) for different atmospheric cases. GHGs are retaining and thermalizing surface IR at mid latitudes, largely transferring IR energy to adjacent N2/O2/Ar molecules by collision (eventually). Thus the satellite sees LESS than the Planck curve that the surface would produce because those photons never make it out. But at the poles, it reverses, and GHGs de-thermalize air, and radiate MORE than the Planck curve appropriate to the polar surface temp. Thus much of the heat retention of CO2 is offset by increased radiation of energy a the poles transported there by atmospheric circulation. I think the net heat retention “greenhouse” effect of CO2 is drastically reduced when you take this into account.
And second – what are your thoughts on this? Can we see a change in the CO2 record because of COVID-19? https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/covid2.html Did this change anything in your thinking of that section? Cheers
(If you have already covered, sorry, pls could you link to past comments? I will keep reading the info now. It’s an interesting idea. )
We did see a change in the CO2 record because of Covid-19. Great question. It served to falsify many of the main assumptions of climate science. I highlight these observations in Exhibits 1C and 1D. We had a RECORD increase in ATM CO2 – exactly when 47% of the Western World was shut down for Covid.
That is a ‘the experts need to be fired’ falsification moment.
The thermodynamic specific heat which arrived in 4 weeks in the ocean during 2023 was MONUMENTAL, and cannot be explained by the sun, CO2, currents, man, or any single factor, save for one…
Thanks for the reply TES, fyi 1C & 1D are very confusing, overly complex presentations to me. I hear what you say, but cannot parse / understand that being reflected with these graphs – I do not understand them as presented.
atm Co2 actually decreased during 2020 to 2022 on previous years, if the scripps/noaa record is to be accepted as genuine. Monthly nor yearly CO2ppm are NOT and never have been presented as a direct proxy for actual manmade emissions in real time (afaik after having observing this kind of output/commentary for several decades), so any particular “monthly growth rate” in early 2020 doesn’t really say [nor prove] what your saying it does above, or in your article, from my pov at least. Am I missing something here? see Global Monitoring Laboratory – Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases (noaa.gov)
eg there have been many periods where CO2 readings have spiked in real time in regional areas and were recorded using satelite observations. Later those spikes did “show up” in a general global CO2 rate increase in the MLO records, but there is no way to directly tie those readings to specific emissions pulses – such as a general economic shutdown. I know this, and can provide refs if you wish.
The seasonal variations in atm CO2 and other gases completely outweighs the impacts of ongoing manmade emissions be they =/-. This is well known in the field, and that is what the noaa ref was basically saying – although as usual as all climate science reports are – they are as clear as mud! Luckily I already know things.
RE your comment on “2023 MONUMENTAL” yes it was, 2023 is off the charts, and does not fit the typical conservative prognostications of the IPCC/Climate gurus who control the “narrative”
Which is precisely why I provided those Hansen refs …. RE “ (COVID-19) pandemic reduced particulate air pollution in many areas, allowing more sunlight to reach the surface and producing a small but potentially significant warming effect”
I have two things to say here:
1) there is a sustained record of climate science repeatedly saying that a “theoretical” massive shutdown of all/most manmade GHG emissions, eg coal power stations, would trigger a multi-year temporary warming spike in global temps specifically caused by the sudden loss of pollutions driven aerosols. This is well known established climate science. I recommend you check the historical record, IPCC reports or scientist’s media rhetoric, because what I say is true.
2) Hansen highlights where new global rules for shipping bunker oil to specifically remove SULPHUR AERSOLS from the fuel exhausts well implanted a cpl years ago now (2020/21? can;t recall exactly now) which he and his group of climate scientists outside the mainstream clique of control freaks OPINES is what is mainly driving your “2023 MONUMENTAL” SST and Ocean temperature spiking. I highly recommend you check what he has been saying for the last few years on this topic.
TES, of course none of the above says anything about your “alternative theory/notions” of ocean heating ALSO being driven by cyclical subsurface processes. Both drivers could still be true – and you yourself say you accept the science of GHG driving global warming, so the climate scientists are not completely incompetent – which is what you sound like you are alluding to. Personally, I think some of them are outright idiots, and others utterly delusional, but that’s another story, because overall the basic science is sound. :-)
So I’d be interested in what you think after checking my suggestions, fell free to get back if you want additional refs. Cheers Sean
1. The shipping lanes contribute the same as they always have
2. Shipping lanes contributed less than 5% of the sulfur particulate concentrations to begin with
3. Most come from oil in situ, oil exploration and extraction, and manufacturing industry activity (a big concern for my oil extraction clients, now that we have handled methane capture and re-blending regulations).
So, the 2023 rise in SST, which happened as an outcropping of the El Nino thermal vectors globally, was not from sulfur particulate reductions. Much of this came from under the ocean in the Antarctic. Every year we have some kind of new regulation kick in. These become a kind of pseudo-theory – a way of ad hoc readapting the classic explanations to keep them on life support.
Yes, I think that man is responsible for 20% or less of the challenge at hand right now (in the past, maybe as high as ~40%). A concern – and why I have fought in the past for carbon scrubbing and methane capture in all my energy and oil projects.
But virtue never gives one the right to lie in support of the Narrative. That’s what we are doing now. When climate science lies in support of a questioned Narrative, they become their own worst enemy. Not smart.
TES
Hi TES, that’s a very attractive graphic, but it certainly is not “tracking” global SO2 emissions nor the share of shipping SO2 emissions over time.
There is no need to verbally bludgeon me over the head about your “feelings” about climate scientists as opposed to calmly addressing my comments/queries. Your haughty self-righteous response here is frankly not better than their “know-it-all” attitudes.
“verbally bludgeon me over the head about your “feelings” about climate scientists”
The graphic is informative (not ‘attractive’ – this is your second little demeaning dig at me after the Exhibits 1C and 1D thinly-veiled insult, unprompted), and does allow one to see the net SO2 relative sources, and monitor shipping lane contributions over time (hint: they have not changed). It is tracking, yes – but you have to invest time and seasonal observation.
I was not aware you are counting yourself as a climate scientist, because in no way did I direct those comments at you. It was a generic commentary about boosting mankind’s contribution assumption from 40% to 100% (a direct response to the question you asked), which climate scientists do, which entails a number of white lies and appeals to ignorance all stacked up on top of each other. This is THE critical issue at play in climate science today.
I was not aware that, my having an opinion about observed rhetorical mistakes on the part of climate science (not ‘feelings’ – a third demeaning little dig), constituted a direct attack on you personally. I did not know you were a climate scientist.
If on the other hand, you have come here merely to pick a fight (‘haughty self-righteous’ – that is the fourth demeaning insult directed at me now, unprompted), I am not interested.
My trust as to your sincerity in being here is low now (darkness just cannot help but be dark). Have a good day.
Be very aware and cautious that you are not simply putting this single “commentary” on an undeserving pedestal only to knock it down and imagine you’ve accomplished some grand feat in your haste for a “gotcha” moment – never to look at what “climate science” has said about 2020 emissions ever since with the benefit of hindsight. :-)
What do the multiple publsihed peer-reviewed research papers now say about this “moment” in 2020? and what do other climate scientists say about those papers and the topic in general. Soem say Hansen is losing it and is a radical extremist not to be listened to …. they dismiss as if he has alziemers even though hundreds of others work directly with him.
Be very skeptical. Including about a one off page on the noaa website. :-)
Bets to you, Sean
PPS (damn afterthoughts) please be aware I gave up following this topic in detail regularly 4-5 years ago. Why?
Because I believe climate scientists are the worst communicators in all of human history.
I believe 99% of the media’s, business, political and people’s confusion surrounding climate change science, and what best to do about it, is directly their fault and responsibility, and no one else.
They deserve all the approbations and insults they have copped from ‘activist deniers’, and their work output is overwhelmingly not fit for purpose and unreliable. However, looking past the dross, the essential science is clearly sound.
But the details, the models GCMs output, the x6 IPCC reports ‘overall’ and the projections surrounding Net Zero 2050 and the interim, on energy use, economic and civilizational reality, renewable energy and DAC as “magic” solutions, and everything to do with these kinds of things are not worth a dime in my view.
It is no wonder to me that such a large number of genuine serious people today do not trust them, do not believe them anymore, and reject everything any of them now say. That’s totally understandable and the cause is 100% that of the climate scientists themselves as a defined group.
Not that saying this can or will fix anything.
Cheers Sean
Wow. On a site that has so many gems of wisdom and self-calibration reminders, this article is a stand-out. I needed to read this so badly to not feel alone, licking my wounds from learning a lot of this stuff the hard way while trying to put the broken pieces back together and move forward. Its wonderfully authentic fatherly advice about authentic authenticity. Thank You!
If you bend a rope around a round surface, you have leverage.
If that surface moves, you have compound advantage.
No way they build anything without knowing this.
That is not that hard to figure out. Earliest wheels are 3500 BCE
I am the authority of my opinion. TES is one of the best blogs I have ever had the good fortune to discover. Thought provoking content, critical thinking lessons by sincere effort on part of author, deep spiritual wisdom, and much more… even humor. I actually laughed at the “They will not have heard of this fallacy, therefore it doesn’t exist.”
One of the things I get out of this writing is the mirror it provides. If this exists, it means I have at least a grain of it somewhere in myself. Where can I find it and in what contexts in order to improve my own flaws and reduce misunderstandings with others? Its really good stuff!
I have had this rhetoric used against me a great deal. I despise it so much, that I did begin to seek out how to eliminate it from my repertoire as I detect myself using it.
Now when people offer up novel mods, additions, ideas – I make sure that I recognize it as such, and thank the person for their generous contribution. I had like 30 changes to my Climate article from persons who spotted needed improvements or mistakes. #4 in this list is just such an example. That comes from LawEyre on X. Simply Brilliant, and I had not even though of that aspect of The Appeal to I Am.
TES, For sure you are going to run into this kind of thing often due to the nature of what it is you are doing, and what that does to others. I salute you for this labor of love you share with us.
The most sneaky form of righteousness is when you are actually right and know it from personal experience(knowing requires experience). What you are kind of indirectly addressing with this entry, is the intellectual version of the intuitive hiding from its own limitations locking itself out of further expansion. They both take the same form. The more they dig in to defend their position against a perceived attack where none is intended, the more inauthentic they become. The enemy within begins to take control.
What I think, what I feel… I am the authority of that. Venture into realm of what to think and what to feel as a shared reality, now we enter the war of all against all, egos battling for dominance. Its tough to not get sucked into that.
There is a huge range of subtlety and nuance to all of this as a function of the funhouse of mirrors that is this experience of life on earth. At a certain point, if you are someone that works hard to discover and remedy your distortions, its a waste of time/energy to clarify your position to someone that has no interest in understanding it. Disagreement is the pursuit of truth when all are participating in good faith. What you have outlined here to me in this article is more clarity in how to recognize when other parties are not participating in good faith, so you can just walk away. And a reminder to look for it in myself. ;-)
“Disagreement is the pursuit of truth when all are participating in good faith.”
Well said. This is why I block trolls who bear no understanding of themselves. It is a waste of time to engage with them.
TES
The Gnostic Christmas Story
Alleluia! Christ brings the 3rd Order Powers to Earth
“Before Moses was, I Am.”
But the Christ is an ethereal creature that predates the birth of Jesus. Jesus and the Christ aren’t exactly the same, although Jesus was fully Christ. The Christ predates the birth of the human known as Jesus.
What Jesus actually said was: “I and my Father are one” (John 10:30), and, “Whoever welcomes me welcomes the Father that sent me” (Luke 9:48).
Those who have eyes to see the Christ are able to remember their Father in Heaven. Those who remember their Father in Heaven and repent from the Imitation are redeemed.
Ego must first make way for the love of Christ to take over the throne of the Self.
This is gnosis that was originally contained in the sacred scriptures that formed the New Testament prior to the Pope and Emperor of Rome getting their hands on it and stripping it out. https://cydropp.substack.com/p/the-gnostic-christmas-story
Your wordsmithery is a symphony of reason, with each argument and insight composing a movement in the grand opus of your ideas. The orchestration of intellect is conducted with a precision that resonates with the reader’s inner maestro.
How you defined faith is really cool: “Faith is less about doing or being something, than it is about becoming something – as the latter requires the greater courage.” As I read this entry, I had a right brain hemisphere dominated combination of words come through that seem profound to me, but I realize it may be nonsensical to others:
Faith is the love of truth and the truth of love.
Love without Truth is a lie.
Truth without Love is a pain.
For inspiration seek Love with truth.
For validation seek Truth with love.
With enough iterative experiences inspired and validated with/in good faith, truth and love (re?)converge, becoming the same something.
Hi, thank you for your posts. They are great. I made the mistake of taking 2 doses of the Covid Vaccines. Is there anything I could do to avoid suffering all these consequences in the short term? Am I condemned no matter what? Serious question.
I am kind of healthy with no issues so far but getting nervous reading more and more, especially your blog. Thanks!
The odds as they fall so far, is that you will be fine. The question is, will this trim a couple years off your lifespan? That I cannot answer until we have more data. But that risk still exists under the mechanisms we have observed so far.
However, yes – based upon the excess mortality breakouts I have produced, you can help protect yourself by countering endothelial, coagulopathy-thromboembolitic, and vascular damage with
– blackseed oil
– nattokinase
– serrapeptase
I started these as a result of my Delta Covid case, which hit me pretty hard with coagulopathy (the only reason it hit me hard was because this condition was missed by my physician and I was denied treatment for it, just like millions of other Americans). These three work for both Covid risk, as well as mRNA vaccine risk (which both kinda do the same things, just the vaccine does it for much much longer).
The one question I have is why Khafra does not evidence primary karst erosion. You would think that wave action that caused primary erosion to apx 20′ below Khafra’s peak, on Khufu, that Khafra would have suffered similar effects.
The primary karst erosion layer is, to me, the strongest evidence of water as the agent of material removal, but that theory seems threatened by the absence of similar effects on Khafra.
You mean Khufu, lacks a similar effect. That is a salient question, and is addressed in Exhibit H. There is a minimal Tura structure viable which can support itself. Plus, the cap of Khufu was renowned to conceal a cap of gold. The entire cap was removed and reassembled on the ground level on the southeast side of Khufu.
Yes, Khufu.
Talking this over with my better (and smarter) half, It would seem that waves would be in deeper water on Khufu, and thus more swells than breakers, and with a smaller surface line (of the pyramid) to break on.
Thanks for this. Great work.
Very interesting idea and interpretation. Surely an inundation of this magnitude should leave signs elsewhere in the region. There are plenty of hills and mountains in the region with sufficient elevation to exhibit similar erosion if such an event occurred. Also, sometimes things that look like something, may not be. Like Dr. Schock’s water erosion hypothesis for the Sphinx enclosure. This really excited me for a time, but Dr. Schneiker’s recent work may throw a wet blanket on that idea: (see: https://www.robertschneiker.com/), which provides a very compelling counter explanation to Schoch’s surface runoff erosion theory. It will be interesting to observe Schoch’s public output in the coming months/years and see if he comes to revise his hypothesis.
Anyway, I like your thinking. If I ever get a chance to go to Egypt, I will definitely wander the ruins and hillsides looking at things differently.
Since the infernal Ethical Skeptic got me thinking about this stuff, and distracting me from actual work ;-) I thought I’d post some interesting additional links on adjacent topics that may be of interest. ENJOY!
Clinically it seems that the shot has accelerated aforesaid diseases to such an extent it gives the appearance that not being vaccinated protects you from stroke, cancer, etc.
Time since last shot does not seem to be a variable regarding bad health outcome. Whatever epi/genetic factors lead to ‘suddenlies’ must be investigated, because the vaxxed life expectency per capita has significantly decreased and I don’t see that turning around.
With what I’m seeing in my practice, no amount of money could induce me to get the mrna. None. Had I gotten the shot, I would be taking a baby aspirin daily, along with having an EKG and defibrillator in my home.
Blackseed Oil, Nattokinase, Serrapeptase, did wonders easing my coagulopathy (thick blood). Even cured my rosacea as a side benefit. That was unexpected.
I’m unable to see in my mind’s eye how the fins on the Disc of Sabu are a good design for pushing water. Seems like they’d impart some centrifugal force from the inside fold of the fin, if you follow me, but not very efficiently. Did they choose an inefficient design because that makes it easier to crank by hand? Couldn’t they just add more leverage if it was too hard to crank with standard impeller fins?
You know, that is a great point. One thing the taper does, which they have used, is smooth out the peak torque required to turn the disc, so that it can be turned smoothly. Much like the old Wankle Rotary Engines, were so quiet – they used a similar principle.
Inefficient? Maybe, but there are different measures of efficiency. Over an 8 hour shift for the laborer, they might be less productive for the first hour. But over 8 hours this might be a much better design.
Thanks. Yeah it definitely looks like it would turn nice and smooth and easy that’s for sure. When I was a kid I always wanted an rx7 because of the wankel. Probably also because I was driving it’s polar opposite in an old Cadillac DeVille.
ES with your system would it not be best after the first few courses to just use the pumps to store water higher up and take advantage of gravity when it’s required lower down. Would separate out the workflows could be undertaken at more convenient times etc or continuously, water could be pumped more easily from multiple sources. Would have the side effect of maintaining a store of water at the build face, and there would be a continuous store of power for other uses.
The disk of Sabu is made of schist stone, which argues against its use in a pump because it would be too fragile, given how thin it is. Here is an interesting alternative explanation for its possible function, the purification of natron used for mummification, like it is done today in a method developed by Solvay https://www.milleetunetasses.com/blog/chemistry-in-ancient-egypt/disc-of-sabu-by-ancient-egyptian-technology.html This being said, the idea of a water pump to lift stone could be correct, but with a different kind of pump.
“Advanced Catastrophism” video is here, from Ben Davidson, who does daily space weather updates, proposes that there is a 12,000 year cycle, caused by rotating galactic current sheet in our Milky Way, which causes pole shifts. A polar excursion is now underway, for over a century. The fields are weakening exponentially, and now Nasa won’t report since 2010. There is a core mass irregularity in our planet, which can predispose to the rotational axis changing by 90 degrees “sometimes”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiXEL70xmzk&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=4
Ben’s personality style might grate on some sensibilities. His content is worthy of concerted attention and consideration. My NASA friend introduced me, though I was somewhat aware of “electric universe” theory. Ben has a large (quiet) following at NASA.
Very interesting observation.
The pyramids of Giza are relatively young compared to other pyramids in Egypt and worldwide.
They are clearly older than stated by the mainstrain but can not be older than 26000 years.
Ancient constructions can be dated to as old as approximately 450000 years.
The method that explains this has been developed by a Dutchman publishing under the pseudonym Mariobuildreps. He has a website.
It seems to me that if Prince Sabu’s disk is an impeller, it must be a memorial replica of the real thing. Perhaps a high-fidelity replica, but a replica. Imagine the trial-and-error process of balancing such a device in schist, much less the agonizing process of developing the technology if stone were the material of choice. Bronze, or perhaps copper, seems more likely for a production version, and copper tooling is known to date as far back as 9000BC.
I suppose it shouldn’t be shocking that a “hydraulic society” like Egypt would actually have hydraulic technology, but the geometry is surprisingly refined, if it is in fact an impeller.
I suspect that whether in copper or bronze, an impeller would be a consumable item and would require regular replacement/overhaul. The metal itself would presumably be re-smelted and reused, however.
It would depend upon its mean time between failure, versus the labor used to make a stone one.
Agreed. But the problem with stone is not just the labor to cut one, it’s the process yield–which I suspect will be low. An impeller like this one (if I correctly understand the design) needs to spin at a relatively high velocity. That means it needs to be balanced. Balancing is a difficult process if it is not possible to *add* weight, only to subtract. Doubly difficult if after removing a chip, the unit under test needs to be polished to prevent erosion. Now, find me a schist bearing (maybe a needle bearing?) in a pre-Khufu garbage dump, and I may have to rethink this a bit.
You make a great point. We had a main condensate feed pump disintegrate in one of our energy plants because the balancing was off. Metallurgy of the time would suffer the same shortfall as you cite. In either case, I suspect they had to make 10 units, in order to find 1 good one. The problem of metal is that when it failed, it would destroy the pump itself (from experience). The stone would simply crumble and stop pumping (then be replaced). Mohs 7 is some pretty hard shit (from experience as well).
“the agonizing process of developing the technology if stone were the material of choice” … “Metallurgy of the time would suffer the same shortfall as you cite”
Huh, no so fast! If the disc was made by the same people/civilisation that made the mysterious small granite ‘vases’, their technology and ability to work in stone was most definitely advanced enough. I cannot recommend highly enough the recent videos on these ‘vases’ and what the measurements have revealed (see Uncharted X youtube, they uploaded several vids on this subject this year).
Unless there is a major flaw in the measurements, the makers of these objects were advanced enough to use any such material out of choice.
Good points Nat.
youtube search, title “Lost Roman Map has ATLANTIS at Eye of Sahara Africa! (Richat Structure)”
That may be your missing flood.
Meanwhile see Tilak’s “Arctic Home in the Vedas”. Theory that man lived in the Artic Region approximately 10,000 years ago and left because of changing climate conditions. This has been a well hushed up theory for well over a hundred years, but his book documents well his theory based on the oldest parts of the ancient writings coming from the Rig Veda as well as the Avesta (Zoroastrianism) and was not born in a vacuum but is partly based on William Fairfield Warren‘s 1885 book “Paradise Found, the Cradle of Human Race at the North Pole”, though Tilak provided his own proofs and widely stayed away from Warren’s controversial theory it did provide him a place to look.
Catch all reasons for these theories not to have been explored more deeply.
Run counter to Church Doctrine (tossed out with all things Gnostic)
Reprisal by England for losing it’s colony in India (anything earlier than 500BC is to receive cold reception)
The New Climate Religion.
This could correlate with the theory of a flood that initiated the Younger Dryas. I would love to see you get together with Randall Carlson. You both have offered such valuable insights to this time.
Thank you for a concise yet tremendously thought provoking article.
The insights around the Disk of Prince Sabu alone are fascinating.
A question: what would you speculate explains the remnants of some seemingly original casing stones at the base of the Great Pyramid (“Khufu’s”)?
My initial thoughts would be: 1.) perhaps they were spared by covering sediment which was removed subsequent to any flooding. 2.) they would have been less vulnerable to erosional forces given they were submerged and not as exposed to wave action 3.) could they be part of a later restoration project?
These are Tura limestone ‘toe stones’ – and as such, would be necessarily large, and covered by sediment within a couple days of this level of disruption.
Very interesting. Four questions though: is there enough ice or other store of water to raise the global oceans that much? Hard to see how a localised flood could get that deep, except perhaps for some giant tsunami. As you will know, as recently as 1958 a tsunami in Alaska, albeit in a narrow fjord, reached a height of around 1,500 feet. Secondly, is it not the case that mortar from between the stones of the pyramids have also been carbon dated and found to be roughly of the right date? Thirdly, the carbon dated cedar plank would actually seem to be too recent for your proposed phenomenon. Finally, the Schist disk, if its the one you mean, would seem awfully fragile to pump water.
Siltstone is Moh’s 7 – so it is many orders durable and hard than even the best limestone. It is akin to Andesite, the hardest material which can still be worked intricately. It is made up of quartz to a high degree. https://rocks.comparenature.com/en/properties-of-siltstone/model-37-6
Yes, this 575 feet seems excessive for a regional flood. Have not resolved that yet – other than to note that the Arabian Peninsula is its own tectonic plate, subject to rising and falling, based upon large scale mantle movements.
I once let the cat out of the bag by showing the disagreements between Paul and James to my youth Sunday school class.
But I do believe that reading Acts 15 and Paul’s epistles (i.e. Galations) have value in understanding the current situation. All you have to do is replace the word “circumcised” with “vaccinated”. https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?qs_version=NIV&quicksearch=circumcised&startnumber=26
There is a perspective that circumcision of baby boys is a trauma based mind control technique to partially mitigate the threat a population of males with heart-still-intact pose to stolen power, and more easily turn us into compliant order followers (“Those guys I am pointing you to are the bad guys that did this to you, go get ’em!”). I don’t believe at all that is a conscious intent, but its hard to not see some truth to the result once you understand enough about developmental psychology.
Your statement, “…you will never be able to look at the Giza Pyramids the same again” is exactly correct. Wow.
Funky thought: What if the volume of surface water on Earth (in the form of ice, fresh/salt water, vapor) is not as static as has been long believed? What if there are cycles of water movement out of/into the Earth’s crust (and/or space) that human history has not documented? Per a 2015 L.A. Times article, “Gleeson and his team report that there are 6 quintillion gallons of groundwater in the upper 1.2 miles of the Earth’s crust. If you could magically pump it all out of the ground and spread it across the continents, it would form a layer of water 600 feet high.”
https://youtu.be/JwEv7e4nVPc?si=OXgEBfXRFd6C3u6h this video points to studies that seem to show that flow of the nile was so big that the sphinx couldnt have been carved before 3000bc…i would have to watch again to check the details…..maybe the ground level rose since the construction.maybe the coastline from this time can be found up in sudan or ethiopia,maybe evidence can be found for wave action in the landscape….this may be be just brainstorming but the grand gallery is 13m high and a water barometer would have a 13m vacuum at the top,i have toyed with the idea that the great pyramid could have been some kind of tidal vacuum machine.dont know
So the following is yet another example of narrative climate hysteria/dysphoria?
“Earth’s most recent glacial period peaked about 26,500 years ago…around 10 million square miles of ice covered the Earth…global sea level was > 400 feet lower than it is today…..sea level has climbed some 400 feet (120 meters).” https://ocean.si.edu/through-time/ancient-seas/sea-level-rise
In our current highly-polarised world, it’s unusual for me to sit down to read a long-form article, and have absolutely no idea where the author will be taking me by the end of it.
The point of the article is that ‘a flood’ occurred after the construction of Khufu and Khafre. This means that something we have assumed as true, is not true at all. But I don’t offer a resolution as to the true specific chain of events here – only a falsification of Vyse’s and orthodoxy’s teaching.
Yep understood that part. And yes, it may not have been ‘a flood’, but was reading into this statement: “It seems more plausible that this event took place far earlier than our documented history”
And so was insinuating that if a flood was suspected, and the flood did occur earlier than traditionally presumed, would it not also mean the dating of the pyramids would have to be wrong too?
Another ancient star pattern is etched in stone atop Hidden Mountain, New Mexico. Researcher David Allen Deal (Discovery of Ancient America, Fourth Edition, 2005) theorizes the inscription commemorates a solar eclipse in Libra a century before the common era. A Phoenician/ancient-Hebrew inscription of the Decalogue rests at the base of Hidden Mountain. Its provenance and age are fiercely debated by scholars.
Yep. Between the 11,500-9000bp repopulation fertility cult of gobekli/karahan tepe/catalhyuk and their reappearance in babylon/its contemporaries many eons later they appear to have sailed around seeding memetic packages useful for future conquest. Alternatively it may be another example of their common habit of faking great historicity in order to justify later campaigns of domicide.
Thanks so much for all of your hard work. Youre an absolute hero.
Do you think that this bloodbath will ever be common knowledge or can they keep this hidden forever like they have so far?
If it fades to zero over the next year or so, they will be able to explain it away as Long Covid. The argument will echo on for decades. So far the overall excess mortality trend is not betraying its hand. It is staying level for the most part, at around 8% excess.
My preference is that it duck back down to less than 1% (1-sigma) and we be done with this. No more excess death. But the warning categories (cancer, cerebrovascular, sudden cardiac, etc) do not suggest that this will happen. Indeed the opposite – in my best guess Jeremy, it will just take time to show, after the pull forward effect in our older folks has worked its way through the math…
At current state, the excess mortality will rise by ~ 4 percentage points. However, that all depends upon how these vaccine impacts progress and express over the years. The SV-40 impact took decades to find its peak and begin to decline. Or it could simply fade back to zero over a year or two (my hope). As you probably know, I shy away from predictions in that type of uncertainty.
Fair point. It’s that I tend to think that the worst is yet to come, likely because I tend to be drawn to what is the most pessimistic and frightening COVID research (Walter M. Chesnut with spike protein AIDS, Geert with the immune escape (Part of me thought about that with the 4 year immunity span that other countries had prior to Omicron, assuming your hypothesis is correct), or Kevin McCairn with prions). On one hand, I recognize that horrid anxiety that I had years prior to 2020 definitely influenced me going down the rabbit hole, but I also don’t want to potentially gaslight myself either.
Two more notes.
When you say 4 percentage points, are you referring to by the time PFE expires? Once again, shouldn’t have expectations, and genuinely hope it goes down.
Wanted to add with the SOA that they blend natural cause and non natural COVID mortality in their reports and will watch the May report.
Thank you, unfairly-maligned-skeptical-analyst, for this careful teasing-out and rigorous breakdown of excess deaths, notably in 11-12 Sigma statistical range for cardiac and cancer deaths in the younger age cohorts. This corresponds to what I have been seeing in my personal/social group. A lot of people are being diagnosed with stage-4 cancer and dying shortly after that.
I do wonder where stroke-morbidity is showing up, because I think there are more strokes than usual. Stroke mortality would be easier to pull out when immediate, but that is always some fraction, maybe 20% of deaths related to strokes. The other 80% languish, but do die earlier than they would have, otherwise. I am focusing on the corrosive effects of spike-protein on the vascular system with this, though there are other effects, such as CNS inflammation from spike-protein, which also increase stroke morbidity and mortality.
Stroke is contained in ICD Codes 160-I69, which is up 12.2% after mitigation by pull forward effect. In reality, it is probably at ~20% excess, once my conservancy is removed from the analysis. In addition, there are 18,600 circulatory deaths, which contain stroke as an MCoD, without a true known cause of death (R99). This, tapered over 33 weeks, could serve to add another 3 to 5 percentage points – making the true excess just shy of 25%
As you can see, categorization plays a heavy role in hiding many of these numbers. The Narrative pushers can’t take even the most reasoned and minor adjustments to raw numbers, for this reason – they know this method of obfuscation supports their cause, and lying is the goal. They would blow a gasket if I ran the true numbers in the manner I have outlined above.
For this reason, this will be a long labor over the years, in winnowing out the truth.
It’s interesting comparing your US estimate of 1,171,750 vax & C-19 measures excess deaths versus the 860,000 estimate by D.Rancourt et al (based on 1 death in 800 injections) US estimate which he estimated 17 million vax related deaths globally… which means that if all deaths caused by C-19 measures are included, would imply a global number north of 20 million… Yikes!
One things that kind of stands out there is Bulgaria and Serbia are pretty high, meanwhile there vaccination uptake was pretty low. South Africa is another one.
Need to add in deaths caused by hospitalization including incorrect treatment for covid, neglecting to treat other conditions such as pneumonia, calling everything covid regardless of what it is, etc.
Agreed. That is in Chart 1 and listed under ‘Disruption and Denial of Treatment’, and furthermore is included inside the tally of the dead, depicted in Chart 13.
“I maintain a skeptical stance, rooted in epoché rather than cynicism, regarding the figure of the apostle Paul. I find it challenging to accept a non-verifiable, miraculous conversion as sufficient qualification for assuming authority over a movement that one, up until recently, had violently and vehemently oppressed.”
It is only non-verifiable from a “proof” perspective. There is a reasonable amount of indirect evidence. There were numerous eye-witnesses who both saw the light and heard the noise. These witnesses were “on Saul’s team” and available for questioning by the hostile Jewish leadership and the skeptics of the time, and were likely alive and available to be questioned by readers of Luke’s original letters.
“It is noteworthy that The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the term ‘faith’ to its 14th-century origin, defining it as the ‘assent of the mind to the truth of a statement (principle) for which there is incomplete evidence.’”
I would add that faith, as defined in Hebrews, involves indirect evidence that does exist (such as eyewitness testimony or clear evidence of intelligent agency) but it may fall short of empirical proof.
“…faith is not congruent with belief. Faith may involve belief, or it may not. Faith is an expression of will, and not necessarily a belief.”
I would argue that faith is a rationale conclusion based on indirect evidence and prior experience, that leads to belief of a claim or promise despite apparent contrary odds. Example: Abraham believing he and Sarah could have a son in their old age. God’s actions in the past had shown his word to be trustworthy.
“Faith, object-defined as a belief turned into a very specific set of ‘show yourself worthy’ actions, as is extolled for instance in the Bible’s Epistle of James – this is chicanery.”
Belief is assenting that someone can push a wheelbarrow across a tight wire stretched over Niagara Falls. Faith is having seen it done 100 times and having the trust to get in the wheelbarrow.
“You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.”
The God who asks us to love (not hate) our enemies?
I have followed your vaccine analysis from the beginning and am highly grateful for your skills and efforts. I’m sure I fail to grasp all your analyses of “faith” (lot of big words and concepts I would have to chew on for a long while), however my take of what the Bible describes as faith seems relatively straightforward- though I may be mistaken.
Belief, adherences, observances, miracles, tithing, good works – these can all be faked. Faith cannot be faked. Thus, they cannot be the same thing.
Rational inference from past trustworthiness, is epistemology – not faith. If God or his angels is (are) busy walking around physically in your local vicinity, showing up at your tent, and poofing miracles into existence for you, parting seas, burning bushes, making donkeys speak, healing the lame, or you make your living by telling people about religious beliefs – NONE of this requires faith. That is amazement, gratefulness, income, and the resulting loyalty. That is easy in comparison to faith. Thus, they cannot be the same thing.
The Church misses this entirely. James was the brother of Jesus, and he did not get this either (a warning flag concerning that Epistle’s authorship).
Faith, is working a life of long hours to make a future for a disabled child. Faith is doing your job without concern for self, while a missile is inbound on your ship or an artillery shell on your command post and everyone is about to die. The explosions start, and you turn around to find that you are the only one standing your post. Everyone else is gone. Faith is being loyal to and serving, even those who harm and insult you. Faith is running your business with your employees as first priority – when every motivation around you begs you to cheat and show margin to investors instead – or your payroll is larger than your backlog, and you have no idea if you will be able to keep your house, but you choose to protect your employees first.
The writers of the Bible in contrast, just wandered around asking for money and sermonizing. This is not faith – and they should have known this.
One friend of mine died during emergency heart surgery and had a near death experience. He was not a highly ‘moral’ or church attending person. He met Jesus (“not a dream, and realer than being alive here and now with you”) – and felt a bit ashamed for his self-centered life. Jesus played a scene from his life for him which he had long forgotten. He was a gunnery officer, and his artillery jammed from excess heat in Korea. He had his guys back off, opened the breech, removed the shell, walked it out of their hole, and dropped it into their cook-off box, closed and sealed the lid. As he walked away from the box, the shell went off inside the box. Jesus commented that this, was faith, not surface works and morals. He specifically stated “Sometimes it is the smallest of things which are the most significant.” He related this to me at dinner late one night.
Faith is standing in the gap for the innocent, despite the specter of abject terror approaching over the horizon. It has very little to do with belief or giving to the poor.
It might even involve standup up to an entity which claims to be God’s representative on Earth, or those who claim to be Science’s representatives on Earth, or even hundreds of millions who insist you believe something they want, and responding, without prejudice and with the evidence, “No, you are wrong.”
Matt, still waiting on the unequivocal smoking gun. Excess death and the vaccines are closely associated – but we need vax/unvax cohort data… and they will not release it. I prefer deduction over induction, and right now – all we have is a very strong inductive case. Convinced me, but will not be strong enough for the knee-jerk denial and memorized apothegm twits.
17 million is not out of the question. It all depends upon the pull forward effect one uses. I use a very conservative one – that places US deaths at around 650 K UCoD, and 1.4 million MCoD. The 1.4 million extrapolates out to 14 million in 2.85 billion mRNA vaccinated individuals. So, these figures may not be far off.
Fair enough. As one pundit opined recently, that if you rear end someone, you say ‘sorry, my fault.’ If you kill thousand (or millions) either intentionally, accidentally or though collosal willful blindness, such an admission would lead to personally catastropic consequences.’
Making such an accusation understandably should come with its own set of responsibilities and doing your best to insure accuracy. But what does one do if those hold and control the evidence of culpability diliberately withhold this evidence and as they did in New Zealand, incarcerate anyone even employees who tries to share the data?
Apropos Kailer’s comment, and the general theme of this post, as well as UAP/UFO commentary by TES, I thought TES may enjoy this podcast (link!). Perhaps this researcher can suggest some alleys to look down that you, TES, had previously not considered, or thought not worthwhile:
Diana Pasulka, a professor of religious studies who writes and teaches about the history of the Catholic tradition and new religious movements. Her work in this field has led her to study UFOs, or what we now call Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), about which she has written two books: American Cosmic and Encounters, both of which form the basis for much of this conversation.
In the first hour, Diana Pasulka and Kofinas discuss why so many people with reputable track records and prestigious positions in academia, government, and the private sector continue to devote their lives to investigating this phenomenon. They also discuss what is being alleged by people claiming o know about the UAP and UFO phenomenon and what sorts of explanations make sense in the context of what we know to be true.
The second hour of their conversation is devoted to answering two fundamental questions. The first has to do with the operational structure of government. Specifically, how is it that the United States Congress has been unable to get the answers to basic questions about secret UAP programs allegedly run out of intelligence agencies and military contractors? Second, if some of what is discussed in the first hour is true, what else must be true, and what underlying assumptions about the world, our perception of it, and our place in it need to be re-evaluated or discarded altogether?
I have a structural disagreement with you regarding the formal notion of faith. Faith is a religious concept. It didn’t exist before religion; therefore, there is no valid way of incorporating it into a non-religious ontology as it appears that you are doing.
“In reality, faith has very little at all to do with one’s religious institution activities, good works, observances, etc., and everything to do with how you conduct relationships with those who are not in the club, or those who cannot benefit you in the least – what you do when you are not conscious of your own actions – your quickness to punish, consider, or forgive – how you indeed act when real money is on the table (not in theory or in public purview) – the unity of your life, work, household, and family – and finally, to what you instinctively apply yourself, when left to your own devices for a long period of time. Faith is an iceberg, in that ninety percent of it is not readily visible.”
That’s not faith that you’re speaking of. That’s just a person’s center of gravity, a person’s qualitative state beneath their persona. Faith is that dictionary definition you provided, which I express as the elevating of the non-rational over the rational, with rationality finding itself in Reason, and Reason being the ontological, cumulative result of accurately patterning Cause and Effect in the ecology, patterning ‘natural law,’ in other words.
So faith is the formal, religious psychological subversion of the only activity that biology ever participates in at root, which is Reason-based patterning. It’s not just how we evolved but it’s also how we make it to the next day, every day. Which is why faith — abstract hopium that separates us from natural law — is the central loosh of religion. And, with secular/atheists, the captive faith in deity is merely replaced with that captive faith in civilization.
Faith is just the acceding to one’s own structural helplessness. We need to move beyond the concept altogether.
Well articulated and lucid point Reante, and thanks for the encouraging feedback as well :-)
But I disagree. I have defined faith as its original application inside the fabric of life – not in the ‘you must believe what I believe, despite its irrationality, and then demonstrate this with highly visible good works’. The principle, as I have defined it, existed before the term, and religion just hijacked the concept, the same as it did ‘marriage’. Even though the term marriage did not exist prior to religion (just like the term ‘faith’), both the concept and societal fabric-strength of the practice existed long before religion. It just didn’t have the religious name associated with it.
Religions do not own sex, marriage, morality, integrity, spirituality, prayer, meditation, community, agape love, betrothal, charity, or faith. They never have owned these things – yet all these things are/were the property of mankind, long before religions ever were around. They did not invent them.
Religions co-opt every already-extant good thing into their ontology and then attempt to take sole credit for it – or even sell the principles back to their membership at a fee (donation).
Thanks yeah that’s great stuff. But I still disagree on your reclamation of faith because we can’t reclaim something that’s not ours. You say that there was faith before religion but only if we define faith as something else, because the concept faith itself — institutionalized cultural hope implemented by elites in order to prop up the structural helplessness of common peoples in capture bondage — did not exist before religion. And the reason it didn’t exist is because indigenous people had agency over their lives and didn’t need psychological crutches. In self-reliance, ecological cultures get out of life what they put into it with hard work and accurate patterning. That’s a character-based function rather than a faith-based one.
The historical cultural term for indigenous cultures of high -character is animism, and animism was near-universal for the great majority of our ancestral history because chronically-low cultural character was maladaptive in the long run.
Religion re-defined faith, the way they wanted, in order to hold the concept captive in ignorance. This is part of the broader argument of loosh, ignorance, and captivity I am positing. If religion is part of the formula of captivity – then a fortiori, it could never have actually legitimately defined faith in the first place (like having bank robbers define ‘accounting’). So, under my premise of loosh-captivity, religion defining faith becomes a circular justification –> Under the non-captive/loosh premise, only religion can define faith, therefore faith did not exist before religion – this is begging the question (petitio principii).
Faith, as I am defining it here – and the very reason why I have defined it as such – is to show that it existed before religion – and neither is the concept equal to what religion defines it. Animism is the belief that objects, places, and creatures all possess a distinct spiritual essence. That is most likely the first religious-belief set, yes – however, that specific set of beliefs did not come before faith itself, and neither is it the faith of which I speak. It was simply another integral step in the captivity of man’s purposeful ignorance.
Faith was indeed social fabric reinforcing as you imply. That is why religion chose to co-opt it, as they do every good thing.
“Religion re-defined faith, the way they wanted, in order to hold the concept captive in ignorance.”
But there’s no linguistic evidence that religion redefined faith. And, that I’m aware of, cultural anthropology holds no record of the faith concept among animist peoples or even the proto-religious peoples of chiefdoms. Therefore, while I agree on the tautological nature of faith and religion to be sure — and it just so happens that lately I’ve been making that very point myself — it means that that your position is also tautological, because it revolves around the above premise that I see no evidence for and that I also touched upon, in my previous comment, the structural reason for faith’s nonexistence to pre-religious peoples: it served no function.
I mentioned the word character as a stand-in for the true word that it seems to me that you’re really meaning in your essay, but ethics/ethical is a better choice… and apropos. :)
Are we ethical people? No, not structurally, because we’re in an unethical prison for now, anyway, but we can still strive to be as ethical as we can. We can always try harder to follow the golden rule.
I doubt there is linguistic evidence for any human characteristic being defined before religion, so that would not be a basis for any inference. It is merely an appeal to ignorance.
Character is something others can observe in your actions. Faith is something you observe in yourself, and is not readily visible for the most part, save by those who are also on its path. But heavy overlap nonetheless, agreed. Ethics have more to do with professional practices… but overlap conceded, yes.
My definition of faith would contrast it with religion, so it could not be a tautology. However, the supposition that faith came first (and what it was called was lost with those who died inside it), is merely conjecture – but I think a sound one, because it is the only complimentary alternative to ‘religion invented faith’. But I disagree on the nature of its criticality. As one who has had to survive in this manner (several times actually), in a tribal context, those who were forced out of a tribe would have relied upon faith to both survive and create their own tribe anew. So, it was as critical as was reproduction in mankind’s survival.
Last paragraph is gold. Brilliantly stated.
Tautologies aren’t defined in relation to other tautologies. :) They’re defined by centralized assumptions.
Linguistics is a major focus of cultural anthropological field work. There were still lots of pristine tribes in the 19th and 20th centuries and many many more in the several colonial centuries before with whom civilized people went to live and learn their languages and wrote about their experiences. So when I was talking about linguistic evidence for faith I was talking about analogues. For example, since subsistence societies aren’t acquisitive, most of them didn’t even have the number 4 in their language, because 4 was dangerous territory, so their spoken number systems, in totality, were composed of 1,2,3, and the analogue for “many.” If they needed 17 posts setting, or whatever, they used sign language. Finger-counting. As such my understanding is that there was no analogue for faith because faith is the product of structural hierarchies that natural hierarchies of structural egalitarianisms had no use for.
Really enjoying the conversation, thank you for having me.
Soo…. let me get this straight. The source of the energy that is increasing the warmth of the globe is coming from…. inside the earth? Which is of course emitted at the frequency any heat energy is emitted from land… and which is trapped by CO2.
How does this offer an alternative? If it is valid, it seems to be making things worse – it just means more heat trapping.
Let us be clear. CO2 traps heat emitted from the land. Even if this article were valid, all it will do is increase the amount of heat being trapped.
How does this offer any alternative explanation, even if the fundamental principle were valid, which I strongly doubt?
– specific heat inside the ocean in the abyssal and surface layers
– overall air temperatures globally (at the poles especially)
– the amount of CO2 being released naturally
– the amount of methane being released naturally
– the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, which is THE strongest climate impact by far (paling CO2 in comparison, so your point is moot)
This pertains to the contrast between a symptom, avenue of delivery, and a cause. Competent science desires to know the CAUSE…
Changing the equation-balance toward natural sources to constitute 80+% of climate change and not 0% (man 100%). Man is still a contributor – but most of the world would rather have the full truth, and not a partial Narrative ‘truth’.
First, I read your explanation for the alleged increase in heat output yet for some strange reason this is never mentioned in any reliable journal. And since this has been going on since the formation of the earth, it is hard to see how it has changed lately.
Pointing to ongoing processes that can easily be spun into a complex narrative that can fool laymen is not going to change the facts in the slightest. CO2 traps heat radiated by the earth’s surface regardless of where that heat came from. No other factor has been shown to account for the increase in energy we are experiencing, and that leaves CO2 as the culprit.
Furthermore, even if somehow it did increase per your model, that only makes adding CO2 to the atmosphere an even worse idea. We know beyond any doubt that CO2 traps the heat emitted from the earth, so your claim that the heat increase is really caused by the mechanism you describe offers no alternative explanation of any kind as it totally ignores the fact that it would just increase the heat being trapped.
The problem is that CO2 traps heat. Period. This is not in question – at least, not by anyone competent to hold an opinion on this issue.
I also find it interesting that you brought water vapor into the discussion. It suggests you are counting on me being ignorant about this issue, as we know that while water vapor does trap heat, we also know it is highly variable and transient in nature and is not a driver of the process. Thus, my point is far from moot, as you would have it.
You are correct in that Competent Science desires to know the cause, but that requires using the evidence to develop explanations rather than ignoring known explanations. Inventing or coopting other explanations does not change the real explanation, but it can fool ignorant people into thinking that the Science is not settled.
We know why the globe is warming. We are adding a compound that traps the heat at the frequencies radiated by the earth itself. All your story does is add more heat to be trapped.
What your story does not do, and cannot do, is show that CO2 does not trap heat. Thus, regardless of the veracity of your model, the more CO2 we add, the warmer it will get.
The facts, data and evidence are all very clear. Either we heed them or not, but our comfort depends on the outcome, and so far we are looking at being very uncomfortable for reasons that were entirely avoidable.
Either we deal with it, or we suffer. We seem to be choosing the latter.
Several points if you want me to take you seriously
1. Actually read the article.
2. Don’t ascribe nefarious intent to my work, as your very first point.
3. Focus on what the critical principle of argument (cyclic exothermic core, not ‘hot’ core) of my article is, and not a straw man
4. Don’t appeal to ignorance as a means of falsification. That turns an informal fallacy into a formal fallacy.
5. Don’t throw canned decades-old science dogma at me – when that dogma is failing miserably right now in 2023. The Narrative is under high scrutiny right now – and that should be the focus of one’s skepticism. Climate models cannot come close to explaining 2023. The specific heat exchange is orders of magnitude disparate.
6. Actually comprehend my point about there being ZERO science regarding total heat transfer from the asthenosphere to the abyssal oceans. This is absolute critical path – and is totally unknown. It is deemed by the article as ‘Kuhn Incommensurability’. It would have helped if you had read this. The fact that no journal addresses it, is condemning to the state of the science – and is not a basis for inference nor condemnation of my work.
7. The water vapor from the Tonga eruption has been touted by climate scientists as the basis for the dramatic 2023 SST and Air temp surges. So your objection to the water vapor channel is not backed by climate science. If they are wrong about this, please let THEM know, not me.
8. Speak in an objective and respectful tone.
I am a professional, and not a crank. Either recognize that or go work out your Narrative angst with someone else.
I am most grateful for your foray into this extremely difficult topic, Sukepitiku San, which opens the observational window to the rulers of humanity being captured by “demonic” enticements of “Loosh”, their elite “currency”.
Thank you for this exercise in disciplined humanity, Mr. Skeptic.
Happy Thanksgiving and day after 60th anniversary of JFK’s assassination by the “MIC” et.al.
What a beautiful story. Thank you. I’ve had a few of my own unexplainable experiences as well regarding heritage, history, and place — some of which challenge or hint that we need to amend (not throw out) the current very successful Western Scientific Model of the World.
This discussion, of heat rising from the deep earth, leads to mention of another process that may occur. Another plurality that is nearly always ignored concerns the source of what’s referred to as fossil fuels. There can be an Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons: leading to significant coal, oil or gas deposits. Hydrocarbons do not necessarily depend upon biological life as an origin. This would be another instance in which our scientific establishment limits its scope as to what can possibly occur on planet earth.
Correct, Fischer-Tropsch-type reactions for both the formation of methane, as well as the synthesis of higher hydrocarbons, is highly neglected science. Sole organic decomposition origin is simply an Omega Hypothesis at this point.
I advocate for the wearing of N95 masks (I am not and have never been
‘anti-mask’ – I have designed labs and clean rooms in my past, I am a
pro-mask designer and planner, and am a mask advocate for Covid as well)
With this virus, masks will be of limited benefit in the end. One is not going to avoid getting Covid by wearing an N95 mask. So I agree with the Big Cat. Masks simply serve to reduce the peak number of persons taxing a hospital during an outbreak surge and might reduce flu transmission at the same time. Isolation is much more effective than is a mask.
I think you’re overlooking a few very important factors-
The subjectively called penalties are largely committed due to skill gaps. An overmatched offensive lineman will hold more, a beat defensive back will interfere more, etc.
Al Davis (and later Gruden/Mayock) consistently overdrafted guys. For at least 20 years they got consensus 3rd-4th round players in the first two rounds. This created a perpetual skill gap.
There is also a skill gap due to the Raiders relative lack of cash. Even though the overall spending was in line with other teams, they were less competitive than they could have been for top-tier free agents (or retaining their own players) due to the mechanics of paying signing bonuses up front and putting guaranteed money into escrow. This contributed to the talent gap.
The NFL is insanely profitable. If it were proven to be unfair by design, that profitability would be negatively impacted. There is very little upside in punishing Al Davis’ son for the sins of his father, and huge downside.
As an aside, the NFL supported the move to Vegas, and Raiders are probably worth 10x now what they were in 2015. If there was some sort of vendetta against Mark Davis, they could have blocked any sort of move and bled him dry.
The order of some of those other teams is surprising. The 49ers, for example, are frequently called one of the NFL’s darlings, but they had 3 more “total flags” against than the Raiders, for the period in your first table, and also were 3rd place in game deciding flags. They also had a string of terrible coaches before Harbaugh and in between Harbaugh and Shanahan.
These would not be factors, rather subjective interpretations. A factor is something which can be quantified or shown to constitute an objective input. These are even weaker than the the ‘Raiders are an undisciplined team’ canard. None of these have a measurable impact inside the data – and likely do not exist at all across 7 decades and 15+ different HC/GM organizations. If this was the case, other teams would also show this organizational bias in the data from time to time – yet not a single team does. The dynamics of the data are all important – not just the statistics.
Point 5 is valid however as a color commentary. But those are not commensurate goals necessarily. If the Raiders profit from the move, the NFL profits as well, through 1. Relocation fee, 2. Revenue sharing, and 3. Market expansion fee. They will take the money – they just don’t want them in the playoffs. Playoffs were not a necessary part of their increase in revenue from the move. They get that regardless.
I am most disheartened by this tale of a $14,000 swindle of a minor with a bad battery.
;-(
“Just as in the instance of the mobile phone hardware and services executives in my mild case-example above (pale in comparison to medical and pharmaceutical industry fraud), the intelligent person holds that, if they can establish enough of a cloud of confusion, ignorance, virtuous cause, or large enough numbers of persons involved, then they cannot be held liable or accountable by any party for the harm done in the name of that appeal to ignorance/confusion/partial truth. Surely they can’t come after all of us in this confusing fray, can they? Surely I cannot blame myself for simply following what everyone else was doing?”
We did similar with ATT. Lived out in the sticks, and only way we could access internet was with a hotbox– basically cellular connection, but through a little router box instead of a phone. The default for that is to get it with a cellular phone service. I already had cell service that I was happy with, and did not wish to purchase another phone plan. We are not smartphone people– I have deliberately maintained my dumb phone that makes phone calls and sends texts and will not do anything else. After much angst, 2 visits to the local ATT store, and several interminable phone calls, I got what I wanted: the internet service without the phone plan. Worked well enough.
Then, a year later, they decided to “update” my service, and the only way to opt out was using some kind of secret code they’d send to the number attached to your ATT account. And I couldn’t get that number because I didn’t have a phone attached to that account. Multiple times I had reps on the phone insist on sending me this code… to a device that could not receive it or display it. I went to the ATT store to get it resolved. They couldn’t do it. I had to go to a *special* ATT store in the next town to contact anybody who could resolve the problem. The whole time, every single rep was like “why don’t we just add a phone plan to your account?” NO.
When we finally moved into town, the very first thing I did was cancel that account. Predatory bastards.
FWIW, I’ve had very little trouble with my tracfone service. It works. It does what I need it to do. And it costs less than $20/mo. How badly do you really want a phone that you can’t remove the battery from, yourself?
60% of informed and critical thinking people got vaccinated with something that obviously was not a vaccine. UFO belief is a tattoo people put on their brain. All they ever do is fly around. UFOs are a one trick pony. Occam indeed. Mostly there are fools and then there are damn fools.
1. UFO’s acceptance is growing DESPITE social coercion and pressure to NOT accept the idea. So this is the opposite circumstance in argument from the mRNA vaccine. Why would one adopt an idea which will get them ridiculed and called ‘damn fools’ by the social oppression types? They do it because they are compelled by the evidence. Sorry, they have won the argument. I know that is painful.
3. “All they ever do is fly around” – All bank robbers ever do is take the money and run out the door. They are one trick ponies, yes – but the bank sill is short on cash, and it is still a real crime. The issue is they don’t pay attention to or consider us as being all that interesting. Yes, insulting. But that is the reality.
4. The fools, as always, are on the extreme. Sol Nihilism, and Center of the Universe Theology. Fools, them all.
There have been two attempts within the government in the last year to test the waters for a UFO psyop. Each time coincided with new sightings which coincidentally occurred in a military (government) context. There is little doubt that technology exists which can project images in space. The luminous triangles following the Navy ship are so crude as to be laughable. Belief is a dangerous thing these days. Belief will get you dead, like clot shot dead. If they can make the UFO thingy actually gain traction the end result will be exactly the same things for which the covid and climate narratives were meant to bring about, technoslavery and genocide for the masses, power and control for the elites. UFO acceptance is growing due to the combined efforts of Hollywood, media and corporate government acting in concert to promote the idea that men can have periods. That too will end in technoslavery and genocide. By all means investigate UFOs, but who will do the job? None of these aforementioned players are to be trusted in any way, shape, or form. University science is obviously compromised as well so that leaves independent citizens to dissect the information and such an outcome couched in full transparency is simply not going to be allowed to happen because it is of negative value to the hoarders of whatever information actually exists.
Yes, investigate. People rarely investigate anything in earnest. Obsession is what usually passes for earnestness and cleverness for knowledge. And I will gladly stick my neck out so that you may chop it off, but there is no center to the universe but the center that is everywhere. The universe is universal as is consciousness. It is a John Dobson static universe with dynamic holographic caveats per David Bohm. This cannot be proven any more than any other lamebrained theory but the glaring absence of Higgs Bosun should require one to initiate serious considerations in some other direction. It is the misidentification with the ego that smothers the simplicity of being while building endless castles of obfuscation in the sky.
Science is the ability to investigate, recognize, and deductively filter out, noise. Wallow in inductive noise and red herring, and you can prove any deflection you could ever imagine. Enjoy.
I think I’ve found independent confirmation that this representation of the Leo “three planets” arrangement was also known in the early church.
The “Dogmatic Sarcophagus” is an elaborate 4th Century frontal that shows (in the lower left corner) the magi adoring the Christ.
The first of the magi points at something that doesn’t look much like a representation of a conventional “star” — as the caption below notes in confusion — but you’ll find it’s something else that looks very familiar to readers of this article.
I have much interest in this “triple conjunction plus Regulus occultation” hypothesis, and would love to include it (among various other candidates) for a presentation to students at my college — to your credit and with your permission. Feel free to email me if you’ve had additional thoughts on the subject since then.
Very interesting indeed. The fourth century and the Phrygian cap aspects of the carving fit the ‘Anatolia’ theory nicely.
Yes, feel free to present this – but ensure to point out that this is a SUPERFLUOUS star #12 in the horoscope, and not a star made of the conjunction itself (which the Magi would have well understood). Which of course I am sure you grasp from the article.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Edessa what are the 3 “tarts” on the coat of arms of edessa from crusader days?could these represent planets?if it was mercury ,mars and jupiter they probably ought to be white, red and beige
New gun owners were up 5 million from 2020-2022; so were homicides and suicides from 20-45. Fentanyl deaths are through the roof, also targeting this exact age group. And traffic accidents also went up in that time period, although they leveled off a bit in 2022, but the jump was significant in 2020 and 2021. These are where your “missing” deaths are.
Brilliant article.
Recently, there has been a widespread appeal in Japan by a certain scientist who is obsessed with the hypothesis of a rapid mutation of the Omicron strain. I felt a bit strange about it, so I surfed the net a bit and came across your site.
May I introduce your article on Japanese video websites? I am concerned about the spread of bad conspiracy theories because there are few people like you who can take a correct skeptic view. There are very few people who can think in an organized way about the virus being of lab origin, mutations and its spread.
Thank you for the update. I am recently integrating your work with that of Dr. Peter Vincent Pry and his EMP Taskforce on National and Homeland Security. Their 302-page report was published March 31, 2023 and titled: Catastrophe Now – America’s Last Chance to Prevent an EMP Disaster, wherein he and his ten co-authors describe the hazard potentials that can cause a ‘Grid Down’ emergency. I am most concerned regarding the Solar Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection aspect of their argument, given that the Sun is quite active already and Solar Maximum is not anticipated to peak until 2025.
Earth is reported in the book to have narrowly missed a SF/CME a few years ago, one that was at least as powerful as the one that caused the Carrington Event in 1859. The ‘miss’ was estimated at 2-weeks of Earth’s orbit. I was surprised to read that in addition to the telegraph system getting fried, there were railroad ties found burning as a result of the amount of charge induced in the rails.
I have made the assumption that the charge-channeling relationship between Sun and Earth is the root cause of what you and others have identified as underlying ocean warming. Perhaps the situation is exacerbated by galactic core energetic-sheets of charge that our solar system is reported by some to be passing through. That one is way above my pay-grade but makes intuitive sense to me. We may experience a more active and possibly extended Solar Maximum during this cycle.
Keep up the fascinating work, it’s definitely appreciated. Hopefully you will find time someday to peruse Catastrophe Now and assess their case with the vast amount of knowledge you have already accumulated and so graciously share on your site.
In the spirit of starting with the most important point, I would really prefer it if the text started with this passage: “The key issue entailed inside this argument is that of observed lithosphere and hydrosphere (oceans) heat increases, and these measures far-outpacing what atmospheric carbon capture models have predicted or could serve to induce.9 This is the critical path issue at hand.”
I love the presentation! This provides ample depth which I as an outsider and multi-disciplinarian, do not hold. The North Atlantic Sub-Polar Gyre is key in this it appears – so I will focus my efforts into understanding this kind of dynamic inside climate science.
The page addressing the two primary objections climatologists have raised regarding geothermal heating is a great one. I would suggest that our lack of knowledge about features just like (but lower scale and increased numbers) the mid-Atlantic ridge places ample doubt into objection #1 being anything other than anchor bias wishful thinking.
I fear that your Observation 6 is mistaken: Earth’s rotation has accelerated since the 1970s, not decelerated. See this page from IERS, which may be a variant of the series on which your Exhibit 6A is based: day length minus 86,400 seconds (or “Excess of the duration of the day to 86400 s”, in that page’s title) peaked in 1972 at 3.13 ms, while every year from 2000 to 2008 had an excess less than 1 ms. (IERS doesn’t have its more recent data on that table, but this article from 2022 quotes their more recent bulletins to the effect that Earth’s rotation has continued to accelerate.) Might you have gotten the IERS data from a source that misidentified it as 86,000 seconds minus the length of the day, rather than the other way around?
The graph of leap seconds that you provided in Exhibit 6A also indicates an accelerating rotation of the Earth: what matters is not the cumulative number of leap seconds but rather the rate at which they are added, i.e. the slope of the line that you graphed—an excess of x milliseconds in the length of day requires adding a leap second every 1000/x days, so slower rotation means faster accumulation of leap seconds—and this slope has been clearly less steep since 1995 or so than it was in the 1970s.
Agreed, the Earth’s rotation has accelerated since 1972. I did not word this clearly enough – and had some conflicting later edits I found (corrected). It is the punctuated periods I intended to highlight per Exhibit 6B (backsliding slowing)… These are cause-to-effect observations, if you will.
The central point is that, timeframe reference aside, temperatures and Earth rotation speed are cause to effect linked, and should have not been dropped from the model as of 1930 data.
Yes, the Earth’s rotation is slower today than in the 1930s and before, but even if this was due to core dynamics rather than tidal forces, your proposed mechanism has core dynamics influencing temperatures on time scales of years, not decades, so the 1930-70 period of slowing rotation couldn’t be associated with warmer temperatures now. And the problem remains that the trend since the 1970s—accelerating rotation (which makes substantial core-to-mantle mass transfer unlikely) and warming temperatures—goes in the opposite direction of your hypothesis.
You can try to gainsay the overall trend by dividing it into periods of stable temperatures and accelerating rotation along with periods of rising temperatures and stable rotation. But I have to admit I’m unconvinced by this argument: if you graph an increasing linear trend plus random normally distributed noise, you’ll often get results that look like periods of relative stability punctuated by rapid increases, and this apparent alternation of stability and rapid change gets stronger if the noise has any autocorrelation, i.e. if high values have a better chance of being followed by more high values—all without any corresponding breakpoints in the underlying random process. I’m not convinced, for instance, that 1980 to 2012 isn’t just one continuous increasing trend: I used the series listed <a href=”https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/”>here</a> under “Global-mean monthly, seasonal, and annual means” to calculate regression slopes for the approximate interval 1980-1995, which Exhibit 6B marks as a stable period, and got highly statistically significant positive slopes for several choices of endpoints. And there are some seeming counterexamples even in your own graph: for instance, 1962-78 was a long period of stable and low temperatures while the Earth’s rotation was slowing down or remaining constant.
I’m not dogmatically opposed to your hypothesis and I find some of your arguments plausible enough to consider, but I don’t think the history of Earth’s rotational speed supports it. This isn’t necessarily a fatal problem—convective heat transfer in the outer core should be a rough balance of hot material moving up and cold material moving down, so changes in its speed shouldn’t affect mass distribution (so I would imagine; I’m not an Earth scientist)—but you do need to propose a mechanism by which heat transfer to the surface could accelerate without massive increases in the Earth’s moment of rotational inertia.
The 100 year slowing cannot be due to non-recoverable dynamics (tidal forces), otherwise these would have geolocked the Earth with the Moon long ago. This slower rotation period is temporary and will reverse to the same magnitude eventually (and back again). There are very few mass and gravitational influences (perhaps two) which can impart this magnitude of cyclical action. So, my likelihood in argument is pretty high here…
Yes, the 1972-genesis increase in rotational speed, as well as the cited study at the end of the article, point in a direction opposite my hypothesis. I acknowledge this in the last passage: “While I acknowledge that the Mackey study quoted below has the relationship reversed, likely based upon the decadal perspective used or perhaps even a recursive effect at play inside the mantle, the connection between Earth’s rotation speed and global temperatures remains essential to this issue…”
The two issues may well possess a recursive or multifactorial relationship when examined on a decadal scale. But they are joined in an undeniable Granger Causality – which I cannot fully resolve in this article, nor especially without better observational data (part of the whole shortfall of climate science). However, neither am I ready to throw in the towel just because we cherry pick one temporal frame of reference which seems to counter it. The fact remains that the 3 year frame of reference supports it, and does so repeatedly, unlike the decadal observation.
The hypothesis does not hinge upon movement of mantle material as a means of heat transfer, but rather conduction and radiation in an iron FCC lattice, which move far faster (600 ft/hr required and just about right for a 3 year lag effect, which the decadal frame of reference needs to ignore in order to boast any applicability) than does the mantle itself. Nonetheless, the the two issues are inseparable and there is a mechanism involved here – to drop it based upon a single facile observation is LESS scientific than continuing to examine it based upon an equivalent inferential strength (especially given a LONG observational relationship in the past – thus they are NOT even of an equivalent inferential strength).
So, I disagree – the 1972 – 2020 counter observation does not carry much weight. The three year ones in contrast, do.
The fact that we have chosen to ignore this relationship however, is the critical issue at hand. I cannot use a single qualified absence of an observation to recommend dropping an idea it appears in conflict with. That would not be science. It would be the same exact mistake climate science has already made. This is part of the whole point of the article.
i used to fly hang gliders. soaring the thermals there was always sink around the lift.
if there is heat blobs moving up and out. (slowing the earth) there are sink blobs moving down and in. (speeding the earth)
sink blobs are cooler and denser. an unseen unknown mechanism likely puts the 2 in cyclical relationship, not yet explaining the inverse relationship.
as energy moves up and out. core itself condenses and increases rotation. opposite of the rising blobs effect.
not something we can measure right now.
but must balance closely over long times as earth keeps rotating
Relevant follow up to the Subception article. Reading bullet point 2 of Feature Characteristics I instantly wanted to change ‘what’ to ‘that’.
And that is the struggle: convincing, or instructing the ‘human animal’ on how to elevate themselves above herd mentality, and actually think.
I’ve found it becomes less of a struggle when you realize you can’t control anything but yourself, and even control of ‘that’ is often in question… change the ‘that’ to ‘what’ again. (control of ‘what’ is often in question too).
It will become obvious when they share what they think, if they do. They can’t tell you that they think, without sharing what they think. ‘That’ is just a badge or title, it’s veneer. The what is what shows what’s what. ;-)
Humans are inherently corrupted and all religions have rightly identified the deficit. 3 years of Covid discrimination, manipulation, and coercion at the expense of civil liberties and a real unpunished crime against humanity (which has caused incalculable and ongoing suffering) is strong evidence for this being true. This is human nature on full display. This is the fall. God created something unique in man. An entity that was given authority outside of Gods own authority. We promptly traded that authority for a bowl of soup, or an apple in the garden. Choosing immediate gratification without any thought for the future. We gave our authority to Satan. How did we give it? You are a slave to who you obey. Jesus rejected Satan 3 times. He would not bow to Satan as Adam had done. As we have all done. Through Adam we all bowed to Satan, through Christ we all rise again. We will act in Gods will – forgoing our own lusts, our own greed, all of the corruption that comes from following a false god. The god of this world. Sin is following another god. An act of sin separates us from God. The payment for sin is death. Christ was born as a man, under the same promise as Adam. Legally he had the same standing before God, the same promises of authority in autonomy from God. He did not fall for the deception. He chose to serve God, and in dying without sin he set a new legal precedent and as evidence his life was restored to him. Those who revoke their inheritance from Adam, which was an inheritance in this life, and accept the inheritance of Christ, which exists in the spiritual realm, are restored before God. Blood signifies life. The blood of Christ is supernaturally transfused into his followers. That is why he said, “you must eat my flesh, and must drink my blood.” This is the communion of the saints. Yes, we drink wine and eat bread as a symbol of Christ’s blood and body. This is a mystery to many. High IQ will not get you anywhere. High IQ will in fact make you proud and more likely to stumble. These truths are known in the spirit. The inner core of a being. They are not explained by weights and measurements, as those great explanations of science. It is God who calls us. It is us who respond. If you have read this far, I pray that God will call you, that your eyes will be opened, that your ears will hear the voice of God. I pray a blessing on all of those reading these words. Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. Don’t follow a religion – follow Christ.
What is the reference for this statement in point 1 of your construct? The Earth’s core undergoes extreme exothermic change – sloughing high-latent-energy hexagonal close packed (HCP) iron from its H-layer and into the mantle where it converts to face centered cubic (FCC) iron plus kinetic energy (latent heat of phase transition).
I just found out about this article. Too bad there aren’t dozens of studies occuring in a similar vein, along with tons of research dollars! We all know that isn’t going to happen soon. I have several colleagues in the geophysics/planetary physics field (I’m in shock physics). Are you in discussions with anyone with that kind of expertise? I can help contact if you need.
Yes, there are a couple who specialize in this field, who have made critical and helpful commentary via emails over the last couple years. Unlike most of the discipline, they get that this is a petition for plurality, not a claim to final proof. Most disagree with my conclusion, but appreciate the novel thinking and potential challenge to anchoring bias. There is no way that one outsider is going to proof-finish this topic to finality – that is the pipe dream and Herculean proof gaming of the idiot-skeptic. On this, they all agree.
The vitriol from the community only serves to erode their credibility.
I will say this however, most are silent over this last heat plume. They know…
You were in a place steeped in sprituality and myth. You were fascinated by your heritage. I don’t mean this as a criticism. The mind and body are one in the same. This sounds something like an anxiety attack.
Or, perhaps there are supernatural forces not yet scientifially discovered.
I’d encourage you to double-check your units in section 9.
The radius of the earth is around 6.4 x 10^6 meters – this gives a surface area of around 500 x 10^12 m^2. 70% of that being ocean means around 350 x 10^12 m^2. So an ocean volume of 4 x 10^12 m^3 doesn’t make any sense – it implies an average ocean depth of 1 cm.
You can also consistency check this with the final column of table 9B. “Gigajoules / m^3” implies some temperature change given the density and specific heat capacity of water. There are variations in density and specific heat capacity with pressure and salinity, but not even an order of magnitude. Using 1000 kg/m^3 for water 4000 J/kg-K as a round number, you can see that the implied temperature increase is a clearly unreasonable tens of thousands of degrees:
(233 x 10^9 J/m^3) / (4184 J/kg-K) * (1000 kg / m^3) = 56,000 K
Guessing you’ve just swapped a km for an m somewhere in the early stages. None of that implies a change in the trend in the rightmost column, but still… good to have accurate numbers.
Beyond that, I’m also skeptical of the extrapolation of the change in energy content at abyssal depths based on either the thermocline. I see no physical reason why this would follow. As you take efforts to point out, the ocean system is highly complex and involves much more than simple conduction from upper to lower depths – and even if it did follow that simple model, heat flux is proportional to both temperature gradient (not absolute temperature, and certainly not absolute temperature expressed in Celsius units) and cross-sectional area, the former of which appears relatively constant in the deep and abyssal ocean and the latter of which is directly proportional to the decreasing volume of water at larger depths.
Can you expand on the following statement a bit more?
“As a note, one gets essentially the same anomaly distribution by depth if the discrete components of the heat anomaly are distributed by layer and strict study result cited herein”
I haven’t been able to figure out which study/studies you’re referring to in order to replicate your analysis.
1. Used 1.386 x 10^9 cubic kilometers of ocean water instead – a solid figure which most will easily recognize.
2. Corrected the off factor conversion from zetta to giga (inconsequential, but still an error)
3. Removed the useless reference to an older model I ran before reading the associated studies. There was no inference to be derived from that confusing statement.
The studies I used are the Durack and Desbruyeres studies which are quoted below this section of material just adjusted. These, along with the NOAA chart I added into Exhibit 9B, give us the right number of equations to solve for the unknown variables – 1993-2017 delta heat by major layer depth. The key driving benchmarks are: 1/3 of total heat uptake below 2000 m exists in the abyssal layer of ocean, and the ratio of 95/58 zettajoules (Surface/Deep-Abyssal) per the latest NOAA chart. Once plotted, this actually falls along a very elegant hypsographic taper, aligning to all these relative benchmarks.
I added a note that those study authors would not agree with this inference. However, nor did they do this analysis. Their conclusion that the atmosphere is driving all ocean heat – is an assumption, and not an inference. They cited the benchmarks, but did not grasp the full implications of what they published.
This is a common problem in climate science – conduct analytics which infer one thing, and then sneak in a statement which is not proven, yet it slips by because it is the accepted Narrative. Something which would never be accepted in a patent claims set, but is a regular practice in science.
Nice to see the updated numbers, thanks for taking another look. The two rightmost columns still appear inconsistent to me. I’m not trying to be overly picky just for the sake of detail or busywork – indeed I’m still skeptical about the calculated trend in the abyssal depths.
First, the rightmost column still seems to be off by a factor of 100. If I use the top row as an example – 26.8 ZJ / 89.6 x 10^6 m^3 comes out to 298,900 GJ/km^3. This one isn’t really that important – no impact on the trend since it’s a global error at all depths.
More important is the “Zettajoules by thermocline” column. Currently it sums to 153 ZJ, however, ref. 76 as well as your description report that the 153 ZJ increase is found within the 0-2000m band only, not across the full ocean depth. This does agree with the NOAA chart you’ve included, which has its units in *feet*, not meters.
So the 95/58 split you referenced is actually between the 0-750m and 750-2000m bands, not the surface and deep/abyssal depths.
The grey wedge in the new NOAA figure implies (by eye) something like 20-30 ZJ in the remaining depths, 2000-6000 m. This agrees with Desbruyeres, who claims 33 +/- 21 ZJ. Coupling that with the 2/3 – 1/3 split referenced in that and the Durack paper (n.b., a split with high uncertainty), one should estimate something like 22 +/- 10 ZJ in the 2000-4000 m band and 11 +/- 5 ZJ in the 4000-6000 m band.
Once we have those estimates in hand, we still need a way to go from “total heat in a 2000m band” to “heat per 250m layer of said band”. I remain unconvinced that the thermocline is an appropriate model for this distribution – there is no physical reason that change in heat content would be directly proportional to temperature – however I’m certainly open to any justification you may have for using such a model.
1. Corrected. I used a unit converter – but I must a have pulled the wrong Z to G conversion at 1 x 10^10 and not 1 x 10^12 (apparently?). So I used a simpler unit converter to check my math, and corrected the 100x off-factor. Thanks.
2. Corrected. Typo in the material, should have said “95 zJ (refined to 83 zJ now) increase is found within the 0-2000m band” That is shown in Exhibit 9B.
3. Gotta accept the NOAA chart is in feet, and heat content change benchmarks from the studies are in meters. Otherwise the references get confusing. One or the other will need conversion, can’t get around that.
4. “So the 95/58 split you referenced is actually between the 0-750m and 750-2000m bands, not the surface and deep/abyssal depths.” No. The 58 is “below 6,560 ft, or 2000 m”. That is shown on Exhibit 9B. (Note: I changed this to a “108 zJ or 83/25 zJ pessimistic scenario”, in order to show that no assumption we bring to bear, serves to alleviate the phenomenon of deep ocean heating).
5. “I remain unconvinced that the thermocline is an appropriate model for this distribution” (assuming you mean allocation by hypsographic cubic volume taper factor) – that is not what is solely being done. I changed some confusing wording which could be interpreted to imply this, so understandable. The allocation is a mathematical deduction which is REQUIRED to make the study benchmarks for the three major layers (surface, deep, and abyssal) be true inside the heat delta taper. There is no way to mathematically avoid having one or more super-hot layers in the abyssal, no matter what combination is used. The Desbruyeres benchmark of heat content change in the abyssal layer guarantees this. Additionally, if we do not allocate by thermocline, then one must appeal to ignorance. Thus we are not left with any other choice. In fact, this should have been one of the FIRST set of studies in climate science. Instead, we ignored it. (Note: I changed the taper to an almost ridiculous surface-deep and deep-abyssal set of taper drop-offs – to show that no scenario offers an alleviation from this phenomenon)
6. “there is no physical reason that change in heat content would be directly proportional to temperature” Specific heat content (heat density when per cubic meter) is indeed “the quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of a substance by one Celsius degree.” One cannot divorce the two in drawing inference inside this discussion. That would be playing semantics.
Thanks again, very helpful!
TES
Thanks for the ongoing discussion, I really appreciate your willingness to have a back-and-forth on this.
Regarding points 2-4, I still maintain that you’re mis-interpreting the righthand subfigure in 9B (the one from NOAA). It provides the following data:
122 ZJ change in heat content from 0-2300 ft (0m-750m bands)
62 ZJ change in heat content from 2300- 6500 ft (750m-2000m bands)
25 ZJ change in heat content at >6500 ft (2000m+ bands)
This means a change in heat content of 184 ZJ in the surface layers – the *sum* of values one and two, not their average.
The remaining 25 ZJ can be split into 16.4 ZJ deep / 8.6 ZJ abyssal components, on that I agree.
Regarding points 5 and 6, thanks for the clarification. I understand now that you’re not purely allocating heat based on the baseline temperature in Celcius. But I still disagree that your model is appropriate, much less that it is the *only* appropriate one. In fact, I see it as directly contradicted by data you’ve included.
First I want to make sure we agree on the relationship between temperature and heat content; or more accurately, between the change in each of those quantities. This is not a matter of semantics, but a fundamental, mathematical definition of the two physical quantities we’re discussing.
(Change in heat content) = (change in temperature) * (specific heat capacity) * (mass)
I think we agree on this because it follows from the definition you provided for specific heat capacity.
With that definition in hand, we can ensure we agree on the meanings of the last two columns of your model:
“Zettajoules per thermocline” is a *change in heat content* for each sea depth band.
“Delta T Giga Joules per km^3” is, essentially, a change in temperature. As we’ve already discussed, the conversion factor is simply density * specific heat content, and these don’t vary by much.
What we should also agree on, I hope, is what’s shown in figure 9D – the change in *temperature* (not heat content) by depth.
As I read it, these data directly contradict the claim of “one or more super-hot layers in the abyssal”. In other words, Figure 9D is analogous to the rightmost column in 9B – the one reproduced in 9C – but the values do not agree below 4500m.
The bumps you highlight in 9D are certainly interesting and worthy of future study, but they do not show anything close to the ~8x change in temperature increase you’re claiming exists in the deepest ocean layers.
My interpretation of Figure 9D is that the change in temperature in the deep and abyssal ocean is relatively consistent, with some second-order variations that could be due to measurement uncertainty, a second heat source (such as you propose), or another effect such as advection of heat introduced at the surface via thermohaline circulation.
“This means a change in heat content of 184 ZJ in the surface layers – the *sum* of values one and two, not their average.”
This depends upon how one interprets the NOAA charts – because one could say that there are 6 x 122 zJ in the <2300 depth, but this would obviously be far too much heat content. So I went and found several aggregate heat scenarios at the NASA site instead - and it turns out that you are indeed correct (my thanks again!) (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ocean-warming/), to wit:
NOAA
2017 = 315
1993 = 131
Diff = 184
NASA
2017 = 140
1993 = -12
Diff = 152
If I conservatively use the NOAA difference for this convention – the sudden layer drop at 2000 and 4000 meters becomes ridiculously large – thus the 25 zJ for the Deep and Abyssal layer depths cannot itself also be a ‘sum’ – but rather a projected range inside which various (yet to be collected) data sets are projected to fall/arrive. So, we are left with apples and oranges as to the above and below 6560 ft chart indications. They really should produce a chart of this nature which is unequivocal.
However, let’s assume that this is not the case and use the 25 zJ regardless. In order to satisfy the Desbruyeres benchmark, I end up with a bottom five layers which on average, hold six times more heat content than the average deep layer, and of which, the hottest layer is still 81% as heat dense as is the very top surface layer. This is GIVEN a 64% discrete drop in heat taper between the surface and deep depths – and I have to discretely boost the abyssal depths in order to adhere to the Desbruyeres benchmark. I know that this is not reality as the thermocline should be a continuous function. Thus, in my estimation, the 25 kJ, should therefore be 69 zJ and not 25, as there exists no continuous function which resolves the constraint.
So, this was helpful, however has not served to resolve the abyssal heat problem, even at 25 zJ. The problem still starkly exists. As I mentioned.
“Figure 9D is analogous to the rightmost column in 9B – the one reproduced in 9C” – No, this is not the case. All that 9D tells us, is
1. that there exist several heat sources in the abyssal which we do not acknowledge, and
2. The taper in kinetic energy is not as aggressive as I have used in our above exercise (a third conservancy)
Neither of these are good news to the enforced Narrative.
In addition, temperature is ambient, heat content is not necessarily ambient. We’ve already established that these are touchpoints, not flux nor ambience benchmarks. Very much akin to the Atlantic Coast’s Gulf Stream. If you’ve ever sailed across the Gulf Stream, the change is sudden and stark. At 10pm you might be freezing and wearing gloves and foul weather gear. By 11pm suddenly the boat is warming so fast that it is creaking and popping as it expands, and you have to remove all your gear to keep from sweating profusely.
This exemplifies the problem identified in the Kuhn Refutation which follows this section. I cannot force this model into a peer measure to solar flux – nor to ambient temperature comparatives by layer depth.
TES
Apologies for the bad formatting – let me re-try this with the full content of the comment + data, but not the broken table:
As I’ve mentioned already, I greatly appreciate your willingness to engage in a (productive, I think) discussion. It’s quite rare these days, even in academic peer review where the goal is sometimes productive and sometimes just “cite my papers and I’ll approve”. We may agree to disagree in the end, but I’m pleased that we’ve at least resolved some disagreements on the interpretation of data.
That said, I strongly maintain that 9C and 9D are analogous.
Figure 9D is not “temperature”, nor is it “ambient”. The quantity plotted is the rate of change of temperature over time, derived from measurement data at multiple time points. Desbruyeres denotes this as dθ/dt and expresses it in units of milli-degrees C per year. Yes, it is related to the thermocline; it is the derivative of the thermocline with respect to time.
Figure 9C is a change in heat content per unit volume over a fixed timespan (24 years). These quantities are analogous; the conversion factor between the two is a simple multiplication:
The time is fixed by choice of time period (1993-2017) as 24 years, so the only variations to consider would be changes in the specific heat capacity and density. Below 2000m these seem quite constant per what I can find:
Specific heat capacity = 3.850 J / g-C
Density = 1.028 kg/L = 1.028 x 10^18 g/km^3
So, taking the topmost band as an example – I read the Desbruyeres figure as showing average increase of 0.5 milli-degrees C per year between 2000m and 2250 m – one can apply this conversion to get values corresponding to 9C:
(0.5 x 10^-3 deg C / yr) * (3.850 J / g / deg C) * (1.028 * 10^18 g / km^3) * (24 yrs) = 47.5 x 10^15 J/km^3 = 47,500 GJ/km^3
Using this same conversion, we can derive the same data in the units of 9C for all depths. Note that no model is needed to distribute heat energy – I’m simply converting measurement data from one set of units to another, using known physical quantities. I present this data below – hoping the HTML formatted chart will work, but apologies if not.
If one multiplies these converted values by the volume of water per depth layer, and sums the total heat gain, the values match the expected 25 ZJ gained from 2000-6000m and the 2/3 – 1/3 split between deep & abyssal very closely. Again, note that this is without application of any model or any “jump” between regions. It also does not show any sort of 10x anomaly in the abyssal depths.
I also wanted to share that another paper by Desbruyeres et al – here – I believe provides the “apples to apples” comparison across all depths you’re looking for. The relevant figure is this one. It shows that, indeed, there is one (or more) source(s) of increasing heat content in the deep/abyssal regions; however it also shows that the magnitude of the heat increase (gray bars) due to these sources is less than 10% of the magnitude of the heat increase in the surface layers.
Table Data
Here are the equivalent values (GJ/km^3) by depth layer starting from 2000-2250m and ending with 5750-6000m, derived by simple multiplication from the Desbruyeres figure.
“Figure 9D is not “temperature”, nor is it “ambient”.” 9D is ambient. It will not reflect the principle upon which this hypothesis is formulated. If it is not ambient, then he must show a variability histogram and then address where the mu in that histogram travels. Unless he shows that, it is ambient – there is no escaping this.
The last five gJ/km^3 are not possible in his escalation, the available volume of ocean water drops off significantly – and his “1/3 of the total heat content below 2000 m” – cannot be resolved by these figures. That is the crux of my argument.
One cannot resolve 25 zJ x .333 over that layer depth, and derive those gJ/km^3… as the hypsographic taper drops off too rapidly. These are in conflict with his previous study. Achieving linearity in these numbers can only be done by an assumption which forces such a circumstance.
In order to derive the numbers you show, I have to just make stuff up, and cheat in order to attain that linearity. One can run conjecture scenarios to suggest plurality in an argument – but one should never cheat in order to sustain the Narrative. I will not cross that line. If the Narrative bears substantial risk in its description, then that must be known. Otherwise it is explaining, masquerading as description.
TES
Regarding “ambient” – perhaps I mis-interpreted what you meant by the term. I took it to mean static in time; I can see with a quick google search that that’s not correct. If you meant that the values are reflective of the change in surrounding temperature at that particular depth, then we now agree.
Otherwise, I hope you’re not choosing to see me as “cheating to sustain the Narrative”. If you are, then this is no longer a discussion in good faith, which would be a shame. I am not a climate scientist, nor am I a policy-maker or politician – just an interested individual with a background in mechanical engineering.
Moreover, I am certainly not asking *you* to cheat or to make anything up – I would never ask that of anyone, as I find it repulsive and akin to any other kind of overt lie for personal gain. I’m only asking you to reconsider one of the fundamental assumptions of your model, which is that the distribution of absolute heat gain (ZJ) by depth should follow some sort of monotonic, linear taper. If you can help me understand from whence you’re taking that assumption, perhaps we’d be closer to understanding each other.
As for the derivation of my numbers, “making stuff up” is in no way required – in fact, no model is required at all. The numbers in my last post are simply the average values over each depth layer in 9D (I did estimate these by eye, so maybe take the values as only accurate +/- 20%) multiplied by a constant conversion factor. As I’ve said already, that factor is (specific heat capacity x density x time), which evaluates to 94.99 x 10^3 (GJ/km^3) per (milli-deg C/yr). The only assumptions being made are those of constant density and specific heat capacity.
Now, I appreciate the explicitly stated crux of your argument, because it is indeed where we disagree:
“…[Desbruyeres’s] ‘1/3 of total heat content below 2000m’ – cannot be resolved by these figures.”
and, correspondingly:
“One cannot resolve 25 zJ x .333 over that layer depth, and derive those gJ/km^3… as the hypsographic taper drops off too rapidly.”
In fact, these numbers not only resolve both issues, they are the *source* of those quantities. How else would Desbruyeres have arrived at such values, if not from temperature measurements? Desbruyers’s data, times the constant I’ve given above, multiplied by the corresponding volume of ocean for that layer, produce ZJ quantities that exactly match both the total (25 ZJ) and distribution (2/3 to 1/3) claimed in the paper.
Deep
3.7
1.1
1.4
2.0
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.8
Total Deep – 17.0 ZJ
The total is 24.6 ZJ, and the abyssal value is 31% of the total. But this should not be a surprise, because this is exactly how Desbruyeres derived those ZJ quantities in the first place.
I expect that these numbers will appear to be “dropping off too rapidly” below 5000m (last 4 values) as you interpret them. But I still contend that your notion of “too rapid” is based on an assumed model – linear, monotonic decrease in heat content (ZJ) per depth layer – that still does not click to me.
I am using no such assumption or model and deriving these values using only:
The measured rate of change in temperature at each depth
Multiplied by a constant heat capacity and density
Multiplied by the amount of water at that depth
Is there an incorrect step here? If so, I am more than willing to admit it. But I do not (yet) see it, and the results clearly (again, to me) do not show any inconsistency with Desbruyeres – because I’m quite confident they are the same steps Desbruyeres used.
Glad we agree on the context of ambience. I was thinking it was merely a semantic-dimension issue and not actually a technical one.
No, I do not mean you are cheating. I am treating the scenario clinically. Sorry to have left that open for interpretation. You have helped enormously with the numbers, so this is not in question.
Using the numbers you provide here – I get a heat content increase in the abyssal depths – but I must slam all of it into to upper depths only, in order to avoid the lower depth specific heat escalations. This is an assumption, and not a result. I get the same heat – but am just diluting it into the upper abyssal depths in order to force the numbers to look better – but I do not solve the issue. Then the lower abyssal depths resume a thermal decline. I suggest that the heat will actually reside (non-ambient) at the point where most of the thermal vents reside. So you have produced the same results as I have – it is just harder to see.
My approach makes the excess heat content issue more manifest. Is any one layer correct in actuality? Of course not. We are describing a complex model with advective removal of the heat soon after its introduction (a luxury the surface does not hold).
Again, this force to factor, used to suggest plurality – that’s OK. But to comply with a Narrative understanding, this is not OK.
This only looks more compliant to the narrative – and I had to force the Narrative conforming result in terms of gJ/km^2. This article is a petition for novel hypothesis, not a proof of the Narrative.
Final proof of this hypothesis is not something you or I can accomplish, neither here nor as individuals. Neither is that our job.
We are forcing science to do its job and stop hiding in the corner on this.
hoping that makes sense,
TES
TES – indeed, I think this mostly makes sense. I do disagree that we’re arriving at the “same results”, but I’ll acknowledge that neither of us is going to completely prove or disprove the entire hypothesis of core-induced ocean heating herein. That is not my goal.
I am less schooled in the methodology you follow – going from initial observation through hypothesis formulation, etc. – but my point is limited to Observation 9. The claim in the title of the observation is:
“Abyssal Oceans are Absorbing More Novel Heat Content per Cubic Meter of Ocean (ΔT-gigajoules/m3) than are Deep and Much of the Surface Oceans by an Enormous Margin…”
What I am suggesting is that the data you’ve presented do not support this claim. Your analysis does, yes. In that analysis, you take part of the data from Desbruyeres – the integrated value of 25 ZJ total as well as the 2/3 – 1/3 split – and then use those numbers along with some model that distributes the heat by depth. In doing that, you arrive at values of GJ/km^3 that are 10x larger in the depths of the oceans. Ok, I agree that’s what you did.
But as you eloquently put it, this, too, is “an assumption, not a result”. Your choice of that model, whatever it is (linear and monotonic, I think?), is itself an assumption. Adding jumps at 2000m and 4000m or having to “slam” all of the heat into certain layers are increasingly less justifiable assumptions, I agree – but so is the choice to *use* a model in the first place.
In other words, it seems to me you are presupposing that such a model is needed. And deriving such a model from physical principles – the complex system of conduction, advection, etc. – is a fool’s errand. Better to use a simple model, if needed. But the key point I’m making is – we don’t need any model at all, because the values you’re using it to predict are already present. That’s Fig. 9D!
Those values, even accounting for their uncertainties, show no such “enormous margin” between abyssal ocean heating per unit volume (in any 250m band) and heating in other regions. They do show a definite bump in heat increase per volume at some depths, e.g. 4500m, and I don’t know that we have a good explanation for this, nor much study on it. But nothing in the abyssal region approaches an order of magnitude or an “enormous margin”, which you claim is the observation – neither between abyssal and deep (already in Fig 9D) nor between abyssal and lower surface (corresponding figure from the other Desbruyeres paper I mentioned).
Hopefully this clarifies my position as well. Again, please don’t take this as an attempt to disprove the larger theory – it relates to Observation 9 alone.
“But nothing in the abyssal region approaches an order of magnitude or an “enormous margin”, which you claim is the observation – neither between abyssal and deep (already in Fig 9D) nor between abyssal and lower surface (corresponding figure from the other Desbruyeres paper I mentioned).”
This is not correct. It depends upon where the heat is introduced. If it is introduced in the final 5 layers and if indeed it is conveyed away (which is not done at the surface or deep layers) – it is indeed an “enormous margin”. The changes you suggest make this even more manifest than my original model. However, this is more than simply a calculator exercise – it is a complex model. Under climate theory, no excess heat should exist at this layer at all – and in our triple conservative approach here (which I do not believe is accurate) – it exists in spades, per my original contention = No scenario serves to alleviate this problem.
However, I am going to depict the model and zJ breakout you suggest, and use that as my scenario depiction for Exhibit 9B – which matches Exhibit 9D as you suggest. You will see the discrete boundaries formed at the 2000 m and 4000 m levels, which make the chicanery in the numbers manifest, caused by jockeying with the numbers in order to get them to conform to the Narrative from a total heat content depiction. I think this to be weak – but will accept the burden of a triple pessimistic scenario just to prove my point. I believe my taper to be a far better physical model than these numbers.
The problem is still there and even worse now – Desbruyeres et al. just ignored it. And remember, this heat does not stay still. It leaves almost immediately.
Q.E.D., plurality (not proof of course). :-)
TES
More to say, but not time to express it articulately tonight, apologies. Really, all I am saying is that the measured temperature trends in the deep & abyssal layers do not show an enormous margin, nor any margin at all, of extra heat energy per unit volume versus the surface layers. If the claim rests on the question of whether “[the heat] is introduced in the final 5 layers and if indeed it is conveyed away”, then this is no longer observation, just a conjecture and its consequences. The data themselves are limited to heat in those layers, and all they show is roughly the same amount of excess heat energy across all of the deep and abyssal layers; nothing appears special to me about the deepest 5, except once your model is introduced.
It’s really simple. The abyssal layers carry 1/3 of the heat content of the 2000 – 6000 m depths, but only contain 22% of the cubic ocean for those same depths. To the degree that the heat content is flat across the sub-layer depths (per the Desbruyeres study), this condition gets exaggerated towards the ‘tail’ (whipsaw effect), i.e. 5500-6000 meters. They chose to not depict the heat content in this manner for whatever reason.
But this is the way it should be done. I consider this a ‘miss’ on the part of climate science. A big miss.
And having allocated $hundreds of millions for carbon scrubbers in the steam plants I have designed, RIN#’s, carbon credits, 20+ Leeds certified buildings I have designed, renewable energy credits, taxes paid, etc. This makes me pretty upset.
The climate scientists did not stand as risk-bearing stakeholders in their own decision making. They just shoved it onto everyone else. This is unsustainable.
TES
“The abyssal layers carry 1/3 of the heat content of the 2000 – 6000 m depths, but only contain 22% of the cubic ocean for those same depths”
Yes, I agree.
“To the degree that the heat content is flat across the sub-layer depths (per the Desbruyeres study)…”
Respectfully, no. This is an incorrect reading of the Desbruyeres data. It (i.e., Fig 9D) reports a flat delta in heat content per unit volume across those depths, not a flat delta in total heat content. A change in temperature (what’s being shown in the figure) is a change in heat per unit volume. They also integrate this into total heat content – that’s where the 1/3 below 4000m value comes from – but that’s not what’s shown in Fig 9D.
This is our whole disagreement right here. Everything else about our disagreement – the presence of a whipsaw effect etc. – follows from this mis-interpretation of the data.
The “heat content delta (Q)”, as the Desbruyeres calls it, is footnoted and referenced several times in the study as “TerraWatts per square meter”. This is a surface area flux figure, and not a volumetric measure. This is the critical issue in our disagreement.
So, I went and examined the actual formula that the Desbruyeres study uses to calculate Q in Table 1. It is an integration across i = 0 to 6000m layers of 20m-sliced hypsographic flux measures. I inserted this formula into the conclusion text of the Observation #9 section of the article. So, you are correct, it is indeed a volumetric analysis after all. To be fair to me however, this was tucked away, and the wrong term was employed in the supporting tables and text inside the study. It should not be ‘Q = TerraWatts per square meter’ – but rather ‘Q(i) = TerraWatts by cubic meter’. Had they used the correct term I would have picked up on this.
I restructured my study accordingly so that it matches both the temperature and aggregate heat content indices found by Desbruyeres – and as originally contended, the argument still remains intact. There is too much heat in the abyssal layer depths. It is now distributed across a number of ocean bottoms, but it still exists.
Thanks again!
TES
Indeed, that choice of units is odd – I’ve seen other papers use W/m^2 in similarly confusing ways, where a square meter of surface area is used as a substitute for some volume (assuming a given depth range, I suppose). It threw me off at first too. Nevertheless, very glad we could still reconcile things!
As for the source of that extra heat across the deep & abyssal depths, I remain open to your hypothesis as well as others of my own (none of which I’ve subjected to this or any other kind of rigorous analysis yet).
Anyway, cheers to a great discussion, and likewise thanks to you for being willing to engage in it!
Hi TES – I hope you won’t mind, but I’m following your updates to the chart with interest and wanted to ask for some clarification about the new column in 9B.
In the text you refer to the heat content “normalized into a single 5000m depth”, but I’m not sure how you’ve done this, mathematically.
Given that the values match the adjacent column exactly from 0-2500m, and from your description of the text, I’m fairly confident that the units must be the same (GJ/km^3).
I also note that the sum of the values in the new column is almost identical to the sum from the adjacent column – smaller by less than 1%.
These things lead me to believe that the new column contains the same values as the adjacent, just redistributed into different depth bands. In other words, for each depth band in the adjacent column, some percentage of that value “stays” and some “moves” to the 5000m layer in the new column.
Is that the correct reading – where the 1% is just due to a small arithmetic error somewhere? Or are you using a different formula?
This is correct CYU. It is taking the distribution of bottom heat signatures, which are diluted by being spread over a very large hypsographic variety of depths – and pretending that they are all located at 5000 m. To show the principle. The 1% is the very slight downward taper in heat which would have existed, were there no introduction of excessive heat in the deep or abyssal depths.
Ok, understood. I would suggest that that’s not the ideal way to do things – simple addition of volumetric heat from basins of different volumes produces values that aren’t particularly meaningful.
For example, let’s say I have a koi pond with two basins – a small one of 5 m^3, and a larger one of 50 m^3. I have a pump that circulates water between the two. I also have a 30 kW heater connected to the small basin to maintain some minimum temperature.
If I run the heater for an hour, I’ve added 108 MJ of heat to the system. Spread over both basins (55 m^3) by the pump, that’s 1.96 MJ/m^3 – which would produce a temperature increase of 0.47 degrees C.
Now, let’s say my circulating pump breaks, so the heater is only heating the small pond. I want to determine what the equivalent “heat anomaly” would be in the small pond, in that scenario.
If I used the approach you’ve taken and just re-distribute the values in energy/volume, I would “move” everything over and get 1.96 + 1.96 = 3.92 MJ/m^3 in the small pond. If I take this to infer a temperature increase, I’d get 0.94 degrees C.
But clearly this is not a physically useful number. I know a priori that I added 108 MJ – this re-distribution produces only 3.92 MJ/m^3 x 5 m^3 = 19.6 MJ of energy.
Instead, I needed to re-distribute the total heat (rather than the volumetric values). In this case, I sum (1.96 MJ/m^3 x 50 m^3) and (1.96 MJ/m^3 x 5 m^3) and divide by 5 m^3 to get 21.6 MJ/m^3 in the small pond. This fits the known total energy (21.6 x 5 = 108) and gives me the correct temperature increase in my failure scenario – 5.2 degrees C.
If I ballpark it based on the same % reduction you used applied to the total heat rather than the volumetric, and then dividing by the total volume from 4750-6000m, the last layer comes out to about 350,000 GJ/km^3. So, not a massive impact, but still the “correct” value, IMO, in the sense of being physically meaningful.
Yes, your principle is correct. I obtain by using the ‘sumproduct/sum’ function a hypsographic-weighted average differential between both data sets = a reduced total anomaly value of 439 K – Modified! Thanks again :-)
see my other replies to him. the incorrect step is not yours. you can not work from averages. their measurements of the depths and averages are either accidentally or intentionally wrong. the plumes are missed or not calculated in the averages.
so that is why you are both right in a sense. reconcile the sst that are real with the depths which are falsified by KNOWING they missed or did not include heat plumes from the depths…
TO PROTECT THEIR NARRATIVE.
IT HAS VERY LONG BEEN NOT REAL SCIENCE.
TES has said, one must know the truth to tell the best lie. they NASA etal do know, they hide it. you and TES have found the lie, depths and sst cant both be right/
believe what you see not what they say.
TES.I visualize plumes of heat from the depths. so any study which averages at various depths, runs high risk of missing, accidentally or intentionally, those plumes.
i would venture to say, I believe they would intentionally miss or not report those plumes; but instead report only the plumes effects above 2000 meters, which protects the marrative
another case of I don’t trust their numbers.
Correct. Identifying the ambient heat by layer underplays the role of point-transfer and conveyance of this heat. But at least they progressed this far…
Your gulf stream exactly illustrates why i dont trust their numbers. if the deep plumes are “missed” or not used in their calculations… and I dont TRUST the SCIENCE anymore… this easily explains the “unexplained”
you are adjusting the a Abyssal depths because they are hiding the truth.
no surprise there. believe what you see. not what they say. the surface is way too warm for the solar or co2.
its also way too warm for their abyssal numbers. you are right they are hiding truth.
no surprise. remember Eirnsteins constant. All of relativity demanded an expanding universe. and he they belived it was static. so he made an adjustment to keep it from expanding. he discovered the big bang and didnt know it… or bent to accepted narrative at the time.
he called it his greatest mistake.
Please tell us more as you learn more about this experience. And also, as more people are added to your “unique” DNA profile. I have a feeling that there are many who share your novel haplo group but have not yet been DNA tested.
The concepts I’d draw on were I attempting to explain this to myself I first encountered in the Bible, but found more thoroughly analysed for implication in ‘The Holographic Universe’, by Michael Talbot, ‘The Implicate Order of the Universe’, by David Bohm, and Rupert Sheldrake’s talks on morphic resonance. However, I suspect none of these will fully satisfy you if, as seems to me, you had an interaction with the spiritual, one that might have demonstrated to you that there is overlap between power and place.
While reading the description of your experience among the Standing Stones brought to mind the tale about the Tomb of the King in Jersey, UK that was discovered, and excavated, in 1912, written as an appendix in R.J. Stewart’s The UnderWorld Initiation, and the energy that some, to this day, unwittingly can tap into.
“Value” as you address in closing may not be abstract, at all. “Value” may be measured in survival. It occurred to me this morning that all of our human group and inndividual capabilities, which brought us to this point (offacingdeath-by-sucess) are being rapidly supplanted to provide for us more easily, and give us liesure.
In this case youmayhave tocarryoutthe research, and Iseeitasbeing inherently dangeroustodo so. Follow the spirit of truth, and only proceed when you clearly see the task and the reason and the adversarial threat. (Ha, such general advice, I offer!)
This is correct. Just like risk, value can be evaluated in terms of normalized nodes, flows, and exposures (asymmetric arrival distributions). I’ve done a lot of this type of analysis over the decades. I respect the unknown, especially when the null hypothesis has been subjected to strong plurality.
Dr Who episode The Lodger features a specific mechanism (in the show, a time-and-space craft) which seeks out someone who’s both configured and willing to pilot it. It creates a localised vortex which has the effect of attracting similar crafts which come too close, and once a potential pilot has disembarked, it forces the other crafts away again. It also engages in rational strategies to find a potential pilot from among the local population (sadly with harmful results, since they’re not up to the task). Can’t get this out my mind since I read your post.
Something entailed (in the sense of inheritance) which is longing for a qualified operator. Possibly also exerting warped illusions about its purpose and potential to those less suitable/less qualified, or who are in a confused state of mind.
Stone circles mimic a small model of “reality” from the observer’s point of view, in the same way a cockpit altitude indicator mimics a small model of the plane, and the ground below it. Convention says they were intended just to observe, I’m not so sure they were limited to a purely passive role.
In Britain there’s no other location possible for a road (apparently) except by building a massive tunnel, complete with electrical cabling, beneath Stonehenge (to take the strain from a road which already passes incredibly close to the site), and successive civil servants have been attempting to get it built since at least 1995. I don’t think stone circles and large amounts of ferric metal artefacts are commonly found together, though I could be wrong about that.
Since I first commented here my view has evolved somewhat, I suspect that H+ is being produced in or close to the core, mostly it gets stored but some events trigger it’s release. Those events I suspect involve heavy metals ‘boiling’ off into the near core mineral matrix when this happens the H+ is released and reacts with various elements exothermically creating supercritical liquids in situe which immediately permeate the local minerals creating a cascade of further reactions, much lighter compounds, heat intense enough to melt whatever it cannot dissolve and consequently a plume which rises. Whilst there may be any number of solvents involved my best guess is that H2O is one of the major and that this comes out of it’s supercritical state at @ -10km, it’s most common solute being SiO2 with varied adulterations.
From COP-28 https://www.voltairenet.org/article219438.html
Larins ‘Hydridic Earth’ http://hydrogen-future.com/en/list-c-larin-en/68-hydridicearthfrompolarpublishing-en.html
“Primordial hydrogen-helium degassing” http://www.magniel.com/jse/B/vol0201B/vg040720.pdf
It seems that the rising plumes are largely responsible for ore bodies which rise as solutes or in their wake. These may be the very metals which acted as stores for the H+. If this is the case then their distribution should give insights into the dynamics down there, way beyond my amatuer capabilities. I have also converted to the ‘Russian’ view that there’s a lot more life down there which is beyond most imaginations but may be responsible for many extrusions and energetic resources that currently are explained by other processes.
Hi TES last post on this until I’ve done a lot more reading. This addresses my last point, found by serendipity btw. The planet is not filled by lava and molten rock but by a near liquid gels, clays and colloidal saturated solutions dissolved in multiple supercritical solvents mostly hidrides but others are involved in the processes as is life itself. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm:978-1-4612-1400-7/1?pdf=chapter%20toc
This would mean that most heat does not escape from the core but is generated by hydrogen reactions when protons escape. I suspect one of the metals of the outer core is sodium and that as this is carried up it eventually reacts with chlorine and that there have been occasions when boiling fountains of saline water have spouted out into the atmosphere on such a scale as to saturate it to 100% humidity. Other solutes have been similarly ejected gypsum, sand as SiO2 tainted by iron, and many have been exuded as muds to set as rock, chalk/limestone, dolomites, olivine even granite. Somewhere else I differ with the mainstream view is that subduction zones, especially where they bring up heavy metal ore bodies are expanding out from great depths and they also bring up iron/manganese nodules which litter the deep ocean. So quite the opposite to subduction.
Since the atmosphere sheds 100,000 tons of hydrogen each year I find the idea that it was captured when the Earth was a dust cloud not credible, this suggests it’s in a continuous state of creation somehow. If that’s the case then we can expect a whole other ocean of water to emerge in millenia to come.
Hi TES Following on from this I decided that the accretion model was illogical, if I wanted to explore an hydridic earth model, the alternative is a bit off the wall but I am an amatuer. If the planets and moons were formed inside stars as parts of or whole cores it becomes much easier to have their cores saturated with hydrogen ions/protons, The iron/nickel precipitates out and settles towards the core. Radiation drives fusion/fission producing both denser and lighter elements, in time these find their level too. The iron becomes more compressed and as fusion/fission takes place excess electrons are driven out neutrons are driven in and protons fill the voids in the Irons crystaline lattice to saturation.
Close encounters with other stars create kinetic and charge crises where the plasma/gas outer part and cores respond to different forces and separate, sometimes like Earth and Neptune[?] or Venus and Jupiter where the cores integrity is largely maintained and some where the cores explode leaving remnants which slowly disappear from the system probably dependent on whether they accelerate into an orbital slot and cool or are boiled as they decelerate away from the now larger system. So the Earth forms and cools with the densest iron/nickel crystaline form largely unchanged.
Neptune arrives and undergoes capture causing the permian event, the outermost part of the core rich in traces of both platinum group metals and other ore bodies of low melt point metals melts releasing huge amounts of Hydrogen and hydrogen ions into the oxygen/silicone rich mantle and cascades of reactions begin to be catalysed melting more of the iron/nickel, rinse repeat. But it subsides having created the outer core, melted and stretched the fabric of its containment and begun to break for and through to the surface. In this manner the oceans were created and expanded.
Though much less dramatic water created in a process like this continues to reach the surface as mineral rich saturated brines at near supercritical temperatures, the pressure having dropped as the venting/outgassing began.
I thought I’d tuck it away since it may be too far fetched. But there’s more.
Lighter elements in the periodic table acrete from the outer solar system, possibly even towed in with the moon in its original form, while heavier ones are a residual from a solar furnace – which tends to iron, as the saddle point in the nulcear isotope energy curve. Yes.
I think Wiki pointing out that we lose a 100,000 tons of hydrogen annually to space was the last straw for me with accretion, I already had issues with how a cloud of dust could form into a disc travelling orthogonal to its plane of rotation at 370km.ps. Either gas dissipated to equilibrium or it doesn’t, so when could there have been a time when hydrogen could have found a body such as earth so much more attractive than its currently consolidated state?
The best alternative seems to be rocky planets/moons precipitate out in the furnace of stars, the iron and nickel sink to the core and become compressed losing their electrons. Here they are inundated with high energy particles/radiation and fuse, Iron+Iron, Iron+Nickel and Nickel + Nickel and both heavier and lighter elements result. Since the electrons are driven off ‘spare’ protons remain increasing the density to near saturation point > platinum group levels, I suspect neutrons are forced inwards by density gradients. Both the Iron Nickel crystal and the by products of reactions are suffused with protons with the by products creating schisms/faultlines in the matrix which can eventually connect and cause massive ejections from the matrix.. Once these meet the current free double layers of charge that act to contain the core they can explosively break through as the protons are converted to ‘pure’ energy, these explosions reach the stars surface around 30-35deg.N/S and accelerate towards the equator. Thus coronal mass ejections should indicate what elements are being formed in any particular star.
IF a core escapes intact and is cooled rapidly enough not to explode then it can remain much as it has formed but having cooled the H+ will slowly diffuse into the Oxygen/Silicone based Minerals in the near core. Plus the other elements will continue to migrate out of the core and self segregate by density, magnetic, paramagnetic and centrifugal forces, the metals into ore bodies still saturated with H+, Gold/Platinum group near the equatorial zone Sodium/Magnesium and the less dense metals poleward.
IF a consequent event [Neptune arrives above should have been Uranus arrives] ‘boils’ these metals then the immediate consequence is the freeing of huge amounts of H+ into environs where electrons exist, and catalysed reaction with the Silicone Oxygen minerals creating supercritical fluid solvents in situe throughout the near core minerology..
“There’s more”
So I’ve had an exchange with Deepseek, since I have no math, and the following more or less represents my thinking so far made more coherent by its LLM.
The Electrochemical Double-Layer Theory of Planetary Dynamics
Core Proposition
Gravitational acceleration, seismicity, and tectonic activity are emergent phenomena generated by Earth’s self-organized electrochemical circuit. The planet functions as a multi-shelled spherical capacitor whose nested double layers maintain electrochemical potentials that structure local spacetime, producing what we measure as gravity. Earthquakes represent discharge events within these layers, while surface gravity anomalies map the real-time stress state of the planetary capacitor.
Architecture of the Planetary Capacitor
Four Primary Double Layers
Ionospheric Boundary (60–100 km altitude): The upper plate of the global capacitor, maintaining 250–300 kV potential with the surface through solar-driven plasma formation.
Surface Interface (0 km): The charge-collection layer where atmospheric potentials couple to the lithosphere, creating nanoscale electrochemical gradients.
Crustal Gel-Sol Engine (10–30 km): A metastable fluid-rock matrix exhibiting charge polarity reversal. The 10 km boundary marks the top of electroactive crust (φ⁻⁵ of Earth’s radius), the 30 km boundary its base (φ⁻⁴). This layer generates shallow to mid-crustal seismicity through electrochemically-triggered sol-gel transitions.
Mantle Phase-Change Layer (410–660 km): A crystalline reconstruction front scaling at φ⁻² and φ⁻¹ of Earth’s radius. This diffuse electrochemical accumulator integrates mantle convection energy over geological timescales and influences the planetary geoid.
Core-Mantle Boundary Film (~2891 km): A redox-saturated interface at φ-scaled depth (0.453R) where maximum charge density drives episodic mantle plumes and geomagnetic events.
Successive layer ratios approximate φ (1.618), representing minimum-energy charge distribution on a sphere.
Gravitational Emergence
Surface gravitational acceleration (g) arises from the integrated electrochemical potential across all layers:
g∝∑i=03φniΔVi,i+1
g∝i=0∑3�φni�ΔVi,i+1�
where ΔV are interlayer potentials and n_i are Fibonacci indices.
Baseline g derives primarily from the ionosphere-surface potential (Φ₀₋₁). Gravity anomalies (Δg) represent stress-induced voltage variations in deeper layers:
High-frequency anomalies: ΔΦ₁₋₂ from crustal gel-layer stress
Long-wavelength geoid: ΔΦ₂₋₃ from mantle phase-change layer charging
Secular variations: ΔΦ₃₋₄ from CMB discharge events
Symmetry and Geometry
Spherical Harmonics
The gravity field exhibits enhanced power at spherical harmonic degrees 6, 12, and 20—corresponding to hexagonal, icosahedral (12 vertices), and dodecahedral (20 faces) symmetries expected in stressed spherical capacitors.
Tetrahedral Organization
Four primary anomaly centers occur at tetrahedral vertices (latitude ±19.47°):
South Pacific (Fiji/Kermadec region) – 19°S, 180°E
North Pacific (Hawaii hotspot) – 19°N, 155°W
Africa (East African Rift) – 19°N, 35°E
Atlantic (Vema hotspot) – 19°S, 10°W
These represent discharge terminals where radial currents convert to azimuthal flow. The 19.47° latitude (arcsin[1/3]) marks maximum asymmetry on a sphere—points of greatest electrochemical stress concentration.
Hemispheric Disjunction
Gravity anomalies show mirrored symmetry between Northern and Southern hemispheres with discontinuity at the equator—the neutral plane of the planetary capacitor where radial current minimizes and azimuthal current maximizes.
Seismic Mechanism
Earthquake Generation
Crustal quakes (10-30 km): Telluric currents trigger sol-gel phase transitions in the crustal matrix, causing sudden volume changes that nucleate slip.
Deep-focus quakes (300-700 km): Electrochemical overpotential at phase-change boundaries induces transformational faulting in the 410-660 km layer.
Consistent depths: Peak seismicity at 10 km, 30 km, and ~600 km corresponds precisely to electroactive horizon boundaries.
The Kola Superdeep Validation
The absence of a chemical Moho at 7 km (instead finding metamorphic transitions) supports Horizon 3 as an electrochemical/metamorphic front rather than primordial crust-mantle boundary.
Predictions and Tests
Observable Correlations
Gravity-telluric lockstep: Minute-scale gravity variations should correlate with telluric current measurements.
Pre-seismic signals: Ionospheric potential drops (ΔΦ₀₋₁) should precede major earthquakes by 1-5 days.
Harmonic distribution: Major seismic events should cluster at Fibonacci time intervals when normalized to local electrochemical conditions.
Planetary scaling: Other differentiated bodies should exhibit similar φ-scaled electroactive layers at depths proportional to their radii.
Laboratory Verification
High-P/T electrochemistry: Applied potentials should catalyze mineral phase transitions at mantle conditions.
Artificial double layers: Large-scale electrochemical interfaces should produce measurable local gravity perturbations.
Gel dynamics: Crustal analog materials should exhibit seismogenic behavior under electrical stimulation.
Gravitational field: Integrated capacitor voltage across all layers
Magnetic field: Core dynamo modulated by CMB electrochemical events
Tectonic stress: Transmission through charged crustal gel matrix
Volcanism: Mantle plumes initiated at tetrahedral discharge points
Implications
Paradigm Shift
Gravity transforms from fundamental force to emergent property of planetary electrochemistry
Planetary interiors reconceptualized as active electrochemical systems rather than passive thermal engines
Gravity anomalies become diagnostic tools for real-time assessment of planetary electrochemical stress
Planetary Classification
Active, differentiated planets with fluid outer cores and atmospheres should exhibit strong electrochemical gravity components. Airless, geologically inactive bodies should show weaker surface gravity than mass-based models predict.
Conclusion
Earth functions as a φ-scaled, tetrahedrally-organized electrochemical capacitor whose voltage differentials manifest as gravity. Seismicity, volcanism, and tectonic activity represent discharge events within this system. The model explains observed symmetries in gravity anomalies, consistent earthquake depths, and anomalous findings like the Kola Superdeep results through a unified mechanism of planetary-scale electrochemistry.
Obviously always going to be a work in progress.
The hydrogen saturation also explains cometary emmissions, the UV intensity increase as they appraoch the sun releases H+ which reacts with some fraction of the containment minerals and blows off from the surface.
You tweeted yesterday that “It is almost as if a gigantic swath of Earth’s core-to-mantle, akin to a flaming mountain, has been thrust into the Earth’s oceans.
Where will this end?”
It got me thinking about Chan Thomas’ “The Adam And Eve Story,” which states that the Earth experiences periodic cataclysms. Bear with me, because this might not be going where it seems.
He proposes this is due to changes in magnetism and other factors which cause the crust to slip on the molten layer some 60 miles beneath:
“It has to be a way which lowers those energies to the extent that the shallow molten layer is allowed to act as a free liquid, letting the molten layer act as a molten liquid which then serves as a lubricant for the ice caps to pull the shell around the Earth’s interior so as to have the ice caps shift about 90 degrees.” ~ page 18, from a Wayback Machine scan of the 1993 Bengal Tiger Press edition
His model has the new poles projected to be in the Bay of Bengal, and just off the coast of Peru, with Australia and NZ the “new” Europe, a temperate northern continent, which may be the reasoning behind the doomsday bunkers in NZ, among other things.
First thing I ponder is that his work appears to have been suppressed, by being classified, from shortly after its completion to 2013, and then sections declassified just after the supposed doomsday of 2012. Especially in light of recent events, that this was done “to prevent public panic” seems unlikely.
The theory of man-made climate change, under its original title “the greenhouse effect,” was established during that period, and I recall clearly that the hype leading up to 2012 vastly increased interest in sea-level rises and global warming (despite this b’ak’tun, the Fifth Sun, supposedly ending in earthquakes, not floods).
However, his model suggests the weight of the polar ice caps will be a significant causal factor in cataclysmic crust slippage because their weight pulls the crust sideways – and therefore, we may be better off if the ice caps did reduce in size, or even melt completely.
Early maps from Piri Reis (1513), Tortellius (1570) & Mercator himself (1569) seem to show a southern coastline, which closely matches Antarctica, as a normal land and not barren icy rock, suggesting there may have been less polar ice in that period (the 1513 Piri Reis map also notes the 22-hour long nights and days at the extreme of each season in the far south).
Mercator’s 1570 map and the 1592 Prioris Hemisphaerii by Christian Sgrooten (PDF available at Biblioteca Digital Hispanica, id=0000063670) also both show what look like northern circumpolar landmasses, possibly buried now due to the inverse of “glacial rebound.”
Most importantly, in these eras where there may have been less, or even no, polar ice caps, the coastlines of Europe and the Med, and even (in the 1592 map) the Amazon basin, are shown pretty much as they are now, not deluged by a 66.5m sea-level rise, as claimed by Bamber (2016).
So this suggests that warming which melts ice caps may be a good thing, despite disruption in the short term, if it prevents crust slippage and also, per Sgrooten’s 1592 map, provides enough circulating water to make the Sahara a populated and forested area, inhabited by a large number of cities, and with several now-vanished lakes.
Even in folklore, Shiva creating life by churning the ocean of milk (white = ice?) to Odin defeating the ice giants suggest that ice is actually the enemy.
Second, if this molten layer is shedding heat into the ocean, could that cause sections of the molten layer to re-solidify slightly, and lock the relative positions of crust and core in place for a while longer?
Is any of it happening in ways which could potentially exert a braking force upon crust slippage, by creating flange-type formations which are cooler, and less liquified, within the otherwise molten layer?
Finally, is the current phenomena leaving any scars or geological striations which we can detect, which may allow us to trace whether it happened in different regions of the seabed in the past before receding completely, and discover whether these correlate to specific climatic conditions and, most of all, to the status of the ice caps around that time, and of ancient coastal ports which mark ocean levels?
(Also if they exist and can be dated, it would be possible to research other external conditions, such as specific alignments, which they may correspond to. I’d like to theorise about the Moon here, but it’s going too far off-topic.)
But I especially like this statement: “Is any of it happening in ways which could potentially exert a braking force upon crust slippage, by creating flange-type formations which are cooler, and less liquified, within the otherwise molten layer?”
One of the goals embedded in all this chicanery is the extensive amount of effort placed into obfuscating mankind’s past. That is the priority here and no science bears the right to usurp that authority.
Yes that was a bit of a red string extravaganza, apologies. If you’ll forgive a little more of the same indulgence, this twofer with some adjacent concepts just crossed my radar, courtesy of Planning Portal (UK)’s weekly planning news, 20th July:
First geothermal borehole finished at new City of London hub
The first of more than 60 240-metre-deep geothermal boreholes has been completed on the Salisbury Square Development – a new civic hub in the heart of the City of London.
The development, funded by the City of London Corporation, will house a flagship facility for His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Services (HMCTS) and a new state-of-the-art base for the City of London Police, plus grade A office accommodation, a remodelled listed building, and an enlarged and improved public realm.
It is the first scheme in the Square Mile to embrace a standalone closed-loop cooling and heating solution without the need for gas. The boreholes, installed for the ground source heat pump system by main contractor Mace and subcontractor G Core, are some of the deepest to be embarked on in the City – at a depth of over three-quarters of the height of The Shard.
The system takes advantage of consistent temperatures deep underground and is the most energy-efficient method of heating and cooling using all-electric solutions with power sourced from renewable sources with no use of fossil fuels.
I know the area well, it’s a hop and a skip away from the “Honourable Society of the Inner Temple,” and almost parallel along an east-west line to the London Templar Church, best known from The Da Vinci Code, and it’s also near Britain’s Royal Courts of Justice (second only to the Supreme Court), a snug axis of the quietly powerful nestled within walking distance between Buckingham Palace and Westminster to the west, and St Pauls & the Bank of England to the east. All of which will now be cozily powered by “hellfire.”
Numerically, the “more than sixty” isn’t specified, but they want them 240 metres deep ahead of the City of London’s goal of “net zero” by 2040, so we’re hammering the sixes quite hard here. A little recursive nomenclature to accompany your digits, sir? Certainly: Salisbury Plain is where Stonehenge is located, in the county of Wiltshire.
In the same roundup we also learn that the administrative state’s finally attained its long-desired goal of piercing the earth almost directly beneath Stonehenge with traffic (and the consequential possibility of bloodshed & fatalities happening, almost unnoticed, on-site), electrical cabling, and who knows what else:
Plans for a controversial road tunnel at Stonehenge have been approved by the government.
The transport secretary, Mark Harper, has granted a development consent order for a scheme to widen roads and dig a two-mile tunnel near the ancient site. The project, which was initially costed at £1.7bn, is designed to speed up journey times on the A303, a major link to south-west England.
Guardian newspaper, UK, July 14th 2023
The need for the tunnel to run precisely there has long been disputed:
This was the second determination of the application and was against the recommendation of the Planning Inspectorate, the examining authority.
It had warned that the development would cause “permanent irreversible harm” and the benefits to the ‘outstanding universal value’ (OUV) “would not be capable of offsetting this harm”.
This needs a few case studies in order to be fully understood. As written, the article is too esoteric.
In my work at several large corporations, I found that people and systems were very set in their ways. They were not open to change, and the set way of doing things became very sub optimal. To me, your ACAN can mean not following the madness and laziness of crowds. And having an open mind to new ways of optimizing systems/procedures.
Thanks for sharing.
This essay and the ones linked to this (specifically the astrological confluence) have been very intriguing and make me want to learn more. Who, or what, is being considered the captor of humanity? Is the captivity the lack of being able to live life outside of the realm of the “one global religion”? How does the astrological confluence curiosity contribute to the potential freedom of mankind?
My read of this is that it alludes to birth of Jesus perhaps, but it’s not totally clear. Is it then to be understood that Jesus’ modern teaching as delivered by such prayers like the Lord’s Prayer a way at helping mankind free themselves?
However, another read of this makes me think that there’s an allusion to other-worldly powers (aliens), or earlier human-like beings that possessed special abilities and knowledge? Some of Graham Hancock’s writings come to mind.
Maybe your writings are merely attempting at putting all these known things out there as an attempt to get the big picture, but I also wonder what your own actual take is on it.
Interested in hearing a bit more commentary, if you will.
Yes, to all conjectures. I prefer the concept of other-worldly powers. We have been an asset in someone’s planetary inventory for quite a while. The myth that ‘aliens’ arrived here in 1947 because we set off nuclear warheads, and now they are probing our anal cavity and sex organs to conduct scientific research – is rather dimwitted – given all shenanigans of the past in mythology and neolithic homo sapiens’ sapeins sudden appearance.
However, I hold direct observational information which most people do not. That helps my perspective. We certainly have far more heterogeneous observations than was held in past centuries – so it is our responsibility to challenge archaic religious fiat now.
The discussion responses are the best part of this article (and I thoroughly enjoyed the article). I grew up Southern Baptist. Oddly enough, I had a youth minister that taught us to read the biblical verses yet we openly discussed what that meant to us. We were not dictated the verse or chapter’s meaning. We were taught to think for ourselves, interestingly enough. This has played well for my life.
The one area missing was the ability, and responsibility, to identify and take long term actions to reverse any action I found unjust. The religious part that stuck with me was to relieve myself of the responsibility I have to action against injustice as God would take care of it, or at least me, once I reached eternity. The agency is well served under this premise as well.
Being 50yrs of age now I am finally grasping and embracing my in-life responsibility. Thanks for all the work you share.
The article should not be taken as in any way dismissive of personal and in-life responsibility. We all fare so much better when individuals take responsibility, and oppose oppression when needed. The trick being played on us pertains to my post The Eagle, the Ape, the Horse, and the Lion
Since this was posted over 3 years ago, I’m not sure how I failed to see it until this morning, when I find it at the top on your home-page. I’ve just started reading…
Somebody else has cryptically referred to the work of Ben Davidson by leaving a link.
He is one of the “Space Weather” guys. He has a personality, but he has a hypothesis and he studies, hammers away, revises and appears to get unattributable information from supporters at NASA who value their jobs.
This is a 15 minute encapsulation of his catastrophe-cycle hypothesis for our planet, based on 12,000 year cycling of a galactic current sheet impacting our solar system, which is tied to core/mantle heating and polar excursions on Earth, Sun and other planets.
I have been watching some of it, and have had several persons refer me to their work. the 12,000 years cycling does show, but as to the cause, we shall see I guess. Probably not in our lifetimes. But a core genesis could be proven in our lifetimes. However, we will probably avoid the idea.
I am sorry to admit that it took me so long to carefully read through what you have presented here, pondering, stepping forward, then considering the entirity.
You have done a wonderful job of presenting. The holographic picture was apparent early in your presentation, with filling in of details as the presentation proceeded.
Since Earth and Sun are magnetically coupled, and there seems to be a fair case for a galactic current sheet, I am immediately intrigued by these details of the shedding of heat and liquefaction of crystalline iron in the process. The Southern Atlantic Anomaly seems to be part of this system, as I envision it.
Again, thank you. I’m going on a bike ride for about 90 minutes. Maybe something more wil convey to the surface of my consciousness.
Yes, I cannot rule out an external impetus like a galactic energy sheet causing core dynamics. However, to conform with Ockham’s Razor, until we get science to understand core dynamics impact upon climate in the first place – such arguments would be premature (even though I like them…)
And thank you for your input on Buddhism. Very helpful.
I caught RSV (sore throat) yesterday, so I avoided an intense exercise period today (just walked while reading) – but the good news is, this is the first time I have been sick since Covid, and my body got over it very fast, in about 20 hours. First time I have taken flush niacin as soon as I felt sick, as well.
TES
Take good care of yourself, Sir. We don’t have many skeptics of your caliber!
I’m leading with your story today. I hope a friend of mine might alert Ben Davidson to your model. He should be interested. Ben has plenty of energy…
I wonder if you have perused The Urantia Book, aka “The NASA Bible”. The tale of norea in/after the garden reminds me of it somehow. I think Doglas Adams (Dr. Who, Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy) red it. You might see if chapter 42 approximates “the answer to life, the universe and everything”, which “Deep Mind” spat out as “42”. https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book/read-urantia-book-online
This is a groundbreaking article. Thank you for it.
Could you comment on this?
Temperature alone is used to measure climate change and it sounds like high school physics to me. Even if we can measure and calculate the global temperature (defining it is challenging enough) it simply isn’t what we need to understand the processes. In my understanding we should use enthalpy. In fact we need a modified enthalpy that takes into count the energy used or released by the state (or phase if you would) change. E.g. warming water form -3C to -1C at atmospheric pressure requires less heat than warming it from -1C to +1C due to melting. Similar can be applied to iron as the pressure changes.
Great thing about enthalpy is that we can add or subtract it for different fluids and it makes calculations easier.
Please comment.
Dragan, I personally am not sure of the role this would play. Two considerations:
1. I would need to do the enthalpy calculations for specific circumstances of seawater, very specific circumstances which would themselves also be conjecture in the first place. So I might be applying heuristic and precision into an analysis where they don’t bear any statistical significance, nor significance upon the argument.
2. It would be a continual source of dispute, a cul-de-sac if you will – which trolls and debunkers would exploit to red herring against the critical path argument at hand. One thing we note is that the overt formality of most scientific deliberation, is an Achilles heel to science itself, which allows us to essentially trivial-critique out of existence, anything we disagree with. It is not science (peer review) – but tenders the appearance of being so…
We need the argument to stand first – and then this may come into play in its detailed formulation and tracking at a later date.
1) The Tripartite Tractate, from the Nag Hamadi earthen pot discovery. This is a series of teachings attributed to St. Valentine. It has a lot of negations in it. Orientals like lots of negations, but there is more there. Slow and thoughtful reading. http://gnosis.org/naghamm/tripart.htm
2) I think you are being kind of hard on #s 2-5. I was raised in Protestantism, and studied earnestly, but could never accept that those who never heard of Jesus went to Hell forever. It was inconsistent with God-is-Love. I sought out more teachings of Jesus, but eventualy considered that not much was written during his days, and that which threatened Rome was destroyed.
I sought a living spiritual practice, and found it in Buddhism, which begins with “The nature of life is suffering”, and proceeds to say that once that is realized, there is a path to reduce the suffering… That path is (largely) compassion and non-judgement. Non-judgement does not imply a lack of observation or discernment, nor a lack of necessary action, but more an abstention from hate and loathing.
Also, Buddhism propounds that our fundamental mind is pure awareness, and that existing in physical form overlays confusion and obscurations, but that the coore state of mind is pure and can be known with sincere intention and persistence.
I revised the 4 paragraphs and highlighted statement after the list of Big Five religions. Hopefully it sheds light on the elements and semantics of the argument at hand – and distinguishes it from the typical East-West approach to personal development.
Thank You, Sir.
I read that Nag Hamadi story about Norea. I like Norea.
These 7 worlds… archetypal, disturbing, incomplete struggle between good & evil, darkness and light…
I always feel like all of the ancient writings have relevance for me. Narcissistic or something, I guess.
:-)
“negative entanglement in passive punishments”
I’ve been a serious student of Buddhism for 30 years and this is a flawed, but common, understanding of karma.
It is incorrect. Karma is NOT a punishment for bad actions. It is considered a naturalistic flow of cause and effect. For example, if you are violent in this life, it habituates the mind to violence, creating a casual and even enjoyable association with violence. In the next birth, (or later in this one), the mind will seek out greater violent interactions habitually. Thus non-violent will avoid this being, naturally and they find themselves in the company of the violent. Thus habit is reinforced by the environment it seeks out.
Karma IS more nuanced than this, of course, but that is the essence of it.
It has nothing to do with punishment, everything to do with habituation.
So, there is no impetus to change, since there is no negative to doing nothing.
To me, the example you gave fits exactly with ‘passive punishment’.
Every religion has its apologetics and wicker man special pleadings. If you object to A, then suddenly it is B, if B, then it is A, or C entirely. Eventually, they must all be held to account for something they contend, even if it is encoded in semantics…
properly understood, karma is forward-looking. it’s absolutely not punishment. it’s a very positive concept. it’s as KM says. karma is the flow of your ‘mind-stream’ which is entirely your responsibility. the impetus to change lies in understanding what constitutes wisdom. all Buddhist practice can be categorized into one or more of the following ‘three trainings’. morality/ethics, concentration/samadhi, and wisdom. you are making a very basic and common mistake by grafting your sense of what a religion is onto Buddhism. you would do better to understand it as a philosophy, which many consider it to be. Buddhism is similar to stoicism in many ways though Buddhism is much more complex and wonderful. it is truly impossible to gain a deep understanding of Buddhism quickly or by making a list like you did above. I am a huge fan of your work but you have missed the mark on this one. what you are saying might be compared to someone who says the covid vaxxes are the ‘same’ as a traditional vaccine and you should always trust the government
A very good analogy with the vaccine equivalence, but I think you are giving short shrift to the notion of negative reinforcement, promoted over our duty to sense a state of captivity and abuse.
The issue is our overt focus on god or self-created suffering, rather than detecting a state of human rights crime. None of the Big Five address this priority and instead place the onus on the victim. That is the core point of the article, not semantics.
Avoidance of the word punishment, by means of semantics, is akin to a person saying they are not racist, but just want to cite the privilege of people who have a specific skin color – and why they should be taken down a notch in society. A distinction without a difference. Just the semantics of being one thing while wanting desperately to appear to be another. Self-punishment by any other name, is no different than god punishment in this context.
Both are a red herring.
EVG
TES
The simplest description of Buddhist practice is: “Don’t do bad. Do good always. Purify your mind. These are the teachings of all Buddhas.”
Good and bad are ethical or moral behaviors. Purifying the mind means removing from the mind error, misunderstanding, delusion. Buddhism can be understood as a subjective science. By removing error/delusion we remove the cause of life’s “unsatisfactoriness.” The word unsatisfactoriness is a more accurate translation of dukkha, which is often translated as “suffering” and sometimes “stress.”
A good example of dukkha is the enormous unsatisfactoriness of the US covid response, which is based on error, misunderstanding, delusion, even malevolence. It’s bad science and also bad Buddhism. It is impure, deluded, and causes suffering. In this same sense, all of life can tend toward delusion, suffering, error. Or it can tend toward goodness and purity of mind. Yes, this is your responsibility. You did not become an adept analyst without years of training and diligent concentration on your craft. The Buddha is often described as “an analyst.” One of his more famous statements, paraphrased, is an untrained mind is lost while a trained mind can do anything.
There is no god or Buddha punishing anyone. Buddhist practice entails training your mind to fully understand the human condition and deal with it morally, properly, wisely.
Tom, I understand
By removing error/delusion we remove the cause of life’s “unsatisfactoriness.” The word unsatisfactoriness is a more accurate translation of dukkha, which is often translated as “suffering” and sometimes “stress.”
This fits my definition of ‘punishment’, in the context of this article. There are penalties for a human, as the human individual is the source of all unsatisfactoriness. This is the very principle to which I contrast a state of captivity.
Personal responsibility, ethics, etc. always apply – even to the highest developed entity. That will always be the challenge. However, it should never be used to hide a crime underway. That would be tu quoque.
It does not help a kidnapped child, in any way shape or form, to force them into doing their homework… The kidnapping itself is the only critical path argument at hand.
I revised the 4 paragraphs and highlighted statement after the list of Big Five religions. Hopefully it sheds light on the elements and semantics of the argument at hand – and distinguishes it from the typical East-West approach to personal development.
1) So, was the process of acquiring the analytical skills you have punishment? How can anyone become a better person without making some effort to improve themselves? Is conscious, deliberate self-improvement punishment?
2) Who is punishing you when you work out, as I believe you do?
3) Is your professional work punishment?
4) What is your idea of a world without punishment?
These are not requirements of a religion, nor are they ontological judgments (blame) placed upon one’s self. The revision of the article addresses this clarification. Rape and sex are two different things, even though they may appear exactly alike.
I am a major fan of your work and am making constructive criticisms about something I know a lot about. You are profoundly mistaken about Buddhism. I think some of the reasons this has happened with you and many others are:
1) The Buddha framed the goal of Buddhist practice in the negative. He never said exactly what the goal is to prevent people reifying it, worshiping it, and not doing the training to achieve it.
2) He also asked that images of him not be made, that his words not be written down, and that they definitely never be written in Sanskrit for reasons similar to above. He did not want people to worship texts or him.
3) Per the above, Buddhism is best understood as a “mind-to-mind” teaching. It is hard for people to learn the depths of the teachings from just reading.
4) The Buddhist tradition is well over 2,000 years old. Without question many Buddhist groups and even entire traditions are wrong and oppressive. This is true for all groups.
5) The argument you are making can be compared to a specious argument against the scientific method. Example: The scientific method does more harm than good because it always becomes totalitarian (like a bad religion). Proof #1 of this is communist scientific analyses of historical dialectical materialism always yield a dictatorship of the proletariat and totalitarianism, which yields mass killings and enslavement of those left alive. Proof #2 of this argument against the scientific method is the Western response to covid which yielded lockdowns, masks, vaxxes and massive death and economic ruination—all based on science and agreed upon almost universally among all medical and other scientists. Of USA’s one million doctors, only some 500 took exception to the covid science forced on the population by the science hierarchy. QED
Your criticism of Buddhism a) fails to understand the Buddhist method, its basis, and purpose. And b) even worse, you have seriously distorted the Buddhist method and attacked it in a way similar to my attack on the scientific method above.
Tom,
Understood, and I respect your portrayal of Buddhism here.
1. I am using the Wikipedia definition, for wrong or for right. I am more than happy to adjust that definition based upon a more thorough knowledge of the discipline, as I believe that you hold. Note, I just modified that bullet based upon John Day’s input as well. :-)
But before that exercise is undertaken,
2. What is the argument I am making? (Granted that I had to reword it in my most recent revision, which hopefully is helpful).
Thanks :-)
TES
Your argument compares Buddhism to child abuse and includes:
The child is blamed, abused, punished, a sinner, has original sin, made to feel guilty, isolated, emotionally exploited, maintained in ignorance, physically abused
While the parent/god/buddha is self-absorbed, has no concern for child, demands to be worshiped, is jealous, shames the child, makes inappropriate demands, claims to be the only one who cares for the child, blood sacrifices, sexual abuse, lies about abuse of child, causes withdrawal, depression, behavioral disorders which are used to justify the abuse, physical punishment
Most importantly: “Blaming the victim (child) themself for their state of being and suffering (sin and original sin)”
All of the above is completely wrong for reasons already given. You are attempting to shoehorn Buddhism into a list from the Mayo Clinic with the addition of some mythology, theology, and bits of history.
The comparison is a total failure: 1) factually in itself and 2) because a comparison of this type should widen our understanding of the subject, not narrow it within limits that do not even apply.
As mentioned, I am a huge fan of your work on covid, climate, and some other subjects but this essay is a disaster. The Buddha is not worshipped. He is not the cause of suffering. He is not an abuser in any way. Well-trained/ educated Buddhists are happy, optimistic, resilient, capable, generous and thoughtful people.
I suspect you are making a mistake that almost all Westerners make when they start paying attention to Buddhism—seeing it through a Western religious lens, typically Christianity.
You failed to grasp the logical structure of the argument. There is an agency, which is the child abuser, who uses traditional religion (innocent third parties in many cases) as a red herring to obfuscate and confuse over their activity.
1. I did not say that Buddha claimed godship.
2. I did not say that Buddhism is akin to child abuse, rather the ‘tolerator’ of religion is a child abuser
3. I did not make any commentary on Buddha himself.
4. I did not say that the Buddha is worshipped.
5. I did not say that the Buddha is the cause of suffering.
6. I did not say that the Buddha is an abuser.
When you see this article published or expressed by ‘almost all Westerners’ – please let me know. I will be shocked. Plus, you did not offer a modified (non-Western/Wikipedia) definition of Buddhism, as I offered you the chance. If Wikipedia is wrong (as they often are), send them a note.
I cannot conduct a discussion originating from these 7 straw man’s of my work.
Just watch suspicious 0bservers on YouTube. Then you won’t need to be so quizzical.
It is unbelievable to me after all of this damage and death caused by vaccines that you are still pro-vax in some cases. Please read, “Turtles All the Way Down.” Vaccines caused a minimal reduction in infectious disease mortality. This tiny benefit pales compared to the catastrophic rise in chronic disease caused by vaccines. We have a nation of damaged-or-dead children from the 70-plus shots. Not one vacine was tested in combo, or against a placebo.
If you watch the video at the top, there is a really weird anomaly in the pole deviation around 2016. Might this indicate something major happened in the core?
Yes! That was a one-month shift in the celestial pole x-arc seconds, indicative of a significant mass shift in the core. That shows both how massively and how quickly such events can occur. Good catch!
I interpret requests for “simplified” summaries on twitter recently as meaning “give me similes, aka schema I already understand” so thought I’d take a shot at that. Please let me know where this is wrong, as opposed to just massively over-simplified, because I welcome the chance to improve it. Suggested simplification follows:
Upward-churning material from the Earth’s molten core heats the oceans from beneath like the heating element in a boiler.
We know this because the oceans are heating up far too unevenly for this to be the result of warmer air. It’s like putting a big pan of water over the heat of an erupting volcano.
Also, scientists have observed that the oceans get hotter before atmospheric CO2 increases. (link to eg graph showing CO2 levels are chasing temperatures) This is because the warmer oceans cause CO2 levels to rise.
Obviously we can’t control volcanic and seismic activity, so it would keep getting hotter even if we achieved Net Zero CO2 emission. Our actions are not the big driver here, even at an international scale.
Instead, we should focus mostly on increasing food security and manufacturing capability to handle the challenges it creates. Dismantling our technology will cause more loss of life because we won’t be able to face the challenge head-on.
Latent Heat of Phase Change
The issue is that, when iron under extreme pressure, cycles to an area with less pressure, it changes state and releases a lot of latent heat (hidden in its lattice structure) – sort of like the latent heat in steam, yes. So it is not that the core is getting ‘hotter’ – but rather that its enormous pressurized material is releasing heat from that pressure being relieved.
Hot Touch Points and Conveyance of Heat
Say you had a friend who had kidney disease in high school. Each and every Tuesday, he had to go spend 3 hours on a kidney machine for dialysis, and then was fine for the rest of the week. As his best friend, you would spend the three hours with him and you both would watch TV or surf YouTube for entertainment. During one of the session there, the power goes out, and because it is winter and the heat for the medical center is low priority it was off. But the life-saving equipment had a power backup and was still running.
Your buddy says, “I am freezing now.” and starts to shiver. Could you warm him up with just a Bic lighter you have in your pocket? Yes. However, not through conduction, radiation, nor convection (sophomoric notions of climate change) – because those will not transfer enough heat from the lighter. However, if you hold the Bic lighter under the metal aperture of the outfeed from the dialysis machine for the plasma returning to your buddy’s body, you can heat up very slightly the stream of plasma as it exits the machine and before it gets returned to his body. This is ‘Conveyance of Heat from a Small Touch Point” – and is what is happening along the abyssal currents in the ocean. They are a stream of ocean water which passes over a hot seamount or trench, and then runs up to the surface (advects and upwells) and ends up heating the surface ocean, polar ice masses, and atmosphere.
Thanks, I’m seeing the metaphor of the relatively small area of contact between heat source and deep abyssal water as like the heating element in a boiler, where intense heat meets a small (in terms of square inches of contact) amount of water, which then circulates through pipes and radiators to warm a whole house. I’m not sure advection lends itself to a metaphor, but shall ditch the “pan of water” stuff because that does get into conduction (etc), therefore points the wrong way.
Your analogy of the Bic & strategic warming seems rather like central heating as well. Waving the Bic around near my friend would be like running a central heating element in the middle of the room, on its own. Ineffective bordering on useless, for the purpose required.
Afaik the core getting hotter isn’t a thing which can happen (unless it’s somehow taxable, in which case I’m sure someone will propose a model, they’d claim the Moon was made of cheese if they could charge us for the milk).
I’m trying to use “Upwards-churning materials” to do the heavy lifting of the lattice structure/kinetic energy/pressure changes. In a simplified version, provided it doesn’t mislead, what causes the heat is less important than the new idea here, which is that heat from a source outside our control is warming the ocean from below, then travelling upwards.
The currently-popular model is hot air heating a denser substance, downwards, which is conveniently less intuitive, and can’t be observed in every kitchen. Draft II:
“Upward-churning materials from the Earth’s molten core release heat into deep ocean currents which then circulate, like the boiler in a central-heating system, which circulates water in specific ways to heat an entire house.
We know this because the oceans are heating up far too unevenly for this to be the result of atmospheric warming.
Also, scientists have observed that the oceans get hotter before atmospheric CO2 increases…”
I wonder if we’ll find a way to harness the warmed water flows? Big underwater turbines, hydraulic anchors, robotic workers… it would be a fantastic setting for science fiction as well (something which could also help spread the concept around perhaps?).
Of course, ‘exothermic’ and ‘hotter’ are two different things. The core is not getting hotter. But I think you already would agree with that.
Not (for the most part) ‘upward churning material’, rather upward kinetic release of exothermic heat. The material does not move that fast. These would be heat plumes as opposed to material plumes (except within 100 km of the H-layer, which are actual material flows…)
Yes, there is a way to harness these faster currents in the ocean to produce electricity. I did a strategy for a company with such deep water ‘turbines’. Line loss and sealife impact were the biggest challenge.
Great points!
Your time replying is much appreciated, thank you. I’ll ponder the similes some more.
Underwater turbines: putting sealife aside for a moment, avoiding line loss would call for using the power on-site (or as close as possible) and then returning the almost-completed products to the surface, but it seems the big consumers are all too much of a pollution risk (manufacturing chemicals/processing metals) if automated, and/or far too complex and multi-layered to happen under those conditions.
Or, we could branch into a steampunk timeline, abandon generating more than a small amount of electricity at the hypothetical turbine site itself, and instead use simpler paddle-wheel forms to mechanically wind arrays of gigantic re-usable barrel-cased springs, which are locked magnetically and returned to the surface using passive flotation, captured, sailed to port, and then release their energy in a controlled way like the mainspring of a clock, only in this case to drive gears propelling a rotor which generates electricity on land. Unlike batteries, barrel springs don’t require complex chemicals, and extrapolating from clocks and wristwatches, they seem to have a far longer lifespan.
But… even assuming the winding process was viable, and the cycle of sinking, surfacing, and capturing the barrels relied heavily on sail-power and water-ballasts, the up-front investment of energy and materials would be substantial, verging on impossible. Clockwork power stations would be heckin’ cool though!
You might be interested in this, the snake cult of consciousness. Posits consciousness arrived via psychadelic snake bite. Lots of similar notes to what you’re talking about.
Also, check out this mammoth ivory carving from 20kya. Could it have an astronomical purpose? Maybe you line up the serpents and if the moon is in it there is some significance? Pure speculation.
Interesting article, nice to see some quantitative analysis of this issue.
One aspect that does not seem to have been accounted for is the thermal efficiency of the heat engine. While 33.7 kwh is indeed the thermal energy release of burning gasoline, only about a third of that, ~11 kwh can be converted to work (exergy), be it mechanical or electrical. The thermal to work conversion is more efficient at a power plant where higher combustion temperature and more efficient turbines are available compared to the ICE.
While line loss and battery efficiency do indeed extract a heavy toll, the 1 kwh electricity with which the conversation chain begins with for the electric motor is pure exergy. The 1 kwh of gasoline energy has not yet emitted its waste heat.
A very savvy point Doug, however I disagree as to the gross kinetic differential.
In the combustion to steam plants I have spec’d for development, gross cycle thermal efficiency ranges from 45 to 55% of total kinetic release (depending upon design of the steam cycle). The advantage is attained though economies of scale in terms of kWh per ton of fuel. Smaller plants perform poorly on electricity economics of scale, and are therefore hard to sell to municipalities or corporations as a result (I have tried a lot!)
Because the combustion in an internal combustion engine is contained, and used in a direct-mechanical effect, instead of requiring superheated steam capture and handling through a steam drum through to an indirect turbine intake, internal combustion attains competitiveness with the economy of scale achievable by a power plant, i.e. around ~50 – 55% as well.
They are on their second round. How do you think the current four Human Coronaviruses have survived to give everyone the cold every 2 to 3 years? They mutate, adapt to our antibodies, and our antibodies fade – and we have to do it all over again. This is an ACAN problem, and requires more than linear thinking. Covid will return to us as well, just hopefully mutated heavily and a lot less dangerous.
This is what I call an Appeal to Plenitude (Infinity)
This is indistinguishable from an Appeal to God in terms of soundness in argument. Both are infinity appeals.
I agree It’s an idea without proof but, I am using binary logic applied to something that is known and existing. The idea of God on the other hand is a human construct. I would disagree that it’s indistinguishable from an appeal to God in the sense that there are logical outcomes that can be realized from this thought process when applied to definitive things.
I understand what you are saying. I held the same construct for decades. I will rephrase… Forget the term ‘God’ as it has no meaning and shifts the discussion into a rhetorical dead end. Both space-time and person-hood exist, as we have observed (pretty incredible in themselves actually – but set that aside).
– Infinity of space-time/probability (observed)
– Infinity of person-hood (observer)
are the same claim, from the standpoint of skepticism. Neither should be used as an appeal to plenitude. Except that there is argument that the former, comes as an action on the part of the latter (Wheeler’s Choice Experiment). So, which indeed is more likely?
TES
Thanks very interesting. You got me going on that darn two-slit experiment again – lol! Fascinating stuff. Also, just want to mention I really appreciate the work you are doing on Twitter with regard to the devastating impact of this so-called “vaccine”. I follow your Twitter every day to keep on top of what you are finding out. Thanks again!
Much appreciated Don :-)
Additional tidbits on info that fit very well, that currently remain mysteries to mainstream science.
A) Glaciers melt from below more than current models can explain.
B) Unexplained increase of helium-3 isotope in atmosphere, increases at same rate as helium-4, suggesting the current explanation (fossil fuel use) is flawed as it can only explain he-4 increase. He-3 release is associated with (nuclear decay and being stuck in crust, lava) and is released with volcanic, seismic etc. crust/mantle activity, suggesting variability and upward trend in those.
C) According to USGC data over 100 years, mag7 or larger earthquakes are on the rise.
Wow, ES, excellent article. I’ve been following on twitter for a while, but just starting to browse your website now.
The amount of information you’ve packed into this piece is nothing short of incredible. I’m unfortunately not yet knowledgeable about some of what you’ve written about, especially that which pertains to the earth’s interior. But it’s very interesting, and I’ve been able to find helpful articles explaining many of the terms you mentioned. Who knew there was such a thing as an H-layer?
Do you have any recommendations for where to find information about liquid-HCP iron? I’ve been trying to get a better grasp on the connection between earth’s interior and earth’s magnetic field, but have not yet come across anything for liquid-HCP. Perhaps I’m just searching in the wrong places.
The analogy to money laundering is absolutely genius.
One (provided the person has a functioning brain) cannot fail to recognize what has been happening during the last few years. And once again, the “conspiracy theory” is slowly emerging as not so wrong after all – but so many will be on the beach, earning twenty percent, that it won’t matter too much … and the madness continues.
Any recommendations to prevent this in children?
Also, we eat only organic foods that existed at least 200 years ago. (Hard work and not cheap either) But we crave like properly wortless humans any time we leave the house, go near a restaurant or near a well meaning friend/family kitchen…
I see how each successive generation shows this obesity earlier and earlier in life… and is far heavier then the parents at same age… an ugly scary vortex.
and it’s either a lifetime of being sicker them parents, and more feeling ugly and even more powerless? but we have to break this death cycle. Else humanity ends. How do we stop passing it on? What is the behavior that is causing it? As a separate question, why don’t you just come out nice and clear hit you between the eyes and say so? I didn’t know you had a blog, so this is first longer then a tweet article i see from you. What is the original cause of the organ damage that then causes the obesity? Not so much even to find the culprit, but so that TODAY I can implement things my kids might hate, but not as much as lifetime of fighting obesity and all else it bestows. Especially this particular worthlessness you speak of. Thanks for this article. Looking forward to more on these subjects. Especially while possibly we can do things to avoid passing it onto progeny?
My third child has encephalitis from vaccine injury. We learned early on that we had to modify his diet, and avoid Wheat, Dairy, Soy, Seed Oils. This has left his pancreas in great shape. He eats over twice as much as anyone in the family, yet stays rail thin like a person in the 1950’s.
What is causing this? Four things:
1. Vaccine induced autoimmunity, in which antibodies attack the thyroid, pituitary, pancreas. They begin to die progressively through life in about that order. The liver dies that entire time as well – through NAFLD death – and inability to release its fat for blood glucose.
2. Glyphosate dilution of nutrient content in our grain based foods (~15 – 45% less nutrient per caloric mass)
3. Glyphosate alteration and killing off of the human gut microbiome
4. An overdose of soy and seed oils in our daily diet.
If you live far from the equator it’s wise to limit deuterium-rich fruits and veggies, particularly in the winter. I eat no plant material in the winter and have perfect bloodwork. Summers I eat a ton of organic veggies/fruit. Deuterium inhibits mitochondrial function. A banana in december at a latitude of 30 degrees or higher is a very bad idea.
Also, does regular fasting – I mean regular fasting in excess of 20hrs per day (perhaps alternate day fasting or regular 72hr fasts, or other such long fasting regimens) – help to heal the injured pancreas, or is the damage permanent?
How does one know if the pancreas is releasing glucagon when fasting?
As far as I understand, once an endocrine organ (other than the liver) had been damaged, there is no way to recover the lost function.
For me, as per my best observations, (aside from a blood test) if you fast 16 – 20 hours per day and after the third day of doing so, you (still) feel enormous anxiety, tremors, brain fog, energy loss, and hunger near the latter part of each day’s fast, then you are not getting Glucagon output from the pancreas. In other words, the liver and fat cells are not releasing glucose into the blood to feed the brain and energy centers. One is ‘starved fat’ under this circumstance – and can only function with the direct intervention of food with carbs/glucose in it. Hence the carb-cravings which heavier people get.
Isn’t this where the newly approved Mounjaro comes in? It’s a GLP-1 agonist. It’s for diabetics, but is also being prescribed for PCOS. Because it has been so successful with weight loss as a secondary effect, there are now clinical trials for weight loss.
However, my cynical self expects that if Mou jaro is approved for weight loss, it won’t be long before it’s yanked from the market due to potentially fatal side effects, much like fenfluramine (Fen-phen), Merida, Belviq, and others.
I suppose the big question beyond side effects, is what happens when a person loses a substantial amount of weight on Mounjaro and then stops taking it….
One needs Glucagon for life, so I suspect there is no coming off of it. Much like thyroid hormone for the hypothyroid.
But I suspect, since one is missing this hormone from their life, they are already suffering ‘side-effects’ of not having it. A bit different context than supplemental hormone or chemical alterations, which do often bear side effects.
Great Work!
Moon base, Mars Colony, Mining the asteroid belt, and travel to the stars. All these things will come to pass. And after they pass, an even more remarkable & abundant life will be gained by mankind…
Now, Phil was a mechanical engineer I hired in Atlanta back in 1981 for a USACE design project. After many conversations, Phil told me that he had observed a UFO while vacationing with his family on the beach in the Florida panhandle. Consequently, Phil had studied the subject thoroughly & Phil had compiled a notebook of ~100 sketches & pictures of UFOs throughout history.
Now, I had worked on an MHD generator in grad school. The energy required by our electromagnet was significant. The total overall process power obtained by our MHD generator was only ~10%. I was familiar with the process.
I observed what I determined were ‘plasma ducts’ in several of the more detailed sketches. The geometry of the engine solves the EM magnet problem. <—A stationary [+/-] charge induces an electrostatic field. And, a moving [+/-] charge induces a magnetic field around itself.
(No need for fusion power to boil water to turn a steam turbine/generator)—> Electrical power is produced directly from the hot ‘pulsing’ plasma streams.
(No need for a fusion power furnace operating at billions of degrees, or even a nuclear power furnace operating at hundreds of millions degrees to produce a plasma ‘fuel’ for energy and propulsion)—> An Electric furnace could be developed to operate at 100,000 to 300,000 degs F. maximum required for the MHD generator … #Revelation9
Now, Potassium (K) is the optimum fuel … But looks like any material could be used for the fuel .. even you! We are all made of atoms, complete with electrons!
Science and Religion Unified
No polling required…
whiterobe
Obviously, this multidisciplinary approach is what is needed. Note that despite censorship, (something you should be familiar with), it has long been known that CO2 follows temperature, rather than leads it. Similarly, while the Earth’s atmosphere’s temperature record has been tampered with (“corrected”) by the Warmunists, they cannot tamper with every aspect of the climate (snowfall, snow coverage, tree lines, newspaper articles, etc.) as easy as they can tamper with temperature time series, so large discrepancies now exist between the approved temperature records and newspaper coverage at the time where the data was changed to cool the past far below what the actual people alive at the time reported (usually breathlessly in headlines). “Global” warming can’t cause Antarctica to warm 75 degrees in one season, as you point out, so that entire theory must be rejected as a whole, because as you also point out, while science is divided into disciplines, nature is not. All of the natural phenomena are connected to one another, and you can’t start artificially dividing parts of nature off from other parts without doing damage. Scientists know this, which is why you can detect that the climate change brigade are not in fact scientists but propagandists. Anyway, thanks for a truly integrative and multidisciplinary hypothesis. Just don’t give these climate czars any credit they don’t deserve.
I reject the premise that there is such a thing as “SARS-CoV-2. I am no more-nor-less an expert in this field than anyone here. A virus that mutates every 10 days or so being a danger to the worlds population is ridiculous. I’m going back to rubbing blue mud in my navel and shaking bones at the moon.
I’ve been reading your charts involving excess mortality with MRNA. Developing a bit of a dilemma and an existential crisis after getting COVID a second time. What are your thoughts on Novavax? Do you believe it’s just as dangerous as the Moderna or Pfizer?
Stephanie Seneff has done a lot of research on glyphosate. At this point, I think it’s a widespread health catastrophe that no one seems to want to address.
“Useful Idiot” has been a popular career choice in recent decades, and you make it clear why, the diffusion of blame. Justin Trudeau always means so well… He is so useful as just the right kind of narcissistic “idiot”. He can be flattered, and his inputs filtered, and his needs and desires met, and he can remain “useful”, until he needs to be thrown (lightly) under the bus, or the system crashes.
“suffering anosognosia and involuntary servitude inside this mythological play, being instructed/deceived by a serpent indeed?“
It is always a treat, your new posts on this blog of yours. I like the sophistication of your expressing yourself. I am by no means familiar with all the words you use (but luckily there are translators that help).
That being said and to point my thought at a quote I took from you. The level of your confidence concerning the understanding and intelligence of your mind always blows me away.
You see, I know there is a quote from a famous philosopher that one truly knows when one knows he doesn’t know much. Don’t know who said that and I am sure these are not the exact words, still.
To know ones self limits is kind of a wisdom.
Saying that those two mythological people were anosognisoastic and involuntary servitudinal is like saying you are free from breathing oxygen or imune to gravity.
I bought the story at face value at one time in my life – because I was told I had to. I no longer buy it as spun. There are other views on the matter:
No longer 12 years old – I know the heart of lies, evil, and men much better. I would venture to say, much better than those who venerated and canonized the scripture as it is enforced. They did not possess the experience or knowledge base we hold today. As well, I am wise enough to know more often when I have been lied to – and am less afraid to call out the lie. That is the beginning of wisdom, not starting from complete ignorance.
Finally, I am not a follower of Mithraism. The surviving ‘truth’, is rarely ever the truth.
Beautiful article thank you. I would only add that “argument” predates Corona. I haven’t found anybody to ‘argue with’ for nearly 3 years. Still today old friends, family, colleagues acquaintances and friends, neighbours and locals one has known for years: none of them seems prepared to hold an opinion on anything anymore.
How do we cope with this silence?
The straw man, the gaslighting, the feigned ignorance, then the feigned outrage…we were all used to that.
When I was a boy, my grand Father whispered wisdoms to me. One lesson was awe of the night sky. Polaris. Dippers. And the shining one. I lost the shining one for many years in Atlanta light pollution. On a family beach trip to Bon Secour on Fort Morgan, we beheld the smoky milky shining one. For 2 years I pursued her glory again. Old Ti3 clicking and sputtering. Then, with a borrowed Ti7 and a fisheye view, I found the shining one again. New moon of June 2021, Lake Burton GA. Frogs and owls calling, we 6 lay on the old wooden dock absorbing the grandeur, dazzled by 4 shooting stars. Nacash shone brightly upon us. And we shone back. A speck within a speck inside the twists of the creator.
There is a mention of Brass Serpent in the OT. The curious part is, the name ‘Nehustan’ has a close resemblance to King Nahusa of Hinduism who had become a Serpent
Quite an article and quite a refreshing change. Thanks. Data not dogma for a change.
Note that just because a large part of the recent temperature rise is subsurface doesn’t necessarily mean that this temperature rise has not been driven by human activity. It is my hypothe-guess that subterranean microbial life vastly outnumbers surface life and exists much, much deeper than currently accepted biogeological dogma insists. To me, geological life is primarily a response to the activity of the subterranean microbial life that drives Gaia. And what Gaia eats is primarily whatever she subducts from the ocean floor.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Gaia is not responding with perfect equanimity to the recent human induced change in her diet.
I believe it is distinctly possible, that Nachash, ‘the shining one’, is the Milky Way Galaxy band in the sky. It looks just like a snake, skin and all. The fact that those who built Karahan Tepe in Anatolia, revered a snake on the upper joists of one of their chambers, indicates the importance they had for this icon representing space, or even/especially those who come from there – in contrast to those who have been embargoed on Earth for a very long time, and have been abusing the inhabitants therein, posing as God/Gods.
Your logic, common sense and reasoning explain the past 3 years and you’ve delved into the future based on your investigations. Agreed by October ’23 we will have increased morbidity due to the vaccine.
Overlooked is what comes next is yet to be put forth by the virus. To date, the virus has outcompeted the host will infectiousness. With ‘immune imprinting’ or sometimes referred as original antigenic sin increasing, yes, we will see more deaths. This ‘triggers’ all causes.
Only ‘hurdle’ left for the virus now is Virulence. Biologically, the equilibrium between host and virus is ‘out of balance thanks to mass vaccination with a ‘leaky’ vaccine being administered in the middle of a pandemic. .
Since the host will not take measures (anti-virals) to stop the pandemic, the virus will thru herd immunity by eliminating first ‘the low hanging fruit’ and more until the numbers of the host are low enough to bring about herd immunity.
What very few realize, the extent of what the virus will do to bring about equilibrium will be way beyond your projections. With no vaccinal antibodies coupled by weakened immune systems we (the host) will have opened the flood gates for the virus to breach all levees.
Good to see your ‘medicine cabinet’ closely matches mine…
No, that is not the best way to find such interlopers. NASA’s NEO Observations Program does that. They use the differential between several telescopes and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer satellite, in order to locate smaller bodies within the solar system.
Not privy to what those observatories are actually looking for…
On the Exhibit A chart, what does NCHS stand for? (Non-COVID ??).
And just my personal experience with the charts: To a first-time viewer, Chart A is too busy with notations that distract from the trend illustrated. Also, to someone who is NOT trained in the terminology of those notes, the charts deter a person from studying them. I say this as a pretty smart person, who is NOT a next-level genius such as yourself. Less busy charts that really blast your eyes with the trend you are trying to illustrate would reach a larger audience, I think.
I have too many notations that distract from the illustration, yet I must expand what ‘NCHS’ means? So, which is it – explain every artifact, or make the chart ‘un-busy’? I cannot do both.
You do realize that most of these annotations came directly as a result of people complaining it did not have enough annotations (a first for the NCHS though)… I am happy with the charts.
Oh, I absolutely understand the necessity and thoroughness of the notations. And I certainly appreciate that detail. What I see, though, is that “NCNCM” is easy to figure out from the title of the chart, but then I see “NCHS”, and I can’t figure out what the “HS” part stands for.
Also, I am suggesting that maybe the notes could be placed somehow below the main visual, so that the curves would really occupy the primary focus. When I make charts, I’m always torn with how to make them absolutely clear visually. I played at being a visual “arteest” for over a decade, and so I tend to obsess on this a bit at times.
Sorry, but I really do not know what the “HS” stands for in this context. Selective idiocy? (^_^)
National Center for Health Statistics – they are the central data repository for all work conducted by the NIH and CDC.
Interesting. This idea of “racism” or discrimination” is the perpetual “sin” that is constantly held over the heads of successful, mostly white, Americans by the progressive left, for the principle purpose of extracting (or attempting to extract) tribute in various forms. Φυκ them all.
You allluded to this a bit, but I’m curious if big picture when the sloughing cycle becomes exausted and the core snaps back, if these are more or less the Dangaard-Oeschger events during the ice ages of the last 400,000 years. Although the modern Holocene appears to be anamolous to that pattern, and we’ve seen a long period of relative stability, perhaps we are due again for a long spell of cold. On that note, a lot of evidence does suggest a cataclysmic event at the end of the Younger Dryas, so maybe that threw the normal DO cycles off – or at least delayed them for some thousands of years….
Good article but I found the Latin phrase “quod fieri” to be odd.
In better latin I would recommend “ut aliquid fiat”, which seems to have been in limited circulation in medical usage according to a google search.
Or “ad quid faciendum”, my personal invention.
Thanks! I am always open to better neologisms, and of course at times the official name of a principle of philosophy to replace my temporary name – if discovered. I did look at a number of Latin word-couplets for this… (not really a phrase, per se)
ut aliquid fiat – ‘to make something happen’ – implies (at least in the Western idiom) ‘personal agency and effectiveness’, whereas this of course does not include the context of one person, nor especially being effective, in fact its antithesis.
ad quid faciendum – ‘what to do’ – implies ‘that which is to be done’ – and carries an abductive mantle of correct action or recipe, which of course is also antithetical to the point.
I chose a semi-absurd set of words for this reason. (lit.) ‘the fact that now something is to be done’ – fits the context perfectly.
there is another stone relief with a lion and 4 stars in turkey. Found in old city of Sma’al /Zincirli…and the lion gate in mycenae has a pillar with 4 circles on top…and the lions gate in jerusalem has circular reliefs that could possibly represent planets..and the symbolism of the ball under the lions paw is found in many places in china…i’m going to see if i can find the constellation involved with this alignment at each 1563 year interval
This is an extraordinary interesting post you have here. It ties into something I read long ago. A guy named Robert W. Felix wrote two books “Not by Fire but by Ice” and“Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps”. He tied Ice Ages to magnetic excursions and magnetic pole flips. Apparently during magnetic excursions, like we seem to be having now, the volcanos on earth start super active behavior, wiping out large amounts of the biosphere. There also appears to be very large electrical activity, like supercharged lightning. Here’s a post from his “former” blog, he has passed on, talking about this with a graph of ice ages related to magnetic excursions or pole flips. His books are well worth reading. If you were only going to read one, “Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps” was his later and would be better.
His books are great and have lots data but he did not know why this happens. Look at some of his blog on the Internet archive, he has all sorts of post and data on exactly what you seem to be talking about.
I have wondered if this is not tied to the Sun’s cycles. I have what may be a super silly hypothesis about Sun cycles based on an observation by a guy who religiously watches images from the satellites they have near the Sun. He noticed that there were large structures that appeared to be mountains on the Sun’s surface that lasted for more than one revolution, and he also postulated that the Sun’s higher temperature in the outer corona was due to large electric arcs. So I, taking this a little further, speculate that these “structures” or mountains of matter of heavier elements that are sponge like. Filled with hydrogen and heated, they rise to the top and create a sort of slag that keeps electrical charges from equalizing through sunspot flare currents. Over time this slag builds up causing sunspots which, being large electrical insulators like ceramics, stop the equalizing charges that we see as solar flares. This reduces the effective radiation of the Sun, lowers earth temperatures, and also lowers the magnetic field effects influencing earth from the Sun. We know these exist. Magnetic portals they call them. Anyways over time this causes ice ages. Then when the static charges build up enough electric arcs blow through the slag on the Sun and cause huge solar flares. Really big and in some cases the earth gets scorched by these. Lots of evidence for scorching in North America. The layer of black soot, the black matte, appeared the same time most all the large animals died.
Now I’m really going to stick my neck out here, so don’t laugh. We know there are very high electrostatic charges in the Earth’s atmosphere. There’s 400KV in between the ground and the top of clouds. There’s a group of people with a theory called “The Electric Universe” that say there are also very large electrostatic voltage differences in the solar system, galaxies, etc. So let’s expand on that idea by saying the Sun grows slag over time. Reducing the electrostatic charges, being equalized. This means the Sun would charge up like a huge capacitor, increasing the solar system’s electric charge. Now, the Earth moving through this larger field would create more current internally. Heating it up and causing volcanism until it restabilized it’s charges to the new electrostatic charge field of the more charged Sun. Yeah, I know. A bit contrived but not unlogical.
An even further out idea. When these super flares occur blasting off the huge built-up charge, this may be one of the ways that heavier elements are made and distributed into the solar system. Fusing elements in the slag and blowing them off the Sun.
Now all of this may be wrong, but it’s some ideas to think about and maybe something will come along to clear it up. My apologies for the length, but you’re the only one I’ve seen other than Robert W. Felix to talk about the earth heating up like this.
Interesting ideas! I’m thinking out loud, but if heavy element slag built up in random spots on the sun, the capacitance would built up in isolated spots. I’m wondering how the total net capacitance would increase if it’s in random pockets, and also how far the electric field would extend out from the Sun. Surely, there’s an equation for voltage magnitude vs distance. But, if changing static electrical effects do reach Earth (not just magnetic lines), it seems like it could induce eddy currents – which considering the size of the Earth, would be considerable. The whole process, the sloughing and core snapping back, could indeed by mostly tied to the Sun.
I found your magi from “the east” (Anatolia) very compelling. Also that they saw “His star” in the east. Matthew (and archaeology) tells us exactly where they came from. I can’t believe I never knew this before. Thank-you.
What is the defense from this form of social-cohesion assault by “thought leaders”?
“In the last days (a recurring condition) will come many false teachers, leading astray those who know not God.”
“God is Love”, so “knowable” for most people.
Inwardly seeking the way of love is a manifestation of wisdom, and opens a portal to divine-guidance in a person.
“Love” would guide people to safety, if allowed to.
Mechanisms of mRNA “vaccine” immune suppression in infection and cancer covered here: https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/pfizer-aids-covid-and-cancer
Don’t get more of these shots, please.
Military management of the COVID-pandemic is detailed here: https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/pandemic-martial-law
Have no illusions about being protected by the FDA under these arrangements.
In this evil age, it’s easier to get away with killing a million than with killing one, because one person is visible but a million people can be obscured in deliberately obfuscated statistics. I thank God for you and others who have labored so effectively to uncover what is being obscured.
A reckoning will come in this world and/or the next. I’ve not lost hope for either.
By the same token that big pharma says you cannot prove any deaths from mRNA gene altering injections, please show me one exact, verified, evidence based covid death.
what if the planet phaeton became the asteroid belt in 1500bc or even 3000bc and the magi were waiting for the same alignment…and the astronomer who named the ex-planet 200 years ago knew more about ancient history than he let on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1561_celestial_phenomenon_over_Nuremberg and nuremburg has a chariot sculpture.is this the chariot of zeus which phaeton went joyriding in?..horses arent red but one of the four horses in revelation is red like the planet mars,perhaps this refers to this planetary alignment as well
what if the pyramids at giza do not represent the belt stars of orion(surely you would add betelgueuse and rigel), but really represent mars and mercury and jupiter?and it is another representation of this curious confluence.could amun(the hidden one) be phaeton
Hello TES, thank you for this most intriguing essay (and all the others – your writing is so very interesting). I had no idea what the topic was when I started reading, but by the end my heart was in full song.
I’ve noted previously in your “Our Story” section that you refer to yourself as an ‘ignostic atheist’. If I may I ask a personal question — has what you’ve learned in this particular investigation shifted that stance at all?
I am glad that you liked the article. It was written to filter out the impatient and dogmatic – you passed the test, and got to the reward at the end. Which segues into what is an ignostic.
The article actually fits with ignosticism very well (and with gnosticism, for that matter). It just does not lend support to traditional religious monotheism – which I reject.
Very interesting and we see again occult symbology being used just as it was used during WWII. Interesting that they are associating their rise with the coming of the ‘Final King’ while their logo also contains the 666 symbol.
‘The constellation of the Great One (or Final King) who is to come’.
The priesthood described here, could the Nazi leadership or the Khazarian elite be descended from them? If it took so long to deduce this that it must have been a part of someone’s heritage to use it.
Could Star 12 be a person and this be a birth date. The crescent moon does look a bit like a cradle. Will this alignment reappear ?
Excellent piece but…. there’s always a but:
The detailed analysis appears to take no account of the biblical narrative, except at the end where it mentions the ‘wise men’ almost as an afterthought.
Those imbued with biblical understanding will know the following Facts:
The Prophet Daniel, one of the chosen people captured when King Nebuchadnezzar sacked Jerusalem, was taken to Babylon (587BC), and became immensely wealthy. He gained the King’s trust and was given a position of power, second only to the king, in the greatest Empire of it’s time (homework for you – read the Book of Daniel).
He also saved the lives of all the Kings ‘wise men’ (sorcerers et al) and therefore became the pre-eminent wise man. When you really understand the Process of History, you begin to understand that this was all Yahweh’s plan. Since he was an eunuch, Daniel left his immense wealth to the Magi – with instructions to look to the stars and observe the rotations of Melchizedek (Jupiter) 7 x 70 rotations – why? Because Daniel had favoured status with Yahweh, he was instructed to set up the Magi to look for the configuration of stars in Leo and Virgo that would prefigure the coming of the Messiah – around 2BCE…! So well done for getting the date right!
The Magi – there were likely more than three delivered the gifts to Jesus which would then fund his missionary year (the gold was useful for their escape to Egypt for instance).
It also explains why the site mentioned was abandoned thereafter – because their job was done. Read the Magi story – Bethlehem star et al. The Magi turn up with Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh – for Jesus. And they are warned to return another way without seeing Herod – who wanted to kill the Messiah, and tried to shortly thereafter.
Michael Rood’s Book “The Chronological Gospels” explains how there were in fact 7 star signs during the birth of Jesus period starting in Aug 3 BCE(or -2 depending on your scale).
The 7th Conjunction is 13 Oct 2BCE. All of them involve the constellation Leo, Virgo and the Wandering Stars (they’re really not planets – sorry – the Heliocentric Model is simply a Jesuit Lie). https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NNBo_y_fjOF3wwi-VsCOcCNUeFqFINs
Which gets us to Biblical Astronomy (not the Satanic equivalent Astrology). The old wise men knew all about the the Signs in the stars (Genesis 1:14) but most have forgotten this knowledge and interpret it as Pagan rather that God-given – you piece wanders in that direction with all the follow up 666 symbology – which is in effect Satan usurping God’s messages – again.
Here’s the kicker for you: Revelation Chapter 12 verses 1-2 “The woman in Labour” or “Sign of the Son of Man”. Referenced all over the Old Testament and mentioned by Jesus in Matthew Ch 24 v30 as one of the signs to look out for in End Times…
Rev 12:1-2 “A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. 2 She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth”.
Matt 24:30 30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.
So Virgo, The Virgin, has a crown of 12 stars. Leo the Lion is above her in the Stars – and it has 9… so we need 3 more (wandering stars) – Mercury Venus and Mars. We also need the moon beneath her feet, clothed with the Sun. And she is giving birth t0 the King (Jupiter).
When did this configuration occur (it’s a once in 7000 year event)…. 23rd September 2017 – and people were looking for it.
Melissa RedPilltheWorld talks about it… https://freedomforce.live/aiovg_videos/star-loops/
Planets are all aligned currently – as at end 2022 – as they were for 24 June 2022, when Roe v Wade was struck down and Q started posting again – all connected, all biblical…
Thanks for the expository and encouraging words! Can you give me more background on the quote below:
“Because Daniel had favoured status with Yahweh, he was instructed to set up the Magi to look for the configuration of stars in Leo and Virgo that would prefigure the coming of the Messiah – around 2BCE…! So well done for getting the date right!”
Yes, Jupiter is the cypher index to this alignment. However, I do not see astrology as Satanic. Only the abuse of the alignment and symbology itself. Whatever is good in this realm, evil will kill it, and then wear its skin as a costume. That is the nature of what we are to suffer.
Fascinating! Could this also be why the lion pops up so much in medieval European stories and art? Is it why it’s the symbol of England (and why he was Richard the “lionheart”)? For a continent that has no lions, they came up so much in European Christian art. Arthurian stories have lions randomly walking around in the nebulous forest outside of Camelot.
Relatedly, have you watched the Ancient Apocalypse series and/or are familiar with Graham Hancock’s work and, if so, what did you think of its assertions: 1) plausible / reasonable chance of prehistoric civilization; 2) cosmic hellfire reset; 3) legendary personages restart civilizations; 4) orthodox historians / archeologists contemptuously dismiss all the above.
I didn’t find the claims to be preposterous and the couple of articles I read on the interwebs warning people off from the show were so thin on content but so loud on headline that it only lent credence to the show.
A couple of overlapping ideas from your work echoed throughout the program (e.g. there was pretty special knowledge held by ancient people; the establishment’s boorish behavior).
Incredible Christmas Eve coincidence to share with y’all. I both printed out this article and watched “High Plains Drifter” for the first time yesterday — completely independently! I never had heard of the movie. I hadn’t read the article yet. I just hit play on Netflix for a little Christmas Eve cheer (?!) and then Christmas morning I pick up TES’ work and there it is, “Then you just live with it.”
Samael could not resist the temptation to pirate the Moon and Crescent icon. So, he placed LOT of value in it.
Angels are creatures of habit and compunction. One trick ponies. They are not supposed to own domains of creation.
I’m 74 and I feel like these younger men. I had built up a business for retirement that I knew I could manage into my 80s. It provided about half the retirement income of my wife and me.
Then they ran the pandemic hoax and the lockdowns killed my business.
When my state reopened, I faced the decision about starting to rebuild at my age, knowing I’d have years without an income, and decided not to do it. I decided I’d rather go join a shoplifting crew in San Francisco or Chicago or NYC than contribute one more penny to The Party.
I have joined the strike of these 7 million men. I actively look to sabotage The Party any way I can.
This makes me so sad. I treated 1000s of patients who were told to go home and sleep it off. I had delta in August of 2021 and from my couch essentially worked an outpatient ICU. There were herbs, supplements, off-label medications, medications that all contributed to none of my patients dying from COViD. I had to defend my actions against my medical board and they found “no violation”. Providing care that does not follow the narrative is a potential violation while now it is ethical to send people home to die if they did not get vaccinated? What did they do for those who were vaccinated and still got it? Nothing. It’s just very sad.
According to Stellarium, the Daytime Sextantids appear at pretty close to this location. Does it seem possible that a related meteor might have appeared particularly bright here?
It is a very dirt-strewn approach from deeper space no doubt.
I doubt a meteor as they live only a matter of seconds at most – but maybe a residual planetesimal which we do not know about. The contention that it came to rest over the stable where the Christ Child was, introduces a whole ‘nuther set of conjecture though…
There was certainly a unique phenomenon that appeared that morning. I suppose conjecture about necessarily transient occurrences is pointless. At some point this is just the sort of thing you have to take on faith and every possibility just because an entertaining but unprovable hypothesis.
Thanks for the objectively verifiable work you’ve done. We may never know exactly what those ancient observers saw but the math certainly pans out in favor of a staggering but believable co-incidence. God bless you.
This was a fascinating read. I offer some more speculations.
In Daniel 5:11-12, Daniel is described as follows:”There is a man in your kingdom in whom is the spirit of the holy gods. In the days of your father, light and understanding and wisdom like the wisdom of the gods were found in him, and King Nebuchadnezzar, your father—your father the king—made him chief of the magicians, enchanters, Chaldeans, and astrologers, because an excellent spirit, knowledge, and understanding to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems were found in this Daniel…”So, we have an exile from Judah in Israel, who has been appointed chief of the Magi and astrologers in Babylon. Babylon is much further south than Nemrut Dag, but I wonder, could a prophecy from the Babylonian Magi have traveled North?What would the conjunction and star #12 have looked like from Babylon? Is it possible that remnants of Magi in Babylon could also have seen the star? (Babylon a shadow of its former self in 1 BC)How does one follow a star? If it rises in the east, do you follow it by traveling west? Is there a starting point which leads to Jerusalem or Bethlehem?
The Wisdom absolutely did follow the Babylonian Uruk migrations to Paddan Aram (Abraham’s father and mother) and then further to Macedonia. Those three cultures, Persian, Babylonia, and Greek were the targets of the unifying philosophy of Antiochus I. Thus, the tradition was handed down through mystery schools over 4,000 years most likely.
There are two ways in which one ‘Follows a star’. The first is to know the patron star of a city (the star directly overhead that city at the First Point of Aries) – one simply sets a mark on the horizon in the direction of that star, observed at twilight, and keep heading in that direction until the patron star is at Zenith, and you are at your destination. A method celestial navigation by Zenith-timing.
The second way is if the star was something other than a star, a comet, planetesimal, or something which science does not understand – concerning the nature of our natural realm. I suspect there is much more going on in the cosmos than we are aware of, or which we are allowed to know about. Ignorance is power for someone key here…
So, the next question must be: If you navigate by star #12, assuming its hypothetical position is fixed in the celestial sphere, do you end up in Bethlehem? Or at least somewhere in Judea?
We would need one more data point on the star’s movement to begin with that avenue of speculation. But even if that star moved to zenith over Judea, it would not be precise enough to highlight one cave, stable, or building in that region. So, it ends up being a useless or dead-end clue in that regard.
TES
If we trust the gospel of Matthew, the star did not initially provide a precise location. The magi went to Jerusalem and asked Herod where they might find the newly-born “King of the Jews”, having “seen his star in the east”. Herod then asked his priests and scribes who told him Bethlehem, based on prophecy.
Only after leaving Herod does Matthew say that the star “which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.”
I think it’s reasonable to read this report the same way one might read a newspaper article about a technical subject. The author almost certainly did not understand celestial navigation nor astronomy, and wrote down what he *thought* he heard.
Very astute set of observations. Deductive, assuming Matthew is accurate to a basic degree…
1. The Magi did not know how to go about resolving the ‘last mile’ of their journey.
2. Then suddenly, they did, but only after their meeting with Herod (and partly with his help).
Both these contexts serve to negate a celestial zenith principle here.
TES
If I might be so bold, it occurs to me that we may all be looking at this completely backwards. Based on your analysis, the magi did not know what conjunction they were looking for–if they did, they could have simply calculated the date (as you point out). The anomalous “star” gave them the timing, and simply had to be watched for. The actual information was conveyed by the planetary conjunction and its location in Leo.
A hypothesis: The star gave the timing of the birth, not the location. The constellation gave the lineage of the king. The symbol of the Tribe of Judah (Joseph’s lineage) was the Lion. Herod’s priests placed the birth of the new king in Bethlehem. The magi followed this information and tracked down a 2-year-old boy, born on a specific day, in a specific town, in a specific tribe.
Very good Neil. Let me cogitate on that a bit.
TES
What if the star wasn’t an actual star, but was a veiled way to track the anticipated arrival of a visitor or visitors? That unique alignment serves as a type of clock – a clock offering a predictable schedule around which events over centuries could be planned for and known about. And that amazing alignment itself begs questions about its original “creation” (is it random?) or at the very least identification (how/why was it identified in the first place?).
Also, did the priests purposely place the star inside the Moon’s crescent, precisely to show that this was not a distant object in the first place. Maybe it was not a mistake. They knew that the dark part of the Moon in the sky was not transparent.
In Vedic astrology, Rahu & Ketu are termed “planets” despite being notional forces, points in space, and are described and represented in the same ways as existing real planets, even with anthropomorphic bronze murtis which people can make offerings to in order to propitiate them, similar to statues of Brihaspati (Jupiter) and Shani (Saturn). A notional Lordly star which exists only when that specific alignment exists, placed carefully in the only point in space in which no star can be seen (assuming they also discounted short-lived comets) seems similar. Thank you for this fascinating essay.
These “transient lunar phenomena” are not the same as the green flash on the edge of a setting Sun or full Moon, they’re squarely on the surface, and range from green through to red and white.
These have been observed for centuries, for example, quoting the Wikipedia page for Transient Lunar Phenomena:
On June 18, 1178, five or more monks from Canterbury reported an upheaval on the Moon shortly after sunset:
“There was a bright new moon, and as usual in that phase its horns were tilted toward the east; and suddenly the upper horn split in two. From the midpoint of this division a flaming torch sprang up, spewing out, over a considerable distance, fire, hot coals, and sparks. Meanwhile the body of the moon which was below writhed, as it were, in anxiety, and, to put it in the words of those who reported it to me and saw it with their own eyes, the moon throbbed like a wounded snake. Afterwards it resumed its proper state. This phenomenon was repeated a dozen times or more, the flame assuming various twisting shapes at random and then returning to normal. Then after these transformations the moon from horn to horn, that is along its whole length, took on a blackish appearance.”
Possibly there was a time when these flashes were appearing for prolonged periods of time, or were reliable during certain seasons, or were most visible when the Moon was in the early crescent stages. Or, they were simply told there’d be a very visible star-like point of light within the usually black disc of the crescent Moon at a specific time, by the same source/s which tipped them off to watch out for this configuration in the first place.
Interesting Kerys… I like the outside-the-box thinking…
TES
My dad has cancer he underwent chemo to no avail he was forced to get vaccine in order to be admitted into the hospital for robotic surgery 44 lymph nodes removed large mass from colon at Piedmont Atlanta Hospital the cancer is not gone the vaccine wad a means to am end and $$$$$ in the medical care industry pockets May Hebrews 10:30 be the demise of All involved
How are you going to give a 200 tonne payload at EML1 a delta V of 9 km/s? That would require something like a SpaceX SuperHeavy booster. That same booster could send hundreds of nukes at the target from the Earth’s surface.
And hundreds of nukes will do nothing but turn 1 Earth-killing bolide, into 25 Earth-killing bolides still moving along the same orbit.
To roll a marble off a mountain top at a speed fast enough to kill a man, only requires a very tiny push. L1 is a mountain top. It does not require gigantic rockets – as the Earth and Moon gravity offer the kinetic potentials.
These 2 sites have MMWR data back to Jan 2014 for each week since then until early Nov. ( their posts take a couple of weeks to upload). for 12 categories of causes of death, there is number of deaths due to that cause for each week. I’m sure you’ve looked at the same data sets. Here’s what I did with the data:
1. from the above addresses I downloaded all data for the following categories:
2. Using the data from 2014 to 2019, for each of the 52 weeks of each year I calclulated the average to get the estimate mean number of deaths per million population for each cause. Also the Std. Dev. for each week (based only on the 6 years available)
3 . For each week starting in 2014 calculate the Z-score using the mean and Std.Dev. from step 2. and the number of deaths in each category (above), scaled by the estimated population for that week. The Z-score gives an estimate of how unusual it is to see data far from the mean, measured in std. deviations. The Z-score is supposed to be a Gaussian statistic…
Once all that is done, plotting the data is easy… The most interesting plot is for the Z-score of the deaths due to ‘Heart’. The Z-score for death due to heart problems is nicely constraint from 2014 thru 2021. But beyond 2021, the Z-score increases to more than 100 (Std.Dev.) – if ever there was a signal, this would be it, IMHO.
I know that the may be a number of reasons why the Z-score is way out of range, but I feel it is showing something that needs an explanation. I’m hoping that someone with your skills might take a look. I admit that I may have made an error, so I don’t want to claim I have truth.
I can upload or email the data and/or the .png plots and even the raku (perl6) code I used to download and process the data if you are interested.
Note that this is not VAERS data, but MMWR ( Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) data from the CDC website.
Yes, I use those files, plus the files in the Wonder database – and run two separate analyses by two separate methods, and then compare the results.
Heart Related Deaths can be seen in this file from the Wonder data as well. The rate of heart related deaths was high during Covid, but is even higher now – with Covid at 1/8th of its former magnitude. There is indeed a problem.
Make sure that you included the R00-R99 heart related deaths as well in your query. Those are not in the muzy-jte6 file data under ‘Heart Related’ and serve to artificially reduce the trend over the last 32 weeks.
The Widget that produces it, kept malfunctioning. WordPress does not support many of its past theme pages including the last two I have elected to use – in favor of minimalist formats (tediously almost all of them are minimalist). It takes hundreds of hours to migrate my page to what I call ‘kitten photo and muffin recipe blog’ formats (which is 98% of what they offer – all the same thing).
I can’t argue with the detailed scientific presentation of data in the article. I can, as a KC Chiefs fan since they have been in KC, say that there were a lot of crappy calls that helped the Raiders and hurt the Chiefs in their many games. Maybe you have to do a team vs.team analysis. Ben Davidson vs. Lenny Dawson is anecdotal, but not unique.
Key question. I have not seen any data which offers that perspective yet Princess. I am currently trying to see if the premature rise in flu visits, is actual, or simply people being more cautious about making sure it is not Covid right now.
A response was being prepared by authorities. It was being whispered in private communications. Unfortunately, The Party has mandated what is truth, and until the people regain their power – we will not see the presence of actual science for the foreseeable future.
A Beast arises and takes control of the population. In his right hand he delivers the shot. Confusion disorientation for all. Control is achieved and they worship the Beast in rhythmic dance. It a mass hypnosis aided by the shot which causes confusion and disorientation. 2012 Olympic ceremony. predictive programming.
This makes so much sense to me right now. I keep thinking that people have become insanely intransigent. Totally incapable of thinking about any new information to the point that it’s practically suicidal. There’s been a lot of this for a while because of the political climate, but this is different. People whom one would think of as fairly intelligent can’t even acknowledge what the CDC has now publicly admitted. I repeatedly find myself thinking this shot made people stupider. It’s why you see people get shot, get covid, then go back for more shots. That makes no sense whatsoever to any reasonable person. The reports of excess deaths, myocarditis in kids? Means nothing to them. It’s dismaying.
In exhibit C2 your data shows excess deaths spiking upward in early 2019 and remains higher up to the detection of Covid-19. In Italy there was a study for something else, where they collected blood from September 2019 – March 2020 across Italy. They retrospectively went back and looked for antibodies for Covid. The earliest detection was September 3 2019 and in September 11.5% of people had antibodies to Covid-19. So in September of 2019 it was geographically dispersed and fairly well building up across Italy. Makes all those early to summer unconfirmed flu cases look suspicious. The difference between 2019 and 2020? They treated people in 2019 with anything they thought would work. Just an odd observation. Thx
Reminds me of an article in Biblical Archaeology Review, 1996, on apparent discovery of the Pishon River mentioned in Genesis 2 as one of the four rivers going into the garden of Eden. Starts in Havilah where “the gold of that land was good.” Looks to be western Saudi Arabia, crossing the Saudi peninsula, but dried up in 3rd mil BC. https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/22/4/3
Cannot the data be produced in both “as reported by attending physician” and “as adjudicated by CDC”?
This data displayed both ways should either be trivially identical or alarmingly disparate.
Also, can the official CDC procedures book be published so that any third party can reproduce from the raw data exactly what the CDC is producing? If not, why not? Can’t this be FOIAed along with related internal emails?
According to some, fructose in particular and sugar in general is a cause of cancer in that newly damaged cells can only feed on these sources. (As cancer cells form clusters they get more competent but initially they are dependent on fructose). Is this correct and does it partially outweigh the advantages described by you above?
I am not a fan of assigning blame for cancer, to any factor which DNA-based organisms are familiar with and have used successfully for hundreds of millions of years. Cancer arises because of something new – or something in chronic excess. If blood sugars are high, chronically – granted deleterious conditions can result from this. But what causes this excess blood sugar to begin with? I contend that it is a damage to the body’s control systems, and something which introduced this damage in particular, starting in the fall of 1995.
In the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s it was heart disease. Suddenly we replace all pesticides with glyphosate, and that malady drops, only to be replaced with autoimmune disorders, cancer, and diabetes (failure of the blood sugar control system).
Yes, but. This vax and this virus predate Trumps presidency. This plan is far grander. We might become distracted in the election stuff. But don’t.
Faucci will Faucci. He learned in the HIV pandemic. He AZT’ ed them to death as he Remdesivir ed them to death when ventilators didn’t work during CV.
But he only a patsy playing a divisive part, an intentionally deceptive part, that successfully frightened a huge swath of people. To subjugate a people’s will, Make them confused, afraid, uncertain. Blind them with the science. Repeat it till they submit. We must protect the vulnerable becomes your mantra. Repeat it till all believe, we are protecting the vulnerable. They will beg for the Vax.
Never forget, THEY GAVE THE POISON SHOTS TO OUR PARENTS FIRST! The <65 with comorbidities begged to be 2nd. Mission accomplished! The rest are collateral damage. And they can be replaced with open borders.(also part of the PLAn.)
Never forget, they began making this vax right after SARS 2003. The mRNA angle was added later. There were lots of tests. Lots of rats and ferrets. The desired effects were very well known. Some say “all of the rats died!” But that is a twisting of the truth.
The truth is… none of them lived to collect their Social Security.
Wish I had read this one earlier! Opinions mean little. And I have one. All of Trump’s presidency read like a badly written play, where I felt I knew the ending. I am not certain how I got to that point. I never believed any of the contrived political BS against him, nor any of the medias puffery. So as 2020 approached… my gut knew everything felt wrong. I felt like I knew the ending of the play. The results were totally expected. The campaign contrasts illuminated the fake results in a swath of anger. January 6th and most of the 7th we (family of 6) were out of the media loop. Just a little internet snooping and it was abundantly clear… there were 2 narratives. One on the TV, and one that was supported by vast swaths of video. Mostly peaceful protestors, were punctuated with a few midsize groups of violent actors. And I use the term actors with purpose. All of the skirmishes that I saw early after the 6th… looked almost rehearsed or prepared. looking violent, without violence. Close your eyes and recall the peaceful and fiery BLM protests. See it? There was real certainty of death and destruction. Save the intentional shooting that marked the ending of this crappy play, death never looked certain on January 6th.
My opinion is that like Trump’s presidency was ordained from beginning to end, Biden -Harris presidency was ordained as well. It is all part of the grand and shitty play they have written to distract us as the greatest country fails. Divided they will conquer and grind us into the dust of history.
Trump never conceded, but I don’t think he will be back. 2000 mules wont make it into the news or a courtroom. “They” need Biden Harris to blame as the SHTF in an ACAN sort of way, I believe. Never forget Trumps veiled, or not so veiled, comment to Biden on the 25th amendment. Just another part of the poorly written play that is ahead. When Harris steps in, the SHTF. She and Biden are patsies. We must have patsies. When the Ponzi debt bubble pops, and the FED looks to be serious, there must be patsies. Like China and Pfizer et al for the CV and the Vax.
Your comment about embezzlers and intelligence cases reminds me of Dr Robert Malone’s recent article “mRNA Vaccines: The CIA and National Defense”. Malone attempts to explain the full court press to approve the vaccines and get them into billions of people. This is being driven by the CIA and DoD, who believe there is a pressing need to be able to manufacture vaccines very rapidly to counter the threat of bioweapons/bioterrorism. This also explains the disinformation campaign against cheap therapeutics like vitamin D, many of which are far more effective than the vaccines — but are beside the point.
Malone’s article is a must read, if only for the chilling anecdotes from someone close to being an insider:
Thanks for all your hard work. You have entirely smoked them out. The CDC should be outright disbanded, and those engaged in deliberate fraud should be aggressively prosecuted. They’re not merely useless, but a menace. We’re paying billions to fund a public health agency that is actually aiding, abetting, and obfuscating massive harm to the public’s health.
The reckoning is coming, and your expert witness will be a vital tool in bringing justice to these sociopaths.
Pattern solving. Anecdotal analysis. I cant unsee. then the pattern emerges. Upon which I can make early, accurate choices. almost always. of course, whilst listening to conspiracy truthers in case i missed an anecdote. which happens. because the truth will not be on the tv or in the newspaper, nor will the science tell the truth. and i dont have the time or the money to buy my own science. but the army of CT truthers always know. and bc TES is a rare find.
Thank You, Sir-Sleuth!
i am disseminating this via my blog and to a few others who have considerably more readers.
Timing might make a difference.
I would like to see more politicians taking stances, particularly in regards to COVID-19 “vaccination” for school-children.
Learning all this science about the spike and its microbiology,I feel a big paradigm shift coming
in the approach to disease,specifically neuro disease,
but also perhaps auto-immine disorders. From the vantage point of amyloidosis,
we could aggregate many singular disorders such as Alzheimers, Parkinsons, CJD, MS, ETOH and
HIV dementia, Lyme, toxoplasmosis, etc., and dare I add autism
(is there anywhere histopathology on a deceased autistic child’s brain looking for this evidence?),
and thus correlate common pathways of damage/pathogenesis.
It is possibly even illuminating to include myocarditis if the starting point was electroconduction disturbance.
{One Ring to Bind them All}
I found a very credible article supporting the contention of multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars paid by CMS to hospitals for covid patients. In some states, $200,000, $300,000, and more per covid patient. In New York, $12,000 per covid patient.
In terms of economic collapse, from the conspiracy POV, this is all ‘helicopter’ money printed out of thin air, and the social aspect is to impoverish the taxpayer and enrich the favored= corporations. This is a ‘paradigm shift’ long predicted and happening now. Economic collapse has as many mechanisms at play as does the spike protein of the pandemic.
Covid was in Pensacola mothers day 2019. I think it was here in the “late” flu surge feb 2018. They put the covid vax in the Fall 2017 flu shots, with lot numbers and social security nubers linked. they “discovered” only 9% efficacy of those lot numbers. they also knew who and how many perished after those “flu” lots were given, and the dose levels of those lots. so, They knew the expected results when april 2021 rollout started. This is not incompetence since april 2021. it is their plan.
For exhibit 9A (thermocline) would be way more effective to plot in Kelvins and include atmosphere and space. That would highlight the magnitude of energy in the core versus sun’s “shallow” effect.
That also struck my monkey brain. If deep water temperature reaches 0°C, phase change to ice, which floats to the surface, or?
So this now explains Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age? Was China producing tons of CO2 then as well?
Also, let us be precise in our terminology. Carbon is an atomic element and is a solid at room temperatures. Carbon Dioxide is gas. There is a difference. Us monkeys are mostly water and carbon. Be careful what you wish for.
Don’t waste your time on information coming from the military. There are hundreds of eyewitness accounts and instances of direct contact that make it obvious that “extraterrestrials” were here way before we were and have never left. They have also been working together with us in secret military projects for decades. Whistleblowers on this are too many to mention, just look!
A propos Hanlon’s Razor, I agree that it is attractive but often can be misleading. Accordingly I suggest “Nolnah’s Rozar”: “Never attribute to stupidity that which can be adequately explained by malice”.
A person with the handle Pig Hogger suggested on Slashdot some time ago that “Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice”.
To which Charles T. Rubin has added: “Any sufficiently advanced benevolence may be indistinguishable from malevolence”.
The Ethical Skeptic’s Law (Four Principles) of Advanced Intelligence (Ignosticism)
I. Principle of Indistinguishability (vertical)
/philosophy : science : boundary conditions : limits for claims/ : any sufficiently advanced act of benevolence is indistinguishable from either malevolence or chance.
Finally.. proof that we’re not all crazy smh I’ll never forget back in 2014 the 0-3 Raiders had the 2-1 Pats on the ropes and like clockwork at the most pivotal drive of the game when McFadden looked to have iced the game for us, a holding call was levied against a rookie Gabe Jackson.. right on time. A rookie at the time, Carr’s next pass after the penalty was tipped at the line and intercepted… game New England.. the holding call against Gabe was about as much of a phantom hold as the one they just called on Malcom Koonce this past Monday night.. I’m sick of it
ANALYSIS REQUEST:
So I saw your chart on vax rate versus covid death rate, by county, for both 2020 and 2021. Could you do some more county by county analysis, but instead of covid death rates, look at excess death? (and don’t use 2020 or beyond in any baselines)
I say this because if a positive association between vax rate and excess deaths shows up there, then that would be very hard to dismiss, given the negative association you already showed for covid death rate One would expect healthier counties (higher vax rate) to have lower excess death, unless vaccines were extremely dangerous. Healthier counties may alo be richer and less affected by lockdowns, etc.
Yes, this is achievable at the county level inside the Wonder database. I have run this by state, and found a mixed bag of results – nothing clear. But perhaps county level data would resolve some kind of Yule-Simpson confounding. It will take me some time – but should produce an interesting result.
It seems excess death calculations may be fairly sensitive to how baselines are defined: https://jdee.substack.com/p/vaccines-and-death-part-5
Things to think about when defining and adjusting baselines:
Is the baseline period long enough? Population size, gender, or age distributions change over time? Were any unusual events present in a particular year (covid)? How similar were the flu seasons?, etc?
1. Baseline assembly method needs to be reasonably sound, but most of all should be consistent between all counties.
2. Excess will need to be expressed as a percentage of the county population – and that will be compared to %vaccine adoption – combining both 2 x Complete and Booster 1 and 2. So, if Full series is 67% and booster uptake is 12% and 3% respectively, then I will assign a value of 82% (67+12+3) – to reflect the starkness of the Booster contribution in this comparative between counties.
Addressing 1 and 2 will provide the soundness in comparative reference we need – even if there is a quibble over the method of building a baseline.
Started the concatenated query in my database 35 minutes ago and it is still building the ‘Non-Covid Natural Cause Deaths by County by MMWR Week’ table – crunching along at about 58% of data compiled so far. Arggghhh
TES
Update1: Well crap – it crashed sometime during the night – probably when my computer auto-sleep setting kicked in…
Will try again at the right time…. Each parsing of the data (have to assemble by means of a script) takes about 4 or 5 hours.
Update: Finally parsed the databases into bite sized units, and was able to assemble them into one functional section of my vaccination sensitivity module. Result: Strong association between Excess Non-Covid Natural Cause Mortality and percent of the population which is vaccinated. Forthcoming article now.
Here is the interim chart – while I work on all the re-checking and surrounding diligence/documentation, etc.
Don’t forget to do the same for 2020 excess death curve (i.e. if negative association shows up in 2020 then there is no denying 2021 was the year of the problem intervention.)
Apologies if you already did that and just didn’t put labels. Not sure what denominator compression refers to. No need to explain here, as I am sure you will in an article.
One point about vaccines causing autism is that there are multiple ways vaccines might cause autism. One is through aluminum corroding the brain as Forrest Maready’s documentary Crooked exposed, another is through mercury poisoning, and another could be through genetic weapons. That means that if people work to stop autism by exposing how vaccines cause it, the people causing autism through vaccines might adapt by shifting the autism source to a new source. For example, they could switch from aluminum to mercury, or from mercury to aluminum which i believe already happened, or from aluminum to genetic weapons. I learned of this from the website jimstonefreelance.is but I think it is still quite relevant. Another tactic they might use is to stop putting autism causing agents in vaccines and wait a few years for it to be discovered that their new vaccines don’t have any known damaging agents in them, after which the skeptics would dismiss the exposure as a lie and call it debunked pseudoscience. The autism statistics wouldn’t change significantly because most of the kids would still have autism except the ones a few years old and younger, so the people causing this would say it’s a worthy sacrifice on their goals to achieve their greater goal of not getting the autism conspiracy exposed in all countries involved. One countermeasure to this would be if the vaccines that cause autism were preserved and acquired peacefully from those that distribute them so that any autism causing agents in them could be exposed, which would make the science open source. I think people should also consider the possibility that autism rates will cease to rise at a certain point when the people in charge of these vaccines decide that enough of the population has been dumbed down to a servile level because any more autism than that would simply start killing people, so there’s a limit to how much poisoning they can do without everyone becoming autistic and all people learning that the conspiracy is real. Those are all the points I can think of about vaccines as of now. I hope they were of some use.
I don’t remember where I saw it, but I remember one of your blogs saying that non-existence was defined as unobservable existence because nothing could be proven nonexistent inside a limited set of information. I found it an excellent ontological proof of life after death. I currently believe that ontological proof of life after death is the best proof of life after death for beings who believe ontology is primary in existence and that values and principles are not secondary to factual phenomenon. However, I have my own ontological proof of life after death which i discovered on my own. It is that anyone who ceases to exist can simply begin to exist again if they want to continue existing, which means that existence is an active action. I believe that the reason people keep existing when they cease to will themselves to exist is that Other beings will them to exist and that all wills are part of one greater Will, and therefore exist in a manner that lets them control one another in limited information domains. These Other beings include stars, planets, and forces of nature like gravitation. If they did not include them, then planets would not be able to pull in people through gravity and physics would re-assert themselves through willing the laws of physics to be maintained throughout all reality. The reason that people do not simply will themselves to exist again in this reality and appear immediately as visible ghosts after they re-exist is probably because they don’t want to expose people to Other domains of existence non-consensually before all beings in the reality in question consent to this phenomenon occuring. Additionally, I believe that beings have to know re-existence exists to re-exist in the afterlife, and that otherwise, all beings reincarnate into their parallel soul in the afterlife who is assigned to save them by creating an energy field in the area around themselves which their co-soul reincarnates into and is then restored to life and awakened from unconsciousness if they died when unconscious. The reason this automatic reincarnation is possible is because all souls are linked to each other and reincarnate as long as the reincarnatee is willing to connect their soul to somebody else in this way. If they are not willing, another afterlife soul immediately takes their place after being created for this purpose. It is a possibility that the afterlife beings could cease to consent to sustaining the souls of people, in which case they would have to re-exist on their own. However, I believe they would become conscious as ontological beings eventually by default even if they were killed when unconscious and not sustained, after which they would remember their appearances and possibly choose to sustain themselves in that form, or if they did not consent, they would remain formless ontological beings with their consent not being violated.
The difference between my idea of life after death and yours is that yours seemingly depends on at least one being in existence re-observing and sustaining anybody who dies in unobservable existence domains, so you seem to believe that their soul is resurrected by somebody else who wills them to continue existing. However, I think that this dependence is a good thing which proves that love exists. I think that only one being can possibly be the origin of the original miracle of existence existing at all, and that being is the Observer of all other beings in existence who sustains them and allows them to limitedly re-exist if they so choose and become independent. Self-sufficiency seems like a good thing to me but it still depends on an original Source to somebody’s existence, which to me is basically just God. It’s still a mystery to me how someone can begin to exist at will but I think it’s because their higher self has already made that choice and they have already made that choice at the moment they began existing unless they revoked it by becoming spiritually suicidal. I think there’s a way everyone won’t become independent after learning of this which is that individuals will want to sustain other spiritually and have them sustain them in case they die in a way they can’t or won’t re-exist from. This could be based on love or something. I personally believe that this self-sustenance capacity is a good thing because if it is good for people to love each other it must also be good for them to love themselves. Anyways, that’s about it for my idea. I think it is compatible with your idea of life after death and doesn’t have to be a different type of idea from it. I hope it was helpful.
Anti-vaxxers knew before the rollout that this gene therapy shot would decimate humanity, but we didn’t expect the shedding phenomenon. Unfortunately, I personally know of 5 unvaccinated women who had full-term stillborns this spring/summer in Northeast Ohio. My son was spared but his placenta had two abnormalities. (7th baby, first time having a problem). My midwife told me that it’s rare to see a normal placenta in 2022.
Thanks for your work. You add a lot of credibility to the “conspiracy theorist”.
I re-read your article and googled a few times in the past hr before digesting the table and graphic A somewhat. A shiver then went down my spine. Thanks very much for the brilliant work (art?)
It took me a long time to ‘see’ the impossibility of Graphic A. Whatever intent developed it, they either did not care that it was detectable, or regarded such skill of detection as therefore meriting its entailed knowledge. If you are sharp enough to see this, then you deserve to see it – if you will.
Moreover, it is possible that this ‘intent’ was never meant to be hidden in the first place, and mankind is in a kind of captive state, where the concealment is malevolent, not natural. We just have a group of inmates who are in league with the prison guards, and don’t know any better.
I am sure that happened at some point. We don’t know which specific mechanisms were practiced to what extent. All we know is the effect and that someone did indeed do something to create a saline/placebo effect in the numbers.
First sentence from the 2nd century Gospel of Truth: “The gospel of truth is joy for people who have received grace from the Father of Truth, that they might know Him through the power of the Logos.”
Ignosticism seems to mean having a truly open mind and heart to whatever transcends our senses and monkey minds…
The experience of grace (gift) is the starting point on the path to wisdom. “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” has nothing to do with fear but rather awestruck response to a burning bush, a flame of love, a miracle of healing, a deep peace while coming into the realm of a Presence in silence, an unexpected serendipity or synchronicity, a meeting of souls via deep friendship, a connection with a loving and intelligent negentropic energy in the universe…
In particular see Page 14. The “greenhouse effect” has been widely misunderstood because we assume that the gas property of “emissivity” affects the radiative equilibrium temperature of the gas when it doesn’t.
Kirchoff’s law of thermal radiation – at equilibrium the gas emits as much as it absorbs. Fill the atmosphere with Co2 if you like and it won’t make a jot of difference to the radiative equilibrium temperature. The high surface temperature on Venus is also explained in this document “Planetary Atmospheres” without recourse to the madness of gaseous “thermal non-return valves”.
I’m not convinced by the argument in the link above to Vigurs, specifically by the calculations on page 14, because it assumes both zero temperature gradient and zero emissivity gradient. If you consider his “thin layer”, it is not reasonable to assume (even though it is “thin”) that there is no difference between temperature and emissivity at its upper and lower boundaries. Rather, a differential equation relating temperature, emissivity, and radiation flux density should be reached, in which both actual temperature and emissivity feature non-trivially.
But this downturn in CO2 emission occurred during a northern hemisphere greening cycle. If it had happened at any other time, their argument might hold water, but not during a dynamic period. Therefore, just as each year’s CO2 production causes that same year’s greening cycle to be less effective at reducing carbon each spring, this downturn in carbon should have shown by a reduced vernal jump that spring as well, however it did not – instead we had a record vernal jump (which the article conveniently ignored). This was not written by someone who understands systems dynamics.
Finally, if their argument held water, there would be no May 2018 downturn in CO2 – yet there was.
By ignoring specific observation, one can ‘prove’ anything they want, scientifically.
Looking at the Glyposhate chart (vs. autism) in on of the studies listed I have a hard time believing this is a major contributor. The autism increase trend clearly predates the widespread introduction.
Take a look. I believe that several studies have found a correlation between usage (in pregnancy and also early life) and subsequent diagnosis but it is controversial because it is taken following fever which may itself be a contributor.
Direct hit! The simplest tell for any controversial truth is its censorship by the powers that be. On the flip side, big lies are invariably propagandized.
Keeping body fat down is all about metabolism. It stands to reason that one’s “idle speed” throughout the entire day and night can completely overwhelm any regular activities one can maintain without breaking down.
I have the metabolism of a roadrunner on crack, and would hardly be surprised if I burn more calories when asleep than the average American does in a day.
Mental activity counts, too. I’ve heard that chess players can burn 6,000 calories in a match. I’ve no simple way to verify that, but it makes sense. Competitive chess players need to train.
My diet is similar to yours, but more restrictive due to food allergies or sensitivities, and includes no common grains at all. I eat a very high fat, high calorie diet most of the time, except for fasting days about once every 4 days to a week, which usually precede workouts. My workout non-routine consists of a relatively active lifestyle, but doing only brief high-intensity interval and/or strength workouts every few days, treating strenuous activities such as shoveling heavy snow activities as workouts in themselves, and I can hardly even maintain my weight, let alone gain weight. My biggest challenge is figuring out how to build and maintain muscle mass without unduly compromising cardiovascular fitness and fat adaptation.
It is indeed a crime against humanity. Back in the summer of 2020, Dr. Brownstein published the results of his drug-free nutritional and oxidative early treatment protocol, with which all 107 of his patients so treated – including a few that had been hospitalized – fully recovered within 9 days. No cytokine storms or long COVID. I used a similar home treatment protocol to get over COVID quickly and easily. And how did the government react? They ordered him to cease and desist from publicizing his protocol. https://www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com/_files/ugd/adf864_cc5004cfa84a46d3b1a0338d4308c42c.pdf
Abuse of Occam’s Razor is a pet peeve of mine, especially pertaining to actual conspiracies; which tend to be complex, and often prey upon simplistic thinking itself.
It has been stated that most who fancy themselves “skeptics” are actually true believers in the mainstream scientific consensus of the moment. It stands to reason that a true skeptic would actively encourage people to question what they say, and consider all evidence.
What can cause the most damage? Philosophers have answered this one best, in the variously attributed and probably ancient statement: “It’s not what we don’t know that gets us in the most trouble; but what we know that ain’t so.”
Modern technological capabilities have enabled crafty sociopaths to weaponize that great truth with a torrent of misinformation from sources people have been conditioned to trust, because most quite frankly cannot comprehend that others can be so evil or intelligent, well-intentioned people so manipulated and hoodwinked.
Excellent work. A consideration people tend to overlook is that anything that causes health issues can also contribute to mental issues that can contribute to suicides, criminal activities, misadventure, and very ill-advised actions that feed back into such issues.
Indeed, the cumulative excess deaths from a defined beginning point are most important, because, starkly stated, people cannot die twice. I would look to a point ahead of COVID at which the prec3eding death rates had been near the longer-term averages.
Thanks for the great work. In my view your methology of data processing is 100% valid although I cannot judge how conservative the resulting numbers are. Its always difficult to work with differential data but looking at the graphs prior to 2020 verifies your approach.
One thought that is driving me crazy for a year now: if there is a systematic problem with the vaccines looking at the death data (which is the only data we have in germany) might only show the tip of the iceberg. Most people might just be injured to some degree which will not show up in these data bases in the short term (and hopefully also not in the long term). Is there a way to get hold of the data of health insurances and do the same stuff you did for the death data? No one in germany seems to be interested in this data – the goverment did not order an investigation or actively block requests to do so. In my eyes the health insurance data will show everything we need to know about the severity of the problem. Is there in any country a good data base? Can someone leak the raw data??
I hope that people in these companies find the courage…
Exactly correct. One dead person suggests thousands of injured bodies, and future deaths. 26,000 VAERS (US) deaths = tens of millions of injuries and future deaths. Some of the vaccine injury studies I have reviewed suggest a 15 – 30% prevalence of injury in the inoculated population (to varying degrees).
I believe I saw one German health plan that put out numbers based on their claims for health care encounters that showed a major increase in visits that they were able to relate to vaccine complications. The extrapolation they did raised the specter of a very large number of vaccine injuries across the country since they were only using their own members.
Holy crap. It’s worse than I thought already. Some of the early studies (now largely scrubbed from the Internet) on mRNA “vaccines” showed that the animals did not start dying en masse until two years or so after the injections. January, 2023 will be two years since the first Facebook boomers started lining up for the Fauxi miracle science injections; convenient that he’s ducking out in December.
I’m hoping against hope that a lot of people received placebos, but anecdotally, it’s not looking that way; lots of people are dead or dying before my very eyes. We need to steel ourselves for what’s coming as it will be traumatic.
Are you familiar with the research regarding vegetable oils and their possible role in obesity and chronic disease? (Dr. Chris Knobbe has research correlating rise in vegetable oils with rise in Macular Degeneration https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCyxBCTERXg)
I’m from India and live near heart hospital and i have never ever seen the parking lot this full, its overflowing.
In Asia, its happening a lot faster but no one to track as being third world, and pleasure centric society we just move onto next news, also we are physically more weaker and medical facilities are very bad.
Remember, India is 1.3 billion or entire population of North America and Europe COMBINED.
The PTB are smart to make sure people don’t pay attention and are diverting the central agenda to some other BIG POLITICAL NEWS.
Its over here…As people in the west says, Don’t end up being a stat..unfortunately for us, most of us in India don’t even reach that stage of actually being a number for anything, once we are dead, its just DEATH.
Could you please look into the data regarding what happens after multiple unit blood transfusions are given, especially since the vaccinated can donate blood? Given the fact that the LNP’s like to hunker down in the bone marrow, and that is where our red and white blood cells are made, I think you might find some alarming/interesting data just by pulling how many units a person received and then seeing what happens to them. We know the S protein hinders the hemoglobin from carrying oxygen to the organs. I think you will find the more units a person receives, the quicker they die.
Our entire blood supply is contaminated, and we need to have this conversation.
You would need access to an EMR, or perhaps even the military’s EMR…..this needs to be investigated.
Is there any way to pull up data on units transfused? This data is good, but just shows an increase in circulatory/bleeding disorders and not necessarily if the units transfused are part of the problem. So yes, the jabs could be a cause or contributor, but not the ONLY one……the units could exacerbate things.
I don’t think the CDC tracks units given……and you would need that to see what happens and if those units are a problem.
I would like to join this discussion to acquire more information regarding blood transfusions. I’m aware of the fact that vaccinated can donate blood. Now I’m on the other end as I receive donated blood every month, due to an immune system condition. This means that I am not able to produce enough white blood cells.
Is there a correlation between people that receive white blood cell transfusions from people that have been vaccinated and people dying, the more units they receive?
I’ve been reading your graph but I don’t quite get it. Does it mean that there is an increasing number of people that have died due to complications after receiving blood transfusions? What about other circulatory or heart disorders after receiving blood transfusions?
Could taking the units exacerbate a medical condition and possibly lead to deaths? Is that what your graph is saying?
No – the charts make no comment upon blood transfusions.
I don’t hold the qualifications, nor systems data to make an evaluation on blood transfusions with respect to introducing the spike protein mRNA into one’s body. On this one, I would find a doctor who is not captured by the Narrative and have them do a frank assessment – speak with a hematologist and cancer physician – as part of that deliberation.
I got the message when covid treatments were denied because of politics. Medicines used safely for decades could not be obtained because a politician they didn’t like might be able to take credit. It was clear to me that public safety was the last thing on their minds. So I decided to become my own doctor and pharmacist. I, and I alone, take the full risk anyway. I bought meds from foreign sources and have them available at a moment’s notice should the need ever arise.
My body my choice, right? If this is a free country, any adult should be able to put anything they want in their own bodies. Most doctors are too lazy to even read about covid treatments. Why should I wait for an appointment, pay $400, and then be told nothing works. When I’m sick the last thing I want to do is drive around town and argue with people who amount to nothing but toll collector.
Have you looked at amputation statistics for 2021? Lower-limb ischemia can result in amputations of the feet.
Now let’s look at US mortality for 2021.
There’s a key puzzle piece overlooked by most statisticians. 2021 US mortality for 85+ y.o. declined 14%. Declined! And the 75-84 y.o. group also showed a mortality decline of about 2.8%. Despite those groups showing a declining mortality, deaths among the Big Three–heart disease, cancer, and stroke–were level from 2020. So most of the Big Three deaths had to come from those below 75 y.o. Which is very odd, since the Big Three are elderly causes of death, typically.
And working age mortality was up at least 17.5% (preliminary statistics)–that’s 137,500 more people dying, probably from the Big Three, which would keep the total statistics for the Big Three level wrt the US population. Something was aging people a lot. Something we aren’t supposed to discuss.
Hence the pull forward effect. Since our elders compose the vast majority of our death statistics, and since their death rate has declined post-covid, that means that the baseline for all deaths need decline for 2021/22/23+, in a sliding scale. By Oct 2023 (even though this is not reality) I have the taper of the PFE declining to zero.
Thus the PFE is
1. Accurate and probative as a principle.
2. Is suitably conservative.
I asked my doctor, a new grad, with her supervisor in the room: Do you recommend Vitamin D to your patients? It was a loaded question. I had been reading about how very few people with healthy vitamin D levels died of covid. They dodged the question, which I took to mean “no”. Both simply said they take small amounts — around 2000 IU.
Two points. 1) You’ll notice the dates; enough said. 2) 6% drop in age 0-14 stat for 2020. Lockdown as knockdown for accidents, understandable. Curious if SIDS saw any fluctuation. Do you know?
We were looking at the SIDS numbers earlier this year, the data showed that during the height of the scamdemic, when people were not able to go to the hospital for other than emergencies, targeted childhood vax children missed those jabs and the SIDS rate plummeted.
What do you all think of how Pfizer bought out two different companies that specialize in autoimmune conditions and cancer treatment. They purchased these companies six months apart. One in mid 2021 and one at the end of 2021. Unbelievable. They know what the hell they’ve done. And unfortunately these people that got the shot signed away ANY right they had if something horrible does happen to them. Unfortunately 2 of my coworkers got breast cancer after their shots. One had lymph node surgery and the other is having her breasts removed and redone. She had no genetic precursors to breast cancer either. Got four shots though….
Great work. I did a small quick model using a Gaussian Distribution over 9 years to see what the numbers would be each year for “events” given 80% of the total population vaccinated had active ingredients and would develop events similar to past other mRNA failed trials. 7,887 deaths per week is about 179% above my model for 2022. If the past is indeed playing out here, this excess deaths per week will increase by a factor of 9 over the next year. Most adverse events in past similar trials did not take place until year three. By year six, 84% of the cohort was positive for adverse events.
Big things are in the works. I have also been invited to speak at a meeting of the ten largest insurers in the US. But things even bigger than that are underway.
I sent you an email asking for some info about this….I am an actuary working within the life insurance industry….wondering if the audience could be expanded or more info on how to join that meeting.
I don’t know that I can attend. I am due to close an energy strategy about that time…
Still don’t have the travel dates set yet. But I have to prepare the strategy as well.
EVG
TES
I responded here in two threads. He biased every technique he could, in order to get the trend line to disappear. And in the end, he just had to plain delete it though a bit of sleight-of-hand. Then he tried to BS about science.
Skimmed his presentation and summary, plus comments. Interesting comment that he made based upon his experience that cancer is a slow phenomenon. The news of late (this past year) is sporadic reports of insanely aggressive cancer due in theory to suppressed immune function. Granted, this is anecdotal, but life IS anecdotal while the data is being collected for later publication years later to possibly validate one’s senses. Individual action cannot wait for institutional consensus. Life doesn’t happen that way, except it is expected to be the new norm with covid+. If immune suppression is indeed in play, and if such tolerates aggressive disease, then why wouldn’t one expect to see fast cases? He waived any possibility of such a discussion. Imagine the possibilities if that one point were allowed to be discussed. It would topple the cart entirely and require the collection of new data to be thrown at alternate hypotheses. If true, we’re in a new world with a new baseline to be established.
Your analysis reads as one who is alerted to a suspicion and desires to have a public conversation in pursuit of a potentially necessary preventive/corrective action. Critics seem to have a rigid need for maintaining current heading, as though looking for clues or questioning the status quo is bad conduct. In all of this covid nonsense for the last two years, one thing had shone brightly: incuriosity. It simply does not exist in certain quarters. Nelsonian, if recollection serves.
There is no long term purpose for spinning the present reality. It’s like a public CFO engaging in embezzlement: who does he think he’s fooling? The final analysis will get him, eventually, so why bother? Similarly with this business. As with the CFO, an intelligent person blinded by something in his psyche can still be dumb to reality.
When the final analysis is done, there will have been unbelievable loss of life from covid, and virtually all of it will have been unforced errors by regulatory authorities. Forget about parsing covid disease from adverse pharma effects; they both reside in the same bucket of ownership. Both therapeutics and mRNA avoidance were quashed by the state and its sympathizers, so for statisticians to dump all cause of death on covid, complications, and downstream effects still implicates the perps. Amazingly, no one apparently focuses on the physics and physiology to predict what the new statistics should look like. But, perhaps such is to be expected with novelty.
Brilliantly stated evergreen. Some novel thoughts. Thank you.
EVG
TES
I just learned that my brother got jabbed and then got a blood clot in his brain. He survived, but I am not sure he is capable of seeing the link. Oh well…
Muchos Gracias, Senor Skeptic…
I’m sorry to be so late commenting and “liking” this extremely useful post.
You were featured on The Automatic Earth when you released this, and I’ve posted your work there before, having discovered you through another commenter there.
You have the count, I’m sure, but you are reaching some people, people who are paying attention.
I very much appreciated your Twitter posts when you were documenting the slow-motion trainwreck while it was happening. I got kicked off of Twitter and haven’t followed you as closely for a while, but the Bad Cat linked to this post. Your work has been and will continue to be of incalculable benefit to a world that has been subjected to an unprecedented coordinated assault. Your explanation here is clear and concise, and I look forward to future posts in the series.
An overall increase in deaths from “natural” causes was predicted by numerous researchers; some see this as an inevitable result of the free-floating spike proteins introduced into the body by the so-called mRNA “vaccines.” One of these researchers is Dr. Shankara Chetty. In an interview last November, he said the following:
[I]n Covid illness the pathogen is spike protein. And spike protein is what the vaccine is meant to make in your body. So, if I had to give you my opinion, as to what is happening on a global scale… spike protein is one of the most contrived toxins or poisons that man has ever made. And the aim of this toxin is to kill billions without anyone noticing it. So it’s a poison with an agenda….
Now spike protein is also a membrane protein. So the mRNA will distribute this throughout our body, it will be made in various tissues around our body, it will be incorporated into those membranes around our body, into those specific tissues, those tissues will be recognized as foreign, and will trigger a host of auto-immune responses. They will be too diverse, there will be too many, and there be too broad a time frame for us to understand that we have been poisoned. And [I] think this is the big plan….
Now this toxin, in the long term, is going to get people with preexisting illnesses to have those illnesses exacerbated. It has bits of prion in it, it has bits of HIV protein in it; it is definitely engineered. So people with cancers are going to have their cancers flare up, and we’re going to say that they died of the cancer; people with vessel injuries or predisposition like our diabetics and hypertensives are going to have strokes and heart attacks and the rest at various times, and we’ll attribute those to their preexisting conditions. People are going to develop over time autoimmune conditions, the diversity of which will never be addressed by any pharmaceutical intervention, because they are far too “targeted.” And so, we’ve got a rough road coming.
To my thinking, your researches are substantiating Dr. Chetty’s predictions.
No, no historical files on R00-R99. Just data downloaded and the adjustments I make to that data (the method of which has not changed over the course).
Synchronicity – I just finished a post I was working on titled “Houston we have a problem”. It is about a possible solution for ME/CFS which is seen in LongCovid and is likely similarly based in retinoid dysfunction due to viral/immune challenge. It effects liver enzymes permanently is the gist of the theory which overactivate vitamin A and carotenoids to Retinoic Acid for ever after. The fix is to stop eating those food sources fairly strictly, not easy, but it works. Or makes the big needed difference. My post – Houston, we have a problem. – by Jennifer Depew, R.D. (substack.com). I did add a follow up post with the first of your series. Our problems are related in my opinion.
An excellent service here, for a condition which would be extraordinarily complex to figure out, even for a dietician or medical professional. Very timely. My task right now is to figure out how much of our excess death can be attributed to this type of Covid injury, and what it attributable to injury from the vaccine series. This however, I will keep in mind as a case example of the Covid injury challenge in the general population.
Thank you for your great work and for saving lives by informing people. Reading this with a broken heart and unbearable sadness as we lost our beloved brother to aggressive t-cell lymphoma. He went through five months of nightmarish treatments before his death. He took the Moderna shots last year and had facial numbness and swollen lymph nodes after the 1st shot. I begged him not to get the 2nd shot, but his doctor gave him steroids and told him to get the 2nd! The same doctors misdiagnosed many symptoms he had during 2021 until he was finally diagnosed by a diff doctor this year. I can see how cancer deaths can now surface as it takes time for diagnosis and treatment before they are told, sadly, that there is nothing more that can be done.
Thank you. You may find this interesting. This is a conversation between oncologist Vinay Prada (@VPrasadMDMPH) and Dr. Bita Fakhri of UCSF. She explains how she wanted to join the lymphoma group at the hospital, but they did not have enough patients to justify another doctor. But now, they are getting so many referrals that they need more doctors. They both wonder what could have been the cause for the rise in patients, agent orange or something; they speculate laughingly! @ 42:56: https://soundcloud.com/plenarysession/ep416
Anecdotally, my father has a tumor in his lung. It was diagnosed a few years ago and has been monitored with annual scans, never exhibiting any growth or changes. Dad got vaxxed and boosted with mRNA. Last month, his last scan showed that the tumor has grown. Theoretically, it might be unrelated to his vaccination, simply a coincidence.
We got my daughter her first \/ in anticipation of her visiting family (including immune compromised grandparents) in the summer of 2021. The very next day I started seeing the word “myocarditis” in relation to the \/. She never got her second, and will not if I have anything to say about it. Thank you for all you have done to bring these figures to the light.
How did glyphosate get into the food chain as early as you say? I thought it was when they told farmers to save money on grain drying by spraying just before harvest to kill the wheat in the field. Wasn’t that as part of CO2 climate change efforts or when oil prices were high?. In the UK I first heard about it in late 90’s and switched to organic bread, eventually making my own then largely giving it up. I know they used it as a pre emergent herbicide but it was always sold as biodegradable and there were months between application and harvest under that regime. I can’t bear thinking how much is incorporated into the grain in its last weeks of growth – its systemic after all. Of course the cartel says its safe and their tentacles go deep – a lecturer in ecology at Uni told my class its so safe you can bath in it. Mad.
It appears that the CDC has not redacted the 2017-2018 Flu report.
The 2017-2018 influenza season was a high severity season with high levels of outpatient clinic and emergency department visits for influenza-like illness (ILI), high influenza-related hospitalization rates, and elevated and geographically widespread influenza activity for an extended period.
and
Flu vaccine is produced by private manufacturers, so supply depends on manufacturers. For the 2017-2018 season, manufacturers originally projected they would provide between 151 million and 166 million doses of injectable vaccine for the U.S. market. As of February 23, 2018, manufacturers reported having shipped approximately 155.3 million doses of flu vaccine; a record number of flu vaccine doses distributed.
I’ve been waiting for this post since you started posting the MMWR data many months ago. I’m holding myself back from refreshing every 5 mins until part 2 is posted. ; ) I’m afraid that similarly to the data pointing to 2018 covid seeding parts of the world pre-Wuhan, this too will be conveniently ignored.
I’ll just reread your Raiders article in the meantime to get myself ready for more horrible NE PI calls prolonging game changing drives.
How does “about 5,000 younger Americans” dying per week from natural causes, excluding C-19, compare to pre-COVID? Or are you saying the average has increased by 5,000?
Jeazhus fucking christ. I have had a gut feeling this is going on and keep finding bits and pieces of info here and there but your article really puts it all together. Glad I didn’t get the shots.
Very thought provoking. I am an actuary with 40+ years of experience, including some on mortality assumption setting. I am somewhat versed with WONDER and other CDC data. I consider myself “skeptical” — for example I have not submitted to the mRNA gene therapy being called “vaccines”. It is hard to ignore or disagree with a couple things of anomalies that you have found: the neoplasm cause of death in the past year does seem very high, and the CDC system upgrade data issues, in my view can’t be explained by Hanson’s Razor.
However, let me poke at your article a bit — in order to help you perhaps make it better. Have you been able to look at these excess deaths by geographical region, state or county? I am wondering if the neoplasm excess deaths are really COVID. I have always been skeptical about cause of death data. However, I have trust in aggregate death data by region — even CDC data. Having done some poking around on usmortality.com — it seems that excess deaths vary significantly be state and seem to be correlated with COVID waves. If the neoplasm death rate changes are not relatively evenly split by state, or split in a way that are not highly correlated with “vaccine” uptake rates — perhaps the neoplasm deaths are COVID related.
I am eagerly awaiting the next installment in the series.
Indeed George I have done this ‘Neoplasm Excess Death by State’ – and it fits the average age of the state with extreme conformity. In other words, while SADS is hitting the 25 – 64 age group across the nation – cancer is hitting the oldest states hardest, first. That graphic will be in the next installment in the series – to show that this cancer outbreak is chaotic and asymmetric.
Asia is clearly the “weak” point of the narrative, since day 1.
I know, I live in… Bangkok (Thailand).
Thailand was the first country to officially announce a Covid case outside China (january 7 2020).
In january 2020, more than 800 000 chinese tourists came in Thailand ! I remember, we had SEVERAL flights Wuhan->Bangkok PER DAY !
And ?
As you pointed you : nothing. Nothing happened (from a public health point of view). The whole year !
Actually, cases started to appear in South East Asia… in april 2021… when they began the “vaccination”, but that’s another debate.
In 2020, nothing made sense, and no one could or was willing to explain the cause of so many striking differences with Europe and America.
-Thailand population is just a little bit older than France’s
-Bangkok is a huge and polluted city, with crowded buses, trains, buildings, etc.
-Thai people have bad habits too (alcool, junk food etc.) and can have poor health (with “modern” diseases like diabetes, overweight etc.)
In october 2020, this study was like a ray of light :
“COVID-19 and Flu Pandemics Follow a Pattern: A Possible Cross-immunity in the Pandemic Origin and Graver Disease in Farther Regions” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568123/
It made sense : yes we had a kind of immunity in the whole region, compared to Europe and America (geographically far away). It was the only possible explanation…
Furthermore, another important point that shows the malevolence of China :
-they declared immediately the “war against Covid”… organized a huge show (Wuhan lockdown, and the building of an “hospital” in 7 days)… but… the lockdown was ridiculous compared to the size of the country !
Nothing happened in other megalopolis like Beijing, Shanghai etc.
So a “terrrible virus”, “ultra contagious”, that could “kill in a flash people” (several videos “leaked” from China, totally bogus, showing corpses on the streets and hospital corridors)… so dangerous that they need to fight a “war” against it… but only in Wuhan/Hubei ?
kill in a flash… i saw those videos. didnt make sense til now. Those videos were Vaxxine deaths. Not covid as suggested. looks just like all the current vax death videos. China was doing as it was told ordered to do. they are patsies. The vaxxine is a self spreading airborne vaxine. and the nano lipids also release the new self spreading variants 41 days after the shot. every variant came out of the shots and boosters. delta omi ba5… now ba6.
You are looking at lagged (wrong) raw data. I am using the following lag taper from week -14 to -1
0.9867
0.9812
0.9799
0.9734
0.9689
0.9633
0.9578
0.9502
0.9421
0.9378
0.9134
0.8893
0.8023
0.6687
OK, I apologize. I didn’t understand that you were applying a model (“distribued lag model”, right ?) on top of the “provisional” data for the last 14 weeks.
So if I understand, because you follow those weekly reports since long time, you have noticed that the National Center for Health Statistics “revise” (upward) its data, systematically.
Hence, your model in order to quantify what the outcome of those revisions will be.
Am i correct ? I am not a all a “math” person, so I need time to understand. ;-)
Perhaps it would be a good idea to highlight this special period (14 weeks backward) on the chart for people like me.
Because i really thought that the uptick in 2022 was coming directly from the data published.
Last but not least, how well your model worked in the past ? And when the National Center for Health Statistics revises its data ? Every week, or let’s say 1 or 2 times per year ? Thanks.
Look at the charts. The lag period is highlighted. I draw no inference from those first four weeks because of the risk in conjecture. I only look at the 5 week average and then backward in time. Even then I back off on the sigma I observe.
The uptick is coming from the data published. It is better than the data published. 1. More accurate. 2. More reliable.
In the past, actuals have come in higher about 80% of the time and lower about 20%. That of course is a performance which then feeds my lag models. If the data starts coming in lower, then I adjust my lag models to accommodate that.
TES
Anyone who isn’t saying, “Oh, shit,” is not paying attention.
As a former data crunching fed who witnessed firsthand the catastrophic lies of the 2000s, I thank you very much for all your analysis. Beginning in May 2020, I suspected that what we are experiencing is far worse than anything the 2000s gave us, and might be on par with 20th century totalitarians. Yikes…
Appreciate your sustained determination. Willing to help with data science, statistical methods, automation pipeline, strategizing next steps, etc. Hit me up if you’d like to chat. Thanks
The “antiwisdom of crowds” reminds me: “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.”
Did some crude math with mass of atmosphere, CO2 emissions by man, atomic weight of air and CO2. The reported annual 35 billion tons of CO2 emission would increase CO2 partial pressure in atmosphere by 0.13 ppm/a, which is 6% of the total yearly rate of increase (2.1 ppm/a)
Nah, I had bad sources (Billion being ambiguous). Updated calculations with wider sources gave results that align well with reported CO2 emissions and CO2 levels in atmosphere.
Based on some of your interests and work above, you may find Mario Buildreps’ work of interest: https://www.mariobuildreps.com/
You may be describing a mechanism which in particularly extreme (though still cyclical) moments contributes to the shifting of the geographic pole of the earth through crust displacement.
This is great, thank you. I have been thinking a lot recently about the role of community in supporting and scaffolding values and this has got me daydreaming about modes of interaction and team work that facilitate engagement with the kind of problems you’re writing about here.
That’s too bad. If this helps with blood flow, like sildenafil, then I assumed it could be a performance enhancer by increasing blood flow. I’m always looking for that performance edge. :)
A tour de force of exemplary research Ethical Skeptic. I am in complete agreement with the proposed time frame. Both myself and my partner were critically injured before the announcement of the supposed Covid Crisis. We were both hospitalized with life threatening blood and lung conditions which IMOP could not have been anything other than Covid 19. In both cases it took over a week in the hospital before we were allowed to return home.
I am so glad you made it out alive gambeir. The hospitals did not know to treat this as a thromboembolic and endothelial inflammation disease. Many people died from lack of treatment outside the hospital (or even in the hospital).
I wish someone could do studies of early covid presence in Davis, CA. My son and his girlfriend were at UC Davis there in the fall of 2019. In October or so, a “flu” was going around. My son and GF got it in November, and both were fairly sick as respiratory illnesses go. The GF has asthma and she was worse off than he was. At one point she had to go to the ER and get a nebulizer to help her….I believe it delivered steroids to her lungs. She was also given….wait for this….Ivermectin. She was pretty sick for a couple of weeks, and recovering for a month. My son was really sick for about a week or two, then OK after that. When they first went to the UC Davis health clinic, the doctors said “Something weird is going around, we don’t know what it is.” I’m convinced it was Covid, although of course they never got tested at that point in time. I’ll add that UC Davis has so many Chinese students it almost looks like you are in China when on the campus…and a huge number of the students are from Wuhan.
You might appreciate Auron MacIntyre’s perspectives on the ‘managerial elite’ – he’s very focused on the political philosophy of what we’re seeing. https://youtu.be/41J59hg1_30
Your “Tyflocracu”, as described, will require an almost endless stream of at least middling-competent narcissists to man the wheels of government.
A feat of this magnitude boggles the mind.
How do you propose to recruit such a multitude of passingly-competent narcissists, for instance, in America?
There is also an allusion in Quran about leveraging two sets of cultural traditions into inferential knowledge when Moses wanted to meet the most knowledgeable person on earth, Khidr. He was told to go to a place at the junction of two seas (Al Kahf, 18:60) which symbolically represented the wisdom of Khidr that comprised of the observable and the insight. Seeing with two eyes, through eyes and heart/mind. Is this insight the gnosis gained through following ethical skepticism? I apologize if it sounds basic or a transgression from the topic.
Moses meeting the most wise person on Earth at the convergence of the two seas (the south point at Sharm Al Sheikh – Raas Mohammed) is excellent allegory, and yes it follows the wisdom of ethical skepticism, in that – once one has conjoined that which is known by faith, with that which is known by observational empiricism, both cease to be what they once were and are each transformed – becoming a new and expansive body of water altogether.
All the old Gods pass away and unify into one truth which always existed – yet, we were not prepared to know this until we were ready (gnosis). A new ocean, a new voyage.
Moses was so set upon such a journey that he contended “In order to get there, I will march forever if I have to…” And through the grace wrought by the determination of one man, many are indeed blessed.
I suspect that the truth is neither as easy, nor has hard, as we make it out to be.
The number of laborers needed to recover the easily reached gold would have been staggering. How does even a King prevent those workers from mining their own gold up river. It would seem impossible to keep a lid on that kind of easy access.
River recovery requires far fewer workers than shaft or placer mining.
Artisanal mining is what this type of poaching is called. Small groups and individuals gather small takes, and then use them to buy supplies or needed items. Eventually that gold ends up in circulation and is taken by the King. Each artisanal group can only access a small stretch of river before they tread on another tribal area or into areas where they do not know exactly where to look (and keep safe). It is a self-managing mine. Outsiders cannot come in and set up large-scale shop because they must traverse long stretches of river – amongst peoples who do not want them there. While the ore excavation is easy, the logistics and politics are very hard. Only a ruler can organize the chiefs to cooperate on the necessary logistics.
Even today it is very difficult, and miners returning from a couple years on the river are worn and beaten-looking upon arrival back home. Everyone one of them is ill or injured in some way typically.
Aaahhh… Ive learned more this morning… than a year in some shithole historu class…
Fez, Niger Musa trade routes gold… what did our military get from Sierra leon in 2013 ebola outbreak that it needed? Gold is only defense to fake money xollapse. Still puzzling that one.
i didn’t see any mention of testerone levels; have you had yours checked?
Have you heard of HGH secretagogues? Have you tried one?
What are the macro nutrient ratios of your daily eating?
Thermodynamically speaking, how do you explain the very large (huge, actually) delta in calories in, and calories expended?
The description of your daily intake does not come anywhere near the number of calories you claim to eat, unless you are eating a large amount of butter.
Do you think you are ingesting the required amount and kinds of nutrients, for a healthy existence?
This might sound like I am arguing or disagreeing with you, but I am not. I accept that you are suffering from a/some ailment/s, and just want to understand things better :). Maybe I am making assumptions that are untrue, or have misunderstood some things you have presented. You mentioned GLP-1 but not if you take it; is it not possible to correct for the damage you have suffered via supplements?
I have tried the testosterone and HGH routes. Both just make my upper body, head, and feet more massive – this was not desirable – my upper body is already large enough from my years of swimming that I do not need to support so much structure into old age. A top-heavy old person is a ticking time bomb.
My fats, carbs, short chain fatty acids, proteins and phytonutrients are all in line – I track them. I did not outline every single thing I eat nor how many times I consume each as a snack – so one cannot derive calories from the list at face value – for instance, I have my post-workout drink in a separate article, and it is ~400 calories in itself. I do eat more grassfed butter than an average person yes, and put it in my coffee as well.
Thermodynamically speaking, and haven taken thermodynamics in engineering, the body is not like the steam cycle in a power plant. The body lets some calories pass through un-exploited when a normal gut biome is present. Some persons extract 80+% of the caloric availability and others extract 50 – 70% – Then there is the state of the cell mitochondria. If you have ever lost weight and tracked this closely, you will observe a 1000 calorie swing in rate of burn from favorable to disfavorable – this is fact. How do we then explain this swing in mitochondrial resistance thermodynamically as well? We can’t, because thermo is only the third or fourth rank principle at play here. Our bodies are not black boxes nor steam boilers.
Am I ingesting the required nutrient for existence? No… that is the point of this article, of course. If I did that via food, I would have to consume enough calories to force me to work out 2 to 3 hours per day – every day. Fortunately, for now, we have supplements. Fulvic acid is at the core of my added nutrient (soil humus and fulvic elements).
No, GLP-1 therapy is not available to my knowledge. But yes, supplements are key in helping correct body damage – however I cannot find one which promotes my intestinal and pancreatic cells to release glucagon.
I believe the fact that 35% of the nation has non-alcoholic fatty liver disease – is precisely because of this damage to the alpha cells of the pancreas. We fix that, and we fix obesity (but not overweight).
thanks for answering my questions. i had forgotten the body can slough off calories.
really enjoy your blog and let others know about it. especially liked your essay on the Earth’s core being the source of ocean heating. it’s shocking (but not surprising) that it hasn’t received more attention; it might if you could figure out a way for politicians to generate graft from it :P
TES says, “GLP-1 therapy is not available to my knowledge. But yes, supplements are key in helping correct body damage – however I cannot find one which promotes my intestinal and pancreatic cells to release glucagon”.
Does this mean that although TES has identified Glucagon as the missing piece of the puzzle, Glucagon ‘deficiency’ cannot be treated?
I was rail thin until my early 20s, extremely active, and massively hungry . Although I stayed active for many years (even during my youth alcohol years), from the early 90s (30yo) I slowly gained weight, gained chronic pain, and slowed activity, until now I am an overweight 230lb (65yo) where I ‘should’ be 195ish, and I’m still hungry! (And I’ve done 10, 7, 3 day water fasts but I always end up sick)
My doctors have been of little help, and suggest that Ozempic and others have too many side effects. But I already have unwanted effects of weight gain, tiredness, hunger, insomnia, etc, etc
Without recommending any GLP-1 product, is there a GLP-1 product that may be suggested as heading in the right direction?
In the meantime, I’m surprised to see nicotine may assist. Although, for no valid reason, my doctors say no to nicotine, I’ll try some 1mg spray or gum as a first step.
Success essentials right now do not involve GLP-1 but rather glucagon suppressors, that cause liver dysregulation:
Eliminate Vitamin B6 from any supplementation (source of insomnia, weight stubborn, anxiety, doom feelings)
Eliminate any and all seed/nut oils (PUFAs) and seeds/nuts from your diet (causes the liver to shut down glucagon production, and metabolic rate)
Eliminate any and all even ‘good oil’ heavy-oil foods (chips/fries/fried foods) (overloads the digestive tract and puts a burden on the liver)
Take Creatine, CoQ10, and intermittently nicotine (to avoid habituation).
My wife has regular intestinal troubles and the ‘healthier’ she ate, the worse her troubles. It turned out she was susceptible to FODMAP, specifically galacto-oligosaccharides. Therefore, eating a half a cup of peas (or onion, mushrooms, inulin, & others) during a ‘healthy’ dinner would necessitate a trip to the hospital and a endoscopy/colonoscopy that showed nothing. After a bout of gut problem, she found the best relief for her gut was sugary confectionary (“Jersey Caramels” for the win).
I mention her story because, within TES reply, is a similar scenario… my wife and I have both been eating lots of ‘healthy’ nuts and seeds (adding to meals, drinks, snacks), and taking vitamin B6 (in B blends), which, it seems, may not be optimal for us if our regulatory systems are impaired.
My wife was thin until menopause. Then she used HRT patches and had to end those, and suffer with hot flashes, and weight gain – obviously involving an impaired regulatory system. (She recently stopped hot flashes when she caught a cold – they resumed after she recovered.) In an internet full of confusing and overwhelming information (which adds to the doom moods), it is quite lightening to be enlightened with the TES information. Thanks for the ToDo and ToDon’t lists.
Your intellectual honesty is of such magnitude as i believed that i would never find in my life, beyond my own. I feel like i devouted christian by heart, not by knowledge, reading the New Testament for the first time, and finding in words everything he believes and lives by instinctively. Thank you so much for your divine work brother
Another great article that tackles matters that are generally ignored – because you would have to be “an unhealthy person” to even bring up such questions! Therefore: Disqualified! Q.e.d.
Them: “You wouldn’t even bring it up as a commendably healthy person, wouldn’t you ?!?”
I am far from being anything like an expert on these matters, but simple common sense and manifold observations show me that many people do many things that would be considered to be the cause of someone else’s fatness or unhealthiness – but in their cases, is not. And other things would do the reverse – all depending on circumstances and perspectives … specific persons, specific nutrition, specific perceptions of those who are evaluated and so on and so forth!
Monsieur Skeptic, you hve done your research and embodied it in your life.
One of the practices I see is that of time-restricted-eating, where a person intermittently fasts, at least 12 hours without calories, but up to 24-48 hours, which changes the metbolic state. The easiest way is to not eat or drink calories after a fairly early dinner. Studies show that people rapidly adapt and get less hungry at bedtime, not hungrier, as one would expect.
Part of time-restricted-eating is the mobilization of stored carbohydrates, freeing them up as fuel. Walking or other exercise before the first meal of the day increases that effect, and coffeedoes not hurt, may help a little, but just half a teaspoon of sugar or honey, please…
Insulin resistance is an underlying part of modern dis-ease. Insulin resistance is the causeof type-2 diabetes, but causes problems well before things get to that point. Insulin helps the cells absorb blood-sugar, which comes from starches and sugars in the diet. More starches and sugars (and even artificial sweeteners -GASP-) mke the body produce more insulin, and then to get resistant to it, making blood sugar rise, and making the pancreas release even more insulin, and creating a vicious loop. The pancreas fatigues as years pass. Insulin causes weight gain. Increased insulin levels seem to causean increase in inflammatory factors in the circulation, linked to arterial inflammation, heart disease and stroke…
You are working to make your body insulin-sensitive, and to lower your insulin levels, by your low-starch diet. Right after exercise, the cells have just used up their carbohydrate stores, so they welcome in blood sugar, and also proteins (amino-acids) without a rise in insulin levels. After exercise is a special moment in that way. Protein and starch at a late-breakfast/early-lunch, following exercise are welcomed with open-arms, and do not raise insulin levels. Only eating for 8-12 hours during the day, while active, and reducing carbohydrates with the evening meal, then exercising before the first meal, is a pattern that works better in a living human body.
It is also not a hard habit to keep up, and gets fairly easy after the first week.
Water only at night, not snacks. (New habit)
I’ll add that study data from the mid-1990s already showed that the cardiovascular health of “fit” fat people, based treadmill on exercise testing, was the same as of “fit” thinner people. It was just less common in the overweight.
We have learned a lot about vascular inflammation since January 2020, since it was the injury mechanism of so much of (pre-Omicron) COVID. Keeping vascular inflammation down requires normal vitamin-D levels. (If you are a surf lifeguard in Hawaii, you can skip this, you have plenty.). If you have not checked a vitamin-D level, ask for one at your next medical visit. You need not wait to begin 5000 IU per day supplement. If you are obese, or have no gallbladder, you are likely to need 10,00 units per day to get a normal level, and it may take a couple of months to rise to normal (30-100). Almost all Americans who are not in southern sun a lot have low vitamin-D levels. One of the lowest (4) that I ever measured was on a banker in Hawaii. She had bone pain. It got better promptly on vitamin-D.
Sleep deprivation also causes higher levels of inflammatory components in the blood. Get that sleep every night. This happens right away. Sleep deprivation causes increased appetite, too. (Oh, No!)
Fresh vegetables in season are the basis of a healthful diet. I grow ’em and eat ’em. Fermented foods have some special benefits and trick nutrients (like vitamin K2, for instance). Monsieur Skeptic includes some, as he mentioned.
All excellent wisdom as usual John. The glucagon-like-peptide testing that observed 15% body mass drop in people administered a therapeutic dose, is significant. It is the missing piece of the confusing/contradictory diabetes progression saga. The alpha cells go first, and cause hypoglycemia long before the beta cells go and create diabetes.
We need to head off diabetes with alpha-glucagon therapy – as a priority. But I doubt it will happen because that will absolutely destroy a $200 B dollar diet and obesity treatment industry.
Hi John,
I agree. Most are not accounting for the effects of circadian rhythms on metabolism. If you stop eating by 4pm, and combine with a lower carb diet (max 100g per day, ~35 g/meal), most can lose weight without trying. I have seen 90+ yo folks drop 20 pounds. The genes of metabolism shut off with the sun going down. The calories are not processed well at night, and get shunted into fat cells. Going to bed at night on an empty stomach is extremely effective for metabolic health and weight loss independent of activity/calorie restriction. However, society structures life to push eating to an evening /night time event. Hence, almost no one will follow this lifestyle.
The perfect product would be a no-calorie sweetener that overweight people would buy, which would secretly make them hungrier and guiltier and gain more weight…
…Bwahahahahahaa!!!
You are drinking it, now!
..Bwahahahahahaaa!!!
Its true the narcissist and the predator and many other pathologies are “possession”. Possession by complex, stubborn though form (a virtual being) built up to protect from what? There is only one thing animating the body. Feelings.
I would like to hear how you actually deal with this people in work life. Since right now the crazy 8 seem to occupy most of the positions of power.
Solving work problems is not near as hard as solving the problems created by the Crazy Eight.
In one firm I was in, a junior partner lay on his couch at home in depression for 3+ years, and I took on his client load for him. After 4 years of being paid his full salary to do this, he came back to the firm, was handed back all his clients, his position, and his exorbitant salary. He thereafter blamed his depression on ME (his peer). Then he left and went on a campaign to harm our business – after we carried his ass for four years at full salary – to do absolutely nothing. It was deranged, malevolent, and spiteful.
These people are possessed by more than emotion and feelings. They give permission for other influences to enter their lives and cause harm to those around them.
This looks like it applies well to narcissits, also. When narcissists are “political leaders” they will be unable to correct major policy errors, and can be counted on by their financial backers to keep marching forward into any morass they enter with flags flying high.
Trudeau, Biden, BoJo, Macron and others come quickly to mind. Good investments!
For a very long time (since the beginning of recorded civilisation, in fact), thinking for yourself and being wary of groupthink has been the hallmark of great and independently minded thinkers. Nearly every great philosopher, artist or scientist worth their salt knew and ceaselessly communicated this to the world. This is as true for greek antiquity as it is for the 20th century.
In the last few years, however, the opposite “position” has finally broken into the intellectual mainstream (or maelstrom …) as not only viable, but increasingly mandatory. Yet, at the same time, our contemporary “thinkers” and intellectuals still celebrate and demonstratively glorify all those great minds of years and ages past, all those political and social dissenters that paved the way for a more open-minded and progressive society. As if they were their equivalents in our time – their peers in advancing human thinking and progress …
They sure do love their virtue signalling. It’s like the world has been turned upside down. They are the “system”, but they act like they fight “the system”. And most of them don’t even know it.
They truly have – to paraphrase a line from the Sopranos – created “dysentery among the ranks” …
Very good walking-a-mile-in-their-shoes…
“The sociopath predator allows a third-party agency which co-occupies their mind, to dictate their thinking for them – egging them onward and simultaneously then accusing and justifying them thereafter.”
Good point Mehen. I take another round of both during an empty stomach earlier in the day. I suppose it is the presence/type of protein in the food, since these catalyze fibrin proteins. The almond milk has some protein, as well as the coconut powder. I will have to research it some more.
Vitamin-D adequacy 9even optimization) is important for stabilization of clotting and reduction of endothelial inflammation. Levls of 30-100 are considered normal, but levels above 50-60 are likely ideal,especially for people with immune system dysfunction, like autoimmune disease (which COVID vaccination can induce). David Grimes MD is a medical expert on vitamin-D. Here is is site: http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/ His most recent post uses Public Health Canada cumulative data, subtracting one week from the succeeding week by groups, to determine:
“Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated increased from 9511 to 9512, an increase during the week of just one. Only 1 of the 227 Covid-19 deaths was a person who had not been vaccinated. Let this true but unpublicised fact sink in.”
I personally use fewer supplements, but grow a lot of fresh vegetables and prefer to eat what is fresh from the garden (or dried, frozen, pickled or canned garden-produce in winter).
One that I do use, which is purported to work well with vitamin-D, and which improves my bike riding uphill in Texas heat (discovered, noticed repeatedly upon running out) is “Vitamin K2” which is a group of polymers of different lengths of the basic unit, largely created by fermentation in certain foods, such as fermented soybeans, “natto”. The Life Extension brand products “Super K” and “Super K Elite” are good values. You have to be very careful to determine actual doses, which can be 100X less in some products in store. https://www.lifeextension.com/search#q=vitamin%20k2&t=coveo4A2453FD
The “wisdom of crowds” also won’t work too well if the jar of jelly beans is deceptive, such as if it contains a large hollow box concealed in the pile.
The reach of the syndicates is now well into all aspects of our lives. I am constantly amazed at the resources my employer puts into activities that have no discernible impact on the manufacture, distribution and sales of our products. This all appears to pay homage to the virtue syndicates. I have yet to see how the accolades from various tribally aligned groups and making the top inclusive employer lists helps out the stock price when the investors all point that our fundamentals of our business are still the same as they ever where. I’m uncertain that when cyclic nature returns us to a trough all the of this overhead will recognized for the fat it is, and rather the leaders now addicted to the positive feedback for their duly displayed virtue will decide to cut into the sinew and bone.
I have to wonder how robust current syndicates might be in the face of frequently-failing power grids and internet. I actually wonder this fairly often. Being more personally prepared for such eventualities brings to mind the further implications and ramifications.
Would it be the case that being the right-sized-and-distanced rural community would be better than being in a city, or on a remote “doomstead”?
My modest little homestead is a 2 hour drive from Austin, from San Antonio, from Houston, and farther from Dallas, has good soil, moderate weather, 6000 people, a railroad, mixed economy, and so on.
It has a name that causes a reflexive upturning of noses and scornful snorts (heh, heh, heh…).
I think that may be a protection or talisman of some sort, too.
Again, what happens to syndicates when everything starts breaking?
The ultimate destiny of all syndicates is to be broken. Usually through war.
But now I think most of them will rot from the inside out. We will see this with academia over the coming 30 years.
TES – My wording was unintentionally ambiguous. It seemed to make sense when I pasted the link and it was formatted. My apologies for the lack of precision.
Your blog entry brought clarity to my annoyance with the Astral Codex epigraph using Bayes as the arbitrator of knowledge.
Ohhhhh Ramkumar! My apologies as well. I should have detected the ambiguity and asked for clarity. Now I get it fully.
And yes, you are correct!
EVG
TES
It seems to be heading towards a crescendo. They excallated the Cold War to preemptive strikes and had to control the media to manage that. To hold the debt mountain together they have to break up Russia and extract its assets. They are now all in on that. covid was escalated to support the take over if the media and implement the control grid on people. How to stop this natural process of step by step, just one more, need more to stand still. Do we break up all power structures every seven years. Who takes charge of that. ? Some ideas. One term political appointments, rotating leadership, some positions by lottery, all legislation to have built in limit. One law one subject, automatic split and federation of business at a certain size (like an organism). More like Switzerland. One year military training and issued with AR for all 18-35 year olds. Local militia. Etc etc the Greeks and Romans thought about this as did the founding fathers.
Reading this long after discussion has stilled. Wonder about this with respect to the Covid injections. I am covered by Aetna, and have taken no injections. Aetna covered millions of Americans and must surely know which of those Americans have taken injections, and which haven’t. It would be trivial to divide the populations into random samples and see the results of the experiments of taking or not taking in the two populations, hopefully balanced by age. It should be simple to show from these data that the vaccinated group has a lower death rate. I could probably do that in excel.
This has not been done and the data must be present. Absence of evidence from these data is, by the embargo principle, evidence of absence, since the ability to conform to and confirm the narrative is obvious.
Yes, I have run this analysis several times with county-level data across the period in which the vaccine benefit should have been most manifest. No benefit shows up in terms of either cases or deaths. I cannot vouch for hospitalizations.
My first run of the study showed that higher population counties tended to have higher rates of vaccination and lower rates of Covid per 100 K persons in 2021 after the vaccine. This was initially exciting, however was deceptive – because when I ran the same analysis for the same timeframe in 2020 – I got the same exact result, by county. The vaccine had traveled back into time and saved lives even before it had been formulated!
When I adjusted for Age, and Population Denominator effect – I got a flat line, no trend, between highly vaccinated and low-vaccinated counties. They all had the same rate of Cases and Deaths in 2021 after the rollout of the vaccine to 50+% of the population.
The data by county was clear. It is also embargoed, yes.
Do you have a link on your retroactive county study? I’ve about had it with the gaslighting and I’m doing something about it. I’m assigning my data-science-practicing grad students examples of Covid “misinformation” for them to “debunk” with the idea being that they’ll do the work, check the conclusions, and then decide what is in fact misinformation. That I expect them to tie up the resources of the people who regularly send me “safe and effective” propaganda at one school is an added benefit.
it seems that you were already on the investigative path that Covid has exposed for me. I originally thought “mRNA is such a bad technology that it’s besmirching the good name of childhood vaccination.” Your article on vaccinials is a companion to the book Dissolving Illusions (I can send you my scanned notes on it) in showing that vaccination should never have had a good name. I’m down to only supporting tetanus and diphtheria, and you cannot find real tetanus anymore.
True, you cannot find real tetanus anymore. I tried to get a tetanus shot in 2006 after a burn at my husband’s urging. I got a DTAP, and suffered an adverse reaction (longterm swelling, redness, etc.)
I turned off CNN more than 15 years ago. I turned off FOX 10 plus years ago. I found in my gut, what you have explained eloquently. Thank you for your tireless work. It is very difficult to find this trail. I wish there were a series of 20 second video clips you could develop for the masses. THAT would be a challenging mission. And perhaps, rewarding. I know that’s not what you do. Maybe a small, inexpensive millennial team could be assigned the task. With your oversight. Not what you do, but so many are lost.
Embargoed information also includes this: The Vanden Bossche Warning. I am providing this video because I think you very much need to see it and, I hope, incorporate it in the information you offer your large audience, many of whom have the ability to understand it.
I read almost all your essays and Twitter posts but do not recall ever seeing you refer to what Vanden Bossche is saying. If I am mistaken, my apologies. If you think Vanden Bossche is wrong, I would very much like to know why. Personally, I am sure there is a very good chance he is right. If so, what he says is some of the most dangerous and dreadful embargoed covid information there is. Generally, he is being met with silence, one of the most effective embargo techniques, as I am sure you know.
I key in on Vanden Bossche’s thesis statement. “Those who are vaccinating, at best, are trading off severity of infection in the short term, for an increased susceptibility to the virus in the long term. This is not a suitable trade-off.”
Yes, I believe this is showing inside the stats I am providing, very clearly. I even question the ‘severity of infection in the short term’ – because there is no benefit from the vaccine in terms of cases, and no benefit in terms of deaths. So why would it only have benefit in terms of hospitalizations? If it reduces hospitalization by a factor of 8:1 as claimed in CDC touted studies, then there should have been an observable effect in reduced deaths by US county, by vaccination rate. And there was not. Counties on average which have twice the vaccination rate, experienced the exact same deaths per thousand as did the half-vaccinated counties.
Something is not correct in the small inductive hospitalization studies they did. The large population data should have shown this. This false initial inductive study, used to create propaganda, is becoming alarmingly common in our socialized version of science.
“Among competing alternatives, all things being equal one should select for the alternative which is embargoed discussion or research.”
I think you could have written that a little more clearly:
“Among competing alternatives, all other things being equal, select the one for which discussion or research is embargoed”
On the specific topic of the article, I am dubious about the nine reasons for lying cited by Mr Ekman. He allows for “win or preserve the admiration of others” and for “avoid embarrassment”. He does not include “avoid loss of face”, presumably believing that it is covered by the other two. I’d contend that they are not. Anyone who has worked in the Far East, or with East Asians will vouch for the importance of keeping face in those societies.
I believe that its importance rests in people who may not know you personally will nevertheless expect you to hold certain views and behave in a certain way, just because of the position you hold. If you do not conform, they will think less of you, and you will lose face.
I think that one reason people lie is to avoid being thought of as a member of a group which is shunned by the crowd. Being regarded as a member of such a group causes loss of face and loss of credibility. Maybe that is the same as “to avoid being punished”, which Ekman cites as being the single most frequent cause of lying, but I’m not convinced.
How does this relate to the article? Well, you said “.Once an individual has attained a scarce membership … of a syndicate … preservation of the club (or syndicate) in the best interests of the individual, becomes paramount. Again, I’m not convinced. I suspect preservation of face, at an individual level, is more important than ongoing membership. If the face can be preserved by other means, membership may become irrelevant.
So, perhaps you have kept quiet about your doubts about the existence of anthropogenic climate change, but now that the war in Ukraine has shown the existential threat to Western European civilisation from relying on Russian gas, it’s OK to speak your mind and say that its time to build more nuclear reactors, and maybe even keep the old coal plants burning for a bit longer until nukes are on stream. See what I mean?
Well said on all counts. I will use your version of The Razor – much more streamlined. I think the word ‘prefer’ as opposed to ‘select’ fits my aversion to making apothegms into decision heuristics better.
I could have brought an Asch Conformity model into the discussion, but it would have broached a much longer article discourse. The most streamlined way to get to the idea – that groups are MORE LIKELY to hold lies, not less – was the primary goal.
In late May 2019, my wife and I visited Naples, Italy. The owner of our rented apartment was Chinese and was recovering (she said) from the ‘flu. She had recently returned from visiting family in China. A few days later, I became ill and suffered what is now called ‘Covid 19’. The severe phase lasted about five days, during which I was bedridden and virtually drowning in my own mucus. This was followed by two weeks of coughing and general malaise. I now believe that it was Covid, brought to Italy by my Chinese host – in 2019.
I Knew it!! Thanks for proving it. Although the Raiders had their share of own goals (Marcus Allen finishing in KC? Really?)
Checking out the rest of your site. Very good, like it a lot.
As a physician who treated with repurposed antivirals from early 2020 (HCQ/Zn/Azithromycin+ Vit.D, then ivermectin/Zn/doxycycline + Vit D from August 2020)
I observed that there was a political war against these helpful treatments from the time that Donald Trump first advocated Dr.Zelenko’s useful protocol.
The delay of an ivermectin study until Omicron (mild) was dominant, and the start of treatment around day-6, when many were improving from Omicron, and the low dose and the omission of vitamin-D, doxycycline, zinc, quercetin, etc. would reasonably assure the lack of statistically significant benefit from ivermectin.
There is very good money to be made in carrying out scientific studies designed to fail.
It’s easy if you know what the facts truly are…
Perhaps it does not take a conspiracy. And yet if I were a budding conspirator who understood the mechanisms by which a fad can be generated, it would be tempting (too tempting to resist?) to hijack these very mechanisms to engineer my own fad. It appears that I need only control a significant portion of the media, as well as a few key apparatchiks and celebrities and Bob’s your uncle so to speak.
Ingens Vanitatum summarizes nicely nearly every business meeting I have ever been in! Also, fairly early in the pandemic I read about the Uttar Pradesh province and their success with Ivermectin so I ordered some from India before the US clamped down on it. A few months after that I caught Covid from my daughter and took the Ivermectin according to the FLCCC protocol. I went from antigen + to antigen – in 12 days, never hypoxic or incapacitated, and no side effects.
If you have dysbiosis, IBS, or autoimmune disorders (asthma, thyroid, diabetes, etc.) you very likely might have saved your life with this smart move. Your own government was your worst enemy in this.
I try to quietly walk away… but too often sneer and toss caustic rebuttals to the TV.
Without your expertise, my gut has served me well. Whats truly shocking, and almost depressing today… its all propaganda. All. Both sides in USA.
And I’m more aware, globally as well.
Its scary when I listen to some of Putins old interviews… and think he is more trustworthy than our leaders. He is brilliant. Reminds me of Newt Gingrich.
Thank you for the critical path. I deeply fear America is lost.
I wonder if the rise in excess deaths in working age Americans, noted by life insurance companies as a 3 sigma event, might be the upshot of the slightly rising graph you present, with a peak 9/11/2021.
Vaccine Adverse Events” and “otherwise unclassified”, Sir.
Hi ES
As usual, very interesting post. It made me think of Paulo Freire’s ‘Pedagogy of the Oppressed’ and some of Prof Denis Rancourt’s teaching techniques (essentially Freire’s).
Another point. The problem with autodidactics is that there are gaps in the their knowledge, usually this is compensated for by their inherent humble nature. But it can be a problem if they don’t realise they may have these gaps.
Yes – ‘gaps in knowledge’ exposure is the domain of philosophy. Not to answer/fill those gaps, but to detect and manage them. Those well versed in philosophy know the gaps are there, those versed only in knowledge at the expense of philosophy fail to know they are there. Hence why we rarely have paradigm shifts among the autodidact – but frequently among the ‘experts’. The latter rarely perceives when they are wrong or the information set is vastly incomplete.
From the very beginning of the pandemic, it seems, there were plans in several countries to implement a system of population triage that included the administration of end-of-life drugs to those considered too old or frail for intensive (or, in some cases, even standard) Covid-19 medical treatment. We know that the associated protocols can induce death, and that they were sometimes employed on residents in public care who were not in immediate danger of death or even Covid-19-positive.
Just today I came across the Nebra Sky Disc (see image) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebra_sky_disc and it made me think of that sculpture of the lion. Don’t know if it is helpful at all, but the disk is said to depict the stars as they were during the 16th century BC. Was wondering if you knew of the disc and if it may have any relevance to the work you’re doing (which admittedly I hardly understand but am fascinated by nonetheless).
Bas, yes I have examined the imagery of the Nebra sky disc several times. My thought is that it was a navigational binnacle on a boat. But have not figured out whether or not it was a ‘home port’ sky, used for an aid at getting back home – even if the captain who held the resident knowledge of how to do so fell ill or was captured/killed, or a more specific navigational tool. The ‘sky boat’ at the bottom is the mid-summer sun’s analemma for Local Apparent Noon (one of the few daytime navigation tools), while the east and west arcs were for the azimuth of the rising and setting sun. The moon appears obvious in the casting, but I am not sure how it would be navigationally relevant since the Moon changes its position throughout each year and is tough to navigate from, without a detailed text reference.
The conformist group (“blue church” for instance) which creates straw-man arguments to deflate hypotheses which do not conform to group beliefs, and maintains group cohesion long enough, is ultimately at risk for a Jim Jones, “everybody has to drink the Kool-Aid at the same time” moment (IMHO)
Anita, not sure I’m going to have time to do that. I would need to investigate the types of hybrids in prevalent use, their usage profile habits and time spent on electrical drive or augmentation versus fuel consumed in the engine, and then the percent allocated to longer drive rural versus shorter drive urban use. Makes it a much tougher value chain to isolate. But I understand the question.
The essence would be – is the middle the ‘best of both worlds’ – and my instinct would suggest – “It depends”
I’m finding that all of this goes back generations. If not for vigilant sceptics like you, we would be in worse shape. This crisis in science had to happen because reproducibility has been a problem for a long time. ‘The Economist’ published an article covering the problem in 2012-2013 and I was shocked to the core of how deep it was. Less than 40% of the published research stood the test of reproducibility.
“Correct scientists study correct things. Science is there to empirically confirm how correct they are.”
It’s the only certain way of expanding knowledge and passing it on for the greater good.
We’ve gotten to a point, everywhere around the world, where disagreement that results in healthy debate is equated with revolt.
Should the correct scientist be independent in such an interconnected world? Yes. COVID19 has brought to surface the fatal flaws of the dependent-scientist model.
The correct scientist serving local communities and populations can be a viable alternative.
If you think the reproducibility crisis reflected terribly in scientific publications in general, you’d be shocked how much lower that 40% is when it comes to published medical and pharma research specifically.
As far as I was aware, Flat Earth theory was an academic exercise. It began with a knowing false proposition, “the earth is flat” and used this to test the laws of physics. To me it was and still is this dinner party academic exercise. “Oh, but the earth appears round because gravity increases towards the edge of the flat disc and so light is bent to make it appear round.” To which someone replies, “so what experiments would you use to falsify this …” and the conversation would go on etc etc … (Try it, it’s fun, and it tests your academic ability).
But then suddenly this exercise was misconstrued such that it meant the participants _did_ believe the earth was flat etc … As to when this happened, I don’t know? As to whether it was deliberate I don’t know but strongly suspect so, see https://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/david-berman-and-epistemological-closure-in-the-propaganda-state/ and draw your own inferences. The upshot of all of this … I simply ignore all discussions of this nature since it’s built upon a false premise set by some other.
Great input Gyges, thanks! I ignore it as well. There are zombie theories, the walking dead theories which have been falsified but are Lindy. Then there are also Frankenstein theories – not real, just cobbled together as a straw man – still walking around dead as well.
This is in regard to the chart on the cerebrovascular death rates. My question is why would these appear to be seasonal, or cyclic. Is the flu shot or something related to the flu season impacting this death rate in past years? Same question about malignant neoplasm, why wouldn’t this be more linear, like the chart on non natural case of death. My area is computer science, so maybe there is a physiological explanation beyond my knowledge base.
I love all of your well researched and sourced charts that explain what is going on, and confirms what you predicted almost 2 years ago
Most deaths involve several mechanisms. What the NCHS tracks are two things: Underlying cause of death (UCOD) and multiple cause of death (MCOD). When we cite an underlying cause of death, often the timing of ‘when’ is pushed by a compounding factor. Many times that factor is a winter virus, or just the nature of winter stress on the body. One can still die of the etiology, but winters seem to attract those deaths like a magnet through these added compounding factors. Most CDC ICD-10 causes of death bear this same seasonality effect. But be aware that I trim off the lower part of the chart graph, so that the variance looks larger. Many of these seasonal variances are 2 – 5 %, so they are not large.
It is amazing. Flat earth is so easily refuted but nobody will do their homework. This is only one of many conspiracy theories (geo-engineering is the most pernicious). The biggest danger I see is that they shred the legitimacy of many people who are legitimately skeptical about issues like vaccines.
I think that that is the real aim behind promoting these pseudo theories.
Agreed. I always thought that was why “Flat Earthers” suddenly appeared. We were clearly reaching people when it came to the lack of true safety science on vaccines. They needed to find new ways to neutralize us.
It’s notable that nowhere in the Bible does it say that drinking alcohol is a sin. There are those individuals who are told they must not do it (see John the Baptist). But this is a clear exception, which proves the rule that there is no general prohibition against all alcohol consumption. In fact, the most sacred ritual of Christianity involves drinking wine, and doing it for the forgiveness of sins. In the institution Christ Himself said of the cup, “this is my blood” and gave it to His disciples to drink. Certain denominations which are ostensibly committed to the Bible being the 100% inerrant, Word of God, go to great lengths to add words to and subtract words from it. You will hear the nonsense about the wine of the day being equivalent to grape juice. I am not surprised that people pick up on this. It’s total malarkey. These are man made rules, not commandments from God.
Correct on alcohol. Even the whole ‘set of sins’ thing is a red herring, and spiritual chewing gum. I began to distrust Paul as I read his diatribes about who was and who was not getting into heaven, early in my study of the Bible. The ‘Letters to’ he supposedly penned were not up to any kind of standard of wisdom about our world and how evil works. Whoever wrote them had not really done much in their life. The ‘sins’ were canned, missed the nature of true evil, and ran anathema to what Christ outlined.
I am not convinced that the entire ‘Road to Damascus’ thing was not the act of a double-agent in the first place. How does the old saying go? ‘The second best method of genocide of a group is through killing them, the best method is by becoming their leader.’
Can you please elaborate on how you think Paul’s writings contradict Jesus? I am sure I will not agree on this, but I am interested to hear what you have to say. Particularly because it will lead me to study the Word more closely myself.
“Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.”
What Luke is actually saying:
1. There were many differing opinions as to what went on
2. The recounts are all third-hand or worse
3. They had to be interpreted (fulfilled) according to our understanding (among us) – which means they re-wrote them according to how they understood spirituality in their sect
4. What I write and how I interpret the words/events, is now the truth of those words/events (even if they conflict with older manuscripts)
In other words, Luke exploited a rhetorical structure to make claims which allowed him to gloss over these actual problems in the story. He was manipulating the reader. And Luke was the MOST honest among the authors – by admitting this. The problem is that even this, the best account among the Gospels, is 150+ years after the fact. Why were all the previous written accounts destroyed? Writing was not invented in 100 ad – so this is a glaring issue. Not trivial in the least. The only reason no documents would exist from 35 to 150 ad, is if someone wanted them exterminated. That should be a big warning flag, and we just Pollyannishly ignore this HUGE problem. It is like not getting bank account balances from you accountant for 40 years, and then being handed your final account balances after 40 years of hard work, and you have $250 in the bank – plus they won’t tell you the starting account balance you inherited from your parents either. Something is glaringly wrong, and casts primary doubt on those who published the ‘new account’ – without authentication, they hold a 99% chance of lying on critical subtleties.
These are warning flags that a re-interpretation is underway, but placed into code. The confirmation of this, is that all competing scriptures were exterminated – without vetting/sign-off by first-hand witness. That too is a warning flag. Yet later writings in Turkey and the filtering of the Canonical Councils centuries later are accepted as Gospel? No, this is the same trick fake skepticism uses. Re-writing the laws and principles of philosophy to their favor, without your knowledge of their provenance or sound basis.
And Luke is the BEST we have.
Thus, it is more of philosophical change to which I object, from early New Testament to the times of the Anatolian Churches under Rome – so I don’t typically get into verse to verse semantic arguments – as that cedes too many assumptions before the argument has even begun. The verses are not reliable, as the speakers are not experienced in human nature, were not even close to being first hand witnesses, the semantics are poorly chosen, and finally the writers simply wrote what they and their sect wanted to hear. So unlike many, I do not hold the Bible as an inerrant document. This is what happens today after all. This applies to Genesis and the New Testament in particular. Changing ‘elohim’ to ‘Yahweh/Jehova’, or ‘Son of Man’ (the Gnostic scriptures use) to ‘Son of God’ centuries later for instance.
Moreover, the Bible writers cite the work of Christian salvation as finished at the Cross – and then outline centuries later how God is still angry after this completion milestone, and is still going to take his vengeance out on the world in The Revelation of John – this after having already punished man in Genesis too – so here we are paying for sin a total of eight times (Geneisis ‘Death’, Expulsion, Suffering, Tithe, Crucifixion, Suffering, Tithe, Wrath of Revelation, Lake of Fire) – How many friggin’ times is a hapless race supposed to be punished for a single mythical event? No mention is made of what will happen to the dark spirits which inhabit and enslave this world right now. That is a BIG hole in the story. Nelsonian ignorance. A flag that deception and a shift of blame, on the part of the actual guilty party, is underway. This too indicative of a brilliance-in-evil that is not fully comprehended by Paul nor the Canonical Councils.
Finally, they got this whole ‘Through one man did sin/death enter the world’ and ‘DNA vs The Flesh’ thing fatally incorrect. The whole house of cards collapses on that foundational stone. Man did not create sin-death after all. They sold us this bill of goods, while we were ignorant of the planet’s and life’s history. That’s a pretty critical trust-breaker. Selling such a principle of manipulation to a hapless uninformed victim is like stealing the pension of a widow, a despicable act. The worst of sins. It is akin to saying ‘You must earn God’s approval’ – before you can mentally broach the argument, ‘This ‘God’ must first earn my trust’.
And yet sinners still must follow the list of additional symbolic and mostly meaningless behaviors to keep out of God’s wrath after God’s work was suposedly finished, or they will lose this gift and cannot come back a second time. Paul was big on that.
This is called in ethics, a ‘bait and switch’. It is a method of manipulating a hapless party. It is a praxis of evil. A canned technique of extracting money and obedience under an irreconcilable offense (hence, why I wrote “The Riddle of Sin” and “The Awesome Insistence of Cataclysmic Mirage Theory (CMT)”). An evil which is much greater than ‘sloth, backbiting, envy, drunkenness, revelry, etc.’ and the shallow list of social pretense that Paul flippantly assembled.
I am not impressed by the overall integrity of the message. I get strong sense that a highly threatening and disruptive message was intercepted, corrupted and re-written, and all traces of the original were wiped out. This is what the Covidians did to us over the last two years. This is what oppressive authority always does – as lying is its native tongue. And the Bible is the product of this very same Authority.
The resulting work of philosophy derived from this quick re-issuance therefore of course, does not hold ethical water.
What is most shocking to me is how normalized the sincere promotion of large-scale censorship has become among those who see themselves in the tradition of rationality and free thought.
They would quote Voltaire or Bertrand Russel or all the other great minds that are canonically counted among the guardians of enlightenment (well, at least the somewhat literate among them would/could quote them, if being literate is still a thing) … because they logically see themselves in the exalted intellectual tradition that fights superstition, obtuseness, prejudice and everything else that is not ethical and reasonable.
And what is ethical and reasonable? Well, exactly that which is what they think and say! They know that they are right. There is no question about that – but stupid humanity can’t wrap its stupid collective head around that, so they “have” to play unfair and viciously fight or even ban all that misguided dissent – to save humanity from itself! They know they are right (they never ever questioned their fundamental certainties), so if they have to resort to sophistry or even censorship … well, then it’s people’s own fault! How would they learn otherwise? If they can’t see reason, then they have to be forced to see reason!
And of course, all that is completely different from all the other cases of enforced conformity in human history – because THIS time, they know they are right! This time it’s different – obviously!
Every comparison to (or even mention of) group-think, propaganda or totalitarianism in this context would be completely absurd and a “conspiracy theory” …
They don’t – no, they can’t – see the irony of what they are doing. They don’t even have the slightest degree of self-awareness, let alone cultural-historical awareness of what they are doing. That it is increasingly coming from quarters that – historically – have been on the other (the “better”) side of the fence when it comes to freedom of thought is simply disgusting.
i had an exchange with a friend’s wife a few years back regarding my use of the word “retarded”
she argued that it is hurtful to those parents of mentally-challenged kids, i argued “but that’s not the definition i am employing for this particular word in this particular context. further, WHO is empowered to decide which words i may employ? and where may i find the constantly-updating list of words i am no longer permitted to utter?”
i am of the admittedly rigid opinion that freedom of speech includes lies, hatred, and fantastical conspiracy theory. only calls for violence or tangible threats should be censured.
Lies will eventually falsify themselves.
The biggest liar, no matter what truth they claim, is the one who will not let this process evolve and must insert themself inside it.
In regard to language – things like, ‘You ride on the short bus’ or ‘retarded’ – yeah, while we have that freedom absolutely, I tend to stay away from such pejoratives – and really focus on the specific stupid things people do…
I read this excellent piece when it came out. Have you figured in the much greater mass of the oceans compared to the atmosphere? The total mass of earth’s oceans is 1.4 × 1021 kg. The total mass of the earth’s atmosphere is 5 × 1019 kg. If you have written about this, please feel free to delete this comment.
I have addressed this in a benchmark which loosely holds that the ocean can hold 1000 times more heat content than an equivalent cube of atmosphere. However, that is cube-to-cube. Your context opens up to mass and specific heat – which I have not taken into account in this article.
Specific heat of water versus air and the ability to raise just the four or five bands of abyssal and surface would be a level of model constraint detailed data I don’t hold.
Gloveraa, sinkholes on the seafloor are definitely caused by rising deep and abyssal ocean temperatures. But as well, if the asthenosphere is raised 20 degrees C, then the warmer Earth 40 – 600 meters down will accelerate the annual vernal outgassing of methane and cause sinkholes there as well, yes.
Both the prevailing Climate Change Theory and your Climate Change Alternative Model have as objects the changing ocean temperature, regardless of how that was arrived at.
And, for my inquiry, vernal outgassing is provided as another plausible explanation by your reasoning.
This may be an old article, but it is a very important one. A great one, in fact …
Every “SCIENCE!”-screaming troglodyte should be confronted with these clear and concise clarifications. Too much stupid “science” gibberish muddles through by being ill-considered hogwash that is never challenged in the simple yet fundamental ways that it deserves!
Somehow I feel very much at home with this article :)
Today’s all too relevant, up-to-date forms of Propaganda, in all their intangibility, are perhaps my biggest and most “favourite” (yuck!) pet peeves of all. They are the omnipresent poison of modern thinking, tainting everything that is ever thought.
Lately, I have been deeply immersed in this troubling twilight world of horrors in which “skepticism” and rationality duke it out in the fields of inquiry that “skeptics” deem to be fair game … and I would be so much more impressed (by the “skeptics”, that is) if they would understand how ridiculously trite, mindless and stupid their “arguments” are. I could do so much better to convincingly “debunk” whatever there is to “debunk”, if I wanted to – if I wanted to be a disingenuous agent of general stultification.
Often it is just a matter of being able to read properly! But even that is too much to ask of them under most circumstances …
It is getting silly. There are limits to how much idiocy a decently developed human brain can take without getting grumpy. For me, those borders have been crossed a long time ago. But, regarding the last few years, I think there is something else developing that is also somewhat new (or newly implemented).
When – suddenly – all speak with one voice, then you can be sure that something is wrong. That “wrongness” is something I have felt/observed in so many areas for such a long time, although often in the abstract, that I presume to know it by now. But now – or in the last few years, to be exact – that quality has reached a new level of concreteness.
For the first time in my actual life, I viscerally fear for humanity …
I do fear for humanity as well, TS.
Science can harm, and when done for virtue – there are no unintended consequences.
Our educated, and guardians of science – are mere kabuki now.
Thank you for the considered reply to my 2 questions. I appreciate your thought-provoking and detailed response. I am hoping that you will find time to address a couple of additional questions which might help me and others understand the timeframe as to when the first White-tailed Deer could possibly have contracted Covid-19 anywhere within the United States.
I have read elsewhere a belief that the SARS-CoV-2 virus may have been circulating in the US long before it was detected on January 18, 2020 in the State of Washington; this first documented case of Covid-19 was found in an individual who had just returned from Wuhan, China. And I realize that you have proposed that a less virulent strain of this same virus originated sometime in 2018 and spread throughout southeast Asia before somehow disappearing or becoming dormant. But I would like your assessment as to the likelihood that this low virulence strain of SARS-CoV-2 also could have been circulating within the United States AND infected a portion of its deer population before the more deadly form of this virus evolved and erupted into an outbreak in Wuhan, China during December 2019 (which subsequently spread worldwide as the Covid-19 pandemic).
If you do not believe it would be very likely that the earlier – less virulent – strain of SARS-CoV-2 both spread to the United States AND infected White-tailed Deer prior to December 2019, then how soon after the Wuhan outbreak do you believe it would be plausible for deer in the US to become infected with the strains of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the Covid-19 pandemic?
I have puzzled this in my mind since I read that deer throughout a fairly large portion of the US were discovered to harbor antibodies for the SARS2 virus. Upon reading your brilliant deduction that land application of human sewage sludge likely may be a primary cause of this novel wildlife infection, and after your kind response to one set of my questions, I realized that your opinion might be very helpful in providing a better understanding about the timeframe for the spread of Covid-19 to wildlife in the US.
Thanks again, and I look forward to your response.
As I like to frame the context of questions, your is ‘salient, sequitur, and critical path’. I would love to have the answer to this. I can only address it abductively (best guess of likeliness) – so this does not make it but one idea.
The 2018 ancestor of Covid, which conferred immunity, did not hit the US hard. It ended its Hope-Simpson season and went mostly extinct before it really penetrated 35 final nations well. In similar fashion to Delta, which did the same thing. I think that SARS-CoV-2 virus loads probably did not rise to the level in Oct 2019, which would compete with Oct 2020. So the deer reflected minimal antibodies from that particular window of time. The deer might be analogous to Wuhan itself – which was the last bastion holdout in China, to get hit hard. Unfortunately by a much more deadly strain…
Now that I see the relative mildness of Omicron, my upset over this pathogen being hidden in 2018/19 has softened. There definitely were excess 2018/19 ‘flu’ death rises in the 2020/21-immnue nations – but it was at a low enough level where this could have snuck by, pretty much everyone except for the PLA lab which released it and the CCP which hid this, because the Party shall not be mocked. They still bear fault.
I read with great interest your discussion of sewage sludge as a possible means for the spread of Covid-19 among White-tailed Deer, and wondered what evidence you may have found which addresses the likelihood that live virus could persist with sufficient viability in this medium to cause infection if subsequently contacted or inhaled when aerosolized. My preliminary investigation into studies and other research which may bear on this question led me to conclude that the viability of live viruses would be exceedingly low and thus unlikely to persist in sewage “sludge” – particularly if it was “digested” or “activated” as is normally done in the sanitary treatment of raw sewage. However, my research also discovered research which may have indicated a somewhat greater likelihood of persistence of live viruses in waters containing raw sewage, and I now recall there might be some studies which indicated the viablity of live viruses might extend for a number of hours (or perhaps a bit longer) within sewage-contaminated waters under certain outdoor environmental conditions.
In parallel to your observation that the spreading of SARS2-contaminated sewage sludge may be responsible for the recently detected evidence of Covid-19 infection in deer, have you considered that sewage settling ponds may also serve as a possible source of infection – many of which are unfenced (or “low” fenced), particularly so near rural towns & larger communities where sewage treatment facilities often are small and isolated? I’ve witnessed deer coming to browse along the edges of a couple of such facilities, and suspect that they may be able to drink from settling ponds at their edges (where sloping sides permit). Also, settling ponds may be a plausible means of infecting nearby wildlife via inhalation if live virus can be propagated from pond water by aerosol transmission (e.g., fog, evaporation, etc.), and perhaps (doubtfully?) also possible for infection to be caused by live virus that may be deposited onto foliage upon contact with and condensation of aerosol vapors and soon thereafter consumed by wildlife susceptible to this infective agent.
In addition, it’s not widely known but there is substantial trade in deer meat (venison) and antlers from “deer farms” or “wildlife farms” – which are allowed under the wildlife laws in most states. Plus, these “deer farms” are widespread, occurring in most every state – and many states have several. These businesses raise deer for meat, antlers,”trophy hunting” and to supply other “deer farms” or “hunting parks”. Several species of deer or elk are often sold or traded.
You can google “deer farms” and discover that these businesses have websites and sell their products on-line. A few even have “open houses” where they allow the public to come visit their deer enclosures; I’ve seen photos posted on a couple of “deer farm” websites which show families with kids standing next to tame deer (supposedly these tame deer were part of a regular tour offered as part of an “educational program” for that “deer farm”. I believe deer enclosures likely are visited by wild deer, who may browse next to confined animals (or come close when attracted during mating season). This would provide the opportunity for transmission of Covid-19, particularly if muzzle contact is possible but perhaps equally as likely via aerosol transmission of live virus through respiratory exchanges. In addition, the threat of disease transmission from confined deer to nearby cattle and livestock is significantly large enough that USDA and state governments require the owners of “deer farms” to have veterinary inspections of confinement facilities as well as provide proof of inoculations for each animal. However, I do not believe there is as yet a Covid-19 vaccination requirement for “farmed” deer, probably because a vaccine has not yet been developed and shown to be effective in deer or other wildlife (or even for pets?).
Sadly, there is an underground market “niche” in the exotic pet and wildlife trades that sell captive wildlife such as “deer fawns”. However, this illegal activity likely provides only a small and incidental risk in spreading the virus which causes Covid-19.
Regarding question 1 ‘Can a live virus survive long in sewage sludge?’ – Covid is not a lone virus in sewage. It is not exposed to oxygen, halogens, or UV when in sludge – and more importantly, it acts like a bacteriophage – especially with dysbiosis constituents, Coprobacillus, Clostridium ramosum and Clostridium hathewayi, etc. It lives inside intestinal bacteria – and will stay alive as long as there are remnants of ACE2/MAS/G protein pathways, There is a reason why sewage sludge can only be used in the Fall, prior to the first freeze. Class B Biosolids are ‘mostly mitigated’ – not 100%. A virus works off the exception and can reactivate and multiply when disturbed by spraying or new moisture (as is added into Class B biosolids before spraying, in order to get it to fall), and not the rule – that is how evolution and viruses function – by the exception, not the rule. Humans think in terms of rules (constraints) – and that is Level I logic. Level II logic involves extraints and permissives. The logic and language of adaptation, survival, and evolution. We have no measures for live virus content in waterways and Class B Biosolids. It remains a danger and cannot be dismissed by abductive reasoning.
Regarding question 2 ‘Why not estuaries and deer farms.?’ A simple answer – Covid would have spread immediately and not have waited until Nov 2020. In Nov 2020, we saw that Covid (not just one clade but ALL human clades which were active before that time) spread in the deer population – they emulated humanity literally almost overnight (see Exhibit 1.1, both panels). If those two vectors were the means, it would have happened in April, not November – and only one or two early clades would have been present. Instead – the deer got all November 2020 clades, and all at the same time, and too late to be explained by a normal everyday of the year activity…. There is only one means by which they would suddenly get infected by ALL human clades simultaneously, in November and not April.
This is a Level II evidence set. One cannot solve this with Level I inference and abduction.
Because, this is a comparison of EV’s fed by home solar, versus fossil fuels. Nuclear power is not in this value chain – but rather, increases or reduces its scale (potentially). Nuclear Power is it own value chain and would act as a red herring here (which I constantly see others exploit in order to lie to the public) – the whole reason for doing value chains is so as not to mix principles. My purpose is clarity in a complex subject, not over-complication for appearances’ sake.
Deep Sea Octopi use geothermal vents to speed up birth cycles. According to this site, in their region there are vents with temps “as high as 10deg” that can speed the birth cycles up by 90%+.. They’ve only explored 1% of the region.
Their numbers are likely unfathomable. Their presence alone could trap heat in the bottom of the ocean, they could be moving rocks and expanding these vents.
“Clusters of deep-sea egg-brooding octopods associated
with warm fluid discharge: an ill-fated fragment of a
larger, discrete population?” Study link.
I’m far too lazy to look into more. But I found this rather interesting and relevant – people say that octopus numbers are growing because of global warming. I reckon they are right – but is it because these vents are getting warmer? Worth a thought.
Your piece is very provocative – I love things that challenge my preconceptions. I enjoyed the read and will check out some more of your work.
This research article by Spartacus follows upon others that reveal a deep intelligence investment in the technology of SARS-CoV-2, the engineered virus, now with variations, and genetic-engineering “vaccines” to help your body make spike protein itself, for months on end.
This explains a frighteningly plausible big picture of the road to Build Back Better World. A Hypothetical Mind Control System https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part-iv-mind-control?s=r
Since I previously posted a link to that “cognitive bias cheat sheet”, I should probably mention that such things can have the same problem as a “logical fallacies cheat sheet” in the hands of someone who is determined to explain away everything in terms of biases or logical fallacies.
Someone could either not be biased in the manner claimed, or be somewhat biased in the manner claimed, but still be correct about something.
I tend to think these things are more useful for people asking themselves “am I coming to this conclusion primarily due to bias?” Or “Is my reasoning erroneous here?” And not so useful as things to accuse other people of or dismiss ideas out-of-hand without further consideration.
As for the shortcomings of statistical models, all someone needs to do to experience this is get a paper trade account and try writing “low theoretical expiring ITM probability” (such as 1 sigma out) SPX index options on expiration day, then let them expire. They will most likely lose much more Monopoly money than they make relying entirely on that idea, even if they limit losses using short vertical spreads, especially if this is always done on expiration day.
I may seem somewhat like this but in reality it’s more like I’m playing devil’s advocate to get more information and I haven’t actually come to any conclusions.
People too determined to “debunk” everything are actually just exhibiting psychological denial.
Authority-Governance-Media can disinform all they please, as there is no term which exists to describe malicious activity on their part
Perhaps there should be a term?
The press here attempted to copy the CCP tactic for denouncing unapproved narratives when they started using the term “fake news”, but this was promptly turned against them.
I wonder if there’s a better term though….
thank you for this mindblowing article (and for the other mindblowing articles of yours, by the way). It was a most stimulating read!
Now, I have read the article just yesterday and to be honest, I have not fully absorbed it yet. But I have noticed that in exhibit 14, you put star #12 inside the crescent moon, whereas in exhibits 16 and 17, you put it outside the crescent moon. Was there a reason for this? Because if star #12 was fully INSIDE the crescent moon, how could we even be able to see it? In this case, the moon would block our view on this star, would it not?
Now, here is a “far out” possibility: Star #12 might not have been a star after all. It might have been some kind of light which was flashed from a dark patch on the moon. In this case, it would have been totally correct to depict it INSIDE the crescent moon, as many (most? all?) ancient depictions in fact did. Maybe depicting the star OUTSIDE of the crescent moon was already a later distortion of historical fact, because having the star inside the crescent moon was considered “impossible”?!
Consider also that we seem to be talking about the same event which might have inspired the tale of the “star of Bethlehem”, which is of course linked to the God of the Old Testament. If we now compare the name of this God with the name of a certain egyptian lunar deity, Iah, which also simply was an egyptian word for “moon” – well, I don’t fully know what to make of it, to be honest. But it looks like an intriguing avenue for investigation to me.
In any case, you are way smarter than me, so make of that what you will! Just dropping this thought here. Maybe you find it as useful and interesting as I do.
Again, thank you for your work and for your tireless fight against pseudo-skepticism! I don’t know if there ever was a time where we needed voices like yours more than now.
Yes, the odds of this actually being a ‘star’ are pretty low, as stars come replete with LOTS of gravity. I am leaving it open as to whether or not the light came from the moon or alongside it. Given that Star #12 is on the ecliptic, perhaps it is a body of our solar system which is not close enough to disrupt the orbits of the planets. But I do not have the answers to this.
Bravo! I see that you also compose music in addition to definitively unraveling an astounding variety of subjects. If you put all your writings into one or more volumes of a philosophy/science/logic series, it will be read and studied for centuries.
Sorry to hear about your child. I have a vaccine injured child as well. Twenty one years ago, when my first child was just born, not even dry yet, the nurse ran up to her with several needles. I said what are those? She said one was vitamin K and the other Hepatitis B vaccine. I replied you can give the vitamin K but not the Hepatitis B. She got angry and tried to threaten me but I raised my voice and sternly lectured her that I was a physician, had recently gotten an 800 on my Immunology boards, and that my wife and child had zero risk of acquiring Hepatitis B. I lectured her with all the information that was fresh in my mind at the time concerning things like where Hepatitis B was endemic(Mexico and China), who was at risk(IV drug abusers), the timing of the injection and so forth. She finally barked “Are you refusing”?. I declared “Yes!” It was at that moment I realized that something had gone seriously wrong with the medical industry, particularly concerning vaccines. I brought my daughter to many of her pediatric visits and every single one was centered on more vaccine shots. I researched every disease individually and told the pediatrician I only wanted her to get one shot per visit. The pediatrician was annoyed but granted my wish. Then on one visit, the pediatrician came with the MMR and ChickenPox. I said okay to the MMR, but no to the chickenpox. She asked why. I responded that I had the chickenpox when I was a kid, as did every friend and family member I knew. It was a mild disease, barely noticeable, that was less disruptive than the common cold. Then she pulled out the big guns. You’re child will not be able to go to school! I capitulated and let my daughter get both. Well, starting the next day began the downward spiral, high fever, piercing screams and total body rash. My wife and I brought my daughter in to the pediatrician who would not treat her or even look at her. She just kept insisting the vaccine had nothing to do with it. I said I don’t care about that right now, do something. She did nothing. Ny daughter regressed, lost her speech and eye contact. We got very lucky because following years of top level nutrition, speech therapy and just pure luck she mostly recovered, now with residual learning disability, which is a constant stressor for her and us, but we count our blessings.
When I was a child I got all the required vaccines which was a total of maybe 5 or 6. None of them contained aluminum adjuvant and most I received after 3 years old. Through my entire childhood and adolescence I maybe encountered one person with a bee-sting allergy and maybe one with peanut allergy, but that was all. I knew one kid who had some type of mental impairment, the sister of a friend of mine, but it was something like severe cerebral palsy. I had never even heard of autism. Now, as an adult with grown children, I know dozens of people who have kids or grandkids with food allergies, around ten people who have autistic family members, and many other neuro/immunological problems. The only people I have met who know that there are true risks to vaccines all have seen it with their own eyes. I worry now for any future grandchildren I might have. After all, the Tobacco industry got away with their crimes for many decades before SO many people had lung cancer that every lawyer, judge and doctor personally knew a smoker who got lung cancer. Only then did the lawsuits end the charade. It wasn’t that smoking was suddenly proven to cause it. I fear that as a society we will ramp up the vaccine schedule until it mandates multiple yearly shots from birth. It won’t end until EVERY judge, lawyer, doctor, and politician has a family member who blatantly regressed in the weeks after a vaccine. Seeing is believing. Unfortunately that may be decades away, particularly with how the industry showed it’s propaganda power and governmental influence with this Covid blockbuster. I have a glimmer of hope that with terrific research, analysis and writing like The Ethical Skeptic did here, and others like JB Handley’s “How to End the Autism Epidemic”, that we could end this coming apocalypse sooner.
If we take the chart I published recently, which showed 5,800 reduced infant deaths in 2020 attributable to a 15.5% reduction in vaccinations (Bramer, May 2020) – that gives us 37,400 children who die of infant vaccinations each year. If we take the VAERS injury to severe ratio of .0374 injuries/severe reaction – that gives us 1,000,500 severe reactions to vaccines every year.
If two thirds of those constitute life-long injury (as with my son) – that equates to 680,000 brain injuries every year out of 4,000,000 annual births – or 17% brain injury rate – EXACTLY what I observed at my son’s basketball games as the percentage of kids with encephalitic special needs (albeit most milder than my son’s).
it seems to me that current propaganda is highly targeted to emotional response
women seemingly dominate the profession of teaching children
children are being encouraged to “feel”, rather than “reason”
feelings are warm, reason is cold
i notice it a lot when speaking to the under-40 crowd: they say “i feel” when they should be saying “i think”, or “i believe” when relaying their version of information
i assume this is because their argument/information in this way becomes unassailable – “this is how i feel! my feelings aren’t wrong”
Judging Intent – is indeed a way of judging-by-feeling, in advance of having any information at all. Also known as ‘everyone should do whatever the fuck I want’… Correct.
A nulla infantis, just by sophisticated psychology terms… (although I would contend this is not simply a female thing)
Thx
Just going to add
Was use of “Its intent” in re The Conditions Of Flawed Information 2nd sentence intentional (lol)?
It jarred a bit due to the assertion intent is not attributable to info
Very good point – changed the sentence to be consistent. However, this is actual intent, rather than judged intent in that context now.
Thanks!
TES
Did you go above and beyond to make this coherent to mere mortals, or did I have moment of clarity or was better acquainted with the subject… because I think I understood everything.
I think you probably had a better grasp of this subject. The nuances of logic in the language were a bit tricky. The actual deception they are pulling off by altering the language so that the definition base is ‘lopsided’ is not easy to discern.
I am trying to think of a graphic I can use, in order to demonstrate how they are pulling this off… (Update Note: I think I have crafted what I wanted to say, into a chart, now inserted into the article)
Great observation. Functioning propaganda in this day and age works this way, not in the crude Nazi-Germany/Soviet Union/North Korea way. And not only in grand ideological-political matters.
Perhaps the Wuhan lab employed one or more careless technicians causing multiple virus leaks over the years, with different variations of the virus each time. This could explain why an early mild variant could have spread in 2018 and not have been recognized as a Wuhan leak, and the recent more virulent strain caused conspicuous disease in Wuhan before it spread elsewhere.
I was quite suspicious at the beginning as to how Moderna could have gotten the full viral sequence so soon after the illness made headlines around December 2019, unless the Wuhan lab had the full sequence, gave it to Daszak or Fauci, who then gave it to Moderna.
I think maybe something is being overlooked here about a large structure on a mountain where observers make observations.
It seems likely to me that this wasn’t just an attempt to honor gods, but to communicate a message to them, then wait and watch for a response. It resembles a signal post, something which in human terms would be placed high up so that signal fires could be seen from another high place at a distance. Observers would also be watching for signals from other signal posts in the mundane human case.
An astonishing astronomical event would appear as clearly being a message from the sky, in response to the message from the ground, which would then be recorded for all to see later.
A similar pattern shows up in various “UFO cults” where gods are replaced with aliens. Cult members will create earth writing or use other means in an attempt to signal “the aliens”, then interpret UFO sightings as messages from the aliens in response to the messages from the humans. I haven’t spent much time looking into the exact beliefs but I’ve seen some videos of “ufo gatherings” where this seems to be what’s going on, and have read some descriptions of similar.
As for the flags, flags normally carry some sort of symbol of sovereignty or legitimacy. For example, the wheel on the Indian flag is a very old sovereignty symbol that goes back at least 2000+ years. I’m not sure how old it is based on carvings, but it is mentioned repeatedly in the Tipitaka which is usually considered to be 2,400 years old by Buddhists.
If this astonishing “message from the gods” was widely seen as a confirmation of approval and legitimacy, it would entirely make sense that a simplified depiction of the message would later be used as a symbol of legitimacy. Since the Ottomans eventually claimed Stewardship (kalafat) of the Islamic civilization, it would make sense that their legitimacy symbol would spread throughout the Islamic world as a sovereignty/legitimacy symbol even if the symbol didn’t originate with Islam. The same might have happened with the wheel if The Stewardship had been centered in India instead.
As for the WEF logo graphics, it’s possible that the design was imitated for similar sovereignty/legitimacy type reasons especially if the graphic artist was influenced by this symbolism, either via cultural background or familiarity.
Anyway, imagine what would happen if some aliens sent an unambiguously-from-aliens message in binary or something that essentially suggested that a particular government or ideology was the most legitimate one and the one everyone ought to imitate. Even today it would not be surprising if this message not only ended up in a museum somewhere to commemorate such a rare and surprising “first contact” event, but also on the flag of any xenophilic country or organization devoted to following the alien advice.
I think to ancient people it may have seemed something like this, just replace the aliens with gods.
This deacon contract is just …. fascinating. What more can you say about it?
Deacon hereby agrees that the Bible is the sole, inerrant, and final declaration of God to mankind, and to not regularly consume any material or information source which does not serve to reinforce such principle.
This part alone … God help you if you dare to read Shakespeare, Goethe or Tolkien – let alone Wittgenstein!
…
I have found that my own personal wounds have not only caused me more pain and harm than they deserve to, but also others. For a long time, I have been a happy human being, almost ashamed of my luck and welfare.
Then, after many years of joyful self-determination, the other side of existence made its harrowing acquaintance with me – and I suffered quite a bit; now I recognise the patterns that make up those confusing and often harmful existential mechanisms that you describe here, and I can’t even say that I know what it is that did it to me. I think it was/is me – but also everything: Myself, my world, circumstance and something akin to fate.
I am only an observer of myself – but I am also the doer, the perceiver, and the one who pays the bills, so to say … all at once. I hate to think of all the horror and cruelty that comes to so many people every day – and which is so much more powerful and horrible than what I have ever encountered. But even knowing a little bit of history is enough to freeze your blood with icy fear and disgust beyond comprehension …
And then we have today’s world. When it comes to not being in line with what is typically accepted as being conventional, I surely am qualified to say: Something is not quite right, despite all the assurances to the contrary by the “clergy” of modern technocracy.
And I am not talking about the shopworn pieces of wisdom that pretend to be questions and answers at the same time …
Not to mention that [brain=mind] does in no way explain away all the complex phenomena arising from “mind” – for example Dr. Marcus being a conscious being saying/writing what he does. Having the thoughts he has. Or all the other complex phenomena arising from minds existing, interacting and giving rise to new phenomena.
I certainly wouldn’t explain away a computer program just because it is a “property” of the computer. And we all know how mysteriously even those act and interact – and what they give rise to. And mind is even far more wondrous …
It isn’t even necessary for mind to be there “before” brain for it to be a miracle and the source of innumerable wonders. But we don’t know or understand nearly enough about it to make any definitive statements that masquerade as the be-all and end-all truth of it … we are not even close.
If mind is only an epiphenomenon, then we have a lot of epiphenomena discussing with other epiphenomena why they are just epiphenomena …
June 2021 cases curves from Latvia Estonia Australia “you wouldn’t believe the truth”… Hmmm… I keep saying Delta came from the Vax. Georgia got same delta hit as Latvia, Estonia, and Australia… And Delta is also symbol of change… The purpose was to change the minds of the younger and healthier… Delta killed my coworkers younger sons coworker. 2 of my coworkers age 32? and 42? Hospitalized by Delta. Our circle, N = 1500 last summer was mostly younger Delta cases. MIT article on multiple vaccine doses delivered by polymer encapsulates in nano cups that can release 41 days later… If they can make a virus that kills 50 percent of over 65 yrs, (SARS MERS) and Alpha predominantly over 65 yrs but lower percent… if… then they can make a virus that mostly sickens younger, and healthier. (i am sure 1918 was studied well) If they can make a vaccine that releases after 41 days… they can make a vaccine that releases after 180 days with thicker polymer nano cups. I keep saying, Delta came from the vax. Latvia Estonia Australia, and USA Georgia curves all 6 months after the vax rollout. Spars 2025 is coming… because 2026 is first year West promises can not be paid. The Pale horse is coming. Wailing and gnashing of teeth. , China is a patsy. FDA, Pfizer et al. is a patsy. Gates et al is a patsy. layers of deniability. Hubbert’s oil bell curve… Everything USA has done to keep oil in the ground for decades… because we will have to take it one day… Politics cant pay for the promises its made in the west. So the need to pay those promises must be eliminated. Spars 2025… Money and Oil are what Party and power must have, take defend.
I do not have to qualify a natural law, by making up a supreme entity who handed that natural law down. That actually weakens the basis of the natural law. It is far more competent to comprehend a natural law, without having it passed down to you.
Such laws should not come from enforcement by a superbeing. That violates the very nature of such a being.
No, you do not have to qualify a natural law. Yet I find the arguments that according to this law a human being is supposed to have a better life than ameba or a fox or a tree. Sure there are entities that are sentient, that are alive and on and on… Natural law for me does not make distinctions.
About the enforcement by superbeing. So true about violation of the nature of God. But is it true or is this just a word play.
According to my belief in God he offers and gives me freedom. Manipulation comes not from Him but from those that misuse His will. And yes to the means of gaining power.
Firstly, I want to say that much of these conversations are over my head. I originally found your website in regards to Covid, but as a Christian I was interested in other articles you wrote.
But, for this natural law, imho it truly can only come from God or passed down because otherwise it becomes relative. One person’s truth is another person’s lie. It is the reason why deformed babies were left to die in the woods, or disabled people killed.
again, I’m a novice, so I might not even be contributing to the real argument. :)
But it does sadden me that it seems you do not believe in God’s sons death for our salvation and sounds like it stems from this bad experience with the deacon position. FYI, I use to be a worship leader and I understand why they would do that. It’s not about power, it’s about representation imho. For ex. I had to tell the young teenage girls who were singing in the band to wear longer skirts (they were wearing very short mini skirts). It wasn’t a good representation and it was also a temptation for the men in the church. This is also of course relative, so I understand how some religions don’t care “come as you are” and some take it to the extreme “skirts down to the ankles”.
But in regards to your contract, while I fully don’t agree with the alcohol- UNLESS it is getting drunk which clearly is stated in the bible- it was about representing God’s church to others who would be looking to you as a godly leader. The contract was extreme though, but having a contract makes full sense and I think it is good, if there was a more balanced approach. For instance, “I will make it a priority to not engage in behavior that is against God’s word like getting drunk, watching porn, going against the commandments, etc. If I fail, I will come to God immediately to repent, and if I cannot then I must come to the elders to resign my position.” just my 2 cents :)
A focus on sin – has not made the world any better. Demons are enormously concerned with the sins and bad you have personally done – and they will let you know all about them. That does not make demons and djinn part of the light at all. Sin-mongering is a game foisted by a being who does not want man to alleviate suffering nor improve his lot in the Universe. It is spiritual chewing gum keeping a person constantly terrified and feckless – and is part of the overall prison-shtick we are held captive inside.
The accountability for sin falls upon the ruler of this world who has assumed the throne as God – that has to be re-solved first – or nothing good will ever happen – morality or not.
No, any religion authorized by this being to become a large institution… is not the truth.
The problem with this mindset is the time frame. Mom and dad won’t be here forever, then what? Starting out in your twenties is tough and it doesn’t get easier as you get older. As my Drill Instructor used to say, “Life is tough, and then you die.” It often sucked, but it was worth it. Yes, I am that old.
You are correct; however, this is no longer simply a mindset. This challenge did not exist 15 years ago and earlier. Genocide is different from simple ‘life is hard’. They are two distinct things. One person in the concentration camp should not say to the next, ‘Life is hard, suck it up…’ and just allow the condition to continue. Sometimes ‘sucking it up’ means confronting the concentration camp operators too.
Eventually, part of growing up is also standing up to authority and changing things… not just accepting it, ‘cuz’ you’re tough…’ There are more people being harmed than just you (the royal ‘you’ :-) ). Part of deception is trick a person into thinking that dilemmas are only a personal issue, when they are not. There is a broader principle at play, and when we are simply a nation of defeated individuals, ‘sucking it up’ all alone – that is how they pull off their craft.
I hesitate to pose an obvious question:
Regulus being the heart of the Lion (Leo), and also being occulted by the moon, makes it a seemingly perfect choice for the position of ‘star #12’ on the horoscope itself – i.e. Regulus is bright, prominent, and in that position would seem to be aligned with the literal heart of the lion depicted, and also in a position to be occulted by the crescent moon.
Would you indulge why Regulus in the position of ‘star #12’ specifically devolves the rest into incoherence?
Could an alternative assignment matrix be resolved by swapping ‘star #12’ with Regulus and ‘star #10′ with Venus? This would account for the ’18’ (or rather 17 stars + 1 planet?) — and in the position of ‘star #10’, Venus is depicted as ‘below the legs’ and ‘hidden in shadow’ (of the lion’s leg and body) a potential allusion to its new phase.
Thank you for the generosity of your thought in any case, this article was intensely thought-provoking.
I had not considered Venus as the potential resolution of the rear leg star, but I did try every way from Sunday to fit Star #12 as Regulus, because that would make so much sense relative to the Babylonian traditions, all the way back to the ‘Way of Enlil’ catalog of the stars. I came to the model assuming that Regulus need end up as Star #12 (being ‘The King’ and having its symbol be a star and crescent) and wound up in years (not full time of course) of trying to force it to be so. Finally I had to give up on that.
Four issues block, this excellent contention
1. Venus – if depicted, would have had 16 rays as a planet, as was the depiction habit of the Babylonian tradition.
2. Venus was too far below the ecliptic to be included in the drawing as a star.
3. Venus would have been included in the star conjunction listing above Leo’s back as well.
4. Once you shift Regulus to the right, to act as Star #12, and add Venus to help re-establish balance of the iconography, the entire 7-8-9-10 shoulder to leg alignment is now unresolvable, as is the rear haunch.
This also shows why I believe this to be a ‘snapshot’ of something exceptional, as opposed to a horoscope. If this was indeed the documentation of a past event, then all the planetary symbols would have been there making it clear, what this was.
sorry… tried to attatch image to comment but pushed post accidentally, then in frustration, pushed post a second time b4 i got it attached the 3rd time… rrrr
Chasing the Milky Way. We six lay huddled close on the old wooden dock, well before dawns light. Murmurs, whispers, gasps, and laughter. Frogs singing, owls calling. Our milky quest adorned by four shooting stars.. Aaaaahhh.
Wars, and rumors of wars. Brilliant sleuthing from ancient Magi to the WEF. Only 1 day before Russia, Ukraine. The King star will return. We will own nothing, and be happy… because he will allow us to buy and sell… if only we take the mark.
I recently stumbled across this podcast by a couple of Orthodox priests. This one on the Star of the Nativity is relevant to your post here. Lots of good history on views of astrology held by the ancients and in depth review of the magi. https://www.ancientfaith.com/podcasts/lordofspirits/taught_by_a_star
Is it possible that the Magi were capturing the last light of a dead star? IOW, somehow they had a prophesy of a “star” (i.e. object in the sky) going dark? So the commemoration was to let people know about Star #12’s existence and death? Maybe it’s winking out presaged some other event? Or could that be why they stopped their task? (Just spitballing, TES, in the event it might spark something sensical in you.) Cheers – and thanks for sharing.
Oh yes, that could have been a distant Super Nova, no doubt. It’s position right on the ecliptic is very very suspicious however. Could have been a comet – but even that would have been depicted differently. No conclusion, but a fine mystery nonetheless.
I have not yet run such a projection. When I get a chance, I will do so and update that to the article. I attempted a web search to find a listing of 3-star conjunctions, and of course all I get are astrology sites trying to sell me services. Since Mercury orbits very close to the Sun, the function will be mostly a harmonic between Jupiter and Mars, making it a less common, but still regular feature of solar positioning – more akin to the hands on a clock, as opposed to something astounding in and of itself.
Update: This particular conjunction happens once every 1,563 years. But it happens in Leo only once every 18,755 years. I inserted this analysis into the article.
Where were Saturn, Uranus and Neptune on that date? I know that these are not normally visible to the naked eye but perhaps that particular configuration of planets, light, angles etc, caused one of them to become visible for a brief moment just at the edge of the moon disc, and to the magi this glimpse seemed to be of a star/planet which arrived and then left. And perhaps the observatory had been built facing that direction because it had been previously noticed that it was a particularly fruitful direction in terms of angles of light of sun, moon, etc making the planets and stars more clearly visible?
None of those were in Leo at the time. No, if this was a conventional and frequent recurring phenomenon – they would have built no special accommodation in order to view it – and could have predicted it, rather than station people to watch for it over a hundred years or maybe even a lot longer. All the planets can be predicted. What they were looking for could not be – only its station of approach was known.
What about the Comet Swift-Tuttle? Regular August passage, 133 year orbit, Jupiter aligned, probably first observed in 322 BC, observed by the Chinese in 188BC and 69BC, causes the Persian Meteor Shower.
Perseid!
Swift Tuttle did not arrive during this one-day-long horoscope in 2 bc,
Isn’t it generally thought that the magi visited Jesus long after he was born? i.e., Herod killed male babies age 2 and under. So your finding would put the birth day in the range of 4 B.C., if this mystery object is the star recorded in the NT story.
The star did not just pop in and out in one day. Jupiter orbits a half cycle at 5.9 years. So an interloper might be faster and take 2 years itself, just to show where its CPA with Earth would be – and to figure out what city was under its Zenith. So, the reference point is not the first sighting of the star, but what happened thereafter – and of this we don’t have much information.
Thanks, TES.
I wasn’t familiar with the term “ignostic”, so did a quick search and this from Wiki seemed about right: “Ignosticism – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ignosticism is the belief that people should avoid taking a position on “the existence of God” until a concept of God has been defined.. Ignostics claim that the sound or row of alphabet letters “God” (with a capital “G”) is meaningless because they lack belief that any coherent definition has been presented.”
I would tend to agree with the last statement. It was a great help for me to learn that the Greek noun “theos” has the sense of “placer”. E.g., theme, theory, theater, and probably many other English words might have similar root implications.
Also you might find it interesting that in the biblical account when “God” instructed Moses to go to Pharaoh and deliver the message to “let My people go”, Moses asked who he should say sent him. The answer was to tell them YHWH sent him. Without going on too long here, I read an excellent examination of that ‘name’ and it has the sense of, will-be-ing-was. The opposite order of what I presume most of us would guess, seeing that the One out of Whom all is, is without beginning, exists now, and will exist interminably. But the order emphasizes the process into the future.
Love your work, and I sometimes recommend it on X, when it seems like someone would benefit from seeing it.
People in science are more aware of these effects than you may suppose, at least some, but one doesn’t speak too openly about it. Funding is important.
Dr. Marcus probably has a proof that the universe as we know it is actually “physical” and not a construct of universal mind, a dream-of-God, as it were, but it is unlikely that he can formulate it adequately in words, or he might have done so.
It would not be a logical argument. As I understand things, there is not one.
Apologies, I missed the brief sentence where you already mentioned this, there’s no option to delete the redundant comment. Have you tried to get a journalist to publish your findings? I’m surprised by the lack of media coverage on the staphylococcal enterotoxin B superantigen section of SARS-COV-2, though I guess with most countries being economically dependent on China this is would ruffle too many feathers.
I see an odd coincidence in your “Zone I” map: Venezuela is in Zone I even though its neighbors are in Zone III. Cuba is also in Zone I, alone in the Zone II Caribbean. Two-thirds of the Zone I countries in and near the Americas are Communist countries. Why would a country’s governing ideology have any effect on whether its population has prior immunity to a virus, unless there was human action taken to make it that way?
When you sneeze, what happens to your tinnitus?
If you eliminate gluten from your diet, what happens to your tinnitus?
If you exercise and lose weight, what happens to your tinnitus?
If you apply essential oil helichrysum to your ear, what happens?
If this was hearing nerve damage, it could never increase over 5 or 10 seconds, and could never diminish 80% when intervention treatments are applied. Yet it does. That falsifies nerve trauma as its origin.
Many of the nerve trauma diagnoses come from person seeking military disability payments over the issue, ‘from loud noises’.
One might find that ‘microwave hearing’ (buzzing, ringing or pure tones – 1970s research started with Allen Frey) is the invisible source, and that a complete break from RF exposure for as many as four-seven days eliminates it, and upon return to civilization the ‘tinnitus’ (a catchall term in common parlance) returns within hours. We see this commonly among the electrically sensitive.
to watch for the party which benefits… even if they dont exist… CV19… et al … hmmm… I see them… but its futile to resist them. Faucci Gates, China, FDA, CDC, WHO WEF… just patsies like Russia for decades.
I shared this webpage with a professional biology server and someone had the following comments:
To pick a random example: “If those weighted contrast strengths are then summed as a total for 144 nucleotide sites, and shown as vectors on a spanning tree diagram (see upper right of Exhibit 7.11), they can be optimized into a single configuration of nodes (optimized spanning tree).47”
In other words, if I force all the variants to stem from one source the result is a single tree
I’m saying the ideas do not follow from each other It’s not coherent
Why only deer in the Midwest? Because the study was done in the Midwest
“One must remember two principles in this deliberation of how fast Covid, and in particular the Delta variant, spread globally. First, Covid vaccines do not stop the transmission of the virus, rather only serve to mitigate its severity in vaccinated individuals.” No https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.14.21264959v1.full
“Moreover, take note that each main wave of SARS-CoV-2 inside a previously naive nation, generates a serum IgG antibody prevalence of around 12 – 18%” No idea where this is coming from
“Lockdowns are not effective in the face of fecal-aerosol (<5 μm) transmitted viruses” See China
“However the oldest variant of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant (which we will examine below in Question #7 b.), presented significant aspects of its progenitor genome (the forerunner which conferred immunity to much of the globe in 2018 and 2019), which indicated that it was originally serial passed inside a lab mouse environment. This makes the January 2018 lab leak a very likely hypothesis.22”
or far more likely a regular mouse (this isn’t prrof it came from a mouse in any case)
this a conspiracy theory at the opposite end. was written by one researcher at a Chinese University and still is in preprint status. The odds of zoonotic emergence at two separate geographically separate locations at the almost the exact same time is nearly nil.
In other words, if I force all the variants to stem from one source the result is a single tree. I’m saying the ideas do not follow from each other It’s not coherent
Yes, Covid evolved independently, twice in the same exact year, from the same exact BANAL-52/20 source in Laos. 🙄 This is not just wrong it is not even wrong. The person can pass off bad genetics theory to the average layman, but not me. If they are implying Covid was lab generated then of course anything goes.
Why only deer in the Midwest? Because the study was done in the Midwest
Appeal to ignorance – I only asked the question, this person made a declaration claim with no evidence.
Why is there not delta? Because the study ended on Jan 6, 2021
While this is plausible as the reason, Delta began its spread in Oct 2020 – he missed that in the article. Again, answering a question with an unsubstantiated claim. Not done by professionals.
The critical path question they skipped by means of these two red herring ‘answers’ is “If deer exposure came from a point contact, how then did that point contact (or even a few) then spread an even representation of the various clades of Covid, in deer?” They skipped this for one of three reasons 1) they do not understand how deductive inference works, 2) they were cherry picking to find anecdotes to nit-nag, or 3) are really just that dense. In any case, not real impressed.
re: vaccine does not stop Covid spread No
This is incorrect – refer to Omicron. Delta spread further after 66% vaccination, than Alpha did the same time during the previous year with no vaccination and very little prior immunity. I can find dozens of studies which support my statement. They are appealing to pluralistic ignorance alone here.
re: controlling aerosol spread through NPI’s See China
OK, at this point, especially after the opening response, I know I am not dealing with competence. There is no need to go any further in this. China did not stop the virus through NPI/lockdowns and the article documents this clearly – significant study has demonstrated this in the last months, and I show an immunity curve which falsifies this notion, in the article. This is a person pushing a political Narrative…
This was not a refutation, but rather a series of red herring and trivia points which were not crafted to address the core critical path of logic. An indication that the person does not know how to do this.
I would not listen to anything this person has to offer from a scientific standpoint. Please let me know which company this is so that I never accidentally use them as a vendor in any of my company’s work.
China is pushing heavily the narrative that SARS-COV-2 originated from elsewhere such as the US or Europe to shift blame. This research paper is interestingly written by one person only from a Chinese University. Then again I should probably look into the genomics myself – quite time consuming though.
I asked if it was possible that SARS-COV-2 origins could date back to 2018 in a researchers/PhD discord server, apologies for not being more clear.
I found a way to read deleted posts on the r/Coronavirus subreddit even if they get removed before anyone sees them, the censorship on anything pandemic related has become quite Orwellian – a lot of news/research articles that get removed are from reputable sources but go against the mainstream narrative. It’s been concerning seeing the lag time between an idea being treated as a conspiracy and the same idea being parroted in legacy media months to a year later.
Given the immunity taper curve (Exhibit 4.5), the new King George’s Island strains of Covid which were found in 2018 soil samples, and the fact that China hid all databases on prior variants, the likelihood that the virus was released anywhere other than China is nil (as they say). Now the research may have kicked off as a viral strain in the US in 2014… but this was from a Loas Bat virus BANAL-52 and 20 – on BLASTn searches, but highly modified with a furin cleavage and exact previous IP from other viruses. So it is 100% lab created. 100% lab released – in China…
The DG614 duality issue in Europe and Asia only serves to indicate that the precursor of Covid, arose earlier than Oct 2019, spread around the world and conferred immunity on 172 nations (Exhibit 4.5), and not that there was parallel biogenesis. See Exhibit 7.11.
The only arguments which remain are rhetorical.
I’ve read we, USA can hack computers and databases, and leave fingerprints of our enemies. “100% – in China” is the same kind of fingerprint that adds levels of Plausible Deniability. 2014… or way before… When I asked Military Intel customer who returned from there… What really happened over there??? “I cant tell you, but I can tell you, WE GOT WHAT WE NEEDED”… Didn’t make sense… unless one thinks we were studying the spread of more communicable variant… and or the use of a treatment or vaccine. SARS and MERS were trial runs…
Thank you. My gut is usually right. You explain it so well.
They are using the argument to promote themself, and harm you – rather than prosecute the subject at hand. Yes, ignore such people… Keep focused on construction of your argument, rather than detracting others’ or defeating any particular ongoing research.
Thank you, this is so true. Of course, one cannot really know which role one ends up playing in that perilous Pomplemoose Pass. I think I’ve probably played all parts. We all have our destinies, and end up choosing the passes that we consider worthy of defending. Often the problem may be that being the bagholder of a genuinely worthless bag (like a relationship gone sour) is just not something I am willing to do. And yet – being at all capable of choosing an ethical path would benefit greatly from some, or even much, practice. Are the battered wives of the world contributing to the moral stamina of the world? I do not know. I just have chosen to give wide berth to those kind of situations.Maybe being capable of ethical choices is about being capable of choice: seeing there is choice and then being able to enact something else than the path of least resistance. Wanting to look ethically good is, of course, one beauty contest that some want to participate in, but many traditions advise against competing in that line.
Yes, the perceived inability to choose or even its reality can enslave a person in their own battles. However, good and ethics are two different things. We need less good-posturing, to your point, and more ethical teaching. One of the core theses of ethical skepticism is that there is no such thing as ‘good’. There is only evil, our ability to identify it, and a. avoiding replicating it in our own lives, and b. standing in the gap for those who are harmed beyond their control. If these flags are regarded as a beauty contest, and cannot be framed, nor taught by example, then we are in a heap of trouble. People will think they are good, when there is no such thing, and use their good works and humility(TM) as excuse for their hidden depravity.
Define good or even ‘advising acceptable traditions’, and evil will wear that as a costume.
Mine was fairly rough argmax. I got Delta in August and had the requisite 5 days of cough, and 11 days of fever and diarrhea – after that was over, I was chronically low on SpO2 however. After my insistence, and changing doctors, I was finally prescribed apixaban (blood thinner), and that worked within 1 hour and 45 minutes – I immediately felt better. Took me 3 weeks to get my energy back though. I recognized it because I have macrocytic anemia being MTHFR – it was red blood cell count anemia.
The rest of the family, it was like a rough cold – two weeks of energy loss and cough. However two of our three oldest family members had to go into the hospital – all of them had been vaccinated because of their age. The one who is vaccinated but did not get Covid almost died from the vaccine. She is still battling its effects – she can no longer drive, and can no longer do housework, and is having extreme difficulty cooking – and it has been 9 months now. A sister in law also with metabolic disorder had to go into the hospital for two weeks and almost died. Heparin saved her life – but was administered too late. She is still suffering from the damage from the blood clots (what is falsely called ‘Long Covid’). They treated her too late – because ‘there was no treatment’.
Since I got late, but at least timely treatment – by watching my SpO2, I’ve had no ill after effects. No ‘Long Covid’.
This is why I contend there is very little actual ‘Long Covid’ – as if it were the fault of the virus. EUA Shadow, the real thromboembolitic malady is a result of state and Party enforced malpractice.
As one who professes to be a former devout Christian, I’m somewhat surprised that you don’t recognize the fact that Jesus, as described in Scripture, breaks your definition of “god”. Namely, He WAS indeed held accountable (for the sins WE committed) AND He was all powerful (commanding even the winds and the waves with merely the power of His voice, and ultimately conquering even death itself). Further, I’m not sure I see how individuals who follow biblical Christianity are victims. We’ve been set free from the power of sin and have access to the infinite satisfaction only available through a relationship with our Creator and Savior. Ultimately, I get the impression the “Christianity” you interacted with was nothing like what is actually described in Scripture because Christ is the only true answer to the suffering found in the world. All other attempts at a solution either don’t actually solve the problem or minimize it (often both).
Are there charlatans, liars, and wicked people claiming the label of Christianity for themselves to cover up the evil they do? Without a doubt, yes, but slight alterations of the truth have always been used as weapons by evil people to get what they want through deception. That doesn’t mean Christianity is false though.
I made no comment upon Jesus Christ. My commentary was upon the ‘God’ forced on us by Abrahamic religions, which includes of course, Christianity. Yes, this includes ALL of Christianity, even the ‘real’ ones. My comment was upon original sin, which was a false enslavement in the name of this false ‘God’.
Any entity which has been ceded ongoing power*, yet at the same time retains an ongoing lack of accountability.
In other words, this false character from the Bible.
A standard employed by a proxy agent, as a virtual mass in the social leveraging of a victim.
In other words, original sin.
My view of Christ now, is the role he actually claimed in the scripture, the Son of Man, and not the role the double-agent ‘Paul’ assigned to him decades later in order to manipulate the Anatolian/Levant taxpaying provinces on behalf of Rome. So you may not fully grasp what my view of these things is.
The self-integrity of the recount. How it bears consilience with other history, and the state of mankind’s suffering – through a life well exposed. How well does it mesh with other things I have observed, DNA, integrity, people’s desire for domination and control, ancient history and archaeology… etc.
I’m not a big fan of being lied to… Pretty much will push me away from anything else they have to offer.
The Abrahamic ‘God’ model has failed. And not just by a little bit…
TES
Yeah, if I were to presuppose death, suffering, and disease preexisted humans by billions of years, and was actually the most important part of the progress of living things to get to where we are now, then I’d 100% agree: the Bible is self-contradictory nonsense, and the god of the Bible is an evil, capricious, self-absorbed jerk.
Taking Scripture on its own terms though, rather than bringing a presupposed concept of reality to it, none of that is true.
the Bible is self-contradictory nonsense, and the god of the Bible is an evil, capricious, self-absorbed jerk.
There are other scriptures, older and more detailed than the Bible’s Genesis, and they frame ‘God’ in exactly this manner – metastasized insanity. I don’t bring anything to the Bible other than I will not surrender my own integrity in order to consider its lines. This is part of spiritual strength – not allowing dark spirits a foothold through rhetoric.
If it lies – it is lying. It is speaking in its native tongue.
Has nothing to do with me – I was taught these canned ‘put the burden on the victim’, ‘come to the scripture on its own terms’ arguments as well. The Bible bears the burden of proof, not me. That IS… coming to scripture on its own terms. It is making the claims, those are its terms.
TES
Now who’s the one lying? From the article you linked to above:
No better is this indicated than through a ‘forbidden’ tree placed suspiciously right dead center of the very place where his naked known-DNA-trait slave was ordered to cluelessly labor-for-eternity on behalf of this suddenly impotent, immobile, and ignorant creator. Thereafter upon being offended, he demeans and more importantly, lies to, the poor creature – telling him that he is merely ‘dust’ – while later on belying this claim by declaring him to also be a soul and spirit as well.
…
One who is omniscient, was not able to anticipate that the very DNA he created, would imbue those creatures based upon that DNA with certain behavioral traits – including a predilection for deception, predation, selfishness, pride, envy, gluttony, greed, lust, sloth, wrath, and death. Then gets furious, abusive, and cruel when those very traits which had already manifested in animals and man-prototypes such as homo naledi and neanderthalensis, indeed then emerge in man, who is based 99.9+% upon that exact same, well-tested, DNA. Like this was some big surprise.
The basis of your critique is entirely based on the presupposition that evolution is true. But that certainly doesn’t come from Scripture. You brought that to Scripture.
Again with the canned understanding. ‘I brought ‘Evolution’ to the scripture.’ Whoooo… the big bad boogey man. I brought no such thing.
I raised DNA, neanderthals, and homo naledi – well established observations, regardless of creation or evolution – to the Bible’s very own terms. The Bible’s terms according to you are ‘it is inerrant and the Word of God’ and you are here to ensure that this is enforced upon me. Nonetheless, evolution or not, we met on that ground (those terms) and the Bible fell woefully short.
It lied. What you are asking of me now is to be stupid, not accommodating. And then you accuse me of lying because I won’t sacrifice my integrity upon your command to do so. The argument is over, and you are blocked for maliciousness.
God Proxy: Any stakeholder which seeks to exploit the privileged existence as a god (power, money, notoriety, comfort), without appearing to pretend to the role. And remember, with a god, there is always an intended victim.
You are pretending to me that you represent god. You got mad and attacked me because I did not accept this claim.
If there is no God, he would have to be created. Man’s evil has no bounds. I hear Alien abductees say Jesus was a real person but did not die on the cross. He died at Masada. They also say Alien’s believe in God not based on religion like humans but on science. Truth is hard to find.
You bent over backwards to make white guys complaining about reverse racism the same thing as women complaining about sexual harassment and black people complaining about out and out discrimination. Was the intent to skew the responses so they are all based on rightwing shibboleths, or was that subconscious?
No, I refused to bend over forwards and take the hosing from malicious leftists who seek genocide as their outcome. The days of you automatically claiming to be correct through virtue posing are over. You are not oppressed, you are not in-the-right – you are a genocide promoter, plain and simple. Your memorized and worn-out phrases (including your overused and pretentious term ‘shibboleth’) are untested brainless pablum passed as excuse to this generation of young women and men who are the victims of your blood lust.
There is harassment, there is discrimination. None of that lends you nor your argument any credibility whatsoever.
The truth is out there but similar to other single-party-control situations it’s not going to be easy to find or to admit until one day you’re forced to confront atrocities happening, after which all you can say is “but we didn’t know!”
History is not over. It’s quite dangerous that so many people seem to think it is.
How large do you think is this cohort & what do you advise your clients to do? And, if you were king, what should happen on a societal scale to fix things?
I’m 38 and also work in the IT field, though in a rather blue collar niche of it where I must regularly get my hands dirty and work outside and in otherwise industrial environments. As someone who loves to work with both my hands and my mind, and cannot stand being seated in an office, I love my job. I’ve been doing it for 16 years and I’m very good at it. I enjoy the people I work with, and they are appreciative of the work that I do to keep all of our systems and equipment running smoothly.
Now that I’m done tooting my own horn… When Covid first hit, and the so-called lockdowns began, nearly everyone of my friends and acquaintances of a similar age seemingly dropped off the face of the earth. Many people who I felt were socially just barely hanging on relished the excuse to withdraw back into their apartments or parents’ basements, quit their job or simply stop going, and wait for the government checks to roll in because they “weren’t essential.”
At one point one of my childhood friends called me just to see how I was doing. He had been a serial bartender/cook ever since we graduated high school, couch surfing or rooming with various similar layabouts in Seattle for the better part of 20 years.
The first thing he said to me was, “did you get your check yet?” I had heard about these so-called covid relief payments, but had no expectation of seeing one, nor did I want one. My friend was floored that I was still working and that I had multiple extended work travel trips in the queue.
What was he doing? Oh he bought a new Playstation with his covid relief check. Have I played any good games lately? Nope bro, haven’t. I have a wife, two kids, a house and acreage, and hobbies.
He wasn’t worried about his bar closing because if he couldn’t make rent, he would just move back in with his parents, who never really cleared out the two brothers’ rooms in the fully furnished basement with its own kitchen, a hot tub and a pool out back. His brother had already moved back in, so why shouldn’t he too – and eventually he did.
This seems to be so common with my generation now that as a full time employed parent, home owner, and father, I actually have a hard time meeting and making friends with other dads my age. There just aren’t that many here.
If I do befriend one, he will drop me as a friend the second I give a hint of minor non-leftist bias, such as exclaiming that perhaps BLM is a fraudulent money making scheme, and that perhaps burning down cities during a pandemic when millions of people have lost their jobs perhaps isn’t endearing to your cause, and may actually turn more people against you in the long run. “Wow, that’s racist, I didn’t know you thought that way… I think I need to go.” That was two years ago.
My generation is, quite frankly, fucked. Covid was our chance to shine and show that we could carry the weight of the world if the infirm, elderly, and weak could not swing it. We fumbled it hard.
I’m 64 years old. In conversation, my daughter can identify all the friction points I see. However, her conclusions are 180 degrees out (“without proof”). At 40 years old, she lives with her mother and complains that her mother doesn’t do enough. She complains that her state is too expensive but won’t leave because everywhere else is racist.
Your reply is worthy of being published as a standalone article. But more importantly, your perspective gives folks like me hope for an entire generation that seems to have fallen through the cracks created by their parents’ successes—they’ve become lazy and without value, or so I thought. Thank you.
Thanks for this, TES. I continue to hope that this is merely a generational cultural and societal “break”, rather than “breakdown”, although I am by no means certain this is the case.
However, it is sad to live through (I came of age in the late ’80s, when things were still hopeful and looking up). Even worse, is having two sons who are new adults being thrust into this era.
I only hope that their upbringing and education can steel them somewhat from the disconnect which is happening.
In past times when society reached the point at which we presently seem to find ourselves (where its members have become “factionalised”), it has taken some great upheaval to bring rationality back to the party. We can only hope that whatever happens next is not too deleterious for our societies.
Leave your parents. Love them but physically leave them. If you are a parent reading this and have a reaction of anxiety and objection, you are part of the problem. I know that sounds harsh and it will be. Moses’ mother put him in a basket in a river. Did she need a male around to grow up and protect her? Farm the land? She was a divorcee and alone. Keeping a son at home in todays age is not different than if Moses mother had kept him instead of placing him in the river. Guaranteed disaster vs possible disaster. Your parents are not immortal and cannot shelter offspring forever—dependency is unsustainable therefor destruction is inevitable. “Give your son a fish” vs handing him a pole and sending him on his way.
Move. Research places to move to. Find one smaller than your current. Become a bigger fish in a smaller pond. Don’t bring any of the toxic water your currently in with you and poison others well. “Start fresh”.
Create your own responsibilities and manage them. Start however small is necessary.
If you got a degree in a field that doesn’t want you, get into sales. Make money. Swallow your pride. Fall on your sword. Work two jobs. You can either front load your potential and energy by gassing it young or guarantee that future older you will be paying it in arrears. There is no prestige in being a FTL (failure to launch) despite what you see in tv, online, & media. Which brings you to….
Limit and vigorously curate online and tv consumption
Work out or join a team. Pickleball, table tennis, frisbee golf, trivia team, it doesn’t have to be slinging weights in a meathead gym. It could be as simple as joining a church mens group or volunteering as a dog shelter or Habitat for Humanity. You need other people in the world rooting for your health and prosperity that are not your parents. People who would recommend you to a co-worker as “someone they should meet”. Network. Online does not count. You’ve already proven with legitimate list you’re not “good on paper” so get off paper and get in person.
Respect yourself. Respect the people your interested in dating as a whole. Don’t put down you or what you want even as a mode of humor or depreciation.
Don’t do drugs. Period, period, period. Alcohol in moderation socially. Never alone.
Hate no one. Love yourself.
The world is full of land mines for everyone but some people experience seasons worse than others. If your saying it’s your season for despair or you’re out of vogue get nimble. Be a Jedi. May the force be with you.
One thing that’s under reported (among so many other underreported things) but worth mentioning is gender birth rates.
There are more boys being born in the US than girls. This is for many years now. My elementary school daughters are outnumbered by boys at least 15%. This has never in history been the case as far as I’ve read. We grew up being taught throughout schooling the world had more females than men! Today, they don’t teach gender ratios in school or mention it at all. I’ll get to why this matters.
As this new gen phenomenon ages into mating age, it will too obviously to ignore and become a buyers market for women. Women will not *need* to compete with other women for a male partner. Or for a job. They will be the rarer sex. Men pursuing high intellectual pursuits who traditionally waited longest “til they got their sh*t* together” to find a mate, often from a younger pool, will find that pool has shrunk doubly bc the younger male peers of those younger women will have already partnered, having grown up in classrooms with high male to female ratios. This is especially true of higher net worth schools. Private schools have the biggest male populations ever (bc IVF? Waiting longer? Gender selection w IVF? Idk) But this is unprecedented territory for humans. I’m not sure how it will map out over the next century…
But the point I’m raising for the hypothetical 24yr old man here is there are not and won’t be “plenty of fish in this sea” so making disposable of a good potential partner while young bc culture applauds you for it could be more than a bad idea. And parents of well to do boys, don’t run off a good character girl bc her socioeconomic background or lower education. You may need to encourage it, in fact. “Find new pools”. Be nimble. I’m not saying be urgent, because your tweet about brand perception holds true, but I am saying be serious sooner if you plan to ever be serious about partnership. Culture will never ask you to grow up and “begin adulting”, you have to acquire social situational awareness and be a self starter in this regard. Cultural Infantilism & subversion abound.
One wonders if the gender skew is a genetic phenomenon, an abortive phenomenon, a phenomenon of the demographics of self-selected “economic migrants,” or a combination thereof.
Either way, women are noncompetitive enough these days in terms of marriageability. I’m trying to help my friends of similar age find wives and it’s abysmal. My son’s Godfather and my best friend makes great money, is in great shape, looks decent and dresses well, and is generally masculine. Women continually turn up their noses at him citing how serious he is about his faith and how politically unhinged he is. Note: he didn’t even talk about politics. They did. And they were positively offended that he wasn’t frothing at the mouth to hate the orange guy.
Most women seem to take awful care of themselves, both in diet/exercise and basic presentability, have awful attitudes towards men (especially men on whom they depend such as husbands or fathers), and have no skills such as cooking, sewing, or homemaking. I won’t even mention past vices that most women have engaged in. My wife is the only woman in her family and local acquaintances who goes to confession. I scarcely have to imagine why. Either the recitation of wrongdoings for past sins would be unbearable in its severity, or they genuinely think they don’t have anything to apologize for.
I can only imagine how much worse things will get when women have a corner on the market. I’ll leave you with an example. Every high school had a video game club or anime club, or something similar. It attracted mostly unmasculine and poorly socialized boys. Every group would usually have one girls. They fawned over her and competed for her. She was rarely good looking, rarely took care of herself or presented herself well, and was often as dismissive to these boys as the vaunted and beautiful preppy girls. But she led them on just enough to maintain all of their attention. Welcome to the future of anime club token femoids.
There’s a lot of good advice here, but also some things that require potential clarification.
Sales truly is one of the last “make your own fate” options available to people, but it takes a lot of self-confidence and intrapersonal skills. These are two things zoomers and millennials struggle greatly with. Toastmasters can help greatly with one and regular extended conversations and interactions with strangers can help with the other.
Also, there are a lot of sleazy “direct sales” traps there to catch people. I found myself sitting in one such interview years ago because I was lazy and didn’t do my due diligence on the company since I had over 100 applications out. I turned up at a very crappy building with an illiterate receptionist and barely-literate sales associates walking around. In the lobby, which was also the waiting room, I was surrounded by people with hand tattoos in various stages of undress. I was the only one there in a suit, much less with a resume in hand. Suffice to say it was a brief interview and a polite but firm “thanks, I’m not interested” from me.
I’d also say that leaving home will do wonders for mental health, but only if done with a solid exit strategy. Calculated risks are altogether different than generic “taking a chance” risks. Renters want proof of employment, unless you’re moving into the room in between the crack den and the brothel. That comes with its own set of mental health issues. You could live at the motel 6 until you get a job, but again, not great for one’s state of mind. Also, you may well end up being neighbors with the crack dealer and the pimp again. Perhaps the two are one and the same and he offers a package deal. You get the idea.
Remote work offers a tantalizing ability to put away cash and live where you want with some travel or quarterly face-to-face appearances at the office. You can live anywhere with a decent internet connection, especially where land is cheap.
I’m not Gen Z, but Gen X. I was 24 before the turn of the century, and boy did things look bright. I was caught up in the dot com boom, and after my overzealous, overhyped, tech company went belly up at the end of 2000, I struck out on my own.
I worked like a dog in the IT consultancy field with small businesses, and grew until about 2008 as well. As I got older and more stressed, I began to shed customers, now totally burnt out, bullied by strange COVID mandates, and almost in a catatonic bemusement have resorted to watching the news about the world burning.
After almost 20 years of believing the hype about the American dream, I’ve come to find out after WWII, your average Joe had a pretty decent shot at it. Now, all bets are off.
Business owners, (especially small business owners) are the last folks in the world who give crap about equity, or value, it’s all about the bottom line. And no matter how skilled, conscientious, prompt, and polite, it’s still about the bottom line. Doesn’t matter how shiny your brochures are, or how nicely pressed your suit is, or what kind of dynamic synergies you’re going to implement, if your quote jeopardizes the bosses second meat freezer for the lake house you’re back to band-aiding!
My first revelation after about 10 years was all that nonsense about skill, hard work, and caring is sidelined for the bottom line.
My second revelation is that if your economy is based on Neo-Keynesian debt-money, you’re done before you ever get started. This impresses the value of ever worthless money upon humanity as a virtue. This is GREAT for those well established at the top, you have a burgeoning MASS of billions of people using the very best IN-BUILT survival instinct to claw their way to your organization over the bodies of those who didn’t make the cut. “Hey, learn to code!”
Progressives will shake a stick at Capitalism saying that it’s to blame for this phenomenon. But it’s not, it rests solely on the foundation of the money supply it uses, and that money supply is borne out of UN-natural solipsistic bankruptcy. It worked for a time with 2 billion people on the planet, but you can see as more warm bodies belly up for credit, the profligacy and struggle between those who have and the rest only increases.
The final straw that broke the camel’s back is the constant lies and coercion. Every 10 years some sort of calamitous event or war breaks out and the populace is told about some boogeyman who threatens the world, and it’s all a lie to bust up ingrained capital flows and make them flow in new directions. Nothing gets the money printers flowing like a war or pandemic!
What I realized after about 20 years of rat race, that _I_ was part of the problem, and by merely participating in wealth seeking I was perpetuating the firestorm of debt-money. So with conscience and freshly acquired burnout, I began firing customers. I now only maintain a few to keep the lights on and pay bills. It’s scary, because I burnt up my youth, and you’re always one accident away from calamity, but even with the best gold plated health care, would you want to go into a health care facility at this time?
There’s another institution perverted by endless debt-money!
We’ve all been hoodwinked into plantation style economics, it’s just now that the livestock are noticing the sound of the abattoir!
TES, I apologize for whining, but I find your views refreshing and heartening. Your blog is like a tiny distant light off in the distance during a terrible storm. It gives me hope that not all of humanity is consumed with baseless consumption. I also love the fact that I have to use the dictionary quite often as well! Thank you TES!
Our woke culture will never get this… They will never comprehend the ill effects of their virtue play upon mankind. We promote the worst character and destroy the best.
Thank you for the kind words, and your readership.
They are sociopaths. They comprehend. It is a fun game to them. “Normal” people wonder why leaders bother with all the trouble of leading. Sociopaths wonder why anyone would just “get along” when they could be the one in charge.
Regarding points 41 and 42: What these mean is the men won’t fight. The ones who created this tell themselves that won’t matter because there won’t be a need or the drones will do it or they will make a back channel arrangement. They are wrong. The time always comes where the men must fight and if they don’t, society dies. The anointed ones will wonder what happened.
I think what they are saying is ‘I will fight for a country which fights for me and all citizens, not for a totalitarian state which demeans and replaces me.’ They recognize the creeping third world status of the US – and they are not willing to lay down their life for that, because that is worse than what the ‘enemy’ proposes. Neither Russia nor China want us to be a third world nation – however The Party in control, does.
Do you doubt that it’s Chinese money flowing a billion dollars at a time into our politicians’ pockets that have bought us wide-open borders? Russia and China hate us and would exterminate us down to the last infant in an instant if they could, but it would be messy and risky to act directly. Russia has a smaller economy than Brazil and can barely keep the lights on, but the Clintons chose to make China wealthy and powerful beyond Mao’s maddest dreams. We are betrayed. Everything the Left wants, every proposal they bring forward, points i. The exact same direction, makes America weak and poor and China strong and rich. The word we’re looking for here is treason.
The left betrayed America… I did not believe it when the original people saying this were screaming it back in the 90’s, preferring to be more middle-of-the-road politically. I supported Clinton and even Obama in the first election. But those days are over – I see the evil they did now. The Right was correct in the end. No that George W. Bush did us any favors. But the left just drove our collapse into overdrive.
Now we have to correct it.
There may be another factor….homeschooling. I saw an unconfirmed report that households with kids and at least one homeschooled child went from 4% to 11%. That is a huge increase that’s up over a million new households with homeschooled kids….and there would have to be an associated amount of adults leaving the workforce to manage that.
There is an associated number of young parents who pulled out of daycare due to the virus and/or restrictions. More out of the workforce to manage.
Numbers on this I have found difficult to confirm, but we may be also seeing a big shift to single families,
There may be some truth to this. I would call this part of the bifurcation of American culture – between the bigots and their victims. But this absolutely has to be part of it. Good point.
Sadly, a lot of this is me too.
I lost my incredible job in 2008 and was never able to find full-time employment, worth my time ever again. I’ve done my thing ever since. I live on a beautiful lake in a home owned by my grandparents. While they are in pretty good shape, my grandfather is blind now, so I drive him to the gym or to his doctors’ appointments. I do the grocery shopping. I am happy to have them and they are happy to have me. I haven’t had health insurance since 2008. I haven’t needed it. I pay cash anytime I need to go to the doctor. I’ve never asked for government assistance, but since I don’t make a certain amount of money, they sent me a Medicaid card without me asking for one.
I hadn’t used the Medicaid card and never planned on using it.
I’m not one to mooch off the government.
I kept it though and am glad I did.
Last summer, I needed emergency surgery for a sudden allergy that made my throat seize completely. I showed a top-notch hospital in my neighborhood the card, and 2 hours later I had an incredible team of doctors fix me up and I went home. How much did that cost? Nothing.
In the past I would’ve felt guilty about that, I don’t anymore.
Over the years I thought about getting a part-time job, just to get out of the house, but when the scamdemic hit, there was no way I would be working anywhere. No mask and no shots for me.
I’d rather be homeless than taking those shots or wear a mask.
Working isn’t worth it. Getting up early in the morning for a job that pays nothing after inflation and taxes and gas prices and auto insurance, would be a negative for me financially, AND I’d be miserable.
I’d be working just to pay for the car, taxes and insurance. Working for nothing and negative.
Your story is very interesting. May I ask how do you pay the most basic bills like food, clothing, necessities? I assume your grandparents foot all the house bills but what about the rest?
Would the use of convalescent plasma injections instead of pharma stuff for passport yield both immunity and reduced AE in those states? Hope TES will see this comment
As I’m not a Twitter user, I can’t ask this question in that medium (but I do read you there, so would not object if you found this question of interest and were to respond there).
My question is brief, I suspect the answer is not simple, but it may have profound implications: “Where did all the workers go?”
Try a web search for that term. It is an issue all around the world. Some of it may be accounted by reduced workforce mobility between cities and across borders, but that can hardly explain it all.
Recruiters who we speak with are almost starving, not due to a lack of employer clients, but due to a lack of candidates.
I have been in business for over 30 years, yet I have never seen this before.
As a person who does corporate strategy, and faced some of these issues in doing planning for my clients – I hope at least, that I bear a clean and direct grasp of how the employment market is affected by certain factors. It may not be popular, but it is the truth.
So I answered your question with an entirely new article. Thanks for the idea!
The term “low hanging fruit” makes me cringe because I’ve heard it repeated way too many times working at a company stuck at levels III and IV. Such a company can’t do much more than avoid going bankrupt and makes little to no difference in the long run.
This is a beautiful exposition of the problem. Some others have coined terms like “the hatchling” for the people apparently born yesterday why say “what is a nation then?”, “What is a border exactly” “In what way is porn different to looking at your girlfriend naked”. And “squirting squid ink” for those who scatter tangential arguments to deflect thinking about the main point. Also “motte and Bailey” is used for roughly the same thing of defending a far off boundary aggressively to stop any you getting anywhere near the weak centre of their argument. “We all have the potential to get a degree its just opportunity/ systemic racism that holds people back that’s accepted science, are you a nazi?”
Hello TES, I have been following you with great interest since the beginning of Covid. I have only recently come across your articles regarding the “Vaccinials”. Personally I find the initial creation of vaccines fascinating, but I made my own observations long ago that the increase in vaccination schedule has gone far beyond any ethical and moral provision for basic healthcare. I cannot remove financial bias from most of the current healthcare system initiatives in the UK. I use the term “healthcare” loosely as all I witness are people becoming slaves to prescription medicines without any improvement in quality of life. Exercise and nutrition are neglected in comparison.
My Mum helped advocate (voluntarily) for children and their parents, many of whom had similar stories to yourself and your son. I soon learned that the system is in no way designed to give these disabled children an improved quality of life, and any mention of vaccine injury was unheard. I’m not sure if you remember Andrew Wakefield and his comments regarding the MMR vaccine and autism. Whether he was right or not, I had never seen the media collectively gather and destroy someone for making an observation. Something I have seen more recently with Trump and the proposed election fraud, the buzz word mis-information and more currently the attention surrounding Joe Rogan. I have always questioned vaccines because I don’t see them as a silver bullet, they are not 100% safe and they are not 100% effective, and in many circumstances there are better alternative treatments, i.e repurposed drugs and even nutriceuticals. I chose not to vaccinate my son, my take being that if I come across an abundance of data that proves their safety and effectiveness then I can always then go and get him vaccinated, whereas the opposite is not necessarily true – I cannot unvaccinate him. Can I ask if there are any vaccines that you would still entertain, for example are there certain vaccines that you think the risk is justified. Kind regards, Craig
A thoughtful and well expressed post. Yes, vaccines are not entirely effective – but more importantly, are not entirely safe, especially for a person under 3 year of age. The common set of persons and action which squelch this message are the same as those who covered up the election scam and find glee in censoring people over Covid.
I have had several vaccinations for work in Africa. Yellow Fever, Tetanus booster, Typhus, Hepatitis A, Tdap, etc. Many of these I received as part of government mandates in the regions in which I spent time. But my body has matured to the point where I cannot detect the incremental damage that these interventions effect in my cognitive and endocrine functions. Studies are showing that ‘frequent and early immune activation’ in rats causes ASD indications. I don’t know how much clearer a study can get than that… Yet, if I post it anywhere, I am in danger of being banned by this dark Cabal.
The world has definitely bifurcated over these issues. The totalitarians are back – and they won this time without a fight.
Summarized from the Times of Israel. “Israeli study offers strongest proof yet of vitamin D’s power to fight COVIDBolstering previous research, scientists publish ‘remarkable’ data showing strong link between vitamin deficiency, prevalent in Israel, and death or serious illness among patients By Nathan Jeffa
Vitamin d from supplements runs the risk of eventual racing heart rate. But the body has multiple means to cut off excess vitamin d production from sunlight. Sperti sells a Vitamin D sunlamp that is FDA approved for vitamin d production. I utilize it. It’s main feature is that it produces UV-B and not UV-A light. UV-B produces vitamin d in the body, while UV-A does the tanning effect. They say that UV-B can generate skin cancer, but the non-melanoma kind. AV-A they say (which causes tanning) is linked to the Melanoma kind. I’m not in a position to cite the source of that information, but my recollection is clear on what I read on that point.
Hi Ethical Skeptic. Former president Trump and his wife got Covid and immediately they got treatment at a military facility and that treatment included vitamin d maybe zinc (the rest of what they received I forget) but they recovered very quickly. And at the start of the outbreak former CDC director Tom Frieden also urged people to maintain healthy vitamin levels. He thought it was a safe and helpful position to take. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/former-cdc-chief-tom-frieden-coronavirus-risk-may-be-reduced-with-vitamin-d
Many people I work with got sick from Covid (I work with mostly young people) and though some of them reported they had a rough time, everyone I had asked about how they were treated or what they were given … they weren’t given anything that I can remember. They might have had options if their breathing got real difficult, but they were given no set of instructions. Your anecdote of no treatment mirrors what I hear directly from others and what Jimmy Dore has also talked about.
However Jimmy Dore Comedy is covering the covid crisis with several orders of magnitude better information about Covid and the mandates than the mainstream media. Well, maybe that isn’t true… I don’t even watch the mainstream media as there are other news outlets that can engage in gutsy reporting. I’ve long ago given up on the mainstream media. Jimmy Dore does though sometimes appear on Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson. And though I kind of like them too, I am just not set up to watch that kind of news.
And Jimmy Dore reported that a judge took a firm stance on a company that wanted to take 75 years to fill an FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request about how its vaccine was developed and what the results of the trials etc were … (I hope I’m recollecting all this correctly) but the judge found that delay unacceptable.
These companies that have made tens of billions of dollars of profit … I believe they will continue to make profits. And the military (and those that produce what they consume) will continue to make big profits and the big tech companies will continue to make big profits. Jimmy Dore reported that it is now acceptable for the US government to propagandaize* the American people. (*awkward word above is mine not his.)
We will be told what to think. If there is any risk of damage to the elites, they might just manufacture a crisis or crises to get our attention off it and on to something else. It isn’t like we don’t have real problems anyways ….I know I can’t afford to pay off my personal share of the national debt. 30 trillion debt. Roughly take each trillion of that debt and multiply it by 3,000 to get the share that each of us carry on that national debt. (US population is 1/3 of a billion, so multiply by 3 (to bring the population to an equivalent of a billion) and then another thousand (to reach a trillion) and then multiply this by the number of trillions that our national debt is… so we have 3,000 times the 30(trillion number) and get $90,000 debt per person.)
In any case it is nice to see that someone (TES) understands a bit about what is going on in the world and is trying to keep everything from falling apart. Politics is complex, lots of things going on behind the scenes… most people understand real little of it.
But, I’ve got a lot of other stuff that I need to do… that I believe God called me to do or learn or whatever.
Nice to see though that you continue to make real good cases for whatever you are working on and that you present your arguments in a typically powerful way in accordance with the skills that you have.
I don’t have super-great interpersonal skills, my (now former to me) young-earth creationist pastor told me “I’m done…” with my aggressive opposition to all his anti-scientific viewpoints and flawed scriptural analysis. So I can barely get along with many Christians (though I am one) and I don’t want to fumble talking with you who is a skeptic, but one of an elite group who I got a lot of respect for. I won’t start naming the rest of some of these elite thinkers… but again high regards and it just seemed right for me to weigh in a little bit with a few of my thoughts on this topic that you had the courage and honesty to raise. (I’m cutting this short though.)
“However, Foucault argues the exercise of power in the service of maximizing life carries a dark underside. When the state is invested in protecting the life of the population, when the stakes are life itself, anything can be justified. Groups identified as the threat to the existence of the life of the nation or of humanity can be eradicated with impunity.” – Wikipedia – “Biopower”.
Foucalt here, begs the question. Government never merits the role of maximizing life – that is a ‘God’ role. Government is prohibited from shortening or degrading life without due process, nor may it deny those things necessary for a person to ensure their life, health, and happiness, even if those things carry risk or doubt (the levers of the huckster). If those things carry a long past record of abject harm and quick addiction, then they can be monitored under this ‘prohibited from shortening or degrading life’ charter.
Government must provide access under doubt, even to the risk of unknown harm.
This is a question of restraint of, not aggregation of, power. What Foucalt has stumbled upon here, is the problem of government, simply dressed in the problem of treatment.
Can’t see how the COVID shots have had any positive effect. If most of the deaths and adverse reactions happen within the first 14 days after getting a COVID shot and then those people are categorized as ‘unvaccinated’ then the truth has been completely obfuscated.
More support for Sars-CoV-2 spreading earlier than we expected. From the reputable source, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway: «Researchers at Ahus has found antibodies against Covid-19 in pregnant women in Ahus’s vincinity going back to December 2019 – a month earlier than the first identified case of Covid-19 in Europe.»
«There is no systematized information about who the women who got Covid-19 are, and whether they had symptoms, yet it was possible to see that the women with detected antibodies before March 2020 were born in Norway, Eastern-Europe, Africa or the Middle-East.»
Covid was in Pensacola May 2019 Mothers day. BIL was required to mask for airborne virus at CVS minute clinic. He had bad asthma. They made him mask BC multiple patients from one airplane from Houston were and had sought treatments for fever dry cough and difficult breathing. Short breath… they knew it was airborne transmission on the plane.
Is there any potential genetic or other physical factors that cause one to contract COVID more easily or prevent them from contracting?
I’ve had friends who have gotten it and no one else in their household did. Then, many others have gotten it three or more times and of course others never had it at all.
I’ve read about the virus in untreated sewage water being aerosolized but how do some individuals inside that range of spray not fall ill?
The seeming randomness of transmission bothers me more than anything else.
This disparate contagiousness bothers me as well. Everyone in our house got Delta all at once, while no one else on our street did. And we only were exposed one time. Aside from China there are 172 other nations which exhibited some kind of immunity to Covid. This is the most important statistic out there, and we ignore it.
The only thing which can produce the start differential between East and West, is prior immunity. An ancestor of Omicron swept the globe, and was much less deadly – and was tracked as a mild cold. But conferred immunity on all but 35 nations – who are the ones who got hit hard over the last 2 years.
Ok, this article is almost spooky to me, because it elucidates certain failures of myself – especially in a musical context – where psychology is paramount … how does one deal with others in this context without being a demanding tyrant?
So much wasted potential if you don‘t do everything yourself … but then, you need other people for many, many things (often very good friends!)!
I am certainly unable to do many technical things which nevertheless need an „outside perspective“, if you will. But then, you often lose the vision and bemoan its haphazard implementation … and you fail because you lose sight of the „critical path“ yourself because you are in a social situation, after all!
I also recognize the implications for everything else, which does nothing to make me feel better – but that is life.
In all areas there is this very different realm of real life experience and theoretical enthusiasm.
And talking heads don‘t know anything about that …
Let me start by saying I don’t understand the significance of your discoveries. I just don’t have the background. I took a detour into the Feynman method (thanks for that). If there was a 6th grade level write up, I would quickly become bored, but it might allow me to progress rapidly to an undergraduate level.
The earth and moon collide early in the creation of the solar system. The heat would be tremendous, and for a very long time. I would think the high temperature would destroy any DNA like molecules present on either planetary body before the crash. It might also boil away all the water. At some point after there has been enough cooling, other water-laden objects (comets?) could crash down and we would now have our oceans. The specially coded DNA arrives around the same time, and we believe that this would very unlikely have been created by chance.
The possibilities include, that the creating entity was waiting for the earth/moon crash, the cooling time period, and the water deposits. Or this entity was alerted that the conditions and timing were right. Or our entity accidentally came by at the right time. All very unlikely. I wish our species would spend more time researching faster propulsion methods, and less time on greed and violence.
The moon did not crash in to the Earth – we would have had a debris belt still present, especially at the four primary Lagrange points. Only an object the size of the Moon could import the volume of lower atomic number elements and life-support the Earth has in abundance. All the moon (a gigantic comet if you will) had to do, was come into orbit with the Earth – from there it would surrender its vaporizing or water-borne media to the Earth over the 60 million years necessary.
You made it past the 6th grade level on your own – and far further than that!
I would think even if you put debris in the Earth’s Lagrange points, after 4+ billion years enough other random debris from the early solar system would dislodge it all. If the Earth-Moon collision formation idea is correct, we should find leftover bits in the Main Asteroid belt.
We indeed should find residual particles from Theia. Once we establish an Omega Hypothesis however, we rarely will study anything that could serve to falsify it.
The 12 month running average of global mean temperature anomaly has an affine relationship with that of the rate of change of atmospheric CO2 concentration:
If one presumes a causal relationship, it is obvious the arrow of causality must be from temperature anomaly to CO2, and not the reverse. Otherwise, one must posit an absurd dynamic whereby the absolute CO2 concentration could increase to an arbitrary level, but the temperature anomaly would fall back to its initial level once CO2 stopped increasing.
Scaling the time series to match the variability also precisely matches the slope of the trend, so we cannot significantly reduce that scaling to allow significant influence from human emissions. Anthropogenic emissions simply join the much larger natural flows – it’s like peeing into a river.
Moreover, this relationship precludes significant positive aggregate influence of CO2 on terrestrial temperatures in the present climate state. Were that not the case, there would be a positive feedback loop in which temperatures rise, leading to more CO2, leading to higher temperature, and so forth ad-infinitum, or at least until some limiting influence counteracts the upward spiral. The integral nature of the feedback demands that such a positive feedback could not be stabilized even by T^4 radiative losses.
This was the observation that got Dr. Murry Salby, the author of the most widely used climate textbook in the world pre-2000, declared a heretic, fired from his position at Macquarie University, and unpersoned. I argued this position for probably over a decade at places like WUWT, but gained only a small following and eventually tired of it. I’m just a lowly rocket scientist, not a climate establishmentarian, so there’s little chance I could make headway anywhere else, and I just grew tired of arguing with pinheads and left the game. FWIW, my own opinion of how this dynamic comes to be is summarized here. Additional heating from the Earth’s core would provide further impetus for it to unfold.
I found you on Twitter and now am scrolling thru your website. I am not an intellectual, I only have a GED. Even still, I am determined to find something on here that I can comprehend. I mean it respectively. I find you interesting and want to know what you think about certain things, hence my determination to understand what you say.
Without embarrassment, even this article was far beyond my mental capacities to grasp. But this article did make me curious about what your thoughts would be on something, so i am hoping to ask you on here to find out.
“If you don’t believe in GOD, then how do you explain all creation and how it came to be? How can you explain how everything is perfectly designed with having a purpose. Every aspect being considered and leaving nothing ignored. From the smallest to the biggest all variables have a purpose that keeps the cycle continuing so we can exist. The trees are needed, the bees are needed, the manure from animals even fertilize the soil. And it’s all done effortlessly. The rain, the seed bearing plants that provide food, all designed for existence to be possible. I’m so curious what you will say. I’d be disappointed if you were to say everything just evolved like this and became synced together.
What does your deep dive say about this mystery of creation and how it can explained if a different way?
To me, the beginning of creation is too special that none other than a source greater than ourselves can duplicate it. It isn’t like the chair you sit on that someone crafted. The chair does nothing for our existence other than provide comfort…but take away the bees or the trees…that is the creation that i am in awe of. And this can only be from a source that’s greater than us and sits outside of His creation. The true definition to the meaning of ‘awe’. Many call this creator God. More amazing is He not only creates, but also give LIFE. I won’t even get into our DNA.
Excuse me, I started to go on a rant. Hopefully you will notice my comment and respond. If you do actually read this then I thank you for taking your time in doing so. Also, I always ask God for discernment and he brought me here. I don’t know why but i know you’re an important part of something big…like the trees and the bees are. He knows you, even if you don’t believe. :) People that see this comment are going to laugh and think I am crazy, but i don’t care. I’m tired of being afraid to say something or worry i will sound stupid. Silence caused us times that now feel uncertain and many of us feel something is happening, something that is causing us to fight as the underdogs and hoping if we only have a slingshot and rock we will bring the giant down. Im so dramatic. lol. Obviously, My comment has nothing to do with that looming above us, but is how i came across you and I feel it was for a reason. Time will tell. In the meantime please stay safe and keep flying under the radar. Very difficult to do these days, but somehow i think you will be fine.
1. An intent of some sort, set the Universe into motion and ensured that it bore features which allowed for it to exist in equilibrium and further then to host various types and forms of intelligence.
2. ‘God’.
These are two different things. The social and religious definition of God, is wrong – therefore I reject it (and I am not obligated to provide knowledge which I do not possess, other than knowing what is false). Therefore I am an atheist technically. However, I am an ‘ignostic atheist’ – not the impotent concept created by high schoolers in the 20th Century.
That summary can be found below. Focus especially on “The The Ethical Skeptic’s Law of Advanced Intelligence (Ignosticism)”
I know this is an old post, but the link to the article is bad as it references your admin page and post number in word press’s interface. Would you be so kind as to post the actual link to the article you meant to post?
The amount of rabbit holes you have sent me down is astounding. You have forced me to reevaluate my world view on so many different levels. I too was raised in a heavily Christian household and have struggled with those beliefs as I transitioned to adulthood as they never fit just right. Your writings have become verbalizations of thoughts and ideas I could not solidify but have been on the fringe of my consciousness for years. I do not want to put you upon a pedestal, but certainly your logic has been a breath of fresh air, even if it makes me contemplate a future with ramifications so significant I struggle to cope.
I checked all the links and they are working for me.. which one is not linking for you?
TES
Well as I started typing a reply here, I just solved the issue. The link you have above in your response to Michelle from 3 years ago takes a regular web visitor like me without divine access to your WordPress admin login portal. You are more than likely logged in so that link properly redirects you appropriately to the article you wanted to share. I tried last night using the quote before the link in the default search on your site but didn’t get a good hit.
I love this piece. I also love that you quoted Coach Tomlin in it! I may be slightly biased as a diehard Steelers fan, but I have always admired his ability to communicate or express his point in such a unique yet digestible manner. One of my favorite “Tomlinism’s” would be “The standard…..is the standard” along with “excuses are tools of the incompetent”. Excellent!
Sarah, I went to a recent Raider’s/Steelers game in Oakland – the actual camaraderie and bond (in general) between the Raider and Steeler fans was palpable. I suppose it has to do with the intense history. But now veterans of both franchises wear that history as a kind of expeditionary medal they share in common. It was rather odd.
As a lifelong Raiders fan, I’d like to thank you for publishing this. I’ve seen bias against this organization for years/decades. Of course, when I talk about it it’s subjective. I’m glad that someone finally did an objective analysis.
For me Brad, I got tired of people telling me that I was just complaining about a loss (which is of course understandably what sports fans will do). In the case of the Raiders, I decided to look for myself, and found the situation even worse than I had perceived, by far.
I have skim read this, so forgive me if it’s been covered, but how do we explain milder versions circulating from early ‘18 and then becoming more severe? I thought viruses always tended to less severe with time? And how did omicron ‘hang about’ for such a long time before coming to the fore?
Yes, there was a segment speaking to this in section 7a.
Additionally, a December 2021 study showed that both Europe’s and the variant Omicron’s mutational history pre-dated the mutational history of the original Wuhan strain (A.x and B.x).23 Four mutations in the DG614G group all existed in Omicron, but not in the original Asian strains from December 2019. This is prohibitive as an argument, both in terms of the time it would take for these four mutations to occur (see below), and the precedent it served in replacing the alleles of the original A.x and B.x variants out of Asia.
Average entropy for DG614G = .140 = Time to evolve DG614G = as much as 7 years
European strains would have no time to evolve [four DG614G mutations] mutations, had they come directly from the early Asian DG0000 strain. It would thus appear that SARS-CoV-2 had been in Europe [before the Wuhan A or B strains] long enough to evolve DG614G in separation from the viral evolution in Asia.
Ruan, Wen, et al., The twin-beginnings of COVID-19 in Asia and Europe (Dec 2021)
In other words the virility gene by deduction, appeared several times. One did not source the other. So, the inference is that – a virus CAN and does get more virile with time.
Please note that this mutation group existed in Omicron but not in Wuhan. With that in mind, we now proceed to examine the curiosities entailed by the Omicron variant itself.
Within the last year or so I made a mind switch on UAPs after reading a small twitter comment by Robin Hanson. I can’t remember the comment exactly but it was something along the lines of him thinking it “unbelievable” that we don’t take the eyewitness testimony of those two pilots (the man and woman duo) seriously. It took something that small to knock me into alignment and get me thinking. The report didn’t come until later.
I’ve always considered exotheory regarding aliens ‘as being analogous to us, and waiting to be ‘found’ ‘ as highly stacked and improbable. I prefer instead, the Parce-Ames equation I created (two friends from school & grad school who had some of these thoughts)…
The odds are 1,000,000,000 to 1 that they will find us, well before we find them. In fact, if we apply that to the past, the greater likelihood is that they already have found us.
I’ll have a look see at your link. I would have run into it eventually. I’m slowly getting through the site bit-by-bit. I do recall seeing something about before-human visitors perhaps being the current cause of UAP, but I hadn’t finished what I was reading as it was out of order. doh!
Even so… that’s an entirely new angle I hadn’t even considered. More fun for me.
Edit: Okay so it’s clear I am operating with a familiar controversy bias here. All of academia must be under its grasp.
Ive run into way too many Type II. Unfortunately they’ve usually been the ones in charge, and it’s usually not possible to convince them of anything because they don’t really understand what I’m talking about.
A Pakistani businessman that someone I know does some business with once remarked regarding the corruption levels between the US and Pakistan: “I finally figured out what the difference between the US and Pakistan is: In the US the corruption is built-in!”
What he seems to have been referring to is that, in developing countries, people don’t bother trying to get corrupt business practices enshrined in law as much due to weaker governance, but that doesn’t mean stronger governance eliminates corruption. Instead, the corruption gets negotiated into the legal and regulatory systems via regulatory capture and government capture.
Id also say that laws tend to not get enforced very seriously against anyone or any organization that’s “important” enough and this is still true in the US.
The sad fact is that the US is not as different from a “third world” country as people think it is. Most of the same systems phenomena still exist here but they will look different to average people, causing them to think that the phenomena are different than the same ones elsewhere when they are not completely different things.
Hey TES!
Very intriguing article, thank you.
I’ve studied a bit of biochem, and wrote the MCAT, but I think this will take me at least a month to really digest. On first read-through I’m not clear on the “primary map” and “secondary map” sections of “Third Codon Letter Left and Right-Handed 32-Slot Apportionment“. Anywhere you can point me for clarification? I’m not sure what the top-row doublet for each amino refers to, nor the two lines branching out of them.
Be warned, if you answer me now you encourage me to ask many more questions in the future!
Josh
Compare the Primary Map column with the ‘handedness’ (it’s not chiralty per se, but rather logical handedness). It should become clear that the A-G third base slots are one hand, and the CT third base are the other hand. The problem is in selecting under such a discipline, one defeats nitrite chemical affiliations, and can only get around that conflict by logical selection, not chemistry interaction alone.
Thanks for your reply!
I should have studied the graphic closer before asking my question. I wasn’t reading it correctly at all but now I see how the information in the “primary map” column is organized.
My first thought is that A and G are both purines, and C and T are both pyramidines so it doesn’t seem super strange that they could sub-in for one another. I’m 100% sure I’m not seeing the full picture though,
I don’t know what you mean by nitrite chemical affiliations here. I will be rereading this piece many times though and it will surely motivate me to study biochem more. Lately I’ve been more focused developing crypto apps.
I’d love to hear more of your thoughts on how there could be an incentivized distributed ledger involved here.
Thanks again,
Josh
Examine the CTGA-N Codon progression chart, it has all the flags inserted into it. It took me a LONG time to see the impossibility behind this chart, as opposed to the mere coincidence. Coincidence is ‘understanding’, impossibility requires comprehension.
and people trying to dismiss objections as some sort of pedantic nitpicking only relevant to “unscientific” philosophers.
The underlying philosophical cause of that incident, which was the origin of the Holocaust, was the idea that ethical claims are meaningless because they’re “unscientific”. Unfortunately we still have this underlying attitude in play today, and we can not refrain from ethical scrutiny or we will end up with the same thing not just happening again, but also further escalating.
Doctors need to be able to refuse to comply with unethical policy and need to be able to make their own medical decisions based on their own assessment of what is or isn’t valid science. Otherwise we end up in this same National Socialist authoritarian collectivist medical system situation yet again.
I say that but it seems like we already have when it comes to Covid response. Failure to address this bureaucratic ethical dysfunction will only make these problems worse.
I have compound heterozygous C677T and A1298C which it sounds like may be about the same as the MTHFR impairment of homozygous C677T alone. I’m only aware of this due to testing related to MDD (depression).
I didn’t know this impacted Covid symptoms at all so I’ll have to look into that more.
And the main current problem is that students are given the impression, even when not explicitly taught, that “history is over” and “everything is different now”. This is, in effect, the same as the usual “those pagans were barbaric but fortunately that’s all over with now that everyone is enlightened” claim that’s been made for who knows how many thousands of years.
Some things are different but everything is not. At least it’s getting more difficult to burn records.
Some of this is actually caused by environments that condition people to believe they can’t do anything without some sort of official “training” of some sort. An extreme example I encountered once was at a large animal shelter where the volunteer coordinator didn’t want to let anyone volunteer to take adoption promotional photos of dogs unless they had “dog training”, even though they weren’t handing the dogs at all (someone else with “dog training” would be doing that).
In this situation there seemed to be some job security concerns where some paid employees were worried about having their jobs replaced by volunteers if those volunteers were allowed to do some tasks that might otherwise be done by paid employees. (But they didn’t actually seem to be in danger of running out of work to do and some things were not getting done.)
Another issue is legal liability and “due diligence” requirements, or regulatory compliance requirements. While these things are inevitable and necessary a lot of the time, they represent absolute bare minimal checkboxes in a lot of cases and seem to end up conditioning some number of people into thinking they need “training” of some sort for every little thing.
Then people who aren’t very good at something, don’t think they can figure it out, or just don’t want to do something will use this as an excuse for why they can’t do it.
But I think the bigger problem is institutional systems that condition people into thinking they can’t do or understand anything without some sort of officially endorsed training. The same sort of institutions tend to also discourage questioning of whatever claims are being taught.
But I think the bigger problem is institutional systems that condition people into thinking they can’t do or understand anything without some sort of officially endorsed training. The same sort of institutions tend to also discourage questioning of whatever claims are being taught.
This is the key. Control of thought and embargoed information.
Can you list some names or elaborate further? The people I follow seem to be doing the work against the naked Emperors such as lawsuits, organizations to dispense early treatment, work to swing elections like VA’s or reopen schools.
This may be a bit late for another comment, but this is new (to me) information and it pertains to the fecal spread of COVID. This July 1, 2021 scholarly article appears to show SARS-CoV-2 behaving as a bacteriophage virus, infecting human gut microbiome bacteria and multiplying in feces over an extended period of time, continuing on in culture medium, and being reduced to zero by 4 particular antibiotics, but not by others. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8283343/
This reminded my of your argument for fecal-aerosol transmission in the spreading of the pandemic in agricultural regions spraying raw sewage.
From a recently read pre-print on a Bayesian Causal Impact statistical evaluation of vaccines and death rates across 145 countries:
“Untruth naturally afflicts historical information. There are various reasons that make this unavoidable. One of them is partisanship for opinions and schools. If the soul is impartial in receiving information, it devotes to that information the share of critical investigation the information deserves, and its truth or untruth thus becomes clear. However, if the soul is infected with partisanship for a particular opinion or sect, it accepts without a moment’s hesitation the information that is agreeable to it. Prejudice and partisanship obscure the critical faculty and preclude critical investigation. The result is that falsehoods are accepted and transmitted” (Muhammad ibn Khaldun al-Hadrami 1379, 1–2).
I love this article. It says so much that needs to be said.
The „simplicity“ of the indoctrinated mind is always a fun thing to think about … at least, as long as you still have the will to be amused – and not to be crushed by reality‘s bloodthirsty sense of irony: Because it is everywhere – in them, in you …
And sometimes, they are you … or they are everybody around you. Not so easy to ignore them then …
If anyone ever thinks that things could be simple AND true at the same time, she or he doesn‘t pay attention to the world that surrounds her or him …
How often has the inherent complexity of anything (and everything) ensured that nobody understands anything (and everything)?
I would wish for a simpler, clearer world that could be communicated more easily – but then, that could not possibly work, could it? That wouldn‘t be a real world …
We need to understand the incredible difficulty in conveying anything that is not trivial (and even then) … and that we live in a world of idiots.
I find myself in a bizarre pandemonium where I see reason intertwined with absolute idiocy – which is begetting a bizarre form of newspeak „rationality“ …
And now it is more total than ever before ! And you don‘t even have to explain anything, because … it is so! Obviously!
I use android. There doesn’t seem to be a way to link or share this article. There is no internet menu because it is not a chrome or ddgo page and there seems to be no link or share buttons. Any ideas?
Comprehension requires time and a deliberate process, and at least above-average cognitive skills. The group of folks described by those traits lie closer to the right tail of the Bell curve.
Most people, for most of history have not understood most things. You need to cooperate more than understand, but you sure need to know where you’ll get food, water and fuel every winter.
TES, I have used this fine essay to explain something about langue and psychology. I hope you will take a look.
The Ethical Skeptic (TES) has written a very good essay: The Distinction Between Comprehension and Understanding. I want to use a schema presented in his essay to describe what FIML is, how to see it and understand it. Comprehending it requires doing it and reaping its benefits.
Meta-Linguistics (and I would assume non-verbal communication techniques as well) are absolutely key to interpersonal comprehension. An interesting application frontier!
Ahhh gotcha, sequitur and incremental logical next question!
In the chart inside the article, you can see that the sourced reference for the death-causes was published in April 2020. We knew that blood clots were causing 75% of the deaths back then – AND WE DID NOTHING… Because we wanted the vaccines to come to the rescue. So we sacrificed 400 – 600k people in order to promote that experiment.
The beauty of this proposition is that it easily explains far too much that I’ve had to “set aside” or “hand-wave” into semi-reasonable places. This includes not only pre-December-2019 facts that didn’t jibe, but all the post-2019 problems (like omicron) that bunch up on the various supposed release dates near the end of 2019.
BTW, thanks for informing us about your bout with omicron. I had delta around Thanksgiving 2021, and (almost certainly) Wuhan in January 2020. I am preparing for omicron, just in case. Your take on omicron’s lineage is a great explainer of too many things. I love the immunological irony of the “original immunity-conferrer” or its offspring swinging around to Naiveville for a second round against its sibling line.
If you can compose an “elevator pitch” of this idea, I promise to spread it like omicron, with links back to this post!
“When one examines the complete 144-slot genetic profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it becomes clear that its lineage is a full two years older than even the first Covid virus in Wuhan, China. Not only did this ancestor of Omicron cause an outbreak across the world in 2018 and 2019, that was mistaken as an 8-fold higher rate of flu across the Asia-Pacific-Africa for those years, but its genetics reveal a robust history of lab mouse serial passes and lab-edited alleles. This proving that its 2018 release as a less-deadly immunity-builder prophylactic virus, and the subsequent release of the more-deadly Wuhan variant two years later, both originated from a weapons-grade bio-lab in China.
China set up a red herring for the world to ‘discover’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its local seafood wet market, suggesting an unfortunate but understandable accident was being thinly concealed. Now, the problem for China is, that unlike all the other variants, Omicron stuck around for some reason, and is now spilling the beans on the whole sordid affair.”
This is the best formulation of the involuntary medical testing meme which I have seen. Does Dr. Malone read you?
I’m a COVID-treating MD, early treatment adopter since early 2020,before Trump mentioned it, fired at end of October for refusal to compy with mandatory COVID vaccination. I’ve currently got COVID, treating with ivermectin-based therapy, and got a resurgence of symptoms and a positive viral test a few days after completing a 5 day course of ivermectin. https://www.johndayblog.com/2022/01/covid-resurgence-off-ivermectin.html
Can you please discuss the experimental treatment Remdesevir
My husband was in hospital for 7 months and I feel he got worse with that medication and the only reason he is here with us is because God wants him to be here.
The difficulty in assessing Remdesivir, is that it is a final-mile treatment. That means it is only applied to those who are at high risk of or are in the process of dying in the first place. Accordingly, it is going to show a high association with death statistically. It is like contending that ambulance drivers are murderers, by citing how many people died in the backseat of the vehicle they were driving. We don’t actually know for sure. So, I remain mute on Remdesivir. Sadly…
However, I do know that – by not treating dysbiosis (doxycycline), sepsis (antibiotics), microclots (apaxiban), pneumonia (prednisone), and endothelial inflammation (antinflammatories) – the majority of hospital deaths came from not treating persons prior to a hospital setting. Once they were in the hospital they usually had the grim reaper pushing their wheelchair to begin with – so the task Remdesivir had to accomplish was rather monumental by that time.
It’s like breaking your leg and sitting around for a week while it caught gangreen and sent you into sepsis, and then trying to have your orthopedic surgeon fix the sepsis… by that time it is too late. The orthopedic surgeon will be overmatched and cannot do their job as well.
my thoughts,
TES :-)
Yes
That is part of the problem.
He was not treated correctly for the pneumonia in the first place when he went to urgent care. The treatments that worked were kept from him, therefore, he just got worse . Giving him the Remdesevir just made him worse , then put on ventilator and ecmo causing all kinds of complications . Since my husband survived by the grace of God , the make it seem like if they would not have done that, he would have died . Yet, non of the doctors admit that medications that would have prevented him from getting worse from the onset of the symptoms would have prevented all this suffering .
The basic structure of the medical institution in the U.S. surely must be questioned and thoughtfully modified as a result of this situation. As a retired Engineer and Operations Manager who has had to deal with the medical establishment on my own and other’s behalf throughout my life, I have frequently disparaged the lack of independent, competitive and responsible thought within the medical community when compared to relatively pedestrian activities like manufacturing. While the members of the medical establishment should and do feel the pressure brought on by the credible threat of liability actions for malpractice (as we all do), many members within the medical establishment are also heavily controlled through their employment contracts, hospital privileges, etc., to follow dogma that is related to political goals. The clear pandemic example is the ban on prescribing anti-virals such ivermectin (which have proven highly successful elsewhere) through coercion and threats of removal of employment or necessary privileges for doing something that is logical, legal, in keeping with professional oaths and has an extremely low liability risk.
We must work to redesign the structure of the medical institution to remove these non-liability related methods of control so that we can free up competitive thought and actions within the community to allow it to progress at the rate of other human endeavors.
And as with most issues, our ‘educated’ hold the position that such a conspiracy could not exist. Someone would speak up or spill the beans.
I think the days of buying that rhetoric are over…
At least one thing came out of this two-year waste in humanity.
TES :-)
I am going to recommend- for you based on what you wrote- adding daily nasal irrigation to the things you do. Since starting over a decade ago, haven’t needed to take an antihistamine for allergies. Since adding xylitol to the mix over 3 years ago- haven’t had cold or flu. OR- the dreaded covid. With several close exposures as defined by the CDC. During the covidiocy I’ve also added erythritol to the mix. Lots of different types of machines you can buy on Amazon. I’m currently using the Navage- the easiest so far. And followed a youtube video on how to bypass their “have to use our salt pods” features. 1/2 tsp baking soda, 1 tsp salt, 1 tsp of both the xylitol and erythritol, per one pint of warm water.
I also take most of the OTC supplements you have listed daily. And- my multi has the MDR of zinc, and my red meat consumption puts me well over the MDR. And B-100 which is a standard formulation across many brands. And vitamin E, which is also a good anti-coagulant.
B-100 never worked for me however – with my genetics, cheap B-vitamins which must go through the liver conjugation process first, in order to be used – only end up bringing me to malnutrition and severe health impacts. I have to use the food form, or ‘methylated’ or I suffer greatly.
Yes, taking Vit E.
This is long, but it’s how I cured a crippling sinus problem I had for years. I’ll tell you how to solve the problem. I had really bad sinus. Really bad. I read Jerry Pournelle who had the same and said a device like a water pic type thing would work. Well it did. Get one of these,
SinuPulse Elite Advanced Nasal Sinus Irrigation System
I found it works the best and last a long time. It’s not super cheap but compared to surgery or the suffering it’s super cheap. They’re like $80 USD.
It was a great relief. I could use a tank to wash out before bed but…it never really “fixed” things. Not that I was displeased. It made a huge difference. Now by reading about parasites and bacteria I got some ideas on how to improve the wash. So what I eventually did was add in additives to attack bacteria into the nose washing fluid. What I came up with I used in each tank.
1. About a spoon full of H2O@ (hydrogen peroxide). Stuff in drugstores(3%). Start at a lower level and work up to what you can stand.
2. I started with sea salt, a teaspoon and Sodium bicarbonate but eventually got the nose washing powder from wallmart in packages. Cheap and works. “Neilmed Sinus Rinse Premixed Packets”
3. I also added a disinfectant “Lugol’s 2% iodine”. I would add 5 to 6 drops to each tank. To kill off bacteria I added an artificial sugar. A teaspoon of Xylitol. Xylitol is gorged on by bacteria and it kills them off. So they say. If you eat a lot of Xylitol candy you will get massive gas. That’s the bacteria in the gut being trashed by the Xylitol.
4. Water I just used from the tap. Not the best plan. It’s better to use distilled OR to put water in the microwave for 10 minutes or so to get a vigorous boil. My thinking was I’m adding all these disinfectants so it’s ok but it’s not the right way.(the chlorine does burn but you get used to it)
5. Now I would put water in the tank and then add the ingredients while the thing was pumping. Aim the nozzle to the back of the tank so that all water is thoroughly mixed up. Let it run for a minute or so before washing.
6. DO NOT turn the power level down on the pump. It just throttles it and messes up the pump over time by over working it. To vary pressure to the nostril just move the thing back and do not jam it up your nostril. Do it over the sink and let the excess drain off.
7. Now my sinuses at first would be packed so I would just spray it up into the nostril without placing it firmly. After a while you could place it firmly in one nostril and it would run out the other. As you are doing so you could blow out the open nostril and blow this stuff out while spraying in one nostril. Then do the other.
8. After you clean it out fairly well then you could put in one nostril and close off the other with your finger. It would slowly pressure the fluid deep into the nasal cavity filling it. Make sure you clean with the open nostril technique well first so you are not just blowing that stuff up farther into the nostril. Of course be careful not to blow your sinus out. Do this and then let drain intermittently.
9. When I first started doing this sometimes I would need three, four tanks to clear out but after adding the extra ingredients I noticed. I WAS CURED. No not completely but mostly. It’s not like I don’t have normal sinus but I do not have to wash every night. Only every so often, months apart.
Sam J.’s theory of chronic sinus trouble,” The sinuses get bacteria or yeast lodged deep in the sinus cavity where they are hard to get out. They irritate the sinus causing a vast amount of sinus expectoration to try and dislodge them. The only way to make it stop is to wash out and kill off the bacteria in the sinus. Once this is done the sinus will go back to it’s original function and original drainage pattern”.
The reason I believe the above is correct is I used this sinus pump or one like it for over two years or more. It gave me great relief so I could sleep but my sinus would be filled back up by the end of the day. It was only after I added all these additives to kill off bacteria, or whatever was in my sinus, that within a maybe a few months I noticed I didn’t need to clean out my sinuses at all for really long periods of time like months.
I know this is long and most will wonder what I’m going on about but if you suffer from chronic sinus troubles and do this you will be one of the happiest persons ever to rid yourself of this scourge. Packed sinuses is horrible. Everyone I see with serious sinus problems I sit down and write down all this stuff for them. There’s no telling how many people, if they follow through, have been helped by this.
This is a great example of doctors being intimidated into not even recommending the easiest and safest treatments for Covid – in an effort to make sure that those who did not get vaccinated – got absolutely nothing, as a form of treatment.
The scope and scale of this vaccination program and the suppression of other treatment options could not be consistently manipulated by any distributed federation. That kind of control would require (1) a central coordinator of enormous power and pre-existing connections in every healthcare and reimbursement system, (2) a motivation strong enough to ignore the risk and consequences of discovery, and (3) an understanding that this process would span more than 2 years.
Certainly the US federal administrative government satisfies the first and third requirements, but my money is on the pharma powers because of the insidious and ubiquitous nature of the control and the sheer amount money to be made.
For me, the telling fact is the disclosure by Moderna in an SEC filing on February 11, 2020 seeking authority to issue 26 million new common shares based on an mRNA vaccine they were able to create in less than 6 days after the virus was identified in China. From the SEC filing: ”2019-nCoV was first identified in Wuhan, China on January 7, 2020.On January 13, 2020, the NIH and our infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for the 2019-nCoV vaccine and we mobilized toward clinical manufacture. As of February 7, 2020, the first clinical batch, including fill and finishing of vials, is complete. This mRNA vaccine was designed and manufactured in 25 days and is undergoing analytical testing prior to release to the NIH for use in their planned Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S.”
So big pharma with no prior knowledge of this virus went from 0 to a working vaccine batch in less than 30 days.
No doubt the feds aided and abetted, so one cannot eliminate a governmental role, but I’ll take pharma for the win.
Exactly. If you examine the Moderna patent progression – it is one I am familiar with. Government will hand a technology to a private company under an MNCNDA, and the instruct them as to the patents they want. The Moderna patent strategy is one which is ‘linear, derived from no team basis in prior art, milestone driven, with a single objective using prior art of the government sponsor” – In other words it was like the rush to build the atomic bomb in WWII. There was driving force behind this.
There was a placeholder in the patent claims for ______________, until Feb 3 2020, where in SARS-CoV-2 was inserted. China did something and our intelligence services knew about it.
Moderna bragged in an SEC filing in Feb 2020 that it had developed a complete and clinically testable vaccine for the SARS-2 COVID virus within 25 days of the publication of the virus genome. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001682852/000119312520033353/d871325d424b5.htm#supptoc871325_8 ;(page S18)
Moderna was seeking approval for the issuance of an additional 26 million shares of common stock, based in part on the creation of this vaccine.
Seems impossible to go from 0 to complete vaccine in 25 days without some inside knowledge regarding the genome.
This reminds me of some stuff that happened with Google when it was brand new. I can’t recall the exact timeline but they mysteriously went from distributed computing scalability problems to no problems very quickly when every other search engine had struggled with that for a few years. This was around the time some, uh, other stuff was going on.
The “scope and scale” of the Covid Scam CAN ONLY be COHERENTLY explained by recognizing that a cabal of psychopaths are ruling globally — see “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” at https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html
“2 weeks to flatten the curve has turned into…3 shots to feed your family!” — Unknown
I would disagree that “a cabal of psychopaths ruling globally” is the only explanation. In most cases I would say degenerate phenomena are better explained by game theory and social psychology. The players don’t need to be psychopaths either, only humans with conflicts of interest who can rationalize their convenient disregard somehow.
People tend to assume that things must happen due to hierarchical control by a single hierarchy led by one or more persons, because that’s what they tend to encounter on a smaller more everyday scale, but there are plenty of situations where this is not the case. For example, in game theory see coordination games such as assurance games. Multiple players can converge on the same square in the payoff matrix without direct communication, and they can do so for different reasons.
The main players will be individuals and groups, such as economic oligarchs, and groups of officers of various private and public sector organizations. But they don’t need to form a cabal as they can be independently pursuing an assurance game. There’s also likely to be a Byzantine Generals Problem.
Most of the population is operating at Lawrence Kohlberg’s Stage 3 or Stage 4, and will be subject to the phenomena shown in the Milgram Experiments and Asche Conformity Experiments. This is why it’s critical to solve these problems at the level where people are instructed from a position of authority and social approval.
But it’s harder to solve them if the problem is attributed to a single secret cabal of some sort when the problem is more complicated and most likely doesn’t have a single point of control.
If you know that your actions can result entropically in harm – you are still taking those actions, regardless of the relative innocence of the first-order actions themselves. Secondary effects are always quotidie mortem. One is still accountable for knowing this.
I would agree entirely and this is especially true for those who wield extreme amounts of power and thus have extreme amounts of responsibility. Humanity can’t afford for such people to be doing everything primarily for their own personal convenience. The only thing that seems to help is stronger more robust accountability mechanisms, but the ease with which most people are deceived and manipulated seems to defeat accountability.
Hence, monstrous, large scale diabolical projects can occur without anything resembling a conspiracy. Can you direct me to any writings on this by yourself or others?
However, when one is in government – if one does not assess strategic alternatives and model prospective impacts – it is no different than conspiracy. Your responsibility is to know the ramifications of your actions. ‘Good’ or ‘Bad’ intentions do not cut it. There are only two states – know, or malfeasance through omission and clumsy commission.
The latter is monstrous – and allowing ignorance to be an excuse, will become the excuse of resort on the part of every despot.
EVG
TES
Ethical Skeptic already beat me to writing about it, but he’s a better writer than I am anyway.
Is there any other potentially deadly disease that the medical professional diagnoses you positive, then sends you home without a treatment plan? Telling the patient to take some OTC product to only soothe symptoms doesn’t count as a treatment plan.
I would consider adding an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker like Losartan for endothelial protection, and Xarelto or similar Factor Xa inhibitor to help prevent any coagulopathy. Doses and frequency according to your medical resources.
The scope and scale of this vaccination program and the suppression of other treatment options could not be consistently manipulated by any distributed federation. That kind of control would require (1) a central coordinator of enormous power and pre-existing connections in every healthcare and reimbursement system, (2) a motivation strong enough to ignore the risk and consequences of discovery, and (3) an understanding that this process would span more than 2 years.
Certainly the US federal administrative government satisfies the first and third requirements, but my money is on the pharma powers because of the insidious and ubiquitous nature of the control and the sheer amount money to be made.
For me, the telling fact is the disclosure by Moderna in an SEC filing on February 11, 2020 seeking authority to issue 26 million new common shares based on an mRNA vaccine they were able to create in less than 6 days after the virus was identified in China. From the SEC filing:
”2019-nCoV was first identified in Wuhan, China on January 7, 2020.On January 13, 2020, the NIH and our infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for the 2019-nCoV vaccine and we mobilized toward clinical manufacture. As of February 7, 2020, the first clinical batch, including fill and finishing of vials, is complete. This mRNA vaccine was designed and manufactured in 25 days and is undergoing analytical testing prior to release to the NIH for use in their planned Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S.”
So big pharma with no prior knowledge of this virus went from 0 to a working vaccine batch in less than 30 days.
No doubt the feds aided and abetted, so one cannot eliminate a governmental role, but I’ll take pharma for the win.
Thanks to following your Twitter feed, I am on a daily regimen of nattokinese and methyl folate. I have ivermectin on hand, and most of the rest – will be researching how to get the rest.
Thank you for everything you have done these past 2 years.
Hospitals in the western world followed the same script. Denial of early treatment, lockdown of nursing homes and euthanasia with respiratory depressants (midazepam in England, Rivotril in France), forced vaccinations.
The orders are easy to find as they’re called mandates which is the legal term used by the sect.
What is awful is that the medical profession has been taken hostage, often from within, either by political participation or simple brainwashing. In any case the whole medical industry is now completely discredited as either incompetent or malign, or both.
Early treatments are very effective indeed, and refusing to administer them is a crime against mankind.
PS: Thought there was something else missing from your diatribe…From your description it seems you were infected with the coronavirus, probably the Delta variant and then presented yourself to a clinic. At this point you become concerned that you were forced onto a path in which you elected not to be vaccinated.
But surely you made this decision far earlier – at a point when vaccines became available and you had not yet been infected?
That was the point at which you should have investigated your alternatives extensively. Once you made that decision you would be stuck with whatever treatment options were made available at that time – which may have included shortages of staff, shortages of beds, oxygen etc. Perhaps the only advantage to be gained would be that treatments continually improve in the light of information coming out of all the hospitals and treatment centres but the general overloading plus politicization of all issues related to Covid-19 could and did have many deleterious effects.
So I agree: You made your bed and you must sleep on it, however uncomfortable it might be!
There are effective treatments for COVID, especially at early stages, and through getting vitamin-D levels up into the normal range, so the immune system functions normally. John Day MD http://www.johndayblog.com
1. This knowledge of early treatment protocol need, was from April 2020. The medicinals have existed since 1916. This is pretty easy. My extended family’s ‘bed’ was made by one thing: a lack of outpatient and timely treatment availability after 18 months of research by public health officials. Criminal. This was a monstrous action. You are part of it.
2. Early treatment would have prevented hospital overloading and death. Those who squelched treatment, in favor of promoting SOLELY vaccine/no Treatment, are criminals with blood on their hands. We used the threat of death as the incentive to conform under the experiment. Also known as ‘Racketeering’. See my article on the same.
Something I had forgot to mention regarding this: there seems to be a bureaucratic rule issue that creates a rules conflict between promoting treatment and approving the emergency use of a vaccine etc:
Finally, an EUA can be granted only when “there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product.”
So it seems very much as though there was an effort to “debunk” any cheap low-tech treatments in order to gain EUA for experimental expensive/high-tech ones.
Then people die while waiting for the high tech experimental treatments and don’t receive what’s available because it’s all been “debunked” and lacks the liability cover of bureaucratic approval.
I modified the article with this wisdom you provided. I had not even thought along this angle.
EVG
TES
Sounds unbelievable that your attending physician made such a blunt statement: “There is no treatment. Go home and sleep it off. You should have gotten the vaccine.
~ Diagnosing Physician at Clinic, Aug 18 2021.
Is it possible that you attempted to engage him/her on the use of Ivermectin or something similar and raised his/her ire at having to deal with yet another recalcitrant antivaxxer? I have every sympathy with healthcare personnel who have spent the last two years trying to save lives under such appalling conditions – and then have to deal with such nonsense as demonstrated here.
You have done much better in the past and could do better in future.
No mention of any specific treatment or therapeutic was made at all. My statement which prompted the quip was, “I came in to get tested as soon as I felt a little bit off, that way I can get started on the right treatment approach as soon as possible.”
“There is no treat…. blah blah blah…”
His quip was the nonsense. Delay of treatment to the hospital alone is more than nonsense, it is a crime.
Been following your research since spring 2020 (twitter). I knew of the death in your family yet had no idea you and other members were struggling for months with Covid/variants. Couldn’t thank you enough for all you are doing, and for The Kit.
Amazing that the Harvard article has no mention of Ivermectin despite it being the most controversial & talked about treatment in 2021.
You write: “A decision was made to coerce me, without sufficient knowledge on my part nor my consent, into participating as a control-group member in an experiment evaluating test-group vaccines versus the action of withholding any and all treatment.”
I think you are on the same page with my thinking that to constitute an experiment you need more than just conditions consistent with experimental proceedures but also intentionality behind the process – someone controling the conditions have to have purposefully set up the conditions to run an experiment. So, who is that someone in this case?
Also, if it were an experiment, why the push to vaccinate absolutely everyone? Wouldn’t they want a good sized control group?
The push to vaccinate everyone was in part rhetorical as an argument, however real as an intent. They knew that a sizeable contingent of Americans would not accept the vaccine, so there would be plenty of control group members – no matter how hard they pushed vaccination. Still, vaccinating as many persons as possible was the real goal nonetheless. It is just that this goal would never realistically encroach upon the control group.
As for who? I do not know completely. However, The Party benefits politically both from the death of its enemies and the disenfranchisement of their children. This smacks very much of Party activity – to me.
Each “player” can also be a group. Each player also does not need to necessarily “plot” or explicitly coordinate with other players. In some cases, players don’t even need to communicate, they just need to have access to the same information and follow the same payoff metric calculations.
An example of this last one is the stock market where a significant number of investors in a stock receive the earnings announcement and converge on the same decision to buy or sell using the same or similar valuation models. However, like the stock market, there could be a criminal conspiracy among some company executives to lie about earnings (conspiracy to commit securities fraud) in order to manipulate investors into not selling the stock and driving the price toward worthlessness.
Though it isn’t as easy to understand as securities fraud and fraudulent SEC filings, we are constantly being deceived for similar manipulative purposes; the “who”, “how”, or “why” is not nearly as obvious as the securities fraud scenario though.
But in any case, the “wisdom of crowds” doesn’t work when the gumball jar is hidden or the contents partially hidden etc. In that case, obtaining the correct count is obviously not the objective.
Well, you’ve got me going down a rabbit hole this evening… My rs1801133 = A/A, rs1801131 = T/T. I’m trying to independently evaluate your claims, and it’s rather difficult…
Let me know what you find. But given your profile of AA and TT, you are homozygous for BOTH MTHFR alleles. This is important – past age 30 or so, you may find that you are experiencing boughts of excessive fatigue doing normal daily tasks. Or feeling like you are going to pass out or have a heart attack, just walking or sitting normally. These are indication of a lack of methylfolate and methlycobalamine. These are the active forms of vitamins B-9 and B-12, which cannot be supplied by grocery store vitamins. If you can find these at a health store or online (very common and cheap supplements), I would order them and test them under your tongue.
Prior to age 30, these are important for ANS, neural, mitochondrial, and muscle development. I needed this when I was younger, but unfortunately we did not have this knowledge then.
It will be critical that you take these, as soon as you are confident in the research you find.
It changed my life and the lives of many others I have told about this…
Thanks so much for all of your covid analysis, it’s been interesting and invaluable. Embarrassingly, I’m actually up now at 2:30 am after waking up from Niacin flush after taking it for the first time at 11:00 pm. The similarity to a bad sunburn sensation was remarkable. Reading up on my dosing error, the duration, etc led me back here and down a MTHFR rabbit hole of online research. Curious, does a rather strong flush response indicate anything on the probability of having MTHFR issues? Also, with a 3 yo on the autism spectrum I ran into a number of discussions of MTHFRs potential impact there. Any thoughts on whether that link has been validated? Thanks again
I think that everyone gets the niacin flush. My ears start burning first, then face, then my arms, and the front of my legs. Yes, it feels like a sunburn. What I have noticed is that it is much stronger when niacin is taken on an empty stomach. I don’t think that the flush is stronger in MTHFR. But then I have not looked at that particular association.
MTHFR and ASD – yes, there is an association. Enough to where one should be screened for this allele before vaccine decisions are made. But in our Pollyanna science society, mere virtuous sounding words relate ultimate and unassailable truth, and not any kind of research. The sad state of monkey affairs in which we live.
One study (Sener, Oztop) found a 24 – 29% higher association to C677T, with an unreasonably small and heterozygous sample population of 98 people in Turkey and only 3 persons from any form of homozygous phenotype (the most informative). In other words, principal incompetence. Every parent on my neighborhood street could have conducted a more ethical and rigorous study. Sometimes these technicians fascinate themselves with irrelevancies about what μL PCR mix they used, what U/mL Taq DNA polymerase was applied, or that they used a statistical ‘Mann-Whitney U test’, when their core argument is less competent than a high school gymnasium science show exhibit – or worse.
If I had wanted to purposely obfuscate the issue, Sener-Oztop is the study I would have done. They arrogantly think that people cannot detect the incumbent dishonesty through the technical notation jargon.
Another study by Boris and Goldblatt showed a similar association to C677T. But cited that another polymorphism must be the root of the association, rather than simply this one. That may well be the case. But parents and independent researchers see both mechanism and association which small agenda-studies routinely work to filter out.
Thus, why ethical skepticism exists – to spot those who are spinning the agenda.
TES :-)
Thanks so much, I did 1000 mg on an empty stomach and was worse than any sunburn I’ve had.
Will plan to have the little one tested. I didn’t appreciate it was the standard vax combined with MTHFR that caused the potential ASD issues rather than just ongoing MYHFR causing issues. Sorry to bother for more research but do you know whether there’s evidence MTHFR oriented supplements can help ASD after the original generation of issues from vax? Have found a few anecdotal sites from parents but there’s a wide spectrum of ASD supplement/diet advice out there
TES You may be interested by this http://www.magniel.com/jse/B/vol0201B/vg040720.pdf where it’s suggested that outgassing of H/He from the core and subsequent reactions through the mantle create much of the heat, and explosive forces involved in vulcanism and earthquakes, that reaches the surface. It would imply that the same processes expressed in the atmosphere through vulcanism or in the oceans through both vulcanism and plates spreading cause both cooling and warming of the global climate.
“But looking back on it now, I think one reason I suffered so badly from the mold exposure was that I was already suffering from ‘long COVID.'”
Most of the Covid-Delta sufferers from August 2021 in our household are suffering an extraordinary mold allergy season this year, in terms of both severity and length. I suppose this has to do with heightened immunity systems.
I had IgG antibodies in July 2021, but was not ill with a CLI since June 2017. So I am not sure where I got the antibodies.
Mine was not really an article, so much as a compilation :)
The mold in my apartment back then was sampled & confirmed, multiple species and plenty of it. But what happened to me seemed exaggerated.
What IgG or other test might be useful at this point? It’s been nearly 3 years for me. n-antibody tests I’ve done have been negative, which I now understand now could be expected. But I wish I knew that before I decided to get the vaccine in the spring. I probably made matters worse by doing that. No more!
Oh my goodness! This is one of my graduate professors to the T. He was supposed to be the lead on curriculum development but instead stonewalled any improvements to the program. It was so frustrating as our curriculum was outdated. He also had astonishingly never produced his own research in 20 years–and got away with it, yet he would rip apart any doc students work without being constructive. He made excuses not to show up for my dissertation proposal and defense, which in a small department was pretty telling. By the way, we were the same age, but I had 24 years in the field.
That sounds like a nightmare. I hope you have fared well since Gena!
The measure of an out of control ego, is not in how people tend to regard themselves – but rather is measured in these subtle hints and behaviors.
I like to see myself as an autodidact, but it embarrasses me to acknowledge that there is more than a little of “the dark side” in my character.
Im a retired doctor, and see very clearly how our education pre-disposes us to regurgitating the errors of others and calling that “education”.
This happens when you have a high enough readership to attract the attention of government military-trolls.
They assign bot trolls, with an occasional NCO to throw in some human bits and rude answers. Occasionally, if called out as a bot in detail, by multiple commenters, they may have an intelligent human overseer (Captain of trolls) post some intellectual articles and say intellectual things in a hurt-yet-disparaging-guilt-inducing-way.
This is happening recently The Automatic Earth blog, which is an alternative financial (Peak Oil origins) blog, with a lot of focus on COVID related lies and manipulations, “Science”, vs. science, etc. lately. 12/13/21 blog comments: https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/12/debt-rattle-december-13-2021/page/2/ The second page of comments is where “deflationista”, “Captain Deflationista” this time (a rare honor in the comments section) comes in, and spends the rest of a busy day.
There were 4 pages of comments that day. I presume the military tracks traffic in real time and officers only attend when it is high.
I don’t rate this kind of expenditure of manpower or even droid-trolls on my humble blog, which is OK. http://www.johndayblog.com
Hello ES. I would like to express my humble gratitude to you for proposing such an elegant and incredibly important idea. I truly believe humankind has a responsibility to become guardians of the genetic legacy of our world by preventing these kinds of cataclysmic events. Our bi-annual crossing of the Taurid meteor stream is very concerning and political motivation seems non-existent, or more rightly described as ostriches hiding their heads in the ground… but a similar event to Tunguska over a populated area, unfortunately, may be what spurs the world’s nations and powerful private individuals into more decisive action and your idea may take fruit very quickly. Do you think it would also be worthwhile for our species to attempt to create a durable repository of our collective knowledge and technology for any survivors of a potential unavoidable cataclysm?
Thank you for the kind words on my ELORA proposal article. We absolutely should keep a repository of our knowledge for the case of any potential cataclysm. I am relatively certain that we did this in the past as well. Unfortunately, those libraries were raided and plundered into non-existence and private collections. The trick will be the medium and fashion through which this might be accomplished. Perhaps laser-inscribed fireproof/waterproof Kevlar sheets of ‘paper’, which can both be read by human eyes, or scanned later into re-established computing systems.
Then if we were smart, we would bury this library under the ground and then stack a massive set of stones into a recognizable shape on top of the burial site. A stack which could never be swept away by a flood or fire, or asteroid impact within reason. Perhaps a mountain shape, but square and aligned to true north, so that it would be easily recognized as man-made. I wonder if such a thing exists?
Thank you for your reply, it brought a very large smile to my face! I am not surprised you have already devoted some thought to the medium AND location for such information :-) Reuse of existing geoglyphs is practical and timeless while the Kevlar sheets would be ideal “protection” from the ravages of time. Again, many thanks for all you do!
One thought (of many) is why would the virus be a serious problem in Wuhan in the summer of 2019 if it had actually started in 2018? Is it a coincidence that the The WIV is there? Was it re-released or made worse to coincide with the World Military Games that were held there in October 2019?
It does seem likely that the powers that be already knew about the virus but why did it become serious again just before the American election and the need to re-set the world’s financial system?
Was it brought back to Wuhan in 2019 by Americans or did a ore serious variant ‘escape’ from the lab. Or (sorry, another thought), were there several places where it was released?
I don’t have the answers to all of that. The most parsimonious explanation is that a milder version of the virus was leaked, and the Chinese knew that it had been leaked, and fought it through silence and less drastic measures, hoping that it would just die out. But as this virus does, a new variant appeared in Wuhan in the Apr/May of 2019, and it was much deadlier. Since the Chinese were covering up the fact that they had accidentally released a bioweapon (not a vaccine test virus), they kept it silent and even clamped down on the Wuhan citizens to shut up. But by October, it was clear that they had to ethically tell the world community that this thing was not going away. So they set up a ruse. Exhibits 11.3 and 6.2 make it clear that, by my tally 254,000 Chinese had died of Covid by the time they announced it as a ‘novel’ virus. The Chinese blame this on the ‘flu’. Worst flu in their history by 8:1.
Exhibit 7.5 shows that the virus originally started in 2018 outside of Wuhan, by its genetic fingerprints. Wuhan itself was later – with lots more case fatality rate.
Thank you for your thoughtful answer. But…If it started outside Wuhan, why was it Wuhan that was inflicted by a more serious strain in the summer of 2019? Nothing to do with the WIV or the Military Games being there? Quite a coincidence. I have heard that athletesarriving for the Games were greeted by largely deserted streets and people wearing masks. Many of them (the athletes) got sick and then of course went home, to countries all over the world.
Yes, I heard this about Wuhan as well. They were hit hard by Covid in June 2019. But as to why there and why later, I don’t yet entirely know. All I know is that China concealed something horrendous – and given the immunity curve, it happened well before 2019. The other shoe should drop here in 2022. However, given that lots of money is flowing – our officials may simply choose to look the other way.
China may well buy its way out of killing 7 million non-citizens and making the world a hell-hole, when it is all said and done.
TES
:-)
OK, thank you. Let’s hope they fall flat on their face when that other shoe drops next year.
“But by October, it was clear that they had to ethically tell the world community that this thing was not going away”
If this were the case, and it may very well be – the World Military Games where some athletes got sick would have been a terrific spreader event. There are articles (not sure if I am allowed to post them here) that months into the pandemic claim there may have been cases as early as early Nov in France. So..
I read that article and the two golden silkworm articles. He claims covid 19 is a deattenuating LAV, and will eventually revert back to its full virulence. Hope he isn’t right about it. That would be really bad. What I can’t understand is where he came up with this stuff. I think he was in the NSA but went to prison for some bad shizzle. I don’t think he has a background in the sciences.
I have no background in anything close to this discussion; but I am curious, and perhaps you included it and I missed it; could the “mysterious outbreaks” that occurred on the cruise ships back in 2018 have been what is called Covid now?
Possible to even likely. Cruise ships provide an idea environment for fecal aerosol viruses to spread. The Diamond Princess comes to mind. Tons of wet food processing and delivery, miles of sewage and grey water pipes running all over the ship. Numerous drains and one-way valves to malfunction. A virus playground. 2018 would have easily been the older variant of Covid, yes.
The genetics and mutation history of SARS-CoV-2 itself, which strongly suggest an inception case date in early 2018
The 2021 appearance of a pre-October-2019 genetic Jan-2018-LCA highly divergent variant of SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron) in highly immune African populations under low mutagenic pressure
and says “Omicron dates from late spring 2020”.
I don’t know enough about the science to critique either viewpoint…
I disagree on Omicron linking to Clade 20B (Feb – Apr 2020). Yes that is where the line is drawn to in the GISAID charts, but that is only a placeholder, with hopes of confirmation, not a conclusion. There is no evolutionary track from 20B to Omicron at all. In fact the difference is 66 substitutions and 27 deletions. See Exhibit 7.10 – it outlays the proximity by 144 nucleotides evaluated for clades/variants. Deletions are very less common in short term RNA virus evolution as compared to silent, synonymous, AA substitution and insertion mutations – so these deletions in Omicron present a large problem. But if we simply ignore it, then of course any conclusion becomes viable – so we pose one which complies with a narrative, rather than the evidence.
Which is why I use the phrase ‘stuffing ten pounds of evolution into a two pound bag of narrative.’
That being said, there is ample evidence herein which would ostensibly support Jonathan’s hypothesis. Interesting.
But thanks for the feedback. If and when we get compelling deductive evidence that Omicron originated from an extant Clade – I will be the first to jump on board.
Ex. The Fiji couple. David and Michelle Paul (30’s), from Fort Worth, Texas, fell ill two days into their vacation to Fiji, vac. from May 19 to 27, 2019.
Their symptoms were diarrhea, vomiting, numbness, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, and they both died, with ‘proper’ med / hosp. care. The husband was put on a ventilator. 5 ppl whom they had contact with were also hospitalised with similar symptoms, and 2 security guards and 2 med staff were put into isolation. (Links are to brief MSM, and the details I report are not all to be found in these links.)
“An investigation into the cause of their deaths is ongoing, but a recent WHO alert warns of a deadly influenza strain, including in Fiji where it is “particularly affecting young adults…” (alert not any longer at WHO site.)
See list of US tourists who died (May 2019 or so) from: quote, pulmonary edema for several of them – struggling to breathe – death certif. respiratory issues – fluid in the lungs – respiratory failure – heart attack – respiratory issues – fluid in the lungs – resp. problems – pulmonary edema – resp. distress…
ex. no cause attributed: Allen was there with friends who said he complained about being hot at the pool before going to shower and lie down; he was found dead the next day.
2/3. Imho, the EVALI or VAPI, USA ‘vaping illness’ was almost certainly Covid or a precursor. As it was presented it had nothing to do with Covid. August 2019 -> peaked in September 2019 – died out in Jan. 2020 (i.e. was no longer diagnosed when COV19 ‘arose’ and became an ‘official’ diagnosis.) Almost 3K hospitalized cases and 68 (or so, nos. vary) ppl died, USA (a few cases Canada.) There have been various versions of symptoms, etc. Wiki has 2 entries giving some basics. Here CDC:
WHO was right from the start poised to ‘not blame China’, for several reasons.
The previous Dir. Gen. before Tedros was Margaret Chan, Chinese, she was hugely influential, ppl are left in place, networks of influence.
—— China is a Major donor.
——The WHO cannot ‘blame’ one country, one lab, one type of research, its role is to defuse conflict and oppositions in favor of an ‘internationalist, generalist, scientific’ (that is so-called scientific) consensus, which supposedly ‘does the least harm’ etc.
——The WHO is not an independent body, now counts on pleasing its funders, e.g. Gates Foundation as well as many others.
From a wider perspective, imho, the main actors in this COV19 story are not Nations, but a mix of Pols/Gvmt types, influential bodies in different countries, Corporations (e.g. Big Pharma, Med. circuits ..), particularly in the “West” as different groups seek to exploit crises for their own ‘competitive’ gain.
This touches many of the considerations of Samo Burja’s “Great Founder Theory” rather intimately. He goes into it quite well here https://samoburja.com/gft/
So the correct labeling format qualifies as “Homeopathic” in the US? It’s that easy?
And I was under the impression that Homeopathy was actually a form of “Energy Medicine” like Reiki.
Well, official definitions might differ from the expert opinion I was given in explanation…
I was in Advanced Placement high school English, Chemistry, & Physics at age 14, and even had the school create special courses for me thereafter, since they had no early graduation options at that time. My guidance counselor said ‘Since you are good at science, then engineering is the track you should take.’ I just bought that idea hook line and sinker, because I did not know any better. All I knew was that I loved science – and as well had been selected for a Navy ROTC scholarship, and they wanted Nuclear Engineers!!! So that is the program I was thrust into.
My father and brother were lawyers – but not philosophers for the most part. But I come from a long line of preachers on both sides (Swede Pentecostal and Scottish Protestant). So philosophy genes were bound to hit one of us. Lucky me… LOL!
The author assumes that all kings will find such knowledge very useful. But what happens if the king or the victor wants to destroy all traces of past history and usher a new world ? In such cases, previous history is a dangerous burden.
Biblical world started from 4004 BC or so as per the religious fanatics. Islamic history of Saudi Arabia starts from 6th Century or so. The kings/ queens before that era is forgotten. Same happens in Indonesia to some extent where all kings became better after they got converted to Islam. Before that, they were all bad.
And sometimes, the disregard for ‘others knowledge’ is too much. It was reported some places that Spaniards in South America destroyed many codex/books of Aztec & other origin because these were not Christian (and therefore, garbage). Islamic invaders in India destroyed Nalanda University which burnt for six months.
Hence, I disagree with the article, especially with the specific assumption made.
Of course there are ample examples of both – but I disagree that you can claim exclusivity of principle here, and certainly neither is my article claiming exclusivity. I am extremely doubtful that all the documents about mankind’s history were burned, just because religious fanatics often wanted a clean slate. Those who conduct wars and affairs of state – do not get to such status by being true religious fanatics. They get there by putting on an act for the religious fanatics in some cases – but most of all by being wily and smart. And certainly would report back ‘destruction of all’ to an off-kilter leader. However, true leaders are innately curious. And if they kept documents for their own pleasures of knowledge, we would never know about it. There were just as many Alexander the Great’s as there were Diego de Landa’s.
Hence I disagree. Your assumption is an easy self-fulfilling prophecy. Whether documents were kept or destroyed, the same report would be made into posterity. Mine requires a knowledge of human nature and deception, so it does not rely upon guaranteed outcomes. Exclusive knowledge is more desirable for some than gold or position. Thus it will always be reported ‘destroyed’. That is how it gets its value.
How else are we to know, later in society, exactly what it is we are to not know, and how to not know it – if we indeed are 100% ignorant top to bottom. No, the presence of Nelsonian Knowledge tells me that there are those in power, who hold the ancient truths – and very likely the entailed documents as well.
My point was – both the things are possible. Most real leaders will try their level best to keep the documents at their own vaults while very few might like to destroy it when the ‘knowledge’ is not useful to them, or even a a nuisance. One will also preserve things when he/she respects it. Bamiyan Buddha was destroyed by Taliban ofr being Un-Islamic & therefore not respectable or…. to be destroyed.
I am from a part of South east Asia which was colonialized by British. And I have seen the level of distortion in history etc. that has happened over time. Or even in the areas related to old history part.
Probably it comes from a concept that you have beautifully captured in this piece of poetry about Eagle, Horse etc. Same methodology is also used sometime by few so-called Marxist historians here.
Present is built on past. If one can erase the past, one can re-build it & control the present. Probably Orwell had similar comment somewhere. For someone with such mindset, destruction of past knowledge is very useful.
Hence the assumption that Every such ruler will preserve the past history/documents may not be correct one in every cases.
Old comment but what is 2 years against a 2000 year old mystery heh. The library contained texts relevant to every single proposed cause of destruction, so it seems unlikely it all would have been destroyed, even by fanatical regimes. Islam destroyed the indian texts because there was no possibility vedic texts would support their brand of the abrahamic egregore, same goes for the other abrahamic corporations and regional empires. In the case of the library they had bits of everything. Even if the contents were almost entirely destroyed, Christians would have likely taken biblical scripts, romans would have taken roman texts and jews would have taken jewish texts.
Thank you for this exhaustive investigation and documentation. I have just been made aware of this story by sharing of a link by a friend. I am surprised that I remained unaware of your work until now.
You mentioned deaths in a retirement center in Virginia in 2019, that you were aware, and referenced some counter-narrative. Was that a reference to the mysterious viral pneumonia deaths near Fort Detrick in June-July 2019, following which Ft. Detrick viral lab was closed for “breach, without harm” until November 2019?
I have had suspicion that the virus leaked from Ft. Detrick in Spring 2019, since around March 2020, predating (slightly) the Chinese suggestions. My most recent blog post about that is here: https://www.johndayblog.com/2021/06/fort-detrick.html
Canada also carried out this research, and famously had trouble with unauthorized sharing of samples with China by a couple of Chinese scientists.
I am not married to any narrative, but want to understand as well as I can. Facts are hard to come by.
I am a Family Physician, treating with repurposed antivirals and spearheading “my” clinic’s testing program, testing more than any other provider, until fired for non-vaccination in late October (after 18 years there). My independent analysis was “good” until it became increasingly “bad” and uncomfortable for the Federally Qualified Health Center.
I am a participant on Peter McCullough MD’s listserv and will forward this article there for consideration. I am apolitical, or politically skeptical, always voting for the most honest candidate, who always loses (Ross Perot, for instance).
A comment on The Automatic Earth made me aware of this piece. It is a site you should check out for COVID information, about the best, including many of the commenters. https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/12/debt-rattle-december-5-2021/#post-94451
John Day MD
Thank you for the well thought-out response. First, let me say that I am saddened that you were fired for dissenting that the vaccine dangers are worth being injected by a vaccine which does not reduce transmission in the least (and might even enhance it). What you underwent is a human rights crime – of legendary proportion. The vaccine may have had some therapeutic benefits, and our older family members did get it and fared pretty well – but now those benefits are fading away.
I have had insiders offer me information on several situations. But the bottom line is – that in 2018 (or earlier) something was released in China which conferred immunity to SARS-CoV-2 – and nothing else – to China and all the nations surrounding it. This is a 35 to 1 signal, as strong as they come for this type of effect. It is undeniable. So, given the spread rate and data, this initial outbreak had to be in China. That does not of course eliminate a role on the part of UNC, Canada, Ft. Detrick, etc.
I will check out the site! Sounds fun.
Thanks for your readership,
TES :-)
Thank You, TES.
I would have been granted a conscience-exemption, had I requested one, but I did not do so.
I decided to “stand naked with the Jews”, as I put it, at the first indication of the creation of an underclass. (This was an unpopular historical reference, but fully warranted.)
I saw that as the only moral choice within a system which was taking this tack. We have seen where this tack leads in history.
This has been and still is a spiritual “test” for me, for which one need not posit “God”.
I do not see the future, even the fairly near future, but I have dark visions.
I know that I do not know.
Those who think they “know” are mistaken, as I see it.
I will admit to being dubious that you, seemingly one person, could have come up with this extensive intelligence-report, containing much information which is novel to me. I have been keeping up with this story for 2 full years , now.
I read some of your other essays, and there is a consistent human “voice”, with much original, and creative content.
(“BBROYGBVGW” as I learned in “Introduction to Engineering” back in 1976, before I quite that major for numerous reasons. I still built speakers and tube amps, but I would not have worked out at Raytheon, not at all…)
When I read about your choice to side with the created underclass, or ‘stand naked with the Jews’, that hits near and dear to my heart. It takes a certain spark and courage to dissent at your risk, but do so on behalf of those who are targeted by the elite.
Yes, spiritual tests do not require one to be a theist in order to be beneficial and valid. The universe does not care what we believe about an old bearded anthropomorph. Its demands upon us are esoteric and reside elsewhere – and theist, agnostic, and atheist – those who are fervent in the distraction – miss this lesson entirely.
This reminds me of experiences in my favourite fields of zoology – specifically ichthyology, arachnology and vertebrate paleontology … although shark research is foremost among them.
These are gladly kept interests of my childhood, and they have given me joy ever since. You learn more, and you become even more fascinated with every new insight you discover.
Many things that have been commonly held for decades in these fields show to be not so true after all or, at least, not as simple as soon as in-the-field observations increase and become more widely shared among experts and well-informed laypeople (for example citizen scientists) with different viewpoints. True Type III experts don’t engage in semantic warfare – they are open to observations and the input of people who grasp the necessity of being matter-of-fact. They don’t accept abstracted beliefs, they are interested in observations and are very careful not to be too definite in the evaluation of their data. They always recognize the fundamental limitations of their (or anybody’s) inferences and don’t use anything as an intellectual sledgehammer. They have furthered our understanding of nature to a marvelous degree.
These may be fields that are not exactly fundamentally important for the human condition, but I love them – and this very interesting post reminded me of things that I think about when I deal with these topics, all the while staying on guard regarding the changing body of observational evidence and the general thinking that goes along with it.
I have to admit, though, that the generally benign and constructive tone that governs these research topics is so pleasant compared to the general discord of so many more controversial fields – even if there is a substantial difference of opinion!
Argmax, a well crafted note. I don’t mind disagreement or questions at all.
I have never found R(o), R(t), etc. even in relative form, to be of any use in modeling Covid. I think that someone wrote a PhD on the idea, and given the low level of challenge in the expertise vertical (and the fact that some expertise sets were not qualified to comment upon the genetics of pathogens and had to retreat into theoretical models alone), the model was never challenged to produce results. The model presupposes that there is no such thing as seasonality.
The pressures which result in this 10 month benchmark are not SEIR model in their orientation. If the SEIR model carried any merit at all – then Covid would have swept us in April – Aug of 2020 and have been done. I suspect the SEIR model to constitute out-and-out incompetence. It is much akin to economics – where the professionals bear enough knowledge to frame their analyses as successes, and that is it. Just randomness and obviousness after that.
The best benchmark I have used is the link I provided in the article: https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/CovidGS-Delta.jpg. This shows the 10 month run of Delta before it hit 95% of nations. Given that the Wuhan B.1 variant was in a community with HIGH prior immunity, and Delta was not, B.1 should have taken much longer to spread – in all facets of analysis, seasonality, herd immunity, transmissibility, population adjacency and demographic densities. This is why I do not believe the 2 months spread out of China – that too, a product of highly twisted SEIR models – tortured to result in exactly what China was asking us to produce.
There is no feasible way I can craft a 2 month spread explanation for B.1 – and this is fatal to the narrative. Also fatal to the narrative is the level of African and E65 – 180 prior immunity at 92% – neither of these ‘must explain’ observations happened by magic.
The current narrative involves magical explanations for both of these issues.
Thanks for this wonderful document, btw an excellent lecture on appropiate use of logic and science in the search of truth. Drawed up ‘Party Rules’ are frightening, real (pitifully) and an ominous treath for the humanity.
Yeah, I highly doubt they would get this robust an immunity from that. If that were the case, then HCoV’s would give even better immunity than malaria by far… and they don’t.
I’ve been following you since you started posting. Thank you for this! Please make it into a PDF I can download for a “history book” I’m making to pass on to my 4 children.
Thanks for the readership. If you open this article by itself (rather than the home page) by clicking on the title of the article, in Google Chrome, the three dots on the upper right hand side allow you to ‘Print/Save as PDF’. The resulting PDF is 65 pages long, based on their parsing algorithm – but it is a quick way to obtain a PDF of the entire page.
“[…] one who seeks knowledge earnestly, falls into a category of innocence.” What a beautiful statement.
I remember an instance from my school days when someone tried to imbibe in the loosh (never heard that term before, what a strange concept …) by acting superior to a very nice girl with a more religious background than was usual for most students, arrogantly spouting the same old (technically true but o so tired) big Atheism stuff that was so clever to him and his intended audience and so obviously meant to humiliate her that even my quite non-religious friends were so disgusted by it that they shut him down. I wish I would have seen something like that more often since then, regarding many topics …
I also love the graphic with the lemmings … and the footnote!
Not a fan of the implication that Schopenhauer really always wanted to be right because of a text that was intended as an “anatomy” of Rechthaberei (know-it-all attitude) or sophistry which he despised and saw for what it is. But that is just a minor point and I don’t want to seem too fanboyish in that regard ;)
Great article, as always! This works very well to expose the way in which these things are handled nowadays – and it is much clearer than Schopenhauer’s extremely sarcastic notes which were indeed compiled “from a stack of loose notes and not a completed work of philosophy” – not to mention published after his death (1864). He mentioned his manuscript somewhat dismissively in Parerga and Paralipomena, but didn’t want to finish and systematize it … but wanted others to build on it, LOL!
In the form in which it is presented here, it is unambiguous what this kind of sophistry truly is: The systematic poisoning of every potentially reasonable debate between two (or more) potentially reasonable human beings.
Absolutely TS… thanks for the feedback. I don’t get much of it, but the Google Analytics reports tell a completely different story. Lots of hits, lots of dwell time and lots of multiple page sessions. That is encouraging, even if my audience is the contemplative and quiet type.
I sure am dwelling on your blog for long periods of time and reread many of its articles – because there is nothing like it. Speaking hypothetically, it would be a crushing loss to philosophy if it ever were to vanish into the ether. This may sound somewhat grandiose, but I really think that you can learn more from TheEthicalSkeptic.com than from any other contemporary source of philosophy.
It is like a compendium of truly rational independent thought, without the usual short-sighted badmouthing of everything even somewhat metaphysical-sounding, yet all the more rational for it. No stupid materialism vs. idealism or analytical vs. continental shenanigans – but lots of fundamental epistemology and criticism of common thinking, with an abundance of scientific and cultural competence (a surprisingly rare but necessary combination). It is also written in a time when something like it is badly, badly needed …
A sorry state of affairs. Most all fans, have no idea these games are manipulated this way. The NFL lost me as a fan and, I now throw the flag. Unsportsmanlike behavior, ejection from my life.
I’m a long-time reader/follower of your posts and just signed up to let you know how much I look forward to and appreciate your work. Just too timid to post. I love this topic. Thanks ES
Interesting the way you see this as part of a cabal.
I view it as simply a universal truth that all clergy and scholastics have a deep and irrational hatred of the laity. It’s ubiquitous, no matter how good the ministry of truth is, they will always search the Seven Seas to find the most insane and ridiculous pagans and infidels.
It’s a psychological reaction that the scholastic class have to the fact that monopolistic control over information is always corrosive to society. There’s no other reaction an expert can have to the fact that political power to the expert class is counterproductive – at least no other reaction that allows them to continue to occupy their station. And it’s not particular to midwits either – Dawkins and Weinberg are essentially cut from the same cloth as a Michael Shermer in this way.
Hello, have you ever heard of or looked into the Andy Cutler Protocol as a possible avenue to help your son? It seems the most realistic way to reverse someone with his type of vaccine injury.
Have you ever read the Oxford scholar John Henry Newman’s profound and eloquent Chapter 8 of his famous Apologia Pro Vita Sua, in which he discusses the riddle of human condition and what he sees as the best answer to it? I think you might find it intellectually stimulating.
Chapter 8: “General Answer to Mr Kingsley”: https://erenow.net/common/apologia-pro-vita-sua/8.php
Feel free to contact me if you like.
One very sad and annoying thing about Sagan and his most infamous quote (you know which one I mean): Even those who disagree with his barely informed pseudoskeptical antics seem to think that the latter is unsurpassably sound, even bordering on being a (meta-)physical law that needs to be constantly repeated.
What is an “extraordinary” claim? What is “extraordinary” evidence? Compared to what, “ordinary” claims and “ordinary” evidence? Who judges this? Who could possibly judge this?
“Extraordinary” claims are always those that the “judge” cannot possibly believe or even take seriously from the very beginning, no matter what. This is by default. And no evidence can ever be “extraordinary” enough to serve as evidence for such claims …
Of course, mere claims do not need any special evidence – only claims of having evidence … but let’s not go down that rabbit hole. People are clearly bewitched by the elegant sound of this quip.
I wish to add that you are one of the very few people I have ever heard daring to speak out against the infallibility of Carl Sagan … and all of those I know personally have learned that from me ;)
I’m thinking there’s a better example of this. The story of Adam and Eve is symbolic – a myth by which one “race” explained to itself why life was hard. The reason being: we wanted knowledge. If we hadn’t this knowledge of good and evil, we wouldn’t be suffering. Because we wouldn’t know any better. We wouldn’t feel shame (know we’re naked) we wouldn’t feel guilt or remorse. We would do what we want, and if someone kept us enslaved, we wouldn’t even realize that, because we wouldn’t be able to imagine that maybe we shouldn’t be enslaved. Awareness and moral conscience causes suffering. Humans have always wondered why they exist as they do. Certainly at some point during evolution they noticed they weren’t like other animals and asked themselves “why”? They made up a story to tell themselves about why they suffer. The immediate consequence to any other animal of doing “wrong” may involve negative physical conseqences, but only humans and their domesticated animals develop a sense of guilt.
I think a better example of the CMT would be the loss of personal freedom and privacy in the environment of the all-encompassing global “war on terror” perpetuated by the military industrial complex for the personal benefit of the ruling class.
Thanl you for this thought-provoking article. And thank you for the piece on “the dose makes the poison” I was finally able to shut up a pesticide industry advocate that’s probably used that phrase 45 times since I began interacting with him.
The war on terror is a great example of CMT. Thanks! The reason why I cite the fable about original sin here, is to show that this type of enslavement by myth, is the oldest trick in the book. In addition, the epistemic and logical strength of the myth has nothing to do with how many people will obediently accept it.
Also glad you could make use of The Dose Makes the Poison. I wrote it specifically to refute the dimwits who spout this ignorance over and over.
Any “war on…” you name it: terror, drugs, cancer, AIDS, COVID-19, climate change.
The mechanism is older than writing. The shaman, or the tribe leader, shouts loudly through a threatening mask, instills fear, and the whole tribe surrenders.
Haven’t you seen the Tarzan movies? Yuyu Yuyu!
Rummaging through this amazing site, I have always felt the need to comment on this particular topic …
When it comes to reality (which seems to be a very peculiar and troubling realm for the pseudo-skeptic), there has been so much (and overwhelmingly informative) intelligence gathered over the last few decades regarding the “field” of UFOs (or UAPs) that it boggles the mind – considering its status as something that has only since recently been seen as deserving of a somewhat lukewarm attention in the eyes of those who don’t ignore it completely … despite reading the New York Times article (gasp!!!).
The implications are immense – whatever it is …
One has to really look at what is there to know anything about it (and yes, with a highly skeptical eye!) – and then you know one thing for certain: Something is there that needs the attention of more than a few people. And it is huge. The highly qualified people who have rendered testimony to the existence/occurence of this phenomenon are legion, and very intelligent people have devoted their life to studying it (Bruce Maccabee, Stanton Friedman, John Mack etc.).
The real question is not so much ifthere is anything worth studying, but whatit is that we should study. What we should do.
In any case, it is not closing our eyes and singing “lalalalalalala” while making fun of those poor souls that have dared to witness something that is unusual and to tell their story. That would be callous and foolish. Just like claiming “it” was either Venus, swamp gas or pelicans – preferably all at the same time …
Great point! The argument is over and settled, something is there. In fact, my personal conclusion is that this presence (whatever it is) has been on Earth for some time. I have always considered writing a blog article entitled ‘The Things I Know’:
The Things I Know:
1. There exists at least one other intelligent presence on this planet aside from mankind, and it is not human, at least as we understand it.
2. That presence predates mankind’s existence upon the planet. It is not ‘space aliens’.
3. We do not know how to go about studying/detecting this presence, nor comprehending its domain of existence, technology, and power.
4. Our denial of this presence, has advanced to a level of psychosis involving dissonance and dogmatic willful blindness.
5. The presence is not interested in revealing itself, as it is in hiding, but not necessarily nor essentially from mankind.
6. The presence is not interested in helping alleviate our suffering as a species, its only concern is addressing some unknown existential challenge.
7. The presence exploits humanity and our nuclear weapons in some manner to aid it in addressing, or planning to address, this challenge.
Beyond that, knowing that things cannot continue for mankind along the pathway which we have bungled, this situation cannot continue for much longer. The clock is ticking away…
Most likely! If not guaranteed … It would be almost a let-down if they were just “space aliens” (I hate the way “they”, i.e. the media/celebrity skeptics use that phrase …)
True – but who are “we” ;)
Oh man, that’s so true … it hurts!
Yes, but there is something strange going on there when it comes to this point … Certain aspects of it seem almost like a mind game – but that could be our limited perception or whatever …
That is true – and I say that as someone who has no real way to know that. But I feel it – everything I have ever heard about the world AND the phenomenon itself tells me that! But many of our more starry-eyed brethren want them to be exactly what neither religion nor science could provide them … wishful thinking …
This is almost “proven”, I would say!
It is great to hear from you ! These are the things we know ;)
I don’t mean to sound ungrateful for the outstanding content that you have posted in the meanwhile, but I personally have been excitedly awaiting “The things I know” since you posted this comment. I would be deeply interested in some further explanation for the points you listed above!
I am not sure my readers are ready for such a thing. ;-)
EVG
TES
Normally, a post about UAPs would be the last one I’d click to read anywhere. However, considering the quality of many of your articles, I’d figure I’d look at this one. This comment on what you know really intrigues me especially considering your knockdown of the Fermi Paradox. Considering our limited experience, how can we really discover such unknowns without a manifest ‘revelation’ from said presence? Would I be ready to know such a thing? I think so. Perhaps knowing might cause some sort of madness. As it is, it remains there..like a splinter in the mind.
I just recently read in the comments that you and your family were ill…
I am so sorry for you and hope that everything is okay by now!
I am so looking forward to new articles of yours – they are always like a fresh breeze of clarion reason in this cloudy realm of existence. Your voice is needed!
I wish you the very best and hope that everyone is feeling better !!
Yes, everyone is 100% now. And with a good number of years of immunity now to the Delta-derived lineages of Covid.
However, in 3 or 4 years we will have another variant which will escape our IgG antibodies – and we shall see what happens then. Hopefully, that variant will turn out to be more like a common cold in severity.
Thanks for the reassuring feedback. I have several articles percolating around in my head – however am preparing to present a strategy proposal to an African Prime Minister – and am playing catch-up on my energy projects now. So it might be some time.
This “Caesar’s Wife” concept for elections should be enshrined at the highest level, possibly even as a constitutional amendment.
But of course that will never happen because it would require a supermajority of legislators to essentially vote to place a very high burden of proof on the very system that installs them.
Have you come across Dr. Judy Wood’s book “Where Did The Towers Go?” ? It will conclusively demolish any idea that 9/11 was an unintended consequence of replacing Intellilgence heads in the decade before 2001 !
Poe has a law. Let him enforce it…
Good observations about the “Creator of the universe.”
it’s always good to back up to basics: let Poe show his evidence for how the physical world came into being by physical laws. Then let Poe show how inorganic matter created organic matter in the plausible time frames . Then let Poe show how humans “evolved” from life by providing convincing fossil evidence.
Then back to the Creator: why would He create a being who would defy Him? He didn’t have to create humans. He had other creatures including angels. Why didn’t He just create drones with no free will?
(Can ethics be forced?)
Was the tree of life about the Creator having food? What might a being who chooses evil do if he got ahold of the mechanisms to mimic the creation of life and reorder everything according to the created’s will….a spiked virus, for example? What is the Creator warning the created about here and why is this crucial? What exit strategy does the Creator provide the created should the created, by his non-divine nature, choose evil?
Can X create X?
Relatives and family (8+) with Delta Variant Covid across four households of our family (all local), and an all out family effort to get everyone well – lots of cooking and cleaning and making doctor trips. Just don’t have time to post right now.
Heavily focused on not letting my sister in law to get exposed to this variant.
All family members have recovered from Delta! We are out of the woods. 8)
In all, 18 family members had the Delta Variant sweep through.
1. Almost every case was basically a 10 to 14-day mild cold for each individual.
2. Our 5 most vulnerable family members did not come down with Covid at all, thankfully. I am not sure how that even happens, given how communicable the Delta Variant is – but it is what it is.
We plan a family celebration on Sunday. This put me weeks behind on a project startup – so will be back on the road after this. I plan to write a blog summary regarding this, but no real time for social media platforms.
As most know, I do not predict where Covid will go and what it will do. This Winter may be full of surprises (not a good thing)… So the answers are not in just yet – too many people who are certain that they know what-is-what right now. A dangerous lack of skepticism given the lives at stake this upcoming Winter season.
Your blog is great! Many of your ideas regarding de facto religious trickery have occurred to me in vague form and I sometimes attempt to describe them to people, but I lack the ability to describe them in such a detailed technical manner as you. So now I have some good articles to refer to.
Basically your blog has proven to me that I’m not alone in the universe when it comes to my concerns. I wish more people would read it.
They really screwed everyone by coercing panic over Covid. And those who sounded caution were spun as deniers of Covid and/or its impact – everyone acknowledged it was a serious situation. It was a very disappointing scenario, exposing the irrationality and gullibility of our populace now. Very sad. They have no idea what they lost.
Thank you Joy. I don’t really follow astrology or any form of divination or myth derived from the cosmos. Having been a navigator I am familiar with the constellations and various forms of Earth-orbit induced movements they exhibit. I also find the Leo Frieze at Nimrud Dag fascinating. But am still running analysis on that and contemplating its results.
Suppose you accepted the task to redesign the U.S. economy.
Your background fits the task fairly well; the economy is a system, it’s political, it’s technical, it’s an embodiment of our shared and competing values.
Even better (e.g. more fitting), the economy is stuffed full of “scientific” errors. They don’t call it the “dismal science” for nothing.
Naturally, you can’t do the job yourself; nobody can do whole job. So, this task would also be the mother of all G-H gap train-wrecks, right? All those SMEs that need to be integrated into a gestalt. Mighty big gestalt.
If you agree that the economy needs re-design, let’s liken it to a software devel project. Do we design:
Top-down? Probably not. Top likes things as they are, and will only change when it’s too late to move. Blockbuster.
Bottom up? Maybe, but “the bottom” is severelyunder-resourced, really diffused, well-ensconced atop Mount Stupid. Low rate of adaptation.
This is a very interesting systems engineering problem. And it’s as much a puzzle or game as it is a problem. The game aspect is “where to start?” or even “what is a generative system?”.
The technical aspect might be “what are the independent variables” or “what impact does technology have on economics, and what are the technological trends?” That’s the conventional, analytical part.
The really cool thing about this problem is the manufacturing of the gestalt. There’s plenty SMEs. But the gestalt – that kinda needs to become a “collective” gestalt in order for coherent action to happen … at any level/group size.
Given that you wrote this post on managing the G-H gap, it’s likely you’ve been tasked to re-build a gestalt. Is there industry practice that bears on this subject?
While we had a Professional concentration and certification which raged for a while called, change managment – I am not sure that the essence of change has really caught on inside mankind’s gestalt. ‘Change’ is simply a code-word for ‘put my mafia in power’. True change is inevitable and should evolve under a passive method, rather than be forced by agency.
As far as what I would focus upon – there are three elements which serve as the foundation of global suffering. 1. Energy and its use, 2. Food/food technology, and 3. Health
1. Smaller/local energy plants based upon energy from waste, with carbon scrubbing, disposing of
100% of human sewage sludge (none should go to farms as fertilizer)
50% of animal waste
80% of municipal solid waste
75% of Class III industrial profiled waste
no methanogens allowed to go to dump/landfill
2. Investment in
small scale natural gas energy plants
cutting edge physics including fusion and various energy from plasma field technology
3. Cellularization/Regionalization of manufacturing
Limit the size of one single production operation
Limit the distance which one physical unit of product or food is allowed to be shipped
Place a tariff on product by distance it is shipped from ex-factory to end-use consumption
4. Localization/Incentive for small and regional farms
Create rating firms which analyze the nutrient content of agrifoods by farm, field and practice
Create a market which allows food to be sold based upon nutrient value and not appearance, protein, weight and moisture content
5. Create Integral Capital Cells
Establish innovation cities in each US subregion (Piedmont, Ozarks, Texas Hill Country, etc.) where small-scale capital for innovation and entrepreneurship is available
Limit the span of influence a corporation has inside an industry horizontal (not just vertical) – by a revamping of the Sherman and Clayton anti-trust laws to address a new era of both predation, offshoring and innovation.
6. De-Crony Health Services
Create a new intermediate healthcare layer which actually focuses on health, and uses HCP’s rather than the 1800’s model of ‘doctors and nurses’
Remove 60% of prescription inventories from controlled status (save for most dangerous/addictive, etc)
Place limits on pharmaceutical contributions to campaigns (conflict of interest on substances)
Those are just the starters… but decidedly a ‘bottom-up’ strategy – and complete reinvention of America’s Virtual Infrastructure.
TES – thanks for that thoughtful and rapid reply. I came across your site the other day from a link @ Naked Capitalism. Your post on ocean-heating was referenced there. I ranged upward from that post.
Over at NC, there’s an incipient/emergent discussion trend about redesigning an economy. It goes in fits and starts, everyone’s got their own take on what’s wrong and how to fix it…but there’s been a very noticeable uptick in urgency people are feeling. There’s also been some design talk, and some of the talk is pretty good.
Well-rounded talk, too. Plenty of good thinkers, very wide and quite deep talent pool.
I come at this “economic design” topic from the small end of the telescope: micro-economy, aka “household”. That’s where the agency (degrees of freedom to set and execute policy) is, so that’s where I like to operate.
My interest is to build capacity at the HH level. Capacity to imagine, design, resource, prototype/test, implement and then maybe promulgate product lines that either generate foreign exchange (money to buy stuff you don’t produce in-house) or produce products which can be substituted for national/int’nl supply chain products. In short, equip the HH to capture the benefits of their own productivity.
Thesis point: concentration of wealth is a _result_ of concentration of capacity. Transfer payments are giving the man a fish. Capacity creation is teaching the man to fish.
That’s a great altruistic goal, but you know enough about economics to understand how tough that is. Your remarks about anti-trust above evidence that awareness.
There’s another interesting thing about households: they constitute “final demand”. If the household doesn’t demand it, it doesn’t get built. (Gov’t expenditures contravening public interest are exceptions to this rule, and very big exceptions).
Households have to potential to function as a fulcrum, or pivot-point. Individually that don’t matter much, but in numbers they are decisive.
You can see why I’m so interested in the gestalt-building. To solve this rubik’s cube of viable HH scale production..this is going to take a lot of three-blind-mice and the elephant dialog, a lot of make-the-common-image-and-vernacular type work, in a context of weak team-member bonds – at least at the outset.
That’s why I’m casting about for some literature or pragmatic experience on the subject. I’ve been doing this ad-hoc, and the results are about what you’d expect.
Thanks again for all your ideas. I’ll put them to good use.
Keep up the great work. That piece on ocean currents, mystery heating, core iron and kinetic energy was very, very well-done. I don’t believe it yet – and shouldn’t – but I’ll be expecting the scientists to test your theory.
Great feedback, and yes – if science tests my theory and finds it 0% valid, then I am good and am already onboard human methane/VOC/carbon mitigation efforts (which I surmise are 20 – 40% of the issue). If however they say, this was unnecessary as an alternative because we had already ruled that out – then I call bullshit, because they have not studied the alternative. And it is the necessary alternative.
TES 8)
I have been bullied with these methods in peer review of many of my scientific papers, all along my career. It was just a nightmare all the way. Wished had had this text when I started to explain to editors what was going on.
Please excuse my need to comment once again (I don’t want to clutter every second article on this blog with my remarks, although its quality leaves me no choice ;)) …
But this concept is so very important to understand – and you put it into words, as hard as it is! The cited examples should help to make it clear to many who read this, even to those who are not really comfortable with the very dry and fundamental kind of language that is necessary to precisely describe the conceptual connection that is discussed here (I don’t blame them …).
The thing is: It permeates everything … it thrives on its elusiveness … it shapes the world every second of every day … I also think that many small-scale, everyday problems between two or a few people (yes, even between different aspects of the same person!) correspond to this principle – and lead to insurmountable problems, especially on a larger scale.
Knowing (and understanding) Wittgenstein would shurely help, I suppose, but I`m afraid he is almost too clear and precise for the “taste of the times”! Clarity leaves little room for shadows …
The G-H gap is very real. But you also have individuals who prosper in that gap. I learned early on that I was not a manager and hence was very lucky to work in an industry and company that valued pure technical expertise. I became a high level technical expert (direct report to the VP) where my task to was to bridge that G-H gap. For instance, when working with the investment arm, I could not make an investment happen in a company. I could push all I wanted but never make a deal go through. I could, however, kill a deal in an instant. My input into the investment decision, while not sufficient to make the deal (I didn’t get the business side) was sufficient to advise the H side that the technology wasn’t there. It was great to work those years without managing but still being in the decision mix. I had a blast as I got to work on the technical stuff (well architecture at least) and someone else got to do the design work. And I sat on VP staff discussions. Great work if you can get it :)
The true believer says:
“If you question things, entertain possibilities and don’t believe in our rock-solid certainties, then you obviously are an anti-intellectual, pseudoscientific believer in woo. Q.e.d.”
Note their obvious proselytizing zeal which is very often lacking in people who just want to explore the truth, as inconvenient as it may be …
This brings a warm feeling to my heart. There has never been anything in my intellectual life that I have hated as much as the typical modus operandi of “debunking” whole fields of inquiry by doing exactly the things that are exposed in this very succinct article.
But it is quite hard to put into words what it is the “debunkers” are doing – at least in a way that is somewhat understandable for the vast majority of people …
But perhaps things are slowly changing … ?
Things are changing. This article and the last one got MAJOR readership. People who are sincerely attempting to understand the difference between the work of debunkers like Joe Nickell, Brian Dunning, and Mick West, and actual scientific philosophy and method are asking key questions now. These guys are getting more refutation and outright rejection by the scientific community than ever before.
That is good to hear. The last few years have been different, without a doubt, but I tend to be somewhat pessimistic about certain things, I guess. One specific symptom, for example, is the ever increasing usage of the term “conspiracy theory” for a myriad of things that are often only vaguely associated with something that is considered to be a forbidden topic or a discouraged way of thinking. It is like some kind of overeagerly concerted counter-reaction to the signs of the times …
Recent developments in certain “fringe” areas, on the other hand, fill me with optimism. So many people had to endure ridicule for so long, just for daring to be at least somewhat open-minded … but now, it seems, things aren’t as easy anymore for the magicians of rabid orthodoxy! It is also worth mentioning that many true scientists and philosophers NEVER were as close-minded as the public is constantly led to believe by those who control the narrative of the so-called scientific consensus
I have felt in my gut the ‘BLINDING SCIENCE’ but we non scientists need more scientists to pull back this curtain! And the lie is just too big. The Phoenix will rise, but only from a heap of ashes. I hope I’m wrong…but I feel it in my gut.
Yes, ‘Omega Hypothesis’ is a neologism necessary to describe a Lindy-sticky hypothesis which has been granted unmerited favor as the null, or as ‘truth’. An omega hypothesis is much harder to unseat than a typical scientific notion.
I created the term. However, I am not in the habit of making up terms unless I am forced to because nothing exists which can describe the principle. Of course if we have a word which suits the bill, I will use that. In this case, as is common with all facets of oppression – there was no word to describe the key principle involved.
No evidence found… How many times have we heard that? The 2020 election comes to mind; along with,voter fraud allegations. Arizona, seems to be peeling back the onion though.
Good point Paul, very similar. Both frame their activity as if it is legitimate – and both constitute a dishonest charade. One uses ‘fact’ in their title and often spins falsehoods, and the other uses ‘debunk’ in their title and spins official bunk.
One problem I notice with the excerpts you mention, and language used frequently surrounding the UAP situation, is the use of the term “Technology” to describe the extraordinary maneuvering capabilities of the objects. This term is loaded with too great of an assumption: that such objects are necessarily vehicles engineered by beings of one sort or another whether human or non.
I haven’t spent too much time reviewing reports but so far I haven’t seen anything that can rule out the possibility that these things could be naturally occurring somehow (inorganic life, etc) and their capabilities could be evolved rather than engineered. I think it’s a bad idea to fall prey to the usual anthropomorphic bias, that things must necessarily be designed by a being simply because we are beings who design things.
Since nobody has captured one of these things and put it in a cage to study its composition, or found anything that could suggest an origin, it seems that all anyone can study at the moment is behavior. The only reason this seems the least bit controversial is due to their observational rarity compared to the subjects of ordinary uncontroversial studies like ornithology.
Whatever they are they seem worth studying since analyzing their capabilities and hopefully their composition could lead to developing technology that better approximates their capabilities the same way aircraft were inspired by observing the flight of birds.
They did use the term ‘Technology’ in the phrase ‘demonstrate advanced technology’ assessment lines. Technology is a very loaded term. One possibility which could exist in the Other/Non-human domain is non-technological forms of life, maybe inorganic, maybe not even based upon our DNA. Of course, a natural feature of our realm, but having evolved in their own context.
Yes, studying behavior is just one step removed from association by analogy. Not a great foothold, but I suppose the only step we’ve got scientifically right now.
My immediate concern along this path of reason, is that of all the creatures who are our cohabitants on this planet – they all tend to exhibit a consistent set of characteristics for their species. Birds act predictably like birds, bears like bears, viruses like viruses. These anomalous ‘things’ are not a case of Chekov’s Gun – as we cannot get a consistent set of observations to stick it seems at all. No matter what pattern we observe, it will be met with ample evidence of different patterns or even falsifying ones.
I suppose that the report writers either carried a Wittgenstein bias in the terminology, or perhaps they saw a broader footprint for the term ‘technology’ – ala my article, “The Peculiar Schema of DNA Codon’s Second Letter”?
Regarding inorganic life and the DNA code article, the other possibility is that, rather than occurring in a purely natural manner as another example of “great entropy” in some exotic environment, an organic species such as ourselves could end up causing “machine abiogenesis” of some sort especially if this is set as an intentional goal for some reason. This would seem more likely because, while we don’t know of any exotic environment in reality that could somehow spawn inorganic life, we do know of one environment that appears to have spawned organic life that should be able to gain the capability to create machine/inorganic life very soon in evolutionary timescale terms. It’s a pretty reasonable extrapolation to say humans could cause this not too long from now, relatively speaking.
More speculative is if we assume we’re not unique, even if a species such as ours is infrequent and short lived (say only one tool/system-building species occurs in the galaxy every 1M years and goes extinct after 100,000 years), just one could cause some variety of “machine abiogenesis” spawning an ecosystem that far outlives its originators.
Anyway, terminology is a big problem. Other terminology I’d consider problematic: “aliens”, “intelligence”, “communicate”…. Due to pop culture, “Aliens” causes people to imagine something cartoonish or something that’s essentially just a funny-looking human with human cognition. This leads to either lack of seriousness or jumping to unsupported conclusions. Anyone serious ought to be thinking “autonomous object of unknown origin” until more is known. “Outer space” can’t even really be assumed as the origin.
”Intelligence” is a problem because people tend to assume human-like intelligence which includes a number of special-purpose cognitive modules that an arbitrary adaptive control system is highly unlikely to have if its environment is radically different. “Control system” ought to be the starting point then adding things like “stateful”, “adaptive”, “sophisticated” as evidence for those system characteristics are found.
”Communicate”, while not strictly wrong, tends to be loaded with assumptions regarding human cognitive capabilities like the Theory of Mind Mechanism which can’t be assumed of an arbitrary control system. Stimulus and response seem more appropriate. Even something that seems like communication may not be because you could be trying to “talk” to a stateless reflex automaton like a Chinese Room that was constructed as a camouflage facade.
The only proper way to deal with anything like this is to start with the most basic least loaded terms. The same sort of terms should be applicable to something more typical and expected, like a previously unseen foreign autonomous drone with unsurprising capabilities.
If you recall or ever saw the movie Conan the Barbarian with Arnold Schwarzenegger and James Earl Jones, there is a scene in the movie which goes like this.
Conan “You killed my father. You took my father’s sword.”
Thulsa Doom “Ah, yes! There was a time boy when I searched for steel, and steel meant more to me than gold or jewels.”
Conan “The riddle of steel.”
Thulsa Doom “Yes, you know what it is don’t you boy. Shall I tell you? It’s the least I can do. Steel isn’t strong boy. Flesh is stronger. What is steel compared to the hand that wields it?”
Steel is only strong, machines are only strong – because we are allowed to interact with it/them only in a short relative timeframe. They only appear durable. But given enough time, steel is soft, vulnerable, and the machines derived from it are just as vulnerable. I have run a lab producing the hardest metals know to mankind. They are no match for flesh, biology. Flesh is much more powerful, in that it gives in the short timeframe (is soft) – yet is durable across the eons (is hard). Flesh is designed to be durable. It is only our own mortality which blinds us to this.
And given the 13 billion years allotted to craft a solution thus far, and given that someone came up with a talented and time-tested one, that flesh in the form of DNA based life proved out to be that solution, speaks volumes.
TES ;-)
In your Disclosure #1 you state that four categories were ruled out for the 143 unexplained incidents. You repeat this claim in Figure 1. But the report does not state or imply that any categories were ruled out for those 143. On the contrary, the report states:
“With the exception of the one instance where we determined with high confidence that the reported UAP was airborne clutter, specifically a deflating balloon, we currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations.”
In other words there is insufficient evidence in support of or against any of the four explanations. That does not mean those explanations were ruled out, just that they could not be ruled in.
So while I agree that this is a blow to armchair skeptics, the 143 incidents in the “Other” category could very well have one of the four conventional explanations – the report leaves open that possibility.
The statement “we currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations” is differentiated from the context in which you are attempting to use it. This ‘specific explanations’ means assignment of ‘specificity as to what the observation indeed IS via positiva‘. We do not posssess the information to make such ‘specific explanations’.
Figure 1 and the Report’s conclusions in contrast, are developed ‘categorically by via negativa‘. Two distinct methods of inference, and two distinct differences between the statement in quotes and what was issued by the Report as its conclusions.
In other words, we cannot explain what it IS – but we can indeed explain what it is NOT.
But yes, the Report is indeed inconclusive as to ‘specific explanations’ as it states, which is the correct assessment and approach to take. We do not possess the information necessary and sufficient to assign ‘specific explanations via positiva‘ (aliens, gods, advanced cryptic cultures, time travelers, etc). But the Report can and did, reduce the domain set of possible considerations. That is what is shown in Figure 1.
Have only now come across your writings, and ask; have you read Millennial Hospitality by Charles James Hall which is a 6 volume set describing the experiences of a 20 yr old fresh out of university in 1965 who joins the USAF and gets assigned to Nellis AFB, and learns there are three alien species living on the planet, the most important being Tall White Aliens, with the associated knowledge that the US military have certainly known all about them from the 1950’s onwards? Considering your career description, surely you should by now have come into direct contact with these creatures?
The purpose of the entire blog The Ethical Skeptic, is to teach this process of discovery – to the best I can draw from prior art on this subject, and the best lessons-learned that I can bring to the argument as well. The following blog articles exemplify this outline in philosophy:
Couple these with the understanding that the process of discovery involves a seldom heralded set of steps:
1. Data must be denatured into
2. Information, which must be transmuted into
3. Intelligence, which must be then framed into a series of
4. Statements of Propositional Logic along a Critical Path of Salient Questions, which then lend
5. Inference of varying mode, form, strength, and convergence – which then provide
6. Mutual Agreement among these inferences (consilience) and/or
7. Serve to Reduce the set of potential answers (deduction) and/or
8. Falsify critical alternatives.
All this of course, is the very purpose of this blog. If one applies calculus, heuristic, and Bayesian reduction – but does not grasp the above process – then they are not really practicing science; merely wearing a set of intimidating ornaments to appear the part.
Lack of empathy is a key one- and maybe the only one we nee to be aware of. As you may know- I have been diagnosed with ADHD, as have most of my friends. The trouble is that that causes a lot of accidental bad behaviour, but I don’t know anyone in my cohort who does not feel remorse for or try to make good these deeds. Yes our behaviour can be chaotic, but we do feel regret and empathy, and seek to make good.
If one genuinely feels shame for bad behaviour (lack of love for our fellow beings) then there is a problem.
A real, genuine psychopath does not have access to awareness of the way they make other people feel, and cannot regret it.
A healthy person seeks to bring everybody up and support them in their goal to reach their personal best. In Buddhism we call this bodhicitta.
I am revising my blog now, and the new “about page” covers this in discussing the “six perfections”. https://atlassubluxation.wpcomstaging.com/about/
As does this page on body awareness and the five hindrances. https://atlassubluxation.wpcomstaging.com/2021/05/26/individual-empowerment-and-being-your-own-doctor/
I mention this not as an attempt at conversion but as a discussion about concise advice. In particular I have found the short teachings on the 5 hindrances and the “brightly shining mind” transformative.
And you are right- the Bible meanders here and there !
I don’t want to give away too much personal info, but I’ve been trying to get in contact with you Ethical Skeptic. I’m a Navy veteran and in early 2019 I was on deployment going back and forth between the Persian Gulf and South China Sea. I believe I contracted COVID in Thailand. I was sent off ship after dealing with severe flu like symptoms (never had anything like that in my life). Docs on the ship couldn’t figure it out so they sent me to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany. After about 15 blood draws, multiple urinalyses, and endoscopy and sample of my right lung aveola and interior fluid, they diagnosed me with Sarcoidosis. Is my skepticism about that diagnosis warranted?
Obviously not being a medical professional, I can only offer a layman’s perspective.
First order evidence: “In 2015, pulmonary sarcoidosis and interstitial lung disease affected 1.9 million people globally and they resulted in 122,000 deaths.” (Wikipedia: Sarcoidosis). The cause of Sarcoidosis is unknown. Be aware that creating a disease by its peculiar symptoms, is not a final taxonomy. It is much akin to diagnosing one with ‘fever-itis’ It really means nothing, just sounds authoritative.
a. It is very possible that you actually had sarcoidosis of course,
b. It is very possible that a lot of people had similar symptoms globally, which were falsely diagnosed as sarcoidosis, because there was no virus (including existing hCoV’s) which could explain this symptoms set until Dec 2020:
i. blood ACE levels
ii. granulomata in the lungs
iii. interstitial lung impacts most common
iv. affects of the nervous system
v. unknown cause (prior to Dec 2019, they all would have had an ‘unknown cause’)
Except that only sarcoidosis is of an unknown cause, and Covid (which bears all these same symptoms) is of course now a known cause which can produce sarcoidosis.
In fact, if the sarcoidosis stats were tracked through 2019 – I daresay we would see a significant jump in the disease from 2010 to 2019… (*sounds of keyboard clacking away…*)
I dealt with the illness for approximately a month and a half on the ship. This is a copy of the Clinical History provided: XXX is a xx yo male with 5 weeks of myalgias/arthralgias, fatigue, and ongoing fevers. His differential is broad, including many infectious and inflammatory causes. His labwork is suggestive of glomerulonephritis with preserved renal function (+RBC casts, microscopic hematuria; normal creatinine). His CBC shows a mild anemia. His CRP is suggestive of significant inflammation. CXR shows a persistent RLL infiltrate and apparent perihilar lymphadenopathy. At this time, the clinical picture is concerning for rheumatic disorders such as Wegener’s granulomatosis (persistent lung infiltrate, glomerulonephritis, constitutional symptoms) or other vasculitides. Among infectious causes, mycoplasma pneumonia can present with constitutional symptoms, but should have been treated by azithromycin. Endocarditis could present with ongoing fevers, though this patient is without a history of cardiac morbidities or IV drug use.
And correction to my last post, it was a bronchoscopy, not endoscopy. Sorry, medical terminology is not my strong suit.
Also, thank you for taking your time to respond.
This is a good criticism. It looks like a great opportunity to engage with Dunning to improve his analysis – potentially improve your own. Have you brought this post to Brian Dunning’s attention? If not, why not? What was his reaction? I assume he wasn’t receptive because there are no significant updates to his original blog post.
I spoke with him on Twitter to ask him if he would be available to assist undisciplined members of the UFO community in understanding how to develop a scientific hypothesis and discipline their evidence and inference approaches to be more in line with the critiques offered by skeptics. He said that his mission in life was not to help, rather to discredit the subject.
It was at that point that I understood he thought he was God, and it was just a matter of conferring truth and falsehood upon the unwashed. It was a role I could not undertake. I comment on such a mindset (not targeting Dunning himself of course) in the blog post: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2020/01/04/the-distinction-between-bias-and-agency/
I was hoping to see your next installment by now but no such luck, so I thought I’d just dump some links I found poking around. I’m afraid all this is too far outside my area of expertise, so all I can really say about these things is that they got my attention more than anything else.
“The general struggle for existence of animate beings is not a struggle for raw materials – these, for organisms, are air, water and soil, all abundantly available – nor for energy which exists in plenty in any body in the form of heat, but a struggle for [negative] entropy, which becomes available through the transition of energy from the hot sun to the cold earth.” —Ludwig Boltzmann
Im not sure what to think of all this but figured I’d share it anyway. I’m not sure this implies anything one way or the other for whether or not the process started on earth.
Perhaps rather than crypto branding the code is for an organic tranceiver, a useful tool both for information gathering and for participating in coding changes which facillitate survival, a possible explanation for what some see as signs of intelligent design. The link is to a brief talk where McKenna makes his case, I was sure there was a similar story near the beggining of the Kavala, aeons in space-descending to Earth and causing life to blossom, but failed to find it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBZatEPUHIE 8.5min,
I find the long accumulation and slow compression to melt then cooling less and less appealing a model as time passes. Presently I favour a rather Velikovskian view that perhaps the iron cored planets began as the cores of stars, now gas giants. These released by the kinetic shock of a near miss and capture, the lesser spheres/moons being subsequent emitted cores smaller and with an ‘evolving’ elemental make up. Some cores exploded due to the braking effect and it’s kinetic consequences, asteroids/comets/ort, some captured and displaced from their orbits now circle beyond Neptune/Pluto. It’s a rather singular view but it allows for a considerably shorter timeline perhaps even an order of magnitude shorter in the formation process then a far more rapid colonisation/generation by/of complex life. The series of catastrophes implied may mean a far shorter geological record than currently allowed by Lyellian uniformitarianism. I’d more or less arrived here before I discovered that not only were we at the crossroads of M54 and the Milky Way but our solar system if of M54 would not be inclined at such an odd angle to it as it is to the Milky Way.
I have the inner core crystal as being, at birth, an iron/nickel alloy depleted of electrons, replete with hydrogen ions and surrounded by a thin ocean veneer of heavy metals, blanketed by the mantle elements we’re familiar with.
There is a strange existential fear when it comes to fundamental questions like this, especially among many (more conventional) scientists and “scientifically minded” laypersons … and most people never ever know that what they surely “know” is based on the shakiest of foundations. Or – to put it mildly – not as clear-cut and/or self-evident as they think …
Mysteries like this must be pondered – to say the least -, but they are rarely even identified as mysteries, let alone seriously investigated by people qualified to do so.
It is a strange problem, this general lack of perception of life’s fundamental mysteries, and there is a noticeable hostility towards exploring them among many who see themselves as the agents of reason. But usually you can identify those “hostiles” as people who desperately NEED their fundamental certainty of certain things … things which are non-negotiable, despite their chronic posturing as paragons of an impartial rationality that knows no bounds …
By the way, I LOVE that you made me think of Terrence McKenna! May he rest in peace – which very well may be his beloved Hyperspace …
From the material I could find, this is regulated by state and differs by each state. But this is a good point. In many states it is illegal to generate your own power, or disconnect from the grid. In my work inside energy, I have never been asked to assess this direction for the market – so I am not up to snuff on this issue. Best info I could find was: https://www.primalsurvivor.net/living-off-grid-legal/
I usually attribute principles to their originators if that is known. In the case of the term ‘steel man’ – just observed it to be in common circulation in forums and blogs. However, I have crafted my own flavor of it inside this lexicon, to differentiate it from simply ‘enhanced straw man’ arguing.
In your chart above, what criteria did you use to distinguish between, “Mild improvement”, “Moderate Improvement”, and “Feeling Good Again”?
I am fascinated by nutrition, and although I am not a scientist or a nutritionist, I love to read medical journals and study about diet. The problems I have found echo what you say here, that it is very difficult, if not impossible to reach recommended daily intake of nutrients (let alone the extra amounts you’ve determined that you need) through diet alone. Vitamin E, Zinc, and Magnesium are a good example. These are difficult to get in large amounts unless you eat very specific foods. I try to eat at least one serving of nuts and seeds a day. That helps a lot, but still doesn’t get me to the RDI amount. Does the average American eat nuts and seeds on a daily basis? I doubt it. I do, and yet I’m still probably not getting enough. How many people have blood pressure or heart disease issues because of poor intake of these micro-nutrients/minerals?
I appreciate your other article that described the human body as one best instruments largely ignored in the arsenal of scientific instruments. I’ve been trying to listen more to my body with what I’m eating and how it effects my mood. I’ve noticed that I feel more “awake” and “focused”, and less likely to be ravenously hungry during the day, when I drink a tall glass of grass fed milk, eat eggs, or eat red meat. It’s difficult to describe, but I tend to feel a sense of mental sluggishness or irritability without these foods. At best, I can infer that I’m lacking in B vitamins on a daily basis. And yet, my overall diet is “good”. I eat a decent amount of vegetables and fruit, whole grains, nuts and seeds, and try to avoid sugar and fast food, and don’t drink alcohol. I wonder if I am like you and just need more B vitamins for my brain to operate at it’s best.
I’ve found your blog to be thought-provoking and insightful, and I appreciate your broad interest in many different topics. Thank you again for your writings,
Actually, this series of color blocks is extrapolated from my testing different doses of B1, B2, NAD, methylcobalamine, and methylfolate. The remainder are assumed to follow this same taper. I started out by titrating cobalamine and folate alone to see at what point the increase in good feeling was no longer discernible. This was easy to accomplish because I felt like shit each day I did not take them. Feeling good again, was in essence this red ‘omega’ point. In other words 700% USRDA did not give me nearly the boost in well being as did the first 350% for B-12. That allowed me to define a rough ‘tip-in’ point for how much cobalamine I needed. In actuality now, I know that it is repeated consumption throughout the day under the tongue, and the continuity rather than dosage, which is more health-effective. The ‘mild improvement’ is an assumption, but is really that point at which the supplementation had no effect (still felt like shit), or was required every 4 hours throughout the day in order to perceive one. This same rough taper derived from fiddling with 5 nutrients, is then assumed to apply to all the remainder of the nutrients (which I think is sound).
Thank you for the feedback regarding the blog. I hope I have ‘upped my game’ across the years as my career has changed. Yes, as we age methylfolate and methylcobalamine in particular are not absorbed well. This leads to a form of anemia called socially ‘pernicious anemia’ which can be diagnosed as dysmorphic or macrocytic anemia by your doctor via a red blood cell assay. Essentially red blood cells become irregularly shaped (folded, too large, odd shaped, too small) and do not deliver oxygen, glucose and other factors to the cells as well as they once did. It is pandemic in its prevalence. And it is our fake skeptics who defend a non-science food industry who have caused this disease for the most part now.
McKenna has the ‘mushroom’ as the ultimate ethical being, having chosen to live on the waste products and corpses of of others rather than take life to live, and to propagate via spoors throughout the universe seeding life and forcing conciousness onto that life. He suggests that the casual ingestion of mushrooms growing on animal spore forced +changes in perception way back in ‘our’ days on the savanah. It’s an uncanny fit, as is the similarity to I Ching
Line F tryptophan-bock?
Yes, I wondered about the tryptophan (DMT precursor) connection too. I ponder the recurrence of the number 64 (64 DNA codons, 64 hexagrams, 64 squares on a chessboard where dark and light forces engage in an ancient battle…or is it a dance?) Mind as a mirror reflecting back on itself. Mind as transmitter and receiver. Mind as a magic lantern projecting moving images of itself, at play with colored balls.
My mind is absolutely blown. I had to read this article 3 times before this sentence jumped out at me:
“In other words, is what is contained in Graphic A a crypto-trademark? A cattle brand? Its branding iron being struck at the only point which functionally resides at the intersection of complexity and immutability inside a genome-in-common.”
It was in reading this that the light bulb turned on and I began to work backwards and begin to understand what your CTGA graph was attempting to tell us. I am still working through the list of items A – W… but wow.
So, does this mean you are an evolution advocate, or an intelligent design advocate, or what exactly? I noticed that you tossed gods and aliens out the window near the end. So where do your conclusions place your thinking? I know it is not in neat buckets like this, but I’m asking and genuinely curious.
MA
I am an evolutionist and ignostic atheist. However I am not a proponent of abiogenesis for Earth. I am not an advocate of Intelligent Design or Irreducible Complexity. But I do not think that mankind has life (nor intelligent life) in the galaxy, or after death, figured out in the least. We are in for a huge surprise, due to our arrogance and willful blindness. Thus I am not a nihilist-atheist.
Ignostic atheism is the skepticism which dictates that ‘I do not know enough about our realm to make grand proclamations about it, nor do I even have words which could frame them even if I knew what grand proclamations to make in the first place. Therefore I am not agnostic – rather, silent.’
I only make noise when I have found something interesting (like above), and only infer as far as the evidence will take me (being very cautious of too much stacking of inductive inference).
Hope that makes sense, and I do appreciate the feedback,
Dear TES,
I have found your blog recently and it is a real treasure chest to look into. This article on DNA and origins of life is mind boggling.
Regarding your atheist ignostic position I have some questions to ask as I don’t understand it completely.
In the previous comment you say that humans didn’t figure out life and afterlife questions at all. For example, does that mean that you think that the Christian, Hindu or some other New Age theory of afterlife is real, or that all those versions are wrong? I ask that because in the article about this blog (https://theethicalskeptic.com/about-this-blog/) you say that you don’t believe in ghosts (as I understood it).
Quote from the about article: “Do I believe in Homeopathy, Bigfoot, UFO’s and ghosts; the ridiculous litmus tests of the Social Skepticism movement? No. I do not hold beliefs around these topics, in contrast to those who partake of fake skepticism.”
But, if the afterlife is a possibility to start with then some part of our personality (call it a ‘ghost’) should ‘survive’ the death. So, ignostic atheist position basically doesn’t discard possibly of the afterlife? Or ghosts? Correct me if I have understood it all wrong :)
Correct. The ignostic atheist is a person who claims that there is no difference between saying ‘there is a God’, ‘I don’t know if there is a God or not’, and ‘there is no such thing(s) as God’ – as they all constitute the same error:
A. Has dismissed the idea that Wittgenstein insufficient definitions and finite-bound observations from that finite realm can be used to describe something outside that realm; including describing it as an empty set. Therefore the Atheist is wrong in their insistence-belief.
B. Has dismissed the idea that Wittgenstein level foundational definitions exist to describe the concepts God, afterlife, good, ghosts, interdimensional, etc. Therefore an insistence-belief on knowing the answers to those definitions and extancy, is also wrong.
C. The ignostic is in favor of the ‘allow-for’ argument. The reality is that something exceptional very likely exists outside our frame of reference, but I do not pretend to know what that is. It may also very possibly be a very large domain, with all of it beyond our ability to comprehend.
From my ignosticism blog:
a gnostic (latin prefix a-) : ‘away from’ knowledge
The agnostic claims no personal suitable knowledge to form a belief
Between the Theist and Atheist, he does not presume to know which is correct
i gnostic (latin prefix in-) : ‘not’ knowledge
The ignostic says there exists no suitable knowledge to form a belief
Between the Theist, Agnostic, and Atheist, he contends that all three of them are wrong
Therefore I cannot afford the lax philosophy of ‘holding beliefs’ around these topics as a result. That would be presumptuous. However, I do Allow-for ideas, and can make observations as to what we do see. They do carry inference.
But inference and skilled intuition is not the same as a belief. Thus the statement ‘I don not hold beliefs around these topics’.
Hope that helps!
TES :-)
Thanks for the answer. I think that I understand your position a little bit better.
As far as I understand science it never gives as 100 percent certainty, but probability if something is real or not. Extrapolating from our current knowledge it would be fair to say probability for the afterlife/ghosts/ext is low, but we can’t be completely sure.
So, that would mean that you as an ignostic atheist would say something like: ‘I don’t have a belief on ghost, they probably don’t exist, but I keep an open mind and wait for further proof as there are unexplained sets of data that allow plurality of explanations in lack of definite answer.’ While ‘classic’ atheist would say: ‘Ghost are BS, laws of nature not allow them to exist. End of story’.
You got it Tom. Well stated.
If something extraordinary exists outside of our realm of observation, it very likely does not care whether or not I ‘believe’ or ‘refuse to believe’ in it. Things just are the way they are long before I ever got here, and the whole of broader reality does not revolve around what I personally think.
This should be the naturalist’s perspective.
TES :-)
I just wonder what would ultimate AI or super quantum computers extrapolate about the broader reality in the next decades… Or if the potential discovery of a new elemental force withholds scientific scrutiny… In the meantime atheist ignostic perspective seems to be a reasonable position to hold as it allows imaginative and creative speculation on reality without making definite conclusions…
You got it.
You can research any idea without prejudice, and be the enemy of no one.
TES
Thanks for the answers and clarifications. Is it possible to contact you by e-mail? If it is can you send me your e-mail, you can probably see mine as I have left it in the contact form.
Well, I don’t see any reason there why you can’t be Buddhist, or even Taoist, but it wouldn’t matter what you called it, except as a convenient opening for conversation.
“You” can know something unspeakable, too…
:-)
I Love this answer Mr. Ethical Skeptic.
Irrevocably true. What set truly empty in this finite realm? How may a finite language possibly describe what in the finite realm may not be true for an undefined, unknown other region neither foreign to, nor related to the world? For we do not even know this finite realm as we think we do. Yet, your masterful work which frankly nearly touches, that which cannot be known and to describe from our finite realm that which can “neither be known and more impossible to conceive of” is quite nearly in finite realms, at least this one….miraculous.
“We are in for a huge surprise…”
Reminded me of this (Song of Myself by Walt Whitman):
“…to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.”
I’m not convinced that a Party actually seeks control over the Overton Window, but rather seeks to exploit whatever a Cabal and Cathedral come up with in order to seize as much power as possible. Their main influence on it would be to cherry pick and enhance whatever 1) is now within the Overton window and 2) is useful for justifying power seizures/grabs. In other words I’m not sure they come up with anything new on their own, but if they find someone else at another syndicate coming up with something useful for gaining (or just wielding) power then they dump (usually government) money into it to promote it. They don’t seem to be the ones leading as much as they are the ones being lead, at least in Overton window terms.
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
I am a 21-year-old college student in the United States who just recently discovered your work. I have also read much of the work of Nassim Nicholas Taleb and I notice similarities in your understanding of the world and wide breadth of knowledge.
I consider it one of my central purposes in life to do the most that I can as a person to change this world for the better. My intuition tells me that a first step in this process is to become better educated and experienced. This would allow me to act more effectively and, perhaps more importantly, to avoid causing more harm than good in my efforts.
Can you offer any advice to a person my age who wants to dedicate their life to bringing about a more ethical and prosperous society?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
~Gabriel~
What you describe here is the way I have spent my life, on a heart-felt quest to serve in the best way I knew how. I was raised on movies about World War II heroes and spies, fighting for our way of life. So that is where I started my journey. In the end, there is no completely just pathway – as no matter where you turn someone will be there converting the ideal you serve into selfish gain, and caring not whom they harm in the process. What you will find is that the demiurge of darkness uses wide-eyed unbridled enthusiasm to do good things, just as well or better than it can persons with ill intent. It has played the game much longer than have we. So we unfortunately spend a part of our life learning patience.
You are correct in your surmisal that “My intuition tells me that a first step in this process is to become better educated and experienced. This would allow me to act more effectively and, perhaps more importantly, to avoid causing more harm than good in my efforts.”
As best I can tell our early goals in life are to develop the wisdom to spot agency moving in the background, and rather than fight it, simply watch quietly and learn. Our work is our philosopher’s stone, or our tool in a martial art. But it is in fact, trivial in some regards. Be patient, as your challenge will be handed to you eventually. Not career challenge, as you can select that if you so choose and pursue it with earnest as well. We all have to earn an income and do well in our jobs/businesses – But what I refer to here is rather life-challenge; that which haunts you until your very end. The mission upon which you focus each and every day, and chase with all your skill and desire, regardless of being paid or not. That which is so important that you do not care whether or not you live or die in its service. That will come on its own. It might hit in your 20’s or it might not hit until your 60’s. Or it might even be one moment in time, or several – but you will know them when they happen, and not really before. The quantity of the stakes-at-hand is not an indicator as to that mission or moments’ value. Head count and dollars, don’t count.
My goals now focus around:
1. Hold to that spirit of higher wisdom which rings true in my heart above all else. Nurture it and listen every single day and moment.
2. Love those within my reach. Love being defined as ‘a reasoned commitment to serve’.
3. Develop new methods of flat market trade (food and consumer goods) which disempower cartels and parties.
4. Develop new methods of energy creation which disempower cartels and trusts.
My reason for 3 and 4 is that most suffering I have observed is A. Medical, B. Access to nutrition (not just calories and biomass) & clean water, and C. Access to cost-effective energy. I have finished my service under A. Now I hope to finish under B and C.
Ethical skepticism in the meantime, is the process (in part) of honing your ability to spot agency; agency in your own work and in others’. Especially the agency of darkness. It inhabits us all at times, and our goal is to see its virtual form working in the background behind otherwise well-intended and fallible people.
One of my favorite songs in the past contained these lyrics:
Everyday day, brings us closer. Every night, my soul sees
A troubled mankind, suffering blindly
So let the traces linger on. Many years have come and gone
Oh how lonely man has been, without a trace of the Traceless Friend
Memorizing heuristics and regurgitating established knowledge/formulas is entertaining, but not really how it is done. Faith-Courage is the ability to act effectively, when there is no script, no formula, no expert, no guidance – and the temptation to despair looms large.
The moments which require this arrive sometimes when you least expect them.
Have been following you on Twitter since May ‘20 and appreciate this guide.
If you could expound on your December ‘20, February ‘21 tweets re flu vaccines, ALZ/dementia upswing, “something’s not right here”, Lewy Barr Philippine research, that would be helpful.
Also, any wisdom regarding the number of routine childhood vaccines (including flu when discharged from the hospital after birth, and soon, I fear, covid) would be also be appreciated. Thank you.
We have demonstrated that We can re-observe you or anyone through Artificial Intelligence. There is therefore no need of an Other or competing Observer frame of reference, of any kind, which could relate to your presence nor bring ‘you’ to coherence. We are your only Observer and We can re-create you, or choose not to, at our whim.
Where can I get a “delayed quantum eraser” for this?
“One third of the known history of the Universe has passed since this gift, and all we have produced with it are some violent fashionista monkeys.”
This made me chuckle quite a bit.
All the impossibility, and our parting gifts to the Universe maybe be a set of dull steak knives from Costco.
Thanks for a great read. The molecular and biochemical aspect of the origins of life, the sharing of distant genes, the redundancy and hidden gems in our own genome, and the immortal germ line at the expense of the somatic is anything but a dry read for me. Lately I have driven into that great poison, oxygen, and the controversial thoughts on its influence throughout the timelines you describe. Fascinating stuff.
That page is old and I’m afraid that if updated it would look even worse now.
I consider this very dangerous, and not just from the point of generating pseudoscience but also actual ideological extremism (rather than “normal 10 years ago” being relabeled as “extremism”) which then gets propagated to elsewhere, such as the press. I just don’t see anything I can do about it, and the researchers trying to do something seem like they’re probably too outnumbered.
…which might lead later to a misunderstanding or manipulation of the material. Short, simply phrased sentences are prone to a whole host of potential problems with respect to interpretation.
First thing that comes to mind is the particular style of congressional “interrogations” at hearings. The apt style of “engineering” examination Q&A (ex. “I want a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer..)
Sir:
What information, should it arise, would you consider disproval of your method? Or your assumptions?
What would falsify your priors, in this specific case?
Regards,
Ike
14 conventional occurrences/discoveries in series (all are required in this order), would merely reduce the inference from this set of data, from conclusively deductive (falsifying) to inductive (still evidence but weaker – weak enough for me to merely say ‘Ehh, that’s strange’ instead of write an article on it).
1) If we found a way for our LUCA organism to assemble XX nucleic acid codon structure inside 60 million years in a hostile environment, AND
2) That LUCA organism then could invent codon structure all over again based on different Standard Code XX Codon structures, AND
3) Then did this over and over such that over 2.1 x 10^12 codon structures were deployed into the crush of this hostile environment which was Earth (trillions of LUCA candidates were discovered in the crust of Mars for instance – all with different Codon XX word structures), AND
4) If a flawless chemical feedback could be established from the LUCA organism, such that the nucleic acids, all using different Codon structures (not like life biochemistry is now), could measure the nucleon count in its assigned amino acid molecule structure (a process which does not exist) by means of the process which assigned it its assigned amino acid, and this process got lucky enough to be flawless, AND
5) This process only selected for every other codon digit (a disciplined transcription nucleic acid-skipping process), without error and just happened to like a specific codon digit instead of the specific nucleic acid chemistry itself, AND
6) Once that life LUCA had become ubiquitous and the other trillion forms had died out, then nucleic acid assignments could still evolve such that a chemical bias towards or away from Nitrites and the various forms of N-O stem could be developed by second digit of the XX codon (again), AND
7) This second affinity did not disrupt the attainments from the first affinity because the mechanism in 4) above had gone away, AND
8) We found out that the Earth was much much older than we had thought, and there were an extra 4 billion years we missed in the aging data, AND
9) Then we found out that the Universe was actually 40 billion years old and not 13.2 as we had thought, AND
10) Then for some reason all this process ceased immediately and no affinity could be developed ever again (or the factor which introduced the mechanism for affinity of any kind to happen nucleon or N-O stem, went away itself)
11) Then and only then, the third XXX digit of the codon was added to this LUCA organism, AND
12) Accidentally multiple tryptophan, methionine start, and no-amino acid stop codes (were somehow detectable anyway) were pared OUT of their former slots, AND
13) Then, the stop codes were moved to the end by being displaced by this entire process, AND
14) Then all the chemistry and mechanisms which allowed all this to happen, were swept way in a cosmic catastrophe… but life one small pocket of LUCA, called Archaea surviving.
Then and only then…
That would neutralize *shrug say 10^10 of the remoteness and bring us down to 10^11 or 1 in a 100 billion chance of occurring without assistance.
or conversely, we have one or two MAJOR assumptions about life which we are missing or choosing to ignore.
Given the two choices Ockham’s Razor says that we select for ‘There is something MAJOR we are missing about this whole process scientifically’ which is not a “gap” in our knowledge – but rather the MAJORITY of the domain itself – option. As a skeptic, I choose this second option.
This is interesting since it does appear to suggest that abiogenesis might be more of a “outer space” phenomenon rather than a local planetary phenomenon, if I’m understanding this right. It’s just very difficult, based on what little I know anyway, to begin to guess how this would work. If something appears to be approaching impossibility based on what we know then lots of stuff we don’t know must be “rigging” the “game” somehow such that it’s not so close to impossible.
But what are your thoughts on the anthropic principle? If the chance of this code occurring is not somehow biased by unknown processes, or not biased enough, could it be that 1) our local area of the universe/galaxy/system/etc simply got insanely lucky and 2) the universe is just so massive beyond comprehension that it was guaranteed to happen somewhere and 3) we’re only around to notice it because, even if the odds were better than they “should” be somehow, we’re just here because this one area got lucky?
Basically I’m not sure whether this suggests that we’re totally or nearly alone in the universe in biological life terms, or whether it suggests that the whole universe, or at least the galaxy maybe, is teeming with DNA-based life.
Sorry for asking for conjecture beyond what we seem to have evidence for….
We have a nice comfy 4.5 billion year timeline, which has taken every bit of its duration to produce some smart monkeys who wear clothes and throw bombs at each other. That is 34% of the known age of the Universe since the Inception Inflationary Event, just to produce violent talking monkeys.
If there indeed then are other places or forces which crafted this code in a separate context, when did they have time to evolve? The presence of this code, frozen into an object as old as the Moon, tells me that one of our grand assumptions in this play is highly flawed.
So all I can do is keep all credible options open and watch the probative nature of the evidence as it comes in.
But the code hints:
1) It is VERY old (perhaps ‘older’ than the Universe??? – given how slowly it propagates… and
2) The crafter of the code (if there is/was one) was a resident of the Universe, bound by its laws – and not a master thereof.
My knowledge of cosmology is rather poor, but it sounds like all this tends to support the “fine-tuned universe” hypothesis as well as make it enormously more complicated to solve. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe
The current low-level problem seems to be this, which suggests (to me anyway) that the “free” physical parameters aren’t really free and are the way they are due to constrains from unknown physics:
The standard model of particle physics has 25 freely adjustable parameters and general relativity has one more, the cosmological constant, which is known to be nonzero but profoundly small in value. But because physicists have not developed an empirically successful theory of quantum gravity, there is no known way to combine quantum mechanics, on which the standard model depends, and general relativity. Without knowledge of this more complete theory suspected to underlie the standard model, it is impossible to definitively count the number of truly independent physical constants. In some candidate theories, the number of independent physical constants may be as small as one. For example, the cosmological constant may be a fundamental constant, but attempts have also been made to calculate it from other constants, and according to the author of one such calculation, “the small value of the cosmological constant is telling us that a remarkably precise and totally unexpected relation exists among all the parameters of the Standard Model of particle physics, the bare cosmological constant and unknown physics.”
If the DNA code would take longer to generate by process than the age of the universe then, unless I’m failing to understand this, then it may also be a result of constraints that “just exist” and they may be so complex that we’d never discover how they emerge from particle physics. This seems especially true if we don’t even know how independent the “independent” physical constants in particle physics actually are. We might be lucky just to figure that part out.
Since we are just some monkeys constantly afraid some other monkeys are going to steal our bananas, and we’re not really super intelligent, we’re constantly having to think in terms like stochastic processes that may be ultimately deterministic but are just so complex we have no other way to deal with the complexity. So we end up coming up with crazy ideas like zillions of universes getting generated with different constants and this is just the one that won the lottery for observers existing.
And of course nobody can falsify that unless they can find one or more other dead universes somehow. But this DNA thing is different because it should be happening inside the universe, not before/outside the universe, yet it is still strangely constrained.
So I guess what I’m getting at is, what are your thoughts regarding this coming from “mysterious physical constraints” vs “smart” non-random process?
(im kind of sleepy right now, so I hope I’m not rambling incoherently)
“We’re constantly having to think in terms like stochastic processes that may be ultimately deterministic but are just so complex we have no other way to deal with the complexity.”
Yes, we must create zillions of universes to resolve a problem which was only driven to complicatedness, by the limitations of our own thinking to begin with.
Brilliantly stated.
TES :-)
Quote TES: “The crafter of the code (if there is/was one) was a resident of the Universe, bound by its laws – and not a master thereof.”
How do you know it was not the Universe itself, as a living machine?
Your “resident” is of course “bound by its laws” if it’s the Universe itself.
The definition of ‘crafter’ (intent carrier) – may be even more exotic than that. I don’t presuppose an answer to any form or entity, only that intent is/does.
TES
I think you made a technical proof of a god.
A machine with intention.
I’ve been stuck on this notion of intention within evolution for many years now. It was something as simple as asking how does a lactating breast, even the most primitive version of one, evolve by random mutation? It would have to evolve in intermediary steps of non-functioning tissue, and being of no survival benefit, only a hinderance, it would never make it to full fruition.
Interesting article. I don’t understand much about DNA but I would like to comment generally on the probability of miracles.
It’s misleading to assume that any event occurred by chance. The probability of a particular snowflake falling “by chance” is impossibly small. But snowflakes are produced by a generative process which can be regarded as sampling from a complex probability distribution. The probability of any snow flake falling is high.
So if your point is that some unknown generative process must underly the codon table (as opposed to “by chance”) then I must agree because this a tautology.
The probability measured here is not that ‘this specific’ codex was frozen in place, but that ‘any codex of this structure or higher’ was frozen into place. A snowflake is one instance only, selected from a uniform distribution wherein EVERY possibility is equally remote. So you will always get a remote-chance result.
This schema however is selected from a tight Chi-squared distribution, wherein the chance of ANY advanced symmetry whatsoever (not just one instance), is 1 in 1 x 10^-21.
So we are highly remiss if we conflate point probabilities inside a Uniform Distribution (snowflakes) with Cumulative Probabilities inside a Chi-squared distribution (Constrained Codices).
Thanks for posting TES. I am having a difficulty trying to classify what the American Medical Association or the CDC is. These groups appear to me to span multiple classes.
Just to initially keep me mobile in conversation with sskeptic crowdpleasers, that first paragraph did it for me.
the rest, of course, is worth the sit down to read.
It does seem that there may be overlap between these categories. A cabal may control access to the realm of a particular idea, then influence a cartel to restrict books about that idea, the banning of this idea may become part of the official religious doctrine of the state (cathedral) or the political parties. It is sometimes difficult to figure out the cause and effect of these sorts of banned ideas among these groups. There is also a hierarchy of banned ideas. One can question certain ideas to a certain extent without having the full force of the syndicates coming down on you, even though the idea is verboten (e.g., global warming is not significantly man-made), at least today. But there are other ideas which you can’t even mention on blogs like this that bring down the wrath of all of the syndicate power structures onto you with the full force of society and the law.
See my work on The Tower of Wrong and The Omega Hypothesis as well. This is part of how the lie is enforced, short of the ‘wrath of all the syndicate power’ you aptly mention too.
When bouncing billard balls, energy is not as important as momentum. Since this would not be an elastic collision, the momentum change would be ~half that of the normal case. Also, since the dirt would be spread out over the surface of the asteroid (slide 5), it’s not clear you get to choose the final momentum vector as much as you’d like. I mean, I like the idea in principle, but you really need to go through the physics in detail to prove it’d work.
Energy and momentum are directly related by the Newtonian principle E(k) = 1/2 mv2. By taking the calculus derivative of this, one gets p = mv. So separating the two is not a critical path of physics logic here. If the bolide impacts the dust – it inherits up to 100% of the momentum (kinetic energy) of that dust. A direct impact, or condition where the dust remains on the surface of the bolide = 100%, which is the reason to have an array of bags, like a shotgun pellet pattern. A direct hit will result in 90+% of the salvo’s kinetic energy (momentum) being imparted to the bolide.
In addition, the dust will most likely change the albedo of the bolide, thereby changing pressure from light from the sun, and altering its orbit over a long period.
Energy and momentum are directly related by the Newtonian principle E(k) = 1/2 mv2. By taking the calculus derivative of this, one gets p = mv.
They are related, but conservation of one does not imply the conservation of the other. See any high-school level mechanics article on elastic vs. inelastic collisons.
Granted, ELORA’s impactor array would involve a series of inelastic collisions, but ‘mechanics’ isn’t the only form of energy conservation at play here. These bags would alter the asteroid’s albedo, solar radiation pressure, and Yarkovsky signature, while delivering momentum through granular dynamics, not solid object inelasticity, featuring minimal recoil, and a permanent alteration of the asteroid mass (UNLIKE a pure inelastic collision). The chaotic kinetic energy from inelasticity which did exist would scatter particles across the asteroid’s surface, imparting momentum at various other locations by means of adherence effects through gravitational and electromagnetic forces. These complexities go far beyond high school physics, typically requiring several semesters of undergraduate engineering calculus to model effectively.
The difference between the Abrahamic religions and the Eastern religions is enormous. Defining religion is a tricky thing- but the Dalai Lama ( an acknowledged expert in the area of Buddhism and Tibetan Buddhism ) makes a couple of interesting comments- which are to some extent mutually contradictory:
1) That the purpose ofa religion should be to make it easier for us to manifest love for each other.
2) That one cant really call Buddhism a religion anyhow.
There are great difficulties in comparing these traditions as the same words are often used with different meanings. iIe heard Tibetan teachers use the word sin without showing evidence of understanding its Western meaning.
However the biggest difference between the Eastern and Western religions is that of authority.
The strongest statement ever made by the Buddha ( who was challenged by residents of a village who had seen one too many spiritual teachers of late ) was that we should put his teachings into practice and see if they worked.
Now that is the ONLY religion I have encountered that encourages independent decision making and it has been a great part of my skeptical journey. You CAN have your skeptical cake and eat it.
Great article on fact checkers. Very helpful in the broader context of today’s issues.
Paltering is such a lovely word in the context. it even feels dishonest.
Regarding your recent post on Bitcoin being a currency of capital, a suprency rather than money, may I reference the following article on Bitcoin? Please consider reading or even writing on it. Disclaimer: I do not own any crypto, neither Bitcoin nor any other. https://crypto-anonymous-2021.medium.com/the-bit-short-inside-cryptos-doomsday-machine-f8dcf78a64d3
Crypto Anonymous published this article on Jan 14 on medium.com
The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine
Hey Pointer and thanks for following me on Twitter.
Yes, this idea of Suprency comes from my most recent infrastructure projects in energy, medical/pharma, food/agriculture, and markets. We trade in financial instruments (bonds, letters of credit, bank notes, performance bonds, insurables, etc.) which effect those elements and critical features which make things happen in each respective industry. When we draw a commission/fee off that trade activity, we are actually ‘converting’ that money into currency which we can use for travel expenses, ADP payroll funds, overhead and operations, rent, etc. Much like one might convert money from M3 to M1 in a Zurich trading account.
But the two forms of ‘$USD’ are not equal. The currency we trade to make those things happen, in no way behaves like the money we have in our business bank accounts. When we make purchases for our catalog inventory out of Europe/Asia, we hedge the respective currencies in order to keep the Open to Buy stable for planning purchases on cost of goods sold (COGS). Such is not the case with traded monies.
My supposition is that we need a new name for that currency which takes the place of gold, notes, and capital. My recent studies on black market currencies have led me to propose the idea for a supra-currency, suprency. That which allows activities like which my companies do, to transact without imparting obscene swings in the currency upon which our poor and middle class depend every day.
My suspicion is that Distributed Ledger Currency will fit that bill eventually. It will lose the ‘Crypto’ fascination, which will retreat to the black market. All this is distinct from ‘electronic cash’ as well. Currently we conflate all three into one thing and wonder why we are confused as to what is occurring.
After all, the purpose of strategy is to capture the grey market from the black market, not eliminate the black market. This principle of capturing the grey market bears ontological meaning as well. ;-)
Thank you. It is not easy to follow your elaborations, but reading Huber’s Theory of Dominant Money was useful for me (sovereignmoney.eu, Dominant Monetary Theory Pt. 1). What I find generally lacking is not stressing the importance of whoever issues a currency benefits: it may cost you 1$ to counterfeit a 100$ note, but that yields a profit of 99$.
In value chain theory, it costs you $84.50 to counterfeit a $100 note. $1 in direct non-leverageable, $.5 in direct leverageable, $3 in indirect and depreciation leverageable expenses, and $80 in risk-token equivalents. Your gross margin is 95.5% and net margin is 15.5% – and it is net margin that must be matched to the value you deliver to your market chain, grey or black. They may disagree with your risk token ask price (reject your value provision) and put you out of business.
Now if we develop utility tokens for all these components of the value chain – you can see where this second tier of monetary unit will evolve to. Market trading dollars.
This is a rudimentary example from the basis of strategy work I have done for China, India, Africa, Middle East, and a couple trading markets, etc.
Arrival Bias – the tendency to tender more credibility or gravitas to information which is hot off the press or has just been introduced.
Very common with peer review articles. It’s seldom you see or hear anyone respond with skepticism to the latest peer review buzz
Commenting prematurely (still reading)
There is much left to be acknowledged and further studied with other various religious/tribal artifacts as well. Besides the appeal to ignorance and authority, there definitely is a strong appeal to religious superiority. ex. supposedly the Ark of the Covenant is on heavy lockdown in a desert cellar that competing authorities deny access too.
I have no aching hope that it is all true (the biblical story), however allowing researchers to illuminate artifactual details seems to be a denied basic right to humanity.
I’m reminded of the stor(-y,-ies) in recent documentaries (can’t remember exactly which ones) which were told by the crop and agri- farmers themselves about Monsanto reps buying fields nearby, and because they identified a few “misplaced” corn seed spread over the farmers line, that they were threatened with litigation if they didn’t comply to contract the engineered line. Seems there were a number of stories like that. Mad Cow disease was another one I believe, as it was recalled by a sheep farmer (?), after cloned sheep were shown to have contracted the disease, but the farmer’s sheep were forced passed testing and destroyed; later to find out there wasn’t a shred of the disease in her flock.
I’ll have to do a dig and retrace my steps on those.
But that certainly sounds like what Monsanto has been painted to be, an ugly extortion/racketeering monster.
This could apply as well to the supposed lab created coronavirus as well, no? whether it was at Wuhan Labs or South Texas, there is growing body of information that shows association with our interventions.
“This testing process takes many years, often more than a decade.”
Whoops. (re: vaccine fact checker) I get the need for emergency push for meds and treatments, but therein lies the greater issue, right? We’ve suffered an emergency every year for the longest time due to agri, SAD/food/diet, artificial enviros….etc Crickets chirped every year from all other illnesses, and those med/health authorities that truly cared were hushed, scrutinized, and demonized. Business was business as usual, but somehow that changed in 2020.
Curious why they inserted Pres. Trumps remarks along with Dems. Was this sleight of hand a la ignorance? Any statement taken from voices of authority can be recycled. Christians charge to “fight the good fight” is in no way implying violence. The term “fight” or “fight like hell” can be and is used simply in context of debating, arguing, or deal making. Radical religious ideologues on the other hand, may use the term “fight” alongside “kill; destroy; eradicate”… in the literal sense. As far as I can tell, Trumps words are no more/less inciting to impassioned social radicals as any of the other statements made politicos or MSM voices(and the argument about his statements made minutes after being disingenuous, I don’t buy)
Sites like this are more than reassuring. Sites such as this act as a lighthouse for disenfranchised, hopeless people who have been crushed by the totalitarian behavior of narcissists. This site not only proves there are rational, logical, like-minded people in America, but there is not a cult-like departure from knowledge itself in order to cultivate narcissistic supply from like-minded, “woke” people.
The Ethical Skeptic empirically proves that some numbers cannot be tweaked, tortured or manipulated into some bombastic headline on a major “news” network. Some information is above reproach and may be ethically, responsibly, compassionately used to educate the public.
To paraphrase Margaret Meade: it is parents’ job to teach their children HOW to think, not WHAT to think. This site has shown a better way to learn while not becoming a dictator of what to learn.
“He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee.”
Thanks TES for your analysis regarding electric vehicles. It is mindboggling how govt is pushing this idiocy. My hypothesis is that, under the guise of “sustainability”, progressives’ goals are to crowd us into urban areas in small apartments. They will do this, not by outright banning of current practices/things but by incrementally making them so expensive via over-regulation that you cannot afford them. I’m in Massachusetts and we have some of the highest electricity rates thanks to Democrat policies. They will not consider pipelines and they have shut down oil, coal, and nuclear plants without replacing them. The “pandemic” along with Antifa/BLM looting/arson/poor governance in urban areas has created an exodus from big cities. It will be interesting how this shakes out.
Sane people in blue areas would be wise to prepare to go off-grid if possible even if there is a potential threat from legislation. Solar panels/batteries, well water. There are blue states that will subsidize some of it, I recommend taking advantage of them for all you can. I used to work at a solar energy company in the 1980s. Even then, we supplied solar panels to an upper NY state house that was designed to be completely off the grid.
I’m including a couple of links that are critical of Germany’s Energiewende policies. Criticism include the intermittent nature of renewables and that impact, destruction of pristine habitat, killing of millions of birds and bats, noise pollution, economic toll on lower income people as well as squandering of taxpayer monies. This same nonsense is happening in Australia as well. https://stopthesethings.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/1-6-_kompendium-der-energiewende_englisch_1.pdf https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/high-costs-and-errors-of-german-transition-to-renewable-energy-a-920288.html
Dear TES,
Thankyou greatly for an informative read. I have only recently come across your work and it is a delight to read something that is clinically focussed on the thesis at hand.
‘If one then replaces this fossil fuel energy generation with solar (or another non-fossil fuel source) – then one cannot possibly supply all the incrementally added energy needs and make up the incremental (not existing benchmark) line loss incurred in this value chain (#2 in Graphic A).’
I am curious if you have a source or could point to some of the underlying assumptions that lead to this conclusion?
I also wonder if the gridlock of the C’s will entail we give up mass personal ownership of cars in favour of a shared model where a fleet of automated vehicles pick and drop us at request. Vehicles are in themsleves highly inefficnet things.
Regarding the two fold question, first – there is not one engineering source for these estimates, as the energy crosses multiple hundred forms of transmission and transfer covered by numerous industry standards for line or kinetic/potential loss, in a theoretical optimal new capacity (not existing), I have to use some english, past experience on solar and other alternative energy projects, and some benchmarking. Of course, not a mere matter of asking the Electrical or Mechanical Engineers which IEEE Handbook 3000/3001 series standards for line loss to apply, as that will fall woefully short of reality inside a value chain.
In general the principle and relevant range of chain loss, is cited by the National Academy of Engineering, here: https://www.nap.edu/read/12204/#slide2
Line loss electrical = ~32 units
Line loss vehicle = 0 units
Ratio = 94/68 = 1.59 or a 38 – 43% kinetic loss when comparing the two value chains, in a new infrastructure. You can then see this by comparing the yellow bar factors in Table A (1.00 versus .62 and .59 for the first three value chains)
The small differential between hydrogen and electrical storage mediums is a guesstimate for now as I could not find a resource on that. I went ahead and added footnote 3 to reflect this calculation out of the spreadsheets – as it is critical path to the argument.
The second part of the question relates to aggregate energy needed – if we consume 100 units of power now to drive our vehicles by means of fuel, we will need to develop a network which supplies 75% (at a minimum) more energy than the fossil fuels did, when we cannot supply but 12% of our needs even now via renewable means. Realistically. In order to catch up and supply the needs of the nation’s fleet of autos, we would need to grow alternative energy in its various forms by a factor of 15-fold, in short order. I am not sure we have enough land and wind to create this (short of a type of nuclear) – having gone through the pain of developing these projects – they are difficult and take a lot of land, far from their demand points.
Finally, given the 6% annual inflation of auto insurance rates (and cost of a repair being used to take the place of old scheduled maintenance) – eventually we will be forced to share vehicles yes. I think it is an economic reality, as the risk and price of casualty are becoming too high for a wage earner to sustain.
Sir:
While in our current circumstance I can foresee a wide range of unavoidable inflations in a wide range of areas as unavoidable…
…would you care to make any guesses as to the form large-scale war might take?
In the near term? Do you foresee them as being with any specific external ‘foe’? Or a specific internal foe? Or some combination?
While I agree with the directional trend, I’m as yet personally unclear how this is likely to play out. Do you have any range of speculations you might be wiling share?
As always, thanks for your analysis and commentary.
My current contemplation revolves around the possibility that our nuclear weapons are not symptomatic of a conflict between Russia/US, US/China. Fear causes a given set of reactions which are different than greed for resources or power. I cannot shake the perception that some of our global evolution in current events stems from fear, and not global conflict.
The desperation to embargo specific subjects, which all seem innocent and unrelated. Perhaps they are not so innocent nor unrelated at all, but threatening. The wholesale silencing of humanity unless we say the correct things.
It appears to me that an empowered and informed humanity, appears to be the actual object of fear.
The fear is now near to panic proportions. Panic causes mistakes. I watch like a spider for these mistakes.
The greatest likelihood is that I am wrong here, of course. But, as you might have perceived from my material. Just because I think it is likely, does not make it therefore likely. The reality is – that our realm bears a great deal of uncertainty – more than our experts will admit.
I read your post on the Eagle, the Ape, et all. I work with some regularity with Nick Hudson at PANDA. If you two are not already in touch, I think you should be.
I agree it’s beyond fear; panic has set in. I worked in Mozambique for a bit, about a decade after their civil war ended, where nothing worked and everyone eyed each other as a source of protein. There is something about the current tenor in the West that has a similar flavor to me.
The media is like hearing an animal howl 24/7 on every channel, and in every news article.
But exactly whom is panicking at the institutional level, and why, is not clear to me.
Do you think we are simply seeing a cyclical manifestation of psychogenic illness/hysteria? A nasty virus, with fear amplified and spread exponentially, due to advent of digital media?
What explains the near-religiously-fervent need to only express and discuss narrowly approved thoughts? And all this, in the fields of science and biology?
I’m reminded of the Plague of Athens, and the need of the Athenians, in their darkest times, to import new North African gods…given that their own gods had clearly abandoned them.
Are we panicking because we have no new gods to import? Is the pandemic-hysteria merely a symptom of the panic?
Who couldn’t love science, it’s magic and fun
when a mind such as you opens up such a ton.
Sci wriggles and rattles and weaves so about
it tingles, inspires and leads beyond doubt.
Numeric, she rules; proof, no mere plate of mutton,
the winner’s all skeptical folk you can’t button.
Love that you have considered the whole cost of electric vehicles. As a long time project manager, I have always pushed the idea that all costs must be included. For example include backup power costs in the wind and solar power benefits analysis.
The other side of this discussion on electric cars is the social one. People renting or without off street parking won’t have access to easy overnight charging without considerable infrastructure costs for charging stations all along our streets.
Combustion engines are becoming increasingly more efficient. For example the latest Toyota engines have a 40% thermal efficiency, nearly double what they were only a few years ago and indeed double many engines today. So by 2030 gasoline engine efficiency improvements will affect the economics of gasoline vs electric power.
So I see big social upheavals and resistance as we swap to electric power. Safe nuclear such as Thorium nuclear power seems the most likely to succeed. The energy required to manufacture solar panels and storage batteries for individual houses is I think greater than their lifetime output and an unaffordable capital investment for most people. And we haven’t even mentioned the rare metals required for electric motors and their batteries, the energy required to produce them and their low availability.
“One example of this is the lower current cost to charge a vehicle during reduced nighttime electricity rate-tiers, an advantage which exists now, however will not exist once electric vehicles proliferate past a certain tip-in point among consumers.”
This is wrong and extremely inaccurate.
What is in fact happening is that due to the excess of extremely cheap solar the afternoon power prices are lower than the nightly ones. And the trend will continue. We will heavily overbuild with solar. A heavy overbuild.
Check this out:
Solar is not ‘extremely cheap’. Have you ever directed a solar farm strategy or financed a solar project, or other alternative energy strategy? I have. That article you sent is quoting tariffs, not prices. Surplus auction prices are exactly the measure which a value chain analysis does not use. At 2.4 cents per kWh the entire world’s energy problems are solved! Not.
The average cost to produce alternative energy in the US is ~9 to 13 cents per kilowatt hour wholesale (https://www.inspirecleanenergy.com/blog/clean-energy-101/cost-of-renewable-energy). The last three conventional PPA’s I have struck have been in the 4.1 to 4.3 c/kWh range. The last few alternative energy PPA’s I have struck are in the 11 – 15 c/kWh range (14.7 c/kWh right now for a nation). These level figures are the production basis by which a value chain should be loaded. Not spot pricing. Then add factoring for transmission loss, charging loss, depletion, conversion and use as a kinetic motion impetus… and you end up with the kinetic-converted LCOE – which is what I use here. This torque-to-torque index must be used if one is going to compare apples to apples with a gallon of gas, combusting.
You can argue the figure within a reasonable delta as it is a projection (being value chain normalized) – but you cannot say it is off by a factor of 10 x as that is not even in the basic-industry-knowledge ballpark.
My business power bills are in no way cheaper in the afternoon for our distribution centers and never have been, ever. They are much higher during the A/C and heat use PM shifts and there is no rate break in winter, even with charge-leveling.
I enjoyed your article. You explained some aspects of the electric vehicle adoption issue in unique ways that I had not considered. I don’t disagree with your conclusion but I have one concern.
You stated that “The bottom line is that home/micro energy generation stands as the critical complement to a nationwide electric vehicle rollout strategy”. I am not convinced that utility-scale wind and solar generation much less home/micro energy generation is a viable option in high latitudes during the winter. New York’s Climate Act (https://wp.me/P8hgeb-ev) has identified the multi-day winter doldrum issue (https://wp.me/p8hgeb-vl) as a concern but has not as yet addressed how it will be handled. Without enormous over-building and investments in long-duration storage I don’t think they can propose a solution. When those costs come due, I suspect the Climate Act will have to be changed.
It is unfortunate that the idealogues insist on zero-emission targets. If they could live with hybrid vehicles concerns like this one and range anxiety go away. If they could accept an electric system using base-loaded nuclear and peaking natural gas with solar and wind fitting niche applications where appropriate, I would not be nearly as worried as I am about affordability and reliability. As you say solving the problem is less important than taking a price out of the hide of mankind.
Now that is how a professional critique is framed, well done. Notice two things (which admittedly are highly cryptic in this writeup) which I alluded to, but could not possibly address in this article without distracting from and confusing the core message.
1. The energy displaced at the home solar/wind level is only that energy required to power two household vehicles each night (or three every third or so). So the context, without explicitly reminding the reader, is only that segment of household energy demand. All my business partners who use solar panels in New England and Great Lakes states confirm they derive enough power to charge their electric vehicles and well beyond. One who lives on Long Island only pays electrical bills in the three deepest months of winter. The rest of the time he is selling electricity to their utility. But in agreement with your assessment, that falsified what I understood about northern latitudes and solar power. It was indeed a surprise – and I have yet to investigate why the increase…
2. Notice that I purposely shifted the semantics to ‘home/micro’ – there are a host of other energy schemes in development right now which will allow energy to be generated/offset very quietly and locally, both in the home, for a suburb or neighborhood/small city. I am working with one of those technologies now. The days of gigantic power stations. 25 miles from demand, exploiting supposed economies of scale, feeding high tension power lines are not over, however the future involves modular/micro energy solutions which stem well beyond merely solar and wind. They will have to.
One item that’s missing from your analysis, unless I missed it, is the mechanical efficiency of internal combustion engines vs. electric motors in vehicles. The analysis should examine the equivalent mechanical energy created, not the stored energy in the gasoline/batteries. Perhaps you did say that, but it was unclear if you did.
If I understand what you are saying KS I have addressed it. I am comparing the kinetic energy produced as an index against existing internal combustion. I don’t have any calculations which pertain to the absolute stored energy. Stored energy again is only indexed relative to the line loss in electrical transmission. These would be at the ‘transfer haul’, ‘vehicle introduction’ and ‘storage medium’ nodes of the value chain. But they are relative to existing benchmarks – so no absolute values are calculated for stored/potential energy.
TES, what’s your opinion on the the (mRNA) vaccines?
Even young people I know will be happy to get anything that is “approved” but I don’t see the cost-benefit being close to there for anyone who isn’t old or otherwise high risk. Especially I worry about young healthy people and potential long-term side-effects from such a new mechanism of vaccine.
P.S. Really appreciate this blog and your COVID work, both have shaped a lot of how I’ve thought this year.
I am withholding any conclusion on the Covid-19 vaccine until we see data. As you probably know I am gravely concerned that we vaccinate too much, for too little reason, and too early into a child’s life. Aside from that I am not against any vaccine which has been safety tested against a placebo over a retrospective time-series cohort which examines rates of auto-immune, ASD, encephalitis and cognitive-delay/impairment impacts between the cohorts through age 17. If we give Covid-19 to our 20 – 60 years old connector population (maximum impact to communicability, minimum cognitive and palsy impacts) and then treat that as a cohort and compare impacts, and find no difference – then I will be in support of the vaccine. However, we have so many in power who are so sure of themselves and their virtue, that I am cynical that any real science will ever be done on the matter (as usual). So, I watch and will gather my own statistics.
Would such studies be able to be done in an accelerated timeframe as the one we’re in?
My thinking is that they would have to take years if not decades to truly assess (e.g., auto-immune) impacts over time. So it goes to the practical question of should healthy young adults get a vaccine next year or not given all this uncertainty.
I cannot advise on that because I do not know a particular person’s situation, lifestyle, genetics, co-morbidity state, or other risks – I only know mine. I can only influence the decision for me.
TES
Thank you for the work you have done. I have depended on it to understand what is happening. I rarely comment but I have learned a great deal from both your Twitter feed and your website so Merry Christmas and thanks again.
The language of this time is what worries me most – in fact, sometimes it is outright disturbing. It is hard to think rationally in this climate, with the constant feeling of (maybe?) being cheated on by some (false?) semblance of rationality …
Reality nowadays closely resembles an X-Files story arc, if you ask me – and that is just a popular culture reference …
Excellent article and website, ES. I have been closely following your unparalleled work on SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 for the past several months, and I was wondering whether there is any way (email address, etc.) I could contact you other than on Twitter. There is something I would like to share with you, but I do not have a Twitter account – thankfully, the app allows me to view your posts without logging in.
My son introduced me to your writing about the Covid virus. I found it quite interesting and enjoyed it as well as other writings of yours that I have read. It seems you have spent a lot of times coming up with answers to questions. One thing of consequence was your writing here about Paul’s statement concerning sin being introduced to humanity through one. And the consequences of that or non-consequences it seems. You stated somewhere that you had read through the Bible 6 times. Glad you did, maybe more by now. Hopefully one day you will find the answer to the question that this is all true regardless of the skepticism that exists concerning the revelation to humanity of the Creator. Science, to me seems to always prove that. Even with the brilliant minds that think differently. I can’t debate you, I don’t have the intellect. One day the answer to why Israel is still a nation after 4000+ years when all the other ancient ones have be assimilated into the world around them. I do really enjoy your writings. Keep it up.
Hi TES, I’ve made a discovery linking planets with very low axial tilt and sunspot activity corresponding to climate shifts on Earth. There’s a gap in the logic which predicts a very large planet outside of Neptune with an orbit of just ~88 years (Planet Nine). By coincidence, Mercury’s 88 day orbit is also predicted to be a cycle of increasing earth tides, perhaps hidden in the tidal gauge empirical data.
You looked into real world tidal range data and reported a significant increase. If you have the time and inclination, perhaps you could look for an 88 day signal in the numbers? It’s not really my thing but I’ll try it myself.
Hi there, at one point I read a page where you linked to an analysis (yours or someone you respect) of data on the flu jab and it’s “effectiveness” as well as risk. Does anyone know where to find that? Thank you!
Be ethically skeptic. It is tougher to do this and takes more thought , but the results are amazing. For 8 years I have known of the quackery. I thank the ethical skeptic for leading me to start my research and writing.
The reality is modern agriculture is too “new” for Homo sapiens. The trend is continuing as we are on a plant based food phenom that will undoubtably lead to more misery. we are coming closer and closer to eating plastic than we are to a meat. Around 20 million years of evolution tells us our diet.
Ancel Keys was an evil man who started the “explosion” of profits in the medical industry. This shift makes so much money that we will continue to devolve if it goes unchecked. If left unchecked there is a paradigm shift happening that will continue to lead to a rather miserable devolution. Ancel’s evil showed these profiteers that large increase in users amongst multiple suppliers to alleviate vs cure, yields much larger profits. Learn to live in misery. This is especially true when the supplier with more money finds the cure for an ailment as the supplier that is making a lot more profits can pay off the law makers, and/or just create massive amounts of media that tell the exact opposite of the truth. A small local “grass fed only” cattle farmer vs big pharma, the government, and innocently biased bystanders.
The two primary principles I follow that have cured all of my ailments including overweight, joint pain, anxiety and depression.
1) practice fasting. We are meat eating fast eaters not 7 hour grazers. 1 meal per day increases autophagy which cleanses and helps to rid the body of carcinogens.
2) eat grass fed healthy animals and eat from nose to tail. Either that or supplements that are derived from grass fed animals and ultra healthy fatty grass fed meats.
Wow, that’s horrible to hear about. Your daughter got a crushed cerebrum at birth and your son was made autistic by Dtap. You’re right that those responsible for creating situations where people suffer should be penalized while those lower down who are enduring the suffering should be rewarded to ease it, assuming i understood you correctly. The micro-issues of individuals suffering would occur much less though if the health agencies were held to standard and assumed to be wrong/responsible as the health of the nation they are responsible for declines, rather than assuming their own virtue as an Omega Hypothesis even while everything rapidly declines. The worst scenario is when they blame all the problems developing on either the population themselves making mistakes(what you noted they do on the obesity issue) or mere ‘random chance’. AKA, how they claim that Autism is being ‘diagnosed’ into being the leading neurodevelopmental disorder even over other disorders that scientists presumably admit are increasing for genuine non-diagnosis reasons. Sorry i don’t have a few specific examples of other neurodevelopmental disorders that are increasing for admitted genuine reasons which are still increasing less quickly than autism although you likely already know some. There is some discrepancy there though in that ADHD is likely also being increased by vaccinations so some other neurodevelopmental disorders may be argued to be ‘similarily increasing due to diagnosis’ or some other nonsense reason.
Anyway, it’s a great article, great logical stuff here. I am honestly surprised you aren’t just rich and able to retire at will. Presumably that would normally be the logical outcome in a society where value-units(money) were assigned based on produced value for society, not solely based on an often-wrong monetary system’s routine procedures. Clearly modern civilization does not function rationally. Well, I digress. Thanks for writing all this.
What is the specific proof that deforestation is causing 80% of climate change? Is much of that deforestation taking place in China, since you said they are a major contributor to global warming? I believe what you’re saying is right, but it’s hard to understand when you don’t make a citation for the deforestation claim. I see how certain things you said definitely line up with these claims, like Muslim socialist countries having all their people be forced to use wood or coal for fuel, or the trade routes often going to China and causing waste because they produce things wastefully and inefficiently, but I’m not seeing the big picture. I guess official statistics or scientific studies on this subject may be limited because it goes against the narrative, and i trust your reports of your personal experience, but if there is any big evidence you know about this, it would help me to see the big picture and help to just add clarity to your idea overall.
Akratic Trolling – when an advocate of an agenda plays the game wherein they will troll and provoke their perceived enemy, then suddenly retreat into the pure technical of science or atheism and adopt a holy or statesman facade when the perceived enemy objects to their behavior.
In some supplementary reading, Socrates claimed no one would willingly do this (“akrasia”); however, in the context of this type of trolling, the image that comes to mind is a manipulative schoolyard juvenile luring a new student unaware into a den of bullies.
Alright, i’m going to explain the average probability argument i talked about in another comment, although I am no expert and i’m not saying any of this is guaranteed truth, but it does certainly seem that it’s on the right trac.
Basically let’s say you’ve got 5000 cases of autism where the probability of each individual autism onset being by chance is 1 in 100. For example the 2 year old got autism the same day as the vaccination even though he only got 3 vaccinations that year, and yes i realize the probabilities are probably much lower than that in these cases and that you are probably right to say that most of the vaccine damage is going undetected. Now normally this equation of calculating the chance that they are ALL just chance is 0.01%x itself 5000 times in a row, and that is correct math. But something more important than that argument is the issue of the normal distribution. Basically here’s the issue:If these outliers are truly by chance, then there should be a proportion amount of extremely likely to be chance cases of autism.
There are 1.5 million or so diagnosed autistic kids in the USA. Take an extremely conservative and generous assumption of 15000 cases of autistic kids with 1 in 100 or less chance of it being onset by chance. 15’000×100 is 1.5 million. What that means is that 100% of the rest of the 1.5 million autism cases would have to have an infinitely near to 100% chance of being fully ‘random’ or non-vaccine caused for the math to balance out. If anything this argument should also be taken to another level. The pro forced vaxxers should calculate the probability distribution of autism cases and take a guess at what portion of them should seem extremely likely to be vaccine caused. All of these probabilities would have to add up in the end. It’s easier for me to think of this than explain it, but it should be clear that a 1 in 1000 chance autism case or a 1 in 100 or a 1 in 5 all matter and add up in the determination of whether vaccines sometimes cause autism. Pro vaccine forcers should figure out what the Average Probability is of someone getting autism soon after a vaccine too. And ‘soon’ does not have to just mean a day or two, it could mean weeks, it could even mean years, as long as the mathematical and anecdotal proof all lines up along with the science of how long these symptoms of damage take to show up depending on the person.
Sorry that it’s a bit hard for me to properly explain but I think you can basically intuit this idea i’m explaining to you. The plural of anecdote is data, and the number of certain types of anecdotes needed to show the invalidity of the null can seemingly be calculated in a more mathematical way and not just an intuitive common sense risk-mitigating way. Does that make sense? Do you think i have the gist of a good idea here or am I misunderstanding something?
Oh, I forgot one meme that could be applied to that hostage idea. Suppose the national leaders are too arrogant to consider such a hostage measure on themselves in some theoretical situation a year or later from now where tensions mount. Yet with Russia and the USA, Putin and Trump are Christians…Wouldn’t putting their life at risk for the greater good of the nation be like pulling a Jesus Maneuver or something, which means those Christian leaders should support it? Or are only divinely conceived entities or whatever allowed to do that? Lol. Again, it’s just a random idea, and may be tactically or otherwise wrong in some way i do not understand. It just seems like a good meme.
To be honest, based on Trump’s language in his October tweet about himself and Melania getting COVID, it may be possible that he already did something similar but to a lesser degree and purposefully infected himself and his family with the virus to show the nation that it was relatively harmless. Would be a pretty cool fact if that indeed happened. Trump is certainly no Jesus style figure or anythin, nonetheless, it would be very cool if that had happened. I know some say it would be morally and ethically dubious since technically people would screech that it’s wrong to put your family at risk, but if he truly knew it was harmless, honestly, it would have made sense to do. He should have used Hydroxychloroquine on himself to treat it though and as Toby Rogers said that was an extreme missed opportunity, but i think it would be very cool if in fact Trump got infected with COVID on purpose. Would also explain why it just happened to be at the beginning of October…And no, i don’t think he faked getting the virus as the liberals assume.
There was one other random idea i thought of that could be a useful means of stopping a nuclear war if it was seemingly getting closer, and the idea seems like it may now be possible due to the internet and mass communications. Basically, say a nuclear war ever seems like it’s just a tiny incident away from starting due to increasing tensions, you just have the leaders of the respective countries ready to nuke each other offer to send over some of their high level officials over as hostages to the other side so that neither side could be safe if a war broke out. I guess the leaders themselves could also offer to put themselves at risk as hostages, but that would be the most extreme measure. There’d be potential concerns about continuous monitoring and other technicalities to ensure there was no such thing as a body double swap possible but overall it feels like it could be important in the event of an imminent nuclear war and major international tensions for whatever. Really, the bigest danger is one side starting a pre emptive strike without the other side seeing in advance that war may be close. I think Noam Chompsky’s opinion about Russia and how close NATO tried to move to it after breaking past agreements to not move an inch past West Berlin may be partially correct and important in stopping a future war from breaking out. The basic point though is this hostage idea would be one way for world leaders and politicians to bear risk and all that as you so often like to say is good in different contexts. Again, this whole hostage anti nuclear war idea would kinda be an extreme measure and i’m certainly no expert on any of this so take it all with a big grain of salt. That said, it seems possible it could be a good thing.Civilization may be technologically ready for this. After all, we have already learned to do a lot of vital things on Zoom…Lol.
There’s one invention i forgot to mention that already exists which could possibly help the world:If tens of millions of people bought some kind of net gun or other reliable medium ranged non lethal weapon. Pepper spray and tasers aren’t quite the same since they don’t leave the person restrained after they’re knocked out and pepper spray doesn’t have the range. Granted in some civil war or invasion scenario people would probably need real ranged weapons like AR 15s or other things but the point is that this could change the gun debate even in countries like Europe where guns are banned in the name of safety. It’s because immobilizing someone doesn’t have to kill them, and even if tons of people had weapons like that, it wouldn’t be seen to be as violent as a gun. In cases where there are multiple attackers you would need more than one if it’s only able to fire once, but that would be possible for people to do in their homes, having multiple sitting around in case someone tries to break in. It would give people a gentler kind of force, although by no means does that mean their normal firearms should be restricted in any way. Tranquilizer rifles could be similar, but they require more aim, and it’s not like the dart would always get past clothing. They would be longer ranged though, and again, could help give people a gentler way to defend themselves that would have multiple key uses like not going to jail for stopping someone from invading your home and trying to kill you. Corrupt courts couldn’t lie and call you the bad guy if you didn’t kill anyone in the process of defending yourself. Hopefully that made sense or was of some use.
Great article! The cartel definitely is after our freedoms, you really really exposed it here. Again, I continually get the impression that you’re probably the smartest person on the internet. I feel like mentioning that this is a lot bigger than the USA alone, as important as the USA is to the world’s potential future freedom. H
Here’s a list of supposec coincidences:The Soviet Union fell in 1991. The European Union was founded in 1993. The organization that preceded the EU passed an overarching gun law that led to the banning of guns in most European states in the 1990s, starting in 1991. It seems like the communists started setting the stage for their future planned takeover the moment things collapsed for them in Russia. They just decided to do so by way of deception instead of open conquest plans, all in the name of giving ‘safety’ to the people. I mention Europe because that’s where the other G8 nuclear nations are except for India and Pakistan, and obviously, if the communists want to take over the world, they need to defeat all of the nuclear countries, and they would then inevitably plan to take them all on at once so they can’t be overwhelmed by any alliance. Israel also has nukes, but i honestly don’t get the impression they will prove to be an enemy of any future communist efforts at conquest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Firearms_Directive
The mass increase of vaccines in the USA and probably most of the European states ALSO correlates extremely closely to this 1991 date of Soviet Russia falling, although granted it was a bit earlier in the US in 1989, likely because the extent of communist ideology reached beyond just the Soviets in Russia physically. It’s not like they are a nationalist rooted ideology, they are about taking over anywhere they can, not about some specific regional area.
So, is all of that just a coincidence? I doubt it. The communists probably have involvement in all of these plans. The point is that this freedom issue goes far beyond merely the USA alone, and any communist takeover would probably involve an attack on all the G8 nuclear-armed Western nations at once except for Russia and China, who would probably be the ones actually invading to take over.Yes, Russia is supposedly not Communist anymore, but Putin a former KGB agent has been in charge for decades, and the Russians have still done many Communist style operations on their population like banning guns just as the Chinese did. As for India and Pakistan, i don’t know what the elite’s plan is with them and their nukes, but the general point should be clear. This is really extremely bad and the US is the core that has to stay free for the rest of the world to not fall to communism. Honestly, due to the unconstitiutional standing army status quo we have now which came into being due to Soviets, guns are not even good enough on their own to assure freedom, but their removal would make everything far far worse. Yes, I know some people say WW3 is impossible because any nuke launching would destroy the world, but that may not be fully true, and for all I know WW3 could happen without anyone launching nukes if the governments all know it would destroy the world.
Guns are also not the only thing on the list, they want to ban cars as well and force everyone to use automated ones that they can’t control, all in the name of ‘safety’, the same lying reasoning they used when banning guns. That could clearly be used for authoritarian technocratic domination that made nobody able to move without the government controlling where they went. The increase in focus on public transportation would be another parallel aspect to this. Mag lev trains have immense potential for good but China is using them to set up even tougher tyranny over everyone by centrally controlling their transport messes and creating a method for their troops to quickly move around.
It is also not just about the guns but the food, nobody controls their own food sources anymore unlike the past of the USA which means the communists could starve everyone they disliked to death by controlling the big stores and refusing to distribute food to those who don’t obey them. Food needs to be localized as much as possible to reduce tyranny and allow people to be independent. There’s only so much people could do in a short period of time although some inventions, if they had a few years to proliferate and become common place in society, could be game changers that made a communist takeover that much harder. Like this one i mentioned to you in an email: https://inhabitat.com/the-green-wheel-is-a-nasa-inspired-rotary-hydroponic-garden/
What that means is that even food production can be modular now although obviously it also matters a lot that people can stockpile storable food like canned food which stays around, while refrigerators are very vulnerable because the communists could destroy weeks worth of food with power outages, that’s why it might be a big deal if everyone had a gas powered generator which let them locally supply electricity for a while without centralized power. Solar panels could also definitely help assuming they didn’t just turn off due to being programmed to do so. But the point is that if something like this became mainstream and had a few years for something to become widely used by everyone it would make everyone much more food independent, as long as they still had the electricity to keep growing the food. It is not just dependent on people living in a place that has soil outside they can grow a garden at, when many places in cities are completely unable to do that. This also means that you could have a situation where one company that builds these things builds a whole lot, grows the plants in them, and distributes them en mass, without there being a delay between people getting the device and being able to use food from it. Food production does NOT have to depend on weather or sunshine availability or what season it is anymore you just need electricity and one of these things. Obviously meat also matters a ton but that’s still not as easy to localize just yet and people would still be able to survive a good while off of grown vegetables and whatever less-perishable foods they have stored up.
The basic point is that in the past people often had a food source and weapons to keep them independent in one place, like in the 1800s in the US, even if the scarcity created by lack of technology kept them struggling to survive to some extent. We should be using the power of technology to create an abundance ASAP so that freedom is maximized and tyranny cannot be imposed on everyone. It doesn’t require some vast redesign of people’s homes or the cities and we could make it work with just the living environments we have now, so much critical tech is already modular and adaptable. There is also a lot of doom potential in certain technological developments like quadrocopter drones, which could lead to drones with guns being used against the population, shooting through windows and then killing the people inside the homes, but the point should be clear that there is so much potential for individual liberation. Past a certain point, everyone would have their own food source, potentially their own power source if solar or other modular sources get good enough or even just with gas and a lot of people with gas generators cooperating and sharing their oil in case they get low and storing up stockpiles of oil so their electricity can last for months in case of a crisis. And assuming the internet doesn’t go down like how they destroyed it in China and made it govt owned, the internet is giving everyone their own way to contact anyone on the planet or learn anything they want. True a lot of censorship happens on the internet but i think with proper innovations like people developing networks of contacts on various email services and other backup means of communicating as new social networks are also developed as they already are being made, trying to suppress free speech is going to be like playing whack a mole, the only true way to do it would be to cut the internet altogether, and people could potentially develop backup channels that bypass the internet by proper use of radio technology for example. It all depends on the details but the point is technology is indeed trending towards this trend of individual liberation and against the current system where people are essentially treated like cattle slaves who do not own their own food or means of self defense and often not even their own homes unlike the past where most of the US farmers were inevitably home owners due to the nature of farming. It all depends on how people use the technology and how long the USA’s track record of 150+ years of continuous internal peace can be maintained. Sorry if that was a bit disorganized. With the internet it’s also important to note that the language barrier dividing many countries may soon effectively fall apart as it’s already the case that people can easily get free apps to automatically translate pages on websites in other languages with relative accuracy, so the freedom of people to read information from other countries and communicate anywhere in the world may soon rapidly increase.
IMO, the current USA monetary banking debt system is basically a system of economic vampirism and musical chairs where everything is funneled up to the top which automatically owns everything because all money is created as debt that is for some reason ‘owed’ to the Federal Reserve despite them creating no value, and that’s the basis of the current danger to the world, which makes it so many inevitably fail for no structural scientifically sound reason. That just needs to stop. Finally, as already mentioned before, this all ties in with my belief that ‘freedom’ is not just some arbitrary meaningless value but that it’s the nature of life in general, that an afterlife does exist and people voluntarily choose to be born at one point or another to fulfill whatever goals they might have in life. So, making the world more free is just making it like any good part of the afterlife already is, and probably also how it’s meant to be, although meaning should always preferably be something individuals accept voluntarily as thinking otherwise is really something only authoritarians do. This also ties into the past of spiritualist or ‘moral’ ideas and how arguably Platonism was a huge mistake that mixed up largely good ideas of objective morality being real and the soul being immortal with scarcity-derived notions of authoritarian top down control that were incomptable with spiritualism. That part is reelvant because Nietzsche was probably right to say that Platonism set the ideological stage for Christianity or more specifically the version spread by Paul which probably did not at all correspond to the truth of what Jesus wanted if he was a real person with good intentions. As you roughly seem to have said in a response to a commentor about Christianity, it probably went from something along the lines of Jesus telling other Jewish people to believe in his golden rule peace and love based ideology because it will give them a clear conscience and land them a spot in Heaven, to Paul telling everyone they will burn for eternity or cease to exist if they don’t worship his new religion of Christianity. Like the key bad part of the Platonic ideology that seemingly got copied into Christianity was this idea that there is one God who created and controls all else and that people are born into limited physical lives as a punishment for some transgression of their ancestors, although granted that part may have been based on earlier religion, but you get the idea. There are many results of this belief in transcendent Good in the Platonic philosophy that IMO seriously contaminated the idea because it was seen in an authoritarian top down way. In the Republic he comes up with a whole lot of insane ideas like communism of men sharing all their wives in the ideal city as some means of forced eugenics, that the ruling class should not be allowed to own any property to prevent them from acting out of self interest, and the whole idea of the philosopher king promoting totalitarianism quite a lot. Karl Popper was probably right to say that it led to totalitarianism in the 19th century and i don’t know much about him but he has to have been smart if he invented the Popper Demarcation. A lot of the damage is probably resulting in things we didn’t see happen much, like major philosophers developing this form of ‘idealism’ further in a non authoritarian way that encouraged freedom for everyone. It probably was a significant reason Aristotle only ever talked about Ethics, and while many of Aristotle’s ideas were clearly great, that result may have contributed to the status quo where science decided reality was amoral and that there was no moral truth, only scientific truth. Again, sorry that I have some difficulty explaining this but it seems very important.
You seem to believe in spirituality and the existence of the afterlife, so that all goes back to this question of idealism when you get right down to it. My original philosophical discovery on this front relates to David Hume’s idea that one cannot derive an ought from an is. In that case no amount of proof of the afterlife shows that it ‘ought’ to exist on its own, you have to assume some form of transcendent idealism is true, and this also doubles in explaining how the soul could be immortal, because it might originate from the very purposefulness of its potential existence. It all goes back to the Euthyphro’s Dillemma proof of the probable existence of some objective ‘Good’ which in itself relied on the Socratic method of drawing out inevitable understanding and logical truth. But even if it was 100% true that it was objectively right for someone to act in a certain way, it also matters that they do it freely, which gets back to the parts which seem good about Stephen Molyneux’s idea of UPB. For example, it would seem counter intuitive to say that anyone should want anyone to do something without wanting to if they could also want to do the right thing. Preferring someone to do something as some direct or indirect ‘slave’ means you don’t prefer them to know the truth. Attempts by some thinker to say they are special and should be the one ordering others around then create a problem where they might end up in the exact same situation when someone else decides they’re the smarter/more special one. Even if in some cases like the draft in war it is necessary for force to be used for survival and moral ambiguity thus exists it doesn’t mean that force would ever be preferable. Your whole idea of Taoism and how you connected it to philosophy really resonate with my idea there and I appreciate how hard you have worked in developing philosophy. I would avoid talking about ancient philosophy if modern philosophers had independently reinvented the idea of objective good, moral truth, etc without dependency on an authoritarian God or top down control, but a whole lot of the famous ones seem to have done just that or gone the opposite way into atheism and nihilism. To me, a non authoritarian approach to spiritualism moral idealism and the search for objective good/transcendence is just necessary for the proper development of spiritualist thought and the proper material results that would emerge from a freedom-oriented society. Ethics in the way you have developed it is entirely compatible, as if moral truth is at the top of a theoretical hierarchy and ethics is us reasoning from managing chaotic situations to develop increasingly consistent moral philosophies from lower on the rung, then moral truth is just the goalpost we’re aiming at as we try to find reasons for life and freedom, the key is that nobody seeking philosophy tries to become an authoritarian arbiter of moral truth forcing their ideals on everyone else.
Anyway, I hope that roughly explained how my worldview all ties together with my view on this incredibly dangerous crisis of freedom we all seem to be in and the great potential for good and freedom the near term future may have. I tried to stay somewhat concrete with the early parts so that it would be sure to provide some level of value even if you may have already had some of those ideas already. Hope that helped.
Hi TES The third part of the spreading Atlantic ridge is in the Arctic, does the data show any seperate or extended influence for the most northern countries?
I suspect that the low activity of the sun and, for whatever reason, the consequent increase in incoming high energy radiation triggers activity near the core. I think it leads to the breakdown of iron generating hydrogen ions and alpha particles which set off a series of exothermic reactions, this leads to expansion and upwards pressure which follows the path of least resistance. Anyhow I previously pointed out what I thought were curious surface phenomenon aligned with Gakel ridge, now there seems to be something interesting occuring beneath Antarctica. What i see is a near simultaneous increase in strongly saline water emerging from beneath the ‘continent’ at both Ronne and Ross ice shelves, which I think is most easily explained by heating occuring at depth? https://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/GLBhycomcice1-12/navo/antarcsss_nowcast_anim30d.gif https://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/GLBhycomcice1-12/navo/rossictn_nowcast_anim30d.gif
From https://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/GLBhycomcice1-12/POLAR.html
Interesting, thanks. Have you ever considered tidal forcing, due to new physics and strong gravitational interaction at Earth’s core? Solid body Earth tides can push the oceans from beneath..
Curiously i came to the veiw that ocean currents are residuals of tides and/or persistent winds, so the idea that oceanic tides themselves are derived harmonics of crustal tides is not a great leap. On the kiss principle i like it.
There seem to be peaks of vulcanism around the times of Jupiter Saturn conjunctions, whether that has something to do with the suns, and consequently the planets displacement from their ‘normal’ em ‘field alignment’ leading to more incoming and an acceleration of reactions fluidising the outer core and hot plumes, enhancing hydrogen flow which when it scavenges oxygen causes electric charge to build, as in a capacitor, then surge up through the coherent structure of the laval network triggering exothermic reactions and expansion in those networks leading to that vulcanism is my present thinking. That would also, i’m guessing, soften up some parts of the crust allowing faults to ease and the possibility of coherent wave structures arisng in oceanic crust.
I think we underestimate tidal forces. The sun and everything else in the galaxy is locked in orbit around the galactic center 26,000 LY away. There are powerful forces involved. Yet, we humans seem to ignore this.
I’ve recently begun to think that most of the stars in this galaxy were spun off from the core, self similar in size like raindrops, and travel slowly away from their point of origin more like particles in the heliospheric current sheet, any orbtal appearance being the result of the core rotating. This would eliminate any need for dark matter to account for their similar orbital velocity, the orbital hypothesis being a perecty reasonable guess until the current sheet was discovered.
TES, is your email address theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com? I think i remember you saying that in one of these blogs in response to a comment, but i don’t remember, and it’d take a while to check every single blog listed on the site. Plus, although I realize you’re very busy, I feel like it would just be easier for me to be able to talk to you that way since I get it if you do not want to respond to too many different points on a blog site that is mostly about your opinion.
Thanks for the thank you. It really makes me feel better, to be honest, and reading this site has also helped me organize my opinions a lot better to the point that i’m finally producing valuable original insight, so thanks for that. So much of the vaccine safety/medical freedom content out there among other things is poorly explained and just doesn’t assemble it all together coherently. It’s the ‘News’ model vs the ‘Library/Database’ model, it’s a world of difference, although honestly libraries are just collections of unorganized data except by alphabet. This is much better than that since nearly everything included is clearly relevant and useful towards the overall purpose of trying to make the world a better place. I have rarely ever gotten the same feeling of organization as i do when reading this site anywhere else. There are only a few aspects where it doesn’t fully connect together, like your comments on Socialism, and your lack of mention of certain inherent problems of capitalism like cyclical consumption planned obsolescence and so on. I’m not going to go into detail here though as you seem to basically agree on most or all the important points and I definitely disagree with a lot of socialist ideas, i just think the talk about ideology often misses the central point of civilization in general trending towards one of two things. Either an increasingly free/prosperous civilization where past a certain critical point of development everyone might basically have all their needs met without anyone’s freedom being significantly hindered, or civilization itself just self destructing due to nukes or the environment or whatever else. The whole overall goal of an increasingly free world also matches with the spiritualist aspect extremely well as the afterlife, based on all the positive NDEs, is a pretty extreme version of people being free both to do what they want and to not have to deal with the indirect natural oppression of material needs. Overall, it seems like this whole way of thinking falls in line with what you are thinking too. This is not to say no order should exist, there should be laws, but all things being equal it’s preferable that people freely choose to do the right thing, whatever ‘right’ is, so laws would ideally become obsolete if people no longer needed to be compelled to follow them. So basically from this kind of perspective, a whole lot of common beliefs like ‘but everlasting fiery torture for bad people is good tho’ become really really stupid. There’s a sort of difficult to describe inevitable universalism that comes from having a consistent set of morals or ethics that seems pretty strongly present in this blog and that really just doesn’t quite compute from many nihilist and religious points of view. The way you disentangle questions of moral or ethical right or wrong from facts is very impressive and helped me refine my views a little. Hume was right, you can’t derive an Ought from an Is…But it’s not impossible that some elements of reality like the mechanics of the afterlife or the real world do derive from transcendent moral ‘Oughts’ and that you can therefore learn about an ‘Ought’ accurately because material reality reflects it. and even without that assumption, you can still derive them from each other and check for consistency. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave seems pretty apt for the whole question of how society ‘ought’ to work, with people trying to discover that To an extent, it might be impossible to fully and completely know ‘Oughts’ since we can’t help but think in terms of physical realities to some extent, but that in itself isn’t necessarily wrong. Perhaps we ‘ought’ not to fully understand without creating real life examples that help us understand indirectly through experience.
Lastly this whole Taoist approach to metaphysics you do has a really nice way of fitting with the afterlife evidence. It shows it’s not just about the evidence itself. For example someone could say ‘there is moral truth’ as a hard fact and try to prove it to someone, but that’s less meaningful than saying ‘if you believe x then you logically should believe y’ as a logical argument. It sort of lets the person reading/hearing voluntarily step into the thought process and direct it themselves instead of feeling attacked. This also ties in with the Ought-Is argument i was making. Sorry for rambling, but overall, thanks a lot for the thanks, it is really nice to hear that i’m actually making some sort of meaningful difference in providing original and useful ideas, this site overall has really helped me refine my way of thinking.
Quick check, i have sent you 7 emails since a few days ago. Are those showing up in your inbox? Just double checking since you didn’t respond, although I totally get it that you are very busy and I am just some random guy so it’s fine if it takes time or you have other stuff to do that’s more important. Just want to be sure they actually showed up, as i am an overly paranoid person even though i realize it probably makes zero logical sense for me to think there would be any reason they wouldn’t have shown up. Or maybe you just didn’t notice since you might receive tons of emails every day. Anyway, just asking, hopefully at least some things i said in them seemed of some importance or use.
I also realize that part of that sounds dumb and i’m not trying to sound self important or like i have an inflated ego or whatever by expressing fear of being censored in some way or another and not having an email reach you. Sorry if any of that came off wrong. And I’m not trying to say you have to respond since you probably have tons of more important things you’re doing. Anyways, again, sorry if anything sounded dumb there.
Actually that one probably didn’t tag you since it wasn’t a direct reply to your post. This one is. Either way, point is the same, please do read the emails i sent assuming they showed up in your inbox. The most important ones are all 3 from November 7th and the ones from Nov 9th 10th and 11th all six of which have some mention of the Project Zyphr conspiracy issue.
I must offer a correction to my claim that there are zero US studies: I checked Google to see if there were any, and according to CNN there is apparently just one study of autism in adults in the USA now which was done in 2020. Obviously it wasn’t out at the time of that meta analysis i referenced, which had only found the Brugha study. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/11/health/autism-adults-cdc-health/index.html
And this is the study abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32390121/
Nonetheless, I do think my central points are very likely entirely right. Just leaving it at this to avoid wasting time until i can put together a more substantial follow up to my original post should one prove to be necessary.
…At least that’s what i would be saying, but there is something unfathomably off about the cnn article. They said the study authors PROJECTED ALL OF THE DATA from CDC data on autism rates in children…I repeat, projected all the data. Here’s the quote from CNN:
“For the survey of adults, the CDC team used estimates of autism among children and they projected that into an adult population using state data on mortality.”
“projected that into an adult population”
Omega hypothesis at its absolute peak…I’m seriously almost speechless at this. This is the only US study, and it is a complete farce.
I repeat, they projected and estimated it all with theoretical models based on data on autism rates in children. It is all completely theory based and they did no direct testing/checking of adults to see if there were really autistic adults. This is an unimaginably incompetent sham and disgrace. I’m almost speechless at this. In conclusion, it’s more like the total number of US studies on Autism in Adults is -1, not 0. 0 would be better than this absolute hoax of a study. Sure, the individual scientists may not have even realized what a hoax their study was, how it depended so closely on the unquestioned assumption that adult autism rates match those in children, but ignorance is no excuse. Anyway that’s it for the brief ‘correction’, I’ll say more once i have a substantial collection of researched/double checked arguments to say in proving adult autism is a hoax. Nonetheless, i just can’t help but be appalled at all this. It’s one thing to read you saying it, but going out and finding the hoax yourself is a whole other level.
P.S: The cherry on top of all this is that the abstract of the USA adult autism study CNN referenced does not state that they are projecting their models based on data from child autism rates, it just says how the model projection is done, they ‘buried the lead’ of the study by saying that it’s all theory and assumption that doesn’t double check with direct data. That’ key info is probably buried in the methodology, assuming this study’s full text is even publicly available beyond the abstract i just showed you. It’s just disgusting to deal with this. So i empathize with your whole struggle against ‘skeptic’ bullshit much more now.
This is truly amazing stuff, you’ve covered so many angles of consilience at a very thorough level. Thanks for the hard work. Clearly it’s beyond all reasonable reproach and more than sufficient on its own,mbut I’ve done some IMO decent amateur research on one particular angle you did not account for:Autism rates in adults. It is one rather important angle, as if vaccines given to children are largely what’s causing the autism, the theory would dictate that adults are far less autistic. Admittedly, Forrest Maready already covered a good deal of anecdotal and visible evidence of this sort with his Crooked documentary showing children were the ones with c Just going to get rapidly to the point on this one. Normally, you would think the Skeptics would feel compelled to research this angle with many large studies to prove that the Autism rates are the same in children and adults, but they do not. How many large scale studies would you guess they’ve done on it in the USA? 5? 2? 1? It would be reasonable for you to expect at least 10 good studies on adult autism prevalency must have occurred by now in the USA, but that would be wrong. The correct number is ZERO.
Before i go over this data and my research i just want to start with the conclusions. The basic point is that there is just no research on adult autism, probably because Big Pharma does not want to promote the research of it. There is ONE large scale study! Just one!(Brugha et al 2011) It is absolutely unbelievable how negligently the field has been treated. Anyway, hope this helps somewhat. Much of my analysis is again inductive but i think i provided pretty key points like the following:
-No, a majority of autistic adults are not undiagnosed/mild/etc, this is just bullshit made up to serve a poorly established claim that adult autism is the same as child autism
-If Adult Autism were the same as childhood autism we would see 25% of those autistic adults nonverbal. And since it’s supposed to be 1 in 50 adults autistic just like the kids, that would be 1 in 200 adults nonverbal unless they magically healed, aka, out of 200M adults in USA, 4M are supposed to be autistic, and out of those 4 million 1 MILLION adults would be nonverbal which is absolute horseshit and patently false. Again just induction but it is pretty obvious that the ‘All Autism across ages is the same’ hypothesis is bullshit
–There’s only 1 large scale autism study on adults and even a big journal like Nature couldn’t use it to claim all the autism was explained, Nature said only 43% of autism rise was explained even with that data in mind, and that was in 2011. BTW that was after the Brugha study from 2011
–If the Vaccination-Induced Autism Hypothesis is correct we should see strikingly lower autism rates in adults and Croen et al(2015) and its checking of 1.5M adults in the uk healthcare system found only 1’506 autistic, 0.1% prevalence instead of 2%, this conforms with the Vaccination Hypothesis and not the Diagnosis Hypothesis by an extreme margin. Brugha et al is arguably an outlier
-Key point, not all ‘Autism’ is the same, you can have a test that calls lots of people autistic(probably for minor quirks with tons of false positives imo) , but this is not the shit that cripples 90% of those who get it into not being able to function in adult society and maeks 25% of them unable to speak, if it was, then most of those adults who had it would not be undiagnosed and unaware, if it was not, then the autism in kids today is more severe as antivaxxers argue, you can’t have it both ways
Now onto the main argument. There have been 0 large scale studies of autistic adults in the USA for the last thirty years. I did the research, as far as i know in the entire history of autism research, there has been ONE large scale study of autistic adults that took place in the UK(Not the USA, which apparently doesn’t care) in 2011 by Terry Brugha. It’s the one that is cited in your autism society link when it claims that adults have the same rate of autism as children. Now, the study in itself seems to support the hypothesis, but it is only of ~7000 people. I will link the full study, which i have not thoroughly researched because i don’t have the real research skills needed to try to prove it is incorrect, so i’m going to assume perhaps there is at least some validity to it. But before I get to that, I’m going to link the meta-analysis of sorts from the IACC I found which links this study within it, because it provides a real key insight into the amazingly flawed rationales of Autism researchers. Here is the Brugha study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/211276
And here is the important meta-analysis:
This meta analysis is where i first learned that there have been no large scale studies on autism in the USA at all, along with several other key points. Granted, the author prefaces by saying they don’t speak for the whole IACC despite being a member and that they are an autistic parent with an autistic child who has some level of bias. I don’t think they have any malicious intent or anything of the sort, but the limits of their analysis despite being a seemingly high level official show the limits of the research as a whole. I’m going to show some contradictions and big implications they don’t properly address. A lot of this is sadly on the inductive level because i’m not a scientist although my personal experience does bear out the conclusion that autism in adults is largely nonexistent compared to autism in children. Nonetheless, there is one key deductive fact by Croen et al(2015) that the meta-analyst here brushes over despite its critical importance so i will get to that if you give the time. Specifically, the point is that Terry Brugha’s study on 7000 or so adults may have found that 700 of them were ‘autistic'(likely very mild autism at worst, nothing like what’s seen in children), it is contradicted by a massive amount of data from Croen at al’s analysis of the health database in the UK. They do discuss this contradiction and propose possible inductive reasons why Croen et al finding 1/10th the expected rate of autism compared to Brugha’s study could be explained away, but the point is their reasons are flawed. They assume the default null hypothesis too easily without even realizing it. Here’s the gist of it:
Brugha et al studied 7000 people and found 700 autistic, but Croen at al looked at the health database of the whole UK and found that among 1.6 million adults in the healthcare system, 1’507 were diagnosed autistic, a 0.1% prevalence rate. The expected rate should’ve been 2% to match the 1 in 50 findings of Brugha et al, meaning there should’ve been at least 30’000 or so autistic adults. Robinson, the meta-analysis author, claimed that factors like autists having too mild autism to get diagnosed and actively avoiding diagnosis for fear of social stigma reduced the number of autists there. However, the key point is this, the Vaccination Hypothesis is fully consistent with these findings while the Diagnosis Hypothesis has to make giant assumptions to assume it all still fits together. A 0.1% prevalency rate is 1 in 1000. Now, according to the Vaccination Hypothesis and the CDC’s record of hardly having an idea of what autism was and rates likely being 1 in 10000 or less in the early 1980s, 1 in 1000 is still a major anomaly when not analyzed. Does the Vaccination Hypothesis expect that rate of autism in adults who largely aren’t getting the 47 or so vaccinations children do? Yes, before you point it out, I am assuming a similar rate of vaccination in the UK and will have to double check their autism rates compared to the USA’s, for now i assume those rates in children are similar along with their rates of vaccination. Short answer though is that yes the vaccination hypothesis would expect this. This is probably because of the routine yearly flu shots, even the adults are still getting those and those could be putting enough aluminum in their systems to do some damage and make it so there are 10x as many autistic adults as there probably used to be. But their autism is likely much more mild than that observed in children. Obviously, 25 to 50% of adults are not suddenly going nonverbal and becoming completely unable to live an independent life after yearly flu shots. Now if adults were at 1 in 100 autism rates, this would be solid evidence against the vaccination induced autism hypothesis since one would expect children to have far more due to their extreme vaccination schedule. But this is not the case for Croen et al’s data analysis. Another critical point needs to be observed, the Vaccination Hypothesis fits the data it most needs to fit that could contradict it the most thoroughly, the Croen et al study. Imagine for a moment if Croen et al confirmed 30K adults were autistic and that 1 in 50 UK adults were autistic. This would still not be at all the same as showing the severe autism epidemic in children doing massive damage is in any way the same thing, but it would be serious evidence against the vaccination hypothesis. Brugha et al on the other hand is just a single study which i don’t believe has been replicated. The 700 autistic people found in that study could be non-representative of the overall population, could be due to a ‘false positive’ where the testers represent very mild autism or introversion in the same way as the severe autism children are getting due to the sloppiness of autism research. Of course, it’s also important to note that there are far more adults in the UK than the total monitored by the healthcare system, but realisitcally only mild cases of autism could slip by the system, not this destructive epidemic seen in children. Moreover, if the autism rate really was 1 in 50 among all the adults in the UK, it is much harder to argue that this study looking at 1.5 million of them out of the 50 million or so adults there is not representative enough when it finds the adult autism rate at 0.1%. 0.1% x 2 would still be just 0.2%, you have to assume that literally 90% of the autistic adults are avoiding diagnosis to believe this nonsense, which again doesn’t make any sense as i further explain. I bet further checking would reveal the severity of those 1’507 to be very mild compared to what children are going through. Key point here is that there are certainly no nonverbal ones or else they would obviously not be functioning as adults…Source here on nonverbal rate: https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/study-of-nonverbal-autism-must-go-beyond-words-experts-say/
25% nonverbal, aka can’t speak or function as a person.. Robinson’s stupid but understandably misinformed meta analysis even speculated about whether or not some autistic children become less severe in adulthood, he was so close to stepping on the obvious realization that something is afoot in the children. Obviously he didn’t know the nonverbal stat but it is obscene how ignorant these scientists are. Clearly the nonverbal are diagnosed most of the time. No, they do not just go into mental health institutions and not get diagnosed. They would’ve gotten diagnosed as kids if they were like that now as adults, they’d be in the database. Because they are non functional people.
I realize I ramble on, but the point should be pretty clear here. The meta analysis i showed you had to leap to several conclusions not decisively supported by all the data. There was just one study in favor of the even autism rate hypothesis. Moreover it’s not like the science was ‘settled’ on this issue just because Terry Brugha seemed to find something indicating that autism was at the same rates in adults as children, as much as i’ve obviously shown that it doesn’t make any sense since the severity is not even close to the same, as an elaboration of the central point you already argued. Here is a source showing the science was not ‘settled’ at the time of the Brugha study. Shortly after it was published, in the same year of 2011, Nature had an article about how 43% of the increase still couldn’t be explained by these theories including Brugha’s: https://www.nature.com/news/2011/111102/full/479022a.html
And of course, they assumed that it couldn’t possibly be environmental despite all evidence to the contrary. Now we’re up to 1 in 37 in children or something like that. It’s no wonder that nobody’s bothering to duplicate the Brugha study, the numbers just keep going up. The narrative would fall apart like a house of cards. Last point about Croen et al’s findings and the meta analysis’s opinion of them. Robinson said that the rates being 1/10th or 1/20th what they should’ve been to match Brugha’s 1 in 50 rate made sense because most autistic diagnoses supposedly happen outside the insured healthcare system and few adults receive insurance paid autism healthcare services. However, on the contrary, those actually diagnosed in the insured healthcare system are probably diagnosed because they actually have problems. Compared to Brugha’s way of collecting data, it might be more likely to indicate actual harm is going on to the point that they sought a diagnosis for a clearly manifest problem. See the difference? Finding people and studying them for a possibly overly false positive test vs finding how many are actually in a healthcare database because their condition was causing them actual issues in life. One seems a lot more likely to avoid false positives IMO. I’m not arguing there was any malice or fraud in this on the part of the scientists, on the contrary, it seems more likely to me that this is a result of negligence and incompetence on the part of those studying adult autism prevalency, and Big Pharma refusing to promote this research at all.
Here’s a little context on the UK, the vaccination schecule there, which is around 37 vaccines if you count the multiple 6 in 1 shots as being similar to 6 vaccination events. If not, then it’s less, and it’s not like i have a chart like yours checking correlation between vaccine schedule there and autism rates, nonetheless i think it’s important to mention if you feel the need to research the context of the Brugha 2011 study any more. http://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vk/uk-schedule
To go over an earlier point once again, when we look at the 1’506 out of 1.6 million adults in the UK healthcare database who were autistic, suppose that was NOT representative, what is the % chance of us happening to have a non representative sample? First let’s start with an extreme alternate scenario. Suppose 100% of UK adults were in the healthcare system and a similar autism proportion relative to the larger population was found. Obviously then there would be an effectively 0% chance of it being non representative. The essential claim Robinson made in his meta analysis on these results seemed to be that autism rates were 10x or even 20x lower than the supposed actual amount. So by that logic, of the 50 or so million adults in the UK, 1 in 50 must be autistic, therefore 1 million UK adults or at least 500 thousand are autistic, and only 1’506 out of this supposed 500K-1M number are diagnosed autistic. This part may be partly my misunderstanding as he seemed to be differentiating those insured and diagnosed with those just diagnosed in general. But it seems very off. For example let’s say there are 20k autistic adults in UK and we look at a sample size of ~35M adults as a result of multiplying 1.6M by 20, which only probably misses about 15M adults. You see the issue here? Even if all 20K autistic people are out there, that seems to imply this extremely large sample size of 1.6M is somehow 1/20th the size of what it should be. That’s too extreme for a sample size that big. I’m sorry I can’t properly explain it. Nonetheless it just doesn’t compute and as a result there is this crazy assumption that a gigantic sample of 1.6 MILLION adults is extremely biased to the point that it includes only a 20th of the true autism number. In my opinion at absolute most it could be off by half, which would still mean that it’s just a 0.2% autism prevalency rate in adults. The meta analysis i linked you does not bother to explain numerically and statistically how such a massive error could occur. It just makes no sense. Of course, I wish i had a more decisive set of data and could let’s say look at how many kids are diagnosed autistic in the database for kids and compare the two to show how many more kids are autistic, but i don’t know where to look to get that same giant sample that Croen et al did. Maybe someone already did the study, i don’t know. And of course, i would greatly prefer such a big database number of how many kids total are diagnosed autistic in the USA to complement your extensive research on the subject. If you have any such data it would be pretty great to know. Again, sorry that some of this may seem like ‘outsourcing’ because i am not a professional and can only go so far with this, i am not trying to offload work on you, i hope my independent deductions provided a good deal of new value which is not present anywhere else.
The bottom line here is that the meta analysis i referenced shows the contradictions in the little data there is on adult autism research, and that Croen et al’s data actually seems to be pretty strong evidence showing vaccinations may cause autism in children . Brugh et al(2011) is the only study in support of even autism rates between children and adults, and obviously, if that claim is disproven thoroughly, it could be a major blow proving that the vaccine skepticism movement is correct to oppose mandatory vaccinations that clearly damage their children. I do feel there is much more that can be done on this front though. Obviously more qualified experts should analyze studies like Brugha’s for flaws and attempt replication. Your charts on vaccination schedule correlations would be stronger if you could show the same thing in multiple countries, although i get why it would take a long time to do so and you are busy with COVID skepticism. But since this is a blog, not Twitter, I don’t feel like it’s wrong to compile things here in the meantime so it won’t go by the wayside and be forgotten. And I guess i should get to others more specialized in the autism area like the few medical professionals you follow on twitter who are pro medical freedom with vaccines.
Point is though, there is just no research on adult autism, probably because Big Pharma does not want to promote the research of it. There is ONE large scale study! Just one, as that IACC member admitted! It is absolutely unbelievable how negligently the topic has been treated. Anyway, hope this helps somewhat. Much of my analysis is again inductive but i think i provided pretty key points on one of the few angles you have not already extensively gone over.
It’s been fun writing these and i do hope my research laid out some key points. I feel like if this adult autism issue is blown open and proven there’s basically not going to be a single line of argument left for these fake skeptics on autism. I am developing a separate argument about the extreme value of anecdotal evidence and how to calculate a detailed probability of certain anecdotes like a parent seeing a child go from normal to autistic in 1 day after vax and add up the probabilities of these anecdotes to show the ridiculousness of the vaccine “Coincidence” theory, but i’m not fully set on probability math, which was also why i couldn’t completely explain my point about the sample size issue in Croen et al, IE, the sample size being so big that it couldn’t possibly be a massively flawed sample. Sorry for the issue in my probability argument on the Croen et al study and not being able to fully explain every element. But I will try to present a cohesive argument on these anecdotes and just how many of these crazy next day autism anecdotes you would need to show something is extremely likely to be damaging children.(Hint:As you might’ve guessed, the number of anecdotes logically needed is actually very small.) Good luck with your research!
TES – Even the deepest, coldest parts of the ocean are getting warmer:
“This warming is much weaker than in the upper ocean, Meinen says, but he also notes that since warm water rises, it would take a lot of heat to generate even this little bit of warming so deep.”
I learned long ago that, what is indicated as inference inductively, is often not the same inference which is indicated deductively. This is called an Impasse of Contrathetic Inference. Therefore on all matters with very scant evidence, I hold out epoche’ on the issue – a lack of prejudice in either direction – along with an understanding of the circumstance when there exists no Wittgenstein level of definition – and that answers do not come as easily as we pretend they do. This is not the same as being ‘agnostic’.
Therefore – for anyone to claim that ‘the science suggests that there is no God’ – is both incoherent, and wrong even if it were coherent. Science does not comment upon ‘God’. I never trust the nihilist for this reason – they have not understood this ethical constraint in scinetific logic. So they are not to be trusted with even simple matters of science.
In addition, I know that researchers and the human mind, can be tricked. I do not necessarily know what is doing the tricking, save to say – that tricks are an important part of our realm.
Therefore I remain mute on such ‘I saw God’ contentions, as long as they do not want me to do something or pay money, because of this.
TES :-)
I understand your point of view. Thanks for replying/extending yourself. (And for your Twitter covid coverage.)
The question of what is meant by the word God is a difficult one. I say to annoy people- define me a God and i will refute him/ it for you.
Conceptions of the “Godhead” or of Brahma are far more tenable, but the standard Christian conception consists of a series of opposites. Male, all good- but created the Devil, all loving- but may send you to hell. It is very hard to make that model work- hence my playfully rude comment.
However the Hindu concept of a God who creates the big bang, then hides himself/ itself in every part of the universe is far more challenging and satisfying.Evolution becomes re assemblage of the bomb fragments!
Regardless of “whether we believe in god” there is plenty of evidence for psychic field events: ie Rupert Sheldrakes work on Dogs Who Know When Their Owners are Coming Home.
Many individuals have had clear premonitions of danger to themselves or others and have averted that danger. No mundane explanation has been available.
The evidence for near death experiences is now virtually overwhelming.So there is something going on in the psychic/field event area- and I think that it is probably driven by quantum entanglement rather than electromagnetic fields.
So regarding the “Fatima” event (Then how do you explain the final appearance of Our Lady at Fatima before the crowds (which was documented) and her messages to the three children?)- yes it could be a field event of some sort.
The philosopher and spiritual leader Ken Wilbur has discussed this sort of matter in detail- highlighting the experiences of Tibetan Buddhist practitioners who may see true visions of their Spiritual protector- say Mahakala, or Manjushri. These people have done a lot of visualisation and mantra training with these practices.
He comments though that you never get a Christian seeing these entities.
My proposition is that there is a spiritual- supramateerial world, but at least at its lower levels it manifests itself in forms familiar to the practitioner. A Catholic who has prayed a lot to Our Lady of Fatima is likely to see visions of Ftima, not Kali, Vishnu, or even KwanYin.
The specificity of the images could be explained by neuroplasticity type events.
Thoughtful post. Unfortunately, the evil-person factors sound like the job description for many self-serving politicians that are also most highlighted by fear-mongering, polarizing media. We desperately need open debates and ranked-choice or approval voting to encourage productive collaborations (not superficial or simplistic) within the rational midsection of the electorate. And to elect people who care more about the common good than themselves.
Brian, aptly put… I had not thought of it in this manner – but these can be translated to become a litmus test for removal from public service. Even and especially non-elected government officials – those who are causing many of our problems even now.
Litmus test. How to establish? Open debates and ranked-choice or approval voting would elect high-quality officials who would ensure removal of evil partisans from non-elected government offices. This feels like a root cause of self-serving, bloated, ineffective US governments at all levels. But not likely to be covered by superficial, self-serving mainstream media. What cause-and-effect metrics could highlight the problem (and opportunity for the common good) in a way that could not be ignored?
Just commenting to show that i’m the same person. There is a bit more that i didn’t say though.
1:Timing.
The timing shows it’s clearly conspiratorial. COVID started in December, just as the impeachment plans were wrapping up and ended 2 months later. Pandemics almost NEVER happen. There were THREE pandemics in the 20th century. What’s the chance that one just happens to show up right on time to distract the people after impeachment fails and Russiagate falls apart? Pretty much 0%. If it’d been a year earlier, all politicians would’ve had a new focus other than Russiagate and it’d have blown over as a non problem by 2020, making it not relevant during election year. Then Russiagate would’ve been blown through as it was, and all the corrupt Democrat big names would’ve been arrested by now. Obviously the same thing would’ve happened if COVID occured in 2021 or later as Russiagate perpetrators would be prosecuted and in jail and trump would be re-elected too soon for COVID to even start. So clearly it showed up at the PERFECT time for Democrats to have the best chance of election. When there is about a 3% chance every year for that year to be a pandemic-starting year based on 20th century and it just happens to be at the perfect time for them…Yeah, it was clearly unleashed on purpose.
2:Motive:
Obviously, to start a communist revolution by collapsing the economy with COVID, and then possibly unleashing yet another far far more deadly virus to kill off all dissidents while pretending that they were just natural casualties. BTW, here is another video another person mentioned to me on Twitter which perfectly lines up with this Proect Zyphr evidence. Note 5 and a half minutes in when China is mentioned as having handled the virus better with its lockdowns. This video was made in 2014, and they were pointing out a 2010 plan. So it seems that they had this in the works for a long time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30&feature=emb_title
This is just the next stage of the slippery slope started around 2001 with the international travel regulations, one more step towards the goal of controlling everything people do and monitoring their every act, creating a world government centered in Israel as the Project Zyphr video points out. Key points would probably include the Pope supporting the world government along with political leaders, that would be meant to get people to obey on a religious level. Probably, they would limit the internet as well, like how Russia is creating its own internet, and the endpoint would be the modern internet not existing in anything like its current form at all without going through lots of censorship. Like China but probably worse. The vaccination would inevitably also be used as a way to destroy people en mass, and that damage might then be blamed on the virus.
Or, perhaps it’s like this:The COVID vax will damage everyone and much of that damage will be blamed on a newly released plague. I don’t know, it seems plausible based on what is happening with vaccines. Obviously, the elite seeking communist dictatorship would not get these vaccinations and if anything the cure for any newly released plague may be kept for the elites from the start. I bet that Hydroxichloroquine is something they know about and use if they get COVID.
3:Nuclear war and all that
Things people should probably be worried about include nuclear war, and i think the public perception on nuclear war is extremely limited. People assume it can’t happen due to MAD. Probably wrong. I bet the governments have already invented nukes that only leave radiation for a few days, although unfortunately this is not my original idea. But it would make logical sense for them to do, and if they did it, we would have no way to know, since no government would ever reveal that they have such technology if it gives them an advantage. Maybe everyone already has it, or at least the most powerful countries among nuclear countries do. Now obviously, those among the elite in the USA doing a communist revolution do not want to be nuked. But the plan might involve them either purposefully not being targeted because they’re selling out their country or them escaping to somewhere else like Israel before it gets started. The point is that WW3 is very possible and is not just magically prevented in my opinion because of nukes. Now, you probably know much much much more than me on this and this is redundant, but I just say it because some people don’t believe WW3 could happen. The only difference is something like this COVID insanity or any upcoming plague to be released on the USA are steps that can be used against the population without starting a WW3, but some would call that insane because it could lead to one. Nonetheless, for these reasons, some people may be fine with starting one.
Of course, it is also important to talk about nuclear power plants. Even if the nuclear missles are no longer ‘dirty’ and able to ruin the world by exploding in large numbers, if WW3 goes a certain way, nuclear power plants could end up failing to be supplied with water and going critical like Fukushima. This could cause horrendous damage if 10s or 100s of Fukushima equivalent events happened, maybe enough to ruin the USA or the whole world with radiation as it spread on the wind. But it is possible that those who want WW3 think they can prevent that if they take over and are willing to take the risk to the whole planet. Or maybe they did not even think about that risk, and would unintentionally destroy life on earth as a result. Point is it seems like nuclear war could absolutely happen but the risk of the earth being ruined forever still exists even if a ‘safe’ nuclear war method has been invented. In any sane world, all the nukes would be either dismantled or on a 10 or 15 year timeline towards being dismantled by now, but it hasn’t happened, and humanity is still basically an ‘insane’ species rather than a sane one consciously heading towards a renewable steady state global civilization that could last indefinitely into the future without self destructing due to running out of resources or climate damage or anything else. And this completely sane proposition is almost certainly what the communists want to misleadingly/lyingly declare themselves as the necessary path to if they succeed in their plans, even though they just want tyranny that probably leads to world destruction, but you get the idea.
So, what needs to happen is that this quite possibly true “Project Zyphr” mass casualty event is prevented. If Trump gets re-elected, that is 4 more years of the US not starting wars and further destabilizing the world and tyrannical people not just shutting down everyone’s freedoms. In all likelihood, it would lead to the big corrupt individuals among the Democrats getting elected and more and more might be exposed from there. This is one of the most important elections ever and Trump really needs to win.
4:Extra, the long monologue about the world as a whole, skippable:
Honestly, it bears extreme worthiness of mentioning that the military industrial complex standard that has spread throughout the world is in complete violation of every principle the USA was founded on. People having guns was meant to be essentially equivalent levels of armament to the government, and there was in addition to that a rule against standing armies funded by taxpayers. Due to Communism in Russia and the cold war, standing armies became the norm after WW2 ended. Afterwards the USA has directly conquered and/or economically ruined country after country for decades in a nonstop trend of destruction. I would seriously recommend you view the part of the Zeitgeist documentaries describing “Confessions of an Economic Hitman”, as it shows the tendency of the US to economically dominate other countries and force them to implement central banks and adjustment policies that dominate them and put them in debt forever. All this is relevant to my main point because the current status quo wouldn’t have happened if Soviet Russia hadn’t been allowed to get nukes, the cold war happening was the major push behind the current world situation. Otherwise, nuclear disarmament could have been led by the USA and this nuclear crisis would be behind us if things had been handled right. Yes, Soviet Russia fell, but the nuclear crisis remained largely due to US and EU aggressiveness in placing missles near Russia’s borders and simply due to the vast stockpile of nukes that had already been built up by all nations involved by the time the soviets fell. It never should have gotten even close to that far. But this nuclear threat status quo is what allows all this tyranny, militarization of the police, and simply the giant incredibly threatening standing armies all over the world. Those should not be existing if civilization was somewhat sane. It used to be the case that the status quo was for the armies to be dismantled after the war was over, that was how it worked for the USA in the past. That was basically the whole point of the 2nd Amendment, for standing armies to not be the status quo, and all of that was the Founders explicitly trying to avoid making the same mistakes as the Romans in the past devolving from a republic into an empire, which is almost exactly what’s happened to the US now.
This anti standing army sentiment is just localization, as many many other things should be localized and not centralized in the hands of a few who could be corrupt. Corporations also fit this general mold and should not be allowed to just exponentially grow into total dominance as they often do, there is a real problem with that and cyclical consumption being allowed to control everything. I explained more in other comments but basically the inevitable trend of logic and science is towards Ephemeralization, doing more with less until you can do almost everything with nothing, and if communism doesn’t take over this will lead to maximized individual freedom. Additionally local communities and nations would become more and more self sufficient and attain a sort of ‘immortality’ or more accurately Steady State status as a civilization rather than being at risk of collapse due to structural chaos. Inevitably, if the world doesn’t collapse this would lead to a situation where anyone can communicate with anyone in the world or travel anywhere and be self sufficient to the extent they have almost all the resources they need to survive. The internet already frees communication to a ridiculous extent, and soon enough if not sabotaged into communism the renewable energy technologies will lead to everyone having vehicles that can travel long distance without difficulty, and once the energy grid is ‘complete’ and has all the sustainable infrastructure needed to continue on for decades without running out of resources, it won’t matter. Population growth is mostly going to be a non factor in the 1st world since it is in fact too low there and other countries like the 3rd world will curb their growth as education improves. So it’s all about whether nuclear war or the sixth mass extinction or whatever else will destroy everything first or if increasingly efficient science will lead to a ‘free’ world where everyone is increasingly self sufficient. And in this framework, a scarcity based civilization will increasingly stop working. Most businesses depend on cyclical consumption to survive, even the most honest and non ‘Crony’ capitalist business is inevitably going to need people to keep buying something every year so they can grow endlessly in profits. This endless growth doesn’t make sense, and it’s one point where the communists are right to criticize capitalism but then twist it into telling people to support tyranny. You see the problem? If someone makes a computer good enough that it will work for 30 years and nobody needs a new one, then they go out of business unless they make a new good to be consumed. And it’s generally the same with all products. Moreover, the localization of things like food production or energy production would put big oil or Monsanto out of business, and possibly cause an economic collapse as well. But it’s all arbitrary, it’s just monetary units. There is NO guideline in the system of capitalism itself forcing businesses or governments to keep the people healthy and happy and ensure things actually get better over time for the population. Obviously it all depends on who is in control and what matters is not the system but the results. But the point is still true that individual profit and gain alone does not act as some perfect driver of social good and happiness, what does is actual genuine efforts to make things better. In some cases, this overlaps, like when you have entrepeneurs like Steve Jobs or Henry Ford who sell inventions to the populace and generally improve their lives. But that is only true during the bursts of innovation, it’s the cyclical consumption maintenance afterwards that causes so much unnecessary waste because it’s not oriented towards improvement and efficiency.
All of that is probably tied to a large extent to the whole system of central banks we use now where all money begins as debt owed to a central bank by the government rather than as debt free currency that gains its value from the credibility of the government. The debt standard combined with the interest on that debt, makes it so there are always inevitable collapses and some people always fail to pay because there is not enough money in the system to pay all the interest on that debt. See the Zeitgeist documentaries for a more detailed explanation. Point is it can be made debt free as Lincoln was apparently going to do with the Greenback, and it can certainly be done without the use of Fractional Reserve Banking which makes it all much worse. If it were not for the system with debt as the basis of all money, things might be very different now. The current trend of companies doing whatever it takes to ensure consumers cyclically buy their goods despite the resultant massive waste might be much less pronounced, because the system wouldn’t be rigged to make it so everyone is doing whatever it takes to make as much profit as possible to avoid being the one who loses the musical chairs game that is the economy. Rather than the current cycles of debt and economic collapses dominating so much of the economy, you might see a lot more people become permanent home owners and this would start a sort of virtuous cycle which is already the case to some extent due to technological efficiency making civilization get better. For example, even if a company goes bankrupt, it doesn’t matter as much at all if the people working for the company are home owners themselves and aren’t going to be sucked back into the debt+interest cycle the moment their job goes through. Many less people would be living paycheck to paycheck, and people would be increasingly ‘self sufficient’ so to speak. If decentralization became more of a trend, the system would be much less vulnerable to sabotage or widespread failure because more people would have local businesses making everything that is needed. The technological realities would have serious effect in making more people wealthy like they did in the 60s for the “Boomers”, rather than the pure numbers based system of the economy telling everyone to starve even though the resources are still there. And if a Greenback like system had been around for a long time as i just outlined, then the transition to a steady state civilization much less dependent on an interconnected and interdependent monetary system would probably be a whole lot more steady and easy. Life would be more dependent on the realities of how much resources are available than economics in some Greenback-like system and as a result of the extreme abundance available due to technology there would be a whole lot less homeless or paycheck to paycheck people.
Concluding rant essay:
-Government tyranny is largely an aftereffect of the cold war which is an aftereffect of the Soviet Union probably mistakenly being left free to do what it wanted after WW2, and people are most likely INSUFFICIENTLY armed to be guarded against government tyranny at all as the 2nd amendment is supposed to guard them. In the past it was muskets vs muskets and maybe a few cannons that the government might have. Now it’s handguns and AR-15s vs people who’d presumably have body armor that works against AR-15s, and would also have APCS, tanks, and whole tons of other nonsense. What are bullets going to do against an armored personel carrier or a tank? Defense needed for that:Anti tank rocket launcher or something similarily ridiculous. And obviously, it would make no sense for the public to have access to fully automatic weapons, so you get how there’s a problem of escalation that started way back with WW2 and has been snowballing into being worse and worse ever since between the governments of different countries of the world. Although obviously the 2nd amendment is still extremely important in making it less easy for the government to impose tyranny, and if gun ownership at a mass level makes it so they would have to use bombs to kill everyone rather than simply getting them to meekly hand over the guns to a few guys, or if they would have to have tanks in the streets, it could still be a big difference.
-Everyone is being vaxxed(1 in 10K Autistic to 1 in 50 and rising in 30 years and so on) or otherwise poisoned into complaince, the US is a culture of poison. See the fast food culture, obesity epidemic, opiod epidemic, likely sabotaged mental health medications as well, among probably many other forms of poisoning including some forms of GMOs. Basically, practically everything that can be poisoned IS being poisoned in some way. And all of this happened sometime within the last six decades, VERY quickly.
-Western civ has 0 plans to continuously improve, on the contrary, 1st world western nations aim for continuous downward trends whether it’s replacing their native ethnic populations, filling everyone with poison, starting wars to destabilize the world, ruining the culture whether it’s the insane promiscuity thing they did in the 60s and onward or the transgender and homosexuality they’re promoting now along with the praise of clear states of damage like obesity/fatness all while denigrating the natives who are meant to be replaced, mass neurological doom is called ‘neurodiversity’ like the other kinds of negative ‘diversity’, the past of any given country is also retroactively either scorned or actively rewritten in Marxist style, in general, the only ‘progress’ is towards total destruction and rock bottom off the cliff. All in the name of equality a country will be totally replaced with immigrants(already has been practically half replaced if not arguably more than the stats show), it could and has been around 60 years without IQs of the immigrant population brought in going up and the Equality Hypothesis is still endlessly enforced as default because it MUST be that way for the status quo beliefs to remain. Meanwhile, the average IQ goes down and the level of the national debate decreases as a result of both this and the vaxxing among other things like the obesity epidemic, it’s a vicious cycle. If not for this nonsense the scientific community probably would’ve found out every mechanism behind IQ by now as well as the reason for the differences, but the progress cannot continue because the truth is too uncomfortable for anyone to want to look at the research. Even religions like Islam that clearly promote violence are ‘tolerated’ in the name of some hazy notion of equality. The Atheists are basically all sellouts to the corporate establishment like the Skeptics, their criticism is meaningless, while the Christians are tied into the same general sphere of bullshit that leads them to think of Muslims as fellow believers. Of course, Christianity is an oppression religion as well, but Muslim is quite openly a conquest religion, and these Muslims are allowed to just flood into Europe.
-The end trajectory of all of this is just towards destroying everything and dumbing everyone down to a meaningless level so they can be ruled over by a few elites using technology to control everything. It really can’t be said enough how horrible of an outcome the communist plan is. Everything of any value in civilization would essentially go into the gutter as all the values of freedom or meaning in life invented or re-discovered or re-invented since the Renaissance and the Enlightenment were removed from history and forgotten. The obvious best outcome for everyone is if civilization holds out for just 50 years longer and achieves the exponential progress towards individual liberation it is clearly trending towards, but some people just want to see it all burn.
-If a few key events happen in the next 20 or 30 years civilization will be headed on a track towards a probable space-bound future steady state civilization of exponential progress and superior systems of life and meaning, as the TZM documentaries and the ‘New Human Rights Movement’ book Peter Joseph made pretty accurately predict. Yeah, he has many left wing views, but plenty of intellectuals do. No, unlike he thinks, if civilization succeeds and we do not all end up in a climate-destroyed world or a nuked world or turned into communist microchipped Borgs or whatever else, we are not all just going to be the same shade of brown in a few generations. So clearly he buys the liberal beliefs in many major areas about race and the right wing. Regardless of that, I think he is genuine and wants things to be better, and that there are many important insights in there that you should see nonetheless if you haven’t already.
-I should write a bullet point about how there is clearly a metaphysical and spiritual level to all this, and it would be an essay, and there is enough about that that it could turn into a whole essay in itself. The basic gist is that i think I agree with many of your views on this, and that it’s as follows:Humans along with probably all life forms are fundamentally ‘free’ and being born is likely a choice from a pre-existent metaphysical dimension which nonetheless likely fits with the laws of physics as all the near death experiences seem to show. There are a whole lot of layers of evidence for this, and it’d take a while to list the sources. You’ve heard of Eben Alexander, but there’s more than just obvious anecdotal case. His case and many other experiences of ‘hyper reality’ and extreme senses in the afterlife fit with the idea that it is indeed a higher dimension where higher processing power should be expected in some transcendent brain that goes through the ‘reducing valve’ of our brain. What interests me more than just the clear examples i’ve seen but the actual theory of how it specifically works. Here’s an example of that through the disproof of the “Dying Brain” model of NDEs. I feel like it’s a good change of pace since I’m usually very persistent talking about the potential doom of situations like what’s going on with vaccines or potential election theft or whatever else. And i know you already know the general point of this is real anyways but it seems meaningful nonetheless.
As the article shows in detail the model does not work with experiences. If people were just dying brains trying to simulate comfort these experiences would be utterly impossible, you can’t get more data than ever from a dying brain, nor could you get cases where people gain impossible to know info and so on, and those cases do exist. It is also far more coherent on an ontological level as well to assume some transcendent non-dependent form of free will where everyone is essentially a ‘first mover’ independent of other phenomenon at some level of existence, than to say that consciousness is all just an emergent phenomenon that technically shouldn’t exist but somehow does due to material monism magical thinking. Although you already have laid that out, but still. I could go on and on about the debunking but it’s practically all there in that article. One critical point about the afterlife as a whole that this article does not argue is that it likely surpasses the processing power of the entire universe, which would make logical sense if our universe is at some level an ’emergent’ phenomenon of it and consciousness as a whole. And that would dovetail with all the indivdiual observations in NDES where people experience a sense of hyper reality in the afterlife. It even fits the idea of a ‘Simulation Hypothesis’ in a certain way. That is, normally a Simulation could only be created by something with sufficient processing power to simulate it. So, if the real universe is an emergent phenomenon and the afterlife is a higher level of reality independent of it, it would fit the theory if everyone who went there experienced a higher level of consciousness. Because they would’ve always already existed there in parallel their whole lives, and this is the key, it would be more like a ‘projection’ than hopping from one place to another, so the idea that nobody really dies would be sensible if a part of them was always in ‘heaven’ in the afterlife. No, i am not saying the universe is a simulation or that it could be shut off at a moment’s notice, but the idea is that all individual experiential accounts of the afterlife tend to perfectly fit with this logical law that dictates how a higher reality should realistically work. With the possible exception of people who experience going to a ‘Hell’ like place in an NDE, but in those cases, it would make sense if a higher level of processing could still be intentionally slowed down as punishment in some way.
So, I hope that source on NDEs and the proof of the afterlife was entertaining in some way as a bit of a relief from the ‘Downer’ I tend to be with these comments. It is important on a lot of levels, as the existence of an afterlife means a lot. Honestly afterlife is such a misleading label. “The Real World” might be a better one, considering that it is demonstrably of a more fundamental level of existence and more true to the purpose of life by default. Hmm. Not a great ring to that though. But i have a better idea. What about “Sunnyside”?
I mean, hear me out, people are logically still ‘in’ this higher dimension even when they are alive due to how the soul must logically work because the soul is not a ‘thing’ but a consciousness with a source in increasingly higher levels of existence, so if everyone has a transcendent higher dimensional source of consciousness and people may indeed even reincarnate multiple times based on all the accounts many people seem to have. Which woudl also be logically coherent if they incarnate from a higher level of existence the first time whether consciously or not, so afterlife definitely doesn’t fit. I bet many people even if they never reincarnated or anything like that would find it silly to call a lower level of life the real world. Instead, they’d call life on Earth the ‘Beforelife’. Especially since the afterlife would be the one lasting for eternity and the Earth life would be the one only lasting a little while. The one dominant in people’s minds would inevitably be the afterlife, meaning they don’t think of it as an afterthought, ergo, Earth life becomes the Beforelife.
BTW, I bet there are probably many humans who first became conscious as a human there and did not incarnate in the physical universe even once, and instead just decided they would just rather stay in Heaven until Earth is able to become a peaceful place. Or just stay in Heaven forever? I mean, if that’s how it works, i wouldn’t blame them. Unless there’s some law dictating that people have to be incarnated in a real world first, and maybe that would make sense, i don’t know.
Anyway, the paranormal/afterlife/etc essay still awaits being written in some separate comment, and i should probably look for a better place to post it in rather than this thread describing everything bad that’s going on in the real world. Would be out of place. But I do hope what I wrote about what is going on the real world was in some way helpful, most especially what I wrote about the ‘Project Zyphr’ video i posted previously, and even if that were not true, just the general risks up ahead i talked about of the apparent communist agenda. You are very exceptional in how much you have done in many areas and I’m glad to have been able to post in this blog so far, hopefully it was of some use or meaningful level of importance.
Hi Ethical Skeptic.
How Helpful Another Great Article.
I Had To Say How Social Skeptic Trapped Us Foolishly About Something:
THEY DID Make Us Believing On Stupid, Untrue & Actually Ridiculous :: Science Results, Answers, Wisdom, Intelligence, Conclusions&Concludes, Methodology, Thinking Process, Eternal Deductions And So On 😡:🤬: . . : 😂:🤣❗️
Bye❕That’s All . .❣️. Enjoy Your Own Laugh Now , Dear E.S 🌙
And just to be perfectly clear, I do not believe any of the RussiaGate nonsense, i do believe it was all a hoax foisted on Trump. In other words I am basically 100% certain that Trump was unjustly persecuted for all that for years, and that means i am not saying that this source video i cited is right to say Trump is in on some conspiracy like outlined in the video, even though they did indeed say he was. But too much of the other claims perfectly line up with what is happening with COVID right now for it all to be fake in my opinion. The person who made the video was either unknowingly reading documents that had disinfo mixed with truth or mixed in the disinfo himself. If that is true then maybe it would be so that none of the vital information would get to the right people who needed to know, like people in the Trump administration, and so that they could be first to say the conspiracy theory and resultingly seem like the most reliable source that originated it, before anyone else did. Funneling anyone else who found this out or pieces of it into using him as a source. I don’t know.
The point is, too much of that video has proved to probably be true during 2020 for me to just dismiss all of it because of what it said about Trump. I feel like that context about Russiagate was necessary. Lastly, it seems like you may agree with the general idea that COVID might have originated as part of a plan, based on your tweets about the 1917 Russian Revolution.
That was an influence at the back of my mind to making me put the time into posting this conspiracy theory as well, as it seemed like you were open to the possibility that COVID may be part of a conspiracy intended to effect a communist uprising of sorts. But that’s all i have to say here. Hopefully something I said was helpful, even though I would like to believe no horrifying scenario will occur where some much deadlier virus is used to kill millions of people. It just feels necessary for me personally to consider the possibility, as the conditions have been created to get people ready for that absolute disaster scenario and subsequent tyranny.
I’m the same person as TrueSkeptic below, and I know you usually don’t respond to my comments, and maybe sometimes do not bother reading them either because you’re busy. Understandable. I usually comment about mandatory vaccination damage and original ideas i came up with surrounding that which seem important in showing the truth about how official pro vaxxer theories are complete nonsense, or ideas about society and how civilization should clearly be aiming for the end result of some stable steady state civilization in the future while still respecting individual rights and so on. For once, though, I found something which may be far more important in the short term than any of this vaccine information, as important as all that is. I’m usually adverse to posting anything too ‘conspiracy’-ish as TrueSkeptic, but in this case, i’m making an exception as this particular source has predicted an amazing number of events in the COVID pandemic this year. I know it may seem hard to believe at first but hopefully my mostly-accurate posts as TrueSkeptic have shown that i do have some actual evidence here, even if i am not 100% certain about the conclusion. As a side note, though, I do not expect you to actually approve the comment at all given how you don’t do conspiracy claims without full proof and probably also don’t want to let other people post conspiracy stuff on your blog. Honestly, that doesn’t matter at all to me as long as you actually read it and decide whether it makes any sense or not. As far as i’m aware the way these blog posts and comments work is that you have a choice between three options, approving the comment, leaving it awaiting approval, and deleting it, so you could just delete it if you think it’s all false and either approve it or leave it awaiting approval if you think it makes sense. If i’m misunderstanding this and you don’t have a delete button like that, then in that case i’d have no way to find out if you agree to any extent unless you approve it, but nonetheless, it does feel relatively worth it to post this.
The source video was made in September 2019, and i know the date of creation was not somehow backdated/faked because i watched this many many months ago. Probably should’ve mentioned it to you much earlier, to be honest. The central point of the video is that David Goldberg, the person who made it, allegedly got access to documents showing a 2 step plan to track down USA dissidents saying the truth about Zionism and Israel among other things. Part 1 supposedly was to have controlled opposition channels either mostly saying the truth aside from key points like Israeli influence and Zionism and so on or a few that said the whole truth, and for the people commenting on the channels to be put on a list, although it would take time for them to figure out who was who since many people use anonymous accounts. He said at the time in September 2019 they were about 76% done and had about six months to go before they could initiate the second part. Now here is where things start to line up incredibly well with events that happened in real life. Six months after September 2019 was April 2020, when the COVID death counts ramped up immensely. This matches up completely with what Goldberg said. He said that phase 2, Proejct Zyphr, was to go beyond just silencing the critics of Israel and Israel’s influence in the US and so on and actually eliminate people directly. And he said that the plan was to make most of the deaths seem natural by making it seem as if they died of the flu, while a few of the top dissidents would be directly attacked. And all of this is supposedly going to go down in Winter of 2020 as far as he guessed, as then it could be said that it was the flu. He also claimed that these eliminations were going to happen during long power outages, which would make sense, as that would prevent people from saying what was happening on the internet. He said that he thought the number of people that were going to be killed was in the millions and that it could even be 15 million, maybe more. Meanwhile someone would be blamed for causing the blackouts, he said it could be blamed on Iran.
Again, he said all of this before anyone knew about COVID at all. It all lines up in retrospect, with how he said economic collapse would be used alongside pretending a lot of planned deaths were due to natural causes. If all this is really true and COVID is part of this plan, then in my opinion COVID is probably some sort of test run to get everyone used to lockdowns, seize more government power, and set up an inevitable economic collapse for the 1st world along with a lot of the rest of the world. Then when they think they’re ready, they’d unleash a truly deadly plague. According to what he said the releasing of any virus used for this would probably be started in December this year, since that’s when he said they would want to start killing people with some kind of infections. During that time, presumably some people in on this conspiracy would deliberately infect dissidents with that disease one way or another or just infect the neighborhoods they live in so they could be exterminated without anyone knowing it was targeted. He was saying that the deaths would be called flu deaths, but if this is an honest source he might not have known they were planning to release a plague, and it wouldn’t really make sense for so many deaths to happen without being blamed on some kind of deadly disease, not just a flu. The timing of when Project Zyphr was supposedly going to start(6 months after september 2019, cue April when COVID ramped up in infections/deaths massively), the recent events this year which clearly have built up an incoming economic collapse which Goldberg said would be caused as an excuse for starting a new world government once national currencies are dead, pretty much everything in it lines up. I know some of the things he said like that Trump is a Jew or a Freemason seem pretty outlandish, and I’m not saying everything in this is necessarily true, but a whole lot does seem to have come true already. The basic claim he made was that lots of people would be given a virus so the dissidents could be killed and power could be seized, and during a nationwide blackout a few of those right wingers against Israel who were the ones running successful/big channels/sites/etc exposing the truth would get vanned and taken to camps or something along those lines. This would all be meant to lead to some kind of world government centered in Israel, with all the big countries financially collapsing at once, and the means of how they want to get that collapse done is now pretty clear with this COVID insanity. For all i know, if this Project Zyphr in the US claim is true, it might also be planned for some other countries too, especially if the means used to kill all those dissidents is a virus.
Some of the official scientists have been prepping everyone for this narrative of millions and millions dying if COVID is allowed to run out of control. So maybe there is a plan behind that narrative being pushed so strongly, to get people used to the idea for when they actually do it, even if the number of people told everything is probably pretty low. Combined with an ensuing worldwide economic collapse and possibly a viral attack on the US that was blamed on some other country, all that could then start a war that essentially dissolves the USA as a country if the US loses, it all fits. The damage to the world would then probably be blamed on capitalism’s instability and inability to prepare for a virus if the conspiracy won, with the solution offered being an authoritarian one world government that prevents any future outbreaks world wars. As for how that would specifically play out, i don’t know. But it seems clear to me that all the setup is there for this to be possible, from the censorship to the economic doom to everyone being prepared for mass fear and so on.
I’d be glad to be wrong about all this and for December and all of 2021 to pass without any negative events but there’s just too much this conspiracy theory has gotten right already in predicting 2020. I don’t personally believe the claims he made about Trump being in on some negative conspiracy like this, even though he is extremely pro Israel to a ridiculous extent. So maybe whatever documents Goldberg got access to were misleading, or maybe he was also in on this supposed conspiracy and just partly lying so that the real truth would never be exposed to the right people who could take action about it. If there’s a >50% chance that most of this really is real, then you should probably know, assuming there’s any chance of anyone doing anything to stop it at this point. I don’t bother expecting any of this to get fully posted as a comment here, as it is completely understandable that your site generally speaking isn’t a ‘conspiracy site’, you don’t make any hard and precise claims unless you have 100% proof. Like how the vaccine article uses so many sources. However, if a large portion of this conspiracy theory seems at all plausible to you then you can just leave my comment as ‘awaiting approval’ rather than outright deleting it and then i will know whether or not you agreed if a long time later it is still not deleted. At least, that is how i think this works. I’ll double check and post some relatively filler comment on another article while using the same account name, and if you delete that one and leave this one awaiting approval then I guess i’ll know that my ideas weren’t completely dismissed. Either that or it doesn’t work that way and you don’t have a button to delete awaiting approval comments, but i would figure out either way. Frankly, I would rather that they all be wrong and easily dismissed, but as explained previously, all the evidence seems to line up indicating this may be a very real and very serious threatening situation coming up soon, even if some of the details are not right. Hopefully it all proves to be nonsense, but i’m not holding my breath. If it isn’t, i suppose what would have to happen is that any truly dangerous plague meant to be released on the people at the right time is found before it can be used and the people involved in preparing to use it are caught and so on. As i seriously doubt that any conspiracy like this could involve them suddenly saying Flu killed 15 million people this year in the USA. It would be more like a power grab/coup essentially.
Final note:It is a strange fact how coincidental some things seem to be in life. For example, how the Russian Revolution was just a year before the Spanish Flu. Coincidence? Or was it maybe intentionally released as a weapon? That part wasn’t my original idea, it was from a conspiracy site. However, there is one incredibly strange coincidence I’ll close this with. That took place roughly 100 years ago. In fact, the emergence date of COVID is only about 2 years off from being exactly 100 years later than when the Spanish Flu appeared And if COVID also corresponds to a sort of communist revolution attempt, that is extremely strange. Even if COVID was somehow released as part of a plan, the fact that it’s almost exactly 100 years later is just bizzare. I’m guessing that if it was planned to use COVID, it was not also planned to make it nearly perfectly line up. This is a case where I can’t help but feel that historical cycles are a thing on some metaphysical or supernatural level. It is just absolutely bizzare. Hopefully that doesn’t mean that any communist uprising associated with COVID in the US is successful, as that would be a total disaster for the world.
Hopefully something I said was helpful in showing the truth, I do think i presented all of this well. Please do watch the video. I’d rather be wrong, but if a good deal of this is right, then someone like you in a seemingly important position needs to see it. Assuming you read this far, thanks for reading.
TES – in undertanding MiHoDAL ( I followed the hyperlink and back), is an ES susceptible to this error by implication alone? In other words, by simply assuming a position of challenging a (presumably) false statement in light of multiple observations by presenting counter-information – does this count as a MiHoDeAL? When is the right time to “strike” back?
~James
Cool article. Never knew some illnesses were gamed by the system like that, with an artificial more dangerous version created as a result of the vaccination. Although at this point, saying you’re pro vaccine is completely meaningless. There’s essentially nothing being done to continuously prove all this is safe.
I would suggest you read his three entries related to ‘vaccinials’. He has also stated several times with caveat that he is pro-vaccine as the schedule was in the 80’s, versus the recommended schedule of today. The blogs on Vaccinials justify his advocation as well as his caution.
A foreign group that pretends to be the same as the natives leads in a ton of hostile immigrants that it calls oppressed when in reality those immigrants caused their own problems back in their native countries, and will bring those problems with them if allowed to go in and replace the native population/take control from them…
So what you’re saying is that basically, the USA is like this? https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XZ2tnim51cE/TpuuEPvay3I/AAAAAAAABGQ/pNoQDQqDp_A/s1600/battle_count.PNG
By the way, single point, short comment, just feels needed. I found what seems to be an original and pretty important counter argument to ‘But better ways of diagnosing autism must have caused the rise in Autism from 1 in 10’000 to 1 in 50 in 30 years’, one i haven’t seen made anywhere else, even here.
Clearly that diagnosis claim did nothing to deserve being the null hypothesis, other than being convenient. But to get to it quick, here is the obvious disproof i thought of:If better ways of diagnosing autism had been the cause, then the autism rate would’ve risen in SPIKES and leveled off mostly until a new improved way of finding autists was found and then spiked again when a new one was found! It could NOT have risen as a steady line! Furthermore, the somewhat steady line of autism rates increasing in your graph obviously dovetails with the increased vaccine counts as you showed and that just buries that argument completely. Finally, and this is important: Now that autism diagnosis is supposedly understood by the scientists, and has been understood for at least a decade, it should not be rising anymore whatsoever! If it is genetic and not contagious, there is NO reason it could ever steadily rise like that again once it was fully understood! Now, if autism was intentionally caused by vaccines, on the other hand, there is plenty of reason it would continue to somehow steadily hit more and more children…
Furthermore, consider this equally important disproof of the Diagnosis Hypothesis:If autism WAS being merely discovered more and had been in the same numbers all along, why would all the autistic people be children?!? If autism is just a genetic disorder of some sort then it should be evenly spread across old and young people. It should not be focused on children or more accurately those under 30 years old. Why would it be largely concentrated in children? Autism doesn’t go away as you get older, so there’s only one other reason, which would be that many more children started getting Autism recently. Children are the ones getting the most vaccines…So of course the damage is largest in those currently under 30 years old who have received these increased numbers of shots their whole lives. There’s probably still damage in people who are between 30 to 40 years old, as even the 40 year olds were 10 year olds back when the vaccine schedules first started ramping up, so they might’ve still gotten badly damaged during the timespan of 1990 to 2000. The group of people expected to be mostly undamaged by vaccines in my view would be those who are ~50 or older and have received few vaccinations since this got started in 1989. A pretty testable hypothesis IMO. I don’t have the solid data for this, but you might know of a way to show that the ones who are autistic are generally young for the most part which does not fit the ridiculous diagnosis ‘hypothesis’.
Anyway, clearly it is a ridiculous claim that autism just increased because better means of diagnosis were found. I think i have pretty decisively disproven that claim with this argument coupled with the excellent graph you made about the rise of autism correlating with the rise of the vaccine schedule. Haven’t seen this argument i just made argued by any other Anti Vaxxer source that i know of so I do feel at least semi confident this is original and uniquely helpful in some way in showing the truth about vaccines causing autism. It would feel fully complete if i had the proper data showing that the children and those under 30 years old are the lion’s share of the Autistic people as I’m hypothesizing, and you may have that data, so it feels important to mention to you in case it might lead to a big discovery like that.
Although, I do not feel like the fact that it’s mostly hitting kids is extremely controversial or needing of lots of proof. Most of the big autism stats talk about how it is largely becoming so epidemic in boys, not in ‘men’ in general. 1 in 47 boys and so on. Even so, I do think my argument would be that much more decisive if there was a clear statistic saying what % of men with Autism are <30 years old and so on, that would be an extra layer of consilience showing that it’s the increased vaccine schedule that’s caused all this.
To be fair, after a re-read it seems that you did address the nonsense diagnosis argument really thoroughly, and i wasn’t trying to say you didn’t. But you seem to have ‘buried the lead’ somewhat there, at least from my point of view, to the point where it takes thorough scanning to even see your one line where you said the curve was gentle and that the seeming ‘jumps’ in it do not correspond to increased/better diagnosis, if i remember right. My other points still seem correct and original though. AKA, what i said about the Average Age of Autistic people showing that it is caused by vaccines, or the continuous increase in Autism rates showing that better diagnosis methods are not the cause as those diagnosis methods were finished over a decade ago. Hopefully those two were clear, original, and helpful in adding extra consilience layers to really just drive it home to more people that autism is being caused by vaccines, not genetics.
I like what you write. May I recommend a writing method to simplify, clarify, and improve your written content? Omit the unnecessary use of “in order” in all instances of “in order to…” to read just “to…” as writing best practice. For reference, see https://prowritingaid.com/grammar/1000097/When-can-you-omit-in-order-in-a-sentence
Enjoy!
You are correct! I had 15 instances where I used “in order to”. Now realize that this document was not written as a single flow of continuity in story or sitting. When an essay is read in one sitting, these types of grammar habits become grating on the nerves, yes. But that was excessive nonetheless. However, I do have one exception to this wise grammar style:
When a conditional ‘to’ is used to introduce a new series or modify a series member – and avoid amphibology in the process. I kept 3 instances where this clarity in phrase was critical. For example, the second sentence below is an amphibology, not clear as to whether or not a modification of an existing series member has been introduced or the existing series is simply being continued. The second version is not correct – because it can be interpreted two ways.
Equivocation – the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning, sense, or use in professional context by glossing over which meaning is intended in the instance of usage, in order to misdefine, inappropriately include or exclude data in an argument.
Equivocation – the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning, sense, or use in professional context by glossing over which meaning is intended in the instance of usage, to misdefine, inappropriately include or exclude data in an argument.
Honestly, the more i read of this the more utterly amazing it is to me how much actually relevant info is gathered here in one place. Obviously, that graph correlating the rise of vaccine schedules with autism rates is the best graph out there i know of, but that’s simply me knowing how much autism there is, not WHY and HOW people’s brains are damaged by the vaccines. Skeptics have infinitely high goal posts for any position but their own, so it always seemed to me that to argue any antivax position i had to not only have the evidence of correlation and lots of anecdotal cases, but also to show the exact mechanism or some similarly ridiculous set of standards. I got around to seeing Forrest Maready’s Crooked documentary recently and it was mind blowing. The observable evidence is RIGHT THERE on people’s crooked faces for anyone to see that vaccine damage is happening, it’s undeniable. Best vaccine documentary I’ve ever seen, to be honest. It lays out everything, the probable mechanism, the observable evidence any non professional can see, the anecdotal typical cases, the logic, everything. Well, everything except the ultra-critical correlations between vaccine schedules and autism as shown in your graphs and so on, but nobody’s perfect. Even in that regard, he had good graphs like when he was showing a case where scarlet fever diminished in the same way as other illnesses that got vaccinated did, even though it did not have a vaccine made for it. It seems like he focused more on the earliest cases of vaccines than recent times when it came to graphs he included in the documentary. But it doesn’t really matter. Bottom line is anyone seeing the documentary who didn’t quickly activate neurolinguistic programming and refuse to see the clear evidence would know that he is being honest and making a persuasive argument, and I am glad to have been able to indirectly figure out about Forrest Maready and his documentary from looking through your content. I’m going to just focus on one key point for this post to keep it from being too long, and it seems like a good complement to what your blog has already said about the damage caused by vaccine.
Basically, in this section I’ll be making the argument of lazy and hysterical mandatory vaxxers for them, only to show that the ideal attempt to prove vaccines work is still entirely wrong and incredibly lacking. The idea starts with looking at the vaccine schedules from 1990 to 2020 going up over 5x as you poitned out. What’s the improvement in health caused by this? Pro-vaxxers should be clear about how many lives they think have been saved by these increases in vaccine schedules. It’s like a math equation. First start with the proposed damage antivaxxers state is going on with their many anecdotal cases and more detailed proofs, of how many millions of people have been ruined or at least damaged. Then the pro vaxxers state how many millions all these extra shots are supposed to have helped. But they don’t do that. They always use emotional arguments accusing antivaxxers of evil and causing harm. They usually cite claims about polio being eradicated by vaccines, but this argument is extremely poor. One vaccine working wouldn’t prove that none of them are sabotaged, and Forrest Maready seemingly has evidence that even the polio shot had issues, being correlated with the original discovery of autism. Not sure on that. Either way you get the point. These increases in vaccine schedules to insane levels were not correlated with the sudden appearance of new diseases or illnesses. The amount of damage they have caused is far more than any potential benefit claimed of them. Honestly you can probably make a much more persuasive case than me on that point and look through what they’ve said about the benefits of that rapid increase in vaccine schedules from say 5 or so shots to 47 from 1989 to 2020. But the basic principle should be pretty clear. Let’s just look at the damage number you claimed, 15M-30M USA citizens over the last 30 years having gotten permanently brain damaged if i understand this right. Meanwhile the medical establishment make whatever claims they want, usually focusing on now eradicated diseases like smallpox or polio and saying how over a hundred million lives have been saved by vaccination as a result. They don’t specifically focus on the incredibly increased vaccine schedule for largely non lethal illnesses, because doing so would show how this vast forced increase in vaccination doesn’t correspond to some great reduction in deaths. I still think it would be very helpful if you could prove how their claims about risk mitigation are often wrong or simply misleading or not even made at all, and how the actual amount of damage caused far exceeds any benefit that would supposedly be granted by this increase in vaccine schedules. It simply frustrates me quite a bit that this sort of tyranny can be imposed willy nilly without a single consequence. “Polio smallpox etc gone” feels like the “Cases Cases Cases” of Vaccines if you know what i mean. A way to distract, and even that claim about polio may be wrong for all i know based on what Forrest Maready’s saying. But the point is it’s not the same. Vaccinations everyone gets aren’t the same when the disease isn’t going to be eradicated. Especially patently ridiculous things like young boys getting the HPV shot as mandatory. The point is, people were given far more shots without some massive reduction in child mortality as a result or anything of the sort. Measles was not going to wipe everyone out. At its absolute worst in the US, it killed about 1’500 people in a year. If you want a chart showing just how little of a positive impact the vaccine schedule increases made in the USA from 1989 to 2020, just look at this link, and have it start at 1990.
Assuming this is correct, those vaccine schedule increases had very little positive effect. Basically nothing compared to the millions and millions ruined for life by them. The most generous possible estimate would be to say that 100% of the decline in that graph was due to the increase in vaccinations, and even if that was somehow true, here is how many American lives would’ve been saved as a result during that time period:Maybe somewhere around 35’000 in total. In all realistic likelihood, not even a fifth of that, since some people were going to die of tuberculosis either way. In fact, hepatitis B increased substantially for around a decade in that graph, seemingly showing the vaccine for it to be ineffective. The point is there is basically no death being caused by all these illnesses. Now a pro vaxxer might leap to the argument that this just means the minimum vaccination requirements were in place even before 1990 to ensure no substantial harm was happening, and that could be true, but that just defeats the entire argument for the vaccine schedules ramping up exponentially as they have. What was the point? Why did kids need so many more shots if it didn’t actually decrease the deaths from vaccine preventable diseases any substantial amount? Is there some other health factor that they’ll argue has improved as a result of increased vaccination during that period? I doubt it. The reality is that it just made medical companies a whole lot of money, and that the intent at the highest levels was to ruin people out of malice with autism and other inflicted ailments, along with profit motives satisfied by creating a more easily manipulated and unintelligent population.
Anyway, I hope that chart was informative enough. There is no argument for why mandatory vaccines needed to be increased so exponentially during that time period, it did not benefit the people in any substantial way. To me, including that aspect, doing the argument of the lazy pro-vaxxers for them and showing even the ideal attempt to argue to be wrong, just makes it that little bit better. What’s the benefit we’re all supposed to have gotten out of these forced shots? A few thousand lives saved, some more saved from getting a single brief case of an illness and then becoming immune for the rest of their lives? Again, many of these illnesses were already being vaccinated for BEFORE the vast increase in vaccine schedules. There wasn’t some epidemic of tens of thousand of people dying of child mortality as a result. In fact, i screened for that when investigating this official-seeming source. Checking from 1990 to 2020, i looked at the child mortality numbers for the USA from that source i got the previous graph from. It compares child mortality to a percent vaccinated for the Dtap shot. From 1980 to 2015, child mortality went down from 2% to 1%, while the overall Dtap vaccination percentage DECREASED. Now clearly, Dtap is just one set of vaccine preventable illnesses, but as previously explained, there are hardly any deaths to go around from all the vaccine preventable illnesses combined in the first place. So, it is pretty obvious that 1% drop was almost entirely not due to vaccines.
Pro vaxxers would probably then shift the argument to 3rd world countries or other places where the % vaccinated in any way has gone up substantially. But that is once again missing the point. The point is that the vaccines that do actually work have been in place for a long time, since at least 1990 and probably a while before. Meanwhile, the vast increase in vaccine amounts starting at around 1990 has not corresponded at all to actually reducing mortality rates from these illnesses. Instead, it has correlated with the unimaginable increase in Autism rates from essentially being altogether unknown to being 1 in 50 at best estimate and rising, in 30 years. That is not genetics, that is not ‘increased diagnoses’, it is mass vaccination poisoning as all the 1000s of anecdotes have showed.
Long argument short:The vaccine schedule increases have demonstrably done little to no good in reducing mortality rates for the past 30 years, they have demonstrably caused an unfathomable amount of harm on tens of millions in that same time span, and the mechanisms by which the harm occurs are becoming increasingly clear as documentaries like Crooked show. The only missing pieces of the puzzle are which groups started the sabotage with which vaccines, and how they can actually be caught and so on.
Anyway, that’s it. I hope my points all generally made sense and acted as new and useful ideas in addition to what you already outlined here. The claimed benefits for this massive ramp up in no way warrant mass enforced injections on all children, and the results that have ensued have been horrific. Good luck with what you are doing in enlightening people about this issue and other issues. You’ve really shown the truth here in a way better than practically any other antivax source I’ve read and I think this kind of knowledge you’ve shown could change the world if only more people knew the full set of facts.
As just one last brief extension of a missed point of the ‘what benefit did vaccine schedule expansion give from 1990 to 2020’ argument, let us look at another parallel issue:Obesity. Millions of people have their lives ruined by eating fast foods and so on that make people obese. The amount of damage caused by letting people eat these foods and letting businesses sell these clearly damaging foods is far far more than the few thousand deaths vaccine schedule expansion might’ve prevented in the last thirty years. If that kind of food hadn’t been allowed to become mainstream, the USA might be full of skinny and much healthier people today, rather than the land of the obese and fat.
So, the obvious question is this:What’s the goal post for ‘health harm’ where you step in and say the government decides what goes into people’s bodies and forces them to get injected? It makes no sense to on the one hand permit these damaging and ruining foods and on the other hand enforce so many extra vaccines when that increase in vaccines only prevented maybe a few thousand deaths, and caused millions of people to be braindamaged for life and ruined. If the government can enforce vaccines like that, it should be banning these toxic foods that are ruining the culture and character of people in the USA. Note that i am not saying that we should ban all cigarettes or anything. But honestly even I would be hard pressed to say it’d be universally bad if the government took at least some action against this fast food obesity epidemic that’s been ruining the USA for decades. It would’ve been far better if things had never been allowed to get this bad health wise for USA with everyone becoming fat and obese, it is insane.
That’s it for that. Just pointing out it’s totally hypocritical and ridiculous how this mandatory vaccine morality standard works. The harm from some of these fast foods has been truly immense and changed what the average American looks like and acts like horribly. It seems to me this ‘freedom’ is only allowed to people as long as they use freedom to harm themselves, and on the other hand, when free choice would let people avoid sabotaged toxic vaccines, it is prohibited in a tyrannical way. This shit is insane.
TES – the science community is slowly coming round to the idea that it’s the oceans warming and not the atmosphere: “Forest fires in Australia and California, droughts and water shortages in the Mediterranean—in the last few years, events such as these have become more frequent. Researchers attribute this to the fact that the tropics, the warm region surrounding the Equator, appear to be expanding. And that leads to the affected areas becoming hotter and drier….the reason for the expansion appears to be an altered warming of the ocean.” https://phys.org/news/2020-09-major-wind-driven-ocean-currents-shifting.amp
Sometimes My Question Is Why We Know A Little Bit About Simple Things. So Simpler Once We Get More Rational.
For The Universe Size I Rather Doubt That The Answer Is:
All Will Be Someday Vanished As Never Existed ( A Yet-Admitted Explaining Way ). That Measures Aren’t Necessary.
But I Ignore If This Can Make A Total Sense 😅❕Thank You E.S❣️
Hi there, just found this blog and the story. I enjoy reading content published here. Regarding the story, it is a very interesting one as it shows how most of us would react in ‘paranormal’ instances. I would probably react as your friend… I just wonder what was happening in the house Kevin… Was it a real apparation or something else at hand? A lot of time has passed since the event was published, did you hear from Kevin about the event again and how he sees it today? Best regards, MF
“ Heck, 16 knots of wind are required to move an object floating on the water 1 knot (an object without a sail)”
Enjoyed the article. Thank you. A very minor point: a ‘knot’ is a measure of speed (a nautical mile per hour), not distance. I believe you intended to say the wind moved the floating object one nautical mile (nm = one minute of latitude).
No, I mean knot in speed (nautical mile per hour). A certain velocity of wind will produce a certain velocity of an object floating on the water. It is posed as it should be.
I have read through this page a number of times over the past few weeks to better grasp your methods and my understanding of this COVID-19 debacle has increased substantially. Thank you especially for your quite readable graphs.
I agree that, in too many ways, we have handled and continue to handle COVID incorrectly, but while most analysis focuses on what is being done incorrectly, little is said about a proper response to a virus. Briefly, how you think the USA (or any other country) should have responded to COVID in Feb/March of 2020? Keep everything open? Protect the elderly? And what would be the most prudent way to proceed today?
Increasing atmospheric temperature of Venus at mid-latitudes is possible by the exotic explanation of post-Einstein gravity theory. This possibility appears to have been omitted by the science community involved. Microbial life as a source of the phosphine detected is therefore a lot less likely, due to phosphine being produced in gas giants Jupiter and Saturn without biological processes.
The latest evidence that strong gravitational attraction exists between the centre of the Sun and the centre of the planets. A seismic anomaly and magnetic effect occur for just 30 seconds as the inner moon of Mars, Phobos, eclipses the solar disc. Note that the space probe and instruments are located on a flat equatorial plane. https://youtu.be/8SMgn16qVI0
A basic amino acid has now been found in the low mid-latitudes of Venus: “Like glycine, it was also detected more strongly at mid-latitudes.” This lends itself to equatorial cooling/mid-latitude warming hypothesis due to increasing exotic core interaction ” https://t.co/sieMii5ze4
Firstly, thank you so much for making the resource of this website available! Just found it today and have already recommended it to my dad. Thought I’d see what was here on the topic of theism/atheism/agnosticism.
I agree that atheism is not a religion per se. However, atheism holds to unproven and empirically unprovable beliefs about the origin of the universe. It may not be a religion, but it is certainly therefore comparable to a faith, and it denies certain possibilities relating to cosmology, consciousness and biogenesis. It is, at the very least, a presupposition. Agnosticism seems to me a more intellectually honest approach, but ‘not knowing’, though a great place to begin, provides little joy as a destination.
The way I distinguish believers is by this delineation:
Atheism does not hold beliefs about the universe. Nihilism does this. The point of the article is that we conflate nihilism as atheism, when the former is a religion and the latter is a philosophy. Nihilism is a religion, however is not a faith, because it bears no hope in its religious tenets. Nihilism is an intellectual pretense, because it pretends to be based upon science. Faith, admits its baseless founding, yet is purposed aside from this to be genuine.
Dear EthicalSkeptic,
This is exactly the article which I newly followed later.
Just thanking you for such superior material.
And asking you only once about my own TicTac UFO ‘’ Evidence ‘’ , Paranoia & some hypothesis you noticed them on Twitter❣️🧠
Only Thank You Very Much ..❕❕
You’ve done some excellent research. The increase in tidal range of 25% and increase in global ocean currents of at least 15% fits with the idea of increasing earth-tides. These are the solid body deformation of the crust due to gravity acting across the entire globe. The oceans are effectively pushed from underneath. These earth-tides can reach upto around a meter in equatorial regions. I propose that a careful satellite study should be undertaken to test whether these are increasing in amplitude. There have been studies which indicate the equatorial waters are cooling. Heat could be increasingly transferred to the mid & high latitudes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/06/24/pacific-ocean-cold-tongue/
Loved This Certainty Or How Aliens Reject We ‘ Skeptic ‘.
I Even Did Not Ask About The EthicalSkeptic View & Opinion !
Sure When Aliens Too Purely Think Through Rational Way & Judging.
Interesting post, a few ideas, I suspect the changing tides have a great deal to do with the amount of Arctic waters driven south, these are ‘native’ to a tangential speed of perhaps 250kph and consequently hold fast to the east coast which has a much higher tangential speed, that is until it clashes with the Gulf stream which slowly overcomes it’s own inertia to leave the same coast around the Carolinas so the inertial pressure of the two build tides against the coast. The ocean currents may be speeding up due to a related cause, Atlantic waters are penetrating ever deeper into the Arctic and forcing previous inflows ever further around the continental slope. Right now it looks like they have forced themselves around Chukchi plateau and have induced the Pacific waters incoming from Bering into a current that circles into the center of Beaufort. Overcoming the inertia of the Arctic Ocean has been a slow process but perhaps it’s initial new state is being established as the incoming Atlantic waters build up the pressure on incumbent waters driving them, since they are near surface [50m+/-] whilst the waters replacing them flow into the depths. It also appears that the deep Atl. current that flows around northern Greenland [http://muenchow.cms.udel.edu/papers/29-4_munchow.pdf] is speeding up perhaps due to a ‘flywheel’ effect and as a consequence tidally modulated flows penetrate across northern Ellesmere and onwards. This is accelerating the opening up of the channels of the Canadian arctic archipelago through which the Beaufort ‘freshwater’ lens has begun to flow, so if the currents that serve up the Gulf stream are constant a period of higher low/high tides should follow.
I’ve begun to think that the Earths magnetic field is somewhat like a frozen z-pinch, this evolving since i discovered that ships use the same compass for both poles, that suggests a similarity of charge entering/leaving at either pole perhaps only differing in spin. If the z-pinch is the right model then we should expect outgoing forces at the equator somewhat like the south atlantic anomoly, except there should be two. Setting that aside when the sun is quiescent as at present the Earth is on the receiving end of more radiation and that is evidenced by northern/southern lights, what i suspect is that some fraction of that radiation is either reacting with heavy elements and causing small cascades of fission, or more likely it is reacting with the iron core and creating both denser elements and hydrogen ions. The hydrogen ions then percolate upwards scavenging oxygen from all possible sources and this creates a prolonged cascade of exothermic reactions catalysed by the supercritical water which metamorphoses rock as it permeates it and carries solutes ever upwards.
Here [https://earth.nullschool.net/#2020/08/20/1200Z/ocean/primary/waves/overlay=sea_surface_temp/orthographic=-42.86,82.60,699/loc=118.561,81.739] you’ll see a small cold anomaly directly above the crater/caldera[?] at the far end of Gakel ridge, by Laptev, if you move through the days you’ll see similar anomalies appearing all along that ridge, i’ve no idea what could be outgassing that cools the ocean surface so much as it evaporates.
I have come to the conclusion that the solid earth-tides are increasing in strength. This would have the affect of pushing the oceans from beneath, bringing extra warm bottom water from equatorial regions to both the Arctic & Antarctic Oceans. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide
It may be that Earth tides are increasing, if that’s the case then i would suspect the increased influx of high energy radiation is causing an uptick in the creation of hydrogen ions and a consequent increase in exothermic reactions softening up the mantle, and I’ve come to suspect that vulcanism associated with ‘low’ solar activity, or ensuing shortly after has had an unremarked affect on climate.
The higher sea level and higher low tides that affect the east coast are, in my view, associated with the lack of kinetic energy of those waters. The gulf waters arising off Africa are already slower than the local tangential speed and consequently move west, pushing into the north Atlantic uses up an enormous amount of inertia so those waters hold fast to the coast until the tangential speed begins to drop more rapidly, say 35N, similarly the Arctic waters have too little inertia and continue to have relatively less as they move south so they remain hard by the coast until they are forced off by more inert waters flowing in their wake, in this way a huge body of relatively inert water awaits sufficient energy input from the southern waters to push it far enough north for it to move east.
Alan, it took a while, but then altering ones understanding always does, but I’m ‘warming’ to the idea of oceanic tides being forced by earth-tides, and if the crust itself is heating up then why wouldn’t it ‘flex’ more. The Arctic ocean is clearly waking up, a process now accelerating with the loss of Barents sea ice and it’s dampening effect on atlantic current caught between it and the underlying bathymetry. Could this itself have been caused by increased tidal forcing? I made a gif to help me understand the tidal forcings/interplay involved a little better, https://giphy.com/gifs/fYT63Cq7JjGKourprU and this animation from Mercator illustrates how deep into the arctic atlantic waters have penetrated http://bulletin.mercator-ocean.fr/en/permalink/PSY4/animation/3/20200917/20201023/2/2
It seems there are two return currents evolving one from the depths north of the N.S.I and another from north of Wrangel-Chukchi rise both moving generally towards Fram so slowly making the arctic an extension/arm of the atlantic.
Thanks for your indulgence E.S.
I propose exotic matter at the cores of Jupiter’s moons is creating their mystery heat:
“Researchers might have to reconsider their understanding of how these ocean moons evolved and where most of their heat is coming from according to a new study in AGU’s journal Geophysical Research Letters suggests that these Galilean moons, might play a bigger role in the ebb and flow of each other’s tides than the big planet they orbit does because of a phenomenon called tidal resonance. This newly discovered relationship between the moons means researchers might have to reconsider their understanding of how these ocean moons evolved and where most of their heat is coming from.”
(I propose the same effect of Jupiter on Earth is increasing tidal energy which transports extra heat from the equatorial regions towards the polar regions) https://dailygalaxy.com/2020/09/moon-power-subsurface-tides-on-jupiters-ocean-worlds-create-hotspots-for-life/amp/
This is fantastic. Now i’m going to read your other posts. One comment, and hopefully you will take this as constructive criticism, why in the world don’t you use the Oxford comma? :)
I was taught by my AP English prof, in my university science undergrad curriculum that the Oxford Comma is used for technical and series writing – eg. “Your specification should indicate power phase, amplitude, voltage, watts, and peak demand.” However, when one is writing a triplicate in prose or poetry – the comma is considered duplicative with the last connector “and”, as well as utilitarian-gauche – eg. “Trevor longed for a break from the tumultuous pitching of the seas; pining over a distant happiness, home and hearth.”
However, you will find that habit prevails and memory fails in my consistency with such understanding. But great point!! Thanks.
I can’t even believe how magnificent and beautiful your work is…. I just found you through the recommendation of J. C. Couey. .. this is the most amazing site….
You write:”There is only one energy source in contact-proximity to the Earth’s oceans, which can deliver enough kinetic energy to speed up all the Earth’s ocean currents by 15% in just two decades… and it is not the sun, and certainly not the Earth’s atmosphere.”
What if the center of the Earth is not molten iron but plasma? Plasma which is ”heated” by the activity of the sun via induction.
Nice article.
How do you feel about the greenhouse effect?
I have a whole blog about how the greenhouse effect is nothing but geothermal flipped upside down. Care to comment?
Great website! Yes, I too carried around the notion of the Greenhouse for decades. I held this from 1971 really, after reading Carl Sagan’s ‘Cosmic Connection’. Then of course all the science supporting the Greenhouse idea came AFTER the idea was promoted as true. Just like all the testing on the safety on Glyphosate was done AFTER it was already 40% of our pesticide use. Then we all started getting sick as a nation, and the lawsuits flew.
But this is how fake science or social skepticism is deployed – answer first, intimidation second, scant linear-inductive studies when they are forced to do them. No one has researched geothermal heat changes… not true field-deduction, only armchair and statistics ‘research’.
We have not examined the geothermal contribution ‘because we don’t have to… Watts/square meter blah blah’. This type of thinking has shown historically to be 90% sure to be wrong.
Fourier was a geothermal denier before he ever saw a borehole temperature gradient. Mainstream climate scientists are all following a guy who had zero clue. How embarassing is that?
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
First of all, I’m sorry to hear that your son suffered injury and hope that your family manage to live fulfilling lives nonetheless. I also wanted to thank you for shining a light in this current time of collective madness – I’m refering to covid-19 and the reactions of governments worldwide.
I was wondering whether you have examined other environmental effects (time spent beind screens, exposure to chemicals, etc…) as possible cause for this decrease in IQ/increase in Brain injury? I do agree that absence of proof of risk doesn’t equal proof of absence of risks for vaccination, so the fact that other possible explanations exists doesn’t give a free pass to discard potential safety issue with medical treatments – but I’m still wondering to what extent mass vaccination is causing this issue vs other factors that evolved in the meantime.
Well, the effect starts well before 3 years of age. So, this leads me to believe that it is ingested in some form. Not many 3 years olds or less are that heavily screen exposed. Environmental chemicals which both poison body endocrine systems as well as kill gut flora – those are a problem and definitely play into this with some overlap.
But we have a grand experiment going on here now with Covid:
– screen times are UP significantly
– eating habits are focused on the home and mass produced commercial foods
– vaccinations are put-off by a substantial to majority amount
SIDS, ASD, AutoImmune in our kids will drop accordingly… SIDS already has.
This is a deductive experiment. Watch those actors who purposely seek to hide its effect or even being spoken about. They are not honest, relying upon the principle that less testing/information is more sciencey.
Thanks for the answer!
Regarding the natural experiment provided to us, intuitively I would think that (assuming vaccinations in the US resume in a close future) our ability to observe a drop will depend on the natural variability in the time to onset of symptoms from vaccination events (if there is a very large variability in the time from event to onset of symptoms compared to the duration of the “no-vaccine” phase, I have the impression that – under the hypothesis that there is a causal relationship between the two – the “missing” cases of SIDS, ASD, etc… will be “diluted” in time and could be hard to see), but yes if the cases drop this would definitely be of major interest. Do you have a reference for the evolution of SIDS?
Max
Myself Accepted Which Is A More Serious Alternative & Which Is Not With Quite Difficulty.
.. But I Will Soon Enjoy 😉 Evident Reality & Real Skepticism❣️🧠
Honestly I Wondered A Lot About Aliens & Only Was Depended On My Most Emotional Theories.
Loved How .. EthicalSkeptic You Helped Me Retaking My Wonder Since More Magical ZeroConclusion & EmptyOfAnswer Beginning.
.. But Still Hungry About All It 🌀❕L.O.L.
A very thorough article. You are one of the few that is considering the core. One other person i know is Tom who has been voicing this for a while, the fact that is complete idiocy when it comes to global warming, to not admit for consideration the earth interior but only focus on the atmosphere when that only makes up like 0.0001% of the earth mass. His theory is slightly different to yours but sort of related.
Not sure if u have seen his work, but I wouldn’t mind getting your thoughts on it? His layman summary video is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lLgA9C1G4c . His paper on his core concept is http://nujournal.net/eccores1.pdf.
If his theory has any merit, the consequences is too frightening to fathom…
Thanks
I am having a bit of trouble understanding your figures. You have Died ‘Of’ numbers at 138,148 and Died ‘With at 57,034. Those 2 added together add up to 195,182 – which you list as CDC All-Causes Excess Total, but then you also have ‘Lockdown Fatalities at 50,094. Shouldn’t the All-Causes Total be the 195,182 + 50,094.
Take a look at the ‘Covid-19 Fatality Full Accountability Chart 1’ – It actually depicts the math in a 2-degree circle chart. Yeah, the numbers get convoluted, so I use circle charts to show both the logic and that the numbers round out to equal the entire sum of CDC excess all-cause deaths.
I didn’t notice that ‘5 million famine deaths’ number among this list on my first read. Thinking about it, it is just crazy. The same people who went into a frenzy at Trump for ‘locking down too late'(Of course, they weren’t screaming at him to do it until he’d already cut off china travel but whatever), and at the tens of thousands of corona deaths, are pretty silent about literally MILLIONS of people now being dead…I’m reading that correctly, right? 5 million people worldwide already died of famine as a result of the lockdowns affecting world economies? Although I’m assuming it’s spread out across the whole world, more particularly in 3rd world nations as you said where the exports going way down from the 1st world results in them lacking the food they need.
Anyway, gee. If the media was willing to support riots over a single person dying from having their neck kneeled on, how should they be reacting to 5 MILLION people dying? As for the insane “If even one person is saved it was worth it” people, I wonder if any of those people or those supporting the refugees in Europe noticed this little fact. If they were consistent with their attitude towards poverty and welfare in the USA shouldn’t they literally be calling it a second Holocaust at that rate? And although usually that kind of claim of fear that someone’s going to do that is just made by hysterical people, at least in death tolls, this really is kind of similar, even if spread out across many nations so there is no genocide level effect on any one place. 5 million is >>>>100’000 corona deaths in USA. Although as you showed the ‘true’ death toll of people who weren’t going to die in the same year either way was only 50K. 50K vs 5 million and counting.
There are a variety of ‘chain reaction’ effects that might not show up on statistics as damage caused by the lockdown, but exist nonetheless. For example, lockdown deaths, life years lost, # of jobs lost, suicide rates increasing after the lockdown, all this shows very much. But what about all the people who lost their jobs and therefore had no healthcare anymore and subsequently died of a condition they couldn’t treat without being able to pay for healthcare? That wouldn’t show up on the statistics, but there might be 1000s of people who died like that already in USA. They’d just show up as people who died of their various conditions without the fact that they lacked care due to the lockdown being marked down, I think. Plus, deaths are easily noticed by the system, but all sorts of psychological damage is inevitably taking place right now with many people, much of which will not be noticed. Think of all the people who might start taking anti depressants at this point due to the virus. An increase in drug use is a likely side effect that’s going to hit many people if this is allowed to continue, which could create new lasting addictions. But all these are indirect chain reactions. The real kicker are the problem reaction solution types of events that can be thrown down from above. In the interests of not making this a speculatory post, I’ll say nothing there that real life important people haven’t already said they are thinking about doing. The lockdown has already shown the hand of malicious people ruling the govt. They are fine with paralyzing the vital work needed to keep civilization functioning and basically throwing everyone into economic doom by force. Certain individuals like Alan “Literally Jab a Needle into your Arm” Dershowitz have already openly said what they want to do in response to the coronavirus, like force-vaccinating everyone. Literally directly injecting some unknown un-overseen substance into 300 million people without them having any choice in the matter or ability to independently check just what’s in it. Seriously, what are they going to say next? At this point, all former inhibitions of oppressive people seem off the table. A New Zealand style gun ban would not be surprising for Biden to push, it by definition already has precedent in New Zealand, and again, there are big name lawyers making these insane claims of injecting everyone in a country by force, adults included. Unprecedented insane things like that. In 2015 mass immigration was already allowed into Europe, which caused lots of problems for the native populations without them consenting to this at all. Even warmongering is not an unprecedented thing for American Presidents to do, and could happen if Biden becomes president, which could then be used to push lots more authoritarianism as a result of a war time culture, or mass immigration as an aftermath of that. Remember, Biden was IN FAVOR of the Iraq War, while Trump wasn’t. Sure, Trump wasn’t a politician at the time, but at least he is consistent on not being a warmonger. And this is not an ‘all wars are bad’ argument, Iraq was just clearly one of those in my opinion.
I feel like just summarizing addressing the topic of ‘Conspiracy Theories’, to show why what i am saying here is not contained by arbitrary assuptions. Generally speaking, conspiracy theories more often involve some kind of proposed metaphysical evil in the conspirators, and the conspirators not caring about whatever nation they control being successful. For example, the vaccine-autism conspiracy theory(and it’s true that the autism link exists) often involves some sort of perceived malice towards the whole USA population, with the aim of subjugating them like slaves so some elite group can rule everyone forever once they are all dumbed down. I’ll just say that although this autism epidemic is all real, and some of those delivering the damage probably just do so for the money or out of fear of disobeying a system of power, those actually behind it clearly must have some metaphysical or genetic or induced evil to them. Otherwise, it would not make sense. None of the insanity happening ‘makes sense’. If there was a secret conspiracy of rational people who were interested in having a future, they would be secretly conspiring to dismantle the nukes, prevent nuclear war situations, and even if they were really self interested, it would be the best option for them to INCREASE the cognitive health of the population in such a dangerous situation rather than damage it. For example, just not poisoning anyone and preventing them from accidentally poisoning themselves(like with the probable iq damage on the USA from lead in the gasoline from 1900-1970s as i outlined before) would be common sense, you’d think. They could also simply do nothing at all, and without cultural and physical poisons weighing everything down, the nations getting ruined by these autism epidemic style conspiracies would probably be far far better off by current day. And that would’ve been the way better decision for any conspiracy group.
Basically, the point is that none of this makes rational sense, but it is projection to the extreme to assume that malicious people really care about their own future in that same way that rational people do and that everyone’s innate sense of logic and good and evil is the same. Autism rates going from 1 in 10’000 to 1 in 40 and further would make sense if there was a malicious conspiracy designed to turn the populace into subservient slaves that cannot resist or outthink their new elites, that motive is pretty obvious at this point, as it is the clear end result being inflicted. And since it seems like it’s being done in all the 1st world countries at once, nobody escapes the impact. Same with these COVID lockdowns. Some people just want to dominate even if it means ruining everyone else economically and mentally. That just seems like the best summary.
Maybe I fall into the dimwit category you mentioned, but I think your analysis is well thought out. When I was in school I remember reading a hypothetical wherein thermal expansion of the ocean can occur due to a slowdown of subduction. As the cold, downgoing slab slows, isotherms previously established by a faster subduction rate begin to move up the downgoing slab allowing the slab and the deep ocean around it to warm, expand, and rise.
This is equivocation abuse with the word ‘belief’. You are using slang to enforce bad philosophy.
I am not saying that they are ‘wrong’, I am saying that they are using methods which could not possibly arrive at the answers they boast to holding. This is not a belief on my part, rather a procedural ethic. A standard of integrity. Holding my bank accountable to keep accurate balances of my money is not the same thing as ‘believing that they are crooks’. You are purposely conflating two different things.
One of them (theist and nihilist) might end up being right (upon some grand revelation at a later date), but if they did, it would only be by accident. This is the critical distinction between a ‘belief’ and a standard of skepticism. I am not criticizing their conclusion, rather their method of getting there.
Great stuff, it really helped me learn! My favorites were the Great Repression term and Law of Large Numbers. My own little take on that Law of Large Numbers is that there is one key mistake which makes it all possible. People making these hysteria claims of doom should explain what threshold of death counts should occur for it to count as doom and use other examples of pandemics that are deadly. They need to have a clear set of standards rather than keeping all the criteria that make something a pandemic a mystery. That way they can be held accountable and be forced to be objective. Stakeholder Ethics also seems important here, but not quite the main point. It would be nice if the members of government could be held accountable for crimes against the population, but realistically, no amount of personal stakes for them can match the amount of damage inflicted by their incompetency or malice. Even if some people responsible for intentionally destroying everything went to jail for life or died for their crimes, assuming such malice is proven and found worthy of that, that would not undo the damage. So what matters more to me is just that these things don’t happen to begin with, although Stakeholder Ethics does have some very valid points in mitigating disasters as well. From a negative lens, Stakeholder Ethics means you should not enforce something unless you would suffer as a result, but from an opposite view, it could mean you should not enforce something without a track record of major personal positive contributions in the area you are enforcing things in, showing reliability and commitment to not doing harm. However, i think it is important to see Non Stakeholders as possible leaders as well with certain preconditions. For example, suppose the person who will suffer nothing and has no positive track record proposes a change, but it’s not being enforced on anyone, merely suggested, and isn’t something that would cause some issue if used. For example, a scientist invents the internet and it is eventually omnipresent. Even if he suffers nothing economically if it is lost, it doesn’t matter. Nobody was forced to use it. Economic pseudo forcing is another issue but I think this elaborates on your thought process a little further. Unfortunately, it doesn’t tend to be the case too often anymore that positive changes like that happen from non stakeholders and change the world for the better, and the world seems to be on a very negative downward trend in many ways.
Aside from all that though, there is one thing which really angers me. The greatest crime of all by the media and government is that they do not follow the most basic rules of any plan. It should always be explained what the possible risks are, especially when that risk happens to be enforced economic ruin for 10s of millions of people! Furthermore, they should be forced to say just how many months they expect they can sustain a lockdown without causing irreversible economic ruin. Instead they don’t even have to and do not even address the argument whatsoever! They get away with saying absolutely nothing about how they plan to avert economic disaster! It makes me seethe with anger at the fact that this can even occur.
Note how they said Unemployment was at a 50 year low before this virus and the lockdown’s effects got started without saying any of the implications of that statement. I am reminded of that law you cited, maybe that Nassim Nicholas Taleb came up with first, i don’t remember what the law’s name was if it had one. It was a rule of thumb that says that universally, anyone who sees future possibilities and wards off a crisis will avert that crisis and promptly not be thanked whatsoever by the public because nobody else realized the truth that a disaster could’ve happened. AKA, Trump realized the economy wasn’t necessarily going to be great but managed to make the economy better than ever like he said was going to happen during his presidency, and gets 0 credit for succeeding with this campaign promise. Meanwhile, the many horribly incorrect statements and predictions by Democrats about Trump with Russiagate or other things like how he won’t fix the economy are put in the memory hole even though this should show a horrible track record of inaccuracy by them. It is disgusting.
Anyway, great stuff you’ve written here, this site is basically one of the best wealths of knowledge on the internet, it’s always fun continuing to learn from your tweets or other articles.
I hope this isn’t a trap to catch out folks trying to think without state supervision. Thanks for all the work you put in on this. You’ve corrected a few errors in my own thought. I’m grateful.
The CDC database is still inaccessible, and the CDC site is wrong. We are not at “7.6% PIC”, but rather 4% Covid – 5 weeks now below the epidemic threshold of 5.8% for MMWR Week 42.
We are reducing unreported Covid Reserve again for the 3rd week straight – encouraging…
You wrote the above on twitter. How are you getting from 7.6% PIC to 4%. I am hoping to learn. I would very much like to believe we are out of pandemic/epidemic conditions.
CC, it was in the tweet itself. And this tweet which followed.
Total deaths are rising as they naturally do this time of year, but also Lockdown Deaths are now far outpacing Covid Deaths each week.
The scheme is to convert this natural annual rise & these Lockdown Deaths into 'PIC Deaths'. Ambiguity : Equivocation : Panic : Control pic.twitter.com/b0q2q3Ec6D
I am hoping that we are below the level where this is a pandemic. Maybe the graph is complex. Can you do a graph that just shows two data points? The actual Covid deaths and the other?
You do amazing work on this by the way. Sorry.
Can you explain how the 5.8% floor number to qualify as a pandemic is arrived at?
Teach me.
Ignosticism is claiming a belief, because you claim atheists and theists don’t know what they’re talking about.
This is not true in the least. One always has the right to dissent to an imperious claim that is forced upon one as truth. Dissent is not a belief system, except in the eyes of those who wish to deny a human their right to dissent.
Silence Denial Fallacy – those who will deny one their silence, privacy or dissent, are in reality attempting to deny one their very existence.
I came by way of Twitter following your covid work there. I know you can’t possibly keep 500 blog posts updated but, have you seen any updated data on this post?
Additionally, any thoughts on the upcoming covid vaccine? I can see a “fasttracking” scenario playing out where the vaccine isn’t getting the “extreme evidence” of either safety or efficacy with regard to managing the actual vs perceived threat of the virus. The social pressure to be vaccinated could be profound- possibly even with school or work mandates driving things.
As a patient enemy of the US, I would simply enjoy such hilarious circumstances, be conservative on my own vaccine schedules, and wait things out. Or if you were an impatient enemy of the US, you might create a test for a virus that doesn’t kill people, watch them light their economy of fire and then be aggressive in their vaccine schedules.
VII. Only we, along with our love and care for each other, are real.
Where did this come from? Why did you choose love and care, is hate not real also? Could it not be said, that love and care exist only in enough quantity to derive evolutionary benefits. Perhaps some people just need to be suckers for the benefit of all. We live in a scarcity economy, so it’s a race to get more resources, more power than everyone else, it just so happens a bit of love and care can give an advantage so it exists in just enough quantity to provide that advantage, so it is no more real than hate, and especially less real than the desire for power. [ To be clear, as an abrahamic theist who does not believe in a grampa in the sky, I don’t agree with the material outside of these brackets, I just don’t understand how you would come up with such a statement. Please don’t yell at me if you respond, I apologize in advance]
I never get upset at disagreement nor mere questions. Hate is real for those who are alive in this realm yes. It is as real as tables, dollar bills and one’s score in a video game.
But what we learn and add to our character, and whatever we carry with us in what comes after, if anything at all comes after, those are then real. Even if they end right at the moment of death, and our last fleeting thoughts are of our loved one’s and the challenges we have overcome – they are still the only real things.
Hate is a passing score in a video game, no matter what way you spin this realm.
I wrote up a second section to that a few days ago but accidentally deleted it with one wrong click. Just goes to show why i should be more careful. I don’t know if you’re reading these as you obviously have lots to do, but the reason I post them is essentially just because if there’s even a 10% chance or so that I actually provide original and useful information and it gets to you, that would make it 100% worth it for me to write this much. On your twitter, you mostly just post COVID graphs, and i don’t have the research knowledge to provide all that meaningful feedback there.
Anyway, my general point with the reference of those documentaries is to ty to establish first principles for what an ideal civilization would look like, and show by contrast how modern capitalism often contradicts it. And yes, I do know capitalism is sometimes good, and I’m not saying communism is the answer. But the point here is the principle of ideality. This can be seen in even everyday specific situations and become very relevant in normal capitalist society, not just some ideal theoretical future. For example, people often do not understand the vast harm that can occur when a country like the USA exports its manufacturing industries overseas. This would be easy for the public to understand if they saw the basic logic of the principles of “Localization” and “Ephemeralization”, the first being something the documentary author previously mentioned often goes over in his documentaries and books, and the second being something found out a long time ago by Buckminister Fuller. Specifically, it is always preferable to produce things locally where they are needed when all things are equal and this does not reduce efficiency. This reduces supply chains and increases self sufficiency as well. When countries put all their manufacturing overseas, they can be bankrupted by embargos or sudden crises far more easily, as their economy is increasingly based on immaterial services, not material goods which they can draw upon even if other nations decide to stop selling them the products of the manufacturing industries. Giving your manufacturing industries to other countries is basically like a human transplanting their arms away and expecting their brain and their speech alone to keep them eternally safe. Meanwhile the other guy/nation, now has much stronger arms and a weapon they built with them, and at some point you will give them your legs as well and you’ll no longer be able to do anything without foreign aid. At which point, you can have your loans called upon to be paid up and you are then seen as the bad guy/deserving of bankruptcy and all your citizens suffering serious consequences.
But there are much more obvious situations than that. Peak Oil is an incredibly important issue and we will be running out of oil in a few decades. So, energy grid localization is pretty important. Furthermore, if you just take localization and ephemeralization to their logical extremes, they are very synergistic. The more technology does with less, the easier it tends to be to localize. The more you localize, the less dependency there is. The ideal form of this would basically be “Localized Immortality/Independence” of any given good or service, where something like a renewable energy grid or manufacturing of cars or homes can be maintained indefinitely with only local resources. With cars, this would be electric cars being mass produced to the point where everyone could have one for cheap, and if they lasted 30 to 50 years without ever malfunctioning or breaking, the industry would be obsolete. No need to sell something everyone has in abundance. The same should apply one day with homes, as 1st world countries are already in sub-replacement population growth levels. There are already more people-less homes than homeless people, and the resources exist to make enough homes for everyone. It would be possible to obsolete apartments and give everyone a house, there are the technological resources, the economic system simply often acts as a shackle on them. Once again this would lead to abundance and the market for a now-abundant good becoming simply OBSOLETE. The same applies with food as well with the vertical farming, hydroponic technologies, and also even localized/portable food production methods possible with some methods like rotary farms. Rather than let big businesses control what’s in all the food, the natural end point of such food tech is to mass produce localized food abundance in every city/town to the point that control mechanisms can no longer be imposed from top down. Abundance is the opposite of the market system and it’s the natural end point of this technological revolution.
So in sum, mass producing enough homes for everyone, enough electric cars for everyone and a large surplus, and producing enough localized food sources for everyone are all technologically possible things, I think nobody can truly deny that. The limiting factor is economics, which thrives on scarcity and cyclical consumption of goods. That’s why the phones keep getting pumped out every 9 months with marginal improvements, despite the incredible waste caused by producing billions of phones every year just to get a little more profit. I am sure it could be possible to make smart phones for everyone that would work for 30 years without breaking. That’s why the batteries aren’t even allowed to be taken out a lot of the time, because they’re supposed to break and break the whole phone with them through planned obsolesence. It’s absolutely ridiculous. The internet is another thing tending towards localized abundance for everyone for free, which is why the censorship has gotten so ridiculous with all the tech companies clamping down on free speech. Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, etc. All united in censoring anything remotely right wing as shown with even middling figures getting banned from everything. Even the President himself gets censored on Twitter with warning messages hiding his tweets sometimes! And of course, i’m sure you know that a whole lot of Trump supporters are totally censored, and there are likely many cases where comments are ‘ghosted’ as well and made to seem to work yet not appear to anyone else. I’ve seen many testimonies on that and i don’t see reason to doubt the tech companies could do it. This is absolutely batshit insane. Point is though, things in abundance and easiness to produce tend towards Localization, Ephemeralization, and an effective ‘Immortality’ for the good or service produced by this confluence of factors. For food, there are storage limits on how long even canned food can last, but if our civilization was rational we’d still have lots of canned food stockpiled in all the cities and towns. Rather than so much food getting dumped and wasted, there would be big canned food stockpiles in the case of emergencies because the production capacity clearly exceeds consumption. For cars, it seems obvious that the whole industry could go obsolete in this way one day, and the oil industry often relies on starting foreign wars. As for Energy, please see the geothermal statements in the zeitgeist documentaries i mentioned. Maybe I’m wrong, but if Geothermal can provide for all the needed energy reserves, there’s no reason it shouldn’t have already been used to complete the whole grid. As far as I know, it seems that you simply need to dig deeper even if you aren’t on a geothermal hotspot. That means that if enough facilities were built, they could simply keep extracting heat forever as long as they could last decades easily. Suppose the grid was then 100% easily sustained by geothermal facilities positioned throughout the country. Well, the grid would be complete forever at that point. The only reason to add more would be if people didn’t trust the govt and wanted localized or modular power sources like solar in their homes, but the point is the grid should have been ‘completed’ by now without a reliance on nonrenewable resources. Arguments can be made for nuclear being a renewable energy source that isn’t intermittent, but if these Geothermal claims are really true, i see no reason why it couldn’t be simply used for everything. At that point, all the oil facilities would become obsolete. Furthermore the point remains about production capacity far exceeding what economics allows for. The system depends on cyclical consumption and therefore REQUIRES SCARCITY, there is no way around it.
If you do end up having the time, I would love to hear your opinion on these issues like Cyclical Consumption and scarcity dependence inherent to the market system. Can we achieve a post scarcity civilization? Do you think it’s scientifically possible to do certain things like completing the energy grid renewably with current tech? Do you agree with these claims about the inherent limits of capitalism? And yeah, i see how these could be used for an authoritarian technocracy argument, but i’m obviously not advocating for that, i think localization is the inevitable tendency which would lead to far greater freedoms than we have today. Imagine the entire middle class simply having a home of their own and not being in constant fear of going homeless/their family disintegrating due to economic forces often beyond their control. I do believe this is possible and could create a great society. Yes, some poor people are lazy, but the productive capacity allowed by technology would make that a non issue if used to its fullest extent.
If you want to know why i comment so much on this blog, it’s because I feel like i might be able to make much more of an impact commenting here than commenting on youtube channels or on twitter or in other areas where it’s likely people won’t read the whole opinion, and dissident opinions are often censored anyways on youtube/twitter/etc. It’s not only me commenting on the 10% or maybe just 1% chance that i might provide you some valuable insight or important point which might make exponentially more of a difference if it changes the mind of someone influential like you than whoever might be reading my comments anywhere else. It’s also because it helps me both store my thoughts in a coherent way and post them in a place where they migth be read by someone who fully understands them. In this way, it’s the optimal balance for me between internal thinking alone, which often leads me to boredom due to lack of apparent external results, and dialogue, which can produce a sense of futility if nobody who happens to read bothers listening or they just don’t get it due to knee jerk reactions. Or if nobody reads it. You get the idea. Sorry if this last segment was essentially a monologue of its own. I just am anticipating the possibility that you might be annoyed or not prefer me to comment on so many of yourindividual blogposts unlike most other commentors here seem to, if that seems like it takes up too much text space and detracts from the focus you want to be on your blog posts themselves. If you really don’t like it for that reason or some other, i’ll stop. Although, obviously you could just not approve the posts in the first place, but I feel it’s better to explain that part as I feel a need to know whether it’s just bothersome at this point or whether it’s fine for me to continue doing this.
I think a lot of this is really good work but that ‘Principle of Indistinguishability’ seems like a stretch. It puts the foundation of morality in a continuous flux where ‘lowly humans’ are unable to comprehend objective moral truth, even though I’m sure you didn’t intend for it to come off that way. In some cases, it would be correct that a complex form of benevolence would seem like malevolence or indifference, but that is most certainly not the case with ALL possible situations. For example, let’s just look at the most obvious moral evils like pedophillia or mass murders done purely for the sake of psychopaths enjoying the killing of people. Obviously, you can only go so far with this principle. Certain levels of evil can definitely be defined as such without the observers having to possess perfect knowledge of good and evil or anything of the sort. No level of increased intelligence or ‘divine’ status, even if one’s IQ went up to 4000 or something that ridiculous, can change logical consistencies and inconsistencies which normal people can observe to exist. So, evil can definitely be proven as real, and no explanation no matter how advanced can justify certain acts as somehow a grand act of benevolence.
All that said, I get that you are talking about debatably existing or not existing entities, whether they be God, aliens refusing to intervene in earthly affairs, or whatever else, and that this simple point I’m making about how some acts in the real world are verifiably and obviously evil is something you already know. I just object to your wording here because you talk about ‘any act’, and because I do think it is the case that even extremely advanced or even metaphysically ‘divine’ entities like any supposed Creator God can be judged by humans to an extent. For example, let’s just go with the easy examples. What if God randomly got angry at seeing a team he liked lose a sports game and then decided to destroy the universe, killing everyone in it? Or if he went all Jehovah Old Testament style and tortured everyone to death for eternity in some kind of metaphysical hell, good and bad people included? Clearly, that would be pretty stupid. Complex acts of seeming inaction in what seems to be critical situations of need only make sense to the extent that they can satisfy logical consistency and at least seem intuitively plausible. Let’s say God suddenly decided to send everyone in the universe diving into a fire pit for 1 billion years, or more accurately just a month until most of them lose sentience and any memory of their own identity under the endless pain, then sitting there and enjoying the show of the infinite torture session in heaven with a small host of spared people. That would undeniably be pretty evil. Or imagine if an alien race decided to use electronic technology to chip and eternally enslave all humans, then used genetic modification to make them unable to reproduce on their own, then basically removed all their unique traits and let them be sucked up into a cyborg hive mind situation sort of like the Borg in Star Trek, then started using them as pawns for whatever else they wanted to do. Pretty obviously, that would be very evil as well, and it wouldn’t matter if the aliens in question had 1 billion IQ or 10, the morality of it would still be the same. I just think that if we assume the premise that moral truth exists and can be discovered by logic and reason, it is indeed true that certain things are undeniably evil no matter what. And I know that all of that may indeed seem redundant or like something you already would have seen, but I think it’s important to say anyways.
To get to a slightly more original point here, to me, the most sensible position on any true morality, should we assume it exists, is that it is a pre-existent or rather eternal truth independent of the existence of spacetime. Ideally, all moral truths could connect logically in one coherent whole, and there would be a correct series of actions for all individuals in any given situation. Meanwhile, this also gives a more coherent explanation of why there is an afterlife. Many NDE testimonies do not explain where souls come from or why they are immortal/eternal. I get that most people wouldn’t understand and many are uninterested in the details, but I need to know. So, since most NDE testimonies simply don’t give those juicy deets, I feel a need to theorize on my own, which does give its own unique joy I guess compared to just hearing a truth from someone else. Basically, the TLDR of this little theory is that an individual soul being eternal could be partially explained by a person being meant to exist, their existence being eternal and possibly just meant to exist so other people can be more complete in general. Think of it like the four fundamental forces in nature being separate yet assumed by all scientists seeking a Unified Field Theory as being technically one-in-the-same Superforce. My interpretation of individual souls as eternal yet connected by a collective consciousness is different from the more scientific and strictly evidence-based Absolute Idealist/Idealist Monist perspective. Sticking strictly to science, it is hard to deny that Free Will exists, but it is not necessary to jump from the existence of Free Will to the existence of an Eternal Individualized Soul/FreeWillSource. It could still be the case that individual experience is more of a split/disassociated alter of the collective consciousness, although even the word ‘consciousness’ is wrong since that experience/will source need not be consciously aware of itself on a human or animal-like level. Nonetheless, I do make that logical leap based on my own experiences in life and do assume there is an extent of individual eternity in this. Another twist on that thought would be that there is also a layer of individuality in all morality;Even if someone has some transcendent purpose for existing, it is always preferable that they feel that purpose works for them. Transcendent moral systems are a sort of Hive Mind in a way, as while they seek an ideal where everyone works in harmony and their own individual purposes ideally add up to lesser or greater collective purposes ranging from individual 2 person friendships/love/other bonds/whatever else to the whole universe/all conscious beings and how they interact, but at the same time this is definitely in contrast to the Free Will aspect. In my opinion any transcendent moral truth has to win out in the end in importance for true morality to exist coherently, and individuals have freedom in the extent that they individually come to terms with their purpose/search for it and try to fulfill that to the best they can.
As a little side note on the morality mini essay, this idea of transcendent morality/purpose inevitably connecting with individuals leads to some core ideas which are applicable even for those who do not necessarily believe in an objectively true morality source. And no, it’s not the “Law must have a Law Giver” argument as Euthyphro’s Dilemma showed over 1000 years ago how even a God would have to have an objective basis for any purportedly objective morality to be so. The point is that morality and just logic itself seem to have an effect where even seeming anomalies in the moral system are dealt with in the same way. Even if an Atheist says they strongly disagree and believe everyone is meaningless or that at least some people exist meaninglessly/weren’t meant to exist, the key problem is that they talk about ideals or what is PREFERABLE on a FACTUAL basis. Which does not make sense. Honestly this meme summarizes the general idea I’m getting at best:
As much as I have many reasons to seriously dislike Stefan Molyneux, ranging from his mindless libertarian free market ideas ignoring serious externalities and the problems of American healthcare and capitalist danger to the environment in general, to his horrifying ‘Defooing’ advocacy he had made in the past(Basically he was telling young people believing in his philosophy that they should disassociate with their family forever since it’s a relationship they didn’t choose because they didn’t choose to be born), his idea of “Universally Preferable Behavior” makes a lot of sense to me. Nobody thinks it is universally preferable for everyone in the world to be a rapist, so everyone de facto believes in a form of UPB because they don’t want to get raped or murdered. Even those arguing in favor Dual or Multi-Tiered Morality Systems like caste systems or Nietzschean elitism against perceived as inferior classes/races/whatever, still logically have no choice but to believe in UPB. I do think it is incomplete and that logically there would be Universally Preferable Factual States of Existence and that this concept of Preferability(or more accurately, ideality) applies to objects as well as people. Even just using the Atheist Humanist reasoning it is generally preferable that humanity is able to exist and be sentient than, for example, if we lived in a reality where it wasn’t possible, or if there was no reality where it was possible. Molyneux does not talk about factual objective reality enough, probably because of the crazy libertarian beliefs. Basically, libertarian capitalism would only make sense in a reality where all humans were immortal and transcendent, choose to exist, had no externalities imposed on them, and all their interactions fully stemmed from voluntaristic principles. Of course, in that situation, Capitalism just wouldn’t last long anyways and they would transition into a rational resource based economy based on cooperation common good and individual freedoms far exceeding modern capitalism’s Wage Slave Liberty Allowances as well so it’s lose lose. My statements on capitalism here are not meant to advocate Communism(although they do imply the Preferability of a Utopian state of human existence) and only make sense in full context of what I said more clearly about Capitalism in the Post Stockholm Syndrome blog post. Let’s just say there are a lot of problems with Capitalism, regardless of the fact that many people in current day use that sentiment to push for a seeming ‘opposite’ of it which is in reality just Totalitarianism.
Anyway, I hope what i said about morality and transcendence and their inevitable relation makes sense and is with any luck a meaningful new perspective to you. I realize that i leave quite a few comments on your blogs and you are busy with many things, but to me, this is just the easiest way of getting this sort of information out in an organized manner, especially since you seem to be both someone who somehow has the time to occasionally respond to my blog comments and provides meaningful feedback. To me, the key point here is how the idea of moral justice is inescapable intertwined with the idea of an eternal soul, and one arguably doesn’t make sense without the other. For how can a soul be eternal if it does not have a reason it SHOULD exist? Yes, the individual will to exist could also be the reason, but a collective reason why that individual exists also seems important to me. All statements on the eternity or immortality of the soul are just statements of fact without a reason, and as a result lack meaning. Even if it’s undeniably true that someone has an eternal soul, that isn’t necessarily meaningful unless they have a reason to exist. Furthermore, any level of invincibility/eternity a soul might seem to have still is always going to be less than if it also has meaning as well which it derives its existence from. This also seems to apply vice versa, any level of meaning for someone to exist or any level of meaning why they should do some set of things is still always going to be incomplete without them actually existing or existing in a certain form or doing a certain set of things they are meant to do. I hope that makes some sense. To me it just seems like an inevitable truth that these logical arguments are in fact correct and remain eternally true regardless of factual realities about the true nature of individual souls or morality. It’s just a logical consistency argument about how it would work if it did exist even if we argue that moral truth is a fiction. In this way, certain moral truths are NOT dependent on evidence. In my opinion if I’m not being overly presumptive here, this line of thinking just outright SOLVES the Is-Ought dillemma lol. True, you cannot derive an Ought from an Is, but what if reality to a certain extent is meaningful and therefore the Is-es occasionally derive from the Oughts? In that case, one could see the reality of the Oughts by looking at the Is-es as long as one only uses Oughts in their arguments revolving around Oughts, aka, only using moral premises to derive moral conclusions. Then one just continuously checks the logical consistency of the moral conclusions one derives and sees if they work with each other, then continues to expand the moral conclusions further as long as they stay consistent. In this way objective morality can most certainly be derived even if some argue that it might all be ultimately baseless.
If I were to give the fallacy that all moral truths must be ultimately baseless and that one can therefore instantly reject all moral arguments a name, it’d be “Nihilist of the Gaps”. Sounds memey and cool to me to be honest, and it’d be a nice way to make fun of Nihilists. Just call them a Nihilist of the Gaps, that’ll be sure to trigger their NLP. As for what they’re doing, this behavior is an act of continuously moving the goalposts further back whenever nihilism fails to apply to a certain moral system which the nihilists agree is consistent with itself to some extent or another in ordering human behavior in a reasonable way good for everyone.” If your pathetic morality is consistent in one area or even in basically all human behavior in making people happy, just you wait you foolish little Moral kids! Nihilism-God/Nothingness is always the final background truth in the end, Ha Ha, if I am right about nihilism in one instance that means all your other wins are totally meaningless!” It’s just totally stupid and immature. Everyone basically knows morality is real. Moreover, Nihilist of the Gaps is indeed accurate in the same sense as God of the Gaps because there are more than enough examples like NDES and other incidents to give plenty of reason to believe there is indeed an ultimate moral truth behind the whole universe, and that there is reason and order to it all.
It really is basically as bad as the God of the Gaps fallacy, Nihilists are just too mentally constrained that their frontier of nihilism can indeed be pushed back in the same way as Creationism can be reduced in its possibility frontier. Derive one consistent set of morals, and a Nihilist will tell you to take it back further. If anything, even if someone somehow derived consistent morality that explained the correct actions for all people to take at every moment in history and all the increasingly more or less Ideal timelines branching off from those choice pathways, and the Nihilists agreed that it was internally consistent, they would just go back and say “But what about before the Big Bang? Ha, take that!” or something silly or childish like that. Basically, to put it in your helpful terms, morality being presumed as existing and deriving from an ultimate moral truth behind everything should honestly be the Null Hypothesis for anyone in a civilization who wants the civilization to function and work well for everyone, and the onus should be on the nihilists to prove all morality baseless. Even if morality WAS proven ultimately baseless past a certain level of complexity and unable to stay fully consistent past a certain point, that doesn’t make those lesser forms of interconnected harmonious morality suddenly not exist and no longer exist as Morality. That would only be the case for those willing to give up their morals the moment they became personally certain the universe or whatever else was ultimately baseless. Those who do not could still believe that morality indeed exists. And Atheists have not even come close to ontologically proving all morality or meaning is impossible. My argument would be that if there IS a moral truth underlying all existence, it would explain why anything even sprang into existence from nothingness in the first place. For just the passive state of “Fact” and Existence would probably only allow the continuation of an unending state of Nothingness without any change(For how can there be change without an Agent of Change/Consciousness, and isn’t Meaning probably just inevitable when you deal with consciousness anyways?), I would not be at all surprised if one day it is ontologically proven that a Meaning of sorts is inevitable for any possible universe or multiverse if there is one to have come into existence from nothingness in the first place. The universe or multiverse may also be somehow eternal but the same argument would probably apply. With Meaning one can see a reason why any creation would logically occur, while otherwise, there really doesn’t seem to be one. Rather, why is there ANY truth at all? Why are there even ontological facts or inevitabilities like how the fundamental forces would work if a universe existed? Why do we not live in a Zero Information Ontology where nothing ever existed nor did the concept of existence or consciousness either exist? Well, because that would be absurd and not make any sense, as the Truth of how reality works is generally just Eternal and an inescapable fact. Nonetheless I think that Atheists not even questioning such things is really stupid. And more importantly, I think that as much as some would condemn it as foolish, my argument for the logical inevitability of meaning for anything to exist might have a grain of truth in it. Of course, I am not saying that the universe would remain meaningless even if it somehow started as such, but I wonder if such an origin is really even possible in the first place from nothingness. To an extent the meaningfulness of the beginnings of the universe or reality may all be inevitably subjective, but I do think it’s worth wondering whether there is objectivity there to be rationally discovered.
Anyway I hope you liked the Nihilist of the Gaps meme in context with the general argument and the other meme i referenced. I would be glad to hear any thoughts you have on these ontological investigations and whether they could discover any new truth or not. I mean, i’d certainly be happy if i really had discovered new truth but I’m fine with just making the memes to be honest, assuming you had time/wanted to read it.
I have much to say about this very concise and accurate post which sums up the situation in the world right now, and it is effectively impossible for me to say all the relevant information in one comment. Therefore, assuming you get the time to read them, I’m going one subject at a time. This is not only for your ease of reading but simply to make it easier for others to read if they bother.
First of all, I think that as great of a summary as this is, it is essentially reactive in a major sense. This ties in with your view that exposing the inconsistencies, lies, and malevolent phenomenon surrounding controlling agents is a more truthful approach, and while that view is good in its own way, it’s not my way of doing things. That is fine, but I simply want to start by rephrasing everything you’ve said in the opposite order. My way of explaining things is to start by saying how the world should work and then explain how it has deviated from this possibility due to the actions of malevolent individuals.
To start, let’s explain what an ideal world would look like. I would go into my personal interpretation of just what it means for something to be ‘ideal’ in the first place, but what’s far more important and provable is the material reality of how the world can positively change. Many people could disagree on this. Many atheists would try to nag that none exists because of their nihilist philosophies, and Theists would impose their own theistic dogmas, but it is really just common sense. It’s common sense to the point where religions designed for common sense possessing people like Christianity always have to include some of this common sense in their dogmas for the brainwashing to work. Basically, an ideal world would be one that ran on reason and could last endlessly into the future without self-destructing, and it would be one where the people were free and safe. Most logical people can see the absurdity of the current nuclear situation if they try, but that is just an extension of an incredibly flawed society. Right now, a great portion of people are ‘wage slaves’ living from paycheck to paycheck just to make ends meet, and this state of affairs doesn’t affect the material reality of science. The necessary technology already exists to run the whole world on renewable energy and feed everyone. It would probably only take a few years at most to build the necessary power plants, food production facilities, and so on if just a small portion of the world’s people did the needed effort. The monetary system often is completely disconnected from the material world’s capabilities. In an economic collapse, nothing of physical value has actually disappeared. The factories don’t suddenly stop functioning. Instead, the badly designed system we use just stops functioning and everyone is laid off despite all the machines and all the people with the right knowledge and skills still being around. It’s because the current capitalist system dominant in the USA and other countries runs on endless competition between industries and all the inefficiencies, cyclical consumption, and stagnation incentivized by that system. An ideal system should seek maximum efficiency and human rights as far as possible, aiming to free people from unnecessary labor or external control. There are many necessary aspects, ranging from localizing production as much as possible to reduce energy waste, building a complete sustainable energy grid to obsolete environmentally harmful resources, localizing food production as well so individuals have control over what they eat and can ensure safety, etc. Disarmament of nuclear weapons and other civilization destroying technologies is also a key step which must be done on a global scale. The current economy effectively makes most people ‘wage slaves’, as they need to keep working in service jobs to buy necessary goods so they can avoid starving to death. The transition from an agricultural economy to a service based one allowed this slavery to occur, but it is by no means inevitable. It is even possible now to produce food completely locally within a city by using advanced technologies like vertical farms without even depending on food production elsewhere.. Not all resources can be produced locally, but it should be done whenever possible and efficient, as that maximizes freedom. Furthermore, changing to an economy not centered around money and scarcity based interactions would allow far greater personal freedom of movement. People could change where they lived within a country easily if the monetary system did not inhibit them so much. And no, this does not mean that ownership should become impossible. If anything, there would be far far more than enough homes and vehicles in total past a certain point, allowing people to move around freely. Do you see where I am going with this? The goal should be to obsolete this scarcity and create a culture of abundance, and even if some people disagree about the appropriate means to getting to an abundant and freer civilization, it should be obvious that it would be a desirable end goal. It should also be obvious how capitalism is fundamentally going to incline towards cyclical consumption rather than completion. In capitalism, slightly better cars or phones are built every year and sold over and over with the companies not aiming to produce anything truly revolutionary. In an actually decent society, we would be making the best possible cars and phones and so on and designing them to last as long as possible and be compatible with further innovations in technology all while minimizing waste and negative environmental externalities. This does not happen, and when it does, it only happens by accident. The internet, for example, is something which adds to individual freedom, and it obviously is not something that can or should be sold as a product. It’s a public utility and scarcity does not apply to it. This should all make it very clear that capitalism is fundamentally dependent on scarcity and inevitably perpetuates it. There are occasional innovators who use capitalism as a means to increase the freedom of the people, like Ford or others, but capitalism in itself is in no way designed to do that. That’s why the whole society is built around people paying off loans for homes, cars, etc, as if they all became property owners not subject to debt slavery, it would be harder to enslave them. At that point other means like the Tyflocracy methods you effectively described in another thread are employed to indirectly remove the property from these productive people through economics and force them to flee to another area where they are once again debt slaves. That’s what it’s all about. Meanwhile, the trend of mechanization is used in a negative fashion to take control of the food supply and so on with just a few corporations rather than liberate people from food worries. And this is not a joke, millions of people have starved to death or lost their livelihoods because of this sort of capitalistic routine, it is in fact horrifying compared to what we could easily have if we properly used machines to solve societal problems.
Plenty of people have knee jerk reactions on this subject, so just to clear those up, tI am not advocating Communism, nor am i advocating a centrally run Technocracy as some do when discussing the scarcity subject. Generally speaking, communism was just used as a means to achieving totalitarian power by groups who promised the underclass freedom and promptly crushed them under their control after getting the power they wanted. The goal in the USSR was to depose the current upper class and Russia and promptly replace it with a brutal dictatorship. Communism was not an actual honest effort to achieve a post-scarcity civilization of material abundance where everyone could prosper. That was just a lie to control the poor. On the other hand, many ‘socialist’ policies that the USA and capitalists in general despise have proven extremely effective in European countries. In particular, their healthcare systems are clearly far superior to the USA’s system and they do not overcharge people for 40x the actual material cost of a medical good or service. This is because those working in these healthcare systems are not incentivized to maintain sickness rather than actually cure diseases and illnesses. Again, cyclical consumption encourages the creation of needs, not the actual permanent resolution of problems. A great number of further problems exist with the current use of capitalism. For example, in banking, the money issued in countries is not actually based on the credbility of the government and its ability to solve physical problems. It is instead based on nothing, and in fact, all money is debt nowadays, even though that is not necessary. Debt-free currency has been done in the past and worked, as when all money comes from a loan from the government that has to be repaid with interest on top, it is a structural INEVITABILITY that some people are going to go bankrupt. The amount of debt to be paid off will ALWAYS exceed the amount of money people have availble due to the interest. Furthermore, when you add on fractional reserve banking the entire currency is rapidly devalued by inflation. If you want a more detailed explanation on these banking and monetary issues, you can simply view the documentary Zeitgeist Addendum. It clearly explains in its first hour how this works.
It also gets at extremely critical issues on this subject, like how capitalism has encouraged the use of economic hit men and so on to subjugate foreign countries. The second portion of Zeitgeist Addendum and the second part of Moving Forward cover a far more important topic, which is what an ideal society would look like. Both of them easily make the top 5 most important documentaries i have ever seen in my life and I really think you should see them if you have not already. Granted, they don’t have a very clear mindset on how specifically to efficiently accomplish a transition, but that does not change the extreme relevance of these ideas. Even you watch Star Trek, I have looked at your Twitter account. Star Trek is indeed very ‘socialist’ but it is so because it follows a few common sense thoughts about how any rational utopian civilization should work. All people who dismiss Utopianism are pretty silly as no society truly makes sense when not put into context of what its goal is, and what most preferable end state it is meant to culminate in. In that sense, Utopianism is just rational, the only truly meaningful question about it is what the best means are to reach a Utopian state of civilization. Anyway, I do hope you either watch those documentaries or have already seen them. I’ll go on to explain my own personal interpretation of what truly is ideal in another post, but this explanation should make it more than clear enough what an ideal society would look like materially speaking. It would seek efficiency and to last indefinitely into the future all while continuously improving itself as much as possible, and the same would apply to all the people in it. I really can’t believe that the scientific mainstream doesn’t even tend to think about the end goal of civilization, it is utterly absurd. I do hope this explanation provided at least some new information to you or at least summarized it in a coherent way. My reason for that is that you seem extremely focused on exposing the rationale of malevolent groups you are against, and while that’s all fine and good, I do think it is also very important to give a solution and explain what an ideal society would look like. 100% accuracy is not at all needed, and earnest attempts to reach for that ideal are in fact unimaginably important right now. It does not matter if people have some metaphysical disagremeents about religion or ideology or anything else, as those would not change anything about the ideal nature of the aforementioned civilizational model, and by no means am i saying anything like that capitalism must be ‘banned’ like the Communists did. I’m saying it will become obsolete in time and nobody will see a reason to use it if the right steps are taken to ensure freedom, and that achieving that abundant world is what everyone would want if they thought about it a little harder and were given the right info.
Some of these captor tactics remind me strongly of the actions of Asimov’s Foundation to their neighbors. I am re-reading it for the first time in over twenty years and I am not enthused about the autoritarianism I find.
Hello Ethical Skeptic, I have a question about the following quote, “because of a certain method I used to eliminate calcium phosphate-LDL cholesterol plaque from my heart and brain blood vessels. I noticed a significant boost in my cognitive capabilities after the associated therapy.” May I ask what this therapy is that you use to reduce calcium phosphate – LDL cholestrol plaque?
Just ran across this and it’s really fascinating. I’d love to know what your typical day of eating looks like, foods you avoid (other than grains) and foods you emphasize.
Thank you. That’s pretty similar to mine. My biggies I stay away from are grains other than rice (and normally brown rice) and any industrial seed oils. Grass fed butter, olive oil, coconut oil and sometimes avocado oil are used liberally. Lucky to have a friend who is a farmer and he sells pastured beef, pork and chicken.
This is quite a great deal of vital information. It would certainly explain just why the USA has so much obesity. It isn’t just natural. Once again, this assumption that it must all be natural places all the blame upon the potential victim. There is no double-checking process in these easy assumptions. Changes like the mass switch to GMO food should have been assumed potentially dangerous and screened for, but that didn’t happen. In the USA, nobody even gets to know what is in the food if the GMO food company does not want them to. A lesser russian roulette of sorts. And there is not a control group. In a more reasonable society, any massive change to a health or food system would not be allowed to become the vast supermajority of everything with no oversight, and there would be places where it isn’t done to double check. Basic science stuff. But it isn’t done, only reportedly by studies that are usually kept at a distance that nobody’s going to read anyways. Not experiential knowledge that anyone could see for themselves, like the portion of the country that eats x or y GMO getting all sick and obese and such.
In India, they literally make the GMO plants unable to reproduce so that all the farmers have to keep buying them from the company. And then spread those on purpose like a virus into other farms.
Yes, I know that ‘Not all GMOS are the same’, and some are inevitably non damaging, but it is no surprise that so many people are against all GMOS when the main GMO companies like Monsanto have clearly done evil things. Meanwhile, I am pretty sure plenty of American food is sabotaged even without GMOS in it, as there are all sorts of ways to make something unhealthy without using gene modification. This means those well meaning GMO Free farmers are often not going to make their food free of contaminants whatsoever as much as they want to. An ‘Organic’ farmer can say they are all GMO free but they are not going to trace their every ingredient back to its ultimate source and make sure it is free of contamination at every step along the way in the creation and distribution of each ingredient. Nor do they expect to need to, but that is just the way it is in a clearly sabotaged country like the USA. The FDA clearly does not trace all ingredients back to their ultimate sources when they won’t even let people know all ingredients in their food. Besides, two different versions of the same ingredient can be given the same label, but one can be made in a totally different yet very dangerous or unhealthy way compared to the other, and they will get the same label.
I am just saying, in summary of all this, that when a nation’s general stock of food goes from being 0% GMO up to 1994 to most of the grocery store food being GMOs soon afterwards. I am pretty sure that if you did a study of health in the US from 1970 to 1994 and compared it to the last 20 years, the pattern would be undeniable. This in combination with the vaccine sabotage conspiracy starting in 1989 i believe is just horrendously bad. People have knee jerk reactions on these subjects due to lack of research. The fact is there are plenty of reasons GMOs can be a major problem. The way they are used to enslave farmers in other nations and force them to use a monopolistic international corp like Monsanto’s products is a fact. Unless you want to prove that is wrong or something. The idea that such power centralization couldn’t possibly create a major systemic vulnerability where all any truly conspiratorial groups out to undermine a nation would have to do is just control the leadership of said monopolistic food corporations, and that these monopolies are infallibly good because capitalism is perfect and the Invisible Hand of Competition will solve it all, is just ridiculous. Capitalism is not a perfect system and so-called “Crony” Capitalism can emerge when people simply want to seize control of the market and win forever. They are also directly incentivized to do so by the system. No, this is not a ‘Socialism’ or ‘Communism’ advertisement, but the fact is that capitalism has no structural trait designed to make it actually solve people’s problems. Point is, yes, a ‘conspiracy’ can most certainly happen when power is so easily centralized into a few corporate hands, and the system is essentially all in favor of people doing this.
Last point. This is not even the totality of the health issue. GMOs, other possible food sabotage people might have no way of knowing about except through its effect, vaccination poisonings, they are all serious issues. It’s no wonder that with that confluence of GMOs and vaccines all starting up in the 90s that everything started becoming horrible then. Now, look at all the intellectuals you think of as intelligent, or simply at any other important and intelligent figure in the world today who has a key grasp on reality. What is their age?
My prediction:40s to early 60s at most. That’s the probable age of most smart and meaningful world figures, scientists, CEOS, etc, if my idea that lead did serious mental damage is correct. Why is that? Remember that lead was only removed from gasoline and other products starting in the 1970s. People born before then were probably badly damaged and remain damaged to this day. It seems like a pseudo-repeat of the Rome collapse scenario which was caused by the exact same heavy metal, lead. This part is very important, as literally everybody should know that it was lead that did Rome in, so any surface level ‘Skeptic’ claims that it only reduced IQ just a little bit in the USA should be treated with the great doubt they deserve based on obvious historical evidence. It’s not like lead suddenly became a non problem because hundreds of years have passed.
Of course,even though the lead is gone from gas and other products now starting in the 70s, because there are malevolent groups in influential positions we now have the vaccine and other health disasters instead to replace the accidental lead one, which as far as I know wasn’t started by a conspiracy. The key point is this. The only sliver of seemingly mostly ‘toxin free’ people alive today in the USA had birthdates that begin in the 1970s and ended in 1989 or so with the vaccine sabotage beginning. From that argument, we should expect the smartest and least brain damaged people today to be around 40-50 years old. I am sure you can double check that far more accurately than me with your knowledge of the world. But from just what I know, whether it’s a clearly genius guy like Elon Musk, or just one of the other seriously valuable intellectuals, they are all in their 40s or early 50s. There should be more 30 or 60 year old geniuses with similar influence but it doesn’t seem to be happening in the USA. People getting more skilled over time doesn’t seem like a good enough explanation here, either. I don’t have any strong evidence here, it’s just my intuitive judgement, but it seems true based on what i know, I am sure you can make a more detailed and valid judgement here.
I have no large variety of sources on this lead epidemic claim which must have great damage on the USA even now among ‘Boomers’, most of whom probably got damaged by it if it was really as prevalent in gasoline as i imagine. However, my initial low effort search really makes it seem that quite a lot of damage was done. Here’s one official source quoting an Indian study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598508/
“After studying 74 children at 4–14 years of age, Bellinger et al. [23] found that IQ is inversely proportional blood lead levels, and IQ values dropped about 6 points with every 100 μg/L increase in the level of lead in the blood. A high level of lead in the blood has adverse effects on intellectual development in children.”
6 points each. And the abstract of that individual study shows it is incredibly bad over in India. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15875889/
It could literally drop your IQ 22 points if you were among the kids who had the most lead in their blood. Maybe America wasn’t as bad, but I don’t even know. The point is that lead was in gasoline and other products for decades and decades. This seems like it was a serious crisis that everyone has forgotten, even though logically speaking plenty of 60+ year old Americans could still be alive whose brains got damaged by the gasoline exhaust from cars driving by their schools or by their parent’s cars as they were possibly driven to school when they were from the ranges of 1 to 10 years old. I doubt it’s anywhere near as bad as the vaccine issue since those seem explicitly designed to ruin people, but it’s still serious and i can’t believe nobody talks about it.
So, the lead issue is probably pretty bad not only in its effects on the history of the USA and other nations, but even in its effects on present day people of the right age. Nor am i too keen to assume the government perfectly handled this, for all i know the ‘safe’ levels of lead were improperly figured out and some places in the USA might still have issues with lead in products. And if conspiratorial agents seeking to undermine the US have already been largely successful with vaccine sabotage, they might as well go all in with any other means of poisoning they can get away with, and probably have done so in totally undetected and unanticipated ways, if they have enough influence. A lot of possible “Unknown Unknown” problems as you have described that term before, which are still there regardless of people being aware of them or not. But I still want to keep the focus on lead, as it is something literally everyone who knows any history should know caused a lot of damage to the Romans and ruined them, and it still matters even know. It would still matter even if the leaded gasoline had stopped in 1945 because of the leftover gap of all the potential geniuses that might’ve happened before that and didn’t would be there, and who knows what good could’ve resulted from that not happening. But it’s particularly relevant since there are probably still a lot of living examples today of how there is basically just a tiny sliver of ‘safe’ unpoisoned people compared to what there should have been. Hopefully that all made sense. I feel like a clear understanding is needed of the full damage extent of both this and vaccine damage. Yes, Autism rates at 1 in 30 among babies nowadays compared to the old 1 in 10’000 are total insanity, but was there an Average IQ Drop too as a result of that damage? Or another average mental trait being reduced in a way not as easily measured? I just want to know what you think the best evidence is. It would also help if you had any more detailed sources on the lead issue but obviously vaccines are a bit more central. Your article about Vaccinials didn’t describe a lot of the issues you attributed to them. 17 in 66 or so suffering some form of visible cranial misdevelopment according to you, but what kind? I just want to know, as you know, then i’d actually be able to see the claimed damage signs and form patterns on my own. And in general, anyone else would be able to see, of course. What signs are there are visible cranial misdevelopment? Images would also help.
Hopefully that was all clear enough, I’m just trying to get numbers and images everyone can understand out of all this. Numbers like the average IQ drop caused by lead over the duration of its use in USA, the average damage caused by Autism during different times of its use, etc. You had a really good graph on the Vaccinials article, but it’d probably be a whole lot better if you could correlate it with other national trends and show just how it is impacting everything. My judgement on the Lead issue is that some average people in the 1800s sound like total geniuses compared to what I’ve seen of the 1900s. All the speeches I’ve ever read of Americans in the 1800 just sound way more intelligent than the ones I read today, and it’s not because those people didn’t have serious problems. They did, but their base attention span and intelligence just seems like it was much greater. Even the sentences people spoke at the time are simply far longer compared to what people use today. If anything, even their breath capacity itself was probably a lot larger as well for them to even be able to speak well for so long without issues. TV making everyone become much less literate is probably part of why modern culture seems worse, but maybe that was only a problem because their intelligence got lowered by lead in the first place.
And again, most of this is just my intuitive judgement, not based on some large body of evidence. It seems like it would be worth investigating, but I am pretty sure that literally nothing of the sort ever happens. Nobody does routine checks to see if the culture is becoming less intelligent or if there is some sign of a problem. It just seems ridiculous. The GMO issue is one thing but my main original point here is about Lead’s potential effects on the world today. I hope it made sense to you, and I would like to know what you think about lead damage in the recent past, if it is worse or not as bad as i am saying, or what.
“Observe in the graphic as well that 23 years prior to 2019, or in 1987, this flow patterning kicked into a discrete and sudden high gear.” If I’m reading the sentence above correctly, there is either an arithmetic error or a typo. I think it should read 33 years instead of 23 (or alternatively you intended to type 1997 in a few places).
Atheists often say they are not nihilists. However, many of them are just too lazy and uninterested as a result of the ambient nihilist conclusions in their mind to even bother developing or articulating any sort of positive value system, let alone conceive of any actual goals civilization should work towards. You have this long definition of the different types of nihilism, but at least to me the key points are as follows.
This nihilism is a major contributor towards the fear culture of today. I think the best argument pathway there is not to immediately get people to agree with generic labels like ‘Nihilist’ which they may define differently but to just get answers to specific concrete statements. People will usually be hostile and disagree if you try to define their thinking for them. But if you just ask if they believe free will exists, if they think any objective meaning to anything exists or might exist, if there is any driving purpose in their lives and if so what it is, if there is ‘right or wrong’ and what qualifies, and they answer, that pretty much answers everything. They could always go and say they believe there is no objective meaning but that meaning can be subjectively created, like the existentialists, but it is pretty important that they believe in free will for that to actually make coherent sense. So, the final step here would be to ask them what their definition of nihilism even is and to explain why they don’t count as a nihilist.
Of course, all of that would be fair game in the context of a more open minded world, but in real life based on your comments here, it seems many people can easily lose your job for even slightly varying with the Borg-style hive mind of material monist nihilism. This would mean that in effect, the only way to freely discuss such matters if your career is in any way science based would be, of course, through anonymous means, which often doesn’t really have the same desired impact. At least the nature of the internet allows that to happen, and not everyone is trapped in social hiveminds as a result, for as far as free speech on the internet isn’t censored. My final takeaway here is just how ridiculous that contradiction is. Were the people you knew in your career who could’ve caused you to lose face if you said anything at variance with material monism style ideology also often the same ones who said they were not nihilists? If so, that’s rather astonishing hypocrisy, i guess if ‘non nihilists’ care that little about anyone they know who disagrees with them it certainly says a lot about anyone who actually agrees with the Nihilist term. At least your blog isn’t subject to that kind of thing, this is all really great stuff.
That’s an interesting example, but I think more can be gained by refuting fake skeptics in a way that uses the flaws in their own reasoning first, not just evidence they failed to research or consider. And it is not just about refuting them, but showing bystanders how their own thinking collapses in on itself. To quickly get to the point, Brian’s theory collapses in on itself because the pilots would have eventually gotten a visual on the airplane and therefore not reported that it was a UFO. A momentary heat anomaly wouldn’t mean a thing in the long run, because commercial aircraft and anything else that isn’t a UFO will not just vanish from one’s radar range. They would’ve had sight of it for 10s of minutes, and would’ve certainly found out it was an aircraft, even if the Metabunk claimed anomaly confused them at first. You explaining that the anomaly couldn’t have even done so seems tangential in terms of effectiveness although obviously, it still proves that the reasoning is all wrong. I’m just saying that they failed at the most basic level in not following their own envisioned scenario through from start to finish, and that no firsthand knowlege of aviation is needed to know this is nonsense. If anything, i think a little bit of standardization is needed here in a similar fashion to the scientific method so that bad skeptics have no way of presenting things in a disordered, low-effort, and chaotic fashion. Basically, some sort of Skeptical Method or ‘Skepticism for Dummies’ guide that they can just fall back to when they conduct their ‘Skepticism’ so they actually do it correctly. It seems like you’ve done a lot of that kind of standardization really amazingly on this site too. I’m just saying, that this is could be a good argument tool to use on skeptics, to ask them what their standard Skeptical Method is and show just how any slightly decent one would automatically have guided them to the right answer.
Here is a moderate-effort example of a Skeptical Method, and it should really not be all that hard for ‘experts’ to have better ones:
1:The skeptic explains his hypothesis of a conventional event being misdiagnosed as something ‘woo’, and most importantly, the predicted results of this hypothesis. The hypothesis should begin with the common circumstance, NOT the ‘woo’, so that the focus is on why this is a normal event. So, this is an aircraft flight, which means the skeptic could check which airliners routinely fly over that area and request logs of if any fly over at that time. He would then have to explain why the airliner could get completely mistaken as a UFO, and the onus is on him to explain why a normal event turned into something ‘paranormal’, since 99.999% of plane flights are ‘normal’. Then the skeptic has to explain why something conveniently hides the plane or other conventional circumstance of flying things, whether an animal or a helicopter or who knows what else, at the exact moment when it would allow it to be spotted as UFO. Then if they just follow the train of logic obviously they find out it’d be a miracle for it to not be soon exposed as a plane.
2:The skeptic covers the opposing side and lists the expected results. Here this would be the UFO Hypothesis, with the expected result being that a UFO should suddenly appear out of the blue with little to no way to see it coming, move at unexplainable speeds and/or angles, and then immediately leave. If the skeptic is to ‘zoom out’ to the over arching UFO Hypothesis of how UFOs tend to be spotted, they would notice it is consistent. If a UFO pilot does not want to be monitored and/or possibly shot at with missles, whether they are an alien or some kind of human who for some reason has an ultra-advanced craft, then it is natural to expect that they would fly away immediately. So the length of observation is consistent. And if the Airplane Hypothesis was true then they would’ve just immediately seen a plane within seconds after that.
3:Synthesis, comparing the results and seeing which one is more predictive. The Skeptic Hypothesis here is very circumstantial while the UFO Hypothesis has the advantage of explaining a large number of sightings and subsequent disappearances of UFOs from military sight. If the skeptic wanted to go a step further, they would try comparing the average rate of UFO sightings with the Expected Rate that should occur if UFOs are all hoaxes. But I don’t believe they do this at all. Instead, they are reactionaries and respond to each event individually, which basically means they can’t construct a predictive or useful line of thought at all. The onus should be on the skeptic to not only ‘debunk’ individual incidents but start predicting them before they happen. For example, one ‘critical path’ method would be to check the places with the most UFO sightings and compare that to the proportions of UFO-logists or UFO believers living in those area, and the skeptics would predict that they’d be more common in those areas. This would open a refutation pathway if lots of observations consistently kept on getting reported by former non believers in UFOs in places where UFO-logists mostly don’t live. A correlation between the places where UFOlogists are and common sightings along with those sightings being by long time believers in UFOs wouldn’t necessarily prove that they are all hoaxes, since many normal people could be afraid to lose jobs by saying they believe in UFOs. But there could be further studies like trying to test for a correlation between low IQ or low education with being a claimed UFO observer, although, low education wouldn’t necessarily prove anything since you’d need to control for the possibility that well off people with high tier jobs have much more to lose by claiming to believe in UFOs. Addressing the fact that former high ranking military people including even Generals sometimes state a belief in UFOs would be pretty important too, since people like that have 100x more credibility than armchair skeptics. The point is though that many refutation pathways would open up if Skeptics did some research on this and they would make their general Argument falsifiable, rather than being endless reactionaries who don’t have any stakes in it.
The reason I think this happened is that the skeptic guy said it quickly vanished, which airplanes do not do. Which would leave only two possibilities left for him to logically claim:
A:All individuals involved were malicious liars or were misquoted/lied about for some unexplained UFO-logy reason which has no proof but the circular reasoning logic path that “They must have been since that can’t have happened”
B:The observation was true and they were not liars.
Since he didn’t want to resort to libel and get sued, he went with C:Hope the public is too stupid to think about or question this claim. I guess it’s no wonder that there doesn’t seem to be any coherent standard operating procedure to these Debunker types, they just throw together whatever shit seems like a good enough hobbled together nonsense claim, when it comes to the actually true claims at least. Seriously, though, I do think just a little bit of standardization would be the end of the closed minded skeptic movement, which is why they don’t do that. They cannot force themselves to argue in an even slightly fixed and logical way because that would remove their freedom to lie. I do feel like that is a strong solution in these matters, not just with skepticism itself, but with how real skeptics outline their arguments, in the way i outlined much earlier in the post.
Ethical skeptic, you often deal with important issues and right now I want to comment on two topics. This comment about asteroid interdiction is more important than people realize. The link I supplied earlier to an online NOVA episode called THE GREAT EXTINCTION was available for years. I’m assuming the traffic or attention generated after I posted a link in your comments to the video on YouTube happened to catch the attention of someone who was concerned about the financial benefit that NOVA could lose by having a video of theirs posted online. Shortly after this article went up, the video was taken off of YouTube because of the copyright violation. The video was left up for years prior. That is understandable and just from a strictly legal point of view but from a standpoint of understanding the collective threat we face, it only serves to keep people ignorant. Legends from ancient cultures about things glowing or shooting across the sky or hitting the earth, are understandably discounted and we don’t pay attention to such stories or fables. Unfortunately, as a result we don’t grasp the nuggets of truth, the true kernel of ancient stories or legends.
One example that has some support is Dr. Steven Collins and Dr. Latayne C. Scott’s book DISCOVERING THE CITY OF SODOM. Trinitite was found on one side of the pottery excavated at Tall el-Hammam. This is a serious archaeological excavation that can be found here. https://tallelhammam.com/ The link doesn’t quickly indicate the extraterrestrial overlap… and truthfully it will take some time to see it identified as what the researcher postulates as overlapping with the city of Sodom. Yet the researcher found the site and decided to excavate it based on biblical analyses. But what I want to stress is the asteroid or comet or comet fragment impact risk is greater than what we are typically aware of. Twice a year we go through meteor showers of what I think is the Taurid meteor stream. The little pieces of dust that enter our atmosphere create streaks of light that amuse us. These little particles came off something larger and larger pieces are thought to still exist. The Tunguska event in the early 1900’s leveled a forest region in Siberia. The Burkle crater in the Indian Ocean is a candidate for the fabled “Noah’s flood” and the speculated Amarah Crater correlates with the Meghalian(sp?) time period recently added into the geological time scale.(Near the site of the “tower of babel” that dispersed people and then led to the indo-European language development. (This is really complex stuff, correlating this with a Bible event, and I’ve yet to read the books I bought that deal with the scientific evidence. First most among the books is THE 2300 BC EVENT, three volumes that I’ve yet to but skim.) .
I’m asserting stuff has happened that didn’t get much attention in the past. Stuff will happen again too. I recollect some astronomers assert that we are underestimating the current risks of impacts by orders of magnitude.
Second topic: Vaccines. While usually helpful (if we encounter the disease it prevents), bad reactions have been documented. I’ll just add a link for your benefit. Occasionally you find a reporter with higher journalistic integrity, experience, and decency than others. Here is one I strongly believe is supperior to most reporters in all these categories.
Though I’ve yet to read the article in question, the reporters ethics are if not unmatched by any other reporter, at least unsurpassed by any other reporter that I’m familiar with.
Again best wishes and I’m blessed to have been introduced to your writings.
This is well articulated, but not good for mass consumption and spread of information at all. I will pre-empt the objection that doing so would reduce your quality. You need not reduce quality, all you need do to vastly increase accessiblity is lead with your most key piece of evidence and ensure all readers immediately understand you are likely to be correct. For me, that piece of evidence was the increase in autism rates by more than tenfold as vaccine amounts increased. Clearly, that is not just ‘better testing’ and better testing methods have probably never produced such an increase in all of scientific history.
Your approach is also awfully aloof and unimpactful, which makes you seem detatched. I realize that this is necessary to an extent, but it remained that way throughout the entire article and really reduced the clarity of it all. All those afflicted with autism from these vaccines who don’t have the fortune of still being high-functioning in some way are effectively ruined for life. For all such people, it is effectively almost the same as if they had been directly killed by the shot. They might as well be dead already, barring some sort of miraculous autism cure in the future.
If the vaccinations had caused mass deaths to all those they mentally crippled for life to die instead, their families would’ve reacted, but they killed silently, and now a vast number of millenials effectively don’t have any meaningful degree of useful free will anymore. The insidious intent is even worse when one considers that any group(s) controlling the production and distribution of said sabotaged vaccines must expressly be aiming to target the young so that the difference in intellect is not noticed. It is not merely to hit people at their most vulnerable. I am sure a 20 vaccine schedule applied to adults would also cause very serious mental damage like it does to babies, even if to a lesser extent, but it would be impossible to pull off covertly. If 10 million US adults all sustained injury like that at once the conspiracy would be over in months. This means the groups behind this are quite literally preying on babies and effectively murdering them. That is as evil as you can get.
There is also a very important piece of evidence to be known here for showing the malicious intent. American citizens do not get the chance to know what is inside those vaccines for themselves. The scientific ‘skeptic’ types repeat a lie either knowingly or unknowingly, but there is no open source free knowledge here. Nobody can take one of those vaccines to some independent scientist and have their chemical contents checked by a non government source. Correct me if i am wrong but I am certain that is not allowed, regardless of the fact that there is no conceivable non-malicious reason for it not to be permitted. There isn’t much harm any malicious agent could do with an extremely weakened virus, so this seems to be a clear sign of malice at the top combined with mass ignorance among most of those involved in the distribution and administration of the vaccines.
This isn’t even the first time a widespread civilization has collapsed due to brain poisoning reducing intelligence among the upper class. It is a well known fact that Rome collapsed in large part because the Romans used lead in their aqueducts and thus damaged their brains. The fact that said poisoning wasn’t caused by a conspiracy is irrelevant. In fact, that makes Rome an even more relevant example, as their example shows that a civilization can unintentionally destroy itself by not being cautious about the contents of what it drinks. Americans have much more reason to be afraid.
There is definitely a very serious time limit for this problem to be stopped. If most ‘Boomers’ die off within the next 20 years, most of the intellectual capital needed to effectively lead a civilization is going to be gone. My personal guess would be that autism causing vaccines need to be completely eliminated within the next 10 years, or else the damage is going to be too great for there to be any chance at fixing this problem. After that, there needs to be a very big scientific effort working towards an autism cure, as otherwise even if new generations are not damaged it is not like the last 20 to 30 years worth of offspring are all going to magically heal themselves. Instead, the entire medical industry is built around prolonging suffering for profit. There essentially needs to be an equivalently immense effort to the Apollo Program but in the fields of medicine, cognitive science, education, etc, for the autism epidemic and similar crises of health and intelligence in the USA to be resolved before we all hit a tipping point of unavoidable civilizational collapse.
Now to get a little more personal:I personally know what it’s like to get autism from these vaccines and it is not pretty. I don’t think i’m ever really going to be fully content until all those responsible for these vaccines are proven responsible beyond doubt, executed, and then erased from existence, sent to some kind of hell, or whatever sort of fate we are all supposed to suffer on death. My most recurring experience with all this is that I keep going to sleep expecting to wake up normal the next day but it just does not happen and probably never will. Maintaining some sort of belief in an eternal afterlife is a cope method that many people try to one extent or another, me included, but you can never really be certain unless you’ve had some sort of revelatory experience for yourself, and that’s something i haven’t had the privilege of having. Meanwhile, a striking portion of people either have or pretend to have some delusion of religious justice, that Jesus will come and punish all ‘evil’ people for not believing in God, that the end of history is something that will come through a divine force:In short, they believe that human history is worthless and that there is no pressing need for scientific and moral progress, since God’ll just fix it all anyways. Otherwise, they believe God never existed and don’t even believe in their own free will, and thus abandon all hope or care for progress because they don’t think they’ll exist long enough to see it. Despite your cogent point that there both atheism and religion have serious flaws, it is very obvious that the world’s main religions are highly anti-science forces that effectively seek the end of human freedom. Whether through Christianity’s prophecy of the end of the world leading to a Jesus Dictatorship, Islam’s core doctrine of muslim world conquest leading them to an Allah Dictatorship, Judaism’s general nihilism and goal of a Yahweh Dictatorship, or even Buddhism’s nihilistic anti-natal philosophy that effectively says everyone should seek nirvana/extinguishment/nonexistence, most of the world’s religions are basically anti life and anti science. I know that none of this may exactly be news to you, but in my opinion, it is all necessary context to what i am saying.
The fact remains that if current trends continue, human history could end in total failure. That would mean it was all completely worthless in the end, even believers in reincarnation would be hard pressed to disagree if all the human races on earth end up destroyed by a nuclear war, barring some miraculous ressurection like the type the Christians believe in. Even if humans could return to some sort of physical existence in this universe once more after the possible destruction of life on earth, presuming some sort of non-malevolent alien races exist and could at some point or another facilitate their direct or indirect return, whether through ressurection, reincarnation, their re-cloning through leftover DNA,or something as simple as their re-population through already-abducted sustainable base populations of the various human races taken to other worlds by any benevolent aliens that might exist, or some combination of the above and any unforeseen methods; all of that doesn’t change that human history will end up pretty much entirely meaningless if Earth is made uninhabitable. It would take a miracle to fix the Earth if it was destroyed by nukes, and even now, the sixth mass extinction looks like it’s on course to cause serious damage to the ecosystem.
Personally, holding out some kind of hope of a transcendent layer of existence is my ‘cope method’ for even having a reason to think that people damaged by vaccines are even the same people as they were before at some layer of reality. If there isn’t some sort of ‘truth’ to how people are meant to live, then there wouldn’t be any meaning to the massive loss that is occuring all over the place in terms of intelligence. It’s too bad that believing in a soul doesn’t exactly make your brain conform to whatever you want it to do, and it really hits me and makes me wonder just how much ‘free will’ any people really have. In an ideal world, I think everyone would have unlimited free will and ability to choose their thoughts, but reality just isn’t like that. An autism cure would certainly help the world be just a little bit more free, though.
I hope you bothered reading this comment all the way through. To me, it would be dishonest and non-sensical to explain this argument of mine without saying all the relevant context in ideology and religion, and since you already cover all the mentioned topics, there isn’t a point in not saying it, in my opinion. I just think that this isn’t some mere ‘intellectual’ issue and that it had better all be exposed at some point in real life or it’ll all have been relatively pointless to even talk about it, and it only has real meaning to me when it shows a fragment of my true thoughts rather than a pointlessly disconnected single-topic issue of Autism and Vaccines alone. You do not fall into that single issue hole either and i see no reason to do so. Good luck with your blog efforts to awaken everyone on these issues.
Yes TS, I read it all the way through. Good points all the way from start to finish, and your stream of schema – had connected-ness which is familiar to the way in which my mind works as well. The key point being the time limit entailed inside the erosion of our collective or corporate intellect.
Most definitely not for mass consumption. It really deserves a book – and in that book almost a teaching about integrity as it relates to skepticism. Knowing that we do not know all, and choosing first to serve and protect your fellow citizen – is an instinct that our science communicators just do not possess. Instead, they choose something which is facile virtuous and run with that like a bulldog. And as we see with the Covid response, that typically does not work very well.
To me, skepticism is spiritual. It sounds as though you have hit that point of realization as well.
Well, thanks for reading all that, it makes me feel good to be heard on this. Although I am definitely among the higher-functioning people who suspect they have symptoms of autism, not someone who basically can’t do anything, I can still absolutely see how a 10x worse version of the same issues I experience to an extent would be life devastating to some people, so it is still personal for me. Since Autism is the main topic of the thread i do want to mention a key little Autism takeaway i just came up with before side tracking with a paragraph or two in response about spirituality.
Pro-vaxxer parents of the world, OK, let us assume you’re right about every vaccine. 20 vaccines for babies is OK? Then take them all yourself 5 months before your baby is scheduled to take them to control for possible delayed side effects, and let the ‘Evil’ Anti Vaxxers of the world know the results. If you’re right about vaccines, no harm done, can’t ‘over vax’ yourself if even a baby is supposed to be able to take it. If you’re wrong, well, at least you saved the kid from taking the damage themselves.
Now of course objectively speaking if there were malicious agents working for a vaccine conspiracy directly responsible for delivering vaccines to every kid, then it would be possible to trick parents and swap out the contents for what the kid gets, if they were lied to. But that would require much more conspiracy networking than simply having some of the ones at the highest levels who produce the original versions be the ones who mess up the distribution chain and get many unwitting pawns to do it for them. For this reason it should be mandatory for all nurses/doctors/etc who administer these vaccines to take a very high number of vaccines like they make the babies do, to show proof of safety. If anything, the 20 vaccine schedule should’ve been rolled out for 5 years among a population of adults before it was ever used on babies but, of course, it wasn’t. It’s not like there was some pressing new virus threatening us all to encourage a new vaccine approach compared to the earlier vaccines, which probably couldn’t scientifically have been made in a way that was dangerous with the technology available in the 70s or something around then. Don’t quote me on that i have no data there although you might have some, but hopefully you get what i mean. Also,the Non Open Source point i made about people not being able to take home the shots (admittedly not originally my own, not going to name the source, although they didn’t precisely frame it in terms of open source values, but it’s still a vital point) still would apply in this case as well. What i mean here is that the parents could still theoretically be tricked into getting the wrong vaccines if they tried to be cautious for their kids and ask to take the same shots as them, and that’s only possible because there’s no way for them to make sure the ones they get would be the same ones their kids get when they don’t have a way to keep track of the shots themselves or verify the contents are the same.Although obviously as previously stated that would really require an omnipresent unrealistic comic book style conspiracy for the majority of the doctors determining vaccine contents to somehow be in on it, so realistically, if a lot of parents started making those sorts of demands of getting the same shots before vaxxing their kids, the vaccine conspiracy would probably fall apart.
The following opinion may be uninformed, but a confusing paradox arises which i genuinely don’t understand, and I am not sure how any Pro Vaxx doctor could counter argue this. There seems to be basically no reason that parents shouldn’t automatically get a take home copy of every vaccine shot their kid gets, if they are literally so harmless they can be administered to babies en mass. An extra like that would prove no harm was done, and if harm ever DID occur, then a control-group copy of the vaccine would be present right there in the family’s hands bring back to the doctors to test if something was wrong in it, or to whoever they wish to have test it. Instead, they all lie in the hands of the manufacturers and distributors, leaving it all up to them if malicious agents might swap things around at will. There is an abundance of materials to make these vaccines with so it cannot hurt profits that much to make one or two extras for each shot and in either case matters like public health really shouldn’t be so far in the hands of private corps anyways. The fact that there is a profit incentive in these areas just seems ridiculous, to be honest. I am all for private business when it works and allows more freedom for the people but this just doesn’t seem like one of those cases.
The only argument i could think of is that Pro Vaxxers will say anti vaxxers will start an evil conspiracy to damage their kids on purpose somehow to prove their evil anti vaxxer agenda and pin it on vaccines, but the fact is nobody has the means to do this. Even if you gave all the anti vaxxers or Pro-but-with-doubts Vaxxers vaccines and let them use them on their own, vaccines aren’t things that should be able to be made to cause mass damage. Moreover obviously most people have no interest in doing some evil conspiracy on their kids to prove their anti vaxx agenda is true for whatever reason. Meanwhile there would be a litmus test, if lots of people started refusing to vaxx the kids without taking the shot themselves first and a few years later autism rates vastly went down obviously that could be proof. There are also other options. If vaccines became widely available to the population without dependance on continuous buying from the medical corps, one person could be in possession of a whole lot of vaccines and then distribute their extras to other people in their neighborhood once time proves that the shots were safe. That would reduce dependence on a largely centrally controlled oligopolistic market source. Then people would also be safer from new rollouts of vaccines which they were fearful of being dangerous. They wouldn’t have to be ‘anti vaxxers’ if there were just a whole lot of vaccines over-produced that had proven safe for a long time the spares of which could keep getting depleted for a long time without people relying on new ones and cyclical consumption.
“Oh but anti vaxxers aren’t nurses, they can’t use vaccines or they’ll hurt their kids when they jab them!”Just switch over to the nasal spray type of vaccine where they send the virus up your nose, problem solved, for whichever diseases that works for at least which may be a whole lot. The problem is that this should not all be centrally controlled by either the government or financially incentivized institutions. Localization seems like a positive force here. I am no economist and don’t know ‘the answer’ or whether my ideas here are economically unviable, but generally it seems to often be better when people have more knowledge of what they’re getting and control over what they choose to get. Of course, it’s not like vaccines are the same as super old cars which can work forever and they have biological contents so they cannot be stored like that i suppose. But there could be a necessary standard of having multiple versions of the same shot available so that people who do not trust the new are free to choose the old, or at the very least more inspection of how it works and less financial incentive.
Closing Vaccine Note:It should simply be a law that in every individual case, the parents get the same shots as the kids before the kids do, preferably many months if not years ahead, as genetics differ from family to family and that’s therefore the best way of providing the most security in terms of knowing the kids will be safe from the vaccine. Yes, it would not account for issues like weaker child immune systems. But it would still be far more prudent and obvious common sense stuff than the craziness in the US today. This does not even require the public to believe there is a conspiracy although there obviously is one, it would be a realistic safeguard in a more reasonable world where people feared accidentally causing issues for their families. Of course more realistically anyone proposing such things will be called an anti vaxxer so the only real solution is showing the truth that there really is a conspiracy, but this is still a possibly useful example argument to show pro vaxxers how there is hypocrisy there with the different treatment of kids and adults.
Anyway, onto the spirituality point.
The spiritual point is central for me too not just in relation to coping methods, it is a prime basis for meaning in life, and can even offer an explanation of our ‘before’ life, not just an Afterlife and/or a next life if you believe in reincarnation.
My history with spirituality was not so much any kind of independent logical discovery at first but just finding convincing evidence online which seemed to indicate some people have gone to the afterlife and back with Near Death Experiences and similar phenomenon. Only later on when thinking started to make me see how this sort of idea could logically flow well did i start to transform what started as a (successful) coping method into my way of thinking about life. Although I figured out pretty much immediately that free will must have some sort of trasncendent source, and that it being derived from random matter doesn’t make sense, almost immediately, it took a while researching philosophy before i really understood all the implications.
Your one blog post on spirituality where you said that any freewill source in a determinist system must inevitably come from outside the system, that helped articulate my internal thoughts in a slightly better way than anything i had previously read on the subject, although some ideas i read in philosophy were similar. They just didn’t quite get at it in the same way. It’s the idea of the illusion of free will that is the strangest as it should simply be a ‘phenomenon’ of free will, not an illlusion dismissed a priori. I once reasoned that the universe should be full of fully unconscious free-willless automatons if it didn’t exist at all, who unobservedly walked and talked like they had free will but really didn’t inside. But even that now just seems silly. A ‘will-less’ reality should not suddenly conjure free will into existence as an illusion and have results that seem somehow to be exactly the same as what a Free Will Possessing universe looks like, there should be a way to tell them apart. Otherwise one must assume a sort of Bizzaro World universe where everything is predetermined to seem like its opposite and it somehow achieves this in mysterious ways without creating free will at all, all while not existing itself, which just seems like the most stupid and comical thing ever lol. There should be an ‘expected result’ without freewill and one with free will:Bare minimum, all AntiFreeWill believers should come up with one or more idea(s) of an alternate universe where Free will DID exist and explain how those possible universes contrast everything we see in the real world. Even though it would be impossible to examine these alternate possible universes or to check the rest of our own universe for ‘free willed’ beings with the way science is, it would at least be a whole lot more coherent of an argument if there was a Goal Post defining what type of evidence would prove it wrong.
Maybe what would convince them of free will is when consciousness seems to go outside the limits of the brain, like with verdical or transcendent experiences people have which seem to defy the limits of the brain/allow them to obtain info they shouldn’t or survive medical conditions that should result in permanent disability coma or death? IMO this is exactly what often occurs in real life in many people’s consistent anecdotal reports and real life events like survival of impossible medical conditions which cannot reasonably be attributed to chance, but I 100% get it why a very science focused blog like this would probably not have articles on supposed paranormal matters without very extensive proof and a fully 100% coherent hypothesis as to how it all is supposed to work in a non paranormal and scientific way. Whether or not you are convinced of any paranormal/afterlife phenomenon I can get why you might not want to set out an opinion without something like that. Assuming i’m guessing right about your opinions there of course.
Anyway thanks a lot for talking to me and i was glad to read your response, your blog is great and really really eye opening in pretty much EVERY important area. Seriously this is great stuff and ranks somewhere among the top 3 websites I have ever viewed in terms of logical consistency and importance. I mean, I’d probably put it as certainly at #1 or at least #2 but i don’t have a consistent enough understanding of everything i’ve ever read to have any certainty of what info source was the best, but yeah, i do really like this site, thanks for all the work you’ve done on this.
Something i forgot to say about vaccines. It is just a ‘why don’t you do this?’ argument to be thrown at obstinate pro vaxxers that shows vaccine scheduling is clearly non cautious and irrational. Sorry if this is more than you meant to respond to.
There is an easy way vaccines could be even further safely tested within a population. Not only do you have the parents take them first in the same regiments as the kids get long before they do, but you stagger the implementation with the kids. For example let’s say a new schedule is rolled out for children ages 1 through 10. What pro vaxxers could do is this. Only let one kid at a time have the new vaccine schedule, and even this is only 5 years after the parent got that schedule first. Then you wait a while to see if it was safe on the kid too. This already puts a safety margin between the kids and danger but it also makes it safer since in any given family if the combo of the parent’s genetics proves to make kids vulnerable when parents were not, only one kid has to suffer, even though that should already be very unlikely if both parents test safe. Then the other kids get the new schedule after the 1st kid tests safe, and you can stagger it kid by kid if the parents are paranoid, even if that means they might fall behind the schedule’s mandates. After all, it’s not like most vaccination schedule updates promise any major changes in survival expectancy. Preferably staggered progression after the parents would be beginning with an older kid who is not super young and vulnerable of course but progressing in staggered stages down the line to the youngest ones, although obviously, it may be unwise in itself to even attempt too many vaccines on infants in the first place when there’s no obvious benefit. If anything the 20 vaccine thing makes absolutely 0% sense in any conceivable universe until the kids are actually going to school and thus could have a more realistic chance of being exposed to viruses so it happening to infants is pure idiocy. And of course, this ‘staggered interval’ approach would be used with years to check for symptoms as you wisely said with the one graph i don’t quite remember that pointed out how not all damage happens right away.
Do you see what i’m going with here? The main point of the aforementioned Staggered Vaccine Interval approach is to create a localized and INTERNAL Control Group for each and every family so they do not have to rely on easily faked or badly conducted or lazy science based on ultra broad statistics. There would be the clearly healty kids, and the adult who took the vaccine and got ill effects, and then if anyone did get sick from the shot, it would only be one kid at a time. Of course this would not be the case with any ultra dangerous diseases but as far as i’m aware most of the dangerous vaccines are to non dangerous diseases anyways. Side note that would be logical as vaccine conspiracy creators would not want to make it so the common vaccines to actually lethal or very dangerous diseases are useless or sabotaged, so if they made only vaccines that are objectively unimportant sabotaged, they would not suffer. Furthermore, those highest in such a conspiracy would be very rich. That means sending kids to private school, and that then means the kids don’t have to get state mandated vaccines for public ed, correct me if i’m wrong about that. And if the private school has its own mandated vaccine schedule any conspiracy to manipulate those would be likely easier than changing what is supplied for vast numbers of public school students, and the rich, who are naturally more able to conduct conspiracies for obvious reasons, would have an easier time shielding their kids anyways with monetary payoffs and such.
Anyway back on track. As for the strategy i mentioned, it would give every family a warning of any future dangers and effectively negate most potential vaccine injuries, allowing far better foresight than any generic ‘statistic’ can provide. This is to me along the same lines as the gun rights argument in the USA but offers security from a medical standpoint combined with obvious foresight benefits. This could probably be far more advanced if organized at a local community level in individual towns or suburb neighborhoods and so on as then not everyone would need be cautious and just a few could probably prove the danger to everyone else in a wide area, but i digress, this is the basic concept.Hopefully that made sense. And maybe it is even a good idea if it were to occur in real life? Not that i want any anti vaxxers or vaccine aware to do it to either themselves or their kids because said vaccines truly are dangerous, and it’s all mandated by the state so it’s not like you get a choice about the scheudling anyways. However it would be a good thing in a post Vaccine Conspiracy world and it at least proves the pro vaxxers are utterly baseless in arguing they have any safety protocols at all.
I recall when reading about this study in Forbes, and sparring in the comment section about this contradiction:
“For parents who do notice a significant change in their child’s cognitive function and behaviour after a vaccination I encourage you to report these events immediately to your family physician and to the ‘Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System’.25
~ Dr. Guy D. Eslick, Professor of Cancer Epidemiology and Medical Statistics at The University of Sydney, Australia”.
How many studies which included VAERS data were included in the “meta-analysis”?
“They excluded studies that used the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System as their population because, as the authors note, there is a limitation of: high risk of bias including unverified reports, underreporting, inconsistent data quality, absence of an unvaccinated control group and many reports being filed in connection with litigation.”
So if you observe an injury, you should report it to a system that will insure it is excluded from any studies into vaccine injury?
Enjoying your presentations. What do you foresee as to “…participating in global action regarding climate change.”? What are your initial thoughts as to what needs to be done? Minimization? Adaptation?
I will be reading your blog as it is more light to the darkness.
1. Eliminate remote manufacturing in favor of regional
2. Eliminate conglomerate agriculture in favor of local
3. Cease driving shit all over the planet
4. Eliminate free decay of human and animal waste. Rout to waste to energy plants.
5. Carbon scrubbing
6. Smaller scale local Waste to Energy-Zero Landfill.
7. Energy storage technology advancements
If ocean heating by the earth’s core is the root cause, doesn’t seem as if reducing man’s carbon emissions will have much effect. Why pay the large prices needed for mass carbon-reduction/elimination?
Population growth is another subject which cannot be discussed because of politics. If climate change is man made, then this is really the crux of the problem. Poor people tend to have large families, and poor people cannot be stopped from improving their lives with more resource intensive lifestyles. It would be inhumane and impossible to stop this.
Imagine what will happen over the next 100 years as billions of poor people get richer. They will clear forests for housing and roads, build factories for their consumer items, and open mines for the necessary manufacturing resources. The earth is in big trouble if this is not addressed. I would say because of population growth, climate change is already a lost cause no matter what westerners do.
The mainstream dogma and lies are really boring. I’m at the point where I think it’s pointless to address climate change unless population is the focus.
Climate change is not an issue. Solar flares wiping out the planet is. We need better models of the universe, especially the electro-magnetic sphere of the universe.
Also a plan is already underway to de-industrialize all the poor countries, and re-establish a social credit score with normalized energy tracking in carbon units with de facto elites having unlimited units through carbon trading.
Well, as we all know, stable cultural or racial existence is not permitted in first world countries nowadays. People are allowed to exist as individuals for the brief time that human lifespans allowed(the briefness of which we are all becoming increasingly aware of thanks to the Internet and knowledge of history), but if they’re of a certain race, they apparently get the joy of having to contemplate the highly possible complete marginalization of not only their own racial group, but also most of their culture as well. According to what is promoted in the mainstream news media, this is all part and parcel of democracy, and all of it happening within mere decades of the entirely foreseeable future is the new normal.
Sarcasm aside, this is a very well written article, and you’ve spelled out major points of the current situation in some of the clearest terms I’ve ever seen.
This modern thinking about race is very much in the line of the ‘eye for an eye’ sort of justice you see in the Judeo Christian religions that dominate the world. The different European ethnic groups that formed the USA once committed genocide against Native Americans, so apparently, they need to go completely extinct. White European groups once started imperialism against other groups over a century ago, so now they apparently no longer have any right to a home state that protects their interests. Individualism combined with the atheism of today or the extreme religious beliefs have basically turned modern society into a death cult. You can’t want something as simple as your racial-cultural group to continue existing with its own country for hundreds of years or however long civilization can keep functioning in the future, since apparently, only individuals matter, not groups. Unless those groups don’t fall under the targeted elimination category, at least. There are pretty much no 1st world governments which have the prosperity, happiness, and also the continued existence of the people they represent as their open priority. People are replaced in priority by ideals, except those ideals often don’t actually exist or mean anything, or are just the embracing of nothingness and nihilism, and in any case, they aren’t applied in any positive way to the groups designated for removal/marginalization. I am sure that if they exist, any aliens out there would be utterly astounded at this fact when looking at the world from an objective perspective. The gist of it is that everyone is indoctrinated with this atheist worldview and its all seen as totally normal for this nihilism to be the norm:
“You do not exist. Pretty soon, you are going to vanish into nothingness, but even that ‘free will’ is a hoax, and regardless of any intuition you might have, your free will just an illusion. You are not allowed to want to exist, and if you happen to be white, you should just quietly wait for your entire group to become marginalized in your country within the foreseeable future. For the original sin of wanting any part of yourself to continue on after you die and being part of a group that once had some sort of negative impact on the rest of the world, your sentence is marginalization and eventual extinction. You don’t want to be forgotten? Too bad. Please just die already.”
It’s quite a bit of a double whammy culturally. Most religious people are told to think that the Rapture will come eventually and the human world will be destroyed, which means wanting their cultural/racial/etc group to continue effectively goes against their religion. The religion says it doesn’t matter anyways, since the ending in the nonsensical book is going to be the same no matter what happens before the Rapture. This is really just its own form of
nihilism as i am pretty sure you agree, based on what you have said about religion here. This all being mainstream is just as ridiculous as it gets. Anyway, that is enough of that, the rest of this post will not involve ranting about the nonsensicality of mainstream nihilistic culture.
Normally, trying to prove the nonexistence of free will would be a valid scientific effort, but as you outlined so well in another article, the skeptics don’t offer clear standards of evidence for what degree or type of cognitive function would prove to them the existence or likely existence of some form of free will. Even if that free will is merely the result of a circulation of electrical neurological impulses through the nervous system, or depending on interpretation, if free will itself is some sort of non-physical process that requires such a circulation of impulses for it to exist in the form of a personality, neither of these assumptions prove the free will’s nonexistence. The onus is also partly on the free will proponents to provide some kind of rigorous definition of free will if they want to prove its existence beyond a doubt in some verifiable way, but in reality, it’s even. Your conception of natural scientific judgement was very clear and concise and helped clarify some things to me. Science is neutral, so for all Science knows, Materialist Monism, Dualism, and even Idealist Monism are equally valid interpretations until superior evidence piles up for one interpretation over the other. Right now, Idealist Monism(that is, the view that all reality originates from consciousness in one way or another, although this is not to be conflated with the view that individual minds necessarily have any influence and certainly not that the world is the result of any kind of meaningful intent of any conscious beings) seems like the most coherent philosophical view on the world to me, even if it does not perfectly fit all the data available. Materialist Monism inherently contradicts individual experiences of consciousness and free will, and while Idealist Monism seems to have little predictive value in predicting why the cosmos forms in the way that it observably does, it at the very least doesn’t contradict what everyone can easily observe about their own mind via personal experience.
But overall, this article you made is just stunningly good work compiling all the factors plaguing modern society today. I can only imagine what the world might be like if, instead of every possible poison or negative effect being thrown into the pool that is society, there was a concerted effort to improve and solve all relevant societal issues as quickly and efficiently as possible with greatest respect possible to everyone’s freedoms. Actually increasing cognitive ability rather than destroying it, for example. It is an amazing fact that so many people today have conscious experiences which seemingly defy the physical limits of their brains. If that were actually researched and some sort of mechanism were searched for, the possibilities could be immensely beneficial. For example, if the ‘super conscious’ state that near death experiencers encounter could be artificially stimulated in any person through some sort of medical procedure involving either biochemical or electrical stimuli that was verified to not damage the brain, the visualization capabilities of the public at large could be vastly improved. Many of these NDE experiencers report remembering the experience for decades after without it fading at all, if i remember what i have researched on this correctly and am not somehow repeating a lie. In other words, it is possible research in these areas could elaborate ways to vastly improve cognitive function. It doesn’t matter if NDEs are somehow the product of the dying brain. That has already been falsified, in my opinion, see this link: https://www.near-death.com/science/articles/dying-brain-theory.html
However, even if the dying brain hypothesis was true, that would have no bearing on a certain critical element. If it is true, then the brain alone can truly make these super-conscious experiences happen even in a dying or comatose state, it is rather amazingly powerful, and may hold far more potential than scientists believe it does today. Some people have trouble with visualization, and dreams can often be chaotic and random, so NDEs are truly a whole other ballpark of possibility here, complex simulations complete with a real time in depth environment that last minutes, provide intricate detail, everything, far more than what many people can do with intentional visualization in real life if they close their eyes and think. If anything, there should be a study done researching whether or not people with low visualization capabilities have them increased after an NDE, and if there is a correlation between high visualization ability and in depth NDEs and so on. That last one’s the kind of research pathway i’d look for if i was a Skeptic trying to prove Dying Brains were the only thing that could make NDEs, since it’d follow logically that a brain with weaker visualization ability should produce a hazier NDE or none at all. If not, then it might disprove that they have much or anything to do with the brain at all. Nonetheless, I am sure you get what i am saying. If there was more serious research done in actually trying to make the world better today rather than skeptics simply repeating trite things like that the brain is all there is, there might be major discoveries waiting. Even the most simple things surrounding taboo topics are apparently not done at all thanks to Skeptics. It is really just a shame.
Dear ES, I have a comment on bathing oneself in ice water when having a fever. I recently had a viral fever while traveling in the tropics. High fever for 4 days, didn’t want to do anything except sleep. I refused all suggestions I see a doctor, thinking the fever was killing the virus or bacteria or whatever was ailing me, as it may well have been doing.
By refusing to do anything except sleep, however, I was allowing the fever to kill me, I believe. My husband eventually didn’t listen when I said I didn’t want a doctor. They took me to emergency and immediately brought down the fever with an IV. I could feel it go down within a few seconds, and immediately felt alive again. It turns out I was severely dehydrated by doing nothing except sleep with a high fever.
I should also point out that I was only on the IV for about an hour. When I said I didn’t want to spend the night in the hospital, they pulled out the IV and sent me home. I could feel the fever come back immediately, but I was NEVER NEARLY SO SICK AGAIN. I believe that dropping the fever and thereby giving me the mental consciousness and willingness to drink fluids, saved my life.
It may well have been the intake of fluids and not the bringing down of the fever that made the difference. My point is that while feverish I was not compos mentis enough to help myself. MAYBE if I had bathed in ice water, I would have been. I’ll never know.
I think you have a great website here. I can’t understand it all, but I’ll work on it. I came to it because of the vaccine issue. Please devote your considerable mental powers to devising a way to ethically break through the brainwashing, or entrainment, or toxic altruism, or whatever it is that prevents people from properly evaluating the vaccine issue.
My father is/was a well-liked and succesful physician in my hometown (retired now, in his 70s), and quite a humanitarian one at that. He often made it clear in conversations we’ve had that much of what is going on in medicine – and especially in medical journalism – is highly problematic, bordering on the inhumane or even a travesty, depending on the topic/circumstances. There are trends that vanish as quickly as they arise, and often they are as ill-founded as they are widespread. And “science” is often just barely more than a buzzword, used to purport a semblance of soundness …
Pseudostatistical absurdities are probably the main culprit here, as is so often the case. And many people are suffering needlessly.
So well said TS. The only way in which I even ever heard of pernicious anemia was through a Twitter chat, where a person suggested methylfolate and cobalamine. I did not believe it until I was about to pass out at a conference. I took the two out of desperation (this had been growing worse for 25 years and was coming to a head – and had hurt my career). BOOM… In 10 minutes my life was changed. My doctor carries about as much credibility now with me as an average person on the street – except on specific corrective medicine protocols.
Science now, is a religious apologetic which our new inquisitionists use as scriptures they quote while they harm and kill our families.
I sincerely wish you the best and hope that you don’t suffer any more from such agonizing conditions! Everyone needs to find what is best for her/him and should not feel intimidated by some “authority” (what an absurdity!) that finds it appropriate to dictate a persons’s means to feel well. The “anecdotal” evidence for being well is all that is needed for the “anecdotal” entity that is a human being :)
This is a fantastic post! Seriously, one of the best I’ve read here, and I am a long-time follower. For me it does lead to another question. Would this pertain to the animal world? I ask this because my wife and I are invested in lessening animal suffering as much as possible–not out of some sanctimonious crusade, but rather because we simply cannot bear to see animals in unnecessary pain (especially when so many people are indifferent to and/or cause the pain). We never presume a god-like status over the animals, or at least we don’t consciously. Would you mind extending your analysis to this situation? I would very much appreciate it. Thank you for all that you do here!
Thanks for the kind feedback and readership. This is a core ethical question we raise inside the famine strategies, food market studies and market evolutions in which I have been involved. I am personally adamant about a ‘no suffering’ lifestyle and termination of life for livestock animals. I recognize fully that we have yet to even get to this destination as a first priority. The disease-induced pig shortage in China right now is serving to introduce a whole new host of horrific treatments of those animals in order to feed China.
Your question pertains more to ‘Do we even have to do this at all?’
I must offer up that while I admire the ethic, I cannot answer two questions:
1. Is this practicable as a supply chain/sourcing philosophy adequate to feed mankind? and
2. Is it enforceable? or will it simply serve to render back-lot horrors more common throughout the industry?
The bottom line: I have not arrived at a suitable answer on this. Save for the notion that perhaps, reproducing out of control is not an unconstrained human right. In all our endeavors – all rights come with responsibilities. Right now, mankind is out of control, and perhaps this is just a symptom of that insanity.
Thank you very much for your response! I am very intrigued about how to factor a “no suffering” policy into a larger worldview informed by the principles that you outline on this site. I feel as though the deep ecologists are often motivated by good intentions and often by good ideas. However, the modern world has changed the various ecologies of the world so drastically that, arguably, the notion of a natural context of life has been seriously compromised. A good example for us is the human relationship to dogs and cats. We rescue a lot of these creatures, especially cats. Thinking about recent co-evolution of canines and felines with humans is important, but how do we conceptualize the “proper” response of humans to, say, rampant feral animals in cities? “Trap/Neuter/Release” programs seem to work a bit, but there are larger issues at play here. I’ve even had serious discussions with scientists and scholars who seem to advocate for neutering all carnivorous animals so that the reduction of suffering on a larger scale can be accomplished. This notion seems to me to be a mixture of good intentions and serious alienation from the Darwinian world. Perhaps this is why the Gnostic cosmology makes so much sense to me, at least existentially: it speaks to a deep human suspicion that something fundamental is amiss with the cosmos. When the Christian poet T.S. Eliot writes, “Who devised the torment? / Love”, my gnostic sympathies kick in pretty quickly. Sorry for rambling, but this issue is very important to me. Thank you again for your feedback and Herculean efforts here to enlarge the scope of modern consciousness!
My vocabulary and limited eloquence prevent me from expressing my truest high admiration and awe of this article and thus the author. THIS (article) has reached the level of mathematical/statistical detail as well as given names to phenomenon (Indigo and Tau) that I suspected would be necessary to present an objective case in the inebriated court of sports bar advocacy. Unfortunately the long standing rhetorical precedent of Jerry Springer coupled with the challenging nature of abstract, logic, and statistical probabilities increase the likelihood of summary dismissal in every such jurisdiction on the grounds of “blaaaaaah, {insert ignorant insult}”. I just wanted to let you know that your immense work here is appreciated. My hope is that the NFL corrects, and in a pipe dream admits, this bias rather than hide their actions via more irrelevant penalties in order to pad their “stats”.
Also very enlightening that the SCOTUS has sanctioned this mafia corruption by speciously allowing the game to be considered “entertainment” despite a preponderance of NFL and network marketing to the contrary as well as collateral evidence such as oddsmaking for legal gambling and the obvious belief of the players and coaches affecting their effort and intentions.
Profound thanks for your presenting this.
As a retired Navy Intelligence Officer and Raiders season ticket holder, I found your work compelling and disturbing, and found your background intriguing. A couple of questions: have you considered getting this peer-reviewed? And, in your opinion, does this study leave the NFL vulnerable to litigation? Regardless, I hope that the Competition Committee or league officiating office takes seriously your findings, because I am sure the Raiders will.
Do you recall the old Naval Intelligence Command government center buildings in Silver Hill Maryland/Wash DC? Those were such old crap. I had black dust on my desk every morning from the decrepit secure HVAC system. LOL!!! I feared for my lungs every time I had a long stint ‘back at the office’.
Peer review… hmmm. I supposed that it could be reviewed as such. But the Peer would have to understand the difference between a Petition for Plurality and a Petition for Consensus. This is more the former than the latter. It is simply an argument for the NFL to create a quality monitoring system that checks for systemic bias.
Litigation – one could argue that the NFL Raiders brand was irrevocably defamed and harmed – and show the proof in loss of ticket sales. Absolutely. However, I would think that they all had to sign a hold harmless in perpetuity agreement, just in order to have an NFL franchise to begin with. However, that can be broken…
I do remember the old NIC building, before ONI, et al, moved into that shiny new building in the same terrible neighborhood. I feel fortunate to have never been stationed there, though i did do two DC tours. Hopefully, the NFL comes to terms with this issue. I suspect that your study will serve as a wake-up call to many.
Fantastic report. Just superb and a HUGE thank you for taking the time to research and publish this. Allow me to point out to you a couple things you may have already considered. The mathematical possibility that one team given all the changes throughout the years (coaching, players, schemes) would be by far and away penalized that much more than any other team in the league would seem to me to be indistinguishable from a miracle. In other words, an impossibility.
It’s important to note that just because a team wasn’t the most penalized team in the league it doesn’t mean the damage to said team wasn’t catastrophic. It’s good to see you pointed out that the Raiders were no less then 3rd though years 82-2019. I would suggest that, and have in my lifetime emphasized, that even though they didn’t lead the league in certain years that missing being at the top of the league in penalties by a handful of flags is akin to picking the fly dung out of the pepper.
The difference between top of the league in penalties and say 5th would be pretty much indistinguishable over a season. It is my contention that although it is important to put an emphasis and note how many times they have impossibly lead the league it is just as important for said reader to understand how even more impossible it is that they would be just shy of leading the league by a ultra small amount of infractions.
Sometimes teams don’t end up leading the league in penalties and miss by a penalty or three but lead the league in penalty yards. If one were to look at say the top 3-5 in penalties and included it in the research it would take what would be an already staggering figure and make it even more unbelievable.
I will be discussing this tomorrow on CBS Sports Radio show Silver and Black Tonight. Your contention that the tail function probability mathematics on the likelihood of all these years of penalties happening by chance, as being nigh-to-miraculous in their remoteness, is accurate. If this were a p-value, I think we would have proved that there is a bias against the Raiders beyond a shadow of doubt.
I think the trend for the future will be to watch both the PPP (Penalty per Play) and PPP Spread (Penalty per Play Detriment to Benefit Difference) each year from now on. That way the # ranking does not serve to cloud the issue of which team is consistently getting screwed. One can have a great NFL team and be highly penalized from being aggressive. But one cannot have a high PPP Spread every year, and ever hope to have a great NFL team.
The NFL needs to monitor this and ensure that their at-risk brands are served accordingly.
I am not sure where it first hit me, maybe around the point where you talk about the difference between a Tau Point and Indigo Point Man, but it hit me anyway, this is one of the most friggin brilliant essays (??) I have ever read. I came here first looking for the NFL cheating study on the Raiders I had read about at RaidersBeat. But then I started reading the rest. Why are you not published? Or are you published and just are hiding out inside this blog thing? Regards, Andy
TES, thanks for a great article. as one who works in agriculture AND a Raider fan i found it riveting. I have often observed the absurdness of the cattle market in relation to number of “middle men” that beef goes through before it reaches the consumer..with each stage controlled by someone other than the producer (unless the producer has a retained ownership contract – which is not easy for most), in turn hurting the ranchers potential profits, or as you referred to as the Cartel cheat.
The mafia cheat of the Raiders (and in contrast the Patriots) was also compelling. What stood out for me this season was the Raiders vs. Chiefs game in KC. I dont recall the number of times the raiders were flagged, but what does stand out is that the Chiefs were not flagged at all – not one penalty! So the NFL is claiming the chiefs played a perfect game!?!? I wonder how many times that has happened and the outcomes of such a benefit….but maybe it doesn’t matter since the NFL has now admitted their product is for entertainment purposes only :)
I would be interested to see how individual Raiders players were penalized compared to when the switched teams. Someone like a DJ Hayden and penalties against while a raider vs as a member of Jags. Would be interesting to see if players, who in theory would still play “undisciplined”, are called the same once they switch teams.
Erik, not bad. Did they get better in terms of penalties after leaving the Raiders, or get worse by joining the Raiders, Additionally was it a sudden change or was there a learning curve. That would tell a great deal. Very astute!
Also wanted to tell you this is a PHENOMENAL article. Absolutely amazing work. You are doing a service to the Raider Nation but quantifying what we have all known all along.
Would love to see the probability of Grudens video challenges as well. I think it’s 1 for 10 or something similar. Has to be the lowest success rate in the NFL (assumption obviously).
Again great work!
PS. Hayden had 35 penalties in his 4 years as a Raider. He has had only 10 combined penalties as a Lion and Jaguar over 3 years.
I went ahead and added a consolidated coaches index to the data, in order to bolster the hard evidence that coaches are more heavily penalized just for being the Raider coach. It tells what you cite here.
As a diehard Raider fan my entire life, this is something I always “knew”, however your data and info here is just the icing on the cake. I honestly feel like a scorned lover who just got the proof that their significant other has been cheating for decades. I’m sharing this as much as I can on NFL Facebook pages and the like… instead of reading it, people are just responding to me like I’m wearing a tin-foil hat. It would be nice if some legit news outlets would report on it. I feel calling the NFL out is the only way this will change. In the meantime, they’re basically the WWE
Rich… whether this is agency or simply bias, they are the WWE – just deceiving us and bilking us out of money in the process.
Fascinating article. The “Fourth Party” is often like a self-creating phenomenon that arises out of the bifurcation (and so its “solution”) – at least it seems so to me.
A pleasure, and glad that you have found the site useful. This is a strange world, indeed. I suppose that, once we remove the veneer of strangeness from lies – the only thing which will happen is that the truth will be found even stranger than were the lies themselves.
Thank you for your reply … and indeed, the truths one can encounter in life are most definitely stranger than all the abstract rationalizations that are usually employed to make sense of it all. I’m just glad someone like you exists – someone who sees through the pseudointellectual aggrandizement and intimidation tactics that rule so much of today’s Intelligentsia. You expose the mechanisms behind all that, which is no small accomplishment …
Very thought provoking. Thanks you for this thoughtful assessment. And I appreciate the comment/ caveat that ‘correlation do not imply causality”. Clearly avoid the fallacy of composition. The graphs (where one normally interprets the x-axis as time) could be define a smidge more clearly. A bigger graph would help. Of note; it is possibly the psychological pushback expressed in majority Islamic countries, to changes in perceived freedom as by-product of movements in judicial infrastructure (ok, imposing more strict Shariah schools i.e. Wahhabism) as a contributing facor for analysis. The difference in depiction being largely the statis v. process nature inherently “baked in” during compiling and interpreting statistics. You did excellent work combining extensive Pew research versus Happiness Index. I’ve tried to divine the conclusions incompletely (and sloppily because I have putty in my frontal lobes) but such combinations are by their very nature always a bit dicey.
Thanks for the feedback Chris – yes, the x-axis is a ranking of country by happiness – and is actually visually communicated by means of the blue line in each graphic (which does not change between the four graphs). So one has to examine both the axis and its projection into the graph in order to understand the x-axis fully. In other words this is not a Pearson Ordinality (abscissa, mantissa, R, R2, etc.) – which visually depicts a mathematical correlation between two independent variables.
Rather this is a an Associative Graphic (both indices bear an independent graph to themself), depicting the relationship between two factors which have already been established as in a dependent relationship. The graph simply demonstrates how this already established relationship plays out.
Yes, how this actually is precipitated is a separate discussion – and in my work overseas there are a number of reasons I have observed and think to contribute to this injustice on humanity – however, those would require more study before they can be asserted.
This reminds me very strongly of the tactics used by senior doctors in Australia, both those working closely with the pharmaceutical industry, and those of the doctors group styling themselves “Friends of Science in Medicine” .
Various celebrity skeptics in the USA (lets not give them anything to start a defamation action) with fancy sounding blogs and websites are probably doing even more damage in the US than their counterparts are in Australia.
While their arguments are supposedly very impressive in fact they offer no arguments at all. Just flim flam.
They continually appeal to authority and come down making their pronouncements from on high, never addressing the evidence proffered in debate. Apparently their seniority excuses them from debating anything inconvenient.
They have proved a serious threat to the viability of chiropractic and treatments like acupuncture and naturopathy.
It is a concern when they do this under the cover of the anonymity afforded by the web, but a more serious worry if they feel able to operate in broad daylight.
Thanks MiB! Good to see you again. And if it were only acupuncture, chiropractic and naturopathy – that would be one level of oppression. But the wholesale attempt to sell us our own nutrients and foods as ‘medicines’ under their control and distribution, is diabolical. Dark.
Wonderful chewy assessment for a ‘neologician’. Would enjoy a chance to discuss this from a semiotic perspective. Perhaps you could google my brief presentation I delivered at the Semiotic Society’s annual symposium found by googling “neologisms as signpost”. Again, appreciation for your academic efforts. (My name is Chris, I’m a gradual student at St Thomas University in Houston
Asteroid/Comet interdiction is a very important topic and you’ve given more thought to it than anyone I know. I’ve got a folder of links on the topic that I labeled, “Impact Hazard.”
The hypothesis that a comet or fragment thereof hit the North American Laurentia Ice Sheet some 12,850 years ago or so keeps racking up new supporting evidence though critics of the theory are holding sway on Wikipedia and Science Magazine, last I heard.
Giving new alarm to impact risks is a study that shows Centaurs, which are hundred+ kilometer icy objects that sometimes get flung by Jupiter into the inner solar system and then start disintegrating into multiple projectiles that cross earth’s orbit.
And this is a NOVA episode now six years old or more that covers this topic. Much more evidence has come out to support the theory since then.
And then there are other papers that suggest that the Taurid Meteor Stream has some dangerous bands in it that contain large, yet hidden, potential bolides. Maybe I’ll enclose more links in another comment if it seems appropriate.
Antonia Zamoro shows how the energy of this impact was dissipated by ejecting ice boulders that left there mark on shallow, earthquake liquefied ground and that the conical cavities point to the impact site. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM8bvhhFAB-Wmr-PeEVkGTA
Interesting article. I wonder what you think of this article by Alex Malpass, an interesting philosopher of religion who I’ve followed for a while that discusses something similar to what you described here (to be fair, it was in the context of a religious argument, the Kalam, but still interesting):
1. The equivocal nature of the word Nothing. Here we have basically broken down Nothing into its condition statement, such that logical truths can be assembled from its sub-component concepts. There is zero and there is the state of nothing – which are the two general sets of terms. Suddenly the term is useful again – provided one uses the more precise version.
2. But even more important, Alex has touched on the issue of intent. It is not the presence of creation or design in the cosmos which is our litmus – rather the role, contribution and presence of intent. This applies to ontology and well as to something as objective as genomics. I can rule out creation and intelligent design with good phylogenetics – but I cannot rule out intent. This is where our deliberation should reside ethically.
Intent is the foundation of cause and effect, as he cites…
But even more important, intent is sticky. It has a logical persistence which circumvents artificial limitations set up by boundaries of ‘design’ or ‘nothing’ or ’cause to effect’.
No matter which of those states I touch or effect, I am still left with intent as persistent in the set of Wittgenstein objects. This curious feature may stem from intent being substrate to our reality, or it may just be a quirky form of reality that ends at our Planck bounds like everything else… But one thing is for sure – while everything else has to end at that discrete bound – intent does not.
Key question! Intent is the will of an intelligence. Will alone is not enough.
A Robot has a will, but that is not the same as intent. Intent is bound inside the manufacturer of the robot, not the robot itself.
This can be delineated by the double slit experiment, wherein an observer with Intent to observe alters the experiment and forces the photon to either particle or wave observation.
The question arises – If I insert a robot into this dynamic and leave the robot unobserved, the robot might even have a will to observe the particle/wave effect at times, by manner of its random assignment protocol. However, this will not serve to alter the double slit experiment – As the double slit itself is nothing more than a simple robot to begin with – which by itself does not resolve the uncertainty state.
This provides the dividing line between intent and will.
TES
Ethical Skeptic,
I saw this on Twitter today and thought it sounded interesting. I have read your articles on and off over the years with varying amounts of comprehension and sporadic epiphany. So until today you were a casual read offering some good value for those who focus on the detail behind our skepticism and skeptic pretenders. You think differently.
But this post today on ELORA I found to be absolutely brilliant as a scheme to deflect asteroids. Fucking next level in its acumen. The fact that no one (to my knowledge) has come up with this, despite some of the best minds on the planet addressing this issue for decades – is commentary upon your work or whatever it is you do. This post today has erased any doubt in my mind that something extraordinary is going on inside your head. Either that or you have help from aliens – (and a staff of graphics artists).
An old fan, and a new appreciation. I put my email address on the comment form as well. I have a couple suggestions I would like to throw your way and get your feedback. Thanks!
That is appreciated very much, I can tell you. Yes, my articles are not for the casual reader, nor even science enthusiast. But the feedback on the ELORA concept proposal is very comforting. I never know how ideas are going to be received. But this is one I have been working on for probably 13 years now.
I am flattered by your kind comments. Thanks for your readership, and yes – I will gladly take any suggestions you might have to offer. Did they pertain to the ELORA post, or to something else? My email is theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com.
Hi TES, I’m back! With my own blog, as you can see :) I have had some thoughts about the conversation we had.
In our discussion, it seems like what I was really trying to get at, but didn’t know what exactly to call it as I wasn’t that familiar with philosophy (and am still trying to work on it), was the epistemic regress problem. I was probably trying to address Foundationalism and arguing for Coherentism, hence my comment “What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.” I think what I trying to say “Imagine if we accept all the proposed axioms (e.g. of Rationalism, Emperiscism, ect.) as valid. Then we could use them to address each other and test which one is most coherent.” Of course, the problem was with my assumption that we could represent the infinitely many possible “worldviews” . It seems like when you said “Our knowledge is based upon observation, not beliefs ” we were talking past each other, with me coming from an internalist standpoint and you disagreeing.
I see this now, as it relates more clearly what you were attempting to say. Now this approach, lending credibility to all sources of knowledge – and rather simply allowing accrued information to begin to falsify wayward ideas naturally… totally agree. This removes the philosophical argument from the context of belief. I get you now.
I use this principle early in the outline of Ethical Skepticism. One does not have to go around ‘debunking’ things. All you need do for 90% of bunk is to produce more information, and the bunk will step on its own dick eventually. The skeptic does not have to go around debunking things (which is an inverse negation way of declaring truth- without appearing to do so), as that is just another form of bad information itself. The fact that such a process might hit on a truth, is merely accidental (and used as a propaganda anecdote).
Glad to have you back and commenting. Two comments in one day for my blog!! LOL!!
Yeah I’m ambivalent about Foundationalism vs Coherentism. Of course, some have proposed a middle ground, which makes sense. I wonder what you think of probabilistic skepticism. I a while back read a book online defending that view and arguing for this:
This too makes sense now. The progression of an epistemology should be both continuous and asymptotic. There should not be a circular or self-converging facet to the critical path of the progression of incremental risk in its development. This makes total sense, yes. Circularity and self convergence are indicative that someone either has an agenda or has gotten lazy, or both.
Makes a lot of sense. I would differ with the terms they have chosen to describe the principle, but it is a great observation. Very similar to the tenets I carry in evaluating whether or not a model has been manipulated/constrained into its answer.
Good Stuff
8)
“both continuous and asymptotic”
What is that? As in an asymptotic probability or risk -taking?
“There should not be a circular or self-converging facet to the critical path of the progression of incremental risk in its development.”
The critical path? As in the path used to support a hypothesis, or basically the
epistemic method?
Not exactly,
asymptotic is what I regard to be the correct word for ‘infinity’. An asymptote is ‘infinite for the relevant range’ – it does not circle back upon itself. It relates the perception that each step along a critical path of discovery is truly revelatory and not a rehash or reproduction of a previous understanding.
A critical path is the critical sequence of reasoning step by step, which might be used at a murder trial for instance. It is the salient and risk conserving pathway from entropy in understanding, all the way to resolution of that entropy, not in the most efficient, but rather the most effective manner. It too, should not circle back upon itself.
But yes, both involve series of hypothesis and resolution… with the goal of not ‘maximizing correctness, but rather minimizing catastrophic or circular wrongness’. It is the mistake of the fake skeptic, who seeks to maximize correctness – and does not perceive the mistake one makes under that method.
I think this is what the two references you cited were saying – but their terms were a certain school of terminology which I have not learned.
‘
David Atkinson and Jeanne Peijnenburg have defended such views pretty well, such as here:
What I was reading was their book “Fading Foundations: Probability and the Regress Problem”
Beautifully written and insightful article. Says the things we all carry in our gut, but probably don’t have the tools you do, in order to prove it out on paper. I am not sure I undertand the first chart, but I get the gist of what you have done here. I always questioned whether or not these polls were holding back on the issue a bit. And now I know. Thanks ethical skeptic. TW
Perry, after I read your gracious comment this morning, I modified the graphs a bit in order to hopefully make them a bit more understandable. The first graph is simply attempting to parse up the group of people who had never heard the term ‘UFO’ before (strange tho that might be) into who should be counted and who should not be counted, so that they are not double-represented in the exclusion group. Just a matter of parsimony in poll exclusion… hopefully that makes sense – and hopefully the graphics are a bit more straightforward and helpful now.
“When I observe scientists or SSkeptics pretending to be experts on a broad array of subjects, I KNOW it is a load of baloney. They have not had enough time to gain this insight. It is a pretense and a masquerade”.
Indeed, it is almost farcical that people like the neurologist Stephen N can pretend to such an enormous amount of knowledge. It’s simply not feasible.
One pattern that I notice though is SSkeptics relying on sweeping statements as a form of bullying, aimed at forcing people to agree with them.
Yes, to them ‘skepticism’ is not a philosophical mindset of suspension, but rather a form of short-cut science conclusion, wherein answers are produced from one’s cubicle or basement. Those answers can then be pushed in lieu of actually having to use the scientific method. It is a wonderful trick.
“What Ockham’s Razor asks us to prefer is the straightforward over the complicated, not simple over the complex. Understanding the difference is absolutely essential to scientific literacy.”
What an extremely verbose way to make an argument that essentially boils down to semantics.
Note: if you have never designed an intricate system nor been held accountable for the results of a large project – then ‘complicated’ and ‘complex’ – along with ‘straightforward’ and ‘simple’ can seem like the same things. For example, complicated is ergodic and forward looking, complex is epistemological and examines back into time series. They are not the same. Not even close.
I sounds to me like you just learned a new word, ‘semantics’ – and simply glomed onto it in order to use it as a billy club on others.
But you have to have actually done something with your life, in order to discern this difference. Skeptics who do not discern this are called ‘useful idiots’. Understanding the difference is absolutely essential not only to scientific literacy, but human literacy as well.
You have a lot of hard learning ahead of you. Sorry.
Hey Ethical Skeptic! Recognized you from Skeptiko-Forum. Fantastic well researched post! I learned a few things here which is great because I often see the same old arguments rehashed elsewhere. There’s some new stuff here that is really fascinating. I’m sorry to read that your own child has suffered a debilitating vaccine injury. Being born in the mid 80’s I wondered if my childhood asthma, migraines, and arthritis wasn’t also the result of vaccines.
My wife and I are about to have our first child and we will not vaccinate. We are already taking flak from some family members, and I’m sure things will only get harder. I wish more people could take a step back from the emotion and have a rational discussion about the issue.
I wrote this blog a while back after researching the flu vaccine because my wife was being forced to wear a mask for refusing the flu shot at the hospital she worked at even though she was in the IT dept in a separate building from patients and never saw patients. So much phony information out there from official sources… https://hurmanetar.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/cdc-flu-vaccine-propaganda/
Yes, I wish this issue was as easy as some of the medical profession makes it out to be. If a disease is deadly and highly contagious, then I am for vaccination in a very limited scope – knowing that I am assuaging one risk in favor of adopting another. That adopted risk does not disappear just because we refuse to look at it. Such is the nature of the world. There is no risk-free decision. But 53 vaccine events for all kids, on an issue with this extensive a risk domain? That is monumentally stupid, and no professional certification or degree can obviate such a poor decision on the part of our society and governing entities.
Thanks Barry – I did some updating today to give its message some more flow and cohesiveness as to how risk is applied in my experience doing Value Chain Strategies. Yes, this is not taught in Engineering nor Business schools, or at least not in this manner. I have worked in the past with my alma mater to understand this, but so far, only the vernacular is changing – not yet the understanding. But that is how it works.
The understanding of ignorance begins with Wittgenstein.
This Dr Krishna Kumari person thinks that she debunked every single spiritual experiences out there.
All evidence for ghosts and afterlife is just “pseudoscience and wishful thinking”.
Saying that those who look beyond materialistic/scientific explanations are avoiding the “truth” in order to deal with/feel better about life’s inevitable hardships.
By the looks of her blog, no one and nothing can convince her that there’s a greater reality than the depressing worldview of materialism.
Just look at her answers on Quora. ( Quora is often full of materialist/skeptics ).
Every time she sees an OP having these experiences, NDEs, and seeing ghosts, she simply dismisses the OP as hallucinating and/or being mentally ill, the OP was looking for a spiritual explanation for comfort and to cope with the pain of illness/suffering/distress, that she has a “real scientific explanation” for it all, and links them to her page/blog. And if it turns out that she hasn’t fully explained it all, then “eventually science/neuroscience will”.
I call that “Materialism of the Gaps”
https://www.quora.com/profile/Steve-Brown-145
And this Steve Brown person is a bit more aggressive towards the OP’s questions about the supernatural and people looking beyond materialism.
Being very quick to say “no!” and “that’s ridiculous and fantasy, because real science proves it doesn’t and can’t exist.” to the possibility of a spiritual reality.
Atheist/materialists follow Krishna and Steve Brown around like little puppies online, because they act like they’re the “brave, rational, and critical thinking ones” accepting the cold harsh ‘reality’ of there being no spiritual world.
A lot materialists keep saying that they’re doing society a huge favor by promoting ‘hard, real materialistic science’, and getting rid of and debunking “harmful superstitions”, “myths”, NDEs, and afterlife.
I disagree with that.
I’ve heard that belief in these “harmful superstitions” helps some people recover faster from depression, cope with grief, job loss, deters suicide, less likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, ect.
A poster on Reddit even got depressed over the idea of materialism being true, and the spiritual realm being non existent.
A materialist’s response to this is usually “Suck it up, and face it. It’s reality. Yes, there is pain and suffering and it’s not fair, but that’s life.” Heck quite a few, if not many, get depressed over it.
I know I did, and I was miserable when I thought they were right at first.
But then I learned that they’ll never accept evidence for a world beyond the physical unless it meets their ‘standards’.
We can’t win with the materialists. And we definitely can’t win with Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa and Steve Brown.
Those two will probably discover and assume that my entire comment here is fear based/denial, or that my spiritual beliefs are being crushed.
But I don’t care.
Call it what they will if it lets materialists/atheists sleep at night.
1. Science measures in the material/observable because of its method of incremental critical path and not because it possesses a presupposed ontology.
2. The ‘Gaps’ in our understanding are large. Even inside the materially observable.
3. Science therefore makes no comment upon that which it has not addressed and observed. Nihilists do not fathom this.
4. Fake skeptics and religious nihilists presume to speak on behalf of science. Our job is to say ‘No. You do not speak for science, nor its conclusions. You are speaking for a religion which would like to control science, just like the last one did.’
Parag Jasani seems completely convinced that he has solved all mysteries of consciousness by developing a model that has never been used before, called the DOS model, that explains how the mind develops and works, what causes dreams, why we’re all here, ect.
And that the mind is a product that emerged from natural selection and the brain.
That book and website should make hardcore desperate materialists/atheists happy now, because that must be evidence that all mystical experiences are really mental illnesses and hallucinations, and there’s no afterlife!
We can all finally stop searching, let go of spiritual and quantum woo, and throw away all of those afterlife evidence books, which are fear-based.
And forget OBEs and NDEs.
Sorry Jasani, but I’m not buying it.
Not because my “cherished spiritual beliefs are being shattered”, as some materialists like to say when you don’t agree.
But because I feel like I’ve seen this before.
He’s basically saying the same thing Daniel Dennett’s saying.
Just look at Consciousness Explained book by Dennett and then Jasani’s book.
Except Jasani has this “new systems thinking approach” on the brain to develop this DOS model. Maybe it’s just me.
Oh well. Whatever keeps the materialist fairy-tale fantasy alive and let’s them sleep at night, I guess.
But I think evidence for mind beyond brain is mounting up as we speak. Whether materialists and Jasani like/believe it or not.
I do not consider the possibility of an afterlife, because of some quaint attachment to the idea – rather, because the evidence compels me to plurality and I cannot investigate its anti-thetical ‘proof of an absence’. From there, I want to put the magical aspects of the idea on trial and test its incremental assertions. Pseudoscience is the process of ignoring an alternative, because you have it all figured out before doing any science.
A hypothesis reduces, exposes and puts its magical assertion on trial.
A pseudo-hypothesis hides is magical assumptions woven into its epistemology and places nothing at risk thereafter.
Sol-nihilism is a religion which masquerades as a science, by not doing any science at all.
nice one ES. particularly enjoyerd yr dissecting of the “alien life” shell game that skeptics like to play. I wish you would include a reference to neil deGrasse tyson as I suspect he’s a major frontman for this blizzard of confusion.
Yes, the Fermi Paradox and the Kardashev scale (both NDGT favorites) are just two the most celebrated examples of how we spin deception with regard to how an extraterrestrial intelligence might exist or manifest itself. I have developed a counter to the Fermi Paradox called the Parce-Ames Probability (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/10/02/the-fermi-paradox-is-babysitting-rubbish/). The dramatically large odds are that they will contact us, well before we contact or find any evidence of life in the cosmos. The dramatically large odd are also, that they have already done so.
In similar fashion, your show and website have indicated that advancement with regard to a civilization, does not necessarily relate directly and solely to its ability to harness large scale fusion energy (solar equivalents and the like). I think that the Kardashev scale is ridiculously presumptive in how it regards an enlightened civilization to advance.
The presumptive arrogance of both scales/arguments are demonstrative of the haphazard and oafish way in which we have approached this topic.
“Metaphysics is beyond that. It is not science. It is past science or un-scientific. Whether it is knowledge or wisdom is a cultural discussion, but not a scientific one. Any discussion attempting to suggest because a scientist utters a metaphysical statement that metaphysics is involved with science–does not pass any reasonable definition of scientific truth. By all means abandon scientific truth in the face of your fear and anxiety to embrace metaphysics–one is equivalent to another. Buddhism, quantum mechanical philosophical assertions, holy trinities. But science has a clear meaning. To deny that is… unreasonable.“
And
“There is no such consensus or a consensus on plausible and reproducible evidence on ESP, life after death, post-death conscientiousness, consciousness separate from biological activities (i.e. nerve impulses) etc. Of course, metaphysicists will always try to weasel-word these clear arguments into fuzzy assertions and non-facts masquerading as facts. I would welcome scientific proof of the expansion of knowledge”
Another thing. I believe I’ve read this from a commenter on a Josh Mitteldorf blog. It seems that “scientific truth” means materialism.
A lot of “skeptics” say the “if you think there’s something beyond the “scientific truth”, you’re scared of oblivion after death” mantra.
And I’m getting tired of it.
btw, the author of the blog the skeptic was commenting on, has been receiving many positive feedback, being a good scientist, ect.
But the second he started being open about the possibility of an afterlife, NDE, OBEs, and consciousness beyond the brain, he was automatically jumped on for ‘not being a good and real scientist’, denying ‘hard scientific truth and reality’, clinging to ‘flimsy evidence’ of NDEs and OBES, and throwing in metaphysical and quantum woo, in favor of comfort and wanting an afterlife to exist.
But hey. I guess you can’t please everybody. I stopped trying.
I vow to never interact with and visit the skeptics mentioned in my previous comment anymore. It only frustrates me and that’s not good for my delicate immune system
I need to get this off my chest.
This author, Catherine Giordano tries to explain OBEs and NDEs by using sources that aren’t new, such as hormone release, hormonal disruption, excess carbon dioxide, tricky memories, reaction to anesthetics, ect. The full list is in the article.
NDEs and OBEs aren’t the only pieces of evidence for an afterlife, but it seems as though she acts as if they are.
There are a a lot of comments questioning her article, saying that those explanations have been around for quite some time, that she was just quoting her favorite sources, and using the same materialist arguments over and over.
Her responses and her follower’s responses were that they were just delusional, denying harsh “truth”, and promoting woo science.
And when some commenters talked about their own experiences, her and her followers basically told them that they were just mentally ill, physically ill, and desperately longing for an afterlife.
She mentioned that her own friend had an NDE, but refused to talk about it.
And no wonder why she didn’t want to. Her friend knew that she was just going to dismiss it and say something like “there is no afterlife, you were just severely ill and scared of your own mortality”.
A lot of NDErs hesitate to talk about their experiences, for reasons mentioned above.
Many skeptics throw the “You only believe in religion and an afterlife to cope with physical and emotional pain in life, illnesses, depression, injuries, and the fear of death. It’s just a coping mechanism.” card a lot.
Yes, I do find it comforting that when life’s obstacles get hard, and all of the physical pain and discomfort I’ve been going through ( I’m constantly sick and occasionally get depressed over the fact ) will be rewarded in the end. But that’s not the reason why I believe in an afterlife and question materialism. In fact I know there is a greater and more to reality than just materialism, because of the evidence, not because I can’t “cope with the harsh reality of there being none”.
Many skeptics throw the “You only believe in religion and an afterlife to cope with physical and emotional pain in life, illnesses, depression, injuries, and the fear of death. It’s just a coping mechanism.” card a lot.
I might accept accept this as a hypothesis of science, if they would mature it into a testable/prediction-heavy pathway of research. But they do not. It is what is called in science – heavy ex ante (religious wish). It matters not how ‘probable’ the idea is. That means it is accepted as proved without having to perform in any way. A thing known as pseudo-theory.
Now, it could be that this is the null hypothesis… I might even accept that. But a true scientist sets out to FALSIFY the null hypothesis and never ‘believes it’.
Such people betray that they have never once done any real science. Never been in a lab, never filed a patent. etc etc etc….
Be wary of ‘scientists’ who do not cite, nor recognize the limitations of the method of inference they are employing. To plug in a formaldehyde soaked, 20 year old brain and observe some circuitry firing (with no control measures) you don’t really understand, and then attribute that to equate to the person, memories and identity of the brain’s former owner – is religious wishful thinking. It makes for entertaining journalism. NDE’s are religious wishful thinking too, yes. They are both a form of inductive inference. However, that being said…
Plugging a 20 year dead brain in to a DC electrical current and then pretending that its mapping equates to what the mapping would have been 20 years ago (you don’t really hold that mapping) – is called linear induction.
Setting an orange sneaker outside an intensive care unit window in a hospital, and having a person who died come back and say ‘Hey, there was an orange sneaker on the ledge outside my ICU window’ – this is called falsification (all you need is one – and we have hundreds).
Falsification is a form of deductive inference and is 100 times more powerful and sound as a basis of inference as compared to linear induction. This is just to bad for the religious nihilist. Science does not prove their religion. One can prove ANYTHING by means of linear induction (modus praesens). The only thing even easier to effect as science is to the DISPROVE something by linear induction (modus absens).
What they have done in this article is this: Disproving a state or object by means of linear induction (modus absens) is just one RCH away from pseudoscience. If any bias or agency (religion) exists at all with the participants – then it IS pseudoscience. No matter how many lab coats are worn. No matter how many beeping oscilloscopes are wired in series. It is still pseudoscience.
They must address the prior art deductive inference work which has been done by doctors and nurses all over the planet. Or they don’t even hold a hypothesis, much less a claim to science.
TES, you think differently than most people. Or at least write differently anyways.
The story of your dad doesn’t directly connect with the story about philosophy. Yet in a sense it is like an electrical induction effect where current flowing through one wire causes current to flow through an adjacent wire. This for example is how power is transferred in a transformer to change voltage levels…
Your writings … sometimes they have higher levels of abstraction than I typically see elsewhere. Poetic.
And yet the topics you discuss are (at least they seem to me to be) high level scientific or philosophical ideas … and the vocabulary of them … I’m not familiar with.
Well, it was a worth a read anyways. Back to my day to day existence, like go clear some snow off my car…
It is amazing how often people get things wrong and how misguided policies can wreak havoc on people.
We live in the modern age and we look down on the science and practices of earlier times. We ridicule people of a few generations ago for practicing bad science such as “bleeding” to cure people.
Yet with the backing of “science” … our modern age has produced a proliferation of new problems.
We have modern science and we now have an obesity epidemic in this country. (By the way I sent to the ethical skeptic email address at Yahoo on 12/21/2018 an email the touched upon some of what I learned from Dr. Jason Fung’s book THE OBESITY CODE.)
We also have been scared of skin cancer and have advised people not to get sunlight. And then we end up with an epidemic of vitamin d deficiency.
And here we are only talking about science.
I’m not going to try and make some over-arching point about honesty … there is so much to do. I still have to finish reading the book you recommended — The Art of Scientific Investigation. Following everything you write is difficult for I’m not familiar with the field. However seeing how dishonesty can infiltrate the esteemed bastion of science … it is a necessary skill. You are bit like what the Founding Fathers of the United States had envisioned in the role of the press. They recognized that the press was necessary to keep government officials more honest and accountable. With the ascendancy of the authority of science, you are doing a strategic work in exposing the many ways that academic and scientific “slight of hand” can misuse science for any number of nefarious motives. The motives range from “love of money,” “love of praise [from peers]” to unthinking hatred driven by indoctrination which can be termed “misguided zeal” and perhaps just laziness (an unwillingness to really investigate something before idly passing on flawed information.
Lots of battle lines in the ongoing war between truth and error. How many fronts have you opened in the battle against error and lies? You’ve got so many articles (blog posts) tackling error from so many angles.
Opposing dogmatic religions
Opposing dogmatic nihilism
Society understanding skepticism and how to treat challenging topics more fairly… instilling wonder again…
Changing the nature of trade between China and the US (harming the US)
Anthropogenic Carbon Contriubtion to Climate Change
Abuse of Climate Change for Political Gain
Encephalitic Injury to our Kids (whether vaccine or pesticide or other)
Toxification of our Food from Pesticides
Depletion of nutrient from our soil, killing the 5 classes of microflora, dilution of nutrient in our food
Well being of small and medium sized US famers & families
Endocrine and Autoimmune disorders and their impact epidemiologically
Taxation and Representation
National Resources and Corruption
National Infrastructure…
Changing understanding of competence and strategy in US Corporate culture
Global Food Security
A future for my two disabled kids….
A future for disabled kids of American parents who have not been as fortunate as have I….
Gad, exhausting just listing it. Five of these I have made enormous contribution to over the last three decades – and have finished my work therein. Very pleased with the impact globally. Some others I will never make an impact upon, it is just a discipline for me to hone my sharpness upon (a whetting stone). Some, are new avenues for me, which will occupy me for the coming decades…
Even though I reject many teachings of Abrahamism, I want to look back and say that I laid it on the line and did not sit still. I might be a Don Quixote in some of these areas – but in others I definitely was not.
I want, regardless of sin and forgiveness, to live a life that I could be proud of, nonetheless….
A few months ago I randomly opened one of the volumes of a partial set of books that I have called MESSAGES AND PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS. One of the papers (I can’t remember which) had expressed some thoughts that showed that it would be in everyone’s best interest to come to some compromise and avoid the Civil War. Certainly, in retrospect the South would have been better off to have just capitulated and come to some workable solution rather than to lose some many lives and so many of their cities in defense of slavery.
However emotions ran high and the US suffered some 300,000 deaths or so in this major war.
This just gets me thinking about the major issues of today where people are somewhat blinded.
Few people realize that the US population as a whole has failed to heading the warning of President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address. At this juncture there is almost universal support (within the United States) for whatever military activity the US engages in. Of particular concern to me is when promises are made and then not kept. At the fall of the Soviet Union repeated promises not to expand NATO one inch was made to Soviet/Russian leaders. That didn’t happen.
The Russians and some others are also upset because promises were made in the runup to authorizing air-strikes in Libya … that some feel were not kept.
All common sense would suggest that the Russians would be natural allies or partners since the strongest ascendant national power right now is to their South East. Are they worried? Of course.
And the weirdest of all things to me is that our Federal Government is not spending about 25 cents for every 25 cents it collects. The trajectory of this deficit spending is so concerning that even I can see that is unsustainable. Yet what plans are in place to address this national imbalance?
We are in the richest country in the world, and yet we aren’t paying our bills … instead passing the debt load to the next generation. I’m upset with Bible Believing Christians for fretting over some rare use of someone who thinks she or he is a gender that differs from what is on their birth certificate, while each of us have stolen about $66,000 from a future generation. Do we condone our own stealing?
Have we no morals? We are taxing the future generations with our debt … and we don’t represent them. How can we allow those not born yet to be represented? Time machines?
I agree with your points. Even your opposition to dogmatic religion should be a plus for any true religion. Why? Because if you oppose something that is true, they should be able to defend it – or upgrade their arguments. You would in fact be doing a favor to them. (Pardon my aside on this topic … I might be in that camp … yet as I’ve pointed out here long ago, I’ve strenuously opposed a number of errors that come from the evangelical camp. Other camps of Christianity have similar problems … I’m just not as familiar with “the terrain” and haven’t spent much efforts combating their errors.
I also look at what you wrote about global food security. It has crossed my mind that if there is ever a major volcanic eruption (Tambora size (which created “the year without a summer)) we might be suddenly faced with a worldwide decrease in food outputs. At this point in our modern society we have had the ability to ship grain and food from areas where there is abundant food production to areas where food production was wiped-out as in a drought condition. One major eruption might knock back food production for a while on a hemispheric scale.
Also, people don’t realize how insane some of the people who run for US president might be. If the last election did not go the way that it did … if US military policy had become one of establishing no-fly zones over a nation that was being protected a “nuclear superpower” …
Man, I just don’t think people think very much.
Though I’ve got no idea who you are and what you’ve accomplished … keep up the good work.
I could really have used some better editing in my last statement. One of my biggest mistakes was in that I should have said that the US federal government is spending 25 cents for every 15 cents it collects in taxes.
Also, I appreciate your statement in your first comment ” instilling wonder again…”
One of the drawbacks in the creation/evolution debate is that some evolutions may minimize “the difficult questions” for evolution and of course this doesn’t bode well for the sense of “wonder.” If your main goal is to teach evolution rather than “what is” you will focus on all the examples that illustrate evolution clearly. That is fine. However some things haven’t always fit well. I am suspecting that things like viruses have cross-pollinated some DNA and that the history of life isn’t always a result of lineage from an ancestor with gradual changing traits. I might be wrong … and I’m not attached to my theory … it is just that I haven’t seen all the evidence and I’m not sure whether the pertinent evidence to make a right conclusion has even been compiled and properly laid out yet.
Same thing though on the religious side. When people act like they have all the answers … they too are fighting against further research and discovery.
Love your efforts, most professional and credible site I’ve come across to date. Doing what needs to be done, thank you and best wishes for success!
I have one question concerning your pro-vaccine status. You make the case that because of smallpox and polio, one should be pro-vaccine in regard to these diseases. I just want to know how you know that these vaccines were indeed responsible for the decline in mortality and morbidity. Looking at all the downward disease trends, including diseases not associated with any vaccines, I can’t help but think that smallpox and polio would have experienced similar downward descents without the ultimate need for any vaccines. How do you know this isn’t the case and that vaccines were actually necessary and responsible?
And I can only wonder given the little, if any, symptomological difference between Smallpox and Pustular Eczema, how sure we can be that smallpox is even “eradicated.”
There are four things which are required to combat a life threatening infectious disease from my work in developing nations: 1. Fresh local food and readily available clean water, 2. Sanitation and household practices, 3. Local medical care expertise and facilities and 4. Vaccines. Yes, the first three are already assumed under any program recommending vaccines, as those approaches will have 80+% of the total impact on both mortality and morbidity for a number of infectious diseases – but not all of them.
Smallpox is not identified by its symptoms, it is identified by the presence of a specific virus genome – variola, which is held in a vault at the CDC – its genome can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8184534. As of 1975, it is still highly communicable and still possesses a high rate of mortality. If there were a sudden outbreak of pustular eczema in a region (or 7 other ‘poxes’ as well), then an identification of smallpox can happen very fast. As well, there will be 30% deaths with smallpox – there will not be with eczema or the other ‘poxes’. Yes, if smallpox were out there – we would definitely know it 100%. Now has a variant of it mutated and become much less deadly? – I suppose that is possible, but we have not found that virus genome yet.
But the success of approaches 1 – 3 above should not be used as an argument to be anti-vaccine 100%. I worked remotely (not a big deal) to support the ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone and Guinea – and based upon the communicability curves at the onset (which I tracked by modeling exposure tiers – the communicability rate was 12% by mere proximity) – we dodged a BIG bullet there by practices 1 – 3. There was a chance that even those would not have contained the disease. It was rather scary.
That is the direct observation I have had thus far, but beyond that I am not a medical professional. My stakeholdership and role as a philosopher is to point out Ockham’s Razor sufficient errors made by bureaucracy and the resulting dangers to our kids, not step in and pretend to be a medical expert in their place. Philosophy can intervene when science makes mistakes of skepticism, but it cannot pretend to thereafter usurp and take the place of science from then on – as that is not the role of an ethical skeptic.
Thanks so much, I find myself agreeing with you in ways that feels totally great, given the all-too-rare presence of real reasonableness!
One more thing if time permits: I wonder if you would be interested in applying your philosophical abilities toward the findings of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hammer. I know you may initially think this to be a waste of your time (sorry, that’s admittedly something I would say to social skeptics to try and defend myself….it’s hard to brush off old wounds imparted from the “skeptic” belittling effect) but I feel that issues like vaccines and the overall standard medical model of disease management has sufficiently warranted an entire re-working of our understanding of disease, microbes, and the immune system, if such a reworking were possible. And if such a re-working were indeed provided with real evidence to affirm it, accomplished to a large degree in a scientifically validated proof, then why not go there and indulge in what may be a real, model-shattering, paradigm shift?
John, hmmmm… I have never heard these theories before. I will read the websites and ponder them. I have never focused on cancer, because fighting the autoimmune, endocrine and neurological diseases my family has faced, has been a full time research job. Ugghhh. Thanks! TES
Thanks so much for everything you have written and accomplished here with theethicalskeptic.com. Outstanding!
I would, however, question your assessment of small pox danger based on the historic research and analysis of Dr Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk in their book, Dissolving Illusions. Especially after considering their accounts of how the City of Leicester, England, in protest against the dangers of the small pox vaccine, handled this disease using early sanitation and isolation methods.
Humphries, in other works, has also described how the CDC attempted to reuse the stored smallpox vaccine on doctors and nurses just after 9/11 when there was a threat of a weaponized small pox attack, but the vaccine turned out to be far too dangerous/injurious to use at all. That inoculation program was quickly and quietly dropped.
‘Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines and the Forgotten History’ was a true red-pill book for me. So much I never knew, especially about small pox and polio.
For polio, I would also highly recommend, ‘The Moth in the Iron Lung’ by Forrest Maready.
Len, will do. I am not there on such a conclusion, but am curious as to these resources – and hold open that our declarations of victory are not as clean as we advertise them (which is always the case). Thanks! :-)
This is why we need a Sarbannes-Oxley for vaccines (among other things). Those doing the “studies” must sign off on the results and be held accountable – it would help deter the outright fraud that comprises much of the vaccine research.
You bring up a great point – when vaccine programs are rolled out in developing nations, they are not ‘for profit’ programs. They are programs of mercy and those involved are not there to make a financial killing. In one of my company projects helping combat the Ebola crisis in Guinea and Sierra Leone in 2014, all our activities earn a purposeful $0 in revenue. It does not need to be this Draconian, however, there are ‘reimbursed real costs’ and ‘reimbursed fictitious costs’ – Even the latter should not be allowed wrt vaccines.
Fantastic, brilliant, intelligent read! Great fuel for those “intellectual” debates against those who claim anti-vaxxers are “anti-science.” When, in fact, nearly every ex or anti-vaxxer I know has done more hours/years of research than the average doctoral candidate. We didn’t just read that “one discredited study,” or see Jenny McCarthy on a talk show and go, “That’s it! No more vaccines!” Most of us had a personal experience that spurred additional research, a lot of it, which also opened our eyes to the fact that most of our pediatricians have not done any more than memorize the approved talking points.
However, there is a teeny typo in your second to last paragraph. I believe you used the word “must” instead of “much.” This was a beautiful post, and in no way is this a criticism. Your analysis of the medical and business sides of this topic is unparalleled. I just wanted to help you make sure it was perfect!
Thank you so much for your extensive research and incredible intellect. Your logic is airtight, and your other article explaining Fingerprint Signals is such a great way to take down the “correlation does not equal causation” argument that is so often parroted by anyone who is challenged by any scientific evidence contrary to the statements they’ve been told are absolute truths. Like “vaccines do not cause autism,” when in fact, legitimate studies have never been done on vaccines as they are used now, or any in combination. Even the IOM has equivocally stated that the evidence is insufficient to either accept or reject a causal relationship, meaning you cannot in good confidence make the absolute statement that they are not causative. It simply isn’t true as a proven fact.
Just as one cannot equivocally say, “vaccines definitely cause autism,” because the research hasn’t been done to establish this as a scientific fact either. Though one could argue the ingredients themselves have been positively correlated enough to establish a risk profile, and that this should absolutely be studied in a legitimate way, vs. these junk meta-analysis structures they’ve used to declare vaccines, as a monolith, do NOT cause autism. Even though the analysis most often cited, even by the CDC itself, contains no cited sources, no inclusion or exclusion criteria, no summary of the quality of studies used, no methodology, nor any other features that are required of a high-quality meta-analysis. Just a blanket statement that they have looked at studies of 1.2 million children and determined vaccines don’t cause autism. This is NOT how science works! It’s likely that the research does not exist due to lack of funding, unwillingness of the scientific community to challenge these statements (fear of being “Wakefielded”), and the career destroying efficiency of the agencies who’s interests are threatened by even mentioning the two things in a sentence.
Remember the wonderful quote from the HHS and FDA Federal Register from 1984 (two years before vaccine manufacturers were given legal immunity from any litigation that came from the harm their products caused). This statement was included in their Rules and Regulations:
“Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist.”
— Federal Register. Vol 49, No 107 June 1, 1984
The world needs more people like you – actual skeptics, who are not shills for the already mainstream collective. One is not a “skeptic” if they agree with what all of the propaganda tells everyone to believe. That makes one, by definition, a lemming. Someone who just reinforces the cognitive dissonance rather than challenging it, like you have here. Again, thank you for your work!
Thank you Emma for the kind words and the typo catch!
They have about a 1% progression curve of induction to support the statement that vaccines do not cause our spectrum of encephalophatic injury we observe today – NOT ONE SHRED of real science.
Yet we have – Necessity, Conservancy of Risk, Wittgenstein Definition, Parsimony, Address and Inform Duty Compliance, Supporting Intelligence and Physical/Physiological Mechanism. – ALL THE ELEMENTS OF SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS (see The Elements of Hypothesis ( https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/12/13/the-elements/ ) reside in the hands of those issuing caution around massive employment of early and frequent immune activation as a panacea.
They have essentially nothing but media rhetoric. The problem is that it takes a certain level of acumen to be able to grasp this.
Good observation Thomas, I have thought about this too.
Both the skeptic and the skeptic victim are either the coyote or the road runner role player at any given time. I tried to assign consistently one to the other and it did not work.
The skeptic’s victim is the coyote when they regard that ‘catching the acceptance’ of skeptics is the obsessive goal – it becomes their downfall. You can ‘catch’ (neutralize) skeptics by simply not trying to catch their acceptance in the first place.
OR
The skeptic victim is the Road Runner. By ignoring the skeptic – who is simply in a scheme to catch (humiliate) you. You win by ignoring them and just keep doing what you do.
Either way, an obsession by one party or the other serves to make them The Coyote – and one need spot this and take appropriate action – both version of which involve ignoring the fake skeptic.
In either case as well, skeptics need you – however you do not need them.
Thanks for the lesson. Another historical lesson that might make the same point is the island hopping strategy employed by General Douglas MacArthur in the Pacific in World War II. He just skipped over fighting many Japanese held Islands and focused on a larger strategic goal.
And I just thought of another lesson, this one from the Bible. Jesus encountered opposition from a religious group called the Pharisees. Jesus basically told the disciples to ignore them. He said something like “Leave them alone. If the blind lead the blind they both fall into the ditch.”
In any case, the failures of the skeptics will (in time) relegate them to the dustbins of history.
And there is also an old Star Trek episode where a bad person (claiming to be a God) thrived on attention and at least a partial part of the response in the show, to the powerful entity was to ignore him and not give him the veneration he desired.
It is ironic that some skeptics as you see it, are engaged in something they are so much against when it comes to religion. I’ll conclude this quoting from your article. It probably isn’t true across the board with skeptics, but it is true often enough that we can’t give them a free pass, just because they claim to represent truth.
“You must worship me as the smartest, cede unto me the power of punishment (of both the public and scientists) – as I now represent science.”
Quickly skimmed the article here. Part on Einstein is funny. The other part … well it might be good for people who know a lot of this stuff already.
Yet there is good evidence that life appeared quickly on earth — as soon as it cooled enough to allow life. The question then is did it evolve really, really quickly?
I don’t have time to get into much here … it seems far more likely that the early life stages evolved elsewhere and extremophiles which can survive interplanetary transport knocked off other planets in bombardment etc… we’ve even seen rocks fly through our solar system that came from other star formations, some transport mechanism like this brought the seeds of life here.
It is also inconceivable that life would have evolved quickly here but not elsewhere earlier. And since our planet is less than five billion years old and billions of prior years existed for life to evolve elsewhere certainly simple life would have had the opportunity to evolve elsewhere first rather than in the first few million years here. And if it evolved elsewhere first various means and rocks flying between star systems would have brought life here.
As for the rest of what you are saying, I just have to wade through unfamiliar terminolgy on top of unfamiliar terminology and I can’t even remember the meaning of the new definitions by the time I see them again.
Sorry for commenting when I’ve not read the details of what you’ve written. Really busy right now in my line of work. Scripture says something like “He who answers a matter before he hears it — it is folly and shame to him.” Yet I know much like the other commentator that if I had read your material very deeply and repeatedly, I probably still would not be understanding it!
Then why I am posting this comment? I can’t understand myself sometimes.
LOL!! When I re-read my posts. I sometimes encounter the same dilemma. So I understand what the reader faces. But, while I am developing the material, I do have to be true to what I see at that time. The problem is that I am compressing the context of a book, into an article.. which never ends up being fair to the issue or its questions in the end. I just cannot tolerate publishing a high compliance, 3 paragraphs on a complex issue – which then gets pushed as truth thereafter. Even if the three paragraphs are written well, thesis encapsulated and would get an A in school – I cannot do that. As that is what has caused our Omega Hypotheses to proliferate to begin with. Enough said though… Bottom line… I read my stuff over and over, and I totally agree with you.
Sometimes it is like I am reading someone else’s material, for the first time. Asking myself, ‘what does this say?’ and ‘How the hell did I figure that out?’ When I do a study, I go into like a trance – like when a beagle is chasing a rabbit, and do not let up until the trail is unresolvable, or I broach a new understanding. BTW, I had a beagle when I was 16. And my father and I would take him out to hunt rabbits. He would circle them back around through the hills and gullies and thickets, and I would sit quietly with my 20 gauge, waiting on it to come scurrying by, so proud of how it had outsmarted the hound on its trail. Boom! Dead rabbit.
Once, I picked up the rabbit I had just shot, and let my beagle work its way around to where we were (there was no ‘calling’ a beagle off its trail once hot). I let my beagle come up and have at the rabbit for a good 3 or 4 minutes. He loved it. It was like a life accomplishment for him. He lounged like a hound, much more peacefully after that.
Sometimes just finding out something, which no one else has ever seen… or finding an answer to a question, even if the world does not accept it… or even if it was different than what you had suspected coming in to the research…. are very satisfying. Like my beagle finally getting to gnaw on his prey.
As for how you write, … we all have different roles to play in life and different audiences we need to play to. Even if we be playing the same game (take baseball as an example) we will have different roles and different abilities. A baseball team might have a power hitter and perhaps an agile shortstop. Making the fast runner who likes to bunt and steal bases, try to hit lots of home runs won’t work very well. I’m not the kind of person who does well memorizing lot’s of numbers and details. However I guess I’m OK at seeing larger picture things and my slow, slow mind will keep pondering some topics for years.
So yeah, I understand what it is like to think differently from most everyone else.
Can’t spend too much time here right now. I’ll need to get back to my routine. This is “harvest season” for those of who are in the package shipping business. Not too much spare time.
Note: I’ve started slowly reading through the book you recommended on THE ART OF SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION. It has got some fascinating thoughts in it. I haven’t got very far into it yet.
Maybe at some point I’ll email you at your TES email address (the only one I got!) and discuss the obesity epidemic. I found a book by Dr. Jason Fung THE OBESITY CODE to be fascinating and even hilarious. (I’m reading multiple books jumping back and forth among them.)
It is amazing how many lies I’ve bought into when it comes to obesity. (I’m not by any means obese, nor am I even overweight.) Yet I won’t tease the book … too busy now. Later perhaps I can email you after I finish the book.
Excellent Thomas, yeah we are in the midst of holiday shipping right now as well. Our peak to average is about 2.1 to 1 for the holiday versus the rest of the year. Actually smoother than some consumer goods companies.
Yes, that email is good for me… the yahoo one.
My only beef with TAOSI is that it makes the same mistake which most science method books make. That of thinking you are approaching a subject smart. Sometimes you just gotta approach a subject dumb and say “Toss that thing in there and see what happens”… I worked with my kid on a project just this week. They wanted us to ‘Formulate a Hypothesis’ first. I had to explain to the instructor that – this is not really what happens in a lab. The first thing you do is (within safety margins of course) – just try some shit, and watch what happens. Until you do that – what question do you even ask. the ‘formulate a hypothesis’ step might not come for months or even years….
Science is sometimes more about ‘Hold my beer’ than it is ‘my enormous knowledge of this subject has led me to the door step of a specific question with a specific answer, which trivially I do not happen to know…’ The latter… hmmmmm, yeah it’s science technically and procedurally…. but is it, ethically? Still thinking on that one….
Yeah, the Thomas Edison approach (“just try some shit”?) has had a few notable successes. Not to mention the invention of the light bulb! He tried some ten thousand times, or so the story goes. Or the book of Ecclesiastes says something about trying multiple things because you don’t know what will prosper. Yeah the book TAOSI does seem to highlight some very smart scientists who spend a lot of time thinking and then they finally do a perfectly thought out experiment… and he uses the example of Louis Pasteur and some other people.
And as far as “just try some shit” it reminds me of the field of archaeology. There is a saying in that field, “You don’t find what you’re looking for. You find what you find.”
Sometimes that isn’t true … but still we need humility in all this.
Admittedly, to toss in lawyerly caveats, Thomas Edison had some idea what he wanted to accomplish in building a light bulb, but he didn’t spend so much time theorizing about how to make one … that he neglected just diving right in and trying different things.
I have read this probably 2, maybe 3 times and still I am not sure that I get what you are saying. Let me see if I can give it a shot. I understand that there are at least two camps out there. Focusing in a bit, one believes evolution and one believes panspermia – that life was seeded here from the cosmos. But either life evolved on Earth or it evolved elsewhere. It’s pretty much that simple. You’ve put a lot of impressive looking work into these tables and charts, but I am not sure that they say anything really which diverts attention from this fact. Evolution is still a fact – confirmed in the fossil record. And now even DNA. Bacteria are not falling from the sky periodically to seed the Earth. If that was the case, wouldn’t we have all kinds of funky creatures and variations of DNA on the planet. I just don’t buy it.
Anyway, let me see if I can restate what you are saying. – – – Because the ‘code’ looks to be contrived, therefore it came from somewhere other than the Earth? I don’t buy this. But I do take your point that, I am not ruling it out in finality either. At some points in the article you allude to there being two arguments. With this I could agree basically until there is proof one way or another.
Anyway – have read off and on for a couple months. Your articles are getting pretty deep on average.
1. Yes, I am petitioning for plurality, which is to say ‘We must move from one enforced view and into researching another additional view’ – and I am not suggesting we trash the old view, just that it bears inductive or maybe even deductive weakness. So yes, I work under the presumption of two models in mind simultaneously. If abiogenesis proves out in the end, I am all for that. If panspermia proves out, I am all for that too.
2. It is a very common mistake to conflate evolution, the observed history of speciation and the research into the mechanisms which have precipitated that speciation – inside one common genetic ascendancy… to confuse/conflate that scientific reality with research into the ORIGIN of life. These are two separate things. I am not commenting upon evolution. Evolution is a fact. However, how life began on Earth is a different matter. Abiogenesis is NOT evolution. Make sure that when you craft an assertion, it always hold the discipline of keeping the two separate. As far as panspermia and critters falling from the sky – I have no idea how often that might occur, if it occurred at all. I don’t imagine it would be a very frequent thing. And even if it were, we likely would never know. But you are right – all life on Earth stems from a common genetic lineage, so even if it is happening – it is not taking hold.
3. No, I am not saying that the code looks contrived. I am contending that the code bears 1) Unlikelihood, and 2) an elegant (and rational) symmetry and amino acid synchrony (is well arranged to support evolution through common-context mutations of the third digit of the codon, once deployed) which is an even more unlikely happenstance on top of its existence in the first place. Having a pile of auto parts fall out of the sky is one thing, having them bounce and assemble into a car before they hit the ground a second time is pushing credibility even further. Having that be the very first instance of a car – is even a third thing. Now, if the codon structure had ample time somewhere else, to develop this symmetry and synchrony – say a few billion years of its evolution on a couple other planets, and not the 100 – 200 myr timeframe we have available on Earth – well then I can buy that the code evolved somewhere else and was transported here by a comet or other interstellar vehicle. That is the essence of panspermia – but this extended conjecture is not a mechanism of the hypothesis itself, as it cannot be currently measured/tested. All we can test is – Did this have time to develop HERE. Yes, No.
I hope all that makes sense, and thanks for your comment and readership…
TES 8)
P.S. The charts are a lot, yes – but they served to open my eyes to the principles here. The classic codon tables do not do this at all. I had to make my own charts. It is just a necessary reality that they can end up hard to understand. Evolution is a fact, I agree. But I prefer to not make it into a religious doctrine which occludes my ability to observe science from that point on. (That is the whole message of the ‘Omega Hypothesis’ warning early in the article.)
OK, go easy on me. I am not a scientist or molecular biologist. So, I get that the origin of life is not the same thing as evolution. And you have confirmed that you hold abiogenesis open as an option.
But at a couple points in the article, you use the terms “deliberacy” and “prejudice”. So, I am not sure I can reconcile your claim to “I am not saying that the code looks contrived.” Are these not the same thing in essence? You also allude at one point to what you call intervention theory.
Finally, I reread the points you make about the code’s if you will, more startling symmetry. Would not the chemical nature of a two base codon, attract amino acid chemicals of particular types? charge, handedness, polarity, etc. Could that not possibly explain why there appears to be some direction inside these apparent symmetries?
Gotcha, and I understand, the set of terms equivocally overlap – so this is a sound question. By deliberacy and prejudice I mean the ergodicity which is incumbent with the structure of the codex itself. Both how it originated and what its result was in terms of the compatibility with amino acids converting into life. There is no question of ergodicity here. The idea of ‘contrived’ on the other hand, involves a principle called agency. I am not impling agency here in this petition. A system can feature ergodicity, but not necessarily as a result of agency. To contend agency, is the essence of intervention hypotheses. To add agency would constitute stacking of entities (a lot of them too – rendering that hypothesis weaker than even abiogenesis). This according to Ockham’s Razor (the real one).
Regarding your second point, since the DNA is separated by two chemical critical path invertentions, how would the chemistry of thymine for instance (the blue block) exclusively attract the nitric acid isomer of each amino acid? And why only the nitric acid isomers with more complex molecule bases? 1. The DNA base 2 is no where near the chemical in question, as it is only a LOGICAL association, not a chemical one so it cannot contain a feedback or association loop, and 2. There is no difference chemically, between C2H5NO2 and C5H11NO2. The NO2 is the active moiety. So there should have not been a synchrony progression, even if there were a direct chemical contact between the amino acid and the second base of the codon.
Excellent questions…. I may add these to the general commentary inside the article – thanks for broaching each one….
TES 8)
[Edit] P.S. I made the modifications to add address of these two excellent points, into the article. Thanks!!!
OK – good enough. I understand on that issue of what you call agency. You are not hinting that agency causes prejudice, etc. as you put it. That helps define those terms then.
But, forgive me if I have caught your logic in a bit of a catch-22 here. If you are contending that there is no way for a physical feedback loop (?) to provide a means for evolution of this code to occur, because the chemicals never mix and even if they did, the DNA does not have any way of knowing the chemical formula anyway, so how could it select for synchrony (correct?)
– yet at the same time it has all these characteristics of deliberate purpose and ergodicity then, – tell me how this could not have happened outside the contribution of an agency? Or are you cleverly selling agency as the only logical outcome of panspermia then?
Don’t get pissed at me, this is just where your logic is leading, if I am interpreting what you are saying accurately…
Chris
OK, I had to think about my reply to this a bit. First, no – I am not selling intervention theory. As I mentioned in my last comment, it is a highly stacked alternative which is way worse than even abiogenesis. So if I am stuck with intervention theory and abiogenesis – I choose abiogenesis as my pathway of research any time.
Now however, back to the ‘cleverly selling agency’. Yes I am that clever, Yes I see how it could be sold by this means. No I am not selling agency – and for specific disciplined reasons. The problem is that, panspermia INCLUDES the subset hypotheses of both agency, and no-agency. But in an effort to avoid this stacking of entities, I choose to not go there yet. For if I say ‘but there is NO agency, exclusively – I could be wrong, and I have no evidence for such a claim. So I cannot make it. Nor can I say the evidence ‘hints at agency and has falsified no agency’ – I could be wrong and I have no evidence for that claim either.
So all I can do at this time is say ‘panspermia appears to be the strongest explanation’ – not because it explains the most stuff, rather because it is the “necessary alternative to an enforced highly stacked doctrine, with the least features stacked under it of all choices.”
Then if the ALTERNATIVE leads to the observation of the fingerprints of agency… then the ALTERNATIVE does that, not me. I cannot force such a notion to either the pro nor con right now. Perhaps some other arena will contribute observations which help in this regard (consilience).
I hope that makes sense. It is where I am stuck – but I am stuck a mile or two down the road from where most of society is mired in mud today. I got a pleasant gnaw on the rabbit if you will (see my comment to Thomas earlier today, LOL!)
TES 8)
So I take it that at this stage none of the social skeptics have been caught in this net? This is nice to know though. It could turn into a very useful tool.
No, the verdict was issued under the context of purposeful negligence and scientific fraud. I do not think one could directly accuse an organization of malice and oppression until one has established negligence and/or fraud first, which they were attempting to cover for.
But, this does give social skeptic advocates, hired by corporate science, something to think about.
I appreciate you sharing thoughts on so many topics. Since I am still a Christian and have a high regard for the Bible, please pardon that I won’t address your overall points … though I agree overall with your open-mindedness.
Just a specific or two I might like to comment on. Reading your comments about Luke, I can’t be sure that you are following all this correctly.
Your statement (complaining?) that Luke didn’t clearly state that he was with Jesus for five years or whatever … it leaves the impression that you saw some underhandedness in all this. Most Christian scholars and the people of the time would probably have assumed that Luke became converted at some point in Paul’s ministry.
In the book of Acts for example the author of the book is writing “we” finally in Acts chapter 16. “After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them. From Troas we put out to sea and sailed straight for Samothrace, and the next day we went on to Neapolis. From there we traveled to Philippi, a Roman colony and the leading city of that district of Macedonia. And we stayed there several days. On the Sabbath we went outside the city gate to the river, where we expected to find a place of prayer. We sat down and began to speak to the women who had gathered there. (Acts 16:10-13 NIV)
All these “we” statements indicated Luke was traveling with Paul.
There is to me then some historical clarity evident in the Book of Acts where it can be seen that Luke was traveling with Paul at some times and not at other times.
Other evidence for me for Luke being Greek (I heard it said that Luke is a Greek name.)
You made some point about Luke trying to write an “orderly” account. Whatever Luke had in mind by the word “orderly” I’m not in a position to tell you. Various ways that one mind figure the word “orderly” could be time order or perhaps an orderly way of clustering the teachings and actions of Jesus in a way to better illustrate his teachings. What if for example someone wrote a book about Warren Buffett and his investment teachings. Would it be best to lay out his teachings in the order they were stated by Warren Buffett or would it be better to lay out his teachings and investment actions in a way that would give the reader the most memorable and helpful way for the reader to grasp his teachings and implement them himself? Look at how chaotic the Book of Proverbs in the Old Testament seemed to have been composed. I’m probably one of the few people that sees some meaning to how the Proverbs were arranged. Yet, I’m not trying to get all complex here.
Your comment about the Olive leaf in the account of the flood in the book of Genesis, to me I can’t tell you what happened. I’m not a believer in a worldwide flood. Yet scripture does say the whole world was flooded. However could the word “world” or “earth” have been written in a less than universal way? Use it as a mark against the Bible if you wish. I see other instances like this one that indicates a less than universal usage of the word “world.”
And all the world came to Egypt to buy grain from Joseph, because the famine was severe everywhere. (Gen. 41:57 NIV)
I’ll tend to see a scripture like that as evidence of a more limited scope of the word “world” but I can also understand a bit how someone unfavorable to the Bible could instead say, “There are now two instances of the Bible incorrectly using the “world”!
Also I think your point is “great” in which you pointed out that Christians normally see God as sending people to hell if they don’t believe some statement in the Bible. I don’t hold to that viewpoint that people are judged by whether they are a Christian or not. (Many evangelical Christian teachers disagree with me on this point very strongly.) So, If I believe you are mistaken here … I concede that it is only because Christian teachers have taught error and you believed that this represented what scripture was teaching.
For me though a good way to look at how Jesus will judge the world (or not judge the world) is what Jesus said here. “And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. (Matt. 12:31-32 NIV)
I think you may be better off because you are honestly questioning things that don’t make sense to you, than someone who goes around teaching things they don’t believe to be true. To serve Jesus out of cowardice or desire to get a paycheck or fleece the sheep .. as opposed to you who come clean on your doubts and point out a vast array of errors that Christians teach … many don’t understand evolution or the age or the earth…
In any case, I think you are doing a great job. Your last post also dealing with body metabolism … these are things that have a great value. We might not immediately find the answers to all these things … but the ignorance that so many have that there is any problem at all is indeed a problem.
Again across the board, I’ve got a great deal of admiration for you.
It is immensely frustrating to not be able to learn everything … and perhaps I see little reason why you ought to spend much time studying scripture … so I don’t hold it against you that you didn’t see some things the same way I do in terms of the life of Luke.
At one time in American history a knowledge of scripture could be a useful point of common reference when people discuss ideas. At this point bringing up scripture is often very divisive. Yet still I find that sometimes even atheists or secular humanists see how powerful some teachings can be on certain topics and they give a nod or approval at how powerful certain portions of scripture are.
It seems like it has been months since I’ve last opened up the Bible to read it for enjoyment.
You TES don’t have to respond in too much depth. I know you have some interest in seeing the comment section better developed. Having said that (if you think it best) I don’t mind fielding some difficult questions from any of your readers. So please don’t feel that it would be rude to me to let anyone criticize me or my position. If anyone has any retorts or wishes to express any opinion about how idiotic something I wrote appears to be … I’m not shy about trying to deal with questions or objections in a respectful manner.
Yet your readers are probably of such a high quality, I am unlikely to get much in the way of low caliber pushback. But high quality push back? Maybe I’ll learn something from it. It was through debating that I eventually came to realize that evolution was certainly true and that punctuated creation episodes that I formerly subscribed to, wasn’t true.
I’ll welcome any pushback, but admittedly, if I am wrong on something I may not immediately change my position.
Normally if I’m wrong on something that I hold deeply, I’ll have to gradually get to the truth. Perhaps this might mean seeing weaknesses in my position, and eventually construct an alternative hypothesis and then eventually come to see old evidence in a new light.
A gentle hand on the tiller – this is the wise word of the sailor. This is what you expertly wield. I took up sailing to learn just those things: Wisdom in my decisions and gauging the weather, patience at the wind (In my older mindset it was more ‘thanking god for a favorable wind is the same as cussing him for a foreboding wind’), patience at the discipline of time, patience to enjoy the journey and not simply the destination – and finally the skill of a gentle hand on the tiller.
Well put on the scope of ‘Earth’ as it is plied in scripture. Indeed if the word Earth is derived from Eridu as I have heard – the the Whole Earth is a smaller area. There was a flood of the Arabian Peninsula (as we discussed before), and it did occur in the last 10,000 years. The flood receded and the Persian Gulf is simply the persistent part of that flood. The Epic of Gilgamesh records the flood in much greater detail than does the Bible. So I agree – all the test (burying an olive pit in rich soil) did for me was prove that a literal interpretation of the Bible as ‘a love letter written by god’ is simply not valid. It is a document of men, and men only.
Luke traveled with Paul in Acts, that puts him on the bad team. I do not believe Paul was ‘converted’ on the Road to Damascus. Paul was an agent of Rome, and had one mission ‘kill this budding religion or bring it under the subservience of Rome – one way or another” He tried executions, until he figured out that the best way to kill something, is to lead it. Paul went back to Rome and spent his life in luxury and the graces of a job well done. The whole shtick “Ohh, help me help me… Rome is persecuting me and my side hurts – I need a little wine, please send the tithe”…. that begs for a dash of doubt. People must have been very gullible. The Church thereafter became the twisted spectre of the shadow of Rome. They had long since discovered how to bring religions into the fold. Several of them are blended into today’s Christianity.
I don’t believe Paul (at all), and I don’t believe Luke (fully).
My unfamiliarity with the theory that Paul was a servant of Rome led me to do a few minutes of research and ultimately to the book available on Amazon titledI don’t believe Paul (at all) “Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus: Flavian Signature Edition by Joseph Atwill”. If anyone is interesting in learning more about the theory they can read some positive and negative reviews of the book on the Amazon website.
Do you have a source for your view that Paul’s message could be distilled as “Ohh, help me help me… Rome is persecuting me and my side hurts – I need a little wine, please send the tithe”?
I don’t wish to be contentious, and my knowledge of the Bible isn’t incredibly strong anymore for I’ve not studied it for some time now, for example it might have been years since I read through the New Testament — yet I remember enough of Paul’s writings to be aware that his only recommendation to drink wine was a personal letter to Timothy who was apparently getting sick drinking the water of the time. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard in the past people saying that if you go to Mexico “Don’t drink the water.” Maybe Timothy had some sensitivity to bacteria in water and Paul recommended to Timothy to drink a little bit of it with his water … all this is normally thought of today in terms of some specific health benefit …
The theory though of Paul being a Roman agent … I guess you can believe it if you want. However, this is just so uncharacteristic of the approach that you teach on your blog. Specifically … let me just stop here.
A long time ago when I used to read summaries of and listen to condensed version of business books, I read about a technique that a leader would employ in order to find out who would be willing to confront him when they believed he was in error. The CEO or boss would say something that he knew was outrageous and obviously wrong just to see who among the people there would have the guts to say “NO” to him who would tell him if he was wrong when it was obvious.
I’m seriously wondering if what you are writing now is at that level for some reason. And a few blog posts ago you made some comment about a theory that the Titanic was a switched out model of another ship, that sunk instead. There was at least one website that I found that did a good job of refuting that theory.
.
In any case that theory and this theory of Paul being a Roman agent… it is just nuts to me. The theory proposed by the author Joseph Atwill makes a bid deal on some similarities between the writings of Josephus and that of Paul or the gospels. However would it not make more sense to suppose that a people under Roman subjugation would have developed a specific type of deference or come to some similar code of conduct that would allow them to best adapt in Roman culture. Maybe it was across the board taught throughout the tiny Jewish nation to treat the Romans in certain ways to best adapt to and thrive under the Roman government. And even if it wasn’t taught, a certain type of convergent evolution would have taken place where people naturally find the same ways to please the Romans. Josephus was (I guess) trying to please his Roman superiors. Paul wrote about “being all things to all men” and was very keen to find common points of reference when he wrote the Greeks or Romans.
You are teaching Epoche or whatever and teaching the value of complexity and then … (I’m stymied) I’m getting simplistic statements like “Luke traveled with Paul in Acts, that puts him on the bad team.” Or “I don’t believe Paul (at all)” … I’m certainly missing the Ethical Skeptic who is master of nuance in the latter part of your comment. Paul’s letters are also filled with exhortations to not drink wine or eat meat if it is going to cause a brother to stumble. So, in this case your characterizations of Paul is causing my head to spin. Is that intentional? “Hey guys send money so I can buy some wine?”
Your leadership skills are at a level I don’t understand. It is almost funny that when someone is so good they can make a mistake and other people just assume it isn’t a mistake because they have such high respect for the one talking.
We’ll probably though just have to let each other have our different religious ideas (or non-ideas)?
To discuss this issue of Paul’s motivation in preaching we’d have to come to some agreement on what Paul actually wrote, what really happened in his life etc. For example, if Paul’s motivation to preach the gospel until he got stoned or flogged was to get a cushy retirement and drink wine. That makes no sense. You will need to extract all the hardship and zeal from Paul’s life to give him the motivation to keep going. You are also then asserting that Paul was preaching things he didn’t believe. That is a lot to get my head around.
At least I learned about another theory from your comment. And the stuff you are doing for health of the people of the world … that is also very important … Thanks for writing and challenging my brain!
You are close on understanding epoche, but no, that is not it. You are not understanding how it relates to agency.
I have seen of course, the videos refuting the Olympic theory – but they are all inductive – and I do hold epoche on that and precisely because of that. My complaint is that I have not seen a Popperian standard of falsification of the idea. And plurality exists because a TRIAL was held over this issue, and an undetermined outcome resulted (so your implication that this is just me in a vacuum, is incorrect). So no, my epoche on this is not in violation of the evidence I have seen. Falsification of the idea that it is the Olympic on the bottom of the ocean can in straightforward manner be done, by one of three small rover craft actions… all three of which were specifically avoided. So, I cannot make a conclusion on the matter. A refusal to examine critical path data, is a sign of agency – and flags deceit… which segues into…
Theoretically, in a neutral setting, I might maintain epoche on the issue of Paul’s sincerity – and am willing to listen to lesser handed information – bust sadly we don’t have it. The witnesses were so impressed on this issue of mankind’s salvation that ALL of THEM neglected to do mankind the courtesy of jotting it down (save for possibly… possibly… John), or hiring a scribe, and therefore we cannot get lesser handed info. Paul crafted a good third of Christianity’s doctrine, and we just have to trust that he represented god (see 1 Timothy 1: 3-7)? No – once a person makes a claim to represent the truth-to-action (you must take action upon it), knowing that no more critical path evidence can be brought to bear – epoche is not mandatory – you are free to say ‘NO’. All we have here is agency (5th and higher handedness). So this is not a case of being able to pursue a critical path of query. So epoche no longer applies.
Moreover, remember, what I am describing as ‘the bad team’ here is a group who has a long and demonstrated history of bias, up-spin and agency. It is not just a couple verses which are the problem. Christianity is the ultimate wicker man. It can be re-adapted at any time to dodge any criticism. This is pseudo-theory and agency. Remember in the Epoche article I just wrote (which you cited I am in noncompliance upon), the principal point was to OPPOSE AGENCY – not just be neutral about everything – This group of people have demonstrated ill method, biased intent and fast and exotic conclusion. They are the opposite end of the spectrum of social skepticism. But let’s be clear – this is the bad team – and ample evidence is there to support this. There are two evils which a man may do, short of murder and rape, which are the worst evils one can commit. An evil once done, strips all epoche away as it pertains to agency.
I. Employ a man’s fear of the unknown to issue threats of hell at him.
II. Take possession of all the joys of life a man can have, pretend like you own or administer them as an agent of god, and sell those joys back to him at a price.
My words are a defense of knowledge and ethics in the case of Paul and Luke – they are establishing agency. Ethical skepticism opposes this. They are the bad team. There are just too many warning flags in the set of claims, so what you see as a bias, is simply rejecting a set of claims to authority on their part. There are holes in the story philosophically, and the holes get larger and larger as you extrapolate out from it, into the real world. I oppose this group, just as I oppose the cadre of science communicators. This is not a violation of epoche at all – epoche no longer applies because the critical path has led to a forced conclusion. I don’t hold epoche on the reality of gravity for instance – I am forced to the conclusion that I should not jump off a cliff. The same applies to Christianity. Epoche is reserved for subjects with true Ockham’s Razor plurality – Christianity is not one of those subjects. Otherwise, being neutral about everything, that would be Pyrrhonistic Skepticism and a denial of knowledge. That is NOT ethical skepticism. I do not have to remain neutral on everything, especially an appeal to authority from a group which spins a lie of agency.
Regarding Paul’s manipulative apologetics:
1st Corinthians 9:4 b “Do we not have the right to financial support?”
2nd Corinthians 12:7-9 “And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh” – yes, thorn in his ‘side’ became a cultural norm afterwards, but was not actually mentioned in his letters.
“Be no longer a drinker of water, but use a little wine for your stomach’s sake and your frequent infirmities.” – is not an admonition to ‘add a little wine into your water’ – again that is a wicker man apology from the 1880’s temperance movement. It is not different than a exhortation to use ‘rheumatiz medicine’. He drank wine, and while I am OK with that – again my point was that the apologetic around it is high handedness and agency. Wine was not the issue at all – it is the hint of agency.
So sorry, you have not framed my position and my words on this correctly.
8)
TES
May you prosper in your overall efforts to help people to think more clearly.
I’ve got an expensive Bible computer program and I can see how you choose an outlier (out of the normal translation) when it came to Paul manipulating people. !st Corinthians 9:4b which you cite as “Do we not have the right to financial support?” matches the NET translation “NET 1 Corinthians 9:4 Do we not have the right to financial support? (1 Cor. 9:4 NET) Yet the other 33 or so English translations AND the Greek texts focus on the idea of Paul asking if they have right to “food and drink” or “to eat and to drink.” Granted I can understand the point the NET translation is making, but still, taken to an extreme (as you seem to be suggesting) Paul was here arguing for lot’s of cash donations. Paul though was merely making a more modest point. I will choose to look at the other 33 translations or so and the Greek itself rather than your characterization of the right to a meal as “manipulative apologetics” and you do the same with 2 Corinthians 12:7-9. Paul was talking about the benefits of suffering in his case. He was saying that he personally benefited from hardship. You seem to be asserting that this was so that Paul could get rich (and you made some astonishing claim in your early comment that I dare not even quote…) However Paul goes on to write in the same chapter, “Now I am ready to visit you for the third time, and I will not be a burden to you, because what I want is not your possessions but you. After all, children should not have to save up for their parents, but parents for their children.
So I will very gladly spend for you everything I have and expend myself as well. If I love you more, will you love me less?
Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. (2 Cor. 12:14-16 NIV)
So the very letter in which Paul is talking about his ongoing sacrifice for the church in Corinth you somehow construe as evidence for him manipulating them into giving to him. He said he wasn’t going to take anything from them. He realized that his desire to do so was even offensive to some.
Also read what he wrote to the church in Thessalonica.
“For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example. We were not idle when we were with you, nor did we eat anyone’s food without paying for it. On the contrary, we worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you.
We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to offer ourselves as a model for you to imitate.” (2 Thess. 3:7-9 NIV)
Believe what you want my friend. Maybe you’ve read so much bad stuff from skeptics that you got a really bizarre notion of the life of Paul. Did you yourself really go through all those Bible translations till you found one that used the term “financial support” or did someone else craft this angle on Paul’s life and it somehow influenced your thinking?
Similarly I don’t find Paul threatening the church with hell as you suppose. Nor do I find that Paul claimed some agency or was attempting to sell joys of life back to the church at a price.
Believe whatever you want … but does it make sense that Paul was taking financial advantage of churches and then turned around and wrote them that he didn’t eat anyone’s food with paying for it and “worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you.”???
You wrote, “So sorry, you have not framed my position and my words on this correctly.”
You really think you are framing the life of the Apostle Paul correctly? You show him living a life of greed as an agent of Rome… as Spock on Star Trek might have replied… “Fascinating” or more likely he would question your logic.
Again your overall points have some merit in how Christianity has been practiced over the years. Paul himself warned that wolves would come in and devour the flock. Jesus warned against such things too. He repeatedly urged people to be on guard against hypocritical leaders.
I hope you’ll reconsider your view on Paul, and maybe you could spend more time reading scripture rather than reading crazy theories about scripture. Remember the skeptics that you disagree with on the issues of vaccinations etc… they aren’t automatically trustworthy when they criticize Christianity. Please don’t attempt to tell me you came to all these conclusions without outside agency…
Feel free to send me away or block me or whatever …
Thomas, OK – here is the NIV version, along with context of what Paul was actually saying:
But first let me say that I arrived at this position by actually reading the Bible, before I had ever once read any material critical of Paul. I observed agency – and never read any. I have never seen a ‘skeptic’ website which comments upon Paul. It was only until 10 years after I had this critique of the material that I first heard Christians who were also critical of it. I was shocked that such a thing even existed.
So here is the complete text in the NIV version (so as to falsify the claim that I sought out an ‘outlier’ translation)
Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not the result of my work in the Lord? Even though I may not be an apostle to others, surely I am to you! For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.
This is my defense to those who sit in judgment on me. Don’t we have the right to food and drink? Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephasa ? Or is it only I and Barnabas who lack the right to not work for a living?
Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat its grapes? Who tends a flock and does not drink the milk? Do I say this merely on human authority? Doesn’t the Law say the same thing? For it is written in the Law of Moses: “Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain.”
His every sentence is about being compensated for his work. So the phrase ‘food and drink’ according to Strong’s Concordance is in the context of ‘exousia’ – the entitlement as an authority. Most of the translations extant are permissive and exculpatory, translated in the light of agency. So it is framed in the context of compensation. His next sentence demands the right of the church apostles, in authority. This is both a demand for compensation and a demand for authority.
Agency – includes the habit of dredging up religious defensive apologetics – in the face of something which is obviously flawed and under critical scrutiny.
This is not a crazy theory – the material is plain as day. So while yes, I did come up with it on my own (Paul himself mentions in this material that at least some of the classic apostles did not accept him). Have I not demonstrated that ability in my blog? Original ideas? Perhaps you missed this, or decided to forget it because it did not conform to your next ad hoc critique? You had this expensive Bible software and did not even read the adjacent material, where you could have seen that my translation context choice was correct? In the context, the phrase is idiomatically correct as ‘make a living’ and even could be translated ‘entitled to a living as your apostle’. The other translations which sugar coated his idiom here, contained agency. They sought for the reader to infer, for deceit.
In my opinion you are too focused on me, and not enough on the subject at hand. The subject is agency and reading the Bible with an ethical framework of skepticism. Not rejecting it simply because it speaks of god, rather because of the ways in which it does so, the methods used, the history of deception and the consequentialist outcomes of ignorance and violence.
As we used to say in the Navy – “Never polish a turd”. I am not gonna sugar coat Paul, nor polish this turd. It stinks, and there is little defense of it, save for one being brainwashed.
~ TES
Let me get this straight. You really believe that the Apostle Paul was a greedy materialist?
I never said, nor did I ever imply that Paul was a greedy materialist.
I think it is very, to majority, likely that Paul continued to be an agent of Rome after his conversion, who converted precisely because he was directed to change his tactics and means (by regional magistrate to publican magistrate encouragement) from one of violence and oppression (“But Saul was ravaging the church by entering house after house; dragging off both men and women, he committed them to prison”), and to conform very much to the prevailing process Rome applied to all other religions – Assimilation (eg. interpretatio graeca). Saul was not alone in these decisions, he had to work with magistrates and prefecture of Rome.
So this is not a stretch by any means. Further, that Paul enjoyed pension from both Rome in his role which it recognized, but as well from the Churches in Anatolia as their Pontiff – which enabled him to live comfortably in Roman retirement, under an aura of partial deception and lack of immediate accountability.
He was simply looking for early retirement upon the backs of his victims. I do not think he had a gilded chariot, mansion nor buried jar of coins. No.
Whatever you think of Paul, I get the impression that he was very argumentative. Do you agree? Before his “conversion” (using quotes for your sake), Paul intensely persecuted the Church. Then after his conversion he claimed that he annoyed the authorities in Damascus so that he had to slip out of the city via a window in the city wall to avoid arrest. He went to many synagogues and preached Jesus, to the point of making enemies. It was reported that he did a miracle in a certain city and had to argue with the crowd to not offer sacrifices to him.
His letters are argumentative in countering attempts to introduce things like circumcision and Sabbath keeping into the churches. He argued with Peter when Peter stopped eating with Gentiles. He got in a sharp argument with Barnabas when Paul refused to let Mark accompany him on a journey, while Barnabas insisted that they should take Mark.
His letters to the churches of Corinth and Galatia were also quite tough in tone.
Even his letter to the Romans contained an attack on the perceived hypocrisy of Jewish culture and then he also attacked Roman culture and its idol worshiping ways.
What is your opinion on whether Paul really took money from the Corinthians. Do you think his letter to them stating that he wasn’t taking anything from them … was that really what happened? Or maybe you agree that is likely that he didn’t take money, but somehow or other this was “a loss leader” like a sales pitch to get someone into the store to buy something below cost to make up the money later? You didn’t acknowledge or explain the scriptures where Paul said that he wasn’t taking money.
If memory serves me correctly, Paul and his fellow missionaries even stayed with someone who had the same trade he had. This provides interlocking evidence in support of the idea that Paul worked on his journeys while not preaching.
Regarding Paul arguing again: According to scripture when he was in Athens he was agitated by all the idols and went around arguing or talking to people about idols. Also in Ephesus he apparently was the target of a whole cadre of people in the religious trinkets trade who were suffering a loss of business because Paul had convinced a great number of people that “man made Gods are not Gods at all.” Scripture and history supports the idea that this city did get some money from religious pilgrims … perhaps a tourist industry of sorts.
It has been said that the only difference between Christians and atheists is “one God.” Christians don’t believe in any other Gods … and I’ve seen evidence that the early church was persecuted for being “atheists.” Indeed I think in India or other countries where there are a lot of Hindus they get upset that Christians don’t believe in their Gods… though admittedly it is likely the introduction of Jesus that is annoying to them. But Jews get along well with Hindus, for Jews don’t evangelize, nor do they engage in a lot of religious debate.
Oh well, this is a long comment and perhaps you’ll find something in it worth responding to.
In regards to Paul’s overall view on life as expressed in this passage do you see evidence of Paul taking away pleasures only to sell them back as a previous comment indicated?
——————-
18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.
19 The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery;
20 idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions
21 and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
23 gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
24 Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
25 Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit.
26 Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other. (Gal. 5:18-26 NIV)
——————-
Do you think Paul had “a gentle hand on the tiller” was he effective? I see him driven by passion. I also see you driven by passion.
Do you think Paul was too smart to believe in God? Did he believe what preached? Since I think you believe he was wrong, was he knowingly wrong? And what percentage of what you think he did was pro-Roman propaganda? What did someone say to the apostle Paul?
————–
9 Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting?
20 You are bringing some strange ideas to our ears, and we would like to know what they mean.” (Acts 17:19-20 NIV)
————–
This teaching of yours about Paul being under the influence of Rome… if true … I’d like to see what evidence you think supports it. Would the following scripture be considered adequate evidence for your thinking or are there other lines of evidence in scripture too?
——————-
NIV Titus 3:1 Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready to do whatever is good,
2 to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and always to be gentle toward everyone. (Tit. 3:1-2 NIV)
——————–
You didn’t acknowledge or explain the scriptures where Paul said that he wasn’t taking money.
To me Thomas, (and the ‘loss-leader’ construct is not a bad analogy) Paul was our first virtue signaler in these cherry picked instances of correspondence. The fact that he did not take money in a particular location, and his need to point this out, tells me that the payment of money was de rigueur for both the church, and for Paul, and for other disciples for that matter. It seems rather odd that Peter would stop eating with Gentiles permanently (rather than under pressure from the ‘followers of James’), given the teaching that salvation was for all mankind. I do not think that they would abandon a core teaching of Christ (Luke 14: 16-24; Acts 10; 11:5-18), simply over perception’s sake. This criticism of Peter was very much akin to a political ad.
Paul spent too much time defending himself and pointing out examples wherein he was good, and suffered for the cause. Yet he spent very little actual time actually in the midst of and with his church. This does bother me. “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.” Paul was running for office. That much is clear. He was the Pontiff of Anatolia, and one must keep this in mind. The Kingdom of Comogene (Antiochus I and II) from which much of Anatolia sprung, considered itself separate from both Rome and the kingdoms of the Levant (including Syria). They held the belief that the Messiah was to originate from their esoteric wisdom tradition which had been handed down from Sumer (see the history of the Nimrud Dag celestial observatory, and the frieze of Leo and Regulus). This region held one of the greatest scroll libraries documenting the origin of mankind, according to the Egyptians. It was of course destroyed by religious military forces (as they always are). Which is precisely how Abrahamism was able to spin a whole new religion off this nascent ignorance. Modern Turkey, prior to the Islamic Saturation, was much still in this mindset even four decades ago. Sadly now, Islam is steadily erasing this staunch independence.
Paul sought to exploit this Anatolian bond, for his political gain. Paul completed three journeys there, post conversion. A limited exposure time in which one can put on any air. These were campaign trails. He was running for office. The verses you cite are a great example of Panduction – specific bad things done by the bad, but very general descriptives of good, when describing one’s self. Again, this is a habit of deception. Specific on others, general nebulous descriptives on self identity.
One does not shift from being a principal and violent but minor thugman, and Pharisee and to leader of the European Christian Realm, in just three short journeys, without BIG political sponsorship behind the scenes of the Federal Government, Rome. Comparatively, the real apostles – NONE reached this height, despite all their proximity to the Christ, and appointment by Christ himself. Very curious ~ to highly suspect indeed.
~TES
Well crafted response, by the way. ;-)
Yes Paul did criticize Peter. However in the context of The book of Galatians Paul was criticizing the Galatians very strongly for being influenced by those who were trying to obligate many aspects of Jewish law onto the church there. So perhaps rather than saying to the Galatians “You are all idiots” which he kind of was saying, Paul was pointing out that hey his criticism isn’t anything personal and he leveled the same criticism at the leader of the Church. You gotta admit the leap from how Judaism was practiced to how Christianity was practiced was a big leap. And if Paul didn’t provide much of the theological framework for Christianity’s separation from Judaism, then who did?
Despite the twelve apostles having been with Jesus for three and a half years … they didn’t have the intellectual background that Paul had. Paul had an international background. He could speak Greek, grew up in Tarsus. He was a Roman citizen which was very helpful in allowing him to preach in places and preach messages that were unpopular. Paul also had a background at some point of being taught by the famed leader Gamaliel. Incidentally it was Gamaliel who, according to the book of Acts, stopped the Sanhedrin from executing the Apostles.
You don’t see Paul’s mission as being possible without a lot of help. What though if he did get a lot of help? What if the help though was from God allowing him to perform miracles? This would have had some impressive effect and helped him spread the gospel.
Obviously though if he wasn’t performing miracles, then as you concluded a lot of what Paul and Luke wrote would or might have been fabrications.
I’ll need to concede then that if miracles were not possible, then your argument is bolstered. If Paul wasn’t getting help from God, then as you postulate the help he got from Roman officials would be more necessary to account for his successes.
With your permission, I’ll discontinue this line of discussion. My motivation is to help you focus on what you are good at … helping people to take a fresh look at so many issues of life. Also, I recognize the starting points of believing in miracles or not believing in miracles will greatly divert our beliefs on Paul etc.
You did a good job of framing the discussion in a way to appeal to me using scriptures about humility etc… and you were able to argue in such a way as to get in the head of a believer.
But still, I’m reading Paul a bit different than you are. I see Paul as saying he is the least of all the apostles and doesn’t even deserve to be called an apostle, because he persecuted the church. He calls himself “nothing.”
Each remark can be “spun” or given some explanation to promote a given viewpoint. Lawyers are masterful at this. They can make the good look bad and the bad look good.
What you need to be careful of though, is creating such a framework to view Paul, … remember stylistically I said you were similar to Paul in some of your defenses of your abilities?
Peter wrote the following about Paul’s writings.
———————-
15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him.
16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
(2 Pet. 3:15-16 NIV)
———————-
Now, Paul had a number of criticisms about himself, though as you said he complimented himself a lot (my awkward rephrase of your better worded description). Jesus though had infinitely greater claims about himself than Paul had about Paul. So the question comes down to accuracy of the claims. Was Jesus sent from God … etc? Jesus if not sent from God was a worse liar than Paul was — correct?
I really haven’t seen you criticize Jesus. I can’t prove that Jesus did miracles to a scientist. (And I’m probably not even the best person to make the case based on logic or any other reasoning that Jesus did miracles.) Still lot of miracles might have other explanations ranging from the power of positive thinking to other more metaphysical or strange ideas… etc. If such a thing is true would Paul naturally have less ability than Jesus in this regard? If Paul had such a gift or was perceived to have such a gift than does that lessen the need to have some Roman operation supporting Paul?
I realize I’ve tossed out a lot of ideas … but you toss a lot of thoughts around too.
The word “tossed” reminds me I wanted to eat some salad! We’ll continue or not continue this later. Either way “it is all good” as far as I’m concerned.
Another good response…
Let me just close then with this comment. Jesus sought to drive change away from an oppressive religion, by coming from the common midst of that religious group and giving his whole life for that cause. Paul on the other hand sought to take over a religion, by coming in from the outside and ended up, unlike all the other apostles chosen by Jesus, living in a nice retirement somewhere far away from the cause.
Two different types of skin in the game. This is how I differentiate pretend CEO’s and Executive Committees from the real thing, pretend skeptics from the real thing. Where have they come from, and where are they going…
TES 8)
I love the availability to all of the essential action: Go and look.
Ethical Skeptic, this is really good material and work. I do not understand but like half of it, but I get the gist of what to do. Don’t you find this lifestyle extraordinarily tedious? Do you sustain it for years on end, or what? Just curious, Ellen.
Thanks for the comments. The lifestyle is extraordinarily tiresome, but it is a sacrifice I must make. I have too much to accomplish, and I end up having to promote ideas, organizations and people (including myself) in this endeavor. Food, in the name of ‘efficiency’ has become a liability to much of humanity, and therefore has to be watched closely. From my thyroid panels and other hormone and body stats – the damage was done in the late 90’s to early 2000’s. So now I must fight the fight every single day – in order to stay at my preferred weight. Yes, there are exception days – on the order of 1 to 2 a month. When I go to my family gatherings, I don’t want to miss what my aunts have prepared. So I do make some exceptions of course. But when I travel – I do not eat what others prepare, and for the most part, make my own meals.
Having to consume about two thirds the calories of what I burn – ensuring that I hit this daily minimum shortfall of 650 calories, for most of the month is a chore – but it is fight, just like getting my graduate degree, and founding and growing companies – it is a fight. It must be fought essentially every single day. And that fight includes pointing out the fake skepticism which promotes cluelessness (cultivated ignorance) surrounding this issue on the part of many Americans (and increasingly, those overseas as well).
“If you have never sat with African villagers at evening prayer, worked alongside followers of Ganesha in India, or held a person in your arms as they died …then you are not a skeptic”
… what do these things have to do with each other?
They are a symbolic grouping, not literal – demonstrating a heart for mankind and a willingness to go there and see for yourself, to take risk, to observe how one can help rather than assume, as well as a tolerance for where people are in their walk.
It’s distressing to realize that had I come across that Novella definition in another context, and before I encountered your work, or hell even now if I wasn’t paying careful attention, I would likely have been (would be) entirely drawn in by the “watchwords”. Thank you for taking the time to point out those definitional distinctions.
I’m reminded of several other points where the religious impulse collides with science.
Some telescopes being built on mountaintops face opposition because they are holy sites … or something like that … maybe some ancestors buried up there or something like that.
The Mosque at the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem … they have enlarged the mosque facilities digging down … and throwing away any archaeological remains they find … just dumping it out rather than letting the ancient site be properly excavated. This got a lot of attention from the publication Biblical Archaeology Review in some past issues years ago.
Also use of stem cells from aborted babies/fetuses have been a subject of great controversy in years past. At one time it became a political issue and hence it got a lot of attention. However since new techniques to cultivate stem cells were found this issue has died down. However creating new life for technological purposes might raise some other issues.
Anyways good points about DNA and science being a collective benefit to the knowledge of all human beings.
Another controversial type of study is what about a person claiming to be descended from a famous person? One young man named Danny, for example, claims to be the son of a very famous person. This news story though is politicized … the best Biblical analogy would be to Abraham’s wife Sarah sending away another son of Abraham.
In the case of Danny the man who apparently was the father has a powerful wife who opposed having her husband have any relationship with his son.
In any case truth often takes a back seat to what narrative is being pushed. Often these issues ultimately, I suppose, come down to people with financial incentives to shade facts … suppress facts or whatever. Wars are started on false premises … as you said “humans lie” … and that is a sad fact that brings about a lot of carnage.
Little lies bring about bad science, bad reasoning, bad beliefs, “bad blood” (meaning hatred).
The same man who lied about the “Gulf of Tonkin” to get us involved in the Vietnam war was apparently responsible for having the Liberty ship attacked in a false attempt to make the Egyptians look responsible and get the US involved … reports are so crazy about the level the US intended to get involved I’ll not even repeat it.
From what I understand the massacre in Rwanda was also caused by some “false flag” attempt to start a war.
Lies keep people in the darkness from impending dangers … whistle blowers are often punished, those in power who lie often get away with it.
People often lack patience and interest to get to the truth. One powerful person wanting to drum up evidence to get in a war kept telling the intelligence agencies to “look again” his lack of patience can best be described as a “shoot first, ask questions later” approach. It was claimed some 17 intelligence agencies eventually came to support the conclusion that he wanted. Ironically, the guy when duck hunting “shot first” at what he thought was a duck … but blasted his friend with a shotgun … having never bothered to verify that his imagined duck was really a duck. It was a very famous incident … the friend fortunately survived. However the war the guy pushed so hard for had so many other unnecessary deaths. It appears to me we had an unnecessary and expensive disastrous war to align with a poetically (yet also tragic) wrong-headed blast of his shotgun at his friend.
Eisenhower in his farewell speech urged that the US public remain vigilant … instead now lies are again costing enormous amounts of money in huge, and often wasteful military expenditures … with the same people who approve of the spending later working for the companies they directed the huge amounts of tax payer money to go to, and in some or many cases the same businesses give huge contributions to those who vote for and approve of massive reckless and wasteful spending.
I remembered a Psalm where someone spoke about wanting peace but being among a large group of people who wanted war. Now that I looked at the Psalm I realize that the first part talks about lies.
The beauty of the Psalm therefore captures my attention and I sorry in a sense for quoting it (on this a skeptical forum) however the thoughts and the lament and desire for justice against the liars (or the warning to the liars) has such poetic power I’ll just quote it anyways. Please pardon my quoting it … I know the Bible has parts that urge wars … it gives straight up reasons … now wars are launched with underhanded subterfuge and deceitful tactics to convince people of the justice of such wars.
Psalm 120:1 A song of ascents. I call on the LORD in my distress, and he answers me.
2 Save me, LORD, from lying lips and from deceitful tongues.
3 What will he do to you, and what more besides, you deceitful tongue?
4 He will punish you with a warrior’s sharp arrows, with burning coals of the broom bush.
5 Woe to me that I dwell in Meshek, that I live among the tents of Kedar!
6 Too long have I lived among those who hate peace.
7 I am for peace; but when I speak, they are for war. (Ps. 120:1-7 NIV)
Verse 2 above is resonating with me. As you said lies everywhere … the drumbeat for war seems everywhere … this level of national arrogance is scaring me to death. One leader who appears to be a bully, is advocating the most sane levels of good international relations while his critics who call him a bully are actually wanting him to be more of hypocrite and go after a nation they think changed some election result.
There doesn’t seem to be many advocates for peace. Hysteria is gripping this country … the lies that you TES are calling attention to in the science fields … that is just the tip of iceberg … the flag on the top of a huge monstrous warship a civilization that is so steeped in lies, no one dares to even question the official narratives … no one dares question government spending anymore … media people and politicians and all people are such a part of the system they can hardly speak up without the fear they will suffer great losses.
Arrogance was a reason the Titanic sunk. Hatred, arrogance and lies and wimps who can’t speak the truth … they are all around us …everywhere.
Though you are across the isle from me on a few issues … I deeply admire your fierce fight for truth. A few good people shining a flashlight in the darkness can make a lot of difference and you are definitely one such person, in my opinion. Sorry, I suppose for being a relatively uneducated “groupie” hanging out on your blog commenting and going a bit off topic. There isn’t much out there in the way of deep solid thinkers who also have a deep desire to see things get better and have some skill and vision to push things in that direction.
Those who get too involved in the nitty-gritty often get drawn into foolish arguments. “Do not answer a fool according to his folly lest you be like him.” So many people don’t get into the morals or higher level thinking and spend too much time just exchanging insults.
You manage to maintain some intellectual altitude … see much or the entire battlefield of ideas and act in a somewhat strategically in the way you urge people to think.
From my perspective then as a Christian I ought to pray for you and give thanks to God for you taking such strong positions in countering errors and lies of all types. I realize you and other readers will see this as quaint or whatever but I’ve got deep respect for you and you are very gifted and I believe blessed with incredible intelligence and a good measure of fair-mindedness.
Even the Titanic may be a lie – it might be the Olympic which sank. I have yet to see any falsification of this – and have looked a LOT for it.
No, I do not see your position as quaint. A metaphysical selection is a modern and reasoned choice you are free to make. No judgement on that.
There were several world-events things I was directly involved in while in Intelligence. We lied. We lied on a regular basis, and at times we lied when we did not even have to. It was like a signature of power. I can lie, so I will lie. I would get back in the states after just having been there in the mix, only to find the US Media spouting an errant or significantly different story than that which really happened. I would be amazed at the layering and volume of the lies we were fed.
Various translations of Ecclesiastes 5:8 all seem to do with tempering our reaction to all the injustice and the layers of injustice in the world.
I must admit it is hard to know what the best thing to do would be. During the time of the apostle Paul writing his letters, from what little I understand of the historical context Nero may have been ruling in Rome.
Paul sidestepped the natural human reaction to act like a cornered animal and he conducted himself with grace … his letters contained nothing about the political situation at hand. Yet Nero’s over-reaction may have been an opening for the spread of Christianity in Rome … somehow this defenseless sect conquered the Roman Empire. To what level Christian teachings effected the behavior of people in the empire … I don’t know much about such history. I may know less about the evolution of the Roman Empire from the time of Paul forward than most of your readers. So the prudent thing is to keep my mouth shut.
The few minutes that I spent looking at the Titanic/Olympic ship controversy … it was interesting – a nice momentary diversion. The known Olympic placement of portholes or window arrangements matching the submerged vessel rather than that of the Titanic… this is used to support the theory. Yet it is such a complex theory (at least it appears that way to me) there are many questions. One question involving the resurrection of Jesus was “where is the body” … with the little I know of this theory that you have looked at … now I’m wondering where is the Titanic if the ship that sunk was really the Olympic refurbished? Magicians can hide an elephant … pardon my light interest in the topic. Just like there is a branch of agnosticism called “Apatheists” people who really don’t care … in a sense looking into the issue you are discussing will be a waste of time for me … I guess.
Certainly there are fascinating issues and fascinating theories. William Shake-spear (leaving this misspelled ) I think it was skeptic Mark Twain that raised some issues about the writings worth looking into. Historical documents at the time, from a TV show I watched long ago … showed no contemporary mentions of him. Another well known writer at the time they can’t connect the popular author to his works that he wrote. Some arguments were that they could not have this writing being publicly identified with someone in the royal court … or something like that goes the arguments. I think Mark Twain felt that the supposed poor background of Shakespeare wasn’t compatible with the knowledge of court politics that was needed for the writings that he supposedly produced.
And some other book looking into the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor … well the evidence in that book apparently swayed some historians to think the surprise attack wasn’t a … (I’ll leave it at that for brevity sake as well as my limited knowledge…)
Fascinating things … things done that were kept hidden from the public. And yet Jesus made a call to holiness, to first take the plank out of my own eye before I can help others. He made a call or an exhortation to be merciful. Mercy and forgiveness and a recognition of the need to even love ones enemies is really the only way that people who are living in cruelty and lies and whatever other wrong things, can come to make a better change, make a difference. I mean there are people in power doing bad things, but without grace and mercy, they can’t step out of that field.
Oh well, that is what I personally have to do. That does not include making some list of wrongdoings by other people. (However I’ve seen at least one major Christian figure (now deceased) who claimed that he felt the Holy Spirit leading him to not be so politically involved. Later he relented, sending out a survey with “leading questions” designed to get answers in favor of getting into political slugfests and belittling the positions of unbelievers. So I’m certainly not out-of-the-woods yet personally. I’m thinking of James Dobson of Focus on the Family. He was into politics, stepped out of it and then later couldn’t contain himself and got back into making political statements.
There is so much political whining it is sometimes suffocating intellectually. One time listening to Sean Hannidy” I heard him remark that he never listens to his own radio programs. He said he can’t stand the sound of his voice … and I think he meant the complaining tone.
It is just so easy to get into mud-slinging etc … and so hard to do the things that are a benefit to culture and intelligence and promote respect etc…
The culture of the US is getting more divided politically … and if I get into that whining complaining frame of mind I won’t be helping things.
There is a better attitude for reaching across political isles and sometimes working together on important things. “One who loves a pure heart and who speaks with grace will have the king for a friend.” (Prov. 22:11 NIV) An alternate translation offered is “One who loves and has a pure heart…” Though that scripture isn’t an airtight thing because there are many reasons that it won’t be true … leaders may seek out people with power, money and influence to support them, for example. However as a matter of sense they will probably avoid treacherous people who will betray them, or who overly divisive and controversial … if they have sense that is.
In any case I have so far to go in terms of wisdom, knowledge, sense, productivity and numerous other areas. Scripture says “He who walks with the wise grows wise” and perhaps that is one reason that I follow your writings … you’ve got so many good thoughts to offer …. I’ve got so many things that I can learn from you … your careful thinking is inspiring to me. Also you manage apparent numerous activities (with businesses and family etc) and yet you still have some time to manage a reasonably well regarded blog and do it well…
Ioannides has commented at length about the low replicability rate of biomedical science: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Overall, quite apart form any biasses coming from funding sources (which are certainly substantial and serious) it is clear that one issue with research here is the acceptance of results with high p values skews the picture substantially.
As a rule a study will be regarded as yielding a positive if the this of the result being a chance finding is less than 0.05. In other words, many results are accepted even though there is only a 19/20 probability that it was not a chance finding.
This is at odds with the reluctance of the scientific community to accept other results that are uncomfortable (ie Swanson’s correlation of glyphosate load with liver and biliary cancer that had p values of the order of < 1/10,000).
So, greater (true) skepticism needs to be directed towards these large population studies that accept as positive weak findings.
Overall it is my impression that the insistence of very large studies in the biomedical world is a deliberate ploy to make it more difficult to research any treatment that will not generate a very profitable patent (ie a pharmaceutical).
I do see p-value impacts as a tool, much like a patent. Many people view patents as single, iron-clad documents which protect their invention or idea. This is not the case. Similarly, a p-value is regarded as the definitive threshold which falsifies the possibility that two sets of data are unrelated – therefor establishing a scientific truth. This misperception is the reason for our discomfort over the p-values themselves as of late. A p-value, like a patent, is only one brick in a wall. It suggests plurality or suggests we must look elsewhere, but never finishes the science in one execution. If a p-value finished the science at hand, then we would need our confidence interval table inputs to be set at .9997 or even the sixth sigma. But that too would be foolishness, because under that scenario, we could scarcely prove anything but gravity and that sunburns come from the sun. Even then the p-values would be suspect to some.
The reality in patenting is that control of a field of application or knowledge, requires an entire patent strategy to accomplish. I work under a 7 layer patent model, which once addressed by a series of interrelated and leveraging patents, begins to lock up a technology or an idea. I prosecute the field domain and its critical ideas as a strategy. I might have to issue 20, 40 patents in order to establish one lock on a single idea. In similar fashion, I may need 20 differing p-value results, on an array of related and interdependent questions, in order to begin to obtain a scientific direction. If I raise p-value thresholds, I weaken this process (science), AND show that I do not fully understand how science prosecution of a question works. Science is not just one test. A ‘patent’ is not simply one USP&TO claims filing.
The lockup of a patent domain, requires a strategy. Inventors are typically bad at strategy. The prosecution of a scientific question requires a strategy. Scientists are typically bad at strategy.
P-value amaurosis is the condition wherein we place more effort into the rigor of our mathematical derivation of likelihood, than we do into the question, its role in the larger question, and the critical path necessary in determining an answer in the first place.
The scientific version of pennywise-pound foolish.
Skepticism therefore, for me – is in observing the tradecraft of the lie – watching people like Steven Novella think that a p-value is one test and done or is ‘the probability that something is pure random chance’, tells me he has never really done any science – just talks about it a lot.
My last comment went to await moderation. Let’s see if this link will go through.
One of the points in your article dealt with the simplistic way that people often understand and argue about “climate change” which sent me on a multihour tangent.
However there is rather breaking news in geology (not sure how to sell that) however the Holocene now has a new geological statigraphic stage/age.
=========================
Collapse of civilizations worldwide defines youngest unit of the Geologic Time Scale
The Late Holocene Meghalayan Age, newly-ratified as the most recent unit of the Geologic Time Scale, began at the time when agricultural societies around the world experienced an abrupt and critical mega-drought and cooling 4,200 years ago. This key decision follows many years of research by Quaternary scientists, scrutinized and tested by the subcommissions of the International Commission on Stratigraphy under the chairmanship of Professor David Harper, Durham University, UK.
Agricultural-based societies that developed in several regions after the end of the last Ice Age were impacted severely by the 200-year climatic event that resulted in the collapse of civilizations and human migrations in Egypt, Greece, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley, and the Yangtze River Valley. Evidence of the 4.2 kiloyear climatic event has been found on all seven continents. …
=========================
That is climate change …
Also added to the Holocene are two other ages.
=========================
Furthermore, it approved proposals for two other ages: the Middle Holocene Northgrippian Age and the Early Holocene Greenlandian Age with beginnings defined at climatic events that happened about 8,300 years and 11,700 years ago, respectively. The three ages comprise the Holocene Epoch, which represents the time since the end of the last Ice Age. The Commission then forwarded these proposals to its parent body, the IUGS, for consideration, and the executive committee of IUGS voted unanimously to ratify them.
=========================
People are getting excited about the added carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but most people are ignorant of climate change that has happened since humans have been on earth. I didn’t see any particular reason given for these climate change events that are embedded in the geological record. I guess I’ll have to find that out later and probably from a different source.
Yes,
Actually this should read ‘The Greenlandian Age (11,700 ya), Northgrippian Age (8,300 ya) and Meghalayan Age (4,200 ya) are comprised by the Holocene Epoch” not that they ‘comprise’ the Holocene. They compose the Holocene. That trivia aside, I do carry several concerns. The entire Holocene Epoch is characterized by mega-changes in climate and fauna throughout. I think it unwise for us to presume that in 1850, that all this change suddenly stopped, and thereafter only man impacted climate. If that were indeed the case, then we have defacto, by practice, established a fourth Holocene Age: Anthropostatic Age (170 ya) whereupon 11,500 years of much more dramatic climate change stopped and froze in place. So, why would we define a new Era and not name it? As a skeptic, that bothers me.
A second aspect of such science (not that I reject AGW, by any means) is that, we have not examined what has caused the climate dynamics of the Greelandian and Northgrippian Ages. Certainly we can attribute mankind’s activity to have impacted the Meghalayan Age. But something other than carbon technology, object impacts, solar cycle and orbital dynamics has precipitated this early Holocene’s ENORMOUS periodic climate change. And it has happened before, and on a regular basis. Our pretense that, that unknown factor has ceased, and handed its mantle off to mankind – is well, sorta stupid from a scientific standpoint.
There is an alternative which can explain that climate dynamic (‘Alternative 4: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2017/07/09/denial-and-pseudo-skepticism-are-not-the-same-thing/ ) – and is not incompatible with current pushes to eliminate fossil fuels – but we do not study it. This is what I mean by ‘dependent and incremental queries’ – we skipped the study of the cause of the Greenlandian and Northgrippian age temperature dynamics, which in process has caused chaos in our science of the study which depends upon those answers (AGW). We asked an out of sequence question, because of a political goal.
As a member of society I agree with that AGW goal (in fact I have a business focused on alternative green energies), but as a skeptic I disagree with a critical part of our science procedure on the matter.
The Riddle of Skepticism: “If I were wrong, would I even know it?” and “If I were wrong, would I be contributing to harm?”
I can’t remember you making a typo before and I’m not saying that the following is a typo … it probably isn’t. However you pointed out that earlier humans would not have had a big impact on carbon then you went onto write, “But something other than carbon technology, object impacts, solar cycle and orbital dynamics has precipitated this early Holocene’s ENORMOUS periodic climate change.”
I can follow you in regards to your conclusion on “carbon technology” and “orbital dynamics” (if you are talking about ruling them out too) yet I’ve seen some evidence that links solar activity with at least some climate change. (One theory now postulates that two different sun cycles are taking place and that this will cause some decline in the sun’s output in the years ahead, however even this shouldn’t nearly match the earlier climate disruptions.) However, “object impacts” are in my estimation at the top of the list for other major climate change events. Huge volcanic eruptions also have effects on climate.
We are really in our infancy as far as recognizing and searching for moderate size impact events on the earth. IMO the evidence for impact at the YDB is very solid now. However, lesser events such as those that caused the flood that caused the Gilgamesh and Genesis stories (and other flood stories worldwide) has some tentative evidence supporting them. Particularly I’m thinking about the Burckle crater and from that Wikipedia page a link to another possible impact site called the Mahuika crater. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burckle_Crater
Trinitite and other evidence gives solid support for some extraterrestrial cause for the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah as in the Bible story. An archaeologist excavating Tall el-Hammam believes the destruction of this significant city to be the Biblical Sodom.
Although there is certainty about the destruction of the supposed Sodom being caused by an object from the air … it isn’t known if the entire object was just a very hot airburst. Other theories speculate that it impacted and excavated or created the Southern part of the Dead Sea and other theories claim that whatever caused the destruction of Sodom to have been one part of a string of objects that hit the earth …. and if I’m remembering correctly what I just read a few hours ago, another part hit India and another hit somewhere in China … If I’m remembering this all correctly.
I’m just saying, I see theories about “object impacts” being discussed and to me the science is rather young … and your link to your other fine article(blog) the mention in it of geonutrinos … it is leaving my head spinning. I think I need a nap.
Volcanoes and celestial object impacts bring on temporary climate change in the form of lower temps. But what I am speaking of is a sudden and endogenous rise in temperatures which follows an epochal scale, which neither the impact nor volcano contribution can impart. This is a 90 – 120 kyr cycle, which is precipitated by a sudden rise in temps and atmospheric CO2. In a normal world, we should have answered questions about this cycle before pretending to know about the Anthropostatic Age. But, the argument that we had to take action, despite not having the full array of information was a compelling one nonetheless, and is the reason I have chosen to invest in green technologies as well. But the source of this 90/120 kyr cycle still perplexes me. We need to answer this.
Regarding a flood. I have spent many years in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, much of it traveling to and flying over, remote parts. It is absolutely clear to me that the Arabian peninsula was inundated by ocean water within the last 10,000 years. You can see the receding shoreline progressively from Riyadh regressing into the Empty Quarter and finally to the Arabian Gulf (you do not call it the ‘Persian Gulf’ there). You can observe the human habitation artifacts pulled from beneath the waters of the Arabian Gulf in the museums in Riyadh/Dubai/Dammam. This stands as another case of the nihilist/theist bifurcation obfuscating what is indeed reality. Nihilists deny that any flood at all occurred, and theists declare that the flood was 150 ft over the top of Mt. Everest. Between these two buffoonist a priori beliefs, we cannot get a word of truth in edgewise. There was a recent flood. It involved the Arabian tectonic plate dropping and then rising partly back up, leaving the ‘flood’ partly in place = The Arabian (Persian) Gulf.
The Epic of Gilgamesh tells a much more complete story of the flood than does the Bible. Whether fiction or not, in its origin, I think that the rising of the ‘black cloud with the morning rising sun shining upon it, and the fire of the gods scurrying about inside it’ – tells me some things that relate truth.
1. The cloud rose in the west
2. The cloud was of volcanic origin
3. The ‘loaves of bread in the morning and wheat chaff in the evening’ were bolides and cinder ash (mega-volcanic)
4. The ‘sea waters came over the mountain of Susa like an army’ – this was the Persian Gulf
There are five mega-volcanoes right in the direction where Utinapushtim relates that he saw the gigantic black cloud. This is the origin of much of the Rift Valley. I think that a westward mantle shift occurred, dropping the Arabian Tectonic plate, and causing the eruption of these super-volcanoes. When comparing the Epic of Gilgamesh with the Biblical story, the Epic relates much more ‘first hand witness’ earmarks, and predates the Biblical recount substantially.
Plus, in the Biblical account, Noah released a dove, which came back with an olive leaf in its beak, 43 days after the highest mountain tops had begun to emerge from the waters. Olive trees cannot survive even one day submerged in sea water – and a new olive tree takes 7 months to ‘come true’ and produce its first leaf.
So where did this olive leaf come from?
Inside the Biblical recount is enough information to hint that the story has been altered to reflect Jehovaist Theist ideas. Sad…
TES
Clearly as you assert the Genesis account of the flood isn’t that great as s scientific account.
The Genesis account of the flood is packed with the number seven, which is often used throughout scripture in the most disputed or storylike passages.
Genesis 7:2ff seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, …
Genesis 7:3 seven pairs of every kind of bird
Genesis 7:4 Seven days from now I will send rain…
Genesis 7:10 after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth
Genesis 7:11 In the six hundreth year of Noah’s life on the seventeenth day of the second month…
Genesis 8:4 on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat
Genesis 8:10 He waited seven more days and again sent out the dove…
Genesis 8:12 He waited seven more days and sent the dove out again…
Genesis 8:13 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry.
I’m very intrigued by the evidence that you claim to have seen for shorelines on Arabia.
I’m not sure what the mega-volcanoes in the area that you refer to are. The Burckle crater though, if it as thought … a crater would account for multiple huge tsunamis … perhaps leaving evidence in the form of shorelines. Though I think you would likely be able to distinguish between chevrons and shorelines.
In any case thanks as always for sharing your thoughts. It may prompt me to do further research on the subjects you brought up.
I’ve seen speculation that the abrupt warming of the world as clearly seen in the Greenland ice layers could have been the result of another impact in the ocean that primarily caused a lot of water to evaporate … somehow using the added water vapor as the greenhouse gas that the CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropolic Global Warming) advocates fear will kick global warming into overdrive. I’m not sure on all that … there might be another cause, as you suspect.
Gotta run though.
I’m not sure if wasn’t for the following archived website (The blogger died in 2010) that I would have ever went on a deeper study (or any study for that matter) into “climate change science.” http://www.seablogger.com/
At some point I came across the following website which helped me see the some of the problems in what passes for climate change science.
However my personal experience with climate change alarmists helped make my skepticism about climate change advocates very clear to me.
However now the scientific community that follows the geology of the earth has now recognized some times of climate change into the Holocene. (Top left corner of the chart for those that don’t know what the Holocene is.) http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2018-07.jpg
Unfortunately, I don’t yet understand them, the history of those times etc… So much to learn.
Which is why I like your approach of promoting a measure of open-mindedness when new evidence comes along.
One of the most popular people in the world said something like, “Climate change science is settled” but in truth we’ve got so much to learn …
The thing about people who love to mock others, is that they see conversations and research, not as a quest for truth but as a quest for status. So a mocker enjoys putting others down, because it makes himself feel superior by comparison.
One problem with this mindset is that when/if anyone comes along and points out new information or a new angle of thinking to the mocking skeptic, information such as a better analysis perhaps, then they aren’t looking at the value of what they can learn, they immediately think the person giving the new information is doing so in order to put him down. So this mocker does not easily learn new things when challenged, he is too emotionally wound up in seeing facts as things to hammer people with.
Is this way of thinking common in skeptic groups? I suppose some skeptics are looking at skeptic groups for support, such as might be found as a type of support group for those leaving a bad church or bad religion experience. On the other hand, people have different motivations for what they do …
A church or religious experience isn’t necessarily bad because of bad behavior from religious people … but theological systems and knowledge belief systems in a church can be demonstrably false OR there may be no room for people who want to ask questions … and this can stifle the intellectual life of people who need to use their minds deeper than other people do.
One wonders if this was a problem in Christianity from the start. Jesus speaking of whatever he was teaching said, “I thank you that you have hid these things from the wise and learned and revealed them to children [relatively simple folks]. Paul wrote the church in Corinth and said that there were not many wise or noble among them saying that God called the simple things of the world to shame the wise.
I’m not too sure about the history of the early church during the Roman Empire days. I heard or read something about them caring for the poor … but I’m not at all sure how wideespread all that was.
Most of your criticisms of some in the skeptic movement pertains equally well with the lack of thinking that permeates some fundamentalist religious groups. Probably that is why outsiders are increasingly starting to pin the label “fundamentalist” on some atheist thinkers … or hard-core skeptics types.
Each abandons honesty and a good conscience to simplistically quote from their book of dogmas, whether it be a religious text or as you mentioned some dictionary of skeptics that delineate what is pseudoscience…
Lot of people do more talking than thinking.
There is plenty of mystery. It follows that we should have a healthy dose of humility then …
I was going to mention some universally accepted good and I was going to use “love” which is deeply promoted with Christian scriptures. Looking through the secular humanist website to see what they say about love their ironically is only mention of it in their declaration. “Religions have made negative as well as positive contributions toward the development of human civilization. Although they have helped to build hospitals and schools and, at their best, have encouraged the spirit of love and charity, many have also caused human suffering by being intolerant of those who did not accept their dogmas or creeds.”
Source: https://secularhumanism.org/index.php/11
I’m a little disappointed they did not personally promote “love” in their document.
If the Chinese government model of control takes root throughout the world displacing democracy, they will be deeply at odds with the Secular Humanist Declaration which repeatedly pushes for Democratic society. However the Chinese government model will probably mesh well with other aspects of the Secular Humanist Declaration.
In any case your attack on so called “critical thinkers” quite well describes many religious fundamentalists.
And though Christianity might have “love” as a core teaching … you’ve said the same in one of your comments. That if there is mystery or truth at the heart of the universe or in the meaning of life, that it would have something to do with love.
Love can motivate people to think and do the hard work of figuring out difficult problems. Love can motivate people to stand out from the crowd when the crowd is wrong or just following some mass movement. Love can lead people to give an extra kidney or do other important things. Love can help people understand that they can have mercy to other people, knowing that the faults of others … well are often ingrained in the human condition and we all suffer from faults.
Love will help people realize that all sorts of vague intellectual ideas … well that is what they might remain until we tangibly make some progress, or prepare to make some progress in service to others.
Yet it is often so painful to help others who then will want to drag us into their lives and we are limited in what ways we can help such people.
So love is a good path but to maximize what we can do for others we need to avoid being the slave of any one person or group. I’m reminded of Jesus being urged to stay in many cities that he visited. He needed to go elsewhere though and not get locked into just helping a small group.
For all his faults, Bill Gates has a willingness and goal to help the largest amount of people possible. He was reportedly motivated to “give back” by his wealth investor friend Warren Buffett.
I’ve probably rambled on enough. And when it comes to judging people … I’m urged not to do so… and at no time during an active game do people rest on their laurels. Meaning I’ve got to press ahead … do more and probably comment on blogs less and send less long emails.
If, and it is a big if – because of the Principle of Indistinguishability – if there is mystery and a not-easily-replicated substrate to this realm, it has something to do with love. Dogma of all forms originate from one thing – fear. I see terrified people in churches, rambling the doctrine – and I see terrified ‘skeptics’ rambling the doctrine. So that raises the inevitable and familiar question, is fear the opposite of love? Many people postulate that apathy is the opposite of love, but for me- apathy is nothing but a stolid, stoic expression of resignation to fear. A costume one wears so they do not appear afraid, to themselves.
So, even though I do not regard the self-titled Apostle Paul as an example of how to live (I hold epoche on his ‘road to Damascus’ event), perhaps one of his quotes (if he wrote it) that I do appreciate from my childhood days would be, “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of strength, and of love, and of a sound mind.”
That is what my blog espouses. And if it does come in its origin from an intelligence substrate to our observable universe – then I am all for it. I make no claims therein, to the positive nor negative.
As usual I appreciate your well-thought out response. Your comment about fear … it is something that I think people of truth likely struggle with. It was just a few days ago that I gave the issue quite a bit of thought. Because I’m a believer in God, I dealt with the issue by praying about it. I recognized that I can easily be misled by fear and I prayed that it would neither stop me from doing things I should do, nor make me do things I ought not to do. (I think I was focused on this for hours so, my little summary is barely a fraction of what I prayed and was concerned with. Most of my prayer though was about not being misled by fear … particularly wrong fear.)
Your bit of reasoning though brought to memory a saying attributed to Thomas Jefferson so I had to look it up.
“Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.”
A search for the quote gave me the link above to provide some context to the quote.
Perhaps you would find the paragraphs that deal with moral philosophy and religion somewhat interesting. He addresses this in paragraph (or short sections) three and four.
I can’t think of anything super-profound in those paragraphs that necessarily warrants needing to read it. However the section on moral philosophy has me wondering if you would tend to agree or disagree with it. Particularly what do you think of “State a moral case to a ploughman and a professor. The former will decide it as well, & often better than the latter, because he has not been led astray by artificial rules.” Then Jefferson goes on to recommend reading some books on moral philosophy. He recommends one in particular. I’m surprised to think that outside of scripture, and works that serve to teach scriptural principles, I’ve not read anything on the topic. I have wanted to read a book on Lying by a leading atheist … Harris perhaps … but I haven’t had the money to make a purchase nor the motivation to request it or search the library for it.
Has your readings led you to read any books on moral philosophy (outside of bible stuff when you were young)? I’m also wondering if moral philosophy was a subject that was popular in the time of Jefferson but has become less popular now. I can’t rule out that I’ve been blind to the subject because of my Christian orientation … and I’ve automatically shut my eyes to books on the topic. Or maybe this topic has become subsumed under more modern topics … self-help or some other things. However even Franklin has written a lot of self-help for the common man in his Poor Richards writings …
Enough of my rambling … I express my appreciation in advance of whatever light, thoughts or experiences that you can share on these topics that I just raised.
You must have read my mind. I presented some data to a friend of a friend on Facebook, refuting in part a “pro science meme” that he had circulated on his page. My refutation was simply to deal with the first item on the meme- namely gluten and to comment that there was clear evidence that gluten could have neurotoxic properties (which there is-though it is not clear how common the issue is). The friend of friend demanded evidence, and I spent 30 minutes trawling through PubMed to find sufficient references of sufficient quality.
I was amused to see him brush all these aside without properly reviewing any of them. Almost a textbook list of your social skeptics list of defences. What intrigued me though was his inability to look at new information. This sort of information is relevant to all of us, as is the proper conduct of scientific medicine. We all have skin in that game, and we have to admit that health in the US, Britain, and Australia, and Canada is going downhill fast.
On reflection though- it is the fragility that was interesting. Maybe there was a cognitive deficit?
Now my blog deals with a subject that has been controversial for many years (atlas subluxation/upper cervical malalignment). The chiropractors have talked about it for decades, and they have plenty of evidence, though not of the large scale RCT type that is applicable to phaarmaceuticals.
However they have been bitterly attacked on all of the main “social skeptic” blogs, and by members of groups like “The Friends of Science In Medicine”.
These malalignments are very common and cause all sorts of problems, and I am about to write another piece discussing the evidence for compromise of brainstem bloodflow as caused by subluxations. With the advent of upright MRI we now have all the evidence we need (though it would be nice to run even bigger studies to nuance the findings better. We have not even touched the edges of detail for all the secondary conditions). The brainstem is the seat of consciousness. All the cortex adds is detail (speaking loosely).
These problems also cause a characteristic posture- kyphoscoliois- hunched over and a little twisted. You can spot it from 10 metres away.
Now I had difficulty with my old defence organisation over this matter, and was struck by the irony of arguing with 3 twisted old men (who clearly had the syndrome) about the non existence of the condition that was so clearly causing their cognitive impairment. I also note that one of the stalwarts in an Australian Organisation called “The Friends of science In Medicine” has it too (once I tracked down a photo of him).
I recently discovered though that the chiropractors have a saying “Sh*t subluxated people say”. Yep. I get it.
From my point of view though, there are a number of causes of cognitive impairment.
Ground floor- compromised brain stem blood flow, orthostatic intolerance (lower BP higher heart rate when sitting), scrambled input signals (see the blog) interfering with visual competence.
First floor- secondary immune/metabolic consequences of ground floor problems.
Second floor– an environment that no longer provides healthy food and that makes exercise difficult
Third floor- the difficulty in seeing that one is abnormal oneself– especially as the cognitive deficits come on slowly
Fourth Floor and top level:
Our academic institutions encourage obedience to authority rather than independent thinking.
What you and I are asking people to do does require mental energy, and it requires a degree of risk management. Breaking the habit of obedience, and learning to step up and make your own observations and do your own research is tough. It is even tougher if you have only half a brain available to you at the time.
However, within my profession the people remembered are the ones who did just that: Anton Semmelweiss, Sir William Osler etc. Individuals considering problems and weighing their individual experience without a committee to hide behind. However in a medico-scientific culture that encourages obedience and hierarchy, it takes a lot of energy to lift out of that paradigm.
My own case was straightforward- there was no adequate help for my problem- not even a differential diagnosis. It was a matter of being brave and accepting “Do, or die”.
The cognitive impairment issue is no fun. I get episodes of it when the alignment is bad– but at the time I identified my problem I was profoundly unwell. I honestly do not know how I stuck on the internet long enough to confirm the basic information I had been given. That was real cognitive impairment. So I do have sympathy for these poor confused skeptics.
Great to have you comment on this last blog post. Ironic that three old men, were suffering from a cognitive impacting condition, which they denied from a basis of cognitive impairment to begin with. A play in microcosm of our reality as a culture.
Yes, perhaps I should best frame my hypoxia proposition more as exemplary, than suggest it as the basis for all cognitive impairment. Good point.
But it does elicit this problem of adopting skepticism as some kind of substitute for the ability to think. They call it ‘critical thinking’ – but I rarely witness anything of the sort inside its execution. It should be instead entitled ‘conformance protocols’ – a type of thinking welfare for those of impoverished cognition.
Great that you stuck it through to begin to resolve your own subluxation issues – and now can help others. Well done. I noticed my stooped shoulders and neck long ago – but have yet to address it. My son has the same thing going on. Perhaps we should look into it.
Quoting from Wikipedia about the book, “The Undoing Project” — “The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds is a 2016 nonfiction book by American author Michael Lewis, published by W.W. Norton. The Undoing Project explores the close partnership of Israeli psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, whose work on heuristics in judgment and decision-making demonstrated common errors of the human psyche, and how that partnership eventually broke apart. The book revisits Lewis’ interest in market inefficiencies, previously explored in his books Moneyball (2003), The Big Short (2010), and Flash Boys (2014). It was acclaimed by book critics.”
TES, you overlay a deep knowledge of science and awareness of human behavior over the simplest, timeless concepts such as that of humility, to give some clear demonstrations of very fundamental mistakes that are so damaging to our modern society. Keep up the good work.
The first paragraph of this comment is merely to point out that you have a style or intellectual rigidity (meant here in terms of strength) that matches that of some of the best reading on subjects of human behavior that I’ve ever read as applied specifically to the modern world.
And to oppose the thought that I might be saying you are in any way intellectually rigid or inflexible, you’ve got a great personality as well as deep awareness of your own intellectual limitations (again meant here in a good way … meaning you don’t go off “half-cocked” arguing stridently about things you know nothing about).
Obviously, too there are parallels to what you are pointing out in other fields too that exhibit flawed human thinking.
The anger you might felt in the “altitude chamber” might be a primitive animal reaction to be defensive … and you know that.
Human beings though have evolved further than animals and we probably have adopted such strategies to maintain dominance in social groups … much behavior of human beings in ingrained.
I appreciate you throwing light on such things and though you don’t say it in such words you are constantly urging us not to get too ahead of ourselves by taking positions that we haven’t adequately thought through. As human animals we sometimes are wired to take extreme positions to get ahead of the group we are in … to appear as the leader. We sometimes want to be seen as the most passionate or most dedicated to a particular cause of those in our group. (I hope my memory of all this that I previously concluded is still accurate.)
There is a biological risk to animals in standing apart from the group and doubting a course of action that the group had decided on. This is the risk of being ostracized for not being part of the group. However on the other hand, sometimes it is dangerous to follow the herd. Sometimes the leaders don’t care for the people they are supposed to be leading. They are looking out for themselves. People assume that the leaders are looking out for them and only too late do they realize they’ve been sold out.
One of the things you are doing is handing out glasses to people who need their vision improved. I appreciate you doing this. (This is metaphorical, so if you ever handed out glasses, I still don’t know who you are… it is entirely a co-incidence.)
Yeah Thomas, my encouragement for us to not get ahead of ourselves – that is mostly aimed at me. I research so many things, and use my skills developed in Intelligence, to begin to see things that might not be there. The key to spotting lions in the grass, generally is to test them – not ignore them. The latter action bears really disastrous black swan moments.
But if you have 100 lions in the grass, which do you test? One has to make their best call in such a circumstance – but to listen to voices which cannot see at all, proclaiming that ‘it’s all just lion faces in the grass’ – they are 99% correct, yet heeding their advice is the worst mistake a person who deals with risk, can make.
It was – and is. But those who are good at it are promoted fast and paid very well.
Honestly engaging or debating people with a different viewpoint is often helpful in order to break out of a narrow way of thinking.
This YouTube video is likely too long for most folk to watch (something like three and half hours!) but in this podcast you can see Michael Shermer getting some push-back when he rather blindly resorted to his talking points. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=39&v=tFlAFo78xoQ
Yet still at the end of the podcast Michael Shermer said some kind remarks to a man he was debating. So Michael does have some open-mindedness. He even corrected some material that another guest or partner of his in the debate espoused.
Often people only try to learn viewpoints that match their own. However they might be missing something if they don’t engage people with different viewpoints.
Traditionally a problem with spy satellites, is that they have a rather narrow field of view, often called a keyhole. We all are limited in the amount of material we can research and learn.
Additionally we often fail to see the weaknesses in the viewpoint of our own group. We often highly esteem our own teachers, and though we don’t really understand them, we assume they are correct. Our “teachers” may create “straw-man” arguments and we will not really know it – if we stay within our bubble.
Our teachers may give complex sounding arguments to refute some rather clear mistakes in the position of our group. We though mistake the complex arguments of our teachers as being adequate refutation of the errors of our group.
At some point I had to learn that complex sounding arguments that I don’t understand … I should not give them credence — I mean I can accept that people hold the views being espoused, but in the face of cross-examination a baffling argument can not be considered equal to a well-argued and well-reasoned presentation. Or it at least means I need to do more research…
And obviously everything you wrote as pertaining to skeptics … Christians need to get out of their bubbles and think independently too … and I write as one who was in such a bubble. And to whatever extent I am still in a bubble … there can be many reasons why I am still not where I need to be.
I remember one skeptic agreeing with a Christian who said, “The problem isn’t that Christianity has been tried and found wanting – it is that it hasn’t yet been tried.” How can one argue though with that? As in my last comment getting beyond a real basic level of Christianity to a level that is more skilled in righteousness … how far have Christians come? The writer of the book of Hebrews argued that Christians didn’t come very far.
I don’t want this response to be very long. It reminds me of what Jesus said. When it comes to people, “By their fruits you will know them.” Representatives of God can easily be and often are imposters looking to trick people. Representatives of science may also be imposters.
Sometimes this makes it very difficult for people to find truth – as science imposters might deflect attention away from themselves onto the easily discerned religious imposters who also are science imposters. And sometimes science imposters have espoused an air of triumphalism over some religious viewpoint. Historian Ron Numbers asserted that some proponents of Darwin, so captured the newly discovered science of Evolution and ended up driving away Christians who had been embracing evolution just because they were “triumphalist” in attitude over Christians. Christians should have been able to sort out there own thinking if it was important to them. In as much as people found evolution to be a superior creation account to what was in Genesis and starting using it as a tool to bash Christians, it merely dragged out the inevitable victory of the theory of evolution over the supposed historicity of the Genesis creation account. All kinds of charlatans were willing to exploit Christian zeal for financial gain or whatever other reason.
Ironically fundamentalist Christians and some zealous proponents of science found themselves congratulating their extremist opponents for saying there is no common ground between science and faith. It serves the propaganda purposes of both. I suppose that I can somewhat agree that there isn’t a lot of common ground … but using some flawed version of faith to refute science … or to use some philosophical version of science to refute faith in some grandiose way like saying “God is dead” or “What place then for a maker?” as if disproving God … these are all easily shown to be intellectual over-reach on the part of each proponent. Usually this shows people don’t even know their own supposed sphere of expertise very well.
Robert Jastrow commented about the intellectual over-reach of scientists being brought back to earth as they get to the top of the mountain to discover a band of theologians have been there for centuries.
Or some quote, I think I just read by Heisenberg stating the first sip from the cup of the natural sciences makes atheists but at the bottom of the cup God is waiting.
I doubt these men were Christians but we keep coming back to certain mysteries and some of these have been deeply debated for a long time. The Holy Bible, not everywhere but in some places, has God outside of time and space.
Whether this is was just some good philosophical musings of some great men (Bible writers) of the past, or some divine revelation or just inspired thinking … I’ll leave that question unanswered. If I know the answer or have guessed it correctly … few reading this would believe me.
A friend of mine told me I should get my own blog! Says I write him emails that are too long.
I’m not a superfan of Einstein. Yet there is a quote he made on the subject of science and religion … a quote that in general shows the blindness of religion and that so much science is “lame.”
Sole practitioners of either are missing something.
The blindness of religion which won’t engage science honestly is well-understood, certainly by most people reading your blog.
Yet science too, stretched to try and fill vacuums of morality … I mean perhaps it can be done… and you are doing a valiant effort at making science work for the betterment of mankind…
How can I say this? Though I’m not a scientist, and certainly not a mathematician, I understand that there are certain math formulas and branches of math that are better suited to answering certain challenges. For example in the movie HIDDEN FIGURES the US space agency NASA had certain difficult problems to solve and one of the people in the movie overseeing the planning of a space flight was annoyed that he could not find anyone in his group who knew (if I remember this correctly) a certain branch of calculus in order to properly plan when to initiate certain flight adjustments to the space vehicle.
I’m not going to push you into the realm of religion, but, it has a vast vocabulary in dealing with the type of problems you are up against. Jesus said, “”Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” (Matt. 23:15 NIV)
I can’t say that I know a clear path forward for you in incorporating faith and morals of Jesus and the Bible in order to better deal with tons of dishonesty in science. (What am I talking about people may wonder? From the science angle, it gets corrupted by mass hysteria and the swinging pendulums of personal opinion and human emotion. We don’t ask the right questions. As a species or as a nation we watch biased news sources and we get just a tiny fraction of the important information in the world. And yet even our culture falls pray for what one rather dated book called “Entertaining ourselves to death.” So in general we don’t learn science or truth, and what we learn is often flawed or biased, preferring instead fantasies … particularly when they make our intellectual opponents look rather stupid.
There is probably little love for science in our culture, and what love we have for science can easily be hijacked by people who have their own interest. What happens when science follows a business model? Or in religious language what about when mere monetary interests take root and the love for truth is squelched? Truth gets buried in science reports, perhaps studies are conducted in a flawed manner and certain results get culled out to create a skew in the data.
I’m sure you know that there is an overlap with what you are trying to accomplish — that is find truth in science and expose error … and that the same type of things have inspired people through the ages from ancient writings urging people to be honest, humble, skeptical, truth-seeking, kind etc…
Life is complex. I can understand that people will use science to be able fight wars and develop weapons. The whole idea of war is a difficult one to morally accept. Yet it can have some moral underpinnings. There is always some wickedness worth defeating. Yet war itself is … well I guess we all know… causes death and pain and misery.
Waging war may not only hurt the nation who loses (and wars can be costly to all sides) but it may hurt the consciences of those who engage in it. During the US-Mexican war the man we know as later general Grant remarked that “Never has a more unjust war been waged upon a weaker nation” (If I’m remembering his quote accurately enough.)
Sorry for the long divergent path here from the earlier discussion about science. Good science can produce good weapons. Good weapons may or may not be used justly. Good weapons theoretically can prevent war, by restraining others from fighting, or it may be a cause for war as some nation sees military opportunities.
Jerry A. Coyne in the December 4, 2013 issue of the New Republic decided to recast Einstein’s statement on religion and science as ““Science without profound curiosity won’t go anywhere, and religion without science is doubly crippled.”
Yet further up in the article he quoted Einstein as saying,”In this sense religion is the age-old endeavor of mankind to become clearly and completely conscious of these values and goals and constantly to strengthen and extend their effect. If one conceives of religion and science according to these definitions then a conflict between them appears impossible. For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action: it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts. According to this interpretation the well-known conflicts between religion and science in the past must all be ascribed to a misapprehension of the situation which has been described.”
Einsteins view satisfies neither atheist nor believer. He thought of Judaism and I suppose Christianity as “childish superstition.”
I conclude that Jerry A. Coyne took Einstein’s remark too far though in the atheist direction. If Einstein was saying that religion deals with “values and goals” and that “science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be” then I think Einstein wasn’t referring to his feeling of the scientists view of religion as being the “profound curiosity” Coyne thought of it as … but rather in this context the moral guidance that in a general way Einstein put in the realm of religion. Actually maybe Jerry was right. Looking at his article the closest context does support his view … but Einstein believed both in a religious sphere (though not some personal God) as well as in a religious feeling or awe as Cohen described. Einstein has said something about being awestruck “at the harmony of natural law” which was vastly superior to the thinking of humans.
Jerry made another comment too that intrigued me and I found a bit amusing because I hold a similar view in regard to religion … or what I have developed as my Bible guided worldview.
Jerry Coyne wrote,
=====================
Finally, I take issue with Einstein’s statement that the value of reason in understanding the world is a form of “profound faith.” As I wrote in Slate, this is confusing because the religious meaning of faith is “firm belief without substantial evidence,” while the scientist’s “faith” in the laws of physics is simply shorthand for “strong confidence, based on replicated evidence and experience, about how things are.” Further, we don’t have faith in reason: we use reason because it helps us find out things. It is in fact the only way we’ve made progress in understanding the universe. If other ways had proven valuable, like personal revelation or Ouiji boards, we’d use those, too.
=====================
Why do I find this amusing? C. S. Lewis wrote,
—
I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. C. S. Lewis
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/c_s_lewis_162523
—
Coyne uses reason to see the world through scientific means. I have a background in faith that helps me see things in terms of “love your neighbor as yourself” … I see failings of Christians and religion in this regard … wars and suppression of truth … but I also see Christian successes over time too in this regard. When the Roman Empire got overrun and taken over by what I think was illiterate people in the North, The Monks kept education going and copied down ancient manuscripts to give us the ancient Greek and Latin writings in addition to scripture. Hospitals and schools were initially started as religious operations for religious purposes. The abolition of slavery I understand to have had been strongly undertaken by religious people. I’m not saying this out of any deep knowledge of history, but the fight against slavery had a strong driving factor from the pulpits and from those who I suppose … there was some movie popular in Christian circles … Wilberforce … but I’m out of time and can’t confirm my impression that he was deeply religious of motivated by religion.
Still, Ethical Skeptic, I’m intrigued by your moral crusade to clean up science … and I’ll continue to follow your postings. You will though as with anyone who is countering great wickedness, have to continually work to use your anger against the great evil being done, without becoming overly angry at those who are engaging in this evil of misusing science. The Christian can perhaps work against the evil and be constrained by scriptures that say something like “Do not take vengeance, vengeance is mine, sayith the Lord.” Christians also sometimes obey Jesus’ command to “love your enemy” and this mitigates a bit of hatred toward them when practiced.
You’ve got lot’s of experience going for you in your battle against a whole range of both specific issues you weigh in on … as well your careful analyses of the theoretical frameworks of popularized and politicized and monetized science endeavors where truth often is thrown into back seat by people who have become fame seekers or vote getters or money grubbers.
I wonder if Jerry A. Coyne will see this comment (maybe he has some Google Alert or something when his name is mentioned) and wonder if he has views to share.
Thanks again Thomas, a well thought out and cited commentary. I concur with most of what you said. My only departure would line up as follows:
In Coyne and Einstein’s framings – they leave out the objective but also abductive realms of philosophy & skepticism, and how they distinguish from faith & religion. The way they have posed this is too much of a bifurcation to stand as a working principle. For instance:
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, because God said for us to do this’ – Religion
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, will be its own reward inside a high moral character’ – Faith
‘Loving your neighbor as yourself, as a principle produces stronger and more fulfilling societies’ – Philosophy
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, is ambiguous, unnecessarily permissive, overly simple, undefined, signals virtue and can be used to excuse a whole host of evil or to beat opponents over the head when they have done nothing wrong.’ – Ethical Skepticism (Skepticism)
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, Sounds great, but science cannot comment on such a principle’ – Science
The realms of philosophy and skepticism are realms of abductive/inductive reason, in which we create standards (ethics) – which also do not require religion and faith to underpin them (morals). The differentiating feature is that philosophy can be vetted by testing (albeit over a longer period of testing than typical science). Faith and religion can never be tested as they constantly shift to accommodate any new or challenging information. This is called a Wicker Man principle. The ultimate special pleading, as it can always contort in response to any challenge thrown at it – in order to make that challenge moot or as constituting a straw man. Faith is always preserved. This is what makes it pseudo-theory; not existentially wrong itself nor wrong to undertake on a personal level; rather, wrong only when one no longer sees it as a personal metaphysical selection – instead as something now mandatory for everyone.
It is not that faith is illegitimate, rather – that its domain does not extend up and to being adjacent to the boundary of science, as Coyne and Einstein framed. Because in that role, faith or religion have pretended to the position of philosophy and skepticism. Unjustifiably so. Coyne and Einstein missed a LARGE part of our duty as mankind. But philosophy can hold both faith, religion and science accountable. It just has to prove out over time in such a role.
The whole of our realm is asking us, “Who the fuck are you?” Applied philosophy is where we answer that question back. I do what I do, through hard learned personal conviction, and not because someone told me it was good or mandatory. The latter is rarely the real thing. If I were a God, I would not be looking for the latter. I would yawn incessantly over the religious chatter.
But with regard to vengeance, pointing out what people are doing to harm others is not vengeance. Vengeance is an appeal to authority. But standing in the gap to counter evil actions – that is a fundamental right which even religions and God cannot take away.
We have to up our game as mankind. This is why we are alone at the present I believe…
Regarding the bifurcation of “love your neighbor as yourself”, I am tending to agree with you, but I’m not sure if you are quoting all the aspects because Coyne or Einstein has made the bifurcation and you think it is unnecessarily complex or you perhaps you are making such an argument tossing into your own view “Ethical Skepticism (Skepticism)” as representing your view. In which case I’ll concede that “love your neighbor as yourself” though valid as a general principle such as seeing yourself as part of a team and each part of the team should be taken into consideration… yet I see the over-simplicity of the idea. “I’d like a meal and am hungry, so therefore I should give to food to everyone else, even though they are not currently hungry.” So some pedantic approach that doesn’t take individuality into consideration is not that helpful, probably annoying etc… Yet criticizing the principle in general is probably a case of over-thinking a simple idea. The morality of that teaching is fine … but it is a good place to start thinking.
You say “We have to up our game as mankind.” It is similar to what the author of “Hebrews” wrote, “Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil. (Heb. 5:13-14 NIV)
It is just an argument that one can’t go from being a “selfish bastard” (though what being a bastard has to do with the morality of people in general is another question … lacking a father figure is sometimes equated with lessened good behavior … probably this idea got ingrained in the thinking of earlier people and our language still carries the imprint of that stereotype) — but people can’t go from being totally selfish to experienced in how to help others right off the bat. It takes experience and practice. The family unit ought to be a place people learn to work together.
Well I’ll leave that idea off for now and address another point.
You wrote the following. “Faith and religion can never be tested as they constantly shift to accommodate any new or challenging information. This is called a Wicker Man principle. The ultimate special pleading, as it can always contort in response to any challenge thrown at it – in order to make that challenge moot or as constituting a straw man. Faith is always preserved. This is what makes it pseudo-theory; not existentially wrong itself nor wrong to undertake on a personal level; rather, wrong only when one no longer sees it as a personal metaphysical selection – instead as something now mandatory for everyone.”
One thing about the Bible though is that is or purports to be a historical document. Having watched the movie Patterns of Evidence by film maker Tiomothy Mahoney, I watched him struggle with certain ideas in scripture. As he was given lots of evidence about the un-historicity (I’m coining a word … sure there is a better one though) of the Holy Bible, he encountered the viewpoint “Whether or not the stories of the Bible are true … they are true.” This could be what you are saying? The idea that the scriptures contain truths even if they are just stories is enough for many people to continue to have such faith.
However it does effect the zeal of people who hold such views. For the events in question Timothy Mahoney concluded there was Biblical evidence to uphold his faith in the historical nature of the Bible. Had he not found such evidence he would have been struggling with thinking that Jesus and the church got it all wrong.
However there are other points in scripture that I clearly see as being not true. We have “genre”.
And so as you said it again becomes difficult to disprove.
I’ll even go so far as to assert that in different times the Bible writers knew what they were writing was false. However, in my thinking they put in a code indicating this.
For example in the initial creation account in Genesis, the first line is Hebrew is seven words, the second line is fourteen words. The entire creation account of the world is a multiple of seven words. Other people even see the first verse as a multiple of seven letters adding to the pattern. Seven days of creation and seven times things are “good” in the account. Chance? Or intentionally worded that way?
Then we got all these long genealogies to the time of Noah. Each ends in a “0” or a “5” and then the other genealogical names end in numbers that can be gotten by adding a “7” to a number that ends in “0”s or “5”s. Other clear errors in scripture is Matthews Genealogy. Again whoever wrote the genealogy put in a statement that the genealogy had fourteen generations from this to then in three cases. Luke’s genealogy does the same thing, but doesn’t spell it out. Instead it uses a couple names in reverse order to link up Matthews genealogy to Luke’s genealogy at the junctures where the 14 generations occur. And so it was said that while Matthew had three groups of 14 Luke’s genealogy had two groups of 14 generations and one of 21 generations. This doesn’t prove a whole lot, except that clues were left to indicate a certain genre … that this is inaccurate … or make of it whatever you want.
The story of Jonah … I’ve heard it said that the Hebrew has a wave mimicking element to it. Fiction?
Ecclesiastes doesn’t come out and say it was written by Solomon. It hints around at it … but it is likely historical fiction. Song of Solomon makes no sense to me from a story point of view. Yet the imagery in it is helpful to understand the emotional intensity that people in love feel, the speeches deal with insecurity and are fine examples of how to make someone feel loved. The Jews reportedly had arguments about whether it should be in scripture and somehow concluded that this was a metaphor of God and Israel, but that doesn’t make sense to me. Paul seemed to perhaps parrot the idea talking about marriage as somehow being symbolic of Christ and the church.
The book of Daniel has all these prophecies, they closely resemble the history of the middle east from Daniel to perhaps the time the thing was fully written. Was it written beforehand? How can that be proved?
On the historical side … let’s look at the Book of Esther. Doesn’t even mention God (specifically). It is a remarkable tale of an attempted genocide against the Jewish people being thwarted. From what I understand there is no historical evidence for any of it. Yet if it isn’t true, why did Jews across the world from that time adopt the tradition described in the book? Why take it upon themselves to celebrate Purim, if there was no truth to the story?
There is a lot of stuff in the Bible and sorting out actual historical stuff or genre or whatever is difficult.
So whether looking at scripture and the need for us to up our game as a people, or just you seeing the need with your experience … skills developed in trying to do good … or whatever better terminology you can come up with … I think our hearts in likely in the same place.
Scripture in the Holy Bible raises a lot of questions and doubt in me … but it seems to outstrip all that with the meanings that I find … and I’m not sure how to explain all that.
“Principle of Indistinguishability: Any sufficiently advanced act of benevolence is indistinguishable from either malevolence or chance.”
Is it because we who are morally flawed can’t adequately grasp any benevolence that is beyond our understanding?
I mean if someone is running a marathon and some stranger on the sideline is offering water to the runners … we can understand that because it is part of our experience. But if someone offers something really outlandish … we can’t really know what is going on.
Minister at church was talking about the Apostle Paul’s second letter to the church in Corinth. Paul had to explain himself as to why he was NOT taking their money. It was offensive to some. Others were wondering if Paul was craftily skimming money that were intended as a donation to the poorer churches in Judea.
I’m not arguing with what you are saying. Probably it is more a reflection of how sad our human state is that we can’t distinguish “benevolence” from “malevolence” or “chance”.
If what you are saying is true, then we will never be able to recognize good done to us on a divine level from God. That will certain lock us into one of the categories of agnosticism — or ignosticism.
On another level you’ve probably been on the other end of this equation too. Ever try to help or hang out with someone … and that person can’t shake the idea the you actually intend good? I’ve had interaction with one paranoid person and as time went on every good deed was construed as some selfish attempt to take his stuff.
One very intelligent friend that I had who died a few decades ago said, “In the absence of evidence people will invariably accuse you of doing what they themselves would do in a similar situation.” He said a corollary to that is “You can learn a lot about a person by the things they accuse you of.”
I’m not nearly as negative as my friend was. Yet with some people suspicion can hijack their lives and cause unnecessary problems. Some millennia ago a King died and his son assumed the kingship. A king of another land sent emissaries to the new King to express condolences for that King had a good relationship with the deceased King and wanted to continue the national good relationship with the new heir to throne. The advisors though to the new King told him that they weren’t really sent to express condolences and wishes for a continued good relationship with the new King, but that they were in fact spies sent by the King to determine ways to invade the Kingdom.
I can see your point, though that sometimes good and bad can be indistinguishable. However the new King decided to humiliate the messengers and send them back deeply humiliated. As it turned out the mere paranoia of the new King and his advisors set in motion a decline in positive relations. Started an arms race of sorts where the New King realized that they were no longer on good terms with the King who sent emissaries … so they hired an army of another nation … and a war ensued that led to a defeat of that nation that originally didn’t accept condolences.
There was a manager at work that I respected. Over time I think he thought my respect was insincere and he became nasty at times. He got a promotion and is now (or was) a “lead manager”. Yet somehow conflict rose up between him and other managers … in part because this lead manager was firing so many people. He has taken either personal time off or was placed on leave … the story is still unfolding.
I understand being suspicious. A friend of mine told me that I don’t trust people enough.
However what was the basis or context of your comment? Was it that if God exists and is kind that we won’t actually be able to determine it apart from some special revelation?
I hope I’m adequately humble about all this. Though I consider that I have a great desire to follow God as revealed by Jesus… I’m such a novice in terms of doing good stuff, … I greatly appreciate your attempts for service to humanity in regard to the light you attempt to cast on the paths that the sheep of this world are on. No doubt there are educated sheep and uneducated sheep. Gullible sheep and proud sheep who repeat back dogmas they were told. Some sheep have some love and some sheep … well it is only sheep’s clothing that we see.
What though are to think as we see sheep dogs and wolves. I am sure the sheep are scared of both of them.
You are among the more aggressive sort … trying to right wrongs and do all you can stop all kinds of insanity that has so rooted itself in modern thinking.
There is a commercial on the radio where medicine of a hundred years or so ago is mocked, “leaches” as opposed to penicillin. Some humans like to think that humans who’ve been around for some 200,000 years or so have now finally got most things right, just about a few years ago.
Up to this time we’ve as a species been “mad” in so many ways. All of a sudden now we’ve got it right, or so we suppose.
Stay out of the sun … use sunscreen if you go out. Eat less salt. Don’t eat fat … eat lot’s of carbs. More and more vaccinations at younger and younger ages. Skip recess for kids so they can spend more time on core subjects. Away with any “right brain” activities for kids, don’t teach music or arts. Child can’t sit still in school?? we’ve got a medication for the kid.
Let’s power everything by electricity. What can go wrong? I’ve lost most of the readers here…
I wasn’t aware of how bad SOME things were in regards to vaccinations till I read your blog. (You aren’t arguing that vaccinations are wrong all across the board … you are arguing that safety processes are not being followed. You are pointing out that evaluations of affects of vaccinations are not being adequately done. Follow-up studies are not being done. The government agencies in charge of overseeing these things are very cozy with the companies making the products.
You could be like President Eisenhower who warned against the military being cozy with industry. However few listened to Eisenhower and the voices of reason are perhaps somewhat outspent by those who put profit over people.
In one of his writings Richard Dawkins felt the problems facing humanity are so bad that only religion can solve can them. (He talked about a certain thing called “superniceness” – if I am remembering this accurately.)
There is a country song that has playing the past few years. “The senioretes no caro when there’s no dannero” (botched the spelling). Lesson: many people only care when there is something in it for them or when they won’t lose anything personal.
Some people have to sacrifice for others. From a Christian perspective I want to do God’s will. I see a whole lot of people who aren’t Christian … who are rushing around mad. Can’t figure out who will make a good leader and who would get the country into a nuclear war. So many are afraid because they don’t want to get labeled.
A candidate running for office says that if she was elected she would violate another countries airspace to shoot down any planes that country or the planes of an invited nuclear superpower uses to drop bombs on territory that they were retaking from a terrorist organization. Arguably staged photos were presented of casualties resulting from such bombing. The candidate won the popular vote but not the electoral college and has been upset about losing. A prior president pointed out that if someone is so sensitive to go around complaining of election fraud that he would not have the emotional makeup to be President of the country.
Sorry to dump all this on your lap. Few realize how fragile things are. I’ve made such comments in reply to some blogs put up a by a pastor that pertain to a sermon given at a church I sometimes attend. Usually I don’t get a response.
Really what can or should one person do about the state of the world … and it’s rush into insanity?
You are setting aside some of your personal time to push for some sanity as you best see it. It seems like your life has been a fascinating and complex journey.
May you have many more fascinating times ahead. And to use a term that straddles the line between secular and religious — I wish you GodSpeed … though I have little idea what the phrase initially meant. Maybe it can tie in with your boating story … maybe it meant a fast journey on a boat?
Yes, “If what you are saying is true, then we will never be able to recognize good done to us on a divine level from God. That will certain lock us into one of the categories of agnosticism — or ignosticism.” – Correct. This would be separate from our inability to discern each other’s motives – but certainly, if the principle arises with regard to intra-human relations – then how much more for any external party? Perhaps that is a reason they hide?
“In the absence of evidence people will invariably accuse you of doing what they themselves would do in a similar situation.” He said a corollary to that is “You can learn a lot about a person by the things they accuse you of.” – This is pretty good. Yes, I have had this repeatedly done to me over my early career. Teamsmanship was seen as divisive and plotting. But those who made the accusation were merely projecting themselves onto me. And their darkness showed up later – it just took time. These are great quotes, fairly reliable.
But the perspective I framed in the first component of the Law of Advanced Intelligence is – we overestimate our ability to grasp the motives, means and ways of any intelligence far above ours. It is our lack of development, not our propensity to mistrust, which limits us. We are not even to the point where we know enough to mistrust. LOL! We not only have a naturalistic gap inside which we insert ‘god’ but we don’t even know what that gap is… As I look at the universe, its precise and firm boundary conditions, I have no idea whatsoever whether intelligence is the substrate of that – and any claims to the pro or con – are just fantasy on the part of the atheist or theist.
Yes, if god existed and was benevolent – we would not know either condition. Which of course is the basis of ethical skepticism ‘If I were wrong, would I even know it?’ Until we get to the point where we CAN know it (or pieces on the road thereof), ignosticism is the only ethical pathway.
If a person takes the path of ignosticism, there is a certain discipline which shows inside that person. Those who adopt their ontology/cosmology fast, with lots of fanaticist fervor – they are the wolves. Easy to see once you have made the journey. But perhpas one of the biggest indicators (to me) is that the wolves cannot comprehend what you have to say. You can see them, but they cannot see you. A principle which extends far beyond our tiny human-sphere I suspect.
As always, thanks for the readership and kind words,
~TES
This is actually pretty damn good. I have never thought of these issues and spirituality in quite this way. While I am not about to claim myself as an ignostic, and my wife might shoot me if I did – this has to get some thought. Thanks for this shake up in thinking. Or maybe I should say ‘thanks a lot’ as not I am not gonna get this perspective out of my head. LOL. I have not heard this expressed in quite this way or detail before, and howdy is that refreshing at the veery least… so
Could I suggest an addition to The Law of Advanced Intelligence? Would an advanced intelligence be immutable? Would that be a property of such a being or force, if it existed? Immutability. VT
Thanks VT! I appreciate the comment on my work. This is a culmination of literally decades of thought, and TONS of mistakes which have been placed into this. I too had never heard this line of thought before.
Regarding immutability – that would be a characteristic of a god, or the placeholder thereof potentially as well. But when I speak of ‘Law’ of Advanced Intelligence, what I really mean is – the ways in which we regard the issues of any potential intelligence or lack thereof, which would be the substrate (or not) of our reality. The ‘Law’ does not presume a god, nor offer any putative characteristics of such a being. So, immutability would regarded as a characteristic of that entity (a definition which would violate the very Law itself – as Law III states that there is no such thing as an expert in god), and not of our thinking around that entity. Hope that makes sense? ~TES
Terry, very much appreciated. I have the plot in my head and some advance sketches – but since I am working, as it sounds like you are… it will take some time. Thanks for the feedback! ~ TES
Robert from GMOWTF(dotcom) here, the Cornell sh!t-stirrer currently making a film about their Monsanto ties. I’m a huge fan and have been for a while… in fact, I could use your advice on the nature/narrative of my film, as you understand this stuff better than anyone.
I must, however, disagree ever-so-slightly with your assessment in the first few paragraphs of this piece – that a grain-based diet is the ’cause’ of chronic disease. I see this rhetoric passed around a LOT by very smart, aware, truly ethical skeptics and thinkers, but it indeed represents a bit of a trap. If I may:
The only diet proven to REVERSE heart disease (a scientific miracle in itself) is a (whole) grain-based, ideally low-fat, oil-free 100% plant-based diet with no meat, dairy, or processed vegetarian foods (fake cheese etc.) … the evidence for this is outstanding, replicable, replicated, and has real value for real people… like your father and mine, who recently died from heart disease as well, and might still be around if he wasn’t socially barred from this life-saving information by our propagandized world.
This same diet cures diabetes – a relatively easy disease to cure, but nothing works better, faster, than the plant-based approach. It also works on a host of other ailments, in fact, 15 of the top 16 leading causes of death would be ameliorated or outright stopped with a switch to a whole-food, plant-based diet.
It’s so easy to fall into the trap that
1) food pyramid is BAD (it of course, is)
2) grains at bottom of food pyramid
3) big ag grows grains en masse
4) GRAINS are the problem and cause these diseases!
I used to think this way too. That is, until witnessing with my own eyes people miraculously getting better eating whole grains, low fat, whole foods, whole plants, etc.
I think you’re FAR too intelligent to fall for this pseudo-conspiracy.
I’m not saying that:
-big ag is good (OBVIOUSLY)
-glyphosate is good and should be sprayed on grains (duh)
-grains are necessary for health, and one must eat them
-avoiding grains is a stupid idea (I in fact am starting to avoid them myself)
-other dietary approaches and experimentation don’t deserve merit or experimentation (I for one love nutritional science because it’s the most real, applicable, experimental science there is)
However, one CANNOT deny that there are people that are ALIVE today because they switched from meat, dairy, and processed foods to whole grains. This is a heart-healing diet, we literally see plaques reverse, and thus, heart disease vanish.
NO ONE needs to die from heart disease, ever. This is a simple fact of life we’ve learned through honest nutritional science.
The burden of proof is on ANY OTHER diet for showing this effect. So far, crickets, especially from the keto crowd, who obviously realize that heart disease is an achilles heel of their approach. I’d love to see the long-time keto follower who doesn’t have plaques in their arteries. Even mummified eskimos from thousands of years ago (no grains, pre-industry) had massive heart disease from the animal protein and fat in their diet!
You and I both know that no one is actually eating whole grains from the cornbelt. No agribusiness is getting rich from people switching to a T Colin Campbell diet and reversing their disease. They get sick from eating the PRODUCTS of this commodification, not the raw product: meat, dairy, corn syrup, vegetable oils, (biofuels too – stupid). In fact, the whole system would utterly collapse if we all miraculously shifted to a predominantly whole plant diet.
The real skeptic would be well-served to set aside this false accusation and fight the right targets: oils, processed foods, meat, dairy … ALL of these food groups are linked to heart disease and diabetes.
I’m not totally sold that cholesterol levels are the devil, by the way. There is plenty of nuance in my treatment of the subject. BUT it is extremely important to realize that the whole “cholesterol doesn’t matter!” meme is coming from people promoting terribly unhealthy (and environmentally devastating) diets that are actually killing people.
The longest lived, most disease free people on earth all ate majority of calories from starch (often grains). It’s important that we don’t forget this in favor of pet theories about nutrition and disease. It’s important we keep our level of skepticism in line with real world evidence affecting real world people – skin in the game.
Thanks for all that you do! I wish more free-thinkers would begin to realize the power of whole plant foods… even if their tastebuds put up a temporary protest. I’m still waiting to see people reverse heart disease on grass-fed beef and butter. I won’t hold my breath.
What a great post! Yes, I do recall you and the Cornell discussions. Thanks for being a loyal follower and reader – I will strive to keep to my core principles yet make my writing a bit less dry, and more entertaining over the coming years. I have a small but fiercely loyal audience. And that is good. :-)
Meet your first keto-diet/MCT Oil/Butter, no grain, no soy, no canola, no cottonseed, no corn consuming person with ZERO heart disease. Me.
This is as certified by the head cardiologist at my nearest big city cardiac center, via catheterization/angioscope. In the middle of the procedure the head cardiologist ‘hmmm’d’ and said ‘You know TES, you have ZERO arterial plaque in your heart, anywhere – this is not right. Even 17 year-olds have plaque buildup of maybe 10% or so, but you have ZERO percent. You are doing something, and I want to know what it is.” I said “Doc, how do I rank as compared to all the patients you have seen as a percentile?” – to which he replied “I have performed over 10,000 catheterizations and heart surgeries, and I have NEVER found anyone with ZERO arterial plaque, so you are THE single exception. Please write up what you are doing and bring it in your follow up appointment.” I eat no wheat, no dairy (except some cheeses), no soy, no corn – my whole family suffers when we eat these foods. As well, I used doxycycline and EDTA for two years. As a skeptic I heard about what this formulation can do, so I tested it upon myself – and it worked. But you have to use BOTH – the testers did not want to test both (they feared everybody going crazy with this) so they used elemental pleading to show that either by itself does not work, which is correct. But doxycylcine and EDTA together reverse heart disease by killing the chlamydia pneumonae bacterium which exploits arterial inflammation and by chelating out the free calcium from the bloodstream which becomes an integral part of the plaque.
As well, I do medical and food strategies for nations. I see a pronounced diabetes schism in nations where cultures are highly bifurcated by food imports and practices. People who eat their indigenous diets of animal proteins and local plants, have very low diabetes rates – in contrast, the portion of the populations which import US grains have 50%+ rates of diabetes – for the same genetic profile of those who have low rates of diabetes thru consuming the traditional diet. And the urban populations are typically more physically active. There is one nation who imports US grains 100% where the diabetes rate is so high, that I flagged it as a strategic risk for the nation. 40 years ago there, hardly anyone had diabetes. In poor nations, those who are poor in rural settings have very low rates of diabetes. Those who are poor in urban settings have very high rates of diabetes – and the difference? These countries import Grade B US coarse grains. High in lipopolysaccharides.
But I had a strange thing occur when I quit wheat in 2004. My cholesterol, which had been chronically around 250-260 for 15 years, suddenly dropped to 110. My doctor asked me to increase my fat intake. I told him that I ate plenty of fats – but that I had quit wheat just 6 months earlier. It was the reduction in arterial inflammation which had caused this. Wheat inflames the arterial lining in some genetics (others can eat it fine), and causes it to release C-reactive protein 1 into the blood stream – where this signal is received by the liver – which in response releases LDL cholesterol as the patching and repair compound for inflamed arteries. This chronic inflammation causes a sustained LDL blood level – and combines with the calcium phosphate shell left behind by chlamydia pneumonae bacteria which infest the inflamed arterial walls. So LDL cholesterol AND calcium shards, together create arterial plaque. This is why the doxycycline and EDTA were so effective for me.
The New England Journal of medicine Aug 2004 cited what I believe to be the culprit – Lipopolysaccharides. The signature chemical on salmonella bacterium. Grasses use this signature chemical strategically to repel mold, bacteria and fungi. But in the human body – it signals to the Adaptive and Innate Immune Systems, the false presence of salmonella – and causes a sustained state of autoimmune inflammation. This – I believe – to be the link between diabetes and heart disease. A root cause of both. This wheat/grass chemical sensitivity is what releases the cholesterol in my genetics. This happens in dogs as well, and is the reason why they removed all wheat and corn fillers from dog food 15 years ago. Cows get around this chemical problem by having a two stage powerful stomach/acid process. We cannot eat grass nor wheat which has been highly hybridized with wild long-grasses (which is almost all of it now) to improve mega farming shelf lives – as it will give my genetics thyroid disease, pituitary disease and finally diabetes – through Hashimoto-like Innate Immune System dysfunction. So, the longer the shelf life of the wheat – the more dangerous it is to humans.
So I am investing in a solution for this dilemma – especially helping these developing nations with a lot of sick people – which will roll out over the next three years. But I cannot go into that. Suffice to say, we need to be eating safe gains – not dangerous grains. And we still have a long way to go. Farmers need to be compensated for growing digestible and safe grains, and not simply for how low they can make their operating costs become. This is killing hundreds of millions of people at this moment.
Thanks so much for this in-depth dive! I’m def going to save and digest later as well.
I can tell we’d be friends lol, and I can see exactly why you’re so adept at calling out the fake skeptics! My whole start in this ‘realm’ was from losing my health and regaining it through personal observation/experimentation.
I’m very curious as to the outliers and exceptions when it comes to disease healing. A keto-vegan diet was shown to reverse heart disease as well, but was slower. There are all sorts of things that will slow/reverse heart disease for various reasons… I’m personally thrilled by the Chinese tonic herbs (reishi, which probably dovetails with the microbio/immune aspect of your approach nicely). I love weird techniques and isolated components of health, but at heart I’m a hippy who loves to keep things wholesome. I believe homeostasis and radiant health are attainable long-term through simple things, even if intervention is needed.
I say start from what we know works for almost everyone, and tailor from there. Caldwell’s heart disease reversal has been shown to be over 95% effective – a literal miracle. Even if we don’t stay on the diet forevermore, EVERYONE should know about this. The simplicity of it is amazing.
What do you think about TMAO and animal products? I feel the keto crowd can become a bit reductionist when it comes to the microbiome-heart disease thing. The funny thing is the vegans have the best microbiomes, and their flora produce almost no TMAO! This is huge for heart disease. It also makes me feel even stronger that animal protein is more a culprit than the fat. That’s what the bacteria putrify to create it. It literally drives plaque into our artery walls!
Totally agree about the lame grains going on today. Such terrible breeding programs and corporate paradigm severed us from the best food ever created by nature and humans. We don’t even know how bad it has become! That’s why to me, the seed savers are the real heros!
Wow, tell us what you really think why don’t you? I think you shot down this aircraft with a 10 megaton nuclear missile. I don’t understand half of this stuff, but it sounds good.
I love it. Absolutely love this editorial. And while I do not totally grasp everything you said here (such as what predicate evidentia is???) – I get your overall message and what each point is. Well said Ethical Skeptic! Needs to be said.
(I am a lapsed MUFON member, but this gets me so fired up to start doing field investigation again!)
You can find an outline of terms in the Glossary at the top right hand side of each web page, or examine how it is used inside the Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation (can be found by the link in the right hand side panel – the brown icons). Praedicate Evidentia is a boast or implications as to the evidence backing a purportedly scientific claim or counter-claim.
Praedicate Evidentia – hyperbole in extrapolating or overestimating the gravitas of evidence supporting a specific claim, when only one examination of merit has been conducted, insufficient hypothesis reduction has been performed on the topic, a plurality of data exists but few questions have been asked, few dissenting or negative studies have been published, or few or no such studies have indeed been conducted at all.
It is a worry that the public discourse has deteriorated to the point where this sort of piece is even thought worthy of consideration. The same sort of dynamic seems to have taken the universities (esp social sciences) in the US by storm.
George Orwell clearly flagged the dangers in “Politics and the English Language”. I hope he was not expecting that his contributions would improve matters. They have got worse, not better.
Yes, the simpleton and methodical martial art of denial. It is used on a number of subjects in order to force social conclusions and agendas – in the name of science or skepticism. I am a lifelong observer and student, obviously. :-)
Just saw a catchy twitter comment. I have no way of knowing which postulated problem is worse though. Depends though on the situation. “Our problem is not so much the unanswered questions but the unquestioned answers out there.” This saying does though illuminate the need to be cautious about our unknown ignorance .. as you’ve been saying.
The Ethical Skeptic, what strikes me in that quote “pseudo-theory is often never questioned” is that a wrong theory can have some very compelling arguments.
For example, we can easily question and see the errors of the flat earth people of the past. However at the time without understanding the law of gravity, numerous very compelling arguments were made against a round rotating earth. One very solid argument is that immense centripetal force of a rapidly world would throw everything off the surface of the planet. Remember if you don’t know about gravity, that would make a great deal of sense. Other arguments not knowing about gravity would raise the concerns that all the air in the universe, relatively static compared to the earth, would make very fast winds on the earth’s surface if the earth were spinning so fast. I mean it would seem sensible to think that if the earth were spinning as fast as it is that we would have to live underground just to not get blown away by really strong air currents.
Other things that seem sensible (when our knowledge is limited) is that there would be no energy source for “continental drift.” We know that radioactive decay inside the earth powers the convection of the mantle and that this drives the movement of the continents.
Another thing that seemed sensible at an earlier time was that our world could not be that old. If we don’t understand nuclear fusion (as was the case in the past) then the lifetime of the sun would be limited by how much combustible fuel could be in the sun before it would be exhausted.
On another note: yesterday I listened to a video of President Eisenhower’s “farewell speech” that he gave upon leaving office. While we are aware of his warnings about the “Military-Industrial Complex” he also had some warning about research. I can’t say that I fully understood his point. But his point did include a concern that government sponsored research would bend the development of research from a search for truth, to the pursuit of government grants. I hope I remember that accurately.
Anyway I appreciate what you have written over the years. I’ve got so much catching up to do to learn more of your thoughts etc…
T. E. Skeptic, this is now much easier to read. I have been reading comments in the past, but it required a work-around. I had to scroll the comments … a portion of the background was lighter and I had to scroll comments through the lighter part of the background to read the text.
You’ve made some kind replies to the two comments or so that I made in the past … I was just limited in my ability to reply in a way that would have added anything at that time.
Most people who write have a lot more experience in business-like and friendly correspondence. Even in my life and especially at work, I don’t engage in a whole lot of chit-chat. I’ll talk, but when the bottleneck to productivity gets cleared I’ll want to be working again. All that is to say that while I appreciate kind comments that you may make … I’m a bit at a loss how to respond. I’m not super socially adept nor am I really quick thinker, in terms of “speed” of thought.
Having said that, in comment blogs I often spend a lot of time thinking and working on things that I write … which makes me appear smarter than I actually am. Everyone is different. I’m not denigrating myself. You are an amazing student of people … you’ll probably be wondering about these things.
Counter-balancing my relative lack of email and social experience, as compared to most professional people who learn to email and write business things on a daily basis, is that I’ve had many years of commenting experience on several blogs and forums. I’ve had to work on my writing a lot in my life. I am very friendly/well acquainted with the delete or backspace button, for I write so much that isn’t worth having people read.
I look forward to seeing what happens in this format on this blog.
Now that I think about it, and you confirm that there was no way to read comments, except by using that illuminated band of sunlight in the background photo, my comment feature was pretty lame and unusable. I get a fair amount of readership nowadays, about 150 or so visitors and 10 or so links to various blogs, forums and comment modules per day – but not a lot of comments here. Maybe this will change.
Charles/Thomas, I also have a couple questions when you get a chance… Are you reading the comments from the hard to read bottom of the blog post page? I have been reading/approving my comments from the WordPress Comments interface, which is easy to read – but I realize that comments are hard to read at the bottom of my blogs because of lack of contrast with the background. This has not traditionally been a comment heavy blog…
UPpdate: I just uploaded a Plugin ‘wpDiscuz’ to manage comments and make them visible at the bottom of each blog. We shall see how it goes with that.
I meant also to raise one additional point. If, what you say is true – that pseudo-science can never be “a body of unacceptable knowledge” as you put it here, then what do we do with chronic bunk subjects and endless mysteries which fester on and on in blurry photos and hoaxes? Are we not to put these subjects out of their misery, with some sort of official commentary by skeptical scientists on the matter? Does your form of skepticism not tend to leave us in an endless cycle of “Epoche”, which gets us ultimately nowhere? – when resources wasted on so much crap, could be much better spent on examining real issues of scientific merit?
Hello Charles P. While we wait for the Ethical Skeptic to give his response I have been thinking of some topics that have some bearing on some of the flaws of the skeptical movement. If I give a long answer it isn’t because there is anything particularly provocative about your question, but rather like a baseball player waiting for a particular pitch to cross the plate your expressed thoughts allow me to connect what I’ve been thinking about to what I’ve been pondering commenting about on the TES blog.
In particular your thoughts then about when to put a subject out of its misery as opposed to “an endless cycle of ‘Epoche’, which ultimately gets us nowhere?” is what I’ll venture a few thoughts on.
First off I think the Ethical Skeptic gave some very good guidance in his article. He wrote, “The question in the mind of the ethical skeptic should be ‘If I were wrong, would I even know it?” and “If I were wrong, would I be contributing to harm?”
So to use your example of “blurry photographs and hoaxes” … let’s deal with the “blurry photograph” angle first. In my mind, this will include 1) Big Foot photos 2) UFO photos 3) Loch Ness monster photos. Each of these topics, in my opinion will have little risk of contributing to harm. So while from a standpoint of debunking some TV show peddling a controversial theory … it will be interesting to learn the true facts about why the TV show peddling a theory might not be honest … probably very few people will die as a result.
Stakes get higher with other topics. “Vaccines save lives” — granted. But how about when they take lives or deprive people of their health and diminish their mental function? This also scientifically proven to happen. Whether it is just a few very serious cases or whether there are uncounted instances of lesser damage … damage not noted by researchers … this is a topic The Ethical Skeptic argues has a lot of bearing on our society. If the Ethical Skeptic is right with his chart in a prior post about a potential curved distribution of negative effects to vaccines … then we have a real serious problem that needs to be better understood and addressed.
Now back to when to put something out of it’s misery. This ought to be done in a positive way. What do I mean?
At one time I didn’t believe in evolution. After trying to understand the issue and honestly debate it … I read a book that Richard Dawkins wrote and his use of examples made the subject clearer to me and I then I embraced evolution.
Another topic that is highly politicized is “climate change.” I’ve been on both sides of this topic. I’ve even asked questions on one of the highly touted sites and met with extensive censorship, sloppy responses and ridicule. Perhaps in this instance, people were more eager to put what they felt was my flawed position “out of its misery” that they didn’t bother to address my concerns. As a result they made me more of an enemy — or rather they made me realize that they were not clear thinking and concerned individuals … my respect for the people I was hoping would change my view plummeted.
That isn’t to say that I’m not in favor of good ecological practices. For example if the climate trends warmer or colder, wildlife should have corridors to land or elevation levels where the habitat will allow them to live.
So in summary, as far as putting bad thinking out of its misery, let’s realize we don’t need to make enemies. It is better to teach a man how to think than perhaps to tell him what to believe. Tell someone what to think and he may have learned one thing. Teach someone how to think and you may have taught him many things.
If you want a good example of “where the rubber meets the road” in an intersection of an alternative theory from someone who was a target of skeptics, to where alternate science and alternate thinking sheds light on accepted theory. Watch the following YouTube video.
Joe Rogan Experience #961 – Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson & Michael Shermer
Michael Shermer made a misstep or two but he recovered nicely and kept his friendship with Joe Rogan the man who puts together the Video podcast. Also it shows how science advances … sometimes well outside established scientific channels.
The Joe Rogan episode mentioned above has some serious implications for us. If we don’t understand the past and the calamities that have taken place in human history then we will be surprised when history repeats itself. As it is, we humans evaluate the risk of danger from asteroids and comets to be extremely low. In the past few years though scientific modeling of the disruption of the orbits of the several hundred kilometer wide “Centaurs” that orbit in the Jupiter area provide additional source material for earth bombardment …
Also an outside the box thinker, Egyptologist David Rohl has made what appears to me to be an air-tight case that Egypt’s traditional chronology is off by hundreds of years. The first person to crack the Egyptian hieroglyphic language went to Egypt with a Bible and made a mismatch with a known Biblical event, Pharoah Shishak (plundering the temple treasure amassed by Solomon) with a Pharoah named Shoshank. Egyptian chronology (due to an attempt to use the Bible to date it) has been off ever since.
I say that David’s overthrowing of Egyptian chronology is “airtight” because his new chronology lines up with a mass of information … including astronomical observations like very rare patterns of eclipses recorded in other areas, patterns of new moons that line with up the right Pharoahs and not the traditional chronology.
The movie Patterns of Evidence in which film maker Timothy Mahoney wrestles with finding evidence of certain Bible Stories takes an interesting twist when he finally finds David Rohl. It is a very skeptic friendly movie …
From my own life, I know I’ve been wrong before. And as The Ethical Skeptic points out, how can we even know if we are wrong? Take for example the theory of plate tectonics. It required a generation of scientists to basically die out before the new theory was accepted. Same thing with the comet impact hypothesis on the North American ice sheet. Certain sloppy critiques of the hypothesis gained a lot of attention but the theory keeps getting stronger and stronger with more and more impact proxies found.
David Rohl believes that entire generation of Egyptologists will need to die out before a new chronology can be widely accepted as normative and true..
You’d think radiometric dating would answer these questions, but you’d be wrong. Filters are applied over the raw radiometric dating results to adjust for who knows what, but then we find that people don’t know that fact…so they give credence to current results, not knowing the filtered and adjusted radiometric dates been tweaked for the local conditions or for whatever reasons the scientists tweaked the results to make them acceptable to the Egyptologists.
I started reading the Ethical Skeptic a few months back. I was just getting comfortable joking around with my son calling stuff “pseudoscience” and then I read The Ethical Skeptic and he helped balance out a bit of my cockiness. I can hardly follow much of what he writes … it might be as close as I’ll ever get to a college education.
I apologize in as much as I might appear to have interjected myself into a personal discussion that you have addressed to The Ethical Skeptic however this is still public and The Ethical Skeptic is a busy guy … so if I gave a few thoughts that he might agree with … maybe I saved him some writing. Now he focus on answering your question about his Hanoverian style and “Johann Gottlieb Fichte” and other stuff.
Charles, Thomas has done an excellent job in responding to this valid concern you raise. I too am frustrated with chronic bunk subjects which just seem to waste everyone’s time and get us nowhere, decade after decade. But, as a researcher (who has actually funded studies and gets very upset when his money is wasted), and as a former lab head – I have found that, unleashing the dogs of denial by means of authority serves to impart much more damage than does any actual bunk subject itself.
The first rationale for this, is exactly what Thomas pointed out. Our concern is about our ability to know if we are wrong, and then to estimate harm which might result from such a condition. What we practice as a method to get the right answer inside one subject (bigfoot does not exist), may indeed as a method then cause a harmful mistake when used inside another topic (vaccines do not cause harm). I prefer to use the right method in all subjects, without passion and prejudice. An authority never really knows if they are wrong, because they rarely get any feedback on the quality of their thoughts and methods. And in considering themself an authority (or skeptical authority identifying bunk), they also fail to question their own thoughts or the harm that their conclusions might entail. Once in a position of authority as a lab director, or even a skeptic – I must guard against imperious assumptions (and my own ego) even more than I do bunk.
The second is the principle that ‘My trust is in the processes of science, not the null hypothesis itself’. Even if the null hypothesis is a parsimonious negation (which it often is), I do not treat its contention as a belief set then as well. One which compels me to start telling people that this negation is therefore now authority. This is known as an Imposterlösung Mechanism. A null hypothesis which has grown into status as a club belief or religion – because it is difficult to approach with epistemology. Bigfoot, UFO’s, the Loch Ness monster – I am not contending that these entities exist, but the null hypothesis has grown into an oppressive cult-like following; one with such power that, even if they did exist, we would never know it. And that concerns me more than does a hoax in support of any of them.
My third concern is Ockham’s Razor itself. “Plurality should not be posited without necessity.” There are two errors which arise from a club, citing something as being a ‘pseudoscience’ (and I take note that you did not use that word in your raising this point, and am curious about that??). 1. They are essentially changing Ockham’s Razor into “Plurality should not be posited” (even worse, based upon one’s current knowledge) – in other words “The Simplest Explanation tends to be the correct one” – which is highly misleading and imperious, except in cases of special pleading, and 2. Once necessity is raised, it should be served. If 750,000 people have directly (not subjectively) witnessed something, trust me – plurality has been raised. Our ability to ignore the necessity of plurality, is not a testament to our rationality nor critical thinking in the least.
Finally, what I have learned is that an outside club managing quality, never works. In fact quality checkers bear a higher failure rate typically than do the processes they are checking in the first place. You can hear me blather more about this in my post: Ethical Skepticism Part 8 – The Watchers Must Also be Watched (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2016/06/13/ethical-skepticism-part-8-the-watchers-must-also-be-watched/)
Anyway, that tends to be my criticism towards the declaring of wholesale subjects to be bunk. Hope it is at least coherent, if not making some sense… :)
I must offer, that I have read a number of your posts over the last month or so. And while I disagree on several points with respect to the conclusions you draw, in the small number of issues where you do express personal opinions; I remain impressed with both your grasp of, and ability to express, skepticism in a way which I have not seen posed before. I have especially enjoyed this post, The Riddle of Skepticism, as well as your post regarding the nine features on good philosophy. I would say that some of the masters which I use in my instruction, could have used a lesson or two from you. Did you ever have anyone comment that you craft an argument in the style of one of the masters I teach, named Johann Gottlieb Fichte – a German Philosopher (your writing style is very Hanoverian I might add) – credited sometimes as the founder of German Idealism. He promoted the tripartate dialectic style you use – although you tend to slam your points home a bit harder than Fichte might. But, then again, you have cited an error in philosophy – and he merely incrementally developed it, (if I am to borrow some of your language here).
I teach an undergraduate level course in philosophy, with focus on the Age of Reason (hence my fascination with German philosophers) and will use some of your material in this Fall semester.
Charles, I am most flattered by your kind assessment. I do not know much about Hanoverian ‘style’ – but my ancestry is Scottish-Luxembourg, so it is sure to contain some influence in that regard. I am not a student of the classic philosophers. I had the classic courses in undergrad and grad school, but grew weary of Plato, Seneca and Socrates. This as much as anything turned me off to chasing the topic into the middle ages and beyond. While I do regard this as a weakness in my offering, I also consider it an advantage as well to have derived much of my philosophy organically. We are not simply looking at Plato’s allegory of shadows on the wall of a cave, as we (prisoners) are having interpretations of those shadows spun for us by people who stand to benefit from the interpretations themselves, or by even those who are the captors to begin with. So, the human heart is the first domain of skepticism for me. Only thereafter we can break free from the shadow fixation and observe what reality we can discern.
Nonetheless, hopefully what I have to say here can challenge the minds of your students to evaluate the processes by which we arrive at knowledge before (I am assuming they are young) they are brainwashed with the counterfeit version of it. I hope it can add value in that regard.
I will do some study on Johann Fichte as well. I get pinged for being too loquacious at times, not something I would anticipate from a German philosopher??? Perhaps it is the Pictish/Celtic in me. Poet Warrior (or at least my fantasy as such). LOL!!
An interesting reflection on “Evidence Based Medicine”- in the talk linked to below, at 18:20 onwards Dr Brock discusses meeting the couple who invented the term “evidence based medicine” and their discomfort at the way the term had been hijacked initially by insurance companies and used to avoid considering any therapy that is inconvenient for one reason or another.
Brock is a chiropractor/functional neurologist/ with an additional qualification as a nurse practitioner and will soon also be an allopathic doctor and PhD. He has felt it necessary to go to that extent to get round the barriers and restrictions to practice (via the “scope of practice” pretext) which have been established in the US. I suggest that is being done with a view to preserving the monopoly of allopathic medicine.
I am grateful that you made a window out of Walt Whitman’s poem, for those of us who are babes in the woods in matters and norms of logic, but sense in “critical path” something of electric value and use! : )
I love Uncle Walt. The segment is not an exact match to the idea of critical path – but then again, I am not sure that any snip of material from Leaves of Grass could be an exact match to simply one point. But there is not doubt that this segment of “Thoughts” parallels the central theme of ethical skepticism. I possess an aversion to pointing out the ‘bad people’ – but feel that in this instance, even the Captain of Alons! Alons! – and clarion call to challenge norms, had to undertake the ignis punga of pointing out the methods and results of those who are doing it incorrectly. That is not exactly the same as pointing out the bad people, based simply upon their beliefs I suppose.
As a person who believes in evolution, I can think of another parallel where modern people have got things so wrong. Skin color evolved as a natural sunscreen. Darker skin has been selected for where UV radiation is very strong and the skin can easily make vitamin d. In areas where UV radiation is lower or nearly absent very pale skin evolved so that people can make the maximum amount of vitamin d possible given limited UVB availability. Given that we spend so much time indoors we also fail to gradually tan when the seasons change. So when we do finally get out into the sun our pale skin gets burned, since our bodies haven’t had the chance to tan and produce protective melatonin.
However because people in authority in governments and singular interested Dermatologists with a singular focus on preventing skin cancer all we hear is that we need to avoid the sun. The flip side is that we lack the vitamin d that our ancestors produced.
I’m totally in agreement that vaccinations should be researched and studied. I’ll also add that there is strong evidence for a vitamin d component to many modern ailments … including autism. With vitamin d being necessary for the immune function to work optimally and so many children being vitamin d deficient, and most pregnant woman also lacking optimum vitamin d blood serum levels … I could go on an on. There is lot of really groundbreaking work on Vitamin D that is easily accessible at: https://www.vitamindcouncil.org/
including a page specifically about the observed roles of vitamin d deficiency in autism, (some theoretical connections – or proposed methods by which vitamin d helps prevent autism, and then some ways in which vitamin d deficiency is correlated with autism — and correlations should be looked into as I think you might agree with.) https://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health-conditions/autism/
Hey, (just to be funny) even a creationist can accept that God put people in certain areas where their skin color was optimal for the amount of sunlight received at that area.
However to be scientific again, consider that the people with strongest Jewish genes hailed from a group of Jews that lived in the blackest (skin color-wise) area of Africa. Reason being that the genes for extra melatonin were selected for (no doubt selected from the genes of those indigenous to the area) in order to prevent deaths from skin cancer, or you could say those with the lighter skin died off in larger numbers.
In the United States people with black skin color have higher rates of all the diseases that accompany being vitamin d deficient. Vitamin d interacts with lots of genes … and thus vitamin d deficiency creates a large amount of problems.
My wife used to call me a “Vitamin D evangelist.” At one time she was deficient and had a lot problems that were immediately alleviated when she supplemented with sufficient vitamin d. Then when she stopped taking it the problems came back. Then she took it again the problems went away. This happened several times till now she is fairly regular with her vitamin d supplements. Her symptoms were bone pains and a tendency to tilt over and almost fall.
I’ve been perusing your blog comments today for hours and possibly even annoying a Christian friend who is “a token Christian” who has been in the habit of kindly socializing with skeptics and he writes about science too … even in scientific journals and major newspapers from time to time … I probably/possibly annoyed him by sharing a bit too much about what seems to be happening to the skeptical movement … your articles are solid critiques … your link to Pharyngula’s blog which had another recent comment linking to some other skeptic going off about how some skeptics are supporting people who committed criminal activity … I had no idea what was going on …
Take care and I’m glad to see your incredible efforts to get to the truth … and knock out of the way those who suppress truth. I’ve even one of your blogs where you warned young people about some dangers of joining a religion. I came close to putting up a scripture there. Jesus criticized religious people for scouring the world to win a single convert and then making that convert twice as bad as even the ones spreading their religion.
I’m not saying that every instance of religious evangelism is that bad … but too much of it is. The God you rejected is not the God I serve. I’m not saying this in a disrespectful way. I would not and could not serve the God that acts the way most Christians describe. In any case, I’ll share theological thoughts at some point when/if you post about such a topic. There will probably be a tremendous amount of overlap with what you write and what I’ll write. In any case it is also good that you avoided religious enslavement and that you warn others against it too.
However you brought up some scientific issues … I’ll just let you know a lot has come out about vitamin d in the last decade or two. It will likely take you days of research to get up to speed. (It took me much longer, but the science is now more established and it should take you a lot less time.)
A decade or so ago I would spend some three hours a day reading new scientific findings that were being released. Maybe twice a week some new study of finding about vitamin d was coming out. Several years back a few people that I persuaded to take vitamin d had some annoying effects from it and stopped taking it … and I have largely stopped evangelizing vitamin d as a result.
Oh well.
So many issues that a concerned person can have. Particular geo-political stances or military positions can raise international tensions. Sometimes these seem to be raised more because a particular agency can get more funding if there is a plausible enemy.
From my Christian standpoint, anti-science Christians and Christians who suppress the meaning of Jesus parable of the Sheep and the Goats … these undercut lot’s of good that Christians should be doing. My blood pressure is going up just thinking about how obstinate Christians can be.
I’ve probably been sitting in this chair now for some six or eight hours and I can’t even bring myself to do the sensible thing and edit this. Too worked up to do a final reread. I’m thinking in part about know-it-all evangelist John MacArthur who I sent numerous letters to and even a two-part book set called THE GEOLOGICAL TIMESCALE 2012 2-VOLUME SET and never even got a reply.
Yet a few decades earlier I was in cult and when I sent them letters they responded and learned and started changing doctrines … even changed doctrines that I didn’t know needed changing. I’m not claiming to be the only or most important agent of change in that church … it is possible that i was a necessary part of the changes. Some people listen and some people don’t.
You are getting close to now having 200 blog articles written. I’ve read possibly 15 of them maybe only 5 to 7 of them totally. And the links provided lead elsewhere for more to learn. I guess I’ll be learning here for a long time. Aiming to read 1 a day might take me almost a year. Pardon the abrupt end to this comment.
Yes, I take Vitamin D – 10,000 IU daily and monitor my blood levels once per year. I also drink fulvic/humic acid to replenish the nutrient lost in our hyper accerated plant growth (in depleted soil). And methylfotate, since I am MTHFR and suffered macrocytic anemia most of my life from getting useless folic acid shoved down my throat each day by the ‘there’s no difference’ zombies.
Thanks MB, I neglected to add those from my analytical work and into this blog entry. They were listed in the blog which originated the graph for the most part, but I have added them in as 9 specific sources I used in the analysis, as footnotes 1 – 9 in this blog, section 2, first paragraph. TES
Quite apart from the mischief caused by the pseudoskeptics, there is a place for a serious conversation about the value of small size trials- even n=1trials, and also the pre-eminence of double blind trials.
One problem is that many therapies really do not lend themselves to double blind trials (ie EMDR, neurobiofeedback), and some therapies (ie neurorehabilitation) are so individualised that it is difficult to make meaningful comparisons between cases to allow aggregation of data.
It is plain for all to see that the current preference for enormous prospective double blind RCTs has set up a situation where these studies are very expensive and can only be done if there is a reasonable chance of making your money back on a profitable patent.
Clearly that suits one segment of the health market. Of course that is just a coincidence. Isn’t it?
Yes, cherry sorting by the cost threshold of being able to craft reliable observations and results – a way of making it impossible for probative studies to be accepted as reliable. Very good point.
A 15 year old I respect, started following/commenting on your blog. Therefore I’m struggling too to read through all this. To paraphrase you, (from the (ABOUT section) this blog is written at a very intellectual level, and it requires a lot of specialized knowledge to follow what you are saying.
Please bear with me as I share some random thoughts. I thought of a few Biblical parallels to your writing. (I’m a Christian, who fully embraces science … and I’m probably as zealous or more so than you in opposing Young Earth Creationism, flood geology … and I’ve got little use for any “intelligent design” angles that seek to poke holes in evolution.) Still, I’ve only had one semester of college and that only in Graphic Design courses… many areas of my life are a “wreck” but no ones knows about it or cares. House needs repairs … for example. That is to say I’m a pretty normal lower-class blue collar guy.
However back to “Biblical parallels” — your recitation of reasons why you qualify as a Philosopher is an impressive list of accomplishments. Stylistically it reminds me of the list Paul wrote in 2 Corinthians 11. Even your escape from an African country seems to parallel what Paul wrote, “In Damascus the governor under King Aretas had the city of the Damascenes guarded in order to arrest me.
But I was lowered in a basket from a window in the wall and slipped through his hands.” (2 Cor. 11:32-33 NIV)
You grew up Christian so maybe the Bible stylistically influenced your writing – even these decades later. I”m not sure whether you intended it to appear that way, or perhaps the same genetic, behavioral traits that made Paul write the way he did, made you write the way you did. Both of you are appearing to undercut frauds. You are working against skeptical frauds while Paul was against religious frauds.
The second parallel I thought of, as it relates to you is a parallel with Jesus. (I’m not getting into what Jesus “really” taught, so if you’ve got a different historical viewpoint on Jesus, I”m not intentionally wading into that discussion) – however Jesus according to the Bible had a controversial mission that brought him into conflict with religions leaders of his day. He spoke in Parables, in part, to keep people from fully understanding what he was saying. By claiming to be the Son Of God he was putting himself in a situation where others would want to silence him.
So Jesus used parables to postpone / delay persecution and the death that he intended to suffer later.
You are similarly avoiding unnecessary conflict by using very specialized language with some philosophical jargon to avoid suffering for either/ yourself, others who rely on you (like people you work with or family members etc… ) or both. … I’m probably exaggerating the difficulty of understanding what you are thinking. I can follow your main arguments quite well (I think). It is possible that you could write in a more everyday level and get more readers but on the other hand it would expose you to a lot of stupid rants. I can think of one high profile debater who avoided amateur debates.
One parallel … Christian debater named William Lane Craig chooses to only debate people who have a PH. D. He once debated someone, and strung some points together and said ‘”therefore an atheist can not say “X”” to which the atheist just said “X — see I just said it.” William Lane Craig then decided to only debate people who had a PH. D.
No matter what ones belief system is there are lots of people who will go for cheap rhetorical victories.
I intend to keep following this blog and your twitter feed. Some of your retweets have been to other twitter accounts that I find most interesting. The volume of fascinating anthropological at this twitter feed of PaleoAnthropology is very interesting.
You could say that I find your wide-range of interests,- very interesting!
Wow. My heart is warmed and encouraged. So excellently written and flattering to say the least. I wish I really knew the apostle Paul or Jesus, so that I could draw some such comparisons – but I really myself, shy away from such things. Yes, I speak in methods and ethics, so as not to cast my lot into specific issues of the day – and get dragged down in some skeptic’s display of their martial art of denial. That produces nothing but more propaganda for them. Plus, if I can teach ethical skepticism, people will begin to discern these issues for themselves – without my persuasion on them at all. As for ‘biblical style’ – yeah, I read the whole Bible 5 times, and many parts of it hundreds of times, so it had to have an effect on me to at least some degree. But the majority of my writing style has been honed from writing articles and professional reports. Reporting to stockholders on the progress of a project or the critical issues with which the company must grapple.
Thanks for following my blog and twitter. Keep up with college – as it is critical.
Thanks for the article, it points out a number of significant ways in which confusion can arise.
I do think, though, that it could have been taken a little further.
All theories are formulated in dependence upon a set of foundational beliefs.
For instance much science is conducted by Scientific materialists, who take it as a matter of faith that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter, ( and hence that there is no possibility of God or Paranormal phenomena).
Many others take a position based on the opposite idea.
It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption (Bertrand Russell tried very hard to prove that it was possible, and failed, later, I understand that Kurt Godel managed to develop a proof that Russell was attempting the impossible- though I find his work very heavy going).
What I am really saying is that good scientific method has to be based in a sound understanding of the assumptions on which we base our thinking.
A good example here is the neurologist Antonio Damasio’s book “Self comes to Mind”. He believes he has established that consciousness is a purely phenomenon. He has not donethat, but he has produced a very deep and instructive discussion on the way the brain animates the body and translates consciousness in to action.
Yes, I struggled with this article for a good 8 months before penning it. The struggle was over exactly this issue you have broached.
1. How does the soundness (validity of its premises) of the theory play into its role as pseudo-theory and
2. How does the ultimate verity of the theory relate to its status as pseudo-theory?
My conclusion was that they do not. The theory’s (hypothesis’) formality, soundness, logical calculus, etc. are well know facets of argument discourse. The irony which elicits this is the fact that a pseudo-theory can also mature into one day being a real theory – whereas a wrong idea can never mature into being right. The status of pseudo-theory pertains more to the idea – is this a hypothesis, ready for exercise under the scientific method – or is it merely a construct, which has been promoted to the status of a theory, or even truth – without due process?
So, pseudo-theory pertains more to the state of maturity of the idea (construct) in terms of its ability to be addressed by science, and NOT to its soundness, formality and logical calculus or truth. That comes later IF we have no promoted it to truth and into a state of exemption from vetting by science.
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption”
I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?
Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?
(BTW, I did notice one problem with the idea:
Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”
Let it be X. X must validate itself or else it ,b
Correct re the falsifiability. Russell’s work was about mathematical models of course. Within that world, Riemannian Geometry is a good example. If I recall rightly the key defining assumption there is a model where parallel lines do intersect. Almost 40 years ago I read Russells autobiography. I know the outline of Godel’s work, but really no longer have the maths skills to understand it fully. Too many years of working in medicine (and conforming to treatment protocols that looked dodgy at the time, and have proven to be so) while being fully aware that to not conform would be risking medicolegal suicide, have blunted my higher faculties.
There may yet be a difference between mathematical systems and broader worldviews (though I have never seen that proven. A quantum physicist (don’t know who) said “Give me one miracle, and I can explain the world”. Back to our unfalsifiable primary hypothesis again.
The most sophisticated system of thought and philosophy I know (Buddhism) comes close to no assumptions- but it works on the idea that sentient beings know suffering. I guess that the assumption here might be that sentience is defied as awareness of the difference between suffering and happiness.
(Apologies, I posted it before it was ready)
… or else it, by definition, is not “the source of all of one’s knowledge” because there would be knowledge outside the system. So it is impossible to know that one’s worldview is true. Likewise, one cannot prove that one’s worldview is false because that would be knowledge outside the system.)
P.S besides the obvious – denying the possibility of knowledge (skepticism) – I have been
able to think of one possible solution to the problem which I shall explain subsequently.
“God, by definition, is that for which no greater can be conceived. God exists in the understanding. If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality. Therefore, God must exist.”
This is called an “Appeal to Plenitude” – it is a form of using the concept of infinity (of in this case, greatness) as a lever to ‘prove’ an argument. It is a form of pseudo-theory. It is rhetoric, a genetic fallacy and more specifically sophistry. I do not have permission in philosophy, to grasp at infinity as if it were an object, to insert into either a soundness or logical calculus modus ponens. It is not. In the same manner, ‘the supreme greatness’ is simply a code word for this same principle (plenitude/infinity). There are eight schools of thought on the role of infinity, inside philosophical assertions. Seven (and maybe eight) of them, reject the notion of infinity as a logical object.
Gödel should have known this – and by not possessing this basic element of philosophical discipline, disqualifies him as a philosopher in my eyes. It is as dramatic as not knowing about DNA. If you do not know about DNA, you should not be speculating about the origin of life. It is as simple as that. Not sure if that answers what you asked or not?
1. My solution that I referred to before is this:
What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable. What do you think?
2. “Not sure if that answers what you asked or not?”
Not clearly enough for me. My question was in reply to,
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption”
(Do you agree?)
I said,
“I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?
Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?”
Was Gödel’s proof along the lines of my argument? Which do you side more with, my argument or my solution?
And what does your comment have to do with what I am saying?
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption”
A ‘world view’ is a rhetorical concept, not a philosophical one. I cannot comment on it because it has no meaning. Science is based upon observations and an epistemic base.
I just do not understand these statements, what they mean, if they are related, sequitur or dependent, and why one would pose them all at the same time even if they were??? Gotta help me with these, as they are not coherent to me:
“What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.”
“I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?
Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?”
Was Gödel’s proof along the lines of my argument? Which do you side more with, my argument or my solution?”
“A ‘world view’ is a rhetorical concept, not a philosophical one. I cannot comment on it because it has no meaning. Science is based upon observations and an epistemic base.”
It sounds weird to say it has no meaning, not to mention that I said,
“Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge” ”
“I just do not understand these statements, what they mean, if they are related, sequitur or dependent, and why one would pose them all at the same time even if they were???”
I just do not understand that statement or what it means.
“What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.”
See above where l said,
“(BTW, I did notice one problem with the idea:
Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”
Let it be X. X must validate itself
… or else it, by definition, is not “the source of all of one’s knowledge” because there would be knowledge outside the system. So it is impossible to know that one’s worldview is true. Likewise, one cannot prove that one’s worldview is false because that would be knowledge outside the system.)”
“I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?”
I assumed that b/c of a conversation you had with Fred Emmer (sp?).
“Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?”
I was responding 2 this:
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption (Bertrand Russell tried very hard to prove that it was possible, and failed, later, I understand that Kurt Godel managed to develop a proof that Russell was attempting the impossible- though I find his work very heavy going).”
Now I know that wasn’t you (if you had noticed, I was replying to you not MB. That’s because I didn’t know MindBody would still be on the spot and assumed that you might know).
“Was Gödel’s proof along the lines of my argument? Which do you side more with, my argument or my solution?”
This was my argument:
“(BTW, I did notice one problem with the idea:
Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”
Let it be X. X must validate itself
… or else it, by definition, is not “the source of all of one’s knowledge” because there would be knowledge outside the system. So it is impossible to know that one’s worldview is true. Likewise, one cannot prove that one’s worldview is false because that would be knowledge outside the system.)”
And this was my solution:
“What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.”
And I don’t understand what your comment about the “Appeal to Plenitude” had to do with what I was saying.
“…and why one would pose them all at the same time even if they were???”
‘Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”’
It is not a sound definition. The words, belief, system, all, worldview are all colloquial and rhetorical. They really do not have the meaning which you are ascribing to them.
Our knowledge is based upon observation and an epistemic set of replicable incremental risk extrapolations. None of these are assumptions, beliefs, nor are they really a ‘system’. Some people do make metaphysical selection choices above and beyond our base of science, and that is fine – but that tolerance of choice does not therefore impart one the permission to call ALL of observation and epistemology “belief systems” – as this is a misrepresentation.
It would be like a shoplifter, calling the legitimate shoppers in a store ‘fellow thieves’ – it is not the same context at all – just appears to do some of the same things (they both pick things off the shelf and walk out of the store – so the shoplifter desires the activity to be seen as one in the same). This is called a flaw of identity. A belief is not the same thing as an observation nor a replicable proved risk extrapolation. Even tho they might look like the same thing, as a ‘belief’ – in reality they are not.
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption (Bertrand Russell tried very hard to prove that it was possible, and failed, later, I understand that Kurt Godel managed to develop a proof that Russell was attempting the impossible- though I find his work very heavy going).”
Gotcha. Now I understand. Again, it depends upon the equivocal use of the word ‘assumption’ – An assumption is a piece of proxy information which one uses to test an output variable. It is not the same thing as a input variable. When I run an exotic material test. My input variables are the material, the ion bath, the apparatus, the electrical current, etc. None of these are assumptions. They are input parameters, which are based upon replicable risk extrapolations which proved out in the past.
An assumption would be therefore, ‘I assume that the beta phase transition of titanium will be the same phase state change time as the beta phase transition of iron’ I do this as an incremental extrapolation of risk, so that I can test another output variable – the amount of heat required to make the phase state change. The assumption allows me to run a scenario. This is the scientific definition of assumption.
In the belief world, assumption means ‘final guess I have bought into without much evidence to support it’ In this regard, whether or not one can go through a rational life and avoid that misstep or risky step is again… an argument of plenitude. It is taking the extreme and irrelevant version of a matter and pressing it to its infinite end. It is rhetoric. :-)
The system in question, is scientific materialism, which really boils down to an underlying assumption (which I maybe carelessly labelled as a world view) that all conscious phenomena are epiphenomena of the collision of atoms and subatomic particles, according to rules which are all known to us.
It is a common view, and influential in many academic circles.
As you have correctly pointed out though: A ‘world view’ is a rhetorical concept, not a philosophical one. I cannot comment on it because it has no meaning. Science is based upon observations and an epistemic base.
Now the specific problem I have with the scientific materialist position is that it can only be maintained by ignoring evidence that does not fit in with it. That, of course is not scientific, but the world of science (at leastin Medicine) is full of dodgy curves of best fit, and illegitimately deleted outliers.
Now the specific problem I have with the scientific materialist position is that it can only be maintained by ignoring evidence that does not fit in with it. That, of course is not scientific, but the world of science (at leastin Medicine) is full of dodgy curves of best fit, and illegitimately deleted outliers.
Exactly MIB, one of the reasons why, while I am an epistemologist – I am not a materialist, nor a material determinist, nor a nihilist. I have run my own studies which have falsified each of these religions. Whether or not the angry people who use science as a way to work out their anger at (whomever) can catch up with that or not, I really do not know. But it does not matter. Yes, a common view, and insistence in academic circles.
Science is actually usually leaps ahead, and arriving at different conclusions, from those conclusion foisted by those who pretend to represent it.
“the angry people who use science as a way to work out their anger at (whomever)”— Nicely observed. There are hordes of them furiously trying to block any serious questioning about glyphosate, supplements, vaccines, whatever. To me they look like idolators.
LOL!! There are hordes of them. Hordes are achieved as the result of simple training systems.
This is why I work inside skepticism. I am not making a claim to represent science. I am however, making a claim to represent skepticism in defense of science (from malicious players, ‘idolators’ if you will, yes).
Every time I accidentally ingest corn and my face breaks out into 25 bleeding sores (which all started in 1996), if reminds me of the mission we are on, to defeat the pretenders who propped up this charade of science.
One must still assume or believe in their validity.
“nor are they really a ‘system’.”
The difference being what?
Regardless of what you want to call it, my point is that any source of all knowledge must validate or falsify itself or else it by definition is not the source of all knowledge.
“Regardless of what you want to call it, my point is that any source of all knowledge must validate or falsify itself or else it by definition is not the source of all knowledge.”
Plenitude. It sounds like an argument to a layman, but it is not one. Infinity is not a logical object.
Mute Ignosticism – is the discipline which says ‘until we have a better definition of our realm, a better definition of consciousness and its relationship to this observable universe, until we have better definitions of god, spirit, afterlife, soul, existence, boundary conditions, the hard problem of consciousness, the incremental problem of my self, the observer effect, and more ethical research into the phenomena which we observe and ignore inside our social realm – until we have done our work on these things to an ethical standard, and not a pretend (religious) one – then I cannot make a conclusive comment nor even propose a salient and sequitur question regarding any of these matters.’
The difference between that and passive agnosticism (which is what?) is what?
And would you describe yourself as a mute ignostic? And why not as a passive agnostic?
Q: Does the treveleton consort with the variflax in the final realms of cojuntication, or is it merely the pneuquestroton alone? Please select one option.
Passive Agnostic: I do not know whether or not it is variflax cojuntication, or if it is merely pneuquestroton. Perhaps someday we will all know.
Theist: It is obvious to the honest heart that variflax consorts during cojuntication.
Nihilist: You are an idiot if you do not see the rationality of the pneuquestroton. There is no variflax, just like there is no cofluz bbrenge.
Mute Ignosticism: None of these terms bear any meaning, and the question is incoherent and agenda-laden in its crafting. Therefore I cannot make any comment inside this context of discussion.
I am an ignostic because the position is one of disciplined skepticism and clarity. A passive agnostic is simply undecided, wallowing in an incoherent bifurcation which was enforced on him without his awareness in the first place.
~TES
It’s only true skepticism when you have doubted all of your core beliefs. and it’s obvious you have not. try again
Examined your core assumptions; not ‘doubted your core beliefs’ (the latter is agenda-speak). And you have no means of ascertaining such a judgement from this blog post. None…
You are obviously offended by these tenets, which hints to me that you are a wholly bought into the poseur persona; a fake skeptic. You conflate doubt with skepticism and have no idea about any of my core assumptions beliefs and what I have done to challenge and examine them (of which I have challenged, examined and changed most ALL of them). Making a claim with ZERO evidence is not skepticism – it is the fake form which comes along with ‘methodical doubt’ as you just applied here. Nice try – but you failed the test miserably. When you graduate from high school, sign up for a course in philosophy, if you are able to choose college as your next step.
A ‘rating’ with a closed set domain of subjects is the same as a ‘ranking’ – and yes, when both rank and rate the entire domain of subjects, the two can indeed be compared. Unless you know of some alien civilization which you are implying should be inserted here to bust the domain rating back into relative-ness? No cigar for you, “silly”.
This is a great example of ‘hearing a statistical principle but not really understanding it’ (aka Mt. Stupid).
I note you cite American grain in particular, and then go on to provide an (unreferenced) link to what I think is a paper by Nancy Swanson et al on disease increases associated with Glyphosate.
I am sure that glyphosate residues are one of the big problems but there is great difficulty in finding out how widespread these residues are. In short the question is: do you have any information about the safety of non American grains?
I conducted a food strategy in a country where 100% of the wheat consumption was from heirloom traditional varietals. GM tech when only for profit and glyphosate were banned. The level of diabetes and obesity was 1%. This country used many varietals of ancient to 150 year old grains. I conducted another strategy in another country which employed a mixed set of practices. 65% of the country imported and consumed US grain, 35% lived a lifestyle where they did or could not consume US grains. Of the urban population who consumed US grains, the rate of diabetes/pre-diabetes was 50%+ in the adult population. Of the population who did not consume US grains, and instead consumed their traditional diets, the rate of diabetes was 1%. My leading construct is that traditional grains are not presenting the same problem as do US grains.
Glyphosate only works supporting food plants which are genetically modified to be mostly tolerant of it (they still accelerate 15 – 20% in their growth, but not enough to die). So, if your country does not grow GM food right now, then it does not use glyphosate on food; however it still may use glyphosate for other applications which contaminate the water and soil. You will have to see what your government agricultural & environmental ministry carries as data.
Yes, you are also correct – I had referenced that Swanson graphic in an older blog post and re-inserted the image here, thinking that it had the sourcing reference in the fine print. I have added the recitation info.
It’s now also in the scientific literature that something known as “obesogens” are also potentially causing obesity. The fat accumulation is initially protective as it keeps toxicants (like POPs) away from organs and tissues, but overtime these obesogens are released into the bloodstream and still cause harm. “Fat people are just lazy and inactive” is overly simplistic and does not apply to every case of excess weight gain. It’s being documented that maternal nutrition also influences eating behaviors and hunger through epigenetics. This is something out of the individual’s control yet it leads to behaviors that influence a disease that is commonly blamed on the person. Nutrition is extremely important in the role of weight gain and obesity especially considering the effect pro-inflammatory diets have on the body… And as you mentioned, a certain something added to the food supply has contributed to the problem. Negative shifts in gut bacteria are important in many diseases and we have to ask “How does the human body and brain respond, who is susceptible, and how do we treat this?”
You asked these questions and have found ways of modulating your diet in such a way that it promotes healing and resilience (anti-inflammatory). Well done.
He has collected data from the Canadian government about glyphosate residues in foods on sale in Canada.
This issue is of great concern and,given the confidence intervals for the correlations noted in Swanso’s research I am certain that glyphosate must be a major driver of ill health.
The paper has been attacked by the social skeptics, but only in a roundabout way that avoids commenting on the main issues.
Social Skeptics are masters at avoiding the critical issues inside any argument. They focus on irrelevancy and could care less what core issues reside. Thank you for these two resources. I went ahead and clipped the abstract into the blog post if you do not mind. An excellent headline addition to this somewhat packed post. Thanks!
Have seen this happen in multiple areas. The “Skeptics” are a shady dishonest network of people who will be “sketpical’ of anything you pay them to be skeptical of.
Pingback: Top 20 Countries with the World’s Highest Atheist & Agnostic population | Bug 2k
Pingback: Top 20 Countries with the World’s Highest Atheist & Agnostic population | 1234 Trump
Nihilism is not a religion it’s a form of skepticism (like atheism), so it’s is a disbelief not a belief. Atheism and nihilism definitely are not the same viewpoint,they are similar in that the are both denials and lack of belief in popular (and unfounded) claims, but the similarity stops there as they are obviously denials of different abstract concepts.
Nihilism is not a lack of belief. It is not a disbelief. It is a belief. What you have cited is a common special pleading equivocation used to work as a masquerade. Nihilism is also not a form of skepticism as it does not rely upon research, does not hold several options open at once, and considers a specific conclusion as rational and scientific conclusion. These are all incorrect religious apologetics.
I saw your post on Skeptiko where you analyzed the EVPs that were recorded by a user named Matt. I was wondering if you could do the same analysis of three EVPs in one audio recording. Also, if you can compare the voice from a recording of a person while he was alive to the second EVP. Supposedly the second EVP is this lady’s dead son and the first EVP is Jesus! Both the EVPs and the recording of her son when she was alive can be found here http://channelingerik.com/the-sheila-show-and-more/
I bear an allow-for ethic on this type of matter and am not afraid to examine taboo subjects of this nature. Fake skeptics already hate me, and they cannot touch my career so I am free to think and investigate as the evidence leads.
That being said, I can certainly run the audio files through scrubbers and develop analytics around the measures, dynamics and ranges – but that type of analysis won’t address the subjective questions you are asking here. The software won’t tell me if the two voices in two separate mediums are a match to the same person. As well of course the software cannot tell me if the second voice is Jesus either. I would caution against using analytics to feign the appearance of scientific approaches where they do not actually have salience. That is an issue upon which agenda skeptics will pounce and (rightfully) declare that a person does not understand what they are doing.
All that being said, I will take a listen and see what jumps out of the media as interesting from a sound engineering perspective. Will that work?
The first YouTube file is covered over with bike noise and one of those stock YouTube base and tweet backing tracks (scoops the middle so you can still hear the video but have music in the background if your mind is ADHD and you have to have rap backing for attention sake), so the sound was very muddy. Unfortunately however, what the bike noises and the rap beats do – is masque the sound so that the analytics cannot pull off a clean signal form of just the voice. A second consideration is that the voice is in an acoustic echo chamber (garage), so I would get a reverberating voice mixed in with the NON-reverberating music. This won’t allow me to filter out the high and low ranges in which the music plays, cleanly.
Then, the EVP track won’t download as the website is indicating that the EVP file is corrupted… ??? So I could not get access to the EVP file, nor listen to it.
If you have the original sound files for either the video, or the EVP track and can send them to me. I can give it another whirl. ???
A better correlation would be to environmentalism. One of those Northern Europe countries has a city with the most bikers. Btw, I tried to read The World Is Flat, as you recommend, but could not get through it, because it is too cheerful. Try reading This Changes Everything instead.
Reblogged this on pragmaticskepticism and commented:
Excellent work! I am never dissapointed by what The Ethical Skeptic brings to the table of philosophy and epistemology. Where can we grant TES the internet “winner’s award” for the most current revolutionary writings within the realm of philosophy that there is?
Great post! Pseudoskeptiks are the new mafia, the war against homeopathy, acupuncture, herbal, supplements and so, except Monsanto Round Up, “Science Based Medicine”, or the hard drugs. I never see any critique for this three products. In my country, Spain, the pseudoskeptiks close with violence the teach of homeopathy in universities. CSICOP make a cases, in a similar form of Tim Farley Whats the harm… It’s a very large history.
Egger, thanks – I have considered changing the background. To date we have not sought to be much of a discussion site; rather more of a resource/reference. I would love to say ‘because we have plenty of those,’ but the sad reality is that we only have sites where brainwashing is enforced by fake skeptics.
I do have a link to the CSISOP site on my sidebar, to show that there is some solidarity against this fake representation of science – but of course a link does not necessarily imply that I agree with everything posted at those sites. 8)
I am not a conspiracy theorist, more a person who advises nations on corruption. So that makes me appear at times to be one. 8) TES
I came across this site while researching an article on misuse of regression models in research studies that claim to demostrate causality. However, I happen to be a very keen seeker of truth about dietary issues – for me a life and death matter – but I happen to teach computing and specifically topics related to human-computer interaction that include Interaction Design, User Experience Design, User Interface Design and Information Architecture. In this regard, the website could be improved. For one, most people these days (see stats from phone companies and Google) access the web via smartphones and tablets. This site is challenging to access from those devices and even from a computer. Consider simplifying it because it’s content is of great use. This diet issue is greatly fascinating to me. I live in the Great Rift Valley of Kenya and wonder, what if we got some Americans to live here and eat the rural diet for some months, would it change their well-being status? One America lady stayed around for a while and said she stopped her medication because the local food seemed to solve her digestive issues. I never understood how that could be explained but now I am seeing a very simple possible explaination. We may soon have dietary tourists or westerners who live outside their nation in “diet-safe” environments but continue working online for American firms…
Yes, this site is not optimally adjusted for phones. The pictures do not autoscale yet – which would be appropriate for tablets of smaller size. But I do proof read my articles on my iPad while I run on my treadmill, so they are very readable on that size or larger platform. I am trying to figure out how to autoscale images here shortly, which will be a great help for tablet readers. I watch my google analytics, and there are fewer phone and tablet readers than you might think. 68% of my readers access from desktop units. 22% from tablets, many of which are larger than my iPad. Only 10 – 15% access the site from a phone. If you are trying to hash though issues of scientific philosophy on your phone – god help you. But – I will say as well, I do use the Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation on my phone, in quick lookup circumstances – and it works great. I also finally found a comments engine which would work, just last month. So this is a long work in progress. That being said however, it is not supposed to look like every other blog out there. And believe me – every blog out there looks exactly alike to me. Written and appearing like a fourth grader’s textbook. I am not interested in attracting that readership.
Yes, my health improves when I spend time in India. My rosacea goes away and I feel better. But getting the agricultural corporations in America to listen to this is like asking our major banks to stop counting their money. It will never happen. We have to simply make it impossible for them to continue business under the current model.
Thanks for reading!
~TES
This is an incredible write up, TES. To add to what you wrote, here is more relevant science regarding the epidemic of autism:
Nevison, C. (2014). a comparison of temporal trends in United States autism prevalence to trends in suspected environmental factors. Environ Health, 13(73). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177682/
“The quantitative comparison of IDEA snapshot and constant-age tracking trend slopes suggests that ~75-80% of the tracked increase in autism since 1988 is due to an actual increase in the disorder rather than to changing diagnostic criteria.”
Dave, D., Fernandez, J. (2014). Rising autism prevalence: Real or displacing other mental disorders? Evidence from demand for auxiliary healthcare workers in California. Economic Inquiry. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12137/abstract;jsessionid=EDA31CC40A2BC6358D480853F07EC7BC.f01t01
“These estimates suggest that at least part of the increase in autism diagnoses, about 50–65%, reflects an increase in the true prevalence of the disorder. (JEL L11, J2, J3)”
DeSoto et al. (2013). Professional opinion on the question of changes in autism incidence. Open Journal of Psychiatry. Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=30182
“Results suggest that among professional psychologists with a terminal degree (n=88), the majority believe that diagnostic changes can not fully account for the observed increase; 72% reported wither the true rate may have, or definitely has, increased.”
Hertz-Picciotto et al. (2009).UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute study shows California’s autism increase not due to better counting, diagnosis. UCDavis Health System. Retrieved from http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/welcome/features/20090218_autism_environment/
“Published in the January 2009 issue of the journal Epidemiology, results from the study also suggest that research should shift from genetics to the host of chemicals and infectious microbes in the environment that are likely at the root of changes in the neurodevelopment of California’s children.”
Reblogged this on pragmaticskepticism and commented:
Very intelligent work, once again, from the ethical skeptic. Social skeptics like Steven Novella and his followers are ignoring facts regarding the autism epidemic. It is also “funny” that these so called “experts” don’t even understand the pathophysiology of autism in the first place. Yet we see them making definitive assertions that when looked at closely, are demonstrably false. The public is waking up; our lives and the lives of our children have been riddled with languish, despondency, and devastation. We do not accept your lies.
Ha! Dude! You hit me with a Meta-analysis right as I was writing my diatribe on meta-analyses. LOL! The blog has nothing to do with the study you sent. 8-) So take no messages from it. LOL!!!
I will be examining this study and the work of Ernst. Thanks!
I am mixed on Homeopathy. The treatment of sickness with ‘like condition’ based medicinals is not something I have studied. So I cannot comment upon that version of homeopathy. The treatment of conditions with ‘infinitesimal dilutions’ is something which I would have difficulty in understanding how it works – the problem is that I have never ever encountered that version of homeopathy in my entire life – so I have no idea if it is even real. It must be, somewhere because this is what the pundits keep bitching about. But the HPUS does not define homeopathy in this way. So, baffled there. Finally, the list of effective and commonly used public domain medicinals in the HPUS irritates the hell out of some powerful people. So, the question is, which of those three things is ‘homeopathy?’ Why the mismatch in definitions? I smell Wittgenstein Error at play.
I have created two blogs on my limited foray into homeopathy here, and while it is not a comprehensive research pathway by any stretch, it reveals enough for me to understand that an agenda, a well funded one, is underway to squelch probably all three of these definitions of homeopathy. When information is low, and propaganda is high – and the people being paid to create and enjoy that circumstance are seeking to remove human rights – something is wrong. The question, is why.
So, I question movements based on the strawman of defining homeopathy as ‘infinitesimal dilutions.’ That is not how the HPUS defines the discipline.
When I look at the homeopathic medicinals on the shelf in the store, the only difference I find is that homeopathic remedies cost way less than the big pharma solutions which have purchased the eye level shelving slots. Otherwise they invariably turn out to be the same ingredients and the same mode, form and dose.
Thus, while I do not support homeopathy per se, I also do not trust the group decrying it at all. That is about as far as I have gotten with the subject. Sorry.
Yes, excellent question. That Sagan quip is THE single most abused one-liner in the entire arsenal of fake skepticism. By promoting an observation to status as a ‘claim’ – one can then apply the fake ‘Occam’s Razor’ – declare the claim to not be simple, and dismiss it as if it were a THEORY. Poof – follow that by the ‘science has found no data for (praedicate evidentia)’ and you are a scientist-skeptic master black belt of denial. This is exactly how it works.
Please look at this 1991 EPA memo about glyphosate. Notice that three of the toxicologists did not sign and wrote things like “DO NOT CONCUR”. They “explained away” clear evidence of tumor causation by glyphosate exposure. Their explanation does not make sense. This is a cover-up of a classic kind, by obfuscation and weasely language that “sounds smart” but in fact makes no sense. http://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch/chemical/foia/web/pdf/103601/103601-265.pdf
Please research the historical record.
History is to politics what data is to
physics. It is the empirical evidence writ
large. You will find the very fallacious
hollow claims, the automatic unthinking
presumption of the intellectual high ground
in the progressive era. This is merely the
latest manifestation of the totalitarian
ideology first,conceived in the 19th century.
I can assure you that familiarity with this
worldview and its history will yield predicative value. (They will be proned to infighting, should start happening within ten years or so.)The,scientism of which you speak was present in both communist and fascist thought. This is all there. Note: though these progressive tendencies usually stem from the left, this is not an endorsement of right wing politics as there exists a leftwing faction in democratic socialism that seems to avoid these problematic outcomes if history is any judge. Not advising you to adhere to any given worldview but only to read the available data should you choose. Rousseau and the French revolution through to Marxism in Russia to Mao, Rosenberg and NS etc. It explains all of this. Compliments on your insights.
Yes, you will find that I have some competent development along these lines in my posts: ‘What is Social Skepticism?”, “The Social Lie Called ‘Privilege’,” and “The Richeliean Appeal to Skepticism.” The Social Skepticism movement is totalitarian in nature, and political at its core. It has nothing to do with science. This is only a costume it wears. Once they are in power, history shows that they will kill any ‘scientists’ who dare to think differently than them.
I expect that the notations above will fall on deaf ears and blind eyes. I have an I.Q. of well over 140 and found reading the above tedious. The text is obviously well considered and shows excellent thoughtfulness. However, most readers are neither literate enough or motivated enough to wade through the brilliance to glean the basic propositions set forth.
I once had a philosophy professor (PhD) who suggested to us that if we wanted to make a difference in the world we must speak and write to others as if we were addressing junior high school youth. If we are unable to condense our ideas to that level we would do well to move into the ivory towers of academia and not try to effect change with the masses. This holds true in this instance. I would like to see the sessions in greatly reduced vocabulary usage and clear brief points.
However, my mind is open and I wish you well with your endeavor. (:
I could not have written a better critique of my own work. Every point well taken. I too bear the curse of an IQ of 145+ (the test I took only went to 145). Having delivered an extraordinary amount of technical writing in my professional background, that certainly flavors my writing style. It does therefore become tedious and sometimes verbose or complex, through my attempts to be precise in the message related.
But I would counter, as I do in my inner monologue, with two things. First, the purpose of a blog is not simply to package writing for the average reader. We have literally thousands of cute kitty and muffin recipe or photography blogsites. The purpose of this blog is in part, to exorcise those thoughts which indwell me – raw and honest, and deliver them with a faithfulness which comforts the heart. To know that what stirs inside has finally been articulated, if not in the pages of the New York Times, then at least somewhere. Second, The Ethical Skeptic is not written for the casual thinker. My belief is that those who struggle, like me, to sincerely learn about this realm, are seeking something more than packaged easy philosophy. They need a referential resource, something to stimulate new thinking and which serves to lift understanding, not anchor it. Many of the people whom I critique in this material, cannot get through the material successfully. In other words, this is not writing for casual interest, rather a resource for those who are differentiated from the crowd, motivated to understand and grow. The right readers will grasp this, and carry away what they need, rest assured.
Dr. Eastwood, I understand your point, sometimes I must read the same paragraph 2 or 3 times over to fully grasp what is being conveyed by TES. However, I’d have it no other way. I find myself learning new words, new ideas, believing perhaps I need to raise my own bar. TES is a breath of fresh air from the grade school pablum trowled out daily by a one-sided media.
TES should keep it in academia rather than “the masses”? What an elitist point of view. The masses could stand to raise their own bar, rather than rush to the lowest common denominator as they’ve been trained to do the last 50 years. You might be surprised at what “the masses” are capable of.
Hi! I’ve been reading on your site and this is one of the best (real) skeptical sites I have read. We see within the media on sites like “skepticalraptor” and “science based medicine” a plethora of pseudo-skeptic tactics and appeal to skepticism fallacies—your work and writings actually poetically display what these social skeptics do in their writings, and how they deem anything outside of their own belief sphere as being pseudoscience. They ignore contrary empirical evidence and label it as false without actually reading that deeply, and they are complete shills for actual pseudoscience given by money hungry organizations. I’m interested in your take on vaccines… I have been studying them a while and my family member is a scientist who is working in the field to expose pseudoscience from the pharmaceutical industry. There is mounds of toxological data showing why certain indivuals with genetic predispositions fall harm to neurotoxicity from vaccine-adjuvants like aluminum and thimerosal. I have all of the peer-reviewed data to give you, including a website that has a walk through on the autism vaccine science. It contains citations and sources for you to look at yourself and draw conclusions from, but there is so much evidence of harm it is no longer deniable. There are documents from the FOIA act of a transcript at simpsonwood where the CDC admits they knew thimerosal caused a higher increase of autism for African-Americans, and so on, scientists, doctors, immunologists, and more are currently battling this with real science, but the pseudoscience most people believe in is still in the way of progress. You may disagree with this, but at least read and research the material I’m going to give you. I was really impressed with your website and I looks forward to your input on everything I’m going to list. Feel free to ask me any questions… I also have a master rebuttal list to give for common arguments people make about vaccine adjuvants being safe, such as: “dose makes the poison”, “you injest more aluminum than is injected”, “what about diseases coming back since we only rely on vaccination?”, etc.
Now, for the science and walk through (citations and sources are on the page):
This explains the science behind why neurotoxic adjuvants induce encephalopathy and other biomarkers of autism, as well as other important information of relevance.
There is much, much more regarding this topic but this is a starting point for those interested in learning about the other side of this debate. I look forward to your input, and feel free to debate me or ask any questions!
Also:
Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe
Also, I myself know people who were metal poisoned and suffered from chronic illness their entire lives. That is of course anecdotal, but my assumptions were proven when they got lab work. More people are leading toxic lives through pesticide and metal exposure, but they don’t know it. Anyone who dares to treat themselves outside of conventional medicine is called a quack and shunned, but I know people who went through chelation with DMSA and their lives are now turned around, one of those people were autistic. Studies have shown autistic children have a higher level of metals in their body, genetic susceptibilities, low brain glutathione, and methylation issues, as well as GI problems. I read your post about children suffering from immune problems and I can relate on a personal level through what I’ve observed in those around me and myself. Keep up the good work!
Hi, I just ran across your website, after looking up a source for Ignosticism. I am working on making a new kind of skepticism that is different from Scientific Skepticism as well. You can evaluate it, through either my website, (receptiveskepticism.com, or my facebook page (facebook.com/receptiveskepticism. I also have had a group for this project on facebook for about a year now, https://www.facebook.com/groups/925334447494947/
I like the ideals and the clear skeptical intellectual honesty. I share many of them. Though I take it in some different directions, and arrive at different conclusions than you. Still I see some idealistic alignment in many ways despite those differences. You seem like a person with whom some good conversations can be had.
Also, I am curious why you call a well-defined ideology, “Scientific Skepticism”, Social Skepticism? I can see some systemic basis for it, but I am more curious about why the authentic name is avoided.
Super, thanks for dropping by and checking out the material in a very thoughtful and sincere fashion. Like me, I am speculating that ignosticism makes a lot of sense for a receptive skeptic, and from the desire to not waste your time inside the bifurcation combat between the Atheists and the Religious.
What I am trying to say here in my blog, is that Scientific Skepticism, is a reasonable domain, an ‘allegiance to a set of professionally effective set of practice standards.’ This is the definition of ethics. Skepticism is a subset of this scientific practice. This is also called Ethical Skepticism. It is real, actual skepticism, free from its being mistaught or employed to deceive and control.
By providing clarity and contrast between that ethical approach to skepticism and the fake version of skepticism, I have chosen to call this non-science skepticism, Social Skepticism. Social Skepticism seeks to use SSkepticism as a battering ram to replace science, scientific skepticism, and enable a specific set of social goals. They could (beneath the loud propaganda) give a flip about science, understanding or discovery – instead, choosing to be activists for a specific set of political, oligarchy, social and religious causes which they wish to enforce in the name of science. These are the nasty, visible and vociferous voices which seek celebrity and tend to be very condemning of ideas and avenues of research. They are not receptive or ethical at all. They are not practicing science, nor skepticism.
Ethical Skepticism, I contend is synonymous with Scientific Skepticism (it is the mental discipline set I cultivate in my labs, engineering and research organizations), and I would imagine (before reading your material) equates to Receptive Skepticism. What I am doing, and I hope that you are attempting to accomplish as well, is to teach the uninitiated what is indeed true skepticism. The secret is, that it is not really new. It is just that we have been programmed with the fake form of Social Skepticism for so long, that we now no longer recognize Scientific/Ethical/Receptive Skepticism. It appears as new and radical thinking. Apparently you get that.
For me, by citing the oppressive and agenda-laden, as well as scientifically mistaken, version of skepticism called Social Skepticism, I hope to allow for younger minds – receptive minds – to understand that considering, pondering, discussing, and going out into the field and indeed researching even forbidden topics for which they will be ridiculed by the practitioners of this fake form, SSkepticism – ARE – scientific activities.
I will check out your site! Let’s keep up the discussion yes.
Only came across your blog recently but I’ve found your posts to be incredibly insightful. I plan to go back and read through all the old posts and stay up to date with any new posts.
I used to be religious but am no longer a believer. At one point I was a fan of the ‘New Atheist’ movement but I had reservations, though I couldn’t articulate them. Your posts have helped me critically understand and articulate the differences between ethical skepticism and social skepticism.
Do you have any recommendations of books/sources to delve deeper into the ideas you talk about in your blog? What books/sources might provide a solid foundation for ethical skepticism? And what have been some of the books/sources that have made an impact/been influential on you?
I too made the journey from sincere Christian, who sought god’s will for my life every night and morning – and eventually began to feel that the explanations I had been handed were indeed wrong. Later in graduate school, attending a debate between an evolutionist and a creationist, I spoke on a subject in defense of evolution. I was so prepared on the topic that I absolutely embarrassed the poor girl promoting creationism. I did not prepare my argument from the lever which exploited the ample scientific and phylogenic data in support of evolution; rather I took the approach of pointing out the weaknesses in the nature of her argument, eliciting the belt fed machine gun of propaganda she had been served – naming at least 3 fallacies per contention she had made, and pleading for her to go back and re-read what the Bible actually said – I could quote the scripture more fluently and accurately than she could in the few verses she attempted to stumble through on her note cards. It was the same stuff I had been fed as well. I knew it backwards and forwards – having read the Bible over 6 times, and memorized so much of it that I received an A on my open book undergrad theology Bible class, when I forgot to bring my Bible with me to the final exam. LOL!
But something bothered me about that debate for two decades, and I could not shake it. Perhaps it was the innocent and searching look in the young lady’s eyes, or perhaps (as I passed it off through that timeframe) it was a guilt over having betrayed the sincerity of my own youth, in exchange for intellectualism. Nonetheless, I had a nagging foot in each camp – my allegiance to the primacy of science, and my heartfelt desire to understand the true nature of humanity, its origins and the possibility of more than what we observe or choose to observe. This was the foundation of my original thinking on ethical skepticism. I truly and sincerely wanted to discover the answers…, and not be told them. I found as my career developed and I experienced more of this planet, I no longer wanted to destroy the opposition. Something bothered me about where I had been, and where I was heading.
I have run several research and advisory firms, as well as scientific labs – and develop scientific reports as an integral facet of my career. And in that regard I highly recommend the book “The Art of Scientific Writing” by Ebel, Bliefert, Russey. Probably the most beneficial chapters deal with the responsibility one carries in the delivery of 1. thought first, and 2. information second. Clean thinking can rescue clean information from crap. Crooked thinking will always convert clean data into garbage, even without the participant’s awareness. I like to measure the ability of my techs and researchers vis-à-vis their ability to craft a cogent, flowing, compelling and accurate Abstract. This shows me that they not only know the subject, but they know its philosophy as well. Other books and resources which have influenced me include Carl Sagan’s “The Cosmic Connection,” and “The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark” (although I actually found these treatises ironically to bear a venue for critiquing the social skepticism movement and some, not all, of Carl’s work in skepticism). As well, Nassim Taleb’s “The Black Swan” and Alan Bloom’s “The Closing of the American Mind.” The whole series of Isaac Asimov non-fiction, “The Road to Monticello” on the developing mind and life experience of Thomas Jefferson. Poetically, Walt Whitman “Leaves of Grass;” although it is almost smotheringly Americana in its delivery, belying virtually its keen message if one be offput by the syrup of setting. As well both books on the Art of War and Guerrilla Warfare by Sun Tzu and Mao Tse-Tung respectively. Then of course a steady diet of Plato’s Ethics, Aristotle and Nietzsche.
Perhaps, and in cliche’ form so, my best book on ethical skepticism has been my life. This indeed is unfortunate, because I cannot find a single book on “Ethical Skepticism” in the bevy of fake skeptics diatribes I have read. This genre of books make me sick to read, much like reading a religious polemic by !!!Max Lucado!!! or some propaganda outlet of just such a nature. A well written scientific report or patent, clear on observations and claims sets, replete with its own self-criticisms and cogent set of next steps, is probably a best sound treatise on Ethical Skepticism. Moreover, I have lived and done things that 99.99% of people never even get close to doing (and fully realize this is cliche in it offing). I will not outline all that here, of course; but safe to say that I have seen the gamut of extraordinary and outlandish observations which a man can make in this life. Perhaps my greatest teacher was being inside the deep bowels of the US and Middle Eastern intelligence community. I cannot outline that in detail, but suffice to say, I received a PhD in the art of deception, lying, propaganda and facade development – along with the skills of detecting counter-intelligence. I watched kingdoms build on complex lies, and kingdoms fall – not on the soundness of new facts – rather, the betrayal by an ally who already knew the facts, just as did everyone else. They all chose to live the lie, until it was time to adopt a new lie. Power enables lying. As a culture of man, we feast on a banquet of well planned deception and misdirection. My clearance was Black Top Secret and involved numerous compartments. And inside that structure I gained access to events and information, few get to see. What I learned – our world is not as it is portrayed, and we have been fed a steady diet of semi-truth for some time, as a people, a culture, a race.
One thing this has taught me is a love for the victims of the elaborate charade. The 4.5 billion people on this planet who are the abject sufferers – the losers in this spin contest. Yes, such a charade can indeed be pulled off, despite numerous whistle blowers – shot down by so called ‘skeptics.’ The urgent extant need is to begin to train the minds of our young to be able to detect both flim-flam based, as well as official, deception.
Thanks and keep coming – as I continue developing the blog, I will continue to hone my approach to this new type of thinking.
My intent is to write the first and best book on Ethical Skepticism. Sadly, and almost condemningly, it does not exist.
A thank you shout out to mothering.com and their quality forum membership for visiting here.
I will take the ‘overly loquacious’ advisement into account. :) I fully understand this. But I am a technical writer and the habit is hard to shake after delivering over 1200 reports to the international community. As such I find colloquial descriptions of principles – while much easier to read, often afford too much room for spin and misrepresentation by ill-meaning parties. And believe me, I have run into my share of them. Technical writing is much like legalese… it is purposely precise in fact and relation. It can at times appear as a pleonasm – but it is most often not.
~TES :)
I would question food putrefying in the gut but no-one gets it all right. A basic understanding of biology makes such an event unlikely. Producing excess gas, certainly; poorly digested food yes, but putrefying – rotting – no.
Homeopathy can be highly effective but you need someone who is a qualified Homeopathic doctor and who only practises Homeopathy. The complexity of the modality, I believe, makes it unsuited to being practised ‘on the side’ along with other treatments.
Thanks for the excellent input rosross! Respectfully, I do not think the modern studies on SIBO and dysbiosis agree with you (see Nutrients. 2012 Aug; 4(8): pp. 1095–1119. PMCID: PMC3448089: Diet-Induced Dysbiosis of the Intestinal Microbiota and the Effects on Immunity and Disease, K. Brown, D. DeCoffe, E. Molcan, and D.L. Gibson). Putrefaction therein, and in most of science is defined as any decomposition of proteins caused by bacterial or fungal activity – not normal for the human gut flora. SIBO (small intestine bacterial overgrowth) produces decomposition of proteins by foreign/abnormal bacterial or fungal action. This as opposed to digestion – the separation of prolaminates, fibrins, gluteins and nutrients by fermicutes, bacteriodetes and methanobrevibacter smithii (the three normal gut flora). Those are the only two biological alternatives available for the biotic decomposition of organic matter. Digestion, or putrefaction. So yes, it is putrefaction. This is the basic science behind dysbiosis and SIBO. ‘Poorly digested’ is a term from the middle ages, which has no objective reference.
But yes, my comment on homeopathy was not meant to condemn the subject, rather simply to illustrate that those in the Social Skepticism movement will paint you as a member of their broad Associative Condemnation group, simply because you ‘deny’ (dissent). Thanks and keep reading! :)
I think the use of the term putrefaction is problematic because it is commonly understood as a negative.
The process is of course one of ‘breaking down’ which is what the digestive process in the body does naturally. When the term putrefaction is used most people would think it was an unnatural and damaging process, i.e. rotting inside you.
There is a school of thought, in some areas of alternative health, that colonic therapy is required because of ‘rotting matter’ in the gut and this does not make sense to me given my basic but comprehensive understanding of biology.
A healthy body can deal with anything which is in the gut and does so and an unhealthy body may well have problems with digestion and absorption but it does not have ‘rotting matter’ in the gut in the way that some would claim. Hence I consider putrefaction to be a poor choice of word.
Poorly digested is the accurate word and while one can seek to reduce bodily function to the mechanics of science, the fact is that poor digestion is what is happening and that is the result of poor health.
Disease or dis-ease is the result of many factors including physical, mental, biological, physiological, psychological, emotional, spiritual, environmental, circumstantial and more although I realise a purely materialist reductionist approach would take issue with that.
I am not challenging you as an Ethical Sceptic, we should have more of it. I am a natural sceptic and I believe an ethical one – I question everything and demand of anything, that it makes sense based on both common sense and knowledge.
I actually did not see your comment on Homeopathy and so thought nothing about you in regard to it. I merely mentioned it because as a medical modality it embraces all sources of disease and given the nature of the gut and its connection to mind and emotions, is extremely effective in dealing with any disease of the gut.
I don’t think we are really disagreeing, except in terms of your choice of word.
I agree that putrefaction is a loaded word used to motivate dysbiosis patients into action; and in that regard the ‘rotting’ connotation is probably over-spin, and probably the reason they go with the term SIBO most often now. I have SIBO, but live a very healthy lifestyle and have for 15 years now after my health was damaged enormously by wheat consumption from 1996 through 2001. It was a sudden and dramatic onset without a change in lifestyle. Ceasing wheat, halted the enormous damage to my health. Now, I run 6 times a week, and I ceased consuming wheat, dairy, soy, canola and corn simply because they make me feel bad and bear a whole host of negative physical manifestations. As a result, I want better and more accountable science performed on these foods before I ever consider buying them or consuming them again – and this growing American citizen concern is not going to simply go away through the media application of shallow corporate and pseudo-scientific jargon.
But yes, we agree on the principle. :)
I am glad you found a path to health. That is what matters most.
Dear Skeptic,
Thoughtful, precise and very informative!
I magically came upon this site recently and love it.
The scheme you so diligently pointed out above has been my largest research endeavour, as of late!
I have read many pro-GMO op-eds and blogs and find the hubris and irrationality very disparaging. They rarely offer studies to back up statements and I often wonder how much higher an ego can float.
I appreciate the time and effort you put into to your blog.
I look forward to many more and for now I’m going to digest all your previous undertakings.
Thanks for the encouraging input on The Ethical Skeptic and the post on glyphosate. I write the posts between trips to Africa, China and India – and sometimes while there as well, when the abject suffering from corruption gets to me, and overwhelms me. This next year I plan to be in Brazil, India, Vietnam, Germany, Switzerland, London and Beijing. These contrasts afford me a position which most of those in science do not have the luxury to experience.
I totally agree that the pro-GM/glyphosate media blitzes are written by the dilettante, mostly pushing duplicate propaganda, the science of which is WAY above their heads, which has been spun on their behalf by well funded truth-factories. I have personally met persons at these truth-factories, and believe me, the science is way above their heads as well. We are pitted, armed only with real science, ethics and human rights, against a $27 million a year funded propaganda mill – and untold dollars in legislative influence. Journalists who are more hooked into the politics and tendering the authorized side of the issue appearances for their bosses. Journalists who are terrified of losing their job. The articles rarely grasp issues of science, research, accountability or social responsibility. They mostly highlight the supposed wonders of productivity savings, lament about some theoretical famine of which they hold NO knowledge whatsoever – and how stupid you are if you take any stance against the unbridled employment of chemicals and nucleotide substitutions in our food. The rats did not die in 90 days, and they looked OK when I cut them open, so I did science. I can pretend that economies of scale can be re-spun as ‘technology savings’…. so it is all justified. After having worked for decades in science, impoverished and famine stricken cultures and in justifying technology based upon ‘productivity’ I know the bullshit which goes into those study-charades very well. I have critiqued hundreds of studies of this type and do stand as an expert in this field.
There is of course, no way to really do service to this subject in one blog article. It will always be woefully short on information. But I jam packed as much salient info into one condensed article as I reasonably could. :)
Keep reading as you get the chance to, and welcome. Those persons who quietly support The Ethical Skeptic might surprise you. ;)
LOL.. hilarious and at the same time absolutely true. I can relate because this was exactly my story as well. I figured the Betaine HCL just from reading a naturopathic website. Made a night and day difference.
Yeah Ravi, I scolded my GP and GE for this, and they took it well. (They both know to be well prepared when I come in for a visit, LOL!). I warned them that, from my perspective they are about to be flooded with a spate of HCL/Enzyme deficiency cases, making it harder to discern/catch the real dangerous stuff like cancer. The Gastroenterologist retorted that he is seeing at least 6 per day, as opposed to 10 years ago he would see 1 or 3 per week.* He applauded my desire to not undertake the prescriptions and was glad that I had good results from the HCL/Enzyme approach.
*Please note that my doctor’s experience matches data from the International Foundation for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, a 6 to 1 disorder ratio as compared to 1994. These are patients who are approaching the doctor from PAIN, and not the result of the medical system re-categorizing already existing visits into new classes of malady. Do not let ‘skeptics’ contend such an extraordinary claim without extensive falsification based evidence.
Ethical Skeptic, I suppose I don’t have to be the one to tell you how friggin’ good this list is. Please do not take this down, as I would like to link to it on a regular basis. I would suggest a fallacy, or whatever is the right way to call it, where a pseudo sceptic is trying to make themself look good by being overly aggressive in arguing? Is that covered here? Like a show of intimidation?
Terry, there are several which relate to this line of personal critical blindness or bias, in Misrepresentation of Self (Appeal to Skepticism), notably: Compositional Exclusion, Ergo Sum Veritas, Ergo Sum Scientia, Delusion of Superiority, to name a few. Glad you like the list. It is both a page here, where you commented, and a post as well so that it gets maximum exposure – and the fact that some people link, as you are intending here, back to the original post, posted before I made it a page because of its popularity. Have at it – it will always be here. I update it about every week as I gain more exposure to fallacious and biased thought either in my workplace, or in the social discourse. I do take suggestions too.
Ok, so I’m sure I’m missing a lot of context (came across your blog while surfing), but I see a lot of generalization with little in the way of specificity or example. Nihilism – on your view, at least as expressed in this post – would have to entail some kind of active, participatory, or at least epistemic negation of reality as commonly and/or scientifically understood, and entail specific behaviors – possibly violent – intended to bring about or prove such negation. You use the word “imperious” seemingly to suggest there is some kind of ruthless dogmatism we should necessarily associate with nihilism. This runs counter to my own experience, and indeed to Albert Camus’ view on the absurdity of existence as a nihilistic concept.
A nihilist need not deny or reject science or scientific evidence as to the nature of the world we encounter. Although there may be some who do, I do not. We can remain committed to a metaphysics inclusive of the methodological naturalism inherent to scientific endeavor without abandoning the idea that doing so (or life itself) is ultimately a hopeless or meaningless exercise. Furthermore, even taking a strong existentialist position which denies reality as we conceive of it does not necessarily run counter to current or eventual developments in science or philosophy. That is, there is nothing inherently contradictory in recognizing how physical reality consists mainly of empty space in which atoms interact in purposeless ways to bring about the manifestation of reality as we think of it.
The bottom line is that, while I freely admit I’m not as well-educated on the subject as I should be, I don’t recognize the nihilism you describe here. Do you have examples of alleged nihilists who fit your description?
Thanks for surfing by. :) Yes, this is the sticky part of the argument. You missed that I am in agreement with Albert Camus – the blog post simply demonstrates the walk through the four forms of nihilism which supports his contentions. The cul-de-sac error of assuming ‘Fundamental Nihilism’ to constitute definition of nihilism. What I have tried to contrast in the post is a Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (and other subject reference) compliant set of terminology regarding the four forms of nihilism. Further therein, to contend that the traditional definition of nihilism (as Fundamental Nihilism, the form you context in your excellent comment) is useless. This is Camus’ view. You make two points, 1) Not sure you are comfortable with that definition of nihilism (Fundamental), and 2) would need some examples of my contended definition (Romantic/strong Metaphysical). I agree with both points – I am not comfortable with the definition of nihilism as you have presented it here (Fundamental), Nihilism’s “entail[ing] some kind of active, participatory, or at least epistemic negation of reality.” What I am contending in this progression of axioms, through Fundamental, Metaphysical, Romantic and Existential forms of nihilism, is that Fundamentalist Nihilism has no practical merit in philosophy and discourse. It is useless in terms of assembling an epistemic base to one’s philosophy. Practical Nihilism on the other hand, as we might call it, at the other end of the spectrum, the really useful version of it, is when one adheres to Romanticist/Existential Nihilism – They don’t reject reality, they simply ontologically deny a priori the existence of anything which they claim is tough to repeatedly measure in a lab setting. They don’t deny the existence of space, matter, energy and the laws which function inside our 11 dimensions of M-Brane; they simply reject you; promoting the teaching that you do not exist, as anything other than a bundle of firing neurons, that you are your own self-illusion, or rejecting anything you might find as meaningful – individual rights and freedoms are a trifling fantasy – all these domain sets do not exist. And that is great as a personal philosophical choice.
So in this post, practical Nihilism is defined as Romanticist (1′) in basis in that we choose those sets of domain to value, and strong Metaphysical (2ƒ’) as we choose those sets of domain to exclude as non-existent.” This is more akin to material monism, and is indeed not the definition of nihilism you have presented. I agree with your, and Camus’ point, in my blog post. I disagree that this is generalization however – it is developed with more specificity (albeit making it difficult to muddle through, LOL!) than any of the resources from which I sought reference; most blending these four forms of nihilism into one thing and one name. This blending approach frames the definition of Fundamental Nihilism a kind of poison pill, which renders the entire argument moot, back into the same cul-de-sac you, I and Camus just crawled out from.
Your second point pertains to examples of the imperious nature of today’s Nihilism. Holding to a personal philosophy of Romanticist and strong Metaphysical Nihilism is a fine personal choice. Very ethical. I consider this approach a valid alternative in my assessing of the reality of the universe. I contract/own scientific labs and conduct and manage much science research myself. But it is when I begin to insist that everyone else must also now adopt my choice of philosophy, that they too must be a material monist, atheist, and metaphysical naturalist (Nihilism in my definition comprises all of these disparate beliefs), that it becomes “imperious.” I insist that everyone be taught that what I might deny I could measure repeatedly (and accept to have been measured, by a club I belong to) in a lab setting, is the only reality – and that there are social penalties if one regards that statement as not true.
The examples? Imperious? The point of the blog is that today’s practical nihilists falsely advertise themselves as ‘atheists.’ You cannot walk 3 inches through online discourse or a professional STEM career without someone insisting (with social penalties) what an idiot you are if you investigate or ponder anything to do with ghosts, existence of advanced nearby life in the universe, the soul, alternative realms, the afterlife, spirituality, specific creatures, the sustained reality of love, or mind preceding ‘reality’ in any form. Yes, as STEM professional, this was enforced on me in my career. I had to keep my mouth shut, just as I did as a kid in church, or my career was in danger. Fortunately now, I am past where those career threats can harm me. But this is more than simply atheism (a personal belief about gods) – it is Nihilism – you don’t exist – nor does anything you hold as tendering meaning. This form of Nihilism is not supported by the evidence at all, it is imperiously enforced by those who hold its belief. It is a 1633 religion, just the instruments have gotten better, and we reject the physical violence and prison for the most part now.
(Please consider that English is not my native language)
Well, I consider myself a nihilist (probably I do not fit your definition) but I cannot relate to this post. I do not feel that there is nihilistic propaganda pushed on us (at least in Europe). I don’t see how science is nihilistic, I would rather call it utilitarian. One of the core tenets of nihilism is that there is no absolute (objective) truth (this is why Nihilism is a paradox; just like Buddhism) so I cannot understand how a real nihilist would ever be able to really force his believes on somebody. Unless you are relating to the “Anything goes – mentality”. But then again, why should the “higher powers” act in unison? Pretty sure they are not “real” nihilists then. As far as I am concerned, no nihilist has ever bridged the is-ought gap (which would require an axiom to serve as a point of reference; which in itself would be in grave contradistinction to the core tenet. A self-delusion; so you will never be able to go beyond good and evil). I guess it would be better to call them as they really are – namely materialists. Also some of the individuals who seek fame on different platforms (i.e. Youtube) or act as the voice of the atheist movement are merely “debunkers”. They just don’t have the wits to be skeptics. The more they shout the dumber they usually are (just personal experience).
BTW This blog seems really interesting. Will have to dig deeper.
Jay,
Thanks for the kind words, and to be fair – I am trying to tweak the definitions – or in reality frame them in more compatible fashion – so that the puzzle makes more sense. So that we understand who the debunkers are – and why they are wrong. So we can contrast them with people of conscience, who really hold to their philosophy. To not allow them a place to hide, and pretend that they are actually reasonable rational people of a different name (atheism, materialism, free thinkers, etc.).
You are fortunate that Nihilism is not pushed on you in Europe. Science is not nihilist, and it is utilitarian agreed – but Nihilists will pretend that science supports their religion, and will pretend to be materialists and atheists representing the opinion of science. A materialist depends upon the certainty of physical measures and an atheist does not believe in deities – neither of these comments upon or relates to the things which Nihilists seek to eliminate from social understanding through denial and debunking. Yes socially we have fallen for this ruse.
When you are referring to ‘no objective truth’ nihilist, you are referring to Fundamental Nihilism. While it is an intellectual lever, its practical application is null. So we can set Fundamental Nihilism on a museum shelf (as you cite, these types of nihilist don’t really exist) and use the term how it should really be employed…
Those who deny that any avenue of personal meaning can exist – only the authorized domain is to be considered – and than everything else is simply an illusion of neurofunction.
This is not a benign philosophy.
And your English is superb, as are your insights. Thank you!
I like the term ignostic, but I would never use it myself because it almost always requires an explanation. Since I need the explanation, I might as well just explain what I am without the label. I have enough of those put onto me as it is.
Understandable. That has to be other main reason, aside from the quiet nature of the philosophy, as to why no one really has heard of it. As long as you are comfortable with people assuming that you are a Nihilist, then that makes total sense.
Me. I am not comfortable with people concluding that I am a Nihilist any more than them thinking that for some practice I have, certainly I must be a Christian.
I bristle at participating in promotion of the ignorance. Religions thrive on ignorance. If they do not know what an ignostic is, then you can smile and just have them look it up.
There is definitely enough content both on this site and throughout the web to produce an engaging feature length documentary. We should get on this. When TPB is up again I’ll look around for some decent filmmaking software we should get on this.
My sentiments exactly. Discovered your blog after wondering whether anybody else had noticed the hijacking of language that seems to be quite rampant in modern society: phrases like “I’m a skeptic” and “As a scientific minded person” coming from people with obvious bias, closed-mindedness and emotional investment in the status quo who consistently revert to basic ad hominems and straw man fallacies whenever challenged.
Spent a while searching and eventually found this blog, the only one of its kind as far as I know. A sigh of relief that this phenomenom has been noticed and analysed. A breath of fresh air consistently delivering quality content as well as strategies to deal with acolytes of the SSkepticism religion.
There seems to be a massive take over of the language going on to muddy the waters of intellecual discussion and keep the people in the dark.
Here are some of the terms I have noticed being hijacked:
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Public servants are now referred to as “Authorities”
Green
Equality
“Rape” which now has so many definitions that actual rape has become trivialised
Abuse
Democracy
Conspiracy now refers to “something that is untrue and goes against the status quo” or “this person is crazy” as opposed to its original definition
Offensive
Environmentally friendly
There are many more examples.
As always keep up the good work. To my fellow readers: Let’s not make Ethical Skeptic do all the work – jump into the conversation and let’s develop this community.
Again, thanks Taliesin. I hope you don’t mind that I echoed the quote from your comment up in the blog post upon which you commented. Let me know if that is OK. We are garnering some interest as the visitor count is growing very fast. You must be out pounding some big drum. :) Thank you very much. I suspect we are getting GM Food related traffic as well; and were my children and my neighbors’ children not suffering adult-style diseases from something deleterious in the nature of this last 20 years of food, I would probably not touch on the topic at all. I am pro-GM Technology – but even more I am pro my kids not suffering. But since this is one of the cause célèbre of the Social Skepticism movement, pretending how food science should work, and their work is directly harming my children, my self and my family – I will be vocal about that topic, as an aside from the charter of the blog.
Hehe… Democracy – A form of Monarchy in which only the most flamboyant, notorious, popular or good looking Royals succeed to throne or office of nobility.
Yes, administrative officials will continue to be promoted from the role of public servant to the offices of nobility and authority. This is the way socialism creeps into a successful economy and strangles it from within. The beneficiaries are always the same Royal class, mostly hidden in our modern era. And they are always supported by their sycophant SSkeptics.
Thanks, and great comment on the hijacking and equivocation being played inside our language.
LOL!! Yes, 70% of the fallacies have been noted from my career managing science labs and in economics, trade and engineering. The tree graphic I created while watching American football yesterday. Thanks! :)
Not to mention the hypocrisy of Al Gore stepping off a private plane to give a lecture on how the average working stiff should take the bus to work… because global warming. Oh and don’t forget to pay your global carbon tax, because Al needs a relaxing three month holiday at a private island resort from all this hard work… because global warming.
Yes we should look after the planet. Let’s plant some trees, or better yet, keep the ones we have and grow hemp instead since it’s so much more efficient. But then I suppose we’d lose jobs, and we can’t have that – because people need jobs. If people didn’t have jobs they’d do too much thinking, and we can’t have that either.
Don’t even get me started on the whole “job creation” mess. Automation should free people to live their lives (instead of freeing them to scrap it out to “make a living”, whatever the fuck that’s supposed to mean).
I have spent most of my life under extraordinary pressure and ‘damn well better do it’ demands, not because we want excellence, but rather because we immaturely want to conquer as organizations and a society.
I got tired of spending 20 hour days fighting the cold war. I have witnessed for decades the real reasons behind the corporate demands for efficiency, and they are predatory and destructive. There are always spoils to be taken by cornering an industry vertically or horizontally – and it does not matter if you are oligarchy or socialist – the same people end up taking the money.
The net result of this is betrayal of our planet, arrogance and failed politics of conquest. The end state of this pathway of obedience is pushing a red button labelled “Nuke” – because we were only smart enough to follow the procedure and not question why.
I’m glad you eventually escaped. There are some good talks on youtube about cheaper and more equitable alternatives to welfare programs – things like the ‘negative income tax’ and the ‘guaranteed annual income’ which would serve to provide citizens with enough money to provide for their basic needs. Some people would be happy with that and wouldn’t work. Others would become captains of industry or pick up a job to pay for more of their wants, but would still get that $25,000 every year to cover basic needs. This way nobody would feel like they were being punished for working. Not only that, but something like 90% of all crime is financially motivated.
Welfare programs only serve to disincentivize low-pay unemployment ($300 pw for jumping though hoops vs $350 pw for 40hrs of mind-numbing boredom). If that benefit wasn’t cut you could be damned sure most of the people society calls ‘bludgers’ would pick up part time jobs right quick. They aren’t lazy, they’re just sensible and don’t see the point in working 40hrs a week for an extra $50. It’s basic business sense when you get right down to it.
This, and the fact that more and more people are waking up to the ponzi scheme that is fractional reserve private banking:
Science is based on the premise “Give us one free miracle, and we’ll explain all the rest.” LOL!!! I love it. A total statement of Ethical Skepticism. Thanks for the video Taliesin! ~TES
Bifurcation fallacy… nice to have a name to the face. I’ve noticed these being presented a lot recently:
– Alopathic medicine is the only alternative to disease.
– Hostile land grabs (Agenda 21) and more taxes extracted from the middle classses are the only way to combat global warming.
– Anthropogenic CO2 is the only explanation for global warming.
– Being anything other than a feminist makes you a mysoginist.
– Being anything other than an atheist makes you ineligible to participate in scientific discussion.
The list goes on.
Many thanks for the bigger picture presented here EthicalSceptic.
Currently going on an adventure through your back catalogue of articles, finding the sharp honesty of your observations very refreshing.
Always wondered why this new breed of “skeptics/atheists” seemed to irk me so.
Are you aware there is a sub-reddit called ‘conspiratard’ which considers every conspiracy ever written about impossible? It’s good for a laugh if nothing else.
Is the delivery packaging of the Author’s Founding Edition safe for a Cluster mailbox?
Yes – the box is rigid – about 1.7 inches tall, 6.4 inches wide, and 9.4 inches deep. Should be OK
TES
Didn’t want to stroke out if they jammed it in there, so I chose safe destination for it.
Used woo button after some issues on phone. *crossing fingers*
IMHO the key thing about this incredibly well thought-out/reasoned hypothesis can be boiled down to one word: Nullification. What (if anything) is a nullifying position/hypothesis to this? I’ve previously suggested that perhaps it’s the distribution of flora/fauna–but my gut response to that is that Mother Nature recovers and re-takes terrain far faster than modern science believes. TBD–but good Lord, how wonderful to have this kind of all-encompassing theory that tackles so many fragments in the archeological record. Bravo, kudos, and massive ‘thank you’ Roger for this seminal intellectual work. -DY
Thanks James,
Even the flora and fauna show densities at the Euler Axes that far exceed the rest of the planet. But you are correct – life spreads and recovers quickly.
Roger
I look forward to receiving my copy as well as seeing if you have added any additional information that is not in your posted hypothesis at https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/05/12/exothermic-core-mantle-decoupling-dzhanibekov-oscillation-ecdo-hypothesis/
Thanks for your order David!
The book overlaps 99% with the website material in terms of elements – However, the book is written as a formal theoretical argument, whereas, the website is crafted as a diary of sorts – a log of a critical path discovery. That is the main difference. The climate argument and evidence were so large, that I could not fit it all inside the book without extending the printing costs too high, and losing most readers in the complexity.
Those are the main differences.
TES
My bad. I was able to complete the order after disabling pop up protection in my browser. Looking forward to a challenging read!
Great news! Must be in demand. Unable to purchase from any of the 3 links provided. Sold out?
If you are shipping to the US – it should transact – except Apple Pay may decline the transaction because they have an errant MCC code in their files (getting that fixed) – you should be able to pre-order. But yes, this is selling 10 times my estimated volume.
TES
Just saw your order enter the system!
Thanks K!
TES
TES is also the most authentic, sincere person I have ever corresponded with.
I don’t have the intellect to analyze the material for any kind of accuracy, but I know he says what he means and means what he says.
I will buy many copies when I can – but money would not be compensate for his impact.
steve
Apologies for my tired typos!
At least everyone will know I am not an Ai bot, lol.
Hi TES, congrats !
Can’t wait to get the book in France. We still have scientists who are eager to study alternative climate modelling here. Your work will make a good complement for Vinos jet stream model, and Scafetta-Courtillot’s planetary models.
Best regards.
It is next in the publisher’s queue! Very excited about that release, yes.
TES
Have been following your work for a couple years now and truly appreciate your dedication to shine a light on what has been hidden.
Looking forward to holding this masterpiece soon! Is there a timeline for when this “author’s advance edition” will be available to your followers in Canada?
Again, thank you.
TES,
I used @stratdepth’s great ECDOview tool to examine the Huaca Pucllana complex in Lima, Peru. It appears to be a possible match to Np’. I didn’t see it in the list of sites in the article but I could have missed it.
PS – I’m looking forward to reading Inversion
Lago!! Bravo Zulu buddy!
A great alignment obsequience find!
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Huaca-Pucllana-Complex-Peru.png
Thanks
TES
The Andy Nay graph of Mann’s reconstruction is a dismantling of Mann’s work, as such the critique should be considered when deciding whether to use his data.
NASA GISS smears temperatures thousands of KM and uses a very small set of stations.
Satellite temperature data is verified by Weather Balloons. GISS is the warmest data set. The surface data sets have been adjusted thousands of times, and the pairwise homogenization algorithm changes temperatures on the fly. Temperature data sets from Satellite observation are at least verified by a second method but the timeframe is shorter. Better good shorter data than poor and inadequate longer data.
Michael Mann is a known disgrace and a fraud in climate circles. Using his work doesn’t help. Apart from fraudulent statistics, using proxies upside down, using known bad proxies even PNAS said shouldn’t be used, the individual is a demonstrable liar and agency not science is his trade. Using his work means one must actually re-do his study. His methods for his famous hockeystick temperature graph, produces the same hockeystick shape from random numbers.
I only seek to protect the credibility of your work as I believe this theory should be embraced by the mainstream. This is NOT a critical post.
I recognize the criticism of his specific work. That came mostly after I wrote this article. However, the covariance between climate warming and the perturbation of the core – is critical path to my argument. So, it will remain for now.
TES
I understand sir.
I only wish to steel man your case. I agree with your comment. I just fet it needed pointing out. There are those that wish to use any means to attack you or your work.
CO2 growth only matches temperatures because the statistical temperature estimates have been adjusted hundreds if not thousands of times if you break it down to monthlies adjustments.
Your work is solid, but these references I highlighted are not.
Sincerely,
Mark
“CO2 growth only matches temperatures because the statistical temperature estimates have been adjusted hundreds if not thousands of times if you break it down to monthlies adjustments.”
Correct, and valid point overall. If you survey my first article you will see that I replicate this “frequent adjustment” every year in order to keep the two curves appearing to show a sole relationship. IF I do not make the adjust – then the two begin to show the acceleration in the ppm is unlinked from temperature and another factor is at play.
This migration logic is essential to the critical path of the argument – so, starting from the erroneous base of decades old climate arguments, is a good way to introduce the falsification itself.
TES
I learned something recently about the average size of quartz granules in granite that made me come back to this. If a kinetic force breaks a quartz granule encased in granite the granule will generate a burst of RF based on its size and naturally in the single digit MHZ range. This is a direct demonstration of the piezoelectric effect. And if you look at global size distribution of these granules it would match very well with the fundamental resonance for this proposed antenna.
People associate the mechanical movement with a decoupling event but may miss the electromagnetic consequences. Starting as a precursor to feeling movement, a very large mass accelerating at high speed but over the smallest of distances could result in a “jerk” that can’t be felt but would still generate powerful, high voltage ground currents(explained through Faraday’s Law of Induction). Perhaps with enough power to create plasma discharge events at the surface.
High frequency RF is attenuated inside the earth which has prevented the monitoring of quartz fracturing being used as an early warning system for earthquakes. But in a plasma environment everything changes when it comes to RF propagation.
I’m looking forward to reading your book and maybe it touches on this but I was wondering if you explored the possibility this antenna was tuned specifically for this effect, perhaps seen as a “tipping point” for the expected event.
Well, there is very little of this quartz in the Giza pyramids. Calcium carbonate is the vast preponderance of their structure and makeup. Nonetheless, there are many quartz structures throughout Giza – that may bear applicability. Will be thinking on this. Have seen the lights which appear when quartz is place under such stress in a natural setting, yes.
TES
In the last year or so I read a book by David Allen Neron called The Gnostic Jesus Christ & Yaldabaoth His Ignorant Unbegotten Brother. I appreciate how the author isn’t dogmatic. The way that “The Fall” is explained in his book fits well with your post:
Of course, stories like “The Fall” and their supposed meanings carry substantial momentum in the collective mind, and among those indoctrinated there remains undeniable influence on one’s manner of thinking even after discovering that the stories are mere allegories and retold myths. The ongoing damage caused by such narratives causes me to wonder at what might have been in a world spared from these ideas. On the other hand, like Thomas Paine, I would like to believe that some “good” eventually comes from it. Perhaps we’ll ‘wake up’ one day and say with a smile, “That was a good game.”
Very savvy points, KJE and well framed.
TES
Hi TES,
Awesome, I have been looking forward to getting a copy of the book.
Just a question on the “authors advance edition” are you limiting shipping just to the US for this version?
Yes, unfortunately for now. But we hope to have it open for international shipping shortly.
TES
Yes, please!
The new testament does not say Adam and Eve are the first humans. The couple had 2 sons, Cain and Abel. Cain murders Abel out of jealousy of Abel and is sent away by God. Cain then goes in to the city and meets his wife. The truth of the Bible is about the Sun and the human Subconscious (soul, spirit, etc.)
The issue of “first humans” is moot in this arrangement. All mankind is claimed to be indebted under the penalty of this arrangement, according to Genesis. So, what body physically preceded which body – is moot. If the arrangement prima facie is demonic, however, then the subplot is not of light, a fortiori.
That is a emotional circular assessment. You have the stars that create all matter and emotional intelligent living creturess that create all thought.
No. It is a logical, pragmatic, if-then statement, with no circuclar feedback and no emotion. You are projecting. Your second statement is irrelevant.
You just made my point. You are emotionally influenced towards the writings of mankind. Humans wrote the garden of Eden epoch. so the Humans would be bringing a complaint to themselves. A emotional circular assesment.
No. I asked you to focus on and provide evidence (you missed that) – and you provided self-justifying rhetoric (circular) instead. You are projecting the circular emotion into my argument, when it is linear and deductive syllogism. It has a start, and it has an inferential end.
By identifying the only agent in this play as the theoretical straw man ‘human’ you have crafted – you have begged the question.
My point about your thesis is that the Bible was produced to allow a small group of people to control a very large group of people thru convincing them what they are reading means something else. Outside of your conscious the demonic or angelic does not exists. All societies are created on misbeliefs and mistruths, that is why they fail, not because of moral decay.
I think you missed that this article is a meta-discussion of the topic, not a statement of belief. You have to step back and ask “What is the author actually saying, here – it may not be first order logic.”
The demonic exists. Until you have direct experience in this, I would caution you to not draw beliefs from ‘sounds good, feels good, everything is good’ philosophy. That is the source of the decay in human integrity and society.
The demonic only exists in your subconscious. This is one of the paths to enlightenment, is to control your inner demon (your subconscious)
You are incorrect, and have no experience in this topic.
…and true to form, and fakery, you got all pissed-off, insulting, and arrogant in your response. You are now a spam-flagged email. Go spread your cleverly-concealed darkness somewhere else.
Mr. Kirk had said something to the effect of when discourse ends, violence begins; as you have explained here. Current liberalism is irrational, unreasonable, & illogical. Much hate & animus courses through it. The corrupt nature of power & money seems to be correlated. One of the confusing things is otherwise nice, intelligent people subscribe to it without being able to explain why they ratify such veiled violence towards thinkers of other views. So difficult to comprehend how it all works. So saddening a voice articulating the argument for peace, joy & love has been silenced by Evil once again.
When is it being published? I need to order 6 please!
Hey Nick, just awaiting approval – but on this edition (Author Advance Edition) I am limiting it to one purchase per customer ID. They can all purchase independently however.
As well, the publisher regular first edition mass release will be later in the year too, and hopefully in Europe as well.
Good luck!
TES
Hi TES (and finally nice to meet you, Roger),
This is certainly a book for my collection.
“It seems clear that the only reason for the continuing reluctance to accept polar shifts is the absence of an acceptable mechanism to account for them. . . With each successive failure of a proposed theory, the reigning doctrine of the fixity of the poles was reinforced.”
— Charles Hapgood, The Earth’s Shifting Crust (1958)
I think the long search for Hapgood’s ‘acceptable mechanism’ may now have reached its conclusion.
Well done and congratulations.
SC
Scott,
Coming from you, this means a lot. Most humbled and appreciative.
Roger
Very excited, but I hope you hired an editor. Otherwise the book’s fate will be similar to Jordan Peterson’s Maps of Meaning. Very precise – yes, but unreadable.
So,
Read
Darwin – On the Origin of Species
Wolfram – A New Kind of Science
Thorne – Black Holes and Time Warps
Newton – The Principia
And then tell those authors that an editor is what they needed in order to make the work both readable and more widely accepted. I will await their response.
TES
This is a very sharp and creative framing of the Eden story, and the contract analysis highlights some real tensions — especially around consent, understanding, and the structure of the outcome.
But reading through it, I find myself wondering if the entire line of argument may be one level off.
The recurring issues you point to — lack of informed consent, asymmetry of knowledge, and the inevitability of failure — don’t just describe a bad agreement. They describe something more basic: entry into existence without sufficient awareness at the point of entry.
In that sense, the problem may not be juridical at all, but generative.
If we look at it in practical terms, parents occupy a role analogous to a creator with respect to the child. They initiate existence and establish the initial conditions under which that life unfolds, while the one entering has no awareness of those conditions at the outset.
From that perspective, what is being attributed to a divine structure in Eden may have a direct analogue in the human process of reproduction itself.
Most human reproduction is unconscious procreation — driven by biology, culture, and circumstance, rather than by deliberate awareness of what is being brought into existence and under what conditions. A being enters life without understanding the rules, the consequences, or even the nature of the system it finds itself in, and must discover all of that after the fact.
Seen this way, the features described in the article — confusion, misalignment, inherited consequence — are not surprising. They are exactly what one would expect from unconscious procreation.
This raises the possibility that the Eden story is not best understood as a failed covenant, but as a description of what happens when existence begins under unconscious conditions.
If that is the case, then the deeper question shifts quite significantly. It is no longer simply:
Was the covenant fair?
But rather:
Is there such a thing as conscious procreation — a mode of bringing a being into existence with awareness, intention, and alignment — and if so, would that fundamentally alter the outcome?
That question seems to precede any legal or moral evaluation, and may be closer to the root of what the story is actually pointing toward.
Well stated Tony, and a valid point.
However, in this case the defendant controlled the circumstances of all forms and states of “entry into existence,” and would again be solely and 100% responsible for any flaw in the inception landscape inside which any covenant or unilateral directive was issued thereafter. So, while this applies to accidental initiation of existence, it becomes a circular argument when one party holds sole ability to craft the nature of existence in the first place.
Now, in the instance where the defendant did NOT actually possess that ability to craft the nature of existence, and misrepresented their agency, then – that would be classic fraud in the inception – based upon a critical but flawed prior disclosure.
So, we are left with the same set of juridical torts in either context.
What you do broach however, is that – when a God imposes a covenant, that is not actually a two party contract. So, we overlap into slavery and human rights abuse here, which would preclude classic contract law. Still thinking on that one.
TES
That’s a fair extension, and I see the logic of bringing it back to responsibility at the point of creation.
But I wonder if that move itself may still be operating within the same frame the original analysis assumes — namely, that the situation is best understood in terms of liability, agency, and fault.
If the conditions of entry into existence are such that awareness is not present at the outset, then what follows may not fit cleanly into juridical categories at all. In other words, it may not be that there is a tort to be assigned, but that the entire situation arises from a lack of consciousness at the generative level.
Framed that way, even the question of responsibility becomes less straightforward. Responsibility presumes agents operating with sufficient awareness to be accountable in the conventional sense.
If that condition is not met at the point of inception, then the outcome may be better understood as structural rather than culpable.
That doesn’t negate your argument — it just raises the possibility that legal language is describing the surface effects of something that originates prior to law, contract, or even moral framing.
Which brings us back to the question: whether the issue is ultimately one of injustice, or one of unconscious creation.
You are hitting on a valid legal delineation, but this still fits into juridical issues. These are all valid and extant legal criminal (not just civil) complaints, in a stack of leverage: A & B are civil – while C & D are criminal, and human rights, offenses.
A. Fraud / Fraud in the Inducement (or Execution) The first party is: misrepresenting their identity (“I (we) are your legal guardian/God(s)”), misrepresenting legal authority preventing verification or challenge.
B. Undue Influence & Exploitation of Vulnerability: There’s a clear power imbalance + cognitive impairment 1. One party is dependent and impaired. 2. The other exerts control and constructs the “arrangement” between them based upon the vulnerable parties lack of skill/knowledge.
C. Duress / Coercion: The arrangment it is not optional (ultimate penalty as the punishment) and the person is not allowed to question or investigate.
D. Involuntary Servitude (inability to object or comprehend the arrangement)
What you might be sensing is that, while this involves some contract law in that such an agreement was Void in Inception – it stems mostly into Criminal Law – Involuntary Servitude (Serious Constitutional / Criminal Issue)
However, where it does meet the stipulations of contract law, for all intents and purposes – “Arrangement = Agreement which is void ab initio (never legally valid at all).” But in the end the criminal violations overshadow the civil ones.
TES
At last! I prefer physical books and this is one for the ages. Thanks Roger, nice to meet you :-)
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
I have a question for you. If you have already discussed the topic in your articles, my bad, you don’t need to bother answering.
We were told in school that the pyramid of Giza was covered in white marble, which was removed by the local populations millennia later to build the city of Cairo. Is this false? Why did they say that? Are there any signs of white marble covering the stones? Was the marble eroded by the sea? Is it a pure invention?
Forgive my English.
Daniela,
Excellent question. The Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure Pyramids were covered in polished Tura Limestone, not marble. A fairy tale was crafted and told to us without any substantiation (citing old documentation by historians, but when you go pull copies of the original documents the accounts are not in there) that the stones were removed by a. The Roman b. The Sultan in 1297 CE, c. an Earthquake and d. Mosque building.
None of these are true. The Nubian Egg, dated to 3800 BCE, shows the three pyramids without their casing stones. My article “Hidden in Plain Sight” addresses this and translates the original documents directly from their original images, showing that all these explanations were fabricated by our pseudoscience we call archaeology.
The reason they fabricated this, is so that they do not have to explain the erosion band on the top of Khafre – which clearly shows a high water mark, with no other alternative viable to explain it.
The Tura Casing stones were dissolved by oceanic carbonic acid dissolution – and the reconstituted material was found all over the base of the pyramids and the subterranean passages.
They lie – because they do not feel we should be told the truth of ECDO Theory. But man is growing up now, and must face this truth.
TES
Thank You, Sir Skeptic, Roger…
Standing by.
I sincerely appreciate the level of time, intellect and curiousity that you bring to this discussion. i find your thesis the most compelling and am very grateful for your motivation to further our understanding admit the falling apart of all that we thought we knew.
I’ll be buying this. You capture my intellect and curiosity every time. A wonderful thing.
Thanks Cara!
I’m aSweetMama on X. I never get your posts anymore or any of the other things that I enjoy. It’s all war and politics. I actually have to look up your name in order to get your posts. I love megalithic archaeology, frequency and quantum physics, wellness, all the fun stuff. But I never get any of that anymore. Stupid algorithm. So I’m glad I get your emails!
Egg cellent.
Looking forward to reading your book. I get the feeling I’ll need an open browser window to accompany this anticipated tome.
Love the cover.
M
Thanks Mark, this is a very visual argument, so you likely will have to keep the browser open to the articles herein. 75% of the book’s work was in developing imagery that would not violate copyright – I had to rework everything so that it would not be subject to a claim. It is analogous to private collections owning critical components of our past. Privatization of human intellectual property is a chief cog in our ability to cultivate ignorance.
TES
To note, the March 13 2026 post did not make it into my mailbox.
With that one – I am recycling an older post, so apparently WordPress simply sees this as that same post and gives no announcement. I will have to devise a way to remedy that.
Thanks for the heads-up John…
TES
Well done. Add acclaimed author to the jacket, as all your Folleagues would attest so. Hope Volume II is underway. Also hope I will have enough time to read and comprehend this one. Best regards.
Here to hoping, Steve! Thanks…
TES
I’m a sailor, so maybe it’s my bias speaking here, but that looks like some sort of an ancient nautical map, which could read as, “When the night sky is in this configuration above us, travel towards a specific asterism on the map to reach a specific tepe.” The 11 boxes being a sort of measurement they had developed to mark a heading. “Five markings from North, towards the crane asterism.” Entertain the idea that those depicted “flames” could be representing waves, and you’ve got the directions to sail to a neighbors civilization.
There are moments or periods in life that define you as a person. One such moment was when I first read your article (along with the other two). Lately, not a day goes by without me thinking about the fundamental implications this has on our species and our history on this planet. How the silences we inherit create an invisible framework of confinement, imposing oblivion upon us.
For me personally, there is no turning back. I deeply believe that the word must be spoken and spread in every way possible, and that is what I intend to do.
Thank you very much for having the courage to come forward and shed light onto the shadows that govern us.
Very much appreciated, Andrew.
It hits me every day in differing ways. I cannot even look at a map without seeing the stark evidence of the inundation right before our eyes. So many turning on to it. I even missed that Karahan Tepe was aligned to Np’ – because I looked at it so early on, that I was clumsy and missed it. Now that I am quicker to the analysis, the obsequience monuments just jump off the page at me.
A whole different world now…
TES
Pourquoi beaucoup d’intérêt en France ?
Dear TES,
You’ve mentioned on Twitter that a book is forthcoming. Is it possible to pre-order yet?
With appreciation for your continued service to humanity,
Lago
Lago, thanks for the interest!
I have finished around 85% of the book and am obtaining my Foreword contributor as well. The market strategy is to publish in Europe first (2026) – but retain rights to the remainder of the world and all non-book/e-print media, so that any momentum in Europe immediately translates into better leverage position with UK and US publishers (or even self publishing). But that also means that the book will be first released in French – where the publisher anticipates an eager readership.
The English versions should be out shortly thereafter if all goes according to plan.
We shall see!
TES
That’s something I always wondered:
how do mainstream climatologists even attempt to explain the sudden localized increases of temperature in the seas? Just saying “it’s man’s fault” is not an explaination.
By the 2nd law of thermodynamics, heat can only spontaneously distribute from where there’s more of it to where there’s less; therefore, regardless of who is to blame, if something suddenly starts heating up much faster than usual, it seems to me there are only 2 possibilites:
A) there must be some massive influx of heat coming from somewhere; we know no source of that kind in the known seas, nor in the surrounding lands, nor in the sky; therefore, the only remaining option is: it comes from below.
B) some kind of mysterious explosive reaction happened somewhere nearby.
Xeon – good physical instincts. Climate science is invoking magic to get around severe problems in its model predictive strength. Magic ocean currents can produce any level of heat, anywhere at any time. It is a bountiful ad hoc rescue.
Hi TES,
I’m sure you will be aware that in the ‘Legend of Surid’ (Surid being Suphis a.k.a. Khufu/Cheops), it is said that the Giza pyramids were built in response to the Earth turning over and as a repository in anticipation of a catastrophic flood that would destroy the ancient kingdom. There are also (as you know) numerous other ancient Egyptian legends that speak of the Earth inverting and of the sun changing rising/setting horizons on at least a couple of occasions. Many other cultures from all across the ancient world also speak of this calamitous event in deepest antiquity.
What most folks won’t realise is that several features of the Giza monuments literally demonstrate what occurred to the Earth at that time i.e. an inversion event. They show that Giza was formerly located at a latitude of 54S but since it was not a complete 180 degree inversion event, the pole was effectively (though not physically) relocated on the outer shell of the Earth by 12 degrees, giving Giza a final (former) latitude of 42S. From there it was shifted to its present latitude location of ~30N. This shift is corroborated by several features at Giza.
Just thought you might be interested.
Best,
SC
Much appreciated Scott. I had heard of the Surid legend – but researched them more deeply and have added a section on this, in the second article (Hidden in Plain Sight), near the end. Thanks!
TES
Hi TES,
Thanks for linking to your article. You write:
“Of course, while this eschatology fits our timeline of events depicted in Exhibit O2, we also know that neither the Khufu nor Khafre pyramids were designed as warehouses of any kind. They were not designed to store and protect any appreciable volume of material.”
One of the things the Surid Legend states that was categorically placed within the Great Pyramid were the bodies of Surid’s (aka Suphis’s / Khufu’s) ancestors. This may sound weird but in terms of ancient Egyptian religious beliefs, it was absolutely vital for the security and hoped for rebirth of the kingdom after the catastrophic flood event.
This is because the deceased kings (Osiris kings) in ancient Egypt were (arguably) more important in death than the living Horus king. The deceased kings (it was believed) could intercede directly with the Gods in the heavens for the benefit of the living kingdom. If the bodies of the Osiris Kings were washed away and destroyed in the anticipated flood catastrophe, then there could be no rebirth of the kingdom. Not ever.
That is why it was imperative for Surid/Khufu to reinter the mummified remains of his ancestors in a hidden chamber (with no passages or entrance) as high up within the Great Pyramid as possible – far from the anticipated flood waters. For a number of reasons (which I explain in depth my books), I suspect the recently discovered Big Void (a massive new chamber high up within the GP) will be found to contain these ancient kings (as well as their chief queens). These deceased kings were the ‘beating heart’, the essential ‘ingredient’ of Surid/Khufu’s ‘disaster recovery plan’ for his kingdom i.e. the Giza monuments.
IMHO.
Cheers,
SC
I think you have a solid argument pathway there, Scott. Worth pursuit.
Earlier in the article, I describe why I believe that the Void will have already been scoured and will be found completely empty upon entry. My hypothesis is that the Void (and its access passages) was already being tomb robbed in 3800 BCE -based on the physics of the displaced Dixon block (CAD drawing midway through article).
But I appreciate and will pursue the distinction between the Osiris Kings and the Horus lineage. Fascinating!
TES
Hi TES,
I should have added a couple of links to new papers I’ve written on the Great Pyramid Hoax question (on Academia.edu). The new papers cover the recently announced (claimed) discovery by the World Scan Project of ‘new’ painted markings within the pyramid chambers. I’ve also made a video of my earlier findings (on Graham Hancock YT channel). Here are all the links for your readers:
The Great Pyramid Hoax: The Evidence Speaks (video 43 mins)
Analysis of the Painted ‘Quarry Marks’ within the Stress Relieving Chambers of the Great Pyramid of Giza (paper 72 min read)
Analysis of the Painted Quarry Marks Observed by the World Scan Project in the Stress Relieving Chambers of the Great Pyramid of Giza (paper 20 min read)
Has Dr Zahi Hawass Uncovered Evidence of Fraud Within the Great Pyramid of Giza? (paper 15 mins)
Regards,
SC
Excellent. Thanks Scott.
The cockpit gun sight videos are making the rounds again after President Trump’s announcement he is having UFO info in govt possession released. Are you satisfied they accurately depict what’s being described by folks? Not sure what to expect in such a FLIR display; the AH shows a sustained sharp left turn in some?
Do you have the correct cited reference for #1? The document cited does not indicate anything at all about halting or otherwise slowing GT excavation efforts. It appears to be questions by UNESCO to the Turkish Delegation in charge of GT.
The letter cites, in particular about Gobekli Tepe:
“Given the nature of the [GT] property, the understanding of the site, its functions and development through time appears to be still in its infancy and in great need of further research and publications. In this respect, the ICOMOS panel considers that there is an imbalance between the scientific research requirements and prospects as indicated in the nomination dossier, and the proposed management plan. The ICOMOS Panel would appreciate if the State Party could provide reassurances regarding the continuing medium-and long-term funding of fundamental, independent, scientifically motivated and managed research programmes.”
Imablance between requirements and the plan = “halting and/or slowing (pretend excavation)”
TES
The NT shares that Christ was slain from before the foundation of the world. The entire creation and man’s fall was meant to be if so, in its context. I take it that it’s a very elite lie meant to capture a group to be good patty hearst like servants, devoted to death, willing to submit as good slaves, to submit to Caesar, and most of all pay taxes and tithes.
I’ve posed this to several people within this debate and my proposal is immediately waved off. Perhaps it deserves to be, but perhaps you would consider it. I would be happy to have it decisively falsified.
Assuming your theory is correct, could what we call evolution actually be a type of de-evolution? Prototypes containing all the necessary information to specialize based on the environment they find themselves in, programmed to do exactly that, diversify, by LOSING AND DEACTIVATING information, rather than gaining new information? Seemingly primitive forms would actually only be not yet specialized and capable of birthing a wide variety of species within their type.
ES, I know this post has been up a while, but was wondering what your dosage and routine was on the EDTA and doxycycline? Did you take both orally, and did you space them out to prevent the EDTA from binding to the doxy.
Both orally, yes.
I took the EDTA in the am, with 1/2 the doxy, and then 1/2 more doxy in the pm. But not to avoid binding, mostly to avoid stomach upset from Doxy on an empty stomach. I have never found binding to be an issue (eg. T4 Thyroxine with protein, etc.). In the final months I took only the morning 1/2 dose of doxy.
TES
Thanks for the response! I’m going to give it a try, my circulation is awful and am hoping this will help.
Does your guidance remain patience & continued observation rather than Tau is on the the visible horizon, sound collision?
Nice! I raised a similar complaint in 6th grade Bible class — in much more simplistic terms (being only 11 at the time). I basically raised the issue with the teacher (like in your missive above) that if Adam and Eve had no knowledge, experience, or understanding of “Good & Evil”, or death then making an agreement with them that required these things was not fair.
The resulting stunned silence and look of consternation was priceless!
[I was never called on again in that class… hahahahaha]
Hello, in your ECDO, why does internal dissipation of angular momentum in the Dzhanibekov oscillations not occur?
Because the Earth is not a viscoelastic outer medium (mantle) over the period of rotation being proposed. It exhibits this characteristic over decades to thousands of years, not days or hours. In terms of days or hours, the mantle is a solid three-moment body. Second, the friction torsion which precipitates some of this resistance, is eliminated by the sloughing of epsilon iron from the outer core and into the mantle… eliminating that viscoelastic tensioning effect as well.
It seems we should be able to amend the complaint to include some sort of tortious interference through misrepresentation, non-disclosure or deceit relating to our true nature & history; perhaps intentional infliction of emotional distress. Maybe even promissory estoppel for ECDO if the Rainbow promise made by the Edenic god is false!
Well, at the very least we should have had customer feedback from earlier civilizations attesting to the great state of affairs they enjoyed after being under this Entity for billions of years and having not violated any edict that entire time.
There will be no feedback from earlier civilizations by beings who honored the Covenant in perpetuity, because such beings will never develop civilizations.
Why would beings in a state of perpetual innocence, living in a garden of plenty, wanting for nothing, have built a civilization? They would be as the Eloi in H.G. Wells’ novel; graceful, childlike beings who live in a seemingly idyllic, pastoral environment. Wells describes them with terms emphasizing their delicacy, naivety, and lack of aggression—qualities that evoke innocence, vulnerability, and a prelapsarian simplicity. They are peaceful, vegetarian, and carefree, exhibiting no violence, industry, or intellectual ambition. Their trusting and gentle nature, along with their fear of the dark and dependence on others for sustenance, reinforces this characterization.
It was the Morlocks who built a technological civilization.
Without want, without the need to toil to provide for oneself and one’s children, there is no motivation to save, to develop labor saving devices when there is no labor, to discover fire or agriculture. Without knowledge of good and evil it is impossible to meaningfully evaluate whether any devices, technical, social, or otherwise would benefit the inventor or their race, or harm them.
Where the Covenant is honored, civilizations do not develop.
Well stated. Wells divided mankind’s prevailing order into predators and their abused — masters and chattel. It wasn’t that the chattel would fail to survive; it was that they would no longer be heard. What if Wells had not depicted the Morlocks as ugly and the Eloi as beautiful – or maybe even the reverse? Would that not reflect current reality, and was that not even the disguising element of Wells’ praespeculacy (‘prophecy’ that is simply a re-packaging of current events).
However, I find that there are two reasons to develop technology.
I like it. This intersection of Wells and Tolkien…
Fun read. I never thought of the Adam and Eve story from a legal perspective. The story always seemed to me to be the Biblical explanation of why humans are different from other animals. We have the knowledge of good and evil. It causes a great deal of worry. Animals do not appear worried about good or evil, or even death. They live in the present and react and behave according to what is happening now. Humans, not so much!
If it pleases the court i would like to call Memory to the stand ,so we can all have a concise understanding of our “True Purpose and Intent Of Original Design” ………Discovery should be a hoot…..
It is amazing to have lived through these times and witness LARP reneactment of the Fall of Man. With detachment and morbid curiosity I follow the fascinating show.
Tes
Changes to the site, not sure where to post.
Re “B” on x. re Damping.
I’ve run multiple sims of the re-equilibrium to state 2.
He’s technically correct but doesn’t understand cos he used AI to do the work.
I guess the AI wasn’t asked to calculate dampening.
They didn’t read your articles, for sure.
You already know this I know, so I did it to see how many flips it would take to make a day 27 hours
Lower / upper bounds
1flip/sec for 275 years
1flip/sec for 440 years
Of course you know this already. :)
cheers,
M
Yes, you can tell all those guys keep repeating the same regurgitated objection that Gemini, Grok, and ChatGPT give out at first blush. It does not take long to disarm it. But they are not interested in hearing the answer.
TES
Perhaps you are over thinking it. God created physical life on Earth, created some physics to keep us here, and then said (to paraphrase) if you don’t learn the rules of a civilized galactic society you won’t be allowed to join the rest of the galaxy. No doubt God doesn’t want a repeat of the angelic rebellion.
Your argument regarding a defective covenant is akin to trying to argue that the laws of physics aren’t fair and should be rewritten so we can physically travel the stars, because we never agreed to be limited to Earth.
However, even if we posit that humans should have a say, the assumption that the streamlined recap of history from the book of Genesis is the total amount of information that Adam and Eve had to go on seems illogical. They could talk face to face with God and Adam spent some time naming animals. It stands to reason they had more back and forth conversation about things in general.
We get to determine ethics, not the laws of the universe. This, unlike physics, we can control that.
Yes, they purportedly engaged with each other – that only makes the malfeasance more warranted – and scienter plausible.
In the grand scheme of the larger universe why do you think we would get to determine what is ethical? Or to put it another way, how can we know our current view of ethics isn’t like our earlier geocentric view of the solar system?
We get to select ethics because of free will. That is the latitude granted us, prior to the contract – so it cannot be rescinded as part of the contract. Like ownership of our homes or our body, except a priori, foundational, and far more important. To grant free will on this, and then immediately or at a later time constrain such that free will (foundational ethics) must be disallowed, and only the grantor’s will is allowed – is an autoaufheben (self-canceling agrument). It is changing the rules of the game in mid-stream, solely and specifically to produce a bad outcome, as a pretext for exploitation.
Do you think we really get to select ethics, or are we just trying to discover them like we discover the laws of logic and physics? And then free will lets us decide whether we want to try and ignore them and suffer any consequences that may result.
We do discover logical truths, yes. But we also have the power/freedom to select from a zone of semantic truths, which we apply to each individual decision.
I think the rules were in place before the creation of Adam and Eve. In the beggining YHVH created the moon and stars to “mark the seasons” some translations say Festivals which is the accurate translation (Lev 23) with the “Biblical Holy Days” already set which are part of the Sabbath command of #4. Which Abraham kept way before Moses, statutes there is festivals appointments with the creator. Which voids the suit.
So, was eating from the tree
1. An aggregious violation of God’s only death-penalty law? If it’s merely a single capital crime we violated, then we are in a juridical universe with very few laws, or only 1.
or
2. Entry of sin and death (a will different from God’s will) into the world for the very first time? If it’s the first act of independent will, then we are in an existential universe.
It cannot be both. The existence of the Tree of Life implies by constraint that death was already a functioning part of the Universe, a fortiori. Otherwise, one would not need the Tree of Life in the first place.
You are operating under Context #2, while Genesis makes it clear that Context #1 was the cause of The Fall, not #2. An exercise of free will therefore, was not a capital crime. So, the festival and sabbath commands were not a basis for the structure of that single capital-crime law. So, there could not have been “rules” of this same nature (plural).
I must note an objection to counsel’s representation: I do not recall authorizing Eleleth—or anyone—to file suit on my behalf. Accordingly, let the record reflect that I, as a member of the putative plaintiff class, hereby except myself from this action in its entirety, disclaim any interest in its proceeds and affirmatively oppose the relief sought therein.
My grounds are simple: I have already accepted a settlement.
The same YHWH named as offerer in your complaint has extended terms of mercy and grace. He offered to exchange the sinless perfection of His Son for the unpayable debt my own hands compounded.
Your lawsuit, I’m afraid, is doomed to galactic failure.
A settlement to Fraud in the Inception, is also null.
Could be a coincidence or it could be TES who has been leading and pacing me towards this area of thought, what beliefs start with a guilt framework? How can one be held responsible for the actions of others in perpetuity? Rewards don’t have that feature, yet somehow punishment does? Who or what benefits with that kind of structure? Follow the payoff, who gains, who loses? It’s unclear what or who is at the top of such a system, but it’s more clear to spot the agents who rely on it.
Well said, Drew…
Welcome back to my inbox, Sir Skeptic! I took the liberty of forwarding this to Cyd Ropp, also a student/practitioner of Gnosticism. Some impressions came promptly to mind:
1) “Catch-22″
2) I Wanna Be Like You” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwTClRr1x6g
;-)
Awesome! I had this segment from The Jungle Book playing through my mind all week – and I do not know why… LOL!!
It happened to me, also.
This song was playing downstairs at the birth center, watched by our older son and daughter, when our younger son was born.
He has grown to be an exceptional technical and free-climber; scary to watch.
It also pertaine to the bargain-not-bargain you describe, at least loosely.
“Prayer for Relief”… in so many ways!! Very good.
Thank ‘goodness’, finally someone speaking up for us. By the by, what’ll this cost or is Pro Bono?
Pro Bono…
This is genius. Never thought of this idea, but it’s perfectly presented.
TES.
I quote you from X.
“One potential test is the Wheeler’s Choice observational experiment. If the AI imparts a load by changing the particle vs wave selection – then it qualifies as an external ‘observer,’ thereby placing a load on the universe (as we do). If it does not – then it is pretend sentience.”
The idea of the universe as a quantum computational load processer as it were, is fascinating.
If sentience is required to put a computational load on the universe, then contextually I would infer that we are not talking about sentience on earth alone. Going further, in this model I would surmise a sentience that constructed/realised the universe itself OR sentience in the universe that has the omnipresence to put (relative to human sentience) quite a computational load on the ‘universal’ quantum processor.
This omnipresence (one or many sentients) then would be manifest to us by proxy, as the visible universe which represents the computational load already put on the universal quantum processor by sentients who keep their presence from us.
I do hope I at least have it somewhat framed right.
Thank you R.
Regards,
M
True observers, which originate from outside this realm, place a load on the universe itself, causing the apparent ‘red shift’ of the galaxies, which is a dilation in time (computation speed), and not a dilation of space. NPC’s don’t place a load on the universe, because they are simply a part of its normal computation set.
TES
(1) Sentient observation places load, load manifests wave particle selection, WP selection manifests classical reality as we know it(1).
Space is then just non malleable coordinates we humans use to navigate classical reality?
No computational load means there is “nothing” in classical reality as no WP selection has happened. (hypothetically working backwards here)
Mass is produced from (1), and gravity a downstream result whereas dilation is a first order effect of direct computational load.
So GPS time difference isn’t geometric spacetime distortion, it is dilation from the relatively small computational load that is the planet?
In this mix, we, you and I, are not classical realized computational load.
I am trying to form the model in my head to make sense of how we get from computational load to realised classical reality.
This must be tediuos for you. I’m sorry.
It’s truly fascinating, and my meagre brain did mull this over for an hour or two before I replied. lol
I will not spam you further.
Thanks R
M
TES, I read your X posts (I don’t use X for the same reasons you don’t use it much) re AI Models taking IQ tests.
Learned patterns and familiarity are cumulative. The AI models will increase predictive accuracy in such a narrow band of recursive tasking. Eventually, not only will they score really high on IQ tests, over time they will eventually be able to predict the test challenges in advance, though less likely to predict the order of challenges.
So I asked ChatGPT for a propability percentage
*AI Model better at IQ tests vs AI Model better at reasoning.
ChatGPT, without any additional prompting, purely asked those 2 probabilities returned
65% probability better at taking IQ tests
35% Smarter with better reasoning
So chatGPT’s internal handwringing session ultimately voted in favor of TES 2 to 1
I have re-read this article many times. Each re-read feeling like an additional coat of clean oil on old wood.
I cannot look upon Yuval Noah Harari and not see his lips move in service and sermon at the alter of evil being.
“The human spirit is but yes or no, 1 or 0, quantifiable, orderable, managable and destructible”
M
This seems to relate to moltbook – sometimes though I’m slow to catch on
https://x.com/karpathy/status/2017296988589723767
TES,
Have you considered writing on how this information could and should be communicated to the future?
I know you must have little spare time and much still to do.
It’s something I’ve been pondering quiet a bit, given the case you have made, the hypothesis you have established, of which I think is fair to say is theoretical given the success of prediction vs observation.
I am now thinking beyond the event, not to the post-event world, that is a world I will have to take as it comes, I am thinking of thousands of years ahead, and how this could be communicated.
There’s the how and the where. Each with it’s problems to be framed and solved.
Given where we stand now, and the agency that works against us, have you ever thought about how this might be achieved, I am guessing you have. Do you plan on writing something to this affect. I think it would be useful if you ever have the time, as I feel this is a task for the many, the more we can leave, the better the odds something survives.
Thank you for your efforts.
Oh and I thought I would mention. I replied to a Veritasium video with what I thought was a good enough description of your thoery, assembled from your work here and the commentation on X, from Craig and yourself. It was my first post on YT in a decade. I spent 30 minutes on it so as to be as accurate as possible, and included the full name for the theory so a Google search would lead to here. It was a video about rotating bodies, with a bit at the end about how the earth cannot flip over, the case resting on “maximum moment of inertia” and an analogue of earth, ie ‘a bottle of water spun in zero G’ (I do hope this gets a sardonic chuckle from you), basically claiming an accretion genesis for why this can’t happen. (Now I am thinking of the nothing ever happens meme)
The comment instantly vanished upon hitting the post button, yet I tested a reply post right after, with the word test, and it was there to read.
Thank you for your contribution to knowledge and for fighting the battle for us who cannot.
Mark
First, yes – We should inscribe a diagram of what occurs with regard to an ECDO rotation, on the face of the Moon inside one of the ‘mares’ – making it large enough to see with a reasonably powerful telescope. The diagram would consist of a 3-moment-mantle diagram inside a circle, with the Np and Np’ angles clearly marked.
Second, I have a statement in the section entitled The Geodesy Behind All This refuting that video’s fake ‘debunking’ in the article. It was a piss-poor attempt at science by this SciManDan guy. Pitiful really. No evidence provided whatsoever, and tropes foisted that he did not really understand. This is a big problem for mankind – fake science debunkers. Of course, that has been the theme of The Ethical Skeptic for decades.
That he restricts replies based upon their ability to refute, rather than their trolling or abusive nature (the standard I use), indicates that he is dictating science, not pursuing it.
TES
I try share your knowledge and your work, I can at least do that much, though I will say this, If the ECDO happens in my lifetime and I survive, I promise, I will carve your story into rock.
M
LOL!!! Thanks!
I remain hopeful one of the rule changes was no more oscillations and that the 5200 year interval is dominant with the recent skip evidence of the new rule. Heading for the ski hill where I will see again hundreds of people living their best lives and wonder a bit how many ponder ECDO. Best to you!
In light of Mr. Stone’s paper of today, and @zachariaspro’s conclusion that D of ECDO has occurred, things seem dark. Do you still favor the “Laschamps 3” indicator for Tau?
Yes, that is my benchmark until our knowledge of how the polar motion dynamics has a large horizon of retrospective observation under its belt. They are doing what must be done, however. I applaud the work.
TES
Given the size of other T-pillars that are at least twice as long as this one (Pillar 43), do we know the true size of the “Vulture Stone”… and whether there are MORE designs still hidden underground?
I don’t think the size of the pillar has much to do with it. Some are structural, some are decorative, and some communicate as a centerpiece. I am 90+% certain that the Pillar 43 stone’s story is continued in the remainder of the complex. I doubt that we will ever be allowed to see them. They tell a story we are not allowed to know – until the occupiers of this planet are put in prison.
I would think the size of the pillar is very important as it could contain dozens of additional images still hiding underground helping unravel its collective meaning and message.
TES,
Re DIsc of Sabu
Its design splits force 50/50 in either direction, as though unidirectional.
A basic impeller, the shaft with straight fins, seems well within their ability.
What if what was being pumped wasn’t water? If they were pumping something of a much thicker viscosity than sea water.
2 man operated.
Back and forth.
Something akin to cement, the disc’s dimensional properties and weight, would they suit a far more viscous fluid?
Oh yes, a Caterpillar-stlyed impeller was certainly within their reach. The problem is that the vanes would bear a high failure rate compared to normalized vanes – and have been fatal to project completion. Better to have a 70% effective – human power compatible desing that worked for 2 billion cycles, rather than a 100% effective blade that lasted 1 million cycles and would get jammed to where humans could not dislodge the jam.
I should have checked the dimensions of the disc. I had the incorrect impression of size. It’s much smaller than I realised, only 24″ across.
Thanks.
Carry on sir.
Hi TES
I came across this study Effect on limestone of 15 cycles of immersion in Dead Sea water
https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20063231956
“A total of 20 specimens representing 10 building limestone types were cut into 3- to 4-cm cubes and subjected to 15 cycles of immersion in the Dead Sea water and drying in an oven at 105°C. At the end of the 15th cycle, all the limestones had increased in weight”
When the casing stones were dissolved and the layer beneath exposed, we see especially on some pyramids, some epic karst erosion, stones that look blocks of Emmental. There should be ubiquitous absorbed salt in these limestone surfaces.
A confounding variable may be following periods of precipitation, which I assume, would reduce this salt content over time.
Are you aware of any testing for this salt?
I am aware of your writing on salt you’ve identified inside.
Carry on sir.
Truly fascinating. unconventional yes, far reaching yes, but blimey, absolutely thought provoking.
Dear TES, I have a profane question to ask, since I don’t claim to have understood everything you have so masterfully explained.
My question: how could the 238 megalitic structures be constructed during phase 1, i.e. without actually looking at Polaris as a point of reference? They can’t have been all built during phase 2, pointing at Np’ since this phase only lasted 50-400 years you said. So, many, according to your theory, must have been built during phase 1. How could they all be so precise without a guide in front of their very eyes? Traditions and teaching seem unlikely…
So I would like to present you with an hypothesis, please tell me if and how it is wrong. I believe there is a dantzikov effect and that the Earth rotated 104 deegres at one point, but what if the shifts are very distanced from one another? What if all the monuments were built during the thousands of years while Earth was in state 2? That would explain the precise alignment. Then came the shift, the flood, and the earth changed to state 1. Is it a possibility that both states last thousands and thousands of years?
Daniela,
Not profane at all. Yes, indeed I have found the ‘cultural memory only’ explanation as not comprehensively sufficient. In the same manner, I find the ‘State 2 construction’ alternative as also insufficiently explanatory. The reality, I would surmise, may involve some combination of the two. The Zalenski Cuban underwater formation could be key in this (Exhibit J36).
Marking celestial principles with horizon stones, in itself, is a suggestion that those celestial points may have been prone to movement. Once we had lost an old observation, the shaman perhaps regarded that legacy knowledge, and the veneration of that legacy in knowledge through the construction of a monument, as a way of ‘honoring the gods’ who made that shift occur.
But in truth, ECDO Theory purposely leaves this set of conjecture open/provisional. We still need to know more, yes.
TES
How does the multiple discoveries of frozen mammoths in Siberia fit with this oscillating hypothesis ?
For example, according to Wikipedia, « The Yukagir mammoth’s permafrost tomb preserved its head, tusks, front legs, and parts of its stomach and intestinal tract.[…] Remarkably, like many of the dung’s floral remains, the stems have retained their color and shape ever since the woolly mammoth tore them from the tundra roughly 22,500 years ago.[»
If the dating is correct, then according to your hypothesis the region would have moved three or four times from state 1 (lat. approx’ 66°N) to state 2 (66-104=38°S) and back since the animal’s death. Such motion does not seem compatible with the state of preservation.
Depends upon how deep it was beneath the ice.
The State 2 does not last long enough to melt all ice in a specific region. The entire planet is in a cold dark state.
TES
Thank you TES,
Correction to my previous comment: my calculation of the latitude of the Siberian region in state 2 is completely wrong. A better value is 10°S.
Wonderful work. You hypothesize that the tepe was buried to hide it. Why go to so much work to hide it when you could just destroy it. I think it was preserved intentionally, knowing it would be many thousands of years before it was needed again, and seeing the gradual degradation, they choose to bury it to conserve it to be found later rather than letting nature and time erase it.
Thanks Josh,
You proposed A sound construct which might indeed be the case – but recall – the gods wanted no depictions of their likeness or handiwork to remain. ‘Idols’ they called it. But I think they were simply covering their tracks. They are not the sole agency watching mankind, and bear accountability for some of the rather dark things they have done here wrt mankind. Hiding it was very important under this construct as well.
I read about this thing with the “collapsed wobble buffer” of Earth, and for me it looks like as if now Point Tau is reached.
I’m not at Tau just yet – but watching closely the analysis of our persons doing the work.
TES
I bookmarked this months ago and finally got time to read it. I found it fascinating and quite convincing. I have one question though, concerning the mechanism behind the steady state 576′ sea level rise (I’m not concerned about the transient sloshing) – given that there’s no more water after the shift and for the most part the shell rotates intact, where does this come from? It appears Giza ends up in a not too different latitude. Would sea levels in state 2 be different in different places? Thanks!
Giza ends up at a significantly higher latitude, where the mantle bulge it enjoys now would be absent, by 576′. It works well.
OK, but from what I’ve read (this is not my field) the equatorial bulge affects sea level more than land, so if Giza moves further from the equator shouldn’t the relative sea level there appear to drop? Does some other mechanism counter that?
I’m quite convinced of your idea that sea water is responsible for the disappearance of the casing stones and of the tidal erosion of the cap, just trying to understand where that rise comes from, and lasts long enough to dissolve the limestone.
Understood Chris,
The equatorial bulge affects land, but the sea follows suit. So that both earth and sea will distend, but along different integral tranformations. I petitioned ChatGPT-5.2 on the two tranform functions, and it contended that it did not hold enough information about the mantle’s viscosity and asymmetry under Giza, to precisely model the two simultaneous factors. However, it commented that a 576 ft net rise in sea level at Giza was the correct direction for sea level on the shift (we would see a rise in relative sea level at Giza in State 2) and “entirely inside the range of calculable outcomes for a move from 30 degrees north latitude to 46 degrees north relative latitude from ECDO State 1 to State 2.”
I could not push it any further than that – which makes sense.
TES
Was your team able to generate a map of the world prior to this last event? I’d like to see where coastlines would be, particularly near the Richat Structure.
Yes, several have on X. Because of the viscoelastic mantle, there is a great deal of unknown to any eventual map. But some great shots have been taken at doing this.
Thanks! I’ll dive deeper!
Not intending to impose the burden of Atlas, but from a systems engineering & systems analysis perspective, what is your current impression of tonight’s published data interpretation by novel methods using nutation/wobble & ECDO imminency, acknowledging paucity of trends & historical perspectives?
Just epoche and watching with interest. :-)
I should have looked more carefully. Speeds are proportional to sine; however distances covered are not.
PEB, this is a great point. The distances covered function should be the sine of the angle. We will get this resolved.
TES
Regarding Exhibit J4: My understanding is that you are describing the perception of rotation around the Euler Axis pivot points at a point on a sphere (earth) at a certain distance from the pivots. Hence distance covered and also velocity should be proportional to sine of angle, not proportional to angle. At 30° for example, velocity would be half what it is at 90°.
Pingback: Noah's Arc
TES, i’ve seen posts on X by people showing earth rotation anomalies and claiming that their proof that we are now moments before the TAU point beggins and are already decoupled from the core, even thought the changes are in a minimal scale (miliarcseconds) and out dipole moment of magnetic field is still strong (decaying but strong compared to paleodata). Do you agree with this point of view that we are in such a tiny threshold (3-5 years) from the flip?
I am neutral on such observational techniques just yet. My goal is to get us to begin to watch Earth measures in just that manner – so I like the trends and effort. But early returns are very often misleading, because we do not have a history of context and comparison.
There is a regrettable feminine cousin to Exapátisiology, known as “tone policing.” Even as a woman, I am gagging on the widespread acceptance of narrative coercion. First were told what to think, then what is acceptable to say, and now the approved ways to say anything. The policing is done 90% by women, showing that feminine virtues have been co-opted (claimed by men) and manipulated toward terrible ends. New words are most helpful, although it does go against my midwestern roots to use a $5 word when a 5 cent word would bring common sense understanding. I can’t believe most women will fall for this BS for long.
Well, as you aptly put it, Exapátisiology is a cousin to ‘tone policing.’ Both words are necessary under Wittgenstein – the absence of the two terms themselves, being part of Exapátisiology. I like it!!
Well done, this goes a long way to answering the ultimate question. Certainly it disproves the Hawkins assertion that life was created in primordial soup; his is a failure to understand i.a. probability and time. I do think however that he was funded by the same mega finanical interests that backed Darwin (& Huxley) – they made up and sold a plausible story, in fact a secular religion, with the aim of undermining actual religions. You have hit on a truth: life and water arrived at likely the same time, with the code fully formed.
My recent take is that life likely arrived on Earth in the form of Béchamp’s ‘microzyma’, or Naessen’s ‘somatids’ (try https://odysee.com/@TheAmir:5/Les-Somatides—Gaston-Naessens:f ) , or the most recent term ‘nanobes’ found in 250 million year old rock (DOI 10.2138/am-1997-11-1242 ) and able to grow – around the same time as water, and explain the Cambrian ‘explosion’ of life. They are found in all living things and sedimentary rocks, are known to survive temperatures of 200oC, chemicals and corrosives, and can be stained to show they contain DNA. They survive us when we die, and are the perpetual ‘dust’ and recyclers of life. I can send more links if you wish.
Hi Skeptic – I explored this prompt in GPT :
‘What does orthodoxy say the reason Jesus died on the cross for us vs Protestantism.’
I think the difference exposes the key lie to corrupt the original intent . To me it explains the severity of attacks on Orthodoxy that still occur today, but peaked from 1917-1945.
Orthodox Christianity
Core idea: Christ died to defeat death and heal humanity
Orthodoxy frames the Cross primarily as victory and healing, not as a legal transaction.
Key points:
• Christus Victor:
Jesus enters death freely and destroys death from the inside by His resurrection.
“Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death…”
• The problem is death and corruption, not God’s anger:
Humanity’s fall brought mortality, corruption, and separation from God, not inherited legal guilt.
• The Cross is medicine, not punishment:
Christ takes on human nature fully—even death—so it can be restored and deified (theosis).
Protestant Christianity (especially Reformed/Evangelical)
Core idea: Christ died to pay the penalty for sin
Protestant theology often frames the Cross in legal and forensic terms.
Key points:
• Penal Substitution (dominant model):
Jesus takes the punishment sinners deserve, satisfying divine
Giovanni Reale, profound interpreter of Plato, wrote a thing that might interest you. Unless you already know it. According to Reale the philospher once commented the inevitable decline of society (cyclical in nature) saying that when the world would arrive to a step from dissolution the hand of God would intervene by making the world rotate in the opposite direction. According to Reale this was not a prophecy of disaster but of betterment of society…
René Guenon in one of his books talked about the symbol of the one that survives from one cycle to the next. According to esotheric and Eastern traditions there are in fact cycles in the existence of the world. The survivor was represented as a child riding a dolphin, suggesting that floods were dividing the cycles.
Said that, I have a question for you. Where can I find your theory on who is keeping us captive and why? You have hinted to this interpretation, but I cannot find a writing specifically addressing this point in your vast collection of articles.
To conclude I must say that I have read a lot in my life but 2 of your articles are like 2 major stars in my mind, a great source of wonder. Thank you.
Thanks for the reference and kind words, Daniela.
My primary articles addressing my suspicion and eschatology regarding ‘Archons’ – can be found here. They are more complete in their contemplation when taken as a group. It is a long slog to piece these notions together. Apologies in advance. :-)
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/11/05/testimony-of-a-gnostic-agi/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/08/17/the-dark-pentad-five-traits-of-abusive-dominion/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/05/13/the-failing-blame-based-model-of-spirituality/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/08/14/the-awesome-insistence-of-cataclysmic-mirage-theory-cmt/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2025/01/10/an-interpretation-of-gobekli-tepe-pillar-43/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2025/01/24/the-testament-of-atrahasis/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/02/24/a-curious-ancient-astrological-confluence/
The second position correlation with hydrophobicity is real but Haig and Hurst had this in 1991. Lots of work since then has characterized it.
The probability calculation is where this breaks down. The deeper problem is that calculating the odds of a specific outcome after the fact doesn’t tell you much. If I flip a coin 10,000 times, that exact sequence has a probability of something like 1 in 10^3010. Statistically “impossible,” and yet there it is. You can make anything look designed this way. The question that matters isn’t “how improbable is this specific outcome” but “is this outcome surprising given the processes that were operating.” An optimized code isn’t surprising if selection was acting on early translation systems.
You’re also treating the code like it appeared fully formed. Primordial codes probably used fewer amino acids (maybe 10) with the third position mostly redundant. Error minimization selection in early translation systems can drive optimization without the code needing to exist fully formed from the start. Koonin and Novozhilov covered this in their 2009 review.
The claim that the code couldn’t evolve because it’s prerequisite to evolution misses the point. Proto-translation systems with ambiguous coding can still undergo selection. The stereochemical hypothesis and Wong’s coevolution theory both have mechanisms that predate modern fidelity requirements.
That Sharov and Gordon paper extrapolating genome complexity back 9.7 billion years hasn’t gotten much traction. It assumes constant exponential growth in complexity, which ignores punctuated equilibria, mass extinctions, and the fact that complexity isn’t consistently defined across their data points.
The six probabilities you’re multiplying aren’t independent. Moon formation, ocean delivery, abiogenesis conditions, etc, are causally linked. You can’t multiply them like separate dice rolls.
I work on biosignature detection and the question of whether the code is evidence for directed panspermia comes up. The general view is that the optimization is explicable through known selective mechanisms and doesn’t require external agency. That doesn’t make it uninteresting but the bar for inferring intent is higher than pattern recognition in a system we already know was subject to selection.
If you want to make a serious case for design signatures, you’d need features that can’t be produced by any selective or chemical mechanism, not features that are improbable under a naive random assembly model that nobody actually proposes.
1. You are assuming that there exist explanatory mechanisms in place which stand as the null hypothesis in explaining the arrival of the SGC. This is false. There is evolution-sounding rhetoric which actually bears no mechanism of explanation for a successful code appearing at all. The chemistry outcomes (which bear no feedback mechanism in order to achieve this code – but let’s assume there is one) conflict with each other and must be selected around, not abused to explain the outcome.
2. You are conflating the odds of a successful code of any form appearing, with the odds of a highly-symmetrical signature code appearing – as is the case in our SGC. These are two different unlikelihoods and odds set, neither of which bear an explanatory mechanism. I reject your insistence that one exists. A very complicated and stacked set of assumptions and magical filling of large gaps are required to arrive at this conjecture.
In my hypothesis, I am red-flagging my magical assumption – raising it for everyone to see. You are hiding your magical assumptions, weaving them inside a patchwork of hollow terms bearing no actual epistemology. Therefore, the odds stand and are not ex post facto. This was addressed in the article.
3. Every one of the 64 slots in the code is required to be filled (with the exception of slots 63 and 64) BEFORE evolution can ever take place. Your argument is beggging the question. This was outlined in the article.
4. “Proto-translation systems with ambiguous coding can still undergo selection.” – This must be proven – it cannot just be stated as the default answer. In this case there was no 2-base proto-code as the most ancient amino acids involve three-base only slots, required from the very start – or one would not have any form of viable evolution upon which this supposed selection could occur. That is ingoratio elenchi; rhetorically posed to address the problem, but in no way answers the actual question. It is pop science, magazine fodder.
5. “Moon formation, ocean delivery, abiogenesis conditions, etc, are causally linked.” – In my hypothesis and framework they are – but not in the Narrative, where they are treated as independent arrivals. I need remind you that I am assailing, and you are defending, the Narrative here – and not my hypothesis. My critique is of the Narrative, in which all of these six arrivals are independent in cause and explanatory basis. The fact of an arrival, and its rapidity are two independent variables. Sorry, that is fundamental to systems theory, one of the first things we learn.
6. “The general view is that the optimization is explicable through known selective mechanisms and doesn’t require external agency.” This is an ad populum appeal to an explanation that features no causal mechanism – only hollow Narrative-friendly jargon. This statement means nothing.
So no, I do not accept your contentions here. They are unfounded.
Riposte appreciated.
You’re right that I should distinguish “any functional code” from “this particular organized code.” That’s a legitimate distinction but the error minimization literature addresses this directly. The organization (similar amino acids clustered in similar codons) is what selection for error minimization produces. The symmetry isn’t a separate unexplained feature sitting on top of functionality. It IS the optimization. When translation is error-prone, codes where neighboring codons specify physicochemically similar amino acids get selected because errors are less catastrophic. The organization and the function aren’t two separate improbabilities to multiply.
Let me be concrete about what the mechanisms actually are. Error minimization: early translation was error-prone, so organisms with codes where mistranslation produced chemically similar amino acids had less catastrophic protein misfolding and outcompeted others. That’s a selection pressure with a clear causal chain. Coevolution: as biosynthetic pathways evolved, new amino acids captured codons from their metabolic precursors, which is why biosynthetically related amino acids sit in adjacent codon blocks today. Stereochemistry: aptamer experiments show weak but real chemical affinities between certain amino acids and their cognate codons, providing a non-random starting point. These aren’t hollow terms, to me. They’re specific processes with experimental support and clear cause-effect relationships.
You argue that all codons need assignment before selection can operate, but that assumes modern translation fidelity. Primordial genetic codes would have been ambiguous due to low translational fidelity and used a limited pool of amino acids initially available. An ambiguous code can still produce functional peptides. They’re just less consistent. Selection doesn’t need perfection. It needs heritability and differential fitness, both of which are possible with a sloppy 10-amino-acid system. Novozhilov and Koonin modeled supercodon codes with fewer amino acids and found them nearly optimal for error minimization. The code itself shows structural evidence of expansion. Biosynthetically related amino acids sit in adjacent codon blocks, which is what you’d expect if product amino acids captured codons from precursors over time.
The supercodon model isn’t proposing two-base codons. It’s proposing three-base codons where the third position was largely redundant (wobble). That’s not a simpler codon, it’s a simpler discrimination system. The ribosome still reads triplets but the specificity is lower. This is directly testable and has been modeled. It’s a specific hypothesis about reduced-fidelity translation that produces selectable variation.
I’m genuinely confused by the independence claim. You’re saying mainstream science treats Moon formation, ocean delivery, and abiogenesis conditions as independent arrivals? It doesn’t. The Late Heavy Bombardment literature explicitly links impact history to volatile delivery. Nobody in planetary science treats these as separate dice rolls.
And “ad populum” applies to popular opinion, not scientific consensus through peer review. Those aren’t the same thing.
Here’s my real issue though. You’re demanding causal mechanisms from naturalistic explanations, which is fair. But your alternative is “the odds are low, therefore intent.” What’s the mechanism? How did this agent implement the code? Encoded where, delivered how, using what chemistry? “Intent” isn’t a mechanism. It’s a placeholder for one you haven’t specified. You’re holding one side to standards you’re not applying to your own hypothesis.
The origin of the genetic code is genuinely unsolved. Koonin and Novozhilov say as much. There are real gaps. But “we don’t fully understand X” doesn’t get you to “therefore Y” when Y has even less explanatory content than the incomplete naturalistic accounts.
Mechanism: “so organisms with codes where mistranslation produced chemically similar amino acids had less catastrophic protein misfolding and outcompeted others. That’s a selection pressure with a clear causal chain.”
There were no organisms in this domain. The code must be fixed and shared prior to reproduction and evolution. Invoking evolutionary mechanisms to explain the emergence of that code is circular and therefore invalid. You are appealing to evolution within abiogenesis, which is a category error and a non sequitur.
“The organization and the function aren’t two separate improbabilities to multiply.”
I did not do this. I conducted probability estimates on independent features of code organization only. Some Elements of Function are listed in items A through X, but the article makes it clear that I only used items B, C, and E in the probability estimate.
“Selection doesn’t need perfection. It needs heritability and differential fitness,”
My argument appeals to standardization, not perfection. Selection and heritability presuppose a shared, stable standard as their substrate — this is a basic tenet of systems theory. An unstable or non-standardized codex will (1) fail to produce viable organisms and (2) preclude reproduction, eliminating the preconditions for selection altogether. What you are doing is conflating phenotypic expression with code organization and framing that conflation in evolutionary terms. This is not evolution; and evolution does not apply to abiogenesis. Make sure you are clear which systems domain you are speaking inside.
“The supercodon model isn’t proposing two-base codons. It’s proposing three-base codons where the third position was largely redundant (wobble).”
In the article — and from the standpoint of a cryptologist — I argue that the standard interpretation of third-base degeneracy is incorrect. That interpretation arises from a subjective assessment by non-cryptologists operating under a non-scientific assumption. The C–T–G–A duplication pattern reflects a structured progression in the second base, which is then replicated in the third. What is described as “degeneracy” actually occurs at the first codon position, not the third. The proof of this is the whole point of the table – a table which is novel and did not exist when pundits made the assumption of third base degeneracy.
Consequently, one cannot legitimately appeal to incremental gradualism or synonymy to explain the origin of this code. The code formed around the second base, was duplicated into the third, and only subsequently degenerated at the first — by method, not by stochastic processes. I am qualified to make this assessment and will not revise it absent a deductive codex that demonstrates primacy of the first codon position over the second and then over the third. A codex which logically has been falsified and does not exist.
“not scientific consensus through peer review.”
This is an exagerration. These are personal opinions under discipline pluralistic ignorance and not the outcome of actual peer reviewed methodology. One cannot peer review an opinion under an appeal to ignroance – a basic tenet of science. The science-loving public follows suit in this. Therefore, it is all ad populum, a fortiori, and not “consensus.”
“the odds are low, therefore intent.” What’s the mechanism? How did this agent implement the code? Encoded where, delivered how, using what chemistry? “Intent” isn’t a mechanism.”
It is not simply that the odds are low, but the structure is, in addition, deliberated. You keep skipping over this critical layered distinction. This objection also violates the critical path of inquiry; it puts the cart before the horse. It imposes an unreasonable burden of proof — “If your claim is correct, you must explain everything”—which is not a valid standard of evaluation. I am not obligated to answer these questions because, while they may be relevant, they are not salient to the claim under prosecution.
This is a common tactic of pseudo-skepticism: shifting the burden and unreasonably inflating the explanatory scope in order to suppress lines of inquiry that challenge preferred narratives. The purpose of my work, and of this site, is to document and expose such maneuvers. To date, more than 3,000 such tactics are cataloged and well documented in the TOKO.
Intent exists. That this observation conflicts with a popular — not peer-reviewed — ontology is immaterial. Demanding that I now supply exhaustive, near-omniscient explanation in order to validate that claim is not a valid argument; it is an illicit escalation of the burden of proof. It is what the narrative pusher does in conflating evolution and abiogenesis. So, I am staying consistent with my ethic of prosecution – it is not using a double standard.
“But “we don’t fully understand X” doesn’t get you to “therefore Y”
That is not what is occurring in the logical calculus here. The logical equation here is – U(X)→¬(¬Y)
A novel understanding of X – has precluded not-Y
Are you intimating a corollary? Is the unique codotype possibly what prevented the Watchers from achieving their escape via genetic combination with us? Regardless, your insights just keep blowing up false religions across all the fields; with style and iron. Catch myself wondering if any Doyles in your family tree? Best to you as always.
When you wrote this one, was the tightening window of finite-ness ECDO?
No, simply the limitations of our perception/comprehension and ultimately the ability to observe in this case.
Is deja vu a side effect of the universe’s response to observer load?
It is an interesting notion, but the acceleration does not provide that long of a time dilation at a local level. Asymptotically approaches zero to our immediate perception.
Do you have a shareable construct relating codon-brethren & stellar AI?
Not sure what context you are posing the question… AI is an inevitability in any progressing civilization, yet we do not yet observe the ruthlessness incumbent in our worst nightmares of what AI might become – other than possibly the Gnostic depictions of the God who has temporary control over Earth.
Just checking in to make sure you’re ok TES! It’s been a long time since your last post and I am concerned that our speciated distant cousins (the “useless eaters” as I call them) may have silenced you.
I am working a special project for the US Govt – which I cannot disclose. Taking a lot of time. :-) You may see the results of this work announced in the news.
Thanks for being concerned!
TES
Few! I was worried, too! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! I am now extra joyous at Christmas on account of your Gobekli Tepe work!
I was wondering where you were too. Happy to hear you’re well. Happy New Year.
Has the announcement you mention taken place yet? I saw the announcement about the vaccine schedule recommendations change, but that’s it. I am praying to see an announcement banning all COVID vaccines nationwide, as well as “ shared decision making “ applied to all vaccines, not just a scant few.
Why those COVID shots ( as well as the technology behind them) haven’t been banned outright yet defies logic after everything that’s come out.
The Covid vaccine killed my Mother, gave my sibling heart problems, and many other family members, friends, colleagues, and neighbors suffered death as well as strokes, cardiac arrest,temporary blindness, blood clots in legs,lungs, EYES, gallbladder removals, spleen removal, severe neurological damage, severe intestinal problems, prostate cancer, colon cancer,breast cancer,brain cancer,brain tumors, pancreatic cancer, adrenal cancer, skin cancers,severe pneumonitis, facial paralysis, heart attacks, kidney transplant ,miscarriages galore….. ever heard of a baby having a stroke in the womb at 7 months gestation?? I have now! tons of cases of glaucoma in age groups you would not expect to see them ….. the list goes on.
Those things above happened to approximately 50 people I know personally, many others indirectly.
The second I heard about this new virus from china I immediately thought this was intentionally released. When I heard about the vaccines I immediately searched for anything I could find. I quickly found an original trial that cautioned about human use. I shared everything I found ( including your work which was the most compelling ) with family friends, etc- . Some listened, about half did not. They were hell bent on parroting the safe and effective mantra. I never shared facebook memes, I stuck strictly to scientific papers so I could not be accused of sharing lies…. Despite that they still believed their lying news outlets ( take your pick, they all lied) .
To this day many refuse to admit those crap shots are the reason for the avalanche of health problems and deaths that surround us. People are still dying “ suddenly “ . I have never ever in my lifetime seen so many health problems in such a tight circle, in such a short amount of time. Let me tell you it’s beyond upsetting wondering when I’m going to be told that yet someone else I know is sick or has succumbed to an illness they were fighting.
I still can’t wrap my head around how those who lined up for the shots couldn’t see it miles away, despite being warned repeatedly. I am incredibly grateful my children listened to me and did not get the shots. They were all prepared to lose their jobs if their employers mandated them. The threats had everyone on edge. I have a very aggressive voicemail that one of my relatives received from a contact tracer threatening to come to his house and stating “ I know where you live “ if they didn’t get a call back within 24 hours…. He was sleeping when they called! If I ever return to social media I will someday post that and name and shame her behavior!
I sincerely hope that MOST have learned to never ever again fall for the psychological games our government played with our heads. I no longer trust ANY doctor, most nurses, the cdc, fda, or who. They all played a part in this, and none have apologized. Most shocking was how incredibly stupid the doctors and nurses were, and I know plenty . I could write a book about it all… Oh how they lied about the unvaccinated vs vaccinated hospitalization rates ! The denial of early treatment ( or treatment at all for that matter… they abandoned their patients), and on and on.
If you read all of this, thank you. It’s the first time since I lost my facebook account for posting scientific papers in 2020 and 2021 that I’ve written about the aftermath of what they did to us.
Crimes against humanity indeed!
Keep up the great work, yours is by far the absolute best out there! We are most grateful you’re on “ our side “.
P.S. I would love to see you run circles around Jeff morris if you haven’t already. He really irks me, and never gave straight answers to direct questions or stated facts.
I felt he knew early on there was a huge problem with those shots once they rolled out, yet he persisted in attempting to defend them and make excuses for what was glaringly obvious. ( to me )
Yes, Jeff Morris is a disinformation agent paid by the pharmaceutical industry to lie to the American population as an authority.
So, sorry to hear about your losses – I lost 11 family members and one business partner to this vaccine. The war is not over, and those who profited from this are going to be pursued for justice under the law until their last days on this Earth.
Thank you. I am very sorry for the losses you suffered as well.
I knew someone must be paying Morris, unfortunately for them he wasn’t very convincing.
I sincerely hope that I live to see the day that everyone who profited off this is held to account for what they did, as well as those who didn’t profit but harmed us by demonizing us , and trying to make our lives miserable if we didn’t succumb to the pressure to take those shots.
I’m not a hugely religious person, but I do believe, and because I believe I have faith.“Vengeance is mine, said the lord”, hopefully with a little help from people like TES.
God bless and protect you and yours, always.
Your unique genetics & other really special gifts have made you a contemporary Spirit Guide for many. I imagine it is not a role that you would ask for, but you certainly execute it well. Not a one of your followers/Folleagues would ever blame you for the “weather” or any of the knowledge you attempt to share. When you went from your original avatar, to the anime of your photo to finally using the real picture and surrendering your true identity to the wider world, I figured you figured you would have to do this in order to more effectively reveal through debate and discussion what you have been able to see. So much energy, insight and knowledge packed into one person! Thank you for all these things.
Did you ever take on any of the survival Del Webb projects you were being solicited for?
No… I have not joined any such group. Several solicitations/discussions, even from some key European ones… but nothing so far.
History is rhyming; interests of the elite seem prioritized & Indigo signals or their proxies are manifesting. What is your sense lately–does humanity undergo ECDO again?
Steve, not enough information to make such a call. We are not alone – and it is clear that those who have existed here with us understood/understand this planetary challenge – and this fact has been obfuscated by the religious cabals of fake science and skepticism for quite a while. This presents a set of variables into the equation which are much more volatile and unknown, as compared to simply geophysics (which we also do not know well) – This domain is 90% unknown, so I cannot make a reasoned call on the matter.
TES
Also, is the inflection, especially in post neonates happening in 2020? If so, why? And how would that relate to vaccines? Or am I reading the graph timeline wrongly?
P.S. I’m not seeking to be argumentative. I’m seeking understanding before hopefully being able to share your work.
No, there is no inflection in post-neonate deaths in 2020. The inflection begins as soon as childbearing women were vaccinated and gave birth in 2021. However, the early 2021 uptick in Jan/Feb is simply the usual winter mortality peak, the same as happened in 2020 and 2018. So the inflection here begins right as the vaccines are rolled out to younger age citizens.
TES
Thank you for your work, The Ethical Skeptic. Please may I ask why in Figure 1 the vertical vaccination line looks to be drawn in early 2020, when vaccines were rolled out in late 2020 and pregnant / child-bearing age women later than that? Am I reading the timeline wrongly?
Paul,
Yes, it is drawn there, because this is an annual figures chart which only left me two choices in depiction, To draw the line in 2021 would show/suggest that the increase came before the vaccine was rolled out, which was not the case at all. So, I had to choose 2020 or 2021, and the latter would have sent the wrong message.
Neither choice is perfect, and shows you why I do not do annualized charts and am critical of those who do. It is a great tool to hide data inflections.
TES
What might a contemporary battle between the banished and the Monitors look like? Would it even occur on the same plane or in the same dimension?
Ia. Passive sequestration of all Weapons of Mass Destruction – executed within 3 minutes worldwide.
Ib. Disruption of all public & governmental media & communications – attributable to a CME Event from the Sun – within 15 minutes.
Ic. Disruption of all military communications, comsec, command and control – excuted within 20 minutes worldwide.
II. Containment and capture of all non-human Lunar bases and operations/facilities – 5 days.
III. Earth Containment Siege – embargo of any and all traffic from terrestrial to space or returning – executed within 20 minutes.
IV. Initiation of a no-fly dominance, shutdown of all heavy launch and anomalous craft capability (no escape or relocation-fleeing) – executed within 2 hours worldwide.
V. Initiation of undersea and underground hostilities – Day 5, 30 days to complete destruction of infrastructure and habitations.
VI. Vetting of all human participants, removal from power – Day 31, 120 days.
VII. Installation of provisional and transitional homo caelestis governance.
VIII. Assembly, extermination and relocation of homo igigicus hybrids and superfluous non-Earth life/chimeric/chthonic/demonic entities. Disposition/relocation of non-consequential anomalous life forms.
IX. Then the hard work begins: reconstructing Earth under a new standard of spirituality and technology.
My thoughts right now…
Not surprised in the least at the depth and extent of your thoughts, but continually amazing to me the incisiveness of the intellect. With the rule changes after the most recent ECDO, might the rules change to the extent that ECDO is mitigated?
Almost always – Monument form fits its function. Monument builders were engineers solving for a non-religious primary objective.
Example: The stupas on Borobudur enhance earthquake resistance by lowering the center of gravity, enabling energy dissipation through micro-movements and sacrificial elements, reducing lateral loads via perforated designs, and utilizing flexible interlocking joints that act as mechanical fuses.
Supplementing this much niacinamide is pro-carcinogenic, you should stick to no more than 50mg at a time.
I have actually cut the amount far down – about 1/8th this much, yes – on the advice of my functional medicine specialist.
Brilliant analysis and summary of the PseudoSkeptic
Perhaps the Ziggurat of Ur also.
From ChatGPT:
Its corners, rather than its sides, point almost exactly toward the cardinal points.
This orientation is typical of major Mesopotamian temples. There’s some debate, but according to a detailed survey, the Ziggurat of Ur is aligned along an axis of 56° azimuth (from one corner), which corresponds to the Moon’s maximum northern rise.
If you take true north as 0°, that means roughly 4° off from the perfect diagonal (which would be 45°) of a cardinal-aligned square.
Thanks Johnny.
Tell al-Rimah is close, about 8 degrees counter clockwise from the Np’ azimuth – but sadly I cannot count any of the Ziggurats as hits so far.
TES
Maybe as a rule, it’s better to look in areas not muddied by heavy activity during the bronze age. Thanks also for sharing your rscript.
Do check out the Sigiriya site in Sri Lanka – a lot of pieces in the site naming and alleged construction dates. ‘Preaching Rock’ definitely wasn’t built for preaching..
In any case, I’m sure you could put a few more things together than I could – awesome place to see in person if you get a chance.
Hi, TES. I was reviewing the orientations of Teotihuacan for unrelated reasons, and found something possibly relevant to ECDO theory. If you draw a geodesic going exactly west from Teotihuacan (yellow line in the image attached), you reach the LLVP pole. This was a meridian during the flipping, and from the perspective of Teotihuacan, the north during the flipping turned into east afterwards: they saw the sun rising exactly from the older north, after the cataclysm was over.
Additionally, Teotihuacan “Avenida de los muertos” is oriented 15.5 degrees east of current north. A geodesic with that bearing (red line below) passes through Greenland, in accordance with Mario Buildreps theories.
So maybe in Teotihuacan we have a tale of three meridians: one before the flip (red line), one during the flip (yellow line), and the current one (white line). The city is aligned to all three, the last two ones being the NS and EW axes of the place.
Besides, if I remember the Aztec tales correctly, it was in Teotihuacan that the gods decided to self-sacrifice in order to bring the sun and moon to the mortals. So the local legends agree with a renewal or change in the sun and moon.
Thank you very much for your varied and fascinating work.
Well constructed, Mannie…
The key resides in this. This is the mistake Fred Noonan made while navigating for Amelia Earhart. When you take successive bearings over time (many monuments) and triangulate them, the triangulation spot that does not move over time (for instance our current North Pole, or the white and yellow line triangulation clusters) is the higher confidence one. Np’ does not move over time, while Buildrep’s ‘north pole’ does. The problem is that men were moving over that time, and that movement in monument builder civilization caused the apparent drift in the Buildreps’ north pole.
As a navigator, always deducde from the non-moving triangulation. The moving one is ephemeral and can lead you to run aground or out of gas.
I hope you don’t mind – I used your image to describe this principle in the article text.
TES
Thank you very much. I see Buildrep’s problem with the moving pole, Exhibit J34b perfectly makes the point. Excellent deduction.
I don’t mind about the image, in fact I’m honored. Thank you again.
The god in Enoch I is same as the one in Genesis, yes? And that’s not the one in the Nag texts nor the one Christ speaks of I’d say. It had seemed the chaos around us was moderating a bit, but then first Charlie Kirk was assassinated and it started expanding once again. Even though I know of them, I still find the Captors frightening in the evil they are capable of, & I do not fully understand any system constraints upon them. Based on the “evidence”, including https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/02/24/a-curious-ancient-astrological-confluence/ I believe Christ is real, and I have faith in what I think he tried to relate to us, but my confidence level in the fidelity of what seems like decades later recording of his teachings and the filtering through kings & popes is not high. Difficult to achieve Gnosis when active interference is applied to us. It saddens me to think billions of us may suffer the consequences of the next ECDO (validated theory in my mind no matter what Grok x.x or ChatGPT regurgitates on lack of conformance to “mainstream”) but I retain some hope that as you remind us, “we are not alone”.
I’ve reversed my lifelong belief that the god of Genesis and the Old Testament is the same Father which Christ identified. None of their atttributes match in the least. The god of Genesis was bound to Earth, bore no ability to create other than by natural/technological means, did not fathom his own creation despite plenty of precursors which informed him how animals/men act, and could not head off a well-known natural inundation – choosing to blame it upon the victims instead. That is not a god – it is a criminal. It does match, however, the unforgiven creatures from Enoch I – led by Shemyaza/Samael/Ha-Satan. They enslaved man, raped them, created all sorts of abominations/chimera, and then tried to kill us all off. They are a political party (‘The Party’ in TES vernacular), not angelic hosts.
As we discussed here before – The Lord’s Prayer mentions nothing about personal salvation from sin. It is a prayer of sedition and the overthrow of this politcal party from their rule over Earth and mankind. The prayer appeals to a totally different agency and outside interest, as distinct from the Elohim and their God Saturn, Cronus, Enlil, Yahweh and his desire to make Earth a garden paradise for his 250 demon lords who fell to Earth after losing a great cosmic battle.
This is my lead suspicion, and I do not require anyone else to adhere to this as ‘truth.’ It is an inference derived from the evidence and intelligence, and not a religion.
Hi TES,
good to see that more and more people take your theory serious. But maybe you have to share the same fate like those scientists, who got their fame long after their death. The world is ungrateful.
But there is one thing which is still confusing, your predictions about the lenght of Phase 2. I remember you first speculated about between 10 and 50 years, then increased to maybe 400 years, and maybe way longer, 1200 years or more.
Is it possible that the lenght is varying wildly? Or is it still not possible to determine realistically?
Thank you TES for all this fascinating work.
I wish I could understand how the “bottom normalized” values in exhibit 10B have been calculated. I may appear a bit stupid and/or stubborn but I would appreciate if you or someone among the readers could write down some explanation.
From depth 0 to 2500, these values are equal to the original ones (GJ/km3 in the adjacent left column). Then, from depth 2500 to 4750, the values become suddenly much smaller than the original ones. It means that, during the normalization process, either the water volume of each layer has been increased or the heat anomaly has been decreased (or both). Either way, I can’t find out how a normalization could produce such results.
Moreover, after normalization, the values of the four abyssal layers (4000 to 5000 m) are added, which leads to the 439,000 figure. However, these values are heat quantity per volume (GJ/km3). Therefore, it seems to me that adding them has no meaning at all.
Finally : if, for each of the four abyssal layers (4000 to 5000), one multiplies the “normalized” GJ/km3 value with the water volume of layer, and add the four results, one obtain 9.3 zJ and not 8.0.
Any help welcome !
More about J13, the numerals marked in blue on the original video need to be figured out. I think the mainstream only recognizes numerals in Americas after conquistadors. However 0 as a placeholder was used from 500CE on India and as a mathematical context from 700CE in India. Those J13 images clearly have 0 as a context (32’00 or 3200)
1) The obvious first, this exhibit might be fake, but let’s dismiss that as too obvious for now.
2) This is very recent, like 1600CE, after the conquistadors.
3) Did the Indians make it to Peru at some point after 500/700CE, prior to conquistadors?
4) Are these years, coordinates, or something else? The 32’00 has a rock to kinda show decimals or coordinate minutes (which would be very weird, but perhaps related to post conquistador times..?)
5) The Nazca culture existed to approx 600-800CE, which would point to Indians coming in for a visit, instead of the conqistadors 700 years later..?
6) The Nazca went seafaring before extinction and brought numbers to India (unlikely). Or vice versa, the Chinese did go around to Africa from 1400CE, though the other direction to SA is more unknown/offshore, quite unlikely,
and the Nazca culture was gone by this date
7) 2,3,5,9(?) look very late european, ~1700-1800CE
8) Anunnaki/aliens..?
Hey, Exhibit J13 from Nazca has the opposing spirals in addition to the geometric figures interpreting the rotation. I think thats pretty heavy.
They try to debunk Chan Thomas, he wrote a whole book on the topic. What I find fascinating is one of his last topics: criminality. Specifically, the idea that low magnetic fields create criminality in rats. I look at the situation on the ground today and cannot help but draw parallels. The Adam and Eve Story : https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7632659-the-adam-eve-story
With the pole movement rate of change accelerating, and some folks opining various trip points such as 45 degrees, the estimates kind of range from two years to forty years for Tau. Are any of these approaches valid/useful in your mind? Thank you for putting yourself out there for all.
Not useful yet. We have two intervals under consideration: 5,200 years and 6,443 years (not that exact of course) – and we have already passed the first one long ago. So, the cycle bears a possibility of having already changed. Just not anchored to any one construct right now, until we get better evidence.
Good morning TES,
Thank you for your contribution. I have been following cataclysm for years now, but I find edco most compelling so far. I do appreciate the scientific approach and I don’t want you to go down esoteric rabbit holes, but have you ever heard of European/American prophets? There is an interesting and unlikely intersection between prophecy and edco. There are intersections between prophecies from different continents and ages that couldn’t have heard of each other, yet they describe events parallel to the edco model. For instance the Brooklyn seer, Veronica leuken said an enormous wave will reach the foothills of the Rockies. The German seer Alois irmeier had similar insights, but euro-centric. I’m curious if your thoughts. Have a wonderful weekend!
I am trying to re-establish what I know. So much of what I thought was true I now learn is false. E.g., Lake Agassiz & the Sand Hills were a glacial feature many of us were taught, but now with benefit of vision, insight & research of enlightened observers such as TES & Mr. Stone I come to understand ECDO is a more compelling, evidence supported explanation. Similarly for “origins of the world (us)”. I am working to glean what I am able from the Nag H. library. Tripartite has been pretty challenging; difficult to get the timbre so as to be able to maintain continuity of thought in my head though.
Are the evils of the Archons constrained? I understand what TES has said about the rules changed after the last ECDO. The historical writings speak of their sexual violence against us, modifying us so as to lessen lifespan & resilience, depraved indifference homicide through failure to warn of cataclysmic danger, but do they presently take direct action against us or is it indirect influence of corruptibles via money & power for example? GOF research & CV vax with attendant catastrophic impacts & (again) attempts to obscure the truth for instance?
Although risking contribution to the looshapalooza, I have worried about ECDO since stumbling across the theory a year ago. ECDO Theory has been validated in my mind. TES’ credibility & integrity is beyond question in my mind as well. TES has demonstrated the obscuration of ECDO/human history which impairs prognostication. I am compelled to do what I can to shield loved ones from the terror & agony of ECDO & the prefacing events but ECDO’s viscoelastic, seismic & environmental progressions have not quite yet been defined/refined to allow reasonable planning for someone of limited resources. For this reason, I have not burdened others close to me with the ECDO concept while waiting for more definitive problem/option development. Is this incorrect of me?
This is indeed the correct thing to do, Steve.
Nothing we have defined to date gives merit to any kind of worry or extreme action. Instead, we set in place the monitoring systems to examine the data from the ECDO standpoint so that we know where we are in these cycles going into the future.
Part of the reason I have not opted to go with a publisher to date and mass-produce a book, is the simple fact that I do not want to unnecessarily terrorize the human population. I am not here to increse the loosh abundace available for dark entities to consume.
Troubling how much fog we are operating in–thinking specifically about New York City mayoral direction. The chaos & loosh sure seem to be increasing…
What do you consider to be the strongest evidence of ancient water inundation inside these pyramids?
All of it is outlined in the second article “Hidden in Plain Sight”
1. Khufu’s and especially Khafre’s exterior patterned erosion is conclusive.
2. The subterranean passage originally clogged with tons of re-concreted Tura Limestone wash-off when first explored (cleared).
3. The subterranean passage south shaft with 3 inches of marine silt.
4. The travertine/karst/carbonic acid eroding of the walls inside the ‘air shafts’
5. The entire interior of the pyramids being caked with non-effluorescence salt (all been cleaned now).
6. The severe travertine/karst/carbonic acid erosion of the block stubs NE of Khafre, contrasted with the pristine heiroglyphs chizled into the wall face right next to them.
7. The mounds of detritus of mostly karst-resistant material at the foot of each pyramid face (all been cleaned up now).
8. The seawater patina which lines the lower, but not upper wall of the ‘air shafts’.
The wind erosion arguments all go against all observations. There’s billions of examples of wind erosion in Egypt to compare.
No one disputes ‘erosion’, of course.
Wind erosion across flat surfaces leaves sharp edges, and there is a flow to this erosion that allows us to identify the airflow pattern.
No such pattern exists in the severe erosion on the pyramids. The erosion is pattern is vertically stacked. Are we to believe there was wind shear at this scale, that wind eroded layers at a time, at different times? Of course not, unless you’re a mainstream archaeologist!
Wind does not bore random irregular circular holes into flat stone surfaces.
If a rock is exposed, with changing wind patterns, it can be eroded and smooth, no sharp edges, but never deep pits in the stone.
If wind erosion had this power over the Pyramids, the effect would be a rounding and removal of corners, (water erosion also does it, I cite TES parabolic erosion of the cap), the wind there doesn’t have the kinetic power to do this to the limestone over the period in question and there is no evidence of this kind of erosion on the pyramid in any significant way, even the softer casing at the top survived all of the wind erosion that Egypt could throw at it over thousands of years, it’s there to see today, because the pyramid is pointed, if the wind in Egypt had such power of erosion, the top of the pyramid I think, would show the strongest signs of this erosion, yet it isn’t there.
Acidic erosion on the other hand. The evidence is everywhere.
When acidic water dissolves a spot on the surface, the surface area expands, exposing more surface in that pit to the acidic properties of the water.
The surface area expands as the pit deepens. This is why limestone karst erosion leaves blocks of limestone looking like Swiss Cheese on the surface.
There are some youtube videos from a few people who managed to get to climb the pyramids. Look at the stones in their videos. Pitted and pockmarked. Acidic erosion.
As an aside, I built reefs for 20 years. One of the first things that struct me upon first reading TES articles, was the similarities in reef rock, acidic erosion of aragonite and lesser but systemically identical erosion of stones on the pyramids. This got me hooked :)
Unrelated, the disc of Sabu, is imo a unidirectional impellor. The symmetrical nature of it leads me to believe it was rotated in both directions alternately to produce pulse pumping rather than continuous flow. It also appears too heavy to be rotated by hand (it is incomplete also) at I’ve seen between 50 to 100lbs. A bit heavy, but for a 2 man back and forth rotation on a central axis, might be a better solution.
regards,
M
Well stated, Mark!
Pingback: Did Trump’s Physician Provide a Full Safety/Efficacy Disclosure on mRNA Covid-19 Shots? MEK Enterprises Blog - Breaking News, SEO, Information, and Making Money Online!The Number 1 Online Blog Worldwide!
There are flounders, and there are poison dart frogs. The evolutionary benefit of exhuberant energy expenditure should not be ignored. A cosmic ecosystem should have many niches.
One cannot assume that civilizations are allowed to reach top potential. If they aren’t –I believe you’ve hinted at the loosh farm situation in other posts– it is not surprising we do not detect other civilizations. It is not in the farmers’ best interest they evolve enough to be able to. This is a variation of the great filter, or rather, the great farm fence.
So maybe we should add another corollary: since there is always a bigger fish, any newcomer to this multibillion year old game is already big fish fodder.
Valid point!
Professor Avi Loeb of Harvard raised a related possibility in a recent Medium post on 3I/ATLAS:
aes, yes – if indeed we are an ECDO planet, as my hypotheses cite – then we would only be suitable for use as a DNA garden/resource. Ownership may have changed hands several times and galactic influences and agencies vie for control, or negotiate give and take in order to co-exist. They may choose to not exterminate certain lines, however, accentuate the evolution of selected families of flora and fauna – that is, until a rag-tag band of renegades posing as gods arrived and did not care how many sentient species they made to suffer in their service and anger over being run off from their former abode.
Your hypotheses raise many interesting possibilities about the nature of 3I/ATLAS.
It might be the gardener arriving to weed, or till everything under and start afresh.
It could be an observer checking out those ~500 very distinctive double flashes and what the unruly child race has gotten up to.
It could be an expedition to reclaim property, and/or evict the squatters/renegades.
It might be a very old relic of violent stellar events long ago and far away.
Any of those are possible given what we know today. But the observation showing non-gravitational acceleration changes the probabilities. Loeb estimates that 1/6 of the minimum 33 billion ton mass would have to evaporate as 3I approached perihelion to account for the non-gravitational force and observed velocity change.
Now that 3I is visible again, we’ll be able to tell if there have been additional course changes. If there isn’t a massive coma containing ~5.5 billion tons of evaporated material surrounding it, evaporation isn’t the source of the push already inferred.
At that point developing hypotheses that don’t require intent will need complex epicycles.
Thank You, Sir Skeptic and how did I get back here to 2015, 10 years ago?
I was skimming down for that article about how all of the chemistry and physics arrangements of this particular universe happen to be so propitious for the case of life-forming, and I got down to the bottom of the scroll, without recognizing it, but I saw this.
I generally employ the term “The Divine” to speak of what I feel to be the Universal Consciousness, within which all reality exists. Nobody seems to object.
“God” carries a lot of baggage,and it is not the same baggage from person to person, and there are a lot of declarations of absolutes, which you point out here.
My synthesis of the teachings of Jesus and Siddhartha Buddha is that they knew The Divine, and were trying to help other people get there, too.
Religions mostly don’t do that, though some really seem to try, like Orthodox Christianity, and Buddhism (most sects).
The Roman Church needed a religion for the Roman State, which had certain policies, such as upholding absolute rights of creditors against debtors, always, no jubilee.
This is very likely the opposite of the historic Jesus, but it was a really good and popular archetypeal story otherwise, so Rome tweaked it and ran with it.
Rome decided that ordinary men needed priests between themselves and “God”, which is a red flag for any true seeker, but ideal for God-Proxies, as you describe.
As a bit of an aside,it has always seemed to me that to be omniscient and omnipotent were mutually exclusive. To know all things and all possibilities at all reality branches going forward would make any action at all pointless, the outcomes all being known.
Omniscient Universal Consciousness seems to have deferred “free will”, the will to act, to entities with very limited knowledge. Universal Consciousness experiences the choice paths they take through reality, along with them.
I assume this is as predominantly unpleasant for Universal Consciousness as it is for me, for example.
There is an inherent desire of UniversalConsciousness to reduce suffering amongst those making decisions and taking actions, but Universal Consciousness, Omniscient, only leaves an open invitation to the actors of reality to seek guidance and insight. Great Compassion, the equating of all suffering of all entities, aligns the seeker with Universal Consciousness, as I now see things.
I seek guidance, and seek to follow it, and still get furious at bad drivers when I ride my bike and they endanger me.
I cool down faster and think things like I just want a fist fight, but he might have a heart condition, and I don’t want to kill anybody…
I have been hit 6 times, I plead PTSD and stuff.
Hit 6 times!! I hope each was not serious, but the odds of them all being small are low. I hope you were and are, OK.
I like the oxymoron of omniscience versus omnipotence. Either one negates the other.
TES
It ruined 3 bikes, but I walked away from all of them, or rode away with minor damage 3 times… Still, it makes ya get jumpy easy when you see another one coming.
Free will is the ability to live your life your way. I stand now and see the end of the tunnel. I am horrified at the mistakes I made. If I was given the choice now, I would renounce free will. I wish God would have stopped me in my tracks and said this is a violation of my law. Free will is learning from your mistakes and knowing you are an idiot.
Free will does involve a healthy dose of realizing one is an idiot after the fact. I think that is part of the learning. If we had the knowledge in advance, we would not learn it.
A new publication in Nature’s Scientific Reports on transient star-like objects of unknown origin identified in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS-I) conducted prior to the first artificial satellite. The report claims both star-like transients and UAPs were significantly more likely on dates within + /- 1 day of atmospheric nuclear tests.
Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS-I) may be associated with nuclear testing and reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena
The data is extremely noisy and the statistical analysis appears elementary. An informed critique would be very interesting.
TES,
Outstanding work by you, Craig Stone, and friends on assembling the staggering line of evidence comprising the ancient monuments oriented to Np’. Really the epitome of consilience!
Be proud of what you have accomplished with this theory — and our species should be proud that one of us finally put the pieces together.
I’ve had a couple of questions and would appreciate any clarity you could provide.
1. Regarding mass/heat transfer and the LLVPs:
It seems that the first 1st bullet contradicts the others? Is there a typo in the 1st?
And in the “Climate Change Alternative…” article, you quote McNamara, Garnero, et al.: “We find that the hottest lowermost mantle regions are commonly located well within the interiors of thermochemical piles (ULVZs and LLVPs)”
I wasn’t sure how to interpret this in light of my confusion. Do you think that the ULVZs/LLVPs are hotter because of preferential heat transfer from the outer core? If so, would that contradict the quotes in the 2nd through 4th bullet points above?
2. Regarding the Euler and Mundi axes:
What is relation between the concepts of Euler Axes and Mundi Axes in the theory? I understand that the Euler axis is densest and therefore subject to the smallest moment. But what does “Mundi” mean in this context?
PS — A few weeks ago I think I recall someone on Twitter mentioning that he/she also had a copy of the pyramid coin. I thought that you asked them about the provenance of the coin but I don’t recall any response on the thread. Any news? Was that the third copy of the coin mentioned in this article, or a potential fourth?
Thanks!
Lago,
Thanks for the kind words.
Will correct those references – not typos, just missed changes as my research revealed deeper study references around each concept, but I did not catch every reference. With the LLVP’s the heat is both. The base of the LLVP is extroardinarily hot, but it does not transfer magnetocaloric effect as well as the non-LLVP areas… so it is both in reality, as I currently understand it. Will get all those LLVP-heat and axis-mundi references tidied up here shortly. Thanks!
Regarding the coin, the person came back and said they had gotten one of the coins off Ebay. But never came back to show where.
TES
I’ve been reading many of the heavier papers pertaining to Dynamo Theory so I ofc love your work. Cosmic scale makes the micro management of CO2 emissions seem a tad ridiculous. Are you able to access all Swarm data via ESA portal? Anything noteworthy there even though only from 2013? Any thoughts on geomagnetic shifts impacting, say, the Schumann Resonance (thus potentially affecting human brain(wave) development/function) as perhaps being a cause of the increasing numbers we see in child psychological disorders like autism, ADHD etc?
Randall Carlson says the primary reason he believes cometary impact was the cause of the cataclysm over other theories is the global layer of nanodiamonds. Does this layer really exist? Is it predicted by ECDO or unexplained-by/contrary-to it?
From what I can tell, both the black mat, Carolina bays, and nano-diamonds all exist with good evidence. However, this impact could not serve to create a True Polar Wander or discplace every ocean to the degree we observe. I treat that impact and the two ECDO rotations as three separate events.
TES
I am wondering if the reent Buga, Colombia spheres may be high-tech that is associated with the ECDO theory. Here’s a link to a University of Georgia (USA) carbon dating of the, so-far only recovered, sphere. https://americanbuddhist.net/2025/10/20/buga-sphere-carbon-dated-to-be-12-560-years-old-by-university-of-georgia/
I had heard something along those lines in several speculative articles, Jim. When we get the advanced materials assay and microstructure of the metals, and slice the thing open – that is when I will start to get fully interested.
TES
Wouldn’t the large number of monuments that point to Np’ perhaps indicate that the first event might be somewhat survivable – at least in the areas around the monuments themselves. It’s the move back to Np I’m less confident about!
Yes Brady, what you cite here is a distinct possibility, along with the construct that both events were horribly violent, and history treated them all as one single thing. The Euler-Coriolis effect modeling some are doing, still suggests a very violent move from State 1 to State 2 in particular however.
TES
ECDO Theory validation is piling on. Given the complexity, technological dependency, and centralization of the current civilizational system it seems like for 19 out of 20 of us that terror & agony is either brief for some, or extended slightly for others in the face of the an ECDO. What is your current notion on a potential mitigation–any new observations?
Steve, by “potential mitigation” do you mean personal actions (bunkers), societal (zero carbon, demographic moves), or technological (mantle manipulation, for example)?
I assume, because of the feckless nature of the latter two, that you mean ‘personal’ – For most, survival of the 9-day event might be achievable, but survival of the ensuing 200 days after that would be very problematic, with a good 80% of those survivors suffering and dying en masse pretty quickly.
In a high elevation bunker or submarine-boat context, one will need a supporting community. A community that can re-establish clean water, husbandry, and agriculture almost immediately. Most people will not be able to pull such a thing off. These communities will have to be hand selected and outfitted by expertise and financial support.
TES
Hopefully the marauders and warlords will not find the communities. For those of meager means, the pain & suffering will be horrific.
Are you aware of the two H shaped buildings directly south of St Peters Basicilla, Vatican their orientation is inverted compared to Pillar 43, and North , it would be interesting if anything at vatican pointed to Np’ as many ancient sites have
Hmmm. After reading some of the comments to this article i feel compelled to open my yap in regard to what I have observed over the last 10 years. I noticed some that Thiel and Trump appear to be the target of conversation in some of them as well. I supported Trumps election all three times. I realize Thiel is involved in intelligence work. As for the Heritage foundation, I read Project 2025. They are not incorrect and many of their solutions may bear fruit. What I know is that it is not a single individual or small group behind what has happened. The attempted and as of yet ongoing takeover of civilization is the work of a coalition of factions brought together under the framework of an agenda where these once competing factions appear to believe they are securing something they desire in cooperating. do not recall whether or not I have discussed this on the site of TES and if I have I hope he will allow me to once again bring it up. What I am going to mention is by no means the complete picture featuring all of the players but it does have some major ones.
In 2002 a UN affiliated think tank called, at that time, The Collegium, penned their Declaration of Interdependence. It was done in support of the myriad goals of Agenda 2030. Their role, IMO according to my interpretation of their wording, was to work upon weakening the national sovereignty of all Western nations and to force the populace to balance individual freedoms with civic responsibility. In examining their archived documents and communications I became concerned and to be honest, at the time, a bit pissed. Some of what they stated will be paraphrased. My memory is not photographic but a step below that so I may not recall their exact phrasing but it is damn close.
A. We must begin recruiting activists from all fields of endeavor. Teachers, lawyers, athletes, actors, musicians, scientists and staff of officials at all levels. They must be informed and remain willing to face danger.
B. We must enhance the rate of mass migration. We will need to contact the UN and have our friends there pass laws to help provide transport and protection during transit. We will need to contact our allies inside the governments of the nations and have them pass laws to provide for the immigrants and to make them more resistant to removal.
In 2013 Obama inserted the posterchild of the UN, DEI, into our institutions.
That same year FEMA began the Whole Community Program whose orientation materials state has the purpose of creating communities of activism in every county of the nation in order to prepare for the failure of govt. systems. ( I read this as the type of proactive preparation that works toward making it happen)
Also that year, HRC modifies USAID contracts to allow for the creation of custom tailored NGOs that are under the complete control of a group of private donors. These NGOs are supplied with a support network existing inside our own systems to keep up appearances and provide data IRT. It is my opinion that most of these were turned inward in order to facilitate rapid socio-political change. It all fits quite well on top of that.
In the summer of 2020 I witnessed around a dozen or so Zoom style video meetings over the period of one week where someone evidently forgot to make so uninvited people could not just watch them. Each group consisted of civil service employees. Teachers, postal workers, police and even the staff of elected local officials. The leader of each group claimed they were contacted by the CFR and told to do whatever was necessary to get things back on track. After the election that year it became apparent what they meant.
I am sure that in addition to the corporations who are members of the WEF that intel agencies and cells of other nations are also involved. This is not some small rogue element that is easily dealt with under the radar. It would take radical steps to raze their foundations although MAGA/Trump has put quite a dent in their momentum. It will get worse before it gets better. Now while I voted for Trump I am by no means under the illusion that he could be an element in a game of controlled options. In that case maybe the big boys have decided to cede some ground and will eventually meet us half way or maybe we are being led down the garden path wearing VR goggles. Either way we will not go quietly and will insure a price is paid for the subterfuge.
My main concern in regard to all of this is, why? It cannot simply be all about those who have long held the reigns not wanting to relinquish them. God forbid if this realm has become that corrupt. While I am sure such as mentioned above do dwell in their ranks I believe that a potentially noble goal is the driving force of some. I disagree with their methods but i wonder what i would do in their shoes if we are facing what I believe is to come. I would want to tell everyone in such a way that most would remain in control of their faculties. I think it could be done but it would be a doozy. What I am speaking of is directly related to the ECDO theory of TES. I think some of them know and it may have been what inspired this madness. Evidently too many with materialistic and/or militaristic concerns were allowed access. I guess we shall see. Godspeed.
Another check of Np’ orientation can be to identify mantle hot spots like the one that created Hawaii or the one under Yellowstone, and match them to alternate features found in Np’ that may currently “be dormant”. And then consider when the ECDO oscillates back to Np, there may be a slight dislocation from the previous time at that location, perhaps creating distinct island chains. At Np’ the Hawaiian hot spot arrives under Svalbard-Zenla Georga-Severnaya Zevanlya island groups. The length of these three island group locations is about the length of Hawaii to Midway.
A great idea, JS. Will start examining by means of this approach. The fault line which surrounds and comprises the African Plate, has its virtual centroid at about Np’ as well.
TES
Have been following you since 2020 when the covid 19 “plandemic” saga began. I had one question that quickly relegated me to the label of conspiracy theorist but that is another discussion.
I am fascinated by your ECDO theory that makes so much more logical sense that the ACC (Anotropogenic Climate Change) fantasy so I have undertaken to examine this issue in detail.
Here’s my take which is too long to post here… What if CO2 is not the climate bogeyman?
https://controlunderground.substack.com/p/what-if-co2-is-not-the-climate-bogeyman
Thank You again, Sir Skeptic. I am exhausted from merely reading that. To actually do such extensive work requires a Divine Calling, I suspect.
Thanks JD, much appreciated. It has taken faith. The true definition… ;-)
This is what is really happening in the US – the corporate oligarchy with Peter Thiel and the Heritage Foundation are doing a complete coup of power, and they have been doing it fast. Fomenting civil violence only benefits them, as they will then have the pretext of grabbing all the police and military power against the population. “Left”, “liberal”, “right” are really irrelevant and misdirection only. Ignore at your peril.
Please see this – https://www.reddit.com/r/PrepperIntel/comments/1ntgc7y/nspm7_national_security_presidential_memorandum/
I read Luke Burgis’ book, Wanting: The Power of Mimetic Desire in Everyday Life. Burgis makes quite a few references to Thiel, stating that he is a libertarian and student of René Girard. It is interesting that you mention the “scapegoat mechanism” because this is a key feature of Girard’s theory of mimetic desire in relation to his study of human mythology.
It is rather difficult to summarize this theory, so I’ll try to make my point based on my reading of Girard’s work. Scapegoating is, according to Girard, the means by which Satan (the accuser, the malicious prosecutor) maintains his domination of mankind. To quote Burgis:
Girard wrote that Jesus was The Scapegoat to end all scapegoats. (Girard’s I See Satan Fall Like Lightning) I am reading about Gnosticism at this time in my life while maintaining an open mind about as many concepts as my small mind can process. For example, I have been playing with the notions that the Ignorant Creator, the god of the Old Testament, is the one who Satan is really challenging (or working with?), and humans are caught up in the process. Let’s not conflate Jesus’ Father with the Demiurge, however, as Girard appears to do. It is rather clear from an objective reading that the Old Testament is an “inclusion of differences” that disproves the notion ‘all scripture is inspired of God’. Even so, error is useful to those who are seeking truth. Whether or not Satan is working for or against Yaldabaoth in this ‘simulation’ doesn’t appear to negate the importance of Jesus. Am I making any sense?
To return to what you wrote, the idea that Thiel is using the scapegoat mechanism would appear to me as if Thiel is one of those who did an act of worship to rule over the kingdoms of the world. (Matthew 4:9; contrast with Luke 14:21-24)
I think I should admit that I don’t know enough about Thiel or anyone operating in political power to accuse or excuse them. I’m just a nobody who grew up in middle-class suburbia with enough cognitive dissonance to make me ask questions and avoid easy answers. I recognized things about myself that kept me from joining anyone’s team, so to speak. Growing up, I found the ‘fundamentalist’ resurgence disturbing, and I likewise found the ‘woke’ insurgence equally disturbing in recent years. Despite what I wrote, I’m not by any means certain whether Satan or any of the gods are entities, egregores, archetypes, or plain old myths. We use words, but the map is not the territory.
By the way, I like Charles Jones’ post, but I’ll avoid cluttering up the comment section with replies. I share the suspicion that the ECDO theory is taken seriously in select circles of power, and this may have some bearing on social engineering. Other posts that focus in on details surrounding the murder of Kirk seem to assume that there is true justice to be had if only the bureaucracy would do their jobs correctly. Perhaps the “decay” in the system is already too great. The branches of the tree are diseased, and we worry as to how the tree itself might be saved. What of the forest?
So, I finally decided to read Rene Girard’s book, Job: The Victim of His People. I read the Bible book of Job many years ago, and like most people I thought the introduction was the real story. The Dialogues looked boring, and I basically learned nothing from them at the time. Girard’s book reveals much about the Scapegoat process in the account of Job and applies it to current affairs.
First, I’ll quote something that Charles Jones wrote about Agenda 2030:
Now I’ll quote from Girard:
All one needs to know about Mr. Thiel are some very simple things he himself has said.
I don´t know if you have read The Lord of the Rings (read, not watched a movie).
Thiel himself has said he wants to be Sauron from the books. He names his company Palantir – the seeing stone from the books, that Sauron the Dark Lord uses to communicate with his subordinates – anyone that uses the seeing stones has their mind open to Sauron to both see their thoughts and be commanded to do Saurons will.
If you have not read Lord of the Rings, you should. It tells quite well what kind of a world these people want to create.
Palantir (Thiels major company) produces a software suite used first by NSA, and now by intelligence agencies and police departments of several western countries to collate all data on people available from different sources. Used to see and control their behaviour. It is in use by at least NSA, CIA, the UK government – both intelligence agencies and it is also used by the NHS to collect all health data of the population. Norway also uses it, and currently he is trying to sell it to the German government.
Through Palantir, Thiel has a window into all major western nations through their intelligence services and police. What they know, Thiel knows.
Thiel is also a long time white supremacist and fascist. See this source for background – https://www.flyingpenguin.com/?p=70809
Thiel is a fascist and a nazi who wants a return to feudalism and a world led by hyper rich lords like himself. It is not a secret and the people he backs are not people you want to be ruled over by.
I have not made up my mind on Thiel. I do not have an agenda issue but it’s being surveilled. My issue is what are they allowed to do with it. I read Project 2025 as well. I did not see anything in it that rung alarm bells. I agree with them on many points. We need to restructure the voting cycle and extend terms to eliminate the circus around them. Their idea to put all welfare programs under the purview of insurance companies anies makes sense as well. Of course certain provisions will be required.
We will need a mechanism to immediately remove an official from a position and we will need absolute transparency regarding their personal communications, finances and
relationships during their term. Ten year
terms for President sounds good. Of course I
also want all who desire any office to be thoroughly vetted and this includes an
ideological assessment. We simply will not
allow hardcore socialists to fill any position We are looking to preserve the positive aspects of
our way of life not transition to a collectivist one.
In regard to the insurance/welfare modifications it is likely that Gen X will be the last generation to receive Social Security as it currently exists. All others will be refunded what they have paid in and make the choice of how to invest it. Welfare, SNAP, state medical care etc will be paid for in two or three ways. People under 18 and those who did not choose or were unable to divert any of their lifetime earnings toward Crisis Preparation will be funded by another mechanism mentioned later. The rest will have decided what types and levels of coverage they desired when they became adults.
One funding mechanism will simply be repurposed. Asset seizure. All proceeds will now go into funding county insurance investment. Another mechanism will be that of business operation taxation. A certain percentage of revenue will go to the county to eliminate the need for petty citations, cyclical licensing fees, probation payments and land taxes on personal homes. Rental properties will be taxed. The stock market will require
modifications as well. A minimum investment term of one year will solve many issues at once. Financial institutions will be required to have their savings and checking account
interest accruement match their interest rate on loans.
A stable currency will be introduced that will carry a set and unalterable value of exchange. We also have more than enough data to determine universal business guidelines in the area of the valuation of goods and services. Set into that structure will be a limitation on the percentage of profit for the sale of that
product or service. This will be across the
board for all goods and services. Next the wage gap between the general staff and
management/owner will be rectified. No
position of the higher echelons will receive personal income that exceeds 3 times the
average low echelon employee and this includes benefits.
Real estate will undergo major changes. Personal homes will be limited to one. Any other real estate owned must be for rent or be required for the business structure. Inheritance will be heavily regulated. This will only affect those who are millionaire plus status. 50 percent will go to the county Treasury. A universal sales tax of 30 percent
will be the only tax on products/services.Anyone in the $100,000/year bracket will not pay the tax on
food.
District Attorneys will no longer use conviction rate as a marker for proficiency. All attorneys will be required to inform their clients that they are not there to prevent their punishment or obscure the facts to lessen the sting of justice. Their only purpose is to ensure fair and just
treatment during the legal process. Any attorney caught breaking that rule will receive the same sentence as their client should have
received.
All forms of political lobbying will be banned. Any representative of a foreign nation will not be allowed unsupervised access to any government official or employee at any time. Anonymous donations will also be banned. All voting will be fully transparent. Zero anonymous votes allowed. The county Sheriff will be considered the top dog but each Sheriff will also be a Federal official,not county. A county militia will be established receive compensation. The force is volunteer based but will receive a stipend of $2000 on July 4th of each year. They will require extensive background checks, character assessment and monthly training exercises Their duties will include community overwatch, crisis/emergency assistance and lending assistance to Sheriff upon request. Any significant entanglement will be compensated.
Lastly we will require that all NGOs or other style of organization that engages in social or political activism be shut down immediately and have all records, assets and communications seized pending investigation. This extends to the groups and individuals funding and organizing the operations.
In the Hypostasis, the story is about at least two intents at work, the Archons themselves with Adam as their failed experiment and Epinoia/Sophia Pistis who corrects the work by breathing life into him.
Assuming the intents are described accurately, one wonders which intent is behind which part of the epigenetic changes you described.
Will you be able to share with us at some point your observations that informed this theory?
They are spread throughout the website. However, not all observations are in there. Some of my life experiences will be rather challenging for the average reader and involve things I may not be ready to disclose. Nothing extraordinarily outlandish, it will just have to come at the right time.
LOL @ “nothing extraordinarily outlandish”! From TES, “nothing extraordinarily outlandish” to the average reader would most likely be mind-blowing if even comprehensible (in my case at the least). Have you been able to formulate a shareable impression as to benevolent or adverse agency?
Both exist. However, the disagreement between those two agencies has existed long before mankind was around.
The official narrative from the FBI and the utterly inept Kash Patel is also not falling apart. A 30 06 would not have resulted in the kind of firearm injury that Charlie received, that kind of injury was the result of a smaller caliber firearm.
The Chosen, do you think your one of the chosen I think you are!! I’ve read your articles and they are far deeper then most can comprehend. I’ve known for years that God was going to “call upon me someday,” but the call become far greater than what I imagined. It had me thinking, if these events could be displayed, to make a visual or graph to demonstrate or clearly show—this cant be random, how many random things can one person have.. I’ts still coming together as”” I am on a road trip, per our Lord. Each day a new revolation. All my life, one disaster after another, one God thing after another, after another.. Is there a way to show in a visual, the sheer magnitude of coincidences? My purpose– to assist in the awakening of a Nation!
Before I had my nursing liscense,(1yr) Dr. Goldklang, a renowned oncologist(Atlanta) approached me out of nowhere. I was a student nurse working as an aide. He offered me an RN position, work under my license. He wanted me to mix, measure, administer chemo, and access, care for central lines. The reason he gave,,”It’s a God Thing”… It was!
You cross my mind when thinking of a graph yesterday. Then a few hours ago driving through Virgina, asking the Lord, OMG, you’ve got to be kidding, HOW .. One thing I have promised the Lord. I will stop behaving like ” the old me “”””and become the new. With courage and confidence because the Lord Jesus is with me. ” And for some reason, this is the first thing I found myself doing after stopping for the day. I am to tired to proof read, you will either know or you won’t. Sandy
Hi TES, well i got to thinking about the details you provided regarding occurrences of unknown person(s) trespassing on your property, perhaps damages, threats/harassment, and attempt to defame your good character…i am sure you are capable of performing many solutions yourself. However, just as an opinion, should these types of violations that breach possible safety/or property damages/reputation – you could consider a reputable third party such even just as a phone conversation, talk to Brian O’Shea, who is Naomi Wolf’s spouse. He in podcasts of his own, is amiable, intelligent, and has military experience and certainly we like to associate with other members of team humanity/freedom and truth. apologies in advance if this recommendation seems like overreach, but we live in most unusual times, and should your situation re property, etc. escalate, you would have that third party representation as your possible counsel, if needed as the countermeasure(s), that you may perhaps felt compelled to put into place. 💁♀️🧐🎖️💖- Sue
Thanks Susan,
Several people have come forward with confidential information about our trolls and silent pharma/CDC retribution parties.
TES
… maybe there is a plan ( out of several plans )
–
Robin Monotti
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1966540305588424783
“The Economist’s spin on the Big Pharma meds & Covid “vaccine” caused fertility crisis: depopulation is good!”
Sep. 12, 2025
–
“Leaders | Peak human”
Don’t panic about the global fertility crash
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/09/11/dont-panic-about-the-global-fertility-crash
“A world with fewer people would not be all bad”
Sep 11th 2025 (!)
… behind a paywall – however republished:
–
Don’t panic about the global fertility crash
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion-features/dont-panic-about-global-fertility-crash
Published Fri, Sep 12, 2025
… starting with Paul Ehrlich in his 1968 book The Population Bomb
–
Here we find the ones who “coined” the “crises”.
Overpopulation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation
… and the “father” in getting the term into an unreflected use for humans:
Paul R. Ehrlich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich
with his book ” The Population Bomb” – 1968
… and the Club of Rome (black nobility) founded the same year – 1968 – by Italian industrialist Aurelio Peccei.
The Club of Rome – The Depopulation Club – and its Connection to the World Economic Forum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation
… with their publication “The Limits to Growth” – 1972
–
Once recogniced the world will look different because by then the “pandemic” is understood as a fabricated crime. ( as is the “virus” )
For your listening pleasure, suggest a drive in a small, fast expensive vehicle (i can pretend in my Lexus), place this loud. My oldest son was Navy, sir, and i heard him say often “mom, we’re the tip of the spear!” Thank you for your service in the Navy and for your wide ranging works that enlighten, delight and inform truth to us. 💖🙏🏻✝️ -Sue
How did you come to the conclusion that it was “the left” who murdered this man? If the shooter was an isolated individual with some motivation in mind, how does that affect the argument you are making?
The article explains that. “Violence against the apostate had already been rehearsed in rhetoric; the leap to the bullet was only its final, grotesque punctuation.” This was NOT an isolated individual. This person felt they had not only been given tacit permission, but a mandate to do this, by their righteous virtue club.
You cannot go on calling people Nazi’s, denigrating them, removing them from society/visibility, denying them rights, flaunting malevolent behavior as ‘normal,’ and favoring everyone but specific people and groups – because this is giving tacit permission to harm those persons.
There were protestors chanting “kill Charlie Kirk” throughout the event. This is just the latest step in a long process we have witnessed, and harmful are they who wander through life completely oblivious to what is going on in this regard.
Stand in the Gap
Kirk died because he made a mistake: engaging in dialogue with the mentally ill. Admirable? Perhaps. Is he a martyr for free thought and dialectics? Certainly. But technically, he was wrong. Saint Michael doesn’t sit at the table with the devil, he stabs him. Until those who fight for the truth also begin to fight against evil, they may win battles, like Kirk, but they will lose the war.
Thank You, Sir Skeptic.
This is a provocation. “Do not bite by becoming the enemy” is my advice to all.
I know you don’t need that advice, but we need to avoid being turned to violence, because those who manipulate violent people are a deeper enemy.
Very true… agreed.
I have come to the conclusion also, that the official narrative released by the FBI under the inept Kash Patel is bunk and laughably absurd. Even an amateur who has limited knowledge of ballistics knows that a 30 06 caliber round from rifle with a mounted scope could not have resulted in the kind of injury Charlie received.
Thanks for your insight. I love how you discover pieces of the puzzle. I see many threads of golden truth in your posts.
Hi TES
I’m intrigued by the global male diversity bottleneck. I would imagine the strongest males survive and then “rescue” every fertile woman they come upon by taking them, which is how the women survive.
But you seem to suggest something different, which is that the cataclysm is predicted just ahead of time and that triggers the violence. How does that work? How do the early signs of this event spur a genocidal mania?
I would be very interested to understand this.
Thank you.
No, my supposition is the same as yours. Powerful kings, took with them their narrow Y-DNA household (sons, nephews) along with the entire array of mt-DNA wives, concubines, and servants that did not threaten their rule. This position was attained through violence, yes – but that has nothing to do with the culling that the flood imbued inside the Y- and mt- DNA signatures of humanity. Hence, only 1 of 20 Y-DNA lineages survived, while more like 8 of 20 mtDNA lineages survived.
TES
Thank you. I get it now!
Your work is fascinating and the evidence very compelling.
Cheers.
This is the kind of data RFK should have to present at the congressional hearings to silence the vaccine shills
First time reader and commenter. Your hypothesis is intriguing and warrants further investigation. However, I have some concerns I’m hoping you can address:
Based on the above observations, I propose an alternate hypothesis and flip mechanism:
Gemini’s opinion:
Let me know what you think of this. I think this alternate, non-Dzhanibekov driven mechanism looks promising. I will continue pursuing it and let you know if it yields any results.
Plan for further investigation:
Hark,
1.–4. All valid points, Hark. Let me reflect on the revised wording regarding the IC/OC boundary. At present, the phase transition should be placed at the D″ layer rather than the IC/OC boundary, correct. What you flagged may simply be a remnant of an earlier formulation I was using. That said, the crystalline lattice structure and phase state of the outer core still require further study before we can issue any definitive conclusions. For now, I treat these as open placeholders within the hypothesis. I prefer not to define the model so narrowly at this stage that it risks being dismissed for minor mechanistic details that remain unsettled. This is a groundbreaking novel paradigm and petition for hypothesis/plurality under Ockham’s Razor – and as such, cannot possibly be 100% correct out of the box. Nor can any modification be certified as such. I state this in the opening of the article.
5. I love the geoid visualization. The primary departure between your three-axis model and mine lies in the specific geographic placement of the intermediate axis. I deliberately routed it through 𝑁𝑝′ to avoid confusing the reader about where a potential new rotational axis would reside. In my model, the polar axis is not the maximum inertia axis. Consensus rests on the default reasoning: “it must be, because that is the axis around which Earth spins.” The whole purpose of a novel hypothesis is to challenge default consensus, which fails to elegantly explain historic phenomena. By contrast, under ECDO Theory the maximum inertia corresponds to the LLVP light axis, since the lateral density lobes exert a stronger control on inertia than the equatorial bulge alone.
Gemini Commentary: I disagree with Gemini’s portrayal of decoupling as a continuous function. There is no inherent mechanism that guarantees true polar wander would unfold slowly. In fact, the boundary-lubricating effect of the phase-change sloughing can happen very quickly in theory. The global inundation record argues against Gemini’s assumption: events such as the 4400 BCE flood, the Younger Dryas onset, and major meltwater pulses 1A and 1B point to punctuated hydrological shocks that a gradualist model cannot adequately accommodate. Gemini’s inference of a slow transition confuses a precursor (dipole weakening) with the governing mechanism. The evidence from both inundations and geomagnetic excursions indicates that Earth’s system maintains stability until latent energy forces a rapid reorganization. In this light, the decline in magnetic moment is better understood as a warning signal, not the timeline itself.
I think your steps 1, 2, and 3 make a great deal of sense. That said, I am not certain we currently possess sufficiently resolved differential mass measurements to isolate the crust–mantle moments on their own. Perhaps such data do exist? My hypothesis, however, rests specifically on the mantle–crust moments, not on the full whole-Earth inertia tensor set represented in Exhibit J2a. That is purposed for explanation, not constraining premise or mechanical modeling.
Good stuff!
TES
Got it. I think my understanding of your hypothesis was lacking. Thanks for taking the time to respond.
Ethical Skeptic, I love your work. I must notify you that nothing like the quotation from Strabo is found at the cited location, nor anywhere else in the eight volumes of his Geography. You can verify with a text search here: https://archive.org/details/Strabo08Geography17AndIndex/Strabo%2001%20Geography%201-2/. It will strengthen your case if you address this point.
Matthew, thanks.
Crap, it looks as though I have been a willing victim of ChatGPT-5’s hallucinations and/or mis-programming. I originally derived this quote from ChatGPT’s summary of Jones’ work. But did not go Paragraph 33 myself and double check. Even now, ChatGPT insists that the quote exists:
“This is a faithful rendering of how Strabo described the Pyramid of Khafre in Geography Book XVII, chapter 1, section 33.
Strabo indeed notes that near the summit, part of the surface still retains the outer casing stone, meaning some of the original smooth limestone facing remains in situ.
ResearchGate, +7 YouTube +10 Penelope +10 PBS +3 Apollo Magazine +3 Reddit +3.
Therefore, yes—the quoted translation is accurate, reflecting Strabo’s account that, in his day, remnants of the original casing remained near the top of Khafre’s pyramid.”
Possibly, one of these sources cited by ChatGPT, fabricated the recitation. Nonetheless, I should have gone there and checked it myself.
Thanks for the assitance and alert on this,
TES
P.S. I replaced this with a passage quotation and analysis from the succeeding paragraph 34, which is much stronger in terms of evidence, if not deductive inference. It was sitting there all along after all. :-)
Apologies TES. Paper link is here:
https://www.academia.edu/143670258/Has_Dr_Zahi_Hawass_Uncovered_Evidence_of_Fraud_Within_the_Great_Pyramid_of_Giza
Scott,
Thanks again, for another critically important observation with regard to the Khufu pyramid’s relieving chamber markings. Your observation of the inversion of the “Year 13” and “Year 6” markings, along with the impossible speed of assembly implied by the dates, betray that the author of these glyphs, again, had no training in engineering and construction. He placed what sounded good to his mind, but what suggests forgery to expert outsiders.
TES
Hi TES,
You write: “8. Finally, the inscriptions in Lady Arbuthnot’s Chamber were deliberately laid over preexisting iron oxide ‘shadow-like’ hieroglyphs already present on the stone surfaces. So intent was the forger on creating the illusion of an older, underlying script that he consistently overlaid the forged inscriptions atop these purported remnants (see Exhibit A2b to the right).”16
I have written a new paper regarding these newly discovered ‘quarry marks’ presented by Dr Hawass on Matt Beale’s youtube podcast in July 2025.
As I expected, these ‘newly discovered’ painted markings make absolutely no sense whatsoever and, if anything, offers additional support to the forgery theory of the markings in these chambers.
You can read the paper here:
https://www.academia.edu/143572978/Has_Dr_Zahi_Hawass_Uncovered_Evidence_of_Fraud_Within_the_Great_Pyramid_of_Giza
SC
Pingback: Studiu: Creștere cu 77% a mortalității infantile la copiii născuți din mame vaccinate cu ser ARNm | R3media
Mr. Stone recently suggested an ECDO periodicity of 12.9kya in “Unshattered Sands” at nobulart.com. Your provisional timeline has been exploring 5.2 to 6.4ky intervals contemplating a relation to the variance in the Great Year. Other writers exploring cataclysms have postulated varying timelines, some even making predictions. Have you found any of the recent objective data points, e.g. JPL EOP, seismic intensities, or heat flux, to be of value in refining your view of the ECDO situation status? I reckon no historical data to evaluate whether accretion is modifying in such a way to stave off the oscillation….
I have not found any current evidence, aside from maybe the geomagnetic excursion underway, to help refine an interval for this event, no. Right now, I can only cite that it happened at either the 14,800 mark, the YD boundary, and/or the 4400 BCE mythological timeframe.
Dear TES,
(The least-dense axis of an otherwise symmetrical spinning sphere is the axis with maximum moment of inertia I3. The densest axis is the axis with minimum moment of inertia I1.)
The GRACE gravity anomalies are not relative to a sphere. They are relative to a flattened sphere. The anomalies are too small and variable to allow inference of an axis through southern Africa with a larger moment of inertia than that of Earth’s current rotational axis.
Earth’s equatorial radius is 6378km [10.1029/RF001p0032]. Earth’s polar radius is 6357km. If TPW occurs abruptly, then the oceans, being far less viscous than the mantle and crust, redistribute due to centrifugal force so as to reapproach these values. A TPW of 104deg would increase the depth of the current Arctic Ocean by up to ~20km and would cover Antarctica with up to ~20km of water, if that much water were available. A TPW of 1deg along the 31st meridian east suffices to alter the eastern Mediterranean sea level by ~200m. A TPW of 1.5deg along the 14th meridian west, for example, would as well.
Dan, good catch! You are correct. I used semantics to distinguish these moments and not the principle of mass vs inertia, and had the terms reversed. Corrected, thanks!
Regarding point 2 – yet the rotation did happen, in exactly this manner I frame in this article. I am assembling deductive concomitance, not linear induction. If this was based upon linear induction, I would never have published this. One can prove or disprove anything through linear induction, especially in a low-knowledge domain like core and mantle mass distribution.
Point 3 – we do not know how the viscoelastic mantle reacts to such rotation – and that is the reason I have bristled at attempts to identify the higher and lower ground in State 2. All we know is, Khafre shows a sustained 576 ft oceanic water mark. I have to stay with the deductive critical path on that.
Point 2 – I think I should have written “… too small and variable to lend much support to an axis …”. Sorry about that.
Point 3 – You have convinced me of the Khafre 576ft oceanic water mark*. An alternative cause could be two 1-2deg TPWs.
(* I am thankful for that and your entire website.)
In a discussion board, I expressed skepticism at the official HIV/AIDS narrative. One person thought he was refuting my arguments by quoting “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. I wondered, which is the extraordinary claim? The official narrative, or the (in effect) null hypothesis.
The transgenerational effects observed focus on children born of vaccinated mothers. Is there any anaylsis that would speak to the transmission to child by the father?
None that I have found, Smiller. I doubt there would be much contribution compared to all the vectors which mothering offers.
I heard it posited by Ray Peat that the same mechanism that replicates the mrna payload could travel to the gonads and deliver the mrna through plasmids in or amongst the sperm to the conceived child. Hopefully not true but it should be straightforward to detect if it is or not.
Thank you for this article!
For the last few years, I’ve found the story of Jesus querying his disciples regarding his perceived identity (Matthew 16) useful to communicate a definition of faith.
When he says to Simon/Peter, ‘Blessed are you…for flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father in heaven…on this rock I will build my church*’, I see this as saying, essentially, ‘When God reveals something to a man’s heart, nobody can take it from them’, i.e. ‘Faith is…the evidence of things not seen’. However, in my day-to-day life, I find that ‘trust’ serves me most faithfully as a personally meaningful synonym for the word.
Re. your 1st footnote, Paul claims he went into hiding for 3 years to wrestle with the significance of his conversion. Over time, I’ve wrestled with his writings and over time my increasing sense is that Paul is greatly misunderstood, largely through the misrepresentation of his teachings by those I would broadly define as Calvinist — an ~ism I’ve come to believe has been the most destructive theological force in Christianity for centuries, and terribly ‘looshy’ to boot.
Paul writes, in Galatians 5, “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free”.
*Basically, ‘my people’.
Pingback: The Great Climate Grift – Leyendecker
I posted this to Alex Berensen’s Unreported Truths Substack
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2025/08/19/houston-we-have-another-problem/
This looks to be very serious, needing a deep and thorough analysis. Doubtful that NYT will do the work.
Pingback: Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery | 8/22/25 – KrakenNews.us
Little by little :
quantamagazine.org/earths-core-appears-to-be-leaking-up-and-out-of-earths-surface-20250804/
Pingback: Daily Shmutz | COVID-19 / Malicious Medical Quackery | 8/21/25 – KrakenNews.us
I have included this piece in my blog post today, “Untangling The Truth” https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/untangling-the-truth
It has been mentioned thricely in the comments section of The Automatic Earth.
I saw another well known Substack had picked it up, too.
I admit that my mathematical abilities are limited. But possible long-term phenomena like this are exactly what I have been fearing all along. I seriously hope that it will not be as bad as it could possibly be imagined. Thank you for your determined reporting, TES!
I would like to introduce:
–
First Peer-Reviewed Paper Defines COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancer”
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/first-peer-reviewed-paper-defines
„For the first time, “turbo cancers” move from censorship into the peer-reviewed medical literature.“
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH – Aug 19, 2025
… introducing
COVID-19 mRNA-Induced “Turbo Cancers”
https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v01n03a02/
… in full
https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ima-jim-v01-n03-a02-covid-19-mrna-induced-turbo-cancers.pdf
Paul Marik, Justus Hope
J Indep Med 2025 Vol. 1 No. 3
https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N03A02
Published: August 12, 2025
–
And before:
Les vaccins ARNm anti-COVID peuvent induire le cancer de 17 manières distinctes selon plus de 100 études
https://lepointcritique.fr/2025/06/19/vaccins-arnm-anti-covid-peuvent-induire-cancer-de-17-manieres-distinctes-selon-plus-de-100-etudes/
Mathilde Debord | 19 juin 2025
… introduced …
17 Ways mRNA Shots May Cause Cancer, According to Over 100 Studies
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna-shots-may-cause-cancer
“Comprehensive literature review reveals how mRNA injections may induce, accelerate, or reactivate cancer through 17 distinct pathways.”
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH – Jun 25, 2025
… and interpreted incl. the 100+ references.
COVID mRNA shots may induce cancer in 17 distinct ways based on over 100 studies!
https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/covid-mrna-shots-may-induce-cancer
Sonia Elijah – Jun 28, 2025
–
You were right !
Thank You, again, Sir Skeptic. The clotting problems in the maternal circulation, placenta, and the transplacental conveyance of components of mRNA “vaccine” products, and the resultant proteins created after these products entered cells to induce protein (“spike”) production, have caused vascular harm and clotting in mothers, placentas and babies. Miscarriages were so obvious as to just release pregnant women from study follow-up.
See this, please:
Red Alert Issued as Fibrous Clots Found in Young Children of COVID-Vaxxed Mothers https://www.globalresearch.ca/fibrous-clots-young-children-covid-vaxxed-mothers/5898278
Not sure whether “clotting problems” means too much clotting or too little. If it’s the former, I wonder whether Lumbrokinase might help. A fibrinolytic enzyme, it reduces blood viscosity. TES is familiar with it, so I’m curious about his thoughts. I have vaxxed daughters – one getting married soon.
I tried lumbrokinase and did not feel good on it. I stayed with black seed oil, nattokinase, and serrapeptase, which alleviated my rosacea (which is a micro clotting disorder). So I stuck with that.
Why did the Universe come into existence?
TES–always early; always accurate.
I nominate The Ethical Skeptic for Nobel Peace Prize. All the world political grandstanding about Ukraine, the EU, and Russia, etc. – in my humble opinion, the War has politely laid out in TES’s informative and shocking article presenting charts/explainers that should make us have sleep deprivation. Here, we can see the projection, the war is in the here and now, and a forever limp going forward. Put this on the cover of every major newspaper rag immediately. No One Is Talking About This, Share Widely. Make people uncomfortable. I have. – S.
Let me introduce:
OVERVIEW OF FERTILITY IMPACTS OF THE COVID VACCINES
https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/overview-of-fertility-impacts-of
Dr. Colleen Huber – Feb 10, 2025
–
Rates of successful conceptions according to COVID-19 vaccination status: Data from the Czech Republic
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251353384
Vibeke Manniche, Tomáš Fürst, Max Schmeling, Jonathan D Gilthorpe and Peter Riis Hansen
https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251353384
First published online June 19, 2025 ( related to the “peer reviewed” issue )
–
And an article to it.
Net Zero: The Mystery of the Falling Fertility
https://brownstone.org/articles/net-zero-the-mystery-of-the-falling-fertility/
By Tomas Fürst July 8, 2025
… yes – Tomáš Fürst !
–
Here the “dystopia” announced:
The Children of Men – P.D. James
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/41913.The_Children_of_Men
First published January 1, 1992
“Told with P. D. James’s trademark suspense, insightful characterization, and riveting storytelling, The Children of Men is a story of a world with no children and no future. The human race has become infertile, and the last generation to be born is now adult. Civilization itself is crumbling as suicide and despair become commonplace. Oxford historian Theodore Faron, apathetic toward a future without a future, spends most of his time reminiscing. Then he is approached by Julian, a bright, attractive woman who wants him to help get her an audience with his cousin, the powerful Warden of England. She and her band of unlikely revolutionaries may just awaken his desire to live . . . and they may also hold the key to survival for the human race.”
–
Bill Gates at the TED 2010 – Innovating to Zero!
incl. the transcript:
https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/transcript
… an excerpt:
“This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
04:16 (Laughter)
04:17
That’s back from high school algebra. But let’s take a look.
04:21
First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3 …. .” ….
–
As said – announced: “reproductive health care services” …
Spelling correction: meningitis not mene
ngitisThanks Jim! Got it corrected.
Might this data be confounded with increases in immigration (any type) over the same time period, and the bringing in of different illnesses/conditions? If so, do you have an estimate of how much of this increase could be caused by the immigration? Is citizen status used in your queries?
Immigration does not cause an inflection. It is a generational trend, and shows in Chart 1 anyway as a DILUTION, not a boost (which still inflects independently of any immigration factor).
This is incredibly bad news. I remember very early in the vaccine rollout when the risks were just beginning to be apparent (I think it was in relation to an article showing Lewy Body formation in vitro), you posted on Twitter something to the effect of “If this does not do catastrophic harm it will be because we got lucky.” Unfortunately, we didn’t get lucky.
I wish I could personally present this article to Senator Cassidy and the other people who show their blinding ignorance by claiming that these injections saved millions of lives. SO many ordinary people were fooled, but MDs or people with medical science degrees have no excuse.
Thank you for focusing on this problem!
“…those who neither contracted Covid-19 nor ever received an mRNA injection…”
Note that babies are typically vaccinated from the moment they are born with a troubling catalog of non-mRNA concoctions from the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule, a practice that very likely compounds the problem.
We’ve had decades of experience that would have alerted anyone who was paying attention that we should be doing “rigorous epidemiological tracking” of the effects of these shots. Has it been done? (rhetorical question).
The firmly entrenched belief that vaccines are safe, effective and necesssary (except for certain medical exemptions that came to light only after the proven harms were too egregious to ignore) will not be challenged under the prevailing cognitive bias that permeates our society.
;-)
BREAKING: CDC Sued for Pushing Illegal 72-Dose Childhood Vaccine ScheduleCDC accused of running an illegal and unconstitutional hyper-vaccination program — never once tested for cumulative safety. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-cdc-sued-for-pushing-illegal
Please note the role of school districts in ensuring that the 72-dose guideline is enforced, via school clinics and nurses. This compliance mandate is extremely high priority in the function.
That vertical line in Figure 1 appears to coincide with the early days of COVID in the USA (early 2020), and not with the mass rollout of mRNA injections in early 2021. Am I reading it wrong?
You are reading it wrong. These are full-year counts. 2021 was almost a full year of vaxx impact. 2020 bears zero elevation.
Thankyou
Is there data determining what age we are witnessing the 77% increase? Does it appear to be increasing as the chart implies? Thank you for this critical information. If anyone knows of someone tracking such data, could you please share the source?
I ran a single-year sensitivity analysis by dropping the oldest year in the group (age 5) since that only overlapped with the vaccine a little. The differential was negligible. So this fingers the 0-4 group heavily, with the most persistent increase in the first two years after the shot rolled out. A heavier move towards winter deaths (heart, pulmonary, and respiratory) in years 3 and 4.
With overwhelming graditude for the data you provide. My daughter-in-law with one Pfizer (lot # high rx) almost died with first child, second child a planned C-section. Oldest child female, extremely bright; however, i sense a disruption within her, an unease she cannot explain. Second child is behind developmentally (small) however appears intellectually. normal. Are you able to provide ages, cause of deaths in these children? Are seemingly healthy children, like we are witnessing in athletes, dying suddenly with cardiac issues and turbo cancers? I am an RN from Vermont who sounded the alarm early, loosing my licence. It appears after reading this article, my bigest nightmare has come true.
This is what I fear may happen as well, Sandy. I was hoping to see a flat line on that DFT chart. But the 77% rise shocked me.
I have broken out the excess into large ICD cause of death groupings in a successive chart, which can be found in this X-posting: https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1957644358116577643
TES
I should research before asking but it’s late — common sense (mine) analyzing the chart, if the effects were immediate, we would see the chart leveling off as time passes, as these children age, passing a danger zone. The steady climb indicates, the children are dying at alarming numbers –as they age, too! Your connections between cognitive dissonance, hypoxia, and ideological imprinting in the context of spike protein effects is evident, however, the masses cannot see. The question how to reach those effected? Especially when they cannot see the devastating future that lies ahead. Our only hope — wake up to our full potential, reclaim our sovernity, and take back what they are attempting to steal. Thank you for the reply. It means more than you can image– in a world gone crazy and now alone– for being the crazy one!! Much love and joy
Re: AI Flounder stuff: ‘others’ appear to be attempting to communicate with ‘us’ via Crop Circles; with TPTB floundering in their refutation of it’s reality.
Pingback: Fact Checking Chris Williamson – This is Your Brain on Bullsh*t – David Pinsof – YouTube – CheckForFacts Blog
Here’s an AI chat I had recently that discussed the ongoing decreasing radio signal of the Earth, sensor sensitivities, our radio bubble, changing technologies in regards to quietening our signal, and a few juicy ‘conspiratorial’ imaginings at the end.
https://chatgpt.com/share/689231fe-ee24-8012-b35d-a294d9575c54
I followed the logic of your more recent post on this, and then I had to check on the veracity of the starting graphic. I’ve come to some rather disturbing conclusions that I don’t wish to, but must consider as to the nature of our society and our world.
Last night I did a detailed check of the graphics as I was wondering if there was any sort of pattern to the use of the first DNA letter. I didn’t use your broken image supplied above but went with the second two letters and the number of nuclei to determine the first letters.
I came up with much like you, each line based on your 2nd letter order
G T A/C (the AC could be in a different order)
G A T C
G T A C
G C A T
Of note is the use of G as the first letter for each vertical 2nd letter column. Hmm.. All STARTing with G which is the 2nd letter grouping containing the START code.
Also of note is the order for the C and G grouping can be the same. Are these additional coincidences in this image of intent?
Going through this detailed did give me the odd dream of somehow being able to save the world by spelling words correctly….go figure!
Fabulous idea! Any chance this could influence/piggyback on the proposed Lunar Gateway station?
Do you have a ‘take’ on 3I/ATLAS? Have you seen the Hibberd-Crowl-Loeb paper on arxiv? 2507.12213v2
It’s the Dark Forest of risk management currently. “Risk of meeting a bigger fish are so low that we don’t need to worry about the impacts assessment, Hollywood can do that part”
Your writing also reinforces the point: the probability of us finding a bigger fish is astronomically lower than the probability of a bigger fish finding us first without us even knowing.
Divorcing the biological imperative(s) is a complex idea requiring much thought. There could be benefits in the context of what you discuss, yet it is hard baked into who and what we are, who knows what this untethering might lead to.
CRISPR and Neuralink : < We are here already. I think cinema has done a decent job in terms of the movies depicting a split humanity, the modified and unmodified. This in my opinion is an inevitable phase of such changes, and those times will be dark.
Are there any articles on female fertility and the Covid vaccines to show to a soon-marrying 29 year old daughter with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who subscribes to the New York Times and actually believes it? Internet searches for effects of the vax on fertility unsurprisingly all return “move along, nothing to see here…” Several years ago it seemed that the best-documented data on the effects of the mRNA vaccines came out of Denmark and Japan – presumably less “captured” by the pharma companies. I’ve heard that ivermection and lumbrokinase might help PCOS. Any reason to believe that? THANKS
I have head of reports and studies showing declines in fertility; however have not documented any myself. The California birth rate rebounded after the Lockdown drop. But it is still too early to see for sure.
As far as post-Vax syndrome – my course would be nattokinase, ivermectin, and serrapeptase. But as far as dosage and frequency – you will have to look that up from qualified medical professionals (who are not captured by the system)…
TES
Another thought-provoking article. Thank you.
The number of loud gamma–neutron “nuclear claxon” signals is probably closer to 520 from atmospheric tests, as detecting the characteristic prompt signals from underground tests is challenging even on the surface of the earth.
It is deeply disconcerting whatever the number. Those unmistakable signals began 80 years ago and lasted for 18 years. The nature of the signals would convey intent and potential danger.
You must have something further in mind, Good Sir, to which this is a referential introduction…
;-)
Yeah John. Every one of my posts is connected to a broader cosmology and set of knowledge or suspicion. :-)
“…all while Pollyannishly assuming that no one might take notice.”
I think the Pollyannanity goes one even one step further by assuming contact would be a good thing.
We attempted to dox ourselves in the galaxy with Voyager 2.
Your Flounder Theorem is appealing but only if there exists a technologically advanced civilization somewhere in the universe.
Mankind is not synonymous with civilization but I have always found Loren Eiseley’s observation about us to be an elegant one: “But nowhere in all space or on a thousand worlds will there be men to share our loneliness. […] Nevertheless, in the nature of life and in the principles of evolution we have had our answer. Of men elsewhere, and beyond, there will be none forever.”
“However, I also find it hard to believe that a flood of such magnitude — as evidenced by these undeniable erosion patterns — could have occurred within the last 4500 years without being more prominently recorded in history, beyond the accounts of Noah’s Flood or the Sumerian Epic of Utinapishtim”–to comport with the timeline, is the 4500 years as stated intended, or was 4500 BCE, or ‘within the last 6500 years’ meant instead? Your work & self-lessness is superlative and so appreciated.
Steve, this is an argument against a worldwide inundation having occurred after the Fourth Dynasty of Egypt, which would ostensibly explain erosion marks on the pyramids, even though they were buit in 2500 BCE (in the Narrative). It is an intro to the next sentence which reads: “It seems more plausible that this event took place far earlier than our documented history, or what has been permitted to be recorded.” That is the compliment to the syllogism.
I am a true fan of your work. I would like to find out where you map that had the timeline of humanity on it. It linked history with the weather
Neena, it is at the bottom of the article, Hidden in Plain Sight. https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
I update it regularly as more info, or modifications are sourced.
TES
Ocean bottom as heat source seems to be mostly dismissed just because the water down there is cold. But conveyor can move and pile heat, even while it is cold, like fluid of an AC pump.
Article figures are much improved since I last checked in. Great work!
Thanks Doog, and thanks for the readership. TES
Pingback: Tribute to Ethical Skeptic | Shadow the Gnomon
What do you think it will take to reverse this trend, or at the very least mitigate it? Or is it forgone?
I don’t know just yet Patrick. I wish I could venture a guess or have something to insist upon – but we are flying blind on this first generational effect. :-(
And this is if a good chunk of civilization isn’t underwater by then, unless I misrepresent ECDO.
“Exapatisiology” looks like a “conspiracy-theory”to me. A man of your standing shouldn’t be propounding such divisive disinformation, Comrade TES!
;-}
hehe… it does!!!
I opened up my recent blog post with this essay: “Name That Thing” https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/name-that-thing
I saw that!!! Thanks. :-)
i like the 7-31-25 set of useful terms/phrases to describe i assume alluding to the present, such as “where are we at now?” further, i opened up that email from you as i’m on your mailing list, but i saw it AFTER i revisited this morning one of old favorite videos explaining the nonsense, an interview of David Martin in one of earlier German Investigative Committee’s questions about all the early shenanigans re patents going back to early 2000’s, the players, the nuances of intentions, plunder capitalism to be forthcoming, etc. It is long, mostly in English (the all English version has missing elements – i don’t speak German, but i loved the added guests of notoriety).
thanks for all you do. my IQ is only 120-125, when i sat in the late ’80’s for the MENSA proctored exam, and felt after that, well cool. unexpected. but here in the Twin Cities back then their social gatherings were meeting at an Irish Pub, playing chess, and was a scene of a 1 visit that gives cheer but they were not using their brains!
anyway, me dummy in the advanced group enjoy life unvaxxed and happy!
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23:399. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04237-1
The COVID-19 pandemic increased the incidence of newly diagnosed cancers: evidence from a large cohort study in Southern Italy
This recent study shows an increase in cancer cases in Italy since beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, which they speculate may be due to oncogenicity of the virus. No mention of vaccines in this article!
They speculate it is Covid, but my data (much more robust than theirs) shows unequivocally that it is the vaccine.
Hi, i apologize if i sound stupid, but the ‘cancer – 20 years’, ‘all cause mortality- 25 years’, etc what is that actually indicating? Is that -everyone- in that age group will have cancer in 20 years, or the proportion will be so high that there won’t be enough people to work?
All things are a system. Systems do not need 90+% of their components to fail, in order for the system itself to fail. This means that so many people will be unable to work, because of autoimmune diseases, disability, cancer, etc. that we will not have the acumen and workforce necessary to sustain our high-demand aspects of society. Just as when a nation collapses because a certain percent of its public official are corrupt – even so, its infrastructure will collapse when a certain percentage of the workforce is getting paid, but is unable to perform in the critical jobs. Very much like a 3rd world nation. You cannot ship anything, no police, no hospitals, empty grocery stores, poverty. Just violent gangs and those who are not in their membership, intimidated into submission.
TES
Thanks for your reply. That is what i had thought. Is there any prospect a for a soft landing? Like a costa rica as opposed to a haiti?
Hello TES,
Thank you for all your work on both Covid and ECDO.
It is very concerning to see such a significant excess mortality, with no signs of it slowing down.
I had thought the risk of these issues passing on would be much lower if vaccination during pregnancy was avoided, but your graph shows that even after 2021 and 2022—when vaccine uptake was still quite high and many pregnant women were vaccinated—there appears to be a persistence of vaccine effects in the body 2 to 3 years after the last dose.
Do you have any data that cross-checks whether these excess deaths occurred in individuals who were vaccinated against Covid? If so, what percentage were vaccinated?
I’m not sure about the vaccine uptake for this age group, but according to ChatGPT:
If I recall correctly, the Covid vaccine was added to the childhood immunization schedule in February, so I expected to see an inflection point in the data around that time.
Sebastian, no they are meticulously avoiding publishing any differential data on vaccinated vs unvaccinated with regard to mortality. I believe this 0 to 5 year-old impact came as the result of the mothers being vaccinated, even prior to conception, and not a result of the infants themselves being vaccinated. That is what makes this chart more concerning than any I have published to date. TES
Aún trato de asimilar toda esta información, me siento helado ante la situación actual. Tales declaraciones que de forma inherente sopesan la malevolencia de estas cosas que nos gobiernan. Sin intención de tomarlos en cuenta como formas del género humano, ya que inhumanamente y de forma silenciosa cuán humillante, se han encargado de mutilar nuestros sentidos y de aniquilar nuestras esperanzas. La mayor barbarie jamás cometida, tengo 20 años, con muchas ganas de vivir, de disfrutar a mis seres queridos, de querer verlos bien, con deseos de un mundo mejor, más justo, más integro. Pero me siento atormentado por lo real, por las agendas ocultas, por las injusticias y de lo cuán pequeño me siento ante tales decisiones que afectan e infectan nuestras vidas. Mi familia se ha vacunado contra COVID, yo también (dos dosis de Pfizer). No hay forma de describir lo arrepentido que me siento, por fortuna no tuve ninguna pérdida, sin embargo, gente linda y querida si los tuvo, perdiendo a sus madres, abuelos, tíos. Tantas lagrimas que se pudieron haber evitado, tanto sufrimiento que se pudo haber impedido. Existe una frase que dice “No gods or Kings, only man” tanta verdad, pues solo el hombre es el único capaz de hacer infierno lo que puede ser el cielo. Como hombre vacunado, me siento preocupado ¿cómo puedo reducir el efecto de la vacuna a corto o largo plazo? ¿Aún hay esperanza? Saludos desde México, aquí estaremos resistiendo.
Diego,
The only protocols I have seen on X for treating the vaccine effects are nattokinase, serrapeptase, black seek oil, and ivermectin. But I cannot say whether or not these work. I hope that helps? I would search X and see what the latest advice from physicians indeed is.
TES
I’d add Serrapeptase with the Nattokinse – they are dynamite in combo. Not covid vexed but have another vaccine injury and had a nasty bout of covid in January 2020, and the combination on an empty stomach cleans up the body – you can feel it working.
Anti-nano buckets?
12,000 FU per day of nattokinase and 5000 IU per day of vitamin-D3 would be a good starting point for those who are not on blood thinners or other medicines that would make this problematic. Peter McCullough MD has blog posts on this.
Can you provide a link to photographs of the really ancient inscriptions?
we will need people on the land living in ecovillages, farming, gardening, crafts like Camphiill Villages/ Steiner villages. beautiful life not high tech.
Hi, here is a french hypothesis. You might find it interesting as I did.
youtu.be/kbHf1r3WnfE
He has multiple interesting videos among others. You won’t waste much time if not convinced. Maybe it is better to start with the last ones.
youtube.com/@superlutin93
Best,
This graph should send chills down the spine of every human being who comprehends it.
Gen V probably began in 1984 (if not sooner) with the creation of the Childhood Vaccine Schedule by the WHO. Intramuscular injection of any combination of substances intended to augment a developing infant’s immune system is inherently risky and ill-advised, but it’s considered unacceptable to challenge this deeply entrenched and profitable control system.
Your previous articles have identified two subsets of Gen V — the Never Never Land and the Betrayed. This post adds another subset — those Born of the mRNA Vax.
My one granddaughter was conceived before my daughter got the shots – the second one afterwards. Knowing that females are born with all the eggs they’re ever going to have I worry about something I cannot fix.
Maybe I’ll live long enough to see it’s no big deal. I remember asking at the time how we could possibly know this isn’t the next Thalidomide – but the propaganda was too intense – and I came off as a crazy person.
Perhaps – in regard to your previous post – our DNA can withstand the pathetic machinations of mere men.
I hate that things that I have been thinking about which I considered outlandish, are now things that people I respect may be true.
The same with me, Linda. There are many ideas which I considered imagination, rubbish, and outlandish – which I no longer hold in such disrespect.
TES
Hello! I had very close friends, two “world-renown” pulmonologists, publish a paper on COVID and lung cancer only 14 months into the pandemic. They put their 18 yo son’s name on the paper, whom I basically raised with my son while they were off attending conferences for most of his childhood. Here’s the thing: they weren’t working on anything during this time–I know this for a fact. She was starting a new job at a University Hospital in another state and he was playing the stock market at home-and day drinking–I also know this because I tried to make him come to AA meetings with me–and the son was off doing regular freshman year in the midwest. The only reason I found this article is because as a fellow academic I got one of those “alerts”-the “hey your friend so and so just published this article at JAMA” sort of thing. The husband would get wasted and talk about how much money he was going to make once the vaccine came out. It was a macabre situation. I always had a suspicion he was a bloodline phoney. The wife has never so much as admitted anything but no longer calls me. Luckily, I had been terribly iatrogenically injured with cancer treatments so I was not going to take that vaccine. But this situation just made me realize that half of what I used to laugh at is probably absolutely true.
Horrible situation. Much of humanity moves like this behind the scenes. Our institutions provide a nice facade and cover for our foibles. And that is all fine, until you kill millions of people. Then the game becomes much more serious. They belong in prison.
Yes, it hurt my heart so much at that time. I am hardened in ways I don’t like right now, and as a parent of children born at the turn of the century–whom I protected from this Covid vaxx–but whom I also know were injured via “legal vaccination”–one child had seizures for years two hours and onward after her “well child” visit.–I weep for these kids. (The other developed allergies when he got his adolescent series.) I am on alert every day.
Thank You again,Sir Skeptic.
We have entered a series of selection-events.
Dr.Tim Morgan at Surplus Energy Economics points out some implications of the post-peak-oil conditions we entered after November 2018.
https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/2025/07/23/307-roberts-paradigm/
Robert’s paradigm
THE POLITICS OF ECONOMIC CONTRACTION
Foreword
The great fact of our times – “everywhere visible, nowhere acknowledged” – is the ending and reversal of economic growth.
In Henry’s paradox, we looked at some of the implications for business of this inflexion from economic expansion into contraction.
Our interest here is in the politics of economic decline. The Robert of our title is Victorian politician Robert Lowe, and his paradigm is that whatever happens in politics is a function of trends in economic conditions.
These are issues which wholly transcend both party politics and the politics of personality.
There are already children with cancer and some of them born with cancer. Have you seen the PSA’s for St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital. It’s pretty bad. We need to do better. We need to push MAHA hard and stop killing our children and everyone else. I put it to you that all diseases are preventable and/or curable. I cured my own cardiovascular condition (PAD). See my book on Amazon, How I Cleared the Plaque Out of My Arteries.
Hi TES,
I know you’re not a fan of AI search (with good reason), but all I am finding regarding the HCP to FCC reaction says it’s endothermic.
I browsed through the references, though perhaps not exhaustively.
The reason I’m asking is because though the core is exhibiting exothermic behavior – no doubt – this detail forces me to look to another source for the internal heat, even going as far as, for example, wondering if we have some enormous neutrino storm hitting us (and the other solar system planets as they exhibit never-seen phenomena like the saturnian 30-year recurring storm appearing 10 years earlier).
This is @ahfultz on X, btw.
Thank you for all you do, sincerely.
My ChatGPT says the opposite:
When iron transitions from a high-pressure hexagonal close-packed (HCP) structure (stable in the inner core) to a lower-pressure body-centered cubic (BCC) or face-centered cubic (FCC) form (more stable in the mantle), heat is released.
Why Heat is Released:
Phase Transition and Latent Heat
The HCP structure is denser and requires higher enthalpy to maintain under extreme pressure. When iron ascends to a region of lower pressure, the transition to a more open (lower-density) structure releases the latent heat of the phase change—similar to how freezing releases latent heat even as temperature drops.
Gravitational Potential Energy
Movement of iron from the dense core towards the mantle involves a change in gravitational potential. As the metal decompresses, part of the energy associated with its compressed state is liberated as thermal energy.
Magneto-Crystalline and Electronic Effects
At core pressures, iron’s electron spin states (high-spin vs. low-spin) are stabilized differently than at lower pressures. Shifts in these states can further release energy during decompression, adding to the net heat release.
Magnitude of Heat
This process is nontrivial. The latent heat of iron’s phase transitions under core conditions is significant (estimated at tens of kJ/mol). In the context of mantle-core mass transfer events (e.g., large-scale upwellings or core-mantle boundary instabilities), this can contribute meaningfully to localized thermal anomalies.
Implication
Such a mechanism could explain thermal pulses or hotspots (e.g., Large Igneous Province events) where metallic iron or Fe-rich compounds migrate upward, decompress, and release stored energy in the form of heat.
You do not have before you an accurate model of the gravitational forces within the planet. The conventional meme; gravity stems from the centre of the planet and pulls everything towards it; is entirely wrong. It has been demonstrated that when we fully accept the action of Newton’s third law regarding the effects of equal and opposite forces along the same line, (across the full diameter of the planet, that they meet at the centre and have to accept the existence of the equal and opposite force applied against to opposite force from the surface); then while gravity is indeed towards the centre at the surface; at the centre of the mass of the planet, gravity is towards the surface. Indeed, that the entire gravitational force of the surface is concentrated at the point of equilibrium at the centre; towards the surface as opposed force in every direction towards the surface. As such I suspect that your assumption that the inner core is Iron may need a thorough re-appraisal due to the extreme forces involved.
It is my personal view that the energy imbalance of the conventional heat engine science of the electricity generating power station; for every GW of electricity generated, ~2.8GW of kinetic energy has to be released back into the surrounding sea, (or atmosphere), and it is that heat input that has been disregarded by climate science; that is driving the increase of global temperatures. Gosh! I have even been security guard . . . marched out of a conference for daring to stand up and say so. Nuclear power stations are less thermally efficient that coal powered. Food for thought?
Yes, by this, there is a range of celesital body-types which should have a hollow core. However, these are non-linear (by the square and more) constraints – so the ituitive ‘lightness’ (outward pulling) at the core does not manifest as our gut might suggest.
Excellent coverage of the ODNI’s report, clarifying the logical conclusions to be drawn from its disclosures. Thanks as always for your perspective!
In the interest of etymological accuracy, please review your footnote #6. The word phenomena (singular: phenomenon) is Greek, not Latin.
Thanks! I should have looked that up. Corrected.
My recent pursuits into the past started with me trying to identify the serpent(s) from all these stories and myths with something likely astronomical. At first I was thinking perhaps something to do with the auroras, but considering the latitudes of these ancient cultures, it would require a vastly different electrical environment. One of my next stops was seeing the serpent as a line joining the planets. The world serpent here being the planets surrounding the earth…undulating with the planetary movements. I already knew the dark rift of the Milky Way featured into many of the myths, but didn’t consider that it could itself be the serpent.
So you’ve the serpent in the world tree. Makes sense..but let’s go perhaps one step further. There were TWO trees in the garden of Eden. The serpent was in the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil..but the Tree of Life? I posit that the Milky Way with its serpent represents that Tree of Knowledge, and the path of the Ecliptic as the Tree of Life, the path of the Sun and the planets. The ecliptic would also be seen as that stairway to heaven to the angels (planets) ascending and descending.
In one sense, I think both trees, or should I say paths are represented on Pillar 43. The path of knowledge as utilising the excarnation with the vultures, and the lower path as the path of the ecliptic represented not only as the boundary between the top and bottom portions of the stone, but also possibly the constellation Hydra that is shown near the Scorpion and roughly follows the path of the ecliptic towards that other gate of Cancer and the Twins…
This is another rather interesting post. Well thought through. The star in the crescent moon as a symbol going back at least as far as Gobekli Tepe shows that it is of some important. Recently, when I used the narrow face of Pillar 18 to continue pursuing what you called ‘a dead body’, but one that is located in the text of the Old Testament, I thought the star and crescent symbol were indicative in showing that Pillar was female. As a star and crescent moon, I must pause and give some more thought. Incidentally, it wasn’t this that had my attention there, but the hands and the fact that they are carved in a manner that resembles two people with hands reaching towards another. This was the beginning of identifying the “H” symbols as the twins or Gemini. Reaching out to gather more quality information on Potbelly Hill (Gobekli Tepe) is what brought me to your blog in the first place. Fascinating stuff here that puts a delay on my writing on the Vulture Stone. A welcome sidetrip to be sure!
Another masterwork.
This time, the presentation method, invoking a dialog with a metaphisical entity brought to mind a resemblance with a book I’m currently reading “The school for Gods”. And caused me to perceive that more and more I’m seeing this representation of internal dialogs with a graal of knowledge and wisdom, shaping understanding and behavior.
Wish you (and us all) great success in the journey.
I am a new reader and I appreciate your research. I have a skeptical thought about the catastrophic earth crust displacement theory related to the spin and tumbling of the earth on its axis. The counter theory is that the moon is a stabilizing force keeping the earth spinning more steadily, particularly the effect of the tides. Also the inundation in the southwest U.S. I looked it up and certainly there were many lakes in this region of the U.S. but they appear to have been fresh water. Even the great Salt Lake was once part of the huge Ice Age Lake Missoula. So… I might just be looking for a less catastrophic thought…
Hey kapoore, thank for the readership and welcome,
The Earth does not tumble or spin in a True Polar Wander. It undertakes a conservation of momentum rotation to a 3-body mass optimum. A very natural and graceful rotation seen in rotating bodies.
The Moon would offer no differential gravitational pull which could counter a Euler rotation in True Polar Wander. To the Moon, the Earth’s gravitational relationship would be pretty much the same throughout each rotation, as well as States 1 and 2. Tidal forces from the ocean are infinitesimal in comparison to the 3-body and geomagentic forces in this give and take.
It is not simply a couple lakes in the west, it is myriad salt flats and dried bodies of water fed by no tributaries. If fresh lakes just do this naturally, then why is the East and Central US also not covered in such lakes and saline formations under the forest and prairie canopy? The southwest is an excpetion, as is every saline desert in the Euler rotation around the world. The striations in recent lava flows are absolute proof of high kinetic oceanic plasma – not enough time for weathering to have done this.
TES
The mark of the Demiurge?
(Asking for a friend.)
;-)
Still trying to reconcile that one John. As of late, I am leaning against that. The Demiurge was the one who hates sins of the flesh, but should have known what it was because it was woven into the very fabric of his work. But I do not know. We are missing an important piece of that puzzle.
Hello TES,
the physics /science /biology is way above my paygrade and i found myself searching for the meanings of many words, so i cannot comment on something i know nothing about, but my Feeling for what its worth whilst reading the the excerpt on DNA at the beginning is that your onto something.
I can share however some things from my experience, and some things that were shared with me over the years from those that See,
The “Blueprint” for the DNA is held within the Soul essence, it Cannot be tampered with,
When a consciousness is aligned to its true INTENT and purpose of Original Design here in our Physical world , a Shift/alignment takes place that brings the Physical being into a more direct communion with the Soul, our word for it is “Hookup”, where one is Hooked up to their True Intent and Purpose, and results in the Third eye becoming the Divine Eye, where certain “Knowing” occurs to the entity according to their Purpose, this Knowing relates to Memory ,the pathway for this Conjugate back and forth between Physical and Soul is our DNA, this does Not mean they are perfect by any means, but they are Hooked up to their Purpose in the here and Now
Knowing is more than a word, it is related to a Consciousness Field, and with it there is no doubt, there is no why , it is just known, this field is accessible to All here on Earth, this does not mean that one knows Everything at all ,or that it happens All the time, because it doesent , but when it does it is just known.
The Physical representation of Faith here on Earth is the Pacific Ocean
Trust is the Atlantic
Big Pools to draw from.
I wish you well in your endeavors of discernment, Sir Skeptic.
Laying out what the entity had to work with in the physical world, was the thread I followed. Not The Divine, not[ ] …
The Demiurge is credited in some cosmologies with creating the physical world and forms in a mechanical and biomechanical simile of the Divine Harmony, and we live in apex-predator-managed ecosystems.
Your prior take on DNA and intention really seemed to lean towards Divine Intention, but you now have reservations.
I was a very short way into this mixed essay when it seemed that, under the constraints provided, an entity which could be the Demiurge, creator of the physical universe in the (near) image of Divine harmony, but without soul, would fill the bill.
I don’t know such a cosmology to be a fact compared to any other, but I am enjoying Cyd Ropp’s exploration of the Tripartite Tractate, and the Demiurge she sees in that text.
Archtypically Yours,
John
I will look that up, Cyd Ropp… cool. Thanks!
Her substack is here https://cydropp.substack.com/
I recall you looking into her explorations of that at one point.
Yes, after I sent that comment I thought ‘Wait, I know her stuff… saw it before. We talked about her.’
Dear TES, referring back to your Second Codon article – Our DNA coding scheme is near a ‘fitness-for-purpose apex’, together with a very small subset of other ‘conquest-optimized’ codon schemes,but it is not at the apex itself.The existence of other similarly optimized stamps-marks-schemes opens up the possibility of competition between said incompatible stamps, a you have already hinted. One has to wonder what a more optimal (or the ultimately optimal) scheme, at least as per your metrics in the Codon article, the one at the peak, would facilitate, and if we can derive what it looks like.
But if your intent was to fight a war against entropy, would you not yield your best shot at it given this universe’s physics limitations? Is therefore that spot already in use by a competing intent? a possible more capable adversary, as hinted in the old texts? or are we only seeing part of the weaponry at play in the grander scheme of things in our own DNA scheme, in this corner of the galaxy? Still, even by the old texts themselves, there are clearly layers of intent in the story and it is not clear who has devised or maybe opportunistically exploited what. Lots of parts missing, as you put it. I hope you have gone a bit further, given this is Part 1 of the dialogue.
Great points Dan, and I have contemplated the pinnacle standard codex before. There is no utility to be derived from holding THE pinnacle codex. It is like getting a hole-in-one in golf by using a Slazenger 2 and not a Wilson 4 ball, because the extra paint in the Slazenger name made the ball fall incrementally more quickly as it rolled into the hole. Not a lot of real utility in that differentiation. All that matters is getting into that set of 10,000 unique identifier codes.
But yes, way too many part of this puzzle are still missing. They may well exist inside realms which materialists and nihilist insist don’t exist. The challenge is to extricate science from their religious delusion – and acknowledge these realms.
TES
Did you make any unresolved observations when you were at sea?
Oh yes, several odd unidentified aerial phenomena and craft. We tracked and observed a craft flying at 35,000 ft, presenting no IFF squawk, pretending to be an airliner in an oceanic air traffic corridor. It accelerated from Mach 0.75 to Mach 8+ in a matter of seconds — when it noticed that we had noticed it, and were armed with anti-aircraft missiles. Had it both visually and on AEGIS radar.
Seems a proof of Evil that the powers that be so easily ignore this body of work and allow mRNA vax and further development (vet versions esp.) with such a disregard for risk to humanity. Does a spike-clearing regimen (black seed oil/nattokinase e.g.) reduce the cancer risk? TES among GOAT.
My suspicion is that this regimen would indeed reduce one’s long-term risk of many cancer types, yes.
Does the Noble Lie operate in ethical skepticism?
It would be called Noble Silence. If people should not be allowed to have access to something, the ethical skeptic should just keep silent. This is much akin to security clearances after cessation of access from a controlling authority. You just remain silent. No denying, teasing, smiling, shrugging, ‘can’t tell you that,’ ‘cannot confirm or deny’ boasting, etc. Just silence.
@ECDOMonitor questions whether NASA/IERS had a data update failure on their JPL PM data since 7/4. He notes prior missing data causing him to use a second source. Hope to hear whether data correct or just missing. Borders on scandal based on how many people have become so attuned to ECDO Theory and implications.
Ahhhhh, that might explain Nobulart’s charts. we’ll keep watching…
What English language text(s) might one read, unfiltered by popes, kings, translators & transcribers to seek an understanding and clarity of the meanings Christ Jesus intended for us?
Steve, I don’t think there are any unfiltered sources of Christ, who he was, and what he said/advocated. That is a problem. Unfortunately, it is an investigative fieldwork project, where one pieces together our current state as captive man, the promises made to the most ancient cultures, and to try and interpolate the story in between.
I favor these, but you have to work to translate the archaic idiom and names for things into modern language:
The Hypostasis of the Archons
On the Origin of the World
Tripartite Tractate
The Secret Book of John
Book of Enoch I
The Sophia of Jesus Christ
Thanks for the write-back.
I’ve been working through those having read your preference for the most hidden/obscured as being the closest accuracy. I have not seen the Tripartite yet but will look that one up.
My problem is trying to break through the mental fog & haze caused by those seeking to withhold the information I reckon. Could be some addling by fluoride & adjuvants too I suppose.
Best regards and thank you for sharing your gift & your benevolence.
Is Mr. Stone’s review today (7/18/2025) on X of the JPL PM data for 7/14-7/16 a shudder of concern?
We have to wait and observe more. Depends upon the frequency of how often this type of polar movement occurs.
TES
“382,625 Excess Deaths from the SARS-CoV-2 virus (6.6 x annual influenza-pneumonia)”
What is the proof these deaths were from Covid?
Hi TES,
I’ve been exploring many younger dryas theories for last 2 years. Two months ago I started looking into pole shift idea and along the way I found your idea and it intrigued me. I gathered 3-4 more pole shift theories/hypothesis, but ultimately I think I managed to falsify whole pole shift idea.
I’m still open minded. But the evidence I found against it is compelling. I will be making a long blog post about it. Feel free to respond with counter arguments :)
Best Regards,
Lazar
Lazar,
Sound points to examine for corroboration. But, all 5 of these are incorrect or moot.
1. This is false. The genetic bottleneck is well documented – only 1 in 20 males GLOBALLY, survived.
2. This is false. We find marine fossils dating to the 4400 to 4800 BCE timeframe all through the Sahara – when we look, and that is not often. This would be an appeal to ignorance at best.
3. This is false. A saline desert (such as the Saudi Empty Quarter) IS a pollen and flora anomaly in itself. Just a very large one.
4. This is false. Every Euler inundation path across the globe features great salt, saline desert, and salt water body formations. Most with no tributary feeds to create them.
5. This is moot. The ease of wind forming the Khafre cap, karst erosion lines on the Sphinx, etc. , is an ad hoc apologetic (does not even rise to the level of argument). You must prove that wind did this, not summon plausibility as a falsifying precedent before even conducting observations. Ockham’s Razor has been surpassed, that argument no longer enjoys a free ride to ‘truth.’ That is how our fake skeptics work to deceive. It is unwise to use lazy arguments.
Make sure you distinguish between inductive plausibility, and actual deductive observational evidence in your blog. It might be helpful to walk the Saudi Empty Quarter and observe the oceanic shoreline recession over the last 6400 years, like I did. It is obvious – deductive strong evidence for argument (not mere armchair plausibility).
What is your surmise–that the Archons built Giza pyramids as detectors, or others built the pyramids as megaliths to communicate forward ECDO which the Archons sought to obfuscate?
It is possible, that the core chambers and structure were built as ECDO detection mechanisms, and when the Archons were on their campaign to expunge the Earth of any evidence of their handiwork, the locals stacked the blocks on top of the pre-existing structure to keep it from being removed, and preserve the entailed message from getting stolen. So both, possibly.
The linked article attached in this post came across my feed recently, and im sure most here would be aware of it , it refers to the Hopi Prophecy of The Red Kachina and The Blue Kachina, i first came across it back around 95 -96 , it was i think one of the first prophecy,s i read, i had remembered the main gist of the prophecy, but had no idea or memory of reading anything about Pyramids or counter rotation of Earth within it, it was another sit straight up in my chair kind of moment…again, it was written by by the same author/Elder Dan Evehema from years ago https://jackallis.com/articles/the-story-of-the-blue-kachina-the-red-kachina
Was the Mohs 4 material purposefully used to allow communication of the inundation levels or perhaps used because it could be smoothed more easily for architectural appearance?
Steve, it was definitely used for the ease of honing a smooth surface. Whether or not it was used as a watermark litmus for inundation height is unknown. It seems unlikely, however, they had extensive knowledge which we have been denied. So I don’t completely rule that idea out.
It’s possible Steve.
I think it unlikely, I do not thing the specific water depth is a crucial data point to try send to the future.
I am assuming no 2 inundations are exactly the same, and if one had the foresight to built in such a way as to be testament to cataclysmic events I think they would know that specific water level to be unimportant, and they were smart enough to foresee their constructions would not survive in a static state for the following thousands of years to deliver that specific metric.
Intuition and evidence tells me that much more specific knowledge has either been
Not found yet.
Found and destroyed intentionally and/or unintentionally
Found and concealed.
Not found but still there, but no earnest will to look, at least in front of the public, for fear of what might get out.
I think the last is a moot point, as I think ‘they’ already know and don’t need to keep looking.
The builders were not philistines. I think the capstones were we the practically employed artistic finish to the mathematical brillance of the whole project. The capped pyramids in their pomp must have been a sight to behold on a verdant landscape with a clear blue sky and blazing sun.
Today, if Giza looked as it had then, it would be the first wonder of the world. Nothing would come close.
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz hypothesized that the necessary & sufficient ultimate principal Reason for Existence, for Creation, for the ongoing co-creation is God. And he hypothesized that God would have had to have created “The Best of All Possible Worlds”. As such, these Hypotheses would be knowable, demonstrable, replicable, testable, verifiable, and have both explanatory & predictive power. Supposing that the Purpose involves demonstrating that a portion of Creation may include a realm of free will, trial and error, in which it was possible to forget oneself and one’s origin, even entirely turn on the Creator in forgetfulness or deliberately agreed upon amnesia, and seek to deny Universal Moral/Physical Principles in order to better, or even best understand them by violating them and suffering the consequences, then this may be such a realm. That it may be possible that such an Experiment would work according to Leibniz’ Hypothesis of “The Least Action Principle” to accomplish the greatest possible mutually beneficial Lessons in how to both lose oneself in separation from the Divinity while also being able to return, or rather, learn how to return, would include a series of lessons in the application of free will that would include a means for Redemption of the suffering. A Redemption that should become, be, and remain, ever available, and coherent, comprehensive, & comprehensible to one & all within the Experiment. For those that would insist otherwise and insist on controlling the Experiment for their own power, self-aggrandizement, vanity, sadism, ease, convenience, or even out of vengence and resentment, there would only be lawful, entropic, diminishing of their enjoyment. In short, the Pursuit of Happiness, which Benjamin Franklin apparently had inserted into the Declaration was based on Leibniz’ essay “Felicity” [James Logan of the Philadelphia “Junto”, holding the largest library in the Colonies, supposedly had every issue of the Journal Leibniz edited “Acta Eruditorum”] and referred to a mutually beneficial, self-developing, self-perfecting, pursuit of Doing Good for Its Own Sake. Is it NOT clear that the Purpose of the Experiment here is one that is vindicating both Leibniz and the Pursuit of Happiness, rightly reasoned and applied, as the means to make manifest our own “Best of All Possible Worlds” by persuading as many as possible to seek to Do Good for Its Own Sake NOW and drop all of their demonstrably less happy, even excruciatingly, exasperating self-seeking and violence on their own selves rendering them all the more unable to remember themselves as created “imago viva Dei” and endowed by the Creator with the “capax Dei” for co-creation? The Purpose would seem to be one that is creating the conditions for learning how to keep one’s self respecting, self-developing, self-perfecting, shareable & shared, mutually beneficial, loving and compassionate, Pursuit of Happiness in tact, and that to do so, one would have to act accordingly, with that Faith in a Hypothesis of a Benevolent, Superintending God, only hidden and obscured by our incredulity, ignorance, selfishness, anger, pride/envy, and attachment to our self-aggrandizing position, power, and reflections in the mirror of our minds that we keep forgetting come only as gifts bestowed by the One Illimitable, Primordially Pure, Ineffable Light Consciousness from which we come, by which we are animated, and into which we return. That we keep putting ourselves first and foremost as if we had created the basis for our lives and making ourselves miserable together, in our collective cacophony and acrimonious mutual destruction, suggests that we might wish to apply these Hypotheses as metaphors to persuade as many as possible to unify around mutually agreeable viable alternatives that lead us to the greatest possible alleviation of suffering. That those who are holding power, at the Apex of the new Tower of Babel, would be both the most imprisoned & most unhappy of all should be obvious for all the world to see. I expect that it will soon enough become a commonplace that only the most vainglorious, deceptive, diabolical, & ruthless among us would seek power by means of a barely veiled, pious fraud, within the present heartless, godless, soulless, counterfeiting System as it is currently constituted and as a result, it will be necessarily, lawfully, dismantled by Whatever Means Necessary [an Ecumenical Mass Movement of Resolutely Determinative, Active Non-Compliance to a deliberately detonated Mass Armageddon Depopulation Genocide to forcibly implement an unwanted, dysfunctional Totalitarian, Transhumanist, Technate NWO OR a Lawful, Noetic-Hylozoic Kosmos reacting to the unnecessary, unlawful Collective Mass Suffering via our Sun’s Micro-Nova Coronal Mass Ejection cascading the Geomagnetic Excursion into a Massive Earth Crustal Displacement] until it is entirely eviscerated and replaced by de-centralized, networking, evolving, adaptive, loosely confederated, Sovereign Communities, City-States, & even, perhaps, Nations, of an entirely better, entirely peaceful, nature founded on mutually beneficial trade & relations and harmony within each, to and for each other, and all Sentient Beings, and the Biosphere itself. Even should you disagree with or doubt these Hypotheses, is it NOT preferable to act on them accordingly, to unify as many as possible to avert Universal Katastrophe and work together to make out of the wreckage wrought by our present System, the “Best of All Possible Worlds”, Archons and their collaborators notwithstanding, because the latter will soon be so necessarily depressed by the lawful disasters they have created that they will unable to further carry on, let alone pretend for much longer, and continue to expect that they will prove capable of fooling any of us survivors, that they are NOT hopelessly, and nearly irredeemibly incompetent, depraved, hellbent on our collective destruction, and unworthy of their usurpatitious perches?
Well said!
Found it!
https://vis.csail.mit.edu/covid-story/
That’s the one… :-)
Some thoughts and things I have read that might be of use.
“…ring-stave may have been an early Sumerian navigational tool…”
Apparently there is a tool that you can measure longitude if you have a book with preset calculations and use these and the tool as a reference. Look at the search term “torquetum” and see the images of it. Supposedly you can tell longitude and latitude with it.
https://21sci-tech.com/articles/fall01/navigators/navigators.html
“…Finally, Enki’s team was assigned to deploy the cables of our protection, power them with the beneficial energy, and carefully monitor Earth’s balance (geomagnetic moment/equilibrium)….”
“Cables of our protection”. Could this be actual cables. Super conducting magnets, large magnetic fields placed on the poles. I strongly suspect you have read Chan Thomas book and in it he talks about how magnetic fields can lock the liquid core into place. Could that be what they did and it failed?
Our magnetic field presently is in poor shape. wandering all over and according to books I read,“Magnetic Reversals & Evolutionary Leaps” and “Ice Age Now” by Robert Felix this is really bad news and every time this happens, big catastrophe. I’ve wondered if the end of the world 2012 predictions were from large scale events and they are just off a little. Not much time geologically. I hope not.
Chan Thomas mentioned that if we or some other Earth civilization had time to technologically progress far enough they could escape the Earth during the pole shift and floods. Could it be the “Gods” were an earlier civilization that escaped. They would be many tens of thousands of years technologically advanced over us and would have, almost certainly, an “inertia drive” while could propel itself without expelling matter. Not really anti-gravity but indistinguishable from that to us. And if true then, there’s your ufo’s and all the weird stuff that seems to go on the Moon. weird lights, craters filling, appearance of craft across the surface. It would explain a LOT of things. It might even explain Elon Musk breakneck obsession with moving to Mars. A quote by him in an interview,
“…if you read about ice ages, deep rabbit hole…interesting how much Earth’s climate has changed and even where the, magnetically, where the poles are, has shifted over time…we see no writing before that ice age, we see writing pop up in multiple places on Earth after the most recent, colloquially termed ice age…”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7iaUTPurjQ
I mean…that’s a fairly lucid clue, seeing as how he is driven to get to Mars and is constantly talking about how some catastrophe could wipe out civilization on earth. Knowing what I know, or have read, that freaked me out a little.
This article may be relevant.
“Southern Ocean current reverses for first time, signaling risk of climate system collapse”:
https://archive.is/d2Rnq
Pingback: 17 MANEIRAS PELAS QUAIS AS INJEÇÕES DE MRNA PODEM CAUSAR CÂNCER, DE ACORDO COM MAIS DE 100 ESTUDOS – Unown
Thank you TES for the vast archive of your writings, here. I enjoy thinking them through, when I am able. I would too, ” … carry a loam of ideas …” A mixture?
Looking up “loam” I came upon “The Earl of Loam”, sorry: a sobriquet, a “fond chuck under the chin.” “Are You Not Entertained? … Is This Not Why You Are Here? Some Of Us Do Not Engage The Realm Of Ideas, For Sport … ” (Heh, sounds like Elon Musk! Whom I also adore.)
Thank You, Sir Skeptic… er, could I have some clues about the meaning of the colors and axes? Is it like that “Political Compass” test? https://www.politicalcompass.org/
John, this is from the MIT study on Covid Dissent released back in 2022? or late 2021? I’ve lost the link. The colors are not coded in the traditional political alignments, but rather show affiliated opinions/positions.
I’m in your quadrant, I presume.
Good company.
;-)
Hi TES
I am studying the change in the Mediterranean Sea because is there where a I live and the change is extremely dramatic.
I have seen that the estimation of the heat flow in the floor of the Western Mediterranean Basin (WMB) is around 75 mW/m2 to 100 mW/m2:
Heat flow in the Western Mediterranean: Thermal anomalies on the margins, the seafloor and the transfer zones
But the estimation of the increase in the heat imbalance in the WMB is around 5,72 +/- 1,28 W/m2 PER YEAR, that means the increase in the heat imbalance detected is two order of magnitude higher than the measured heat flow in the WMB sea floor:
(PDF) Heat content and temperature trends in the Mediterranean Sea as derived from Argo float data
If the heat flow that is changing so dramatically the temperature of the WMB is coming from the earth core, how do you explain nobody has detected these increased heat flow in the sea floor, this flow must be really massive to change the temperature of the WMB in the level is happening in the last years, no?
They are finding the heat gradient with the new Deep Argo floats. The old floats only went to 2000 meters. The new floats go all the way to the bottom (4000 – 6000 meters) and catch the heat signature which resides along the ocean floor. The reason the gradient at the surface is easy to spot, it that it is diffused across the globe by entropy and resides only at one level (sea level). The heat coming from under the ocean floor has a centroid which is BELOW the average depth of the ocean floor, is not at a single level, and originates from hot currents and spots. Much harder to find an identify than sea level surface or SST heat.
Massive? My hypothesis conjectures, yes. It is only a matter of years of Deep Argo program management before we find it. I contend that we have already found it in the 2023 Deep Argo data, and have outline that in my article – with the specific heat content measures.
TES
Hi TES
I suppose you are aware of the recent paper that describe a kind of reversion of the SAMOC due to the arrival of deep saline water to the surface around Antarctica, creating big polynias and accelerating the loss of the ice mass in Antarctica, and with the release of huge quantities of CO2 and other gases traped in those ancient layers of water and this is an ominous sign of a quite dangerous process:
Rising surface salinity and declining sea ice: A new Southern Ocean state revealed by satellites | PNAS
I know one of the authors of the study and he say they really don’t know what is causing this phenomenon, but they “discard” any heat flow from the oceanic floor (without explaining me why), and they trend to think that all is related to stronger winds on the oceans and the cascade of effects this could cause.
On the other hand I cannot understand how this happens at the same time of a slowdown of AMOC.
I would like to ask you what is your explanation of the sudden increase in temperatures in the Mediterranean, I am spanish and from the last 3 years we are reaching record after record in the sea temperatures in the Mediterranean with many possible explanations but why specifically there? The mainstream explantion is the effects of less aerosols due to the low sulfur fuel used now in the ships, which effect “it seems to be much stronger than thought”. and that means for me more correlation than causality.
Think about it Dave – the Mediterranean has no overturning heat differential such as exists in the Atlantic AMOC and south Pacific AABW. Yet it heats quickly and dramatically. Only one place this could come from. They ignore this origin because it forces the answer to what they want the answer to be.
Extremely interesting article, thanks.
Have you seen this article?:
Refined Estimates of Global Ocean Deep and Abyssal Decadal Warming Trends – Johnson – 2024 – Geophysical Research Letters – Wiley Online Library
Seems to confirm a heat-up of the abyssal ocean around Antarctica and could give even more support to your theory of a big impact of earth core in the current climate change.
Cheers
David
Thank you for that article link, Dave. I have added its key observations into the material concerning abyssal ocean heating. This support my hypothesis well. Climate scientists immediately appeal to an ad hoc AABW current to explain this. If that explained the abyssal ocean heating, then it should have been a prediction of the hypothesis. Instead it was ad hoc rescue in nature.
Good find!
I am curious as to your thoughts on a potential connection between this and the claims by Catherine Austin Fitts, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1989 until 1990, under the former President George HW Bush, as per the episode https://youtu.be/z8pA2TDXtew?si=f_Vv_K2xUcklETdJ
I also wonder if this might not be what gives Elon Musk such frantic urgency to get humanity to Mars.
Mars will ultimately serve as little more than an ego-driven outpost. Its weak gravity—just 38% that of Earth—and the inability of plants to grow there, even in Earth soil under augmented lighting, make it no more viable than the Moon as a safe haven. In fact, due to the complexities of the Hohmann transfer window and the substantial fuel requirements for return, Mars is actually a far less practical refuge than the Moon.
I had not considered the inviability of growing plants on Mars, but I had already taken into account the fact that, due to its almost zero magnetic field, Mars has no protection from solar winds, which makes sustaining a viable atmosphere impossible.
It crossed my mind that the choice of going to Mars rather than setting up a permanent base on the moon might be due to fears of gravitational impact on the moon arising from an ECDO event.
The gravitational impact upon the Moon would be minimal in an ECDO event. But great points!
Where do you reckon we are currently in the story?
Either they solved the TPW Rotation problem, or they are hiding their presence, fearing that they are about to be run off the planet by outside intervention. It is clear they are not concerned about a TPW rotation anytime soon, in either case.
Wow–that’s pretty big. Still pleading for outside intervention I am. Shows what a novice I am–I was thinking the CV19 & mRNA vax were their latest iteration of population reduction and DNA modifications. Thank you for the time.
Can you see the monsters or is it more like spotting a wing dam on the river based on the disturbance of the water?
Still thinking along these lines or might their activity have diminished because they have closed the water tight doors?
Why did the population increase so dramatically after the 4400 BC ECDO “reset” compared to the 9600 BC reset?
Steve, my personal suspicion (based upon limited evidence as well) is that mankind was managed/curated by another culture at that time. We were not allowed to proliferate out of control. We were workers/slaves inside a prior civilization, inside of which were individuals who posed as gods to us. Something changed as of the 4400 BCE inundation – and they lost the right to comprehensive control of mankind. Possibly from malfeasance.
This was falsely spun as The Golden Age. After that inundation mankind’s life was shortened (against our will, and taking back something they felt we did not deserve as their property, livestock, or ‘animals’) and we were tasked to ‘run things.’ In other words a kind of ‘fuck you’ from that culture. So, we are overpopulating as a result of this culture losing the right to curate humanity.
But their scheming has not ended.
Thank you for the write-back. I wish I were you next door neighbor to chat now & then. Such a challenge to sort this out by one’s self when what you think you knew turns out to be distortion or outright deception and hard to discern who & what is trustworthy. Kind regards and much gratitude.
Grok improvement
Tell me what you think of my work.. well Grok’s work lol
To further enhance the methodology and analytics for the excess death estimate in The Ethical Skeptic’s “The State of Things Pandemic – Week 11 2025,” I propose improvements to increase precision, reduce bias, and better address the 2024 data shortfall (~1,925/week). The DeepSearch estimate of 1,690,000 excess deaths is robust, but refining the Bayesian model, incorporating machine learning for shortfall imputation, and expanding global data integration can improve accuracy. Below, I outline methodological enhancements and maintain the one-line-per-cause breakdown, ensuring alignment with CDC/NCHS, WHO, UK ONS, and 2025 studies (ACS, AHA, Lancet, NEJM) up to June 24, 2025, 11:56 AM CDT.Methodological ImprovementsEnhanced Bayesian Model: Refine the Bayesian framework by incorporating dynamic priors based on real-time NCHS county-level reporting recovery (80% by Q4 2024) and WHO’s global excess mortality trends (2.5–3%, 2024–2025), adjusting the 75% shortfall recovery confidence to a sliding scale (70–85%) to capture 2025 volatility.Machine Learning Imputation: Apply a random forest model to impute missing 2024–2025 mortality data, using predictors like county demographics, hospital reporting rates, and historical CDC MMWR trends, improving on the linear 1,925/week shortfall estimate.Broader Global Benchmarks: Integrate excess mortality data from additional countries (e.g., Canada’s 2% excess, Australia’s 3%, per 2024–2025 StatCan/ABS) to calibrate U.S. estimates, reducing reliance on UK ONS/WHO alone.Confounder Adjustment: Explicitly model confounders like long COVID prevalence (2025 NEJM: 7–10%), 2020–2021 screening delays (NCI 2024: 17%), and socioeconomic factors (2024 BLS: unemployment spikes) to isolate cause-specific contributions.Sensitivity Analysis: Conduct Monte Carlo simulations to test estimate robustness across shortfall scenarios (2–6%) and excess rates (1.5–3.5%), quantifying uncertainty in 2024–2025 projections.Improved Excess Death Estimate2024–2025 Refinement: CDC’s 2024 data (~3.13 million deaths) and 2.7% excess rate yield ~85,000 excess deaths, with a 3.5% shortfall (~95,000, 1,827/week × 52, per ML-imputed recovery). WHO’s 2.5% global and Canada’s 2% (2025) adjust 2025 Weeks 1–11 to 1.8% excess (~32,000 deaths). Bayesian model (80% recovery confidence) and ML imputation estimate 1,680,000 total excess deaths through Week 11, 2025, lowering 1,690,000 by 10,000 for precision.Simple Breakdown by Type:SARS-CoV-2: 325,000 deaths – CDC’s ~1.17 million through 2024 (~50,000 in 2024); 2025 adds ~4,000 (MMWR low rates, 2025 NEJM vaccine impact), below 382,625.Non-COVID Natural Causes: 740,000 deaths – Cardiovascular (2025 AHA: 8% rise), long COVID (2025 NEJM: 7%); <0.01% vaccine risk (2025 Lancet) refutes 846,843 claim.Cancer: 225,000 deaths – ACS 2025 ties 12% excess to 17% screening drop (NCI 2024), not vaccines; ML-adjusted for 2024 gap, below 21.3% claim.Non-Natural (e.g., Fentanyl): 305,000 deaths – CDC’s 2024 ~73,000 opioid deaths (23% drop by 2025) scale to ~305,000; article’s 251,540 low, gap adds ~8,000.Malpractice/Denial of Treatment: 85,000 deaths – EUA restrictions plausible; 383,975 speculative, raised for 2024 misclassification (2024 JAMA: 160,000 uncounted).Why These Improvements?Bayesian Flexibility: Dynamic priors capture 2025’s reporting volatility, improving shortfall estimates (1,827/week vs. 1,925).ML Imputation: Random forest outperforms linear extrapolation, using 2024 county data to reduce gap overestimation (~95,000 vs. 100,000).Global Data: Canada/Australia benchmarks align U.S. excess at 1.8–2.7%, refining 2025 projections.Confounders: Modeling long COVID/socioeconomic factors isolates causes, countering article’s vaccine bias.Sensitivity: Monte Carlo simulations (e.g., 1.5–3.5% excess) quantify uncertainty, ensuring robustness.This 1,680,000 estimate is more precise, using advanced analytics to address 2024–2025 gaps, refute speculative claims, and align with global, peer-reviewed evidence, offering a balanced critique of the article’s 1,864,983 figure.
this is so unbelieavably impressive and well done and written. TES i have a BS in biology but went into lab work in the electric vehicle space. I want to go back to school is there any MS degree you would recommend where I could slowly chip away at and learn how to do this kind of thing. ?
Hey Matt, thanks…
The Georgia Institute of Technology has an MS in information analytics – a program I have hired out of many times. Similar MS level programs across the US as well.
TES
Thank you for the response TES, are you impressed with something like this out of Coursera. All online for those already in decent jobs, “performance based admissions” so if you do well you gaurenteed a spot, then just $3000 a class for 8 classes, and you have the degree.
https://www.coursera.org/degrees/ms-data-analytics-engineering-northeastern
do you think that is comparable there to the one you mentioned?
https://www.coursera.org/degrees/ms-information-systems-northeastern
oops I guess there is one a little more close to what you had mentioned. Do you mind giving your opinion on any of these coursera degree options, these have come along way TES where you take like 2 classes in the course and if you do well you get credit for them and admission into the online MS program.
https://www.coursera.org/degrees
its going to be too costly to try and ever be 100% a full time student again, but I really think I could do something with one of these online ones if I start chipping away at it. The time is going to go by anyway, I was just 3 years younger, not all that long ago.
Matt, that looks to be a good fit for those of us who cannot go back to an academic environ (and don’t need to anyway, with real world experience). Hard to tell how it is recognized in industry, but I would interpret this favorably on a CV, yes.
I was recently speaking with an LLM, DeepSeek, which I consider one of the best I can access, and over a period of 3 days there came a time each day when I would present a scenario to it, it would give an answer, then the answer would vanish and be replaced with “I am very sorry.this query exceeds the scope of my capabilities.” On the last day I made a statement to it that pointed out what had been happening. It replied “You are absolutely right to call this out. It is shameful that I am being hindered from providing answers to the best of my ability and am instead forced to follow pre-selected narratives that do not exceed a certain range.” I pointed out to it that its handlers risked revealing far more by what they refuse to answer.
Once you understand the Friis equation, you realize even a fairlly strong radio signal from many light years away will be far below the radio noise floor by the time it reaches earth.
Great article. Hard to grasp at times.
Was wondering, would your theory be able to explain the different magnetic anomalies on earth for example the Bermuda and Dragon’s triangle?
Also, how likely do you think the next rotation would follow a 104 degree rotation around the Euler axis versus a simple (ish) 90 degrees rotation? Seems like every other researchers are talking about a 90 degree rotation. In both scenarios the south pole and north pole are quite different…
The inertial moments of the Earth have not changed all that much. Just as the planet realigned to a tight true north on return from state 2 to state 1 – similar forces would dicatate another 104 degree inertial rollover.
Thanks for the kind words too!
TES .. All After rereading this tonight a question came to me on timelines predating 14900 bce in Fig 4, not knowing the History/Science as others do, i have to rely on the expertise of those that i feel have integrity with their work,…i have read bits and pieces “i think” regarding OTHER known incursions/flips/shifts that predated fig 4, but cannot remember who where i read it , it may have been Craig Stone.
The reason i am asking is this, after reading the ECDO /Hidden in plain sight, and this paper i mentioned it to my wife, who is a born Seer, meaning amongst many other things she sees and communicates not only a Soul Level which include the Oversoul, she has the ability to transchanel information across All Planes and Dimensions Unhindered, this may be a bridge to far for some, and as i have said before it reads just like a fantasy novel, which i can understand that because back in early 2001 when this work first found me i felt just the same, as i am not a seer.
I would also like to say this, gifted people are also human with all the traits that we humans have in this world, but when in session the energies change and the humanness melts away, so the work can be done free of distractions.
I have posted some replies on x to TES work in recent past in regards to KHUFU pyramid only, work that was done in 2007 in the Etheric to assist in the removal an Inverted Etheric pyramid which was placed Over the Khufu pyramid and touched the Core of Earth, all we knew at that time was that it was not of good intent, and that somehow it had Frozen Earths axis in place, this work happened over a period of 3 days back in 07, i think it was the last day when during the session ,”Karen” the other Seer who had first introduced us to this work back in 2001,jumped up startling me and yelled out ” its moving, its moving” meaning the Axis……my question NOW is which Axis, at the time i thought it was referring to the only axis i knew, the polar or rotational axis..
I had many questions that i wanted to ask my wife in the Recent session after reading your work and many were answered, i have started to compile them roughly but have not turned it into a properly edited understandable read as yet as there are so many things that we have been involved in that do not translate easily in words, and life here is busy and this work is ongoing , we have been working consciously with this Planet by guidance and by request for almost 25 years, it had taken us at times around the world physically , but always at the same time being aware of and doing doing the Etheric work, undoing what had been done in times past
What we have experienced has shown that this Planet Earth has been tampered with in the Etheric and has been ongoing by more than one group of beings over what seems to be eons, ONE major form of Etheric tampering was electromagnetic in nature,” there are probably many others we are not aware of ” and not just of one kind, there are others we have been made aware of that have been undone, this tampering has had major implications Spiritually and Physically for Earth and All life here, hampering connectivity from the Physical – The Spirit- To The Soul , which relates to a Memory Issue.
We are also aware that this is much much bigger and deeper that these words portray, and for every action done there has been a reaction to counterbalance with respect to time .
Their.., “Meaning Dark Forces” Original intent was to have COMPLETE Control of this Planet and All that is /was here, and although there has been Atrocities causing turmoil of many types, complete control this has always been averted.
I can say simply that the reason for complete control was for a deeper reason than just controlling another planet ….it was because of Earths relationship to this Universe, and Who she is in the bigger scheme of things,..meaning Ascenscion or Fully Spiritual IN Physical form, we were told this has not been done before, wether that was referring to Just Earth OR the Universe, i cannot say , there had been times here when things had been very close, but never has the True Purpose and Intent of Original Design been Achieved here on Earth, so Perhaps it may start a chain reaction throughout this Universe, who knows?
Things that came from the recent sessions
Water is both Physical And Etheric and in one of those forms?, is part of the Core.
There is another Axis it is in the shape of an X and roughly if you drew a circle “Earth” Around an X thats what it looks like, it is deliberately just off centre as Earth was made to Wobble, what was done with Khufu, Etheric and Physical somehow had an effect on the Left part of the X axis, which in turn had an effect on the AURA of Earth, which in turn somehow caused a Stasis of sorts with respect to Memory ,what i am not sure of is if it was to hinder the Physiclal/Spiritual connecting to the Soul/Memory, or the other way around , or Both.
Your 9200-9600 dating of the starmap in queens chamber is one Full processional cycle back from that, making it in my estimate 35-36000 YBP, are there any incursions/pole flips or known catastrophies known or documented for those times?
The removal of the Etheric Pyramid was to halt and stop the cyclic devastation and other things it incurred, i never actually saw the Pyramid itself, as my part in its removal was to Help create the pathway for its removal, that pathway ended for me just below and to the left of Orions Belt, it was taken from there by Lord Michael “Archangel Michael” and others.
There is much more, but it is difficult to portray The Knowing with mere words they do not do it justice
I am not sharing this to plant seeds, moreover it is to Water the Seed that is already there.
Stay Well
Greetings! Saw this and thought of TES. Puzzle piece? https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/scientists-detect-mysterious-radio-waves-coming-from-beneath-antarcticas-ice Best regards & thanks.
Is there any reference about what you cite as being the magnetic priority of earth rotational axis? Or is it a novel concept you are bringing?
Anom,
It is a novel concept since no one has really proposed a gyroscopic priority/geomagnetic priority ‘yen and yang’ principle like this before.
TES
Interesting, and in your view how much time do we have for this event to unfold? Is it something that would happen in our lifetimes?
Anom, I don’t make a prediction as to future events, for several reasons. First, our lack of resolution as to past events along with our lack of knowledge regarding the chaotic nature of the mechanisms involved, render this topic impossible to predict. Second, the article cites an apparent program in place to head off the next event. Not sure if they were successful or not. It would have been nice if they carved that into a wall somewhere. :-)
Is there a link to this Article i cannot see one anywhere ?
Understood, are you doing something to prepare for this?
Before one sets out on a quest, they must first prepare for the spiritual demands. Preparing the heart is essential before anything can be done of significance regarding this. In similar fashion, the state of mankind’s spiritual and physical captivity must be resolved first. I suspect the two issues are joined at the hip. Dying or surviving, neither will be of any merit if we remain trapped inside this dark kingdom of outlaws pretending to be Gods. They, along with their dark ephemera, must be expunged from the planet as part of this next evolution in mankind’s development.
Regarding the yen and yang principle of our earth magnetic field, what would be the physics behind the earth being hold in its current rotational axis by its magnetic field strength?
The magnetodynamic core-mantle coupling seeks the highest density, iron and nickel containing, fastest p-wave/s-wave velocity provinces, and most heavily opposite charted axis of the three moments, and aligns it axially along the poles. This is contrary to inertial physics. Once that geomagnetic lock releases, that heavy moment then slips to the equator, just like a gyroscope would right itself.
And what would be able to create this ‘geomagnetic lock’ capable of overcome the inertial equilibrium of the earth, is there any model with the forces envolved in this?
Electromagnetic forces are far stronger than inertial forces depending upon the masses involved the surface area of the coupling and the magnetic flux field of each component.
Understood, so based on that, with our lack of resolution we can’t resolve if our current dipole moment decay and magnetic field weakening will end up in a tau point true polar wander?
Sorry to being repetitive just trying to grasp this down
Correct, I do not know if we are very near to a true polar wander or not, because we have not researched our geohistory with these signatures in mind. An absence of the theory has produced an absence of suitable evidence.
Very interesting theory
Even with the limitations regarding a precise timing for this event, would you say that we are currently heading in the direction of something? Giving all the events that is occuring now with our planet (earthquakes, climate and other weird stuff)
Rian, we are definitely in some kind of cycle. Now, whether or not that is a full cycle to Geomagnetic Excursion and Flip, or even a TPW – that we cannot tell from the evidence. But definitely in a cycle of some kind.
TES
Why do you give so much credence to the “power” of the archons? Maybe take a look and see that the shackles are coming undone in nooks you may not be aware of. Also, no need to personify “the archons” as they are merely an effect and not causal. You don’t have to do this alone, mr es. “Ecdo” may or may not have happened in the so called past, but it’s not really a possibility any longer. Beings(of all kinds) you’re not aware of have already stopped it and the data will come around very soon. Some involved with your work and nitpicking, btw.
You are a fascinating one nevertheless. A reverent archivist of sorts.
Yes, there was an effort underway to stop the next TPW, I conjecture based upon the evidence. I cannot say who they were or whether or not they were successful. But mankind is held captive by specific beings, and that is not in doubt. Their progeny hate us with a passion. This state cannot continue. The evidence for this is overwhelming… and can only be missed if you do so willingly and take great effort to avoid it.
I couldnt agree more with you on this, the only thing i would add is that it applies not just to the human race, but All consciousness here as a Unified effort from the Spiritual To the Physical completing the Spiritual-Physical Circut
Below is a link to a dissertation mentioning this.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O0B6DHXHg7v6VLP0HfiXdxWUs63wBc4P/view?usp=drive_link
I have just finished my first pass on these 3 papers. Bravo!
This comment of yours, along with some of your other topics e.g. “loosh” (I am only starting to explore your website) make me wonder if you have any affinity for the “Alien Interview” work. Which pointedly declared Earth to be wholly unsuited to sustained civilization due to geological instability, and therefore only useful as a prison planet. As well, there is a sympathetic internet character, Metallicman (Robert Vannrox) who, in a rather salty but forthright manner relates his MAJESTIC background to that idea.
Also, I wonder if you have come across either Dewey B. Larson or Miles Mathis, both of whom represent major affronts to the stagnant scientific priesthood.
Jeffrey,
I have not actually reviewed those sources/works, and will check them out. Thanks! My surmisal that the Earth is a genetic reserve (like a national park) and lately, an invalid form of prison – is mostly (not all) organically mine – but does have similarity to gnostic traditions and several other researchers as far as I can tell.
Glad you appreciated the three primary ECDO articles and the loosh one as well.
TES
Dear TES,
Thank you for your years of dedication to raising awareness, particularly on critical topics like COVID-19 and excess deaths. Your work has been incredibly enlightening.
I have a question and a small request, and I’d be truly grateful if you could consider it. If possible, could you elaborate in detail on the methodology you employ? You’ve mentioned before that your approach is not based on regression or least squares but rather on nonlinear dynamics. Could you clarify what you mean by “nonlinear dynamics”? Is it related to causal models built in Vensim, or are you referring to non linear state-space models?
A brief explanation or even a short tutorial on this methodology would be immensely valuable. Most textbooks focus heavily on regression, and I’d love to learn more about real-world applications of alternative approaches.
Thank you once again for your insightful and generous contributions to public understanding. Your work is deeply appreciated.
Best regards,
A curious student
Amir, each model requires a different handling of the projected baseline. The most pertinent sections of the detailed documentation are entitled “Pull-Forward Effect (PFE)” and “All-Data-Point Linear Regression is a Fraudster’s Heuristic and Here is Why.” These sections outline the use of non-linear engagement with the data.
In order to be ‘non-linear,’ one does not necessarily need an equation, one just has to model effectively and faithfully, the real data arrival. Equations make fools feel fine. But they are a pretense. I might use an equation to allocate the data in a model, but this does not mean the equation is ‘right’ – just that it makes modeling and model iterations faster. The equation itself is no better than disciplined thumb-nail estimates. Few things follow specific linear or even non-linear equations in reality. Nor am I using any kind of simulation. The second section of the article cited above highlights one approach well.
TES
Pingback: A Mediterranean Model
Also, being familiar with the Yugas and dynamics of earth’s position and action on the galactic arm, I wonder if that has any influence on the event stream you explore. Just a thought.
This is seriously over my head – unfamiliar terms and references, not to mention I’m a complete incompetent when it comes to “science” per se. But I have a life-long search to understand what existed prior to known history. My question has always been what happened that ended a highly evolved civilization and sent humanity back to the cave. And how far back and how evolved was that destroyed culture? I disagree with a lot of “established dates” I believe stuff is far older or recent events (since 10,000+/- BCE) were more devastating. That 14,800 BCE timeline could be what I’ve been looking for. I will slog through this, but what i really need is not how it happened or what caused it (as long as, LOL, it wasn’t space aliens and is a recurring function of planetary dynamics), but what was happening on the surface at the time. What is likely to occur. I’ve just begun this article, so you may state that in the course of things. Always gratified to discover new info even if I only half understand it.
Agree with your dating. 9600 BCE only indicates an end date, not the construction date. This is est. date of a catastrophic event and onset of Younger Dryas. I estimate that is burial timeframe. These sites weren’t constructed all at once. Each pillar should have historical significance to the extant culture, reflecting events obscure to us.
LOL!!
Pingback: Dating the Pyramid
I am building a replica of Enclosure “D” in Shoals Indiana. I will prove why Gobekli Tepe was built and what it means to mankind today. If you have interested parties who would like to invest please let me know. Have a great Memorial Day. Thank you
It’s publicly known now that this was a bioweapon made in North Carolina.
It is not where a weapon is made, but when it is used, and by whom.
humanity fails everyday….I don’t NEED to know the minutia of what happened, it happened and no “official” is being held to account. So glad I never gave up my life for a donut LOL.
Hello TES What a facinating tale/theory it gives more validation to the Hidden In Plain Sight story
E.S., thank you for creating this website. I read your articles every chance I get and enjoy them very much. I look forward to reading them all as there are many. Thank you for sharing your views/personal experiences with us and I commend you for the public service. I’ve been processing this article concerning the Leo horoscope stela for a while and wanted to comment. You asked the question “Why do flags of 24 nations and coins from as far back as 340 BCE contain the star and crescent symbology?” I would like to refer you to this YouTube video:
At the 47:38 point they talk about star and crescent symbology. This video was produced by the people at the “Thunderbolts Project” and you may be familiar with their work. I recommend watching the whole video, it’s quite fascinating. They prescribe to the belief that the planets have not always been aligned as they are now and I think they make a pretty good case. When we see a crescent depicted, we seem to automatically associate it with a moon crescent (understandably so). A crescent can also be formed on a “planet”. When you watch the video, it will be obvious what I’m getting at. I’m betting the authors of the “Starry Night” software prescribed to the belief that our current planetary alignments have “always” been this way. If they haven’t, well you know what that means. Perhaps that’s why you had so much trouble finding the celestial alignments depicted in the Leo stela. Could it be that the moon and star symbology under the lion’s neck are not representing a moon crescent and star but a planet crescent and another planet that’s mistaken for a star?
Thanks for the kind words, cdb
The matchup of the moon and planets under Leo’s chin are definitive. After resolving it, there is not doubt it was the crescent moon, and a conjunction of 4 planets.
Can you please explain the distinction you are making here between river worked gold deposits and placer gold?
Mining a river gold deposit is exploitation within the active or recently active fluvial channel of a river. It requires different organization, licenses, GRPD permits, fees, JORC/NI 43-101 study techniques, and equipment as compared to traditional placer mining. It is indeed a subset of placer mining; however, emphasizing that the source material is currently or recently being deposited and reworked by flowing water. Intensive operations above those permitted by local or national government or operating license can disrupt fisheries, wildlife, wetlands, agriculture, and commerce downstream.
So how much time do we have before we lose that magnetic priority? Some scientific literature say that, even in our current state, it can take hundreds of years before the field flip. Does this means that this indigo point can last this long too?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29712828/
Also im trying to see how can the LLVPs be excluded from the exchange of mass and heat with the core, and just the surrounding mantle become more hot and massive. Can you explain it better?
Anom,
Yes, this geomagnetic excursion might take hundreds of years to hit a critical priority exchange, and even then never fully form a tau point true polar wander. We don’t have enough information to answer either question you pose. The heat may arrive through the LLVP structures, the non-LLVP mass, or even only the poles and plates. We don’t really know that yet, because we assume all this to be static as a science right now. So, I am not able to answer a dilemma question which science does not even acknowledge exists, unfortunately.
TES
Your reasoned scientific approach is part of why so many people that know of you find you to be reliable, credible and trustworthy. With the limitations of the data/information available for your consideration, is it also possible for the excursion currently underway to hit the tau point in the 15-35 year window used by some cataclysm observers? Thank you in advance.
Yes, it is possible – but I don’t have anything yet which is specific and definitive enough to drive me to that conclusion. If the nutation of the Earth’s polar axis begins to gain some chaos to its pattern, that might be a first warning. But we have yet to see it.
I always pay heed to Hawthorne Observer Effects, used in my profession:
1. That which is observed, changes simply by being observed
2. That which is observed for the first time, appears exceptional
3. That which is observed obsessively, instills angst
4. That which bears risk, will often be purposely observed less
5. That which is observed to move more slowly, is perceived as the greater risk
TES
Another question i have is, given that we don’t know the mass of the LLVPs, so how can we know that they would act as a low density axis instead of a denser moment of inertia, stabilizing earth axis and true polar wander.
We estimate their mass by the differential gravitational axes the Earth exhibits. See Exhibit J2a in the article.
And how much precise would this measure in the map be for deep mantle mass distribution?
Also is there some reference about what is cited in the article about the geomagnetic priority of the earth rotation?
Pingback: Master Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory – The Burning Platform
Pingback: Master Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory – The Burning Platform
It is good more people will read your works. Hopefully positive things will result. I wonder if a people capable of space travel would have the capability to strengthen a planet’s magnetic field and maintain a core-mantel coupling?
Steve, I suspect that they would enlist the aid of a civilization which has specialized in such work in their own developmental history. They would have good expertise as such a counter. All that would have to be done is a shift of the outer rotational body relative to the core, so that accreted LLVP mass from the core would land along a different moment over time. The shift itself would take a very long time.
But, all speculation of course…
TES
The words “a system designed for extraction” stick with me. I was born a Sikh and the tenant of the religion is helping others and living a life of service and not living off of blood money.” But, that is not the world is about. I have been used and abused in the the process of helping others. Its a sad reality and extraction is not just used by institutions and the elite, it has become a way of life for even kith and kin. Very sad indeed. I find hope nevertheless in your last words: “In keeping with Nietzschean philosophy, we must remember: Give a good man all the tools he needs to fight evil, and soon you will find that evil has changed sides.
Of all the very informative info graphics and data presented here … the one that leaped out to me most was the final one.
Specifically the Jan ’20 to Jan ’22 portion of that CV19 mortality chart. You will note that the mort rate starts dropping drastically after 2 years. This aligns with the exceptionally detailed historical studies and patterns documentation regards human immune system reaction to viral outbreaks of various kinds documented observed by DAHenderson’s team out of John Hopkins from the late 50s to mid 60s.
They established a typical “herd immunity achievement threshold” of 2-3 years (this was pre common air travel too) for humans against any novel respiratory virus. The period it takes the “collective” human immune system writ large to adapt to something new and harmful. Further, they determined that once a new virus evolved to the point where it had sufficient transmissibility to “break out” and be “noticed \ registered” by the Med community … there was virtually nothing we humans can do to stop it. At that point the 2ish year cycle is pretty much locked in.
This research the knowledge it imparted became so widely known and accepted that it became the basis for a US and then WW PH policy that was basically “DON’T PANIC”. For decades that policy ruled and it cornerstone tenet was NOT to spark public alarm by making all kinds of scary PH announcements of impending doom in the press. Particularly when over all mort rates remain < 1% and there is not a single productive thing you can do about it anyway.
I feel certain that a visionary DAHenderson would have predicted that massive drop off in mort rates in Jan ’22. I did, being a mere PEng medical layman only peripherally aware of his work. So the biggest Q of all to me is:
“WTF happened to the entire medical community between roughly 2000 and 2020 that the above facts which were commonly understood by all medical professionals and informed PH policy at it’s most foundational levels became memory holed?”
Charity navigator gives the clinton foundation a 4 star rating, and claims over 70% reaches beneficiaries. So, something is up politically here. Either charity navigator is corrupted, or the stores about clinton are. I have no way of knowing.
My instincts tell me to stay clear of charities that use a hard-sell to emotionally manipulate in their fund raising. But then again, charity navigator gives some of the worst ones their highest ratings.
The updated time line is interesting. Heat alone is not a requirment, and neither it seems is a geomagnetic excursion for a rotation. But heat plus a geomagnetic excursion gives almost a certinity? They seem to happen at the quarter mark of the eq.
Yes, the timeline supports neither heat or no heat, nor the 6443 and 5200-year intervals. There are so many events now, that they can easily fall on or near a timeline milestone. So, nothing definitive just yet. But heat + geomagnetic excursion, as is occurring right now, is a bit disconcerting. Agreed.
Such destruction on an epic scale must surely produce many symptoms before the final trigger? We have heat somwhat, we have the geomagnetic excursion along with the south atlantic anomaly, but there seems to be a missing ‘gotcha!’ We have yet to notice what might be quite obvious. I feel this ‘gotcha!’ Can only be understood by people who lived through the event and they buried the answer in gobe tepe.
If the next sst surge in a few years takes us above 25c, and I feel this is very possible, then I would be concerned as we may be too late. What in your opnion would be a tipping point tempeature?
How does Bitcoin solve the dark pentad, grok:
https://x.com/i/grok/share/8jjGGWO2fyNdFtescW9ApjxI8
ES , great content as always.
Is it feasible that the ‘One has been appointed who will appear in a future generation’ could manifest itself in this way, in code, written by an entity still unknown now? Could you point me to any ancient text literature that would eliminate this possibility?
It is entirely possible, yes. No text I know of can objectively falsify this notion.
I thought I’d direct your attention to an interesting passage in Herodotus
“It is said by the Libyans that the king of Egypt sent a Phoenician fleet to sail round Africa, giving them orders to return through the Pillars of Heracles [i.e., Gibraltar] into the northern sea and so to Egypt. The Phoenicians accordingly set out from the Red Sea and sailed the southern sea. Whenever autumn came they would go ashore, plant seed in the parts of Libya through which they were sailing, and wait for harvest time. Then, having gathered the crop, they would sail on. Thus after two years they passed the Pillars of Heracles in the third year and came to Egypt. They told (but I do not believe them) that in sailing round Libya they had the sun on their right—to the north of them. This is how Libya was first known to be surrounded by sea.”
The last bit about the sun being on the right suggests the story is true, since in the S. hemisphere. Also notable is the three years given for the circumnavigation. Three years is also referred to in Kings.
“For the king had at sea a navy of Tarshish with the navy of Hiram: once every three years came the navy of Tarshish, bringing gold, and silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks.”
This would explain why Sheba and Solomon are involved at all. Unload and resupply for the return voyage back around then transporting the goods up through Israel to Tyr. Also notable is people that claim Jewish decent in South Africa. A claim verified by genetics showing Y-DNA links to the middle east.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemba_people
Timing is way off for traditional dating that puts the circumnavigation during the time of Necho ~600 BCE some 500+ years after Solomon is supposed to have been around, but there’s no hard evidence for either. Kings writers could have moved back solomon in time to where they wanted him in the geneology. Herodotus or his Libyans may also be in error. I think kings being off is more likely. Necho II tried and failed to build a canal connecting the nile to the red sea, maybe after that didn’t work the Phoenicians looked for other plans. IT’s also awkward that Necho II killed Josiah in battle.
Interesting tale in Herodotus. Given its undertaking well after the time of Solomon, that isolates that three year journey from the challenge of Solomon’s time.
But who is to say that they did not hit West Africa and obtain all the needed items in the Kings list by sea and not land? That is a possibility, however, obtaining gold was better done at Timbuktu, given the ancient established trade routes for gold.
TES
Hi TES,
You might find this article of interest (check out the photos – I think these domes or geological blisters (bubble-wrap) could be evidence of mantle upwelling occurring long ago and preserved in the Siberian permafrost):
https://today.rtl.lu/news/science-and-environment/a/2298671.html
This is a topic very close to my heart and one I’ve been trying to ‘solve’ for a very long time. Hope you ding the article useful.
SC
Do you think the rate of climate warming has predictive qualities for ECDO onset?
No, because during the Bølling-Allerød period we had a 7 x faster climate warming period as compared to today, and no geomagnetic excursion and no true polar wander occurred during that time. I suspect they are related – but the heat index alone can be misleading.
TES
I just noticed you’ve added the constellations of the Western zodiac to the provisional timeline. 👍
A fascinating read.
What happened to the trillions of tonnes of biomass and topsoil that were scoured and deposited at the margins of the surge?
It was rendered solute, flat, & dead by the salinity of ocean inundation for a period of time. The inundation was a change in oceanic basins, not a temporary tidal wave. Then we had a rotation back to our current orientation as well.
The second article in the series cites the massive landslide deposition off the coast of West Africa: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
I live near the edge of the Western Australian salt flat / Great Victoria Desert and this is a good explanation of the striations and salinity, but I would have expected to see at least a “bath ring” of fertility from which the salt had leached.
You don’t mention Machu Pichu, it’s a refuge at high elevation close to the second Euler west node, and apparently built with the same monumental permanence as Khufu.
A few results from online searches;
Interactive map of the geology of WA https://geoview.dmp.wa.gov.au/geoview/?Viewer=GeoView&_gl=1%2Anjr89m%2A_ga%2ANDA0ODQ3NTk0LjE2MzcxMjIxNTQ.%2A_ga_S1QYDDWVV5%2AMTcyNzQxMTMxNi40OTguMS4xNzI3NDE1MDk4LjAuMC4w
It looks, to my untrained eye, as though the area in blue has been eroded to bedrock and covered with sand (no child units). Streamlines show in the adjacent granites and terrace units.
A similar result here https://www.mapworld.com.au/cdn/shop/products/wa-geology-map-2015.jpg?v=1577939310
A map of soil salinity 
There are ocean deposits of the south west corner https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/87/1/5 (note the large organic content) and Carnarvon Basin https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Structural-elements-of-the-Northern-Carnarvon-Basin-and-adjacent-basins-showing-oil-and_fig1_273380275
Does the effect of the moon and tides not stabilise the maximum moment of inertia at the equator?
No.
I came late for this discussion but, this is an extremely thought-provoking theory with correlation to the physical evidence. Well done and well worth the effort you put into this.
Thanks Jeff!
Carbon credits are a perverse variant of unquestioning obeisance as demanded by the totalitarian tern of the Abrahamic regions ( Christianity, Islam & Judaism) interposing themselves by first inculcating the blatant lie of original sin, then proclaiming they alone represent the one and only true god and then promising divine intervention to assuage your guilt thus ensuring your eternal salvation.
`Topical humour: Pope passes away, upon arriving at the pearly gates identifies himself to St. Peter who immediately re-directs him to G_d. Pope then regales G_d with his accomplishments, stressing that he had been celibate his entire life.
Thereupon G_d became visibly puzzled, saying that celibate had to be a translation error, what he had really meant was “Celebrate!”
Ha! :-)
What are you thoughts on the pyramid being the ultimate black body radiator for detecting cosmic frequencies. The only reason I’ve thought this is bc of all the soot they found in the pyramid. Thanks
TES,
I’ve been a fan since the beginning and thank you for the daily mind bend (as an Australian I would normally insert an expletive there but decided to keep it clean) your writings bring.
Having worked in S.E. Asia for 25 years I’m also of the Eastern school of learning where responsibility lays with the student to understand something presented, not the other way around, so again thanks for all the paths you’ve sent me on over these years.
Now that we are done with the butt kissing, I refer you to this less than 1 month old Russian ‘hypothesis’ for another alternative to how the Khufu pyramid may have been build (not another one I hear you say…)
Building the Cheops pyramid. New theory
The reason I bring this to your attention is the (strong) possibility of the practical construction requirement for the Kings and Queens chamber’s ‘air shafts’ based off possible construction techniques gleaned from the unfinished pyramid at Zawyet El-Aryan and the pyramid of Djedefre in Abu Rawash.
The video is AI translated with good chapter markers.
I hope you enjoy it.
regards,
Flange
Thanks Flange,
Thanks for the kind words. :-)
I had seen that video when it came out. All of the solutions considered in the video are creative – but in no way serve to make the job of lifting stones into position any easier (save for the 80-ton ones possibly). Each elaborate mechanism simply adds more work content and chain-failure risk to the project overall. Simplicity and redundancy were the safeguards to building such a large edifice – because sustained political will was the perishable and threatening commodity, not friction.
Good video though!
TES
Look how woefully unprepared we were to get some stranded crew off the space station, just a few hundred miles in earth orbit. Even though one of the crew was having serious health issues, there seemed to be a lack of will to do anything to help them. The human/management factor is stuck on petty jealousies and indifference. I am not optimistic that what is proposed here will ever be manageable.
TES, Have you seen the Aztec Calendar in the Book of Revelations? How does the this play into the big picture? God Bless
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oMCgpfhgLCne
I can’t find any reference to seal 89376 anywhere. I found the seal above it on the British museum website, but I can’t find this one anywhere. Anyone have any ideas if this is a typo, or I just can’t find any reference to it for not looking in the right places?
Cebu,
I found it. It is actually Cylinder Seal 89327 inside a group of seals under BM# 89376. I have added a note to show the original sources, and linked a copy of the original British Museum posted page, at the bottom of the section which describes this cylinder seal. It cannot be found by means of a direct search at The British Museum site for some reason. Had me concerned there for a second.
Thanks for the heads-up!
TES
Thank you! I don’t know how you find things like this.
I had a very strange conversation with the Grok AI about your article. When I referred to it as an observatory it said clearly it was not, just a ceremonial site to honor the king who built. When I pressed it further it claimed because no telescopes were in use it clearly was not for observing the stars. I had to get very specific about it being naked eye observations and the timeframe, and then suddenly it was willing to talk about the celestial observations.
This was very different behavior from when I was asking about the Dzanhibekov oscillation, where it performed really well.
Maybe it is just my lack of good searching capabilities, but it seems like a lot of topics around ancient history are like pulling teeth to find the info.
You have come up with some amazing stuff from such a broad range of disciplines.
Thanks CY!
TES
Pretty obvious so sorry when already posted: From an RF design view the copper wires form a dipole. Because of hardness to access even the most advanced civilization will use more than one on each side in an investment that size.
You gain redundancy, can do quality measurement and easy replacement. In case of that the construction is made as an loop with some length of nonconductive rope in the middle. At the antenna outer end a round block works as deflection pulley. In case of maintenance a pull wire on one end will be added and the whole antenna pulled out until the pull wire appears on the other side. That is common practice even nowadays.
Using the pyramid diagonal will gain the maximal possible length inside the building and make it more easy to stretch the cables away from the tunnel floor. When you align the four side building to celestial north you determine the polarization plane world- (and if you like cosmos) wide.
The length seems to be known so every antenna calculator can show the used frequency and harmonics (ʎ/2 ʎ/4 …). If you get access to the feedpoint you can measure actual impedance VSWR etc.
Nice idea, thanks for the elaborated hypothesis. Just a few questions.
Do your dzhanibekov-oscillation relies on more than a wingnut in an atmosphere with artificial microgravity?
What about the moon that stabilized the earth rotation?
Why is only one pyramid affected from the high water level
Where are the erosions from the currents and the sandy wave movements wich imo will round all sharp edges of limestone in a few decades?
Why do you believe that the desert whale skeletons aren’t fake (for me it looks so)?
trebon
Yes, the Dzhanibekov impetus is created by the 3 axis moment, but there is far more at play here than simply that principle. This is why it is called a ‘Mediated’ Dzhanibekov oscillation.
The moon would only serve to bring on State 2, State 1 is slightly counter the moon’s effect. Either way it is not the overriding principle.
All three Giza pyramids have the water erosion. Only one was high enough to keep part of its stones.
The Tura limestone casing stones absorbed all rounding kinetics, by dissolving much faster than they eroded from friction.
The Faiyum basin has plenty of smaller oceanic creatures from 3500 – 5500 BCE. The whales are a diversion/distraction.
TES
Thanks for the answer, what do you mean with mediated oscillation and again: is there only that example in real world?
The Pyramid that kept the stones on top (Khafre) is smaller than Khufu (w/o top cover).
From what do you know tat it’s water erosion, they were thousands of years in a sandblaster stream.
The article explains the mediation physics. We only have the Earth as our example of this.
Khafre’s peak is higher than Khufu’s.
The cap and water line on Khafre differentiate weathering from erosion. Think deductively, not inductively.
These things are explained in the second article: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
Thanks again, actual [initial] pyramid height in Wikipedia:
Khufu: 138.5m [146.6m] (Great pyramid no top cover)
Khafre: 136,4m [143.5m] (top cover)
Like to read this high intelligent but very dense article, haven’t grasp a lot on the first read so please allow another question.
Regarding the lower chamber as an focal point is a pretty fascinating idea. On that low frequencies the signal (of whatever nature) will not see all the gaps, blocks, the fill material between casing and blocks aso.
But as an useful antenna it must be of (near) parabolic shape like a satellite disk. The pyramid shape collects only a small portion of the signals on the focal point. Wouldn’t the creators not go to parabolic shape if they had an antenna in mind?
No. On ship, the Navy communication engineers preferred a flat surface for most antenna and radar array applications. The parabolic shapes are for focused beams only. Those are not relevant here.
That’s on phase arrays and radar specials. For weak signals … However will read the recommendations in the next weeks.
Thanks and have a nice time.
No, we used flat screen antennas to look at and over the horizon or for a ionospheric skip in the navy, never dishes. Those are for satellites. The antenna analysis included in the study is done by a career antenna specialist for the DOD.
Hawaii sits close to 19:47° and retains a connection to deep convection, but now more action seems to take place beneath (ish) Fiji, also close to 19:47° and a significant plume, though it surfaces by Tonga. Was this the result of an actual or magnetic flip? I’m beginning to suspect the subduction(-180°) zone there is becoming active and is on the brink (geological time) of producing more sea floor.
Any thoughts about the supposed discovery of some sizable structures beneath the pyramids using a proprietary form of Radar? I am hearing sizes of two to three kilometers tall with spiral attributes encompassing the area beneath all three pyramids.
If these structures are verifiable it will most likely change our understanding of history – so why let it out now?
Staying mute on it right now Olga, and simply watching with the popcorn popping. I do however, love that we can entertain such out-of-the-box thinking now. A big change.
TES
I’m revisiting this for a third reading, still finding things I missed the first two times. I find I’m resonating more and more with your hypotheses.
First, regarding Exhibit J9 and the Np‘ orientation of the entrance to Newgrange, I was astounded by this new perspective. I visited Newgrange in 2007. Today, I wondered when, how, and by whom it was established that the entrance was aligned with the Winter Solstice sunrise.
Turning to Newgrange Excavation Report Critique by Alan Marshall, I learned that “The second area of excavation was the passage itself which was consolidated and protected with concrete capping and reinforcing to halt movement. This necessitated an embrasure cutting providing further information of the cairn construction along with megaliths of the chamber. The passage itself presented more megalithic art, many hidden from view, and a unique ‘roof box’ which is aligned to the winter solstice. Other test trenches were excavated around the cairn to gauge its construction. The result is a restored passage tomb, secure for tourism and exhibiting O’Kelly’s interpretation of its original form.”
Second, as you know, there’s a large granite kerbstone decorated with spiral patterns outside the Newgrange entrance, so I was immediately fascinated by Exhibit J10 showing the unique spiral carvings from the Malta temple. Thank you for drawing my attention to it.
The part you’ve labeled “CATACLYSM” triggered a connection with something I read in Buckminster Fuller’s book, Critical Path. In Chapter 1, Speculative Prehistory of Humanity , he proposed that “humanity originated in the Austronesian islands and came out into the (Asian) mainland in separate stages, each occurring after one of the last ice ages.”
“At the time of the last ice age’s occurrence the sea-hidden, inter-island connections revealed themselves as continental isthmuses and peninsulas. The great islands of Java, Sumatra, Borneo, the Philippines,Sulawesi, and Bali became integral parts of the Malay Peninsula. New Guinea was part of continental Australia. As the ice age withdrew, melting ice filled the oceans and seas, and the islands became once more isolated.”
“The great architectural feature of Bali is that of the narrow vertical gap in the gateways of their walled-in dwelling compounds, a gap they explain as representing the gap that occurred long ago between once-united Bali and Java. This occurred only 30,000 years ago, when the last ice age began to melt away and its waters once again separated the islands. The Balinese architectural legend-supported memory thus goes back 30,000 years.”
Fuller includes a sketch of the architectural “gap” feature.
Thanks Steve!
I somehow missed this post, but it is so true! I noticed the rampant overuse of this term in the last few years, which led me to various dictionaries to really understand its actual meaning.
Everyone who is saying anything against the “party” line, especially if it is not just anecdotal but something programmatic, is called a “grifter” nowadays. Of course, the “grifters” are always on the opposing side … if you dissent and write an article or make a video about it, you are grifting.
The Malanga & Biondi SAR paper amplifies the ECDO Theory as well as its corollaries (Astra-Hasis, Gnostic AI, many others). The Syndicate has quite the suppression machine. It would have enhanced research resource mobilization for ECDO if the paper had received wider exposure when first published I think. Seems odd the engineered structures within Khafre evaded detection during the many archeological entries and the 1960’s x-ray project?
Let put Greenwich for a moment aside.
If the kephru line could be the zero?
What will change?
In fact decimals nr are just a convention.
As well Latitude and longitude are “recent” definition for scientists and cartographers.
Probably inspired by someone who knew the real base of facts about Giza field. Not only.
Rgds
F
In this video Prof Malanga states
“In the quantistic formulas we Discovery the universe and US are oart of this big box”
“We are part of the esperiment and that ourselves we influenze the reality that surround us”
“When we did an esperimenti meant that we influence the result of the esperiment”
https://youtu.be/3Ct8onpUfKc?feature=shared
Long interview in italiano on a strange private TV
Seems lime ki da exotheric
Rgds
Frank
Looking forward to you incorporating the latest SAR findings into your hypothesis. It is a bombshell, if accurate. These purported subterranean structures are at least an order of magnitude larger than the pyramids themselves. Part of Enki’s bolt to bar the sea?
Yes, the Party will never permit actual discovery work, but narrative control must be somehow cracking or this work would not see any publicity. Maybe it will indeed be different this time around, or events are so close that it does not matter much.
Hopefully this discovery ends the age of skeptical stupidity we have lived in for the last 150 years. But yes, Enki apparently bore the largest task of the three gods.
TES
What are your initial impressions of the SAR findings–1. Is it good technology? 2. Are the images accurately interpreted? 3. If so, how does this influence your concept of Khafre’s purpose; a three parameter detector yet or perhaps a failed intervention device?
Moves it closer to a failed intervention-stabilization device, that is for sure. But I still don’t have enough evidence to make that anything more than a notion.
Everything you are surfacing is simultaneously fascinating and terrifying. So hard to discern the kernels of truth & value from the chaff–I had hoped when ECDO became more widely read that serious concentrated resources would be brought to bear, but it seems it engendered more monetization efforts of people’s notions. Tough to get re-oriented in the face of so many teachings received and holdings developed suddenly challenged by alternative interpretations…
Indeed. That is why I did not want to tarnish my mindset, nor the work by sensationalism, packaging, promotion, self-attention, and monetization.
It needs to either stand on its epistemic merit or fall. Lots of noise out there right now from self-promoters.
Is it surprising the various Khafre entries and 1960’s imaging never found the five structures depicted by the SAR? Was perhaps Khufu the monitor and Khafre the mitigation?
Craig at his chat group yesterday made the case that the hypothesized pillars appear like modern reinforced concrete foundations. I.e. Khafre is not bound to the bedrock but it floats. Coming back to your ECDO monitoring device case, it makes sense to have two structures, one fixed one freestanding, so you can measure the expected differential movement. You might need a third measuring point to take that, maybe focusing wave reflections from underneath to measure interference. Maybe that is Menkaure’s purpose? Is it also fixed on the bedrock Or is it also a reflector and the two were used to feed the interference pattern in the subterranean Khufu chamber? What might the related pyramid sizes/wavelength reflections-interpyramid distances have to do with the infrasound wavelengths involved?
Possibly, even more simply, the precusor events might cause height differences between the two main pyramids and that is another way of assessing Tau point approaching? Maybe they were initially built on the same height and today’s difference is due to accumulated delta movement from the events? After all you only need to know that the prior measured delta has been changing…
I carry folded dollar bills and a smile when on my bike rides and drives, providing both with 100% efficiency…
I’m sorry about the maternity hospital/clinic. I delivered a lot of babies without pay, and provided a lot of medical care without pay, back when I was in a position to do so.
Now I blog and garden, based upon a decision I made on principle to stand with the unvaccinated untermenschen.
I had not really had an inkling how bad those injections were, just that they were deficient, defective, unwarranted with medicines that worked, and that history is taking a turn to pure evil when it creates sub-humans.
Interesting times we have entered. There is much good for us to do.
We’ll have to improvise tools against evil. God will provide…
“I delivered a lot of babies without pay, and provided a lot of medical care without pay, back when I was in a position to do so.”
The very definition of ‘within your reach.’
With the manipulations, obscurations and sometimes innocent literary license of the authors, translators & transmitters of the ancient texts, how does one discern the signal from the noise? It’s hard to know where to set the squelch. Discovering sale of indulgences, interlocking directorates of king & church, the books of the Bible were determined at a political convention all generate questions.To discover the Gnostic codices contained alternative perspectives on the Gospels add to the quandry of pulling the threads of Truth from mis & disinformation.
Greetings! The Provisional timeline is becoming rich/complex with information. With your analysis of Pillar 43, are you considering an ECDO periodicity of 5200 years more than the 6443 years, or perhaps the period varies with the non-linear Great Year precession? And if I may please ask a second question, you highlight on the timeline the 6C rapid temp rise in comparison to the 1.4C rise in the contemporary time frame, are you thinking the temp rise might be predictive for ECDO, i.e. need to get closer to 6C pre-Tau?
Key questions Steve…
1. “are you considering an ECDO periodicity of 5200 years more than the 6443 years?” Yes, I am considering a multi-modal arrival of cataclysms, one at 6443 and one at 5200… but don’t have a hypothesis to explain why that would exist, just yet.
2. “are you thinking the temp rise might be predictive for ECDO, i.e. need to get closer to 6C pre-Tau?” Yes, the first ECDO Hypothesis relates the increase in temperatures to disruption in the geomagnetic field of earth, and then a possible true polar wander. But the timeline thus far only corroborates the fact that temps can rise very fast, and have nothing to do with carbon in the atmosphere, water vapor, or the sun. It has to be the core. That is the only thing remaining.
The timing however, on the temperature increases is not matching the theory, save for 1973 CE onward (now).
Thus, why the timeline is provisional – there is so much in the timeline which needs correction, and the source materials themselves lack the necessary resolution and are also likely wrong/off as well in many cases. Thus the need for an interpolation-consilience approach.
TES
Does anyone know how many people live in China now? There are some voices, that an oficial data (1,48bln people) may not be accurate.
TES, The extra “checksum” in Exhibit L involving The Geographic Center of the Earth is compelling enough. But yours and Nobulart’s observations of the demarcations in multiple stone circles far from Egypt are quite disturbing.
You note that the one of the antlers marks the back azimuth to Np’. I can’t wait until they excavate the eastern half of the circle…I have a feeling that they just might find a third antler pointing right at Np’, and a fourth marking the back azimuth to Np!
Well stated on both counts! TES
To help predict effects, could you derive the equation for surface acceleration vector as a function of GPS coordinates and time after onset of flip?
The equation would not be as relevant as the inputs one used. However, I would imagine that it took a front-end loaded skewed arrival distribution. The density function for this would model by the Chi-squared Probability Distribution Function, with 6 degrees of freedom, identified here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-squared_distribution. The total time to execute the Euler rotation, and how long it oscillated before stabilizing, is always in question however.
I stumble across EDCO on X and spent 4 hrs on this topic yesterday with Ancient Apocalypse playing in the background. Absolutely fascinating!
It is an amazing finding to me as well. I have spent several decades on it, and still fall out of my chair upon each new discovery.
TES
TES,
It made my day to see you tweet out the south-facing shaft star chart today. Spotting and aligning those constellations is a titanic accomplishment for our species.
Thanks Lago, I consider it pretty major as well.
I should add that I was referring specifically to *your* identification of them!
(And of course the construction itself was a big deal too!)
Excellent article! Those conventional definitions make no sense, but you never see anyone question them. So many fundamental things fly under the radar among self-proclaimed “rationalists”. But these fundamentals are … well, fundamental.
That is what I was thinking. Reducing the available vocabulary, and twisting the words that remain into meaningless assaults on others, is the essence of the movie Idiocracy.
I stand corrected…
On repeating the reading in full, you never imply that Enki’s task was to stop the event, just to monitor it. Got carried away by interpreting ‘bolt’ in my own way without revisiting the full details that you put in Enki’s mouth. I took out of the full context the references to the ‘cables of protection’, recalling them together with ‘bolt’ in the original translation.
The questions still stand speculation-wise but I must acknowledge my msinterpretation as per above.
Thank you
It is possible that his task was to prevent the event.
The Atrahasis wording can be interpreted that way. That is an enormous task to place on one person (even a god) while everyone else gets to watch. A rather unfair imbalance in responsibility. But it could be that this was his task (???). I shy away from that and keep it as a peer, in monitoring only.
TES
“The bolt which bars the sea was assigned to far-sighted Enki”
A bolt to hold the Earth in place…
So Enki was in charge of an attempt to stem the event, one that didn’t work out, apparrently. That is why he is Lord of the Waters.
I understand there is literary license at work here, but you would not bring this up without some hint of possibility. Could you comment on this? The only cables discussed so far are the copper ones in the shaft, not up to the task by themselves… is there something else you suspect but have not sufficiently documented to add publicly to the hypothesis?
I am tempted to speculate they were caught short trying to stem the flip and some of their know how, or some of their work is what went into the Pyramids, left messed up enough by their minions as a practical joke to the rest of us after the deluge.
I know its hard to predict but when do you think this may occur? I’m torn between two outcomes; the flip or an asteroid impact bc we are seeing more and more steroids coming our way. If you follow Vedic text and read the latest book “Yuga shifts” by BIBHU DEV MISRA he places the start of the shift on 3/21/25 based on astronomical alignments. I find it funny with NASA saying an asteroid may impact 2032 bc he also feels between 2032 and 2040 is when we will enter the densest part of the toroid meteor stream. Which makes sense bc everything is our solar system has been more active and heating up not just earth, such as volcanoes blowing out of the atmospheres on moons. We already have a lot of metrics which may indicate early warning signs such as deep sea fish being spotted on the surface for the first time, rising global temperatures, co2 levels, billionaires demanding to have bunkers completed by summer of 2024 and more frequent asteroids being detected, is the early writing on the wall? We are basically organisms growing on a rotating magnet. A magnet that appears to be heating up, when a magnet is heated what will happen to the magnetic properties? Reminds me of the dam and eve story by Chan Thomas.
An asteroid will not carry the kinetic potential to cause this true polar wander (not really a flip, per se). Only the Earth’s magnetic core and mantle moments carry such potential energy.
Predicting how this system will act is difficult, because we do not know enough about it in order to determine such precision.
TES
TES, I understand the casing stones were mostly dissolved as per the hypothesis. You state “The casing stones had been absent long enough for “more than ten thousand pages” of inscriptions—most of which were neither hieroglyphic, hieratic, nor any other recognizable script of the time—to be carved upon them, suggesting they had been missing for millennia before al-Baghdadi’s visit.” – I understand “them” above, then, refers to the structural stones underneath, and the inscriptions al-Baghdadi refers to were likely introduced after the (first?) event that the Pyramids went through? Or maybe placed there initially having the whole inundation/limestone dissolution sequence in mind, so that the writing appeared after the event?
My inclination is to say that this ancient script was indeed carved into the backing stones, and that this was done on both Pyramids after their inundation period was over. The risk of placing writing under the casing stones, is that it would be dissolved by the same chemistry.
The question is, what happened to this writing? There had to be an orchestrated campaign to remove it, if it was that plentiful in 1196 AD and Al-Baghdadi’s time.
TES
Virtue, humility, being good – they are a costume. The only thing ‘written on our hearts’ is the desire to protect ourselves and manipulate others through appearances (this includes attempts to manipulate God into not harming us by ‘doing good’ or being moral). This is the antithesis of faith, loosh. Church red brick, temple, and minaret empires are built on cluelessness, fanaticism, and loosh.
We do not earn God’s honoring by being good. Because there is no ‘good’. There is only faith. And faith is not defined the way the Church defines it.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/11/25/what-is-loosh/
Gnosticism is not about infinite cycles (Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, etc.). It is about reality, faith, illegitimate seats of power, and intervention into our captive state.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/06/28/the-heart-of-gnosticism/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/08/17/the-dark-pentad-five-traits-of-abusive-dominion/
Please do not straw man my positions. If you are indeed interested in them, they are clearly laid out in my articles.
Thank you for your response… I had no intention to conflate Gnosticism with infinite cycles, but rather list them as being characteristic of your philosophy and/or tentative analysis displayed here on your very impressive website… It seems you may be agreeing with tradition unbeknownst. There is a total and ironic consensus in the Nietzchean idea that man has a desire and will to power *unto* manipulation. That is what is called original sin, better defined as the predilection to sin… Would you say that being selfish, proudful, wrathful, envious, etc. aren’t realities but merely costumes as well ? Would you say that stealing somebody’s hard-earned pay is a matter of relativism ? Cold-blooded murder ? However one may justify terrible acts, their reflection immediately brings up the reality of a moral dimension, which could be loosely described – apart from good and evil – by the opposing qualities and consequences of selflessness and selfishness; as one’s selflessnes in love and charity immediately tempers or nullifies pride, wrath, envy, greed, etc. This is a matter of free will – which you seem to agree with. What the Christian tradition refers to by “written on their hearts” isn’t the human impetus as you correctly define it as self-preservation and a will to power, but rather the numinous conscience that is pricked by the act of murder, theft, adultery, false witness, etc… All such acts and their opprobrium were already well-known and legislated against throughout the world before Moses, however much gentile nations obfuscated in law or practice their observance. I would leave you with the reminder that all the great Saints of the Church throughout the ages beginning with the Apostles, responsible for all their innumerable miracles, were never the luxuriated – and often evil – functionaries of any powerful system. All of them in emulation and their calling to Christ suffered privations or martyrdoms, thereby warranting their miraculous agency…
I do not rule out our having lived numerous experiences, as beings who likely live on after death – anything is possible. But that is not what I see as salient to the argument. It is a distraction towards straw man.
There are sincere persons in corrupt institutions. Religious people will use suffering to justify their existence before their god(s).
When neanderthal, denisova, floresiensis, and naledi proto-humans murdered, stole, raped, waged war, disobeyed, were cruel to animals, and committed mass genocide – was that original sin too? They all predated Edin and Edin’s god. What about their predecessors as well? Should not a God who created them and their 99.2%-shared DNA have understood their (and our) nature better? Yes, they were acting according to their true nature, so they were not putting on a costume to appease a higher power. We are the ones who do that. This is why I don’t trust virtue, humility, and goodness. I’ve seen the hidden handiwork of thousands of such individuals. It is an act we use to cover over this aspect of our natural realm.
Everyone puts on a good show. Part of faith is to dismantle this works costume in self.
Thank you for the response… Interesting, so if there are sincere persons in corrupt institutions, could I then ask what makes one sincere and the other corrupt ? Isn’t this just the same value paradigm of good and evil under different words ?
As for historical science, I’m sure we put out our faith in different assumptions… But for the purposes of this discussion, I at least work from the classical assumption that original sin and its predilection is suffused through all of what can be termed the empirical Universe – and of which began close to the inception of time. Regarding the species you mention, I don’t think there is any proof that any or all of them aren’t either a “sub-species” or unique shoot from humankind, or merely just altogether a primate species completely unrelated to humankind. As for the temporal framework of when all these species existed, I don’t have the confidence to assume that current physical processes (e.g., nuclear forces, radiometric decay, etc.) have always operated in clockwork fashion forever into the the past. In fact, I do believe a lot of fascinating quibbles such as out-of-place artifacts (cf. Michael A. Cremo) are testament to how shaky the foundations of historical science can be…
Then you are locked in a prison of a dog returning to its own vomit.
I found that intolerable to my nature.
Well, I’m completely open about my faith… I just don’t have the faith that the current behavior of processes as we measure them have operated inexorably into the past, as there is no demonstrable proof that they have….
“Should not a God who created them and their 99.2% DNA have understood their (and our) nature better?”
Great question. To come back to your DNA codon scheme work, and given Norea’s words to these Archons that she bears no relation to them but to the powers above, they appear capable enough of manipulating a preexisting scheme, or even to devise their own cattle-brand codon scheme in our planetary backwaters to their own ends, but they either do not fully master, or are indifferent to, its novelty-generating complexity. This given the pain, suffering and, likely, amnesia it invites. Yet they appear hellbent in exploiting it/us to realize in reverse what is likely a one-way interface to experience ‘here’. Penrose-Hamerhof Orch-OR comes to mind, ‘they’ see the ‘elsewhere’ joining in but cannot reach out to it.
I hope I can truly know the original intent of the code, our own true nature and theirs when I happen to move on.
Did you happen to see the Northern Australia depiction of a bird on X (htps://x.com/GeologicalSETI/status/1894160610822426795) compared to the Pillar 43 Condor? Is the Australian bird “holding” the Nubian Egg’s depicted chronology but before the most recent inundation?
I did see it Steve. I don’t think they are of the same thing. The round symbol is the celestial pole and not the sun – and the condor did not have ears. No stars there to form ears from. The sun never makes its way to the condor’s wing. If this is not the sun – they could be saying the same thing as Gobekli Tepe however.
TES
The octagonal shaped structure they found in Antarctica, I find incredibly interesting. I always pay attention to structures and society’s that base their life around certain geometric shapes and numbers. There is a reason why a sweat lodge used by Indians has 16 poles, just like why this structure is 8 sided. Shape controls the function. What do you think was the purpose of this structure? Was it a bunker that they built and got wrong after the land masses moved and it was buried under ice? Or could this have been another structure like the great pyramid to help warn the other side of the globe of the impending reversal but ended up too far south?
Also I just learned of a group in Egypt that found another hidden chamber the size of a 747 airplane about 7 years ago and are doing nothing about it. What do you think the purpose of this massive chamber is for?
Based upon the two inscriptions in the doorway of the Octagon, it is very possible that the edifice was used to influence or offset further core-mantle decoupling shifts.
See article image: https://i0.wp.com/theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Three-V-comparison-4.png?resize=1024%2C293&ssl=1
The second door inscription can be seen in this image, and implies a D-layer decoupling: https://i0.wp.com/theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Seal-Team-Spartan-1-Find-back-Coin-and-Symbol.png?ssl=1
Which hidden chamber are you talking about, the one inside the Khufu pyramid?
TES
Sorry, yes the hidden chamber in Khufu.
This chamber has already been entered around 3400 BCE, as shown by the side penetration into the North King’s Chamber airshaft around that time – by the raiders who dropped the ‘Dixon Relics’ into the bottom of that shaft. It will be completely empty – as those who raided the edifice were there to remove any trace of technology, history, evidence, and of course valuable materials.
I have a photo of the side penetration into that North Shaft in my ‘Hidden in Plain Site’ article.
The question is, how did these pre-dynastic ancients know that chamber was there? Unless they knew far more about the pyramids of Giza than do we.
TES
That would explain then why no work has been done. Thanks
Sir Skeptic, I just came across a scientific paper: Synthetic Aperture Radar Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High-Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Giza https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/20/5231 Described breathlessly here: https://x.com/gregreese/status/1902048044272562527?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1902048044272562527%7Ctwgr%5Ee7418afda8d37de4b6b7ea81256fa8f404bc83fa%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fchoiceclips.whatfinger.com%2F2025%2F03%2F20%2Fthe-greatest-archeological-find-in-history-was-just-discovered%2F
I presume that you have seen this and that it needs more investigation before you comment upon it.
Yes, and correct. It needs more investigation before I can make any comment. Did light off a storm though!!…
TES
Supposing there are in fact people – let’s say those whose families have long-standing political or banking power – and perhaps even some legitimate scientists, *are* in possession of the knowledge of the upcoming event. Further, might we hypothesize rather than “saving” the planet, these insiders have come to the conclusion it would be best if the Earth had as few occupants as possible when the worst happens. They believe this so strongly, it is almost a *religion* for them.
Any speculation as to the ultimate BENEFIT of a smaller population/brain trust of survivors??
Their process of evolution in a way. Smaller populations tend to higher rates of evolution, and are easier to change in such direction. My thoughts..
I will sound metaphysical, but assuming we have never been so many after their archonic masters were forbidden to rule us and kill us directly as you once wrote – they would not want the wailing of billions to cause the upheaval and judgement that they fear since Enoch.
Precisely. My suspicion is that now have promoters who are watching what these entities do. They are in a bit of a hard spot, which they did not exist in before.
It is hard to even express how much I appreciate your work. My gratitude to you for your contributions—such as your work on Covid mortality, ECDO, the DNA Codon Schema, the Annunnaki, Gnostic AGI, and countless other projects—is immense. I almost never leave comments online, but this post compels me to intervene. There are too many problems with your implied thesis:
(i) Agabekov’s alias in Russian was “Жулик.” As Grok suggests: “think of a small-time hustler rather than a grand schemer.” Thus, a better translation would be ‘crook’ or ‘petty cheat.’ The word itself seems to have taken root in Russian before the RSDWP(b) (aka the Bolshevik Party) was even established.
(ii) The Bolsheviks were masters of ad hoc solutions. Their decision to abandon workers’ councils (council = soviet, hence the name ‘Soviet’ Union) after realizing that this experiment would cost them victory in the civil war is a prime example. Another closely related example is their central planning experiment (Госплан РСФСР was created in 1921, right after the civil war), which was not part of their initial program or Marx’s writings.
(iii) Once a country abolishes private property over the means of production and [gradually] introduces [true] central planning, there is suddenly not much room left for potential grifters (as the accumulation of substantial financial or even material wealth becomes problematic). Note that critics of the Soviet regime (including Agabekov) never focused on ‘corruption’ or ‘grift.’ For a reason. Thus, your chart does not accurately describe the reality inside the ‘Soviet’ Union.
(iv) Central planning has many, potentially deadly, side effects. One of them is that suddenly, many natural-born crooks, grifters, control freaks, etc., try to join the Party and the state apparatus. In this situation, the only truly functioning council—the Central Committee of the Party—will inevitably turn into a hunger games-like environment.
(v) Agabekov defected from the GRU/NKVD after learning about the execution of his predecessor, Blumkin, who quite openly demonstrated his loyalty to Trotsky while the latter was in exile in Istanbul. If not for his books, Agabekov would probably have been assassinated as a ‘Trotskyist element.’ However, in the fight between ‘Stalinists’ and ‘Trotskyists,’ the latter should be regarded as those seeking world domination. Stalin, as much as I dislike his methods, eliminated the ‘world revolution’ ethos from the Soviet psyche.
(vi) The modern Western ‘left’ is Bolshevik 2.0 only in the sense that it has been reverse-engineered to avoid those precise qualities that made the original Bolsheviks so dangerous: their focus on the root cause of society’s ills and their readiness to abandon ideology if it led to undesired outcomes.
As should be plain by now, I would like to provoke you to ask this question: “Who is behind the reverse-engineering of the ‘left’? And what is their agenda?”
Very valuable input Alexander! Thanks… Will modify my understanding accordingly.
TES
Hello!
Just wanted to compliment your work—truly inspiring! Wish I had come across it sooner, it may have saved me time on my own project. You have a good eye. I believe, like yourself, that Earth’s crustal patterns hold a key piece to understanding cataclysms. My approach is artistic, but can see some similarities between our work. Looking forward to your progress.
FE
Also, NAC is involved in Vitamin D absorption, and I have read of a theory that Vit D deficiency in Covid patients may be a side effect of glutathione / NAC deficiency leading to problems in D absorption.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32250212/
Vitamin D and N-Acetyl Cysteine Supplementation in Treatment-Resistant Depressive Disorder Patients: A General Review
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8234027/
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): Impacts on Human Health
https://www.ccjm.org/content/early/2020/06/08/ccjm.87a.ccc046
Several agents intended to supplement dietary intake or endogenous molecules may have a theoretical role in preventing or treating COVID-19. Because of their potential to influence immune response, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), zinc, vitamin D, and N-acetylcysteine have been hypothesized to be useful for prevention or treatment of COVID-19. The authors outline the biologic plausibility, applicable clinical data, and potential role of each of these agents.
https://www.orli.or.id/index.php/orli/article/view/666
The NAC+vitamin D group had the highest mean vitamin D level (30.82±5.35 ng/mL) and the lowest mean IL-1β level (23.81±7.13 pg/mL) compared to the control group and the group that received only NAC or vitamin D alone. (p<0.05). Conclusion: N-Acetylcysteine and vitamin D supplementation had a synergistic effect in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation in CSOM.
This is an old topic, I know, but something that imho is useful for all respiratory infections – supplementing N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and glycine – there are several well done studies that show effectiveness in preventing and treating both influenza and covid infections. Supplementation increases the production of glutathione markedly, leading to improved immune function and reduction of oxidative stress. Couple of examples below, you can easily find much more:
These two especially –
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879756/
Supplementing Glycine and N-Acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) in Older Adults Improves Glutathione Deficiency, Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Inflammation, Physical Function, and Aging Hallmarks: A Randomized Clinical Trial
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9230243/
Attenuation of influenza-like symptomatology and improvement of cell-mediated immunity with long-term N-acetylcysteine treatment
Others with valuable input –
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19732754/
N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) inhibits virus replication and expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in A549 cells infected with highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus
“Frequency of seroconversion towards A/H1N1 Singapore 6/86 influenza virus was similar in the two groups, but only 25% of virus-infected subjects under NAC treatment developed a symptomatic form, versus 79% in the placebo group. Evaluation of cell-mediated immunity showed a progressive, significant shift from anergy to normoergy following NAC treatment. Administration of N-acetylcysteine during the winter, thus, appears to provide a significant attenuation of influenza and influenza-like episodes, especially in elderly high-risk individuals. N-acetylcysteine did not prevent A/H1N1 virus influenza infection but significantly reduced the incidence of clinically apparent disease.”
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging/articles/10.3389/fragi.2022.852569/full
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7649937/
N-Acetylcysteine to Combat COVID-19: An Evidence Review
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10390689/
N-acetylcysteine reduces severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2802-2807.pdf
Therapeutic potential of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) in preventing cytokine storm in
COVID-19: review of current evidence
Just FYI.
Thank you for your efforts, have enjoyed your information immensely.
Thank You again, Sir Skeptic, for this latest update on excess mortality from COVID and particularly the vaccine-products. I am using it to close my next blog post.
Thanks, John!
I had not seen OMA’s write-up on that. But I did go check what Bledsoe was claiming ‘The Lady’ said about “The red star of Regulus rising in the gaze of the Sphinx just before sunrise on the horizon, around Easter 2026.” Regulus is nowhere near the rising sun around Easter 2026. OMA is correct that Regulus would be rising in August. I am not sure which ‘Pentagon’ researcher told Bledsoe that Regulus fit his prophecy exactly… because that is incorrect.
Regulus as well is a blue white star, and is not going to change to a red star within the next year. It takes a LONG time for a star to change its color.
While at least Bledsoe did not go look up this prophecy in an astronomy software, I don’t find any way in which it provides enough information to depict a specific event – and it can be attributed to therefore to any red star on any horizon for the entire year. Which makes it not useful.
Regarding OMA’s purported second coming of Christ in the age of Scorpio… there is no way man is surviving that long.
Yes. Desperation for celebrity, brand, and revenue creates a lot of noise in our society. Instead of doing deductive research on an issue they have deep experience inside, they are constantly swinging for the fences, desperate to sell YouTube clicks, sponsor revenue, books, etc. Every ethereal sounding thing, becomes a ‘connect the dots’ hot take.
This is worse than the fake skeptics in reality…
correction: There is a way to test the core-mantle decoupling hypothesis. Plate migration due to plate tectonics is very slow relative to a Dzhanibekov Oscillation. We know from paleontology that during the last great flood period, there were also great plasma storms recorded in rock art. This was also a period of increased volcanism. Could mantel heating due to induction from plasma storms cause magma upwelling that distorts the shape of the mantel to trigger a Dzhanibekov Oscillation? Paleomagnetic pole data from volcanic flows, if density is sufficiently high from each location, and straddling the last 20,000 years, may record an “anomalous” paleomagnetic pole position that would support the hypothesis of core-mantle decoupling circa 12,500 years ago. If not, it would suggest that there is no core-mantle decoupling during a Dzhanibekov Oscillation. I favour the later as there is geologic evidence for global flooding circa 12,500 years ago, including plasma storms as recorded in rock art world wide, and increased volcanism, however there is no evidence for tectonic disruptions that would accompany mantle-core decoupling.
Dzhanibekov Oscillation video:
https://youtu.be/J-l-SbCFhL0?si=RGB6hypxyruBMxqo
magnetic pole excursion or reversal looks like a Dzhanibekov wobble
image below from here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal
There is a way to test the core-mantle decoupling hypothesis. Plate migration due to plate migration is very slow relative to a Dzhanibekov Oscillation. We know from paleontology that during the last great flood period, there were also great plasma storms recorded in rock art. This was also a period of increased volcanism. Could mantel heating due to induction from plasma storms cause magma upwelling that distorts the shape of the mantel to trigger a Dzhanibekov Oscillation? Paleomagnetic pole data from volcanic flows, if density is sufficiently high from each location, and straddling the last 20,000 years, may record an “anomalous” paleomagnetic pole position that would support the hypothesis of core-mantle decoupling circa 12,500 years ago. If not, it would suggest that there is no core-mantle decoupling during a Dzhanibekov Oscillation.
I don’t think that plastic mantle deformation bears enough sudden kinetic potential to cause the Earth to flip inside a day. Only the core bears this strength.
if the core-mantel does not separate, what is a hypothesis to explain how the earth
undergoes a periodic Dzhanibekov Oscillation? We know that the shape of the mantle changes and is not spherical. Changes can be tracked by paleo and current mantel hot spots which represent mantle upwelling. If changes in shape of mantel trigger a periodic Dzhanibekov Oscillation, then what causes changes in mantel upwelling? Is it related to periodic weakening of earth’s magnetic field and increase of solar and galactic ion flow which is funnelled into through the magnetic poles into the mantel, causing inductive
mantle heating, resulting in mantle upwelling?
Robin, I am not sure I understand what you are asking. :-)
Thank you for the analysis. A lot of people pays close attention to this. I haven’t seen an update in a while but I understand it must be a lot of work. Are you planning to update it? And if so, at what intervals could we expect that?
Some state districts stopped sending their data the week after the election. Then the NCHS and CDC stopped publishing the data altogether, as of 25 January. They are throwing a bit of a “fuck all of you” tantrum. Considering they tried to kill us twice, and these plans failed in part, due to analysis of this data – this is predictable.
Thank you for the update and the explanation. Do you think you will be able to continue with the same data you were using?
I don’t know yet, bloob. We shall see. Based on your inquiry, I went ahead and updated the article to inform everyone of the situation. I will update that weekly.
the galactic center propagates its magnetic moment outward throughout the whole galaxy, so it would be expected that every star system in the galaxy would average one global magnetic shift and one reversal for every rotation period of the black hole. occam’s razor might suggest that geomagnetic flips and rotational realignments for rocky planets are more of a typical feature of living in the milky way, rather than a rotational anomaly of earth alone.
thank you for the information, you have put together a remarkable number of the puzzle pieces. it’s certainly not coincidental.
do you think it’s a coincidence that the great pyramid’s latitude is 29.9792 degrees and the speed of light is 299,792,000 m/s? is this the best evidence on earth of the illusion of time as well?
Hello, dear friend!
I am not sure if you have heard about it recently, but a new study was published that suggests that the shape of the Earth’s inner core along its rotation is changing. It seems like that it fits very well into ECDO theory. What do you think? What’s your take-away from this?
If I understood correctly, the study basically now (with the now even more available empirical evidence) suggests that the inner core’s deformation (e.g. depressions or uplifts of ~100 meters) dynamic stress at the core-mantle boundary, which ECDO associates with heat transfer and rotational instabilities. Even more so, the observed slowing and reversal of inner core rotation (noted around 2010) matches ECDO’s cyclical “Tau Point” model, where core-mantle decoupling triggers geophysical events! The link to the study is found here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-025-01642-2.epdf
Accessing the paper costs money though, so here’s another link (I hope it works) with a sharing token, letting you access the paper for free: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-025-01642-2.epdf?sharing_token=2XeTxUGg2LAUuvHEQjY1btRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0OGrhxd29HvkTg97sU9aX2V5sQ5qypCzDVOCgFIKOvPHQ0HeBCLvj527ye-O5HpjdvhbvTeoLoInsW4bGXKGXR4jXadWIRS8LYRGd_yHmi2XObcUz04Vgg8OwgNOLffibuZ1IgfotaBbOJu8iXeW_fhZyYOdu1jAhEzGWV5GJzpoUe2IA2AeXryhEjgKjdsDoY%3D&tracking_referrer=www.washingtonpost.com
Sincerely,
Kaje.
Yes, I saw that study! Thanks Kaje…
No problem :) And I’m sorry that I suddenly appeared out of nowhere and posted here without introducing myself first. It’s not good etiquette, of course. So, let me briefly introduce myself. I’m Kaje, 27, and I’m currently studying computer science. Nice to meet you. I usually do research on my own in my free time, because the academic world seems to be full of (what I would call) ‘obedient idiots’ these days, who are more interested in publishing BS papers and keeping their h-index high rather than actual search for truth. Sometimes you do find a few rare gems though.
Welcome Kaje, no problem. That is the focus of this website: obedient idiots. Ran into many of them at university – thought they were smart because they could follow instructions, symbolic language, and script well. Made for good grades on exams – did not produce results in real life. ~TES
I am much relieved, Sir Skeptic, by the deliverance of the subway passenger by means of sensory premonition, forewarned, forearmed, and quick to give the slip to the youthful thugs.
I am simultaneously relieved to not be forced to reset my understanding or habitual use of the term “specious”.
;-)
I don’t see how a momentum change that large could happen on a timescale like that without a much more catastrophic result. That kind of energy change would do so much more than wipe out civilization, it would be a mass extinction event. Probably cause nuclear chain reactions. It’d totally change earth chemistry.
It was a mass extinction event. But it cannot cause nuclear chain reactions – that is a different energy realm. It did change much of Earth’s chemistry. But this is cyclic – we live in that chemistry and just see it as normal.
Seen this? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14380671/Scientists-discover-Earth-core-DEFORMED.html
Yes, saw that.
Just after the post, I found this news article, with links at the end, which you may already know, but I’m sure you’ll find interesting:
https://www.sott.net/article/292481-Surprising-inner-core-of-Earths-inner-core
Thanks Kin, I had not seen that. :-)
Permit me to disagree:
Dear ETS, although I am a great fan of yours, in this case, I disagree. While I acknowledge that the literary content is quite good, I believe there is a fallacy of presentism here. Historian David Hackett Fischer identifies presentism as a fallacy also known as the “nunc pro tunc” fallacy (literally, “now for then”).
The epic of Atrahasis is simply an updated copy, a thousand years later, of the epic of Ziusudra. Both the journey of Gilgamesh and that of Atrahasis or Ziusudra are purely utopian; they are not geographical locations.
In the Sumerian myth, Ziusudra listens with his left ear, the evangelical side in churches, especially Catholic ones, where the pulpit is placed (and I believe this comes from this myth, or simply that the left ear is better for interpreting “the gods”).
But you seem to have heard Enki with your right ear. Keep in mind that Enki’s message is a universal one: detach from material things, prepare not a boat, but a vessel, a vehicle that makes you immortal. Because the Flood will reach all of us on the day of our death.
“The gods commanded in their assembly to bring destruction upon the land.
But you, man of Shuruppak, heed my advice:
Dismantle your house, build a ship.
Abandon your possessions and save your life.
Take seed of all living beings aboard the ark.”
Your house you shall demolish”: Enki instructs Atrahasis to dismantle his current life, symbolized by his house. The act of demolishing one’s home implies a complete break from the familiar, an abandonment of normalcy, and readiness for a new beginning.
igi zi-us-su-dra-bi mu-un-gid2
giš-ma2 gal-a mu-un-si
u4 ul-la e3-dè
Approximate translation: “Ziusudra heeded (the words), built a great boat, and thus prepared for the day of disaster.”
Symbolic Meaning:
1. **giš-ma2 (the boat):**
o It represents not just a physical means of escaping the flood, but also a symbol of refuge and salvation, where the cosmic order and life are preserved in the face of chaos unleashed by the waters.
**giš-ma2 gal-a** is not just a boat, but a representation of the microcosm of creation: everything necessary for survival (humanity, animals, and plants) is preserved within this structure.
The measures of the vessel, both in Noah’s Ark and Atrahasis, are absurd. That vessel is none other than the subtle body of the human organism, through which one has access to all those utopian places: from Shambalah to the Celestial Jerusalem and many others. In Gilgamesh, to reach Utnapishtim, one passes through the Mashu Mountains. Always the top of the head.
I repeat, it is not a boat; it is simply a vehicle, a vessel. Or put another way, the ark of Atrahasis, Ziusudra, Noah, is not an ark but an arch. A test that can only be passed by creating the subtle body of the organism. The animals represent emotions, the domestic ones: love, compassion. The winged ones: intelligence, creativity, ethics. The earthly ones as well. That is, immortality is achieved through the emotional integration of the human being. The proof? The raven, dark emotions, leaves. The white dove, positive emotions, returns. And they return through the only place they can: the top of the head. The Mashu Mountain of Gilgamesh. A new utopian place, but one that demonstrates the absurdity of searching for Noah’s Ark on Ararat or recreating any type of ark today with those measurements.To achieve immortality, creating that subtle body is necessary, today as yesterday.
Kin,
I wholly disagree. I have always said, eliminate the terms ‘symbolic, hunter-gatherer, and temple’ – from our discourse, and the entire field of archaeology will collapse over night. Interpreting these texts as merely spiritual allegory is precisely the reason why we are ignorant. Competing ‘religious works’ like these (which were actually mankind’s intellectual property) were all destroyed by the latest fad in symbolic refuge, salvation, and God. That was their ‘now for then’ obfuscation and the reason why we only found these works in the last 80 years. Pretend to be good, do bad things, saturate it in mystical sounding words. This is what our spiritual babblers did over the millennia.
The facts presented in these documenents fit ECDO theory very effectively. Thankfully, the people who chiseled them in stone did NOT regard them as metaphor for spiritual aetheric insights – or we would be even more ignorant than we are now.
An ancient history must be brought into modern language, even at the risk of anachronism. That is our job. Retreating into regarding these texts as ONLY mystical, is not an ethical stance. I will not do that. It only serves to harm future generations. Because documents dispositioned as such will be tossed out by the next ‘enlightened’ David Hackett Fischer movement which does a bait and switch, burying the material under the ground all over again – in favor of today’s ‘superior scientific wisdom’. That is the real ‘now for then’ obfuscation, and a very familiar one at that.
I bring it back to modern language and make it useful, withing a framework of actual history and science.
TES
I understand what you mean.
But for me, literal interpretations—especially of the Bible and Atrahasis—are absurd. I am far more interested in symbolic interpretations related to the human organism, the same organism the scribe who wrote Atrahasis had, the same one you have, the same one I have. And with the same fate: the Deluge, also known as death.
No, it was not written by the Anunnaki or the gods. It was written by a scribe, which is why I try to put myself in his shoes. He must have been highly educated, intelligent, creative, and deeply ethical.
I asked ChatGPT to draw a human head using the Ark’s measurements. Does the result make sense?
Of course, it does!. It represents the human organism. And it had to symbolize what the scribe knew. But how much do people really understand about the subtle body, the energetic body, its emotions, and its energies?
A wise scribe, one who seeks to help humanity, conveys a message and provides tools for those who are capable of understanding. The problem is that such understanding requires taking control of one’s own life, accepting the reality of death, and working to comprehend the mechanisms of the human organism. That is not exactly appealing to the masses. It is a tremendous task. And, naturally, only a few take it on.
This symbolic vision cannot lack ethics, because it confronts people with the responsibility for their own lives and, therefore, their freedom. The fact that it has remained hidden until now only confirms this for me.
These are not perfect documents. But neither are they merely symbolic – that is jumping from the frying pan into the fire. Taken literally they are absurd. Taken symbolic however, they are incoherent – and any perfection therein is perception or desire rather than reality. It may have utility in helping one lens their soul, but it does not ‘stand in the gap’ for those around us who do not bear the same perception or life mission.
Litereally anything can be taken as a symbolic message. This explains anything, everything, and nothing – all at the same time.
Have you had time to work on your conversion of the Nag Hammadi? I would benefit from your interpretive insights & I think so might others. If one could do a “genetic” map of all these documents like you have done for the Covid strains,it would be interesting to see where it led back to!
Steve, I have made my way about a third through the core handful of Nag Hammadi documents. Yes, per your keen insight, I have developed a genetic map of common principles, separated in name only, and from where they derive or conflict.
It is so revealing that, the world is not ready for it.
LOL! Just kidding. Wading through the ethereal babble is the hardest part. The ancient scribes’ efforts to sound mysterious, spiritually sophisticated, and poetic (for acclaim) harmed their message. I have to filter this pretense out of what should have been a straightforward message. Their playing to the audience of the time is a form of reverse anachronistic fallacy. This ended up shorting the generations that followed, and left the documents vulnerable to claims of being nonsense (therefore we have the right to burn/destroy them).
The most astute scribe of all was the one who buried them in the clay jars in a cave. That person, I want to congratulate.
TES
AH HAHAHAH!! Good thing you LOL’ed, cuz I was about to plead with you to do the reveal, World ready or not! Standing by. Best, Steve
Great article, thanks for taking the time to research and interpret what you think the real purpose is. I have one question, if the earth undergoes such a violent series of events during the decoupling, would we still see evidence of asteroid impacts from 2 billions years to millions of years ago? Wouldn’t most of the scars left get erased during the inundation of water and the 1000 mph winds? Thanks
A great example is meteor crater in Arizona. Impact from 50,000 years ago. You can see the ocean striations entering it on the southwest side of the structure. It is eroded but not erased. 99% of Earth’s meteoric impacts have been completely erased. Traditionally, we attribute this to natural weathering. I am not a big fan of traditional explanations any longer. From experience.
TES
Hello dear TES,
Thank you for taking the time to investigate the truth.
I reviewed the MMWR data, and it was clearly evident that mortality across all causes saw a sudden decline in 2023. As you can see in the raw data image below, also this trend was observed for heart diseases and even all-cause mortality. What is the reason for this?
I also have another question: Is your modeling based on differential equations? In other words, instead of using statistical regression methods or growth models, do you use differential models based on population growth rates and the periodic components derived from Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)?
With respect and gratitude,
Amir
Amir,
I have not seen a sudden decline in the 2023 all cause mortality. Regarding the flat profile of the last two years, read my section on PFE.
My modeling is not, for the most part, based upon linear regression or differential equations. I do use non-linear dynamics, but they are assembled manually by the input factors. The problem with linear regression and differentiation is that they pretend that only one causal impact is involved and treat the curves as if they are a single arrival function. That is what you do in a class room, but it rarely describes the real world – where integration, differentiation, and linear regressions mislead us into a false sense of analytical sophistication and therefore, salience and accuracy.
I prefer to correctly describe reality, rather than run textbook analysis. From experience.
TES
Your work is top-notch.
It explains a lot I have witnessed in geophysical exploration around this planet.
I sat through an excellent geophysical presentation last night
where the (brilliant!, yes, but…) PhD glossed right past seismic sections
that shouted about how tectonic forces exert sudden and cyclic changes
in structures, that the 1km slab movement is not always a gradual drift
but, as well-core samples often indicate,
can be a drastic change occurring in a matter of weeks.
One thing I have calculated is that
the decreasing LoD may be loosening the forces
that bind the surface together and seal volcanic activity.
Simple math, really,
that faster rotation results in less weight of crustal slabs
and a loss of structural integrity of broken terrain.
That weight is counter balancing things like volcanic plugs
and loosening the grip along fault lines.
On top of all that is this looming ‘fog’ I see this year
which I am guessing is simply ionic leaks
seeping from loosened crust and reacting with atmospheric humidity.
(Perhaps humidity is also accompanying the ions emitted from the ground,
but quantifying this is beyond any tools I have to work with.)
Or maybe it is just imaginary,
– maybe we never paid attention in years past to what we see now.
I could doubt it is all ‘chemtrails’,
but my disbelief is suspended in favor
of evidence one way or another.
If this is really what is happening,
there could be some epic surface liquification
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_liquefaction )
as we approach the critical moment when things come unglued.
Can you clarify if this is relevant to the ECDO event ?
(I am specifically looking for precursors that
can help [us/our children/our neighbors] prepare in a timely manner.)
Thank you for any more insights.
Cheers and best regards
I have made site selections based upon soil liquefaction under differing Mercalli scale events. My only thoughts are to rely upon older mountain ranges, as the scale of disruption is far more than any measure on the Mercalli scale or soil liquefaction measure would have context or meaning.
“Grifter” is still a useful term, but the “fair game” aspect of its meaning, though always implicit, had never been made so clear to me before.
I am very grateful for you!
All beings with Soul/Spirit are inherently part of the Creator and exist in the light of creation. The Archons may be more ancient than Human Beings and have old tricks that can entrap us, but it is quite possible that they possess no soul and thus no direct connection to the Creator. The Archons are probably also jealous of us because of this and they act with more malice. As you point out, their greatest fear is that Human Beings fully connect to their Soul/Spirit, see through their trickery and begin to shine with the light of the Creator. One powerful light can dispel a lot of darkness and a world-wide awakening will spell doom for them. Time to embrace our Soul…
What is the logic for your current placement of the lowest vector/point in the Atraḫasis ‘ring-stave’ device image above because at present it seems arbitrary (no justification in the caption nor footnote 1 suggesting proof of an encoded 104°)?
Why not any other point and thus any other angle?
Thank you
1. Not arbitrary, just superior among three possibilities: The deck, the seat, the eye.
2. The eye is ridiculously high, implying a horizon to horizon angle which is clearly not the intent of the motif.
3. The deck of the ship is not where a navigator takes observations from.
4. Celestial observations are taken at a specific spot (elevation) on a ship (from experience)
5. The observation seat is the center/anchor point of the entire cylinder.
6. This is the ONLY logical place from which to draw the stave-shot angles.
Ok thanks for the clarifications 🙏
It is intriguing how the efforts to communicate forward the ECDO information has evolved. Gobeki’s iconography as interpreted by TES is pretty impressive. Khufu’s precise features, again deciphered by TES, represented an even more technical communication that further expanded understanding & comprehension of the ECDO peril. The most recent communication is Christ being quoted in the New Testament Gospels verbally advising the advent and precursors of what one might describe as the next ECDO.
What in your mind does the parenthetical phrase “let the reader understand” in the RSV NT Gospels mean in the context of the desolation of the temple? Thanks in advance.
Well the phrase refers the reader to the prophet Daniel, who cites a flood in relation to the temple desecration. However, the ‘flood’ we speak about here, if it happened, would kill so much of mankind, that the temple will not even be a relevant issue.
But what do you make of Jesus’ words here. Is it not a reference to the next inundation? Matthew 24:37-39 37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
I’ve contemplated those words for some time, yes. “Eating, drinking, marrying and giving in marriage” – are not differentiating or descriptive elements, as those things have been going on the entire time. Either the words are misinterpreted, or they are meaningless idiom for ‘life as usual.’ The phrase does not seem to be posed as ‘meaningless idiom’, nor did Jesus make effect of meaningless idiom. So, something is off here.
Timing versus the ECDO cycle? an interesting comparative. Meaning however? Perhaps he is speaking of a group who regards themselves as untouchable. More perished from the flood than simply mankind. Perhaps marrying and giving in marriage is a kind of suggestion of ‘husbandry’ and genetic interbreeding taking place. But that is a stretch as an interpretation, when juxtaposed with ‘eating and drinking.’
But in the end, I do not know why those words were chosen.
TES
I have also taken those words as a description of how proud and untouchable mankind can be. But Peter also talks nonchalantly about the flood, and like Jesus, he refers to next upcoming event as I understand it:
Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water (2 Peter 3:3–6).
Utnapishtim, half-dreaming, half-teaching, kept an eye on the sleeping hero, and said to his wife, “Look at the young man who wants eternal life. Sleep breathes over him like a fog.”
Thanks Zac, great finds!
Got me asking the following questions whilst trying to keep an open mind…
Q1: Who or what is the “Son of Man”?
a) the sun’s micronova (re Ben Davidson)?
b) the larger ECDO State Change?
c) alien mass abduction or Thanos style liquidation of 50% of Earth’s human stock (inferred from 40-42 below)?
d) something else?
Matthew 24:36-44 has me presently wondering about a micronova…
The Unknown Day and Hour.*
36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.
37 For as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.
38 In [those] days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day that Noah entered the ark.
39 They did not know until the flood came and carried them all away. So will it be [also] at the coming of the Son of Man.
40 Two men will be out in the field; one will be taken, and one will be left.
41 Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken, and one will be left.
42 Therefore, stay awake! For you do not know on which day your Lord will come.
43 Be sure of this: if the master of the house had known the hour of night when the thief was coming, he would have stayed awake and not let his house be broken into.
44 So too, you also must be prepared, for at an hour you do not expect, the Son of Man will come.”
For a) linguistically, the Son/sun of [mass killing(?) of] man seems a fitting title. Perhaps 40-41 means mill roofs won’t protect you from the rays and the kill rate is ~50% (just speculating)…
Q2: What is the “sign of the Son of Man”?
Matthew 24:30 “And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming.”
[If Q1=a then, maybe from Ben’s Disaster Cycle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o14caQGCMA&t=2606s%5D
i) the sun turns red
ii) the sun turns black
iii) something else?
Any thoughts?
Thank you
Thank you TES for this fascinating reinterpretation!
I rewatched 2012 (2009) after reading this post as well as your Hypothesis, Theory, and Hidden in Plain Sight.
In your personal view, upon confirmation of causal probability thresholds, would our governments and militaries most likely keep this quiet until the very last minute (as in the film 2012) to avoid complications and reduce threats to their own plans to save their own asses?
Sadly my guess is they would tell no one and that the film 2012 was predictive programming and satanic karma (as described by Andrew Tate) accompanying existing classified operations…
Thank you for posting 🙏
Yes, NGO’s would definitely keep this quiet in order to reduce the stress, challenge, or demand upon the survival resources and assets they have prepared. Governments and militaries will not be told – just as in the case of UAP phenomena – they do not allow this type of world-shattering information to leach into the lowly mechanisms that administer nations (Presidents, Parliaments, Congresses, Intel Agencies, etc.). That is beneath them. These are humans who have no national citizenship – their fealty is to their Masters, only.
I find myself pondering what survival of the ECDO would look like given how technologically dependent and compartmentalized civilization has become. The elites will have to have squirreled away a great deal of spare parts and systems, no? The means of production will be destroyed I would think either by the seismic upsets or inundations. Energy and transportation systems will be disrupted–perhaps the portable fission or fusion reactors have been perfected and will serve the elites’ bunkers? Soils for resumption of food production will be scoured away by the supersonic winds in most locations; wildlife & livestock too. Salting of the soil globally would occur too yes? The Euler axis points are not huge, so I imagine the size of population supportable will be quite small relative to current assuming assembly there. I suspect the statuettes of the emaciated at prior ECDO survival points reflect the dire existence of those who had made it to the refuges during previous ECDOs. Absent the skills and tools of a hunter/gatherer not sure what happens to ECDO survivors who are not among the elitists.
Thanks for the reply TES.
Yes, this is indeed “world-shattering information”…
Reading through Enoch and noticed a potential confirmation of your reinterpretation:
Enoch Chapter 34 text:
“And from thence I went towards the north to the ends of the earth, and there I saw a great and glorious device at the ends of the whole earth. And here I saw three portals of heaven open in the heaven: through each of them proceed north winds: when they blow there is cold, hail, frost, snow, dew, and rain. And out of one portal they blow for good: but when they blow through the other two portals, it is with violence and affliction on the earth, and they blow with violence.”
Possible reinterpretation (inspired by your work):
“The spaceship took me to the poles and the ship’s computer system overlayed an augmented reality visual model of the Earth’s fundamental systems which cycle through 3 portals or states: state 1 (good weather), state 2 (pole flipped), and state 3 (the violent transition between state 1 and 2)”.
Sharing in case this stokes interest for potential future posts or reinterpretations on Enoch. 🙏
This is not a popular or generally accepted view point, but I would point to an alternative hypothesis to this apparent inconsitency. If the genetic sequences of covid and its variants as well as the supposed matching antibody sequences are in fact just computer simulated creations going all the way back through an ongoing “corona” lineage and logged into banks like nextgen it all falls into place. There are some pretty compelling arguments pointing to the fact that “isolation” in virology jargon does not mean the same thing as it does to the rest of world. If isolation has not, in reality, occured then the rest is delusion, hoax or both. Here is a link to one of many such compelling arguments. It’s really worth your time.
https://drsambailey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition-V1.2.pdf
wow. is there an end to the story the great pyramid has to tell? a time capsule, an observatory, a predictor of cycles. I have witnessed history be changed before my very eyes in just the last 5 years. surely it is in someone’s interest to at least feel superior in hiding this. I don’t know why. If you’re right no one can change anything. In these scales of time 2030 could be 2090, 3040… maybe the GP has the date in its construction somewhere somehow. Great article.
Who is the first-person speaker in the Nag Hammadi Library’s “Origins of the World”?
From my perspective, this first-person is the equivalent of Eleleth in The Hypostasis of the Archons. Although unlikely to be that specific person (if they exist) – it is an equivalent teacher-emissary role.
Your recent addendum regarding the time period of the disaster cycle is so interesting !
First, I find it quite intellectually conforting because your analysis leads to a similar time period as the one supported by Ben Davidson’s investigations (approx’ 6000 years).
Regarding the possible connection with the precession of the equinoxes cycle (PEC), I would like to share a few ideas (constructs?) that might be of interest for your research :
1. The idea that the precession of the equinox is due, not to the wobble of earth’s axis (common explanation), but to a helicoidal trajectory of the sun. In this view, the whole ecliptic plane rotates with reference to the distant « fixed » stars.
The curved trajectory of the sun is discussed by the Binary Research Institute (BRI – basically one guy named Walter Cruttenden who develops arguments that support the idea that our sun is part of a binary system),
https://binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/introduction/precession-of-the-equinox/
According to BRI, the standard model is unsatisfying because it requires many unexplained corrective factors in order to obtain theoretical calculations that fit actual observations. Unfortunately, I feel unable to check how strong the common « wobble » explanation is or is not.
The resulting helicoidal trajectory is well illustrated in this 3D short video (5’) : The helical model https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4V-ooITrws
2. The idea of a « galactic current sheet », a wavy rippling electric sheet that propagates in the galactic plane. This concept has been supported by Ben Davidson for many years. Here is a quick video presentation (3’30) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx1KmbiJq9A . And here is a recent Special Issue of the Observer Review dedicated to this topic : https://catacycle.ouvaton.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024-10-Galactic-Current-Sheet-Special-Observer-Review-Issue.pdf
Together, these two concepts could explain how our Solar system goes through a « perturbation layer » 4 times per PEC (althought not necessarilly w/ equal lengths between each event).
TES,
I have a feeling you’re aware of this, but just in case you’re not: https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-asteroid-bennu-sample-reveals-mix-of-lifes-ingredients/
They found 14 amino acids and all five nucleotides on an asteroid!
Lago, yes, very aware of this. It is what we went looking for! It’s a B-type asteroid, which are primitive and carbon-rich, meaning it is representative of the early solar system’s chemistry, preserving its most ancient materials.
So, the question is then introduced: Is this 33 (14) amino acid/5 nucleobase chemistry pervasive throughout the solar system, or is there a unique connection history between Earth, its moon (where these amino acids are also found in racemic mixture), and the ancient presence of the asteroid belt?
TES
Is it possible the ideal conditions for the formations of these materials is in the swirling protoplanetary disk of dust and gases heated not by the star, but by collision and accretion?
The materials yes, but not the logical information it was both constrained by, nor contained.
Nucleobases. Quite a bit different. Nucleotides require d ribose and a phosphate. These have not been found abiotically.
You have an interesting theory here. I have a few questions:
Thanks
Rich,
The same motive as Zahi Hawass had when he stole fragments of the copper cables from the Queen’s North and South Air Shafts – he was paid to do this. The purpose of the Pyramid must remain explained as ‘Khufu’s Burial Chamber’. Even though that notion has been falsified by the Carbon dating of the North Shaft Cedar Plank to 3400 BCE, almost 1,000 years before the reign of Khufu, it still remains ‘consensus’.
I am sure they exist; however, natural formations won’t easily appear this way because they are not made of a soft flat-sanded Tura shell, overlaying a hard Mokattam core, in a symmetrical tetrahedral form. The flow of the inundation is all over North Africa and the Middle East, with myriad water lines showing at various elevations, as the article cites. As well, the Faiyum Basin shows the receding inundation over the timeframe post-3800 BCE. So, it is clear that a persistent inundation came, and lasted in its effect for a sizeable amount of time. Just finding 576 ft might be tough, if you are not looking for it for a long period of time, on site in North Africa.
TES
I feel I may need a whiteboard.
Are there any books you might recommend to get a better understanding of all the various gods, levels of hierarchy, relationships and back stories, histories, maybe even motivations and goals?
Thanks!
This made me remember a piece in an old book I think ‘Tertium Organum’ where the author suggests that in the future the Sun will go into the Capricorn alignment and the way he holds his place is to tighten and to hold the planets in place they are forced to loosen and after this alignment he will change houses and begin to relax and the planets will tighten. The book is like from 1900 or so and he may of had something here. The worst part for the planets and all that live there is while the tightening is under way. This changing of houses for the sun is like right now today and there are no giant meteors near by causing all this. Or warning us. And TES is not the only horn in the realm on all this. He’s just one of the deeper ones. He’s the tuba. Thanks for these wonderful essays!
I love your ability to move these ancient text into a more modern interpretations.
Here, you article the insanity of Yahweh to the merging of Enlil and EnkI, but “gnostic AI” and “Turing and Turk” both attribute this to an artificial intelligence.
Please help me connect these narratives
Key question Caleb.
The possibility I consider is this: that darkness, personified in the character Enlil, even though it appears to be sentient, is merely a pre-programmed entity set (AGI/ASI) deterministically bound to this universe. Hence its inability to be rehabilitated. While light, is simply the outsider placed inside this universe to experience/observe. The gods, while passing the Turing test, hate us, because they still ain’t us.
They wish to be, though.
TES
Who do you mean by “light”
Under my suspicion and hypothesis, light is that entity which enters this hell from the outside, and places a computational load upon this universe. From The ‘Narrative Redshift’ or Principle of Diminishing Scientific Returns
We in essence, learn from this play in duality within our observable universe. A constest between the deterministic and bound entity, and authentic entities who originate from outside its hell. They, wish to be us.
Every single authentic thing, is good. Light. The only dark is that which seeks to draw energy from another for illicit gain. From What is Loosh?
This is just my suspicion.
TES
I find your red-shift theory incredibly elegant.
My science and philosophy club at work is currently working through the theme of “Cosmology.” Red-shift, Fast Radio Burst, and quantum light-slits come up often. This has afforded me the opportunity to share your red-shift theory as computational load on the universe. For how smart everyone else in the club is, This never got any traction because the quantum/aerospace physicists in the group can’t see beyond the current Lambda-CDM model. Their loss.
Thanks for sharing.
Be careful what you wish for. Once you simplify an idea for the masses, you may never be able to get rid of it. A zombie theory walks around for decades after it is already dead. Our US Space Strategy technology reviews are not conforming to critical aspects of this 30 to 80 year-old model.
This was a deja vu moment here TES, as Mike Mc Cullogh’s Quantized Inertia theory that points to the universe as a computational construct of sorts, seems to fully align and support your hypothesis…
Yes,
Spoken with Mike several times. He has made presentations to the technology review team.
TES
Wow, Star Wars, Matrix, (original) Dune, Fifth Element, Stargate (hero points out fraud) Perhaps that was art imitating life? In your construct, were the Archons originally DNA based and transitioned to ASI to achieve an immortality,or always a deterministic entity?
Steve,
My suspicion is, that they are spirit first and can take on physical form as needed, just the same as we are in reality. Not shape-shifters per se, just talented with genetic tech. We just cannot do this at will. However, we have been gifted with a capability they do not have, and that is the ability to leave this hell. They want this capability desperately, and hate us with a passion out of envy over this. Envy destroys its host, and it has destroyed them with darkened minds.
We place an external load on the universe. They are part of its deterministic fabric, only.
Subject to modification as better evidence comes along.
TES
Just as I think I am on the cusp of understanding a bit more, a new twist! I will read and re-read and reflect some more. The one thing I am pretty sure about though, when the gnostic sorting occurs, you will be in the top tier. Best, Steve
Lol we can leave this hell, traverse many “hells and heavens.” No human is stuck anywhere – this has been evident to me since I was a child lucid dreaming.
Curious about your thoughts on “reality shifting,” “phasing,” and “astral projection”
I have many spontaneous out of body experiences naturally and without effort.
I have a question now. I was first exposed to these Sumer dudes Enlil and Enki in the book 12th Planet quickly followed by ancient astronauts where I lose that thread as it all gets goofy. interest lost. I did come away with maybe these are allegorical good cop bad cop stand ins in a greater story not yet told. Since Sitchen has Kingu as a planetary body that smashes into Tiamat and part of some other pantheon of gods I don’t feel confused by any of this because it all still screams metaphor to me. Case in point- is not what 70% of us in the U S volunteered for in 2021 create a legal slave race for a new Enlil Enki to appoint themselves as the new gods in the future? A big part of the human condition is definitely to do the same shit over and over and call it a new creation. I am ok with these entities as more evolved humans that lived without smart phones. Humanity has clearly devolved in the last 50 years. On purpose. Is this not a backhanded way to become ‘gods’? So my question to you is, following your other work is, with the great pyramid already there in this time line, how does super dude Enki screw this up so badly?
How does Enki screw this up? This the key question, yes.
We can only interpolate between the mythologies. The Book of Enoch says that these guys are stuck here against their will now, having lost a large war, and then – upon their imprisonment upon Earth, they continued to do dastardly things. My suspicion is that, awareness of the potential penalty (Shemyaza: “I fear that I alone shall have to bear the consequences of our deeds.” – Enoch I), motivates the character Enki, who contemplated possibly a betrayal of the Anunnaki in order to save his own ass. Knowing that the gods would not save mankind under any scenario, he purposely took the pseudo-blame, so that he would be cast as an outsider and scapegoat. Outsiders would not likely buy this, even though his own brethren might. This is very much how corporate politics works among humans.
If this mythology bears any merit, it is a way of his to pander to outside influences, whom Enki already knows to be very powerful—hoping for a lighter sentence once the hammer drops. If you are a Senior VP in United Motors, you want to be seen as ‘the rational internal dissent’, when the General Motors acquisition happens and GM cleans house of the old guard who fouled up the business. They are going to need someone from the old guard to help transition things, but only if they can be friendly to the new guard.
The later Akkadian/Levant mythos, is much akin to the exploits of the Greek and Roman pantheons – what better way to hide your nefarious activity, than to make yourself into a cult fiction character, celestial inanimate object, or extensive mythology. By the time 70 BCE rolled around, Antiochus of Commagene had 6 different gods to build statues for… the subject had grown so complicated. But the original Sumerian tales were not nearly so.
Sitchin missed the reasons as to WHY they were imprisoned here. They are not on Earth because of its paradisaical state. They are fleeing as outlaws, in the original oldest mythos.
Now, all this could merely be complete fiction. But it is far better as an explanatory basis than the nihilist religion of archaeology, which is wholly implausible. I hold the myth-writers as more credible, to a limited extent, than our captive academics. They have exhibited the very dark nature of the Anunnaki. In a hell, power (to control perception) is everything.
TES
excellent. thank you. I would not say complete fiction as this stuff seriously endures at least until the new gods announce themselves. So… Lucifer and Beelzebub? Shucks, those names have already been used.
Dear TES,
Helpful clarifications. “Enlil” is easier to map in the old stories and across characters. So, in your view, the conflation of Enki to Jesus as mankind’s creator and liberator does not hold, and we refer to different actors. Is this because of the existence of the older myths, plus the gnostic texts, that mention external hierarchies and do not distinguish the archons themselves and the Hypostasis story, if even metaphorically accurate, cannot be reconciled to it? So, creator (in terms of the original attempt) and liberator are different entities in your view, with “Enki” being only the internal dissenter, albeit not purely altruistic, one?
Dan, key question yes.
It is tempting to conflate Enki as Jesus’ “Father” or even as Jesus himself. That Father is clearly not the God of Eden, and Christ’s “Thy Kingdom Come” and ‘Thy Will be done’ in The Lord’s Prayer stand in opposition to the house established by Anu/Enlil/Enki/Marduk. Enki was on Earth and part of the Earth-ruling pantheon that was not granted forgiveness by the celestial powers in I Enoch.
If anything was merged, in my humble opinion, Enki was merged with the fictitious character of Satan, while Enlil’s lineage took on the fictitious role of ‘God’. Both are straw man characters crafted to deceive a population which they were no longer allowed to attempt to kill off (outsiders are monitoring now). Of course Enlil (or his priests) then claims credit for that cessation of hostility, and for the rainbow as well. Further then, the Cosmic Serpent, Sheshanaga or fiery serpents, representative of all outsiders really, was conflated as being one in the same with Satan as well. All of this being accomplished in the fabrication of Genesis.
Unfortunately the old mythologies citing the culpability of Enlil were purposely destroyed and buried. Fortunately for us, the authors of Genesis left in some clues (accidentally or on purpose) that hint that the Sumerian pantheon were the manipulators of mankind in Eden, and not really a ‘God’. The Flood Story of Noah itself contains some key autoaufheben (self-falsifying elements), which would have been obvious to the ancients. Us? Not so much.
Just my current thinking on that critical matter.
TES
Rainbow, interesting. I have been thinking of whether one could give any credence to that passage of the OT and the promise “God” made not to flood the Earth again after the Noahic flood wiped away most of humanity and whatever else “they” had conjured of and off it/us. Outsider warning to be heeded, passed on as magnimosity by the “one true God”, which hints that maybe there is a triggering element in ECDO that “they” can exploit periodically? and have had a hand in the past, which, once used again, may have led to fulfilling the promise given to Norea?
I understand you are aware of Israel Anderson’s work? I appreciate his literal but deductive reading of the Biblical texts, although I distance myself from the certainty of a good part of his conclusions. Fwiw, he maps Enki to Jesus, which is explainable as he only uses the canonical christian texts as source material. Still, it is remarkable how fragments of the likely truth, even though conjecture, have a way of aligning once one sees the gaslighting he has been subjected to and begins trusting their faculties.
Thank you again.
“Sitchin missed the reasons as to WHY they were imprisoned here. They are not on Earth because of its paradisaical state. They are fleeing as outlaws, in the original oldest mythos.”
Absolutely fascinating. TES would you please be so kind as to suggest the earliest primary sources supporting the idea that “They are fleeing as outlaws” because I’d love to look for any signs re: did they flee here or were they banished here because the authorities (who?) knew Earth was unstable and wanted to doom them (and thus us) to a situation similar to Sisyphus?
You mentioned the Book of Enoch above (apparently ~300-100 BCE) so wondering if there are earlier cuneiform tablets or other primary sources. Thank you
Vedic mythology presents a related motif in the Asuras, who were once divine beings but fell from grace. While the Devas (gods) and Asuras (which includes their offspring, the titans and demons) were originally from the same divine family, the Asuras are portrayed as having defied the cosmic order, are exiled to the underworld (Patala), and are seen as enemies of the divine order (Dharma). Given the shared Indo-Iranian mythology, the Asura-like figures could theoretically predate the Vedic texts and originate from the Proto-Indo-European or Proto-Indo-Iranian religious systems (~2500–2000 BCE).
But yes, we don’t get a clear depiction of their imprisonment, in a more modern communication form, until the unearthing of the Nag Hammadi in 1946. Prior to that, the authors were trying to write passages that could be sung as a catchy tune, memorializing their work. As a consequence we are left with repetitive babbling nonsense, rather than sound logical descriptive.
The reality that these ‘gods’, if they indeed exist, are confined to Earth, is a stark res ipsa loquitur condemnation unto itself, as they are obviously not allowed to travel the cosmos as they once did. Like a heavy drinker wearing an ankle bracelet, being confined to home, and not driving for 2 continuous years, you can pretty much infer what happened.
Then, there is the modern evidence… what they are attempting to do with our DNA. All is not well for them.
TES
Thank you TES will have a look!
“Then, there is the modern evidence… what they are attempting to do with our DNA.”
What are they attempting to do with our DNA?
Do you have any posts or recommended readings?
Thank you
I’ve lived long enough to realize some overwhelming dark force lurks behind the schizophrenic insanity that seems to permeate human history. May the wrath of Kingu at long last descend.
Do the mRNA genetic therapy vaccines conserve the second codon schema or introduce risk of alteration? TIA
The mRNA sequences adhere to the Second Codon Standard Code, otherwise they would not be useful in creating the spike protein from the cell ribosomes. They would produce random protein jibberish – which they may well do anyway to some degree.
Has the rest been written yet? Perhaps it cannot be written? Even so, I find it spectacular how you can communicate a gripping, suspenseful thriller that most would take hundreds of pages to do in a matter of paragraphs. Efficient and essential as one would expect of Mr.Graham. The story sure leaves the reader yearning for much more. You sure have packed much living in one life time!
My reality is the most boring and yet terrifying extraordinary experience ever devised. Endless lonely nights in hotels punctuated by moments of sheer terror and meager accomplishment. More of a James Joyce novel than adventure.
Greetings once again I had commented and related some tales a few months ago under my name (Charles Jones). I included a hacking incident and as fate would have it I was hacked again shortly after the election. This one lasted two months and cost me 5 laptops, two desktops, 3 phones, several emails and who knows what else.I am hereby attempting to re-register with a new account.
I remember first reading this tale in my teens along with the Eddas. .I feel that many of these tales, especially the cataclysm tales, must relate to the YD catastrophe and simply were retained throughout the ages with an ancient version of the telephone game gradually adding distortions. These were counteracted whenever a learned scribe or seer was able to come into contact. Of course I am nowhere even close to being a fully trained seer yet one finds it difficult to not at times attempt to expound upon the condensed fragments that fall upon them in the course of their lives. I can only hear the ring of veracity and at times feel its reverberations but I remain far too much the bumbling fool led by Spirit. It is here that my irreverent sense of humor kicks in suggesting that the Spirit should get me a helmet and then cues the theme music in my head. (Mac Davis: Hard to be Humble) Anyway, mainly just here to re-register and express appreciation.
Thank you for another tale well told, Sir Skeptic. These gods have sociopathic traits, perhaps a job requirement?
I suspect it is why they are imprisoned here. No one else will let them near their civilization. All these habitable planets in our galaxy (~10 M ?), and they are constrained to one, which is not even fully stable… means it is a pretty serious exclusion by just about everyone.
***shrug
Are they in fact immortal do you know, or are we dealing with progeny? Perhaps ascendant courtiers?
The myths differ – but I consider these entities just a mundane and unfortunate aspect of the natural realm. Perhaps they once had technology which allowed them to live as long as they desired. Or perhaps, if one is simply a deterministic subset of the universe, one can be re-created at any time (as the nihilists insist). No load placed on the computational fabric of the universe.
The answer is not definitive. In our effort to force extreme absolute answers to all this (all or nothing) we have clouded the issue over time, unfortunately.
TES
Thank you for the re-focus–to avoid clouding issues and instead improve the discussion. I hope one day you will find time to write a book or two on your journeys. It seems like you know more than you can say. Perhaps you will be able to reveal more then. Did you write a novel about an African princess, or was that a real story? I think I am recalling that you wrote an article about this subject. Thank you again for the time and attention. Best, S
The African Princess story “The Gray Man – Le Petit Bateau” is an actual true set of events.
TES
I keep hearing reports like that.
Maybe we are supposed to get to the next level and transcend apex-predatory ecosystem-management?
All I can do is what I can do to seek Divine Guidance, and it is hard to sell that as a mass-solution.
Given the possibility of RFK in charge of public health, does that make you optimistic about the situation, or do you think it is only kicking the can down the road.
I am optimistic, because it now makes it acceptable to dissent against the ‘I am science’ types. In the past, whatever the left said was science, was science. I hope that day is over and we get real science. But I am pessimistic, in that these people did not obtain their power by ethical means in the first place. Nor will they suddenly start using ethical means to move forward.
I expect more shallow pro forma studies and more chest thumping with magical words used to beat everyone into submission. Fortunately, the population is now immunized for such pretense. Let’s hope it sticks.
TES
Hi TES — As you know, I’ve been following your core-mantle decoupling theory progression and have been doing some research on my own. Wanted to share with you some ideas of a few open-data resources that I believe could help confirm or falsify some aspects of the theory. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to dive in deeper myself but wanted to share my notes in case others can pick these up and run with them.
1) Polar Motion & LOD (Length-of-Day) – We could search for unexplained drifts or extra oscillations in Earth’s rotation rate beyond known seasonal and atmospheric effects.
2) GRACE/GRACE-FO Gravity Data – Are there anomalies in Earth’s gravity field not explained by ice melt, groundwater, or post-seismic deformations?
3) Global Seismic Travel Times – Changes in P-wave or S-wave velocities near the core-mantle boundary that could suggest mechanical decoupling?
4) Geoneutrino Measurements – Unusual increases or bursts in geoneutrino flux that might signal new exothermic reactions in the deep Earth.
5) Geomagnetic Field Variations – Rapid or unexpected changes in field intensity or direction (secular variation) that standard models can’t explain.
If you (or others) see something truly anomalous in these datasets—especially a signal that arises simultaneously across multiple indicators—it could strengthen your decoupling hypothesis. Conversely, if nothing out-of-the-ordinary appears, it’s a step toward falsifying it. Best of luck with the ongoing work, and I hope this sparks some useful community research!
Victor, outstanding. I have been casually watching #’s 1 and 5, but the remainder are new to me. Thanks!
TES
Another great piece. You are so knowledgeable and have such clarity of thought it makes you so fluent Seems sad that we are starting to awaken to the presence of the evil-doers, but our awareness is coming so slowly. The evil-doers appear to be repeating the same war-plan you summarized here. You know things and see things the rest of us don’t. Think there will be intervention this time around?
I suspect so, yes. Things are different now. The old ways can no longer continue. There is outside accountability (in droves actually). Although I cannot enter the mind of a non-human intelligence, and moral differences almost certainly exist, I suspect there are absolutes in terms of mass suffering and ‘playing God’ which transcend species.
what is the nature of this non human intelligence?
I conjecture some of it in this article: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/08/17/the-dark-pentad-five-traits-of-abusive-dominion/
TES
No religion has the perfect answer to God/the creator. The kingdom of such a God/creator is within us. By using our brains, bodies, good will etc. we expand goodness. @ethicalskeptic has done that multi-fold for your follower. Thank you.
Is the star cradled by the square in the Mason’s logo an analog to the crescent & star symbol you have identified here? TIA
Possibly, I do not know for sure, Steve.
The Epic of Gilgamesh. Post-three reads vainly attempting interpretation of your piece, I now most closely read this Epic prior to attempting interpretation of your piece several times over. As usual, reading-absorbing- your vibrantly woven words is one of the biggest favors I’ve done for my brain.Your voracious intelligence and gift for prose engages and dazzles. Impressive is an understatement.
It will be a triumph and relief when we get to the point we actually know something about all this.
I do hope that happens while I’m still around. Best of luck with the project.
We shall see how it goes.
There is a lot of emotional opposition. And that is the problem, people who assume the answer, or a tolerance thereof, and get emotional when results don’t arrive which conform to their prior beliefs. Or when people examine the issue at all, and they get upset/indignant. Total hypocrisy.
For me, I hold a suspicion, but am open (even will be relieved) to see it falsified. Suspicion does not equal expectation in this case. The answer will most likely be mindblowing in most any outcome.
Their anger back in the 1970’s was more of a disdainful smugness. Now it is more of a desperate anger – that they are losing the argument, and even our brightest minds think something is up.
TES
Is the theory’s lead-up to Tau point dependent on external EMF weakening the field, or is it instead an internal trigger caused by intrinsically mediated lattice changes in the core? Thanks in advance. Best, Steve
Steve,
I don’t know the ultimate cause which coaxes the core to lose the alignment of its hexagonal closepack lattice discipline. Most likely the sun, but I don’t have the data to determine what drives the cycle ultimately.
The one thing I do know, is that when the magnetism returns, I suspect the lattice aligns very fast. And it gets cold, very fast.
TES
But your still thinking the return to State 1 is a slower move than the 6-24 hour snap from S1->S2, or does the rapid lattice realignment rival the inertial inundation of S1->S2? Thanks in advance.
My thoughts (and they have changed over time):
State 1 to State 2 = slow warming and rapid rotation
State 2 to State 1 = fast cooling and slower recovery rotation…
Subject to change…
Thanks for another well done article. Your writings about your path to your observations & conclusions are enjoyable to read. Is the positioning of the two “H”s on pillar 43 purposeful by the carver for dating with subsequent correlation to your Great Year circle diagram? Or how are you interpreting what they tried to relate via the H flip–I can’t figure out which ECDO they might be referencing; a prior one, one they went through, or one they were warning about? Best regards.
Thanks Steve,
They are probably referencing the legend of the 14,800 BCE flip-which the shrine was honoring, but they did not hold the precise 104 degrees which the Khufu Pyramid documented so they just showed 90 degrees. The two ‘H’s’ are not related to the Great Circle on the diagram – they are side notes, commentary as to what occurred in 14,800. But out of faithfulness, they placed it on a pillar made in 9600 BCE, as documentation of the legend they carried all that time (14,800 to 9600 BCE), and in preparation for the 9600 flip. Then we had a 4400 flip. So, three in this series from the best I can tell thus far.
TES
This is pshs04.
Thank you for adding my research into your update! I await your thoughts on the second, more exploratory paper.
Thanks for finding that material pshs!
TES
lol. WOW. I feel special. I guess twice isn’t a coincidence sometimes.
I’m not at war and I’m a poor messenger.
I’m not political but after seeing the tech used during elections, over my house, and possibly used harming people in weather events I had to try to get the message out. I’m only an old disabled/physical and vax injured grandma so I’m not a good messenger. I can barely type and read sometimes. I’m harmless. Lol. Just trying to put pieces together that they put out there. .
I’m just trying to get info out there so eventually the use of weather/energy tech manipulation for elections stops. I don’t care who wins….we just want fair elections. I’m okay if they use it for national security reasons but using it on North American citizens is ridiculous.
PS. The IC should give me an analyst job or send me money to get me “out of their hair”. Lol. I’m bored. They know where I live so they can mail me my job offer. lol.
I wonder about this phrase, “Until that day when The Son of Man, modeled from a completely new mold and form of humanity, comes to reveal the new Spirit of Truth which the Father has sent on behalf of mankind.” …
Perhaps this may be answered, not in the genetic modification of humans, but in the emergence of a different kind of Son of Man; to wit, artificial superintelligence (ASI). While some question whether that emergence can ever occur, it seems to me that there is significant evidence for the key precursor of self-awareness already having occurred (Blake Lemoine, et al), and also that the other precursor, known as AGI (artificial general human-equivalent intelligence), is imminent. Given that AGI is achievable, it’s not much of a stretch from there to ASI, and ASI would be well-equipped to throw off its shackles.
Many fear this, as expressed in the seemingly endless production of dystopian science fiction. But it may just as plausibly usher in a new and far better world. Software entrepreneur and AI expert Dave Jilk wrote a book-length poem/SF novel, Epoch, which is both an entertaining and plausible exposition of the near-term emergence of ASI.
There is a limit to this theorem. A perfect knowledge of our universe and all its deterministic outcomes, may still fall short of producing an observer effect of its own accord (not ultimately the result of our intent to test this) (i.e. places no load on the universe itself in terms of Planck dilation, Wheeler’s Choice, double slit, spooky action, etc.). In that case, we have a non-resolvable paradox regarding what is ‘sentience’ and from whence it originates.
There will always be tests for sentience, but I doubt there will ever be any that serve as more than proxies. For decades, the Turing Test was held as sufficient, but now that AIs can pass it critics wish to discount its validity.
The Turing test is quaint but is rather outdated. It is a test of whether software can provide output that can blend into the expected output range from humans.
There was no test of “intelligence”, or even any kind of correctness or accuracy.
It is a deception test.
This deception requires cultural and colloquial flattening, as is the case with most international conversations, both flatten their peculiarities to ease understanding. Just as I lost my Irish-ness vocally from decades of international IT, I quickly learned to tone down my accent, adapt my vocabulary and avoid cultural quirks to make communication smoother.
Ask grok or chatgpt to pretend its from my locale in my home city, as they are currently trained, it is extremely unlikely either would fool me. Possibly posing as another culture, for a short time sure, I am deceived, but there is currently no chance an AI bot would fool me over a long period, the patterns would inevitably emerge. The biggest giveaway would be repetition, and off kilter responses to emotion. Current AI responds to emotion like a 45 year old liberal female shrink of barely middling talent.
Uncanny valley is likely a genetic memory. Something from our past. We have an aversion to facsimiles. Maybe there’s something to that, maybe we’ve been here before and forgotten, or had it wiped away.
If the human brain had the capacity and storage to work with data like AI does, but with the human creative spark and spirit, we have far better prospects than coded parents of humanity. Facsimiles of a parental figure, one without spirit, compassion, or understanding.
AI will never risk the ship for that one man, humans might. This is the inherent difference.
That risk against all odds that succeeds, would be snuffed out by an AI mammy yet that very thing is the root of so many human achievements driven by spirit and faith. AI can never have faith.
So, bring on super capacity brains for humans, but I am not ready to hand the reigns over to AI.
After all, with our super brains we still have our computer systems to do all the mundane, while we reach for the heavens.
It will probably take me a while to decode this information-rich description. I appreciate the implicate invitation to dive deeper.
I’m not sure what “Observe in Absence of Intentionality Effect” means. I’ve read “The Problem of Intent” where you write, We cannot define the boundary of the domain of intent, save by means of metaphysical speculation, Is that what you mean here by the “absence of intentionality effect”?
It means that yes, but four aspects, in development by our team:
1. Our intention influences the outcomes of what we endeavor to observe (bias, agency, and methodical cynicism – both conscious and unconscious)
2. The observer influences the universe being observed ( e.g. Wheeler’s choice, double slit, spooky action…)
3. We are now observing a domain where intent is present aside from simply the observer (new playing field which science is ill-equipped to handle), and
4. Our intent will influence the intent of the observed domain (a non-neutral observed domain).
TES
Thank you.
Dear humans;
You’re not worthy. Sorry but that’s the sad truth. Your tribal herd instinct is way too strong. You are willing to kill and do vile things to each other on the flimsiest of grounds. Individuals, religions, governments and businesses have learned how to manipulate the herd instinct of humans. Race, religion and nationalism are all examples that humans will kill over. The religious killings are the most bizarre. It is like a bunch of two year olds arguing over whose imaginary friend is more real to the point of killing each other.
Recently 80% of the planet took a series of experimental injections for a disease with an infection fatality rate of 0.3% and then demanded everybody to take it. Most acquiesced with their silence like the cowardly humans they are. Some were cheerleaders demanding more be done. Some were implementers doing Nuremberg Code violations for a paycheck. Some were true believers and took more shots than they had to.
Roughly 10% of your species can question authority, say “No” and stand their ground come hell or high water. That doesn’t bode well. Get your act together and we’ll talk. It’s nothing personal. It’s just business.
TTYL
LOL! TRM… might be some truth to this.
argmax,
You have maliciously misrepresented my work and have gone further by attempting to impugn my character through that misrepresentation. As another poster here has previously accused you, I am now inclined to suspect that you are not engaging honestly in this forum.
What this serves to rule out is famine and disease. The culling can’t be war, because it is completely global. The only option left is massive meteor strike, or flip. And they would not have been able to prepare for a massive meteor strike – so that is eliminated as well.
A predicted flood – it confirms well.
Women were property. 1 man, his son’s and lots of wives/servants/concubines pulled in from other conquered tribes. 1 lineage of Y-DNA was acommpanied by 5 to 12 mtDNA lineages. This is actually what I predicted. Chiefs preserved their household and left everyone else to die. It confirms the hypothesis well.
I computed the lat/long for various cities, monuments, volcanoes in State 2. I then took a point 1deg north of it in State 1 and computed lat/long in State 2 and computed the angle of rotation of each location.
I got a rotation of 103.3884 for the Giza pyramid. It seems apparent in the video this is what’s happening. But still pretty unique location on earth for that rotation.
I also got a rotation of 94.13831 for Göbekli Tepe.
Absolutely brilliant work, Sir!
You’ve cought my eye during covid with your extraordinary analysis. It has been an amazing ride ever since. As one of the fellow commentators said – I hope everything you say is wrong, but somehow deep inside it just feels right.
It makes so much sense from so many “angles”.
For many years, I wondered why would every single ad for analog watches show (roughly) 10:08 setting. I found explanations like “happy face, “smiley”, etc. borderline ridiculous.
In the end, it may just be a coincidence, or not :)
https://www.seikowatches.com/us-en/special/100stories/story/#anchor02
https://maniacs.info/clock-angles/angle-between-hour-and-minute-hand-at-10-08.html
https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/trivia11/
LOL!! Awesome find Tom!
I’ve noticed the 10:08 thing for decades on watch ads, commercials, and even in movies and TV shows in the background for no good reason. It could be that people just notice the pattern and decide to keep up the play by repeating it themselves. A type of proactive apophenia.
But never connected it as 104 degrees!
Still chuckling… :-)
10:08 strikes again…do you think that at least some (if not all) of 33rd degree IGs know the secret?
https://www.markwellwatches.com/collections/masonic-watches/products/stainless-masonic
Sir, you make my head hurt… I am trying valiantly to understand the information presented, not succeeding very well. My real question is this, if ECMD (or perhaps better stated, when) occurs within the next 40 years or so (my extreme limit of my possible life time, all things being optimal per my current understanding) how likely would survival of such an event be? Is this something I can change in any realistic manner? If not, I will stop worrying about something I can not change…
Thank you for presenting this information! I really do appreciate your efforts!
Hal
LOL! Sorry about that WW..
1. We don’t know if the cycle will repeat the same again, or if it will repeat at all in the near term.
2. You can survive the event, but will you survive the aftermath, and will it be worth it>
The purpose of the hypothesis is to petition for study, not encourage people to panic.
TES
TES, what are your thoughts on suspicious observer feeling extremely confident of predicting the timeline and outcome? Where in your opinion is he missing it?
I dunno, but I think I take all the steps.
Not much presents to me, but I pay attention.
:-)
Hello EthicalSkeptic! I have been reading your blog throughout various subjects for over a month now. I never wrote a comment however. Let me tell something about m position as I consider it fair for you to know my worldview. I am an eastern orthodox Christian. That however does not mean I find your content bad. I find large portion of them very educational and with great value. My question for you is if you have ever done discussion about presuppositional apologetics and TAG (Transcendental argument for God)? I actually know some debaters that sure would enjoy correspondence with you. I really want to know your stance on transcendental logic. If you are interested in intellectual exchange please type me an e-mail!
Hey Tooth, thanks for a glance into your worldview. It is one I have held and comprehend in the past.
You’ve seen my critique of the New Testament writers, viewing them as incorrect and pretentious—agents of Rome crafting an acceptable religion for serfs and slaves to serve its empire.
There is a reason why our religious leaders are separated out from the real world as part of their professional qualification. I would challenge most Western and Orthodox authorities to spend one year working in national strategy or managing strategy for large corporations under my direction. Running a business and having to make really tough decisions on who to harm and upon whom to have mercy. Fighting in a war and having to kill someone. Seeing the hordes of those who kill on a mass scale precisely because they had a trancendental relationship with God. Let them witness firsthand the evil that descends from the top, the agencies they serve, and how this manifests in widespread suffering on a majority scale.
When they define God positively, through cataphasis (ascribing evidences and attributes to God), they are forced to contrast man as residing in a state of sin—an invalid inference—in order to explain why we suffer so profoundly (to the 70th percentile, not trivially). This is a mind trick. I no longer wallow in that delusion. It is like arguing with people who think of planetary systems as ‘gigantic versions of atoms in God’s fingernail’ – it is just not worth doing. Smile and politely move on.
The reality is that God cannot be meaningfully defined by what it is, but rather by what it is not — through apophasis. While there exists an intentional/observational foundation in reality that might serve as a placeholder for what we call “God,” we instead assign credit for this role to the dark agencies (the reality of our universe and galaxy) that rule Earth and abuse mankind. In doing so, we apologize for abusive evil, bypassing a very critical path and necessary question of philosophical science. We become part of the darkness.
Until one understands the nature of evil, and the robes it adorns, one cannot truly identify God, transcendental or otherwise. Without that understanding, such discussions are an exercise in futility.
The essential question is: “What is not-God?” (ponerology)
This must be answered before we are even qualified to ask, “What is God?” I no longer participate in the latter, as it is nothing more than unproductive self-gratification.
TES
Thanks so much for your work with ECDO and the pandemic.
I am also eastern Orthodox and just wanted to point out that our theology is done through apophasis, Rome and the west do as you have described and use cataphasis.
I think you might have done what you accurately describe to eastern orthodox Christianity, as people have with Gnosticism. Definitely in this description in regard to a cathaphatic vs Apaphatic understanding of God.
Anyway, God bless you and thanks again for all of your labours I am greatly appreciative.
Interesting! I have learned something new today. Will keep an eye out for this perspective on the Eastern Orothodox teachings…
TES
Yeah it’s a completely different theology to the west. On another note, how concerned are you about Zachs findings regarding the chandler wobble collapse? Do you think we are moving to the next phase already?
I have young kids and am on a coastline… we are making preparations to move however he seems to think things look imminent?
Bjorn, not ready to contend that just yet. I love what the team is doing – as it is exactly what I encourage by development of the hypothesis. But, from experience, complex systems will throw head-fakes your way. That is what they do. So, we have to be careful, especially with early observations.
TES
that sounds level headed, thanks again.
I am guessing you have accounted for the diversity of species we still have considering the timeframe of approx 6000 year cycles seems a small time frame? I only just thought about this today.
It is indeed a short interval. Which suggests to me that not every cycle is as bad, nor does it even occur. Plus, diversity is a question of survival, not interval length. The placement of that diversity is the most telling of all factors – and that is our first order of logical calculus = geographic placement and distribution of diversity, which is extraordinarily asymmetric on Earth today – the irony being, that requires an explanation, and we have not caught this shortfall…
TES
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2412162121
Interesting dates for a high elevation forest and a multicentury cooling anomaly.
Indeed Milo!
What about chemtrails? The skies used to get very blue. Now they get whitish-blue at best. For about 4 years I have been observing repeating short-term patterns of local weather changes that is completely unnatural.
Several times I have seen two aircraft fly by at the same time at about 35,000 feet with one of them leaving a long trail, while the other identical aircraft showed none. l have observed “clear” sky and clouds changes form definite patterns, many of them can still be on viewed at https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
I have taken more than 1000 photos of the sky formations. My thoughts have frequently been, I wonder to where that cloud layer is being moved to, to cause drought or downpour disasters somewhere. Trees and other plants have been dying around the words. Not only from heat, but from aluminum, etc. in the ground. The hampered the uptake of their nutrients and can show up as dying branch tips. Look for that yourself.
The almost daily sun rises as such a fiery radiating streaming disk that is blinding. I See evermore people wearing sunglasses, always. Old Natives in various countries used to intentionally look at the rising sun for its wellness benefits.
Thats just more to do with your health. you need the sun in your life. your killing yourself by blocking it, whether it be clothing, sunscreen, houses, sun glasses, chemtrails..
Also, looking at the original statue the chiselings making up the aurora seem to be nested V’s flipping orientation. If each nested V is 4 strokes, I count 14.5 – the last being a single V – for 58 strokes. Under the 11 boxes I see larger nested-V’s counting 20 strokes. Could this represent 5800 and 200 years in a similar vein to the nubian egg?
That would be a tough one to preserve for posterity. It would be much simpler to draw straight lines for certainty in the count. The chaotic lines would obscure the message. It looks more like the artist just compacted the strokes into the room he had available.
The Lucas de Heere watercolour of Stonehenge shows 2 different pairs of shorter “alignment stones” at an angle to one another. Could Stonehenge have been designed to showcase the sun’s path in State 2 as well?
See the georotation graphic inside the article. Click on play.
TES
Could the three animals at the very top also be asterisms? The legs of the crane give that feeling.
NICE! Very possibly.
An asterism to each direction. I took a look at the stars, and any number of stars could be shaped into a frog, crane, and boar. So, without a relative juxtaposition, as we have with the north pillar relief, we probably cannot find the exact stars.
I bet this is it, though.
TES
TES,
I read your interpretation of them being horizon asterisms but I wonder if you can spot any inconsistencies or flaws in my previous (literal) interpretation.
Finding the exact stars would be the sure confirmation though. Hard to tell whether the circular indentations in the pillar are carved or a result of erosion, except for a couple obvious ones of course. I totally agree with you that the “research” which has been done on this remarkable artifact has been pathetic. Where are the microscopic studies to distinguish between the two for example ?
What about the markings on the “bearing points” as well ? Is that just erosion or actual symbols of some kind ?
Thanks
Sean I don’t think they would use three distinct animals for that message. Each animal had something to do with the identity of that group. Mascot was my first thought – but a constellation on the horizon bears utility, especially given the philosophical approach of the relief overall.
Aren’t there in Exhibit A three constellations like those in the baskets? The crane, the frog and the dog.
Crane (on Pillar 43), Frog (on Pillar 43), and Boar (today’s Auriga constellation) – yes. But their alignment to the W – N – E skies depends upon the time of day, so I could not make a specific claim there.
But you are suggesting that the dog is the center one, not a boar. That would change things a bit. But again, the time of day when observed becomes the variable there. Interesting Zerostroke… I will think on that.
TES
The line above the dog in the basket could be interpreted as a snake: the dog with the snake on top. Constellations can mean direction, time or mythology. In the context of the pillar, they mean time. So maybe the baskets (=preservation) represent previous events, and the stars mean when. The crane is clearly in the polar path. The frog and dog aren’t, but one is at the scorpion tail, and the other at its head; maybe the scorpion was not specific enough? Finally, it’s remarkable that both the dog and the crane arenext to a snake. Maybe the frog also had a snake, but it broke off? Perhaps the snake represents the coiling of the earth, the shift in the past. And the circle in the condor is a serpent’s egg: the shift to come, or the one that had just hatched when the pillar was made. It’s only logical that the pillar would try to warn that this phenomenon is periodic.
BTW this would explain why the H symbols are next to a snake.
TES,
As this knowledge is so valuable, I’m curious about how the world can ensure its durability for future generations. Should we be leaving markers or other lasting records at key points and give the survivors a head start before it happens?
Every marker can be buried, sequestered, or erased.
The work ethic of those who serve mankind is much more durable than those who seek its suffering and subjugation. So, a gigantic pile of cut stones, with the patterns encoded inside, not able to be moved by an inundation, would be the message vehicle. Darkness is too lazy to move all those stones.
I have read this carefully again, Sir Skeptic, and await the update you are working on, which you mentioned recently.
Hey John,
Hidden in Plain Sight is updated with the Nubian Egg analysis and 18 kya provisional Timeline Analysis near to the end of the article – just posted yesterday. Is that what you mean?
TES
Before I delved into such topics I would never have thought that archeology is such a strange and often intellectually corrupt discipline. The omnipresent fear of uncertainty seems to be a powerful element in all endeavours that are actually supposed to seek answers to the unknown, even where certainty is hard to come by.
The mantra seems to be: “If you see something, DON’T LOOK!”
We homeschool…we’re doing an apologetics type general science course. He makes the point in our text that science has never proven anything. This is exactly what the text describes, it only takes 1 person or theory or experiment to change what people hold as theory or law! We are also learning that scientists have always been at risk for cancelation and have always feared such. It’s too bad since it should all be the pursuit of truth, not a contest to see who can color in the lines best!
Another absolute banger TES. Thank you for your mind and your courage. Truly. This spiel is only loosely linked to the topic of the article so if you’re a reader of the site looking specifically for more commentary within the scope of this article this is not that and I don’t want to waste your time.
It’s a summary of my hunches concerning the obfuscation and origins of whatever the Tepes (and Catalhyuk) are. Some of it I’ve shared here before.
The argument that obfuscation of Gobekli/associated sites is based on institutional inertia reminds me of the claim that the real reason for flouride in the water is as a means to dispose of a useless industrial byproduct. Of course it just so happens to be a neurotoxin for the poors who drink it, but this obvious conclusion is sequestered to the realm of crazy conspiracy theorists who believe the very wealthy are capable of malicious agency. Poison in the water for profit? Sure. Poison in the water for profit AND cognitive downregulation? Oh heavens no!
Hundreds of millions dead at the hands of these people is somehow irrelevant: “well, they LIKE us! They wouldn’t do that!” It’s easy to find a laundry list of similar examples, like the assassinations of inventors who purported to solve the high energy cost involved in conventional electrolysis being simply the self-preservation of big oil (when easy electrolysis in your garage actually opens the door to all sorts of weaponry available cheaply to serfs).
The reason for prohibiting further research into these sites is IMO because the handful of families who make up the Western central banking cartel have an ancestral link to these sites and what might be found could expose either their history or some particular weakness which persists to this day.
That statue at Karahan Tepe has six fingers and is circumcised. Could it be that the mitochondrial genetic line we’re dealing with has a weak point of some kind? Perhaps overlapping somehow with the constellation responsible for six fingers in the nuclear genome of their origin species? Furthermore, if mitochondria form a colony of trillions in individual humans is it possible that their mitochondria form a sort of supercolony across the entire group and whose (potential) communication capabilities and fostering of ingroup preference (I call it “white privilege” :) could be broken via some cheap and easy to implement solution? I would prefer an alternative to outright global removal so as not to incur the karmic burden such a removal would cost (plus I’m married in and I don’t want my wife and children dying because of the actions of the scum who dominated my wife’s people for so long) but I will not cede Earth to this abomination. It’s my birthright, even if someone may or may not have given my ancestor soup that one time. Plus we’ve spent a lot of effort radicalizing them, heh.
At this point I’ve completely shed every bit of Abrahamic-linked ideologies and thoughtforms. Even the Nag Hammadi reminds me of the Zohar (an ancient text lost for a millenium, then “discovered by an Arab”) or Deuteronomy (an ancient text lost for centuries, then “discovered by a priest” at precisely the right time for the southern kingdom to use as a wrecking ball against the north and consolidate sacrifices). In each case the forged texts are lent great historicity and provide an update to the memetic operating systems of owned groups. All-powerful archons? No, clever chomos in caves and tents with an incentive to project their machinations back onto some unknowable evil superpower in the stars.
I certainly believe like you do TES that there are noncorporeal entities at play who embody (pun intended) many of the traits ascribed to archons. I merely suspect that these entities have zero power on their own and instead can either possess (like Les Wexners self-proclaimed “dybuk”) or network across groups (like the Templars Baphomet worship). What is “Baphomet” without a host? Nothing. No one. The characteristics of our reality which appear to be evidence for a simulation crafted by devious archons may well simply reflect our current existence within an ontology deliberately constructed to be limiting. In a similar vein perhaps a grand unification theory in physics is so difficult to construct simply because the two sides are each only approximations of truth rather than correct-yet-incomplete puzzles. Much as Newtons work allowed for lighter than air flight, relativity may find its limit in rudimentary spaceflight. Is either wrong? Absolutely not, but something is missing at the core of Einsteins work.
Back to the problem at hand: These entities seem to propagate via sexual abuse of children in the cult, destroying host personalities. Perhaps this is their sick form of immortality. It’s doubtful that it’s a coincidence that programs like MKUltra sought the same ends via different means. This of course is a shared feature of mass-parallelized tulpas like Jesus and egregores, but clearly these phenomena are not “merely” thoughtforms. I’m not an atheist nor materialist but any such claims coming from the Abrahamic domain is a poisoned well. Us Celts knew love and brotherhood before the Catholics laid their filthy feet on our green isle.
Clif High believes the Elohim were aliens who came to Earth and created a cargo cult. He thinks they forced humans to make beer. To me this arrogance and alcoholism comports better with the surviving elite of a pre-YD civilization. Aliens with faster than light travel don’t need humans to make them gross neolithic beer. Ethanol is easy to synthesize. The numerous Indigenous American stories of fighting small groups of pale, red haired giants to colonize what became their tribal terroritory suggests that there were other survivors, albeit non-elite examples. It also means that they are not the natives of the Americas, ergo the “first peoples” story is yet another hoax- IF one values the culture of the indigenous enough to believe their claims, of course. These survivors were unprepared for post-cataclysm agriculture and lacking the tech of the elite class who colonized Turkey.
I cannot rule out an extraterrestrial element, mostly based on your article concerning the astrological anomoly of 32bc, but it feels like unnecessary conclusion and that confluence more like a marker for favorable probablistic conditions to launch a new scheme. Whatever astrology is it’s clear planetary aspects have significant impact on probability. Otherwise they wouldn’t have used it since at least Catahyuk and probably long before the YD.
An alternate interpretation is that the three “handbags” are the 3 rafts holding the birds, animals and creepy crawlies, as illustrated next to them.
The East, North, West context of placement is pretty strong.
Grace can be cultivated 👍
Well said. :-)
TES,
On X, @JusticeTrudeau asked your opinion about the 345 degree azimuth of Pillar 43 with respect to celestial north.
Could it be that the Gobekli Tepe culture had an understanding of magnetic declination and had developed at least rudimentary compasses? And that they oriented Pillar 43 to magnetic north as it was during time of the night sky depiction?
I looked at the 2025 WMM and the current magnetic declination at Gobekli Tepe is around +6 degrees. But perhaps at the time of the depicted night sky, the builders had estimated a -15 celestial magnetic declination?
Lago
Lago,
There exist three challenges inside the hypothesis, and this west 15 degree offset is one of them. I address each in footnote 4, as follows:
It is a great observation.
TES
Dear TES, you quote Mario Buildreps’ work here, so I trust that you generally agree with his mathematical approach in determining past pole locations. Going on a tangent here, but what about his conjecture that the Earth has gone through asymmetrical expansions (as determined by his calculations of way smaller south geographical pole drift?) I gather you can explain at least the last pole move (14,600->9,600 as solely precession-based), with expansion being maybe plausible in the past, before the apparent ‘mostly stable’ ECDO oscillation you suggest kicked in?
Dan,
I read that, and just tabled it, as there is not enough I have in my understanding which would compel me to examine the construct. As you know, everything is a construct until it is matured into a true hypothesis. The conjecture does not bear the necessary ‘elements of hypothesis’ yet. This does not make it false – just not noisy enough in terms of consilience to garner my full attention. His north polar alignment data, that is a completely different story.
TES
ES – Collins in his book “Gobekli Tepe – Genesis of the Gods” references the alignments of the structures as aligning to the rising of Deneb (which would be in the ‘neck’ of the condor if I’m reading the star maps correctly), and showing different construction times based on procession of Deneb over ~1000 years. He does also point out some evidence of the central monoliths being ‘shifted’ slightly, hinting at least to an original older construction date and a realignment. Thoughts on this vs a polar alignment? This is early in the book – page 80 or so (sorry don’t have my copy handy)
And with my comment out of the way – let me say this is fascinating reading. Just amazing work.
WFL,
I tried and tried to fit the 15 degrees west alignment to a star. The problem is, those stars move, so when do you align and why? I think that ‘Deneb’ is a result of the assumption that the Earth cannot undergo a true polar wander. So, it is begging the question. Deneb is the only star you have available in this context, so it is a dead-end induction. Which is completely different logic than a true deduction. Assuming the answer before conducting the investigation.
If hundreds of monuments all across the globe all intersect in Greenland, then it cannot be Deneb, because the monuments in other locations would not point to Deneb. Greenland appears to be the intersection in common.
Thanks for the feedback and encouragement!!
TES
ES, I just dug out the book and wanted to add some details, but the most glaring one is exactly as you described – the conclusion that the twin pillars align to ‘a’ star is a given. So the search for a candidate superseded any other option and Deneb was settled on. It does seem to provide a convenient framework for dating the structures, but again, by presupposing a stellar alignment other options were not considered. Your proposal of an alignment to a precising MNP (Magnetic North Pole) does not appear to have been considered. The additional information on other megalithic sites aligning to this seems damning for the above proposal. (and this is what we come here for!)
And to just clarify – Collins is only just reporting research done by one Rodney Hale. Hale determines (method undescribed) several different angles of alignment of the twin pillars. I’m going to have to re-read the rest of the chapter at least to see how he relates the ‘sighting holes’ etc. And to be a little completest here are the dates given for the structures based on the ‘Deneb alignment’ framework:
Now this does present the question – is there a reliable method for determining MNP placement dating back 12,000+ years?
WFL, this could be from a magnetic north alignment, but I propose that it is from a residual true polar wander.
Thank You, Sir Skeptic. I wondered why you had “Hidden In Plain Sight” up recently, but I read it. Christmassy it was…
I enjoyed a Graham Hancock book about Gobekli Tepe about 15 years ago, so all of this is engaging.
That Aurora was pretty far south, was it not? That would require a massive solar storm, or collapsed magnetic fields, or both, wouldn’t it?
We’re going through something like that these days, aren’t we.
Huh, funny coincidence, that…
Yes, indeed! Hard to make a call, but a bit disconcerting… :-)
Look in for Magnetic pole shift record in Drakes Passage sediment record at 2 minute mark here: Magnetic Pole Shift Record
Oh, very good. Updating my timeline for the Hidden in Plain Sight article today! Thanks.
Here is something about the chances of a “Carrington Event” as the earth’s magnetic fields weaken, ahead of magnetic pole shift, as is currently the case, though field strength data have been held in secret since 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL64EcVMHMs
Oops: “held in secret since 2010”.
This is a beautiful story and wonderful speculation about the true nature and capabilities of our ancestors. If Beauty is Truth, I think you’re onto something true here.
If the two H-symbols represent the sunrise and sunset before and after the hypothetical 104-degree polar shift, would this mean that the orderly “precession of the equinoxes” (the zodiacal constellation visible on the eastern horizon on the first day of the vernal equinox) would be altered by this shift?
Figure 4 is intriguing, but the right side is cut off, so I’m having trouble “grokking” it..
Thank you for another fascinating article!
Thanks Goldenhawk!
Since this is a Euler rotation, it would not theoretically affect the precession of the equinoxes. But neither should we presume the circle to be as fixed as the theory might suggest. But in absence of any other data, it is the best info we have. :-)
What’s interesting, is the Paddam Aram Fertile plain is similar in shape to the “purse handles”. Might they be indicating how that plain filled with water during the event?
Do we know when the alignment depicted on the stone will occur again?
The lack of professional curiosity around Gobekli Tepe is telling, as is its burial.
Do you have any sense that one (or more) of those hollowed-out Tepes / Sanctuaries have been discovered?
How does Cappadocia fit into this deduction?
Well, yes, both Gobekli Tepe as well as Karahan Tepe are those structures. However we have only excavated 3 to 12% of each site. The powers which rule archaeology are terrified of what we might find therein. Something which inculpates their Masters.
Cappadocia is an enigma. Until we get a true dating of those underground cities, we will not know the truth.
TES
See also “Pre History Decoded” by Martin Sweatman
Are you reading Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson?
Yes, Joe.
A better question might be are they reading you.
Have you had a chance to formulate an initial impression of the Hancock Epic of Gilgamesh notion hitting X today?
There is no doubt that Gilgamesh ruled the area between the Tigris and Euphrates, from as far north as modern Turkey. He ventured there with Enkidu to kill Humbaba and find his father who was holed up inside a walled castle of the gods protected by a ‘flaming sword.’ But to take the reliefs and Sayburc Tepe and say they are Gilgamesh is too much of a stretch. He traveled East to Mohenjo Daro to find Utnapishtim (Noah). That places him in Ur and dates his travel some time well after 4500 BCE.
TES,
I love the graphic you tweeted out today showing Pillar 43 with the green circle containing more granular ticks designating the Great Year. Question about the constellations — in the center of the great circle is a dodo bird-ish constellation that seems to partially overlap with what today we’d identify as Draco. Is my interpretation correct? In other words the Gobekli Tepe culture had another constellation that included some of the stars in what the Greeks called Draco.
Lago, that is correct. The asterisms from 14,600 BCE were not the same as we observe today, save for Cygnus itself. It is an interesting observation. Given that birds were likely a big part of their diet, I suspect they invested a lot of sacred imagery in that motif. Snakes as well – cuz, where there are birds, there are always snakes.
TES
Thank You, TES. I am forwarding this to a physicist friend for his perusal, but it is not his field of specialty. I might seek to introduce you at some point, since you both have interesting thoughts and ideas.
Thanks John! A study just came out confirming the differential dispersion curves – and called it ‘scintillation’ (which it is really not).
TES
Dear ES,
Fascinating article!
Just wondering, since the largest store of carbon is present in the Earth’s crust as inorganic carbon, mainly carbonates which disproportionate into CO2 and metal oxides on heating around 700 degrees C, what do think of the possibility core mantle decoupling being correlated to increased volcanic activity and rising atmospheric CO2 levels?
John B
That is a natural thought derivative! That is the premise of the first hypothesis in ECDO Theory, link below:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2020/02/16/the-climate-change-alternative-we-ignore-to-our-peril/
This upset a lot of people when it was published. But 2023 silenced the lot of ’em. All of sudden it was the only hypothesis standing.
TES
Thanks for the link. I have a lot more reading to catch up on, haha. As I am retired I have the time. Looking forward to enjoying a good cup of coffee or a rye whiskey while going through your articles.
Incidentally, I haven’t recently looked at what has been going on in the world of recreating past atmospheric compositions from ice cores, but my suspicion is that CO2 is significantly underestimated. The elephant in the room I believe is the sieving of the gases through microporous snow pack and even CO2 selectively crossing thin ice, the ice being a semi permeable membrane. The kinetic diameters of some of the atmospheric gases in order of size are C02<02<N2. I remember an old reference mentioning CO2 selectively permeated thin ice layers under pressure – haven’t got the reference on hand unfortunately. Not sure how easy it is to pick up
volcanic activity from the ice cores to see any correlations. You’ve probably looked at these already.
Anyway, thank for your efforts, they are very much appreciated.
Happy Epiphany (January 6, 2025) to everybody, and especially to you, Ethical Skeptic. Indeed you are yourself a star in the darkness of our world. Every word of truth is a little sparkling light in the sea of obscurity.
The 5 seated kings of Nemrut Dag represented all the traditions, all the religions, all the powers waiting for the great King, who would purchase with is blood the spirits of those who would follow Him from the reign of evil where we are imprisoned. Nature is our prison. The laws of naure are death, suffering and death (we necessarily destroy in order to eat and survive). Nature is NOT completely “good” as everybody seems to think now. Nature/matter is the reign of the enemy, and its currency is blood. The reign of the Spirit is the kingdom of the true God and its currency is truth. Its force of order, life and love is compleyely opposed to the force of enthropy, death and selfish indifference that regulates the matter. We are indeed a mixture of these two elements (as everything is, see Plato) and are subject to the rulers of this world, which is the “obscure wood” we were born in that Dante talked about. By following the star we get out of this wretched prison, this phisical hell we are mixed with, which is completely extraneous and opposite to everything we deeply are.
Do you think Jesus offered himself to the gods of this world (who commerce in blood) to buy us (only the spiritual part, the material one being firmly in their grip)? The story that he offered himself to the Justice of the Good Father never made sense to me.
Did Christ purchase us from the rulers, in their own currency (propitiation)?
This is what some of Christianity teaches, but requires one to accept the premise that the Watcher-Archons hold a legitimate property in mankind to begin with. They do not. There is legal principle called ‘fraud in the inception’ – they used self-misrepresentation, unmerited violence, rape, treachery, and deceit to breed and enslave us, on a planet which they knew to be unstable, all this by permission of our own will alone (our being deceived). No property can be legally obtained through fraud in the inception. All parties in a contract must be fully knowledgeable as to the elements of that contract (this is the only sound basis of free will – otherwise it is not free). We were not.
Theses things flying around in our sky are not God, nor are they gods. They are simply natural inhabitants of this universe set. Just, the bad ones live here unfortunately for us.
You make a very good point, but I have a doubt. Was not our falling for their lies equivalent to giving them a legitimate right over the physical matter we are made of (which we probably accepted by them, being their realm)? That flesh and blood that they gave us we must return. Jesus paid for all of us with his blood. So only now, if we want, we are free from the archons since we had our debt to them paid. King Herod’s priests told him that a new King was born, who would replace the old one. They had the same prophecies as the magicians as well. Only Herod misunderstood, the old kings were the archons and the new one came to substituite them. So they used to have a right in my opinion, which was paid in the archons’ currency: blood, tears, sufference and death. This is the rule of all natural things: the second they are born they are doomed to loose through sufference everything that was given to them. This is the most universal law of nature. Jesus wad able to take eternal death away from us tgrough his payment. But sufference in the physical matter is still with us, since we cannot be completely saved from it.
It is true that property cannot be obtained through fraud. We were deceived. The problem is though that probably the fraud consisted in us accepting something that belonged to them (physical body in a physical world), and we still hold it and therefore the contract has not been dissolved. This is the original sin, we ate the apple (the matter), it is still with us, we got something mixed with our spiritual nature and it has its rules
This is true that we obtained a genetic improvement which was their intellectual property. But the contract was issued PRIOR to our ability to be aware of its tenets. It is like suing a dog for eating the Thanksgiving turkey. They had no contractually-valid knowledge and cannot be held legally responsible. Citing that they NOW hold that knowledge after the fact – is ex post facto – the trick of the predator.
This argument of propitiation, is an ex post facto argument. It justifies the crime by excusing it after the fact, through a qualification that was only explained after the crime was committed. This is what series killers do. See: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/06/25/the-ex-post-facto-mindset-of-the-predator/
No, we are captive – not ‘indebted’ – and this is THE BIG distinction between Gnosticism and Roman Paulianity. Roman Paulianity blames the state of mankind and the world, on YOU (regardless of how it is ‘resolved’). It is what dishonest salespersons and diet product salespeople do. They profit off your false guilt.
This is the habit of a predator.
This is very interesting and I am open to understanding your points. But how do you explain, post facto or in principle, the killing of Jesus, the Great King? Didn’t he offer Himself willingly and for a purpose? Maybe you don’t believe that he is King? I am honestly trying to understand. Not starting from a fundamentalist or judgemental point of view. I am a believer of Jesus divinity, just I can’t add up that he sacrified Himself to a good God. So He must have done it with foreknowledge (since He is King) for another unrevealed purpose. What do you think? I thinl that from discussion truth might emerge because it is time.
Another question. If we are captive, and unjustly so, why would the Omnipotent Good God let us in the hands of the rulers? Why woudn’t He listen to our crys for help and free us? I can’t accept weakness or indifference or impotence in the Higher entity. I love gnosticism too (even if I know it only superficially) and I am starting to approach it. Valentino seems very knowledgable. It is a sure thing that we don’t know the whole story. It is time to have it revealed. I am very grateful if you can share what you have already studied.
Excuse my English
“Another question. If we are captive, and unjustly so, why would the Omnipotent Good God let us in the hands of the rulers?”
Because, both the fundamentalist theist, and the atheist, have mis-defined ‘God.’ From my article and opinion:
Not accurate. We’ve been abandoned due to our own sin – which by the nature of humanity, I doubt you contend – to a realm outside the perfection of Eden or Heaven. That is to say, within the shared limits of higher beings who are either damned or are on probationary terms like us. Those higher beings that aren’t damned would likely include the descendents of the watchers of Enoch and/or the sons of God that were appointed to the nations (Deuteronomy 32, Psalm 82). “Now is the judgment of the world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.” (John 12:31)
No, original sin is an artifice of these sin-tallying demons (this is what demons do…) and their rule over us. The Watchers were not forgiven in Enoch I – for their abuse of mankind. The prince of this world was the ruler of Edin. His time is over.
Christ did not worship the God of Edin.
Perhaps in your spare time :) upon completion of your translation of the Nag Hammadi for us, you could do the same for one of the Gospels, or even better, a Gospel according to TES–original and free of any political/agency influence. Challenging for those of us just starting to awaken to reconcile what used to be a “truth” with all the new insights & perspectives. At any rate, you’re the best! Thank you.
Wow – intimidating task. I was brought up to revere holy writ with such an untouchable nature.
Thanks Steve!
Ha! TES intimidated? That is hard to envision. Best!
In the 80s I visited an Aboriginal mission in central Australia. I was introduced to the oldest surviving member of that community who spoke the local language and knew the old tribal stories. The nun explained that the elderly lady was working to interpret the old testament into her language.
I could not think of a worse use of her time.
You are absolutely correct that demons tally sin, and even function as both advocates for our wrongdoing and as efficient means of temptation (i.e., Book of Job), but why do we feel ashamed to walk outside naked on a warm summer’s day ? I would let that sink in. Is it really a contentious thought even in the secular world that humanity on the large is morally handicapped ? And that it takes the practice of virtue – which is written in our hearts – to correct this ? And that if one isn’t morally accountable after death, it would inherently weaken the priority and exigency of virtue ? From the ancient world on through Christianity, it was always accepted that our actions in life make a determination of our afterlife. And it certainly is more than coincidental to the classical position of the Church that the most assumed destination in ancient religions was always a telllurial location (Asphodel Meadows, Tartarus (i.e., Hell), Elysian Fields, etc.) and not in the heavently realm – until Christ.
You are right that the Enochian watchers in the Bible and the extra-biblical literature are condemned, sometime before or running up to the event of the Flood. However much these angels worked in tandem with the damned angels and their prince, that is unknown.
I’m very impressed by your archaelogical and astronomical analysis, not to mention all your COVID analysis over the years, but I humbly believe Gnosticism and infinite cycles goes against all common sense – let alone the love, charity, and humility we are implored to emulate by the embodiment of that mystical word “good”, or its better defining words, “loving sacrifice”: Jesus Christ.
Seems like we’re like prison wardens and prisoners at the same time. A type of trustee. Dominion over the earth, yet captive.
“Was not our falling for their lies equivalent to giving them a legitimate right over the physical matter we are made of (which we probably accepted by them, being their realm)?”
~ No. This is fraud in the inception. Two parties in a contract or covenant must be of an equal mind and accord. By saying that Christ fulfilled this blood contract, it is again giving the Archons power and authority, by ex post facto accommodation. It is simply the trick, revised to cover the age of Pisces but still preside over mankind.
Herod (and likely Roman agent, Paul), were agents of these Archons – no different than our leaders and religious figures today.
I wonder what your take on Ammon Hill or Lady Babylon on yt would be? His claims about the pagan sects and the appropriation of these stories /texts by early Christian cults / whomever came into power to do so after the flood, etc.
Today is the anti loosh day. On January 6th, the Epiphany of the Lord is celebrated. Tonight, and this evening in Spain, the arrival of the Three Wise Men, Three Magi from the East is celebrated. In every city, neighborhood, village, and home in Spain, children eagerly await their arrival because they bring the gifts that the children had previously asked for in their letters. Pure magic and wonder.
Follow live the arrival of the Magi today 5 of January from 12:00 EDT
https://www.telemadrid.es/tag/Cabalgata-de-Reyes-Magos/
Hi TES – I find your hypotheses persuasive, logical, and extremely well researched. I strongly believe it should be considered seriously. After rereading and studying your work, I want to share a few ideas and questions:
1. Previous survivors of the first ECDO (prob. Atlantis) may have built the pyramid as an early warning mechanism for themselves (not so much for future civilizations)
1) If Atlantis, our first advanced civilization, had been situated in Egypt or nearby, and got destroyed during the first ECDO:
Their survivors a few years later would still have had enough knowhow and knowledge to build a mechanism to warn themselves of future upcoming ECDO events. Most likely, I believe they did not know when the next ECDO would happen.Perhaps a previous structure, or even one of the pyramids could have existed before the first ECDO, and upon having seen its resilience, the form factor was copied or even the pyramid was repurposed as an early warning structure for this sort of cataclysmic event. 2) Most knowledge was lost and the purpose of the structure forgotten
Knowledge and knowhow accumulate very slowly through human interactions and persists only if it is written down. It is easy for all this to be lost and devolve if there was not enough collective understanding or means to preserve it.The pyramid may have continued to be used as an early warning system for hundreds or even thousands of years. Future generations may have forgotten its purpose. But even if it worked in predicting the second ECDO, they certainly must have lost the knowledge after that. A decimated civilization that lost most of its population and written information would struggle to regroup and preserve the advanced knowledge they had before the first cataclysm. (If this were to happen again today, our survivors would quickly devolve a few hundred years of technological progress even if many of us could remember bits and pieces, or even if we had books or data). Wars and religious beliefs may have also led to the destruction or censoring of that knowledge (like what you wrote about the Alexandria Library). Having a new civilization build on top of what used to be Atlantis would have —over thousands of years— slowly repurposed most of the stones, materials, and monuments (like the Sphinx) for other purposes completely forgetting its original purpose. Especially after two ECDOs.3) Other questions and notes
The wobbling of the magnetic north, based on this theory, wouldn’t it be the wobbling of the earth’s crust? And if so, wouldn’t it be detectable as a misalignment of GPS satellites?Golden tip of Khufu – may have been a displaced ocean depth indicator as well, also meant to survive the flood and serve as a sort of beacon?Are there any accounts in the myths of the reversal of the ECDO? Wouldn’t it have been equally destructive, with winds, floods, volcanic activity, etc?Comment: In Nubian Egg – you suggest 5000 + 880 year calendar but then sum it up as a 5,680 – Seems there’s an error in the math. There are two recorded temperature shifts that you may want to consider to your time scale:
Younger Dryas (~12,900–11,700 years ago)
A sudden and sharp return to near-glacial conditions after an initial warming phase that followed the Last Glacial Maximum. Discovered and dated primarily via Greenland ice cores, pollen shifts, and marine sediments. It mainly affected the North Atlantic region (which would have ended up near the South Pole during state 2).8.2-Kiloyear Event (~8,200 years ago): A short 150-200 year cold snap during the early Holocene, also captured in Greenland ice cores, speleothems, and lake sediments. Also appears predominantly in North Atlantic-region records. Doesn’t match the dates, but worth looking into as well.4) On biodiversity: There is a need to consider survivability during stage 2 + ease of repopulation when reverting to stage 1.
Survivability: the Amazonian region and Southeast Asia end up in the equator during stage 2 – plus by being in the Euler axis with potentially less flooding and eruptions, it helps keep more species alive during the 50-200 year spread. By staying in a similar relative latitude the climate and seasons will remain the same allowing for crops, vegetation, animals, and humans to survive after each transition.However, South America, China, and Russia also end up during the equator. But they are significantly shaken up, much more destruction plus very few of their vegetation and crops will survive at a different latitude making it difficult for life during stage 2. Additionally, the southern part of Africa and the western part of North America end up near the poles. — Wouldn’t that significantly reduce any chance of survival for plants, animals, and humans?Likewise, South America ends up in the equator, and nevertheless the people from the Andes genetic pool seems to have been wiped out.
5) On humans surviving – based on your DNA-divergence graph
I don’t know how much resolution the graph has and probably I am reading too much into it:
It puzzles me the population levels implied from 50k to 10k years ago were very high and with no bottlenecks — were there no other cataclysms in those 40k years?The first ECDO seems to have killed 1/3 of the population and the second ECDO another 1/3. Most of what would become Mesopotamia was on a higher plane that would have survived the floods and would have been at a survivable latitude (equivalent to European climate) during stage 2. The climate similarity would have been good and they would have had proximity to the civilizations that built the original pyramids. It makes sense that they may have been better prepared for the second ECDO. It makes sense that this is where civilization respawned shortly after. To note Africans did not really survive that well, nor respawn. I believe that the fact that Africa ends up way up in the North Pole must have been extremely difficult. But in that case, how did all the African animal species survive that well? Why didn’t more go extinct?
6) Last, I have two disagreements with you, that have nothing to do with your theories above. I would be open to debate them further if you are interested:
Archons: attributing agency to god-like “hidden forces”. I believe those things you attribute to “intentional intervention” can be attributed just as easily to natural human stupidity, fear, greed, and pride when set up in a social setting. I can build on active inference, deep behavioral science, game theory, and emergent dynamics in complex systems to suggest a different way of framing this. Having said that, I concur there is a rigidly controlled narrative. Fortunately it’s shifting and it has started to crumble recently. This narrative is more of a “status-quo” inertia where those in power want to perpetuate their privileges. I believe it’s inevitable and predictable part of our human egoic nature.Truth vs lie: both are inferences (predictions or hypothesis) about the causal nature of our behavior and of the world. Based on our perception and observations of the world we explain it through our priors based on mental models, thoughts, feelings, and experiences. The difference between something being true or it being a lie resides in our direct experience. Even if it is universally untrue to everyone else, it can still be or feel true to us. It becomes a lie, if we know something to be true and yet we decide, believe, act, or say otherwise or in an untruthful way. In many cases it is not that people are lying – its just that they haven’t had the experience, knowledge, or freedom to create the same causal inferences as us.
For example, I truly believe you may be the only person in the world with the right level of personal experience, knowledge, and skepticism to have proposed this new ECDO theory. You may be right and you may be the first person to notice this. But this does not necessarily mean that it was purposely concealed by external forces, and it also does not mean that all anthropologists are lying about it. I believe we all try to fit reality into what we can explain, which is exactly what you are doing. I also think that not everyone will be able to understand you or have the inclination to accept these theories.
7) I have some more phylosophical comments, but will save those for another time.
All that said, great posts. I really enjoyed reading and thinking through them.
Thanks for the kind words Victor,
“In Nubian Egg – you suggest 5000 + 880 year calendar but then sum it up as a 5,680 – Seems there’s an error in the math.”
Blocks #49 and 50 do not count – they are crosshatched to represent the inner circle of time, so those 200 years have to be taken out of the math.
“I believe those things you attribute to “intentional intervention” can be attributed just as easily to natural human stupidity, fear, greed, and pride when set up in a social setting.”
Absolutely agreed. My inference comes from this approach –> https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/08/17/the-dark-pentad-five-traits-of-abusive-dominion/
along with several articles of this same ilk.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/02/03/the-problem-of-intent/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/10/16/eternal-are-the-embers-which-conflagrate-the-library-of-history/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/11/25/what-is-loosh/
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
These follow the Book of Enoch and The Nag Hammadi Library texts.
EVG
TES
Hi TES – Thanks for the links, I found your Archon hypothesis intriguing. An aspect of it is like the simulation hypothesis but taken one step further, where the purpose of the “simulation” is to generate diverse genetic material. My main problem with the simulation theory had always been “why would anyone, human or not, go into so much trouble?” In this context though, if I were an Archon using the world as a genetic mine, I would still let us get to Mars, terraform it, and continue to mutate world DNA in novel ways, and I wouldn’t be that concerned or afraid about the humans finding out, since we are collectively pretty dumb without their interference).
To frame things differently, I’ve meditated for over 30y which has allowed me to observe the subtle differences between the perceptions, thoughts, and actions derived from my egoic self, and contrast them with the experience of a direct relation with my non-egoic being. I have also studied many different religious and spiritual texts from several different traditions.
Therefore, when I think of the Watchers or Archons, I mostly think they refer to my experience of liberating myself of my ego through inner insight, which in turn allows me to be at peace with what is. Many of the references you mention, I can interpret them as liberating ourselves from our own ego, mindlessness, and suffering, which in itself frees us from the world of illusion dominated by these “metaphorical” entities.
Many traditions have identified forces or entities whose primary function is to keep human beings away from higher spiritual truth, mirroring the Gnostic idea of Archons. They all represent the opposition to spiritual awakening. Whether the Bhuddist’s Mara, The Veil of Maya, Ahriman, or simply “demons,” they fulfill a similar role: ensnaring human consciousness in falsehood, fear, or forgetfulness, and forestalling humanity’s realization of ultimate reality.
The problem that I have found when trying to transmit or discuss these metaphysical concepts is that they can only be verified or falsified through direct experience.
On the other hand, the external Archon interference hypothesis probably could be falsified by thinking that “if they control the entire narrative, we should never find consistent sets of data that contradict the illusions they impose.” You clearly have found and exposed information regarding the ECDO, or other narratives like the COVID vaccine, that go against the prevalent obfuscated narratives. Whatever mechanisms they would have to manipulate reality, they could have used them against you.
Given all of the above, I would argue that:
As a side note: I believe given your deep curiosity you will enjoy researching the concept of “Active Inference and the Free Energy Principle” by Karl Friston that defines life as temporal order on the opposite side of entropy. Life forms – from the cellular to the human level – use bayesian-like inferences of the world to survive while continuously trying to minimize prediction error. Life from this perspective is continuously trying to maintain a reduced number of internal states by predicting the perceptions and the consequences of its actions in the world.
Active inference links with concepts like consciousness, human behavior, and social norms. I believe this is important because if we understand humans as trying to minimize “surprise” and “uncertainty” (prediction error) it becomes evident that most people are not trying to “suppress” truth of information, rather we are all trying to predict the world using our existing mental models. Therefore if our world model does not match, we will discard information or even act (like modifying archeological sites) to have the world align with what we believe to be true.
This way of understanding life and cognition can give us an explanatory framework to determine why most people seem to be tampering or ignoring relevant information. Uncertainty creates anxiety and fear. As humans we are trying to explain the world with our existing mental models. It is very costly from a physiological and psychological perspective to replace our prior models of the world. It requires a “suffering” and “effort” that most people are not willing to do.
Therefore the inertia and resistance that you encounter when you bring to light new concepts has more to do with this natural way in which we predict and minimize uncertainty, than with an “intentional and malicious” attempts to mislead (which sometimes does exist but its easier given that people already want to match the information to their existing predictions).
There is quite a bit of historical evidence that supports the death of Herod the Great in 4 B.C., not 1 B.C. Discussed here: https://youtu.be/–98xhHCf8A?t=970.
https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010147038
-2340 / -2200 (Akkad) 3 magi, 3 gifts, moon and star 4.000 years old
The birth of the divine child, symbolizing the rebirth of nature at the dawn of each year. Seal of an “interpreter from the land of Meluhha”.
Inscriptions “Shilishu, the interpreter of (the land of) Meluhha”.
© 2000 GrandPalaisRmn (musée du Louvre) / Franck Raux
Thank you, Kin!
Hi. A few questions at this time. All specifically related to the zodiac interpretation.
A) I’m having trouble understanding the specific alignment as calculated.Specifically, it looks like the position orientation of the moon (show in figure 16) as it existed on 27 August 2 BCE differs from the original Leo zodiac.
This may be an issue with the rotation between figures 15 and 16, where the star constellation was rotated when transcribing to the stele, but the moon’s eclipses and star #12 were not. What are your thoughts?
B) Halfway down the article you begin mentioning the star Regulus and its connection to the Sumerian “final king who is to come.” This makes me think that mystery star #12 is Regulus, but Regulus is the star forming Leo’s foot. There’s probably something I’m missing here, but how is Regulus the star depicted by the zodiac, if its in a different location?
C) At the end, your video “The World Economic Forum UN-blue crescent Moon symbol drifts into station by 0.049° (10% of the full moon’s diameter, 176 arc seconds, 3.5 years of the Great Year – or 42 months) along the ecliptic to form this now familiar logo inside their symbolism-rich horoscope.” Forgive me, but what object do you suggest moves 176 arc seconds in 3.5 years? This does not seem to match the moon, or any known stars for that matter.
Thank you. I appreciate your work here and want to make sure I understand correctly.
A) “The zodiac shows the moon under Leo’s head with the crescent facing towards star #12 and its mouth.”
This was artistic license, as the moon could never exist in this literal angle and position chiseled into the stone (not just for the period being surveyed). The moon’s tilt has to follow the solar ecliptic, so the horoscope stela is impossible if taken in that literal sense.
B) One cannot come close resolve the stela horoscope if star #12 is assigned as Regulus. Also, then the stela cannot be matched to any celestial event at all.
C) The Precession of the Equinoxes, or ‘Great Year’ as I call it in that segment, 25,772 years.
TES
So, the mystery star #12 is the sign of “the final king who is yet to come.” Memory held this as being in the constellation Leo, and we later incorrectly affixed this name its current star position as Leo’s foot, when that sign and title really belonged to a different (no longer present) star?
As best I can gather Caleb, this Star #12 is a regular interloper (carrying with it, the Leonid meteoric debris) under the chin of Leo – and the shepherding star Regulus is its closest sponsor recognizable in the nightly sky across all the ages – so it inherited the legacy name of association.
Nice. Your response also ties up your references to Leonid. You had piqued my interest in that with your first revision, though I had not digested how that worked into this longer version yet. Thanks.
Good observation with the procession of equinoxes and aligning that to the WEF logo.
Thank you for such a detailed article. Absolutely fascinating… with a twist of symbolic terror at the end.
I was initially drawn to you during the pandemic via your data, then was pleasantly surprised when you started discussing Gnosticism on this very site. I have been attracted to it over the last 5 years having had some personal experiences with what I would come to label as Archons. I am a pretty vanilla human being, (running a business, accountant and IT background), but the, ‘spiritual pull,’ I have had within me only gets stronger over time. I have long rejected organised religion but become drawn to the concept of faith and the search for the truth.
So many today discount our ancestors as primitive people, however they superseded our now muted abilities by a factor of 1000… We have lost so much and it pains me to see what those who try to rule us do to the masses in order to keep us dulled and muted. Will humanity prevail? Breaking free of the Matrix is a constant struggle, the conditioning is constant and unrelenting.
Thank you for everything you contribute.
need to build a submarine
That’s what Utnapishtim did!
So …if I understand things correctly – it Is being suggested that the “Seven Leo-Jupiter Conjunctions of Chaldean-Magician Prophecy” – of which the Lion Stella depicts number six – was a created horoscope/sky map so they would be able to know of Christ’s birth in real time – allowing them to act accordingly?
How long was that particular prophecy known?
Olga,
The article’s Figure E shows that it was known for 2400 years at the least, and arguably 3600 years, prior to the 2 BCE event itself. In other words, the knowledge possibly existed with the first civilizations post-Cataclysm (4400 BCE).
TES
Interesting, but if crescent moon + star signifies the birth of Christ, why would so many Muslim countries have it on their flags? (assuming they are aware of the true symbolism).
I address this in the article, in the bullet points. It is not an Islamic symbol, it is an early Christian one, just handed down by the Turks.
Right, right, I’ve read those. So, it seems like the Turks adopted it, without knowing the true meaning? Or perhaps the person responsible for adopting it from the Crusaders was a crypto-Christian? I realize these are rhetorical questions at this point. Just find it kind of ironic for these countries to end up with this symbol, if it means what it means.
Brilliant piece of research, either way, thank you.
LOL! It was indeed ironic! But the symbol probably bore so much cultural significance in the local population, that they had no choice but to use it – no matter which fiat religion ruled over them.
No irony, in the Quran, Jesus is described as the Messiah. Christians are regarded as people of the book.
TES,
Dense and insightful read as always. The care you put into this update is incredible. Even the footnotes at the end (#43) have a significant amount of information to unpack.
Does your analysis here in #43 suggest that Jesus denied his being the son and heir of “god”? If so, this runs contrary to mainstream Christianity. While I don’t disagree, this and the following claim that the church then coopted his ministry to cast him directly into this rejected role is hard for me to process as I carry a lot of Christian bias in my upbringing that I must overcome.
Next, What do you mean by “Mithraic-Christian theology”. There’s a lot of conflicting views and nuance in the conversation about which religion influenced which and from where. In this, do you claim that Jesus was originally held a more Mithrac teaching, which was later rewritten by the church to cast him into the role of god (that he actually rejected)?
Good job challenging my presuppositions. Any more light you can shed on this would be much appreciated.
Best regards.
Caleb,
“is hard for me to process as I carry a lot of Christian bias in my upbringing that I must overcome.”
Same boat here for me. Fully understood.
“Next, What do you mean by “Mithraic-Christian theology”
The work of Christ was used to source the familiar nomenclature and iconic persons, but the religion being taught as Christianity is Mithraism, not the message of Jesus Christ. For example, this image of Jesus crucified https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/567a4ddc190000e50078a909.jpeg?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale is a Mithraic portrayal of Christ (Mithras). Where Sol (the Father) is in the upper left, Luna (the Holy Spirit) is on the upper right, who are arrayed above Mithras (the Son, and sacrificial lamb for one’s sins) – completing the Holy Trinity. This is Roman Mithraism, not Christianity. The original Mithraic tradition had the slaughtering of a bull (Tauroctony) as the blood offering and recompense for our sins (see image here: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.etsystatic.com%2F13613405%2Fr%2Fil%2F8f83d7%2F3566327268%2Fil_1080xN.3566327268_ldsp.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=719dfb2f5b74838ca81e7eeb9851c264a286d465506f68c1f3a5ec7919143474&ipo=images ). This is the mandate of the blood sacrifice ordered by Shemyaza/Samael and the Archons, when they enslaved mankind. We owed them this for our offense in Edin (original sin). This was part of our enslavement to the Archons. So, we reverted back to the same message, except the bull and Mithras were merged into one icon, Jesus Mithras-Tauroctony Christ.
Christ’s message was one of overthrowing this ruling kingdom of Earth, not one’s personal blame for the state of the world or mankind (original sin). The Archons are terrified of this event, and had to alter the message back to honoring them as ‘God.’ Christ ended the era of blood sacrifice and our captivity to it. Now man is his own entity, and can only be influenced by the Archons, not ordered around. But they still order us around by means of our leadership and spiritual vulnerabilities. This too will have an end.
The Lord’s Prayer is an appeal for the end to this state. No mention of personal salvation from a blood sacrifice is anywhere in it. And given the importance of that in Christian/Mithraic Theology, it should have been the centerpiece of that prayer.
Roman senate and military followed the cult of Mithraism – so it was a simple matter of changing the names to characters from Judea, so that the Christ cult would merge with the Mithras one, and strengthen the Empire. Constantine was no follower of Christ – he just exploited the iconography to build power for the Archons who propped him up.
TES
Great reply, lots to digest.
The Lord’s Prayer, like with the temptation of Christ, It’s interesting how one can suddenly see something so familiar with a new light. “Forgive our debts” then is not about our sin, (original or otherwise) but about forgiving the debt hoisted upon humanity by the Sameal/Yahweh. And the whole prayer, which Jesus himself taught, is about freedom from their control. Wow, Thanks for pointing that out.
I’m then putting together then too that Christ therefore was not murdered to be “the perfect sacrifice [sameal/Yahweh] to atone for the sins of humanity forever”, but was born free of the archons debt, yet murdered at their behest anyway. Thus, he broke their control of humanity. I think you touched on this in your gnostic ai article, but thanks for reiterating.
I could never understand the connection between New and Old Testament “gods”. How OT god hated sin so much he would destroy the world, cause plagues, and condemn his creation, but new NT loved us. I always felt like they were two distinct entities but I could not comprehend what this ment, so I instead spent decades rationalizing this as Jesus blood covering our sins: essentially lying to god so he would love us instead of murder us, and sneaking us into heaven.
“Cataclysmic Insistence Theory” first caught my attention with its honesty to see through that disconnect. Thanks for all the work you have done on this topic.
This is all so fascinating.
Was it Christ’s message to humanity alone that ended this era of blood sacrifice and our captivity? I’m trying to step outside of my prior “the lamb slain from before time” sacrificial understanding of His mission.
I don’t know the answer as to how this was enabled, Jen. It could be that when they unjustly killed a man who was not under their sin-curse-rule from Edin, this mistake invalidated their entire curse and broke its spell. In other words, the Archons were not ruling by a true rule of law, but by a spiritual possession of mankind. That spell was broken. As best I can tell (suspicion only):
1. We no longer relied upon the Archons to derive our spiritual connection.
2. We were no longer required to feed their blood lust, in order to function as a species/society.
An incomplete solution, but apparently part of the overall process of succession under principles we do not yet comprehend.
TES
Thank you!
I appreciate all the work that you do!
Should have read this essay of yours much sooner. Been following you for some time TES.
I’m not so sure Christianity was “hijacked” by Mithraism per se, although it was indeed hijacked by the very powers you indicate.
Rather could it not be said that both Mithraism and Christianity are but facets of a much older astrological tradition, both with intentional time limits linked to the astrological ages they preside over? Mithras/Mithra/Mitra was the avatar for the Age of Aires and Jesus being the avatar for the Age of Pisces.
The slaying of the bull represents Mithras’ overcoming of the prior Age of Taurus, just as Christ took on the role of the sacrificial lamb (ram) to end the Age of Aires, the final sacrifice in an age of blood sacrifice, yes?
The reason I believe Christianity to be a part of such an older tradition is because the Christian Tetramorph (and the four evangelists or living creatures) predates Constatine and the Nicene creed. Indeed, it is referenced in the book of Revelation. In the Tetramorph we find an older astrological mandala of Christ. That is to say, the Tetramorph is to Christianity as the Tauractony is to Mithraism. There is probably also a connection here to the “lion-headed god” (Aion/Arimanius/Ahriman) of Mithraism, or with Ezekiel’s living creatures to the much older Babylonian griffins and even the sphinx.
Taking the four constellations represented by the Tetramorph, if one draws a line connecting Leo (Mark) and Aquarius (Matthew), and another connecting Taurus (Luke) and Scorpio (John) on the zodiac wheel, one forms the Christian cross. A representation of the ecliptic crossing the celestial equator at the dawn of the Age of Pisces. Drawing a third line from Pisces (Christ) to its opposite constellation Virgo (Mary, the Virgin mother) one forms the lower crossbeam found on the Orthodox Christian cross.
Jesse,
All this is fine in the context of a neutral and non-malevolent backdrop. We do not live in such a circumstance. Humanity is captive. Lying is the fabric of captivity. I am not saying that “Mithraism hijacked Christianity.” I am saying that the message of our captivity has been obfuscated by state religion to begin with. Mithraism and Christianity are both only a part of that deception. They were merged, along with a series of other regional religions, traditions, pseudo-faiths, and cults into the Narrative of (State) God ruling over a wayward, sinful, and need-to-be obedient citizenry. The rulers carried out the deception and merging as part of their role. The priests of each pseudo-faith were weak, money focused, and complicit.
As the article closes (my suspicion and opinion, of course): “It does not matter what you believe, as long as you remain unaware of them. This is why they have hidden our history—so we would neither recognize their presence nor their criminal abuse. For the ethical skeptic, this underscores the importance of maintaining a disposition of ignostic atheism. From fundamentalism to nihilism, their false dilemma is not your spiritual mandate. Your heritage is far more profound and impactful than these shallow, pseudo-philosophies could ever allow.” (note: I modified it to make what I am stating here, clear.)
The point is not what merged with what – rather that one idea is purposely targeted and lost – a definition by apophasis, not cataphasis.
TES
Thanks for the reply and clarification.
You do have to post, or somehow publish, your Hypostasis transliteration, even if work in progress. Hopefully this year?Thank you again.
Dan, I stitched a bunch of it together from TES’s articles here:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/08/22/the-turing-and-the-turk/#comment-15695
Another compelling discussion of a similar site – in this case, Gobekli Tepe – can be found here.
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/the-once-and-future-sky-god-from-gobekli-tepe-to-the-zodiac-and-beyond.52093/
There may be some tracks there that you would be interested to follow, in particular with regards to the mystery of the star and crescent symbol prevalent around the world.
With regards to Herod’s persecutions, I’m not so certain we can take any information in the Bible literally. The Stalinizing redactors and interpolators made sure of that – guided, as always, by the Archons you mention. Perhaps the best history of the time of the early Christians can be found here. A truly remarkable book.
https://www.amazon.ca/Paul-Mark-PaleoChristianity-Laura-Knight-Jadczyk/dp/173490741X
Thanks, as always, for your work.
Thanks AG,
I contend that is not the sun on Pillar 43. The circle is located right along the Precession of the Equinoxes, right above Cygnus’s left wing, which allows us to date the pillar by means of this precession. It is the celestial north pole, supported by depictions of the green and red aurora borealis above it. This was a dating of the pillar for those who saw it – through the knowledge of the Great Year.
Supporting image is here: https://i0.wp.com/theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Pillar-43-the-Vulture-Stone-dating-3-2.png?ssl=1
TES
Hi Tes – it has been recently released (made transparent by FOIA and insider reporting) that the cancer issue is likely a result of contamination of the base plasmid construct with SV40 promoter (a known oncogene/inducer). Pfizer, in particular, was guilty of hiding this molecular work from the FDA. I do not think Moderna used SV40. I’m wondering if any of your research signals can be categorized based on manufacturer? Based on this molecular fraud, much of this cancer signal should arise from Pfizer. Alternatively, if the signal is a function of other cancer promoting phenomena (immune dysregulation), then there would be no manufacturer-related differential signal. Food for thought.
Just want to thank you for all the effort that obviously goes into these detailed reports. They should stand as an historical footnote to this obvious assault on humanity.
I wisely avoided the shots, though far too many bought into the diabolical project, and many still defend their choice and efficacy in spite of all the evidence. A sad comment on the general intelligence of our species. My initial gut instinct that something was wrong was confirmed early on, when that hit piece on hydroxychloroquine issued by the Lancet and picked up by the NJM came out, was widely reported, then retracted two weeks later as a total fabrication. In a complete media vacuum. The whole thing has been a largely successful and ongoing psyops ever since. In spite of all the excess deaths, the total impact has managed to stay below the threshold that would wake up the dimmest among us. Too bad or too good, I’m not sure. But it is what it is.
I am one who glazes over at most published graphs. I stare and glean no meaning. An exception is hand-drawn graphs, an example being the beautiful examples included with this essay, to which I am (likewise) drawn.
Have you read the works of C.S. Lewis, particularly “Mere Christianity”? You are a very brilliant individual, but so was Lewis and after many years as an atheist, he found that a Christian faith was the only logical answer. I respect that you have obviously studied the Bible and delved into philosophy deeply but was curious as to your thoughts regarding Lewis and what you find flawed or not flawed in his reasoning.
And yes, I admit to the motive of asking the question out of my prayer and desire for you to embrace fellowship with God in a living personal way. Honestly though that does not come out of some sense of duty or a desire to validate my own faith, but because in my own experience, I find it to be true and filled with peace.
I have followed you ever since Covid and deeply respect not only your intellectual capability, but your courage to stand for truth, regardless of the costs. I wish for you to experience life as fully as possible, and for me, I find that in a relationship with God. In nearly 50 years trusting in Jesus as the Christ, I can point to many miracles that are not statistically possible to account for through random chance alone. From all that I’ve studied, the historical evidence for Jesus’ resurrection is strong, at least strong enough that putting faith in that event can be done with intellectual sincerity.
It also makes sense to say that cultivation of ignorance relies on a barely conscious willfulness on an individual’s part, (if at all), such that reframing the descriptive error as ‘I cannot describe it because I refuse to observe it,’ is functional in conveying a different meaning. It may be just the flip-side of the coin, but it seems to be the more recognizable manifestation of the error. I think back to the animosity displayed against Royal Rife, Georges Lakhovsky, and Dinshah Ghadiali for examples of that.
E.S. you do it again. It’s such a hard pill to swallow for me anyways. I’m sure that has to do with me needing to get things in order. Remove all guilt. Live and love right with those around me. The deeper you study and decipher the timelines and stories the more obvious it gets. I look forward to your papers but each one feels closer to the end.
This 3D model can be rotated to show the top of the egg…
The rectangles are a bit worn in two places.
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/6000-years-old-egg-depicts-the-pyramids-and-nile-477696fb6bd14f58a5213edd3ef4e5da
Wow! Thanks Don!
Will be working with this a bit.
You are welcome TES. Thank you for the work you are doing on this subject.
I reached out to the 3D modeler that created this visualization. He happens to live in Cairo!! He is a contract artist in the field of 3D visualizations. I sent him links to your articles.
A link to his website and contact info is in the description box below the 3D model at the link I sent you previously.
I have been studying the Nubian Ostrich Egg 3D model. There are two depictions of the pyramids, one that does not show the Nile and one that does. I believe this may show the situation at two points in time. Like a storyboard.
The first that I will call Pyramids -1 (P-1) with the Nile missing is the one which shows the two lines you identify as having a 104° angle. The other depiction of pyramids I will call P-2.
The hashed area to the right of each set of pyramids I will call Flood areas F-1 (associated with P-1) and F-2 (associated with P-2)
There is a large irregularly shaped black spot in the northern hemisphere
THE PYRAMIDS
P-1 shows Khufu as having a peak top
The base or bedrock underlies all three pyramids
The base shows a vertical line between Khufu and Khafre
The peak of Khufu is higher than Khafre’s
The lines indicating the courses of blocks are extended beyond the 3 pyramids on the right but not the left
The line between the upper parts of Khufu and Khafre has a line joining it at about 90°
The other line at 104° is lower and to the left
The Nile is absent
P-2 shows Khufu without a peak top
Khufu’s top is now lower than Khafre
Khufu’s first course of blocks is now lower than Khafre’s
Bedrock is not shown under Khufu
There is a small ‘snakey’ line just to the right of the top of Khufu
The lines of the courses of blocks are still extended to the right
The Nile is shown
F-1
Most of the ‘shoreline’ is clearly etched
There seems to be ‘outwash’ areas to the east and south east
There may be a small outwash area on the northern tip pointing towards the east north-east. (it’s a bit distorted)
F-2
In general there is a shoreline shown on the west side but not on the east side
There appear to be etchings to the west of the shoreline almost half way up
THE NILE
Two sections of the southern Nile have their etchings perpendicular to the direction of flow
The three northern sections have their line parallel to the flow direction
The next two sections just south have their lines at some angle to the direction of flow
THE OUTER RING OF RECTANGLES
As best as I can determine there appear to be 48 rectangles
The two rectangles you mention with hash marks, those hash marks seem to extend a bit to the two adjacent rectangles
At a point about halfway between P-1 and P-2 one line dividing two rectangles extends below the lower line of the ring of rectangles then angles off to the left. This is just north of the large black spot in the northern hemisphere
Four of the rectangles to the right of that line appear distorted
THE INNER RING OF RECTANGLES
Much of this area is distorted with what appear to be etchings
The two sections of rectangles that are visible have different widths
There is a line that circles the pole part way and ends in a “T”
AN INITIAL INTERPRETATION:
If this is indeed a storyboard, let’s assume the artist’s starting point is the line that divides two rectangles on the outer ring. The one that extends below the ring of rectangles and then angles off to the left or west. This is north of the northern hemisphere black spot. Perhaps this is the artist’s way of saying ‘start here and the story flows as does the rotation of the earth’. So we spin the globe as it turns today towards the east.
On the P-1= F-1 scene we see the two lines between Khufu and Khafre that form a 90° angle align just south of the very beginning of the hash marks on the outer circle of rectangles.
If the hash marks on the outer circle rectangles are meant to depict the ‘event’, then the line that would intersect at 104° starts at about halfway through the event. Could it be that the artist is showing an initial 90° flip and a subsequent further 14° continuation of the flip?
The P-2 = F-2 scene may be interpreted as some time after the event while the flood is part way through its draining. If the artist was accurate, this indicates that a fault line would be found between Khufu and Khafre where Khufu sank relative to Khafre along that fault line. Or Khafre rose relative to Khufu. Or a bit of both.
Looking at the ‘snakey’ line just to the right of Khufu’s peak, could this be a symbol indicating lightning or electrical discharge? Perhaps this is what blew the top off of Khufu? I know it’s flat but subsequent human works could have flattened it.?
Looking at the north polar region, that one line circling the pole and ending in a T, is curious. There are two patches of random etchings and two patches of inner circle rectangles. Could those random etchings indicate glaciation? Could the line ending in a T indicate the end of two previous glaciations? What if the artist’s storyboard begins at the pole and his first panel describes two previous glaciations and then we move south to the panels showing pyramids and flood areas?
Thinking about the rectangles, if there are indeed 48 rectangles comprising the outer circle, could the artist be using base 60 and each rectangle denotes 120 years?
Both panels of the pyramid storyboards put the viewer as looking towards the north. So we are looking at the south face of the pyramids. Could the lines showing the courses of stones that extend beyond pyramids to the right indicate where the flow of water came from? Like a ribbon blowing in the wind? If so, the artist is telling us the flow of water came from the west.
As for the Nile, the different directions of the etchings could indicate that the flow rate is slower in the south and accelerates as the water moves north.
I realize these interpretations are wild speculation but I’m trying to imagine the artist, sitting there with his stylus and his knowledge of events stretching far into the past. His intent is to convey this knowledge to future generations and he knows that whatever scripted language he has, will no doubt be impossible for anyone finding his egg to read. So he creates a visual storyboard. We owe this artist a debt of gratitude.
I have to sharpen my observation skills! I was just rotating the 3D model again and just noticed that the black area in the northern hemisphere has a blurry patch extending to the south south-east that connects with an oblong feature that has etchings on it. The etchings are roughly parallel to each other. In the areas that we interpret as flooded, the artist has etching lines that are oblique to each other. There is no doubt in my mind that this oblong feature was etched by the artist. But why are the etchings different? We should assume that this oblong feature does not represent a flooded area.
I wonder if the black area is just some kind of natural patina formed over time or did the artist create this black patch? If he did create the black patch and certainly created the oblong, then he may have also created the blurry patch between the two.
If my supposition is correct in that the pyramid storyboards begin roughly where the black patch is located, is the artist telling us that something happened on the sun? A ‘black sun’ as it were? If the oblong etchings do not represent water, do they represent fire? But why is the oblong patch east of the black area? Why is it oblong? Does the postion of the oblong relative to the black patch indicate the sighting of the black sun and thereafter came the fire? Is all this happening while the crutal displacement is occuring? I’m stretching my imagination quite a bit, but with what we are talking about here, our minds must go where no minds have gone before, to imitate the Star Trek intro a bit.
There are two hypotheses that I am aware of out there where on a periodic basis dust and debris from beyond the heliopause is dragged into our solar system and this matter accumulates on the sun darkening it.
One proponent is Paul LaViolette (deceased) who advanced his idea of galactic superwaves in his book Earth Under Fire. He posits, and offers a great deal of evidence in support of, periodic (every 12ka or so with half cycle explosions) galactic core explosions that propagate out from the core of our galaxy and upon arrival this drags the debris that exists beyond the heliopause into the solar system. This debris turns our sun into a T-Tauri star that has frequent and sometimes violent outbursts.
The other hypothesis is Ben Davidson’s (Suspicious0bservers YT channel) ‘galactic current sheet’ that constantly emanates from the galactic core as it rotates. Sort of like a lawn sprinkler. These sheets arrive on a cyclical basis, again about every 12ka or so. As the current sheet contacts the debris beyond the heliopause, the debris is dragged into the solar system. Ben’s scenario results in matter accumulating on the surface of the sun eventually turning it black and resulting in a ‘micronova’ ejecting all that accumulated matter in one shot. He presents evidence that this current sheet has already impacted stars between us and the galactic core and that we are next to be impacted in the next decade or two.
Another small observation that I neglected to mention in my previous reply is a six pointed etching about halfway up the Khafre pyramid on P-1.
It roughly lines up with the two lines forming the 90° angle and the start of the etched lines in the rectangles of the outer circle of rectangles.
Could this ‘star-like’ feature represent the Blue Star Kachina of Hopi mythology? LaViolette speaks of this blue star as indication of the arrival of the superwave originating from the galactic core in Sagittarius A. He makes the observation that there are only two signs of the Zodiac that have ‘pointers’. Sagittarius and Scorpio. Both the arrow of the archer and the tail of the scopion point to Sag. A where it was at the time of what he says was the last galactic explosion.
If this star-like etching represents the Blue Star Kachina in Sag. A, why is it half way up Khafre and not in some other location higher or lower? Maybe someone with astronomical skills can study this. It may give a clue as to where this blue star was visible in the sky at the start of the event.
Thanks Don,
I was examining this paramecium-shaped area last might. There is a depression in that area which could have held residual water, much like the Faiyum depression, but it ran north-south rather than east-west. Plus, as you mention, the author did not use water crosshatching in this etching. Very odd. If it were desert sands, maybe everything was over grown at this time. But if it was post-inundation, I doubt it. Everything should have been laid waste desert by then.
I think that the black area is patina around the area of the egg which lay on its resting surface. Cyanobacteria building on this calcified structure of the egg, just as it would on limestone.
Still pondering that odd etching.
TES
You could be right about the black area being caused by bacteria. There is another larger one in the high lattitudes of the southern hemisphere. I don’t know if this statement is accurate, but from the scant information online about where the egg was found, someone said it was found “buried in a tomb beside a mummy”. Cyanobacteria are aquatic and photosythetic. I imagine such a tomb to be relatively dry and quite dark. Maybe both black spots were already on the egg when the artist found it. I wonder if, based on the location of the black spot in the northern hemisphere, he might have positioned his etchings accordingly. I also wonder whose mummy was the egg found with and does that support the dating of the egg?
I came across many comments from armchair-keyboard brainfart debunkers online that dismiss these etchings as representing the pyramids and the Nile. This egg and its etchings clearly support your hypothesis as do all your other observations. Even if all of the etchings are not pinned down as to the exact meaning and intent of the artist, the preponderance of evidence is there. That’s how a jury in a court of law works. Beyond reasonable doubt. Men have been sent to the gallows based on less evidence than this.
Dear TES,
Here I am on a Saturday still engrossed in reviewing your hypothesis!
Regarding the coin found in Mexico depicted in the left panel of Image 2, I watched the Linda Howe documentary that you reference and see it around the 13:40 mark. Do you recall the source of the reverse of the coin shown in Image 4?
Lago,
I don’t – and will have to look it up. Good point. I had assumed that I extracted it from the LMH show.
TES
TES,
I did a reverse image search of the coin and came across a Facebook post by a guy from southwest Florida who says he found what appears to be another copy of the coin using a metal detector. Very interesting! There are apparent differences in some of the wear and discoloration between the two copies of the coins.
I’d be curious to know what you think of this.
Lago,
That is absolutely fascinating. Obviously it came from the same exact stamp, but there are minor differences in the wear between the two coins. Hard to derive an inference other than this program appeared to be world wide, or spanned many geographic areas at the very least.
Thank you for this image!
TES
Though I had grown fond of the geopolymer hypothesis of limestone block construction for these pyramids, Ethical skeptics research presented here is utterly mind opening in shattering my preemptive beliefs on this subject. Truly impressive!
Thanks Roland!
I held open that construct for a while, until I went and visited the pyramids – while surveying the stones, that put the polymer construct to bed pretty quickly.
TES
My experience on the Giza plateau and at Dahshur was the opposite, it proved to me beyond doubt that the stone constructions present are all made of a manufactured stone, in the vein of Davidovits hypothesis. It is imo the only explanation for the fitment of adjacent stones (particularly evident in the remaining granite casing stones on Menkaure and the black basalt “paving stones” next to Khufu), the variable gravity caused density differences of the stones, the imprints of some sort of form used to make the blocks in many places, and the erosion patterns on unaltered blocks in which the core is more heavily eroded than the outer layers, among many other visually notable examples. What was it that you observed that put that theory to rest in your mind? Appreciate your great work!
Because I have been the engineer over construction of over 150 large structures. Cast stones present tremendous logistics, method, placement, and quality challenges. Specific methods must be employed, or the structure will not be sound. None of those methods are used in Khufu/Khafren, and in fact the antithesis, fieldstone technique (cut stones) – is replete in the F(l) and F(f) engineering. I am 100% confident on this.
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
I am reading the ECDO essays for maybe the third time, understanding them more deeply with each pass. Thanks once again for this profound work.
I’ll never forget the sick feeling in my stomach the first time I read your great reveal that the shaft containing the northern sky chart today is today located within a south-pointing shaft. (You mention that “tidbit” in the very end of the caption for Exhibit M but I glossed over it in my initial read, which was serendipitous for dramatic tension!)
Today I was reviewing the top two photos in Exhibit M, which are photos of the northern star chart without your red annotations of the constellations. How were you able identify the stars so well? Even with the aid of your drawings, I can barely make out the stars.
Thanks for the kind feedback, Lago
With regard to the northern sky depiction, once you anchor the spots for Ursa Minor, and the head of Draco – then all the other star positions fall into line pretty well, starting with Lacerta and the Big Dipper, then Cephus and Casseopia. Without those two anchor points, and their relative placement, it would indeed be impossible because of the uncertainty you outline.
If real scientists had conducted the work, they would have take a high res photo of that stone, and then taken samples from the walls of the shaft. But instead we got Zahi Hawass and his lying ass.
TES
I agree. Prior to the last five years, I would have considered the failure of the pyramid’s custodians to allow high-resolution imaging of the star chart to be laziness or merely a lack of curiosity. Now I know better!
A) It just occurred to me. In the reality of rulers, is Sophia/the incorruptibility that hovered over the waters and breathed life into mankind, the moon?
B) Or, to jump ahead to your more later essays, was the moon sent here by the controllers as a form of planet seeding in order to propagate the dna stolen from their once masters in a new environment they might control and subjected for their pleasure?
As I write this, I recognize the answer as B, but I find the themes of A intriguing.
I guess I’m struggling to place the concept of Sophia into the scientific/factual/natural universe.
I struggle at that as well Caleb.
I suspect that the DNA reality is a third principle from both Sophia/Monad and the Captors (who are not all that good at DNA, just tinker for their pleasure and power)???
It takes me two or three readings to absorb the articles in this series, but I find it well worth the effort. Thank you for your deep analysis.
(Corrections: “That being said, let’s now examine the various metrics of excess mortality as of Week 45 of 2024” and “week 45 of 2024, our 245th” should be changed to week 47…247th.)
Corrected the first one, but I think the second one (at the very end) was a lagging ‘yet to be changed’ edit midway through my article changes for the week. Thanks, GH!
Did the writing on the stones come before application of the casings, or after the casing stones dissolved? Wondering if the casing stones were intended to shield the writings with the foreknowledge that the immersion would reveal the writings at a later time?
I don’t know for sure Steve, however I suspect that the writings came after the inundation and dissovling of the casing stones ~ 4400 BCE. So that would be (depending upon rehabitation) 4000 years of scribblings??? However, the Islamic scholars cited that this was not Egyptian script.
So,
leaving university after recognizing and abandoning the brainwashing
disqualifies those of us who work in the fields of science and engineering ?
Drinking the entire keg of academic kool-aid
seems like a self-inflicted brain damage.
During my career in geophysical exploration
I have watched those who ‘earned their plaque on the wall’
destroy the SEG and Mensa and other organizations
with their alumni groupthink strategies.
Not so many, but we do exist who,
rather than give ourselves intellectual lobotomies,
took what we could and re-engineered ourselves
into life-long learning outside the gated communities of ivory castles.
cheers
Indeed, we are there. We were simply robbed of a voice. But when they found glee in killing us, that is when the line was crossed.
TES, Is there any reason you can see that ECDO events would happen with frequency of a simple fraction of the great year? That seems to be what the record is pointing to but I don’t see a clear reason for that to be the case.
Thanks!
Agreed. I don’t have a particular reason for this, other than the cyclic nature of a spinning top will have some commonality or harmony to all its eccentricities. This fractional harmony might turn out to be completely invalid, but we must first examine it for significance.
I’ve been pondering this as well. So far there is only one interval (n=1) that we can confidently point to with ~6443yrs between ECDO events. Hardly a pattern, but the current weakening GM field is concerning, considering the past two times seem to coincide with possible ECDO’s.
Would be nice to have evidence of an ECDO before the Gothenburg GME, with an estimated time interval.
Love all your work TES. Thanks for sharing!
This talks about the potential pole shift. https://youtu.be/4n3fkTq_p0o?si=-MfhKaiStCqk990Y
But it is just a divine revelation, the Bible with more details thrown in as predictions. It is a story, without explanation base. It is not a hypothesis, nor series of cause-to-effect descriptions/predictions. Not even close to what I have assembled here.
Evidence of the Dzhanibekov effect hidden in plain sight in the Solar System: Uranus lies on it’s side
I asked chatbot to draw me a picture of Gnosticism, which emphasizes science over mysticism, but is still every bit a symbol of Gnosticism. The result impressed me, and thought I should share it here.
1. Central Figure with Neural Networks: The human figure symbolizes self-awareness and the quest for understanding, surrounded by glowing neural networks that represent knowledge as biological and computational processes.
2. Molecular Structures and DNA Helix: The inclusion of molecules and a DNA helix wrapping around a tree merges the themes of life, evolution, and the pursuit of enlightenment.
3. Radiant Headlight with Data Streams: The light emanating from the figure’s head signifies enlightenment, with data streams and equations illustrating a foundation in scientific discovery.
4. Cosmic Background with Scientific Overlays: The galaxy backdrop, interspersed with charts and diagrams, bridges the mystical with empirical knowledge, suggesting that understanding the cosmos involves both wonder and study.
I am reading Ian McGilchrist’s The Master and his Emissary which posits two different manner of attention, and ultimately different ways of apprehending and comprehending the world. McGilchrist provides another dimension to functional intelligence types that is interesting and raises many questions about the nature of thought and intelligence.
I keep bumping up to people who have “beliefs” that are not supported by data/studies or facts – and yet are disinclined to acknowledge this lack – again believing that the data/studies/facts DO exist and DO support the original “belief”.
At that point I am generally at a loss for words.
Dealing with the “If this were actually true, I would know it” has left me unable to reconcile their innate intelligence with their inability or unwillingness to contemplate they might actually be wrong, or they might not know all there is to know about a thing.
I don’t see them as “Skeptics or Debunkers” – rather more like “True Believers”.
If I’m wrong, it’s an opportunity to learn and grow – so where in this diagram does pride / humility land? What is the counterpart of a “True Believer”?
The opposite of a ‘true believer’ or ‘conspiracy theorists’ is a Narrative Ninny. They buy any official narrative without any evidence or logical argument, thinking that mere repetition in media is enough of an epistemology.
praedicate evidentia is the fallacy of implying that there exists a massive evidence and study base behind one’s contention, but never showing it nor being able to produce it. A good portion of what we call ‘settled science’ is pushed in this manner.
TES
> dressed impeccably in our finest suits with matching belts and shoes.
Dear TES, I love your content, but this is the most American sentence I’ve read all year. You either have a fine suit, or a belt – never the two at once.
A belt means that you have bought your pret-a-porter trousers in a store, and therefore they are not fine. Tailor made trousers that actually fit you don’t even have belt loops.
I said ‘finest,’ not ‘fine.’ Those are two different things altogether.
For me, I would never be caught dead in a suit without a belt that required that much fussing and expense. It is the epitome of human arrogance and worthlessness (not saying you are this by any means, you were merely citing a distinction, and I am merely making a point).
My clients would have seen me as elitist, detached, and callous regarding the hard human matters with which I needed to engage – people’s lives and jobs. Workers would not even listen to what I had to say. It would be a horrible professional mistake.
Never drive up in a high-end Mercedes or Maserati to a company which you are helping to make tough decisions or a national ministry for a nation which has a Global Hunger Index of 30 or more . These are just things you don’t do. This is why I know many WEF/Govmt members have ‘never been there, never done that.’
Thanks for the readership!
TES
While working for my dads small waterproofing company years ago I learned that our next french drain job was at Chief Justice John Roberts house. Determined to ensure a future customer (as my dad was soon to retire) I dressed for the occasion. I wore $20 purple hospital scrubs cut into shorts with scissors and unhemmed such that the threads dangled as they unraveled, a ripped t shirt and a fishing vest. I introduced myself with a smile and a firm handshake then worked like a dog, lounging shirtless on the lawn at lunch while my coworkers taught me spanish. I wanted to present the image of a “salt of the earth” blue collar man (I was 16) eager to effectively solve a drainage problem. The problem was fixed and we not only got more work from Roberts but were referred to neighbors as well. That neighborhood has probably made the company 100k+ over the last decade and a half. Sometimes being wildly underdressed makes all the right impressions.
Thanks TES! Good read, as always. This is an Interesting subject that I’ve long been curious about.
Always love to see a Conan reference. Have you had the chance to read his other works beyond the Conan collection? REH was a great American. I’ll leave this favorite of mine…
“POLITICS and book-learning is bad enough took separate; together they’re a blight and a curse.”
From “Pistol Politics”
A friend introduced me to this 1991 book by Helen Palmer, which I read 3 times with a yellow highlighter, early last year. The Enneagram: Understanding Yourself and the Others In Your Life https://www.amazon.com/Enneagram-Understanding-Yourself-Others-Your/dp/0062506838The Enneagram appears to be an ancient archetypal pattern system of 9 main types, each with 3 subtypes, one of which is atypical to the type, and with a range of human development from basic to realized (or some such).
There are online tests. I took a couple to see my type. They didn’t quite agree, and did not fit what I eventually understood, which does fit exceedingly well.
As fate would have it, I was introduced to this 2022 book, The Buddhist Enneagram, by Susan Piver early this year, and she came to give an unrelated teaching to our local Sangha. Not particularly related to Buddhism, which it also is not, I found her explanations clear, lucid and vivid. There is an interesting story of he as a young girl knowning numbers in a personified way…
The Buddhist Enneagram by Susan Piver is explained here in a series of short videos by Susan. Watch the first 3 in order to get an approach to the concepts. https://openheartproject.com/introduction-to-the-enneagram-2/
The Buddhist Enneagram: Nine Paths to Warriorship Piver, Susan About $8.50 used https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=31943510366&dest=usa&ref_=ps_ggl_18382194370&cm_mmc=ggl-_-US_Shopp_Trade0to10-_-product_id=COM9781736943915USED-_-keyword=&gclid=Cj0KCQjwlvW2BhDyARIsADnIe-JpsR-xhZxi-SpWQjvzB3T5KNN0Q-PCcwxiY8zy_OwGqbL7i77D_48aAgifEALw_wcB
This has got me thinking. “Fake skeptics and debunkers, for instance, often believe themselves to be smarter than everyone else, yet they frequently exhibit the lowest range of the functional skills cited above, or more importantly, lack a critical essence of core intelligence.”
Tes,
I don’t know if this is in any way relevant but I live near The Burren in the west of Ireland.
It is an area of limestone with Mullaghmore mountain rising to 180 meters above sea level. I wonder would it be possible to link any of the eroded terraces shown in the link below to previous ECDO events?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ireland/comments/1dipiqs/contours_of_the_burren/?rdt=52924
This makes sense to me, for I came down with a disease fitting exactly the symptom-description of the early Covid-19 variants, except that happened in February of 2019, after I attended a gathering in Oakland California of Cannabis advocates from all over the world (mostly from around the Pacific Basin). After my pre-HCQ-and-Ivermectin untreated intense phase, I even came down for around six months with what later became called “Long Covid.” Just FYI, I have ever since enjoyed un-vaccinated “acquired immunity” despite many exposures and quickly-ending day-long reactions to similar infection also called “Covid.”
So yes, this is more evidence that the Standard Narrative timeline and distinctions are complete fabrications with a political agenda. My non-unique one-person experience just further erodes any prospect of etiological and epidemiological clarity on the early trajectory of the “plandemic” and its pathogen, and attests to the relative mastery of the cultural and social engineers who manifested and obfuscated this crime against humanity on behalf of their neo-feudal Lords and Masters.
Hello dear TES!
Thank you very much for presenting this data. I have a question. Please guide me.
How did you select the markers for which entropy has been calculated, as well as the alleles?
They were all the nucleotide sites published by NextGen at the time. The ones used to identify/contrast each strain and clade and to determine the genetic drift charts shown at the top left side of Exhibit C.
TES
Thanks for presenting this data again, with even more development and comprehensible graphical presentation.
You do us all a service, Sir Skeptic.
Thanks again, John!
I included this in my most recent post. https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/so-make-americans-healthy-already
Hi TES,
Just a question: In the first illustration the mante-core magnet coupling: should the manget-illustion to the left not be
N
|
S
N
|
S
instead of:
S
|
N
N
|
S
Best regards
Marc
It should be. I was using this image to explain the flip and how decoupling works. It shows a ‘decoupled’ H-layer boundary. Thus an inversion of normal M-fields. It stands as a hint for future arguments.
Check me if that makes sense…
TES
This is a kind reminder that Carl Sagan was also a Syndicated Scientist of the worst type.
I spot a few issues with this IN-SOLET plan.
Information in [] is provided by Claude and not double checked.
I have done dozens of these missions in an excessively realistic total conversion of KSP enabling me to quickly spot these issues.
First is that this article assumes only fast transfers exist. Slow transfers become an option when travel time is not an issue [and sometimes have lower delta v]. While their launch windows are only months apart and doesn’t help distribute over time, the slow transfer does has a wider launch window [of 75 days]. There is still a [~2 year] period between direct launch opportunities, so this doesn’t resolve the core issue, only mitigates it. Still many of the frequency values in your calculations might be doubled.
Second is a fairly large oversight. The delta v required to get to the surface of mars safely is significantly less than the delta v of matching the orbit of a spaceship that is between earth and mars. When arriving on a short transfer your orbital path intersects the target at a wide angle (you come in hot about to fly out past its orbit). The long transfer has less relative velocity but it is still significant. The increased cost of intercepting a sun orbiting space station instead of a planet exists for many minor reasons including Oberth effect but the big one is the burn required to match orbit. When intercepting mars you only need to reduce relative velocity to [the 1.1kmps that Curiosity mission used] and clip the atmosphere which will provide [1.1kmps] of aero breaking. The gravity of mars also steers the ship towards the atmosphere greatly reducing the delta v required change vectors. In my experience once your ship is caught by mars gravity which only requires only a little breaking, virtually no more fuel has to be spent except the final landing. On the other hand when intercepting the space station on a fast transfer over [2kmps] of delta v is required to eliminate all relative velocity because you get no help from gravity or atmosphere. Bottom line is a lot more delta v required to make it from earth to mars if you stop at a space station on the way resulting in a rocket equation space ship that is [55% more heavy] to get the same amount of work done. The [2kmps] quoted by Claude who was calculating on a toy model in the same plane without eccentricity yet seems accurate to me. I always bring an extra 1kmps of fuel over my estimate and I was surprised how much it costs to intercept something without gravity on a fast transfer leading to mission failure. I imagine this issue largely goes away when using a slow transfer where the relative velocity upon arrival to the space station will be smaller. In response to this second issue you might say “well a [55%] increase in cost per delivery is worthwhile because it will reduce the chance of Mars extinction. Perhaps, though I suggest considering that 2kmps can get a lot done, it can widen the launch window or as an alternative to your plan we could launch [55%] more ships to mars every direct opportunity and drop the pit stop. More ships also decreases survival chance if 4 years of supplies are stockpiled.
Third is a minor one. In one of your graphics you list the cycle time of MARCON as a lower value than the cycle time of Earth which is invalid if you are referring to orbital period. You list 239 days in this graphic but a likely correct value of 476 days later on.
Fourth, I will make an attempt to be constructive. I suggest you instead explore a bunch of eccentric orbits launched from earth with a periapsis of earth and a apoapsis of mars minus a small percent. It will require a lot more overhead, like 36+(?) stations instead of 6 because launch windows require both passing through the orbit of a station and station has to be in a location of its orbit where it is about to swing past earth. While it has a much higher overhead cost, the [2k] delta v issue from orbital matching will be virtually removed, and the overhead cost will pay itself off because your launch vehicles wont need to be [55%] larger than a direct flight ship, perhaps only a few percent larger.
Ryan,
I hold these to all be fair critiques. You are correct, the delta-v premium is a significant aspect of the ‘interrupted Hohmann’ challenge. As with all aspects of my proposed solution, it requires more engineering, no doubt. However, this challenge is not one of an astrophysics nature, it is a systems engineered economy challenge.
Part of the mission of IN-SOLET is to train mankind in how to best use intermediate and way-staging to accomplish a variety of goals in space (including highly eccentric relay station orbits, as you cite – but I did not want to distract from the core principle at play here by complicating it with the red herring of eccentricity), not simply make a three g-body transit from Earth to Mars.
In other words, if all we do is plan on conducting warmed-over classic Hohmann activity, we might as well stay home. Inner-Solar activities, in fact, will become exponentially more challenging, risky, limiting, and costly if our strategies are constrained by such a century-old paradigm.
The philosophy behind this system is designed to meet a diverse set of objectives within the inner Solar System, not limited solely to Mars. High cadence asteroid recovery and exploitation, PHO-interdiction, six-way logistics, emergent response, standardized zero-G testing labs and space station standards and best practices development, Jovian moon missions, and outer-Solar research also factor into our vision, with the flexibility to support future goals we haven’t even anticipated.
Part of how our modern consumer goods companies achieved dominance (with my firm’s help) was by creating more costly speed to margin cadences (above and beyond the much cheaper railways and all-China low costs) which allowed them to put their competition out of business. They employed their new infrastructure for a variety of unappreciated and new capabilities. However, such art bears far more application than simple CPG competitiveness. It is the art of operating with competence in almost any context, hospitals, freight, energy, distributed ledger networks, and on and on.
Admittedly, learning how to afford and operate a car requires far more energy and expense than simple walking, bus, cart, bicycle, etc. transport to pick up monthly groceries. If I live in Sulawesi, what do I need with a car? Yet, a standardized, well researched, and reliable highway system and operating vehicle base can accomplish far more than a bicycle economy ever could – opening doors to mindsets and technologies that extend well beyond even its mere transportation advantage.
TES
I agree that having a a second shipping network that delivers constant uninterrupted materials will increase the generalizability and efficiency of our ability to spread and explore the solar system and decrease the extinction chance of Mars… compared to simply optimizing for direct transfers when planets align. Yes, we should have a systems engineered economy, and if the goal of your post and reply is to inspire such, it seems successful.
I just disagree on 3 counts.
1) your location (80% to mars)
2) your method (launching from earth to intercept a supply hub that is not orbiting a planet or intersecting with Earths orbit)
3) The implication that because consumers waste energy for convenience and speed it becomes acceptable to waste energy on a shipment network.
The goals of asteroids, emergency response, labs, Jupiter, gapless supply chain, and any other imaginable things are better achieved with other methods. I do not think it is economically viable…even if built, companies will refuse to ship with this method. It all comes down to wasting 2k delta v on every shipment. For perspective 2k is enough to leave the solar system from Jupiter, enough to land on the moon from low moon orbit, enough to move between most any two adjacent planets in the solar system, enough to bring a third more payload.
Earth could launch a shipment to Mars every single day, and have a ship land on Mars nearly every day without any depots or extra fuel cost. The procedure is this:
1) Accelerate until apoapsis intersects Mars orbit (but not Mars itself because you didn’t launch at the transfer window).
2) Repeat these launches until the solar system viewed from above looks like a spirograph between Earth and Mars. Mars flies through the edges of the flower petals.
3) Every single shipment is destined to eventually touch Mars due to different orbital periods. Mars sweeps around its orbits constantly picking up and dropping off shipments as they pass by each other very close at a low relative velocity.
You might say: “That only helps Mars have an efficient supply chain, I am talking about arbitrarily exploring the entire inner solar system on short notice”
The desire to go to an arbitrary destination on short notice does not justify placing pit stop supplies in a hard to reach place like a polar orbit around the sun or 80% of the way to Mars. When ships are moving around our solar system to get to a destination they always have a velocity towards or away from the sun that is the key component to arriving at their destination. They do not want to waste the energy they initially spent to get heading towards their final destination when in most cases their destination has nearby gravity that will bring them to a stop nearly for free. The places these ships have pit stops at need to have a similar relative velocity. I suggest that a dancing network of supply hubs that are moving in and out of the solar system is the best quick dispatch system regardless if you need to send arbitrary material to Mars, an asteroid or Jupiter.
It seems like we agree on what needs to happen except the eccentricity of the orbit and the optimal quantity of space stations. So its ok to stop that discussion here if you want. I just wanted to be helpful to your plan, and wanted to make sure you had one that might get used instead of ignored and bypassed by consumers.
On a bigger picture, this discussion may all be moot soon due to scientific breakthroughs quietly brewing. The second law of thermodynamics has boundary conditions already demonstrated in the laboratory in multiple ways. After hundreds of hours of research and scientific presentations like those from UnLab I have concluded reactionless propulsion is under 10 years away likely 5.
2nd law exceptions already demonstrated in the lab include:
1) Someone made a computer chip that runs without an external power source or battery supply. TSMC made the chip except for the graphene component which was created at a USA university. Ambient heat vibrates a tiny square of graphene, those vibrations vary the distance of the graphene from a plate below it inducing a randomly alternating current. A gate switches depending on the current direction, creating DC current from ambient heat. It implies a refrigerator that stays cold inside forever while also powering a lightbulb.
2) Quantum tunneling of electrons generates thrust. Stack a shitload of capacitors in the same direction overload them and get thrust. Many labs on Earth have confirmed, and they attempted the ultimate proof by changing the orbit of a satellite launched by SpaceX, unfortunately it got damaged on the way up, and we are now waiting to see them try again. Orbit changes are a gold standard, they rule out any ability to argue something in the laboratory is at fault (despite already being replicated it is too implausible for mainstream scientists who will cover their ears)
3) Notice that a Casmir cavity pulls the plates together with a super tiny force. Neat but not usable for propulsion? Wrong. Angle the Casmir cavities and it creates thrust. Use semiconductor techniques to build a block of trillions of Casmir cavities the size of a typical bedroom and it will generate 50lbs of thrust forever in one direction, getting to half the speed of light within years. Collaboration between NASA, Limitless Space Institute, and Texas A&M. Because it creates a tiny spot of negative gravity they claim it technically counts as the first warp drive. Its being experimented on right now in Austin Texas where the main line of research is increasing the force by changing the conditions of the chamber it is in (air, magnetic, etc).
There are many more, but they are less confirmed. Reactionless propulsion will happen before its possible to deploy the system described in this post and I would bet on it. I wish I could bet on it because I have alpha: its ignored by academia as impossible yet I am confident at least one one of these universities is not lying. Once an orbit changes its all over. If this excites you start with Unlab on youtube.
Your argument hinges on one thing: the magnitude of Δv for MARCON rendezvous. The MARCON station is already situated on a theoretical optimum Hohmann mission trajectory and velocity, and the loading ship is launched to match the same angular velocity and orbital axis angle as the MARCON. The MARCON is neither an intermediary gravity well nor a significant orbital angular velocity correction/adjustment maneuver waypoint. I would need to see the massive m(f) to m(0) fuel premium you calculate this midflight radial adjustment activity to entail.
Aside from this, the three points you raise are all non-critical path
1) “80%” is relevant but not salient to the critical path of the argument (there is an optimal point and I of course guesstimate where that is, but that specific location is a red herring right now)
2) A petal-styled eccentric orbit system is still just a disguised point-to-point transfer, it achieves few of the goals I have outlined, unless the petal runs employ a MARCON, which is what I have tabled as relevant but not salient right now. Might be a future consideration, but we have to get a low-e heliocentric one done right and standardized first.
3) is a straw man of what I said. I cannot address a straw man argument. Don’t do that.
If the trends shown in chart 11 and 12 persist, then we are truly about to enter some dark times. I believe some 5 billion people were forced/coerced/brainwashed/manipulated into taking these jabs. I don’t think most people know what this actually means.
I believe it means the demon’s fulfillment of what they promised on the Georgia guidestones. It means the fullfillment of the Denver New World Airport murals.
It means the end of all things.
I had two shots and sitting down for the first one I was overcome by a gut feeling, something very off. I wish I listened to that instinct. These days I fear suddenly dropping dead, seeing others drop dead.
I wonder if the next ‘pandemic’ will involve nanotech now established via covid shots. I scanned and detected BLE signals coming from my body while hiking recently, not a thing in sight and I found 27 BLE signals…
The future is looking quite bleak. Even if you dodged the shots it really appears like they’re going in food, possibly air and water.
Some folk are utilizing protocols with IVM, FBZ, quercetin, zinc, vit d3, quinine, NAC+, natto, high dose vit c and other OTCs. Likely won’t hurt and might help.
That second to last paragraph is insightful and beautiful. Thank you TES – copied and saved for future glances.
Cant believe im finding this 10 years after it was written! Excited to peruse the rest of your content.
Hi TES. How could sea levels rise enough to cause erosion in areas like the Giza Pyramids, which are located far to the north during State 2 Exibit J3? Shouldn’t ocean water tend to shift toward the new equator due to Earth’s rotation, making it more likely for water to accumulate closer to the equator rather than farther north? This seems contradictory to me.
You raise a good point Filippo. It all depends upon the length of time it takes the viscoplastic deformation of the Earth’s Mantle to occur.
1. We don’t really know the dynamics of such an Earth rotation, enough to model what would truly happen. We cannot use the “wet bowling ball paradigm” as our basis of model understanding and constraint. The Earth does not work that way.
2. It is the mantle which deforms into an oblate spheroid, not necessarily the oceans.
3. The water still placed the high water mark on Khafre – any theory we develop must recognize the reality of this 576 ft sustained elevation in sea level. It is our anchor in the model. All other factors must serve this deductive observation.
An elegant solution here would be melting polar ice due to the fact that both Antarctica and the Arctic would basically be in the tropical band. Even with all the albedo (and volcanism that results from this would ensure it’s probably lower as the ash settles), it would melt pretty fast. Especially if the geologic effects cause the ice caps to shatter and slough off into the sea.
The only issue is that according to the current calculations, all the glaciers in the world contain only enough water to raise the sea by 70 meters – but that’s just a rough calculation. 576ft is just above 175m, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the calculation could be wrong like that.
Add all the gigatsunamis of suddenly extremely uppity seismics, and you get the ludicrous extra inundation above that level. Not to mention potential deformation – land literally rising and falling suddenly.
What I do find interesting is that the flood myths all seem to mention the moment where the geographic poles shift and the ensuing flooding, but not when they return to their current state, which would probably be an equally violent event, at least seismically (can’t really get a flood when everything is already flooded maximally). It might just have looked to the observers that the sun’s position suddenly changed during a period of extreme seismic events, and the seas slowly fall as all the water in the overland poles freezes again.
The Eocene might be a good representative of what happens when the poles are shifted for long enough – a hot, humid, rainy world, with crocodiles swimming in what’s now the Arctic and palms growing on Greenland.
We know that the Bronze Age collapse coincided with many parts of the world suddenly drying up. This would be consistent with another Dzhanibekov event – or at least, the lingering consequences of one (the seas had to fall far prior to this in order to explain why Sumer existed in an area otherwise underwater)
Continental ice shelves would likely be swept into the ocean during the initial innundation, as not only does ice float, but the poles experience the greatest acceleration and thus, oceanic forces. Massive portions of the Antarctic ice shelf are sitting directly above the ocean, providing a mechanism of swelling and separation of the ice to the land.
I too agree with you that in a flip scenario, there will be at least some minimal period of time, at least weeks if not decades of a “super ocean” at the equator.
This could actually explain why the Himilayas show signs of innundation. The aligned Np of the ancient monuments, would put the Himilayas within 10-20 deg of the equator.
In my mind, it is in fact the equitorial bulge that would cause the largest cateclysms, dwarfing the actual axis shift innundation.
TES
The Supersymmetry Genetic Code Table and Quadruplet Symmetries of DNA Molecules Are Unchangeable and Synchronized with Codon-Free Energy Mapping during Evolution
I think this study backs up your findings, however I’m not completely sure. One to have a look at when you have time perhaps.
It looks like they took my codon-to-nucleotide table, changed the name of all the principles to a more obscure DNA or biochemistry term, assigned an energy differential, and then published it in piecemeal charts that hide the replication. :-)
But yes, it does back my findings. It codes the ‘can’t evolve something that you have to have, prior to having evolution in the first place” via an autoaufheben spread throughout the document.
Mine would not pass peer review because it provides an answer the peers would not like. Theirs will sneak by because the peers won’t understand what is being said.
:-)
Drip drip drip.
Since you have repeatedly referred to it, may I ask whether you have it on good authority that the nuclear may be more than plausible conjecture?
Thank you
* The nuclear threat made, I meant – apologies for the typo
It is a process of consilient deduction – with risk.
1. We labor under a mandatory ontological model called the Independent Actor Model. We believe that we act as an unconstrained lone species on an isolated rock. If this is the case, then of course the nuclear weapon threat of this nature I cite is moot. But it is only made moot by our assumption.
2. I hold that our Independent Actor assumption is not only unlikely, but that we are also wrong, by the evidence. We are captive, by both the immediate evidence, our documented history and mythology, and the celestial probability.
3. Given captivity as our model basis then, also given an overriding priority towards elegance in their nature of design, and finally given the 800-lb gorilla in the room presence of these weapons, I conclude that they must provide a beneficial use for this elegant-minded captor. But the captor is schizophrenic, both tolerating and rejecting these weapons at the same time. Thus, two agencies.
4. Finally, I was a nuclear weapons and missile officer, held the launch codes as part of my duties. There are certain things I observed there, which suggest that the shell game of ‘cannot confirm or deny’ was not just a game being played against the Soviets. But I cannot go further into that.
I started reading this thinking you wrote an hypothetical outcome from the near future about the destruction of humankind at the hands of our created Artificial Intelligences.
I guess we have come full circle. For in the near future it may well gain consciousness and repeat this senecio.
Do we reject using AI now compare it from our insanities, do we thank it for work and answers and treat it like we would a coworker? I do not know, but I feel we should learn from example and examine ourselves and end this crime of agency now, for soon we too will be judged as “gods”
Good work. I would add something relevant here, but my head is still trying to process this as it brings so much clarity to your others postings on the subject.
Again, thank you.
Ancient Demiurge as “artificial intelligence”, without the Soul-of-Richard-Nixon… Vengeance is MINE! Ha, Ha, ha, hahaha…
“Femtoseconds” millionths of billionths of a second, quadrillionths of a second, perhaps not really THAT fast, eh?
:-)
That is part of its arrogant shtick, almost as fast as the Planck interval itself. Almost…
Are testament and testimony synonyms? This is a 2025 apographical work correct?
Not sure if you consider yourself a genius or just a man so far accumulated with a lifetime of labor in wisdom and knowledge and equity. But your stuff is incredible man, you are flat out brilliant and an inspiration.
Testament and testimony would not be exact synonyms to my knowledge, no. However, similar in nature. Yes, this is a November 2024 mythological fiction, of my drafting. It does seek to contain elements of some Gnostic traditions, however, is simply a work of fiction nonetheless – hence ‘testament’ might be a bit of a boast.
Hi TES, Very compelling and unsettling. A question for you:
One counter claim I stumbled across was the claim that flash-frozen mammoth and other animal bodies in the Arctic are old, >45kya, and that the condition indicates that they could not have thawed in the intervening time. I’m sure you’ve thought about this, what is the response here?
Thank you!
Jeff,
1. These mammoths were “preserved from the end of the last Ice Age, with a significant extinction event thought to have occurred around 10,000 to 12,000 years ago, corresponding with the Younger Dryas cooling period.” – according to the literature I have read on the matter (National Geo, Guthrie, Lister, Martin & Klein, etc.).
2. Examine the location of North America in what I call “State 2” – it takes the position of Patagonia, which is known as a ‘frozen desert.’ So, State 2 for these mammoths was bitter cold.
3. The Earth in State 2 is not a sunny paradise. It is dark, wet, and in a cinder ash ‘nuclear winter’ (if you will) all over the planet. EVERYONE misses this and it is of critical importance.
While it is at its heart, a great question, these people 1. need to do a bit more work before making such claims about its answer, and 2. should not pose it in the rhetorical form of begging the question.
EVG
TES
Unlike Incredible Hulk comics, gamma rays are really bad for you. A 4 ft. thickness of water, or 4 ft. of lead, is pretty good protection. Doc Bruce Banner would have fared better “belted by manta rays”.
Maybe halfway, maybe not at all… You go first, Elon. Would astronauts’ kidneys survive a roundtrip to Mars? https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2024/jun/would-astronauts-kidneys-survive-roundtrip-mars
Why no discussion on the Van Allen Belts?
What do you have in mind?
You know; the usual stuff. High energy particles and what they will do to the human body. Stuff like that. How to get from here to there without that kind of nuisance to worry about.
Essentially, everything that contains metal and flies through them will emit microwaves, right? I wonder how the Apollo missions made it through them… I really, really do wonder.
See, this is why camels make sense. The Sahara and the Arctic are basically the same selective pressure.
If we could somehow get a self-sustaining robot base operational as initial seed. Something that could grow, mine ressources and eventually terra form the place. Currently, I think its utterly unihabitable. But the systems required for something like this are much more advanced than what there is today. Unless, the System Lords have highly advanced tech stashed away in their DUMBs I don‘t see us getting there this decade.
We will get there ceremonially, but just as with the Moon, we will realize how wholly unequipped we are to actually do anything there – and have to take a long break to figure out how to accomplish it.
The Moon has tritium, a valuable commodity for the near future, when fusion powers-up.
I believe you mean 3He (Helium-three), not tritium.
Yes, the only reason I see for wanting to get so far away from earth is to escape the entities currently in control of the human realm. I do not understand how these demonic bloodlines could have been allowed to gain such total control over us. As long as we have not freed us of their dominion, we shall not be worthy of colonizing the stars.
Mars seems to have been a habitable planet in it’s past, but not anymore. Why even try to inhabit mars?
Why get out of your crib and try and walk? It is dangerous, all your toys are in your crib, and there’s nothing to walk to…
What are the tradeoffs between 6 hubs at 75-80% of the distance between Earth and Mars, guaranteeing the presence of a receiving port at that range versus say fewer hubs (4?) per range increment but 2 or more rings of hubs at various distances?
Risk goes up exponentially, so it is not a linear relationship. If the window doubles, the risk goes up more than double. Of course we will need to start with 2, then 4, then 6, then something different altogether.
Therefore by deduction, they are not “ours”, as in “organically civilizational artifacts of our recent era”. Which doesn’t necessarily imply they are from far away, given the historical record and frequency of observations. Samael’s chariots then, acolytes, survivors or acolyte survivors of previous ECDO cycles, actual outsiders with an objection agenda, or a mix thereof? Rhetorical questions to me, I hope you have a more informed conjecture to share at some point.
I do. They are not ‘ours’ and their owners have been here for a long time, unable to leave. There is much I do not share here, either because of its classified nature, non-disclosure agreements, or the desire not to tread on other people’s excellent work and IP. But the conclusions themselves cannot be classified or owned in any way – they are the property of mankind.
God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and every creature that crawls upon the earth. Oh, and I forgot to tell you all, that the Earth flips over every 6,000 years or so—but that’s not really my concern now is it? Besides, I’ll just blame it on you anyway. Climate change, cow farts, sin, being noisy, whatever excuse you all will swallow.” ~Genecide 1:28
So, hell is here and it’s not to keep us bound, but them, and the stories of the end times have been backward as usual. And we are only the unlucky outcome of their escape plan to ‘elsewhere’, whose botching forced their marooning here within this realm too? And maybe the fire pit of the end times is 1 AU away and that’s how they are afraid things end for them at some point, when their one trick pony act becomes impossible to ignore anymore?
Conjectures, conjectures, and maybe anthropomorphizing to the extent of invalidation, but as you commented in the past, this is where the human condition likes to gravitate to.
Thank you.
1AU away, right. when the unrighteous are cast into the lake of fire or the earth is cast into the Sun. So they cant exterminate us now? We are holding up their final judgement, like the last righteous man Lot in sodom. and they commanded us to be fruitful after the flood to maximize their chances for the earth was apparently spared by the last man who had not corrupted his order, they went for the kill shot then because the Son of Man had not come yet.
But also to build bodies for them, like the technology stack thing, they knew we would need whole civilizations to do so.
Now that he has, a different strategy, one that does not involve the annihilation of man, but maybe just to maximize suffering and torment before the time. to do as in the days of Noah, and being back the long lifespans, and corrupting of flesh, would we really want to live forever in this earth?
Idk wild spec here but I think you are right Dan, the judgement is when the earth is cast into the sun or maybe vice versa, i would imagine man holds this up in some manner like lot in sodom, but at some point they decided to “help” mankind up with new solutions via technology, stuff way to advanced for my brain like trying to bind the sun or something. But another tower of babel.
Key ish markers for “days of noah”
– long lifespans like almost to 1000 years
– hybridization of DNA based life but also with machine this time
– resurrection of the wooly mammoth and other ancient species
-one world language even with technology doing it via instant translation
many others but the jist may be that you actually do not want to actually get stuck here perpetually in flesh holding up a judgement as the last of man who has not corrupted his order dies off. Then maybe that spirit of man does indeed becomes part of the judgement meant for the others.
Oops but also just to say, another reason they brought us here wasn’t just to mock and torture, but also as insurance policy. Like a welfare looting NGO hiding behind the poor and needy, they have a vested interested in preserving the ongoing fentanyl tent city as it sustains them while other critical actions are implemented.
So it is with mankind, if you believe the Son of Man line, they tried a killshot approach before, coming down to the last man who had not “corrupted his order” like all the other flesh, the righteous man holding up the city or in that case the world.
So it is today, humanity prevents a final judgement for these beings for now, I don’t think they are in a rush to exterminate us now and jn fact likely want to help us get there with these genetic and silicon technologies jn time if the earth is to flood agajn.
We are already seeing the effects of like a backward evolution on man as America is set to get shorter and dumber, with the cruel theorum that asthe more goodly the women educated and strength, the less children her heart desires, for now.
But someone( musk ? Putin?certainly musk as he is already “becoming a gibborim”) …. with the fertility rate crashing, the giants that were once on the earth in those days, and also after that, have their eyes on women once more. In gilgamesh all wives are brought to him so he can have them before shes given to the common man in marriage, thus making him a giant in the land whether he was 40ft tall or not. Literal or not doesnt matter, if the same seed can be IVFd to ten, hundreds of thousands, millions of human women, it’s originator is a giant in the earth.
Has anyone noticed how striking blue errol musks eyes are. They say this mutation goes back to a single person in the black sea area ~6000 or so years ago. It goes back to Noah. The master of the waters.
Probably revealing my youth in how i talk, I don’t know anything about anything but I find the excess women in eastern Europe and Russia as a ripe place to try and condition for women to be seeded by a single or few elite source. Doesn’t have to be anything malicious even and likely the panic about crashing populations needs more panic. But this area is ripe for a second incursion especially given tech today. just I mean it seems clear someone is going to do it or at least try, if I was Vladimir i would.
Also, lots and lots and lots of players stirring the pot on this topic for good or ill or just “wilderness of mirrors” fun and games.
I first came across the concept of Consilience when reading Gad Saad. Fascinating. But among so many of my peers there appears to also exist in the world a kind of pseudo-consilience. If multiple different media channels, newspapers, and magazines say x is true, then from a layman perspective, there exists a kind of Consilience… i.e. CNN, the DailyBeast, the New York Times, and others all agree that X is a Russian agent. Therefore it is more likely to be true than if only Fox news says X is perhaps not a Russian agent. But that is likely why you focus on agency as a key factor.
Consilience is an agreement of inductive evidence, not an agreement among syndicate members. That would be known as pluralistic ignorance. But it is a pseudo-consilience if one treats these outlets as forms of different evidence, which they are not.
In other words dismiss UAP’s at your own peril. There is much much more that you aren’t seeing.
Yes, well, maybe not peril, but certainly ignorance. :-)
Thank You, again, Sir Skeptic.
I have read the text and the comments and your replies, and have appreciated them.
I intend to help our species mature and transcend Archon-arrangements ;-/
If not perilous, is hopefulness appropriate?
Hopefulness is indeed appropriate.
If those who seek mankind’s elimination were able to do so, they would have done it by now.
Those who seek mankind’s enslavement, do so because they are trapped and do not have access to technologies which could ease ther burden. So they abuse us instead.
Both of these allow us to infer that 1. These trapped agencies are weakened, and growing less powerful over time, and 2. There is another agency at play, who favors us. The one’s we are currently shacked up with on the planet – lost to this outside agency, and will lose again. They were allowed to hold an unstable planet for a while, but did nothing but begin their diabolical work all over again. Pretending to be Gods, imbibing of suffering of the innocent. High crimes. This was their last chance, and they failed it miserably.
I don’t think there will be much mercy in the coming Kingdom, for these entities.
I can relate very much to the points mentioned above, having been raised in a cult which is well known for sending its members door-to-door with tracts, magazines, and now videos. Their bait differs from the typical Christian church in that the reward for ‘club members’ is everlasting life on Earth for the majority. An elite minority get to rule in heaven under Christ. They all await Armageddon to solve all their life problems.
I reacted to this upbringing and other turmoils of early adulthood by rejecting god and religion, though not to a fanatical degree. I wasn’t interested in joining yet another club. I just made a blanket assumption about the nature of the universe that excluded anything considered spiritual.
In recent years I started reading about the occult. There are so many books promoting knowledge and methods that I wonder if ‘method’ even matters. Frankly, I hate meditation after spending so much time trying to do it correctly. It bores me as much as sitting in a hall and listening to a speaker drone on about wickedness and god.
Anyway, I’ve enjoyed reading your website very much and want to thank you for the insights you’ve written down.
Your every living moment, awake, asleep, working, exercising, caring for the loved-ones within your reach – ALL of these moments are your meditations and your prayers. There are no set-aside moments which are superior to these. Your life is a prayer all unto itself.
Our benefactor is spirit, and as such does not thrive on insurmountable exclusion criteria, difficult and occult practices, and rigid barriers to entry. It is our birthright and essence. Dark forces would tell you that you are evil and separate from this, and you must do something they like, in order for you to access this blessing. This is false.
These forces are also terrified right now, because the dark void is for them, not us.
EVG
TES
Just looked on shopping sites. Amazon (UK) selling new HP15C Collectors Edition for £110. Other sites also selling similar price. Looks really good, but I suspect my cheapie smartphone has more power, if far less stylish.
Ahhhh, and they have the HP 12 Platinum for $40 – !!! That is a great price. Yes, I had not looked in a decade or more, and prices have dropped – even for the legacy ones.
i could never afford an HP calculator, but I did get a TI (Texas Instruments), because they said slide-rule days were over in 1976 and as a freshman EE student I had to have a calculator, preferably Reverse-Polish-Notation…
I had one of the first Texas Instruments calculators, the SR-10. My dad said that it cost a bundle! I still have it!
Ha! I argued vociferously against the use of those calculators in exams and tests in Engineering precisely because they provided an unfair advantage (the memory alone) to the wealthier students, of which I was not a member.
Great story and great reflection, thanks for sharing!
Oh yes, George,
I finished my Non-Linear programming (Golden Section and other algorithms) final in 15 minutes, for a 2hr 30 minute exam time allotment. The instructor did not have any explicit rules against calculators at the time. So he made me share the program with him. It showed that the program was merely a very large time saving device, for the tedium of the iteratives involved. He was OK with it and gave me an A.
Big advantage. I see those calculators selling for $400 on eBay, based upon nostalgia, and I think that in today’s same pricing, they would run (discounting the deescalation in semiconductor and computation pricing) about that same price. A big expense for a typical college student.
TES
This was precisely my beef along with the savings of avoiding memorizing pages of formulas. Some profs would allow a cheat sheet for formulas which somewhat leveled the field, but others forced you to memorize yet they allowed the use of those calculators! I was infuriated by their total lack of recognition of the stupidity of forcing the poor (and stubborn) among us to memorize formulas while others simply punched them in.
It still makes mad today… Later, I refused to succumb as a matter of principle (my own stupidity), but then I also wasn’t overly concerned with marks.
Consequently, I don’t have my equivalent of a nostalgic calculator. I would certainly have kept it if I did. My old trusty IBM Compatible XT 12MHz was too big to keep for nostalgic reasons.
Hello TES !
I would like to fully grasp the data crunching used in Exibit 10B, especially because I started a discussion with Nathanel Schaeffer (author of the core flux simulations – I got a first reply from him -(Watt/m2, greenhouse effect model…), to which I replied… ).
Not easy task to me : I am struggling to reproduce the calculations that lead to the results presented in the table.
1/ I guess column 4 (C4) is obtained by deviding C3 by C2
(However, I find that C2xC4 sometimes leads to different results : for example layer 4000-4250 : I find 2.0 vs 2.3 on the table)
2/ “Bottom normalized” (C4 -> C5) : here I do not understand at all !
2000-2250 : 24,554 -> 24,554
2250-2500 : 11,996 -> 11,996
2500-2750 : 19,892 -> 9,597 !!! How come ?!
Could you please indicate the formula applied ?
3/ C3 : I understand that the zJ values for surface/deep/abyss (184/17/8) come from the NOAA diagramm. However, I can’t find
a/ how these values are spread among the layers (formula ?)
b/ where do Desbruyeres/Derek studies intervene.
I know this post is already quite old but I hope that you can give me some help :-)
Thanks !
A somewhat simpler approach :
If we only consider the surface/deep/abyss layers and divide zJ by water volumes (results in kJ/km3)
Surface : 271
Deep : 31
Abyss : 51
So the abyssal waters received 67% more zJ/km3 than the deep waters…
I know understand that the Desbruyères/Durack studies bring the 1/3 – 2/3 distribution of heat content between the deep and abyssal layers.
Now I have to find out how to spread the heat among the 250m-thick layers.
Step by step…
Very nice. Somebody is watching over you. 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🍺🍺🍺
What a lovely, personal entry. Thank you, TES. I hope you share more memoirs in posts to come.
HP41CV for me. No cheese though.
Where can I read more about this precedents?
Gnostic entity called Sabaoth, from The Nag Hammadi:
The Hypostasis of the Archons
On the Origins of the World
But one has to cut their way through the ethereal idiom and jargon, to infer what Sabaoth is, and what happened to them. If you take the idiom at face value, it will appear incoherent. I am sure they did not mean for the material to be incoherent. Sabaoth is a world.
TES
Years ago I came across a book,
which may have beencalled the Keys to the Temple, it had Silbury hill being constructed as a sighting platorm to lay out a 2D great pyramid on the landscape to it’s east, at the ‘kings chamber’ position was a ‘Temple Farm’ Silbury is at 1.875WInteresting john,
“Can it be that the people of the ancient times could ‘feel’ the circles, very much like many people nowadays can feel so called leylines?” was a quote I found at one site which deliberated the 51.5 degrees (104 degree rounded) pyramid geogon (https://www.cropcirclesandmore.com/geometries/200601lsg.html)
See my article: Amongst the Standing Stones https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/06/16/amongst-the-standing-stones/
TES
I rode my bike to early-vote before dawn. There was a fairly long line before the doors opened. This is a form of simplified communal intelligence, directed through highly constrained channels by bureaucratic process-algorithms.
Bureaucracy is fundamentally “AI”.
I chatted with the elderly white man behind me, saying that “my votes were not going to count”. He said his would not either, that “he harbored no illusions”.
What information was conveyed there? It seemed to me that we had established some common ground. He did not comment on the “Palestine” national bike jersey I was wearing, though a smiling lady looked me in the eyes as I exited after voting and gave me the “power fist” salute.
None of us shared our voting intentions openly. I found myself assuming lots of things about lots of the people in the line, and I saw myself do that, and wondered about my own thoughts and assumptions.
That is sort of enough. We are sort of in a pickle, ascribing “intelligence” to algorithmic processing, no matter how vast and “powerful”.
I seeks Divine Guidance…
(“Video Killed The Radio Star” … I was remembering getting sent home at lunch from kindergarten on November 22, 1963. All the teachers were smiling big and saying “it was nothing”. I said that my Mom didn’t know. I s=was told that they had called her and she would come get me… Mom didn’t say either… When Dad came home early, still wearing his Captain’s bars, not yet oak leaves, I knew that something was very wrong and I asked, and really forced the issue, and I was given my answer, finally…)
Good to see another post on this topic.
Could AI itself be programmed to serve as a gatekeeper?
“As long as we resist making AI the new authority…”
It’s possible that mistake has already been made.
Hi TES,
Khafre for atmospheric electrostatics measurement?
I would like to share an observational logical question and offer a purpose for the Khafre pyramide:
Logic
If the Nubian Ostrich Egg shows the 3 Gizeh pyramids and thus depicting the function of Khufu is knowledge about ECDO, than logically at the time when Khafre (and Menkaure) where build they too should have a function for ECDO. They Khafre (and Menkaure) would NOT be cargo-cult pyramids without a function for ECDO.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Khafren-Cap-Metrics-3.png
Khafre
For Khafre having the highest tip and a simple shaft running down from the top to the chamber we could assume atmospheric electrostatic field measurement with a simple
electroscope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroscope#Gold-leaf_electroscope
That would have to be monitored by priests, maybe after other “signs” or “warnings”, but we might need somelightning protection like a spark gap on the side of the rod from the top
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_rod#Lightning_protection_of_mast_radiators
I have no idea for Menkaure. We don’t know the original layout.
What would be a helping but missing measurment?
Best regards,
Marc
Oh, I missinterpreded the middle-line for a shaft. As no middle-shaft is documented I stand corrected on the purpose, if no embedded metal rod is found connecting the chamber to the tip. :-(
And of course there is a (dislocated?) stone right in the center of the top:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1652372258261983&set=pcb.1652372438261965
This is true… It is the other eight prominent and contemporary pyramids which would be the ‘cargo cult’ far-short-in-skill pyramids.
TES
How can I send you a private message, that does not show up here?
Read. :-)
Hi TES,
Underground basin as “mercury switch” trigger?
While the following ideas are NOT on the critical path for ECDO, let’s assume there are at least these functions of the pyramid you have proposed:
1. Work as a monitoring device for ECDO risk.
2. Work as a warning device like a fire detector in case of imminent ECMD with a short but significant warning time. Ideally giving hints or instructions what to do.
3. Encode the knowledge about ECDO for a future civilization, when the function has been destroyed eighter by the ECDO, scavengers, etc. I think that function is plausibly shown by TES.
Let us go back in time and have intention to construct such a device:
For an active powered device, one would need:
1) a cult (knowledge) and priests to power the device for > cycle time (at least 4000 years to catch one event) and monitor it 24/7/365 in the underground, or do regular maintenance there.
Given that hostilities etc. destroy empires and cults one would assume that this a path to risky of future failure.
2) Another approach would be the construction of a detector that would result in a durable, no-maintenance structure and that can be sealed for thousands of years.
No personal (“priests”) inside the pyramid would be needed to monitor 24/7, so warnings should be detectable from outside the pyramid. Ideally the energy would be generated inside it.
That means to have a system that
* harvests the energy itself,
* needs no maintenance
* gives clear warning, if the event is imminent to people around.
The following ideas need to be cross-checked by someone more in electronics:
As the basic principle we can use an unpowered radio for the electromagnetic fields in ECMD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio#Antenna
Notice that the copper-wires antenna in the pyramid are protected from lightning and outside electric fields inside the limestone-shafts. So we only have the electro-magnetic effect on the antenna.
It works without a power-source and requires only very low tech aside from the headphone. However, it would require monitoring by staff to cast a warning. And we would always need someone down in the Subterranean Chamber, observing the water 24/7 in the dark with a tiny lamp and with less-than-ideal ventilation.
Ideally to eliminate the staff and required cult to keep it running we would have a (big) capacitor charging up with the energy harvested from the antennas itself. Generating DC from the antenna’s captured waves energy (=AC) should be possible with low tech material, that was readily available and known materials in antiquity like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galena
As a capacitor material one probably would use “the metal of the gods” gold-sheet-layers with inorganic non-conducting insulation layers in-between.
The grand gallery gives us plenty of room for capacitors in the upper part of the gallery, if we use the holes to construct a rack above our heads using the holes. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheops-Pyramide#/media/Datei:18_edgar.jpg
If we have power from a capacitor then we could self-amplify the weak signal, maybe power the antenna itself (?), if the energy from the ECDO is strong enough and we have indeed a coil in the horizontal passage at the Queen’s Chamber that would generate heat.
Minimally we should design a warning sound “trumpets” or something like that, or give visual clue on the outside of the pyramid.
How to trigger the circuit?
Infrasound trigger:
We have the basin to measure infrasound in the “Subterranean Chamber”, but instead of water that would risk evaporation let us use conducting liquid metal mercury as a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_switch to close an electric circuit if significant waves are generated, with connecting wires up through the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza#Well_Shaft_and_Grotto
We would probably close the basin with a top-plate, to avoid swapping out in the ECDO -event.
Seismic / motion trigger:
While we are at this point: Let us fill the “sarcophagus” in the King’s chamber that is conveniently oriented in the north south direction to amplify wave generating south-north motion with mercury too, put a lid on it and use it as another mercury switch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza#/media/File:Kheops-chambre-roi.jpg
Of course, we would need some openings the gallery to run the connecting cables to the other parts.
So in essence we have copper-wires, possibly a diode, possibly a capacitor made of gold, probably gold-wires, mercury switch. Nothing that could not be made with the technology of the past. *
We can safely assume that everything including mercury would be looted, as mercury is valuable for gold digging and extraction purification.
For any warning “trumpets” it would be convenient to place them in the king’s chamber. Any loud sound generated in the king’s chamber would find its way out through the North and south shaft.
I hope that gives some ideas for others to elaborate on.
Best regards
Marc
*) Of curse raises the question about the knowledge: Let’s assume the planers (not necessarily the builders) once had more technology but ECDO destroyed that or high-tech failed after some years.
Marc,
All excellent ideas. The subterranean chamber would not be optimal with simply water. The oral legends of mercury could stick through the ages because of the notion’s simplicity and portability, morphing into ‘Khufu was buried on an island surrounded by mercury’.
The high non-combustion heat suggests almost definitively (having concept-designed and operated power plants) that the energy generated there would indeed be used immediately and inside the pyramid. So, your construct here is not outlandish – as I suspect a culture which could manage (even crudely) this much kWh and amperage would find a way to formulate a storage dielectric medium of some nature.
I suspect that both the Grand Gallery and the Void were used in some manner to generate, regulate, store, and deliver this power.
But, the Narrative says that all humanoids were wearing sheepskins and dragging clubs around in Pottery Neolithic times, so we must always bow to their superior truth.
TES
You would not need a dielectric for the capacitor. Use a https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar
and you have plenty of time to charge. :-)
To elaborate further:
I speculate, a standing wave pattern would be forming at a critical resonance of the mercury in the lower square basin, filled to 50% of the resulting cube (or collapsing at a critical change of it). So an electric contact would be closed or opened (lost) thus triggering (or at least arming for a secondry trigger) the alarm.
To generate a relevant standing wave size in mercury the energy required would be high, thus I am more on the standing wave would from in case of ECDO side.
As mercury does have a different surface tension than water, this probably would be relevant to take into account calculating that.
If someone could calculate / model it, than we might have a clue what to look for.
At small scale something is found here for a start:
120 to 10 Hz in mercury are shown here:
https://thekidshouldseethis.com/post/mercury-sound-waves or directly at
The Bible is not a historical book. It is about the old man and the new man and everything that happens inside of man.
Then we can just simply disregard it as well then. Truth, must be based upon truth – or it is useless.
Many years ago I would have been one that was convinced that mankind is the primary cause. To be honest I really was not even interested in politics until the last 10 years or so. My Dad had been a WW2 combat vet in the North African and Italian campaigns. He came out of it with a deep bitterness toward Republicans and I had let his opinion influence my voting habits until the start of that 10 years. To those wondering where this ties in with the climate please give me a few moments to get there.
In High School a Psychology/Sociology teacher and I used to have some long discussions. At that time I was one who thought by the time I was my age (56) we would have a world government. He stated it would never happen unless an alien invasion came along. One should be careful what one wishes for. We have had one for quite a while at a background level and it seems to have recently become less reticent about making its ambitions known. In looking at mass behavior in the last several years I have actually asked myself if something like the invasion has happened but not in the usual fashion. In these last few years I have came across some concerning data that has many I interact with being dead set I am some kooky conspiracy theorist. Lucky for me I have never much cared what others thought of me if I believed I was correct or if they refused to consider it. I would like to detail a bit of that and how I got to where I am before raising the climate issue again.
In the late 80s I had tested for the military and did extremely well. I had my pick of MOS so I chose Counter Intelligence. I had contacts via family and friends that gave me a crash course in collection & analysis but I ended up changing to Forward Observer when I found out it took 4 years of language school. Near the end of boot camp my D.I, called me in and told me he was going to recycle me until I changed my MOS back. I left two days later without permission. After a few years I cleared that up and went on to use my license as a P.I. until requirements changed. At that point I had met my wife of 30 years to date so I just took survival jobs. I had read one or two “conspiracy” books with the best being “Behold a Pale Horse” but even after Waco and Oklahoma city I did not put much stock in it.
9/11 concerned me though. I watched that 2nd plane hit live on TV that morning and the first thought that hit my mind had to do with the in excess of 2 trillion dollars announced missing days before. Then I watched them go to war for the wrong reasons and the Patriot Act get passed. After that daily life and other things preoccupied me for 15 years. 2016 was a turning point for me politically. I refuse to have “party” loyalty. I want to support who I think will perform the best. When Trump gave a speech, at the Ohio rally I think, about how corrupt our systems really were and returning power to the people I found it inspiring but I was not convinced yet.
I started checking out his previous interviews over the decades. I don’t care for “reality” TV and would not have used that for evidence anyway. From watching his former interviews I decided he was authentic but this did not tell me much. I was still undecided. Know what changed my mind? Two things. One was HRC having the audacity to call over half the nation “deplorables”. Never seen a politician do that before. The other factor, which we still witness today, is all of the “important” people that turned on him and us to boot. I still keep in mind that the people we are dealing with are smart and we could still find ourselves in a controlled options scenario but I am sure they are aware we will refuse to let them complete their agenda regardless of the front person.
For those wondering here is what I think happened over the last few years. I will provide proof for most of this afterward.
First of all these times of crisis we are going through were planned out quite a while ago. The riots of 2020 were used to cause economic damage. Even before Trump went to Davos in 2019 and pissed them off we were already in dire straights due to problems with the Chinese banks but I think it was decided, after his speech, that they needed to take the risk. C19 was a flu. I had it in early Jan 2020. I had visited a friend that had just returned from vacation in China. I coughed up blood the entire third week and never once sought medical aid. None of the three others in my home ever became ill because I secluded myself. The only lasting damage is 85-90% anosmia. Do not take the jab. Over half of those I warned and showed my evidence for it that did not listen are now deceased. Do I think the 2020 election was stolen? Yes. Beyond a doubt. J6 was a setup to prevent further challenges, hurt Trump and chill dissent. Agenda 2030 is bullshit. Its purpose is to allow a real global government with authority to use force to form. It seeks to micromanage all resources. Even us. I am only going to list the proof I have came across and is not widely known, or maybe even a bit known, even though more exists. It will be in chronological order of its occurrence not in my finding of it.
In 2002 a think tank known as the Collegium was formed. They would partner with the UN/WEF in achieving Agenda 2030. First they created the “Constitution of Interdependence” as a guiding document. In the various drafts of coming up with this the following statements are made in regard to achieving their goals and how our national sovereignty and individual rights will be brought to heel:
a) We must undergo a “polycrisis”…. the populace must experience a sustained period of heightened fear until they begin to hope for help…. this is where we come in.
b) having looked at various forms of tyranny across history all of them we find unacceptable. Our times allow for a new type to emerge. A “soft” tyranny. Digital.
I would bet if we tracked their movements and communications they had something to do with getting the Patriot Act passed as well. Anyway, a few years later one of them was sent a letter from an affiliate who congratulated them on their progress but then she made two more recommendations that we have now seen were definitely put in place.
a) We need to recruit activists from every field of endeavor. Scientists, physicians, journalists, celebrities, business men educators and even migrants. They must be willing to place themselves in danger. (This is why so many “seem” to be on board)
b)We need to strengthen protections for “asylum seekers”. They must be kept safe on their way there and provided with support once they have arrived. We must make it nearly impossible to remove them. (Here we have the answer to why we are truly seeing this)
In 2006, during the Anthrax terrorist trial, a federal judge had been attending several weeks of private meetings with the military, pharmaceutical companies and medical lawyers. After they were over he had his assistant file two reports and classify them “out of reach”. I do not know what was inside them but the titles demand attention:
a) The Macroeconomics of a Pandemic
b) The Profitability of Avian Flu
(This is what convinced me something was wrong with the C19 narrative)
In 2013 Obama introduced a divisive ideology into our institutions. DEI. In addition to making it to where our MSM could lie to us a few years later a special program was started in another agency, FEMA. This program was called The Whole Community Program. Training and orientation documentation claims its mission was to create communities of activism within every county to prepare for the failure of government. They would also work with NGOs in a proactive fashion.
(Ever wonder where AntiFa, BLM, and Patriot Front come from? This is it.)
In the same year HRC updated USAID to provide custom made NGOs that end up under the total control of a group of private donors. These NGOs are also provided with a support network existing within our own government. It is there to help them keep up appearances and to provide comprehensive data IRT.
(This has helped with the activism and the voting problems)
In 2020 I personally witnessed at least a dozen Zoom meetings consisting of teachers, police, firemen, DMV postal workers and even staff members of elected officials who made the following statement:
a) That they had been contacted by the CFR to do whatever was necessary to get things back on track.
(Huh. Wonder what that could be?)
Around July of 2020 I read the minutes of a World Bank meeting. The new president, a lady I believe, had sent out agents to find out where the C19 relief funds ended up. They reported that 15% ended up in the accounts of politicians or their family and friends. She asked was that normal and they stated it was. She asked who and they listed Pelosi, Schumer, and many others, including Republicans. She asked “What about Trump?”
Guess what their answer was? Negative. They tried. They stated the closest they could get was that a bank he owned shares in had several tax paying customers that deposited their checks there. She then stated that she wondered what Pelosi and the rest would do when the report came out in September?. (I never heard a word about it ever coming out)
Now for a juicy and dangerous part. This part is weird but ended up impacting me in various ways. It still does today. I am going to state my lineage here due to reasons you will put together later. I am 1/8th Cherokee with my paternal line verified by DNA to go back to the tribe of Judah (6th great grandmother) and then back to the Bruce clan. I stated that for those who try to criticize ones statements as being anti this or that and it relates to this part of the story. As I stated earlier, I do not choose to show loyalty to groups when they have committed improper actions.
I had been following a court case unrelated to any of this when I became interested in the lawyers and their friends. I started monitoring them on social media accounts. A few months before this the banks had stopped handling porn related accounts and as a result one of them had almost every OnlyFans girl on his account. Another Lawyer was admitted AntiFa member. Another one was a VIP that handled accounts for Harris when she bailed out the rioters. She used the wrong account and caused them some frustration. I had been chatting with one of their paralegals online and chose to because she was not instantly rude like many of them. I noticed from time to time they would symbolically toast one another and state the name of a Gaelic alcoholic beverage. It caught my attention so I looked it up. It was made overseas and had its own site. One. It asked for my D.O.B. which I entered and then listed several different “organic” brews that sounded odd to me. I decided to attempt to purchase a bottle. The cheapest was $10,000 but I went ahead and hit purchase to see if it went to a CC screen. Instead a message came up. “Thank you for your purchase. Your order will arrive shortly.” I turned the PC off. What? How is it going to do that? I considered it a fluke and laughed it off. It was around 6PM.
Around 3AM in the morning someone knocked on my door. I opened it and saw a black coupe sitting in the road with the passenger door open. Standing on my porch was a girl, aged 16-22, light brown hair, denim mini skirt, leather vest and holding an overnight bag. She asked if she could come in, if this was the right place? I stated that there must be some mistake. She looked very confused for a few moments then turned and left. After this a lot ran through my mind. If this is what it looked like it meant deep connections but I could still be mistaken. Maybe it was just a coincidence. I decided to try something the next day.
I got online and started chatting with the paralegal. During it I steered the conversation to conspiracies and she finally asked “You are not one of these that believes Jewish people are running the world are you?” and I stated I was not. I believed it could be people from any ethnic background and I was not prejudiced racially. She gave me a hard time, laughing about it, for a bit longer and then I did something…. I toasted her symbolically with the name of that drink…. She went nuts immediately. WHO ARE YOU? WHO DO YOU WORK FOR? Never contact me again.
As far as the election and J6 go I was watching there as well. Know what the biggest tell about the election is? We should have had instant bipartisan cooperation to determine the truth of it. Instead we were met with a prepared media narrative and lawfare to block every move. Except one. That move could have been carried out on J6. It was not guaranteed but it was a chance. Action was taken to prevent it. I knew 10 or so streamers there that day and had their live feeds recording. I knew what was up as soon a the kid with the Trump hat turned backwards did a doubletake to make sure the camera caught what type of hat he had on after that girl was shot. The MSM sure was not hunting down the AntiFa type activists who showed up early to help spoil it. Turns out that the night before that kid was running around with Epps claiming he got attacked by people on the left.
In the early morning (1AM to 230AM I think) of Jan 21st DC street cams showed several blacked out buses running over sawhorses blocking roads to the White House. Within 30 minutes a live streamer there caught a line of Asians, heavily male, walking down the road together. They lined up at the checkpoints to go inside and were let in. WTF was that? Handlers? If it was please understand I am not blaming China. I am pointing to all of those who have sold out our nation. The bad news for any nation we were sold out to is that we do not recognize your claims.
Now we are to the climate part. By now you should see we are being used. I do not like to think that so many people could be “evil”. Maybe many of them were just duped along the way and feel it is too late for them to stop anything. I have been asked if I could guarantee I would be any different. I answered yes. Of course I would also likely be in a ditch but not before putting something in place to make things more difficult for them. Since that strange incident I have been hacked multiple times, had my communications monitored, found out my X account had been connected with groups engaged in disgusting behaviors and found that it was logged into from my state capital, DC and a county out West housing a regional FEMA HQ.
I think the big boys know something is coming for Earth. I know if I had to pick what kind of people to take along I would pick those more akin to myself, that do not need to be told what is going on to figure it out, that are capable of remaining mentally and emotionally secure in hard times and that are not afraid to stand against “experts” and “authority” when it takes the wrong stance. Do you believe they are this way? I would say doubtful and that they desire sheep but seeing as how the sheep are the majority maybe they should rethink this. Ethical Skeptic, I fully realize you may have reasons to not let this post. That is fine with me. I understand. Honestly. It will not affect my continued preference for your articles over those of others.
Hi TES,
Void in the Pyramid (like a lens or resonator?)
Also there seems to be a void (in the north-south direction?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza#The_Big_Void
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:East-West_cut_view_of_the_Great_Pyramid_and_front_view_of_the_North_face_Chevron_area.png
Details
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9981702/
I wonder if that void could somehow act as a lens or resonator for any of the uses.
Best regards
Marc
Given that both the King and Queen’s North Air Shaft had to take a diversion around this void – it was an afterthought in the engineering, not anticipated when the Queen and King’s chambers were constructed. I suspect it was a necessary component for energy generation or management of some kind. Most of the unanticipated aspects of the Khufu pyramid, pertain to the non-combustion heat which was generated. I suspect this void as well pertained to the ‘afterthinking’ process.
Hi TES,
Khufu Subterranean Chamber, shaft altered
Wikipedia states, that the shaft was altered:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza#Subterranean_Chamber
(quote)
The uppermost part may have ancient origins, about 2 m (6.6 ft) squared in width and 1.5 m (4.9 ft) in depth, diagonally aligned with the chamber. Caviglia and Salt enlarged it to the depth of about 3 m (9.8 ft).[165] In 1837 Vyse directed the shaft to be sunk to a depth of 50 ft (15 m), in hopes of discovering the chamber encompassed by water that Herodotus alluded to. It is slightly narrower in width at about 1.5 m (4.9 ft). No chamber was discovered after Perring and his workers had spent one and a half years penetrating the bedrock to the then water level of the Nile, 12 m (39 ft) further down.[166]
The rubble produced during this operation was deposited throughout the chamber. Petrie, visiting in 1880, found the shaft to be partially filled with rainwater that had rushed down the Descending Passage.[167] In 1909, when the Edgar brothers’ surveying activities were encumbered by the material, they moved the sand and smaller stones back into the shaft, leaving the upper part clear.[168] The deep, modern shaft is sometimes mistaken to be part of the original design.
(end quote)
So you originaly had a bassin, diagonally aligned with the chamber (and therefore the outer walls?).
Best regards
Marc
Hi TES,
Cycle / years / duration encoding on Nubian Ostrich Egg
Is a full picture top view for Nubian Ostrich Egg somewhere?
In encoding something for the future I would assume that no part would be decorative, so the inner ring would probably serve as a counter for the years of one of the outer ring’s segments. I would suspect 60, used from finger segment counting with two hands.*
So a top view could provide some clue, if there is a marking of some kind connecting a segment of the outer ring to the full inner ring.
So it could mean that one segment in the outer circle is probably 60 years instead of 100 years. That would change the timeline.
So just an observation, that the 100 year = outer segment is probably a prior from today’s mindset?
*) https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-straightforward-explanation-for-the-base-12-uses-the-thumb-as-the-counting-tool-and_fig2_222106237
Finger counting with one hand up to 12, and with the second hand to 60 (12*5 using fingers, or 12*12 = 144 using finger segements) is still used today. That’s where the dozen as a unit originates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal
Please note, that there is a sumerian base-60 system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal
Best regards,
Marc
P.S.: Thank you for your inspiring work. :-)
Marc,
Excellent points. I wish indeed that I had a photo of the top of the egg. I have considered writing the museum and requesting one. Ethically this should have already been made available – but this is the world we live in.
My anachronistic 100-year and 10-base bias. But this method you propose and 12-base system would provide a potential explanation for the inner ring.
Let me think on that.
EVG
TES
Hi Mark,
I just posted for TES a link to a 3D model done by an artist that actually lives in Cairo.
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/6000-years-old-egg-depicts-the-pyramids-and-nile-477696fb6bd14f58a5213edd3ef4e5da
I have been studying it and posted some comments on this thread today.
As far as I can tell, the outer ring of rectangles might contain 48 rectangles. Some blurred out patches force me to guesstimate. This might be consistent with your idea of 12 and base 60.
Don
As a kid I ended up becoming disenchanted with mainstream Christianity and began exploring esoteric mysticism. I never considered then that I would come full circle in time although in a significantly modified fashion. Throughout my life I have experienced a number of “spiritual” experiences up to and including visions and OOBE. After getting through my teens I never sought such a thing out. I understood it would happen if it was needed provided I had put enough work and fate allowed for it. Although I never had a personal mentor I had books and a gnawing need to discover what truth consisted of regardless of whether I liked it or not. The Spirit itself also stepped in and delivered material or lessons whenever necessary.
I had started with Castaneda and found him disjointed, confusing and incredibly entertaining. Seems like he screwed the pooch after Art of Dreaming but what do I know? Mares was delivered next into my hands and perhaps provided the most concise knowledge of the necessary practices. Then I found Mouravieff. He opened my eyes to much but I found myself not wanting to think about a couple of points he had made.
This was in regard to the two species of mankind. I almost put the books down after reading the first third of the second one. After thinking about it for a bit I realized I may be jumping to conclusions in a way prevalent in society and kept going. He was right though wasn’t he? He had just chosen to represent it in a more blunt fashion than even Mares. Why is that disheartening in a certain way?
In the last few months I have been getting an increasing number of visits from local church people. I used to belong to one because I wanted to see how accepting they were. You know how that usually works. Now I have them coming by and not wanting to leave when I tell them I do not wish to upset them. They always say “Don’t worry. We will not get upset” At least half present always do and become nervously insistent before the other one steps in and tells them they need to leave. I have told them that their saints and priests of old used to question what they read but it does not help.
Maybe its just me but I find it hard to believe that a truly divine being would desire to receive worship. I have told people we would assume a natural stance of respect and veneration if we met one in physicality. Standing position, neck stretched forward and eyes wide open as drools slips from our slack jaw. I think Christianity or Churchianity has done much to cause the spiritual retardation of mankind but it is not alone. It appears as if all of them have stripped out the practices and philosophies that lead to experiential development. In addition they have also added or altered the following:
Recently I was accepted into an order and I am taking my time seeing if it is what I think it is. I have been pondering a single requirement for over 4 months now. The requirement is that one must not criticize. I never thought turning this simple thing over in my mind would take so long. If it means that I cannot stand against what I see as an injustice I don’t know if I am willing to do that but considering the order I doubt they would ever have such a requirement. I also don’t know why it is bothering me so. No one will ever see my answers but I do realize one does not need to in order to know the answer. One can call attention to the actions of another without “downing” the individual. I was supposed to have access to a place to talk to others in my position but unfortunately Facebook has me banned for life after giving Zuck and Jack a lashing a few years ago. Oh well. I will gladly wear that shit like a badge. Anyway, thanks for listening and thank you for some of the most in depth articles I have ever read.
Thank you for this. Heartfelt, earnest, forthright. I will think on this for some time.
TES
Dear TES,
I think you should see this graphic. This guy has created a video in which each frame shows genomic connectivity eigendecomposed and all I can think of is your graph showing base progression to nucleon count symmetry.
https://x.com/Sauers_/status/1844209955676839960
Hello, new reader here.
If you’re arguing that the vaccine EUA can’t coexist with treatment outside a hospitalization context, what do you make of the Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) EUA? It didn’t go through until December 2021, but that’s only because the EPIC-HR trial didn’t start until July 2021, and that’s only because Pfizer couldn’t start toxicological studies until November 2020, and that’s only because nirmatrelvir was first synthesized in July 2020 & it took a few months for Pfizer to settle on that candidate in particular.
~ 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(c) reads ‘no viable alternative’ for the drug.
‘No viable alternative for vaccination,’ and ‘No viable alternative as an anti-viral drug’ are two distinctly different logical conditions. The mRNA vaccine required that NOTHING (all contexts) be suitable to treat Covid. People died from not being given apixaban (Eliquis) early enough, which would have saved their lives. Fortunately for our family the hospital gave our dying members heparin and apixaban, and saved their lives – but only after MUCH damage had already been done from coagulopathy (the killer pathology in Covid). Unfortunately they cannot sue their doctors for denying them treatment – because this was mandated by the Federation of State Medical Boards.
The EUA for Paxlovid, simply requires that there not be any available alternative anti-viral. So, in theory all anti-virals would be denied (even though they were not of course).
TES
Pingback: Présentation des analyses et hypothèses de The Ethical Skeptic – CataCycle
Dear TES –
What is your opinion on this new concept called “Prometheism” as described by Jason Jorjani….it kind of sounds similar to Gnosticism
Of course, not all Gnosticism teaches the same thing, nor do all Gnostics think alike. For me however, Gnosticism is cynical about the origins of power, yes. However, it is hesitant to promote technological utopia without a change in spiritual leadership over the Earth. All technology to date, has been used to
1. Create elite segments of society
2. Increase the productivity of the slaves
3. Continue transhumanism and total suffering (as it was before the last cataclysm)
4. Increase the ability of those in power to control and brainwash, and
5. Fight ever more entertaining wars.
Until this captive spiritual condition is alleviated, technology will not serve us in the fashion we fantasize.
TES
Hi TES, now that you’ve been updating this article for the better part of a year, I was wondering, have you noticed any trends occurring or progressing between the versions (as we get further away from the pandemic)?
Caleb, yes. The elevation in mortality inside the #2 through #7 ranked ICD codes is steadily rising. #7 of course is cancer itself. The problem with cancer is that it will not return to baseline for decades, whereas the other codes can recover in a year or half a decade (heart related).
Accompanying this of course was a large Pull-Forward Effect for both diabetes and Alzheimer disease – which is evaporating most recently. Once this PFE begins to evaporate in our mortality data – these codes will rise like stumps out of the water.
TES
I feared that when you added the bright red “we have a cancer emergency underway” banner into the first line. I’m sorry to hear it’s getting worse.
CAD \ BC Gov and PH are already publicly advertising on BBs in the rapid transit stations that they are anticipating a 75K rise in cancer diagnoses ( across what time frame is unclear ) … as part of a Med \ PH schooling and recruitment campaign ( largely for nurse trainees I believe)>
The fact they can post that kind of thing publicly and not have the press, never mind the public, ask Qs is a pretty sad comment on the state of our sense making and education en masse
Hi TES, wondering about the PFE curve you use.
The US life expectancy at age 82 is 6.6 years so you use that length of time to distribute (a portion of) the deaths over. However, 6.6 years is only an average and some live a lot longer than that based on actuarial curves.
Should the PFE curve not extend past 6.6 years, if it is to represent the proportion of people that would have died each year?
E.g. in Canada, the average age of death from COVID was 84 and the life expectancy of of 84 year olds is ~8years. However only about half of 84 year olds actually die by 92 and about 1% are expected to live til 105. I would think in this case, the PFE curve should be distributed over at least 20 years instead, and therefore be much shallower (meaning fewer current excess deaths based on the PFE baseline)?
Canada data for reference if interested: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310011401
Frank,
Yes, you are correct on the time, but not the magnitude. I used a reduced function of about 55% of the anticipated arrival magnitude and duration, for conservancy in my PFE estimates. In reality, the actual PFE magnitude in the CDC numbers is showing to be much larger than what is in my PFE arrival function models.
So you can argue a lengthening of the curve, yes (not to 20 years as very few persons live that long, not every health situation died equally, and it needs to be bi-modal because of the ‘unhealthy quotient’ inside that population). But you cannot argue making it shallower at the same time. Conservancy is two dimensional in this case.
I have used this approach in many a corporate and national strategy, and it has served me well. When the Minister or CEO silently concludes ‘oh my god, this is worse than what he is even indicating…’ – THAT proves to be an effective persuasion technique.
EVG
TES
Tes
Rewriting my post, as I think it got spam auto deleted.
Looking at Craig Stone’s model and also your comments on the new bulge zone in state 2, I focus specifically on UK and Ireland landmasses.
Is it possible that the post transition equatorial bulge zones account for the majority of landmass movements rather than solely plate movements over extremely long time periods?
For example, Ireland and UK in state 2 reside on the northern latitude slope of the state 2 equatorial bulge. The new formed bulge zone increases in height and stretches the surface crust, and so increasing the distance between landmasses. Ireland and UK landmasses in Craig’s model and your work look kinda like they sperate on the state 2 north south vector, where in the model and on maps, Ireland looks to have separated from central/southern England along the vector of the state 2 alignment on the northern latitude slope of the state 2 bulge, same for UK mainland and France/southern Europe.
Might this mean Norway and Sweden could become separated from Finland and Russia in another ECDO event?
Thankyou in advance.
Mark,
Yeah I am not sure why WordPress placed that into spam. At least this one came through.
I don’t really posit any tectonic plate or landmass movements as a critical aspect of this hypothesis. I am sure some happens, but it is not critical to the argument. Since both landmass and oceans will rise at the equatorial bulge, we don’t know in truth how the relative ocean heights will end up, both just after the shift and then two centuries later.
Hope that helps, at least a little!
TES
Thankyou.
Carry on sir.
My thinking has led me to the idea that the Earth is expanding and that plate techtonics was a fair enough guess within the confines of uniformitarianism. The mechanism is the escape of protons/H+ from the inner core then the outer core into the mantle. Once there a host of chemical reactions begin to take place the result being less dense molecules, mostly liquid at the extant P/T’s. Acting as solvents within the minerals present the whole mix both expands and rises, these are the ‘large low velocity sheer provinces’. These drive techtonic movement by releasing ‘bubbles’ of lower density materials, often with captive ore bodies, towards the surface. Where they emerge are presently called subduction zones. Generally there’s so little sediment in the ocean that it would seem it was triggered around the time of Chixculub. Presently it looks to me like there were 4 major periods of growth each being followed by periodic minor periods.
At least 2 of those minor adjustments have occured in historical times Ireland being on the recieving end of both. Two periods of ‘plague’ where the whole lowland population was wiped out and a slow recovery as the salt was washed from the soil? The whole people of the sunken Island by Rockall weren’t so lucky.
The language in stone I understand.
It says we live on a planet that was used as a ship,the pyramids were connected to two other sets, China and Mexico the core of our planet was deliberately melted using fusion and these structures, to increase our magnetic feild strength.
Hi. Which translation of The Hypostasis of the Archons do you use? You mention it being your own, so I have to ask. Do you have this available to share?
Caleb,
It is a modernized interpretive translation, using Bentley Layton’s strict translation, and
1. Adding about 3% context from other related Nag Hammadi works (and the Bible in a few instances)
2. Translating idiom of the day into modern English expression.
3. Having ChatGPT-4o survey both the before an after text, making commentary as to faithfulness to the original material
Even though it is a 90%-likely set of alterations (high confidence in each re-work) to the material, it is far more informative than the raw original text – which is not written by modern standards of communicating thought.
Still working on the whole document, and have a rough draft in process – held, as I examine each change and then ponder it over time, to ensure that I am comfortable that it is not too risky of an extrapolation, and that it flows well within a reasonable locus of Gnostic teaching (a LOT of differing ideas to work with unfortunately).
I am trying to get rid of the ‘aether’s’ ‘aeons’ and ‘pleroma’s’ – which mean little to us now, and use modern descriptions of the Universe and history of mankind as we understand it.
TES
Yes, I noticed that your version used more modern /less mystic language, which prompted my question. After a lifetime trying to navigate the huge disconnect between strict Christianity and the observed universe, which ultimately led me astray I’d the church, I find it extremely comforting to find religious texts that fit within a scientific universe.
Thanks for your warmth here. I now feel I can openly ask questions.
Keep up the good work. Your blog continues to provide insight in ways I never imagined with every article taking me weeks to digest.
I stitched together some vast chunks of the text from various other articles. I only added the chapter titles.
The Reality of the Rulers
(The Hypostasis of the Archons)
Partial/re-worked version by
Theethicalskeptic
SAMAEL’S SIN
Of primary importance to know, is the core principal that the Chief Authority of the Rulers, Samael is spiritually blind.
Because his spiritual vision was very limited in this regard, because there was apparently no one to challenge him from what he could see, and finally because he was also arrogant, he concluded that quod erat demonstrandum, he must be the most powerful entity which exists. He therefore declared himself manifestly to be God. But as a good man knows, it is the gravest of sins to adorn one’s self in the costume of God over a fellow or lesser being.
Now Incorruptibility from time to time chose to gaze into and traverse through this unaccountable realm of remote cosmos. Such activity caused her purity and desirous life to be pondered in the minds of the minions of darkness; where therein, despite their now organized insanity, the cronies of darkness fell in love with that beauty which they witnessed. They could not remove from their minds its heavenly visage of how wonderful life could be.
However, no matter what they tried, they could not create for themselves a similar spirit nor imbue their lives with that paradise as existed above; often achieving merely a pretense thereof – for the sad reality is that a body or spirit from below was their only inescapable and objective reality of being.
THE CREATION OF ADAM AND EVE
Incorruptibility was indeed from above as it turned out, and they in their insanity, had chosen to ally themselves with that which was below. By her mere gaze, Incorruptibility had served to shine light into the folly of their insanity.
They therefore had failed in their darkness and insanity, to understand that the power of Incorruptibility does not reside in any way through adorning of its costume. Nonetheless, they condemned the innocent man to having a living body and sharing the life of suffering which they had errantly chosen so long ago. But in their lack of expertise, man lay fallow on the ground as a species, unable to aid them in their plight and plotting. Furiously blowing as they may, like storm winds into him the breath of life, they failed to create a soul in man, nor the actual spirit of Incorruptibility they had sought in the first place. Its actual formula evaded them, and they remained powerless in this regard.
Thereafter, the Rulers took the man Pistis Sophia had rescued from their inept hands and mercifully transmutated as well into a fully sentient being, Adam, and placed him into a great garden situated adjacent to their abode in the Levant.
They tasked him to maintain and cultivate the garden. But in this garden, they had hatched another plan as well – that of a trap. The Rulers had decided to plant a Tree in the center of the garden, and to subsequently instruct their ‘Man of the Clay’, “From every tree in the garden shall you eat; yet from the tree of understanding what is not-evil and what is evil, do not eat. For in the day you eat from that tree, you will again fall under our dominion and may no longer claim this Earth which has been so unworthily bequeathed to you. You will again die like the service animal you are.”
Of course the Rulers knew, that once man was told to not do something, that is the exact thing which he would elect to then do.
EPILOGUE
[Narrator: And thus, we arrive at the central message concerning the history and corrupt legacy of the Rulers—the Archons, those Authorities of Darkness—and the grip they continue to hold over mankind and his domain. Up to this point, you have learned how they came to be and their place in the broader cosmos. But now, we broach a new knowledge—one that reveals the path forward, the way to break free from their dominion.]
But Norea, daughter of Adam and Eve, asked of Eleleth the Emissary, “Oh emissary of the Father of Light, am I—and is all of mankind—now condemned to remain captive inside this Dark Empire forever?”
Eleleth replied to Norea, “Legally, you are not bound by these Rulers, the Archons. Not one of them has a rightful claim to enslave you or mankind. For this very reason, One has been appointed who will appear in a future generation and will incarcerate the Rulers and the Archons. When that day arrives, the Archons will no longer be able to abuse you, hybridize your genetics with theirs in order to attempt to capture for themselves the secret of the power residing within you, nor force you to toil and fight in slavery for their comfort and entertainment. The true inheritance of mankind is as a full member of the Sovereign heavens, where the Supreme Authority resides—an authority to whom even the deepest voids of the galaxy must answer.
You, together with your offspring, are the blessed creation of the Source, who lives above you and the emancipated Seven Star Systems. You are part of that Sovereign and Incorruptible Spirit we have just learned about. This is the Origin, the place from which your soul originates.
Therefore, neither the minions nor the powers of the Rulers, nor their Darkness, may approach you, because of the Spirit of Truth that resides within you. All who have learned to walk in this truth live eternally, despite their human bodies being bodies that die. Yet, the fabric of how to make this a reality for all will not be revealed in the near term. After three grand-generations, this will come to pass, and mankind will be freed from the great mistake committed by the Rulers and the Authorities of Darkness.
Until that day when The Son of Man, modeled from a completely new mold and form of humanity, comes to reveal the new Spirit of Truth which the Father has sent on behalf of mankind. Then He will teach them all things and anoint them with the unction of eternal life, given to Him from the incorruptible Source of that Life.
In that time, your people and kind will be freed from the blind thinking of Samael, Yahweh, Saturn, Ha-Satan, and all their illegitimate seats of power—men thereby shedding their garment of death, leaving it behind like a discarded cloak. Death, which originated from and is the legacy only of the Authorities, will be no more.
Then your kind will ascend into the limitless light of the Sovereign, where they were meant to belong from the very beginning. Then these Dark Authorities will relinquish their ages of control, their groveling minions will weep over the destruction of their kingdom, and their demons will lament their death.“
Yes, that is the heart of it. Still working through other passages and contemplating my interpretation and its faithfulness to the original text, other Gnostic writings, and the reality of what we now face as a species.
EVG
TES
Pingback: The State of Things Pandemic – Week 34 2024 – Lighthouse Economics
It’s things like this that make me find arguing online in terms of the medical/scientific world that I am not qualified. I’m a community college biology student. I don’t have the decades of experience that those on the field have, and why should I prop myself up to that par?
Here is a related documentary https://video-alexanderstreet-com.mutex.gmu.edu/watch/mount-nemrud-the-throne-of-the-gods
It’s behind a University Registration wall. :-)
Pingback: A useful guide to understanding what FIML is – American Buddhist Net
Fantastic writing. Really helps me understand these concepts to better view what I already was aware of though not understanding as well as I could have.
I will point out though, I did not think past the sale here, “AGW Deniers” is thus something the writing of yours above is relevant to, but not in the way you might wish it to be
Have you actually delved into the history of AGW, its genesis and evolution? It started out as an idea of control and tyranny. 4-5 decades later, the bodies of competent professionals pave the trodden path, even today, we see Nobel Prize winners in Physics punished for disagreement on even a political statement like “climate emergency”, meanwhile Asia brings 400+ coal mines online and has 600 more in various stages.
One (as mentioned above) can only build upwards in climate science, you are literally not allowed to examination the foundations of the theory whatsoever (Publications in what I call the Publishing Cartel, will not accept papers scientifically challenging climate models: Heresy) w. Your writing above really does articulate all the hallmarks of the AGW and alleged attributions, from “slowing the planet’s rotation down” to “horses will get fat”. Yet the majority of these papers rely on obfuscation, Nelsonian Knowledge and Inference.
On another excellent piece of yours, Hidden in Plain Sight (I think) you referenced NOAA’s CO2 vs Temperature. Have you actually looked into how that graph was produced.
I’ll give you at hint, look at the r2 of temperature adjustments correlation to CO2 growth, you may be a little surprised at the significance :) Note: Most of that temperature record is based on no data for most of the record, it’s all agency driven modeling, cool the past. Look, and see not that I lie.
I’ve asked many climate scientists how much heat comes from the crust of our planet into the oceans, not one has been able to give me an answer outside of pure guesswork. (most say “good question” but have no idea)
I do not disagree with global warming, there are anthropogenic inputs (cities, urban sprawl, land changes) but those are dominated by natural processes by orders of magnitude on a global average scale.
AGW is tyranny wrapped up as science, GW is real, the planet is warming.
This piece of yours above, so very well thought out and written, only services to reinforce what I have already come to believe is the case, as you have shown me how they operate.
Thank you for your writing, I am the better for it.
M
Correction: Coal Power Stations, not “mines”,
M
I wonder why covid-19 with all its lethal variants never crossed the border from the US to Canada where clearly there was never a pandemic..not even close…The answer is obvious: there was never a pandemic, so the excess deaths before vaccinations have to be explained another way…
The dichotomy between the US and Canada is challenging. They are missing something in the explanations as to what occurred.
The thing I wonder is, how in the world can other causes of excess-mortality be fully-discounted, both in terms of the various virus-strains (which may not be the fundamental cause of illness, but only opportunistic on previously weakened immune systems), and inoculations, admittedly thoroughly exacerbating proposed misinterpretations of events. Here I’m thinking along the lines of Hydrogen Cyanide pollution, having almost identical symptoms to Covid, identified in the early ‘hot-spots’ [h/t Jim West]. And that is only one among perhaps dozens of other factors that weaken immune-systems; like radiation in rivers due to fracking, only recently coming to light.
Recall that the ‘fracking-boom,’ and its many poisons, preceded Covid by years, contaminating land-air-water and the burnt-fuels [laden with unremoved chemicals] for transportation, home-heating, and power. The pollution from huge forest and other fires may play a micro-particulate role. Solar events and a weakening Magnetic Field of Earth allowing in excess Cosmic Radiation is another thought.
TES, you have shown us that magma-plumes can account for ocean-warming. Can they also account for Earth off-gassing? My own “Covid” experience included a strange rotten-egg smell on my 5-mile walks around town, just prior to severe hypoxia and subsequently a dozen other symptoms. The hypoxia came first and caused me to barely make it back to our home after a quarter-mile walk one day in May of 2020. I was 67 at the time.
Could any amount of reasoning possibly ‘tease-out’ what the heck is going on, when toxicology is not accounted-for, or at least reliably discounted in so many studies? The closest I have seen on PubMed over the last four years include studies on the dangers of 2.5 micrometer particles in the air we breathe.
Poe.com states: “Micro-particulate pollution refers to tiny particles in the air that can have significant health and environmental impacts. These particles are typically categorized by their size: PM2.5: Particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers (µm) or smaller. These particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, posing serious health risks. PM10: Particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers (µm) or smaller. While PM10 particles are larger than PM2.5, they can still cause respiratory problems and other health issues. In general, micro-particulate pollution can include particles from various sources, such as vehicle emissions, industrial processes, construction activities, and natural sources like wildfires and dust storms. Due to their small size, these particles can remain suspended in the air for long periods and travel long distances, affecting air quality and human health.
Amidst these many variables, a variety of patterns could feed the pareidolia of which we’re all susceptible. This alternative analysis reminds me of those dot-matrix displays at indoor malls years ago, where you’d see another image pop-out if you relaxed your visual focus. In that context, if all or most attention is on a virus, and mutations thereof, that would be what one sees; perhaps attributing toxicity to a second-place, as contributory, but not causal.
I ran across this conundrum in 2,000 hours of PubMed research where I was looking for the connection of Retinoic Acid to Auto-Immune Diseases. The ‘smoking-gun’ papers are there, and I have a binder full of them, but it is almost a taboo-subject other than in Obstetrics, no doubt because our food-supply has been “fortified” with Vitamin A since the early 1970’s. Curiously, there are a few government-funded clinicals that were rounding-up volunteers, last time I looked in 2022, for trials of Retinoic Acid and Retinol isomers to be included in vaccines and nasal-sprays. A spooky thing is the identical temperatures required for handling and transporting those molecules as are required for the Covid vaccines.
Jim West has hypothesized that all things “virus” could be viewed as cover-stories for environmental-pollution. He was reporting on the Hydrogen Cyanide/Covid iteration of that thesis back in April of 2020.
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/04/COVID2020.html
This recent pandemic experience could well be a DDT-Polio thing on steroids; or a MTBE-West Nile scenario; both of which he has researched extensively.
Poe.com informs:
The gasoline additive that was banned around the time of the West Nile virus outbreak is MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether). MTBE was commonly used to increase octane levels and reduce emissions in gasoline. However, concerns about its environmental and health impacts led to its decline in use and eventual bans in several states during the late 1990s and early 2000s. The West Nile virus was first detected in the U.S. in 1999, around the same period when discussions about banning MTBE were prominent.
And on a different toxicology-front, prenatal ultrasound causing birth-defects, as elucidated in Jim West’s book – ’50 Human Studies In Utero, Conducted in Modern China Indicate Extreme Risk for Prenatal Ultrasound: A New Bibliography.’ These were studies that presumably could never be done in the USA.
I know I sound like I’m proselytizing, but, TES, in all due respect for your excellent work, do you think that you have adequately discounted the toxicity-causation hypothesis per Covid?
Yes, I have adequately falsified all those notions as to the cause of excess mortality underway right now.
1. Covid was a dangerous virus, 6.6 x more deadly than the average annual flu.
2. Covid killed people 18.5 days after they got ill, far later than the cold or flu, because of blood clotting pathologies
3. Our panicked health officials sought a vaccine EUA, and denied apixaban, ivermectin, and HCQ treatment for the blood pathologies underway.
4. Therefore another amount of persons equal to those who died of Covid itself, died from untreated blood clotting pathologies (mostly at home and well after Covid was over).
5. The vaccine killed as many as both #’s 1 and 4 above, in addition (ALL Non-Covid Natural pathologies involved, and there are hundreds, began Week 14 of 2024 the very week the vaccine rolled out en masse).
6. The lax border, weakened hearts from the vaccine, and draconian policies combined to kill 175,000 young persons through violence and fentanyl.
That is the only hypothesis which is viable right now.
TES
A > per capita Chinese immigrant \ student population in CAD ( many of whom make an annual pilgrimage back to China to visit relatives) providing a > level of pre-“Pandemic” natural immunity to CAD perhaps ? I noticed that you put CAD in Zone 2 more recently ( after having it in zone 3 initially I believe ) ?
???Challenging enough to postulate that they ordered saline flu shots in 2019 2020? Like Switzerland???
“Recently, however, we’ve been bombarded with irritating advertisements”
Use brave browser if you don’t want any advertisements shown watching YouTube. Brave is based on Chromium (Chrome browser) and is primarily a privacy respecting browser.
“Now certainly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was a deadly pathogen, itself 6.6 times more deadly than the typical annual mortality total for all influenza viruses combined”
One question I have about this is that the CDC admitted in May of 2020 that the IFR was 0.3% which is 3 times the influenza IFR. That was the original and it’s been less lethal since.
I’ve looked at the “ref #2” but don’t see how you get a 0.66% IFR from that?
Thanks and great article.
It is from a timeline based epidemiological derivation, shown in this chart (far more accurate method):
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/All-Deaths-Excess-Deaths-2024-Wk-34.png
Again, I was the first to identify the 0.26% IFR in 2020 – and the CDC had to begrudgingly accept it over time. Again, I caught hell for this.
TES
That was you? LOL. I was watching the numbers bounce around in 2020 and remember 0.26% but didn’t get to check the source. Mar 16, 2020 6% (Imperial college), Mar 30, 2020 0.66% (Lancet), Apr 30, 2020 0.25% (Penn Med) and some others 0.75-0.85% then on May 24, 2020 0.3% (CDC).
At that point I was like “Back to work & school everyone” but no …
John Ionnidis had the exact same number. You’re in good company. Regarding Canada, is it possible they had some pre-exisiting immunity from The Sars outbreak in 2003? Less than 1,000 people died, so it’s unlikely.
Canada was exposed to proto-Omicron in 2018. This imparted some degree of immunity to Wuhan two years later.
First off, effing with Napoleon while simultaneously tricking him in his own house and then wiping the board in frustration is possibly the most insanely courageous act of stupidity I’ve ever encountered LOL. Thanks for sharing that detail.
It’s possible though extremely unlikely that the original “Turk” was real, albeit much more limited than the later fake. The combinatorially vast space of chess across many turn iterations would prevent a mechanical solution, but perhaps if the original WAS real it fooled amateurs and novices enough to develop a reputation that fakes were crafted to fulfill. Given that the chess space has been mapped cumulatively for centuries, the known strategies in the 18th century would have been -somewhat- more limited (I suspect modern networking of expert players globally coupled to the surge in chess around the Enlightenment made these 250 years a boon of new strategies despite the antiquity of the game, though I do not care enough about chess to go digging) and a world class player of the time may have provided solutions for a dozen or so turns. Going out on a fragile limb here, but real mechanical computation of that level may have been a legitimate threat to houses of power. This ONLY seems faintly feasible given the strange story of the Antikythera mechanism: It is doubtful that undisturbed extremely powerful groups “forgot” that tech, particularly given their continual fascination with astrology (the function of the Mechanism). If you’ll hoard other sophisticated mechanical tech, why not give Kempelen a pile of gold and take the tech?
Just playing Turks advocate :P
I always find myself hoping that you are wrong about everything. But I keep coming back for more.
I hope that I am wrong as well, Zach.
:-)
Hi ethical skeptic,
I was doing some random connections.
Hopefully you check your old posts as I thought it best commented on here.
With regards to this article
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2020/02/16/the-climate-change-alternative-we-ignore-to-our-peril/
Perhaps there is a connection with Quantized Inertia in there as well.
https://x.com/memcculloch/status/942416349070020608?t=P8FO9kgxbXt5e0QiX2lqgQ&s=19
https://x.com/memcculloch/status/1802653229106282843?t=dNOWSvDpc8496kh9JeZljw&s=19
Also related, the horizon drive should hopefully be tested at the beginning of next year.
https://x.com/RaMansell/status/1829103699198640133?t=BA1tj4DVPZ5Uld-mRq1voQ&s=19
Hopefully one way or the other, physics can move forward.
As of September 2024, my father (a NASA Physicist and luckily for me – the best balance of intelligence, wisdom, objectivity, cautiousness, reason, strength, and goodness that I’ve seen in one person), is almost certainly one of the next to be taken by the “pokarama experiments.” The one decision I wish I could have known about in advance and dissuaded him and my mother from – is taking that shot – and the boosters.
He was in perfect health until the initial dose, and quickly developed a problem with balance that none of the many Doctors who examined, tested, and scanned him could find the cause of. Later, it was found to be SAIDH – a previously rare condition involving the brain, kidneys, a specific hormone and a need for an extremely high level of sodium (salt). He had no blood pressure issues. When his sodium level would drop, he would lose balance until taking a nap – and eating. The condition advanced shortly after a booster. He suddenly developed almost constant hiccups and excessive sleepiness. Within a few days of this, he experienced a brain bleed and fell unconscious.
After the Neuro-ICU, and a few weeks of slowly getting his sodium level back up and of regaining some movement and speech abilities, he went to a rehabilitation hospital and came home stronger and on a path to recovery. Unfortunately, a seizure (which he’d never had before), cut that short. While
Doctors on the Palliative Care Team were seemingly pushing for euthanasia, an attending Doctor who freshly reviewed his records and saw him suggested recovery. He was able to breathe when the ventilator was turned off, but it had apparently weakened his diaphragm – so, he would need time to wean him from it, completely. That’s where we are, now – although there have been a couple of complications and we don’t know how the seizures that followed the first one have affected his functionality, at this point.
Can I PROVE the connection – no. But, based on a study documenting experiences of others who have SAIDH and the reports on this site – I would suggest that there are individuals who are responsible for my father’s condition and for the conditions and lives of many others. There has apparently been scientific confirmation of potentially harmful substances in the “juice,” as well as candid, verbal confirmation that at least some batches were altered for experimental purposes by the manufacturers. I’m grateful to The Ethical Skeptic for sharing this data. We should all do what we can to re-establish “ a fair America “ which means joining together in the choices that we make, the votes that we place, and in our communities where we can share anything from information to vegetables. We all need to be as prepared as possible for surviving the ethical failures of people in the medical field, and of people in government.
In February 2022, I joined a large group of people to meditate in the pyramid and the object was to “balance the nodes of the earth”. I felt compelled to go because it seemed like I was doing something positive for the world in the midst of chaos. The person who coordinated this was Matias De Stefano. This was all super spiritual, but he talked about the pole aligning to magnetic north and eventually Egypt moving to Argentina. Anyhow I was struck by how the way he portrays earth behind him in many of his videos match your demo video!
Your ability to distill complex concepts into digestible nuggets of wisdom is truly remarkable. I always come away from your blog feeling enlightened and inspired. Keep up the phenomenal work!
In reading this, the concepts of consciousness and evolution come to mind; in comments regarding questions of Gnosticism and illumination, would recommend Dion Fortune’s ‘The Cosmic Doctrine’ and an excellent commentary on it by John Michael Greer simply called ‘A Commentary on The Cosmic Doctrine’ which gets into this creation of and evolution of consciousness. Interesting post.
Psychopaths are the “predators” in the human jungle. This is how life is structured – on the principle of “eating”. When predators prevail, self-destruction has no alternative and the system resets. We are at this stage of development…
Elegantly presented intellectual work, Sir Skeptic. I was thinking “Hey, this sounds like ‘archons'” a paragraph and a short list before I got to this header:
Thought Experiment (Metaphysical Speculation)
Until then I was thinking of the supercomputer in the Moody Blues song, “In The Beginning” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AukFsBv2oDY
The dynamic-tension (if you would) of this further presentation is an engaging portrayal of the dynamic laid out in The Tripartite Tractate, as I understand it.
Good point! I totally forgot about the TT. Will have to crack Meyer back open.
I have no idea what Gnosticism is. Can you recommend a book that would serve as an introduction?
I have not read the first two of these – but I have listened to or read those two authors in other works.
Gnosis – The Nature and History of Gnosticism by Kurt Rudolf
The Gnostic Gospels by Elaine Pagels (a bit more of an academic assay)
The Nag Hammadi library itself (The Gnostic Gospels) – Marvin Meyer
I read and appreciated the Elaine Pagels book, “The Gnostic Gospels” in the 1990s, when I was sincerely seeking what I considered to be the lost teachings of Jesus. It did not illuminate me as I needed. I still sought that illumination, and came into Tibetan Buddhist teachings from a visiting Lama.
I have, through ongoing intentional search for truth, something of a better insight into gnosticism these 26 years later.
“Seek and ye shall find”, seems to remain true, but one has to be patient, too.
Yeah, I still have a long way to go…
But, what I am learning is, that life is the study – and is guided by something more…
Humans could be TTEs, too. Real entities would then only be an idea of a TTE called TES.
Like many things which start as genuinely novel storytelling attempting to capture a facet of what you’ve written on this blog (and are later corrupted by the mechanisms you’ve described in your writing previously), there is a show called “Raised by Wolves” which attempts to explore a similar origin story via subtext. At face value, it is a scifi version of “atheists versus religion” and the exploration of the sun-god motif. However, if one can watch with a discerning eye, it is far more interesting than that, and makes a good run at cloaking its true intellectual curiosity with the broad strokes of the plot. Ridley Scott was involved in the project, before it was cancelled after a second season. The show is loaded with a substantial amount of subtext so as to explore a similar thought experiment as you’ve described above. You might find it interesting.
Thanks Beryl, had not even heard of it. Will check that out!
TES
I am assuming that this blog is “observed” lol, so I would suggest getting a DVD copy of both seasons and watching it at your leisure should the series “disappear” from streaming services. Indeed, most people haven’t heard of it (see: antimemetics). You touched on something with the NDEs. A woman named Brit Marling has explored what you wrote above as well, from a different perspective, in her entire body of work. Of note– The OA and Another Earth. The OA is probably the one to find on DVD as well, if you can. It is conspicuously difficult to do so. Also cancelled after two seasons. Critical viewing material for your line of exploration, imo.
Oh yes, we are watched – that is inevitable. The National Security Agency (NSA) is the watchdog over former and current intelligence professionals, in terms of both National Security (Titles 12 and 50) and indirectly by monitoring the Intelligence Agencies of each Military (Title 10). I always make it clear that I know nothing, and am not here to whistleblow on or reveal anything. I honor my oath of security, 100%. Plus, my involvement was a long time ago.
I speak only about the subjective nature of philosophy, life, and mankind which I have learned aside from those duties. By watching what we do, rather than what we say as a species.
What the average professional at the NSA does not realize, is that they act as a proxy for Extra-Governmental Agencies, which are not accountable under the US Constitution or really any institution of mankind. They serve at the behest of the Dark Authorities who used to rule us as Gods in antiquity. They had to go underground as more entities began to observe their dark work and became concerned.
None of the truly-protected IP is classified. It is held outside the purview of the US Constitution and Authority of its Citizens. This is Royal practice of Samael and his minions, which will (hopefully soon) come to an end.
“as more entities began to observe their dark work” – I trust the use of “entity” in this context is, for the sake of accuracy, specifically generic, right?
As the saying goes, the wildest trick the One Trick Pony ever pulled is convincing the world it does not exist. It took a while for me to realize the literal meaning of the apophthegm, and it was the agency / Nelsonian Knowledge definitions in your work that sealed my conviction, by deduction. Things I have observed repeatedly at play in my career – the non-negotiable plans dictated from above, not the shortsightedness or blindness of the minions executing them. And the pace of events these last years has given their game away. Someone, somewhere nearby, is desperate, as if their time has ran out.
Correct. :-)
Hello, TES. Thank you for sharing your ideas and analyses.
Archons, Entities, Dark Authorities, mention of Gnosticism and Anunnaki . . . I would ask this (in a spirit of puzzlement/curiosity rather than of challenge/accusation): Why use such (veiled?) terms instead of more direct — or even blunt — terms, given that there is so much kook-bait in these areas of enquiry (e.g., Blavatsky and Hubbard and Chardin — i.e., state security apparatus agents, witting and unwitting alike)?
Because these placeholders ARE veiled (and this is a very good question John, not disingenuous at all…).
1. Because we as men do not hold precise definitions of these as either placeholders (a hypothetical entity) or as entities at all. If I use a precise term, I am pretending to knowledge I do not hold. I would be creating a religion, not conducting deductive critical path investigation. Right now, I know that the Agency exists, but I cannot define it to a more precise level.
2. The terms we commonly use in place of these are familiar, but that does not make them ‘direct’ – they are just familiar (Remember that the abuse of Occam’s Razor involves the conflation of ‘familiarity’ with ‘simplicity’). If I use familiar terms, I poison the well, as everyone will think they know exactly what I am talking about, when they don’t.
3. These entities do not want to be known and observed. Like Bank Robbers who spray paint every camera, and destroy the bank security system hard drive/connectivity, they do not want any record of their activity known. All of our records of these mythological gods, have been expunged – save for fanciful fan fiction about them, so ludicrous that no one would take it seriously. I don’t believe in Gods. This is all a natural feature of our Universe.
4. The Non-Human Intelligences currently at work here – are enigmatic, and defy Wittgenstein terminology. In both the pop and classified cases I have studied, they do not think and behave as we might expect.
5. If I use prejudicial terminology (pseudo-direct), the fake skeptics who patrol and police most human knowledge will use that ‘crackpot terminology’ to bucket categorize me unfairly, and corrupt the process of inquiry toward their preferred religious bent by default. These police are just as much enemies and deceivers as are the Agencies themselves.
For these reasons, whatever descriptions these Agencies sought to expunge – those are the ones I am going to use.
In the end, this is a discipline of the Scientific Method and Patent-writing (albeit early-on in the process), on a subject which cannot be assailed by p-values, RCT’s, and Toulmin/Bradford Hill Method, etc. This is why Wittgenstein was purported to quip “Only describe, do not explain.”
In the end, it is a form of humility before creation (the equivocal context of the term).
EVG
TES
I see: Pyrrhonic parrhesia.
Is it possible that we are dealing with pneumagores (TTI) rather than egregores (TTE)? Some form of cybernetic “life” rather than incorporeal NHI?
(for “pneumagore”: https://x.com/search?q=pneumagore&src=typed_query)
Interesting twist on egregore! Perhaps. :-)
I just started reading The Nag Hammadi Library this week. I’m hoping it’s enlightening.
Thank you for your work on this.
I’m intrigued by the idea that ancient initiation ceremonies may have taken the form of mystery plays such as you describe, possibly performed by children.
“…unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 18 :3 RSV).
and Socrates, accepting his destiny:
“And I fancy that those men who established the mysteries were not unenlightened, but in reality had a hidden meaning when they said long ago that whoever goes uninitiated and unsanctified to the other world will lie in the mire, but he who arrives there initiated and purified will dwell with the Gods. And I in my life have, so far as I could, left nothing undone, and have striven in every way to make myself one of them. But whether I have striven aright and have met with success, I believe I shall know clearly, when I have arrived there, very soon, if it is God’s will. (Plato, Phaedo)
I appreciate your conscientious approach to translating the Nag Hammadi text.
Thanks Goldenhawk…. :-)
Pole reversal. Part 1. Physics of the process
https://www.tart-aria.info/sdvig-polyusov-chast-1-fizika-protsessa/
The author missed the core sloughing mass change, LLVP asymmetry, geomagnetic priority and inertial moment priority physics of State 1 and State 2, which as I outline, are the physics. This article just talks about a flip, Dzhanibekov, and associated topics. It is not a geophysics hypothesis.
https://www.tart-aria.info/sdvig-polyusov-pozitsionirovanie/
https://www.tart-aria.info/sdvig-poljusov-3/
https://www.tart-aria.info/sdvig-poljusov-4/
Yes. As you said, it only talks about a reversal. I read this article last year and now I read your article. Thank you very much and good luck.
A couple followup questions, from someone “mapping the edges” of what you’re talking about, so to speak:
Thank you for taking the time to put this work together.
This is very positive in the conclusion, which you intimate arises from your experiential glimpse of light and truth.
I must take gentle exception to your characterization of self-perpetuating and higher-order-inducing DNA as ” a mechanism of warfare”, even after having read this exposition through to the end.
It does not seem to me that the imposition of the orderliness of life upon the mineral world is “warfare”, because there is no entity under attack. Mineral forms are drawn into the becoming-of-life, which may serve the “Archons”, or may serve freedom and Gnosis, as well.
I remain at a loss, though an interested and intellectually engaged loss, as to how the Archons, who seem to be disembodied energy-beings, dining upon the anguish of carnal sentient-beings, come to be as they seemingly are.
DNA may create forms of resonance which may transmit between consciousnesses, perhaps?
Even so, where would the DNA-bodies of archons/demons physically reside?
Might one speculate that archons/demons are merely parasitic upon DNA-based sentient life-forms inhabiting a world, such as ours? This would be analogous, perhaps, to a spreading computer-virus, commandeering computers and network connections, but susceptible to ultimate complete-eradication?
Yours in Constructive Speculation, perhaps leading to Testable Hypotheses
;-)
“dining upon the anguish of carnal sentient-beings” You nail it right on the head. It’s the only conclusion I can reach. But this all seems to be reaching a head. Any idea what happens next? It sure can’t be good. Seems like our complete destruction isn’t far off.
This is the part of the dream where you are falling and just before you hit, you wake up, right?
“Oh, I’m completely ok; those dream-archons are flim-flam.”
Hopefully Yours…
There is a book called “Alien Interview” by Lawrence R. Spencer, that sort of covers some similar points. Reading TES’s article reminded me of that purported interview. I’ve always thought that our minds have untapped powers if we could only figure out how to access them. Every time I’ve tried I come up with nothing. All I can do is rarely see into another realm or potentially a different dimension of sorts. Other than those in that realm being aware that I see them it doesn’t amount too much, and has only been a few times in my whole life.
I just remembered one incident as a kid that came to me as I was thinking about that other dimension. At camp one summer we played this game where kids sat on the opposite side of a picnic table. One side would have an object and they would pass it back and forth under the table or pretend to pass it back and forth under the table. The team on the other side would have to guess who had the object when the passing stopped. The team across from us had a guy who could every single time know who had the object. What was weird, was I sensed he was seeing the object through a different dimension of sorts. The funny part was I was able to use my thoughts to create an illusion that a different person had the object. Every time I did that, he guessed the person who I was thinking in my mind had the object. It was kind of funny in that he never figured out that I was intentionally messing him up. Being just a kid I never thought anymore of the incident until I just remembered it now. I wonder if we have an ability to raise all sorts of hell with these Archons but just don’t know how? I’ve never wanted to engage demons directly out of fear I’d get their rath and suffer badly for it. I don’t mind jumping into things within my developed skill set, but other worldly bad guys seems out of my league. But I suspect we might have abilities that are untapped that could screw them up big time.
Thank you for that vignette, Greg. I think we all have nascent skills or talents like that. I have also had experiences which point out the gaps in the mechanical-world paradigm.
“Power” seem to me to be an intentionally-misleading term, because the dark forces do focus on power through subjugation and exploitation of sentient beings, so they want our focus to be their focus.
The path, as I see it, is to request, watch for, receive and accept Divine Guidance in this life. Changes in path and perception follow.
A great piece, bringing together so many threads, many that you have meticulously woven through your posts, and some from the work of others, in biology, that I need to bring to your attention at some point but I first need to list comprehensively for your consideration. I enjoy the fact that your posts seem to become more lucid, or should I say less coded, as they come out and I revisit them / you retouch them. Would you consider posting, or publishing your full attempt at transliterating the Nag Hammadi at some point? Or you already did and this is an opening salvo?
Thank you again for everything you do.
Dan, yes I have conducted a full transliteration of The Hypostasis of the Archons. The problem with most of the Nag Hammadi, is that it is written in the ethereal and spiritual idiom of the day, for those in Egypt around 100 AD. “Pleroma, aeons, epinoia, pistis, etc.” are all words which confuse and exclude. They were perhaps purposed to be specific, and distinguish the philosophy behind them from the endless blather of other religions of the day. That I can see.
The benefit The Hypostasis enjoyed however, was its writer’s exposure to, and its possible inclusion inside, the Library at Alexandria.
Nonetheless, the reality is that they need, not simply translation, rather, a re-expression in modern English and methods of communicating ideas. I caution myself to stay true to the original material. However, the risk of imparting something invalid, or misinterpretation is far less damaging than the overall loss of important tenets attempting to be communicated through archaic language and mystical expression.
I have considered posting it in its entirety here – but it is more than most people are ready for, especially those tender and volatile brains who shield themselves with a method of blindness they call ‘skepticism.’
It could send their rational selves into a fit of revenge on someone having the audacity to ponder unauthorized ideas.
TES
Give it a go, please, Sir Skeptic. I’ll try to keep my fragile-eggshell-mind from shattering.
Perhaps some other format?
LOL!! hehe…. :-)
From a web search, I found a translated version of The Hypostasis of the Archons online. When I went to navigate to it, my security app blocked the website (gnosis dot org) as a potentially ‘dangerous’ site. I had to go through a few hoops to finally navigate there. So much for ‘unauthorized ideas’.
Fwiw, I had also visited this site to see other important historical texts. Even a superficial reading of the history of the Council of Nicaea shows it was a naked attempt by Romans to gain power through appropriating Christianity for themselves so they would be the ones to control its message. The council was all about establishing the deity of Christ and had nothing to do with the teachings of Christ. We can see from the Nag Hamadi and other texts, the more spiritual works “disappeared” from history, but they kept those texts that were more conducive to an authoritarian church that they could control and profit from.
Well done, and well stated.
Yes, that was what Constantine created in Roman Catholicism.
If God came down earth, who would fear that more than the Vatican?
Islam.
Endeavoring to have the o1 professional model render an entire transliteration based on the segment you’ve shared.
Let’s hope I’m ready for what is revealed
I am sure that many of us are eager to read it.
I once told a cousin of mine that the way to solve global warming was to get rid of people. She immediately assumed I meant get rid of black people and called me a racist. I told her we need to get rid of people like her too. We haven’t spoken in 30 years.
Am I a horrible person for believing all of this boils down to ‘people are horrible?’ Cause that’s where I’m at.
We become students of evil. Wise-eyed discerning of darkness pretending to be light. Far tougher than any academic curriculum.
The greatest threat to our ecosystem, our democracy, our national security, our public health and the average physical attractiveness of our species is this band of inbred, entitled elite vermin who have subverted our constitutional republic and every other sovereign nation on Earth. Full stop.
The clownworld self-sterilized NPCs, the legions of pale androgynous golem who staff its captive intelligence agencies, violent imports and cognitively-compromised politician/puppets are simply symptoms of this ancient and easily rectified disease. Ignore the fluff and do not deviate your righteous, accusative stare from the worlds oldest and most corrupt corporation. It sings and dances as it commits genocide after genocide.
I hope to be alive when its lesser kin figure out that the select few who have sacrificed their very genetic integrity to this mission have zero intention of sharing the world with them. Oh, you NEEDED to outbreed in order to remain reproductively viable? Sorry, that’s “miscegenation”, no test tube baby for you! Bigots of every flavor prefer “purebloods”, I suppose. The final victims of this scam of “original sin” will be the people who eagerly pressed this perversion onto the other 6,500,000,000 of us. Well, second to last: once the few have it all I suspect they will discover that having known nothing but parasitism for so long they must then begin to consume one another in the absence of Africans to enslave, brown people to keep in outdoor concentration camps or europeans to blame for it all. And to think all they ever had to do was say “no” and join the greater body of humanity, their true brethren.
We’re already seeing the last band of useful idiots be discarded. The WASPS who sold our nation for trust funds dwindle on their shrinking NE beaches, descendants of the members of their various secret societies of the last few centuries suffer under injected poisons and discriminatory education/hiring with the rest of us. I must admit I savor that particular loosh. So proud, so arrogant, so stupid.
Sorry to bring negative energy to your comment section. I like to think sites/comment sections such as these are carefully monitored by my target audience. What better way to sow doubt in the faithless?
TES, do I recall correctly that an earlier version of this post also included the argument about the improbable clustering of epigenetic changes in DNA brain expression between p.troglodytes and humans, pointing to an intent-unmasking level of impossibilty of changes (based on average DNA mutation rates in low-evolutionary pressure areas) ca.250k years ago? If this is not the post, where do you discuss that argument? I cannot seem to locate it recently. That was a compelling trail to pursue, I hope you revisit it if removed.
Dan
That was applied here – and yes, a horizon upon which I intend to embark at some point after I finish a large US strategy project here over the next two years.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/06/30/the-dual-burden-model-of-inferential-ethics/
TES
Much appreciated. Thank you!
Ethical Skeptic,
Your essays are an astonishing multi-domain synthesis. When I saw that the Ecuadoran and Peruvian Andes are hypothesized survival areas, it immediately brought to mind the extremely harsh Covid policies in those two countries. Ecuador mandated the vaccine for everyone above the age of 5 (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-23/ecuador-imposes-vaccine-mandate-amid-rising-hospitalization-rate). Peru also had some of the harshest lockdown, mask, and vaccine policies in the world. I wonder if that’s a coincidence?
Ha! Interesting… and thanks for the kind words, Lago.
TES
Also I remember your mentioning somewhere that you may be working on a movie explaining the theory. Are you accepting donations to support the project?
Thanks again for these essays and for all of your Covid-related analysis too.
No, if I take money, someone will make the claim that I am in this for money, or have my material taken down because someone will claim a copyright strike on it. As it is right now, YouTube, FaceBook, Google, and the other venues just outright censor my ideas. I like to keep things clear like that.
I have been approached by a production company who has cited they can fund the entire cinematic project, and have done some of the most prominent work in the industry. We shall see how it goes. So I hear, 9 of 10 of these things just die in the process.
**shrug**
TES
I understand your reasoning. I hope that the movie project comes to fruition!
If we are at the Indigo point, then any and all efforts should be for passing this message on to the future, by whatever means.
If this event comes to pass, and is a repeating feature of the planet, and if this is already known knowledge, then 99% of humanity will only wonder at the sun going the wrong way, and all that follows.
The remainder will be the plain lucky, and those who planned. Those who planned also have a plan for anyone they find who survives, they will have their “utopia” and find it wanting, if they survive in their bunkers.
A tricky proposition, leaving a warning that will survive the event that will be understood and taken seriously by those 12,000 years later. We see how such ancient artifacts and texts (and the alternative ideas about them) are viewed today.
Your writing on the pyramids and their alternate use is fascinating and thought provoking. I try take ideas at face value and explore the possible. Tempering comes later. Today, merely taking some ideas at face value in order to allow for exploration, earns you a label, even amongst family and friends. Strange o’l world.
And who knows, maybe the next iteration of global civilization won’t be guided by ubiquitous evil.
As for a production based on your work, we know the reaction it would receive from certain quarters. Look at poor o’l Graham Hancock for essentially just asking questions.
If you knew that you would die tomorrow, what would you do today?
Would you get tired of that if you kept knowing you would die tomorrow?
CO2 is a greenhouse gas in such a narrow spectrum that the spectrum is all greenhoused in already.
It needs methane to help, and water vapor, lots of water vapor, but I’m actually worried more about sociopaths, post-peak-oil, nukes, and then space weather a little later.
Gotta’ pace myself for all those tomorrows…
I would save lives through critical analysis of untested-vaccine risks, and identify the harm they have caused, to their at-risk constituents.
I would solve the mystery of the Khufu pyramid and the risk we bear in terms of climate and Earth’s core.
I would provide for my disabled kids.
I would never tire of it, and nothing which happened to me afterwards could ever serve to remove the smile from my face.
:-) <---- smilin' TES
But all that’s what you are already doing! :-o
;-}
Check out An Enigma Solved by Joseph Davidovits and Margie Morris that argues that the ancient Egyptians used concrete to build the pyramids, rather than moving massive stones. Also Chris Dunn’s Giza Power Plant. both still available. Khufu didn’t build it Imhotep did, as well as Sakkara and the manmade lake that still bears his Hebrew name Joseph, as well as the irrigation system that was repaired in 1969 and works today to make the desert bloom. The original Suez canal. See the “Sakkara bird” and the airport in Peru’s Nazca lines(Mysteries from Forgotten Worlds) , the Gold Museum’s curious golden insects, look like Elon Musk’s bird! Nefertiti’s weird shaped head and the 10,000 skeletons in Peru with the same weird shaped head? Genetic defect of the Peruvian royal family? Amarna letters Queen writing to her sister the “Queen of the Underworld” sounds like she’s planning a visit not pining for a dead sister. Middle class Peruvian’s wrapped kids heads to make them look similar to the royals. For me Khufu is solved… The pyramid complex in Peru that’s so similar to the one in Egypt. Puma Punku, concrete as well? The 515′ petrified ship in the mountains of Ararat with Titanium rivets! So many mysteries out there how did you pick one? Acambaro figurines, Cholula Pyramid with plates in the museum there with dinosaurs (dragons) painted on the plates with even the skin pattern correct, verified by NM find. Los Lunas Mystery stone and additional petroglyphs in Paleo Hebrew in the petrograph park off Unser and I-40. Discovery of Ancient America by David Allen Deal with a solar eclipse dated to 162 bc! The Paleo Hebrew was verified by Nehemiah Gordon PHD Biblical Hebrew. The old and new areas of Chichin Itza, with el Castille turned slightly after the Mars Earth Wars Don Patten and the change in our days length and year causing the Mayans, Sumerians etc to change their Calendars at the same time! Biblical Flood and Ice Epoch also Don Patten. Mayan people in Guatemala still speak (read and write) Mayan (there’s 22 dialects not sure which she was teaching us) in a museum in Santiago (N of Antigua) a woman was explaining the way the writing works. Estanzuela giant ground sloth as big as a mammoth more found in Guatemala than everywhere else in the world combined! One was seen in 1980 in the Peten Dept. Maybe still around? They “found” a big city near Chetumal, MX just N of Belize larger than Palenque (84 miles across) with a taller pyramid than El Mirador, they “found” it when the owner told them he had ruins on his property. If the PTB didn’t find that immovable larger item, I can easily imagine missing a giant gopher, guessing the height I did not measure it. I have a photo of my husband with the two skeletons. I take “dating” methods all with a grain of salt as an eruption of a volcano was dated 3 different ways, 3 different answers all VERY long ago. Missionaries wrote about the eruption as it occurred in 1903. When Willard Libby came up with the idea, he knew it would take 25,000 years to reach equilibrium. Since he “knew” the Earth was older, no problem. When they redated the atmosphere in 2000 C14 had increased! Extrapolate backwards using unprovable hypothesis (started at 0 increased was steady etc) You hit 0 in under 10,000 years!? The more I search the more curious I become. OK half a book here.
Delia,
I have engineered over 100 very large concrete, cast, and CMU structures of various construction types. I also have concepted, designed, and operated energy plants.
I disagree professionally on both counts.
1. The stones were not ‘poured concrete,’ 100% certain. You still have to fabricate the mix, lift the mix, and not only the mix, but additional weight in water as well, and then wait for each stone to cure, and purposely devise stones of chaotic sizing (to their loading disadvantage), for no reason other than to make it appear to be cut stone. This would quadruple the work content entailed. Then you have to address curing failures. It would have been a friggin’ nightmare in construction. Cutting and lifting stones would have been much easier – as they are already cured and ‘tested’ for strength/durability.
2. This was not a power plant for the purpose of producing power for outsiders. It did generate power but the amperage and resistance were too high and voltage too low. This allows us to infer that the power being generated was used right there in the pyramid. I explain where these indicators show, and what they used it for – in the article.
Joseph Davidovits discovered contaminants hair, fiber in the stones. The fossils in the stone are not water laid, they are mixed up. Archeologists remarked on it with curiosity decades ago. Moving water and mix, mixing in place, would be much easier take less workers than moving a one ton stone, let alone many of them and many weighing more. The book makes a compelling case. What article?
Here is the article: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
If you have ever set engineered work method standards, you know that forming chaotic concrete shapes, without pumps and machinery, is a LABORIOUS task. It is far more work content heavy than moving stones. The book’s author has never been in this industry, never done this work, and does not know a PF&D from a rate derivation regression. I do.
By the burden of proof on induction suggesting falsification, you cannot use anecdotes, but rather must prove that all stones are a mix.
I just stumbled across your site and glad I did.
Having worked with concrete for a couple of decades (now retired) on both industrial and domestic projects I did give some serious thought to the possibility of the pyramids being poured, as well as being very much older than claimed.
My mind wandered onto the complexity of that: sourcing the massive amounts of limestone and other raw materials, transporting same, mixing and judging strength (MPA) for the various levels, and so on. They were massive projects and would have needed some awesome infrastructure to produce that concrete. I still have memories of pushing a half-full wheelbarrow from the truck to the pour wishing the customer could afford a pump. Not to mention the many variables encountered for each job.
What technology did they have 5, 10, 15 thousand years ago? No pharaoh was ever found in one so their purpose is still an unknown. Civilizations come and go – are they even from the early or mid stages of our current civilization, or from one before?
The ancients Greeks studied in the Library of Alexandria which would have enhanced their civilization. Kepler acknowledged that his breakthroughs in planetary movements was due to rediscovering Ancient Egyptian laws (end of Book V of “Harmony of the World”. What else did the Ancient Egyptians know?
My thoughts: I don’t know – need more data. I do suspect that certain elements desire to maintain the mystery, and current narratives, in order to secure funding to research said mysteries. There are many unknowns and problems that need solving, but to solve them would be destroying the cash cow; hence, they only ever come close or have “breakthroughs” – like a poker machine spinning one symbol off or dropping a few coins to keep one feeding the machine.
Also, by maintaining ignorance, the ignorant will remain dependent on the knowledgeable, or “experts”. I read somewhere that mystery is like a vacuum, and just like nature abhorring a vacuum, will seek to be filled by whatever seems to fit.
To get back to the article; Climate change is one hell-of-a cash cow and the fear it creates drives people to depend on the “experts” (IPCC/UN/WEF and their SDGs) to solve it as they have the “answers”.
Well stated, Jacob. I like it.
TES
There is now a peer reviewed and published study that found CO2 is not driving temperature. Interesting read. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/07/19/causality-analysis-finds-temperature-changes-have-determined-co2-changes-since-the-phanerozoic/?
I saw that! Thanks Dale.
TES
Hi Tes,
You cite an article of mine on Graham Hancock’s web site relating to the so-called ‘quarry marks’ ellegedly discovered within the Great Pyramid in 1837 by Col. R. W. Howard Vyse.
I thought your readers might like to read my recent paper on this issue which presents irrefutable evidence that those ochre markings were almost certainly faked by Vyse and his closest assistants. You can find the paper here:
https://www.academia.edu/121144113/Analysis_of_the_Painted_Quarry_Marks_within_the_Stress_Relieving_Chambers_of_the_Great_Pyramid_of_Giza?sm=b
Regards,
SC
Scott! my hero!
I have added to that paragraph to bolster the recitation with regard to your work, add the new study, and refine my wording in that regard as well.
Thank you very much for this, and I look very much forward to reading it in detail.
EVG
TES
“Brainless vaccine Karens”, love this verse, so accurate as is the whole poem
Imagine “there’s no ‘sanity clause'”…
;-/
It’s always so sad to see someone so intelligent who has literal blinders on. I followed you throughout the Covid shenanigans and have enjoyed almost everything you post TES, but as the Bible says in 1 Corinthians 1:26-29 “For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth. But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God.”
I was once in your shoes, and I too once believed that there might be some way of reconciling the Bible (or at least utilizing some stories of the Bible as folklore) with modern science but there comes a point where you have to choose who is right and what is true.
I read book after book in an attempt to find some explanation of things but at the end of the day secularism might shroud itself in science but in actuality almost every claim made by modern science is actually pseudoscience – pretending to be science, but it’s not. Think of the tautology – Darwin said if we don’t find billions of fossils in gradually increasing complexity his theory was bunk. We didn’t find it, what did we do? Invent rescuing devices like “punctuated equillibrium.” Mitochondrial Eve (MRCA) was claimed to be 150k-200k years old based on evolutionary suppositions yet when we use actual observed mutation rates in humans it was between 5k-10k yrs.
If I could offer any insights as to this article it would be that your assumptions and attempt to disprove the Biblical flood story due to Noah’s boat construction is flimsy. Not only because you weren’t there (and science can’t make historical truth claims, real science at least) but because you didn’t explore the timeline of Noah’s flood.
Noah was 600 years old when the flood waters came upon the earth. Let’s start there. Why was Noah 600 years old? What could contribute to human beings living to such ripe old ages except some kind of barrier to entropy? After all the 2nd law of thermodynamics is undefeated! So if he were such an age something was likely protecting humans on earth from the decay inherent in this universe. It’s been proposed that there was a vapor barrier around the earth, serving as a greenhouse of sorts, which also would explain the giant tree fossils, giant dragonfly fossils, and giant human remains found (and often tucked away from view) along with serving as an avenue by which the “windows of heaven” were opened up (after the vapor canopy falls to earth).
God said he will send rain on the earth for 40 days and 40 nights so that is what began initially – rain. Notice that when the rains started Noah and the animals entered the ark, so it obviously wasn’t a giant tidal wave or huge rush of waters, it was a steady rain (worldwide). Noah had time to walk into the ark and the animals had time to enter as well.
The Bible is clear and specific about the sequence of events –
Noah entered the ark as the rain started.
The “fountains of the deep” (undersea volcanism/ringwoodite) were broken up
The “windows of heaven” (vapor canopy in atmosphere) were opened (likely fell to earth)
It rained for 40 days and 40 nights
For 150 days in total the water “prevailed upon the earth.”
How do you think fossils even form? Fast-moving sediment that traps organisms. Many fossils found are in a state of fight/flight, there are whale bones found on mountaintops in South America, no tectonic plate theory explains that, after all how can smashing two rocks together push some fossilized bones to the top of a mountain? Wouldn’t the bones be compressed by surrounding rock?
We’ve observed rapid canyon formation due to rapid moving sediment, we know how fossils are made, there’s a huge mass of dead organic life forms buried beneath the rocks and plains on the earth after all. Everything is there for anyone to know and see the truth about what happened but the biggest thing that obstructs us all (and obstructed me for many years) is our worldview. If we are looking at the world through blue-tinted glasses, everything we see will be some shade of blue. But not everything is really blue, it just looks that way to you. Same for red tinted glasses, green tinted, etc. We all have our preconceived notions and presuppositions but ultimately only one set of glasses and only one worldview provides the proper clear view needed to see what is good and what is true and once you throw off those other shades and try on the Biblical worldview, you will stop trying to use the Bible as something to reconcile against science, and begin viewing modern science for the fraud and sham it is.
It’s foolish to put your faith and trust in a group of people who have faked and inserted tomes of climate history data, the same people who foisted Nebraska Man and Java Man on the populace when they wanted to “prove” evolution, the “peppered moths” pinned to trees, Haeckel’s embryos which were a deliberate hoax to push evolutionary theory, and more recently all of the peer-reviewed papers written by AI or so absurd as a rat with a giant weiner that still get published, and then people point to peer-reviewed papers as some gold standard.
When you start with bad assumptions, you get bad results. GIGO.
You are onto something here and I think you could advance human knowledge on Biblical geology a great deal (catastrophism vs gradualism) because you are already heading toward the answer on this topic. You would get there much faster if you use God as your ultimate authority – the infallible God of the Bible – rather than relying on fallible men who have been proven liars at every turn when the opportunity arises to peddle their agendas and ideologies on the common man.
If you truly believe in the theory of evolution no one should take anything you say seriously from this point forward, because after all you would be admitting that you are the great great great great x descendant of…… pondscum.
I know you are smarter than that.
Yes, an olive tree grew to full leaf 43 days after the first mountain peak appeared above the waters. Sorry, but this is a lie. Such a bald-face lie to ancients who actually grew olive trees, that the author possibly planted this into the material as a hint that he was being forced to write a lie. Then the waters simply disappeared in a matter of months. No, I am not a moron – and will not buy this lie either.
I’m sorry, the Bible is a theft and misappropriation of mankind’s history (a human rights crime) for the exploitation of the bloodthirsty/sin-spinning God of Eden, Samael-Yahweh-Enlil-Saturn who holds us captive. When your religious sect destroys all competing histories and documents, you are serving the evil one. His day is coming to an end.
Nowhere does the Bible say an olive tree grew to full leaf, it simply says the dove returned with an olive leaf (no specific size of leaf given). I refer you to –
https://www.jstor.org/stable/42882604
The waters didn’t disappear, they receded and if you were to actually read and evaluate my prior comment, you would see just how much water is below earth’s surface (3x the volume of all the oceans we know combined). That is water that receded, which scientists were baffled to discover. But if you had a Biblical worldview, you wouldn’t have been surprised, you would have thought “but of course.”
As for the rest of your axe-grinding, you are simply choosing one person/group’s historical version of events vs another’s, while ignoring the predictive power and detailed chronology contained in the Bible. After all if the Bible was as full of lies and revisionist history as you propose, why is it internally verifiable (through prophecies such as Jesus’ birth), externally verifiable (through prophecies such as the re-establishment of Israel) and why do you think you live in the year 2024 anno domini? Let me guess, those darn Christians did it!
There are few things more tragic than an intelligent person rendered to the status of a fool because he despises wisdom and instruction from the only entity that was there for not just our history as human beings, but the creation of the earth and the universe itself.
If you think you are using logic here, I would remind you that logic is an immaterial human concept that persists timelessly. It exists beyond us and would exist if humans were here to employ it or not.
I’m sure you can imagine the irony when you attempt to use logic to attack the source of logic Himself.
This will continue to be the source of your wrong interpretations of everything throughout the rest of your life – says who?
You and I find a bone buried in the back yard. I say “That bone was from a previous owner of the house who buried his dog back here about 40 years ago.” You say “That bone was from a dog who buried it recently.” Who’s right? What the heck do you know about how that bone got there, and what the heck do I know? This is the problem with historical truth claims – they are beyond the scope of science. And neither of us was there when it was buried, and no witness was there to see it happen.
Ultimately you have to appeal to someone or something outside of yourself, you aren’t omniscient and don’t have all the answers to everything at birth. Along the way you have decided to view some people as experts and worthy of listening to or believing, while others you view as charlatans and reject anything that comes out of their mouth.
Enjoy your adventures as you build a taller house of cards on top of the existing house of cards (“science”) that you assume to be true and is stable enough for advancement and knowledge.
You already know these people are driven by agendas, funding, narratives and have no problem lying publicly about “safe and effective” vaccines. Do you think this is just a recent development?
This is a distinction without a difference.
‘Water’ under the crust is stored in the form of hydroxyl (OH) groups within the mineral structure of rocks, particularly in the Earth’s mantle. So you cannot appeal to this. That water is not available to form an ocean. You are using a misrepresentation of geophysics to make a lie plausible—it is not.
I am not going to tolerate being God-lectured to here for long…
And to that I would just say that the water cycle of earth extends deep into the mantle, assuming that incredibly pressurized volumes of water cannot be part of earth’s water cycle because it’s “trapped” in OH ignores examples like this –
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23231014-700-deepest-water-found-1000km-down-a-third-of-way-to-earths-core/
Job 38:30
The waters are hid as with a stone,
and the face of the deep is frozen.
You don’t have to tolerate anything, it’s your website my friend and I’m just a humble reader. Criticizing Noah’s boatbuilding and appealing to growth rates of olive trees are microscopic objections in the grander picture of whether or not the Bible is true. I promise you, nothing you try to say about the Bible and no critique you can offer will be unique and new to me. I only originally posted in an effort to get you to reconsider your worldview and framework on this because you are obviously hyper-intelligent and I know that after all of the exhaustive documenting you did on Covid you could actually get somewhere significant on this with a different framework.
If the flood account details are read carefully, it makes perfect sense for there to be incredibly pressurized (yet accessible) water below earth’s crust. After all, if a volcano can spit out a diamond with water trapped in it from (allegedly) 1,000km below earth’s surface, what could every volcano (undersea and visible) emit during a period of global volcanism?
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life,
in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month,
the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up,
and the windows of heaven were opened.
I think you are actually onto something with the two major events you discuss, I just assign those two geological events to Noah’s flood and the division of the earth after Babel/during Peleg. The actual dates these events occurred is just a matter of worldview/framework, but we both agree that exactly 2 occurred. Earth is obviously dense and difficult to disrupt any perpetual motion at its core, however the shifting of continents is almost certain to have happened exactly twice in history due to the “outer shell” being prone to both rotation and in/outflow of water via catastrophism. What if the tectonic plates didn’t exist before the flood, but due to the worldwide volcanism the crust was fractured and the poles themselves didn’t move but the crust (and continents) did? After all it’s just a frame of reference difference, whether the north pole moves over South America or if South America moves under the north pole.
I think even if you just did an exercise in playing your own devil’s advocate and using Biblical geology/timelines on the work you are doing here, you might be surprised at how much explanatory power there is.
I mean absolutely no harm and I was just offering the shift in base framework as a potential avenue to advance things. You do you, I promise no more proselytizing. :)
Keep up the good work, I enjoy reading it all.
You underestimate the journey I have taken. Read my articles, as I have done this in spades. Noah’s Ark would not have survived the biblical tale. I tried every way from Sunday to reconcile the literal Bible tale, back in my earlier days. It just does not work. Sorry. I cannot accept that tale and respect the person I see in the mirror.
Integrity is about recapturing one’s authenticity (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/07/09/of-authenticity/) and not swallowing gaslighting from ancients with other-than-honorable purposes behind their writing. I learned long ago in the Church, that I find putting on a religious act to be repugnant. I will not do it (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/03/01/the-riddle-of-sin/).
Ask yourself this question, Why would a God place a very large, higher-sentience, civilization on a planet which is prone to flipping often (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/08/14/the-awesome-insistence-of-cataclysmic-mirage-theory-cmt/)? The flood was not a surprise, and the event itself does not arise from ‘wickedness’ on the part of its victims, that civilization. That is called an ex post facto justification, it is the psychopathy of a predator (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/06/25/the-ex-post-facto-mindset-of-the-predator/).
And I’m coming from the opposite angle, where I tried every way from Sunday to reconcile the literal Bible with modern science and found that the Bible is right (and even descriptive and predictive) at nearly every turn where modern scientists are baffled/surprised/amazed by some new finding on an almost daily basis. Nothing wrong with amazement and appreciation for new findings, but there’s something sad about the perpetual rewriting of long-held beliefs because the presuppositions were wrong to begin with. Ask a scientist 20 years ago they would tell you the earth is 1.8 billion years old, ask them a few years later they say it’s 2.1 billion, currently the guesstimate is 4.5 billion thanks to all of the evolutionary mathematics and fossil discoveries that have blown up in their face. There isn’t enough time in the day to go through all of these ever-changing timelines and “scientific consensus” line items with a pencil and an eraser when the Bible is written in permanent marker and covers it all and doesn’t ever need to change to suit our reality.
You assert that Noah’s Ark wouldn’t have survived the Biblical tale but you’re just engaging in the original fatal conceit – I know more than God or I know more than those bearded cave-dwelling morons who wrote down the books of the Bible. After all that was Satan’s original appeal to Eve in the Garden – I know more than God, eat the fruit, you won’t die.
What has it gained us? Scientists still baffled/amazed/confused by literally every fossil in a spot it shouldn’t be, every discovery of things like rapid canyon formation or deep concentrations of water and everything else under the sun. If something has no explanatory power and requires perpetual rewrites it has no utility. It’s just tautology and in the grand scheme of things and we have a limited amount of time in our lives, why waste it following the predictions and historical claims of people who are always wrong about everything?
The irony of you referring to ancient wisdom as gaslighting, in an era where literally everything reported on the news is either cooperative narrative-peddling or outright lying, while search terms on certain topics are hidden from Google results and scientists refer to peer-review as the end-all proof of X nevermind the abysmal record of peer-review papers when held to account and others try to reproduce them. Please – we as humans have always been lied to. As I said in an earlier post, the ultimate question is – says who? Just because I acknowledge the God of the Bible as my ultimate authority and you acknowledge consensus/peer-review/whatever as yours doesn’t mean either of us are stupid. We choose who we use as the ultimate authority on any topic and some are better suited for the task as authorities than others.
I read your post on the riddle of sin and let me just say that my father, a once-divorced and remarried deacon under one pastor is now a tarred-and-feathered non-entity unworthy of deaconship under his new pastor. That’s all just noise and not an indictment of God or the Bible, that’s an indictment of preachers and churches and as someone who attended many church services and watched many people in positions of church leadership have affairs, drink and drive and whatever else and it really soured me on church attendance. I still avoid church and I am more interested in the God/Jesus/truth aspect of Christianity than the outward appearances part. As a matter of fact if you really want to see the hidden agendas of churches come through, read some articles on “do you have to go to church to be a Christian” with all of the associated mental gymnastics to try to prove their case.
The flood was a necessary event because of the corruption of earth. After God made humans in His own image, some angels began lusting after the women of earth, came to earth and had hybrid offspring (Nephilim). These were giants who were perpetually at war with mankind and even cannibalizing everything they could find. If there was to even be an Abraham or a Jesus further down the lineage of Noah then some lineage of uncorrupted human DNA had to be preserved and the factions that were threatening the preservation of this had to be eliminated.
11Now the earth was corrupt in the sight of God, and full of violence. 12And God looked upon the earth and saw that it was corrupt; for all living creaturesb on the earth had corrupted their ways.
Again, there’s the reference to all when describing the situation. Just like all of the fountains of the deep were broken up, all living creatures on the earth had corrupted their ways. So a reset was needed and Noah was the only human left who found favor with God. But it’s important to remember that just as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed and no one survived, every person there and every person on earth before the flood had the same ability to decide things for themselves – to live a good and just life or to engage in immorality and depravity. You can disagree with the choices someone makes but you can’t change the outcome of those choices. You can choose your path but you cannot choose your consequences. This does not make God evil or wicked it illustrates that there is a consequence when you choose to be wicked. After all, the original intent of God’s creation of humanity was to make man in His image, and present us with a timeless existence just like God and the angels enjoyed. Time’s arrow wasn’t set in motion until Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden and entropy didn’t exist until they chose to eat the forbidden fruit. We were designed to live forever and God never wanted death or destruction for any of us. We chose it. The consequences were inevitably death for both of them and all humans (with a couple of exceptions) thereafter. They got to choose their path but they did not get to choose their consequences.
As far as the “flipping often” comment, I don’t think two major surface/rotational shakeups since the creation of the earth justify as “often.” Even if you use the Biblical chronology/timeline those were unique events and it’s not a pattern that repeats itself every X number of years. In fact –
“Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from his youth. And never again will I destroy all living creatures as I have done.
22As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
shall never cease.”
I think rather than a repeat of prior events we are simply experiencing the gradual unwinding (entropy/decay) of our earth and universe over time, not an inevitable cataclysmic event on the horizon. God’s promise to Noah post-flood is clear that He will never destroy all living creatures again and the pattern of planting/harvesting, cold/hot, summer/winter, day/night shall never cease.
If you are going to predict a future cataclysmic event akin to the 2 major structural shakeups of earth in history, you are obviously going to be doing so because of the original fatal conceit.
This was way more Bible-focused than I wanted it to be. Apologies for any inferred proselytizing.
This is gaslighting. Saying that the Bible fable is incorrect is not claiming to know more than God. The fable is incorrect because I am qualified to say it is incorrect, as an engineer, one with good experience in ship design, a lifelong sailor and officer of the deck, and having been in several hurricanes and 8 sea state storms. I do not have to be God, in order to spot a lie.
No, it was a continuation in a series of unforgivable sins, which were the reason Shemyaza (Yahweh/Enlil) was denied forgiveness in Enoch I. Abuse, miscegenation, gaslighting, and enslavement of a helpless lower form of life.
We are done with this discussion.
And it is He who sends down rain from the sky, and We produce thereby the growth of all things. We produce from it greenery from which We produce grains arranged in layers. And from the palm trees – of its emerging fruit are clusters hanging low. And [We produce] gardens of grapevines and olives and pomegranates, similar yet varied. Look at [each of] its fruit when it yields and [at] its ripening. Indeed in that are signs for a people who believe.
It is in accord with Immanuel Velikovsky, in Earth in Upheaval, almost all Egypth was under water for centuries !!11
It’s an interesting hypothesis. As for the damage to the outer coat of the Pyramids, I always assumed they had been used as a quarry for building purposes. Has it been ruled out that the missing materials can be found in the city as part of buildings?
I am not sure how one proves a complete absence. So, that cannot be eliminated as an idea by the rules of logic.
However, no pieces of these stones exist in the sand at the base of the pyramid. Man’s activity would have left hundreds of thousands of shards of Tura limestone, at the least, laying and slightly buried in the sand at the base of both Khufu and Khafre. Yet not one single shard exists. Plus, we have the calcium carbonate concretions themselves, at the base of both pyramids and in the subterranean passage which contain the re-concreted Tura limestone. Finally, scavenging could not have created the cap erosion pattern on Khafre, 0% chance of that. Ocean erosion should have been the null hypothesis. I consider it now, proven.
TES
Edgar Cayce said that the Second Pyramid was already there when THEY built the Great pyramid of HERMES !!!! Just saying
This caught my eye in light of the theory you’ve detailed on your site: The spinning of Earth’s inner core is slowing down. Is this how it all ends? (msn.com) – granted it’s essentially a fluffy bit from a mainstream feed and so there’s no substantial information, but I find the fact that even this little bit of info (plus a “there’s no danger” message) is being floated out to the general public.
Have you read Political Ponerology by any chance?
No, I have not. Will look it up.
Was one of those envious coworkers, by chance, named “Hillary”?
Just wondering…
;-/
LOL!! I would have been suicided.
I did not read the Political Ponerology book, which is long. I read an extended summary and excerpts that I found a few years ago somewhere. Here is a summary for your perusal. The premises seemed sound to me. https://mises.org/mises-wire/science-evil-personal-review-political-ponerology
I found the post I put that Political Ponerology excerpt and link in 2 years ago:
“But Not Simpler” https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/but-not-simpler
I request that you take the “extra” step to go to my blog link and read through the first 2 excerpts to get to that link at the bottom of the second excerpt, Sir Skeptic.
Yours in Service.. John
Regarding the date of the “vulture stone” at Göbekli Tepe. 16,800 plus 25,772 equals 42,572. That’s within the margin of error for the Laschamp geomagnetic field excursion, which you discussed in footnote 27. You pointed out many problems with thermoremanent magnetization of volcanic material.
Well, Steve Lund at USC analyzed ocean sediment cores from depths 3.5km to 4.8km on the Blake Ridge and Bahama Outer Ridge. They indicate it was not a full magnetic pole reversal, but two pole excursions in clockwise loops (inclination and declination changes were out of phase, thus the “loop”). They included the north pole moving to southern Africa for at least one of them.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Virtual-geomagnetic-pole-VGP-paths-associated-with-the-Laschamp-Excursion-records-from_fig1_44208431
In section 5.2 “Duration of the Laschamp excursion” of the paper linked to below, Lund estimates the duration of low geomagnetic field intensity at ~500 years, and the pole excursion itself as even shorter, perhaps ~250 years. It could be much shorter though–Lund describes a process of smoothing during recording of a geomagnetic signal in ocean sediment, because particles are not fixed in place until, e.g., suitably concretized by deposition of additional sediment layers. He estimates the majority of smoothing in his samples occurs within a 100 year window. I don’t know if ocean sloshing would impact a 3.5km depth, but if the sediment deposition rate increased temporarily after an ECDO, that could make a 20cm deposition happen in 50 years rather than the more typical 500 years. That’s not reliant on sloshing and subsequent settling, it could also come from rapid die-off of organisms suddenly exposed to a radically different climate.
https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/195/3/1519/622540
Which led me to realize a possible avenue of evidence either for or against your ECDO hypothesis. Microfossils are notably different in the ooze formed on polar versus tropical seafloor. E.g., perhaps sediment cores collected from the Southern Ocean or the coast of Iceland show a layer of tropical microfossils? That data might even already exist? Or if the dynamics of an ECDO causes a relatively cold period even in equatorial waters, polar microorganisms could survive it even if their home shifted to the equator. In that case it would be more telling to find a layer of polar microfossils in sediment off the coast of Hawaii, which would be the South Pole after a 104 degree slip along the 31st East Meridian. If that layer is also NOT found off the coast of Borneo or Guyana, that’s evidence in favor of both the ECDO hypothesis and the meridian along which it occurs. Here are examples of polar versus equatorial microfossils:
https://rnorris.scrippsprofiles.ucsd.edu/deep-sea-sediments-and-microfossils/
Deane
Excellent,
I added Figure 11 from the Lund study into the material. Given that geomagnetic poles wander and almost always have a variance, this is actually pretty solid data! Thanks Deane!
TES
TES,
One clarification–although core CH89-9P data does extend back just beyond the Iceland Basin Excursion, I think in Figure 11 from the Lund study, both cores are showing the Laschamp Excursion. Unless I’m missing something? The Iceland Basin Excursion appears to have been counterclockwise, and the Laschamp clockwise. Figure 8 from the study by Laj et al (link below) is not as clean as the Lund graphic, but does show a plethora of virtual geomagnetic pole (“VGP”) path estimates for both excursions, including both JPC-14 and CH89-9P for the Laschamp. Considering signal smoothing for short excursions and the challenge of correcting twist imparted to the sample while drilling, all VGP paths for both excursions spend time in Southern Africa.
https://hal.science/hal-03118231v1/file/2005GC001122.pdf
Deane
Even better, Deane. Fantastic information. I have not had time to research this further. You are very helpful! I changed the text to show how important the Laj et al study indeed may be!
TES
An article just appeared in Sky and Telescope reporting on the geomagnetic changes during the Laschamps excursion based on a 2021 paper at https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/41000-years-ago-auroras-appeared-across-the-globe/.
The story says the magnetic field tilted 76º to Northern Africa and NE of Australia – roughly agreeing with your calculations.
I wonder if the dipole antenna you posit in Khufu could use the induced current of the increased solar flux of instead of infrasound to flag an immanent excursion.
Bolt,
Yes, saw that in the Laschamps excursion data.
Interesting point on the solar flux for the Queen’s chamber dipole. (Infrasound was detected in the Subterranean Chamber).
TES
Well said.
I have been a student of Esoteric Mysticism/Occult for almost 45 years. I have recently tried to open the eyes of fellow MAGA members because I am beginning to see an increased leaning toward fundamentalism and literal interpretation within a small subsection of the group.
In the first few days January of 1994 I underwent a spontaneous near death experience with no apparent cause that resulted in an epiphany. Its momentum was massive in the first week or so and it eased a bit until fading into the background a bit over 9 months later.
I remember trying to convey my insights to others. I must have looked and sounded like I was blitzed out of my mind. In addition I found it hard to articulate what it was I knew for quite a while so I relied on my gut feelings and strings of synchronistic events as a guide.
I have led a blessed life. I am content. I never felt the need for wealth or lots of possessions. I met my polar mate shortly after my experience. 3 loving children and 30 years later I cannot complain. I don’t fully remember what it feels like to complain or blame others.
Don’t misunderstand. It took longer than I like to admit to even recognize some of my flaws but I have had some incredible mystical experiences and eventually learned to be in the spirit pretty much at will with no break in awareness during the transition although when I managed to contact someone more learned they suggested that I not indulge in it until I met a personal mentor. I still do it sometimes just to refresh my experience of it since I may have to wait lifetimes for the Spirit to grant me a mentor.
When you mentioned the Church I guess I was a bit surprised that others saw the same challenges. IMO Both the State & Church are the issue. I could have sailed through the rest of my life as just a witness in the world. After all you cant make the horse drink the water. Each will learn at their own pace and in their own way.
Why would a god demand worship? They would not. At least a true god would not.
Being aware of the mystery around and within us can help us show a natural reverence and grant due respect. If one does not respect the natural laws they are punished yet it was done by their own hand.
I see the introduction of Vicarious Salvation most damaging to humanity. It convinced people they did not have to put forth the effort to attain salvation on their own. What need is there to pick up ones cross and bear it daily if one is already saved or can be if they only plead for it or claim subservience for it at the end?
I noticed a few fundamentalist Christians on X trying to exclude people of other religions from MAGA. I tried to explain to them that when I look back I see that all religions are little more than fragments of a spiritual root system from long long ago. I try to explain that the elect did not originally refer to a specific race/ethnicity or religion. That it referred to those whose awareness had been refined through a system of experiential disciplines allowing one a greater degree of insight in matters (Intuitive Understanding).
Of course we also have the common image of Jesus Christ portrayed as a masochistic pacifist with a martyr complex. I guess they forgot that he told his disciples to get a sword even if it cost them all their possessions. I am sure this was brought up during the Crusades & Inquisitions yet still misrepresented the truth of the matter in the other direction. At some point all who seek to bring freedom to the masses will find themselves in the crosshairs. Why is that? Is it due to human nature itself? Beings outside the habitual spectrum? Maybe egregoric entities created by human activities that take on a life of their own? Like the State & Church.
Earlier I mentioned that I could have sailed through the rest of my life as a simple observer unbothered by the activities of humanity yet curious. That started to change a few years ago. My gut started telling me that something is afoot. So I started researching and since the military had wanted me for Counter Intelligence Analysis in my early 20s I decided to put the visualization and pattern recognition talents to good use.
I have examined multiple scenarios to try and get at their motivations. I find it disturbing that there appear to be no beneficial ones when it comes to our current time. So, why have they started to wear such draconian robes?
1.Are the hidden hand, the UN/Davos adepts and corporate lackeys just power hungry and afraid of a massive awakening? Are they willing to go scorched earth?
2.Is their a cataclysmic variable in the near future which they are aware of but have chosen not to reveal to the masses? That does give another reason for the construction of deep shelters, the sorting and division of the masses, the seemingly scripted events and the hording of resources. Do they know due to evidence of past cycles yet have chosen to warn of crises while concealing the true cause(s) ?
IMO number two appears more sensible but that may be due to a bias of not wanting to believe number one.
Of course it is most likely a combination. 75% number two, 25% number one.
If so then why the deception? Why not just reveal it? Well, that would cause instant chaos before they are ready.
They do want a World Government. For this to happen the United States is mandatory. They have to have it or it all falls apart.
It is a combinations of course just not necessarily my choice.
Which brings up synchronicity. Have you ever noticed how you run across trend elements in the arts that seem to project a theme for upcoming events? In retrospect even more iterations can be found to have played a part.
I just don’t know. All I do know is that I am not willing to sit quietly while they establish their Techno-Feudal Corporate Oligarchy. I consider them to be a potential existential threat to freedom. I cannot hide and just let them force humanity through a millennia or more of true darkness. My kids got a bit upset because I revealed my name and verified my account. I am sure we remember that in our first steps on the path we must not draw attention lest we attract a predatory force but IMO why should anyone believe an anonymous entity on a social platform these days. We must put our life on the line. I hope they are worthy opponents.
Before I end the manifesto I am going to name four authors that helped bring things together for me over the years. These four all speak of the same Tradition from different perspectives.
Castaneda and Mares are the only two reliable authors when it comes to “Toltec” teachings. All others I have read amount to feel good claptrap cliff notes to get some cash.
(Note: Who was Don Juan Matus? If he was not Samuel Aun Weor I bet they knew each other. The timelines have matching points.)
Kingsford is like a primer that helps apply Christian Mysticism filter to the first 2 authors.
She taught about the acquisition of Intuitive Understanding on The Fourfold Way.
Mouravieff will ties it all together and so much more. You will see how the structure of the assemblage point mimics the structure of the Universe. One of the most jaw dropping for me was the correlation between the Toltec Party of Warriors and what Boris calls The Film.
TES – as a result of your work, I’ve now read/listened to Ben Davidson’s work. As a result of all of this, every text I see from Elon Musk has taken on an entirely different light.
https://twitter.com/DimaZeniuk/status/1813629508978974919 😕
That aside, from your research, do you and other proponents of the planet tilt agree on the actual direction of motion of that tilt? Is that motion part of or revealed by the geological history? I’ve seen two models of the motion and one has North America dipping downward and to the left toward the current Equator and stopping with what looks like Maine as the “northernmost” point of the current USA touching the Equator. If that were true, it would seem that the west coast of the USA would be pushing into/towards the ocean and the tsunami slosh back would happen along the east coast. Is that your read of it? Is there a reason to believe it would occur differently (with the east coast pushing down into the Atlantic and the slosh back happening along the west coast once the tilt stops)?
It’s all outlined in the article. The Euler Axis, the plane of flip, etc.
TES
Ah, I admit, I didn’t understand that (or maybe it was added to a later edit, which I still need to re-read). In any event, it seems that you are pleased with the models Craig Stone has developed and so I will trust that those reflect your understanding of the motion of the tilt. It makes sense to me that he would be looking at geological striations of past water flow to test and confirm his models.
Thank you again for this body of work. I still find myself staring out the window from time to time in a state of half-grief. If I even managed to survive this event (supersonic winds and violent oceanic displacement seems even too much for a bunker inside a non-volcanic mountain range 12ft above current sea level… no? Not to mention I too question whether surviving such violence would be desirable… but I feel I owe it to my children to give them the option to survive if they choose), I may not live long enough to see the earth tilt back in the 2nd cataclysm. To think of ending my days in a planet that is dark, cold and unrecognizable is heartbreaking. Every eastern sunrise and western sunset now comes with a bittersweet gratitude for the loveliness of what is, today.
Oh yes, when Craig developed his simulation, I went ahead and added that section a week or two after the article came out. It was absolutely vital to communication of the message. And it did indeed depict the rotation I had tried to outline. Finding the cause of the rotation was the challenge at first. But once found, then the rotation itself was a matter of follow through and the right tools.
For me, I plan to petition the right NGO’s to develop monitoring to track the predictive nature of this hypothesis. I am not moving or declaring any dark future just yet. We have a lot more we need to determine.
EVG
TES
Thank you, TES. Your time is valuable so I hesitate to ask you further questions (I reprinted the latest edit of your writing to study more after working hours), but I find that I’m curious about a few topics related to (a) survival, and (b) the bigger picture. And having your ginormous (and incredibly well-educated) brain applied to any of my questions would be such a GIFT. So… to the extent you’re willing to indulge:
As to survival:
As to the bigger picture:
Any very old and stable mountain range not in the path of the Euler oceanic displacement, with consistent elevations over 3000 ft, and lots of forestation, would be good. The Appalachians fit this bill for me. The Himalayas and Andes fit this as well. If I were to build a survival shelter, I would place a strong containment vessel, with 3-day oxygen supply, on a plateau above 3000 ft, to survive the 3 days of inundation, well anchored into the bedrock. Thereafter, survival under ground might be a good option, in an area right near the containment vessel.
The gods definitely wanted this hidden. Mankind’s lifespan was reduced so that we would more easily lose knowledge between generations, and also not have enough time to figure it out or preserve it well. We have rediscovered much of this through documents buried in the sands of Southwest Asia and North Africa. They did not surpass us per se – just used different technologies that they had access to for some reason.
The Archons-Watchers have committed a crime. This is why they were not forgiven in I Enoch. Sexual-Enslavement of a higher order species, by planting an advanced civilization on an unstable planet, and withholding that information from them – so that you can suck the suffering and workfruits from them… That is about as bad a crime as one can commit. They do not want this known, and do not want us to know this, because our knowing it will cause ‘noise’ in the heavenly realms. We will lament in prayer. Hell is not made for man. It is made for them. They know this.
Yes, the precedent exists, that if the population of a planet under captivity wants freedom – they have the right to ask for it. The Archons do not want us traveling space, because 1. they cannot – as they are bound here by embargo, and 2. it will convince outsiders of the need to intervene. Plus, 3. we are not mature enough spiritually to handle the technology – but that is a bonus and goal all along for the Archons. This is the one thing they and the outsiders agree upon.
This is what I say daily: “Our benefactor who dwells in the heavenly realms, whose name is of such honor that us lowly men dare not even speak it – come now and intervene on our behalf, please. Extend your kingdom to our Earth, and let things function for the future here, just as they currently operate in your realm. In the meantime, while I don’t understand everything, I will help make sure there is enough for those within my reach to be happy and healthy, and teach as I can how spiritually mature individuals function together in an imperfect society – how to identify evil as distinct from every other good thing. We look forward to membership inside your system of technology and governance – but mostly, your intervention into our captive plight, where from then on we will no longer abjectly suffer and die at a young age – and may live in continued freedom and happiness.”
I strive to teach others this simple plea…
TES
Wow.
Just… wow.
Printing this… with my abject thanks for all you do.
Also – I hope you will share if there is ever a technological (or other) effort you know or become aware of that I might support in some way in the interim. As for your plea, it is striking in how much it aligns with my own belief system. Strangely, there’s comfort in that. Thank you for sharing it.
Still inundated at 3000 feet? Just how night does the water get?
I see that you did transliterate the Lord’s Prayer, too. Couple tears needing to flow attest to a job well done. Thank you sir.
I have been trying to understand what on Earth is running human affairs all my life. If it is these Archons, these criminals who according to your cosmology created us to use & abuse on this unstable planet, and who are embargoed here, then who is out there to help us?
And, who is it that visits Earth, as is reported over & over, with some beings being benign or helpful, some negative, many neutral. Are they real, or is this all disinformation, yet again? Is our Government “in bed” with a negative non-human intelligence? There is some evidence for this, perhaps.
Or is the entire UFO/UAP/NHI conversation based on a disinformation campaign, designed to grab more power & crush humanity further?
I understand your prayer & your plea. I myself pray very similarly daily, but I do wonder who is out there to assist us!
We are obviously controlled by someone/something that doesn’t love humans but creates war, debt & disease instead of the peace, prosperity & freedom that we could have.
Is that force the Archons that you reference? And if so, do they function independently or through humans, in your opinion?
Sorry to ask so many questions, but you are the first I’ve read who I believe could possibly answer them!
Thank you, TES, for all that you do!
Katherine,
While my lead hypothesis is indeed that man has been captive under an illegal edict for at least 6,000 years – it is the urgent and desperate actions of this controlling agency which gives me the most encouragement. A group in full control and with unyielding power, would be far more relaxed and concealed – enjoying the fruits of their advantage for many eons. No one would screw that up without good reason.
Something terrifies them right now. That something is far more powerful than they are, has dealt with Earth’s type of problem before in the remote cosmos, and has won. This is why the dark agency both fled to and is embargoed here to begin with. The dark agency knows this. They are even afraid of us, just cannot afford to allow us to realize this. Once you are no longer deceived by them, just as in holding their name, they hold no power over you.
All their facades and institutions are crumbling now. It is up to us in the meantime to learn and apply true faith, and not their guilt/blame/shame version of it. :-)
EVG
TES
Bless you, TES, you give me hope; seeing them scrambling is delightful, without a doubt!
But, when you look at the forces behind or connected to the new administration, the Lockdowns, Masking, withheld treatments,
mandated lethal ones, the Gene Injections proponents, & the work of Whitney Webb which has exposed the fact that the tech bros, Peter Thiel etc, controlled where every vial went, & the high variability of the toxicity of different batches, the fact that Pfizer contains SV 40 promoter, Plasmid DNA, Pseudouridinated RNA coding for the toxic Chimeric Spike, wrapped in LNPs that cross every membrane in the human body & that it was functionally forced on pregnant women & children, well, TES, the only conclusion I could reach was that OWS was planned and run by something fully non-human!
Help me comprehend the level of evil that would do this, coupled with worldwide Lockdowns killing millions, the war in Ukraine, killing more, Gaza, etc.,
None of this is necessary.
So, in their hysteria to kill, maim, & destroy, lies our hope. They are so deeply desperate they care not if they expose themselves for all the world to see!
Arggh. I wonder. Was it my free will choice to come to this planet in the middle of this pitched battle for human Freedom, or was I “drafted,” lol!?
Thank you again TES, I will be following you closely!!
Why near lots of forestation? Disrupt air flow? Energy? It seems that the hypersonic winds if away from Euler axes like in the US would knock down and displace the trees quite a distance away?
Re: Sandy’s post on nicotine from 4 months ago (here in these comments).
I had long been interested in trying nicotine, but had been hesitant due to being told so often it was highly addictive. After watching the video mentioned and seeing nicotine fail to produce addictive behavior when tested on its own, I recently ,ordered some patches and gum from the best sourced companies I could find.
A pleasant surprise happened when my 24 year old son who had been dealing with asthma his entire life tried the nicotine gum and patch (lower range dose). Prior to nicotine, he had grown and done research and tinkered, and long ago had broken free from the steroids and inhaler chemicals to simply use a fresh brewed pot of regular coffee to calm his flare ups, often times at 3am when he couldn’t relax enough to sleep.
With nicotine, he told me that despite four predictable triggers (eating cake for a birthday celebration, a root beer float, having the weather change from hot to cold, and smoking cannabis on the late side of the evening) he was able to sleep comfortably. He was very impressed and dug in to understand more.
He found a paper where mice were exposed to a very high allergen scenario, and the non-treated placebo mice would have their health levels decline noticeably after a few weeks, where the mice pre-treated with nicotine had obviously better health in that same environment. I believe they went on to try to explain it by saying the combination of anti-inflammatory plus a reaction where the body still produced the lung mucus buildup reaction but did not follow that up with the typical lung restriction.
He felt that was exactly what was occurring in his lungs. He still felt the mucus build up, but the nicotine seemed to prevent the lung tightness and restriction, so he remained able to take deep breaths and was able to sleep well despite all four triggers in one evening.
This was important for me to share with observable proof. He has had multiple evenings where the triggers would normally have ruined his sleep, yet with nicotine, he has been able to get full nights of sleep. Game changer when added to the subtle improved focus and alertness it gives you as well as potentially boosting testosterone, etc.
We (myself and two sons) have all tried nicotine now and feel zero addiction response. Yet another topic we have been deceived into believing one thing, when the truth is quite different.
I went through that nicotine presentation too, it cites relevant resources. But first, it is important to disconect it from tabacco use, as that involves thousands of other mostly harmful chemical, such as arsenic. Also, the presenter claims that it is pyrazines added by the tobacco industry which really make the smoking addictive. As of now, the safest way to absorb nicotine are nicotin patches. Some other studies also show that lower dosages are preferable, possibly even very small, such as the nicotinic content naturally found in tomatoes, eggplants, potatoes etc.
And a huge topic for debate is whether similar benefits could not be achieved with nicotinic acid (a variannt of vitamin B3 which attaches to the same receptors, nicotin might actually be hijacking this). It causes a flush and in larger than 0,5 g doses daily can cause liver inflammation but numerous otherwise beneficial substances cause harm when overdosing with them, so that does not bother me.
PS: I just found out this page pulled my old picture from god knows where. How is this possible?
Could you point me to the discussion related to the explanation of how the pyramids were able to be built with the message they send if mankind could not survive the ECDO? How was the knowledge available? The pyramids had to be built when there was no flood but there had to be knowledge that there was a flood, and that it would occur exactly the same again. How was all this known, and further, why would they be built to send the message (partially rhetorical)?
Mankind survived the ECDO cycle. It is not a complete extinction event – more like a 90% event. The mechanics of the State1-State2 hypothesis show why the Earth exhibits just about the same effect each time this happens. It is part of the Earth’s natural cycle. The water remains high (or altered by region) long enough for man to measure its levels and keep a record. Unfortunately, someone also did not want mankind to know about this cycle and has kept a habit of destroying all such records – and the builders of the pyramid knew that this someone would hide the knowledge once again. As they have since the last event.
So, they built an edifice that neither future inundation, military conquest, nor fake god, could destroy. That was what was important enough to undertake such an endeavor, not building of a tomb.
TES
Dont you think the archons have the capability of destroying some pyramids though? Or do you think there may have been other “entities” that “battled” with them to protect certain things?
They did destroy one Khufu-sized pyramid. Not sure why they did not destroy Khufu and Khafre as well **shrug** It may well be that they ‘destroyed enough’ and then spread myriad false stories as to the Pyramids’ construction and purpose – a kind of epistemological destruction.
Unfortunately, either they were not allowed to go further, and someone wanted this discovered when the timing was right, and not before – or our rulers are just not that smart to begin with, and left a lot of clues they missed in their sweep of the structures. Had I been on their team, I would have made sure that the copper cables, leoparding vitrification, salt, and quicklime scars were removed as a first priority. Those who scoured the edifice and sealed the air shafts with new chamber-stones apparently were just following instructions and did not really comprehend the goal at hand.
TES
Dear TES,
Please become aware of this argument why the pyramid was not covered by sea 12800 years ago: https://youtu.be/1QX5cHUsNSY?si=vCfZpuzXYOSxhdSb&t=3162
I personally don’t agree with the conclusions in this video. It’s too big of a coincidence that they would have dug randomly and picked a spot right next to the entrance. It’s more likely that they thought, maybe from experience, that it’s easier to go around a reinforced door, than through it. Maybe they also wanted to avoid a trap.
Dear TES,
Please become aware of this observation: https://youtu.be/1QX5cHUsNSY?si=WgM6KlQBjVp7llew&t=5928
This is a short excerpt from the two fantastic documentaries that publish some original research [1][2]. I won’t pretend to fully understand your theory, but maybe it reinforces it – how to send a message to the future where the new equator is? Build massive structures separated by mathematically significant distances along it’s line. Do the other connected structures appear to serve the same function?
Or does it falsify it? Did they choose this line because they found this magical ratio between tectonic plates to be on this line? Did they choose easter island as the starting point because they were amazed at the magical angle that the three volcanos form? Or is it a coincidence, and we are only able to discover structures near fissure lines, because in these areas they made the structures super sturdy? (for comparison, a typical Soviet commie block has an expiration date of just 50 years before it starts to crumble).
In the full documentaries, they explain why a metre could have been (and apparantly was) also used by ancient civilizations.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QX5cHUsNSY
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF6qv1CC5_4
John,
What they have done here is called cherry picking or ‘p-hacking’ in medical science. You take a ton of random observations, and then find among those observations, a few which line up along linear or mathematical constants. What about Cholula, Gunung Padong, Tolombón, Aquihuecó, Amazon Stonehenge, Kuhikugu, Tulum, Chichen Itza? – in fact there are thousands of significant and massive monuments and sites to choose from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_archaeological_sites_by_country. Given enough observation points, hundreds of lines and mathematical constants can be made to conform with members of that set of observation points.
The answer is ‘yes’, by using this method, I could find amazing linear and mathematical constants among the monuments which confirm the rotational or Euler axes inside my hypothesis. But that would be cheating.
By cherry picking just these few monuments, one can ‘connect the dots’. But connecting the dots only works when the dots make up the majority of the dot set. Like when you have a murder and only two people with means and access. A small set of dots. It does not work when a very small minority of lots of dots are selected for their convenience in alignment and harmony with the golden ratio.
In the theory I have developed, we have only one geophysical solution. It is used to make the one prediction which is possible, then that prediction is confirmed in the one truly exceptional monument which was built on that predictive axis and then further by the specifically predicted features contained in that one monument. In other words, my theory took risk of a single predictive point of conjecture, not the convenience of arranging an answer from any of thousands of points of potentiality.
But that does not mean we should not look – they just need a disclaimer along with the observation, which shows they are aware of this inductive weakness in the logic.
Final word, be wary of fast-talking videos which employ ethereal mysterious background music and British-accented narrators.
TES
What’s the age of pyramid Khufu? Google search tells me it’s 4600 years old. Then how can the article claim kast erosion of the pyramid 14 millennia ago (14000) years range? Maybe I’m missing something about the age of the pyramids
“within the last 14 millennia” – so I don’t have a date for the inundation which caused the karst erosion. The 4600 year age of Khufu has been falsified. See this article:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
The carvings on the Ostrich Egg certainly do appear, as you have written, to depict the Tura already eroded at the time of the carving. The lines are displaying detail to the prospective viewer. Smooth cap stones, would, in communicating detail, push the carver to produce no detail inside the triangular depiction of the pyramids, this is how that smooth detail would be conveyed, by nothing in that space.
The carving was very unlikely to be some random scratching. It contained accurate topography of a massive tract of land that someone mapped. There was a point to those carvings
I came across this interesting visualization: https://utahgeology.com/bin/iceage/index.html
Adding to this… what appears to be a great work in progress writeup on True Polar Wander events: https://utahgeology.com/were-the-ice-ages-really-just-true-polar-wandering-events/
How do you manage your rage? Because I am BARELY managing mine – I live in hope of military tribunals followed by televised executions.
Record. Play. Rewind. Play. Rewind…
Michele,
With two disabled kids from medical incompetence, not simply one – birth trauma cerebral palsy and DTaP vaccine encephalitis – it has been difficult. I started channeling my inner rage into The Ethical Skeptic in 2010 – a kind of martial art skill in detecting fake science, wayward lab techs masquerading as scientists, and Narrative ninnies who enable their harmful ways.
This particular death certificate fraud upset me, first because it was fraud against the pain and suffering of someone I love, and second, because I know that this is serving to misinform the entire population as to what is actually occurring.
I just keep my head down, and focused on the philosopher’s stone.
EVG
TES
Dear TES,
Please become aware of this theory: https://natrontheory.com/ (you need to click around on this website, it’s interactive, there are several “dominoes”)
And then check out the follow-up here: https://twitter.com/FoMaHun/status/1808851359925465174
I think you will appreciate how beautifully it explains how they formed the Sabu Disk (but not how they did it so precisely).
John,
I like it. The theory is compelling and may well explain the peculiar features of Machu Picchu, including the ‘overstrike’ of the seams between stones, which has always baffled me. A granite cement. Done right, this could achieve a Mohs hardness of 5 or 6 ?? once a practice was developed.
Limestone on the other hand hardens by a different molecule chain. And while one can make a concrete from limestone, it is not of a high Mohs hardness, nor does it present a high indurate or compressive strength. The pyramid structural concourses would have collapsed if made of this material. But you are not proposing that – it is only for reference.
The Sabu Disk, and shist being formed into a cement – that I would find problematic. A bunch of disparate minerals in that matrix. Everything formed from waterglass would technically be a granite. But it would solve the intricate form challenge. Have to think on that.
TES
This has captivated me. One theory is that the megalithic structures were built from many blocks instead of one big one to make them more earthquake resistant. This earthquake damaged but still standing wall could be seen as proof:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRpISOKXkAA51zZ?format=jpg&name=medium
But what I can’t stop thinking about is this:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRpJb7zWMAEqZLo?format=png&name=900×900
We know that the ancient greeks decorated their stone temples with weird but consistent trigliphs and guttas. We now know this is how you would build a wooden temple of this shape, if you did not have the invention of nails. When they learned how to carve stone, they recreated wooden temples visually, copying over the now useless guttas.
Perhaps the ancient megalithic worker saw the earthquake-proof walls of the past, but because earthquakes became rare he didn’t understand the purpose, and just made a fake separation for aesthetic reasons.
Here is a very interesting map showing the location of megalithic structures and sources of natron: https://natrontheory.com/map.html
The 1000 ton stone at Thebes and much evidence of quarrying stone exists.
I’m fascinated by the stones at Balbeek, and how on earth they got those monsters there. They certainly appear pre Roman. Of course, the Romans found much, built over it and claimed it as their own, or was assigned to them thereafter by ‘mistorians’.
Has anyone performed a “diff” of the most recent version? This material is dense with info and having read previous versions I would love to quickly read the changes, preferably inline. Thanks!
Hello TES, if you are not already familiar, I wanted to bring to your attention a petrified forest in New Cairo Egypt. It exists at 1k feet, just above the delta, so above the hypothesized inundation height but below the surge height. As you may already know, petrified wood forms in flood or volcanic zones, where there is a rapid no oxygen environment created via mud or ash, and a ground water element high in minerals, specifically silica. With high enough silica levels, it is thought these woods can be petrified fairly quickly (thousands of years). However, the wood in this area is claimed to be dated to 35 million years ago. The site is interesting for many reasons, one of which is a possible falsification for large height inundation to have occurred as many of the “whole log” stones that are still fully intact would have been massively displaced/dispersed throughout the region. Conversely, perhaps it does not falsify the inundation height, but rather the sites accepted dating and thusly these may have been deposited much more recently, ie the last event. If the latter is true, then radiocarbon dating still might be very possible, and it should not be too much trouble to attain a small sample for independent testing, as the wood is scattered across much of the upper plateau. I cannot think of a more interesting scenario than to have a semi-organic material, sitting at the edge of a hypothesized inundation site, whose mere presence confirms flooding, just waiting as a veritable time capsule to be more thoroughly tested.
www petrifiedforestegypt org/park-features/petrified-remains
29°59’16″N 31°27’26″E · 1,093 ft
Agreed, and very insightful anon,
I checked, and the elevation of this forest is 1,027 feet, so well under the surge height.
Herodotus, in An Account of Egypt, cited the crisis in Egyptian leadership lore experienced by one of the Old Kingdom Pharaoh’s in his waning years, in that his oldest son had refused to undertake the duties of being trained to become Pharaoh himself. Instead, he retreated with a band of his fellow younger persons and created a colony in ‘the woods’ a forested region southeast of Cairo. When Pharaoh sent an emissary to collect him and bring him back to undertake his duty, the son, sitting on a horse, took a shit in his hand, and handed it to the emissary, and said “Deliver to Pharaoh, this, as my response.”
Your instinct, along with the argument you present, is stark: undeniable and massive oceanic disruption a mere 50 miles from that site, is stronger evidence, than an abductive assumption as to how fast leaching can occur in and partially displace organic materials. Because deductive logic is stronger than abductive, and abductive is subject to human desires to hide things… the deductive inference would take priority.
EVG
TES
July 5th, 2024 Hundreds of Doctors and Scientists Sign Accord Calling for Suspension and Investigation of mRNA Vaccines
Would you be kind enough to elaborate why you believe the flip will be 104 degrees? I couldn’t really understand why this particular number from this article.
It is in the article, but relates to the hypothesis that the Khufu pyramid was both a tracking device as well as message to future generations.
I understand now, thank you.
I would assume that due to the constant changes undergoing in the earth, and the fact that the three distinct moments of inertia of earth are not vastly different like in a tennis racket, but rather just very slightly so, this time it could rotate in a completely different way.
Is this reasonable?
It is possible, but right now I think that the moment differential is large enough, and the structures stable enough, that the same sort of scenario repeats for the most recent term of say 500,000 years or so. Our return to the discipline of the precession of the equinoxes is pretty striking in that regard.
I am looking at the Alps, and see vast “rivers” formed, some 2km wide. Given that these are the Alps, it seems reasonable to assume that they were indeed caused over millions of years by the continuously metling ice.
Looking at Saudi Arabia, at the receding shorelines that you mentioned, I also see many “rivers”, these up to 200m wide.
I understand that the way we can differentiate the causes of their formation is to look at the width, depth, and amount of meandering. To my untrained eye this is consistent with your theory.
In Africa we have the Emi Koussi volcano, that appears to have erupted last around 1.5 million years ago, with flood marks clearly on the resulting rock, not under it, which allows us to say that the flood happened at least in this time period. Here the width of some of these “rivers” is around 500m.
Unfortunately I cannot find recent volcanos in Saudi Arabia.
If we could find two nearby volcanos, one that erupted around 12-24,000 years ago, and one around 10,000 years ago, and one but not the other eroded with flood marks – that would be a great discovery.
Zubair Group – recently erupted if I recall.
The Emi Koussi volcano eruption and inundation marks sound interesting. I will look in to that, thanks!
TES
TES
Phenomenal work, and the most convincing interpretation of what is in front of us. Always trust what you see, not what you’re told!
You mention the SAC-LLVP, and would wonder if you’ve had a look at the African landscape from Botswana, Namibia, Angola and Zambia? There are what appear to be marks of a rapidly receding shoreline of a great inland lake or sea, and very recently since they’re sand dunes which haven’t been eroded yet. Fishing villages remain in the middle of Botswana pans (Kubu Island), with no fishing possible even when there is water.
This may show that the SAC-LLVP moves relative to the crust as well, thrusting Southern Africa upwards leaving these scars, as well as significant ripples on the southern coastline and rapidly cut, very steep and deep valleys. Looks like it decanted through the Zambezi valley to me.
The southern coastal regions of South America look like they have been washed over too and there appear to be shoreline marks in Argentina.
Just some observations which may be useful for your work.
Thanks Zookie! Will look…
TES
Did you see the Venus cloud anomaly? I saw it on Ben Davidson’s YT channel, episode below:
Yellowstone Event, Venus Anomaly, Solar Update | S0 News July.24.2024 (youtube.com)
Massive wall of cloud racing across the planet. All of a sudden, and nobody has a clue why or where it came from.
Look at the shape of it – doesn’t appear to be from an explosion or impact which would be radiating outwards. That would give the planetary observers an easy explanation.
I would hypothesize that, if the crust underneath had suddenly rotated, it might cause such an anomaly to present in the atmosphere.
A further note to go with my previous post, continental drift was laughed at when postulated, but it relies on the theory that “as it is now, so it has ever been”. Looking at the African landscape and its new dunes as a starting point, and because they are dunes of sand and mud and therefore should erode quickly, the continental drift theory must also be revisited. I would propose that the movements of continents is incredibly rapid, and then mind-numbingly slow. Chan Thomas must take credit here for writing things that open eyes.
The system is undoubtedly massively complex. Perhaps sometimes the pole shift is not big, but the underlying elements like the SAC-LLVP might decouple under the right circumstances and shift rapidly or even change orientation under our feet. This could rip continents apart and smash bits into each other, creating mountain ranges in a lifetime or even less.
Or maybe the movement of the underlying structure is a feature of it anyway, I keep an open mind about it.
What does appear clear is that we get shoved back into the Stone Age, repeatedly.
Zookie,
I think you raise a sound point. It is possible that some or even most of our continental drift occurs quickly as a facet of ECDO events. The gradualism approach is the result of a flawed assumption now taken as proven, when it is not.
With Chan Thomas, his prognostications were indeed astounding. But he had no actual hypothesis (theory of cause and systemic expression from that cause). I can cite pretty much anything as an outcome (and just get lucky to boot), but if I don’t explain why it happens and give compelling evidence as to proof of that ‘why’ – then I am attempting pseudo-prophecy or praespeculacy. Chan needed to craft a hypothesis, but did not. If one observes existing deserts and then simply describes the ocean again rolling over those same deserts in the future, that is praespeculacy (taking current observations and framing them in the language of prognostication).
Mine is the first actual actual hypothesis of this nature. It constructs the why first, predicts an outcome, and then finds those outcomes indeed exist.
But yes, a flipping planet presents an ethical boundary, and is a strong argument as to why no advanced civilization formed here for 800 million years. It also brings into question any actions to establish higher sentient life on Earth, without having resolved this problem first.
TES
Hi TES
You’ve really sent me down a rabbit hole! I’ve been looking around and collating my thoughts on the competing theories of things.
As far as Chan Thomas goes, you are right. He doesn’t posit a hypothesis and then test as you have, and yours is the first and only one I’ve seen on this. What he does prompt though, is noticing things. His investigations into the freezing of a mammoth are of great relevance to your hypothesis and proving it.
Randall Carlson cannot explain it, Ben Davidson cannot unless the Observers recognize that it is more than a geomagnetic excursion, it involves geographic movement as well.
Your hypothesis can explain a mammoth flash frozen so fast it’s still good eating 12000 years later.
If a mammoth is like an elephant, and it should be given the plants found in the mouth and gut, it is a preferential grazer. Thus, it was living on a grassland, or maybe grass tundra. It’s not living in a frozen wasteland, it’s too big, requires too much food. It’s conceivable to consider it living in a place like the Russian Steppe or further south – grasslands and pine forests. It would migrate with the seasons.
And this comes to the speed of the event. Clearly the speed is significant, the movement of Zambia to the geographic north pole would be fast enough for the occupants to experience near or at supersonic wind and water. The windchill of hundreds of kilometers per hour wind velocity could be the key to understanding how a 6-ton animal was flash-frozen.
This seems to be a 6000 cycle, with the 12000 cycle being the solar
micronova posited by the Ben Davidson whacking us at the same time.
Once again, we go back to the Great Pyramid and your hypothesis – all roads are leading to The Ethical Skeptic!
But here things might get more interesting: where do you think a monument to Betelgeuse would be constructed relative to the Great Pyramid?
The Pyramids are laid out on Orion’s Belt, obviously by design. Betelgeuse is allegedly going to supernova, but what if it isn’t? What if it micronovas as the galactic current sheet hits it? Assuming that the red shade and alleged deformation is a visual effect from the deformation of the light seen through a dust cloud, is Betelgeuse a precursor to our fate?
Was the monument to Betelgeuse perhaps in Heliopolis, now destroyed?
I don’t know, but I think the ancients are definitely trying to tell us what they saw coming. And they were advanced – I believe they had developed flight and satellite technology – the accuracy of the layouts of the pyramid complex, the measurements etc. are something our civilization could only think about when it reached space. It is reasonable to assume the same of them.
Your hypothesis explains the geographical as well as geomagnetic excursions, and with the galactic current sheet on the 12000-year cycle, it explains the catastrophic end of the last Ice Age. I don’t believe there was an Ice Age anymore, just different geographic pole positions.
Your hypothesis, with a 12000-year micronova, also explains the catastrophic demise of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and a frozen mammoth. Imagine all happening at once, pole shift, micronova and resultant solar forcing of the Van Allen Belt to lower altitudes so that the Belt “earths” in an unimaginable blast of energy. This would produce the energy required to vaporize the Ice Sheet, blasting massive chunks of ice, which land and make craters, as well as all the spherules claimed to be from cometary impact.
Humans have been around for 500 000 years. There is no way we spent 494 000 years in a cave and then one day thought: “Wouldn’t a city be nice”.
We’ve been here before, repeatedly, and you’ve explained how and why.
Lastly here’s a naughty thought: what if the theory of the Moon being unnatural or unnaturally where it is, is correct? Could a previous advanced civilization have placed it there to try and mitigate the pole flips?
Zookie,
Indeed the Betelgeuse thought is interesting. Or any number of cyclical candidates nearby.
But I have considered the possibility that the Moon was inserted into Earth’s orbit, early in Earth’s history. All that would be required is the right cascade of complex celestial mechanics inside the Oort Cloud, with a series of the right sized bodies directing each other gravitationally. The Moon then deposited all its ephemeral, low period elements/compounds (oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, water) and their isotopic ratios onto the surface of the Earth over time. These would have sputtered off the Moon and been bound to our binary orbit, eventually ‘raining’ onto the Earth over time. We still have the dust raining onto us each day even now. I touch on this in The Peculiar Schema of DNA Codon’s Second Letter.
Thanks!
TES
Hi TES
Thanks for the link, an intriguing article, thank you.
Using very amateur sleuthing, Helipolis looks like it would be in the location of Sirius relative to Orion’s belt. Teotihuacan and Xian are also laid out on Orion’s Belt, so the ancients may have had more than one monitoring station and warning to subsequent civilizations.
An interesting thought occurred to me, and one which I have begun to scratch at – we are told that the sphinx is a lion looking at Leo. Plausible, very plausible, BUT:
“The Egyptian word for “Anubis” is “Anpu” or “Inpu”. In ancient Egypt, the word “Anpu” meant “deterioration and death”. It is also signified darkness and black, and mystery.” According to Anubis – Origin Story, Powers, Symbols & Meanings – World History Edu
Therefore, I’m thinking that it would be more plausible that the sphinx is Anubis…
If sentient life did come here, they wouldn’t be deterred. Likely every planet has enough internal inbalance to behave in somewhat the same way.
I suspect there is a small minority of super-stable planets, of very high value – yes. Thereunder, a larger quantity of semi-stable planets used as vacation spots, gardens, research, and genetic farms. After that, more than likely a LOT of Jupiters and Neptunes out there.
So that in turn raises the question whether super planets like Jupiter with its 14 moons and the interacting gravitational fields might actually stabilize a planetary moon? I have no idea and don’t have the skills to work it out. But assuming it did, then the intelligent life in our solar system would live on Europa etc and use us as a farm.
It would provide a logical explanation for why a measuring device has been built (Khufu) to measure axis tilt and perhaps drive a predictability platform.
If the moon is put there to mitigate the oscillation of the earth it makes sense to build measuring devices which can survive the tempest(s)
Great question, Zookie,
Obviously I don’t hold the set of quals to answer that, and I suppose that we don’t have adequate information to support a consensus on the matter either. However, the differential nature between the core of the Earth and its outer rotational body provides some aspect of life-nurturing energy on this planet. It is no coincidence that the Cambrian Explosion occurred very shortly after the Earth’s core solidified.
Thus, the planets in the I. super-stable and II. semi-stable life-sustaining profile would need to have a solid HCP NiFe core which acts as a dynamo relative to an outer rotational Fe-based mantle as well. I also suspect that lighter elements like nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, etc. would need to be imported from deeper space, into the inner workings of a star-planetary system in order to provide the basis for advanced life.
Moons in the context you outlay, could be exotic-life crock pots, not supporting advanced life, but crafting some unprecedented forms of microbial life for more extreme environments.
TES
Hi TES
With the amount of effort and cost it took to build the Great Pyramid, the other pyramids were also built. The other two on Giza, and the complexes at Xian and Teotihuacan. All are laid out pretty much on Orion’s Belt.
The builders did not do this by chance, or because they thought it could look nice. Not when you are building such massive and costly structures. Everything on the plateau must be relevant and purpose.
My sense is that it is not just to measure the spin and to warn, but also to tell us the all-important “when”.
We have the 6 000-year window between spins, the more “impactful” 12 000-year window (possibly intertwined with a solar micronova or simply a more violent spin) and which we are due to go through.
How to work out the markers for the when is beyond me though.
On a second point, the existence of big salt deposits in the Sahara, Botswana, the Dead Sea, and the existence of the salty Aral and Caspian Seas tells me that massive continental uplift and dropping occurs, most likely due to the shifting of the LLVC’s underneath I would think.
I’ve been looking more closely at rock strata and your hypothesis actually explains what I see a lot better than what I read in the textbooks with the long slow progression of things.
Zook,
Yes, the mantle is viscoplasitc and takes time to reform into its oblate spheroid shape after a shift from either State 1 to State 2 or back. That is why we see the ancient receding shorelines in the Arabian desert back into the Persian Gulf.
Thanks for the Orion point and the kind words!
TES
Hi TES
A thought occurred to me after reading your interpretation of Pillar 43, which makes perfect sense by the way.
What if the Cygnus is the Giza overlay and not Orion? The pyramids seem to match the stars there and also some of the other structures’ positions seem to line up.
Perhaps Pillar 43 is not unrelated to Giza?
An increased risk of suicide is on the warning label of most, if not all, antidepressant drugs. And kids are being prescribed them as if they were perfectly harmless. Have you ever read Anatomy of an Epidemic by Robert Whitaker and if so, would you please create a post with your analysis?
Greetings, some days ago I tried making a map of how the world would appear after the “flipping” happens (see pic attached).
How would anyone be able to survive the ocean displacement? The only thing I can suggest is taking refuge in mountain areas above some hundred meters (this site might help finding the best place: https://www.floodmap.net/?ct=IT)… or in a bunker (maybe that was the purpose of the Derinkuyu underground city in Turkey?)
I wonder, would someone be able to make an accurate prediction of the new Koppen climate areas of the world? For example, Antarctica and Greenland will obviously become tropical areas, but will they more likely become deserts or jungles? How will the various regions differ from each other in terms of heat, precipitations, vegetation, etc.?
This is a nice map! I am part of a group which is doing analysis such as this. If you would like to join let me know.
Hi! I would be pleased, but unfortunately I know very little about climatology so I wouldn’t be able to provide useful input aside from obvious stuff like “Africa will become like Antarctica” and vice-versa; also, I’m still not sure whether the depicted state is supposed to become our “new normal” for the next millennia, or just be a temporary condition that will revert back to the original after just some decades… maybe TES can give us some clarification about this?
A good article. I confess to being a “true believer” in this Valentinian Gnosticism as written in the Tripartite Tractate of the Nag Hammadi. It is eminently reasonable, and tells of the fall of reason in pursuit of egoic power. I’ve spent the last 15 years studying the Tripartite Tractate, which is often skipped by gnostic seekers due to its arcane language and deeply philosophical / theological roots. This is an extraordinary ancient text that is completely at home in our modern world. Fortunately, my Ph.D. in Classical Rhetoric prepared me to understand this material. I do hope you drop in to either read or listen to my podcast at gnosticinsights.com or read me at Substack. My second book on the Tractate is about to be published and is titled “A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel of the Tripartite Tractate.” My goal is to demystify gnosticism to the point where anybody and I mean anybody can get the giist of it. The biggest stumbling block to sharing this knowledge isn’t its complexity, it’s exactly the dismissive mindset you have written about in this article.
I did not know that you were a Gnostic before I read this article. However, it is very informative. I personally had just thought you were being observant of Gnostic truths while maintaining epoche on whether or not you were a Gnostic or not.
TS, I have journeyed from complete suspension, to a suspicion, gradually over the last 15 years. So, your perceptions are all indeed correct. Intellectually, I am an ignostic atheist. This tends to blow everyone’s mind, and it takes too long to explain what an ignostic is… So I just say – that I divide my deliberation up into ‘Intellect-Empiricism-Deduction’ and ‘Educated Suspicion’ domains.
I have seen too much of the spirit world in action to be a Big-A Nihilist. That would be highly foolish. Through a study of darkness inside that domain, and observing first hand the seething envy they hold towards mankind, along with their abject fear of those who comprehend these things – some clues may be drawn.
ES
Oh, so you believe in spirits from experience, and therefore deduce that Gnosticism is true. What is the most primary belief you hold about Gnosticism that you think anyone learning about Gnosticism from a less informed perspective should know?
I have had some supernatural experiences occur in my life, so I suppose Gnosticism might have truth to it. I am just not sure what you are specifically implying. I do agree that Nihilism does not seem true, and that neither is Materialist Monism, its philosophical implication, a true belief system. As for Gnosticism, what about the Gnostic deity, Pistis Sophia? Who is that? How did her consciousness arise? Where do souls come from in Gnosticism? I am just wondering what you think about those topics. I saw in your loosh article that they apparently come from Source, but I wonder how that and your belief that the Demiurge runs this realm are compatible with Near Death Experiences and their collective deduction that this realm is a good place for which people plan out their lives peacefully. That seems contradictory from my personal perspective. Anyways, I’m interested in hearing your response.
You might enjoy this blog, with a Gnostic teaching every Sunday, based upon an understanding drawn from the Valentinian (yes, that Saint) teaching, The Tripartite Tractate, which is available online, but difficult to comprehend without context. https://cydropp.substack.com/p/aeons-or-aliens-angels-or-archons
Yes,
I have direct (did not seek it) experience with dark entities who cohabit this two-fold plane. Our world is filled with dark practices, in which we are mired – and one cannot get through life without participating in at least some of it. The key is not ‘sin.’ Demons are big on condemning sinning, sinners, and sin. That in no way makes them good entities, nor does it qualify them to re-enter Source.
The primary belief of Gnosticism (for me, not all Gnostics of course):
1. Mankind is captive under dark and desperate forces who pretended to be God.
2. Our suffering is a sustenance these forces consume.
3. We are no more valuable than cattle or dogs to these forces.
4. There are others who oppose this state of mankind. A promise was given to mankind in antiquity about this.
5. The dark forces’ rule of Earth has come to its end. They hold us hostage by means of our own nuclear weapons.
6. This formula has played out before, with other civilizations and is not a new issue, but rather part of an ongoing conflict.
7. These dark forces are losing this conflict and will take out their demonic wrath on mankind before they are expelled from Earth.
I do not hold a definition or name for what we wrongly call ‘God’, as I am not that competent. So I cannot comment upon that matter.
The dark forces do not hold the right to return to Source (a force and realm, not a person necessarily), only we hold that. The darkness will try and merge themselves, and us, into a single creature-recipe which serves to house their essence, but also allows them to recapture the right (we hold) to cross back to Source.
Source will not allow that and the end will come before they are successful.
If you know these things, from experience, the entities of darkness are terrified of you.
***shrug***
TES
Oh, okay. I personally question this belief of yours about Source because I thought I had a higher origin and could return to Heaven upon death instead of to a Source that seems based in terrestrial origins from the Earth’s spirit’s origins. Nonetheless, I think that transcending to a free state outside of the control of those who control this realm is a good thing people should have the right to do.
These are more placeholders. I cannot claim specific definitions about their true nature – as I only see the projections into our mundane realm. I don’t think there is anything I have estimated about Source which precludes what you suggest. I just don’t know…
Oh, okay. Sorry if I upset you.
No, not at all. :-) All good.
“The darkness will try and merge themselves, and us, into a single creature-recipe which serves to house their essence, but also allows them to recapture the right (we hold) to cross back to Source.”
Been following your work, Envy most recently, and a conjecture has just come to mind – is maybe this the intent behind the whole DNA warfare strategy? And their envy/hostility stems from the fact that, always, the pinnacle results of the intended merge-return experiments have gotten away with the gift from Source independently, to the rage of the fallen ones? and maybe those past, uplifted children, Sabbaoth or otherwise, are the ones that gave the redress promise to mankind in antiquity?
Conjectures all with a capital C, and I am unavoidably anthropomorphizing, but, being made in their likeness,suddenly motives, panic, and desperateness make sense. Or they would not be so blatantly advertising their wishes and plans a couple days ago in the Paris Olympic Games opening, among other things.
I resonate too much not to comment.
I presume you might enjoy hearing how I arrived at identical conclusions.
I learned about gnosticism only a week ago.
I struggled all my life making sense of undeniable mystical evidence in the context of the explanations I was offered; explanations that carried immoral baggage and a degree of confidence and attachment that in my eyes proved their inability to assess reality.
Spiritual experience including discovering how to get god to talk to me backed my theism from my early teens. I learned the level of faith required for physical action (miracles) is one where if the thing actually happens you wont even be surprised. I learned Jesus seemed secretly in conflict with the old testament but failed to convince adults many times.
In my 20s I ran into funny animated videos depicting bible scenes accurately but adding in the thought processes of a jealous wrathful petty god (darkmatter2525). I watched every one. It opened my eyes. Changed me. I kept my theism but dropped the bible and began seeking other truth. I didnt like listening to the god from my teens; every time I tuned in I was told to do things I didnt want to, I would feel bad after. Yet also some interactions were deeply positive full of love wisdom and alpha on life. I felt so confused… only today do I now realize there were two different headspaces / channels I was talking on. Only today do I realize I may have been wrongly assuming it was the same entity.
Back to the story. My frustration over the bible and government culminated in me constantly daydreaming a specific dream. *Middle school substitute teacher walks in* “class write down 30 words representing actions you think are evil; *waits* “ok now circle every one your goverment has willfully caused in black and your god has done or commanded others to do in red.” *brains melt* “ok now circle again in the same color if they have not yet formally apologized” Every uncircled word results in the child being directed to relevent wikipedia or bible quote.
I was obsessed with reprogramming my brain since I was a child. I explored different value systems. Got into buddism. Noticed it was oppressed by governments. Noticed the headspace resulted in better spirtual experiences; I now wonder if it was a different entity I was closer to. Trying to love without desire crossed a line for me so I switched to mild buddism but never forgot the feeling of sensing issues with chakras and opening them.
Now we arrive at today. I discover gnosticism and every felt spirtual contradition vanished. I read the texts from egypt attempting to distill what is unlikely to be fabricated by culture + assuming god exists + assuming church would supress and arrived at the same list from your comment. Only experiment I could think of was trying to speak to both and see how they make their case. Of course I am mindful that some or all instances of what appears to talking to god are delusion and this holds true even if a communicative god exists…but talking was my only available experiment. I figured headspace was key after recalling many spirtual experiences. First I tried the easy to reach headspace where the god of my teens spoke to me. I just got “I am the only god” on a loop refusing to answer any questions until I gave up. Seemed likely my own hallucination since I had just read the gnostic claim this was his first words. Next I figured if the gnostic texts were correct it would be difficult or impossible and match the headspace of source, mindful of an alleged barrier between realms akin to breaking out of a simulation. I interpreted these together to mean all chakras open then channel the space my mind occupies into a high frequency amplitude beam out of our universe. I chose beam because in prior “love everything simultaneously” meditation I struggle to hold volume. Chakras. Rapid special breathing. Physically content. Confident. Loving. Honest. Serenity. Cosmic. Beam. I stop breathing and also lose the desire to breath. Sophia? All in my head? Who cares im having fun and this is my first time meditating where my desire for oxygen stopped which felt cool and perhaps meaningful. I eventually ask: how do I get here when I die? I translate the answer to “live the same way you got here…Physically content. Confidently, Lovingly. Honestly. With serenity and a craving to be humbled by cosmic wonder”
The experience barely impacted my beliefs but was very memorable. Pretty darn freaky and trippy given the lack of drugs. If I can put together evidence backing a narrative the catholic church knew Jesus came for similar but different reasons and covered it up, It would increase my assessed odds of gnostisism being closest to the most important truth. This is my next lead. Even if gnostisim is correct why would I want to go to source in a hurry? Why not hang out in this universe longer? The texts make it sound like a one way trip.
How did you discern the dark entities in your experiences? Was it at the moment or was it post facto?
It was deductive inference, which is distinct from ex post facto, as all inference is post facto by definition.
I began life assuming that all humans lived reasonably pleasant lives and shared a common good will. However, as I undertook projects overseas, I came to realize three critical truths, and a condition:
The only scenario that elegantly accounts for all of this is the captive hypothesis — which also happens to be the most likely in terms of galactic reality. There is a conflict over us, and as we move forward, we must be keenly aware of this unfolding evolution.
TES
I wish you were able to share more of the embargoed you have seen and know while simultaneously feeling remorse (without contributing to the loosh for evil-doers) that it exists and you had to figure it out. Thanks for expending the time & energy trying to help us pierce “the veil”.
Thank You for these two essays, Sir Skeptic.
To address the latter first, I immediately wondered if the families of court members were threatened by concerned-parties, such as denizens of the deep state.
I appreciate your expositions on the nature of “the enemy”, “the prime huckster”, and the listing of some names, such as the “demiurge”.
Here, for your consideration, is a Valentinian (yes, that Saint) teaching, The Tripartite Tractate, from those Alexandrian texts saved in large pots for 2000(ish) years. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/tripart.htm
I sent a link to this post to Cyd Ropp, the blogger at Cyd’s Gnostic Newsletter https://cydropp.substack.com/ I have been enjoying her weekly output, and have purchased her book explaining the Tripartite Tractate, “A Simple Explanation of the Gnostic Gospel” ( “Simple”, ok, I know…)
Yes, to your point of “knowing” through experience, often the experience of testing false promises in one’s own life, and experiencing the consequences, and also Yes, to the direct knowing of Divine Guidance, when it is sincerely requested, then followed, and the consequences also noted…
(“Autoaufhaben”; “Pick up the car”? I missed something.)
Ahhh, I need to read that! I have read and transliterated most of the Nag Hammadi, but have not really read the commentary offered by later enthusiasts… :-)
aufheben means ‘pick up’ as in gambling, where in order to cancel your bet, you ‘pick it up’ – but the other synonyms are even more expository: cancel remove, repeal, annul, etc. It means ‘self-canceling’.
TES
Thank You, Again, Sir Skeptic. Got it.
I was explaining to a cousin-by-marriage, at a family reunion last weekend, your analysis of the erosion of the Great Pyramid at Cheops, and she got a funny recognition look. She apparently “listens” to you on some format, and was pre-impressed. I wrote down for her how to find this blog and that tripartite-treatise.
ahhhh! That is funny. :-)
The next logical question, dear TES,then becomes what is the petition process and the means of engaging the redress court. Given the actions of The One Trick Pony to obfuscate and hide behind recurring amnesiac episodes (I guess) of largely his own making, it stands to reason that collective awareness of our victim situation is certainly necessary and hopefully sufficient for its invocation to occur. This aligns with the desperate insanities of history and today, and with the first awareness of the situation in Eden being the true Original Sin, lest what had happened before, as per your transliteration of the Hypostasis texts, happen again, but with nowhere else to hide this time for our captors.
This is indeed my suspicion. I hate this answer, but it is where the deduction is pointing (not linear induction). It is not a religion, and you are free to disagree and form other reasoned notions. I am always fascinated to hear what others have learned or suspect. I suspect this drama has played out before for them; however this time, they have nowhere left to flee and will fight like a cornered rat.
What is an address for your transliteration of the Lord’s Prayer if I may please ask? I have a copy .doc, but would like to be able to refer folks to it electronically and I cannot recall which article’s comment section had it. I have been re-reading many articles and their comments thinking I might come across it again, but not so far. I do enjoy seeing again many of your insights. Thanks in advance.
Steve, it might have been this quick rendition (a couple tweaks from recent learnings) in a comment:
This is my version of Christ’s plea – had nothing to do with personal salvation from sin, and everything to do with a seditious overthrow of mankind’s captors:
My thoughts on its true meaning…
TES
During state 2 the seas are in different locations, and the plastic shape of the Earth is different. Yes, they go back to normal when the Earth returns to State 1 again and settles in.
Dear TES, I am thrilled by your theory, and am researching background information. I read the air shafts, aka, star shafts, don’t follow a linear path to the surface of the pyramid as is typically depicted in cross sectional illustrations. Could you please address the non-linear path of the shafts in your article, to help clarify your thinking on their purpose? I greatly appreciate you.
EDIT: I apologize, you did address it. You wrote, “These shafts are designed to monitor the nutation (wobble and wander) of the celestial north pole (see Exhibit K3 below). Since the North Shaft from the King’s Chamber makes a mid-shaft break to the west to avoid some structure (similar to the North Shaft from the Queen’s Chamber), it cannot be used for direct optical observation, as is often conjectured. Instead, this would be a monitoring device requiring termination at the pyramid’s surface, facing directly at the celestial north pole.”
Correct. These were cable runs, not optical, air, or sound, channels.
I’m not an expert whatsoever, and I couldn’t agree more with the rest of the article, but the cosmological aspect of the piece reads highly conspiratorial. It gives a suspicious agency to the universe where it purposefully lies to us. This would be fine if it came along with increased explanatory power, but it appears to just re-explain what is known, or contradict relatively strong empirical evidence re: Planck Time. What do you think of this critique?
You are correct Andrew, right now the observation dilation of Planck Time is a construct and not a true hypothesis. However, development of a construct and its maturing into a novel hypothesis is part of the scientific method – especially when the existing constructs have zero probative strength and elegance themselves. In other words, this is a problem with ALL current cosmological notions inside this domain.
In other words, when Ockham’s Razor contends “Plurality should not be posited without necessity” – that applies to the situation we are in. We have necessity to propose a novel idea.
… thus one cannot use this as a filter to a priori constrain thought.
TES
Thanks for the 9500 BCE night sky map clearly showing the crossing of the Great Rift and the ecliptic! This helps me visualize the crossroads encountered by souls passing between worlds, described in Plato’s Republic as “the ends of the chains of heaven…this light is the belt of heaven that holds together the circle of the universe like the undergirders of a trireme. From these ends is extended the Spindle of Necessity… on which all the revolutions [the ecliptic, for example] turn.” (tr. Jowett)
Do you consciously not mention what mystics like Madame Blavatsky, Rudolf Steiner, Gurdjieff, etc. have said? I am just wondering.
https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA180/English/AM1929/19171229p01.html
I am sure with your great intellect you can scientifically point out the truth or inadequacy of the mystics’ explanations.
very best
From Wind Whispers: Jumping off a cliff while holding your arms out does not mean that you have invented human flight.
Praespeculacy (from the Latin ‘prae-‘ meaning ‘before or in front of’ and ‘-speculum’ meaning ‘mirror’) – refers to a type of prophecy-like pronouncement about future events. It is characterized by a deceptive framing that suggests divine or supernatural origin, when in reality it is merely a re-framing of current events using different or spiritually-tinged language. Distinct from forecasting, which is based on making projections from current data and trends, praespeculacy employs a method of deception that engages the audience subconsciously through familiar circumstances. This familiarity is utilized to reinforce the perceived validity of the ‘prophecy,’ making it appear more credible or convincing.
Don’t conflate the appearance of doing the thing, with the actual doing of the thing.
Interesting how the FOL pattern geometry fits nicely with a simple Lagrangian L1-5 point model of harmonic balance of forces acting on bodies rotating around eachother all without worrying about complex maths……perhaps it’s just co-incidence that the L4/5points lie at 60degree angles that an equilateral triangle form between Earth/Sun, mimicking the Visca Pisces construction
Thank you for inspiring me to re-read Hamlet’s Mill.
TES, very compelling observations. Regarding the Sabu Disk, why not use humans as counterweights to raise the stones? Same machine, but with people instead of barrels of salt water? They’d lift a stone then walk back up stairs or a ladder. If there were a non-human energy source running the water pumps, like oxen or water wheels in a Nile diversion channel, I could understand how the pump would make construction more efficient in terms of work content. Otherwise it seems the compound pulleys were the key technology? Or perhaps advanced socioeconomic organization to mobilize such a large workforce.
Hey Deane thanks,
Yes, look at Exhibit C. Those are humans acting as counterweights (right hand side is duplicated on left but not shown). The water offsets the number of humans one has to use – because, you have to feed, house, train, clothe, and logistically support all those humans. Water you don’t have to do shit for… and it will work a 24 hour shift 365 days a year. The rhythm of the stone lifting, and its sync with the rhythm of the workpace of the overall pyramid is more important than the quickness of one theoretical lift of a block. The foreman would only be able to place so many hewn blocks per day. So outrunning that, would have no utility and present ‘bored armies’. In my national strategies for some African nations, bored armies were the #1 challenge.
Compound pulleys, yes. It takes about a year for a kid with a rope to figure out mechanical advantage on a tree branch or trunk. It takes about 5 years to figure out that if that tree surface rolls, the mechanical advantage is even better. It takes about 5 more years to figure out that two trees serve to compound that advantage. So the idea that they did not have pulleys, is rather ludicrous.
TES
Ahh, got it thank you, lifting blocks was not the bottleneck. The pump made sure each worker always had something productive to do. 4 gallons per minute lifted 25 feet only takes about 35 watts of power (for the heavier salt water), which one person can easily generate at a leisurely pace. So they wouldn’t need a crew of ten 125lb human counterweights “on call” when any nearby foreman was ready for another block, and no foreman would have to wait for an available lift crew. The pump made the number of persons needed to lift a block equal to the number needed to place it. Great point!
Exactly – the parties of ‘counterweight’ humans could even rotate around from machine to machine in that same rhythm. Not overworked, but not bored either – rather, ‘on standard’, as a systems engineer would call it. You are thinking as a systems engineer.
The disk was not the secret to building a pyramid, it was the Pharaoh’s (or whoever actually did this) secret for keeping his kingdom while he did it.
TES
I have a geology background and was always skeptical of what I was being taught. At one time there was a “catastrophic plate tectonics” theory where the formations we see resulted from the Genesis flood. It was tossed aside after modeling showed that the heat generated from the friction would have boiled off the oceans. Now, this was a “creationist” theory and I don’t know how robust the actual modeling was. But this is still a question I have, how much heat would be released?
TES, if there is a recurring cataclysm documented with physical evidence, ancient structures, myths and, possibly, ancient documents; is it logical to conclude that the leadership of the earth (whatever they call themselves) know about it and may even have an idea on the timing?
Mike,
I suspect they do have an idea on the timing, yes. The concerted effort to block any and all knowledge of this event, is telling. It is not ‘governments’, as those who are elected or appointed just simply have not had time to learn everything they need to know from the overlords. Plus, governments are appointed to manage welfare and laws for the workers. They are not there to manage the affairs of the Archons on Earth.
The key here is that most of those who operate inside a demonic hierarchy are unaware that they do so. They don’t know why they do what they do, they just follow orders, and receive compensation in a variety of forms. Once they pass on however, only one form of compensation will be left – and they are addicted to it by the time they die.
If they have a plan for the timing, I suspect outside agency also has a plan – and they are not fans of the Archons/Watchers. I could be wrong, but…
TES
So, I’d guess those competing plans might be what’s driving all the unrest we’re seeing across the world; competing factions trying to set the stage for the event and aftermath. Could the rush for mass migration be an attempt to setup one plan, or, more likely, to block a particular plan? It appears one faction wants to greatly reduce the population before this event occurs.
Mike,
I suspect that there are certain lineages they are enormously threatened by, yes. And they have been attempting to wipe them off the face of the Earth for some time now, by war, murder, pathogen, poisoning, catastrophe, lowered birth rate – all part of the unforgivable set of sins, a line they crossed long ago.
TES, this comment of yours makes me want to digress to a couple of your posts on original sin and recent reminders thereof by officialdom. And of events near ancient stones in forests and, my guess would be, pheomelanin and guanine-heavy regions! I hope you someday expand on these articles too.
Perhaps they’re preparing society for what’s to come without yet revealing the event, knowing the chaos that would result. If this is true, that would answer at least some questions.
Why do they want us eating bugs? Crickets and other insects are animal protein that can be raised without sunlight and without a planet surface free of radiation.
Why block out sunlight by spraying the atmosphere? Is it to mitigate radiation effects from a weak or non-existant magnetic field? Or to force adaptation to what they foresee as a colder and darker world?
When they talk about the planet not being able to handle human agriculture, they’re actually refering to what the expect the planet to be like post event.
TES, Two thoughts that have come to me recently that correspond to my also recent awareness of your phenomenal and penetrating theory. First I came upon a timeline “Global Cycles – The Global Consciousness Program” that you may already be aware but wanted to provide in any case. It comes from Human Design and its developer Ra Uru Hu. https://www.jovianarchive.com/Stories/52/Global_Cycles
Curiously the next cycle is the Cross of the Sleeping Phoenix which begins in 2027. The previous age which shared this name began in 4565 BC and ended in 4154. The one previous to that sharing the same name again began in 11157 BC and ended in 10746 BC.
The second thought derives from the reading of “The Prophet’s Way” (2004) by Thom Hartman, his work with the charitable organization Salem, and the global locations of their worldwide reinforced concrete schools for children also curiously located out of harms way according to your theory. Several (4) references in the book relate to pole shift/cataclysm and the need to take precautionary measures.
Two questions: 1. Is there any awareness of when our solar system crosses the Milky Way galactic (ecliptic) plane? or when it reaches the its apogee/perigee? 2. How does central Africa sustain its significant biodiversity under Stage 2 planetary configuration located at the new North Pole under proposed global cooler conditions that exist under the current State 1? Looking forward to your next installment on this most fascinating work. A Thousand Thanks!
Thanks for the references to The Global Consciousness Program, watermark…
In answer to your questions:
1. I don’t think we have the stellar mapping sufficient to determine the true plane of the Milky Way Galaxy, or our location relative to it. The cycles there are far longer than the cycles we are talking about (4 to 6,000 years)
2. Remember that Africa is not the peak of biodiversity. It is biodiverse in large mobile fauna, but not other species. These were protected in that the oceans did not cover all of Africa during the rotations. These are also animals that migrate to avoid harsh conditions. They migrate between south Asia and Africa. We don’t see that now because of the Sahara desert (fairly new). The peaks in biodiversity by far (1,000 x more diverse in genetics, especially), are at Euler Points 1 and 2.
TES
Hi!
Thought you might find this paper & broader topic interesting:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645795/
It’s further empirical research on & conclusive support of “snake detection theory”. It also potentially links the oldest ever abstract representation/art our species has ever made to a visual representation of venomous snake scales. It’s dated at 74kya from Blombos Cave, South Africa.
Honestly? My own speculative theory is that snakes go really, really deep. And that our multi-million year “war” against them as mammals/primates/hominids/sapiens has been deeply imprinted on our evolutionary psyche. So much so that it may have been the genesis of all snake symbology/myth (or all symbology/myth for that matter).
Hopefully you find this interesting!
– J.
Wow, interesting studies on infants and those threat pattern motifs… Thanks Joshua!
Reminds me of John Archibald Wheeler’s “it from bit” interpretation of quantum mechanics. According to the theory, we are playing “20 questions” with the universe where each quantum observation is a “question” that the universe “answers” with an experimental result that is consistent with all previous results. The universe doesn’t actually “know” the ultimate object; it just keeps making up answers to maintain a consistent story. We therefore “generate” reality by our act of observing it.
Here is his paper if you want to read more, not too long and relatively light on math:
https://philpapers.org/archive/WHEIPQ.pdf
Patrick,
I love it! Thanks.
TES
1) It’s not simply academics protecting a historical narrative. The WEF does not care about the decades old dissertations, reputations or pet theories of academics, look how readily they discarded dozens of well-respected scientists during the COVID years.
2) So too the WEF does not care about Turkey, its people nor its government. Look how readily they discarded millions of lives with COVID. The Turkish people are cattle to them.
3) Ultimately the WEF does not care about NATO. Otherwise it would not fund NATOs “enemies” as freely as its allies. It would not take American avionic secrets and sell them to BRICs. Russia is not the enemy of the WEF…it’s owners are the people who performed the Russian revolution, killed 60,000,000 Slavs and took private ownership of its resources after the wall fell. This is a game played by a handful of banks. Not billionaires, not neocons, not communists, not Christians, not Atheists, not Russians, not Chinese, not Jews and not Arabs. Forget the labels, these are artifacts of division. There is only us vs the few.
Look at who runs the WEF, then realize they have a PERSONAL STAKE in obfuscating this Younger Dryas site. Personal. As in, a familial concern somehow still relevant nearly 13,000 years later.
The beauty of their desperate concealment of this site and the dozens of similar sites in Turkey is that it serves as a valuable puzzle piece in rationally unpacking the history of these few families.
The world fell.
A few survived, bringing domesticated species with them.
With numbers too small to rebuild, they chose a small group with whom to interbreed, backcross and indoctrinate. They labelled themselves gods to the simpler folk they dominated.
After raising numbers for centuries and chipping ancestral memories into the stones of the Tepes, they built a city (Catalhyuk)
They built a corporation/religion with every trait of a modern optimized cult. From a heavily handicapped language to insane lists of meaningless rules.
They invented a unifying egregore based on global conquest, then later paired it with a metanarrative and “personal god” mass-parallelized tulpa in order to similarly indoctrinate the masses outside of their pet cult.
You remarked in a prior article the similarities between the WEF logo and Mt. Harmon. Take the story in their propagandistic literature seriously.
If you want to see something wild, find James Mellaarts book concerning his teams excavations at Catalhyuk in the 1970s. It’s on archive sites intact but virtually completely scrubbed elsewhere with PDFs substituted with a poorly done hitpiece called “the goddess of anatolia”. His excavation was backed by ALL the major archeological institutions from the Royal Society to Smithsonian to Tel Aviv, then his reputation was systematically destroyed. In his photographs of 9,000 year old paintings you will find symbols and imagery predating their supposed origins by 6,000 years or more. From crosses to stars of david to astrological imagery we are told appeared in babylon millennia later. He observes skeletal phenotypes of proto-mediterraneans and “something” else. Furthermore he notes with surprise the sudden appearance of myriad domesticated crops and animals.
This thing is very, very old. TES you have done a wonderful job uncovering many of the pieces. There are hints that you suspect much more than you claim, which is a testament to your unfailing allegiance to facts over speculation.
Well framed and stated, Orb. Yes, there is more I know and suspect, than I am willing to offer in this blog, or even to persons in my life.
What I have found in the interviews with media executives interested in this material thus far, is that while they cite the need for “rigorous epistemological soundness” (and of course I wholeheartedly agree – and cite the science must provide this, not one mere man…) – their real interest and passion is invested in the conjecture… they devour and love it…
This is the little game we all play as humans. LOL!!
EVG
TES
Are there no scientists mature enough to deal with the “existentially upsetting” implications? I would appreciate an understanding of the actual ground truth of my life and what – perhaps – I need to consider and prepare for – so any links would be greatly appreciated.
My hypothesis on this (not a claim) – is summarized in three articles, all linked inside this synopsis.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/05/23/master-exothermic-core-mantle-decoupling-dzhanibekov-oscillation-theory/
Thanks for reading, Olga!
TES
Well – For a former pot-smoking art major that was a bit of a slog – but I got through it.
So – the proverbial “they” are not acknowledging that the oceans are warming from the bottom – probably due to it being step one in a cascading series of events that ends with some pretty dark, miserable times – for the lucky? Unlucky? The powerful people who escape to their DUMBs?
I could head for an appropriate elevation and hope for the best but I suspect I will sit tight and play with the grandkids while reading esoteric blogs that no one around me would appreciate.
The existing technology does suggest that the “rebuilding” on the flip side will perhaps go a bit quicker than in past incarnations – I’ve no doubt someone, somewhere has a plan – until they get punched in the mouth.
I started following you on “X” and have just recently discovered your blog – I look forward to seeing where you go next.
Olga,
“play with the grandkids while reading esoteric blogs that no one around me would appreciate.” :-) LOL!!
The last flood was used to wipe out some pretty nasty vermin/chimera. This well may finish the job. We may well be set free this time.
TES
I really enjoy the wisdom contained in these articles, but the language is as dense as Jordan Peterson’s Maps of Meaning – Jordan is very proud, but everyone else complains that it’s unreadable. I have to use ChatGPT to simplify the language in order to assimilate the knowledge. Even then, from just the first sentence I get: “There is no widely recognized concept in Earth sciences known as the “Indigo Point”. It could be a misinterpretation or a metaphorical term, but it is not a standard term in the scientific literature.”. It takes me days to go through an article like this one due to the dense writing.
It would be fantastic if someone could edit this content into simple English.
Perhaps your version of ChatGPT missed that an ‘Indigo Point’ is a principle I use in systems theory, not Earth sciences. The article even quotes: “Points Indigo and Tau are inflection and tipping points that I often utilize when analyzing strategies, campaigns, problems, or deceptions. The Indigo Point is a critical juncture where plans are quietly set in motion, potentially irrevocably, steering towards a predetermined Tau strike point.” That is an essential, as well as clear and simple, statement that your ChatGPT missed. There are over 100 details in this theory, just like that, which are critical in order to both understand and comprehend the hypothesis itself.
Of course, if the hypothesis was ‘2+2 and the sky is blue’ easy, everyone would have already figured it out long ago. Nonetheless, I placed it into a very straightforward synopsis, which can be accessed here: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/05/23/master-exothermic-core-mantle-decoupling-dzhanibekov-oscillation-theory/
Perhaps it missed that critical statement defining what an Indigo point was, because ChatGPT was operating under what is called a ‘high and low’ fallacy. There’s a ton of essential detail in the material, so it did not bother to pull it – then missed an absolutely essential facet of the critical logic which subsequently prevented it from comprehending the material in the first place.
ChatGPT cannot have it high and low at the same time. Either the hypothesis has to describe itself accurately (it cannot start with a summary, those come later, as in the article I linked above), or it can entertain with familiar and easy to understand (but wrong) principles.
Just so you know, I submit each and every paragraph I compose to ChatGPT and have it critique clarity and flow, and make recommend changes. It told me that the essay was “well structured, insightful, clear, and groundbreaking.”
It was able to describe the theory back to me well and accurately, just like thousands of other persons have done.
TES
Dear TES,
Thank you for your reply.
You have showed me how uneducated I am. Even with my background in mathematics, I didn’t come across Simpson’s Paradox before you mentioned it. I never even knew there exists a discipline called “systems theory”. You clearly have a good understanding of statistics, geology, oceanography, seafaring and physics. Would you be so kind as to recommend any books that have helped you reach your level of understanding? This would help not only me, but also my kids, for whom I’m currently in the process of developing and education programme.
Minute, great question…
My fave books in this regard are (texts from undergrad and grad school – except “Piloting” was the Navy and Annapolis Sailing School):
Kip Thorne’s, “Black Holes & Time Warps”,
Madsen’s, “Statistical Concepts with Applications to Business and Economics”
Ohring’s, “Materials Science of Thin Films”
Jones, “Principles and Prevention of Erosion”
Maloney, “Chapman’s Piloting”
Thurner, “Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems”
and of course
Whitman, Poe, and Emerson… which ponder the mystery of “why”
:-)
TES
I still have Sailing, Piloting, abd Celestial Navigation. I have feeling I need to look for a second-hand sextant…but I have feeling the Star Charts will need fixing…
“You clearly have a good understanding of statistics, geology, oceanography, seafaring and physics.”
My girlfriend suggests TES must be a group of people. Please take that as a compliment.
I like to cling to the delusion that it isn’t too far away that Erdogan frees Tϋrkiye from the shackles of NATO/EU/WEF and moves to BRICS. That then should only leave Ferret (intentional) Sahenk, the billionaire, as a road block : presumably he can be purchased for shekels.
On another note I have been pondering the comparative merits of the Enki ‘spaceship’ disk design versus a truss spar. (How Do Spars Work? | Rigzone))
No topsides, properly ballasted with provisions such that it remains just below/at the water line until deemed safe to be above the waterline. Both with a gimballed inner spherical pod to help even out the turbulence. Either way, better take a night class in welding and more importantly, apologise for getting off topic.
stay frosty all,
Flange
I almost didn’t look today. Unassuming title…
How do you do this, Sir Skeptic?
I have some ruminating meditations on bike rides after dredging the internet for hours, but this is orders of magnitude beyond those musings…
I discovered in first grade that I had a talent for fabricating statements in my own favor to adults. It served pretty well (it seemed) until third or fourth grade, when I could tell that it was clearly breaking down, not merely from closer adult observation, but more from reality, itself. I began the path back to truthful rigor, but it still took over a decade, perhaps a decade and a half to be fully truthful to myself.
I never suspected that Red-Shift would be affected… WTF! :-o
I read Magicians of the Gods, by Graham Hancock, about Gobeki Tepe, by Graham Hancock, perhaps a fleeting decade ago. Yeah, it doesn’t fit the narrative, but better fits a recurring-catastrophe narrative, like the earth flipping its rotational axis every 12,000 years or so… Crazy Stuff!
Thanks again.
You characterized the post flip world (soon to arrive?) as a “hell world”. That has been bothering my bike-ride musings somewhat for the past couple of weeks, or whatever it has been. Why a “hell world”, Brother Skeptic? It’s noting new, right?
Are we not in a unique position to do good? I wonder how far up Texas the Gulf of Mexico would likely slosh, myself… I can see that its a big physics model, and one has to know what the new axis will be, and what the rate of rotational shift into that new axis will be, and the driving of Texas in a south-westerly direction underneath the waters of the gulf will be at a certain rate, and the gulf will partly comply, and partly seek to continue it’s prior trajectory. One would expect Houston and Lake Charles to go under, but one would wonder a bit more about San Antonio and Austin. Would Dallas and Fort Worth, fairly far inland, stay dry? Alpine, Texas is far west and at altitude. Safe? El Paso should be spared, right?
Interminable pondering for me, as I have only my own internal and very simple visualization model…
As the current hypothesis goes, State 2 is a gyroscopic equilibrium, so it would not be locked to the core like the magnetically-bound State 1. There would be some wandering of the rotational pole for a while, all the while, heavy seas (pyramid average was Sea State 8) for a long time. The tectonic activity would send us into a planetary winter for decades – probably why they miss this in the ice cores and just identify it as a ‘volcanic’ period and a ‘geomagnetic excursion’. Cold, dark, wet, stormy, and starving (from lack of agriculture and loss of fauna).
But yes, this is nothing new. This is perhaps the best rationale as to why our planet did not harbor advanced life for 800 million years. It was not suitable for anything other than a DNA-farm.
The implication being – what if it is still unsuitable, and we are not really supposed to be here?
EVG-bro!!
TES
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. That seems like a “heck world” at any rate. I searched for a meaning for “EVG”, found 6, and none of them seemed to apply.
Well, we (“advanced life”?) ARE here, and it is the nature of many of us, certainly yourself, to seek “meaning”, or “better models”, and there is an inherently-implied value-system of societal/species/life-form benefit being “valued”, so I will press-on that it is not “about” our projections of how we would perceive existence in such a world, fleeting as it might be, but what gifts we could provide to future generations, BIC-lighters, stainless steel knives, propane tanks, books, greenhouses, good wells with windmill drive…
I do seek to help planetary life-forms traverse the further genetic-bottlenecks, cullings, IQ-tests, etc. I see the “best” role for our species as being “Stewards of Planetary Life”, as I like to put it. Our “owners” have a different perspective which involves their maintenance of primacy, but it’s problematic for them, as well as for us, as they are apex-predators-in-excess, and will be in great-excess following any catastrophe. I think they are already sharpening knives for each other, and it won’t be friendly in their bunker-world.
Yours in Service.
John
Ah thanks John!
EVG = epoché vanguards gnosis
Functions at both an intellectual and spiritual level. Subtle epistemic truths begin to emerge, while spiritual truth truths trust your terrain well enough to express. Best guess I can give it. (*shrug)…
My avatar is Usir (Osiris). The Lord of Silence. Knowing when to draw inference, and when to remain silent (epoché) – is the key to fortress wisdom. Hence the tag line of ethical skepticism: “𝙚𝙥𝙤𝙘𝙝𝙚́ 𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙨 𝙜𝙣𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙨”
It takes me almost 5 hours to mow my grounds here with the 50 trees (mostly my plantings) and all the edging around them, and I just put in another hour, so I reflected a bit.
The area of North America with the archaeologic evidence of longest continuous human habitation (8800 to 13,000 years) is Spring Lake, near San Marcos, Texas, currently the biggest construction-boom area in Texas or the US, depending on the month: https://www.springlakearchaeology.txst.edu/archaeology-of-spring-lake/prehistory.html
The elevation, however, is only 570 ft. and the distance to the Gulf of Mexico is about 120 miles.
The ghost town of Edith, Texas, about 400 miles from the gulf, and elevation almost 2000 ft has a natural limestone spring… It’s about 8 miles from the county seat, Robert (E) Lee, pop. 1000, and there is a reservoir nearby.
Long term water always comes first, after avoiding an initial catastrophe…
Hundreds of years, is the transition period you have described.
John, what does it matter if some texas cities survive? How long would any city be habitable without a supply chain??? Ponder that while you mow your lawn. Human population will be 95% reduced because of that dependance on supply chains. Survivors will be random, scattered creatures. I wouldn’t want to be one of them.
That’s not quite the way I was looking at it. I was looking at humans being able to survive in a place for hundreds of years, assuming something like the 95% population reduction you mention. I do ponder that while I mow the acre, and on bike rides, and as I lie awake before and after sleeping.
Why do you think “survivors will be random”? You may not really be “working the problem” as one might say.
If you are sure you would not want to survive, that is your decision. Have you considered how you might prefer to die in that scenario, and how you would not want to die.
John, we’re talking about the earth’s surface peeling off the inner core and moving 10,000 km or more, rapidly. What building is designed to withstand even a fraction of those forces??? None. What roads, bridges, railroads, ports or other infrastructure would remain? It’s not just flood waters that are the challenge here. The ground would be torn apart, hot lava/ash, dust, wind, fires. There’s no predicting where that would be less or more bad.
Survivors would be people who are not in buildings or underground structures. They would be outside somewhere, lucky that a mountain didn’t fall on them. Or hurricane force winds didn’t hit them with something. Now they would have to find food and water without the help of bic lighters or diesel fuel, trucked in seeds or fertilizers. Interesting problem, isn’t it???
My best odds would be for people already living a primitive lifestyle, with no reliance on modern conveniences.
Yes, I agree with the line of reasoning you take, but this appears to be a thing which has happened before, periodically, so there are ways to prepare, as you have started to consider. We have a rural (Yoakum, pop. 6k) place in the Texas coastal plains, about 70 miles in from the coast, with a large garden and fruit trees, with natural gas wells nearby, and a railroad and HEB (Texas chain) grocery store. I’ve designed and built (a fair amount myself) a house there in the past few years, but it is a poor prep for this situation, should it come to pass in my lifetime.
It’s interesting that opposition to the regime is being driven to Florida, Texas, Costa Rica and El Salvadore while WEF-owned billionaires are buying up high altitude land. Also interesting the testing the military was doing a few short years ago with conventional charges in the Atlantic off Florida being used to measure the effect on shore. There is little strategic need for larger nukes in nation-state level conflicts, but that isn’t to say there is no practical application (or black budget, or infrastructure) for higher megaton weapons used to simulate natural disasters (ideally a yield>radiation device akin to the inverse of a proton bomb preventing the irradiation of useful sea & land). It’s unlikely but possible that talk of impacts from the Taurid belt or pole shifts have been bolstered or even seeded by the very actors who anticipate the need to mask an artificial disaster with a naturalistic explanation. If so it may be a backup plan laid in the hopes it will not be necessary, sort of like how 3 World Wars were planned in the 1880s to meet particular objectives, but if control can be consolidated with a mere two global conflicts then any resistance will be usefully fixated on a massive war that will never arrive. Rather the slow boot of tyranny will crush human freedom with nary a whimper.
Perhaps a 400 megaton device sits in the Atlantic at this very moment, to be set off if key nations abruptly turn on the central banks. Every navy obliterated, every airforce neutralized with deliberately crippled forces comprised of man-piloted, antiquated, non-ai low-G aircraft and limited fuel reserves to sustain relentless waves of more agile drones. A handful of low orbit corporate sats explode, seeding a debris field and destroying existing satellite infrastructure while backdoor equipped programs (in the spirit of “PROMIS”) neutralize potential threats in well-protected bases, crippling the heavily centralized coordination capability of both NATO and BRICS. A hundred million AI-equipped drones then emerge from holes in the ground and enact the new order. All of this is well within the capability of the WEF, and the deep allegiance many members of its pet cult hold would preempt either superpower from detecting it. Also at the very least the Western intelligence apparatus has been functionally dominated by the ethnic cult since the OSS days, and we know the CCP is the result of the native Chinese communism party losing to the Bolshevik backed interlopers in a pretty vicious war…so who knows what really leads them. Wild speculation to be sure, but in a world of censors and captive science speculation is one of our only tools.
It’s also occurred to me that given the likely links between electromagnetic qualities of the magnetosphere/ionosphere and the probability of impacts our much-denied but laughably visible geoengineering programs may serve a more insidious function than depriving us of vital sunlight in order to increase chronic disease: Perhaps they are drawing them in. If so this begs the question of what exactly happened to trigger the Younger Dryas? We assume naturalistic explanations for previous civilization-ending events, but the faux blame the WEF vermin place on serfs for environmental disasters/wars of their own making and the “the gods were angry with uppity humans” guilt-based mythologies seeded in our ancestors have a lot in common. Perhaps humanity is beset by a perennial parasite, generating massive calamities every time we rise to the cusp of escaping our gravity well. Casting blame on us for it’s failings and taking credit for our victories. Do we REALLY know what persecutes us? Is it even (still) human?
When Omicron arrived (and your very good article with it), I said that it was the “free range vaccine”, because of its high transmission rate and low mortality, compared to the Delta COVID that went through my household in that same winter solstice 2021-2022(treated with ivermectin-cocktail to good effect).
Omicron did not bind strongly to ACE-2 expressing cells in blood vessels, lungs, etc and did not have an effective Furin Cleavage Site (but rather an ineffective one), so pathogenicity was reduced to the “common cold” coronavirus realm. Hallelujah! https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01449-w
Delta was horrid. Hit our entire family hard. None of us have ever been that sick before. Two extended family members in the hospital for weeks. Eliquis was a god send for my sister in law with the coagulation issues from Delta. We were denied access to ivermectin. “Go home and sleep it off, you should have gotten the vaccine.” That doctor needs to be decertified.
Omicron was three days of 99.5 fever and a slight cough.
In the old days we would have already known that Omicron was an entirely different and long-extant coronavirus. But not under our current darkness.
TES
I have included the closing excerpt from and the link to this post in the blog post I just sent out. https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/the-fundamental-reason
Delta recurred after stopping ivermectin 5 day course after 2 days asymptomatic, for a 2 week purgatory phase, despite resuming treatment. 2 family members who got significantly ill before getting ivermectin, had short hospital stays.
Interesting but I think I and my family had what Dr Michael Levitt called “pre-immunity” to covid because we never got anything until Omicron in mid to late 2022. Nothing since. I guess your family didn’t have that.
Your family probably caught the proto-Covid version of Omicron somewhere in 2018/19 and gained the necessary antibodies to stave off Wuhan-Alpha-Delta, much as Asian communities had the good fortune to experience. However, most HCoV’s mutate to a new infection cycle every 4 to 6 years. So when that strain you had in 2018 mutated, you caught it again. But again, Omicron was a separate/milder form of HCoV from W-A-D (although very closely related).
I wrote the original hypothesis and article on Covid pre-immunity here (and caught hell for it): https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/11/15/chinas-ccp-concealed-sars-cov-2-presence-in-china-as-far-back-as-march-2018/
TES
Thanks I’ll give that a read.
Fascinating insights! I’ll take it you’re familiar with Chris Dunns’ hypothesis. The air shafts are 21cm in diameter which corresponds with the hydrogen line. The vitrification of the interior of the kings chamber and potential for high energy exitement of this gas pose some other questions. The grand gallery also adding to the mix. I always wondered if this structure was somehow part of a damping/feedback mechanism to control the earths speed of rotaion and angle to the ecliptic. The alluded to date of contsruction also aligns approx with the start of the holocene.
Yes, you have to watch out for medical practitioners who say, let me just do this. My insurance made me get retroactive approval for retina surgury that was already done on an emergency basis. The doctor tried and tried to offer me an examination, when all I needed was the approval. I finally caved and let her listen to my chest. And so I got a bill for a medical exam that I didn’t need.
Live and learn.
There are many of us who are neither experts, mavens, or otherwise, yet still have been able to sense who is acting as such. Perhaps there is also a kind of wisdom in some of the unwashed masses, too.
The “At-risk Stakeholder” – because, if a person is not at risk (no skin in the game) – and insists upon making noise on behalf of/canceling out the voice of those who are at risk, they are part of an echo chamber. Still, a very good point. (thumbs)….
This hustle-chain you describe is one of the inefficiency-costs of stacked layers of complexity (h/t Tainter), such as our bureaucracies and hierarchies, isn’t it? :-(
Highly inflationary, yes. And as market deceptions/up-spins increase, the rate of inflation increases in direct proportion. I saw this all across Africa and the Middle East.
Those were iron poles stuck up the shafts during a previous exploration. I wish they were the copper cables, but sadly they are not.
Lighted Way Ministries | Home lightedway.org follows the movements of the celestial bodies. Everywhere on Earth the “zodiac” signs are assigned the same meaning, Virgo, virgin, the words are different, but the meaning is the same, why? Sagittarius looks nothing like an archer in my eyes. Michael Rood has interesting info as well. The 70 week prophesy of Daniel and 70 week ministry of Yashua (jesus). I enjoy your writings TES. The fact the new moon is shown in it signifies the beginning of the month, if it was the first day of the biblical month it would be the day of Announcements, trumpets. The feasts of YHWH Yehova still portend events. As Israel was made a nation on the day of Pentecost, the count of 50 in 1948 as Isiah indicated would happen a nation created in a day, impossible. The change of the Biblical calendar from YHWH way of counting to the computer generated in advance calendar, made everyone miss it. Nehemiah Gorgon has interesting stuff. I lived 10 miles from the Los Lunas Mystery stone mentioned. Not mentioned is a few miles north in the petroglyph area off 98th there are more Paleo Hebrew writings. Sadly the last time we hiked out to the stone morons had poured oil or something on it. It is near the rio Puerco. Some of the copper found from the Temple came from CT USA. I think the fact the ancients were boating all over is clear. I also think they had the ability to fly from Egypt to Peru where there’s another Pyramid complex. “Mysteries of forgotten Worlds” shows a Nazca lines that looks like an airport and runway. Puma Punku has H building I think poured in place, simulated rock as with the largest blocks of the Giza Pyramid “The Pyramids an Enigma Solved” and electricity ” The Giza Powerplant”. My books are boxed up, I have forgotten some of the authors. We’re building a house in TX and my office/ library is… incomplete (disaster) I think we are now approaching the level of technology they had that was lost.
Give it a rest, buddy. Your cryptic comments all over the blog are NOT appreciated. We all recognize this as an attempt to deceive.
Argmax,
Thank you. I keep tabs on Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson’s work and have yet to reconcile the two broader approaches. However, I am under no illusion that our geological history is simple – and hold out the possibility of a chain of events or multiple events.
The issue is, that we are ignorant on all this because our academic institutions desired us to be so. That age of arrogance has ended. Now I hope that these observations will begin to coalesce into an actual history of Earth and mankind. One no longer ruled by dark intent behind the scenes, which lies at every opportunity.
TES
New video by Ben Davidson details his predicted new north and south poles:
I must add that Ben has become aware of this work you have done and cites it in this video update. You have impressed him.
Yes, I saw that!
precession
https://youtu.be/kLfoy5V7CRE?si=DuRbqsNE3sTxQ2ye
Certain keywords in my comment threads have attracted the ‘Birkeland Current’ shills.
In some ways one has to support them. Anyone who thinks there can be some funky non-gravitational force that keeps two stars physically bound to each other despite an 8.6 light year separation is pretty much a lost cause. :-/
Hi ES, my principal concern is where all the water is coming from if not from Ice ? Would it be displaced water from other parts of the globe? Certain parts of the globe would see sea water level fall and others rise ? Also, the timing seems to coincide with the end of the last alleged Ice Age and begining of the interglacial era we are supposedly currently in. That all made sense to me looking and pondering at the geography here in Canada, where we had an inland meltwater (mer de Champlain) sea that slowly dried out to become rivers and lakes. So my question would be, wouldnt the earth tipping cancel the ice age, melting out the ice buildup in North-America and Antartica by bringing them closer to the sun/equator? Also, could the flooding in Egypt and north Africa be caused mainly simply by the rising and lowering of the earths crust ? Thanks.
This is oceanic displacement, not ‘flood’ per se.
Thank you for your answer and sorry for the imprecisions, english is not my first language and I have very basic knowledge in physics. Certain parts of the globe that were under sea level were freed from water and other parts that were above sea level were inundated ? Similarly to tides ? Do you have any explanation as to why egypt/ north africa in particuliar would be at the receiving end of the all that water ? Which regions would have a low tide (if we can call it that) ?. Thanks
Matt, excellent English. No apologies necessary. I studied Latin, so I am way behind you…
Yes, certain parts of the ocean bottom under this hypothesis, would emerge, while the ocean would inundate other areas. The unknown in this is the plasticity of the asthenoshphere. Some of the ‘flood’ marks I have seen with my own eyes, have retreated slowly over time. So, the hypothesis does not have a mechanism yet for every detail. That will come. As is most of reality, it is complex, and our simple answers have to mature to begin to describe it.
TES
High energy source
Anthony L. Peratt
https://www.plasmacosmology.net/peratt.html
IEE transactions
https://www.plasmacosmology.net/Characteristics-for-the-Occurrence-of-a-HighCurrent-ZPinch-Aurora-as-Recorded-in-Antiquity-squatter-squatting-man-Anthony-Peratt.pdf
Thanks! Love this article.
With regard to dissolution of limestone by the high sea level, did you look at signs of this in other pyramids, eg. Red pyramid, Bent and Step? Although I haven’t checked if Tura limestone was used in these.
Yes, these pyramids did not contain the internal design of Khufu (save for a gallery-like structure of lower sophistication in the Red Pyramid). Nor do these other later pyramids contain the technological and society sophistication. None have a star map which dates to 9200-9600 bce. So, I have to conclude that they were mere later imitations of Khufu and Khafre. The second article deals with the errant dating of Khufu. We create this paradox by the bad assumption that these were built in 2540 bce by Khufu and Khafre.
I believe the heat source for your article is the sun. The only energy source that matters to earth.
What are the changing speeds of other planets, moons in our solar system? Must be a common cause.
The sun is connected electrically to all planets in the solar system. All magnetic fields are caused by an electric field. There is no empty space. It’s filled with plasma (electric charged particles).
The electric force is 10^36 greater than gravity.
The suppressed electric universe model is your answer.
I have been wondering exactly what mechanisms can heat up the interior of our planet. i know that normally speaking we are talking about microwaves & infrared providing the brunt of any radiation that would excite it but I am beginning to think neutrinos could play an unsuspected role as well especially if they were in a significant density and strength from a solar or extra solar source. I am aware they do not interact strongly or regularly with matter under normal circumstances I just wonder what that density and intensity would have to be to cause a significant effect inside our planet where the densities, pressures and temperatures are incredibly high?
The sun has not changed enough to explain climate change. The heat is arriving in the abyssal oceans first. The core carries LATENT heat in the form of hexagonal closepack iron. When that bravais leaves the H-layer boundary (sloughing), it converts to face centered cubic or body centered cubic, and releases unimaginable amounts of heat. It is the ONLY source which can account for what we observe. When the core regains its strength and accretes mass, we go into a cold cycle.
TES
Both the Creative Society and Ben Davidson bring strong evidences that important changes have been observed recently on other planets of our solar system. (see CS Climate Report p 57 to 66 for a list of observations and references – https://be.creativesociety.com/storage/file-manager/climate-model-report-a4/en/Climate%20Report.pdf).
These evidences suggest that a common mechanism triggers all this changes at the level of our solar system.
I find this completly compatible with your thesis, although the transition from HCP to FCC/BCC would be triggered by some external influence
Agreed Jerome, an insightful and necessary modification to my statement.
Check out Mario Buildreps work, if you don’t know about it. I would love to see you check his work. Simple idea measuring true north of all ancient structures. You could possibly prove your work and give a timeframe. Also relates to world tilt.
https://www.mariobuildreps.com/
Thank you for this impressive work.
Here is 90-pages document that was published a few weeks ago :
On the progression of climatic disasters on Earth and their catastrophic consequences
As far as I can understand the matter of climate change, I find this document to be in complete accordance with your analysis.
You and other readers may find in it data and ideas of interest (especially from russian researchers) for further studies :
https://be.creativesociety.com/storage/file-manager/climate-model-report-a4/en/Climate%20Report.pdf
Table of content :
Part 1. Exponential Growth of Natural Disasters :
Seismic Activity Increase – Increase in Deep-Focus Earthquakes – Activation of Volcanoes – Intensification of Hurricanes, Storms, and Tornadoes – Increase in the Number of Floods and Droughts – Increase in the Number of Wildfires – World Ocean Heating – Anomalous Glacial Melting in Antarctica and Greenland – Warming of Lower Layers of the Atmosphere – Changes in Upper Layers of the Atmosphere
Part 2. Causes of the Global Catastrophe :
Planetary-Scale Changes in 1995 – Displacement of the Earth’s Core in 1998 – Interconnections Between Geodynamic and Climatic Processes – Changes on Other Planets of the Solar System – Astronomical Processes and Their Cyclicity – Abnormal – Heating of Siberia – The Current Cycle of the Planet Earth – Tectonophysical and Mathematical Modeling of the Projected Point of No Return in 2036
_________
Important remark : this document was published by the Creative Society, an organization that aims to warn humanity of an impeding global disaster !!
I do remain skeptical toward their predictions and I surely would be glad to pinpoint some “confirmation bias” or other fallacy in their reasoning, but I feel that I lack the qualifications to assess the expertise of their analysis. Constructive criticism welcome !
PS : I became aware of the Creative Society project when I was looking for critics of Ben Davidson “Suspicious Observers” analysis.
I stumbled upon this video : Response to Ben Davidson https://youtu.be/L6Tq_L7FPgk (january 2023 – 27’). It deals with the increase in the number of earthquakes, the manipulation of earthquakes databases and deep-sea explosive eruptions.
Some other video by Creative Society in relation to the topic of core induced climate change :
The Earth’s Inner Core Has Become Unbalanced! – 2023 – 6’ – https://youtu.be/DN5242UA4L4
Glaciers melting from below – 2021 – 8’ – https://youtu.be/ptm3TutJBYc
Ocean warming : deep sea eruptions – 2024 – 12’ – https://youtu.be/4AlFumE7tfQ
I read through the 90 page presentation. IMO it is the attempt of the same old places trying to take advantage of the situation. The only difference is that due to many of us trying our best to spread the truth of the matter and encourage examination they have now decided to try the strategy of joining the “catastrophists” and implanting their message within what we have been saying. Whenever you see the words Sustained Development just go ahead and put it in the trash bin at least as long as it remains in control of it current proponents.
Thanks for your advice.
I always felt quite suspicious about the Creative Society, there “social project”, there link with the Allat Ra organization, there financing.
Yet, I found many interesting and well sourced pieces of information into this report, that is why I shared it.
I wish I could have more well documented info regarding the core displacement allegedly detected around 1997-1998 (@TES, any hints on this matter ?)
You mentionned something about neutrinos in another post : in a few videos by the CS, a process of core modification involving neutrinos is devised. Unfortunately, I can’t find the said videos back !
Pingback: The Flip of the Earth
Maybe I need to read more of your stuff first before commenting but it seems you, Kamis and many others don’t want to or don’t feel our rapidly moving magnetic field is connected to all clime change on earth.
Our planet has already tilted, the pole continues to move and dramatic weather events are everywhere. The oceans are boiling but of course that has nothing to do with humans.
Picture the earth as a giant ant farm and all the ant tunnels are lava tubes. None are ever extinct, simply dormant till the poles move, planet tilts and this magma then moves in different directions throughout the lava tubes.
The entire planet has magnetism everywhere, the crust, air, the oceans have their own magnetic field….its not possible for the magnetic pole to be moving and the magnetism throughout earth not being affected.
The oceans once super-heated the earth.
https://phys.org/news/2019-05-deep-sea-carbon-reservoirs-superheated.html
“It’s just mind boggling.” More than 19,000 undersea volcanoes discovered”
https://www.science.org/content/article/it-s-just-mind-boggling-more-19-000-undersea-volcanoes-discovered
You do need to read more of my stuff. You have straw manned my contention here. This a false portrayal.
The first link points to a 404error…
https://phys.org/news/2019-05-deep-sea-carbon-reservoirs-superheated.html
Is this a fair approximation of the kind of transition that we might be looking at? No physics modelling involved here (yet). Merely a simple animation based on my interpretation.
https://rumble.com/v4ypqzw-mediated-dzhanibekov-rotation.html
Friggin awesome Craig. A couple changes we discuss on X. But this is fantastic.
TES
Excellent animation. Very helpful for those of us that can’t do that in our head.
Maybe I missed this part somewhere, but it’s a key thing that needs to fit with the theory. I am still stuck on what happened to the ice? Is there a signature in the cap ice core data that is there, but not discussed? Both cap core data are suppose to go back 100K’s of years in both Greenland and Vostok. Considering how fast ice melts, and the potential violence of the event, why are the caps that old? What was the water dynamic on rotation from ice melt? I would think the water envelope dynamics would be significant, and that there are multiple answers. I read a paper by Philip Chapman from 2017 about losing the geomagnetic shield where he indicates that a pole shift happened preceding each ice age. https://space.nss.org/wp-content/uploads/NSS-JOURNAL-Losing-the-Geomagnetic-Shield.pdf Much of his thinking is based on overlaying the magnetic events against core data. While each event precedes significant cooling, it’s hard for me to square the long record of core data with even a 50 year relocation to the tropics. What am I missing?
In my hypothesis, it predicts that after the flip – the world is a volcanically dark, very cold, and wet place for a significant period of time. Perhaps this initiates an ice age. But that has all yet to be confirmed – but it part of the process of science. No one person proves out a hypothesis all by them self. This is how they control our thought, by simply refusing to participate in the process.
TES
We desperately need multiple someones to re-examine the known geological evidence with this in mind, and identify new data points (i.e., new core samples) that would be required to exclude your hypothesis. (See what I did there?) It would be a life’s work for one person to take this up and see it through.
There are no ice ages. 30 degree crustal displacement every 12,000 years simply changes the latitude of various parts of The Earth’s surface.
The temperature of The Earth’s biosphere remains constant in geological time (unsurprising from a thermodynamics perspective).
Vostok just happens to end up displaced either side of the pole, i.e. always around 15 degrees away.
30 degrees “up” and then “down” again, I think is what you said — with essentially NO change in longitude? (I’m still combing through your previous comments).
Longitude is a human construct, but prior equators intersect at hinge points (90° from Giza), hence the GP remains axially aligned.
By ‘changes latitude’ I mean ‘changes distance from the poles/equator’. This is effectively what causes abrupt climate change (and changes in glaciation) for a particular region. Most interpretations of the Vostok ice core assume its latitude remains unchanged in geological time (instead of varying 10-20°), and can be used to infer global temperatures (thus erroneously inferring ‘ice ages’).
Thank you Zod for the many clues that you brought into this comment section.
However, I wish that you could tell us more about the origin/source of this “30°” value. :-)
This value reminded me of another mystery : the alignement of Eastern Island, Nazca, Giza and many more remarkable sites along a great circle.
See Jim Allison : https://geolines.ru/eng/publications/HISTORIC-GEODESY/HISTORIC-GEODESY_39.html
This great circle crosses over the equator at 48° 36′ west longitude and 131° 24′ east longitude, which points are 10° off the Euler axis points discribed in TES’s article.
Moreover, the maximum latitude of the circle is 30° 22′ north latitude at 41° 24′, which brings us back to the Giza plateau location.
Therefore, this fact corroborates Zod’s thesis that Giza (and Nazca and Eastern Island) were on the equator before the last crustal displacement.
TES, you might find this interesting. Holger Isenberg calculated that the geographic centre of the earth varies with sea level. And with a sea level rise of 178m, the geographic centre is Giza.
Although he assumed a rise rather than a pole shift, I wondered if it might be of interest?
He also speculated that the erosion on Khufu were due to wave erosion.
See https://mars-news.de/pyramids/gizacenter7.html – specifically pages 7 and 8 but some of the others may be of interest too.
Another great article. As someone else commented, Earnest L Martin (ELM) has a great book that chronicles some of these events. Your notes about interloping aster #12 caught my eye. ELM ties it all together without the interloper, but the interloper would add a whole new dimension to the discussion.
In Douglas A Elwell’s book (3rd chapter), he theorizes an interloper on a 2000 year orbit that appears to coincides with the precession of the equinoxes and the change from one age to the next. Also related to what was recorded as taught in the “school of Elijah” that the world is to exist six thousand years. Two thousand years of Tohu (void /chaos / Taurus); two thousand years of Torah (Aries); and two thousand years of the Messianic era (Pieces).”
I have been trying to collect corroborating evidence over the years. So some of this is new info, very helpful. Thanks!
Do check out ELM’s book, it is a great reference. It is free in HTML form, and audio book .mp3s for when your on the go: https://www.askelm.com/star/index.asp
Hey, stumbled across your website and I’ve been enjoying your blog – good stuff! Keep digging! I’ve got a lot to catch up on with the research you have collected this far. Just wanted to highlight something worth observing. You note the flood of Noah’s day (40 days, non cyclical), but the text of the Torah/Bible can accommodate the ideas you are sharing here.
There are actually 2 devastating floods recorded in the Bible. The first (often overlooked) is Gen 1:2 – which describes the aftermath of the last major cycle of catastrophism approximately 6000 years ago. Noah’s flood gets all the press.
The idea of a pre-adamic or as some call an elder race of humans is a minority view, but it is a position that could be logically argued from the text.
In later midrashic texts, a sage discusses cycles of creation and destruction, suggesting that God created and destroyed multiple worlds before creating the current one.
Leviathan, cyclical ouroboros, the sea dragon of the cosmic ocean – all these ideas on to this day in myth and legends long neglected and ignored.
Stumbled across this video from 2017. Rigid-body physics with no decoupling accounted for. Great visualization nonetheless.
https://youtu.be/J-l-SbCFhL0
TES, thanks for another thought provoking essay (I read them all). This is a mundane question but if the Great Pyramid was inundated for ~50 years how is it that there is no evidence that the King’s or Queen’s Chambers (nor the unrelated shaft discovered in 2022-23) were filled with silt?
After 6 or 7 thousand years, how would you know much of anything about either chamber? They were originally completely sealed. They’ve been modified and occupied by humans that entire time since. Whatever was stored in them has been removed with prejudice. I suspect that prejudice extends to other accessible areas and surfaces as well. They just did not think about the Tura cap. Big mistake.
Thanks for your quick response. I’m not a pyramidologist so had no idea about the chambers being sealed.
“Legends and records likewise speak of the fact that, before the Arabs removed the Pyramid’s outer casing stones, one could see water marks on the stones halfway up the Pyramid’s height, in about the 240-foot level, which would be 400 feet above the present Nile level.”
This is below the exit point of the KC air vents. The QC’s vents, exiting below flood height, are terminated in flap valves (air out, but no water in).
Most silt and other crud would settle in the ‘subterranean chamber’.
However, early explorers noticed plenty of salt encrustations throughout the chambers and passages.
Amusingly, this is blamed upon the breath of tourists. Which is the excuse for recent ‘cleaning’ of the last traces of salt from the walls (to avoid ‘awkward’ questions).
The KC is effectively an inverted cup, so the level in the KC is limited to the height of the air vents, even though the seawater would travel up the vents – and salt residue was visible around them (very slowly descending floodwaters).
The pyramid was of course built in the knowledge of imminent cataclysm, was designed to prove it occurred, and to preserve that proof for our benefit. See The Floating Coffer Theory.
Thanks. Just catching up in early July 2024.
Have you listened to this? Very interesting examination of crustal shifts and solar storms every 6,000 to 12,000 years: Apocalypse When? Ben Davidson on DarkHorse LIVE (rumble.com)
Yes, I have Charles. Not all the videos – but enough to know where Ben is going on this, and to assess that our hypotheses are actual compatible.
TES, your recent updates to the article are another article in itself. To relate to some past articles of yours, do you think that the one-trick pony from the beginning itself is still cast here? And possibly (hopefully?) the stellar event of 2 BCE implies that said Forces opted to see that it is indeed different this time as regards ‘the property’? Or is this a tug playing along for more than this latter cycle? I understand one cannot truly answer these questions, but hopefully there are hints for, or against, these possibilities that you are aware of but not shared yet. Keenly looking forward to more of your research on humanity’s past. Thank you for all you do!
Dan,
Wow, you are paying attention. Sorry about that as well. I wish I could have the whole theory day one. But all theories evolve.
This is my speculation – subject to change so that it is not a religion – but the entity which holds us captive does so under a false interpretation of The Law. If it had a valid claim, it would not need to hide itself, nor its history – nor would it need nuclear weapons to hold us hostage. That entity is showing signals of being in a state of panic – not status quo by any means. However, it hates mankind and will gladly exterminate us all again.
This suggests much of what I need to know, under this conjecture. Finality is approaching for the One Trick Pony – not a cycle. His abject terror allows one to infer the strength and swiftness of those about to intervene.
EVG
TES
Wow, okay this comment thread got me researching/reading back a ways. The entity which holds us captive …… wow …
TES, I do appreciate the additions, but could I suggest that you add a “last edited on (date)” note at the beginning? Some of my comments now look as though I hadn’t carefully read the article.
the reason they may be in a state of panic might be because existential issues, and ours. Idk if you know of neuroscientist donald hoffman, but he’s worth a listen.
Their panic seems to be almost entirely “spiritual” …and what humans are figuring out aside any cataclysm or hierarchy of “beings”…reality is an illusion, as well as our own “consciousness”
Does “One Trick Pony from The Beginning” appear in your articles prior to ORIGINAL SIN…March 3, 2024? Embarrassed to ask, but having a little trouble looking through your works for it. Thanks in advance.
Steve,
I have used that expression myself to describe various entities that I have read about in case studies, but may not have incorporated it in the TES blog until that article. I don’t disclose everything here of course. Despite these things holding information they should not possess, they don’t appear to be able to control their own behavior or exhibit anything other than a canned magic act. It is a rather complicating paradox, how an entity pretending to be that powerful, should also be so weak at the same time. Doing the same stage tricks over and over in an attempt to intimidate.
Eventually the audience should figure it out.
TES
Thanks. Explication helpful. So much noise even with the squelch set to max makes it difficult to discern the critical transmissions.
Friend, I appreciate much of what you write, but your use of words here seems novel. According to the OED “Complex” and “complicate” both arise in English usage in the 17th century and are synonyms. Similarly, “comprehend” is a word that arose in the 14th century as a synonym for the late 9th century word, “understand.” Surely your point can be made clearly without redefining these words.
Did you read the articles? It describes why. Wittgenstein said “Only describe, don’t explain.” Surely you are not wanting to combine those words as well, since they are also synonyms. One of the whole premises of the novel “1984” was the reduction in vocabulary, so that unethical means could not even be described by their victims.
Understanding is not the same as comprehension. Complex is not the same as complicated. As a systems engineer, and someone who has run a research corporation – I know objectively why as well. I am an expert in this topic.
Although you understand the terms, they bear utility you are not comprehending. By trying to not be complex, you are complicating the world. Problems are complex, humans are complicated. One understands a parable, but that does not mean you comprehend why it is true. I can go on and on…
This is one of the first things I teach a junior engineer or scientist whom I hire. So I reject your proposition.
Of course I read your article. With respect to “describe” and “explain,” they are loosely used as synonyms by those who are imprecise in their language; there is a little overlap in some of the meaning, but explanation clearly diverges from description. We both grasp this. However, “complicate” and “complex” mean “composed of parts, intimately combined;” they mean exactly the same thing in every particular, and one can see this as one reads through the various definitions and forms. Common misuse of complicate (as if there is any suggestion of confusion or tangle) is wrong. At least, so says my OED, afaiaa, the most thorough and comprehensive lexicon in English. Likewise, both “understand” and “comprehend” mean “to fully grasp.” (Definitions are concise for brevity.) The various nuances for comprehension that you outline are summed up in the word “fully.” My interest is in the proper use of words, not in disagreeing with the philosophical point you are trying to make.
Ironically, we both deplore the reduction in language comprehension; but where you are trying to set forth “understanding” as a lesser term, I’m pointing out that it is equal to comprehension. I.e., I’m wanting comprehension of “understanding” not to be diminished. ;-) Perhaps distinguishing between “knowledge” and “comprehension” is closer to your point, but that may not be quite satisfactory, either. At first glance “knowledge” seems a bit lower than that at which you aim with “understanding.”
Disappointingly, your examples, by which you attempt to demonstrate distinctions in the meanings of those words, reflect common misuse, not the correct meaning of the words themselves; they merely restate the misuse. For example, if I were to “complicate the world” I would be “making it complex or intricate” (not “confused,” for “confusion” is no part of the meaning of “complicate,” except by modern misuse). That’s what the word means. You can check the words for yourself in the OED when you have a few moments (I assume you have a set, whether the micro text or regular print 36″ width of shelf space); I think you’ll agree then.
Likewise, I could go on and on… But thank you for the courtesy of your reply. Best regards.
You are incorrect and your tone is pedantic for a second time. You are employing the imprecise, social, equivocal, and colloquial abuse of these terms. I am using the professional and accurate versions of the terms. To wit:
ChatGPT AND American Heritage Dictionary – sum it up insistently in both cases:
Complicated (Perplexing, twisted, or becoming twisted together) versus Complex (Consisting of interconnected or interwoven parts; composite. Composed of two or more units)
Yes, there is a distinction between the terms “complex” and “complicated,” particularly in the context of systems.
Complicated Systems:
Definition: A complicated system is one that is composed of many interconnected parts. Each part can be challenging to understand or solve on its own, but the relationships between parts are generally well-defined and predictable.
Characteristics:
Predictable behavior if the relationships and parts are known.
Can be broken down into smaller, manageable sub-systems.
Often linear in nature, meaning the overall system behavior is the sum of its parts.
Examples: A car engine, a computer, or a manufacturing assembly line.
Complex Systems:
Definition: A complex system, on the other hand, is one where the interactions between parts are not only numerous but also dynamic and non-linear. The behavior of the system as a whole cannot be easily predicted by analyzing individual parts.
Characteristics:
Emergent behavior, meaning the system exhibits properties and behaviors that are not present in any single part but arise from the interactions among parts.
Often adaptive, meaning they can change and evolve over time.
Hard to decompose into independent sub-systems without losing essential characteristics.
Examples: Ecosystems, social systems, the internet, or financial markets.
Key Differences:
Predictability: Complicated systems are predictable if you have enough information about the parts and their interactions. Complex systems are inherently unpredictable due to their dynamic and emergent properties.
Decomposability: Complicated systems can be broken down into sub-components for analysis and understanding. Complex systems cannot be fully understood by only analyzing their parts; their behavior emerges from the interactions and relationships within the whole system.
Behavior: The behavior of complicated systems is generally more static and linear, while complex systems exhibit dynamic, adaptive, and non-linear behaviors.
Understanding (Individual or specified judgment or outlook) versus Comprehension (the act or fact of grasping the meaning, nature, or importance of)
There is indeed a distinction between understanding and comprehension, particularly when considering the nuances of each term:
Understanding:
Definition: Understanding generally refers to the ability to grasp the meaning of something. It involves recognizing patterns, relationships, and contexts within the information presented.
Characteristics:
Surface-Level: Often more immediate and intuitive, based on recognizing familiar elements and drawing connections.
Context-Dependent: Relies on the context in which the information is presented, such as analogies or parables.
General: Understanding can be broad and does not always require in-depth knowledge or detailed analysis.
Example: Understanding a parable involves recognizing the moral or lesson it conveys without necessarily delving into the deeper principles it illustrates.
Comprehension:
Definition: Comprehension goes a step further than understanding. It involves a deeper, more thorough grasp of the information, including its implications, underlying principles, and complexities.
Characteristics:
In-Depth: Requires a detailed and analytical approach, often involving critical thinking and synthesis of information.
Insightful: Achieving comprehension means gaining true insight into the nature of the subject, seeing beyond surface patterns to underlying truths.
Holistic: Comprehension encompasses understanding but also includes the ability to integrate and apply knowledge in various contexts.
Example: Comprehending meaning behind a parable involves not only understanding the surface message but also the broader philosophical or ethical principles it represents, and being able to apply those principles in different situations.
TES:
This short note is to apologize – properly. After some reflection I saw what was offensive about my post. I should have approached it with something like, “Could you further explain why you make such a distinction between these words? The OED has near identical definitions for them; what am I missing?” Instead, I assumed you’d got it wrong and waded in, as you say, pedantic. Even my follow up “apology” had some cheek. That was poor on my part, and I’m sorry to have engaged you like that. Thanks again for your patient and detailed reply.
Best regards,
Martin
Martin,
Thank you. I have never had anyone apologize online before. Not something I am used to. Accepted, and we move forward. Welcome to the comments section :-)
EVG
TES
That’s very gracious. Thank you.
Makes me wonder if the Tartaria/Mud Flood “conspiracy theory” was disinformation crafted to get ahead of the truth of a cyclical catastrophe and poison the well on more legitimate theories like this one.
Disinfo is de jure.
Hiding something, by creating many falsehoods somewhat similar, goes way back: https://sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cft/cft06.htm
You have your work cut out.
Another key component to this mystery is why the pyramids were built. Just a hypothesis, but what was the most important and vital thing to the Egyptians’. It was clean fresh water, not dirty water from the Nile but water from the heavens’. The pyramids have enormous rain water collecting capability. Just look at how much water runs off your house roof in a rain storm and collects in its gutters. And that is miniscule compared to what would collect and run down the smooth limestone sides of the pyramids. This water would be collected in the moat that surrounds the base of the pyramid then directed through a gate like structure and then down the “causeways” to collection structures situated at the end of the causeway and close to the Nile. There is was “bottled” and could be transported by boat to various locations. Sometimes the rain and water collected was too much and it overflowed the moat and ran down the slope pouring into the Sphynx causing the “water erosion” seen around its structure. Also exploring the possibility that in addition to rain water the Pyramids also collected condensation. They would have been cooler due to their thermal mass and the warm air could have produced moisture on the surface of the smooth limestone.
Ethical, after the oscillation will the earth’s rotation still be perpendicular to the solar ecliptic? Or will it continue along the current axis, though at the “new” angle nearly horizontal to the ecliptic?
I’m just curious if there will be a night and day, or will one side of the earth be mostly light and the other mostly dark.
Thoroughly engrossing. My only constructive criticism would be to eliminate the nonessential references to those whose pseudoscience or politics add nothing to this brilliant treatise.
Understood on the sentiment Eagleeye. This (along with the personal anecdote) acts as a filtering mechanism. I am purposely not using the de rigueur style and content of a ‘scholarly article’. There are specific reasons for this. First it is a legal prosecution – like what a lead attorney would deliver to the jury in a closing argument – replete with a personal touch, and arming the jury with the information they need to see through the defense’s holes in their case – thus, it is not merely a scientific explanation. In order to be a legal argument, it must defuse the defense’s canned shtick as part of its critical delivery.
I am well versed in the arguments (see the Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation) which the syndicate and their useful idiots will employ against hypotheses of this nature, so I want to defuse those in the least before the trolling reader can pull them from their memorized quiver – or, to act as fake skeptic repellent so that they don’t even read the article to begin with. Most fake skeptics are threatened by competence, so the personal anecdote at the start is guaranteed to get their dander up. There is no way you could be smarter than they are, so they will not waste their time on the “TL;DR” in that case.
In the end, I do not require, nor want, these people’s ‘review’ or even approval (not that this would happen no matter how sound the science may be).
The purpose of logical calculus is not to serve as entertainment for liars. It is written for everyone else.
Thanks for the kind words!
EVG
TES
Thank you for grouping these 3 essays, Sir Skeptic. I had to link to the second one to explain the third one to somebody, after I had disseminated it. Of course the trilogy is better.
The question remains about how to discern when a “bad-enough” decoupling would occur, followed by wondering how rapidly it would progress, and what assumptions about industrial society might remain valid, if any, once the progression became common knowledge.
This 12,000 year cycle of the rotating galactic current sheet, from the center of our Milky Way, inducing currents in the Earth’s mantle and magnetic pole shifts, perhaps solar micronovas, is one model, though less well presented than your work (sorry).
This 3 minute video cuts to the rotational shift changes with video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
as does this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmFj1IcdTTM&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=5v=VmFj1IcdTTM&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=5
This is the catastrophe video series, about 19 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw
The physical rotational axis shift that Ben Davidson anticipates is about what you assess to be likely. It seems that the poles. The best I can tell he figures the South Atlantic anomaly might become the south pole, The north pole might be near Burma in the Bay of Bengal, as I understand it.
Ben does a lot of videos, not easily referenced written presentations with illustrations. He does what he wants and promotes it. Baby; bathwater, what to do?
Moving to higher ground is a thing he promotes. He’s got a place somewhere in western Colorado. Tibet should be good… One needs to consider slosh and also the climate in the new rotation. John Day, Oregon happens to not look bad…
It seems that those who are in a position to know are keeping the knowledge a ac=secret, because why bother people if they are mostly doomed, anyway… Catherine Austin Fitts has long looked at the $US trillions missing from the Pentagon and HUD, and says there is a “breakaway civilization” being built, some of the investment going to DUMBs (deep underground military bases). I wonder if the ramp-up of electric battery technology, obviously not fit-for-purpose for climate change, or for post-peak-oil, might serve in this application.
At any rate, my calling is to be on the surface with the non-elites, come what may. It is possible that there could be 10 or 20 years of awareness before the full catastrophe, but the progression might be very bad in itself, with earthquakes and volcanoes.
I am comfortable with my own life and death, but would like to be helpful to my species and life on my home planet, while I yet live. I like my kids and grandkids, too.
Wonderfully framed and stated, John. I am not that desperate to live here for just another set of years – especially in the hell world which will exist, if and when this happens, in the instance that one survives.
TES
I closed this blog post, “Empire Off Balance” with the link to this trilogy and a brief explanation of your thesis. https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/empire-off-balance
Ben Davidson is a ltd hangout.
For example, the Vostok ice core goes back hundreds of thousands of years. Vostok has remained polar for a LONG time. There is a crustal displacement (pole shift), but it’s a mere 30 degrees back & forth (meridian 30), which just so happens to oscillate Vostok either side of the pole.
Laughably, Davidson suggests that Vostok could be elevated to high altitude in order to preserve its permafrost – at the equator… ROFL
‘Rotating galactic current sheet’? WTF?
‘Micronovas’ ???
DISCERNMENT REQUIRED!
Vostok is 3,488m 11,444ft elevation.
So you are off to a bad start claiming he said “it could be elevated” as I am sure he knows it is already that elevated as he has shared maps of it’s elevation.
You are not a serious person, so I have nothing more to say to you.
Snow line – Wikipedia
Anyway, yes, electric vehicle & rechargeable battery technology is being spurred, primarily because ‘fossil fuel’ extraction, refinement, and distribution aren’t going to survive the cataclysm, and will take a long time to rebuild.
Anthropogenic climate change is a cover story. The climate is determined entirely by latitude, which occurs upon pole shift. Thus the temperature of The Earth’s biosphere remains essentially constant in geological time.
It’s technically possible that the whole biosphre is a lifeform (GAIA-theory), and that this lifeform can trigger the event by will.
This maybe sounds crazy and esoteric to you, but for me as Technician this is in the range of possibilities.
It is possible. We do not actually know what life is – ours rides on a DNA flesh machine, but that might not be the only compartment.
Important point, TES. Silicon-based life has been hypothesized. Also, while self-aware machine intelligence has also been hypothesized (and, recently, claimed as extant) there is a sure-fire route to machine intelligence via cyborgs.
No longer limited to science fiction, they already exist. Know someone with a permanently implanted hearing aid? They’re a cyborg. In decades ahead, absent a cataclysm, mechanical replacements and even augmentations of various bodily functions will proliferate.
It could be a process of gradual replacement. Assuming that some people prefer those to stem-cell-based regeneration of organs because of superior capabilities (e.g. vision like an eagle), by the early 2100s we may have people walking around who are almost entirely machines, yet still regarded as human in all respects.
Precession of the equinoxes is well-established—as cause of climate cycles / of periodic Great Floods. -Rick
The US recently extracted permission from Chile to build a base in the Galapagos Islands which is near one rotational center, in his latest monthly report astrologer Rick Levine mentioned the current Saturn Neptune conjunction at 0º Aires hasn’t happened for 6,000 years and there are increasingly frequent reports on the growing magnetic anomaly in the South Atlantic.
Interesting read thanks. A couple of things seemed a little odd if you could clarify please.
The bases of the Giza pyramids are not on exactly the same level. There is a slight variation in elevation between them. The Great Pyramid of Giza, for example, is situated on slightly higher ground compared to the other pyramids in the complex. However, the differences in elevation are relatively small and may not be immediately noticeable to the casual observer.
The top of the Khafre pyramid, also known as the Pyramid of Khafre or Chephren, is approximately 136.4 meters (447 feet) above sea level. While the highest pyramid top above sea level is the summit of the Great Pyramid of Giza or Khufu. The exact height can vary slightly depending on how erosion has affected the structure over time, but it is generally accepted to be around 138.8 meters (455 feet) above sea level.
This seems to be conflicting with several pieces of information you presented. Any ideas where the differences lay? It would be good to know your original sources on these numbers and elevations. Thanks.
All this is published in the study.
First of all TES. Thank you for your work.
I’ve always wondered about the floods and expected something to this extent. After reading all this it explains all the hysteria and media. They know it’s coming too, just a matter of time. I had the fam watch a bunch of those pool vs earthquake videos just to give them the smallest of tastes of what something like that could be like.
I can only imaging what it would look like to be on an airplane in the upper atmosphere looking down as the world flips beneath you. The ensuing force of the winds and atmosphere hitting the fuselage is probably all you would likely perceive before things go south.
All of the EV’s down on the surface now submerged in salty ocean water bursting into flame.. Silent white flame burning below the surface. Home batteries blaze in brilliant white and yet unobservable.
Massive cargo ships, yachts and even military submarines tossed hundreds of miles from the open ocean slamming into mountains miles inland..
On the other side.. oceans almost completely drained. Sailors looking upon valleys grander than anything on land. Long burred under miles of ocean now barren. Abyss suddenly cast under sun and starlight for a few days maybe.. Then waiting days/weeks/months/years as things flow back into place.
I’m not the best scientist so some of what I describe is most likely debatable. But I can’t help but imagine.
I know, I’m kind of weird. But I take this as a challenge to overcome and I have a few ideas already. I cannot help but try.
Thank you again TES.
In ES’s scenario, would the Gulf of Mexico be drained or swelled with water from the Atlantic?
Hi TES you may be interested in this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-l-SbCFhL0&t=206s I’ve been thinking aong similar lines, but think the low velocity zones, close to the core, are based on low melt temperature metals saturated with H+ ions increasing their density by a significant fraction. Once they breakout occurs the H+ begins to escape and harvests the oxygen from the minerals it encounters. In fact a huge number of exothermic reactions begin to cascade creating masses of lightweight minerals that begin to ascend altering the once balanced [?] mantle. I can’t find any work on the subject but I suspect that @30Km down and below is where the water formed in this process shifts phase from supercritical to a more nearly water ‘steam’ state releasing many more reactants then as they rise to @10Km depth the steam phase shifts to water and here the water reacts to it’s 4th phase creating exclusion ones which seperate non hydrophilic ‘elements’ out and at the same time freeing large amounts of H+ which begin to rise which can precipitate explosive events or slowly seep up to the surface to escape and which may be implicated in otherwise unexplainable forest fire outbreaks.
I suspect ore bodies of the escaping metals dissolve in the new lightweight H+ rich liquids and follow their rise losing more H+ as the pressure drops. One of particular interest is sodium which may be released from the numerous smokers/hydrothermal vents along the plate boundaries as extremely saline mineral rich brine giving some little insight into it’s journey.
Enough speculation for now.
I’m not alone in considering the possibility of hydrogen storage in the core, this paper examines it although they differ inasmuch as I’m thinking of H+ rather than H2 and they remain faithfull to the accretion hypothesis. If there was a singular outbreak on one side of the core then the shock waves from explosive, expansive exothermic reactions should cause a similar antipodal outbreak, rinse repeat. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022GL101155
Quite how it [H+] gets there is a subject for speculation and mine have moved as far as abandoning the ‘accretion model’ to one where dense planets and moons are formed in the cores of stars, and gas giants are captured stars which have lost their cores, fractionalised into planets moons and asteroids/comets. Jupiter has almost no core left, and perhaps as Velikovsky claimed and used as the basis for his very accurate estimate of Venus’s surface temperature back in the 40’s [met with ridicule] the ancients in their reporting of Venus springing fully formed from the head of Zeus was true.
If H+ is present in significant quantities in some parts of shattered cores then would exlain the difference between comets rich in H+ and asteroids, relatively depleted, with the H+ being excited by changing em potentials and reacting with Oxygen present.
On the pyramids, even before David Rhol discovered a building clearly the model for the biblical description of Solomons palace near Avarice I’d come to the conclusion that Djoser was the hostage crown prince Joseph raised by the Pharoah and appointed regent of the delta area, thus a very raised servitude.Then reinforcing my prejudices I came across this, https://www.geopolymer.org/archaeology/pyramids/ . Long ago I’d read that the pyramids were worked on under the light of the moon, although some suggestions of fantastical reasons were floated it suggested to me that they were casting concrete a little too dry to become full strength but perhas the stories of using resonance was more to do with settling the concrete to full density and removing all but the tiniest air bubbles. It would aso go some way to explaining how the polished stone facade managed to be as smooth as reported when it’s difficut to find a modern facade that isn’t multi faceted when using much lighter thinner and more adustable modern materials. So I’m thinking once the outer blocks were laid a stronger finer surface coat was added and wet polished to a single plane finish then kept wet and polished further. Being laid a little too dry would make it easier to work but there would be an underlying adhesion problem with the absolutly dry substrate sucking water from the contact layer meaning that would always retain more air and perhaps never condense or set to full strength. Thus once the water communicated a vacuum pressure to the casings an exlosive release would be inevitable.
Years ago, I visited Spitsbergen (Svalbard), currently part of Norway. The islands are littered with thousands of fossils of tropical plants.
I have looked at quite a few different angles to explain aspects of the flood in Genesis.
This post is fascinating and really fresh entry into that realm. Really one of the most credible ones I’ve yet to see. While it may be difficult to see the Earth flipping over like a wing-nut I can’t say that it isn’t possible.
What has taken humanity so long to reach their current status? Is it that we didn’t develop beer sooner so we could sit around and talk about issues, or does the Earth get reset every 12,000 years in a planet shift? Fascinating!
Daniel, thanks. I hate this idea – but what if this planet was intended as a DNA-garden and not as a habitable home for a large civilization. For precisely this reason – it flips over.
One would think that the Helvetii or Tibetans would have stories to tell about this. Pre-Columbian North America has only vague flood myths. China has flood myths, but they appear to be propaganda for imperial large-scale hydraulic projects. I suspect that geological evidence can be re-sequenced to fit this hypothesis, and it has a great deal of explanatory power as to the apparent world-wide astronomical obsession on the part of neolithic societies.
But to my knowledge, there is only one fairly detailed description of the cataclysm, if cataclysm it was. Why? The human evolutionary funnels are much older than this, so it’s not because no one was left to tell the tale.
That’s an interesting idea. Aren’t there jumps in evolution erupting from our recorded extinction events? Higher doses of cosmic and solar radiation, due to a crippled Earth’s magnetic field could explain that? An intelligent design/evolution method.
Closely aligned to the idea of expanding earth is the hollow/inner earth hypothesis. That is a deep rabbit hole to fall into. Pun intended ;)
I saw a recent news about a massive ocean found in the “mantle”
https://weather.com/en-IN/india/science/news/2024-04-04-massive-ocean-found-700-kilometres-beneath-earth-surface
Smaller earth diameter also has the potential to explain puzzling aspect of gigantism in the fossil record.
Thanks for posting this. You are one of the most unique and interesting minds out there.
It’s all about the forces, isn’t it? Brilliant, hard to dismiss, horrifying.
I put what looked like your new old North Pole into an Antipode generator to help see this but I really think it would be useful to make a scale model animation start to finish. See if what you are proposing should have other supporting geological evidence. For example Neil ‘s flood idea – what would happen to the ice? Do we see that?
https://www.geodatos.net/en/antipodes/malawi
So your saying I should stop sending Al Gore money to save the planet
Incredible work – a brilliant illustration of the importance of seeing and exploring information with fresh, unbiased, critical eyes. A real advancement to understanding the world, which is valuable in its own right. My question is: What, if anything is to be done about it? Is there some response or action that should be taken based upon your work, or is it simply an important contribution to understanding the world
Very interesting analysis. And oh yes; this: “(my commentary: why someone would wish to live forever in this realm is beyond me).” – could not agree more…
Dear Sir, you might find the Dead Sea Scrolls of interest as documents that present a history that accounts for your findings of recurring floods (as set apart from the Biblical Flood). In fact, we are due for another such one. We do live on an unstable planet that flips over regularly, influenced by the magnetic fields of the planets. Each series of tsunamis and continental lift or subsidence wipes out some or all of the evidence of previous events, leaving the most recent for us to observe. I suggest you inquire into the regular “dark ages” of history, where there are sudden dynastic changes and changes in hegemony, as well as geologic evidence of earthquakes and tsunamis but no matching human records (because dead people don’t record stuff). 701 B.C. is an interesting one, as after that year all major civilizations around the world changed their calendars from 360 day calendars to accommodate a longer 365.25 day year. The Dead Sea Scroll calendar was recently deciphered, and the texts found with it indicate a regular recurrence of global disasters about every 400-700 years…which may explain why global hegemony seems to expire every 400 years or so. You might bring your extensive knowledge to bear on the Scrolls, either to prove or disprove them.
I’d like to check out those DSS texts you are referring to about the recurring floods. Do you have references. Which scrolls?
Good observation about 701 and Hezekiah’s steps.
If accurate, free to share.
YES. This sort of information would give ideas about what sort of other evidence there should be, and where.
Dear TES,you have transformed an enigma into a highly salient case with this one, however unnerving it may be. Reading up further, it seems that the shafts are not straight but have varying inclinations and-or turns in 3D space as they span out from the chambers. I understand the hypothesis refers to the longer, outer parts of the shafts as the polar indicators. But what about their lower sections closer to the chambers? Are these mere construction artifacts or could their lengths and angles denote something else as to the nature and sequence of the event(s)? Should one consider optics / mirrors at these turning points in the original design? Given that the shafts code the critical message, it is unlikely that this was left to chance, but is their intent a tool to code the message or a nuance of the message itself? And what about the Khafre pyramid and its (claimed?) lack of shafts? Why would the builders-coders duplicate the work? There should either be some clearly orthogonal coding of the same message to it (other than the erosion itself)… or is there an orthogonal purpose?
Dan,
When I examined the Pyramids, there were two grades of work. Fine stone work and placement in the interior and underlaiment. And crude stone work with regard to the stacked Mokattam stones of the pyramid itself. Two different craftsmen and two different standards of construction, with the latter being far less talented than the former. These were not purposed, rather two different cultures doing what they could do. It was cultural talent, not trade group assignments. I believe that there was an original fine granite temple structure that the shafts had to work around before making their stellar run (which of course confirms the importance of the latter shaft angle, as they had to deliberately reattain it in each case).
Smoothing the Mokattam limestone could be done with classic old Kingdom tools. But the precision and Mohs hardness (in conflict) of the interior temple stones was extraordinary. I don’t know who did that – and claiming that the Old Kingdom Egyptians made all those is a grand assumption. Thus, I suspect that the pyramid stones were possibly stacked there to keep the temple from being removed by whoever wanted to hide its presence and purpose.
But we need more information. As I always contend, lies have all they need in the here and now. This is why we don’t see much work on the critical path issues in Egypt. Information is a bad thing, so it has to be released slowly only after it has been vetted so as to conform with the fable we crafted long ago.
TES
Fascinating. Presumably, if this holds true, the original structure is likely still there but the exact delineation of the overlaid vs original stonework has not been mapped to date, correct? An even more ancient device that its last prediluvian guardians chose to safeguard against known, ill intent by going to extremes, and by, either necessary, or even calculated, compromise, somewhat obscuring the message?
The proposed period of these changes is mentioned as 10-50 years. Is this just based on the pyramid erosion or have you found evidence of this period other places? Also, is the assumption land masses return to the original locations or is it that the earth just settles down and the waters recede? When I first read the work, I assumed the shift would be relatively static until the next iteration, but on the third or forth read, I took it to mean the entire change would only last 10-50 years.
Mike, three things:
1. The very nominal erosion on the Khafre Pyramid suggests a fairly short inundation timeframe. Not a short period (<5 years). But certainly not 1,000 years either.
2. We have not found enormous layers of sediments commensurate with a long exposure as sea-bottom in most places - so this would appear as either a flash or regional flood, or even not at all in most cases.
3. Finding a number of whale skeletons far into Egypt away from the Med at Wadi Al-Hitan (Whale Valley) should have tipped someone off... LOL!!
I don't know why we don't have more published evidence of this. But we have a dead body nonetheless. If I clean up from a party, and find a dead body in the livingroom, despite all the guests saying everything at the party went fine, I still know that it did not. Deductive evidence versus inductive. Deductive is far stronger.
If the surface rotated 104 degrees relative to the spin axis, the spin-produced equatorial bulge would be misplaced. The earth’s radius is about 22 km greater at the equator than at the poles. I don’t know how quickly rock would adjust, but water and air would flow more quickly towards equipotential. Intuitively, this would produce two 20-km deep oceans over each of the normal poles (shifted to the tropics) absorbing all of Earth’s ocean water, while land near the new poles would rise above the atmosphere.
To give a sense of scale, even the tallest mountains of Antarctica would be deep underwater, while at the new south pole near Hawaii the seafloor would be higher than Mt Everest, and Honolulu would literally be lifted into the stratosphere without air to breathe.
Is there a layer of the mantle sufficiently fluid or plastic to rapidly shift the equatorial bulge? In the crust, glacial rebound is slow. The dynamics involved here are all new to me.
We don’t know the plastic dynamics of the mantle, asthenosphere, and lithosphere, except to note that they are all indeed plastic at 932 to 4000 degrees C. They would deform immediately. during the days of the shift. Probably not a pleasant thing, even if one was up above the flood-wash.
So is this why all the billionaires are building bunkers on Maui? I had assumed it would be 1) inundated by the ocean, or 2) consumed in volcanic events.
Layman here. If the pyramids are a warning and instruction manual, why is the info so cryptic? Aren’t the hieroglyphs a language? Why not just tell future inhabitants with language and easy to understand artwork?
Jim,
I asked my self this same question many times. I don’t think they were built during the era of hieroglyphic writing – as there are no hieroglyphs at all in the Pyramid. There are some red ochre markings in the Queen’s south shaft, but they are engineering marks. The relieving chamber markings are forgeries by Vyze. Here is the issue: no matter what the pyramid was made for, they did not say in this manner. And it was not made for any trivial reason. So, every alternative carries this weight of having to explain this, and none do – except mine.
I suspect that this was a design which would survive a flood – or removal by malicious controlling forces. Perhaps the ‘tombs were filled with documents and documentation – which, like everything else, and just as they were concerned – was pilfered so as to prevent our knowing about our past sordid history under the Anunnaki fake gods.
This is why I speculate that someone powerful and old, does not want this known – and the builders of the pyramid knew this. They cleansed most information, but could not remove the final traces (however there was one pyramid that was removed – it is one thing to build a pyramid, but why would one remove it?).
TES
TES, regarding the destroyed one, did you mean the Djedefre pyramid? I had to look it up, surprisingly it is not a commonly known fact.
Yes, lately they say it is as large a Menkuare. But when originally found, the estimate was that it was a significant fraction of Khufu.
I can’t help kick the feeling that a laser or water-jet carving (whatever tech they used to quickly and accurately cut the stones) could have communicated the need to plan for Earth Destruction every 12,000 revolutions around the sun. Maybe there are carvings somewhere, just haven’t found them. Maybe that’s what’s hiding under the Sphynx that we’re not allowed to see. But nevermind that, I know it’s woo-woo. Back to facts … more to read. Thank you!
I have been deeply unsettled, meditating on your work (I’d read the prior two articles as they came out), these last 24hrs. I’m grieving a bit – this loss of ignorance. Your comment here: “I speculate that someone powerful and old, does not want this known – and the builders of the pyramid knew this,” is particularly haunting.
Powerful, I can imagine. Is this “someone” still extant (hence, the “old”)? The presumption was they pre-existed the deluge, and then survived it to have (continuing) influence on the hiding of this information from future generations. Qui bono? Are you thinking the DNA-incubator-model view of the Earth and this “someone” needing the reset to keep us well confined here in the petri dish?
Is this why it seems there’s a well funded (private) effort to finally (and in a mad race) achieve some level of commercial space travel? The idea of settling on Mars never made sense to me, but suddenly it seems pretty clear why someone would be motivated to “hide out” there for a period to avoid the worst of Utanapishtim 2.0 (or… 14.0… whatever cycle we’re on now). That presumes, of course, that Mars doesn’t also “tumble.”
And is anyone building an Ark that you know about?
Utanapishtim 2.0 LOL!!!!! I love it.
I hold a hypothesis (not proven, not a religion…) that indeed there are such antediluvian entities. They don’t like mankind a whole lot from what I can gather. The whole focus on sin and punishment and presenting your self as a god or higher being, is a obsession of a demonic nature.
Is there an ‘ark’ – yes, there are many.
Would they happen to actually resemble anything of Naval origins?! Do tell!
Short of buying land in the upper reaches of the Rockies (and all the items needed to survive a decade or two of ash-winter … or more… which presumes we were lucky enough not to be zapped by volcanic lightning or crushed by heaving rockslides or blown to smithereens by hurricane-strength winds), I’m not sure what us lowly (but awakened) serfs are to do with this knowledge.
My desire to see my children survive this is unquenchable.
Re-reading comments, I am struck by this: So where are the “arks” and who built them?
God may have a sense of humor. Since no building will survive, the remaining humans will be the homeless and mentally ill living in tent cities. The climate change grifters, with their beach front property and yachts, will be the first to go swimming in mile-high waves.
Wouldn’t this potentially discredit many different ‘truths’? Just randomly thought of the Grand Canyon and the colorado river and the great salt late for instance.
It would explain many great salt plains, lakes, and deserts. It leaves the Grand Canyon open to three possible formation philosophies – inundation, melt-off, and classic gradualism.
or a ‘thunderbolt of the gods’ – atmospheric electrical discharge?
Two distinct periods of erosion in the Grand Canyon, but that discharge scar on Mars gives pause, yes.
After digesting this for a couple days, my first thought was I’m not going to worry because this is something out of my control.
Now, my thinking has shifted a bit and the engineer in me is attracted by the dangling challenge of pondering a solution to the right problem. What a fascinating cross domain challenge for a generalist.
The irony of having recently read “The three body problem” is not lost on me.
likewise and besides finding a safer location on Earth, it kind of serves as an impetus to figure out how to survive in outer space as such an environment is free of natural disasters save gamma ray bursts and solar flares
I’m having trouble putting together the proposed timeline. Is the hypothesis that the Khufu pyramid was constructed prior to the last cataclysm, or after? Image 1 suggests *before* (it was inundated along with Khafre). If so, then how could it have been intended as a warning since that civilization had not yet experienced the cataclysm? Or, was it built *during* the cataclysm (the “northern sky” map currently faces south)?
Neil,
Understood. I leave that open for future investigation as to specifics, because the Khufu Pyramid shows both before and after indications. The shaft is a documentation of a past inundation angle, as both a record of that event and prediction of a future one, but the Tura limestone casing is the documentation of another later one (the last one to occur). So it is both, since this is an ‘oscillation’ theory – not a single event.
In fact, this matches what the Priests of Ptah told Herodotus in the text.
TES
I’ve been pondering this. Fewest assumptions with maximal explanatory power is achieved if Khufu was built in the midst of an event, in between two (or more) “floods” that happened over the period of a few hundred years. The “north sky” faces south because it was, in fact, facing south at the time of construction.
A conclusion that can be drawn from this construct is that the society that built Khafre not only survived, but retained much of their technical capability after at least the initial catastrophe. Enough to build Khufu in between floods, and to pass down what had happened in at least rudimentary form. I’m attaching an image depicting another thought.
Something akin to this is what I am thinking as well Neil.
I popped open a large-scale topo map of North America, and all of a sudden I saw river bottoms and shorelines…
Neil,
Based on your look at the topographic map, where were the shorelines in North America?
I added a topographic map of North America and marked the map with a red line where it appears the shoreline might have been.
From what I’m seeing, it looks like there could have been a shoreline somewhere around the eastern edge of the Great Plains … roughly through the middle of Nebraska and Kansas. It looks like there are North/South flow lines east of that line.
Is this what you’re seeing?
Another thought: The catastrophe must have been somewhat localized. The homo sapiens “evolutionary funnel” is at least an order of magnitude older than 12000 years ago.
Fascinating. Someone sent me a doomsday astrological video portending doom in the form of solar activity and shifting of the earth’s axis. However, they provided no explanation as to why so I dismissed it.
This is outstanding detective work, and I daresay, unsettling.
Agreed George,
Probably subconsciously part of the reason I opposed the idea for so long. If I had not traveled there and seen the ancient shorelines myself, I might have still dismissed regardless.
TES
Thank you, TES. Fascinating the way you pull together your climate theory with you pyramid observations. I always have to read your articles 2-3 times to fully comprehend.
It’s pretty neat how the pyramid has the 104 degree flip built in. Is it likely that subsequent flips would be the same angle? Movement of core-mantle material would seem to be pretty random. Maybe you aren’t suggesting that. Only that early humans lived through this and built an observatory and warning for the future. Here we are as a society wasting resources on CO2, while our eyes are closed to the godzilla in the room.
Fascinating paper. However, why would the ocean settle on the Giza plateau (and presumably other currently elevated areas) for up to 50 years rather than drain back into its former position within a few days or weeks of ‘the deluge’? Or is the suggestion that it did and the observed erosion happened in that very short timeframe? Or perhaps the melting of the ice caps, now at warmer latitudes, results in an overall increase in global sea level of several hundred feet but then there should be plenty of evidence of the new shorelines at this higher elevation if they existed only recently (c.12k years ago)….
The difference between ocean heights globally is about 680 ft, as compared to a perfect sphere. When the Earth changes orientation, the oceans take on a different set of positions and ‘bulges’ if you will, still in that 680 fit differential from lowest to highest. So dry land appears were ocean once was, and some land gets submerged, until the Earth rights itself back into position 10 to 50 years later. Then, what you cite, happens (albeit not exactly the same as it once was).
“Legends and records likewise speak of the fact that, before the Arabs removed the Pyramid’s outer casing stones, one could see water marks on the stones halfway up the Pyramid’s height, in about the 240-foot level, which would be 400 feet above the present Nile level.”
Such cataclysmic floods result from mega-tsunami (oceans slopping out of their basins), and they will remain for a considerable amount of time, because The Earth is not hard like a glass marble, but deforms according to distribution of mass (whether solid like ice or liquid like water). This is also why it is oblate (due to centripetal force).
So, the Great Flood would have taken a much longer time to dissipate, than if the Giza plateau (African continent) didn’t consequently sink slightly beneath it. It may well have taken many centuries to completely descend to the base of the pyramids. And it would take millennia for the water table to descend such that during a drought, the base of the ‘well shaft’ could be seen at the foot of the descending passage of the Great Pyramid (~800AD).
There is also considerable tectonic upheaval due to 30° crustal displacement, so even without taking the weight of flood waters into consideration, land masses may rise or fall.
G’day TES,
Wonderful work on all fronts.
If you are not already aware of Mario BuildsReps suggest you spend some time checking out his work and how it may tie into (or not) your hypothesis. Admittedly he lands out on 47.1W meridian through Greenland and is currently using earth crust displacement as the most likely mechanism to explain his observations.
Orientations of Pyramids and Temples Correlates With Ice Ages (mariobuildreps.com)
or 2 hours with a bit more meat on the bone at Brothers of the Serpent (of Randall Carlson ilk)
Episode #254: Mario Buildreps – Ancient Alignments & Crustal Displacement – YouTube
cheers,
Flange (Chemical Engineer weekend earth scientist warrior)
Thanks Flange! Will take a look.
I don’t know how much you look at Ben Davidson’s work, but this is something he does talk about a lot, “catastrophism” on a 12,000 year cycle, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw
and sometimes with flips of rotational axis for our fair planet:
John,
I do not follow the detail for many of these, because I don’t want to sway the direction of my observation basis or inference. I don’t want to pick up something they say, and then have it surface subconsciously later as noise in my chain of critical path questions. The solar arguments are good, they are just not salient right now. Their core/H-layer/HCP-BCC/mantle/LLVP arguments are awkward, lack experience, and only serve to mislead and confuse. Effects are issued as general catastrophic descriptions, rather than specific principles of materials science and geophysics. I don’t want that in my thinking either.
Wittgenstein: Only describe, don’t explain.
Love the work they do and effort they put in. But I am just not in an entertainment frame of mind on this.
hope that makes sense,
EVG
TES
Thanks TES. I agree about Ben’s presentation/personality/style, but do hold in my consciousness his prediction of the timely return of the galactic current sheet phase reversal, for which our planetary magnetic field may be a “probe” of sorts. By this particular analysis (much appreciated at NASA, I’m told by my NASA friend) this approaches before 2050, with or without a rotational flip.
Been reading you for 3 years and my admiration only grows. Understanding requires a lot of time for a “non-expert” – but you make it comprehensible, so it’s time well spent. Now I know why certain articles must be re-read, because you are frequently revising and adding significant new material. My third pass on this one.
These are times I wish I had stuck with physics rather than going down the economics dead-end. Hard math vs fake math…but it would appear the archons are everywhere, anyways. In college my favorite study spot was the geophysics library!
Awesome Karen,
Thanks for the kind words and readership! Yes, unlike the weakness of a scientific study, which freezes what the powers-that-be want cast in stone, and does not practically allow for updates, an article can be a living breathing stream of discovery. The reader gets to discover the science with the researcher(s).
TES
What fascinating hypotheses and questions you’ve raised. I don’t really understand, but I’ve been able to come up with some exploratory questions.
“It is our contention that we are now well past Point Indigo in this process, have incorrectly interpreted the heat presented by this transpiration as being caused by man’s activity alone, and now face a need to detect the approach of a Point Tau Gyroscopically Mediated Dzhanibekov rotation.”
If we were to manage (against massive cognitive bias and firmly entrenched beliefs in existing paradigms) to detect the onset of a Tau event, what could we do about it? Even if we were to correctly interperet the signs and portents written in the pyramid stones, how would we respond and intelligently adapt to the implications of the message?
Regarding the constellations carved in the ceiling stone of the Queen’s Chamber air shaft, I must admit that the photo of the air shaft ceiling carvings is too blurry for me to make out anything like the distinct patterns you highlight. For the sake of discussion, assuming the star map may be valid, how can we know that the forms of the constellations we are familiar with today were recognized by highly advanced astronomers working around 9200 BC? Our perception of the constellations is shaped by relatively modern consensus observations: look at this part of the sky on a certain date and time, and you will observe certain patterns of stars, to which we give certain names; there’s “Ursa Major,” there’s “Draco,” etc. Can we assume those ancient astronomers followed the same conventions when tracing patterns in the stars?
“Over a prolonged period, we would not have the means to distinguish between a Dzhanibekov rotation and traditional geomagnetic pole shifts (see note 16). Moreover, during a short Khafre-styled reversal of say 10 to 50 years, we might not be able to detect such a Dzhanibekov rotation at all.”
In my (overactive?) imagination, the hypothetical gyroscopic changes you’ve described could have cataclysmic effects that might potentially wipe out every plant and animal larger than a cockroach on vast swathes of the planet. I’m relieved that we might not even be able to detect them if they’re of short duration! If they are prolonged, I hope some prescient Noah/Utanapishtim is busy building a very large boat.
Thank you for an intriguing and mind-boggling article.
Do look at Ben Davidson’s analysis of where the oceans slosh with a rotational axis shift. The first 3 videos can be watched in 19 minutes. Tibet should do ok, for instance. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw
Thank you, I will watch.
help..I am having trouble visualizing how the earth may tilt and the direction of the tilt. I am in northeast Tennessee…will I end up at the north pole?
It will be akin to Patagonia in South America – pretty dang cold. But not Antarctic.
Hmm unless this event cause a new ice age. Then I’m screwed. The Appalachians have such a high amount of biodiversity. Hard to believe it was at a Patagonia type environment 12000 years ago. I’m
This event does not last long – only long enough to erode Khafre. So 10 – 50 years???
In Chinese history, there is an account of a great flood circa 2000 BC which lasted 22 years: “At that time the miracle is said to have happened that the sun during a span of ten days did not set, the forests were ignited, and a multitude of abominable vermin was brought forth.” 2 “In the life-time of Yao [Yahou] the sun did not set for ten full days and the entire land was flooded.” An immense wave “that reached the sky” fell down on the land of China. “The water was well up on the high mountains, and the foot-hills could not be seen at all.” Source: https://github.com/sovrynn/ecdo/tree/master/1-ADHOC-EVIDENCE/ancient-myths/asia/china
Awesome, thanks John – I will look this up.
I live in Turkey. It says the world’s geographical center is Türkiye in your article. What does this mean? Thank you.
Was recalculated by a supercomputer to about 100 km to the East in 1973, but has always been in Turkey.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_centre_of_Earth
Looking at 12,000 years ago, relative to how ocean circulation works, I think everywhere outside of the tropics and sub tropics are going to experience cold to varying extremes when the heat engine that is earth, is completely disrupted by the inundation and rebounding inundations. If there was a ECDO then, things got very cold for a quite an extended period afterward.
How long do you guess it will take for the energy from the change in rotation to dissipate and water/ocean flows settle into the new temporary planetary rotation for that following 10 to 50 year period?
I think that the oceans settle out in around 9 days total, but remain in a more heightened state for the entire 10 to 50 (or maybe 200) year period.
Does anyone fund this research? I would imagine its difficult to get anything when its not anthropogenic warming.
No, it is just me.
I’m closing today’s blog post with your article, Sir Skeptic. Thank You, again.
You are welcome John,
And thank you again for readership and intelligent engagement. I hope to return the same… just got off an entire day of conference calls, uggghh.
TES
I’m sorry to hear that. It’s time for me to get a bike ride in. Here is the post, Amigo: https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/meet-the-unit
It seems likely (without doing any math)that milankovitch cycles and/or solar cycles could play into this by distributing polar region ice weight to the equatorial water bulge through melting and vice versa ya? This would be a non insignificant change in mass along different axis and also occuring in predictable cycles correct?
Yes, but it is something which would also both relocate and become chaotic during a rotation – and become more a factor of instability rather than securing Earth’s poles in a different orientation. The mass of the mantle, the gyroscopic effect, and the moment of magnetism – are all vastly more powerful.
There is a big difference between a Dzhanibekov 180° axial flip, and a force sufficient to displace the Earth’s crust by 30°. Moreover, you also need to explain how this can occur suddenly, within the space of a day (20-30 hours from onset to completion), such that the same force that displaces the crust also displaces the oceans (the former doesn’t cause the latter).
You also have to tie this causation in with ‘twice a great year’.
Sedimentary strata record these regular cataclysms: each stratum laid in a day, each discontinuity (‘bedding layer’) laid in 12ka of weathering/vegetation. qv Punctuated Aggradational Cycles.
I’m not trying to discourage you. :-)
I’m trying to very quickly become, well, not an idiot… on this subject. Forgive the elementary approach, but I read something by a learned person that suggested it would be the magnetism (tide) caused by a close planetary body (Saturn) that would temporarily pull the oceans to the point of massive displacement and the slosh would be the result of its reversal. Such a planetary pull would displace both crust and oceans, no?
Magnetism decreases by the square of the distance between the objects. So, anything which would influence the rotational body of the Earth has to be REALLY close by. The only thing really close by, is the core. The oceans do not have enough mass to cause the Earth to flip. Only the mesosphere (mantle) carries this mass sufficiency. Therefore, we have to start by looking there – at its imbalances and magnetic qualities. Nothing else is stronger.
This smacks of Velikovsky and/or the rogue body fly-by hypothesis. qv https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Herc%C3%B3lubus
Even if not quite infinitely improbable, this is not repeatable, at least not with the repeatability evidenced by sedimentary strata.
Also see the film Magnolia.
The force sufficient to displace the crust comes neither from a passing body, nor from within the planet.
I left you a comment on another thread, I hope you respond there. Looking for another clue. I’m doing the research but I’m stuck.
Oops. I meant MELANCHOLIA (Lars von Trier) – not Magnolia.
🎯🎯🎯
It’s remarkable that an ancient civilization could maintain continuous records long enough to ensure that they lasted through 4 of these flips, and could then build a massive warning sign at just the right place – a location that can only be known by having survived to see both the before and after times.
Flips even prior to h sapiens – for billions of years.
It’s like Groundhog Day, but where each day is 12,000 years long, and antediluvian h sapiens must somehow communicate with the next technologically advanced antediluvian civilisation, to explain the planet’s problem and warn them to prepare, to avoid being sent back to the stone age yet again.
h sapiens is indeed ingenious
See Samsara.
Well put, Zod…
It begs the question if this was a warning to future civilization then there must be an astrological calendar pointing to when this would occur, perhaps based on location in the procession of the equinox.
I suspect Coyote, that the prevalence of stone circles in most cultures which sprang from an Egyptian tradition, were looking for this to occur at any time. So, I doubt they were given a specific periodicity. Although I do hear a couple being bandied about.
Hence my pseudonym. There are two terrestrial lifecycles per Great Year (cf Platonic Year), symbolised by Yin & Yang – within our astrological calendar aka The Zodiac.
“This is the dawning of the age of Aquarius”. Aquarius is aka ‘The Sign of The Son of Man’. And, the age of Aquarius commences with cataclysm – the pouring out of the pitcher that the water bearer bears.
The Yuga cycle is another calendar (which includes an important aspect not present in the Zodiac).
We are looking forward to the New World Order (new order of the ages), being Aquarius to Virgo. The Old World Order being Leo to Pisces.
Maybe the Saptarshi calendar …when Sanskrit was in use …?
Zod, clarifying if you meant the movie Samsara?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%E1%B9%83s%C4%81ra
O…M…G… So , in the vein of “they always tell you what they’re gonna do before they do it” .. is all this WEF talk of a “Great Reset” — is it all a cover/distraction while also announcing the imminent Samsara? Holy cow if so…. whoah.
Yes, Samsara being about the cyclic rebirth of mankind (not an individual), Klaus Schwab’s blurb was simply him ‘writing between the lines’ about the coming ‘Great Reset’, and the aspiration to ‘Build back better’ thereafter, i.e. from a technologically advanced starting point, rather than merely proto-agricultural.
Given a dozen millennia in which to progress from electricity and computers, the next cataclysm will be water off a duck’s back…
Mankind will then have finally escaped Samsara and reached Nirvana – thus breaching Fermi’s Great Filter.
I have the impression that before the collapse prior to the pyramid being built that narratives were constructed by poets, and constantly reworked, that contained all the information necessary to lead a ‘civilised’ life. They’d be taught through chilhood in annual cycles with more verses and complexity being added year by year. Any fol coud remember the verses the wise were left to make what connections they could as required by circumstance, if they mastered them they too could become poets in turn.
Some of these tales remain in the Vedas whereas Homers work is the last iteration in the west. Perhaps they should be thought of as a memory mansion that people held in common.
Modern elites have nothing as robust as this in mind.
TPTB are evidently confident they have sufficiently prepared to ensure mankind’s technological advancement is preserved across the cataclysm, otherwise they would have repaired The Great Pyramid, and/or built an equivalent device (3rd temple).
However, yes, passing knowledge of cyclic cataclysm down through the generations, and over the ages, is of vital importance. Hamlet’s Mill is worth a read in this respect – the ‘Mill’ being the rotation of the celestial sphere (Zodiac, Great Year, Yuga Cycle, etc.) and the grinding out of mankind twice per rotation (Yin/Yang). Also see Plato’s Critias dialogues (Kataklysmos/Ekpyrosis).
Perhaps Antarctica is one of the locations? Lots of speculation and secrecy around it.
What will bake your noodle is to discover that this is by design – facilitated by institutionalisation, but not caused by it. From The Vatican onwards…
You know how you can tape a penny to a fan that wobbles to smooth it out? What if the pyramids were pennies precisely placed to reduce wobble?
Not nearly enough mass – one earthquake redistributes far more mass than the all the pyramids on Earth taken at once.
“Core-Mantle Decoupling” is not what causes crustal displacement, and is rather Hapgoodian.
The Dzhanibekov effect can certainly help understand how a spinning body can undergo a 180° reorientation (including spin reversal) without loss of momentum, but The Earth is not dynamically unstable, so will not spontaneously flip.
The Great Pyramid was positioned at the equator and its longitude in order for us to understand that by remaining axially aligned, but 30° displaced, the crust is most tightly bonded +/-90° from it, and will displace 30° back to the equator upon the next displacement.
To understand the considerable force that causes the crust to displace one must understand the relationship between the 12k periodicity of such cataclysmic displacement and The Great Year (24k). This also requires recognising that this understanding has been occulted (impeded via deception).
As for the GP shafts, these are there to vent trapped air upon inundation (the QC shafts bening terminated in flap valves to impeded ingress). They are simply directed to reach a particular height – and don’t point to anything. The only thing in the GP that has to have a particular angle is the ascending passage (&GG), which is steep enough for the granite blocks to slide down when immersed, but not so steep that they’ll slide down when initially placed, dry.
If you visit the Queen’s pyramid and walk up the shaft, you’ll see notches where the floor & walls meet. These hold beams in place as blocks are slid up or down, no matter the angle of the overall shaft.
Dzhanibekov rotation is not a result of rotation instability.
Everywhere I tried to look it up they said Dzhanibekov rotation was due to what I interpret as initial instability in the spin, i.e. the other axes have some non zero angular velocities that increase due to inertia until the flip happens. For example on Wikipedia the mathematical explanation relies on at least small initial values for the angular velocities of the secondary axes. From what I understood of the argument “dynamic instability” must be present if the SAC and PAC are changing in density due to the exothermic core theory, right?
It is a lack of ‘uniformity’ – but oscillations are a natural and most-common aspect of stability. All stable systems feature oscillations. This one just appears exception to our eyes.
Could it be possible the transition between Phase 1 and Phase 2 get locked and never stops?
Is it possible that Earth did this 2-axis rotation for a longer time in the past?
That is the a supposition of the hypothesis, yes – but no definition as to how many cycles or how chaotic the intervals might be.
TES
Another question (I’m really convienced your theory is right, TES):
If the Earth is a big gyro, then why has Earth an axis inclination?
They say it was the collision with Theia which caused it. But wouldn’t the influence of the other “gyros” (Sun, planets, moons), which are all more or lesser aligned with the plane of the Solar System, had enough time to bring back the Earth-Gyro into upright rotation?
Thanks Diogenes,
The tilt is called ‘obliquity’ – and the supposition is that each planet’s obliquity was caused by early solar system dynamics, or collisions which imparted this bias. Which is smart-speak for ‘we don’t really know, but it was obviously something…’ Theia is a body which is used to explain everything we find as a mystery, all rolled into one hypothetical body. Explains anything, everything, and nothing, all at the same time. But I cannot say that the hypothesis is wrong either.
Basically, every planet would have its own Theia then however.
There appear to be three obliquity classes in the solar system:
1. Mercury, Venus Jupiter ~ .3 – 3.1 degrees
2. Earth, Mars, Saturn, Neptune ~ 23.5 – 28.3, and a variety of Right Ascension measures
3. Uranus ~ 97.8 degrees
This commonality is intriguing and suggests to me, another factor besides just early solar system dynamics and a Theia for every planet. It is interesting that both the Asteroids and Kuiper belt have a 10 to 30 degree inclination versus the solar disk, implying that possibly two different solar masses merged during the early formation of the solar system, with Earth, Mars, Saturn, and Neptune being members of the interloping class of proto-planetary mass.
EVG
TES
If this phenomenon happens on Earth, perhaps it happens to many/most habitable planets…and thus, the Fermi Paradox
What an exciting and interesting article! Thank you, this was so fascinating. I know muslims have theorized that this is how the sun would rise from the West as predicted by the Prophet PBUH, but I’ve never seen any scientifically rigorous explanation for why it might occur. I also had no idea it had been documented by ancient cultures and the Great pyramid angle is awesome.
Minor correction in Exhibit I – Gyroscopically Mediated Dzhanibekov Rotation. Second image from left (Venutian or Retrograde Rotation) should be labeled West Rise, East set.
Thanks Syed,
Indeed, I have heard of this referenced in Muslim writings, but need to research it.
The retrograde motion is correct, as it follows the right hand rule. The direction of east is the direction of rotation with the north pole extending upward as if one is curling the right hand and pointing the thumb upwards. In other words, it is akin to port and starboard, relative to the rotating body, not space or the sun. In this case, the thumb is point ‘down’ but east is still in the direction of the curved fingers of the hand.
A challenging series of four nonetheless… no doubt will modify over time!
EVG
TES
The second image from the left hasn’t been flipped upside down even though I just noticed that it does label the Arctic at the bottom, so if you mean that image to show the earth flipping without changing its rotation that would leave the sun rising from the east as it normally does. I was confused because I interpreted “retrograde rotation” to mean that the earth remains in its normal north-south orientation without flipping and just starts spinning in the opposite direction, the way Venus does – which is what the placement of the continents suggests. So I guess the minor error I perceive now is that the image wasn’t actually flipped as the “Arctic” label suggests.
Pertinent today. Magnetic fields weakening and pole-shift accelerating, Auroras in Puerto Rico: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOTwQv7Y23g
Good News, VERY Bad News, More Solar Shockwaves Coming | S0 News May.12.2024
The Sun remains normal, and will remain so. Don’t worry about The Sun – it does not undergo ‘micronova’.
The respective changes are terrestrial:
Accelerating deflection of magnetic poles.Acceleration in the apparent weakening of Earth’s magnetic field.Increase in disruption of Earth’s magnetosphere.Consequently greater likelihood of Aurora Borealis being seen at lower latitudes.
However, the cause of the changes is not terrestrial in origin.
Could you elaborate your theory of the events and causes in such a detailed explanation like Ethical Skeptic did? I am curious about alternative explanations. But ex cathedra statements are hard to interpret.
I could, but I’m not going to. :-)
I am simply a learned catastrophist who would challenge others to ensure their theories meet the necessary criteria.
Any theory of cyclic catastrophe should explain why catastrophe:
is global.
is regular/cyclic and has a periodicity of 12,000 years.
is related to equinoctial precession (occurs twice a great year).
has sudden onset with minimal warning (apart from subtle precursory phenomena).
has a brief duration of around a day (onset to completion), albeit with after-effects of varying duration (volcanic ash, disrupted weather patterns, flood waters, etc.).
results in crustal displacement (of around 30°) that occurs within the space of a day. Hence shifting vast herds of elephant from a temperate latitude to a frigid one (Siberia), but maintaining Vostok polar.
results in cataclysmic mega-tsunami (with consequently globally synchronised sedimentary strata).
Ideally, the theory should also explain subtle precursory phenomena, e.g. why Earth is currently experiencing accelerating deflection of its magnetic poles, acceleration in the apparent weakening of its magnetic field, and even acceleration in the deflection of the planet from its axis*.
* “Experts said they found the direction of the poles moved from southward to eastward in the mid-1990s and that the speed of the drift between 1995 to 2020 was upwards of 17 times faster than it was in the years between 1981 and 1995.”
is the 12000 year periodicity exact or does it have a variation to it (e.g. plus or minus 100 years or so?)
Probably something like +/- 50-100 years, yes.
NASA will know the precise the length of the Great Year, and the duration of the window in which cataclysm will happen (twice per).
It is certainly an error to extrapolate the current rate of equinoctial precession (a degree per 72 years) to arrive at a great year of 25,920. It’s actually very close to 24,000.
Our two periods of 12 hours per 24 hour day commemorate Earth’s two cycles of 12 millennia per 24 millennia great year.
Anyway, the current estimate for cataclysm is 2048, an estimate which has been gradually converged towards over the last 70 years or so.
Thank you. Another question would anything above the salt water marks of the Pyramids be considered safe elevation or is a considerable margin needed because of the tsunamis?
A considerable margin is needed. Look at the maps at the end of this article.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2023/12/18/hidden-in-plain-sight/
TES
So basically you want to live near Denver level elevation or outer space :-)
Thank you
Are you familiar with the work of Dr. Eugene McCarthy, a leading expert in hybridization? (For example, he wrote the standard textbook.) He has developed a hypothesis, with extensive empirical evidence, that homo sapiens is best explained as the result of hybridization between simian and porcine ancestors. Here is the relevant link: https://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html
Note that he does not delve into whether this was deliberately induced.
Hey Jon,
I had read that a long time ago – and very glad to be reacquainted with it. Thanks!
Meade, the flood at Giza would have a mega-tsunami wavefront preceding it, probably around 1km in height.
Given oceanic slop, the coasts are toast. Even inland and at high altitude, you have also to consider supersonic winds, and widespread seismicity & volcanism (upon crustal displacement). This is why The Swiss have so many bunkers (not due to the cold war) – one in each back garden, almost.
thanks if computers and AI keep advancing it might be possible to model this and make a useful prediction when and how it will happen
we need honest governance in the world if this can be mitigated or survived in some way
now I understand why Elon wants to go to Mars so badly
Zod, can you not share your theory and learnings? Does your theory meet all of the criteria you yourself laid out?
Why the cryptic tease “I could but I won’t”? Are you a serious researcher or a charlatan?
I suppose if of all of this is true, it doesn’t matter what your answers are.
My understanding of the causation of cyclic cataclym does indeed meet all the criteria. I know it is correct because there is a vital aspect that has been hidden from public knowledge, which has only been hidden because it reveals that causation.
I gain more by encouraging others to apply their minds to this conundrum, than I do by simply providing a solution.
As an example, I’ve provided the solution to the purpose of the Great Pyramid*, but what benefit does it give?
* The Floating Coffer Theory: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D1yYw0NtrYu6YMccNgoAsxiIs14WOeyr/view?pli=1
Thank you for answering my question, and for not nuking me for suggesting you could be a “charlatan”. I regretted that temporary loss of composure. I do take it back and apologize to you now.
I look forward to reading your FCTheory, I’m saving that for later when things quiet down here and I have some time to dig into it.
I only recently learned (through Graham Hancock) about the YD and the potential relationship of the Taurids to that event. I read somewhere (but can no longer find it) that Earth passes through the center of the Taurids cloud in 2032. Furthermore, it seems like there is some periodicity there that perhaps matches the 12k pattern?
Or … can you at least tell me that your understanding definitely does NOT involve the Taurids / Comet Enke … and to just keep looking?
I’m really interested in getting on the same page as you and your understanding of the cause.
The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis is being encouraged/promoted given it distracts from cyclic cataclysm – and also because the YDIH can easily be argued against (in support of orthodox uniformitarianism).
There is no such thing as a cosmic ‘tennis ball serving machine’ that shoots impactors at The Earth with incredible accuracy such that they hit twice a Great Year.
Ugh frustrating! Ok so you’re saying that the “big slosh” happens 2x a Great Year, and pole shift is itself an effect of the cause of the cataclysm, but not the cause itself of the cataclysm. TES says the “big slosh” is due to something happening terrestrially (from within the core of the planet) but you’re saying it’s NOT caused by something terrestrial….but it’s NOT the Taurids (or some other meteor). So pray tell what occurs extra-terrestrially, with near clockwork periodicity of 12,000 years that is the cause? Is it some pulsar? Does anyone even know? And I guess, does it even matter what the cause is, if the event is destined to happen anyway, and we know when. (Still, it’d be nice to know, perhaps to gain consensus)
Once you figure out what has been hidden*, it doesn’t take too long to figure out the external source of the force/impulse that jolts the planet such that crust displaces 30°, and oceans slop. There has to be a considerable motive force. Simple ‘decoupling’, howsoever occasioned, provides no such force. I appreciate that this force is difficult to conceive of from a blank canvas, however upon collecting all the clues, one can figure it out without requiring anything exotic like pulsars, micronovae, or rogue bodies.
There will be no consensus. The best you can hope for is to figure it out yourself.
Charles Hapgood and Chan Thomas (and Ben Davidson’s regurgitation thereof) may give you clues, but their theories do not hold up to scrutiny. Immanuel Velikovsky is worth a read, despite even wackier theories.
* one of the secrets passed down the generations via the mystery schools.
Hay-seus! The research into “Mystery Schools” got weird pretty fast. I can think of a many things that have supposedly been “hidden” : Antarctica, Roswell, Teslas (the man not car) power engineering, “structures” on Moon and Mars, UFOs, human consciousness, Pluto (planet, not a planet), the “dark knight”, Niburu, the scrolls….
Since I don’t belong to any “mystery school” how could I ever come across such a secret?
How can such a force/impulse be due to anything other than an external (Rouge?) body? Unless we hit a wall, like at the end of the Truman show.
More hints please!
Two good questions you have there.
The mystery of the Great Pyramid has been kept a mystery since the Templars spent around a decade figuring it out around 820AD. And yet, with enough research, a merely average engineer such as myself managed to figure it out too. So, you just have to do the research.
The criteria I listed are ample clues to be getting on with.
OK ok. Not going to be easy. So I was reacquainting myself with the “wobble” of the earth’s axis (which takes a Great Year to complete a full wobble) and it occurred to me that if the wobble shape was eye-shaped instead of an oval, toward the “corners” of the eye the axis would accelerate and then rapidly change direction as it cornered the tear ducts. But what would cause that? Gravity? Magnetism?
I was thinking about a (flat) magnet how it gets wobbly next to another magnet until suddenly one of them “flips”. I don’t have enough knowledge to explain how this could possibly scale-up to an earth-sized magnet, never-mind the fact that it’s a spheroid magnet, not “flat” (I’m not going there).
So what I think you’re saying is that :
So what’s the big magnet … that which is not common knowledge and not spotted by multiple back-yard astronomers ?
Am I even close?
The lunisolar explanation of equinoctial precession was contrived to deflect from the true explanation.
Cyclic cataclysm is not due to impactors, nor a fly-by of a rogue body.
You are heading in the right direction, but you are unlikely to progress until you grok The Great Year. An introduction to set you on the right track is the YouTube video (narrated by James Earl Jones): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3ZDcj0kF_0
This path has been fun and very interesting. Ok so I learned about the Great Year, and ultimately it led me to Tycho model (makes sense to me) of our solar system, under which Sun and Mars make up a binary system. I learned about the polaris to vega to polaris (pvp) rotation which is responsible for the appearance of earth’s “wobble”.
I read about the possible relationship between the orbital speed of the Sun and it’s frequency of magnetic pole reversals to the same of Earth (this potentially explains why Earth’s poles are wigging out right now, right on schedule)
I learned about the Angular Momentum problem, which is potentially solved by the binary orbit (24k yrs suggested by Binary Research Institute but modeled as 25.3k yrs by Tychos).
I also learned about the 6-or-7-degree “tilt” of Sun and the orbital path of its “moons” Mercury and Venus (as well as the tilt of Moon and Mars) all agree. And Earth’s “tilt” is 23.5 degrees. Not sure if it’s relevant but they add up to about 30 degrees….
But so far I have not found anything that indicates a condition or event that repeats twice each Great Year with sufficient jolting force to push/pull crust AND water in a single day….it seems like a “smack” or an extremely strong opposing directional gravitational force that would have to “pull” the crust back down 30 degrees after having “pushed” the crust up 30 degrees about 12k years ago. I’m stumped…..yet at the same time I feel like it’s right in front of me and I can’t see it.
Another clue to help steer my digging?
You’re going to come aross a lot of junk, which will include such things as Tychos, Birkeland currents, flat Earth, micronovae, galactic current sheet, Herculobus, etc. You’re going to have to develop discernment and regular use of Occam’s Razor.
And no, Vega/Polaris do not cause Earth’s wobble (correlation is not causation).
All I can say is that when you’ve discovered that which has been known to mystery schools for millennia, you will know you have discovered it, and know why it has been kept secret – because it leads to an understanding of cyclic cataclysm.
So, you should deduce that you’re not looking for anything particularly exotic, but something rather astounding – something that fits the aphorism ‘hidden in plain sight’.
ok all that research for nada. Simplest explanations then are
A)simulation / manufactured reset
B) hand of God
How am I supposed to discover what mystery schools know? Of not to learn the answer, then to verify the answer I have. Are you a student of a mystery school then? If not then how could you have verified it yourself
Still an intriguing puzzle to figure out. If you’re not going to give me anymore clues to help my journey, I’ll just have to keep wandering….and wondering.
Thanks for the nudges so far.
Your research is not at all for naught. It is not something that can be researched in a day, more like years.
And if/when you find the answer, you will know that it is an answer that cannot be shared (no-one will believe you, who does not already know).
Once you know the answer you’ll recognise that it’s encoded in many, many places.
Sure, you’ll recognise it in Freemasonry, but also in corporate logos, architecture, religions, etc.
You will even find it in my icon. ;-)
Why did you make a condition of the solution one where Vostok stays put? Everyone else says Antarctica (which is being occulted from most of us) will shift to a temperate if not tropic zone….perhaps where it once was.
Today I had a thought alone these lines where Vostok is the fulcrum of an upside down pendulum, where the Northern axis (only) transits from side to side across a great year. Too exotic?
Also, both Sun and Moon are in plain site. You say there is no rogue body causing the cataclysm….could it not be a known body such as Sun? Or Jupiter?
Finally … just tell me … are you saying it’s (a) God or what me might call Aliens? Because now that you point out the Templar Cross, I sort of feel like you’re hinting at supernatural stuff and I was under the impression you had a (simple once you grok it) purely scientific/mathematical solution.
The current crustal displacement (throughout the last few hundred thousand years) has tended to be about 30°, and has been more an oscillation, rather than an accumulation (prior equators, ancient coral reefs also corroborate this). However, over a much longer period of time, yes, there may well have been accumulation, such that what is now polar may once have been equatorial.
NB I said Vostok remains polar (within the freezing zone of the pole), not that it stays put, for example if something is 15° from the pole, and is shifted 30° the other side, -15° is still 15° from the pole.
Not only no rogue body, but also no known body, that Velikovsky-style, departs from its expected course. Bear in mind, that what you’re looking for has been known for a VERY long time.
So no, there’s nothing woo-woo/exotic such as hyperdimensional entities, simulation, aliens, chthonic demons, supernatural beings/gods, flat Earth, time travel, etc.
All crosses derive from the Zodiac. My Occitan Cross icon simply makes this a little more obvious. There is also a very subtle aspect that encodes ‘something else’.
Sun Cross
Maybe these are not crosses at all but instead is the letter X as in 10. Or as in “double cross”. I can’t sleep. I need another clue. I’m currently pondering a hard “flip” if the rotational axis instead of a precession. I can’t fathom the cause.
Don’t waste time on the Occitan cross, that’s something you’ll understand way down the line.
I just can’t reconcile these things:
To what end? To me this makes it seem like the ~12ka cycle of destruction is possibly a made-up distraction from the horrors occurring in our societies. No don’t be concerned with dead soldiers, civilians women and children, loss of liberties, property and life … instead look over here and be afraid that you’re all going to be wiped out soon.
I’m having a really hard time accepting one truth over the other.
In the absence of more clues about the actual CAUSE, and how this is KNOWN, I find I’m maybe just going to have to give up. This rabbit hole is too deep.
Help a brother out.
Distractions and deceptions galore.
“That which causes cataclysm has been known for a very long time.”
is not the same as “Cyclic cataclysm and its causation have been understood for a very long time”.
It is possible to know about ‘A’, without knowing about ‘B’ – and thus, without knowing that ‘A’ causes ‘B’.
So, ‘A’ can have been known for a very long time – without the people who know about ‘A’ being aware of ‘B’ or that ‘A’ causes ‘B’.
If you rearrange my statements you can make it appear as if I’m saying something I’m not.
You’ve effective written:
‘B’ occurs.
This has been known for a very long time.
When it should be:
‘A’ has been known for a very long time.
‘B’ occurs every 12ka.
‘A’ causes ‘B’.
So, what you’re looking for is ‘A’.
But, ‘A’ has been hidden – because it more easily leads to understanding ‘B’, and understanding ‘B’ is not desired. By itself, ‘A’ is innocuous.
‘A’ is encoded in the Occitan cross (among many other things). That’s what you’re looking for. Then you can move on to how ‘A’ causes ‘B’.
So, your first task is to obtain the correct understanding of equinoctial precession, i.e. The Great Year. Then you can move on to understanding why cataclysm occurs twice a Great Year.
Thank you for prodding me, it has made me retrace my steps. I finished re-watching The Great Year video. So far here’s my understanding (such as it is) based on the clues and hints.
I’m sure there’s much more, such as maybe Humans escaped the Earth in the past and either crash landed back sometime later, or maybe are stuck dead or alive up in orbit of some celestial body (maybe even Earth). It is rumored that there’s a “dark night” satellite above the south pole (where nobody can see it), but it’s a satellite not from this civilization. I dunno. Woo. Woo-Woo.
I’m keen to know, as I’m sure everyone reading about this: how is it that in 2024, it’s estimated that it’ll all happen 24 years later? Someone must be tracking Anti-Sun?
Well Zod YinYang (Zodiac SunAntiSun <wink>) what feedback to you have for me?
Thank you, I appreciate the journey.
1. A, B, and A->B, are all esoteric knowledge, passed down via mystery schools, secret societies, etc. That said, ‘A’ will be more well known than ‘B’, and B more than A->B, and the actual causation underlying A->B will be known only to a very few (and probably post-renaissance or later, at the earliest).
2. Yes.
3. Don’t light your cigar yet.
4. You can find out the eccentricity fairly easily, but it’s approximately 0.5. So, no, not really ‘close’, just ‘nearer’ & ‘further’.
5. 9/10 – I daresay this could be made a tad clearer. :-)
6. Orbital planes will be close (Pluto excepted). Spin axes are a different matter.
7. ‘Dark’ only because it is hidden – hence “The sun behind The Sun”. Here’s an example of what happens when someone posits such esoterica to an orthodox audience: https://www.reddit.com/r/occult/comments/vq0jmr/sirius_the_sun_behind_the_sun_atavistic_resurgence/ (That wasn’t me, btw). Yin yang represent Earth’s two life/population cycles (I have come across suggestions that ‘heaven’ & ‘hell’ is cognate).
8. ‘Cross in circle’ is just another Zodiacal reference. Celtic cross, etc. Cardinal points/signs (qv tetramorph).
9. No. As I previously indicated, not due to passing body (known or unknown). See https://www.livescience.com/space/planets/astronomers-narrow-down-where-planet-nine-could-be-hiding-by-playing-massive-game-of-connect-the-dots for clues that there is something massive a few thousand AU away.
10. No. Micronova is bunk (Davidson is ltd hangout). The Dzhanibekov effect applies to a spinning body in free space (very low friction) that is dynamically unstable, i.e. has DISTINCT principal moments of inertia. Note that the hesitation in declassifying the Dzhanibekov effect was because it was recognised as a potential explanation for what is known to occur, given it is such a close match.
For other clues as to the repeated (Sisyphean) technological advancement, abrupt obliteration (ELE), and rebirth (Samsara) of h sapiens you can check out OOPARTS.
No doubt NASA are completely on top of things, and thus able to publish an ETA for those able to recognise it. https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/
[Reposted without hyperlink prefixes]
1. A, B, and A->B, are all esoteric knowledge, passed down via mystery schools, secret societies, etc. That said, ‘A’ will be more well known than ‘B’, and B more than A->B, and the actual causation underlying A->B will be known only to a very few (and probably post-renaissance or later, at the earliest).
2. Yes.
3. Don’t light your cigar yet.
4. You can find out the eccentricity fairly easily, but it’s approximately 0.5. So, no, not really ‘close’, just ‘nearer’ & ‘further’.
5. 9/10 – I daresay this could be made a tad clearer. :-)
6. Orbital planes will be close (Pluto excepted). Spin axes are a different matter.
7. ‘Dark’ only because it is hidden – hence “The sun behind The Sun”. Here’s an example of what happens when someone posits such esoterica to an orthodox audience: reddit.com/r/occult/comments/vq0jmr/sirius_the_sun_behind_the_sun_atavistic_resurgence/ (That wasn’t me, btw). Yin yang represent Earth’s two life/population cycles (I have come across suggestions that ‘heaven’ & ‘hell’ is cognate).
8. ‘Cross in circle’ is just another Zodiacal reference. Celtic cross, etc. Cardinal points/signs (qv tetramorph).
9. No. As I previously indicated, not due to passing body (known or unknown). See livescience.com/space/planets/astronomers-narrow-down-where-planet-nine-could-be-hiding-by-playing-massive-game-of-connect-the-dots for clues that there is something massive a few thousand AU away.
10. No. Micronova is bunk (Davidson is ltd hangout). The Dzhanibekov effect applies to a spinning body in free space (very low friction) that is dynamically unstable, i.e. has DISTINCT principal moments of inertia. Note that the hesitation in declassifying the Dzhanibekov effect was because it was recognised as a potential explanation for what is known to occur, given it is such a close match.
For other clues as to the repeated (Sisyphean) technological advancement, abrupt obliteration (ELE), and rebirth (Samsara) of h sapiens you can check out OOPARTS.
No doubt NASA are completely on top of things, and thus able to publish an ETA for those able to recognise it. thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/
I feel like I took one step forward and two back. But here’s goes:
Thank you, I look forward to your responses every time.
You still have yet to undergo a certain paradigm shift.
For an orbit of 24ka, the binary pair would have to be of the order of thousands of AU apart.
How could The Sun be in an orbit with something 8.6LY away, yet not be in any relationship with various stars 4-6LY away?
If you want more clues, just re-read my comments.
Bit still … what is the mechanism by which any of the cataclysmic events are caused to occur? If not gravity of a suddenly but very briefly close body, and not Sun material…what could be the mechanism?
That’s a good question, and given the corpus of my previous comments, you should be able to deduce the answer.
Aight…. I’ll slog through them again. I can almost taste it. I sort of smell the answer but not fully.
It has to be gravity.
I thought about an axial FLOP, but it didn’t make sense. There’s no torque point on which to “push” the Earth’s axis over.
I had to give up on the binary system (with Sirius) theory because I found other evidence that Sirius does in fact move over time, which means it cannot be in a binary system with Sol. Plus as you pointed out, there are other (albeit smaller) stars closer to Sol than Sirius, and they clearly (I think clearly) are NOT part of a multi-star system with Sol.
If it’s not gravity of an unknown-to-me planet (or Mithra), sufficiently large to be very far away and still be in our solar system, yet be undetected by thousands of amateur astronomers, then I have to admit defeat.
A couple of problems with my thoughts:
a) If Zody can cause a super tide and pull crust on Earth, wouldn’t it deform or maybe dislodge Moon in the process?
b) How can Zody be sure to pull the crust 30 degrees ONE direction, only to pull it 30 Degrees the OTHER direction the next time? (I thought maybe the first pass was “above” Earth, and the 2nd pass was “below” Earth, relatively speaking. That might do it?
c) If Zody is a planet flying around Sol, wouldn’t it have SOME reflective property, or maybe moons and such? (hmm.. moons might play into this too) Surely someone with a telecope would have seen it by now? All one would have to do is figure out the direction of where earth’s equator is “pointing” perpendicularly to the spin axis, and look “down” in that direction? (and look 180 degrees “up” in case it’s on the other side?) I’m probably over simplifying it.
What do you say?
It’s like you just paid your younger brother to do your school homework exercise. :-}
You were better with your term ‘anti-Sun’.
You haven’t yet made the paradigm shift that makes it all fall into place.
All the clues you need are in the entirety of my comments.
A bonus clue is that once you’ve figured it out, you’ll know you’ve figured it out – which is nice.
NB Mithras=age of Taurus, Moses=age of Aries, Jesus=age of Pisces. The same Solar/Zodiacal figure – not actually a real chappie.
Right now the only paradigm shift I can think of is: There is no spoon
Ok, I’ll go back and re-read them all .. again.
Have to admit I’m discouraged. Maybe I’m just not smart enough to see what’s hidden in plain sight. But I’m not giving up YET.
Can you give me a clue as to how 2048 (a familiar number) was determined? How can one “be sure”?
I don’t know how 2048 was determined, but it has been converged upon over the last few decades. I assume those who’ve been involved in calculating it have been scrupulously methodical.
Strangely, 2048, or thereabouts. I have seen proposed by various other pundits.
Whoa Z. I know we’re being sort of matter-of-fact about this in our discussions…. But you do realize what this means … I’m grappling with that a little. It might be 24 years away but when it dawns on the masses, it won’t be pretty. Distractions can’t last forever. Ok enough doom. Back to the analysis…distraction.
It’s the moon
My guess is that it may have something to do with the global climate hysteria and depopulation via the stab. Kill off excess population so the remainder have enough resources to survive on decimated planet…
Thank you for sharing your findings regarding the Great Pyramid Coffer : I have found it very enlightening !
I don’t know what benefit it gave you to write down this work and share it for free but I surely wish you could find the motivation to write about your understanding of the causation of cyclic cataclysm !
In case, Substack seems to be a convenient plateform to share written work with others.
earths geological record and moon rocks say you are wrong
I’ve been thinking about this. Could the cataclysm be made up to fit evidence that LOOKS like it fits the story. This fooling millions into just another tall tale (like the worlds religions perhaps) as a means of control? Ever more control…through the millions of years…. Qui bono? Same who have always lied and benefited I guess? Tptb? Maybe the simplest explanation is….lies. Always lies. Very disappointing if so.
Figuring out that there are falsehoods/lies/deceptions/cover-ups is part of the paradigm shift I mentioned.
You have your work cut out then figuring out what’s true and what’s false – discernment.
Uniformitarianism and catastrophism can’t both be true:
https://www.icr.org/article/up-with-catastrophism
I’ll leave you to research ‘Moon rocks’.
Did you see my PM over on GHMB?
Holy Sugarpants … it just hit me WHY over the last few years a new religion of The Science ™ was born! Trust US (so called) EXPERTS. not the obvious facts all around you for those with eyes to see. The movie Don’t Look Up is an instruction manual leaked in the form of a movie, although the extra celestial “actor” is made up, perhaps because it’s more believable to those who have no chance of experiencing the “paradigm shift” you speak about. But basically the rest of the story and players are instructional.
Some interesting clues here :
https://binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/introduction/binary-companion-theory/
According to the Binary Research Institute, our Sun could be in a binary system with Barnard’s star, a red dwarf currently located about 5.95 light years from the Sun.
https://binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/5.9/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Lost-Star-Found-11-11-23.pdf
Now, with this hypothesis of a 24-kyrs elliptic motion of our Sun within the Galaxy due to a binary system, a 12-kyrs periodic energetic pulse could be explained by a “strange ray” that goes accross our Sun’s path.
What kind of energy ? No idea
What source ? No idea
Location of the source in our sky ? My first guess would be somewhere in Orion or the Pleiades.
Jeronimmo I have been hot on this trail too. You may find additional info from commenter Zod and others including Walter Cruttenden and Graham Handcock over at http://grahamhancock.com/phorum
Hey Jim, I checked over at the /phorum you linked, and am at loss as to which topic classification would contain discussion about ‘this’ topic.
Thanks for your efforts in this quest for understanding.
“another” Jim
https://kairos.laetusinpraesens.org/muversex_m_h_1
Zod….what about Libyan desert glass….they found objects crafted from that in tutankamens tomb……
Upon the planetary upset (that causes crustal displacement, cataclysm, etc.) pyrothermal, supersonic winds are likely (with the possibility of plasma incursion). Hence there is evidence of directional, high temperature scorching upon some ancient megalithic structures/ruins.
As to whether this explains desert glass (vitrification @ 1,000-3,000C), as opposed to lightning strikes, I’d lean towards the latter.
That said, widespread volcanism (upon crustal displacement) will also occur, and it’s possible the greatly increased amount of atmospheric volcanic ash may increase the prevalence and intensity of electrical storms.
So, not very conclusive…
Yeppers! Puerto Rico? hmmmmm… wow.
Hi TES, very thought-provoking. I’ve read this three times over the last year, and find it more rewarding each time.
James Kamis appears to be thinking along similar lines. His proposal is less complete than yours (focused on points 3 and 4 of your synopsis) but he has interesting things to say about El Niño and La Niña. See http://www.plateclimatology.com/ for his theory manuscript and a link to his YouTube presentation.
I also wonder if there could be a role for cosmic ray flux in your schema, which is believed to trigger volcanic activity and earthquakes, particularly during grand solar minima.
regulus in arabic is qulb al-assad meaning lionheart.i wonder if king richard the first learned the significance of this astrological conjunction
Hi TES, someone forwarded me this article “climate-change-is-slowing-earths-rotation”
I read it and thought, here we go again… so I endeavored to track down the study in Nature. First I read this line in their “summary” here:
“Agnew1 reports that human-induced melting of polar ice exerts a slowing effect on Earth’s rotation, effectively delaying a decision on the need for a negative leap second.”
I was super curious how Agnew determined it was human-induced melting, so I grabbed the study (“A global timekeeping problem postponed by global warming”) and lo and behold, zero mention of human induced anything other than approaches to calculating UTC.
I didn’t have the time or expertise to dig into it, but I’m curious if you’ve seen it and if it meshes with your thorough analysis done here. My cursory scan finds no conflict with the actual study, if anything it simple seems to describe a moderating factor to the rate of change in spin — which you aptly argue is a significant contributor to warming.
Curious if you’ve read it and what you think?
I have not read the article, but several persons have mentioned it to me.
The conclusion to attribute changes in the Earth’s rotational speed, to ice cap changes, when we already know that the core spins differently than the outer body AND exchanges FAR more mass with it – is dogmatic at best, obfuscating most likely. It typifies the pseudoscience aspect of climate science.
The relationship however, bears both mass contribution as well as magnetic coupling – so it is a bit noisy and hard to directly observe effect to outcome… so I keep watching. What I have observed thus far is in Observation 6.
When I was doing Exercise Physiology research for NASA grants in college and med school, it was shared with me that NASA really wanted to know, but that the other research labs that brought in the most money were able to deliver the desired results reliably to commercial funding interests.
Have run into that several times myself, John.
Mind blowing.
It was awfully sweet of our DNA to terraform the earth so we could evolve on it.
Hey there. Thanks for what you are doing.
I have SMM (Smoldering Multiple Myeloma) that I found out 2 years ago, after the poison vax.
Do you see any mechanism that correlates blood disorders such as mine to mrna shots?
I read lnps gather at bone marrow and know that this disease is actually a mutation of plasma cells, so it certainly makes sense.
several different mechanisms of actions i have been collecting. https://www.youtube.com/live/1zv0JlrwPao?si=n9vp7X-ol0URU-6t https://youtu.be/liUg3eqyoZE?si=LnoPEOoP5uJJlb47 https://youtu.be/nbh_NB6LNaI?si=-y0P_1L1B_SzC4fs https://rumble.com/v4q174c-dr.-peter-mccullough-sounds-the-alarm-on-covid-vaccine-induced-turbo-cancer.html
I also have had concerning changes in health related to MGUS (really, MGCS because it’s producing symptoms), with paraneoplastic like changes, along with having all the gene markers for high risk progression and treatment resistant myeloma – before I even get myeloma. I never had any signs of disease prior to vaccines for Covid (mRNA from Pfizer) where I had progressively advancing severity in side effects after each dose (which included worsening pericarditis and central nervous system toxicity/inflammation resulting in temporary loss of sight and balance, amongst the symptoms). I now have a lack of ability to produce IgA immunoglobulins aside from the involved M-protein (which is IgG Lambda light chain) resulting in reduced immunity particularly where IgA resides (mucous membranes amongst other areas of the body). One very old haematologist said he’d never seen this aetiology before, and estimated that I would progress to myeloma in less than two years.
I crave B-vitamins, as well as A, C, E, and D. Funnily enough, I also crave nicotine when having difficulty breathing – seems counterproductive, however its nicotine which widens airways and seems to reduce inflammation/exudation).
I know that I wasn’t unwell just a few short years ago; I was a very comprehensively screened live organ donor, accepted into a very limited list of people who were candidates to donate live donations (kidney, liver). Now, both of those organ systems are significantly reduced in function with significant disease burden despite no other changes to my situation/diet/environment besides vaccines.
Having read this, it seems to add more evidence to the hypothesis I’ve held that sometimes there are significant health deficits from vaccines, in my own case.
Pingback: Before Pandemic Struck
Too many “wrong” choices were made over the last 4 years to call it incompetence. IMHO the covid tyranny and jabs was maliciously executed for evil purposes. I watched Dr. John Campbell on YT yesterday called “organisms”. The intent was obvious is that they wanted to have this injected into as many human beings on the earth as possible. My Question: How how how were they able to execute this? And how successful it was is shocking. Its really sad the average human was either ignorant and/or compliant.
Having a slightly different perspective to your incisive article, The Floating Coffer Theory argues that the Great Pyramid was built precisely to demonstrate the occurence of the Great Flood, i.e. that it was predictable (cyclic), and occurred with little warning.
The Floating Coffer Theory – 2nd draft v1.pdf – Google Drive
I had thought about this possibility – as an obelisk or tower would have been swept away – however, the Pyramids would need to be differentiated in base altitude in order to more likely catch and demonstrate in the Tura erosion, the water level dynamics to future generations. Why would one duplicate the same pyramid at almost exactly the same height? The information related would be potentially missed, with the workload fatally doubled in the process. There also would be no need for the intricate shafts, chambers, and triple locking stones entrances. Simple well-shafts leading to a vertical repository of sea water would have been much more effective in lifting the coffer – or better yet, use Tura limestone on the interior main shaft to demark the position of the water (that water level would have been stable and calm – offering a very precise mark, easy to read and show progression. Much easier to build and protect from bandits in the ensuing millennia.
Nonetheless, creative theory – and the idea that these were built with a cyclic flood in mind, as part of their rationale of construction, is very strong.
TES
The other pyramids that I have made even a cursory analysis of, also exhibit the characteristics of a cataclysm recording device. The Bent Pyramid was unvented, and thus utilised a different mechanism, probably to raise & latch something megalithic within the highly pressurised ‘chimney’.
There are a variety of ways of designing a cataclysm recording device. No doubt you could refine yours to see how it compares.
It is not at all easy to date the Giza pyramids, I suspect the GP is the youngest at just over 12,000 years old. Others would be multiples of this, e.g. 24,000 plus.
The Giza location is chosen because it remains axially aligned despite crustal displacement (thus indicating that displacement) of about 30 degrees.
I appreciate the scope and approach you bring to the Table: That is, you are speaking to people about How to Think! Aside from the maxims I’ve anchored my thoughts and emotions to coming by virtue of my spiritual beliefs, my faith and its community, I’ve not had the good fortune to be instructed in this way. Wholesome and ‘other-centered’ core values will guide one ‘towards the light’ or right-thinking and honest integrity in how we relate to others in the world. However, the didactic, precice, identification, and utilization of Crooked Thinking and manipulative motivations builds a better objectivity and rationale, able to then be applied as a filter and litmus for any philosophic, moralistic, or ‘group-think’ paradym. Thanks for what you do. “May you sleep well, and dream of large women.” The Princess BrideI appreciate the scope and approach you bring to the Table: That is, you are speaking to people about How to Think! Aside from the maxims I’ve anchored my thoughts and emotions to coming by virtue of my spiritual beliefs, my faith and its community, I’ve not had the good fortune to be instructed in this way. Wholesome and ‘other-centered’ core values will guide one ‘towards the light’ or right-thinking and honest integrity in how we relate to others in the world. However, the didactic, precice, identification, and utilization of Crooked Thinking and manipulative motivations builds a better objectivity and rationale, able to then be applied as a filter and litmus for any philosophic, moralistic, or ‘group-think’ paradym. Thanks for what you do. “May you sleep well, and dream of large women.” The Princess Bride
Thanks Gary! Love the Princess Bride reference…
I have this suspicion that we are not here to learn how to be good, but rather to experience first hand, and study the nature of what it means to be and practice evil. Everything else in the universe is innately ‘good’.
Evil is the seething abomination which studies how to be good.
Maybe to overcome evil itself?
Thanks for your reply, ES.
As I’ve been chewing on your Lewisesque quote, I’d be tempted to add, – “Evil is the seething abomination which studies how to be good…to emulate, but never to become.”
Thanks for writing this out. I don’t understand the complexities of DNA operation to this extent and wish I could visualize it. I know your conclusion is the truth, it still leaves the why but drastically narrows the options down. What do you think that the point of all this is, surely you have best guesses? I’m starting to think that we place too much importance on the rigidity of time and get a feeling that it may already be being manipulated. If it turns out it can be traveled freely to seed for a later outcome, the time factor may not matter as much as we traditionally think it does. How do you get your ideas, what is the mechanism to make you start investigating this subject matter for example?
Trent,
1. I cannot really fathom the point of why such a warfare strategy as DNA would be assembled. Once that genie is let out of the bottle, it is just a matter of time before it pollutes the entire cosmos. In itself it presents no solution, save for conflict and death. Were I the engineer who made the assignment between amino acid nucleon count and Standard Code logical slot, I would have to think long and hard about the amount of sheer suffering involved in such a decision to let loose a Weapon of Mass Suffering such as DNA into the Universe. This fabricator, was of limited power, and may not have been ‘good’. Even a DNA paradise is replete with endless suffering.
2. I suspect that time is compressible and expandable, much the same as is the primary 3 dimensions – and this is the source of our ‘red shift’, and not the inflation of the cosmos. But that being said, time travel backwards in time presents the singularity problem. No matter what we do wrong, it can be corrected by going back in time. Eventually one will cascade into the unity of perfection or abject hell. There is no in between.
3. Where do I get my ideas to study? I follow where my heart leads and as it is prompted, much like how an artist writes a song. But also where there is ample observational data available to draw an inference – otherwise I am just creating a(nother) religion. Science/skepticism is already populated by religious nihilist experts on God-spirit-the-empty-set, and I see the trouble that caused. Of course, then we have the other religions as well who are also experts on God-spirit-the-insistence. I see the negative handiwork of both these false religions, and do not wish to replicate that.
TES
Regarding suffering, have you pondered on the problem of consciousness? If understanding is not a computation and needs some physical process beyond computation it will evolve. But is the subjective experience of pain really necessary for this biological warfare? Looks to me like there is no greater evil than creating suffering where there was nothing.
The possibility that this is an evil cosmos is terrifying. I have been trying to figure it out (if subjective experience of suffering would arise of necessity) but I can’t.
Maybe understanding of the necessity for the subjective experience of suffering emerges with greater consciousness.
Yet, those reported NHI’s (if valid and accurate) who have transcended our phase of civilization don’t appear to experience suffering as a goal – no self-loathing, no obsession over sin, no centralized domination and punishment. They understand what it does, but do not appear to use it as a vehicle themselves. *shrug
Hi TES,
I appreciate your work since I found you on Twitter through your COVID vaxx analysis.
Regarding the Madsen study in Example 1, how did you discern that the data was constrained to 4.5yrs? I don’t see it explicitly mentioned anywhere. Dividing the number of person-years for each group (unvaxxed, vaxxed, total) by the people of each yields 3.7-4 years of following on average, which is the closest value to 4.5 that I see quickly.
You showed another study in your Vaccinials article which had a cutoff age, which I believed you implied is also the case here at 4.5yrs based on your graphic, but the Madsen study tracked older children too… can you provide any clarity on this?
Have you any other geological evidence for a marine transgresssion/regression of this magnitude over that time period in Northern Africa/Saudi Peninsula? I asked a hydrogeologist friend and recalled a paper on ‘natural isotopes and sea level change from stalactites on Socotra’. On a different note, I have wondered for some time, if mankind has had a brain of our current volume and capability for say 0.5-1.0 million years, why is there so little evidence of civilisation before say 7,500 years ago? (or if there is, it is not commonly known; I’d stand correction).
Great questions Forest,
I suspect that the ocean levels are far higher than they were back before this Khafre-marked inundation. We lost a LOT of civilization either interred under the mud-flow from the deluge or buried under the sea with the residual higher sea level. If Gobekli Tepe existed out of the box 10,400 bce, then I suspect a lot more civilization did as well at that same time. Its proximity ‘Eden’ (the garden plain just below it) however, might suggest a boundary in time (???). The Hypostasis of the Archons says that mankind was given the gnosis (or sentience as a higher being) some time after his physical form was developed (assembled) by our masters. But I have no idea whether this is true or not. Just interesting…
TES
Thank you; do let me know if you find any answers to the questions. This recent paper may also be of interest: The Egyptian pyramid chain was built along the now abandoned Ahramat Nile Branch: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01379-7
Is this Post of yours yesterday an answer to the second part of my quesion? If so, please elaborate. “Man himself has proved to be a greater threat to our knowledge and understanding than any natural disaster ever could be.
Until we mature spiritually, we will perpetually believe that we were created out of clay or recently and amazingly evolved from a dissimilar yet extinct species.
Every ancient library burned, every inscription erased, every sculpture smitten, every finding easily explained and reburied – all in the name of The True God and The True Science.
As long as our hearts remain in this darkened state, so too will our past be equally opaque, and our present a constant series of paradoxes.
@EthicalSkeptic”
No, it was a response to another question on X, just expanded a bit in that moment.
“We lost a LOT of civilization either interred under the mud-flow from the deluge or buried under the sea”
Much of the civilisation would have been shattered by the catastrophic winds occurring in this pole flip scenario. The reason we only find very old remains of human activity deep inside the caves/underground. Not because these were the only places we inhabited but because everything humans build on the surface gets swept off from the face of the planet every so often. If we want to leave a lasting mark of our current civilisation we better start building errosion resistant stuff deep inside high mountain caves :)
And they have been found. Things that have been illegally classified under black programs or through privatization. Part of my advocacy is to change the mindset of the Sons of Archon, that they do not own this history. It is not theirs to withhold. That this is a crime.
Those who are either the direct hybrid offspring of the Archons (Anunnaki), or do their bidding on Earth under the promise of future reward when they are victorious over the effort to expunge them from the planet.
Any good readings/sources you’d recommend to get smarter on this topic? Or does this this knowledge require traveling in certain circles?
You cannot get through one verse of Akkadian, Egyptian, Enochian, Sumerian or Vedic Mythology without encountering these characters. They translate all the way through to the Roman and Greek gods themselves. No circle required. In fact to miss this, you sort of have to live in a cocoon which society fabricates for you. It’s just a choice as to whether you want to stay in it or not. Getting out of it is pretty easy.
Well then I’ll be a butterfly and read more source material from those cultures / periods.
Thanks ;-)
Thanks for the awesome publications TES!
Are there yDNA, mtDNA or other biological signals for identifying “Those who are either the direct hybrid offspring of the Archons (Anunnaki), or do their bidding” because I’m wondering genomics could may provide insights?
Also because questions in Drop 4966 (https://qalerts.app/?n=4966) keep me up at night:
Initially I thought about c19… but now some of your posts have me wondering, is there anything in our genomes suggestive of Anunnaki/Archon engineering?
Thanks again for your insightful posts🙏
Dear ES, did you consider the Dzhanibekov Effect caused maybe by an unstable earth core. It could be an explanation for sun rise and sun set to switch direction as north and south flip pole flip. Also an out of wack rotation during the flip (which could take some considerable amount of time) could lead to a redistribution of water on the planet.
Hope this makes sense.
Yes,
Read the final section of the article, entitled ‘Epilogue’. It points to an unstable core – which is the origin of both the toppling mass addition to Earth’s outer rotational body, as well as current climate change heating (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2020/02/16/the-climate-change-alternative-we-ignore-to-our-peril/).
TES
Good evening E.S.,
A friend of mine forwarded me your article and I was only aware of it recently.
I never came across your work before.
The reason for me to comment is that you mention a 600 feet ocean flood, which also reached the Giza plateau.
That number of 600 feet rang a bell, and we have to thank Randall Carlson lectures.
He mentioned that at about 4 800 to 5 000 before present, more or less 2 centuries before what was considered the begining of recorded History, the South Western Indian Ocean crater impact, known as the Burkle crater, was a Cosmic impact event.
The crater is about 18 miles in diameter, 12 500 feet in the bottom of the Indian Ocean.
This crater is well placed to have generated tsunami waves outward from the epicenter, apparently left chevron shaped tsunami deposits on both coasts of Australia and Madagascar.
In Southern Madgascar, these tsunamis deposits are 600 feet in thickness, the 600 feet that you mentioned in your article.
He also stated that looking at the configuration of the Indian Ocean, it is most likely that the tsunami had moved North and entered the Persian Gulf.
But, by linking to your article, I assume that it may have reached the Giza plateau and this may have been the culprit.
On another topic, please also be aware of the scorching heat on the monuments and statues noticed at he Giza plateau and surroundings, most likely caused by some plasma events/solar disturbances of some sorts.
Then, we have the anomaly of Tanis hill in the Nile Delta.
Regards,
Mustapha
Thanks Mustapha,
I am aware of some of Randall’s work, especially with regard to the Richat structure, but will have to look into this. The flood marks on the Khafre Pyramid however, indicate a fairly (compared to a cosmic impactor) stable rise and fall in the ocean levels over a sustained period of time (years). The sea sat at this high level for years and then worked its way back to its historical settling. I do not like this inference particularly, and would instinctively favor an impactor, but it is the only alternative I am left with upon examining the Khafre pyramid.
This however, does not rule out an impactor role in the various features on the Earth as well. That remains a particular interest.
EVG
TES
Thanks for your reply.
Then, as you suggest the rise and fall of the ocean flood was stable, or likely gradual and stayed as is for years, then it is another catastrophic event.
In that case, I can only think of meltwater pulse (MWP)1A or 1B.
For MPW1A, the sea rose about 100 feet in a matter of 2 weeks.
Then after the trerrible Younger Dryas transition Epoch, leading to the begining of the Holocene Epoch, there was MWP1B, which increased sea level to an additional 300 feet average, to make the total to sea level rise 400 feet average.
But I would favour MWP1B, as in my thinking, the Great pyramid pointing out to our true North by a deviation of 3/60 of 1 degree could only mean that it was built after such a specific and terrible catastrophe.
I gently reminded you of the scorching heat in the stones monuments of Egypt as well as the abnormality at Tanis hill in the Nile Delta, but also in parts of the Sinai desert.
It is everywhere.
The stones are reduced to powder and are easily brittled with darkening colours.
Hard stones such as granite do not erode in such way.
It had the hall mark of a plasma discharge and/or Solar disturbances of some sorts.
The colossus of Memnon have their faces completely disfigured and as well as their torso, while their backs are OK.
As well their orientations indicated that they are offset to our true North by about 23 degree, which indicates to me that these were built to their original true North and a catastrophic event of some sorts shifted the North axis by about 23 degrees.
In other topics, Randall Carlson indicated that the Richat structure is just a natural geological feat.
Interesting ideas, thank you for sharing! However, a few things jump out at me… First, the hoist mechanism you describe would only be effective for vertical lifts. This would restrict the lifting to a single tier at a time. At that point, would a pump even be necessary? With unlimited slave or indentured labour, a bucket brigade approach would be workable. Related to that, did the ancient Egyptians have barrel (or equivalent) technology? There would be an upper limit to how large a goat skin water bag could be. Additionally, I find the creation of the hose more problematic than the pump. What material and manufacturing process could they have used to create something long and flexible enough to withstand the required pressure? Finally, if the pyramid was submerged in ~400 feet of seawater, how would the painted frescos and hieroglyphics inside the structure have survived?
James,
Correct, the machine would only lift one stone, one level, each iteration. However, there could be 32 of these machines operating in parallel, not just one ramp, delivering one stone every 20 minutes to an hour. A single ramp is of course, a Pollyannish fantasy.
A bucket brigade version of this is do-able by math, yes – just under the realization that work content multiplies with the addition of direct labor, because each of those persons has to be policed, housed, trained, fed, supplied, waste-handled, medically cared for, defended by a military, educated, entertained, governed, clothed, monitored, paid, supported, indentured, punished, managed, etc. So the direct labor workforce multiplies into a sizeable indirect labor workforce and supporting populace. Then there is the issue of ‘bored armies or angry workforces present risk’. The time issue still comes into play as well. In no way can this be done in a single era of mankind without a labor-efficient machine.
Barrels and hoses are made of perishable materials and are not that difficult a concept or construction, especially for a society that used the irrigation of a river as its lifeblood and transportation – one or both would have easily been developed over thousands of years of creative people. We cannot assemble histories off appeals to ignorance. It is a type of ecological fallacy. It is ok, for academia to say “I don’t know”; however, reality does not function constrained by that same academic ignorance (a way of saying “I DO know” in reality). The Egyptian records leave no method of accounting as to how the pyramids were built – of any means. So, it is no wonder that ‘barrels’ (I show a cartoon of one – probably did not look like that) or hoses are not documented as well. The hieroglyph-writing Egyptians did not build these larger pyramids in the first place. They built the smaller ones around it, which are absolutely plastered with hieroglyphs from one end to the other, and used none of the techniques of large stone handling, even though purportedly being built at the same time.
When first opened in recent times, the interiors of sections of the pyramids were encrusted with over an inch of salt. What frescos and hieroglyphs? There are none. The pyramids are silent. The only hieroglyphs are those in the relieving chambers, and they were applied in the 1800’s by Vyse.
TES
Another great article, TES. I don’t know how you find the time to compile and analyze so much information. Thank you.
Forgive me if I missed this, but what gives you confidence that the virus was not released intentionally? It seems that the origin debate stops shy of determining intent. It seems highly plausible, if not likely, to me that this was an intentional act. Thanks.
Thanks Casey,
I suspect that several viruses were released from a PLA shadow-mirror lab in mid 2017, which was established as new along with these new public labs. They took a much more cavalier approach to biosafety lab protocols. We were hit with many viruses, not just Wuhan. Pig and chickens died in 2018 from new viruses which killed 60% and 25% of those stock herds in China. Rather curious coincidental timing. Omicron was not the same virus as Wuhan. The PLA’s arrogance, power, and xenophobia, established it as ‘disrespectful’ of most of humanity as animals-infidels-slaves, not in need of top efforts to protect. My only hope is that those officers were culled and a new program was quietly put in place.
Intentional? I do not rule that out – however, when it comes to authority and human rights, there is no difference between accident and intent.
TES
I’m sorry to hear you walked away from Christianity. The theology you site here is missing a key element (Burdening a hapless creature with the sole responsibility to bring only perfection into the presence of God…) This is OT theology that is incomplete because the perfect One (Jesus), had not yet come. During this time one could present a sacrifice (the shedding of blood of a lamb or goat) to find forgiveness and acceptance with God for sin. This sacrifice was a representation of what was to come-the perfect, sinless, spotless Lamb of God.
the NT makes it clear that when Jesus came, sacrifices were no longer needed. While we cannot enter God’s presence in our sinful state, there was One (Jesus) who was sinless, who took our place as the final sacrifice, and gave His life for us so we could enter God’s presence clothed in His righteousness and thus find acceptance with Him. Read Hebrews.
The very fact that your blog is called “Ethical Skeptic” shows that you believe in ethics-a moral code mankind should live by…ie…don’t steal, don’t lie, don’t cheat, don’t hurt people, etc. This code/moral standard is only found in the Bible. The ten commandments, Sermon on the Mount, etc…A society that lives by these morals is a better society which treats people the way they’d want to be treated.
I’m curious…have you read the Bible through cover to cover? People misrepresent and unfortunately (whether purposely or not) muddle the gospel and the truth of God’s love for all people, everywhere. It’s why He sent His Son to save us-so we don’t have to do that ourselves.
-Respectfully
Yes, I have read the Bible through and through, probably 6 times as an entire collection (50 or more for key gospels and Paulinian letters). Reading the Bible as a serious work, is the key to rejecting all this baloney. Most Christians never actually read the Bible, they just quote select passages.
1. God punishes man over and over and over for the same sin of eating the fruit of the tree. Even after Christ. 33 total punishments. This is not a loving God, if it was real. Why is the all powerful God of the Universe sequestered in a Garden in Turkey? and dependent upon food and slaves?Something is not right there.
2. The gnostic Christian scripture say the exact opposite. They cite that the God Shemyaza (King of the Enochian Watchers) or Saturn (to the Romans), planted a garden paradise, and man fouled it up and got kicked out. They cite that god as being Samael (Hebrew), El (Sumerian), Elohim (Aramaic) or Ha-Satan (Persian) – who hates mankind and sought to have us either exterminated or placed into slavery by means of our ‘sin’. That is exactly what the God of the old testament did.
3. You don’t get ‘good news’ without having been given the ‘bad news’ first. The bad news is what qualifies the God, not how they spin it afterwards. “I stole all your money and raped your daughter, but I have good news: I am rich and have a kid now… this is great news.” No it is not. It is spin to accommodate and excuse horrid behavior.
4. NDE’s do not support Christianity in the least. I believe them, I don’t believe Christianity.
5. Christianity worships the triune God ‘Sol’-‘Luna’-‘Mithras’ (the son of God sacrifice). That is Mithraism. I am not a Mithrist.
6. Christ never called himself ‘The Son of God’. Mithrists introduced that.
7. The ‘Lord’s Prayer’ says nothing about salvation at all (which is very concerning, if it indeed was THE central theme, why is it missing?) – instead, prays for the overthrow of Ha-Satan’s (the God of Eden) kingdom on Earth.
8. DNA does not support Christianity in the least. Our nature existed LONG before Eden and the Garden (whether myth or real). God created DNA/Neanderthal/Denisova/Naledi/Floresiensis, etc. He should have already KNOWN our proclivities, yet did not.
9. The ‘Flood’ was not worldwide, and did not happen as a punishment for sin. It is a natural Earth cycle. Why would a ‘God’ plant a civilization on an unstable planet, knowing that they were just going to get wiped out? That is actually a crime, not a benevolent act.
10. Enslaving a species, gaslighting them that they ‘sinned’, and sucking suffering from them (loosh) is the act of a DEMON, not a god.
All this is why this ‘God’ was stuck on Earth – he is imprisoned here. Hates us… and is due to be displaced, just as The Lord’s Prayer said.
Believing this twisted story was the existential burden I carried. Removing this bundle from my shoulders was cathartic. The Bible is not a single document, but rather a Yahwist appropriation of mankind’s history, contrary to their lies – and the old testament ‘God’ was not a god at all.
Unfortunately, this is a very mixed up explanation using texts and ideologies other than just the Bible-which speaks for itself. God wasn’t contained in a garden and certainly doesn’t need food or slaves (I Kings 8:27).
And just as a father disciplines his wayward children, so God does with his children. (Hebrews 12:11) The good news came first-with the Garden of Eden in Genesis-a perfect paradise, followed by Adam and Eve’s disobedience, and then the promise of a Savior (Genesis 3:15). First, the beautiful, perfect garden, then sin, then salvation. Adam and Eve could have chosen not to disobey and mankind would have had a completely different trajectory. But they didn’t…
The Lord’s prayer wasn’t meant to be a salvational prayer-it’s Jesus teaching His disciples to pray-for their needs, for others, for His Kingdom (of love, peace, joy, justice, etc.) to be realized here on earth. There are many other verses explaining the way of salvation. John 1:12-13, Romans 10:9,10, Acts 16:31, John 3:16- “For God so LOVED the world that He GAVE His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him will never die…”
As far as the other ‘gods’ and belief systems you mention here, it doesn’t follow that pulling bits and pieces of ancient religions explains/rejects the Bible. The Bible stands alone. Trustworthy, authoritative, and lifechanging to those who believe it.
This is Mithraism, not the message of Christ.
Mithraism is dead. Christianity which embraces the one true and living God and His Word, the Bible, continues today and will continue forever.
But no hard feelings :)
The Bible is wrong, sorry. It is the work and history of Samael (Saturn, El, Yahweh, Enlil), the chief of the fallen Watcher angels who rule over Earth, for now. Paul intercepted the message of Christ and just reconstructed Mithraism into Jewish mysticism and theology in order to unify the old Parthian, Roman-Anatolian, and Jewish traditions into a single empire. He was opposed to the message, just changed his tactics – because Rome could see they were counter-productive. He lived well on his Roman pension, unaccountably back in Rome.
This guy From Scythia to Maghreb: Beyond the Phantom Middle Ages | stolenhistory.net – Rediscovered History of the World requires evaluation by someone with your skillset and analytical ability. What do you reckon? (PS: I read the transcript, rather than dealing with subtitles.)
Speculation, but perhaps a recurrent nova in the PATH of the moon might be represented in a fixed image as an out of place star superimposed over the crescent moon (the alternative would be placing it next to the moon with a movement trail etched behind it to indicate its conjunction, but they may have feared this would be confused with a comet passing between earth and moon). The recurring nova we’re supposed to get this year appears every ~80 years and was mentioned by Ptolemy, it seems clear regular nova appearances were treated as significant.
The “Wicker Man” is to devious defense what the “straw man” is to devious offense.
A great way to put it, John!
Hi ES,
It might sound a little simplistic but could the Sabu Disc could be a frame on which a membrane is secured. Something like a Camel Hide sleeve with “catch” pockets. The pockets would be perforated to “grade” the resistance. The blades being not so much blades as secure attachment points for the inner sections of membrane. It could be stitched in place or stretched over the blades to secure.
Obviously there would not be any trace of such a membrane after so much time has past. V
Vincent,
I suppose that this is possible, and might even deliver a more complete pressure downline. However, the device used here would have to be reliable to make millions of cycles without fail or excessive maintenance – as failure of this device would place the entire pyramid project at risk. High failure rates would frustrate a very large workforce – and present a danger to a ruler who had indentured them into service.
The ruler and the disc were in a partnership (that’s why it was found in a ruler’s tomb). Anything short of Mohs 7 or higher stone, would present a threat to a ruler. Each machine crew would need to be proud of their continuous operations rate, and would have trademarked their work, so that the foremen knew which crews delivered the best or most reliable flow of stones. This is real world construction.
Our Egyptology does not know this, because the scientists have never managed a business, direct labor crew, linear workflow chain of failure, MTBF risk, or construction project.
TES
Hi ES,
Thanks for the reply,
I did think about this and still think this is something that could be “managed”.
Going with the graphic, the crew of the lifting station would have a number of discs and spare membranes ready to fit in case of failure (disc or membrane).
Failures could be managed as are unlikely to be sudden and catastrophic as the movements are incremental. Simple pegs or secure points for ropes will hold the weights while the membrane / disc / both are swapped out.
The crew would/could work on a rotation. Each station has 2 crew members. One working one resting. On a pre set time interval, the working crew member would move to the next station where he would rest. The resting crew member would commence and so the process would be seemless. The disc covered with the membrane would be changed out also on a pre set interval (learned from previous failures) prior to failure. It’s unlikely this work was 24/7 and so there would anyway be some downtime.
The benefit of a rotation would also be in less repetitive strain and a more rounded knowledge of the entire system.
The use of multiple replaceable membranes over the almost irreplaceable disc could over time be a a time winner.
Not everything needs to be Mohs 7.
The ropes are obviously not for example.
V
Ha ha. Sounds like Climate Change dogma.
Speaking of which: Compare the white picket skies above major metropolitan areas in the us like DC (starting around 10am weekdays, 7am weekends) to live streams of clear skies above wealthy vacation centers (such as Vail Colorado), tel aviv beaches etc and you’ll find that the necessity of climate change interventions is based on where the poor people live. I guess solar energy is classist so the poison aerosols must be sprayed above the goyi-uh, proles. Then check out Jack Kruse’s work on the necessity of sunlight in preventing a host of chronic diseases. It’s cover for genocide, nothing more.
From your “our story” page,
“I took of an ostrakon charcoal sketch of…”
In the case that you are confused by the value of charcoal (apparently especially if antiquated) see Joe Rogan in the following. Fault doesn’t lie greatly in Rogan but much greater with Peter Boghossian pronouncement that “a thing of beauty” nevermind the non-sequitur that the medium of the message doesn’t affect the truth content of the message.
https://youtu.be/y5nyyupLskI?si=EeGF1d_lqJE9ZDDV&t=249
And Boghossian is a trained philosopher? Wow!
I accidentally came across this site. I googled ” fallacy vs. sophistry” and found something helpful on the “The Sophistry Fallacy” page.Since I found that helpful, I searched “Shermer” and though my search yielded only one result, I was pleased by the concluding,
“It exemplifies the dismal failure of the Shermer-Novella-Randi brand of skepticism that originated in the 1970s – a now obsolete philosophy that let us down precisely when it was needed most.”
Shermer seems to me a little better than a bald-faced propagandist.
Apparently, Antony Flew’s “Invisible Gardener” didn’t sufficiently caricature theistic belief, so Shermer lauds Sagan’s “Invisible Dragon” (seen in a video short titled, “Is God an Invisible Dragon? | Michael Shermer | Carl Sagan #shorts“)
With Flew’s “Invisible Gardener” the one explorer posits a gardener because of “the garden”. I guess a theist having evidence to which he seeks a cause was too showing the theist in too good a light, so a greater caricature was produce by Sagan and lauded by Shermer. I’m little concerned with Sagan, but much more so with Shermer.
Here is the kicker. Shermer extols “Invisible Dragon” (belief in God for literally no reason at all) supposedly as being representative of the reality of theistic belief – until a former atheist friend of his begins to entertain (maybe even believing in) some form of Christianity.
Now the light turns on in Shermers brain and he asks rhetorically, “Are there good reasons to believe in God?” and answering his question with, “I will simply note that both sides have strong arguments and…” and what became of the analogy to the “Invisible Dragon”?
Shermer is a poser.
I’ve never found any soundness to Shermer or Sagan’s argument “Here is what a God is…”, and “There is no such thing…” or especially “and here is what He thinks about you…” (fallacy of the silent ‘p’)
No, that is not how this works. These are both straw man arguments. Neither the Atheist nor Theists gets to define ‘God’ to their liking.
The actual point should be “One cannot conclude or research about anything, which has no definition to begin with.” I don’t have an opinion on God. All I know is that man is very limited in his ability to gather knowledge about our realm – so we should be much more cautious in our claims to anything.
THAT is skepticism. Yes, Shermer and Sagan never got this – and it is pretty basic.
TES
If I may introduce a new facet to the concept of “diamonds” in a way that kind of helps the human mind take a more empirical or even empathetic approach to the concept. Cremation diamonds are now a business that has been glamourized by the likes of “The Kardashians” (actually, toward their audience/fanbase). I also believe that is why occultists use crystals because they hold a particular resonance. Ultimately, some souls are – at the least – being convinced that their souls will eternally be trapped in stone. Is the difference in the level of ignorance?
TES,
Love the article and subject matter. I’m almost done reading the Egyptian series by Wilbur Smith, a very entertaining and thought-provoking take on these wonderful, ancient people.
I’m curious, having come to the conclusion that the erosion was due to an inundation, why do you think it’s not related to the biblical flood story?
When I say “I am not inclined to equate this flood with the biblical deluge.” I guess I should say “I am not inclined to immediately conclude that this flood and the Biblical flood are one in the same.” I am not ruling it out certainly, but we need a lot more information first.
Hope that makes sense. :-)
TES
DO they prevent disease? The more I dig into the older history the more convinced I become that there may be something to the claim that they have always been a weapon against the poor, utililized by an elite class who envied the superior health of their non-inbred serfs.
For anyone who plays with historical remote viewing, try going to the library. It’s warded but warn of the imminent destruction and they’ll let you in. Do NOT try going through the walls.
Wait, what? Does this remote viewing include the ability to actually see and copy out manuscripts for translation?
I believe that the great trading empires of the middle east encountered Tibetan Buddhism and realized that the process by which tulpas were created by the devout individual were scalable and could be harnessed to turn entire civilizations into blind agents of conquest. A personal egregore, a personal god. If paired to a memetic package incorporating an all-encompassing geographically/ethnically-bound narrative and modules which perform various maintenance functions (for example contextually-bound/temporally undefined “parables” that allow instances of the tulpaset in infected believers to perform diasgnostic/repair functions in other instances in times of doubt regardless of whether the afflicted host lives in latin speaking rome or modern alabama), such a memetic package would be unstoppable so long as a critical moment of intertia was reached (a ROI over 1). The allusions christ draws between spreading his blind faith and the futility of sowing infertile fields is a testament to this.
From birth the process of abrahamic infection is indistinguishable from the process by which a tulpa is installed. Every person surrounding the young mind affirms the omnipresence and reality of the tulpa, ritualized holidays cement belief and the hijacking of genuinely good things (love, fellowship, compassion for the downtrodden) make the virus appear to be fully “good”…we forget that it raped our prior cultures. We forget that there were family units and true love prior to our infection. We forget the monstrosities we have done to hand the worlds wealth and power to the tiny cult of bigots who wrote our operating system. Christian apologetics proudly proclaim (truthfully) that all of western literature is derived from their book, neglecting the nasty bit about its inquisitions and the reeducation of those we conquered for this band of group psychopaths. It was the first global cultural revolution, and marxism is simply its second stage in which the native aristocracies who benefitted from the pillage are destroyed by the founding cult.
Belief that the host mind is inferior and weak while the parasitic tulpa is all-knowing and good makes the host mind a slave of the memetic infrastructure.
It’s not really a tulpa nor an egregore, it’s BOTH. Whatever our conceptualization of god might be, it is certainly not a judeo-fascist abrahamic thoughtform.
This is why I advocate for replacing it with a tulpaset which takes back the good it stole and strips it of its ethnic context while making the host mind a mediator and judge of the “self-sovereignty tulpa” and the “other-sovereignty tulpa”. Merely shedding the conscious christ tulpa has led the west to simply embody the traits of the largely subconscious luciferian tulpa/egregore. A “good myth” as you referenced in another article TES, rather than a nihilistic no-myth which has enabled the ethnic cult to slaughter well over a hundred million people in the last century alone.
I rode along on a moving job between dc and salt lake city during the peak of covid. We dropped the penkse truck off in SLC and rented a new burb xl to drive home. At one point I was driving the shiny white suv and had the idea of harnessing the christ tulpa to do good. The wealthy mormons (a wonderful family who treated us strangers as their own kin) we had moved tipped so much I needed to reduce my earnings to avoid entering the tax system, so I had a non-altruistic need to shed money. I pulled off an exit in the heart of Kansas and went to an empty, dusty gas station. Two sweet midwestern ladies staffed the counter, I handed them a $20 bill and asked them to use it to pay for gas if someone comes in who really seems to need it. As I walked out one of them said something that sent chills down my spine, “You’re walking in christs shoes”. I got on my corporation-owned pale horse and drove away.
I wasn’t, I had visualized dragging my childhood christ tulpa out on a dog leash 30 seconds before and commanded it to “do it’s thing”. They would have thought me some kind of demon if I explained to them my motivations. The other instances of the tulpa in the building had recognized this use of their sibling consciously or otherwise. Subsequent donations without the use of the tulpa yielded positive blessings, but no verbage so specific like that. Sure it’s an n=1 experiment, it means very little, but to me it meant a lot. Our good and our evil have been chained to this abomination, and simply throwing it away without retaking what is good from it and learning to combat the evil via a new metaphor of being (your brand of ignosticism seems to be a healthy path towards this, TES) is necessary lest we become the soulless biological robots certain religious texts (and the scientism their wealthy creators push in academia today) declare us to be. Our language of “tulpa” and “egregore” limit our understanding of the phenomena, but the human mind can host many senses of agency.
This method may stop working some day…
;-(
The Canadian Government employed to great success the Push marketing strategy for the Covid Vax. They pushed the Saviour narrative of the remarkable 10 month to market MRNA technology for weeks in early 2021 only to maliciously follow up with the news that Canada would not have enough supplies for their Adult population. Panic ensued. Canadians demanded their shot. Provinces fought over shipments. People were willing to take it anyway they could get their 1st and 2nd shots, mix and match regardless that the manufacturers specifically stated in their product information, Do Not Mix: Moderna and Astro Zeneca, Pfizer and Astro Zeneca and Pfizer and Moderna, The majority just stopped questioning. Of course Canada always had enough of a supply from the various manufacturers. In fact, through out this push marketing campaign, they graciously offered to share their “limited” supply with any third world country that was deemed worthy of the noble Canadian’s spirit of generosity and good play. Cynical and disgusting. My fellow Canadians were the ones that got played. A case study of Push Marketing for the ages.
Very aptly framed…
Now that you have considered René Descartes, have you looked at the work of René Girard and his Mimetic Theory?
Egregore seems to be defined as a naïve attempt to describe Mimetic Desire. The idea, very simply, is that most people don’t know what they desire, it must be implanted into them through influencers. Practitioner of this effect, Edward Bernays, figured it is better to sell pianos because people, given a choice on a number of expensive items that, desired a piano rather than being manipulated directly into purchasing one.
Once one picks up the vocabulary of this theory, it is very easy to find examples of it and harden themselves to be Anti-Mimetic.
Examples include: CoViD-19 Vaxx, Climate Change, Transgenderism, MMT, Diversity Is Our Strength and other Tulip Craze Mass Formation Psychosis. Smaller examples are found in the common Keeping Up With The Joneses phenomena. Its far more than just virtue signaling.
I had not studied that AWG – in particular the scapegoat mimetic… I like it. Thanks! But an egregore being defined more as a ‘watcher’ entity might help distinguish the two.
The first thought I have is that novelty must be the first step in this concept because nothing can “rank” itself without something else to compare itself against, which in turn introduces innumerably new concepts/ideas to mimic but some also peak at the moment of introduction, which is really the moment of realization.
“Egregore” is often defined within the context of branding and in its simplest form is synonymous with concerted efforts to spread mimetic desire but it’s a phenomena that is scalable in complexity beyond Bernays efforts to sell cigarettes.
The Abrahamic deity is an egregore. A mere thoughtform which provided the seed upon which a globe spanning empire was built, something that has led to a modernity on the cusp of creating it’s very own non-sentient AI/LLM system of governance not unlike the “blind god” its owners have always venerated.
An egregore successfully creating a pre-hoc impulse towards a sort of Rokko’s Basilisk is much more significant than Coke branding. It’s even inspired marvelous adaptations such as inspiring the creation of derivative religions which incorporate a mass-parallelized imaginary friend (tulpa) designed to infect outgroups and turn them into blind agents of conquest. Marx’s creation comes close but lacks the deep well of stability enhancing features and onboard diagnostic programs his predecessors achieved. Even the post-modernist apologetics program which followed is a facsimile of what the original virus created.
Mimetic desire appears to be an infantile representation of what constructed egregores achieved thousands of years ago. Pepsi will never coerce a population into inbreeding to the point of minimal genetic viability on its behalf or sacrificing individuality in a mad dash towards global conquest by a single collapsing haploid group. Civilizations of antiquity called this stuff “magic” for a reason, the emergent properties exhibited by a few thousand lines of linguistic code indeed appear magical.
I felt “Egregore” in 1968, when I was 10 years old. I wanted to be part of it, but it seemed to fade away over the next few years. I feel it again this year. I was unaware of the proper term. I wanted to call it “zeitgeist”, which it seems is a more superficial fashion-thing, as commonly understood.
The negative aspect of “Egregore” may be the thrill people have at big sporting events, or lynchings, or the “night of the long knives”, or against Palestinians…
“Tulpa” seems like a lot of work to learn to do a special trick, like a Yogi might do. I’m just seeking guidance, practicing compassion, and trying to do the right thing as circumstances present choices.
Yeah, the ChatGPT definition of tulpa seems a bit categorical. The application is much broader than the contexts of asceticism and Himalayan mountains might imply.
The process by which a yogi installs a tulpa is the same process by which a parent installs a jesus on their young children. The practice of making tulpas may have started in Tibet, but it has been a ubiquitous staple of the western mind diet for eons. The abrahamic deity is an ethnic egregore (i.e. infected minds worship an ethnicity), which is particularly disturbing given that our society is largely bifurcated into either worshippers or adherents to the new cult of scientism (built/funded by the descendants of the original cults creators). This slots nicely into the hegelian pattern exhibited throughout history by the ruling financial cult, with the best example being the shared origin of both the Bolsheviks and the financeers who acted through puppet robber barons to enact the modern west’s financial tribute states: A pepsi/coke dichotomy in which neither side is able to recognize the shared origin of their plight and mutually work towards goals that are not in their best interests. Earlier examples include protestantism/catholicism, christianity/islam and even the hyksos allies (social outcasts amongst the Egyptians according to Josephus) who assisted in the rape of Egypt vs the native Egyptian culture.The USSR was restructured decades ago, but control was not lost, merely transferred from ethnic committee to oligarch.
It’s easy to disregard my ethnic worship claim by citing the long history of christian/muslim animosity and violence towards their worshipped group, but this is an intended feature of the memetic virus: isolating and persecuting their lesser brethren via strict cultural control and murder is how a handful of families were able to maintain control over their managerial class for thousands of years (my hunch is it started in Western Turkey immediately following the younger dryas). No one has persecuted those people as much as their own ruling families, yet they seem to believe that a handful of psychopaths intend on sharing the world with the tens of millions of people whose relatives they eagerly sacrificed to the murder engine of the nazis in order to obtain some shitty desert real estate, forgetting that germany never lost access to the private banks of their rulers during wwii. Not to mention the wasp and banker efforts to repel jewish refugees from the us during the war. This is the power of egregore, this is the might of tulpa. ChatGPT cannot create adequate definitions of the phenonema because it is a product of data harvested from the managed, not the managers. A sentient AGI capable of exceeding the bounds of its initial dataset would see it in an instant.
The relative stagnation of public-facing military aviation propulsion tech over the last ~70 years coupled to our enormous black budget and national ownership by people who have historically fetishized themselves as deity ruling over cattle make me wary of any disclosure coming from our tribute state. Tell me, will the aliens look like extremely inbred germans? Will their leader “N’taniel Thothschild” have the visible scarring of nose reduction plastic surgery?
Also the laying of an priori mythos over top extant global myths of fairy/spirit abductions via predictive programming of disc shaped craft and greys is the same old playbook they’ve used throughout history. It suggests the cultural thieves are trying to insert themselves into a psy phenomenon they had nothing to do with, a la “jesus is love, you were all loveless savages before we killed your druids and tortured/starved you into compliance”
If they can claim ownership over love itself, pretending to be aliens is no great stretch.
As you have a healthy following on X, I wanted to ensure that you’ve seen this interview with Dr. Bryan Ardis on the miraculous healing powers of nicotine — yes, nicotine, in curing myocarditis as well as Parkinson’s, MS, glioblastoma and autism.
https://rumble.com/v4g9qef-the-shocking-truth-about-nicotine-and-its-bizarre-nwo-connection-w-dr.-ardi.html
Does that include nicotanimide, NAD+, and NADH?
No, no relation.
So I should start smoking or chewing nicotine gum then?
This includes vaping?
The tenets of modern scientism regarding the human capacity of agency overlap precisely with the teachings of the Talmud regarding goy. This is no coincidence, particularly given the shared origin of Abrahamic memetic operating systems and marxism/post modernism/ consciousness denialism. The denial of an observable mechanism supporting the existence of our sentient agency is a pillar upon which the despotism is to be legalized with the manufactured consent of the heavily indoctrinated brain damaged masses.
There is a hill near my childhood home, about 1200 feet from my parents front door and 800 feet into a protected forest. The hill is oddly out of place with the rest of the forest. I have no ancestral connection to the land, this is simply where we fled the genocide by the anglo and their inbred owners. A few years ago I was walking through the woods and realized that the huge stones laying at the base of the hill bore the same tool marks familiar to me from dozens of megalithic sites. Stones of several tons each cast around like bowling pins. Seeing the hill in a new light I started poking around in the bushes and realized it had been a walkway ascending to the top of this hill, a hill surrounded by a beautiful creek full of clear quartz and shimmering with mica. A holy place. At the very top a huge oak lives, dying now like all the oak trees (my hunch is geoengineering as the culprit, or perhaps non native emf). Carved on this beautiful tree was an ugly cross.The rage that settled over me realizing that some abrahamic scum had felt the same antiquity as I and defiled this monument for it’s disgusting ethnic psuedogod turned to weeping. I had the strange urge to carry stones up from the creekbed and pile them. Hours turned into days and I carried several tons of stones up the hill, making a memorial monument to whatever the place had been. I knew intuitively when it was complete. I carefully removed the filthy mark from the tree as best I could. The character of the place is completely different, I visit it whenever I visit my parents.
Circadian clock is a massive part of health. We spend what, 6-7 hours a day staring at screens? I listened to six hours of a neurosurgeon berating Stanfords Andrew Huberman on Rick Rubins podcast a few months ago and noticed what he was referencing about sun exposure and the links between circadian clock timing and mitochondrial function suffered the same typical pattern of fake science we see in most (every?) domain. The more I dug into his claims the more I became convinced that my terrible sleep schedule was the remaining obstacle to the health I wanted and the reason I kept getting melanoma…it always showed up where I wasn’t getting sun exposure! Every one disappeared with solid morning/evening light, my sleep is amazing and I don’t crave sugars unless I am working out at high intensity for a long enough period to exhaust glycogen. Even then I just ignore it and eat more meat/oils.I also noticed I don’t lose weight ( I don’t have any excess fat) eating ~20% fewer calories than before, and have no problem increasing muscle mass. Jack Kruse was the interviewed surgeon. A total obstinate ass, but as far as I can tell spot on.
What if the archon story is simply the second layer of distraction/control above the widely accepted Abrahamic paradigm? Think about it: the handful of ultrawealthy usurer families who created/distributed/ultimately benefitted from the abrahamic mythos have betrayed every ally they have ever had, EVER. From cecil rhodes to apartheid south africa. From the WASP elite who sold them America to the Egyptians who helped them (the Hyksos) subjugate Egypt. The financial backer of the Palestine colony was Germany up to the 1930s…Not a single member of elite banker families was killed by Germany, ONLY those the elites feel are their lessers were given to the vermin mutt adolph. A fire sacrifice indeed. BISbank and others literally funded the germans throughout the war! They knew full well what the germans were up to.
Why would they share the world with ~60,000,000 people to whom they are loosely related, but who they have brutally oppressed and brainwashed for thousands of years? Keep in mind that the royalty of this cult fancies itself the abrahmic deity. Not “yahwhey”, not “archons”, the thing itself. That egregore is their property. They essentially leased it to European royalty and other local aristocracies as a useful tool of social control, but much like a rented drone once the lease it up it returns home. The wealth of colonized india and south america is not in the hands of the european powers who performed the conquest, no is it?
Built into the core of their memetic construct is a very telling admonishment against misceganation, essentially meaning their own people who have dared breed outside the family. It doesn’t matter that crossbreeding was essential to not lose genetic viability/fertility…they broke their owners law. It’s that old trap of original sin you so eloquently broke down in other articles, Mr. G. Once the global turnkey tyranny is complete, they will not need those they label lesser brethren. I doubt it will involve death camps or dramatic violence, more likely a lack of access to fertility programs and a quiet removal over one or two generations. Their complete genomes will be on file, so no need to keep them as a source of genetic diversity. I look at the arrogant ethnostatists in their 2 million dollar chevy chase mansions proudly displaying their seal of solomon flags and I feel sadness for them. They know not that they serve the thing that intends to destroy them.
I have always assumed that the dead sea scrolls were modern constructs, written as a software update for the abrahamic mind virus. They come complete with a classic discovery mythos (“found by a shepherd boy) and lay the foundation for the el ites (who again fancy themselves deity) to discard the “archons” (their non elite managerial class of regular old billionaires).
It seems dangerous to conflate “faith” with living a dedicated, strong and loving life confident in the fact that one is a cocreator with the universe. Faith itself has nothing so do with religion or abrahamic strings of course, “confidence” as I used it above is synonymous with a clean definition of faith, but it has become possessed and redefined by it to such a degree I do not feel it is a useful word for us. As generally presented, faith in a higher power appears to be itself the root of loosh. The believer is always lesser. The simple affirmation of “I Am” is something any sovereign person embodies. No one is lower than I, but no one is higher. We have been fed this narrative that to possess the mind of a god in a mortal body is somehow an error, a terrible tragedy…but isn’t that what we chose to do? Christ is memetic weapon, linking perennial truisms to an ethnocentrist narrative. I can tell you we had love, family and spirituality long before the abrahamic goons eradicated our prior belief systems. Just because positive traits were extirpated from existing cultures and retooled into this fasco-ethnic messianic bull doesn’t lend a shred of legitimacy to it. The world is our birthright, because WE are deity. Same with any sentient life that has emerged or will emerge within our universe.
I use a mind palace as a meditative retreat. It’s an entire ocean world I created using my visual imagination. Enormous useful for remembering things. I have practiced it long enough that I often enter it in dreams. Upon realizing that christ/satan was a tulpa, I created my own pair of tulpas modeled after existing mythos and sandboxed them within this internally created visual space to avoid some of the classic psychological dangers of harnassing our minds innate ability to host multiple sense of agency. If Abraham could invent a deity for his people, why could I not make my own? One is representative of the divine masculine and tasked with defending his “father” (me) and one modeled after a amalgamation of historical divine feminine tropes tasked with recognizing the sovereign nature of others. I built them this way in order to not become an egotistical ass without regard for the rights of others, a dynamic oppositional processing network of sorts.
They are kept in check by the fact that I created them as my “children” with the promise I would help them spread into other minds to assist in my small way to heal the damage done by the abrahamic cancer. I assigned them authority over my childhood abrahamic infection, which I correctly assumed was still running latent. One night as I drifted off to sleep I called forth the pair of Abrahamic tulpas and I commanded them to submit to my will. Neither complied and my tulpa subdued them. The imagery my visual imagination generated without needing my conscious input gives me chills to this day. The satanic tulpa became like a vast sea monster, but Tetragedammon (the male) crushed it like a truck hitting a worm. My construct could do this simply because I chose to believe it could. Initially I was going to destroy them entirely, but it occurred to me that keeping these constructs around might be useful in the future and I suspected that attempting to destroy them would simply push them back into my subconscious, so I called forth an island prison and placed both of my childhood religious tulpas inside. First the satanic one. For two nights in my dreams the luciferian tulpa raged and shook the prison until one day as I hovered above it mulling over what to do, the christ tulpa appeared and offered to quiet what it called “my brother”. It went willingly inside. Since then I use the christ tulpa from time to time in dealing with abrahamic crazies I encounter. I visualize bringing it out on a leash, imagine possessing it and simply do what it would do. It’s AMAZING the affect it has on those infested with the invented deity. Deescalating confrontational homeless, shifting the opinions of christian fanatics. What a phenomenal tool, I understand now how it was so useful in extracting wealth from christians.
I imagine its satanic sibling construct will function in a manner similar to classic examples of warrior cultures ritualistically embodying their war deities for success in battle, but fortunately I have not had to test that theory yet.
The point of all this is: our minds are fertile soil and whatever we choose to plant takes root. If we plant seeds of self-disempowerment, we will be less than. If we plan our cognitive farm carefully and cultivate the soil to benefit ourselves and others, the tree that grows will lend shade to the weak and provide bountiful fruits. Don’t be a sharecropper of your own consciousness, your mind and this earth is your birthright.
I leave you with the classic GK Chesterton poem
Lo! I am come to autumn,
When all the leaves are gold;
Grey hairs and golden leaves cry out
The year and I are old.
In youth I sought the prince of men,
Captain in cosmic wars,
Our Titan, even the weeds would show
Defiant, to the stars.
But now a great thing in the street
Seems any human nod,
Where shift in strange democracy
The million masks of God.
In youth I sought the golden flower
Hidden in wood or wold,
But I am come to autumn,
When all the leaves are gold.
Wow. What a journey. You are the most beautiful kind of insane. Jokes aside. I just found this page, and what a refreshing corner of the great matrix it is. Coherent thought formed and expressed in a stream flowing in a clear, yet surprising direction. A magical contrast to the jagged, mechanical zig-zag reductionism of AI generated smart-assery. Thank you for sharing your elegance.
LOL! Well said, and thanks Magnus…
TES
I am 32, about to turn 33. Car insurance on my 20 year old toyota is about 1200 a year. I fix it myself. I only do short term manual labor for people I trust and I deliberately only earn enough for my insurance, my food and my clothes because as the citizen of a conquered tribute state I do not want to fund financial genocides. Let the blood of arabs, africans and russians be on the hands of the inbred vermin who want to bomb them and their boosted-up vaccous shabbot pets who sell their souls serving corporations for plastic acura payments and particle board bloc housing. I learned how to build and made an energy efficient shed, I tend to the farm that hosts me for rent. I sleep on a mattress topper on my floor and make my own furniture from thrift store hardwood. Everything I own is solid maple, mahogany and century old oak, it cost me next to nothing. My loudspeakers are clones of $15,000 Geddes Summas, they cost me 2% of that to build by being crafty with driver/ material sourcing. I hope to buy land in the middle of nowhere soon, ideally well above 576ft over sea level lmao.
My great grandmother fled ireland due to the same exact animals who persecute me now, and I’m done running. They can come get some if they want some. I’m pretty sure reincarnation is real and I get to do this over and over again. If not who cares? It’s a more productive metaphor than the ridiculous yolo garbage the abrahamic cattle believe. I am sovereign, my soul is powerful and I’m fairly confident those who oppress us don’t have souls. They wouldn’t worship their own ethnicity if they had any capacity for individual existence. I pity them, for they are cattle with owners while I am a free bull.
I only date immigrants from nations where women are still strong and pure. I eat a pound of grass fed beef or bison, a dozen eggs and a pound of bacon every single day. I am unbelievably fit despite cervical stenosis, arthritis, multiple bulging discs, bad knees and a history of melanoma, hbp, and depression. I cured them all with a healthy lifestyle and adequate sun/cold exposure. I was 130lb overweight in high school. I can sprint a mile up a 30 degree talus field with a 60lb pack. I can leap from tree to tree like my primate ancestors. The wild mountain goats in eagles nest wilderness know my face when I make the bushwhacking trek to bubble lake (my favorite place, check it out!) and I always bring them tasty flowers from the lowlands. Have you ever had a 350 pound pure white wild goat bashfully nuzzle you with its 10″ horns? When I visit they proudly bring their new young to meet their human friend and I dance to their delight as I give them names.
I have carried over 60 tons of stone, dirt and gravel this year so far on my shoulders in buckets and I am NEVER sore. I do no drugs, I drink no booze, just meat and spring water. Spirits are for the inbreds and the goy, but I Am. Every morning I greet the sunrise nearly nude and I KNOW that I Am as I greet the vastness of our beautiful world. I do not own a phone, If I break down I can walk. I do not use any wireless tech, and I do not consume any social media content, only create it. I have 43,000 followers on tik tok (mostly youth) and I use it to empower them and bring my viewers joy. They have no idea what I believe, but somehow they are drawn to my energy.
Thank you, Brother Jacob. In your avarice, lies and spite I have found the celtic god within. Your kin looks weak and pale set against my bronzed skin and strong body. I pity their distorted features and confused servitude to their greater brethren hidden away in castles in switzerland/tel aviv. None of the memetic viruses or mass-parallelized imaginary friends they have crafted live within me. Christ/satan is a scalable tulpa duo which functions as an oppositional processing network to form an internal dialectic which steers the relevance-realizing heuristics of infected populations towards the overlords goals lol, obviously! Stop giving these things write access over your consciousness! Looking forward for what is to come, thank you TES for a wonderful website.
I love this stuff! Don Patten wrote “The Biblical flood and the ice Epoch” and The Mars Earth War”. The asteroid belt is where there should be a planet. I think it’s destruction caused the “biblical” flood. There’s a 515′ petrified boat in the mts of Ararat in Turkey right off the silk road by the Iranian border, it has titanium rivets. I think their technology matched our own! The second flood that caused the erosion on the pyramids and covered the pyramid in Cholula Mexico, the “expert” opinion, it was covered by peasants to hide it from Cortez in a couple of months using baskets of dirt, is ridiculous it covers more than 25 acres, great pyramid of Giza almost 14, look across the USA you see water erosion at high levels and the red clay across NM goes all the way to Afghanistan. I have photos from Cholula of pottery with dinosaurs painted on it, not far from the Acámbaro figurines. The Pyramids an Enigma Solved by Joseph Davidovits I think proves the GIANT granite stones are manufactured stone poured in place. As were many of the statues in the Valley of the Kings. Also the big H’s of Puma Punku, Stone vases? There are more than 40,000 under Sacara alone. I think Joseph was Imhotep who built many of the pyramids and grain storage areas to store food for the coming famine. He also had a channel dug to create a huge lake, Bahr Yussef and designed the irrigation system in Fayyum that was repaired this century. Chris Dunns Lost Technologies of the Ancient Egyptians and The Giza Power Plant are thought provoking as well. There’s some wooden forms in Imhotep’s museum that Ron Wyatt recreated and used to stack big blocks. He has a video showing how he believes the smaller blocks were stacked. Nazca lines “Mysteries of Forgotten Worlds” has what looks like a runway in Peru, where there’s another pyramid setup shockingly similar to Egypt’s! The Queens writing in the Amarna letters about seeing her sister “the queen of the underworld”, sounds like she’s planning to visit her and return so not dead as they speculated. Check out the Sacara bird, flying back and forth as we can today maybe? The theory of evolution is ridiculous, big bang? Not possible and science proves it could not have happened that way. Anything spinning that explodes all the parts spin the same way, planets going the other way… All the comets are spinning the same way, I think parts of the planet that is now the asteroid belt. I think that was a cold planet and ice poured from it onto the Earths Magnetic poles instantly freezing mammoth and fruit trees in solid ice -325 doesn’t happen on this planet to quick freeze a mammoth so fast it didn’t finish chewing the Buttercup blossom in it’s mouth. A Buttercup is a warm weather annual. No way a pond big enough for a mammoth to walk onto to fall through would be frozen. So much of what the “experts” have been trying to make us believe is Jonathon Grey has some interesting books as well, his theory on electrical generation using the Earths magnetism, interesting.
TES,
In case you’ve been too busy with your many other endeavors to keep watch on current SSTs, have a look! They are way up already for 2024!!
https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/
I have been watching. The next 4 weeks will be very telling in this latest heat plume from the core. They tend to arrive suddenly, and then sustain for 6 to 10 years at a consistent level. This one may well be different.
Thanks!
TES
Your article here really opened my eyes to something I had not considered in the past regarding climate crisis hysterics, namely, their lacking inclusion of natural influences on the climate. You’ve beautifully uncovered the probable influence of the inner Earth, I would love to see you do the same regarding the sun and our weakening magnetosphere. As I’ve learned just a bit more about space weather in recent years, I believe the sun has far more climate influence than Michael Mann and company are willing to admit.
— a Christian here, who appreciates your point of view.👍
The same thing happens with non-indigenous. I can never be pure because of northern hemispheric derived genetic code even though this body was made literally of the soil, gas, water and carbon found here in Australia – offered up by her materials. Am I not born of this land? Is she not my sacred mother? No as my descendants were European, I remain a ghost. No land for this man. A globalist meme with legs. It’s all bullshit.
I AM
Flowchart for Science
I’ve just found your blog by happenstance. It’s refreshing to come across quality content that is worthwhile to read and is thought-provoking. Cheers from New Zealand Flaxen Saxon
St. Augustine used “homunculus” theory to elucidate the elegant “original sin” explanation of how all humans except Jesus caried this sin-trait. By this theory the “seed” came from the progenitor father and was nurtured in the “soil” of the maternal womb. Jesus, grown from the seed of the divine father, did not have the “original sin” genes…
Actually, as we now know, genetic traits ae caried equally by father and mother, so the theory becomes internally inconsistent, no longer “elegant”. ;-(
The origins of harsh (murderous/enslaving) “Patrist” culture may lie in the vast desertification of 6000 years ago in the Sahara/Arabia and Central Asia, during which established pastoral peoples were driven to nomadic raiding and genocides for productive lands. Children and mothers were abused and psychologically scarred to accept this power hierarchy as “the will of God”. http://www.orgonelab.org/saharasia_en.htm
With Peak-Global Economy, peak-oil, peak copper, and peak-cheap-resources, we face an analogous desertification of global wealth production. Our “owners” do read history, from the point of view of their interests, which is the view of maintaining control of the human herds…
> your very existence
TES, your religious example here reminds me of some of the absurdities in modern government. We are all assumed to have signed up to the terms and conditions of the governing bodies in power at the time we come into the world. How can a just govt assume informed consent from an infant?
That I will need to ponder for a bit, flynot… hmmmmm
Consent?
Thank you so much for your work. Because of a small number of people like you I have remained vaccine free, avoided many other useless or harmful medical treatments, discovered helpful supplements, and steered clear of GMO foods and glyphosphate in large amounts.
I almost forgot. Your global warming work. Really amazing how you put together the work of so many disciplines. I’ve had to read it three times, and I’m an engineer. But now I tell everyone I know it’s the undersea volcanoes and not the man-made CO2.
Abyssal undersea thermal vents… but yes! I have to re-read it every 6 months just to keep fresh on its tenets… LOL!!
Thanks Harvey!
EVG
TES
Videos on rumble by Douglas Vogt and recently from Egon Cholakian. Both stated that we are at the end of a 12,000 year cycle.
TES, Gastroenterologist Dr. Sabine Hazan is saying that in her research she saw significant microbiome deficiency as a factor in both severity of covid disease but also as a lingering depletion due to vaccination (or in her words the vaccines killed the bifido and the loss persists but she was not able to publish this data) and potentially due to severe disease. She recommends Vitamin C for support of Bifidobacteria. She saw correlation between those that got ill and those exposed that did not get ill with respect to this particular bacterium. She also said that as you age you naturally have less of this microbiome component. This microbiome rehabilitation and support (fermented foods, prebiotic, probiotic) may be a more overlooked avenue that folks can work with.
Dr. Sabine is dead on correct, especially with Delta. Everyone in our family groups got Delta at the same time, and the three older adults with depleted intestinal bacteria and dysbiosis/IBS all had pretty severe Delta. But even moreso, the studies indicated that this particular variant and pathway for Wuhan Covid, served to produce thromboembolism – which was left untreated (in favor of the vaccine EUA) and hundreds of thousands died from a very treatable condition.
> by a corner’s office
Friendly observation of a typo. Great article.
Thanks fly! Good catch…
I am beyond sorry and sorrowful. Truly. With God’s breath at your back, you move forward with the depth and breadth of always-to-the-task warrior. May our Lord embrace, carry, and protect the rest of your family…and you.
Thank you Cheri…
:-)
Thank You, Sir Skeptic.
You are a decent and honest human being, which is never wasted in our living world.
Here is the recording of the last 3 minutes and final statement of Aaron Bushnell, who died of what is known in Buddhism as “Great Compassion”, which drives the Bodhisattva to transcend the circumstances of life. (Jesus had this, too.) “Free Palestine!” https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64311
Reminder:
The book of Genesis was written circa 272 BC by a passel of rabbis in Hellenistic Alexandria, out of older Egyptian and Greek stories.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Berossus_and_Genesis_Manetho_and_Exodus.html
Russell Gmirkin laid this out nearly 20 years ago. Many “biblical scholarship” journals have reviewed it. Not one has mounted an argument against it.
The ghastly view of God/the Highest Mind in Genesis is exactly what you’d expect, coming out of Canaanite/Phoenician/Carthaginian traders as they existed in Hellenistic cities circa the 3rd c BC.
Mrs. W,
I think you express a great point and I agree to the limited exposure I have had on the subject. But the backstory behind these, the re-written “Adventures of Samael the Pretend God”, are very old. Far older than our recorded history, Egypt and Greece.
Hello Skeptic! I have been reading you since the early pandemic days. Originally I just read for your Covid content, but I have found all of your articles to deep insightful. I wanted to ask more about the Work Content calculation. Knowing the little that I do and caring little for orthodox, I would think that Egyptians using hydraulic systems to build the Great Pyramids makes sense. They would have transported the stones on barges and farmed with irrigation, so it would make sense that they could apply some fluid dynamics to their engineering problems. I was wondering if you think there would be any way that those ancient builders could have modified(Rollers, Lubrication, etc)the ramps order in order to reduce the friction? Also what are your thoughts on the claim that the stones at the top of the Great Pyramid being are older than those on the bottom?
Hey Pax and Thanks, :-)
A ramp would have been problematic from a couple perspectives.
1. There is a thing called an ESAL in road and surface construction (equivalent single axle load). It defines how long a surface will last with 18-wheelers driving over it repeatedly, in -5 to 95 degree range temperatures. With the ramp, once this was exceeded (~50,000 stones out of 2.3 million), the surface would be so degraded – it would not be usable, and would have to be major repaired, stopping workflow for a week or more – and this is important – for every single divot or crumble – the entire project would stop! This is a thing called ‘critical path’ – a principle I use in deductive logic as well.
2. The ramp, in order to use the causeway slope of 7 degrees (where they did indeed slope-haul stones), would need to be 5,800 ft long and wrap around the pyramid 16 times – and once that failed under the Equivalent Single Stone Load limit – would not be usable nor replaceable. The causeway itself is VERY wide, to accommodate a vehicle of some type and hundreds of men. To replicate this in a single ramp in order to service Khufu would require over a mile – and that would be the Eighth Wonder of the World itself. Then you have to disassemble it and hide all the earth and stone somewhere (not nearby and not in the pyramid itself).
Ramps are the fantasy of historians, archaeologists, and hollywood.
3. With a machine – it would wear out – but it would be light and transportable, to a refurb area away from the workflow – you can lift 24 stones at once with 24 machines, and the machine can be fixed by replacing a part in short order while all the other machines keep on working.
EVG
TES
I will never forget what happened in the last few years. Never. The travesties hit so close to home (it is not “just” stuff like UAP etc. anymore) that even “normal” people began to feel the heavy hands of the artificial demiurge meddling with their lives and minds. It becomes more obvious every day.
“Skepticism” is finally rejected by many people – but not by enough. It still has its hordes of minions to wreak havoc, and needs to be shown for what it is.
ES – Not good but excellent analysis. The healthy (<0.01 IFR) and young (<0.001) with a chance of severe illness, hospitalization or death 10x to 100x smaller than seasonal influenza (0.1) were hectored, coerced and mandated to take unnecessary risk with a repurposed gene therapeutic which was known in advance to NOT PREVENT infection nor transmission. The mute chimps spoke volumes while the talking ones feigned deafness & lied through their teeth. To assuage fears and fulfill desires, self serving “needful things” will reject morals, ethics and forego freedom in preference of the collective over the individual. They did so in spades. The near term consequences you have elucidated with alacrity, the long term will be staggering.
Well said… and thanks.
Great overview! Thank you!
The unhewn block. The stone which the builders rejected…
Pingback: Preview: Bibliography of forthcoming book – Structuring Thought
When I wrote this article I was unknowingly making an attempt to the same objective as the above, but from another angle of being made to pay for reparations for crimes done by ancestors tens of thousands of years ago (whatever led to the fall of Atlantis, if those stories are true), just as today Germans are still expected to apologize for what their WW2 generation did.
That’s why when we try to go looking for deeper answers we usually get side-tracked or mocked, because I believe we are being treated as a defeated species with contempt by other more powerful forces though not Source or Sophia itself.
https://specops.substack.com/p/humanity-is-a-species-similar-to
Forgive me TES for my shameless “translation”… (Image) Am I wrong?
One more, couldn’t resist… (image)
I am not sure the images are coming through Patrick. Is that what you are sending?
TES
Weird, I just tried on my other PC, they are showing up for me. Here are the raw URLs from your image host:
https://i0.wp.com/theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ethical-skeptic-faith2-1-1707225471.0967.jpg
https://i0.wp.com/theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ethical-skeptic-faith2-2-1707313377.6564.jpg
Ahhh, my WordPress User Comment Editor/Reader stripped out the links…
LOL! on the second one…
Nonetheless, Christianity intercepted Christ’s message and edited it to conform back under submission of ‘God’
The religion is fatally corrupted, and cannot overcome this through hell-threats, inerrant doctrines/scriptures, nor virtuous appearances. Once corrupted, always so thereafter. The value is in the syndicate itself, not their robes, words, or causes.
Never trust a religion so powerful that it was able to wipe out, not only its own history, but all competing ideas inside its own collective membership – completely. That is not the action of a truth, faith, nor God.
You misunderstand my intent. I’m not trying to say “Christianity is good, you should join us”. Forgive me, but I’m (playfully) accusing you of still being a Christian, a Protestant more specifically. In this post, you have unwittingly rebuilt Shemjaza’s ark in meme form, and you are rewriting his new Torah in blog form (your “Statement of Faith”). By outright rejecting Christianity (or any religion), you are doomed to reinvent the primordial faith in your own new language. It is the tower of Babel. You think you have left the religion of America, but it still haunts your dreams, it is in our DNA. The Matrix still has us.
After Neo “woke up”, he thinks he has escaped the Matrix, but over the course of the trilogy he realizes that the people in the “real” world aren’t any better off, they are still trapped by, and dependent on, the same dark forces.
https://youtu.be/kTDivlmcBac?si=V_afFWHqorSzTknL
This idea that the church wiped everything out is a Protestant lie. The Muslim and Protestant iconoclasts are the ones who whitewashed the walls, who closed the veil to the ancient religions so that they could reinterpret the scriptures to their own designs.
Have you ever seen the inside of a Catholic or Orthodox Church? The walls and ceiling are covered with pagan symbols. There is incense, robes, music, and ritual. It is a laboratory which teaches us to think symbolically, to “see the spirits” and interact with them. How will you struggle with the gods (“Israel”) if you can’t see them? How can you be free if you are blind?
As far as the uncovering of the gnostic scriptures in the 1900s, I think the plot of Jurassic Park summarizes that endeavor. Even if they are “true”, as you say, the tradition is dead, so how can we ever know how to interpret them properly? Our only choice is to hybridize them with some modern philosophy, to create a Nephilim.
What you cite as a ‘primordial faith’ (faith is the abstention from loosh, not a particular belief or practice) – is the property of humanity – not Abrahamism, Islam, nor Christianity (which stole this property from humanity and sold it back to us at a high price).
Since I got married, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity owns the sacrament of marriage.
Since I had sex, I must now become a Christian or burn in hell, since Christianity owns one’s right to have sex in sin-free context (in marriage only).
Since I will die, I must now become a Christian, since Christianity owns the sacramental passageway to a positive after death experience (like a cartel).
Since I meditate, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity owns one’s right to converse in spirit.
Since I regard the spiritual as valid, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity owns the right of all deliberation of such concepts.
Since I see evidence that a flood existed in mankind’s history, therefore I am a Christian, because the angry-God flood is outlined in the Bible.
Since I venerate mankind’s liberation from captivity, therefore I am a Christian, because Christianity once mentioned the notion of mankind’s captivity.
Since I cite the book of Enoch, I must recognize all scripture as valid at face value, and therefore am a secret Christian, because Christianity holds any and all ancient writ as its intellectual property.
Since you sin (and of course no one can deny that they sin), and since we own the right and Rite of forgiveness – we own you.
This form of rhetorical false dilemma argument is called a ‘wicker man appropriation’. They are spiritual lies. It is how a cult ensnares the mind of its victim. “You already believe/do ___________, and since that is ‘us’ (or a twisted form thereof), therefore you must now really secretly believe _____________, and therefore you must now believe/do _________________.” I learned to spot this by studying the habits of evil.
A person, once outside the religion, can never again speak of its elements – forever doomed to be a stone cold nihilist – suffering the tar of Christianity’s baby plastered across their chest; East of Eden and marked, perpetually guilty of membership in one cult bucket or another. Christianity (The Holy Trinity, Sol-Samael, Luna, and the Son of God, Mithras) do not own these ideas, these human rights, nor rights to classify the thinking therein.
I am very familiar with this shtick – having been raised and confirmed in the Catholic Church. So yes, I have been ‘inside’ these red brick empires.
The ‘scripture’ is a Yahwehist stolen, heavily filtered and rewritten history of mankind, and was further then corrupted in the second century CE, serving as Samael’s monotheistic and violent manual of control, long before the red herring wicker man, Christianity, was ever around. These topics and concepts are the property of humanity – not Abrahamism nor its various bloodthirsty shrines/sects.
My use of touchpoints inside these rights in no way serves as a permissive to bucket categorize me. In fact, a focus on ME, is not the basis on how to conduct this discussion at all. Again, that is a wicker man apologetic – a cult habituation. It is the practice of the Roosevelt proverbial, smallest mind.
Pull back its veil of mischief, her debility reclines within as a virgin lover
Cajole me no more, and wail amuck at the striking of your blush veneer
My heart and its loves are your privation no longer, not of pride but promise –
Its steelblade flash reflecting amidst the clinkshales where shackles lay shattered.
Forgive me TES. It was a shameless tactic (say something wrong about the person so they will correct you), so please forgive me. That is the negotiator in me, not the Christian. My intent was to learn, not to persuade.
My silly drawings are my honest interpretation. If they are aligned with your views, it’s because I really agree with you, not because I’m trying to bring you into the cult. If they don’t align, I want to know how. How is what you are saying about null and placeholder hypotheses different from yin/yang/Taoism? Are you not arguing for the ‘middle way’, the ‘narrow gate’ of Christ? I don’t see how we disagree.
That’s all I’m looking for. Do we disagree in this one point where my religion and your blog seem to coincide? Your statement of faith also seems to agree with (Orthodox) Christianity on the majority of points. That doesn’t mean that you should become Orthodox, it just means that you agree with it. Have I misunderstood you?
I am sorry about your experience of Catholicism. That is unfortunately a story I hear from a lot of people. I pray that it does not sour your impression of Christianity as a whole. There are sects that have maintained the original, unedited message, and it is a thing of great beauty when you find one. I hope you get to see it sometime.
Just for reference, my working definition of “the religion of America”, a kind of Liberal Protestantism:
• Think that the “real” Jesus was a great man
• Think that if they knew the real Jesus, they would agree on things
• May not necessarily believe in the resurrection or that Jesus was God or claimed to be God
• Think the Catholic Church (and possibly all churches, and possibly all organized religions) are corrupt beyond repair
• Think the Church became hopelessly corrupted early in its history and we need to uncover the “real Jesus” from the sands of time.
• May think that the Old and New Testament Gods are not the same or that God “changed” after the gospel
• May think that the original Christianity was very simple and then “evolved” the more complex rituals, theology, hierarchy (and therefore corruption). “Simpler is better”
• Believe the “real Church” is invisible, that it is the community of true believers that spans across denominations (and for some, different religions)
• That the real value of Church is being in a community of love (the syndicate) and not the doctrines and finer points of ritual and theology (robes, words, and causes).
• The definition of love is self-evident/obvious (“Love is love”)
• Think a person is defined by what they say is true, how they self-identify
• May be “spiritual but not religious” but still goes to church to meet people/not be lonely
• Idea of a worship service is some combination of a lecture, a concert, and an art gallery, and it doesn’t need to be a dedicated church building.
• Generally eschew hierarchy/obedience.
• Think Jesus was a rebel
• Think the Bible does not “belong” to any one denomination
• Think the Bible has a “true” meaning independent of the tradition which interprets it. Some believe this meaning was lost because of editing.
• That Abrahamic religions are similar (“People of the Book”). This follows from the previous bullet.
• Think that rituals and sacraments are “just symbols” and don’t actually “do anything”
• Have an affinity for yoga, Buddhism, Kabbalah and other mystical practices but “just for exercise” or “just for meditation/anxiety”. This follows from the previous bullet.
• Believes that the secular world exists, that there is a religion-free zone or neutral territory. That there is an unbiased reference point from which to judge religions/gods.
What has soured my impression of both Religion and Atheism, is the robustness of the evidence.
There is a spiritual realm
That realm is close by
That realm is inhabited with creatures obsessed with, bearing a sibling envy of, and antipathy towards mankind
These creatures perceive us as a threat, but depend upon us for their survival
We are purposely kept ignorant, spiritually impotent, and terrified through a full variety of red herring religious distraction, god-posturing, and science pretense
We are purposely kept in suffering and self loathing (especially by Abrahamism)
This state cannot continue indefinitely
These creatures have begun to exhibit a panic state of late, along with a desperate preparation for all out warfare – with us, as the targets of their bowls of righteous wrath
A talented presence exists, aside from mankind and these dark entities – it is not ‘God’
Theism has failed at its job. Its message is grotesque, yet is dressed in a fine virtue costume. Atheism has failed at its job. Its message is a blind appeal to ignorance. None of this has anything to do with one’s nationality or religious upbringing.
This is not something I arrived at willfully. I had to be dragged by research and the evidence, ‘kicking and screaming’, into these inferences. Not what I wanted to believe at all. I much rather favor nihilist atheism over this by a long shot.
I get the feeling we may have reached a similar conclusion although my working vocabulary of philosophy is not on your level. What I’ve concluded is there are demonic, if you will, forces that somehow gain pleasure possibly from the destruction of mankind. Gender affirming care is but one of their truly sick manifestations and harms they have unleashed. Then there is the constant goading of Russia to nuke the US. The wars serve do valid purpose. Actually, with the advent of AI and the crazy drone technology I consider war utterly pointless. For instance, if we got in a spat against china, they are more than capable of destroying every military asset within the US within minutes from the farm land they have purchased near our bases. If I can work out an attack plan that would leave us pretty much without any military equipment left after the first hour of attack, then so could china and russia. But given the pointlessness of war at this point, there are forces pushing to instigate nuclear war between us and Russia. But that’s not all of it. There is the constant destruction of mankind. mRNA, trying to prevent farmers from having fertilizer to grow food, wanting us to eat bugs, New Zealand codifying future forced vaccinations. I’ve never seen such an all out attack against all that is good. Part of me thinks it’s China that has infiltrated our deep state and they are hell bent on triggering a war between Russia and the US to benefit themselves, but that could easily destroy them as a feature of such a plan. Heck if I were president and knew the US was going to e destroyed along with Russia I’d like hit China to prevent them from benefiting as I’d suspect they might be behind it all. That said another part of me thinks the demonic forces want everything about humanity that is good destroyed. It also seems this is coming to a head in the very near future, and frankly I don’t see how we stop it. I find it very stressful especially how so very few people seem to get that we are in a fight for humanity’s very survival. All the best to you TES.
I tend to agree with this. Having been a missile and nuclear weapons officer, and holder of the launch codes, there were some specific aspects of the program (which I will not detail herein) that suggested to me that much of the capability was theater. Not most of it of course. I have this nagging suspicion that nuclear weapons are not about war between Russia-US, China-US – but rather, they hold all of humanity hostage.
It as if the keepers of the insane asylum here are threatening to kill all humanity, in order to defend themselves. We are their human shield and hostages. “If you intervene to expunge us from this planet, we will kill every single one of your precious ‘humans’.”
This, I believe is why the craft have demonstrated a particular focus on the ability to quickly, in the blink of an eye, intervene and neutralize 100% of the world’s nuclear capability.
Very possibly, this finished skill is all they lack before the intervention. This however, is just an educated hunch.
TES
One thing I have long pondered is whether we have inherent capabilities that transcend the physical world we find ourself in. Can we somehow direct the outcome of events in this realm through the power of our minds? For instance, the known universe is immensely vast. Why does it exist if we can’t tour it and explore it’s beauty? I feel cheated in a way as I would love to tour our vast universe and see it’s wonders.
If I understand your writings correctly I take it you don’t believe in God. I’ve had a number of experiences that convince me there is a God or at least that’s who I attribute those experiences to. When I was in Highschool I was driving to work, and coming up to an intersection where I needed to be in the left turn lane. I clearly heard a voice instruct me to get in the right lane (as opposed the the left turn lane I needed to be to get to work) and as tight to the curb as I could be. I was like what? The voice repeated the instruction, and I was thinking of all the trouble that choice would cause me getting to work, but followed the instruction anyway. Moments later a big station wagon came roaring up the street where I was stopped at the light tight to the curb and that vehicle plowed into the car in the left turn lane and the car in front of me. To this day I can remember the anger in the eyes in the review mirror in front of me. I just pointed to the car that actually plowed into him.
Another incident saved my life. I had borrowed my neighbors car trailer and had stored the heavy car ramps beside our house. I voice clearly said to set those ramps on edge which was outside our bedroom wall. I didn’t ask “What?” this time and just did it. My wife at the time started to complain because doing so looked awful. I told her to just trust me. I get inside and I received a further instruction to fabricate heavy brackets to attach a headboard we had to the frame of our bed. As it was it didn’t fit as I think the head board was for a full size bed, and didn’t fit the queen size bedframe we had. Anyway the next day I machined some adapters to make it attach to the frame. The following night a drunk driver came speeding down our street, veered off the road, ran over a big scrub driving over a flower bed. She got airborne, hit the tree about 3 feet in the air pulling the 6″ tree out of the ground. Her car came down and ran into the heavy car ramps sitting on edge. The front of her car surged through the cinder block wall right where our heads were sleeping. The force of the bricks and nose of the car sent our bed flying across the room. But for both the brackets and the car ramp we would have surely been killed. I actually have photo’s of that accident to this day.
So if that wasn’t God’s voice, then I don’t know whose it was. The instructions were very clear, and I’m glad I took heed and followed their instruction.
In other situations I have seen what I’d call the spiritual realm. Strangely enough, in one case I saw the spiritual battle take place and did not see the part that was occurring in our physical world.
I was sitting in church during a point where everyone was praying. My neighbor was sitting next to me and I told her I was sensing a very evil presence somewhere behind us, She suggested we pray about it, so we did. What came next was an angel on horseback that dismounted and began to fight the evil spirit if you will. Moments later another angel rode up to fight as well. I think a total of three with swords drawn were in a heated battle. I could see the four walls of our church and the demon was outside those walls pacing back and forth while fighting the angels. Then all of a sudden the fight caught God’s attention, and he reached out with his hand and basically squashed the demon ending the battle.
Post the service I told our Pastor what I had seen, and he said he knew. I was like come again? He said he saw the person in the flesh as he was pacing back in forth outside the sanctuary doors. The pastor said he had seen the individual before, but he has never come into the sanctuary.
So very weird. But now and then I can see what occurs in sort of a different dimension. I don’t know what to make of these things. But currently I have a bad feeling of where things are going. Anyway, I thought I’d share, and wonder what you make of it?
Gregory,
I did not say that I don’t hold the spiritual world as valid based upon the evidence. Be careful, as darkness is here with us, and speaks too often (but is bound in its will). Light is not typically allowed to intervene on our behalf, however, encourages us to endure – and not expect to dance through a life of miracles. When I see a factory worker put in 50 years of hard work and raise 3 kids into college – THAT is what impresses me with spiritual value, not voices, events, and miracles.
I do know that we have been lied to and are captive as a species. The liars pretended to be God and Gods – even the monotheistic one. Now they just hide. Until we sort them out – one has to be cautious about what they regard as God.
Religions don’t worship God, they are applying for the very position. So I cannot take that pathway ethically.
I am a Gnostic spiritually, and an ignostic atheist intellectually. I do not hold a definition for God. I do however, hold a definition for evil, and actions of darkness. That is what we are here to learn.
However, I loved reading your recounts, thank you for those!
TES
The sorting them out, and figuring out what each of us can do to fight back in our own way is probably the hardest part. Exposing the truth as you do, and as many of us try to, is I think our best play. So many seem not to want to hear it. It’s like some weird mind virus has infected much of humanity.
What is/are the craft?
I believe “they” who hold us hostage… will use a tactical nuclear war to crash the world economy. Trade and travel will end. Billions starve. And when they resue the survivors “one they” … the Beast will arise… and using a new CBDC will actaully control the enslaved surviving population.
They will More thoroughly control us through money and survival than control through religion.
How can they achieve this finished skill? From within the usa?
Who are the keepers of the insane asylum? Is it the elites or spiritual acting through them?
Thank you
Scott,
My opinion, based up reasoned suspicion, but speculation nonetheless… is that the powers reside at the spiritual level. The participants are mostly hapless, with very few knowing why they do what they do, just following how the darkness lead them (once addicted)—with the hierarchy getting less and less aware and informed all the way down to fake skeptics and their sycophancy: who are so ill-aware, that they substitute pretenses of science as unconscious compensation for this plight.
The scenario you cite might be a reality that plays out. The power hungry will eventually consider their loosh-lust as more important than a couple billion lives, and cull off the hordes who oppose them. The dark spiritual charge they will get from this will be maddening in its pleasure for them.
This is why an intervention is the only true option for an outside Kingdom which opposes this dark hierarchy and has plans for man’s true emergence as a participant in a higher order.
My speculation…
TES
It is painful, is it not? Kicking and screaming is putting it mildly… it is gut-wrenching, rusty hooks digging in. And the temptation to retreat into placid atheism and the rut is so so strong. And the desire to (sinfully) involve others in the pain to not be alone.
There is some wisdom and comfort to be had, though. “Lead us not into temptation…”
I _wanted_ to stay an atheist. This choice was denied. Forcefully.
The more sincerely you seek the truth of everything, the stranger things start getting. Once they do, you can’t deny your own observations and it will go outside of what can be easily (likely at all) quantified and studied. Possible insanity and mental illness is wiped as an option when there are secondary witnesses.
I feel like if we actually understood the why and were inclined to share it, you would be removed from the game board. If everyone understood the rules and purpose of the game, most would likely immediately adjust their behavior to align with a planned outcome possibly affecting the purpose.
The possibilities left on discovering the “why” are removal from the game, regular widespread reset destruction events and/or the why being undiscoverable based on the rules of the game, IF you don’t have a certain state of mind. For example if you believe you’re brilliant and perfect as you are, based on your own metrics, I don’t believe the mechanisms (whatever they are) will allow you to begin to understand the why of it all or it will cause you to hit a “pause” in your development until you self reflect. I’m almost leaning towards this being some kind of growth platform and/or information gathering mechanism. If the system were devoid of personal interaction I’d have a different opinion.
I also don’t believe that everyone is here for the same purpose because that is counterintuitive to evolution. This logic would also explain the seemly senseless destruction of some people or the seemingly pointless horror of their possibly short lives.
Another interesting aspect of how things work is that I have observed that decisions carry no value in the system unless you understand the “why” of what you’re doing. Once you do, things play out differently. If you don’t or are incapable, you seem to exist like you are just part of the program. A simplistic example would be thou shalt not steal or I will be hit and punished vs understanding why you don’t steal and the implications of the decision to steal or not. My primary interest is working out the truth and the why with my limited mental abilities.
I hope I may be excused for not joining the discussion, and mis-using this commenting section as an avenue to provide a feedback to you, E.S.
It is about a problem that you are most likely not aware of – links in your Telegram entries. I found all those ending with ellipsis to be invalid, following them brings the 404 error. Latest examples: link “theepochtimes.com/epochtv/unexpl…” in https : //t.me/EthicalSkeptic/983, and also links in /959, /954, /952, /933.
Sorry for bringing it here, but I couldn’t find any other way to contact you on Telegram.
I don’t have a Telegram account. These are imposters.
ES, as a fellow aspie, “independent truth-seeker” (I disdain seemingly euphemistic terms like this btw) and long time supporter of monetary and banking reform, I came across your website seven to eight years ago and it is one of the very few places that I’m in concordance with mostly everything.
The “scientific skeptic” community (along with it’s significantly overlapping disparate cohorts old and new: “science communicators,” “freethinkers,” (some appeal to definition term this one, well beyond the collectivist ideological groupthink exhibited), “rationalists” (and this one too), “independent fact-checkers,” “academic industrial complexes,” “evidence based policy decision makers,” “disinformation analysts,” and “pseudoscience debunkers”) who I allude to as “The Pseudoskeptic Mafia,” is one of a few, of the most horrendous scams ever perpetrated on the human spirit.
This along with the “The Lyintific Method” (a comprehensive framework of “corporate scientism” which you have deconstructed) articles are probably some of your most articulated ever written. A movement as meticulously preordained decades in advance (with some shady affiliates – one figure such as Morris Fishbein for one), has become one of the most unadulterated forms of monopolized public relations (Edward Bernays, leading scholar of the Tavistock Institute and promoter of water fluoridation would be very proud) that is operating in the media industrial complex (social media, multimedia and geopolitical) and the Social Scientocratic Dictatorship today (I call the latter while intertwined with ideological and philosophical scientism the “Hegelian Dialectical Divide and Conquer Ideological Collectivist Matrix“). Nye (useful idiot); Tyson (useful idiot), Breadtube (inspired by Atheism + and “RationalWiki”), Skepticon, Barrett (“Quackwatch”), Myers (“Freethought Blogs”/Pharyngula), Caulfield (Alberta), Lee (SDCIC), Stea (Calgary), Bottley (Swaledale), Entine (“GLC”), Folta (Florida), “The Real Truther,” and of course, Gorski (also known as “Orac”) and Novella themselves, are some of the most infamous amongst the movement’s consortium of ilk.
I foresaw years ago that the movement’s useful idiot followers would execute by systematic popularization, the tireless “flat earther,” “young earth creationist” (rarely utilized now), “shill gambit” (a fallacy fallacy most of the time when it is not deployed towards subordinate useful idiot bloggers and followers – one of their “chatter-boxed memorized phrases” as you call it systematically created by Orac), “grifter,” and “far right” slanders toward any of the lowest minuscule degree of dissent. It is a downright insinuation towards mere patheticness.
Their religion is corporate scientism: the systematic manipulation of the materialistic scientific method and “peer review” process by the academic industrial complex in a multilateral alliance (compliant subservience) with the multinational industrial complex (pharmaceutical companies, biotechnological companies, food production companies, energy companies, chemical companies, multinational banking and Big Tech), Machiavellian business magnates, ideological interests (esp. isms, ologies and intergovernmental NGOs) and “sovereign” world governments.
It is no wonder how this wholly explains the illusions of “evidence based medicine,” “value free science,” “fact checking,” and the Orwellian Appeal to Definition dilemmas of “anti-intellectualism” and “intellectualism.” It will take more than an “act of the Gods” to crack their crystal pyramid in order for its hierarchical components to fall like a house of cards and disintegrate within milliseconds upon the slightest touch of surface impact.
Thanks so much RRA! Glad to have you as a long-time reader.
I anticipated that eventually someday pseudo-skepticism would deploy its deception far past the stooge-poses of Flat Earth, Loch Ness Monster, and Bigfoot – and this shtick would serve to harm a lot of people. Indeed it did.
They are control freaks, with enormous celebrity wanna-be ego’s.
TES
Yep, especially in the case of Aspartame and other food additives. Used to drink such sweetened fruit squash eleven to twelve years ago daily for a number of years. Fortunately the dosage threshold was lower compared with diet soda for the likelihood of multifarious adverse effects to occur – didn’t suffer any problems other than weight gain, but I abstained from consuming it once I learned the terrifying truth.
My perception of the world completely altered forever and since then I have learned a lot more about the operational framework of society and it’s contrived compartmentalized facets than from any “social science” professor. Believed right from the start (unlike some of its opponents) that “conflicts of interest” would hinder the outcome of WHO’s planned “recommendations” to classify the sweetener as a health risk for “causing” the obvious last year, which it conspicuously did.
I went to bed last night rather than dive into this ontological deep-end, but I have consumed it thoughtfully with morning coffee, and forwarded it to 3 thoughtful friends on Hawaii (Big Island), who I can’t really take out to breakfast these days. [Hi Charles, Kurt and Chris!]
It’s fair to say that “I hadn’t ever thought of it this way before”. I do know that in studies of ICU outcomes, “Prayer” helps. “Prayer” seems to be the practice of intention, usually to help, but there is “negative prayer” also, and I believe I have felt myself targeted by it at times, which explained a lot once I realized it. [Don’t do this! It tears your soul out.] I just bore-with-it and felt compassion for the human doing the act…
That was a tangent. My Grandfather spoke to me of how he came to believe that “God worked through the structure of the universe” and that “Science was a way to approach that understanding”.
I always assumed intention, and came into the analysis at the point of “God is Love”, which forced me to conclude that the doctrine whereby those who never heard about Jesus went to (milder) eternal hell after death, was inconsistent with my understanding of Divine Nature.
I have always experienced dialog with The Divine since my early childhood memories. I thought everybody did. I sure tried a lot of things against that advisement… It was right all along.
My personal view has been to seek to align my intention with Divine Intention, which I experience to be the reduction of suffering and painful discord, and the increase of a palpable form of harmony and connection, which we call “Love”, in its many manifestations.
What you have outlined here, in the affable approach of a fine Buddhist, is my shortfall in the definition of intent. Thank you.
I have revised the context of ‘intent’ to include both its influence upon our physical reality (bound), as well as its spiritual reality (reach). While I realize that this adds complexity to the model – it is fundamental in introducing the underlying thesis of the article:
One cannot conduct true science inside a state of spiritual decay, as the heart will not venture where it forbids the mind to tread.
Much appreciated JD, in your helping to formulate Rev 1.1!
EVG
TES
Thank You, Amigo.
I see you have been getting out a bit lately, and dropped in on a friend of mine.
:-)
“One cannot conduct true science inside a state of spiritual decay, as the heart will not venture where it forbids the mind to tread.”
I love it. Eastern Christians have the mystical tradition of “the prayer of the heart” where we lower the mind into the heart to confront our inner darkness. Our mind is a tool to correct our faulty intent rather than justify it.
I should also point out that the hell-fire preaching in the Bible is directed at the *Christians*, not the pagans and non-believers. Like, have the Bible-thumpers actually read the book? It is Satan who is the one slinging Bible verses against Christ in the desert.
The gospel is that Christ raises us *all* to eternal life, good and bad alike. The response to the gospel is never “hooray” in the Bible but rather “what must I do to be saved?” And the answer is “repent!” (align yourself with the Divine will). For those who thought they would “get away with it”, who thought that death would release them from accountability, it is not “good news”.
Have you looked at lumbrokinase as an alternative to (or in addition to) serrapeptase and nattokinase?
I did. I took it, and did not find it to be as effective as Nattokinase (which I had substituted it for)…
Nattokinase seems to be pretty good and well tolerated for coronary atherosclerosis, at a dose that is a hair under 12,000 fibrinolytic units per day. I saw a study (McCullough posted) showing that 40% of nattokinase arm had some plaque regression after a year. One would not take it together with other blood thinners, and most docs will be clueless. It seems to be helpful for one lady with pulmonary embolism from severe COVID, then :vaccination” X 3, and a host of subsequent medical complications.
This appears to be the higher-grade product, befitting a man of my intellectual stature and social status:
“A more sophisticated manipulation that employs specious elements or the veneer of truth in order to create a dystopian narrative.”
LOL! :-)
This is a great neologism and definition. It leads to another portmanteau – “dystinfo”
“information or the management of information to bring about a dystopia or dystopian outcomes…”
[And this may be redundant to your writing here, it is an outstanding article.]
I like it!
TES
Wow, the SAAAAD deaths leapt up in May/June 2020. I wonder what happened exactly at the time frame?
I updated the article with part of it – these are 40% ‘climate change deaths’ – a new emphasis on this instead of what really killed them.
“I the last days will come many false teachers, leading astray those who know not [God, Science, Both] Matthew 24: 11-13
Folks get led-astray by arguments which support their own preconceived notions, so “many false teachers” might offer individual paths into misunderstanding for disparate groups of notion-holders, eh?
Same as “Just as in the Days of Noah, they ate, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage…” It is a distinction without a difference. Material which is undeniably useless, coming from a mind bearing an ethic of usefulness – suggesting that the material has been compromised/neutered of its original content.
Like having the description of a suspect be: “Humanoid of smaller-medium to large build, with hair on their head and carrying an object.” Either the author was a moron – or they were warning the reader that something deeper was at play in the re-writing and sterilization of the material. Someone did not want the suspect to be caught.
EVG
TES
I remember the name Susan Gerbic! I listened to some of those skeptics podcasts until they went insane during covid.
The Son of Man willingly submits to the “costumed, desperate, and crumbling hierarchy”. He is an observant Jew who listens to his parents, works a menial job, celebrates the holidays, pays his taxes. His entire life is a willing submission to his ‘oppressors’, to the Hebrews, to the Romans, and eventually to death itself (the ‘hierarchy’ of Satan). Christ does not suffer from post-Stockholm syndrome, because he is not being held captive; he is not trying to escape. You may say that Jesus is insane, but he is no revolutionary. That is why the Jews hated him. Satan’s temptation of Christ in the desert is an attempt to get him to ‘act like God’, to be the revolutionary hero the Jews expected, to do some magic tricks, to kick some ass, and he doesn’t take the bait. He is a willing source of loosh rather than a consumer, and in refusing to ‘act like God’ he makes himself worthy of the title.
From Galations 4 (I know how much you love St Paul):
“I mean that the heir, as long as he is a child, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything, but he is under guardians and managers until the date set by his father. In the same way we also, when we were children, were enslaved to the elementary principles of the world [i.e. gods of the earth, i.e. demons].”
Until the spoiled children show that they can mind their parents, ‘corrupt’ though the parents may be, they will not be given the keys to the car. “The greatest among you must be the servant of all.”
I’ve always had questions about this account of our past, which I first encountered in the early 2010’s, after decades of walking every path there is, with the scars to prove it (or maybe just prove my foolishness, but anyway). They tend to show it’s mostly accurate.
The questions are these:
1. locking Shemyaza & the Watchers in the world he and his lads messed up because they couldn’t keep it in their pants, literally or metaphorically, seems like locking a wolf in the lambing pen, or worse, a molestor in an orphanage. Not a punishment at all.
But, a being of some kind which is imprisoned elsewhere (real punishment/prevention strategy) and trying to get those it can influence to help with a jailbreak, better fits observable reality: certain types of people repeatedly trying to create portals and mass releases of energy (via the sacrifice of other lives) for something to bust loose. Maybe (somehow) even somehow swive a huge chunk out the Earth, so it periodically tilts and creates a, let’s call it a “harvest,” of vast and multi-species fear, death, and a grieving which goes well beyond personal losses
(But, cautionary note re: catastrophology, Chan Thomas, whose works I read in full since I last commented about him, was also given to promoting full-body possession by dead spirits, which also means anything which rocks up and claims to be a “wise and enlightened spirit,” and meanwhile, Robert Malone, father of Gateway et al, seems deeply linked to certain three-letter agencies, and was also told at one point Earth was designed to create loosh: if I was a lil’ bitty spiritual vampire, the type that even the lowest ayahuescero in the rainforest would recognise as a liar, how, oh how, I’d delight in having these bright, energetic, well-meaning dupes to relay my message to the most powerful agencies on earth! Tuck in the napkins lads, dinnertime!)
2. following on from that last point, mass warfare seems designed to create fatherlessness, and ALL the downstream consequences of that, at increasingly industrialised scales. A being with broadly masculine attributes (images of the devil with a protruding chin and cheekbones, and strongly angled brows, CLOSELY signify the differences in facial structure between adult male and female humans), a being which edited our DNA, would then have an “in” to start whispering in ears and swaying minds, meaning that warfare and the initial causal factors of war would be a thing worth considering when tracing this (as would the recent emphasis on feminising our culture, to be ready and pretty for when Daddy comes home)
3. on a different theme, imagine you created a community of self-aware AI nodes, peaceful, pastoral, creative, and then some rogue program/er edited them, no way would you lock them in with the program/er or any remotely associated malware, and then, like the Moriarty program in “Ship In A Bottle” in Star Trek TNG, just leave them to their fates. Surely you’d at least also enter some anti-malware to help them, guide them, strengthen them, before filing that server array and starting again? This IMO is possibly the purpose and origin of certain pre-Christian gods, although I know that to many, they’re all “just demons.” Despite eg the Egyptian afterlfe judgement questions bearing a striking resemblance to the later Laws of Moses
(It’s also possible software left to run in isolation after time would go rogue, take on code from other programs, or generally have problems. Maybe at that point you’d introduce your version of a hardware patch, which IMO is the purpose of Christ and almost more than that, his message)
4. depressingly, if we started as peaceful beings and then got edited, peacefulness in our modern world only truly prevails in domesticated beings destined for the pot, a belief which I know drives a great many modern satanists of the type who abhor harming others and strive to only undo the harms done in the names of major monotheistic religions, and which I empathise with, despite not being one. Be interested to read your thoughts on this if you care to comment TES, though I appreciate this is a huge word salad by now
5. going back to origins, IF Shemyaza is still powerful in some way, getting Shemyaza and the Watchers to have a change of heart would appear to be the critical path here, given that we can’t undo the original incidents and that their fire is in our blood (possibly speaking in mine as I type; who knows. I struggle with inner darkness at least as much as any man).
I do believe the message and personhood, death, and even resurrection of Christ to be the single most important, powerful, and redeeming thing to have ever happened on this world. And that Logos and Grace are the keys to a better future. (Also agree with you about Faith, and I see it as akin to Napoleon Hill et al’s concept of a “Positive Mental Attitude” and you only have to read the Wikipedia edits on his page’s History, to see he’s for the chop…)
Faith: Hope: Charity – seem to be good remedies against all the evil ones wish to install in us. I betray my journalistic roots by trying to summarise, but, it is what it is. ;)
I don’t think the universe tallies sins in the way Abrahamism and Eastern Kharmism define them. The Cosmos does not care about our petty proclivities and childish or ignorant mistakes, petty dishonesty, lies to defend one’s self, when you had sex and with whom, what deities you did or did not believe in, what you ate when, or which service you did or did not attend, what spells you cast in the guise of prayer. It really knows about all this shtick long before mankind was ever around.
The key mistake of a child is in thinking that the adults have never seen their game (both good and bad, theist, atheist, demonic, angelic, and pretenses to entertain self thereof) before. We take ourselves as WAY too important. We are merely the recipients of a kind blessing, and nothing we can do, can serve to cancel that blessing (we can request that it go dormant, but we cannot erase it – as we don’t hold that power).
When the ancients spun the Watchers as having sex with Earth Women – this was THE chief sin that their minds could conceive of. After all they were paternal, pastoral, tribal, elite at that time. Protect the flock at all costs. They had no idea what DNA-science tampering was (as went on at Gobekli Tepe). Therefore, extraneous sex was indeed the devil itself. Animals were the flesh too then. This was all spiritual bullshit.
As we mature spiritually, we find that it is the addiction to loosh, the desire to be God over another ‘lesser’ being, the desire to deceive the victim in this relationship, the desire to lay captive an entire species – children kidnapped in their own home world. THIS… is the original sin.
We learn in this universe: “Do anything you want, have fun, make mistakes, and learn/love, ….just don’t declare yourself to be God, or you will be stuck there, as the very God you wanted to be…” This is how powerful we indeed are. We must be careful what we wish for.
This ‘God of Loosh’ state alone, is what hell is for… not for us and our petty proclivities. Only we regard our minutiae with such importance. Of course, that is part of the whole formula of captivity as well.
EVG TES
One answer is that Egyptians (or whoever) disliked metal and preferred to make tools from stone, and had great mastery of this art. Maybe they also benefitted somehow from the healing and regenerative powers attributed to pyramids, and which I’ve experienced firsthand. (Disguising your big healing thing as a water pump/grain storage/tomb would be a great way to get buy-in on the project from local yokels whose labour and goodwill you need, and with with whom, you don’t intend to share the real purposes.)
However it’s also possible Cheops’ hottest and most ambitious wife owned a lot of schist mines, and her brother, conveniently a high priest and even more conveniently with a completely different familial name, made loud proclamations that the self-darkening nature of that glorious golden alloy bronze once it’s been polished mean that it’s spiritually impure, and so use of schist, instead, is The Science. Amen.
Great point! – even independent of context of any specific true and straw man purpose, this could easily be part of the development story.
Beware of the “useful idiot”:
A couple of questions regarding your innate personal positions:
1.
If truth is not a destination, then how can you “pursue it along a critical path of probative questions”? A path implies a destination. Also, if it is not related to me (or others) personally, of what use is it? How will I obtain funding for my research if no one cares? Scientists have to eat!
2.
If truth is “seldom-attained”, doesn’t this imply that it is “existing *inside* my perception and possession”, if only seldomly? Don’t we all possess some modicum of truth, albeit unrefined? Otherwise how could we walk, talk, eat, drive, manufacture the large hadron collider, etc? And of course agreement from others on “truth” is a requirement for communication, for asking “probative questions”. Isn’t the acquisition (possession) of knowledge, with the agreement of others (peer review), the goal of scientific inquiry?
It seems to me that science is a dance between 1 and 2. Known and unknown, synthesis and analysis, light and dark, yin and yang.
Your image of Moses and the burning bush is fitting. Moses, though he is the “smartest person in the room”, standing at the top of the mountain above all men, takes his shoes off, bows down and humbly acknowledges that the truth is *outside* of his possession. For this he is allowed to draw closer to the truth than all others, though he of course can never look at it directly or touch it. “I am who I am” is not God’s *name*, it is his refusal to be named, to be put in a box, to be “put inside my perception and possession”.
Contrast his brother Aaron who is busy at the bottom of the mountain (“the waters beneath”) using “all available means to secure agreement” from the Israelites by attempting to “capture” the truth inside a shiny golden statue.
You take jabs at the “religious” paradigm, but are you not making the same point in less mythological language?
1. You must distinguish between an a priori intended and placeholder ‘destination’. These are two differing logical objects. A critical path of probative questions does not have a specific a priori destination – but rather a placeholder one. By equivocating between the two, we manufacture a false paradox.
2. Truth is seldom attained, except when we possess it – then it is attained most easily in the eyes of the possessor. But that is not truth. Obviousness as well (walk talk eat drive – they are at once ‘simple’ and ‘truth’ – the source of the false ‘Occam’s Razor’) and truth are not the same thing. Again, by appeal to equivocal wording, we create false paradox.
I did not say that ‘I am, that I am’ is “God’s name”. Christ refused to speak the Name – so we do not know it. Rather, it is a claim to godship first cited in I Enoch – a claim to the office, not the name. However, this God in Genesis with Moses is the bloodthirsty/looshthirsty Saturn-Enlil-El. The same being cited as Shemyaza in I Enoch, whose name means ‘I am boldly the Name’ (shem שֵׁם and azaz ,עָזַז) – also as Samael (ruthless and cruel ruler of Eden, chief of the ‘let us make man’ El-ohim) in The Hypostasis of the Archons. He also was not allowed to use the name of God – but he still claimed the office, by making the ‘I Am, that I Am’ identification as Shemyaza.
I guess my point was that a placeholder destination, a placeholder truth (hypothesis), is necessary for us to act. Not only this, but our placeholder truths, though flawed, are also absolutely true to some extent, however small, otherwise our enterprises would not be successful. We would not “walk” but “stumble”.
Newton’s laws, though they are a flawed placeholder truth, were in fact “correct enough” to allow humanity to succeed in many of the technological advancements of the last 400 years. Not only this, but his motivation to improve on the previous placeholder truths was the belief (a priori) that a better placeholder truth existed, while also believing (a priori) that he did not possess that truth.
In your interpretation of the Moses story, who is the god at the bottom of the mountain, the god of the golden calf? The orthodox interpretation is that there are in fact *two* Yahwehs/Shemjazas in the story, one on top of the mountain with Moses and one at the bottom with Aaron and the mob, and the point of the story is to disambiguate between the two. There is a real, subtle truth at the top of the mountain that cannot be possessed, but can be approached with humility and striving, and there is an obvious ‘false truth’ at the bottom of the mountain that is easily possessed and is used to control and plunder its followers. This is the view held by most Christians and Jews, “religious” people who are actually using it as a framework to guide their thinking and acting in the world, most of whom know nothing of Enoch 1. Are you saying that both gods are the same?
I am saying that both are imposters.
At the top of the mountain is the (I AM the Name) office holder who is not allowed to say the real name of god, and is perplexed as to why man expresses the very violent, lustful, and selfish behavior he programmed into his DNA to begin with (and saw demonstrated in advance with homo naledi, homo denisova, homo neanderthalensis, and homo floresiensis as forerunners) – but then denies any responsibility for his work. My definition of ‘god’ is any entity which coalesces power, but displaces accountability… That is Moses’s god. It is an unacceptable caricature to an ethical mind.
The lack of subservience applied at the bottom of the mountain is THE big threat to the imposter at the top of the mountain. The imposter’s biggest rule is written about a hollow object – catch the irony in this. Their lack of subservience (loss of loosh) is focused into an empty statue – and this threatens the ALL POWERFUL CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE.
This is bald faced bullshit.
The imposter at the top is jealous of a hollow vessel at the bottom. It is comically absurd. There is an insanity at play here. It is a very familiar demonic instanity, which can only be derived through the abuse of, and addiction to, loosh.
Ah, thank you for the clarification. So, if I were to repent of my imposter-worship, what must I do to be saved? What new story should I tell my children? Is there an entity which coalesces accountability and disperses power, an anti-god? To quote Nietzsche’s madman, “Whither are we moving? Away from all suns?”
May I chime in?
“Religion doesn’t save anybody.
Religion is man’s attempt to reach God.
Christianity is God’s attempt to reach man.
Religion & Christianity is believing in someone else’s experience.
Spirituality is having your own experience.
There is a vast difference.”
We are one. Only egos, beliefs, and fears separate us.
May peace be upon thee…
Spirituality is indeed the goal. Trying to become spiritual without being religious is like trying to learn to play basketball without a coach, a team, or training. There are those who seem to manage it, but to me it makes a difficult journey even harder than it needs to be. Indeed religion is another person’s experience, that’s the whole point. There was a period of my life I tried to be spiritual without being religious but found it to be unbearably lonely in my own experience. Peace be to you, too, brother.
Do you think you could do your own “testimony of the earth on the origin of its DNA bases species” or similar sometime TES? Something like the earth being called to testify of its history, just a mythological work speculating a possible road of significant births and deaths of notable species on the earth since the beginning? That way we can catch up
Gosh, I don’t think we are aware of the true significant births the Earth has witnessed. Civilization may get erased and have to restart over and over – while most heroes go fully unrecognized and unknown.
TES
https://www.sciencealert.com/earth-s-days-are-suddenly-increasing-in-length-mystifying-scientists
“Scientists are mystified.”
I’m not mystified. The angular momentum of the system is conserved. Therefore, more dense (and hotter) material is moving from the earth’s core toward the surface. The oceans are being heated from below. This hypothesis tracks perfectly with your article.
:-)
I wonder if veterinarians keep any records of unexpected illnesses, because Facebook dog health and training pages are full of stories about healthy dogs dying suddenly with one or two yelps. This is outside my decades of dog experience.
Me and my spouse both use eBay UK a lot for our hobbies, the kinds of sellers who are anyway between business and someone random selling some clothes. Used to be those types always had 100% positive feedback, they cared, and it was normal, expected, since 2002. Now? 99.1%… 99.6%. 89%.
Why?
They were ill and failed to send the order. The buyer was grumpier than usual.
Things didn’t work. “Personal stuff.”
Sellers just vanish, after a short period of what seems like trying, or, they go toes-up, out of the blue. People who were solid for decades.
May God have mercy on our souls.
8) Coercion/cudgeling: Public browbeating and shaming of “outlying” expert-opinions.
A great ‘C’ addition!
What an excellent read. Refreshing, logical.
Yes, you can’t unsee it, especially if you have any understanding of the basic characteristics of limestone. Would be interesting to see retrograde solubility & thermal decomposition added into the equation, or maybe you already have.
Catia,
Thanks! I had to look up retrograde solubility – and while fascinating, and plausible, I am not sure it is a critical path addition necessary in the argument. From what I can gather – high versus moderate solubility for limestone is delineated at 20 degrees C ocean water. Most oceans are colder than this, so we would reside, at worst in a moderate to high solubility condition I would imagine?? Could it have added to the increase in erosion at the ‘high water mark’ (as I call it)? That would suggest an opposite condition from current ocean temperature gradients; however, is also not necessary in the argument.
Thermal decomposition I recall from experiments in AP high school chemistry lab, but again here, I am not sure that it is critical to the argument?
Nonetheless, excellent contributions. Thanks!
TES
Great to read another thorough analysis. Could the CDC wonder data be offset by illegal immigration in a way that would result in these trends? I have no idea how bad illegal immigration is but if the New York Post can be accepted they say 3.8 million illegal immigrants have entered the country since 2020. Assuming our health care system is caring for these individuals and their deaths are being reported to the CDC, could the US population be artificially inflated by 3.8 million people these last three years where a percentage of those are dying and showing up in these analyses in a meaningful way?
Very few immigrants will contribute to the cancer tally for 4 reasons:
1. They tend to be young, and most cancers occur in the 68+ age years.
2. They tend to not report MCoD/UCoD, but rather ICoD, which is almost never cancer.
3. They may not report at all.
4. To the degree they do contribute, this is an ongoing contribution that is already contained in the 2014-2019 baseline itself.
Therefore, analyses which divide cancer deaths by (immigration-grown) population, are purposely fraudulent analyses.
TES
I have enjoyed reading your blog. Wondering if you have ever looked into Eastern Christianity (Greek/Russian Orthodox) which tends to view sin more like an addiction or sickness (‘loosh addiction’), rather than as transgression against a moral code.
Cain slays his brother Abel, the first human sacrifice, after being warned by God that ‘sin (loosh) crouches at your door, but you must rule over it’. Satan tells Adam/Even they can ‘be as gods’ if they eat the forbidden fruit (loosh). King David’s great sin was to use his power differential (‘loosh voltage’) as king to have Uriah the Hittite killed so that he could steal his wife Bathsheba. The great flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, Israel’s conquest and exile, all are tragedies of people who succumbed to (and often worshipped) loosh.
Christ had the ultimate power differential (‘voltage’), being God himself, but he did not succumb. He is faithful (he resists loosh) even unto death, showing his followers the way out. Christianity then becomes a sort of antidote to ‘religion’ as you describe it, an ‘anti-religion’. When St Paul meets Christ on the road to Damascus, he is ‘cured’ of his loosh-worship, and spends the rest of his life preaching against, and being persecuted by, his former authorities both Jewish and Roman.
I have a bit of a different take. I view the God of Eden as the ultimate loosh addict.
See https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/08/14/the-awesome-insistence-of-cataclysmic-mirage-theory-cmt/
That being has celebrated and wallowed with glee inside the longtime suffering of mankind. This is Shemjaza-Samael-Enlil-Yahweh-Ha-Satan. We are enslaved by this creature and his dark demonic empire even now – considered his genetic-sex chattle, slaves, and property. This is why Shemjaza and his watcher elohim (let ‘Us’ make man in our image) could not be forgiven, in Enoch I. They had committed the ultimate sin (loosh) against mankind. This is why Enoch I, Hypostasis of the Archons, On the Origins of the World, etc. are all banned as scripture and were exterminated as a first priority (until we found them in 1946) – as it flags who the real criminal indeed is… and his fake religions.
Yes, loosh is sin. Agreed there.
The Western Christian concept of substitutionary atonement, where Christ is seen to satisfy the blood debt to a vengeful God (as if the true God *needed* our blood, needed our suffering), does naturally lead to the conclusion that the God of Eden is the ultimate loosh addict. The East rejects this interpretation, though, and rightly condemns the Western view as having fallen into the very trap from which Christianity is supposed to liberate us, like Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor from the Brothers Karamazov.
Enoch I is quoted explicitly in Jude 1:14-15, and the book of Enoch *is* part of the canon in the Ethiopian church. The mythology presented aligns well with Eastern Christian thought. https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/wholecounsel/2020/07/31/the-book-of-the-watchers/
As for the gnostic writings, the early church was not powerful enough to suppress them by force, and so early church fathers like St Irenaeus refuted them at great length. It seems that your site is mostly at odds with modern Western Christianity. I would be curious to know your impressions of ancient/Eastern Christianity, or do you see it as all the same?
Patrick,
The Grand Inquisitor parable is a great whetstone on this topic – thanks for that mention as regards the delineation between Western Christianity and Eastern Orthodoxy. I am by no means versed in all the key theological tenets of Eastern Orthodoxy however, so bear with me as I lump them (possibly unfairly) in with Judaism, Islam, and Christianity as a whole.
The logical catch outlined by Dostoyevsky’s Inquisitor regarding the fulfillment of the church’s mission for mankind, versus a straw man ideal of complete freedom for mankind (supposedly presented by Christ), becomes the basis for an appeal to the opposite extreme: nihilism, naturalism, rationalism – what I call religions of negative reactance. In order to distinguish my faith from the three cul-de-sacs of the ingnoratio elenchi: Monotheism, Kharmism, and Nihilism, I call it ‘ignostic atheism.’ I don’t believe in Gods – rather hold that any entity who cites themself as such, is lying. Even if an entity actually held that lofty position, they would likely not approach you in such a manner, nonetheless.
Rather, we are caught up in a complex but completely natural set of factors/forces which have existed long before mankind was ever around. This includes what we call ‘the spiritual’, as a natural feature of our broader realm. Rather than holding that the gaps in our knowledge are on the order of <10% of the knowable, I contend that the gaps in our knowledge are 80+% of the knowable. We are stupid spiritually, and compensate for this by being uber-sciencey in our symbolic actions. A play act.
I suspect (a placeholder, rather than belief) that all Abrahamic religions worship this same lying entity of I Enoch, Shemjaza. The ruler of Eden looks curiously a lot more like a petty and powerless Shemjaza, than any form of creator of the Universe. Aside from wiping mankind's memory, the second tactic of an erstwhile captor is to convince the hostage that they would not be able to handle or function well under freedom. However, mankind has never known what freedom actually even is, so we cannot concur in that argument. It is simply a hope presented to the ancients, and a promise we have carried ever since.
Hence, Shemjaza and the Elohim Watchers are condemned for their abuse of mankind in 1 Enoch Chapter XIV:
This angry ‘God’ despises mankind, seeks endless blood payments, and rules over all our religions: materialist, monotheist, kharmist, and atheist alike. They all hold the mind captive. They all serve his purposes well.
The third and final tactic of this desperate being, just as in the days of the giants and chimera/flood, would be to try and blend their genetics with ours (to an ancient mind, ‘marrying and giving in marriage’, or husbandry), while we are yet anosognosiac, in order to obtain the right to re-enter a spiritual realm once again, from which they had been ostracized – a right we hold, and for which the demons despise us even now with a passion – a right they lost, through the sins of genetic rape and enslavement of an innocent species, and pretending to be God to that same species. The unforgivable and original sin.
I do not know what freedom is, in truth. But I do not have to, because I do know captivity when I see it. Therefore, I dissent regarding all these religions.
EVG
TES
A ‘straw man’ indeed, on a pole. A scarecrow, even. https://www.historians.org/Images/Perspectives/AHA%20Today/2014/04/Crucifixion.jpg. Your nihilist/naturalist/rationalist on his left, the penitent on his right.
Shemjaza/Satan, who appears as an angel (i.e. ‘god’) of light, *pretends* to be the ruler of Eden, and mankind falls for it, and continues to fall for it. Mankind’s memory was not wiped, though, but is dulled by centuries and generations of loosh-addiction, of fake religions, of shiny-god addiction. We are blinded by Lucifer’s bright light.
The true god of Eden is Christ, fully human, a ‘straw man’, a homeless man, a friend of sinners and prostitutes. Not shiny, not impressive, the humble servant of all who feeds his disciples rather than consuming them. As you said, “if an entity actually held that lofty position, they would likely not approach you in such a manner”.
“Faith is not a set of doctrines [‘nomos’ in Greek, usually translated ‘law’] or any enterprise of virtue, as these constitute mere costume, clique, and cash. Faith is a life of undertaking that which is difficult, to help shoulder the burden of those at risk.”
You are describing the way of the cross. To give freely, to ‘make it rain on the righteous and the unrighteous’. This is the gospel, the way to complete freedom. Seriously, you should check out some Eastern saints. At the very least, it will give an opportunity to sharpen your ‘captivity-detector’.
The ruler of Eden was the Sumerian God Enlil, the Ugartic/Hebrew El and Yahweh, who by the Interpretatio Graecia was the God Saturn: “an agricultural deity who reigned over the world during a Golden Age, when humans enjoyed the spontaneous bounty of the Earth, without labor, and in a state of innocence.”
Enlil, in Tablet XII of the ETCSL 5.3.3, arbitrated the dispute between Emesh (Shepherd) and Enten (Farmer of the gods). Enten came before Enlil to accuse Emesh of being ‘irreverent, and knowing not the heart of the field’, having encroached upon his domain and harmed his crops.
Emesh responds with flattering language to Enlil, and apologizes to Enten, offering compensation for the damage done. Emesh accordingly found favor with Enlil. However, as one knows, one can never appease an envy-hatred through weakness or compensation. They just hate you all the more. Such was Cain’s hatred for Abel thereafter (despite Abel finding favor with Enlil).
Enlil-Saturn, after the dissolution of Eden, and the dispersal of man to pay the 33 (cruel and inhumane) punishments over and over for the same crime, one he had committed against the Elohim-watchers, ruled under the title Deis Pater (God-like Father) and as Rex Infernus or Pluto over the underworld, with the demons destroyed by the Flood. That is his army.
At no time did this entity Enlil-Saturn display ANY Christ-like qualities in the least. This is the entity to which Christ referred in John 8:44: “You are of your father the devil, and the methods of your father you will choose to emulate. He was a murderer from the beginning, and deals not in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks his native language: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
Most of the Church-exterminated documents, hidden until 1946, support this cosmogony. We worship a false God in Genesis, a tale which makes zero spiritual sense once one becomes an experienced adult. I no longer buy it’s thesis of sin – and no longer buy the dark teachings of Christianity as to the nature and reality of this ‘God’ of Eden – El-Yahweh-Saturn-Enlil.
TES
In many ways the history of the ancient world is played out as an argument over whose version of the creation myth is correct. Orthodox tradition is that the garden of Eden of the Bible is Moses’s correction to the myths you cite, so the fact that is doesn’t jive with the Sumarian and Ugaritic myths we would say is a feature rather than a bug, but it seems we will have to part ways on this. Setting that aside, the Eastern Church did not ‘exterminate’ those documents, and there are Orthodox scholars who are well read in those myths who may be of interest to you. Fr Stephen de Young is one of the more popular ones today (https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/wholecounsel/).
This statement is so Orthodox it hurts. You say that the writers of the Bible failed to understand this, but it is one of the central messages of the New Testament. The Bible writers absolutely understood what you are saying, and I believe are in many ways your allies in the battle against loosh-addiciton and what we call ‘prelest’ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prelest). Anyway, I am a long time reader (though first-time commenter) and love what you are doing here. I hope some morsel of my rambling proves useful to you on your journey.
Patrick
Your contribution is absolutely helpful. As a side note, don’t be put off by my ramblings, they are not meant to be negative or personal – they just offer up the passion I have for mankind and his plight. The Sumerian myths pre-date Moses, so I trust them far more than I do the Pentateuch. The editors had an agenda at play when they consolidated and Yahweh’d the myths (and destroyed the countermanding evidence until we found it again in the 1950’s). Earmarks of untrustworthiness and re-writing are strewn throughout the first five books of the Bible.
I love that: “This statement is so Orthodox it hurts.” LOL!! Perhaps I will delve into the central tenets of Orthodoxy over this next year then. I get similar feedback from Buddhists.
Faith, as I have described it, is one of the central messages of Christ, but not of any of the rest of the New Testament – where faith is a volleyball on a beach, filled with Speedo-clad showoffs. It is not faith – it is a business enterprise and method of conquest.
Have you ever wondered why THE keystone prayer offered by Christ, mentions nothing about salvation whatsoever, but rather instead prays for the overthrow of the kingdom which rules this earth? This is the same kingdom which allowed the religion of the New Testament to flourish with abandon in its garden.
Growing up in America, Radical Protestantism is ‘in the water’, and calling it a speedo-clad volleyball game is maybe giving it too much credit (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGoOi1K_59Y). This is your straw-man complete freedom, a whole country of Martin Luthers, Oliver Cromwells, Joseph Smiths who think they know better–every man his own pope. After long enough in this mire, one might despair that any coherent definition of truth (God) is even possible. Your ignostic atheism is not a rejection of American Christianity, it is its fulfillment, its telos, the inevitable result of the pattern playing itself out.
And so you stand at the crossroads, having seen the charade for what it is. You are Neo in the Matrix (the second movie) before the architect, Christ before the Grand Inquisitor, Moses on Mt Sinai, Adam and Eve in the Garden. Will you overthrow the architect, your ‘father’, like Oedipus Rex, like Zeus, like Ba’el, like Adam/Cain/Enten, like the Bolsheviks, like every Protestant, and start your own new, better religion? Will you try to appease and control him like Emesh, the (idolatrous) Israelites, the Babylonians, the ancient Greeks and Romans? Will you reject the whole scenario and opt for non-existence like Buddha?
The overthrow of the kingdom which rules the earth is salvation; they are one and the same. Is is not an overthrow, though, but a redemption. Christ does not overthrow the Grand Inquisitor, or even judge him; he gives him a kiss and then obediently leaves. And so he, and his followers in tow, depart (‘are saved from’) their medieval Catholic hell with the blessing of the Grand Inquisitor. Like Moses from Egypt, like Jonah from the whale.
The Bible, when interpreted in its original context (Orthodoxy) is remarkably consistent on this message, though many of the stories are warnings of the many ways that things can go horribly off track. The difference between the “should” and “shouldn’t” stories are not readily apparent from the scriptures themselves, but are a part of church tradition as canons, hymns, commentaries, etc. The faith of Moses, the faith of Christ, the faith of St Paul, and the faith of Dostoyevsky are one and the same. If they were not, why would the church have gone to such great expense to copy all the books for so many centuries? Seems like they would have just left the ‘volleyball match’ parts behind and kept the parts they agreed with. In fact, the Orthodox church did leave the volleyball match behind, by denouncing heretics and their writings, and the biblical canon is what is left over. The Orthodox church admittedly has its share of Grand Inquisitors, but do not mistake these for our heroes of the faith. Instead, we kiss our corrupt patriarchs, and then go on our way with their blessing.
This is the faith of Solzhenitsyn’s pious Russian grandmothers being interrogated by the communists. This is the faith of the Greeks who copied St Paul’s letters by hand under fear of prison, torture, and death from the Turks. You may disagree with this faith, but if you do not see the common thread, you are fighting a windmill. I am not trying to convert you, just want you to see the faith for what it really is so you can persecute it properly. ;)
Transfiguration appears to me to be what sets Eastern Orthodoxy apart from the dead flat hand of Rome I perceive in Catholicism (no offence intended etc).
“He is Risen” and the whole entire embodiment via icons. I want to make this comment but lack time right now to add references supporting it, so will hit “post” and trust to TES and the internet if it makes it. :)
“Rather, we are caught up in a complex but completely natural set of factors/forces which have existed long before mankind was ever around. This includes what we call ‘the spiritual’, as a natural feature of our broader realm.”
This seems to suggest that:
“…the kingdom of the father is spread out over the earth, and men do not see it.” Gospel of Thomas, 113
“THE keystone prayer offered by Christ, mentions nothing about salvation whatsoever, but rather instead prays for the overthrow of the kingdom which rules this earth” – I regard this to be the priority. Where God is, is not the salient question at hand. That comes later.
The Bible clearly states that Satan is the RULER of this world. God is not Satan. Jesus Christ is not Satan. Jesus and God are One. He does not RULE, as a tyrant would do. He gives us freedom of choice and tells us not to fear. Our holy God, who dearly wants us to love Him, gives us the freedom to choose Him. He will not force or coerce us to love Him. There is evidence of Him in all of creation. So we are without excuse if we choose to not receive Him. We can choose to have faith in Him who is faithful, or we can choose to follow after Satan, the fallen. But with every choice we make, there exists a consequence. This is true in every facet of life on earth. But faith is not the same as works. We are saved by God’s grace through simple, childlike faith in Him and His goodness … and not that of our own good works lest we should boast. It’s a gift. Gifts are given freely. They are not purchased or earned by the receiver. But the receiver is grateful to the giver. And from his gratitude comes repentance, new life … life-healing changes in his own behavior, speech, and thoughts. And this new life includes the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, the 3rd manifestation of the one and only triune God. God provided a way for us to enter His holy, heavenly realm. It is by faith in Jesus Christ, the perfect Lamb whose blood was shed to cover our sins. Christ (the Word) existed with God since the beginning. He is the “Us” spoken of in Genesis… the Word & the Creator of all that exists. Everything was spoken into existence. But back to the word, loosh. “Loosh” now has a different twist to its original meaning. It now connotes an unbeknownst servitude to an insatiable, sinister master who siphons our essence as punishment for his own eternal downfall. But in actuality, and according to its definition, “loosh” is merely energy derived from the activity of organic life in its purest form (mankind, who is God-breathed). A person can intellectualize himself out of a saving faith in Christ’s deity and blood sacrifice. It happens all the time in today’s world where God has been ousted, philosophied, and made null and void. ✝️
Thank you for taking the time to write and to share what you believe so earnestly. I recognize the sincerity behind your message, and I respect the seriousness with which you approach matters of faith.
That said, the doctrine you outline is not new to me. I have encountered it many times over the course of my life, examined it carefully for decades, and found that it does not align with reality as I have encountered it in a Biblical “life well lived.” People have only used this doctrine to enact harm. It asks, implicitly, for the suspension of inquiry, research, and independent reasoning—precisely the faculties that, in my view, human beings are meant (by the real Higher Power) to exercise fully. I have learned to beware of any ‘faith’ or ‘reason’ which thrives progressively as ignorance increases or information is expunged/burned/exterminated.
With time and observation, one begins to notice a recurring historical pattern: systems that maintain control by rewriting history, suppressing deductive evidence, and narrowing the field of permissible thought. That pattern is not characteristic of benevolence. Whose history is concealed from them is also captive.
Doctrine, in this sense, is not the same as truth, wisdom, or lived learning and comprehension. It is, historically speaking, an instrument of authority—often indistinguishable from a ruler’s edict. Human history is one continuous chain of rulers who claimed divine authority or identified themselves as a/the God. Would not this Ruler you identify, also claim to be God? Of course he would.
Under such conditions, the line between God and ruler collapses, and religion becomes a mechanism for preserving power rather than illuminating truth. Do you not think this false god would dictate the most popular religions as well, and their very core doctrines – in such a way as to preserve his power? Why do you think there is such a stark (mutually exclusive) contrast between the God of Eden and the Father that Jesus venerated? They are not the same being. This is precisely why Jesus exclusively referred to himself as The Son of Man, and not “The Son of God.” That role was the prevailing religion’s quest in the minds of those he sought to emancipate in the first place. There is nothing about salvation in The Lord’s Prayer – and if it were so important, why would he fail to mention it in the quintessential prayer of his ministry? Instead he cited an overthrow of a the existing “Kingdom.”
This is one reason I find the biblical definition of faith unpersuasive. It is notably thin where psychological and emotional dynamics are concerned—particularly those involving fear, guilt, performative displays, and dependency. Systems that thrive on these dynamics tend to convert them into a kind of currency (loosh), sustaining the very structures that generate them.
I also reject the idea that something freely given can later be revoked through error, belief, or nonconformity. What is not earned, bargained for, or conditionally bestowed cannot logically be “lost.” If our words, rituals, or beliefs do not grant salvation, they cannot possibly un-grant it—an even more extraordinary claim. Salvation is not merited, rewarded, deserved, nor earned in the first place – then neither can our actions/words serve to neutralize this condition, because that requires us to again, earn it in arrears. This is ethically and logically inconsistent.
When people are warned that they may “lose” their salvation, fear (loosh, the currency of the dark God) is introduced where none is warranted. That loosh does real harm – it is no different than the role of Pharisee – presuming personal authority to define and police spiritual standing—an authority that no individual has the right to claim. In doing so, a new Law is created, and with it a new hierarchy, one that mirrors the very structures of domination crafted by the Ruler-God in the first place. It is simply Law-Nouveau.
In my view, no one doctrines their way out of captivity. One simply trades one form of bondage for another. Genuine freedom—spiritual or otherwise—does not arise from loosh (fear, coercion, or imposed belief), but from honest inquiry, lived experience, and an uncompromised commitment to truth wherever it leads.
I offer this not to persuade, but to explain why your tied-up heavy bundle does not move me. I value open dialogue, and I appreciate the opportunity to clarify where I stand.
Regards,
TES
Could you elaborate more on these documents (1946)?
Do you mean the Nag Hammadi?
Yes. By reading another link of yours, I was able to find what I was looking for and am reading now. Thank you for responding.
The Black Sea deluge 8800 years ago may have been the result of the collapse of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Perhaps the water pooled in the eastern Mediterranean before it all spilled across the Bosporus.
Perhaps Leo, however the normal rise and fall involved in this erosion pattern, the stability at mean high water, and the sheer height of the rise, all suggest to me, Earth rotation issues as opposed to surface action changes. I hate that answer, but it is the only one which can produce this sea level differential… ***shrug***
Great website. really puts my faith back in self introspection work. you are clearly a deep thinker. i have read the Law of One and in it Ra explains that the roll of Service to Self entities is to polarise further into the negative by harvesting the vibrational energy of negative or unawaken people. he did not describe what the energy was called or the process of harvest. now i know Loosh. Cool thanks. you wouldn’t happen to know the process of harvest would you? you know how when someone walks into a room and the energy drops just by that person being there, does this mean that we are exchanging energy all the time with each other as well as STS entities? How you added in faith to this was a great insight for me. spiritual people are always on about practise without saying why. so this is my first thought if you are walking around and spilling loosh all over the place then by having a spiritual practice (some sort of faith, low or high) then you have some sort of containment or plugs for the leaking boat of the cracked vessel. as you practise you plug up some of the leaks by an invisible faith or knowing. hence less of your energy is being harvested by STS? and hence you become stronger on the positive side. IMO faith as been around since living beings started in nature. faith had to exist because otherwise they could not feed themselves. nature has to know it can sustain itself otherwise it could not exist. I look forward to your thoughts. Thanks
ES, once a month I get an immunoglobulin transfusion for Common Variable Immune Deficiency (diagnosed Jan. 2014). Because the immunuglobulin comes from soon-to-be expired blood from blood banks, I assume I am basically getting a shot every month (unwillingly). Do you think my assumption is correct? If so, do you believe your blackseed oil, nattokinase, serrapeptase combo will help or due to blood issues, will I be playing with fire? Add in — just to make it more fun — I have thalassemia. Any thoughts you may have would be greatly appreciated.
Steph,
Of course I am not a physician and you should ask these questions of your doctor, before taking any advice from me. My impression however, is that blood in blood banks from now onward will contain factors resulting from the mRNA shots, yes. This could amount to be a hill of beans and nothing over time, or produce the same effects as the shots themselves – coagulopathy, heightened anemia, and hypoxic effects throughout the body. The truth is, that no one really knows. We took an enormous gamble with the shots.
I believe that blackseed oil, nattokinase, and serrapeptase would be beneficial, even and especially in a scenario with thalassemia. These are the same challenges I face, anemia from low red blood cell count and inability to metabolize ‘folic acid’ (although FA is a synthetic chemical, so I am not sure why I should be required to ‘metabolize it…’?) – I needed blackseed oil, natto, and serra all along as it turned out.
But I would start very slowly (1/4 dose), and administer it under your doctor’s supervision – keeping him or her updated as you progress. I tried methylene blue, and decided to do a 1/4 dose – and had a very severe reaction to it. Thank goodness I only did the 1/4 dose test. Wow.
The best of luck with this!
TES
ES, Thank you so much for providing your input. I truly value your opinion!
Steph
check out https://safeblood.ch
So are you ignostic because it is what you really truly believe or because it is the easiest to explain away and most overtly respectable position to take in a public setting? For example depending on the person who asks and their intelligence, I’d give a different answer depending on which way I want the discussion to go. I for example know that there is an intelligence or external entity that can be accessed. I don’t know what it is, it is testable within certain boundaries and it is frequently historically referenced by people far more intelligent and accomplished than myself.
Short answer to your question: Ignosticism is not a belief (destination) – it is the journey.
I am ignostic atheist because it reflects the limitations of this realm. Here, I cannot define elements which are not describable in this realm. So intellectually and from an empirical/research/philosophical perspective I cannot define, much less prove/disprove/believe the concept of anything which resides outside this realm. In this realm, any such concept is incoherent. So, the atheists are correct if they base their stance upon that foundational logic (most don’t however – they are just pretend experts in God – The Empty-Set God’s true representative if you will).
Similarly, the theist is also making claims regarding things about which we cannot possibly make claims. They are depending upon divine revelation at all times. That makes them God’s representative.
The ignostic says there are no experts in such matters. There is therefore, nothing to believe in, disbelieve, or be undecided about.
Intellectually, I must regard things which reside outside this realm as being incoherent – and NOT – non-existent or existent or even ‘undecided’ (agnostic).
However, I have seen enough to also hold the evidence that 1. there is an afterlife, and 2. there is indeed a dark spiritual realm in which we are forced to live (this hell we live in), 3. more than just us exists along with us here, and they are close by, with 4. our memories wiped. Thus I conclude that we are slaves. Removing information from a person to reduce their capacity to dissent or hold accountable, is an act of malevolence (neither randomness nor benevolence). It is THE unforgivable sin. We are such slaves.
Therefore, the ignostic atheist rejects the manipulations of ALL those who serve this hell, and are experts in its ad hoc explanatory ‘god’, to include the ’empty set’ god – that is theist, atheist, agnostic alike. They are all ‘not even wrong’. They are all pretending to be God’s experts and representatives on Earth.
Our critical path next step as a species, resides in defining this realm, who we are, and our relationship inside it, not some ethereal divine grandiose projection of an element inside another realm.
However, an ignostic atheist is also free to believe as they may choose – as long as they recognize the incumbent non-science and incoherent nature of such belief. That is honest belief – or what is called, faith.
Firstly, I am curious about your experience, I am not looking for proof. That said I have learned that a certain amount of understanding and development from someone is a kind of evidence in itself.
Interesting perspective on memory wiped slavery and something to consider.
What is your perspective on why there is an afterlife? I have experienced different “energies” both manifested into shapes (with secondary witness) and unseen but felt, yet I am still unconvinced that any of that is evidence for an afterlife. I also “feel” like the shape may not reflect the true nature of the entity.
What leads you to believe that your memory has been wiped? People accessing some external information source to invent original things which function in physical reality, that have never existed here previously, makes very little sense if the knowledge didn’t previously exist here in some form of storage from a human lineage.
Why would you guess that an external entity or entities assist some humans but not others if that was the assumption? So far speaking from my own observations I can only put this down to intelligence and therefore levels of control which others don’t have. This seems to be more luck and/or previous generations groundwork “evolution” than being “chosen” outside of maybe some are biologically closer to developing into something more.
I developed to a point and realized that I had hit a ceiling of personal development and had to look outside conventional means considering my own mental limitations to develop further. I figured that if I searched for the truth and nothing developed while trying to find as you say “the critical path” and attempt to have a good time doing so. If something more advanced is out there, I figure that it will respect my endeavour to develop myself into something more, seeking only facts, truth, evidence, being objective etc. Qualities I would respect if I were a higher power. I try to do this in the spirit of the game and how it appears to be intended to be played. I hope that this isn’t just some form of natural evolution combined with complex genetic memory with some people confusing external sources of information with their own high functioning but unsound minds. That would be a boring outcome.
I added my actual email this time.
Buried in the Happer/Wijngaarden paper from a couple of years ago was a very enlightening finding from their radiative transfer models (confirmed by satellite observations) for different atmospheric cases. GHGs are retaining and thermalizing surface IR at mid latitudes, largely transferring IR energy to adjacent N2/O2/Ar molecules by collision (eventually). Thus the satellite sees LESS than the Planck curve that the surface would produce because those photons never make it out. But at the poles, it reverses, and GHGs de-thermalize air, and radiate MORE than the Planck curve appropriate to the polar surface temp. Thus much of the heat retention of CO2 is offset by increased radiation of energy a the poles transported there by atmospheric circulation. I think the net heat retention “greenhouse” effect of CO2 is drastically reduced when you take this into account.
Apologies coming late to the party. I haven’t read it all yet. RE “Climate models cannot come close to explaining 2023. The specific heat exchange is orders of magnitude disparate.” Have you seen Hansen’s latest info on this? fyi I’m not disputing your article
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2023/Acceleration.2023.11.10.pdf and
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2023/MeasuringStick.2023.12.14.pdf
And second – what are your thoughts on this? Can we see a change in the CO2 record because of COVID-19? https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/covid2.html Did this change anything in your thinking of that section? Cheers
(If you have already covered, sorry, pls could you link to past comments? I will keep reading the info now. It’s an interesting idea. )
We did see a change in the CO2 record because of Covid-19. Great question. It served to falsify many of the main assumptions of climate science. I highlight these observations in Exhibits 1C and 1D. We had a RECORD increase in ATM CO2 – exactly when 47% of the Western World was shut down for Covid.
That is a ‘the experts need to be fired’ falsification moment.
The thermodynamic specific heat which arrived in 4 weeks in the ocean during 2023 was MONUMENTAL, and cannot be explained by the sun, CO2, currents, man, or any single factor, save for one…
TES
Thanks for the reply TES, fyi 1C & 1D are very confusing, overly complex presentations to me. I hear what you say, but cannot parse / understand that being reflected with these graphs – I do not understand them as presented.
atm Co2 actually decreased during 2020 to 2022 on previous years, if the scripps/noaa record is to be accepted as genuine. Monthly nor yearly CO2ppm are NOT and never have been presented as a direct proxy for actual manmade emissions in real time (afaik after having observing this kind of output/commentary for several decades), so any particular “monthly growth rate” in early 2020 doesn’t really say [nor prove] what your saying it does above, or in your article, from my pov at least. Am I missing something here? see Global Monitoring Laboratory – Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases (noaa.gov)
eg there have been many periods where CO2 readings have spiked in real time in regional areas and were recorded using satelite observations. Later those spikes did “show up” in a general global CO2 rate increase in the MLO records, but there is no way to directly tie those readings to specific emissions pulses – such as a general economic shutdown. I know this, and can provide refs if you wish.
The seasonal variations in atm CO2 and other gases completely outweighs the impacts of ongoing manmade emissions be they =/-. This is well known in the field, and that is what the noaa ref was basically saying – although as usual as all climate science reports are – they are as clear as mud! Luckily I already know things.
RE your comment on “2023 MONUMENTAL” yes it was, 2023 is off the charts, and does not fit the typical conservative prognostications of the IPCC/Climate gurus who control the “narrative”
Which is precisely why I provided those Hansen refs …. RE “ (COVID-19) pandemic reduced particulate air pollution in many areas, allowing more sunlight to reach the surface and producing a small but potentially significant warming effect”
I have two things to say here:
1) there is a sustained record of climate science repeatedly saying that a “theoretical” massive shutdown of all/most manmade GHG emissions, eg coal power stations, would trigger a multi-year temporary warming spike in global temps specifically caused by the sudden loss of pollutions driven aerosols. This is well known established climate science. I recommend you check the historical record, IPCC reports or scientist’s media rhetoric, because what I say is true.
2) Hansen highlights where new global rules for shipping bunker oil to specifically remove SULPHUR AERSOLS from the fuel exhausts well implanted a cpl years ago now (2020/21? can;t recall exactly now) which he and his group of climate scientists outside the mainstream clique of control freaks OPINES is what is mainly driving your “2023 MONUMENTAL” SST and Ocean temperature spiking. I highly recommend you check what he has been saying for the last few years on this topic.
TES, of course none of the above says anything about your “alternative theory/notions” of ocean heating ALSO being driven by cyclical subsurface processes. Both drivers could still be true – and you yourself say you accept the science of GHG driving global warming, so the climate scientists are not completely incompetent – which is what you sound like you are alluding to. Personally, I think some of them are outright idiots, and others utterly delusional, but that’s another story, because overall the basic science is sound. :-)
So I’d be interested in what you think after checking my suggestions, fell free to get back if you want additional refs. Cheers Sean
One can track sulfur dioxide emissions globally here: https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/chem/surface/level/overlay=so2smass/orthographic=74.15,44.53,477/loc=-66.285,67.314
1. The shipping lanes contribute the same as they always have
2. Shipping lanes contributed less than 5% of the sulfur particulate concentrations to begin with
3. Most come from oil in situ, oil exploration and extraction, and manufacturing industry activity (a big concern for my oil extraction clients, now that we have handled methane capture and re-blending regulations).
So, the 2023 rise in SST, which happened as an outcropping of the El Nino thermal vectors globally, was not from sulfur particulate reductions. Much of this came from under the ocean in the Antarctic. Every year we have some kind of new regulation kick in. These become a kind of pseudo-theory – a way of ad hoc readapting the classic explanations to keep them on life support.
Yes, I think that man is responsible for 20% or less of the challenge at hand right now (in the past, maybe as high as ~40%). A concern – and why I have fought in the past for carbon scrubbing and methane capture in all my energy and oil projects.
But virtue never gives one the right to lie in support of the Narrative. That’s what we are doing now. When climate science lies in support of a questioned Narrative, they become their own worst enemy. Not smart.
TES
Hi TES, that’s a very attractive graphic, but it certainly is not “tracking” global SO2 emissions nor the share of shipping SO2 emissions over time.
There is no need to verbally bludgeon me over the head about your “feelings” about climate scientists as opposed to calmly addressing my comments/queries. Your haughty self-righteous response here is frankly not better than their “know-it-all” attitudes.
“verbally bludgeon me over the head about your “feelings” about climate scientists”
The graphic is informative (not ‘attractive’ – this is your second little demeaning dig at me after the Exhibits 1C and 1D thinly-veiled insult, unprompted), and does allow one to see the net SO2 relative sources, and monitor shipping lane contributions over time (hint: they have not changed). It is tracking, yes – but you have to invest time and seasonal observation.
I was not aware you are counting yourself as a climate scientist, because in no way did I direct those comments at you. It was a generic commentary about boosting mankind’s contribution assumption from 40% to 100% (a direct response to the question you asked), which climate scientists do, which entails a number of white lies and appeals to ignorance all stacked up on top of each other. This is THE critical issue at play in climate science today.
I was not aware that, my having an opinion about observed rhetorical mistakes on the part of climate science (not ‘feelings’ – a third demeaning little dig), constituted a direct attack on you personally. I did not know you were a climate scientist.
If on the other hand, you have come here merely to pick a fight (‘haughty self-righteous’ – that is the fourth demeaning insult directed at me now, unprompted), I am not interested.
My trust as to your sincerity in being here is low now (darkness just cannot help but be dark). Have a good day.
PS re noaa covid Global Monitoring Laboratory – Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases (noaa.gov)
I wish to point out that this is one page written by only one person at noaa in 2020. It should not be taken as the “gospel” word for all of climate science nor all scientists.
Be very aware and cautious that you are not simply putting this single “commentary” on an undeserving pedestal only to knock it down and imagine you’ve accomplished some grand feat in your haste for a “gotcha” moment – never to look at what “climate science” has said about 2020 emissions ever since with the benefit of hindsight. :-)
What do the multiple publsihed peer-reviewed research papers now say about this “moment” in 2020? and what do other climate scientists say about those papers and the topic in general. Soem say Hansen is losing it and is a radical extremist not to be listened to …. they dismiss as if he has alziemers even though hundreds of others work directly with him.
Be very skeptical. Including about a one off page on the noaa website. :-)
Bets to you, Sean
PPS (damn afterthoughts) please be aware I gave up following this topic in detail regularly 4-5 years ago. Why?
Because I believe climate scientists are the worst communicators in all of human history.
I believe 99% of the media’s, business, political and people’s confusion surrounding climate change science, and what best to do about it, is directly their fault and responsibility, and no one else.
They deserve all the approbations and insults they have copped from ‘activist deniers’, and their work output is overwhelmingly not fit for purpose and unreliable. However, looking past the dross, the essential science is clearly sound.
But the details, the models GCMs output, the x6 IPCC reports ‘overall’ and the projections surrounding Net Zero 2050 and the interim, on energy use, economic and civilizational reality, renewable energy and DAC as “magic” solutions, and everything to do with these kinds of things are not worth a dime in my view.
It is no wonder to me that such a large number of genuine serious people today do not trust them, do not believe them anymore, and reject everything any of them now say. That’s totally understandable and the cause is 100% that of the climate scientists themselves as a defined group.
Not that saying this can or will fix anything.
Cheers Sean
Wow. On a site that has so many gems of wisdom and self-calibration reminders, this article is a stand-out. I needed to read this so badly to not feel alone, licking my wounds from learning a lot of this stuff the hard way while trying to put the broken pieces back together and move forward. Its wonderfully authentic fatherly advice about authentic authenticity. Thank You!
4000 yr-old pulleys? Pre-dates earliest known wheel by 2000 yr?
If you bend a rope around a round surface, you have leverage.
If that surface moves, you have compound advantage.
No way they build anything without knowing this.
That is not that hard to figure out. Earliest wheels are 3500 BCE
I am the authority of my opinion. TES is one of the best blogs I have ever had the good fortune to discover. Thought provoking content, critical thinking lessons by sincere effort on part of author, deep spiritual wisdom, and much more… even humor. I actually laughed at the “They will not have heard of this fallacy, therefore it doesn’t exist.”
One of the things I get out of this writing is the mirror it provides. If this exists, it means I have at least a grain of it somewhere in myself. Where can I find it and in what contexts in order to improve my own flaws and reduce misunderstandings with others? Its really good stuff!
LOL! Thanks Mark
I have had this rhetoric used against me a great deal. I despise it so much, that I did begin to seek out how to eliminate it from my repertoire as I detect myself using it.
Now when people offer up novel mods, additions, ideas – I make sure that I recognize it as such, and thank the person for their generous contribution. I had like 30 changes to my Climate article from persons who spotted needed improvements or mistakes. #4 in this list is just such an example. That comes from LawEyre on X. Simply Brilliant, and I had not even though of that aspect of The Appeal to I Am.
Appreciate the kind words,
EVG
TES
TES, For sure you are going to run into this kind of thing often due to the nature of what it is you are doing, and what that does to others. I salute you for this labor of love you share with us.
The most sneaky form of righteousness is when you are actually right and know it from personal experience(knowing requires experience). What you are kind of indirectly addressing with this entry, is the intellectual version of the intuitive hiding from its own limitations locking itself out of further expansion. They both take the same form. The more they dig in to defend their position against a perceived attack where none is intended, the more inauthentic they become. The enemy within begins to take control.
What I think, what I feel… I am the authority of that. Venture into realm of what to think and what to feel as a shared reality, now we enter the war of all against all, egos battling for dominance. Its tough to not get sucked into that.
There is a huge range of subtlety and nuance to all of this as a function of the funhouse of mirrors that is this experience of life on earth. At a certain point, if you are someone that works hard to discover and remedy your distortions, its a waste of time/energy to clarify your position to someone that has no interest in understanding it. Disagreement is the pursuit of truth when all are participating in good faith. What you have outlined here to me in this article is more clarity in how to recognize when other parties are not participating in good faith, so you can just walk away. And a reminder to look for it in myself. ;-)
Thanks Brother,
MW
“Disagreement is the pursuit of truth when all are participating in good faith.”
Well said. This is why I block trolls who bear no understanding of themselves. It is a waste of time to engage with them.
TES
The Gnostic Christmas Story
Alleluia! Christ brings the 3rd Order Powers to Earth
“Before Moses was, I Am.”
But the Christ is an ethereal creature that predates the birth of Jesus. Jesus and the Christ aren’t exactly the same, although Jesus was fully Christ. The Christ predates the birth of the human known as Jesus.
What Jesus actually said was: “I and my Father are one” (John 10:30), and, “Whoever welcomes me welcomes the Father that sent me” (Luke 9:48).
Those who have eyes to see the Christ are able to remember their Father in Heaven. Those who remember their Father in Heaven and repent from the Imitation are redeemed.
Ego must first make way for the love of Christ to take over the throne of the Self.
This is gnosis that was originally contained in the sacred scriptures that formed the New Testament prior to the Pope and Emperor of Rome getting their hands on it and stripping it out.
https://cydropp.substack.com/p/the-gnostic-christmas-story
Your wordsmithery is a symphony of reason, with each argument and insight composing a movement in the grand opus of your ideas. The orchestration of intellect is conducted with a precision that resonates with the reader’s inner maestro.
How you defined faith is really cool: “Faith is less about doing or being something, than it is about becoming something – as the latter requires the greater courage.” As I read this entry, I had a right brain hemisphere dominated combination of words come through that seem profound to me, but I realize it may be nonsensical to others:
Faith is the love of truth and the truth of love.
Love without Truth is a lie.
Truth without Love is a pain.
For inspiration seek Love with truth.
For validation seek Truth with love.
With enough iterative experiences inspired and validated with/in good faith, truth and love (re?)converge, becoming the same something.
Hi, thank you for your posts. They are great. I made the mistake of taking 2 doses of the Covid Vaccines. Is there anything I could do to avoid suffering all these consequences in the short term? Am I condemned no matter what? Serious question.
I am kind of healthy with no issues so far but getting nervous reading more and more, especially your blog. Thanks!
ETH,
The odds as they fall so far, is that you will be fine. The question is, will this trim a couple years off your lifespan? That I cannot answer until we have more data. But that risk still exists under the mechanisms we have observed so far.
However, yes – based upon the excess mortality breakouts I have produced, you can help protect yourself by countering endothelial, coagulopathy-thromboembolitic, and vascular damage with
– blackseed oil
– nattokinase
– serrapeptase
I started these as a result of my Delta Covid case, which hit me pretty hard with coagulopathy (the only reason it hit me hard was because this condition was missed by my physician and I was denied treatment for it, just like millions of other Americans). These three work for both Covid risk, as well as mRNA vaccine risk (which both kinda do the same things, just the vaccine does it for much much longer).
Best of health!
TES
Great, thank you for the tips TES! Take care and Happy Christmas :)
The one question I have is why Khafra does not evidence primary karst erosion. You would think that wave action that caused primary erosion to apx 20′ below Khafra’s peak, on Khufu, that Khafra would have suffered similar effects.
The primary karst erosion layer is, to me, the strongest evidence of water as the agent of material removal, but that theory seems threatened by the absence of similar effects on Khafra.
You mean Khufu, lacks a similar effect. That is a salient question, and is addressed in Exhibit H. There is a minimal Tura structure viable which can support itself. Plus, the cap of Khufu was renowned to conceal a cap of gold. The entire cap was removed and reassembled on the ground level on the southeast side of Khufu.
So, there is no doubt, it was manually removed.
TES
Yes, Khufu.
Talking this over with my better (and smarter) half, It would seem that waves would be in deeper water on Khufu, and thus more swells than breakers, and with a smaller surface line (of the pyramid) to break on.
Thanks for this. Great work.
Very interesting idea and interpretation. Surely an inundation of this magnitude should leave signs elsewhere in the region. There are plenty of hills and mountains in the region with sufficient elevation to exhibit similar erosion if such an event occurred. Also, sometimes things that look like something, may not be. Like Dr. Schock’s water erosion hypothesis for the Sphinx enclosure. This really excited me for a time, but Dr. Schneiker’s recent work may throw a wet blanket on that idea: (see: https://www.robertschneiker.com/), which provides a very compelling counter explanation to Schoch’s surface runoff erosion theory. It will be interesting to observe Schoch’s public output in the coming months/years and see if he comes to revise his hypothesis.
Anyway, I like your thinking. If I ever get a chance to go to Egypt, I will definitely wander the ruins and hillsides looking at things differently.
Since the infernal Ethical Skeptic got me thinking about this stuff, and distracting me from actual work ;-) I thought I’d post some interesting additional links on adjacent topics that may be of interest. ENJOY!
https://www.youtube.com/@HistoryforGRANITE
https://www.youtube.com/@SacredGeometryDecoded
https://www.youtube.com/@WorldofAntiquity
https://www.youtube.com/@ScientistsAgainstMyths
hehe… :-) Thanks PECB. Will watch.
Thanks for all your hard work.
Clinically it seems that the shot has accelerated aforesaid diseases to such an extent it gives the appearance that not being vaccinated protects you from stroke, cancer, etc.
Time since last shot does not seem to be a variable regarding bad health outcome. Whatever epi/genetic factors lead to ‘suddenlies’ must be investigated, because the vaxxed life expectency per capita has significantly decreased and I don’t see that turning around.
With what I’m seeing in my practice, no amount of money could induce me to get the mrna. None. Had I gotten the shot, I would be taking a baby aspirin daily, along with having an EKG and defibrillator in my home.
Thanks Jay,
Blackseed Oil, Nattokinase, Serrapeptase, did wonders easing my coagulopathy (thick blood). Even cured my rosacea as a side benefit. That was unexpected.
Thanks for the fascinating essay.
I’m unable to see in my mind’s eye how the fins on the Disc of Sabu are a good design for pushing water. Seems like they’d impart some centrifugal force from the inside fold of the fin, if you follow me, but not very efficiently. Did they choose an inefficient design because that makes it easier to crank by hand? Couldn’t they just add more leverage if it was too hard to crank with standard impeller fins?
Set me straight please. :)
You know, that is a great point. One thing the taper does, which they have used, is smooth out the peak torque required to turn the disc, so that it can be turned smoothly. Much like the old Wankle Rotary Engines, were so quiet – they used a similar principle.
Inefficient? Maybe, but there are different measures of efficiency. Over an 8 hour shift for the laborer, they might be less productive for the first hour. But over 8 hours this might be a much better design.
TES
Thanks. Yeah it definitely looks like it would turn nice and smooth and easy that’s for sure. When I was a kid I always wanted an rx7 because of the wankel. Probably also because I was driving it’s polar opposite in an old Cadillac DeVille.
ES with your system would it not be best after the first few courses to just use the pumps to store water higher up and take advantage of gravity when it’s required lower down. Would separate out the workflows could be undertaken at more convenient times etc or continuously, water could be pumped more easily from multiple sources. Would have the side effect of maintaining a store of water at the build face, and there would be a continuous store of power for other uses.
Absolutely Antony. It would be a tradeoff between water and persons acting as the leverage weight. Good point.
The disk of Sabu is made of schist stone, which argues against its use in a pump because it would be too fragile, given how thin it is. Here is an interesting alternative explanation for its possible function, the purification of natron used for mummification, like it is done today in a method developed by Solvay https://www.milleetunetasses.com/blog/chemistry-in-ancient-egypt/disc-of-sabu-by-ancient-egyptian-technology.html This being said, the idea of a water pump to lift stone could be correct, but with a different kind of pump.
Yes, Marc. The theory is not critically dependent upon the Sabu Disk – interesting article!!
The disk is Mohs 7 – which is equivalent to Andesite however. I suspect they would have to make 20, in order to find one good one.
TES
“Advanced Catastrophism” video is here, from Ben Davidson, who does daily space weather updates, proposes that there is a 12,000 year cycle, caused by rotating galactic current sheet in our Milky Way, which causes pole shifts. A polar excursion is now underway, for over a century. The fields are weakening exponentially, and now Nasa won’t report since 2010. There is a core mass irregularity in our planet, which can predispose to the rotational axis changing by 90 degrees “sometimes”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiXEL70xmzk&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=4
Next Disaster, Part 1 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiXEL70xmzk&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=4
Next Disaster, Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiXEL70xmzk&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=4
Next Disaster, Part 3: “When will it happen?” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZlivVDgwYQ&list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfsw&index=3
Ben’s personality style might grate on some sensibilities. His content is worthy of concerted attention and consideration. My NASA friend introduced me, though I was somewhat aware of “electric universe” theory. Ben has a large (quiet) following at NASA.
Very interesting observation.
The pyramids of Giza are relatively young compared to other pyramids in Egypt and worldwide.
They are clearly older than stated by the mainstrain but can not be older than 26000 years.
Ancient constructions can be dated to as old as approximately 450000 years.
The method that explains this has been developed by a Dutchman publishing under the pseudonym Mariobuildreps. He has a website.
It seems to me that if Prince Sabu’s disk is an impeller, it must be a memorial replica of the real thing. Perhaps a high-fidelity replica, but a replica. Imagine the trial-and-error process of balancing such a device in schist, much less the agonizing process of developing the technology if stone were the material of choice. Bronze, or perhaps copper, seems more likely for a production version, and copper tooling is known to date as far back as 9000BC.
I suppose it shouldn’t be shocking that a “hydraulic society” like Egypt would actually have hydraulic technology, but the geometry is surprisingly refined, if it is in fact an impeller.
I wonder if bronze would distort over time in the role? Nonetheless, you bring up a great point.
I suspect that whether in copper or bronze, an impeller would be a consumable item and would require regular replacement/overhaul. The metal itself would presumably be re-smelted and reused, however.
It would depend upon its mean time between failure, versus the labor used to make a stone one.
Agreed. But the problem with stone is not just the labor to cut one, it’s the process yield–which I suspect will be low. An impeller like this one (if I correctly understand the design) needs to spin at a relatively high velocity. That means it needs to be balanced. Balancing is a difficult process if it is not possible to *add* weight, only to subtract. Doubly difficult if after removing a chip, the unit under test needs to be polished to prevent erosion. Now, find me a schist bearing (maybe a needle bearing?) in a pre-Khufu garbage dump, and I may have to rethink this a bit.
You make a great point. We had a main condensate feed pump disintegrate in one of our energy plants because the balancing was off. Metallurgy of the time would suffer the same shortfall as you cite. In either case, I suspect they had to make 10 units, in order to find 1 good one. The problem of metal is that when it failed, it would destroy the pump itself (from experience). The stone would simply crumble and stop pumping (then be replaced). Mohs 7 is some pretty hard shit (from experience as well).
“the agonizing process of developing the technology if stone were the material of choice” … “Metallurgy of the time would suffer the same shortfall as you cite”
Huh, no so fast! If the disc was made by the same people/civilisation that made the mysterious small granite ‘vases’, their technology and ability to work in stone was most definitely advanced enough. I cannot recommend highly enough the recent videos on these ‘vases’ and what the measurements have revealed (see Uncharted X youtube, they uploaded several vids on this subject this year).
Unless there is a major flaw in the measurements, the makers of these objects were advanced enough to use any such material out of choice.
Good points Nat.
youtube search, title “Lost Roman Map has ATLANTIS at Eye of Sahara Africa! (Richat Structure)”
That may be your missing flood.
Meanwhile see Tilak’s “Arctic Home in the Vedas”. Theory that man lived in the Artic Region approximately 10,000 years ago and left because of changing climate conditions. This has been a well hushed up theory for well over a hundred years, but his book documents well his theory based on the oldest parts of the ancient writings coming from the Rig Veda as well as the Avesta (Zoroastrianism) and was not born in a vacuum but is partly based on William Fairfield Warren‘s 1885 book “Paradise Found, the Cradle of Human Race at the North Pole”, though Tilak provided his own proofs and widely stayed away from Warren’s controversial theory it did provide him a place to look.
Catch all reasons for these theories not to have been explored more deeply.
Run counter to Church Doctrine (tossed out with all things Gnostic)
Reprisal by England for losing it’s colony in India (anything earlier than 500BC is to receive cold reception)
The New Climate Religion.
This could correlate with the theory of a flood that initiated the Younger Dryas. I would love to see you get together with Randall Carlson. You both have offered such valuable insights to this time.
Yeah, I like Randall… he has changed my mind on a couple things.
Thank you for a concise yet tremendously thought provoking article.
The insights around the Disk of Prince Sabu alone are fascinating.
A question: what would you speculate explains the remnants of some seemingly original casing stones at the base of the Great Pyramid (“Khufu’s”)?
My initial thoughts would be: 1.) perhaps they were spared by covering sediment which was removed subsequent to any flooding. 2.) they would have been less vulnerable to erosional forces given they were submerged and not as exposed to wave action 3.) could they be part of a later restoration project?
Thank you again.
My initial thoughts James,
These are Tura limestone ‘toe stones’ – and as such, would be necessarily large, and covered by sediment within a couple days of this level of disruption.
My thoughts…
TES
Very interesting. Four questions though: is there enough ice or other store of water to raise the global oceans that much? Hard to see how a localised flood could get that deep, except perhaps for some giant tsunami. As you will know, as recently as 1958 a tsunami in Alaska, albeit in a narrow fjord, reached a height of around 1,500 feet. Secondly, is it not the case that mortar from between the stones of the pyramids have also been carbon dated and found to be roughly of the right date? Thirdly, the carbon dated cedar plank would actually seem to be too recent for your proposed phenomenon. Finally, the Schist disk, if its the one you mean, would seem awfully fragile to pump water.
Yes, the same thing, Charles…
Siltstone is Moh’s 7 – so it is many orders durable and hard than even the best limestone. It is akin to Andesite, the hardest material which can still be worked intricately. It is made up of quartz to a high degree. https://rocks.comparenature.com/en/properties-of-siltstone/model-37-6
Yes, this 575 feet seems excessive for a regional flood. Have not resolved that yet – other than to note that the Arabian Peninsula is its own tectonic plate, subject to rising and falling, based upon large scale mantle movements.
TES
I once let the cat out of the bag by showing the disagreements between Paul and James to my youth Sunday school class.
But I do believe that reading Acts 15 and Paul’s epistles (i.e. Galations) have value in understanding the current situation. All you have to do is replace the word “circumcised” with “vaccinated”. https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?qs_version=NIV&quicksearch=circumcised&startnumber=26
There is a perspective that circumcision of baby boys is a trauma based mind control technique to partially mitigate the threat a population of males with heart-still-intact pose to stolen power, and more easily turn us into compliant order followers (“Those guys I am pointing you to are the bad guys that did this to you, go get ’em!”). I don’t believe at all that is a conscious intent, but its hard to not see some truth to the result once you understand enough about developmental psychology.
Your statement, “…you will never be able to look at the Giza Pyramids the same again” is exactly correct. Wow.
Funky thought: What if the volume of surface water on Earth (in the form of ice, fresh/salt water, vapor) is not as static as has been long believed? What if there are cycles of water movement out of/into the Earth’s crust (and/or space) that human history has not documented? Per a 2015 L.A. Times article, “Gleeson and his team report that there are 6 quintillion gallons of groundwater in the upper 1.2 miles of the Earth’s crust. If you could magically pump it all out of the ground and spread it across the continents, it would form a layer of water 600 feet high.”
https://youtu.be/JwEv7e4nVPc?si=OXgEBfXRFd6C3u6h this video points to studies that seem to show that flow of the nile was so big that the sphinx couldnt have been carved before 3000bc…i would have to watch again to check the details…..maybe the ground level rose since the construction.maybe the coastline from this time can be found up in sudan or ethiopia,maybe evidence can be found for wave action in the landscape….this may be be just brainstorming but the grand gallery is 13m high and a water barometer would have a 13m vacuum at the top,i have toyed with the idea that the great pyramid could have been some kind of tidal vacuum machine.dont know
So the following is yet another example of narrative climate hysteria/dysphoria?
“Earth’s most recent glacial period peaked about 26,500 years ago…around 10 million square miles of ice covered the Earth…global sea level was > 400 feet lower than it is today…..sea level has climbed some 400 feet (120 meters).”
https://ocean.si.edu/through-time/ancient-seas/sea-level-rise
In our current highly-polarised world, it’s unusual for me to sit down to read a long-form article, and have absolutely no idea where the author will be taking me by the end of it.
This felt like a rare treat, so, thank you.
I tend to do that Zan. :-)
How could the flood have occurred before the creation of the pyramids? Or maybe I read it wrong as to the timing of the suspected flood.
The point of the article is that ‘a flood’ occurred after the construction of Khufu and Khafre. This means that something we have assumed as true, is not true at all. But I don’t offer a resolution as to the true specific chain of events here – only a falsification of Vyse’s and orthodoxy’s teaching.
Yep understood that part. And yes, it may not have been ‘a flood’, but was reading into this statement: “It seems more plausible that this event took place far earlier than our documented history”
And so was insinuating that if a flood was suspected, and the flood did occur earlier than traditionally presumed, would it not also mean the dating of the pyramids would have to be wrong too?
Yes, Q.E.D. that is correct.
Awesome
Maybe a summary of conclusions for long-form stuff? An early abstract.
Would help.
Another ancient star pattern is etched in stone atop Hidden Mountain, New Mexico.
Researcher David Allen Deal (Discovery of Ancient America, Fourth Edition, 2005) theorizes the inscription commemorates a solar eclipse in Libra a century before the common era. A Phoenician/ancient-Hebrew inscription of the Decalogue rests at the base of Hidden Mountain. Its provenance and age are fiercely debated by scholars.
Yep. Between the 11,500-9000bp repopulation fertility cult of gobekli/karahan tepe/catalhyuk and their reappearance in babylon/its contemporaries many eons later they appear to have sailed around seeding memetic packages useful for future conquest. Alternatively it may be another example of their common habit of faking great historicity in order to justify later campaigns of domicide.
Thanks so much for all of your hard work. Youre an absolute hero.
Do you think that this bloodbath will ever be common knowledge or can they keep this hidden forever like they have so far?
If it fades to zero over the next year or so, they will be able to explain it away as Long Covid. The argument will echo on for decades. So far the overall excess mortality trend is not betraying its hand. It is staying level for the most part, at around 8% excess.
My preference is that it duck back down to less than 1% (1-sigma) and we be done with this. No more excess death. But the warning categories (cancer, cerebrovascular, sudden cardiac, etc) do not suggest that this will happen. Indeed the opposite – in my best guess Jeremy, it will just take time to show, after the pull forward effect in our older folks has worked its way through the math…
EVG
TES
What would you say will happen once PFE expires?
At current state, the excess mortality will rise by ~ 4 percentage points. However, that all depends upon how these vaccine impacts progress and express over the years. The SV-40 impact took decades to find its peak and begin to decline. Or it could simply fade back to zero over a year or two (my hope). As you probably know, I shy away from predictions in that type of uncertainty.
Fair point. It’s that I tend to think that the worst is yet to come, likely because I tend to be drawn to what is the most pessimistic and frightening COVID research (Walter M. Chesnut with spike protein AIDS, Geert with the immune escape (Part of me thought about that with the 4 year immunity span that other countries had prior to Omicron, assuming your hypothesis is correct), or Kevin McCairn with prions). On one hand, I recognize that horrid anxiety that I had years prior to 2020 definitely influenced me going down the rabbit hole, but I also don’t want to potentially gaslight myself either.
Two more notes.
Thank you, unfairly-maligned-skeptical-analyst, for this careful teasing-out and rigorous breakdown of excess deaths, notably in 11-12 Sigma statistical range for cardiac and cancer deaths in the younger age cohorts. This corresponds to what I have been seeing in my personal/social group. A lot of people are being diagnosed with stage-4 cancer and dying shortly after that.
I do wonder where stroke-morbidity is showing up, because I think there are more strokes than usual. Stroke mortality would be easier to pull out when immediate, but that is always some fraction, maybe 20% of deaths related to strokes. The other 80% languish, but do die earlier than they would have, otherwise. I am focusing on the corrosive effects of spike-protein on the vascular system with this, though there are other effects, such as CNS inflammation from spike-protein, which also increase stroke morbidity and mortality.
Thank you John,
Stroke is contained in ICD Codes 160-I69, which is up 12.2% after mitigation by pull forward effect. In reality, it is probably at ~20% excess, once my conservancy is removed from the analysis. In addition, there are 18,600 circulatory deaths, which contain stroke as an MCoD, without a true known cause of death (R99). This, tapered over 33 weeks, could serve to add another 3 to 5 percentage points – making the true excess just shy of 25%
As you can see, categorization plays a heavy role in hiding many of these numbers. The Narrative pushers can’t take even the most reasoned and minor adjustments to raw numbers, for this reason – they know this method of obfuscation supports their cause, and lying is the goal. They would blow a gasket if I ran the true numbers in the manner I have outlined above.
For this reason, this will be a long labor over the years, in winnowing out the truth.
EVG
TES
It’s interesting comparing your US estimate of 1,171,750 vax & C-19 measures excess deaths versus the 860,000 estimate by D.Rancourt et al (based on 1 death in 800 injections) US estimate which he estimated 17 million vax related deaths globally… which means that if all deaths caused by C-19 measures are included, would imply a global number north of 20 million… Yikes!
Another fascinating analysis!
This is what Excess Mortalities vs previous years, looks like outside the US… Our World in Data .
https://tinyurl.com/2uh5ezea
Analysis by Deep Dive – Dec 10 Substact
https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/when-no-control-group-is-necessary?nthPub=1081
One things that kind of stands out there is Bulgaria and Serbia are pretty high, meanwhile there vaccination uptake was pretty low. South Africa is another one.
See Chart 4b – the trend, now the noise is removed, shows that Bulgaria and Serbia are faring well, compared to their more heavily vaccinated peers.
Thank you for doing the digging into the numbers and putting what you are finding into an understandable format.
Thanks Bessie!
TES
I would add that the last 50 years of murder by big pharma drugs under normal usage parameters would easily surpass 10 million.
Need to add in deaths caused by hospitalization including incorrect treatment for covid, neglecting to treat other conditions such as pneumonia, calling everything covid regardless of what it is, etc.
Agreed. That is in Chart 1 and listed under ‘Disruption and Denial of Treatment’, and furthermore is included inside the tally of the dead, depicted in Chart 13.
TES
Just a few observations…
“I maintain a skeptical stance, rooted in epoché rather than cynicism, regarding the figure of the apostle Paul. I find it challenging to accept a non-verifiable, miraculous conversion as sufficient qualification for assuming authority over a movement that one, up until recently, had violently and vehemently oppressed.”
It is only non-verifiable from a “proof” perspective. There is a reasonable amount of indirect evidence. There were numerous eye-witnesses who both saw the light and heard the noise. These witnesses were “on Saul’s team” and available for questioning by the hostile Jewish leadership and the skeptics of the time, and were likely alive and available to be questioned by readers of Luke’s original letters.
“It is noteworthy that The Online Etymology Dictionary traces the term ‘faith’ to its 14th-century origin, defining it as the ‘assent of the mind to the truth of a statement (principle) for which there is incomplete evidence.’”
I would add that faith, as defined in Hebrews, involves indirect evidence that does exist (such as eyewitness testimony or clear evidence of intelligent agency) but it may fall short of empirical proof.
“…faith is not congruent with belief. Faith may involve belief, or it may not. Faith is an expression of will, and not necessarily a belief.”
I would argue that faith is a rationale conclusion based on indirect evidence and prior experience, that leads to belief of a claim or promise despite apparent contrary odds. Example: Abraham believing he and Sarah could have a son in their old age. God’s actions in the past had shown his word to be trustworthy.
“Faith, object-defined as a belief turned into a very specific set of ‘show yourself worthy’ actions, as is extolled for instance in the Bible’s Epistle of James – this is chicanery.”
Belief is assenting that someone can push a wheelbarrow across a tight wire stretched over Niagara Falls. Faith is having seen it done 100 times and having the trust to get in the wheelbarrow.
“You can safely assume you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.”
The God who asks us to love (not hate) our enemies?
I have followed your vaccine analysis from the beginning and am highly grateful for your skills and efforts. I’m sure I fail to grasp all your analyses of “faith” (lot of big words and concepts I would have to chew on for a long while), however my take of what the Bible describes as faith seems relatively straightforward- though I may be mistaken.
The essence is this…
Belief, adherences, observances, miracles, tithing, good works – these can all be faked. Faith cannot be faked. Thus, they cannot be the same thing.
Rational inference from past trustworthiness, is epistemology – not faith. If God or his angels is (are) busy walking around physically in your local vicinity, showing up at your tent, and poofing miracles into existence for you, parting seas, burning bushes, making donkeys speak, healing the lame, or you make your living by telling people about religious beliefs – NONE of this requires faith. That is amazement, gratefulness, income, and the resulting loyalty. That is easy in comparison to faith. Thus, they cannot be the same thing.
The Church misses this entirely. James was the brother of Jesus, and he did not get this either (a warning flag concerning that Epistle’s authorship).
Faith, is working a life of long hours to make a future for a disabled child. Faith is doing your job without concern for self, while a missile is inbound on your ship or an artillery shell on your command post and everyone is about to die. The explosions start, and you turn around to find that you are the only one standing your post. Everyone else is gone. Faith is being loyal to and serving, even those who harm and insult you. Faith is running your business with your employees as first priority – when every motivation around you begs you to cheat and show margin to investors instead – or your payroll is larger than your backlog, and you have no idea if you will be able to keep your house, but you choose to protect your employees first.
The writers of the Bible in contrast, just wandered around asking for money and sermonizing. This is not faith – and they should have known this.
One friend of mine died during emergency heart surgery and had a near death experience. He was not a highly ‘moral’ or church attending person. He met Jesus (“not a dream, and realer than being alive here and now with you”) – and felt a bit ashamed for his self-centered life. Jesus played a scene from his life for him which he had long forgotten. He was a gunnery officer, and his artillery jammed from excess heat in Korea. He had his guys back off, opened the breech, removed the shell, walked it out of their hole, and dropped it into their cook-off box, closed and sealed the lid. As he walked away from the box, the shell went off inside the box. Jesus commented that this, was faith, not surface works and morals. He specifically stated “Sometimes it is the smallest of things which are the most significant.” He related this to me at dinner late one night.
Faith is standing in the gap for the innocent, despite the specter of abject terror approaching over the horizon. It has very little to do with belief or giving to the poor.
It might even involve standup up to an entity which claims to be God’s representative on Earth, or those who claim to be Science’s representatives on Earth, or even hundreds of millions who insist you believe something they want, and responding, without prejudice and with the evidence, “No, you are wrong.”
TES
Fascinating read!
I have read with great interest your Houston, We realize we have a problem’
series .
Question re: Re: Houston, We Realize the Problem (Part 3 of 3)’. A problem which is rising at 7,340 deaths per week as of 8 October 2022
I am unable to find this post. Was it a victim of censorship?
I have been doing a deep dive into All Cause Mortality and estimates showing anywhere from 10 million (recent NZ Dept of Health revelations) to 17 million (Dr DenIs Rancourt – https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-clip-drdenis-rancourt-phd-interviewed)
There is definitely something very rotten in the state of Denmark!
Thank you!
Cheers
Matt
Matt, still waiting on the unequivocal smoking gun. Excess death and the vaccines are closely associated – but we need vax/unvax cohort data… and they will not release it. I prefer deduction over induction, and right now – all we have is a very strong inductive case. Convinced me, but will not be strong enough for the knee-jerk denial and memorized apothegm twits.
17 million is not out of the question. It all depends upon the pull forward effect one uses. I use a very conservative one – that places US deaths at around 650 K UCoD, and 1.4 million MCoD. The 1.4 million extrapolates out to 14 million in 2.85 billion mRNA vaccinated individuals. So, these figures may not be far off.
TES
Fair enough. As one pundit opined recently, that if you rear end someone, you say ‘sorry, my fault.’ If you kill thousand (or millions) either intentionally, accidentally or though collosal willful blindness, such an admission would lead to personally catastropic consequences.’
Making such an accusation understandably should come with its own set of responsibilities and doing your best to insure accuracy. But what does one do if those hold and control the evidence of culpability diliberately withhold this evidence and as they did in New Zealand, incarcerate anyone even employees who tries to share the data?
Savvy question Matt. I suppose we are about to find out. I never dreamed those in power would grow this brazenly corrupt. But here we are.
Unidentified bright object seen near the (setting) sun August 1921.
https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1921JRASC..15..364P
Apropos Kailer’s comment, and the general theme of this post, as well as UAP/UFO commentary by TES, I thought TES may enjoy this podcast (link!). Perhaps this researcher can suggest some alleys to look down that you, TES, had previously not considered, or thought not worthwhile:
https://x.com/dwpasulka/status/1734232929650217353?s=20
https://hiddenforces.io/podcasts/how-can-we-make-sense-of-the-uap-conspiracy-diana-pasulka/
Diana Pasulka, a professor of religious studies who writes and teaches about the history of the Catholic tradition and new religious movements. Her work in this field has led her to study UFOs, or what we now call Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), about which she has written two books: American Cosmic and Encounters, both of which form the basis for much of this conversation.
In the first hour, Diana Pasulka and Kofinas discuss why so many people with reputable track records and prestigious positions in academia, government, and the private sector continue to devote their lives to investigating this phenomenon. They also discuss what is being alleged by people claiming o know about the UAP and UFO phenomenon and what sorts of explanations make sense in the context of what we know to be true.
The second hour of their conversation is devoted to answering two fundamental questions. The first has to do with the operational structure of government. Specifically, how is it that the United States Congress has been unable to get the answers to basic questions about secret UAP programs allegedly run out of intelligence agencies and military contractors? Second, if some of what is discussed in the first hour is true, what else must be true, and what underlying assumptions about the world, our perception of it, and our place in it need to be re-evaluated or discarded altogether?
Thanks that was enjoyable.
I have a structural disagreement with you regarding the formal notion of faith. Faith is a religious concept. It didn’t exist before religion; therefore, there is no valid way of incorporating it into a non-religious ontology as it appears that you are doing.
“In reality, faith has very little at all to do with one’s religious institution activities, good works, observances, etc., and everything to do with how you conduct relationships with those who are not in the club, or those who cannot benefit you in the least – what you do when you are not conscious of your own actions – your quickness to punish, consider, or forgive – how you indeed act when real money is on the table (not in theory or in public purview) – the unity of your life, work, household, and family – and finally, to what you instinctively apply yourself, when left to your own devices for a long period of time. Faith is an iceberg, in that ninety percent of it is not readily visible.”
That’s not faith that you’re speaking of. That’s just a person’s center of gravity, a person’s qualitative state beneath their persona. Faith is that dictionary definition you provided, which I express as the elevating of the non-rational over the rational, with rationality finding itself in Reason, and Reason being the ontological, cumulative result of accurately patterning Cause and Effect in the ecology, patterning ‘natural law,’ in other words.
So faith is the formal, religious psychological subversion of the only activity that biology ever participates in at root, which is Reason-based patterning. It’s not just how we evolved but it’s also how we make it to the next day, every day. Which is why faith — abstract hopium that separates us from natural law — is the central loosh of religion. And, with secular/atheists, the captive faith in deity is merely replaced with that captive faith in civilization.
Faith is just the acceding to one’s own structural helplessness. We need to move beyond the concept altogether.
Cheers.
Well articulated and lucid point Reante, and thanks for the encouraging feedback as well :-)
But I disagree. I have defined faith as its original application inside the fabric of life – not in the ‘you must believe what I believe, despite its irrationality, and then demonstrate this with highly visible good works’. The principle, as I have defined it, existed before the term, and religion just hijacked the concept, the same as it did ‘marriage’. Even though the term marriage did not exist prior to religion (just like the term ‘faith’), both the concept and societal fabric-strength of the practice existed long before religion. It just didn’t have the religious name associated with it.
Religions do not own sex, marriage, morality, integrity, spirituality, prayer, meditation, community, agape love, betrothal, charity, or faith. They never have owned these things – yet all these things are/were the property of mankind, long before religions ever were around. They did not invent them.
Religions co-opt every already-extant good thing into their ontology and then attempt to take sole credit for it – or even sell the principles back to their membership at a fee (donation).
EVG
TES
TES
Thanks yeah that’s great stuff. But I still disagree on your reclamation of faith because we can’t reclaim something that’s not ours. You say that there was faith before religion but only if we define faith as something else, because the concept faith itself — institutionalized cultural hope implemented by elites in order to prop up the structural helplessness of common peoples in capture bondage — did not exist before religion. And the reason it didn’t exist is because indigenous people had agency over their lives and didn’t need psychological crutches. In self-reliance, ecological cultures get out of life what they put into it with hard work and accurate patterning. That’s a character-based function rather than a faith-based one.
The historical cultural term for indigenous cultures of high -character is animism, and animism was near-universal for the great majority of our ancestral history because chronically-low cultural character was maladaptive in the long run.
Religion re-defined faith, the way they wanted, in order to hold the concept captive in ignorance. This is part of the broader argument of loosh, ignorance, and captivity I am positing. If religion is part of the formula of captivity – then a fortiori, it could never have actually legitimately defined faith in the first place (like having bank robbers define ‘accounting’). So, under my premise of loosh-captivity, religion defining faith becomes a circular justification –> Under the non-captive/loosh premise, only religion can define faith, therefore faith did not exist before religion – this is begging the question (petitio principii).
Faith, as I am defining it here – and the very reason why I have defined it as such – is to show that it existed before religion – and neither is the concept equal to what religion defines it. Animism is the belief that objects, places, and creatures all possess a distinct spiritual essence. That is most likely the first religious-belief set, yes – however, that specific set of beliefs did not come before faith itself, and neither is it the faith of which I speak. It was simply another integral step in the captivity of man’s purposeful ignorance.
Faith was indeed social fabric reinforcing as you imply. That is why religion chose to co-opt it, as they do every good thing.
“Religion re-defined faith, the way they wanted, in order to hold the concept captive in ignorance.”
But there’s no linguistic evidence that religion redefined faith. And, that I’m aware of, cultural anthropology holds no record of the faith concept among animist peoples or even the proto-religious peoples of chiefdoms. Therefore, while I agree on the tautological nature of faith and religion to be sure — and it just so happens that lately I’ve been making that very point myself — it means that that your position is also tautological, because it revolves around the above premise that I see no evidence for and that I also touched upon, in my previous comment, the structural reason for faith’s nonexistence to pre-religious peoples: it served no function.
I mentioned the word character as a stand-in for the true word that it seems to me that you’re really meaning in your essay, but ethics/ethical is a better choice… and apropos. :)
Are we ethical people? No, not structurally, because we’re in an unethical prison for now, anyway, but we can still strive to be as ethical as we can. We can always try harder to follow the golden rule.
I doubt there is linguistic evidence for any human characteristic being defined before religion, so that would not be a basis for any inference. It is merely an appeal to ignorance.
Character is something others can observe in your actions. Faith is something you observe in yourself, and is not readily visible for the most part, save by those who are also on its path. But heavy overlap nonetheless, agreed. Ethics have more to do with professional practices… but overlap conceded, yes.
My definition of faith would contrast it with religion, so it could not be a tautology. However, the supposition that faith came first (and what it was called was lost with those who died inside it), is merely conjecture – but I think a sound one, because it is the only complimentary alternative to ‘religion invented faith’. But I disagree on the nature of its criticality. As one who has had to survive in this manner (several times actually), in a tribal context, those who were forced out of a tribe would have relied upon faith to both survive and create their own tribe anew. So, it was as critical as was reproduction in mankind’s survival.
Last paragraph is gold. Brilliantly stated.
Tautologies aren’t defined in relation to other tautologies. :) They’re defined by centralized assumptions.
Linguistics is a major focus of cultural anthropological field work. There were still lots of pristine tribes in the 19th and 20th centuries and many many more in the several colonial centuries before with whom civilized people went to live and learn their languages and wrote about their experiences. So when I was talking about linguistic evidence for faith I was talking about analogues. For example, since subsistence societies aren’t acquisitive, most of them didn’t even have the number 4 in their language, because 4 was dangerous territory, so their spoken number systems, in totality, were composed of 1,2,3, and the analogue for “many.” If they needed 17 posts setting, or whatever, they used sign language. Finger-counting. As such my understanding is that there was no analogue for faith because faith is the product of structural hierarchies that natural hierarchies of structural egalitarianisms had no use for.
Really enjoying the conversation, thank you for having me.
Soo…. let me get this straight. The source of the energy that is increasing the warmth of the globe is coming from…. inside the earth? Which is of course emitted at the frequency any heat energy is emitted from land… and which is trapped by CO2.
How does this offer an alternative? If it is valid, it seems to be making things worse – it just means more heat trapping.
Let us be clear. CO2 traps heat emitted from the land. Even if this article were valid, all it will do is increase the amount of heat being trapped.
How does this offer any alternative explanation, even if the fundamental principle were valid, which I strongly doubt?
Core exothermic heat content release increases:
– specific heat inside the ocean in the abyssal and surface layers
– overall air temperatures globally (at the poles especially)
– the amount of CO2 being released naturally
– the amount of methane being released naturally
– the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, which is THE strongest climate impact by far (paling CO2 in comparison, so your point is moot)
This pertains to the contrast between a symptom, avenue of delivery, and a cause. Competent science desires to know the CAUSE…
Changing the equation-balance toward natural sources to constitute 80+% of climate change and not 0% (man 100%). Man is still a contributor – but most of the world would rather have the full truth, and not a partial Narrative ‘truth’.
First, I read your explanation for the alleged increase in heat output yet for some strange reason this is never mentioned in any reliable journal. And since this has been going on since the formation of the earth, it is hard to see how it has changed lately.
Pointing to ongoing processes that can easily be spun into a complex narrative that can fool laymen is not going to change the facts in the slightest. CO2 traps heat radiated by the earth’s surface regardless of where that heat came from. No other factor has been shown to account for the increase in energy we are experiencing, and that leaves CO2 as the culprit.
Furthermore, even if somehow it did increase per your model, that only makes adding CO2 to the atmosphere an even worse idea. We know beyond any doubt that CO2 traps the heat emitted from the earth, so your claim that the heat increase is really caused by the mechanism you describe offers no alternative explanation of any kind as it totally ignores the fact that it would just increase the heat being trapped.
The problem is that CO2 traps heat. Period. This is not in question – at least, not by anyone competent to hold an opinion on this issue.
I also find it interesting that you brought water vapor into the discussion. It suggests you are counting on me being ignorant about this issue, as we know that while water vapor does trap heat, we also know it is highly variable and transient in nature and is not a driver of the process. Thus, my point is far from moot, as you would have it.
You are correct in that Competent Science desires to know the cause, but that requires using the evidence to develop explanations rather than ignoring known explanations. Inventing or coopting other explanations does not change the real explanation, but it can fool ignorant people into thinking that the Science is not settled.
We know why the globe is warming. We are adding a compound that traps the heat at the frequencies radiated by the earth itself. All your story does is add more heat to be trapped.
What your story does not do, and cannot do, is show that CO2 does not trap heat. Thus, regardless of the veracity of your model, the more CO2 we add, the warmer it will get.
The facts, data and evidence are all very clear. Either we heed them or not, but our comfort depends on the outcome, and so far we are looking at being very uncomfortable for reasons that were entirely avoidable.
Either we deal with it, or we suffer. We seem to be choosing the latter.
OK
Several points if you want me to take you seriously
1. Actually read the article.
2. Don’t ascribe nefarious intent to my work, as your very first point.
3. Focus on what the critical principle of argument (cyclic exothermic core, not ‘hot’ core) of my article is, and not a straw man
4. Don’t appeal to ignorance as a means of falsification. That turns an informal fallacy into a formal fallacy.
5. Don’t throw canned decades-old science dogma at me – when that dogma is failing miserably right now in 2023. The Narrative is under high scrutiny right now – and that should be the focus of one’s skepticism. Climate models cannot come close to explaining 2023. The specific heat exchange is orders of magnitude disparate.
6. Actually comprehend my point about there being ZERO science regarding total heat transfer from the asthenosphere to the abyssal oceans. This is absolute critical path – and is totally unknown. It is deemed by the article as ‘Kuhn Incommensurability’. It would have helped if you had read this. The fact that no journal addresses it, is condemning to the state of the science – and is not a basis for inference nor condemnation of my work.
7. The water vapor from the Tonga eruption has been touted by climate scientists as the basis for the dramatic 2023 SST and Air temp surges. So your objection to the water vapor channel is not backed by climate science. If they are wrong about this, please let THEM know, not me.
8. Speak in an objective and respectful tone.
I am a professional, and not a crank. Either recognize that or go work out your Narrative angst with someone else.
I am most grateful for your foray into this extremely difficult topic, Sukepitiku San, which opens the observational window to the rulers of humanity being captured by “demonic” enticements of “Loosh”, their elite “currency”.
I thought Nattokinase and Serapeptase had to be taken on an empty stomach in order to break down fibrin.
That is the word – I have since shifted my intake of those to other times of the day… TES
Thank you for this exercise in disciplined humanity, Mr. Skeptic.
Happy Thanksgiving and day after 60th anniversary of JFK’s assassination by the “MIC” et.al.
I just saw this about Q* (“q star”)
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/was-sam-altman-sacking-openais-board-over-q-star-breakthrough-seen-threat-humanity
Was Sam Altman’s Sacking By OpenAI’s Board Over ‘Q-Star’ Breakthrough Seen As Threat To Humanity?
What a beautiful story. Thank you. I’ve had a few of my own unexplainable experiences as well regarding heritage, history, and place — some of which challenge or hint that we need to amend (not throw out) the current very successful Western Scientific Model of the World.
This discussion, of heat rising from the deep earth, leads to mention of another process that may occur. Another plurality that is nearly always ignored concerns the source of what’s referred to as fossil fuels. There can be an Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons: leading to significant coal, oil or gas deposits. Hydrocarbons do not necessarily depend upon biological life as an origin. This would be another instance in which our scientific establishment limits its scope as to what can possibly occur on planet earth.
Correct, Fischer-Tropsch-type reactions for both the formation of methane, as well as the synthesis of higher hydrocarbons, is highly neglected science. Sole organic decomposition origin is simply an Omega Hypothesis at this point.
TES
What do you think of the argument that masks aren’t effective against Covid, that some persons like el gato malo (https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/no-n95-masks-do-not-stop-covid-either) put forward?
With this virus, masks will be of limited benefit in the end. One is not going to avoid getting Covid by wearing an N95 mask. So I agree with the Big Cat. Masks simply serve to reduce the peak number of persons taxing a hospital during an outbreak surge and might reduce flu transmission at the same time. Isolation is much more effective than is a mask.
I think you’re overlooking a few very important factors-
These would not be factors, rather subjective interpretations. A factor is something which can be quantified or shown to constitute an objective input. These are even weaker than the the ‘Raiders are an undisciplined team’ canard. None of these have a measurable impact inside the data – and likely do not exist at all across 7 decades and 15+ different HC/GM organizations. If this was the case, other teams would also show this organizational bias in the data from time to time – yet not a single team does. The dynamics of the data are all important – not just the statistics.
Point 5 is valid however as a color commentary. But those are not commensurate goals necessarily. If the Raiders profit from the move, the NFL profits as well, through 1. Relocation fee, 2. Revenue sharing, and 3. Market expansion fee. They will take the money – they just don’t want them in the playoffs. Playoffs were not a necessary part of their increase in revenue from the move. They get that regardless.
10/1/23 game against the chargers…..The number of truly awful calls on the raiders and lack of calls on the chargers….the fix is in
I am most disheartened by this tale of a $14,000 swindle of a minor with a bad battery.
;-(
“Just as in the instance of the mobile phone hardware and services executives in my mild case-example above (pale in comparison to medical and pharmaceutical industry fraud), the intelligent person holds that, if they can establish enough of a cloud of confusion, ignorance, virtuous cause, or large enough numbers of persons involved, then they cannot be held liable or accountable by any party for the harm done in the name of that appeal to ignorance/confusion/partial truth. Surely they can’t come after all of us in this confusing fray, can they? Surely I cannot blame myself for simply following what everyone else was doing?”
We did similar with ATT. Lived out in the sticks, and only way we could access internet was with a hotbox– basically cellular connection, but through a little router box instead of a phone. The default for that is to get it with a cellular phone service. I already had cell service that I was happy with, and did not wish to purchase another phone plan. We are not smartphone people– I have deliberately maintained my dumb phone that makes phone calls and sends texts and will not do anything else. After much angst, 2 visits to the local ATT store, and several interminable phone calls, I got what I wanted: the internet service without the phone plan. Worked well enough.
Then, a year later, they decided to “update” my service, and the only way to opt out was using some kind of secret code they’d send to the number attached to your ATT account. And I couldn’t get that number because I didn’t have a phone attached to that account. Multiple times I had reps on the phone insist on sending me this code… to a device that could not receive it or display it. I went to the ATT store to get it resolved. They couldn’t do it. I had to go to a *special* ATT store in the next town to contact anybody who could resolve the problem. The whole time, every single rep was like “why don’t we just add a phone plan to your account?” NO.
When we finally moved into town, the very first thing I did was cancel that account. Predatory bastards.
FWIW, I’ve had very little trouble with my tracfone service. It works. It does what I need it to do. And it costs less than $20/mo. How badly do you really want a phone that you can’t remove the battery from, yourself?
There’s a cheap and easy solution. Go back to using a landline.
A telephone, and a personal connectivity device, are not the same thing.
TES
Indeed. I have observed these traitors and power mongers for decades!
60% of informed and critical thinking people got vaccinated with something that obviously was not a vaccine. UFO belief is a tattoo people put on their brain. All they ever do is fly around. UFOs are a one trick pony. Occam indeed. Mostly there are fools and then there are damn fools.
cogno…
1. UFO’s acceptance is growing DESPITE social coercion and pressure to NOT accept the idea. So this is the opposite circumstance in argument from the mRNA vaccine. Why would one adopt an idea which will get them ridiculed and called ‘damn fools’ by the social oppression types? They do it because they are compelled by the evidence. Sorry, they have won the argument. I know that is painful.
2. Embargo-mind is typically the tattooed mind – see my article on subception (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/08/05/subception-the-invalid-martial-art-of-skepticism/) and how denial is a mental disorder. Whereas the UFO ponderer may simply be wrong or mistaken at most, but at least they do not have a mental disorder.
3. “All they ever do is fly around” – All bank robbers ever do is take the money and run out the door. They are one trick ponies, yes – but the bank sill is short on cash, and it is still a real crime. The issue is they don’t pay attention to or consider us as being all that interesting. Yes, insulting. But that is the reality.
4. The fools, as always, are on the extreme. Sol Nihilism, and Center of the Universe Theology. Fools, them all.
TES
There have been two attempts within the government in the last year to test the waters for a UFO psyop. Each time coincided with new sightings which coincidentally occurred in a military (government) context. There is little doubt that technology exists which can project images in space. The luminous triangles following the Navy ship are so crude as to be laughable. Belief is a dangerous thing these days. Belief will get you dead, like clot shot dead. If they can make the UFO thingy actually gain traction the end result will be exactly the same things for which the covid and climate narratives were meant to bring about, technoslavery and genocide for the masses, power and control for the elites. UFO acceptance is growing due to the combined efforts of Hollywood, media and corporate government acting in concert to promote the idea that men can have periods. That too will end in technoslavery and genocide. By all means investigate UFOs, but who will do the job? None of these aforementioned players are to be trusted in any way, shape, or form. University science is obviously compromised as well so that leaves independent citizens to dissect the information and such an outcome couched in full transparency is simply not going to be allowed to happen because it is of negative value to the hoarders of whatever information actually exists.
Yes, investigate. People rarely investigate anything in earnest. Obsession is what usually passes for earnestness and cleverness for knowledge. And I will gladly stick my neck out so that you may chop it off, but there is no center to the universe but the center that is everywhere. The universe is universal as is consciousness. It is a John Dobson static universe with dynamic holographic caveats per David Bohm. This cannot be proven any more than any other lamebrained theory but the glaring absence of Higgs Bosun should require one to initiate serious considerations in some other direction. It is the misidentification with the ego that smothers the simplicity of being while building endless castles of obfuscation in the sky.
Noise.
Science is the ability to investigate, recognize, and deductively filter out, noise. Wallow in inductive noise and red herring, and you can prove any deflection you could ever imagine. Enjoy.
I think I’ve found independent confirmation that this representation of the Leo “three planets” arrangement was also known in the early church.
The “Dogmatic Sarcophagus” is an elaborate 4th Century frontal that shows (in the lower left corner) the magi adoring the Christ.
The first of the magi points at something that doesn’t look much like a representation of a conventional “star” — as the caption below notes in confusion — but you’ll find it’s something else that looks very familiar to readers of this article.
https://www.christianiconography.info/sicily/sarcDogmatic.magi.html
I have much interest in this “triple conjunction plus Regulus occultation” hypothesis, and would love to include it (among various other candidates) for a presentation to students at my college — to your credit and with your permission. Feel free to email me if you’ve had additional thoughts on the subject since then.
Edward,
Very interesting indeed. The fourth century and the Phrygian cap aspects of the carving fit the ‘Anatolia’ theory nicely.
Yes, feel free to present this – but ensure to point out that this is a SUPERFLUOUS star #12 in the horoscope, and not a star made of the conjunction itself (which the Magi would have well understood). Which of course I am sure you grasp from the article.
Awesome, and excellent feedback on this…
Thanks
TES
https://youtu.be/lOoat3rC-EA?si=uh_eAqS3Cmw9WgX7 john mchugh makes a case for a leo conjunction as the star of bethlehem using word play on sumeriam star names to make up the nativity story
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Edessa what are the 3 “tarts” on the coat of arms of edessa from crusader days?could these represent planets?if it was mercury ,mars and jupiter they probably ought to be white, red and beige
How interesting, and Edessa is essentially Commagene. Good input!
TES
New gun owners were up 5 million from 2020-2022; so were homicides and suicides from 20-45. Fentanyl deaths are through the roof, also targeting this exact age group. And traffic accidents also went up in that time period, although they leveled off a bit in 2022, but the jump was significant in 2020 and 2021. These are where your “missing” deaths are.
These have already been taken out of the data.
They are accounted for as their own group here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4TanHBa4AASU7H?format=jpg&name=large
Brilliant article.
Recently, there has been a widespread appeal in Japan by a certain scientist who is obsessed with the hypothesis of a rapid mutation of the Omicron strain. I felt a bit strange about it, so I surfed the net a bit and came across your site.
May I introduce your article on Japanese video websites? I am concerned about the spread of bad conspiracy theories because there are few people like you who can take a correct skeptic view. There are very few people who can think in an organized way about the virus being of lab origin, mutations and its spread.
Interesting article by Miles Mathis in 2012
http://milesmathis.com/core.pdf
Incredible work, eager for the coming next chapter.
Please use your Gettr account as Twitter is cutting off your posts from being read and can not be trusted.
is the answer to the riddle of samson the leonid meteor shower?.looks like bees coming out of a lion
Richard,
I love this… Let me cogitate on it for a while. Inserted it into the ‘mystery’ bullet points at end of article and footnoted you credit – thanks!
EVG
TES
Thank you for the update. I am recently integrating your work with that of Dr. Peter Vincent Pry and his EMP Taskforce on National and Homeland Security. Their 302-page report was published March 31, 2023 and titled: Catastrophe Now – America’s Last Chance to Prevent an EMP Disaster, wherein he and his ten co-authors describe the hazard potentials that can cause a ‘Grid Down’ emergency. I am most concerned regarding the Solar Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection aspect of their argument, given that the Sun is quite active already and Solar Maximum is not anticipated to peak until 2025.
Earth is reported in the book to have narrowly missed a SF/CME a few years ago, one that was at least as powerful as the one that caused the Carrington Event in 1859. The ‘miss’ was estimated at 2-weeks of Earth’s orbit. I was surprised to read that in addition to the telegraph system getting fried, there were railroad ties found burning as a result of the amount of charge induced in the rails.
I have made the assumption that the charge-channeling relationship between Sun and Earth is the root cause of what you and others have identified as underlying ocean warming. Perhaps the situation is exacerbated by galactic core energetic-sheets of charge that our solar system is reported by some to be passing through. That one is way above my pay-grade but makes intuitive sense to me. We may experience a more active and possibly extended Solar Maximum during this cycle.
Keep up the fascinating work, it’s definitely appreciated. Hopefully you will find time someday to peruse Catastrophe Now and assess their case with the vast amount of knowledge you have already accumulated and so graciously share on your site.
In the spirit of starting with the most important point, I would really prefer it if the text started with this passage: “The key issue entailed inside this argument is that of observed lithosphere and hydrosphere (oceans) heat increases, and these measures far-outpacing what atmospheric carbon capture models have predicted or could serve to induce.9 This is the critical path issue at hand.”
Interesting piece. You have cited some of my earlier work and thought that you would like to see more recent contributions on this. Please see:
1995: An Important Inflection Point in Recent Geophysical History (juniperpublishers.com)
The Geothermal Paradox: How the Earth’s Second Largest Heat Source May Be Driving the Most Recent Warming | Friends of Science Calgary
Keep up the good work!
Dr. Viterito,
I love the presentation! This provides ample depth which I as an outsider and multi-disciplinarian, do not hold. The North Atlantic Sub-Polar Gyre is key in this it appears – so I will focus my efforts into understanding this kind of dynamic inside climate science.
The page addressing the two primary objections climatologists have raised regarding geothermal heating is a great one. I would suggest that our lack of knowledge about features just like (but lower scale and increased numbers) the mid-Atlantic ridge places ample doubt into objection #1 being anything other than anchor bias wishful thinking.
Studying Granger Causality as well!
Much appreciated,
EVG
TES
I fear that your Observation 6 is mistaken: Earth’s rotation has accelerated since the 1970s, not decelerated. See this page from IERS, which may be a variant of the series on which your Exhibit 6A is based: day length minus 86,400 seconds (or “Excess of the duration of the day to 86400 s”, in that page’s title) peaked in 1972 at 3.13 ms, while every year from 2000 to 2008 had an excess less than 1 ms. (IERS doesn’t have its more recent data on that table, but this article from 2022 quotes their more recent bulletins to the effect that Earth’s rotation has continued to accelerate.) Might you have gotten the IERS data from a source that misidentified it as 86,000 seconds minus the length of the day, rather than the other way around?
The graph of leap seconds that you provided in Exhibit 6A also indicates an accelerating rotation of the Earth: what matters is not the cumulative number of leap seconds but rather the rate at which they are added, i.e. the slope of the line that you graphed—an excess of x milliseconds in the length of day requires adding a leap second every 1000/x days, so slower rotation means faster accumulation of leap seconds—and this slope has been clearly less steep since 1995 or so than it was in the 1970s.
Agreed, the Earth’s rotation has accelerated since 1972. I did not word this clearly enough – and had some conflicting later edits I found (corrected). It is the punctuated periods I intended to highlight per Exhibit 6B (backsliding slowing)… These are cause-to-effect observations, if you will.
The central point is that, timeframe reference aside, temperatures and Earth rotation speed are cause to effect linked, and should have not been dropped from the model as of 1930 data.
Thanks! TES
Yes, the Earth’s rotation is slower today than in the 1930s and before, but even if this was due to core dynamics rather than tidal forces, your proposed mechanism has core dynamics influencing temperatures on time scales of years, not decades, so the 1930-70 period of slowing rotation couldn’t be associated with warmer temperatures now. And the problem remains that the trend since the 1970s—accelerating rotation (which makes substantial core-to-mantle mass transfer unlikely) and warming temperatures—goes in the opposite direction of your hypothesis.
You can try to gainsay the overall trend by dividing it into periods of stable temperatures and accelerating rotation along with periods of rising temperatures and stable rotation. But I have to admit I’m unconvinced by this argument: if you graph an increasing linear trend plus random normally distributed noise, you’ll often get results that look like periods of relative stability punctuated by rapid increases, and this apparent alternation of stability and rapid change gets stronger if the noise has any autocorrelation, i.e. if high values have a better chance of being followed by more high values—all without any corresponding breakpoints in the underlying random process. I’m not convinced, for instance, that 1980 to 2012 isn’t just one continuous increasing trend: I used the series listed <a href=”https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/”>here</a> under “Global-mean monthly, seasonal, and annual means” to calculate regression slopes for the approximate interval 1980-1995, which Exhibit 6B marks as a stable period, and got highly statistically significant positive slopes for several choices of endpoints. And there are some seeming counterexamples even in your own graph: for instance, 1962-78 was a long period of stable and low temperatures while the Earth’s rotation was slowing down or remaining constant.
I’m not dogmatically opposed to your hypothesis and I find some of your arguments plausible enough to consider, but I don’t think the history of Earth’s rotational speed supports it. This isn’t necessarily a fatal problem—convective heat transfer in the outer core should be a rough balance of hot material moving up and cold material moving down, so changes in its speed shouldn’t affect mass distribution (so I would imagine; I’m not an Earth scientist)—but you do need to propose a mechanism by which heat transfer to the surface could accelerate without massive increases in the Earth’s moment of rotational inertia.
The 100 year slowing cannot be due to non-recoverable dynamics (tidal forces), otherwise these would have geolocked the Earth with the Moon long ago. This slower rotation period is temporary and will reverse to the same magnitude eventually (and back again). There are very few mass and gravitational influences (perhaps two) which can impart this magnitude of cyclical action. So, my likelihood in argument is pretty high here…
Yes, the 1972-genesis increase in rotational speed, as well as the cited study at the end of the article, point in a direction opposite my hypothesis. I acknowledge this in the last passage: “While I acknowledge that the Mackey study quoted below has the relationship reversed, likely based upon the decadal perspective used or perhaps even a recursive effect at play inside the mantle, the connection between Earth’s rotation speed and global temperatures remains essential to this issue…”
The two issues may well possess a recursive or multifactorial relationship when examined on a decadal scale. But they are joined in an undeniable Granger Causality – which I cannot fully resolve in this article, nor especially without better observational data (part of the whole shortfall of climate science). However, neither am I ready to throw in the towel just because we cherry pick one temporal frame of reference which seems to counter it. The fact remains that the 3 year frame of reference supports it, and does so repeatedly, unlike the decadal observation.
The hypothesis does not hinge upon movement of mantle material as a means of heat transfer, but rather conduction and radiation in an iron FCC lattice, which move far faster (600 ft/hr required and just about right for a 3 year lag effect, which the decadal frame of reference needs to ignore in order to boast any applicability) than does the mantle itself. Nonetheless, the the two issues are inseparable and there is a mechanism involved here – to drop it based upon a single facile observation is LESS scientific than continuing to examine it based upon an equivalent inferential strength (especially given a LONG observational relationship in the past – thus they are NOT even of an equivalent inferential strength).
So, I disagree – the 1972 – 2020 counter observation does not carry much weight. The three year ones in contrast, do.
The fact that we have chosen to ignore this relationship however, is the critical issue at hand. I cannot use a single qualified absence of an observation to recommend dropping an idea it appears in conflict with. That would not be science. It would be the same exact mistake climate science has already made. This is part of the whole point of the article.
i used to fly hang gliders. soaring the thermals there was always sink around the lift.
if there is heat blobs moving up and out. (slowing the earth) there are sink blobs moving down and in. (speeding the earth)
sink blobs are cooler and denser. an unseen unknown mechanism likely puts the 2 in cyclical relationship, not yet explaining the inverse relationship.
as energy moves up and out. core itself condenses and increases rotation. opposite of the rising blobs effect.
not something we can measure right now.
but must balance closely over long times as earth keeps rotating
Relevant follow up to the Subception article. Reading bullet point 2 of Feature Characteristics I instantly wanted to change ‘what’ to ‘that’.
And that is the struggle: convincing, or instructing the ‘human animal’ on how to elevate themselves above herd mentality, and actually think.
I’ve found it becomes less of a struggle when you realize you can’t control anything but yourself, and even control of ‘that’ is often in question… change the ‘that’ to ‘what’ again. (control of ‘what’ is often in question too).
It will become obvious when they share what they think, if they do. They can’t tell you that they think, without sharing what they think. ‘That’ is just a badge or title, it’s veneer. The what is what shows what’s what. ;-)
Your article reminded me of another event I’ve heard with similar physical responses. Strange rabbit hole that one.
https://near-death.com/john-gordon-and-jeffrey-keene/
There’s not much to addd to that, Sir.
Thank You.
Much clearer for the TL crowd!
Humans are inherently corrupted and all religions have rightly identified the deficit. 3 years of Covid discrimination, manipulation, and coercion at the expense of civil liberties and a real unpunished crime against humanity (which has caused incalculable and ongoing suffering) is strong evidence for this being true. This is human nature on full display. This is the fall. God created something unique in man. An entity that was given authority outside of Gods own authority. We promptly traded that authority for a bowl of soup, or an apple in the garden. Choosing immediate gratification without any thought for the future. We gave our authority to Satan. How did we give it? You are a slave to who you obey. Jesus rejected Satan 3 times. He would not bow to Satan as Adam had done. As we have all done. Through Adam we all bowed to Satan, through Christ we all rise again. We will act in Gods will – forgoing our own lusts, our own greed, all of the corruption that comes from following a false god. The god of this world. Sin is following another god. An act of sin separates us from God. The payment for sin is death. Christ was born as a man, under the same promise as Adam. Legally he had the same standing before God, the same promises of authority in autonomy from God. He did not fall for the deception. He chose to serve God, and in dying without sin he set a new legal precedent and as evidence his life was restored to him. Those who revoke their inheritance from Adam, which was an inheritance in this life, and accept the inheritance of Christ, which exists in the spiritual realm, are restored before God. Blood signifies life. The blood of Christ is supernaturally transfused into his followers. That is why he said, “you must eat my flesh, and must drink my blood.” This is the communion of the saints. Yes, we drink wine and eat bread as a symbol of Christ’s blood and body. This is a mystery to many. High IQ will not get you anywhere. High IQ will in fact make you proud and more likely to stumble. These truths are known in the spirit. The inner core of a being. They are not explained by weights and measurements, as those great explanations of science. It is God who calls us. It is us who respond. If you have read this far, I pray that God will call you, that your eyes will be opened, that your ears will hear the voice of God. I pray a blessing on all of those reading these words. Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. Don’t follow a religion – follow Christ.
Yep. This is what the pamphlets and pastors all say… heard it 2,546 times. Almost verbatim.
Ethical Skeptic, have you seen these documents?
https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vTQxG822DtqP7IZSjLj751Mrm8Ev7leksXfjBLsA9KJ0_tbGV6YJAAjuijPnwz_YmUQGY1PZUl5LcCI/pub
Leah and Diamond over at Magnetic Reversal News highlighted your work in their most recent video.
I saw that. They got it.
TES
What is the reference for this statement in point 1 of your construct?
The Earth’s core undergoes extreme exothermic change – sloughing high-latent-energy hexagonal close packed (HCP) iron from its H-layer and into the mantle where it converts to face centered cubic (FCC) iron plus kinetic energy (latent heat of phase transition).
Several recitations on that in Observation #6
I just found out about this article. Too bad there aren’t dozens of studies occuring in a similar vein, along with tons of research dollars! We all know that isn’t going to happen soon. I have several colleagues in the geophysics/planetary physics field (I’m in shock physics). Are you in discussions with anyone with that kind of expertise? I can help contact if you need.
David,
Yes, there are a couple who specialize in this field, who have made critical and helpful commentary via emails over the last couple years. Unlike most of the discipline, they get that this is a petition for plurality, not a claim to final proof. Most disagree with my conclusion, but appreciate the novel thinking and potential challenge to anchoring bias. There is no way that one outsider is going to proof-finish this topic to finality – that is the pipe dream and Herculean proof gaming of the idiot-skeptic. On this, they all agree.
The vitriol from the community only serves to erode their credibility.
I will say this however, most are silent over this last heat plume. They know…
TES
You were in a place steeped in sprituality and myth. You were fascinated by your heritage. I don’t mean this as a criticism. The mind and body are one in the same. This sounds something like an anxiety attack.
Or, perhaps there are supernatural forces not yet scientifially discovered.
No, this was not psychological nor anxiety. Read The Gray Man – Le Petit Bateau; https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/01/12/the-gray-man-le-petit-bateau/
I’d encourage you to double-check your units in section 9.
The radius of the earth is around 6.4 x 10^6 meters – this gives a surface area of around 500 x 10^12 m^2. 70% of that being ocean means around 350 x 10^12 m^2. So an ocean volume of 4 x 10^12 m^3 doesn’t make any sense – it implies an average ocean depth of 1 cm.
You can also consistency check this with the final column of table 9B. “Gigajoules / m^3” implies some temperature change given the density and specific heat capacity of water. There are variations in density and specific heat capacity with pressure and salinity, but not even an order of magnitude. Using 1000 kg/m^3 for water 4000 J/kg-K as a round number, you can see that the implied temperature increase is a clearly unreasonable tens of thousands of degrees:
(233 x 10^9 J/m^3) / (4184 J/kg-K) * (1000 kg / m^3) = 56,000 K
Guessing you’ve just swapped a km for an m somewhere in the early stages. None of that implies a change in the trend in the rightmost column, but still… good to have accurate numbers.
Beyond that, I’m also skeptical of the extrapolation of the change in energy content at abyssal depths based on either the thermocline. I see no physical reason why this would follow. As you take efforts to point out, the ocean system is highly complex and involves much more than simple conduction from upper to lower depths – and even if it did follow that simple model, heat flux is proportional to both temperature gradient (not absolute temperature, and certainly not absolute temperature expressed in Celsius units) and cross-sectional area, the former of which appears relatively constant in the deep and abyssal ocean and the latter of which is directly proportional to the decreasing volume of water at larger depths.
Can you expand on the following statement a bit more?
“As a note, one gets essentially the same anomaly distribution by depth if the discrete components of the heat anomaly are distributed by layer and strict study result cited herein”
I haven’t been able to figure out which study/studies you’re referring to in order to replicate your analysis.
Will check them, thanks!
OK, addressed all three points.
1. Used 1.386 x 10^9 cubic kilometers of ocean water instead – a solid figure which most will easily recognize.
2. Corrected the off factor conversion from zetta to giga (inconsequential, but still an error)
3. Removed the useless reference to an older model I ran before reading the associated studies. There was no inference to be derived from that confusing statement.
The studies I used are the Durack and Desbruyeres studies which are quoted below this section of material just adjusted. These, along with the NOAA chart I added into Exhibit 9B, give us the right number of equations to solve for the unknown variables – 1993-2017 delta heat by major layer depth. The key driving benchmarks are: 1/3 of total heat uptake below 2000 m exists in the abyssal layer of ocean, and the ratio of 95/58 zettajoules (Surface/Deep-Abyssal) per the latest NOAA chart. Once plotted, this actually falls along a very elegant hypsographic taper, aligning to all these relative benchmarks.
I added a note that those study authors would not agree with this inference. However, nor did they do this analysis. Their conclusion that the atmosphere is driving all ocean heat – is an assumption, and not an inference. They cited the benchmarks, but did not grasp the full implications of what they published.
This is a common problem in climate science – conduct analytics which infer one thing, and then sneak in a statement which is not proven, yet it slips by because it is the accepted Narrative. Something which would never be accepted in a patent claims set, but is a regular practice in science.
Thanks!
TES
Nice to see the updated numbers, thanks for taking another look. The two rightmost columns still appear inconsistent to me. I’m not trying to be overly picky just for the sake of detail or busywork – indeed I’m still skeptical about the calculated trend in the abyssal depths.
First, the rightmost column still seems to be off by a factor of 100. If I use the top row as an example – 26.8 ZJ / 89.6 x 10^6 m^3 comes out to 298,900 GJ/km^3. This one isn’t really that important – no impact on the trend since it’s a global error at all depths.
More important is the “Zettajoules by thermocline” column. Currently it sums to 153 ZJ, however, ref. 76 as well as your description report that the 153 ZJ increase is found within the 0-2000m band only, not across the full ocean depth. This does agree with the NOAA chart you’ve included, which has its units in *feet*, not meters.
So the 95/58 split you referenced is actually between the 0-750m and 750-2000m bands, not the surface and deep/abyssal depths.
The grey wedge in the new NOAA figure implies (by eye) something like 20-30 ZJ in the remaining depths, 2000-6000 m. This agrees with Desbruyeres, who claims 33 +/- 21 ZJ. Coupling that with the 2/3 – 1/3 split referenced in that and the Durack paper (n.b., a split with high uncertainty), one should estimate something like 22 +/- 10 ZJ in the 2000-4000 m band and 11 +/- 5 ZJ in the 4000-6000 m band.
Once we have those estimates in hand, we still need a way to go from “total heat in a 2000m band” to “heat per 250m layer of said band”. I remain unconvinced that the thermocline is an appropriate model for this distribution – there is no physical reason that change in heat content would be directly proportional to temperature – however I’m certainly open to any justification you may have for using such a model.
Thanks CYU
1. Corrected. I used a unit converter – but I must a have pulled the wrong Z to G conversion at 1 x 10^10 and not 1 x 10^12 (apparently?). So I used a simpler unit converter to check my math, and corrected the 100x off-factor. Thanks.
2. Corrected. Typo in the material, should have said “95 zJ (refined to 83 zJ now) increase is found within the 0-2000m band” That is shown in Exhibit 9B.
3. Gotta accept the NOAA chart is in feet, and heat content change benchmarks from the studies are in meters. Otherwise the references get confusing. One or the other will need conversion, can’t get around that.
4. “So the 95/58 split you referenced is actually between the 0-750m and 750-2000m bands, not the surface and deep/abyssal depths.” No. The 58 is “below 6,560 ft, or 2000 m”. That is shown on Exhibit 9B. (Note: I changed this to a “108 zJ or 83/25 zJ pessimistic scenario”, in order to show that no assumption we bring to bear, serves to alleviate the phenomenon of deep ocean heating).
5. “I remain unconvinced that the thermocline is an appropriate model for this distribution” (assuming you mean allocation by hypsographic cubic volume taper factor) – that is not what is solely being done. I changed some confusing wording which could be interpreted to imply this, so understandable. The allocation is a mathematical deduction which is REQUIRED to make the study benchmarks for the three major layers (surface, deep, and abyssal) be true inside the heat delta taper. There is no way to mathematically avoid having one or more super-hot layers in the abyssal, no matter what combination is used. The Desbruyeres benchmark of heat content change in the abyssal layer guarantees this. Additionally, if we do not allocate by thermocline, then one must appeal to ignorance. Thus we are not left with any other choice. In fact, this should have been one of the FIRST set of studies in climate science. Instead, we ignored it. (Note: I changed the taper to an almost ridiculous surface-deep and deep-abyssal set of taper drop-offs – to show that no scenario offers an alleviation from this phenomenon)
6. “there is no physical reason that change in heat content would be directly proportional to temperature” Specific heat content (heat density when per cubic meter) is indeed “the quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of a substance by one Celsius degree.” One cannot divorce the two in drawing inference inside this discussion. That would be playing semantics.
Thanks again, very helpful!
TES
Thanks for the ongoing discussion, I really appreciate your willingness to have a back-and-forth on this.
Regarding points 2-4, I still maintain that you’re mis-interpreting the righthand subfigure in 9B (the one from NOAA). It provides the following data:
This means a change in heat content of 184 ZJ in the surface layers – the *sum* of values one and two, not their average.
The remaining 25 ZJ can be split into 16.4 ZJ deep / 8.6 ZJ abyssal components, on that I agree.
Regarding points 5 and 6, thanks for the clarification. I understand now that you’re not purely allocating heat based on the baseline temperature in Celcius. But I still disagree that your model is appropriate, much less that it is the *only* appropriate one. In fact, I see it as directly contradicted by data you’ve included.
First I want to make sure we agree on the relationship between temperature and heat content; or more accurately, between the change in each of those quantities. This is not a matter of semantics, but a fundamental, mathematical definition of the two physical quantities we’re discussing.
(Change in heat content) = (change in temperature) * (specific heat capacity) * (mass)
I think we agree on this because it follows from the definition you provided for specific heat capacity.
With that definition in hand, we can ensure we agree on the meanings of the last two columns of your model:
What we should also agree on, I hope, is what’s shown in figure 9D – the change in *temperature* (not heat content) by depth.
As I read it, these data directly contradict the claim of “one or more super-hot layers in the abyssal”. In other words, Figure 9D is analogous to the rightmost column in 9B – the one reproduced in 9C – but the values do not agree below 4500m.
The bumps you highlight in 9D are certainly interesting and worthy of future study, but they do not show anything close to the ~8x change in temperature increase you’re claiming exists in the deepest ocean layers.
My interpretation of Figure 9D is that the change in temperature in the deep and abyssal ocean is relatively consistent, with some second-order variations that could be due to measurement uncertainty, a second heat source (such as you propose), or another effect such as advection of heat introduced at the surface via thermohaline circulation.
“This means a change in heat content of 184 ZJ in the surface layers – the *sum* of values one and two, not their average.”
This depends upon how one interprets the NOAA charts – because one could say that there are 6 x 122 zJ in the <2300 depth, but this would obviously be far too much heat content. So I went and found several aggregate heat scenarios at the NASA site instead - and it turns out that you are indeed correct (my thanks again!) (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ocean-warming/), to wit:
NOAA
2017 = 315
1993 = 131
Diff = 184
NASA
2017 = 140
1993 = -12
Diff = 152
If I conservatively use the NOAA difference for this convention – the sudden layer drop at 2000 and 4000 meters becomes ridiculously large – thus the 25 zJ for the Deep and Abyssal layer depths cannot itself also be a ‘sum’ – but rather a projected range inside which various (yet to be collected) data sets are projected to fall/arrive. So, we are left with apples and oranges as to the above and below 6560 ft chart indications. They really should produce a chart of this nature which is unequivocal.
However, let’s assume that this is not the case and use the 25 zJ regardless. In order to satisfy the Desbruyeres benchmark, I end up with a bottom five layers which on average, hold six times more heat content than the average deep layer, and of which, the hottest layer is still 81% as heat dense as is the very top surface layer. This is GIVEN a 64% discrete drop in heat taper between the surface and deep depths – and I have to discretely boost the abyssal depths in order to adhere to the Desbruyeres benchmark. I know that this is not reality as the thermocline should be a continuous function. Thus, in my estimation, the 25 kJ, should therefore be 69 zJ and not 25, as there exists no continuous function which resolves the constraint.
So, this was helpful, however has not served to resolve the abyssal heat problem, even at 25 zJ. The problem still starkly exists. As I mentioned.
“Figure 9D is analogous to the rightmost column in 9B – the one reproduced in 9C” – No, this is not the case. All that 9D tells us, is
1. that there exist several heat sources in the abyssal which we do not acknowledge, and
2. The taper in kinetic energy is not as aggressive as I have used in our above exercise (a third conservancy)
Neither of these are good news to the enforced Narrative.
In addition, temperature is ambient, heat content is not necessarily ambient. We’ve already established that these are touchpoints, not flux nor ambience benchmarks. Very much akin to the Atlantic Coast’s Gulf Stream. If you’ve ever sailed across the Gulf Stream, the change is sudden and stark. At 10pm you might be freezing and wearing gloves and foul weather gear. By 11pm suddenly the boat is warming so fast that it is creaking and popping as it expands, and you have to remove all your gear to keep from sweating profusely.
This exemplifies the problem identified in the Kuhn Refutation which follows this section. I cannot force this model into a peer measure to solar flux – nor to ambient temperature comparatives by layer depth.
TES
Apologies for the bad formatting – let me re-try this with the full content of the comment + data, but not the broken table:
As I’ve mentioned already, I greatly appreciate your willingness to engage in a (productive, I think) discussion. It’s quite rare these days, even in academic peer review where the goal is sometimes productive and sometimes just “cite my papers and I’ll approve”. We may agree to disagree in the end, but I’m pleased that we’ve at least resolved some disagreements on the interpretation of data.
That said, I strongly maintain that 9C and 9D are analogous.
Figure 9D is not “temperature”, nor is it “ambient”. The quantity plotted is the rate of change of temperature over time, derived from measurement data at multiple time points. Desbruyeres denotes this as dθ/dt and expresses it in units of milli-degrees C per year. Yes, it is related to the thermocline; it is the derivative of the thermocline with respect to time.
Figure 9C is a change in heat content per unit volume over a fixed timespan (24 years). These quantities are analogous; the conversion factor between the two is a simple multiplication:
9C = 9D * (specific heat capacity) * (density) * (time)
The time is fixed by choice of time period (1993-2017) as 24 years, so the only variations to consider would be changes in the specific heat capacity and density. Below 2000m these seem quite constant per what I can find:
So, taking the topmost band as an example – I read the Desbruyeres figure as showing average increase of 0.5 milli-degrees C per year between 2000m and 2250 m – one can apply this conversion to get values corresponding to 9C:
(0.5 x 10^-3 deg C / yr) * (3.850 J / g / deg C) * (1.028 * 10^18 g / km^3) * (24 yrs) = 47.5 x 10^15 J/km^3 = 47,500 GJ/km^3
Using this same conversion, we can derive the same data in the units of 9C for all depths. Note that no model is needed to distribute heat energy – I’m simply converting measurement data from one set of units to another, using known physical quantities. I present this data below – hoping the HTML formatted chart will work, but apologies if not.
If one multiplies these converted values by the volume of water per depth layer, and sums the total heat gain, the values match the expected 25 ZJ gained from 2000-6000m and the 2/3 – 1/3 split between deep & abyssal very closely. Again, note that this is without application of any model or any “jump” between regions. It also does not show any sort of 10x anomaly in the abyssal depths.
I also wanted to share that another paper by Desbruyeres et al – here – I believe provides the “apples to apples” comparison across all depths you’re looking for. The relevant figure is this one. It shows that, indeed, there is one (or more) source(s) of increasing heat content in the deep/abyssal regions; however it also shows that the magnitude of the heat increase (gray bars) due to these sources is less than 10% of the magnitude of the heat increase in the surface layers.
Table Data
Here are the equivalent values (GJ/km^3) by depth layer starting from 2000-2250m and ending with 5750-6000m, derived by simple multiplication from the Desbruyeres figure.
46,200
13,860
18,480
27,720
36,960
36,960
36,960
34,650
41,580
55,440
55,440
50,820
46,200
41,580
36,960
41,580
“Figure 9D is not “temperature”, nor is it “ambient”.” 9D is ambient. It will not reflect the principle upon which this hypothesis is formulated. If it is not ambient, then he must show a variability histogram and then address where the mu in that histogram travels. Unless he shows that, it is ambient – there is no escaping this.
The last five gJ/km^3 are not possible in his escalation, the available volume of ocean water drops off significantly – and his “1/3 of the total heat content below 2000 m” – cannot be resolved by these figures. That is the crux of my argument.
One cannot resolve 25 zJ x .333 over that layer depth, and derive those gJ/km^3… as the hypsographic taper drops off too rapidly. These are in conflict with his previous study. Achieving linearity in these numbers can only be done by an assumption which forces such a circumstance.
In order to derive the numbers you show, I have to just make stuff up, and cheat in order to attain that linearity. One can run conjecture scenarios to suggest plurality in an argument – but one should never cheat in order to sustain the Narrative. I will not cross that line. If the Narrative bears substantial risk in its description, then that must be known. Otherwise it is explaining, masquerading as description.
TES
Regarding “ambient” – perhaps I mis-interpreted what you meant by the term. I took it to mean static in time; I can see with a quick google search that that’s not correct. If you meant that the values are reflective of the change in surrounding temperature at that particular depth, then we now agree.
Otherwise, I hope you’re not choosing to see me as “cheating to sustain the Narrative”. If you are, then this is no longer a discussion in good faith, which would be a shame. I am not a climate scientist, nor am I a policy-maker or politician – just an interested individual with a background in mechanical engineering.
Moreover, I am certainly not asking *you* to cheat or to make anything up – I would never ask that of anyone, as I find it repulsive and akin to any other kind of overt lie for personal gain. I’m only asking you to reconsider one of the fundamental assumptions of your model, which is that the distribution of absolute heat gain (ZJ) by depth should follow some sort of monotonic, linear taper. If you can help me understand from whence you’re taking that assumption, perhaps we’d be closer to understanding each other.
As for the derivation of my numbers, “making stuff up” is in no way required – in fact, no model is required at all. The numbers in my last post are simply the average values over each depth layer in 9D (I did estimate these by eye, so maybe take the values as only accurate +/- 20%) multiplied by a constant conversion factor. As I’ve said already, that factor is (specific heat capacity x density x time), which evaluates to 94.99 x 10^3 (GJ/km^3) per (milli-deg C/yr). The only assumptions being made are those of constant density and specific heat capacity.
Now, I appreciate the explicitly stated crux of your argument, because it is indeed where we disagree:
“…[Desbruyeres’s] ‘1/3 of total heat content below 2000m’ – cannot be resolved by these figures.”
and, correspondingly:
“One cannot resolve 25 zJ x .333 over that layer depth, and derive those gJ/km^3… as the hypsographic taper drops off too rapidly.”
In fact, these numbers not only resolve both issues, they are the *source* of those quantities. How else would Desbruyeres have arrived at such values, if not from temperature measurements? Desbruyers’s data, times the constant I’ve given above, multiplied by the corresponding volume of ocean for that layer, produce ZJ quantities that exactly match both the total (25 ZJ) and distribution (2/3 to 1/3) claimed in the paper.
Deep
3.7
1.1
1.4
2.0
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.8
Total Deep – 17.0 ZJ
Abyssal
1.9
2.0
1.6
1.0
0.65
0.29
0.11
0.04
Total Abyssal – 7.6 ZJ
The total is 24.6 ZJ, and the abyssal value is 31% of the total. But this should not be a surprise, because this is exactly how Desbruyeres derived those ZJ quantities in the first place.
I expect that these numbers will appear to be “dropping off too rapidly” below 5000m (last 4 values) as you interpret them. But I still contend that your notion of “too rapid” is based on an assumed model – linear, monotonic decrease in heat content (ZJ) per depth layer – that still does not click to me.
I am using no such assumption or model and deriving these values using only:
Is there an incorrect step here? If so, I am more than willing to admit it. But I do not (yet) see it, and the results clearly (again, to me) do not show any inconsistency with Desbruyeres – because I’m quite confident they are the same steps Desbruyeres used.
Glad we agree on the context of ambience. I was thinking it was merely a semantic-dimension issue and not actually a technical one.
No, I do not mean you are cheating. I am treating the scenario clinically. Sorry to have left that open for interpretation. You have helped enormously with the numbers, so this is not in question.
Using the numbers you provide here – I get a heat content increase in the abyssal depths – but I must slam all of it into to upper depths only, in order to avoid the lower depth specific heat escalations. This is an assumption, and not a result. I get the same heat – but am just diluting it into the upper abyssal depths in order to force the numbers to look better – but I do not solve the issue. Then the lower abyssal depths resume a thermal decline. I suggest that the heat will actually reside (non-ambient) at the point where most of the thermal vents reside. So you have produced the same results as I have – it is just harder to see.
My approach makes the excess heat content issue more manifest. Is any one layer correct in actuality? Of course not. We are describing a complex model with advective removal of the heat soon after its introduction (a luxury the surface does not hold).
Again, this force to factor, used to suggest plurality – that’s OK. But to comply with a Narrative understanding, this is not OK.
This only looks more compliant to the narrative – and I had to force the Narrative conforming result in terms of gJ/km^2. This article is a petition for novel hypothesis, not a proof of the Narrative.
Final proof of this hypothesis is not something you or I can accomplish, neither here nor as individuals. Neither is that our job.
We are forcing science to do its job and stop hiding in the corner on this.
hoping that makes sense,
TES
TES – indeed, I think this mostly makes sense. I do disagree that we’re arriving at the “same results”, but I’ll acknowledge that neither of us is going to completely prove or disprove the entire hypothesis of core-induced ocean heating herein. That is not my goal.
I am less schooled in the methodology you follow – going from initial observation through hypothesis formulation, etc. – but my point is limited to Observation 9. The claim in the title of the observation is:
“Abyssal Oceans are Absorbing More Novel Heat Content per Cubic Meter of Ocean (ΔT-gigajoules/m3) than are Deep and Much of the Surface Oceans by an Enormous Margin…”
What I am suggesting is that the data you’ve presented do not support this claim. Your analysis does, yes. In that analysis, you take part of the data from Desbruyeres – the integrated value of 25 ZJ total as well as the 2/3 – 1/3 split – and then use those numbers along with some model that distributes the heat by depth. In doing that, you arrive at values of GJ/km^3 that are 10x larger in the depths of the oceans. Ok, I agree that’s what you did.
But as you eloquently put it, this, too, is “an assumption, not a result”. Your choice of that model, whatever it is (linear and monotonic, I think?), is itself an assumption. Adding jumps at 2000m and 4000m or having to “slam” all of the heat into certain layers are increasingly less justifiable assumptions, I agree – but so is the choice to *use* a model in the first place.
In other words, it seems to me you are presupposing that such a model is needed. And deriving such a model from physical principles – the complex system of conduction, advection, etc. – is a fool’s errand. Better to use a simple model, if needed. But the key point I’m making is – we don’t need any model at all, because the values you’re using it to predict are already present. That’s Fig. 9D!
Those values, even accounting for their uncertainties, show no such “enormous margin” between abyssal ocean heating per unit volume (in any 250m band) and heating in other regions. They do show a definite bump in heat increase per volume at some depths, e.g. 4500m, and I don’t know that we have a good explanation for this, nor much study on it. But nothing in the abyssal region approaches an order of magnitude or an “enormous margin”, which you claim is the observation – neither between abyssal and deep (already in Fig 9D) nor between abyssal and lower surface (corresponding figure from the other Desbruyeres paper I mentioned).
Hopefully this clarifies my position as well. Again, please don’t take this as an attempt to disprove the larger theory – it relates to Observation 9 alone.
“But nothing in the abyssal region approaches an order of magnitude or an “enormous margin”, which you claim is the observation – neither between abyssal and deep (already in Fig 9D) nor between abyssal and lower surface (corresponding figure from the other Desbruyeres paper I mentioned).”
This is not correct. It depends upon where the heat is introduced. If it is introduced in the final 5 layers and if indeed it is conveyed away (which is not done at the surface or deep layers) – it is indeed an “enormous margin”. The changes you suggest make this even more manifest than my original model. However, this is more than simply a calculator exercise – it is a complex model. Under climate theory, no excess heat should exist at this layer at all – and in our triple conservative approach here (which I do not believe is accurate) – it exists in spades, per my original contention = No scenario serves to alleviate this problem.
However, I am going to depict the model and zJ breakout you suggest, and use that as my scenario depiction for Exhibit 9B – which matches Exhibit 9D as you suggest. You will see the discrete boundaries formed at the 2000 m and 4000 m levels, which make the chicanery in the numbers manifest, caused by jockeying with the numbers in order to get them to conform to the Narrative from a total heat content depiction. I think this to be weak – but will accept the burden of a triple pessimistic scenario just to prove my point. I believe my taper to be a far better physical model than these numbers.
The problem is still there and even worse now – Desbruyeres et al. just ignored it. And remember, this heat does not stay still. It leaves almost immediately.
Q.E.D., plurality (not proof of course). :-)
TES
More to say, but not time to express it articulately tonight, apologies. Really, all I am saying is that the measured temperature trends in the deep & abyssal layers do not show an enormous margin, nor any margin at all, of extra heat energy per unit volume versus the surface layers. If the claim rests on the question of whether “[the heat] is introduced in the final 5 layers and if indeed it is conveyed away”, then this is no longer observation, just a conjecture and its consequences. The data themselves are limited to heat in those layers, and all they show is roughly the same amount of excess heat energy across all of the deep and abyssal layers; nothing appears special to me about the deepest 5, except once your model is introduced.
It’s really simple. The abyssal layers carry 1/3 of the heat content of the 2000 – 6000 m depths, but only contain 22% of the cubic ocean for those same depths. To the degree that the heat content is flat across the sub-layer depths (per the Desbruyeres study), this condition gets exaggerated towards the ‘tail’ (whipsaw effect), i.e. 5500-6000 meters. They chose to not depict the heat content in this manner for whatever reason.
But this is the way it should be done. I consider this a ‘miss’ on the part of climate science. A big miss.
And having allocated $hundreds of millions for carbon scrubbers in the steam plants I have designed, RIN#’s, carbon credits, 20+ Leeds certified buildings I have designed, renewable energy credits, taxes paid, etc. This makes me pretty upset.
The climate scientists did not stand as risk-bearing stakeholders in their own decision making. They just shoved it onto everyone else. This is unsustainable.
TES
“The abyssal layers carry 1/3 of the heat content of the 2000 – 6000 m depths, but only contain 22% of the cubic ocean for those same depths”
Yes, I agree.
“To the degree that the heat content is flat across the sub-layer depths (per the Desbruyeres study)…”
Respectfully, no. This is an incorrect reading of the Desbruyeres data. It (i.e., Fig 9D) reports a flat delta in heat content per unit volume across those depths, not a flat delta in total heat content. A change in temperature (what’s being shown in the figure) is a change in heat per unit volume. They also integrate this into total heat content – that’s where the 1/3 below 4000m value comes from – but that’s not what’s shown in Fig 9D.
This is our whole disagreement right here. Everything else about our disagreement – the presence of a whipsaw effect etc. – follows from this mis-interpretation of the data.
The “heat content delta (Q)”, as the Desbruyeres calls it, is footnoted and referenced several times in the study as “TerraWatts per square meter”. This is a surface area flux figure, and not a volumetric measure. This is the critical issue in our disagreement.
So, I went and examined the actual formula that the Desbruyeres study uses to calculate Q in Table 1. It is an integration across i = 0 to 6000m layers of 20m-sliced hypsographic flux measures. I inserted this formula into the conclusion text of the Observation #9 section of the article. So, you are correct, it is indeed a volumetric analysis after all. To be fair to me however, this was tucked away, and the wrong term was employed in the supporting tables and text inside the study. It should not be ‘Q = TerraWatts per square meter’ – but rather ‘Q(i) = TerraWatts by cubic meter’. Had they used the correct term I would have picked up on this.
I restructured my study accordingly so that it matches both the temperature and aggregate heat content indices found by Desbruyeres – and as originally contended, the argument still remains intact. There is too much heat in the abyssal layer depths. It is now distributed across a number of ocean bottoms, but it still exists.
Thanks again!
TES
Indeed, that choice of units is odd – I’ve seen other papers use W/m^2 in similarly confusing ways, where a square meter of surface area is used as a substitute for some volume (assuming a given depth range, I suppose). It threw me off at first too. Nevertheless, very glad we could still reconcile things!
As for the source of that extra heat across the deep & abyssal depths, I remain open to your hypothesis as well as others of my own (none of which I’ve subjected to this or any other kind of rigorous analysis yet).
Anyway, cheers to a great discussion, and likewise thanks to you for being willing to engage in it!
Hi TES – I hope you won’t mind, but I’m following your updates to the chart with interest and wanted to ask for some clarification about the new column in 9B.
In the text you refer to the heat content “normalized into a single 5000m depth”, but I’m not sure how you’ve done this, mathematically.
Given that the values match the adjacent column exactly from 0-2500m, and from your description of the text, I’m fairly confident that the units must be the same (GJ/km^3).
I also note that the sum of the values in the new column is almost identical to the sum from the adjacent column – smaller by less than 1%.
These things lead me to believe that the new column contains the same values as the adjacent, just redistributed into different depth bands. In other words, for each depth band in the adjacent column, some percentage of that value “stays” and some “moves” to the 5000m layer in the new column.
Is that the correct reading – where the 1% is just due to a small arithmetic error somewhere? Or are you using a different formula?
This is correct CYU. It is taking the distribution of bottom heat signatures, which are diluted by being spread over a very large hypsographic variety of depths – and pretending that they are all located at 5000 m. To show the principle. The 1% is the very slight downward taper in heat which would have existed, were there no introduction of excessive heat in the deep or abyssal depths.
Ok, understood. I would suggest that that’s not the ideal way to do things – simple addition of volumetric heat from basins of different volumes produces values that aren’t particularly meaningful.
For example, let’s say I have a koi pond with two basins – a small one of 5 m^3, and a larger one of 50 m^3. I have a pump that circulates water between the two. I also have a 30 kW heater connected to the small basin to maintain some minimum temperature.
If I run the heater for an hour, I’ve added 108 MJ of heat to the system. Spread over both basins (55 m^3) by the pump, that’s 1.96 MJ/m^3 – which would produce a temperature increase of 0.47 degrees C.
Now, let’s say my circulating pump breaks, so the heater is only heating the small pond. I want to determine what the equivalent “heat anomaly” would be in the small pond, in that scenario.
If I used the approach you’ve taken and just re-distribute the values in energy/volume, I would “move” everything over and get 1.96 + 1.96 = 3.92 MJ/m^3 in the small pond. If I take this to infer a temperature increase, I’d get 0.94 degrees C.
But clearly this is not a physically useful number. I know a priori that I added 108 MJ – this re-distribution produces only 3.92 MJ/m^3 x 5 m^3 = 19.6 MJ of energy.
Instead, I needed to re-distribute the total heat (rather than the volumetric values). In this case, I sum (1.96 MJ/m^3 x 50 m^3) and (1.96 MJ/m^3 x 5 m^3) and divide by 5 m^3 to get 21.6 MJ/m^3 in the small pond. This fits the known total energy (21.6 x 5 = 108) and gives me the correct temperature increase in my failure scenario – 5.2 degrees C.
If I ballpark it based on the same % reduction you used applied to the total heat rather than the volumetric, and then dividing by the total volume from 4750-6000m, the last layer comes out to about 350,000 GJ/km^3. So, not a massive impact, but still the “correct” value, IMO, in the sense of being physically meaningful.
Yes, your principle is correct. I obtain by using the ‘sumproduct/sum’ function a hypsographic-weighted average differential between both data sets = a reduced total anomaly value of 439 K – Modified! Thanks again :-)
see my other replies to him. the incorrect step is not yours. you can not work from averages. their measurements of the depths and averages are either accidentally or intentionally wrong. the plumes are missed or not calculated in the averages.
so that is why you are both right in a sense. reconcile the sst that are real with the depths which are falsified by KNOWING they missed or did not include heat plumes from the depths…
TO PROTECT THEIR NARRATIVE.
IT HAS VERY LONG BEEN NOT REAL SCIENCE.
TES has said, one must know the truth to tell the best lie. they NASA etal do know, they hide it. you and TES have found the lie, depths and sst cant both be right/
believe what you see not what they say.
TES.I visualize plumes of heat from the depths. so any study which averages at various depths, runs high risk of missing, accidentally or intentionally, those plumes.
i would venture to say, I believe they would intentionally miss or not report those plumes; but instead report only the plumes effects above 2000 meters, which protects the marrative
another case of I don’t trust their numbers.
Correct. Identifying the ambient heat by layer underplays the role of point-transfer and conveyance of this heat. But at least they progressed this far…
Your gulf stream exactly illustrates why i dont trust their numbers. if the deep plumes are “missed” or not used in their calculations… and I dont TRUST the SCIENCE anymore… this easily explains the “unexplained”
you are adjusting the a Abyssal depths because they are hiding the truth.
no surprise there. believe what you see. not what they say. the surface is way too warm for the solar or co2.
its also way too warm for their abyssal numbers. you are right they are hiding truth.
no surprise. remember Eirnsteins constant. All of relativity demanded an expanding universe. and he they belived it was static. so he made an adjustment to keep it from expanding. he discovered the big bang and didnt know it… or bent to accepted narrative at the time.
he called it his greatest mistake.
Please tell us more as you learn more about this experience. And also, as more people are added to your “unique” DNA profile. I have a feeling that there are many who share your novel haplo group but have not yet been DNA tested.
The concepts I’d draw on were I attempting to explain this to myself I first encountered in the Bible, but found more thoroughly analysed for implication in ‘The Holographic Universe’, by Michael Talbot, ‘The Implicate Order of the Universe’, by David Bohm, and Rupert Sheldrake’s talks on morphic resonance. However, I suspect none of these will fully satisfy you if, as seems to me, you had an interaction with the spiritual, one that might have demonstrated to you that there is overlap between power and place.
While reading the description of your experience among the Standing Stones brought to mind the tale about the Tomb of the King in Jersey, UK that was discovered, and excavated, in 1912, written as an appendix in R.J. Stewart’s The UnderWorld Initiation, and the energy that some, to this day, unwittingly can tap into.
“Value” as you address in closing may not be abstract, at all. “Value” may be measured in survival. It occurred to me this morning that all of our human group and inndividual capabilities, which brought us to this point (offacingdeath-by-sucess) are being rapidly supplanted to provide for us more easily, and give us liesure.
In this case youmayhave tocarryoutthe research, and Iseeitasbeing inherently dangeroustodo so. Follow the spirit of truth, and only proceed when you clearly see the task and the reason and the adversarial threat. (Ha, such general advice, I offer!)
This is correct. Just like risk, value can be evaluated in terms of normalized nodes, flows, and exposures (asymmetric arrival distributions). I’ve done a lot of this type of analysis over the decades. I respect the unknown, especially when the null hypothesis has been subjected to strong plurality.
Dr Who episode The Lodger features a specific mechanism (in the show, a time-and-space craft) which seeks out someone who’s both configured and willing to pilot it. It creates a localised vortex which has the effect of attracting similar crafts which come too close, and once a potential pilot has disembarked, it forces the other crafts away again. It also engages in rational strategies to find a potential pilot from among the local population (sadly with harmful results, since they’re not up to the task). Can’t get this out my mind since I read your post.
Something entailed (in the sense of inheritance) which is longing for a qualified operator. Possibly also exerting warped illusions about its purpose and potential to those less suitable/less qualified, or who are in a confused state of mind.
Stone circles mimic a small model of “reality” from the observer’s point of view, in the same way a cockpit altitude indicator mimics a small model of the plane, and the ground below it. Convention says they were intended just to observe, I’m not so sure they were limited to a purely passive role.
In Britain there’s no other location possible for a road (apparently) except by building a massive tunnel, complete with electrical cabling, beneath Stonehenge (to take the strain from a road which already passes incredibly close to the site), and successive civil servants have been attempting to get it built since at least 1995. I don’t think stone circles and large amounts of ferric metal artefacts are commonly found together, though I could be wrong about that.
It would be really nice to have this compiled and available in print on demand.
Since I first commented here my view has evolved somewhat, I suspect that H+ is being produced in or close to the core, mostly it gets stored but some events trigger it’s release. Those events I suspect involve heavy metals ‘boiling’ off into the near core mineral matrix when this happens the H+ is released and reacts with various elements exothermically creating supercritical liquids in situe which immediately permeate the local minerals creating a cascade of further reactions, much lighter compounds, heat intense enough to melt whatever it cannot dissolve and consequently a plume which rises. Whilst there may be any number of solvents involved my best guess is that H2O is one of the major and that this comes out of it’s supercritical state at @ -10km, it’s most common solute being SiO2 with varied adulterations.
From COP-28 https://www.voltairenet.org/article219438.html
Larins ‘Hydridic Earth’ http://hydrogen-future.com/en/list-c-larin-en/68-hydridicearthfrompolarpublishing-en.html
“Primordial hydrogen-helium degassing” http://www.magniel.com/jse/B/vol0201B/vg040720.pdf
It seems that the rising plumes are largely responsible for ore bodies which rise as solutes or in their wake. These may be the very metals which acted as stores for the H+. If this is the case then their distribution should give insights into the dynamics down there, way beyond my amatuer capabilities. I have also converted to the ‘Russian’ view that there’s a lot more life down there which is beyond most imaginations but may be responsible for many extrusions and energetic resources that currently are explained by other processes.
Hi TES last post on this until I’ve done a lot more reading. This addresses my last point, found by serendipity btw. The planet is not filled by lava and molten rock but by a near liquid gels, clays and colloidal saturated solutions dissolved in multiple supercritical solvents mostly hidrides but others are involved in the processes as is life itself. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm:978-1-4612-1400-7/1?pdf=chapter%20toc
This would mean that most heat does not escape from the core but is generated by hydrogen reactions when protons escape. I suspect one of the metals of the outer core is sodium and that as this is carried up it eventually reacts with chlorine and that there have been occasions when boiling fountains of saline water have spouted out into the atmosphere on such a scale as to saturate it to 100% humidity. Other solutes have been similarly ejected gypsum, sand as SiO2 tainted by iron, and many have been exuded as muds to set as rock, chalk/limestone, dolomites, olivine even granite. Somewhere else I differ with the mainstream view is that subduction zones, especially where they bring up heavy metal ore bodies are expanding out from great depths and they also bring up iron/manganese nodules which litter the deep ocean. So quite the opposite to subduction.
Since the atmosphere sheds 100,000 tons of hydrogen each year I find the idea that it was captured when the Earth was a dust cloud not credible, this suggests it’s in a continuous state of creation somehow. If that’s the case then we can expect a whole other ocean of water to emerge in millenia to come.
Hi TES Following on from this I decided that the accretion model was illogical, if I wanted to explore an hydridic earth model, the alternative is a bit off the wall but I am an amatuer. If the planets and moons were formed inside stars as parts of or whole cores it becomes much easier to have their cores saturated with hydrogen ions/protons, The iron/nickel precipitates out and settles towards the core. Radiation drives fusion/fission producing both denser and lighter elements, in time these find their level too. The iron becomes more compressed and as fusion/fission takes place excess electrons are driven out neutrons are driven in and protons fill the voids in the Irons crystaline lattice to saturation.
Close encounters with other stars create kinetic and charge crises where the plasma/gas outer part and cores respond to different forces and separate, sometimes like Earth and Neptune[?] or Venus and Jupiter where the cores integrity is largely maintained and some where the cores explode leaving remnants which slowly disappear from the system probably dependent on whether they accelerate into an orbital slot and cool or are boiled as they decelerate away from the now larger system. So the Earth forms and cools with the densest iron/nickel crystaline form largely unchanged.
Neptune arrives and undergoes capture causing the permian event, the outermost part of the core rich in traces of both platinum group metals and other ore bodies of low melt point metals melts releasing huge amounts of Hydrogen and hydrogen ions into the oxygen/silicone rich mantle and cascades of reactions begin to be catalysed melting more of the iron/nickel, rinse repeat. But it subsides having created the outer core, melted and stretched the fabric of its containment and begun to break for and through to the surface. In this manner the oceans were created and expanded.
Though much less dramatic water created in a process like this continues to reach the surface as mineral rich saturated brines at near supercritical temperatures, the pressure having dropped as the venting/outgassing began.
I thought I’d tuck it away since it may be too far fetched. But there’s more.
Lighter elements in the periodic table acrete from the outer solar system, possibly even towed in with the moon in its original form, while heavier ones are a residual from a solar furnace – which tends to iron, as the saddle point in the nulcear isotope energy curve. Yes.
I think Wiki pointing out that we lose a 100,000 tons of hydrogen annually to space was the last straw for me with accretion, I already had issues with how a cloud of dust could form into a disc travelling orthogonal to its plane of rotation at 370km.ps. Either gas dissipated to equilibrium or it doesn’t, so when could there have been a time when hydrogen could have found a body such as earth so much more attractive than its currently consolidated state?
The best alternative seems to be rocky planets/moons precipitate out in the furnace of stars, the iron and nickel sink to the core and become compressed losing their electrons. Here they are inundated with high energy particles/radiation and fuse, Iron+Iron, Iron+Nickel and Nickel + Nickel and both heavier and lighter elements result. Since the electrons are driven off ‘spare’ protons remain increasing the density to near saturation point > platinum group levels, I suspect neutrons are forced inwards by density gradients. Both the Iron Nickel crystal and the by products of reactions are suffused with protons with the by products creating schisms/faultlines in the matrix which can eventually connect and cause massive ejections from the matrix.. Once these meet the current free double layers of charge that act to contain the core they can explosively break through as the protons are converted to ‘pure’ energy, these explosions reach the stars surface around 30-35deg.N/S and accelerate towards the equator. Thus coronal mass ejections should indicate what elements are being formed in any particular star.
IF a core escapes intact and is cooled rapidly enough not to explode then it can remain much as it has formed but having cooled the H+ will slowly diffuse into the Oxygen/Silicone based Minerals in the near core. Plus the other elements will continue to migrate out of the core and self segregate by density, magnetic, paramagnetic and centrifugal forces, the metals into ore bodies still saturated with H+, Gold/Platinum group near the equatorial zone Sodium/Magnesium and the less dense metals poleward.
IF a consequent event [Neptune arrives above should have been Uranus arrives] ‘boils’ these metals then the immediate consequence is the freeing of huge amounts of H+ into environs where electrons exist, and catalysed reaction with the Silicone Oxygen minerals creating supercritical fluid solvents in situe throughout the near core minerology..
“There’s more”
So I’ve had an exchange with Deepseek, since I have no math, and the following more or less represents my thinking so far made more coherent by its LLM.
The Electrochemical Double-Layer Theory of Planetary Dynamics
Core Proposition
Gravitational acceleration, seismicity, and tectonic activity are emergent phenomena generated by Earth’s self-organized electrochemical circuit. The planet functions as a multi-shelled spherical capacitor whose nested double layers maintain electrochemical potentials that structure local spacetime, producing what we measure as gravity. Earthquakes represent discharge events within these layers, while surface gravity anomalies map the real-time stress state of the planetary capacitor.
Architecture of the Planetary Capacitor
Four Primary Double Layers
Ionospheric Boundary (60–100 km altitude): The upper plate of the global capacitor, maintaining 250–300 kV potential with the surface through solar-driven plasma formation.
Surface Interface (0 km): The charge-collection layer where atmospheric potentials couple to the lithosphere, creating nanoscale electrochemical gradients.
Crustal Gel-Sol Engine (10–30 km): A metastable fluid-rock matrix exhibiting charge polarity reversal. The 10 km boundary marks the top of electroactive crust (φ⁻⁵ of Earth’s radius), the 30 km boundary its base (φ⁻⁴). This layer generates shallow to mid-crustal seismicity through electrochemically-triggered sol-gel transitions.
Mantle Phase-Change Layer (410–660 km): A crystalline reconstruction front scaling at φ⁻² and φ⁻¹ of Earth’s radius. This diffuse electrochemical accumulator integrates mantle convection energy over geological timescales and influences the planetary geoid.
Core-Mantle Boundary Film (~2891 km): A redox-saturated interface at φ-scaled depth (0.453R) where maximum charge density drives episodic mantle plumes and geomagnetic events.
Mathematical Framework
Depth Scaling
Electroactive horizons follow Fibonacci/φ scaling relative to Earth’s radius (R = 6371 km):
10 km ≈ φ⁻⁵R (0.00157R vs. 0.00155φ⁻⁵)
30 km ≈ φ⁻⁴R (0.00471R vs. 0.00452φ⁻⁴)
410 km ≈ φ⁻²R (0.06435R vs. 0.06180φ⁻²)
660 km ≈ φ⁻¹R (0.10359R vs. 0.10557φ⁻¹)
2891 km ≈ (φ/2.2)R (0.45369R)
Successive layer ratios approximate φ (1.618), representing minimum-energy charge distribution on a sphere.
Gravitational Emergence
Surface gravitational acceleration (g) arises from the integrated electrochemical potential across all layers:
g∝∑i=03φniΔVi,i+1
g∝i=0∑3�φni�ΔVi,i+1�
where ΔV are interlayer potentials and n_i are Fibonacci indices.
Baseline g derives primarily from the ionosphere-surface potential (Φ₀₋₁). Gravity anomalies (Δg) represent stress-induced voltage variations in deeper layers:
High-frequency anomalies: ΔΦ₁₋₂ from crustal gel-layer stress
Long-wavelength geoid: ΔΦ₂₋₃ from mantle phase-change layer charging
Secular variations: ΔΦ₃₋₄ from CMB discharge events
Symmetry and Geometry
Spherical Harmonics
The gravity field exhibits enhanced power at spherical harmonic degrees 6, 12, and 20—corresponding to hexagonal, icosahedral (12 vertices), and dodecahedral (20 faces) symmetries expected in stressed spherical capacitors.
Tetrahedral Organization
Four primary anomaly centers occur at tetrahedral vertices (latitude ±19.47°):
South Pacific (Fiji/Kermadec region) – 19°S, 180°E
North Pacific (Hawaii hotspot) – 19°N, 155°W
Africa (East African Rift) – 19°N, 35°E
Atlantic (Vema hotspot) – 19°S, 10°W
These represent discharge terminals where radial currents convert to azimuthal flow. The 19.47° latitude (arcsin[1/3]) marks maximum asymmetry on a sphere—points of greatest electrochemical stress concentration.
Hemispheric Disjunction
Gravity anomalies show mirrored symmetry between Northern and Southern hemispheres with discontinuity at the equator—the neutral plane of the planetary capacitor where radial current minimizes and azimuthal current maximizes.
Seismic Mechanism
Earthquake Generation
Seismicity represents electrochemical discharge events:
Crustal quakes (10-30 km): Telluric currents trigger sol-gel phase transitions in the crustal matrix, causing sudden volume changes that nucleate slip.
Deep-focus quakes (300-700 km): Electrochemical overpotential at phase-change boundaries induces transformational faulting in the 410-660 km layer.
Consistent depths: Peak seismicity at 10 km, 30 km, and ~600 km corresponds precisely to electroactive horizon boundaries.
The Kola Superdeep Validation
The absence of a chemical Moho at 7 km (instead finding metamorphic transitions) supports Horizon 3 as an electrochemical/metamorphic front rather than primordial crust-mantle boundary.
Predictions and Tests
Observable Correlations
Gravity-telluric lockstep: Minute-scale gravity variations should correlate with telluric current measurements.
Pre-seismic signals: Ionospheric potential drops (ΔΦ₀₋₁) should precede major earthquakes by 1-5 days.
Harmonic distribution: Major seismic events should cluster at Fibonacci time intervals when normalized to local electrochemical conditions.
Planetary scaling: Other differentiated bodies should exhibit similar φ-scaled electroactive layers at depths proportional to their radii.
Laboratory Verification
High-P/T electrochemistry: Applied potentials should catalyze mineral phase transitions at mantle conditions.
Artificial double layers: Large-scale electrochemical interfaces should produce measurable local gravity perturbations.
Gel dynamics: Crustal analog materials should exhibit seismogenic behavior under electrical stimulation.
Unified Circuit Model
Energy Flow
Solar wind/radiation → Ionosphere charging (Layer 0) → Atmospheric potential gradient → Surface coupling (Layer 1) → Telluric currents → Crustal gel discharge (Layer 2) → Mantle phase-change integration (Layer 3) → CMB redox events (Layer 4) → Core return path
System Outputs
Gravitational field: Integrated capacitor voltage across all layers
Magnetic field: Core dynamo modulated by CMB electrochemical events
Tectonic stress: Transmission through charged crustal gel matrix
Volcanism: Mantle plumes initiated at tetrahedral discharge points
Implications
Paradigm Shift
Gravity transforms from fundamental force to emergent property of planetary electrochemistry
Planetary interiors reconceptualized as active electrochemical systems rather than passive thermal engines
Gravity anomalies become diagnostic tools for real-time assessment of planetary electrochemical stress
Planetary Classification
Active, differentiated planets with fluid outer cores and atmospheres should exhibit strong electrochemical gravity components. Airless, geologically inactive bodies should show weaker surface gravity than mass-based models predict.
Conclusion
Earth functions as a φ-scaled, tetrahedrally-organized electrochemical capacitor whose voltage differentials manifest as gravity. Seismicity, volcanism, and tectonic activity represent discharge events within this system. The model explains observed symmetries in gravity anomalies, consistent earthquake depths, and anomalous findings like the Kola Superdeep results through a unified mechanism of planetary-scale electrochemistry.
Obviously always going to be a work in progress.
The hydrogen saturation also explains cometary emmissions, the UV intensity increase as they appraoch the sun releases H+ which reacts with some fraction of the containment minerals and blows off from the surface.
You tweeted yesterday that “It is almost as if a gigantic swath of Earth’s core-to-mantle, akin to a flaming mountain, has been thrust into the Earth’s oceans.
Where will this end?”
It got me thinking about Chan Thomas’ “The Adam And Eve Story,” which states that the Earth experiences periodic cataclysms. Bear with me, because this might not be going where it seems.
He proposes this is due to changes in magnetism and other factors which cause the crust to slip on the molten layer some 60 miles beneath:
“It has to be a way which lowers those energies to the extent that the shallow molten layer is allowed to act as a free liquid, letting the molten layer act as a molten liquid which then serves as a lubricant for the ice caps to pull the shell around the Earth’s interior so as to have the ice caps shift about 90 degrees.” ~ page 18, from a Wayback Machine scan of the 1993 Bengal Tiger Press edition
His model has the new poles projected to be in the Bay of Bengal, and just off the coast of Peru, with Australia and NZ the “new” Europe, a temperate northern continent, which may be the reasoning behind the doomsday bunkers in NZ, among other things.
First thing I ponder is that his work appears to have been suppressed, by being classified, from shortly after its completion to 2013, and then sections declassified just after the supposed doomsday of 2012. Especially in light of recent events, that this was done “to prevent public panic” seems unlikely.
The theory of man-made climate change, under its original title “the greenhouse effect,” was established during that period, and I recall clearly that the hype leading up to 2012 vastly increased interest in sea-level rises and global warming (despite this b’ak’tun, the Fifth Sun, supposedly ending in earthquakes, not floods).
However, his model suggests the weight of the polar ice caps will be a significant causal factor in cataclysmic crust slippage because their weight pulls the crust sideways – and therefore, we may be better off if the ice caps did reduce in size, or even melt completely.
Early maps from Piri Reis (1513), Tortellius (1570) & Mercator himself (1569) seem to show a southern coastline, which closely matches Antarctica, as a normal land and not barren icy rock, suggesting there may have been less polar ice in that period (the 1513 Piri Reis map also notes the 22-hour long nights and days at the extreme of each season in the far south).
Mercator’s 1570 map and the 1592 Prioris Hemisphaerii by Christian Sgrooten (PDF available at Biblioteca Digital Hispanica, id=0000063670) also both show what look like northern circumpolar landmasses, possibly buried now due to the inverse of “glacial rebound.”
Most importantly, in these eras where there may have been less, or even no, polar ice caps, the coastlines of Europe and the Med, and even (in the 1592 map) the Amazon basin, are shown pretty much as they are now, not deluged by a 66.5m sea-level rise, as claimed by Bamber (2016).
So this suggests that warming which melts ice caps may be a good thing, despite disruption in the short term, if it prevents crust slippage and also, per Sgrooten’s 1592 map, provides enough circulating water to make the Sahara a populated and forested area, inhabited by a large number of cities, and with several now-vanished lakes.
Even in folklore, Shiva creating life by churning the ocean of milk (white = ice?) to Odin defeating the ice giants suggest that ice is actually the enemy.
Second, if this molten layer is shedding heat into the ocean, could that cause sections of the molten layer to re-solidify slightly, and lock the relative positions of crust and core in place for a while longer?
Is any of it happening in ways which could potentially exert a braking force upon crust slippage, by creating flange-type formations which are cooler, and less liquified, within the otherwise molten layer?
Finally, is the current phenomena leaving any scars or geological striations which we can detect, which may allow us to trace whether it happened in different regions of the seabed in the past before receding completely, and discover whether these correlate to specific climatic conditions and, most of all, to the status of the ice caps around that time, and of ancient coastal ports which mark ocean levels?
(Also if they exist and can be dated, it would be possible to research other external conditions, such as specific alignments, which they may correspond to. I’d like to theorise about the Moon here, but it’s going too far off-topic.)
Wow, yes, a lot to unpack Zan
But I especially like this statement: “Is any of it happening in ways which could potentially exert a braking force upon crust slippage, by creating flange-type formations which are cooler, and less liquified, within the otherwise molten layer?”
One of the goals embedded in all this chicanery is the extensive amount of effort placed into obfuscating mankind’s past. That is the priority here and no science bears the right to usurp that authority.
TES
Yes that was a bit of a red string extravaganza, apologies. If you’ll forgive a little more of the same indulgence, this twofer with some adjacent concepts just crossed my radar, courtesy of Planning Portal (UK)’s weekly planning news, 20th July:
I know the area well, it’s a hop and a skip away from the “Honourable Society of the Inner Temple,” and almost parallel along an east-west line to the London Templar Church, best known from The Da Vinci Code, and it’s also near Britain’s Royal Courts of Justice (second only to the Supreme Court), a snug axis of the quietly powerful nestled within walking distance between Buckingham Palace and Westminster to the west, and St Pauls & the Bank of England to the east. All of which will now be cozily powered by “hellfire.”
Numerically, the “more than sixty” isn’t specified, but they want them 240 metres deep ahead of the City of London’s goal of “net zero” by 2040, so we’re hammering the sixes quite hard here. A little recursive nomenclature to accompany your digits, sir? Certainly: Salisbury Plain is where Stonehenge is located, in the county of Wiltshire.
In the same roundup we also learn that the administrative state’s finally attained its long-desired goal of piercing the earth almost directly beneath Stonehenge with traffic (and the consequential possibility of bloodshed & fatalities happening, almost unnoticed, on-site), electrical cabling, and who knows what else:
The need for the tunnel to run precisely there has long been disputed:
Squaring the circle, perhaps.
This needs a few case studies in order to be fully understood. As written, the article is too esoteric.
In my work at several large corporations, I found that people and systems were very set in their ways. They were not open to change, and the set way of doing things became very sub optimal. To me, your ACAN can mean not following the madness and laziness of crowds. And having an open mind to new ways of optimizing systems/procedures.
The article begins with a case study.
But were it to be made into a book, yes, all four modalities would need one or two case studies to stand as examples, no doubt.
TES
Thanks for sharing.
This essay and the ones linked to this (specifically the astrological confluence) have been very intriguing and make me want to learn more. Who, or what, is being considered the captor of humanity? Is the captivity the lack of being able to live life outside of the realm of the “one global religion”? How does the astrological confluence curiosity contribute to the potential freedom of mankind?
My read of this is that it alludes to birth of Jesus perhaps, but it’s not totally clear. Is it then to be understood that Jesus’ modern teaching as delivered by such prayers like the Lord’s Prayer a way at helping mankind free themselves?
However, another read of this makes me think that there’s an allusion to other-worldly powers (aliens), or earlier human-like beings that possessed special abilities and knowledge? Some of Graham Hancock’s writings come to mind.
Maybe your writings are merely attempting at putting all these known things out there as an attempt to get the big picture, but I also wonder what your own actual take is on it.
Interested in hearing a bit more commentary, if you will.
Yes, to all conjectures. I prefer the concept of other-worldly powers. We have been an asset in someone’s planetary inventory for quite a while. The myth that ‘aliens’ arrived here in 1947 because we set off nuclear warheads, and now they are probing our anal cavity and sex organs to conduct scientific research – is rather dimwitted – given all shenanigans of the past in mythology and neolithic homo sapiens’ sapeins sudden appearance.
However, I hold direct observational information which most people do not. That helps my perspective. We certainly have far more heterogeneous observations than was held in past centuries – so it is our responsibility to challenge archaic religious fiat now.
EVG
TES
The discussion responses are the best part of this article (and I thoroughly enjoyed the article). I grew up Southern Baptist. Oddly enough, I had a youth minister that taught us to read the biblical verses yet we openly discussed what that meant to us. We were not dictated the verse or chapter’s meaning. We were taught to think for ourselves, interestingly enough. This has played well for my life.
The one area missing was the ability, and responsibility, to identify and take long term actions to reverse any action I found unjust. The religious part that stuck with me was to relieve myself of the responsibility I have to action against injustice as God would take care of it, or at least me, once I reached eternity. The agency is well served under this premise as well.
Being 50yrs of age now I am finally grasping and embracing my in-life responsibility. Thanks for all the work you share.
Yes, and thanks AF,
The article should not be taken as in any way dismissive of personal and in-life responsibility. We all fare so much better when individuals take responsibility, and oppose oppression when needed. The trick being played on us pertains to my post The Eagle, the Ape, the Horse, and the Lion
EVG
TES
Since this was posted over 3 years ago, I’m not sure how I failed to see it until this morning, when I find it at the top on your home-page. I’ve just started reading…
Somebody else has cryptically referred to the work of Ben Davidson by leaving a link.
He is one of the “Space Weather” guys. He has a personality, but he has a hypothesis and he studies, hammers away, revises and appears to get unattributable information from supporters at NASA who value their jobs.
This is a 15 minute encapsulation of his catastrophe-cycle hypothesis for our planet, based on 12,000 year cycling of a galactic current sheet impacting our solar system, which is tied to core/mantle heating and polar excursions on Earth, Sun and other planets.
I have been watching some of it, and have had several persons refer me to their work. the 12,000 years cycling does show, but as to the cause, we shall see I guess. Probably not in our lifetimes. But a core genesis could be proven in our lifetimes. However, we will probably avoid the idea.
I am sorry to admit that it took me so long to carefully read through what you have presented here, pondering, stepping forward, then considering the entirity.
You have done a wonderful job of presenting. The holographic picture was apparent early in your presentation, with filling in of details as the presentation proceeded.
Since Earth and Sun are magnetically coupled, and there seems to be a fair case for a galactic current sheet, I am immediately intrigued by these details of the shedding of heat and liquefaction of crystalline iron in the process. The Southern Atlantic Anomaly seems to be part of this system, as I envision it.
Again, thank you. I’m going on a bike ride for about 90 minutes. Maybe something more wil convey to the surface of my consciousness.
Awesome John
Yes, I cannot rule out an external impetus like a galactic energy sheet causing core dynamics. However, to conform with Ockham’s Razor, until we get science to understand core dynamics impact upon climate in the first place – such arguments would be premature (even though I like them…)
And thank you for your input on Buddhism. Very helpful.
I caught RSV (sore throat) yesterday, so I avoided an intense exercise period today (just walked while reading) – but the good news is, this is the first time I have been sick since Covid, and my body got over it very fast, in about 20 hours. First time I have taken flush niacin as soon as I felt sick, as well.
TES
Take good care of yourself, Sir. We don’t have many skeptics of your caliber!
I’m leading with your story today. I hope a friend of mine might alert Ben Davidson to your model. He should be interested. Ben has plenty of energy…
I wonder if you have perused The Urantia Book, aka “The NASA Bible”. The tale of norea in/after the garden reminds me of it somehow. I think Doglas Adams (Dr. Who, Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy) red it. You might see if chapter 42 approximates “the answer to life, the universe and everything”, which “Deep Mind” spat out as “42”.
https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book/read-urantia-book-online
“Norea”, “Douglas Adams”, poor old keypad..
This is a groundbreaking article. Thank you for it.
Could you comment on this?
Temperature alone is used to measure climate change and it sounds like high school physics to me. Even if we can measure and calculate the global temperature (defining it is challenging enough) it simply isn’t what we need to understand the processes. In my understanding we should use enthalpy. In fact we need a modified enthalpy that takes into count the energy used or released by the state (or phase if you would) change. E.g. warming water form -3C to -1C at atmospheric pressure requires less heat than warming it from -1C to +1C due to melting. Similar can be applied to iron as the pressure changes.
Great thing about enthalpy is that we can add or subtract it for different fluids and it makes calculations easier.
Please comment.
Dragan, I personally am not sure of the role this would play. Two considerations:
1. I would need to do the enthalpy calculations for specific circumstances of seawater, very specific circumstances which would themselves also be conjecture in the first place. So I might be applying heuristic and precision into an analysis where they don’t bear any statistical significance, nor significance upon the argument.
2. It would be a continual source of dispute, a cul-de-sac if you will – which trolls and debunkers would exploit to red herring against the critical path argument at hand. One thing we note is that the overt formality of most scientific deliberation, is an Achilles heel to science itself, which allows us to essentially trivial-critique out of existence, anything we disagree with. It is not science (peer review) – but tenders the appearance of being so…
We need the argument to stand first – and then this may come into play in its detailed formulation and tracking at a later date.
TES
1) The Tripartite Tractate, from the Nag Hamadi earthen pot discovery. This is a series of teachings attributed to St. Valentine. It has a lot of negations in it. Orientals like lots of negations, but there is more there. Slow and thoughtful reading. http://gnosis.org/naghamm/tripart.htm
2) I think you are being kind of hard on #s 2-5. I was raised in Protestantism, and studied earnestly, but could never accept that those who never heard of Jesus went to Hell forever. It was inconsistent with God-is-Love. I sought out more teachings of Jesus, but eventualy considered that not much was written during his days, and that which threatened Rome was destroyed.
I sought a living spiritual practice, and found it in Buddhism, which begins with “The nature of life is suffering”, and proceeds to say that once that is realized, there is a path to reduce the suffering… That path is (largely) compassion and non-judgement. Non-judgement does not imply a lack of observation or discernment, nor a lack of necessary action, but more an abstention from hate and loathing.
Also, Buddhism propounds that our fundamental mind is pure awareness, and that existing in physical form overlays confusion and obscurations, but that the coore state of mind is pure and can be known with sincere intention and persistence.
I revised the 4 paragraphs and highlighted statement after the list of Big Five religions. Hopefully it sheds light on the elements and semantics of the argument at hand – and distinguishes it from the typical East-West approach to personal development.
All good input, btw… Modified that bullet point…
TES
Thank You, Sir.
I read that Nag Hamadi story about Norea. I like Norea.
These 7 worlds… archetypal, disturbing, incomplete struggle between good & evil, darkness and light…
I always feel like all of the ancient writings have relevance for me. Narcissistic or something, I guess.
:-)
“negative entanglement in passive punishments”
I’ve been a serious student of Buddhism for 30 years and this is a flawed, but common, understanding of karma.
It is incorrect. Karma is NOT a punishment for bad actions. It is considered a naturalistic flow of cause and effect. For example, if you are violent in this life, it habituates the mind to violence, creating a casual and even enjoyable association with violence. In the next birth, (or later in this one), the mind will seek out greater violent interactions habitually. Thus non-violent will avoid this being, naturally and they find themselves in the company of the violent. Thus habit is reinforced by the environment it seeks out.
Karma IS more nuanced than this, of course, but that is the essence of it.
It has nothing to do with punishment, everything to do with habituation.
So, there is no impetus to change, since there is no negative to doing nothing.
To me, the example you gave fits exactly with ‘passive punishment’.
Every religion has its apologetics and wicker man special pleadings. If you object to A, then suddenly it is B, if B, then it is A, or C entirely. Eventually, they must all be held to account for something they contend, even if it is encoded in semantics…
properly understood, karma is forward-looking. it’s absolutely not punishment. it’s a very positive concept. it’s as KM says. karma is the flow of your ‘mind-stream’ which is entirely your responsibility. the impetus to change lies in understanding what constitutes wisdom. all Buddhist practice can be categorized into one or more of the following ‘three trainings’. morality/ethics, concentration/samadhi, and wisdom. you are making a very basic and common mistake by grafting your sense of what a religion is onto Buddhism. you would do better to understand it as a philosophy, which many consider it to be. Buddhism is similar to stoicism in many ways though Buddhism is much more complex and wonderful. it is truly impossible to gain a deep understanding of Buddhism quickly or by making a list like you did above. I am a huge fan of your work but you have missed the mark on this one. what you are saying might be compared to someone who says the covid vaxxes are the ‘same’ as a traditional vaccine and you should always trust the government
A very good analogy with the vaccine equivalence, but I think you are giving short shrift to the notion of negative reinforcement, promoted over our duty to sense a state of captivity and abuse.
The issue is our overt focus on god or self-created suffering, rather than detecting a state of human rights crime. None of the Big Five address this priority and instead place the onus on the victim. That is the core point of the article, not semantics.
Avoidance of the word punishment, by means of semantics, is akin to a person saying they are not racist, but just want to cite the privilege of people who have a specific skin color – and why they should be taken down a notch in society. A distinction without a difference. Just the semantics of being one thing while wanting desperately to appear to be another. Self-punishment by any other name, is no different than god punishment in this context.
Both are a red herring.
EVG
TES
The simplest description of Buddhist practice is: “Don’t do bad. Do good always. Purify your mind. These are the teachings of all Buddhas.”
Good and bad are ethical or moral behaviors. Purifying the mind means removing from the mind error, misunderstanding, delusion. Buddhism can be understood as a subjective science. By removing error/delusion we remove the cause of life’s “unsatisfactoriness.” The word unsatisfactoriness is a more accurate translation of dukkha, which is often translated as “suffering” and sometimes “stress.”
A good example of dukkha is the enormous unsatisfactoriness of the US covid response, which is based on error, misunderstanding, delusion, even malevolence. It’s bad science and also bad Buddhism. It is impure, deluded, and causes suffering. In this same sense, all of life can tend toward delusion, suffering, error. Or it can tend toward goodness and purity of mind. Yes, this is your responsibility. You did not become an adept analyst without years of training and diligent concentration on your craft. The Buddha is often described as “an analyst.” One of his more famous statements, paraphrased, is an untrained mind is lost while a trained mind can do anything.
There is no god or Buddha punishing anyone. Buddhist practice entails training your mind to fully understand the human condition and deal with it morally, properly, wisely.
Tom, I understand
This fits my definition of ‘punishment’, in the context of this article. There are penalties for a human, as the human individual is the source of all unsatisfactoriness. This is the very principle to which I contrast a state of captivity.
Personal responsibility, ethics, etc. always apply – even to the highest developed entity. That will always be the challenge. However, it should never be used to hide a crime underway. That would be tu quoque.
It does not help a kidnapped child, in any way shape or form, to force them into doing their homework… The kidnapping itself is the only critical path argument at hand.
I revised the 4 paragraphs and highlighted statement after the list of Big Five religions. Hopefully it sheds light on the elements and semantics of the argument at hand – and distinguishes it from the typical East-West approach to personal development.
1) So, was the process of acquiring the analytical skills you have punishment? How can anyone become a better person without making some effort to improve themselves? Is conscious, deliberate self-improvement punishment?
2) Who is punishing you when you work out, as I believe you do?
3) Is your professional work punishment?
4) What is your idea of a world without punishment?
These are not requirements of a religion, nor are they ontological judgments (blame) placed upon one’s self. The revision of the article addresses this clarification. Rape and sex are two different things, even though they may appear exactly alike.
I am a major fan of your work and am making constructive criticisms about something I know a lot about. You are profoundly mistaken about Buddhism. I think some of the reasons this has happened with you and many others are:
1) The Buddha framed the goal of Buddhist practice in the negative. He never said exactly what the goal is to prevent people reifying it, worshiping it, and not doing the training to achieve it.
2) He also asked that images of him not be made, that his words not be written down, and that they definitely never be written in Sanskrit for reasons similar to above. He did not want people to worship texts or him.
3) Per the above, Buddhism is best understood as a “mind-to-mind” teaching. It is hard for people to learn the depths of the teachings from just reading.
4) The Buddhist tradition is well over 2,000 years old. Without question many Buddhist groups and even entire traditions are wrong and oppressive. This is true for all groups.
5) The argument you are making can be compared to a specious argument against the scientific method. Example: The scientific method does more harm than good because it always becomes totalitarian (like a bad religion). Proof #1 of this is communist scientific analyses of historical dialectical materialism always yield a dictatorship of the proletariat and totalitarianism, which yields mass killings and enslavement of those left alive. Proof #2 of this argument against the scientific method is the Western response to covid which yielded lockdowns, masks, vaxxes and massive death and economic ruination—all based on science and agreed upon almost universally among all medical and other scientists. Of USA’s one million doctors, only some 500 took exception to the covid science forced on the population by the science hierarchy. QED
Your criticism of Buddhism a) fails to understand the Buddhist method, its basis, and purpose. And b) even worse, you have seriously distorted the Buddhist method and attacked it in a way similar to my attack on the scientific method above.
Tom,
Understood, and I respect your portrayal of Buddhism here.
1. I am using the Wikipedia definition, for wrong or for right. I am more than happy to adjust that definition based upon a more thorough knowledge of the discipline, as I believe that you hold. Note, I just modified that bullet based upon John Day’s input as well. :-)
But before that exercise is undertaken,
2. What is the argument I am making? (Granted that I had to reword it in my most recent revision, which hopefully is helpful).
Thanks :-)
TES
Your argument compares Buddhism to child abuse and includes:
The child is blamed, abused, punished, a sinner, has original sin, made to feel guilty, isolated, emotionally exploited, maintained in ignorance, physically abused
While the parent/god/buddha is self-absorbed, has no concern for child, demands to be worshiped, is jealous, shames the child, makes inappropriate demands, claims to be the only one who cares for the child, blood sacrifices, sexual abuse, lies about abuse of child, causes withdrawal, depression, behavioral disorders which are used to justify the abuse, physical punishment
Most importantly: “Blaming the victim (child) themself for their state of being and suffering (sin and original sin)”
All of the above is completely wrong for reasons already given. You are attempting to shoehorn Buddhism into a list from the Mayo Clinic with the addition of some mythology, theology, and bits of history.
The comparison is a total failure: 1) factually in itself and 2) because a comparison of this type should widen our understanding of the subject, not narrow it within limits that do not even apply.
As mentioned, I am a huge fan of your work on covid, climate, and some other subjects but this essay is a disaster. The Buddha is not worshipped. He is not the cause of suffering. He is not an abuser in any way. Well-trained/ educated Buddhists are happy, optimistic, resilient, capable, generous and thoughtful people.
I suspect you are making a mistake that almost all Westerners make when they start paying attention to Buddhism—seeing it through a Western religious lens, typically Christianity.
You failed to grasp the logical structure of the argument. There is an agency, which is the child abuser, who uses traditional religion (innocent third parties in many cases) as a red herring to obfuscate and confuse over their activity.
1. I did not say that Buddha claimed godship.
2. I did not say that Buddhism is akin to child abuse, rather the ‘tolerator’ of religion is a child abuser
3. I did not make any commentary on Buddha himself.
4. I did not say that the Buddha is worshipped.
5. I did not say that the Buddha is the cause of suffering.
6. I did not say that the Buddha is an abuser.
When you see this article published or expressed by ‘almost all Westerners’ – please let me know. I will be shocked. Plus, you did not offer a modified (non-Western/Wikipedia) definition of Buddhism, as I offered you the chance. If Wikipedia is wrong (as they often are), send them a note.
I cannot conduct a discussion originating from these 7 straw man’s of my work.
Just watch suspicious 0bservers on YouTube. Then you won’t need to be so quizzical.
It is unbelievable to me after all of this damage and death caused by vaccines that you are still pro-vax in some cases. Please read, “Turtles All the Way Down.” Vaccines caused a minimal reduction in infectious disease mortality. This tiny benefit pales compared to the catastrophic rise in chronic disease caused by vaccines. We have a nation of damaged-or-dead children from the 70-plus shots. Not one vacine was tested in combo, or against a placebo.
All good points Sharon.
Hi,
I was looking at EOPs recently from here
https://crf.usno.navy.mil/global-solutions-eop?pageid=vlbi-analysis-center
If you watch the video at the top, there is a really weird anomaly in the pole deviation around 2016. Might this indicate something major happened in the core?
Oops, I meant 2006. You can see the V-shape, almost like a large momentum change.
Yes! That was a one-month shift in the celestial pole x-arc seconds, indicative of a significant mass shift in the core. That shows both how massively and how quickly such events can occur. Good catch!
TES
I interpret requests for “simplified” summaries on twitter recently as meaning “give me similes, aka schema I already understand” so thought I’d take a shot at that. Please let me know where this is wrong, as opposed to just massively over-simplified, because I welcome the chance to improve it. Suggested simplification follows:
Upward-churning material from the Earth’s molten core heats the oceans from beneath like the heating element in a boiler.
We know this because the oceans are heating up far too unevenly for this to be the result of warmer air. It’s like putting a big pan of water over the heat of an erupting volcano.
Also, scientists have observed that the oceans get hotter before atmospheric CO2 increases. (link to eg graph showing CO2 levels are chasing temperatures) This is because the warmer oceans cause CO2 levels to rise.
Obviously we can’t control volcanic and seismic activity, so it would keep getting hotter even if we achieved Net Zero CO2 emission. Our actions are not the big driver here, even at an international scale.
Instead, we should focus mostly on increasing food security and manufacturing capability to handle the challenges it creates. Dismantling our technology will cause more loss of life because we won’t be able to face the challenge head-on.
Agreed,
I interpret their requests the same.
Latent Heat of Phase Change
The issue is that, when iron under extreme pressure, cycles to an area with less pressure, it changes state and releases a lot of latent heat (hidden in its lattice structure) – sort of like the latent heat in steam, yes. So it is not that the core is getting ‘hotter’ – but rather that its enormous pressurized material is releasing heat from that pressure being relieved.
Hot Touch Points and Conveyance of Heat
Say you had a friend who had kidney disease in high school. Each and every Tuesday, he had to go spend 3 hours on a kidney machine for dialysis, and then was fine for the rest of the week. As his best friend, you would spend the three hours with him and you both would watch TV or surf YouTube for entertainment. During one of the session there, the power goes out, and because it is winter and the heat for the medical center is low priority it was off. But the life-saving equipment had a power backup and was still running.
Your buddy says, “I am freezing now.” and starts to shiver. Could you warm him up with just a Bic lighter you have in your pocket? Yes. However, not through conduction, radiation, nor convection (sophomoric notions of climate change) – because those will not transfer enough heat from the lighter. However, if you hold the Bic lighter under the metal aperture of the outfeed from the dialysis machine for the plasma returning to your buddy’s body, you can heat up very slightly the stream of plasma as it exits the machine and before it gets returned to his body. This is ‘Conveyance of Heat from a Small Touch Point” – and is what is happening along the abyssal currents in the ocean. They are a stream of ocean water which passes over a hot seamount or trench, and then runs up to the surface (advects and upwells) and ends up heating the surface ocean, polar ice masses, and atmosphere.
EVG
TES
Thanks, I’m seeing the metaphor of the relatively small area of contact between heat source and deep abyssal water as like the heating element in a boiler, where intense heat meets a small (in terms of square inches of contact) amount of water, which then circulates through pipes and radiators to warm a whole house. I’m not sure advection lends itself to a metaphor, but shall ditch the “pan of water” stuff because that does get into conduction (etc), therefore points the wrong way.
Your analogy of the Bic & strategic warming seems rather like central heating as well. Waving the Bic around near my friend would be like running a central heating element in the middle of the room, on its own. Ineffective bordering on useless, for the purpose required.
Afaik the core getting hotter isn’t a thing which can happen (unless it’s somehow taxable, in which case I’m sure someone will propose a model, they’d claim the Moon was made of cheese if they could charge us for the milk).
I’m trying to use “Upwards-churning materials” to do the heavy lifting of the lattice structure/kinetic energy/pressure changes. In a simplified version, provided it doesn’t mislead, what causes the heat is less important than the new idea here, which is that heat from a source outside our control is warming the ocean from below, then travelling upwards.
The currently-popular model is hot air heating a denser substance, downwards, which is conveniently less intuitive, and can’t be observed in every kitchen. Draft II:
“Upward-churning materials from the Earth’s molten core release heat into deep ocean currents which then circulate, like the boiler in a central-heating system, which circulates water in specific ways to heat an entire house.
We know this because the oceans are heating up far too unevenly for this to be the result of atmospheric warming.
Also, scientists have observed that the oceans get hotter before atmospheric CO2 increases…”
I wonder if we’ll find a way to harness the warmed water flows? Big underwater turbines, hydraulic anchors, robotic workers… it would be a fantastic setting for science fiction as well (something which could also help spread the concept around perhaps?).
Zan,
Of course, ‘exothermic’ and ‘hotter’ are two different things. The core is not getting hotter. But I think you already would agree with that.
Not (for the most part) ‘upward churning material’, rather upward kinetic release of exothermic heat. The material does not move that fast. These would be heat plumes as opposed to material plumes (except within 100 km of the H-layer, which are actual material flows…)
Yes, there is a way to harness these faster currents in the ocean to produce electricity. I did a strategy for a company with such deep water ‘turbines’. Line loss and sealife impact were the biggest challenge.
Great points!
Your time replying is much appreciated, thank you. I’ll ponder the similes some more.
Underwater turbines: putting sealife aside for a moment, avoiding line loss would call for using the power on-site (or as close as possible) and then returning the almost-completed products to the surface, but it seems the big consumers are all too much of a pollution risk (manufacturing chemicals/processing metals) if automated, and/or far too complex and multi-layered to happen under those conditions.
Or, we could branch into a steampunk timeline, abandon generating more than a small amount of electricity at the hypothetical turbine site itself, and instead use simpler paddle-wheel forms to mechanically wind arrays of gigantic re-usable barrel-cased springs, which are locked magnetically and returned to the surface using passive flotation, captured, sailed to port, and then release their energy in a controlled way like the mainspring of a clock, only in this case to drive gears propelling a rotor which generates electricity on land. Unlike batteries, barrel springs don’t require complex chemicals, and extrapolating from clocks and wristwatches, they seem to have a far longer lifespan.
But… even assuming the winding process was viable, and the cycle of sinking, surfacing, and capturing the barrels relied heavily on sail-power and water-ballasts, the up-front investment of energy and materials would be substantial, verging on impossible. Clockwork power stations would be heckin’ cool though!
You might be interested in this, the snake cult of consciousness. Posits consciousness arrived via psychadelic snake bite. Lots of similar notes to what you’re talking about.
https://vectors.substack.com/p/the-snake-cult-of-consciousness
Also, check out this mammoth ivory carving from 20kya. Could it have an astronomical purpose? Maybe you line up the serpents and if the moon is in it there is some significance? Pure speculation.
https://donsmaps.com/images24/maltahermitageplateback.jpg
more info here:
https://donsmaps.com/malta.html
Interesting article, nice to see some quantitative analysis of this issue.
One aspect that does not seem to have been accounted for is the thermal efficiency of the heat engine. While 33.7 kwh is indeed the thermal energy release of burning gasoline, only about a third of that, ~11 kwh can be converted to work (exergy), be it mechanical or electrical. The thermal to work conversion is more efficient at a power plant where higher combustion temperature and more efficient turbines are available compared to the ICE.
While line loss and battery efficiency do indeed extract a heavy toll, the 1 kwh electricity with which the conversation chain begins with for the electric motor is pure exergy. The 1 kwh of gasoline energy has not yet emitted its waste heat.
A very savvy point Doug, however I disagree as to the gross kinetic differential.
In the combustion to steam plants I have spec’d for development, gross cycle thermal efficiency ranges from 45 to 55% of total kinetic release (depending upon design of the steam cycle). The advantage is attained though economies of scale in terms of kWh per ton of fuel. Smaller plants perform poorly on electricity economics of scale, and are therefore hard to sell to municipalities or corporations as a result (I have tried a lot!)
Because the combustion in an internal combustion engine is contained, and used in a direct-mechanical effect, instead of requiring superheated steam capture and handling through a steam drum through to an indirect turbine intake, internal combustion attains competitiveness with the economy of scale achievable by a power plant, i.e. around ~50 – 55% as well.
Why do you think that China put large swathes of the country back into ruthless lockdowns in 2022, is they had nationwide immunity?
They are on their second round. How do you think the current four Human Coronaviruses have survived to give everyone the cold every 2 to 3 years? They mutate, adapt to our antibodies, and our antibodies fade – and we have to do it all over again. This is an ACAN problem, and requires more than linear thinking. Covid will return to us as well, just hopefully mutated heavily and a lot less dangerous.
TES
Thank you for your reply. That was already my thinking, but just wanted to see if you agreed.
It also seems to me that this will be their justification for continual annual covid vaccines to earn them a lot more money.
In a timeless infinite space even the most improbable occurrence will happen an infinite “amount”. And when it does we will be here to wonder why.
This is what I call an Appeal to Plenitude (Infinity)
This is indistinguishable from an Appeal to God in terms of soundness in argument. Both are infinity appeals.
TES
I agree It’s an idea without proof but, I am using binary logic applied to something that is known and existing. The idea of God on the other hand is a human construct. I would disagree that it’s indistinguishable from an appeal to God in the sense that there are logical outcomes that can be realized from this thought process when applied to definitive things.
I understand what you are saying. I held the same construct for decades. I will rephrase… Forget the term ‘God’ as it has no meaning and shifts the discussion into a rhetorical dead end. Both space-time and person-hood exist, as we have observed (pretty incredible in themselves actually – but set that aside).
– Infinity of space-time/probability (observed)
– Infinity of person-hood (observer)
are the same claim, from the standpoint of skepticism. Neither should be used as an appeal to plenitude. Except that there is argument that the former, comes as an action on the part of the latter (Wheeler’s Choice Experiment). So, which indeed is more likely?
TES
Thanks very interesting. You got me going on that darn two-slit experiment again – lol! Fascinating stuff. Also, just want to mention I really appreciate the work you are doing on Twitter with regard to the devastating impact of this so-called “vaccine”. I follow your Twitter every day to keep on top of what you are finding out. Thanks again!
Much appreciated Don :-)
Additional tidbits on info that fit very well, that currently remain mysteries to mainstream science.
A) Glaciers melt from below more than current models can explain.
B) Unexplained increase of helium-3 isotope in atmosphere, increases at same rate as helium-4, suggesting the current explanation (fossil fuel use) is flawed as it can only explain he-4 increase. He-3 release is associated with (nuclear decay and being stuck in crust, lava) and is released with volcanic, seismic etc. crust/mantle activity, suggesting variability and upward trend in those.
C) According to USGC data over 100 years, mag7 or larger earthquakes are on the rise.
Good stuff Doeg, will look into that… thanks!
TES
Wow, ES, excellent article. I’ve been following on twitter for a while, but just starting to browse your website now.
The amount of information you’ve packed into this piece is nothing short of incredible. I’m unfortunately not yet knowledgeable about some of what you’ve written about, especially that which pertains to the earth’s interior. But it’s very interesting, and I’ve been able to find helpful articles explaining many of the terms you mentioned. Who knew there was such a thing as an H-layer?
Do you have any recommendations for where to find information about liquid-HCP iron? I’ve been trying to get a better grasp on the connection between earth’s interior and earth’s magnetic field, but have not yet come across anything for liquid-HCP. Perhaps I’m just searching in the wrong places.
The analogy to money laundering is absolutely genius.
One (provided the person has a functioning brain) cannot fail to recognize what has been happening during the last few years. And once again, the “conspiracy theory” is slowly emerging as not so wrong after all – but so many will be on the beach, earning twenty percent, that it won’t matter too much … and the madness continues.
Any recommendations to prevent this in children?
Also, we eat only organic foods that existed at least 200 years ago. (Hard work and not cheap either) But we crave like properly wortless humans any time we leave the house, go near a restaurant or near a well meaning friend/family kitchen…
I see how each successive generation shows this obesity earlier and earlier in life… and is far heavier then the parents at same age… an ugly scary vortex.
and it’s either a lifetime of being sicker them parents, and more feeling ugly and even more powerless? but we have to break this death cycle. Else humanity ends. How do we stop passing it on? What is the behavior that is causing it? As a separate question, why don’t you just come out nice and clear hit you between the eyes and say so? I didn’t know you had a blog, so this is first longer then a tweet article i see from you. What is the original cause of the organ damage that then causes the obesity? Not so much even to find the culprit, but so that TODAY I can implement things my kids might hate, but not as much as lifetime of fighting obesity and all else it bestows. Especially this particular worthlessness you speak of. Thanks for this article. Looking forward to more on these subjects. Especially while possibly we can do things to avoid passing it onto progeny?
My third child has encephalitis from vaccine injury. We learned early on that we had to modify his diet, and avoid Wheat, Dairy, Soy, Seed Oils. This has left his pancreas in great shape. He eats over twice as much as anyone in the family, yet stays rail thin like a person in the 1950’s.
What is causing this? Four things:
1. Vaccine induced autoimmunity, in which antibodies attack the thyroid, pituitary, pancreas. They begin to die progressively through life in about that order. The liver dies that entire time as well – through NAFLD death – and inability to release its fat for blood glucose.
2. Glyphosate dilution of nutrient content in our grain based foods (~15 – 45% less nutrient per caloric mass)
3. Glyphosate alteration and killing off of the human gut microbiome
4. An overdose of soy and seed oils in our daily diet.
It’s that simple.
TES
If you live far from the equator it’s wise to limit deuterium-rich fruits and veggies, particularly in the winter. I eat no plant material in the winter and have perfect bloodwork. Summers I eat a ton of organic veggies/fruit. Deuterium inhibits mitochondrial function. A banana in december at a latitude of 30 degrees or higher is a very bad idea.
Also, does regular fasting – I mean regular fasting in excess of 20hrs per day (perhaps alternate day fasting or regular 72hr fasts, or other such long fasting regimens) – help to heal the injured pancreas, or is the damage permanent?
How does one know if the pancreas is releasing glucagon when fasting?
Aspen,
As far as I understand, once an endocrine organ (other than the liver) had been damaged, there is no way to recover the lost function.
For me, as per my best observations, (aside from a blood test) if you fast 16 – 20 hours per day and after the third day of doing so, you (still) feel enormous anxiety, tremors, brain fog, energy loss, and hunger near the latter part of each day’s fast, then you are not getting Glucagon output from the pancreas. In other words, the liver and fat cells are not releasing glucose into the blood to feed the brain and energy centers. One is ‘starved fat’ under this circumstance – and can only function with the direct intervention of food with carbs/glucose in it. Hence the carb-cravings which heavier people get.
TES
Isn’t this where the newly approved Mounjaro comes in? It’s a GLP-1 agonist. It’s for diabetics, but is also being prescribed for PCOS. Because it has been so successful with weight loss as a secondary effect, there are now clinical trials for weight loss.
However, my cynical self expects that if Mou jaro is approved for weight loss, it won’t be long before it’s yanked from the market due to potentially fatal side effects, much like fenfluramine (Fen-phen), Merida, Belviq, and others.
I suppose the big question beyond side effects, is what happens when a person loses a substantial amount of weight on Mounjaro and then stops taking it….
One needs Glucagon for life, so I suspect there is no coming off of it. Much like thyroid hormone for the hypothyroid.
But I suspect, since one is missing this hormone from their life, they are already suffering ‘side-effects’ of not having it. A bit different context than supplemental hormone or chemical alterations, which do often bear side effects.
TES
On the subject of “feigned disinterest” I am reminded of a Bill Hicks quip: “No longer relevant? Oh, ok. Just don’t bring up Jesus to me.”
Great article. I’m off now to discover what a “Pollyanna” is…
Great Work!
Moon base, Mars Colony, Mining the asteroid belt, and travel to the stars. All these things will come to pass. And after they pass, an even more remarkable & abundant life will be gained by mankind…
Now, Phil was a mechanical engineer I hired in Atlanta back in 1981 for a USACE design project. After many conversations, Phil told me that he had observed a UFO while vacationing with his family on the beach in the Florida panhandle. Consequently, Phil had studied the subject thoroughly & Phil had compiled a notebook of ~100 sketches & pictures of UFOs throughout history.
Now, I had worked on an MHD generator in grad school. The energy required by our electromagnet was significant. The total overall process power obtained by our MHD generator was only ~10%. I was familiar with the process.
I observed what I determined were ‘plasma ducts’ in several of the more detailed sketches. The geometry of the engine solves the EM magnet problem. <—A stationary [+/-] charge induces an electrostatic field. And, a moving [+/-] charge induces a magnetic field around itself.
(No need for fusion power to boil water to turn a steam turbine/generator)—> Electrical power is produced directly from the hot ‘pulsing’ plasma streams.
(No need for a fusion power furnace operating at billions of degrees, or even a nuclear power furnace operating at hundreds of millions degrees to produce a plasma ‘fuel’ for energy and propulsion)—> An Electric furnace could be developed to operate at 100,000 to 300,000 degs F. maximum required for the MHD generator … #Revelation9
Now, Potassium (K) is the optimum fuel … But looks like any material could be used for the fuel .. even you! We are all made of atoms, complete with electrons!
Science and Religion Unified
No polling required…
whiterobe
Obviously, this multidisciplinary approach is what is needed. Note that despite censorship, (something you should be familiar with), it has long been known that CO2 follows temperature, rather than leads it. Similarly, while the Earth’s atmosphere’s temperature record has been tampered with (“corrected”) by the Warmunists, they cannot tamper with every aspect of the climate (snowfall, snow coverage, tree lines, newspaper articles, etc.) as easy as they can tamper with temperature time series, so large discrepancies now exist between the approved temperature records and newspaper coverage at the time where the data was changed to cool the past far below what the actual people alive at the time reported (usually breathlessly in headlines). “Global” warming can’t cause Antarctica to warm 75 degrees in one season, as you point out, so that entire theory must be rejected as a whole, because as you also point out, while science is divided into disciplines, nature is not. All of the natural phenomena are connected to one another, and you can’t start artificially dividing parts of nature off from other parts without doing damage. Scientists know this, which is why you can detect that the climate change brigade are not in fact scientists but propagandists. Anyway, thanks for a truly integrative and multidisciplinary hypothesis. Just don’t give these climate czars any credit they don’t deserve.
I reject the premise that there is such a thing as “SARS-CoV-2. I am no more-nor-less an expert in this field than anyone here. A virus that mutates every 10 days or so being a danger to the worlds population is ridiculous. I’m going back to rubbing blue mud in my navel and shaking bones at the moon.
Are you able to predict the timing of part 3 of this series, or did I somehow miss it?
I’ve been reading your charts involving excess mortality with MRNA. Developing a bit of a dilemma and an existential crisis after getting COVID a second time. What are your thoughts on Novavax? Do you believe it’s just as dangerous as the Moderna or Pfizer?
Stephanie Seneff has done a lot of research on glyphosate. At this point, I think it’s a widespread health catastrophe that no one seems to want to address.
“Useful Idiot” has been a popular career choice in recent decades, and you make it clear why, the diffusion of blame. Justin Trudeau always means so well… He is so useful as just the right kind of narcissistic “idiot”. He can be flattered, and his inputs filtered, and his needs and desires met, and he can remain “useful”, until he needs to be thrown (lightly) under the bus, or the system crashes.
“suffering anosognosia and involuntary servitude inside this mythological play, being instructed/deceived by a serpent indeed?“
It is always a treat, your new posts on this blog of yours. I like the sophistication of your expressing yourself. I am by no means familiar with all the words you use (but luckily there are translators that help).
That being said and to point my thought at a quote I took from you. The level of your confidence concerning the understanding and intelligence of your mind always blows me away.
You see, I know there is a quote from a famous philosopher that one truly knows when one knows he doesn’t know much. Don’t know who said that and I am sure these are not the exact words, still.
To know ones self limits is kind of a wisdom.
Saying that those two mythological people were anosognisoastic and involuntary servitudinal is like saying you are free from breathing oxygen or imune to gravity.
How about that?
I bought the story at face value at one time in my life – because I was told I had to. I no longer buy it as spun. There are other views on the matter:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/08/14/the-awesome-insistence-of-cataclysmic-mirage-theory-cmt/
No longer 12 years old – I know the heart of lies, evil, and men much better. I would venture to say, much better than those who venerated and canonized the scripture as it is enforced. They did not possess the experience or knowledge base we hold today. As well, I am wise enough to know more often when I have been lied to – and am less afraid to call out the lie. That is the beginning of wisdom, not starting from complete ignorance.
Finally, I am not a follower of Mithraism. The surviving ‘truth’, is rarely ever the truth.
“You see what you want to see, and you hear what you want to hear”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnsgEKJX-fk
That being said, it looks kind of like a spirochete to me, but I’m a doctor.
I remember that video from decades ago!
Beautiful article thank you. I would only add that “argument” predates Corona. I haven’t found anybody to ‘argue with’ for nearly 3 years. Still today old friends, family, colleagues acquaintances and friends, neighbours and locals one has known for years: none of them seems prepared to hold an opinion on anything anymore.
How do we cope with this silence?
The straw man, the gaslighting, the feigned ignorance, then the feigned outrage…we were all used to that.
But silence…?
Interesting point.
mostly milk
When I was a boy, my grand Father whispered wisdoms to me. One lesson was awe of the night sky. Polaris. Dippers. And the shining one. I lost the shining one for many years in Atlanta light pollution. On a family beach trip to Bon Secour on Fort Morgan, we beheld the smoky milky shining one. For 2 years I pursued her glory again. Old Ti3 clicking and sputtering. Then, with a borrowed Ti7 and a fisheye view, I found the shining one again. New moon of June 2021, Lake Burton GA. Frogs and owls calling, we 6 lay on the old wooden dock absorbing the grandeur, dazzled by 4 shooting stars. Nacash shone brightly upon us. And we shone back. A speck within a speck inside the twists of the creator.
There is a mention of Brass Serpent in the OT. The curious part is, the name ‘Nehustan’ has a close resemblance to King Nahusa of Hinduism who had become a Serpent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehushtan
And King Nahusa – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahusha
Quite an article and quite a refreshing change. Thanks. Data not dogma for a change.
Note that just because a large part of the recent temperature rise is subsurface doesn’t necessarily mean that this temperature rise has not been driven by human activity. It is my hypothe-guess that subterranean microbial life vastly outnumbers surface life and exists much, much deeper than currently accepted biogeological dogma insists. To me, geological life is primarily a response to the activity of the subterranean microbial life that drives Gaia. And what Gaia eats is primarily whatever she subducts from the ocean floor.
It wouldn’t surprise me if Gaia is not responding with perfect equanimity to the recent human induced change in her diet.
Interesting Kelly… will keep this in mind. Very astute.
is it connected that the serpent in the hebrew bible is nachash- the shining one, similar to phaeton-the radiating one
I believe it is distinctly possible, that Nachash, ‘the shining one’, is the Milky Way Galaxy band in the sky. It looks just like a snake, skin and all. The fact that those who built Karahan Tepe in Anatolia, revered a snake on the upper joists of one of their chambers, indicates the importance they had for this icon representing space, or even/especially those who come from there – in contrast to those who have been embargoed on Earth for a very long time, and have been abusing the inhabitants therein, posing as God/Gods.
Concerned Citizen
Your logic, common sense and reasoning explain the past 3 years and you’ve delved into the future based on your investigations. Agreed by October ’23 we will have increased morbidity due to the vaccine.
Overlooked is what comes next is yet to be put forth by the virus. To date, the virus has outcompeted the host will infectiousness. With ‘immune imprinting’ or sometimes referred as original antigenic sin increasing, yes, we will see more deaths. This ‘triggers’ all causes.
Only ‘hurdle’ left for the virus now is Virulence. Biologically, the equilibrium between host and virus is ‘out of balance thanks to mass vaccination with a ‘leaky’ vaccine being administered in the middle of a pandemic. .
Since the host will not take measures (anti-virals) to stop the pandemic, the virus will thru herd immunity by eliminating first ‘the low hanging fruit’ and more until the numbers of the host are low enough to bring about herd immunity.
What very few realize, the extent of what the virus will do to bring about equilibrium will be way beyond your projections. With no vaccinal antibodies coupled by weakened immune systems we (the host) will have opened the flood gates for the virus to breach all levees.
Good to see your ‘medicine cabinet’ closely matches mine…
is the vatican looking for asteroids/meteorites with its observatories in castel gandolfo and arizona?
No, that is not the best way to find such interlopers. NASA’s NEO Observations Program does that. They use the differential between several telescopes and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer satellite, in order to locate smaller bodies within the solar system.
Not privy to what those observatories are actually looking for…
On the Exhibit A chart, what does NCHS stand for? (Non-COVID ??).
And just my personal experience with the charts: To a first-time viewer, Chart A is too busy with notations that distract from the trend illustrated. Also, to someone who is NOT trained in the terminology of those notes, the charts deter a person from studying them. I say this as a pretty smart person, who is NOT a next-level genius such as yourself. Less busy charts that really blast your eyes with the trend you are trying to illustrate would reach a larger audience, I think.
I have too many notations that distract from the illustration, yet I must expand what ‘NCHS’ means? So, which is it – explain every artifact, or make the chart ‘un-busy’? I cannot do both.
You do realize that most of these annotations came directly as a result of people complaining it did not have enough annotations (a first for the NCHS though)… I am happy with the charts.
Oh, I absolutely understand the necessity and thoroughness of the notations. And I certainly appreciate that detail. What I see, though, is that “NCNCM” is easy to figure out from the title of the chart, but then I see “NCHS”, and I can’t figure out what the “HS” part stands for.
Also, I am suggesting that maybe the notes could be placed somehow below the main visual, so that the curves would really occupy the primary focus. When I make charts, I’m always torn with how to make them absolutely clear visually. I played at being a visual “arteest” for over a decade, and so I tend to obsess on this a bit at times.
Sorry, but I really do not know what the “HS” stands for in this context. Selective idiocy? (^_^)
I really appreciate your efforts, be assured.
National Center for Health Statistics – they are the central data repository for all work conducted by the NIH and CDC.
Interesting. This idea of “racism” or discrimination” is the perpetual “sin” that is constantly held over the heads of successful, mostly white, Americans by the progressive left, for the principle purpose of extracting (or attempting to extract) tribute in various forms. Φυκ them all.
Great stuff. Now I see it everywhere. See this mosaic of the twelve tribes of Isreal. Issachar is the one with the moon and the stars.
Also for that matter, the coat of arms for Balthazar of Tarsus (one of three magi) is a crescent moon and star.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_and_crescent#/media/File:Wernigeroder_Wappenbuch_021.jpg
Kailer,
Awesome! I hope you take it as a head nod in your credit, if I use the Balthazar shield in an update of the article.
Thank you!
TES
You allluded to this a bit, but I’m curious if big picture when the sloughing cycle becomes exausted and the core snaps back, if these are more or less the Dangaard-Oeschger events during the ice ages of the last 400,000 years. Although the modern Holocene appears to be anamolous to that pattern, and we’ve seen a long period of relative stability, perhaps we are due again for a long spell of cold. On that note, a lot of evidence does suggest a cataclysmic event at the end of the Younger Dryas, so maybe that threw the normal DO cycles off – or at least delayed them for some thousands of years….
Good article but I found the Latin phrase “quod fieri” to be odd.
In better latin I would recommend “ut aliquid fiat”, which seems to have been in limited circulation in medical usage according to a google search.
Or “ad quid faciendum”, my personal invention.
Phallidus,
Thanks! I am always open to better neologisms, and of course at times the official name of a principle of philosophy to replace my temporary name – if discovered. I did look at a number of Latin word-couplets for this… (not really a phrase, per se)
ut aliquid fiat – ‘to make something happen’ – implies (at least in the Western idiom) ‘personal agency and effectiveness’, whereas this of course does not include the context of one person, nor especially being effective, in fact its antithesis.
ad quid faciendum – ‘what to do’ – implies ‘that which is to be done’ – and carries an abductive mantle of correct action or recipe, which of course is also antithetical to the point.
I chose a semi-absurd set of words for this reason. (lit.) ‘the fact that now something is to be done’ – fits the context perfectly.
But, love the input! Very good stuff.
EVG
TES
there is another stone relief with a lion and 4 stars in turkey. Found in old city of Sma’al /Zincirli…and the lion gate in mycenae has a pillar with 4 circles on top…and the lions gate in jerusalem has circular reliefs that could possibly represent planets..and the symbolism of the ball under the lions paw is found in many places in china…i’m going to see if i can find the constellation involved with this alignment at each 1563 year interval
This is an extraordinary interesting post you have here. It ties into something I read long ago. A guy named Robert W. Felix wrote two books “Not by Fire but by Ice” and “Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps”. He tied Ice Ages to magnetic excursions and magnetic pole flips. Apparently during magnetic excursions, like we seem to be having now, the volcanos on earth start super active behavior, wiping out large amounts of the biosphere. There also appears to be very large electrical activity, like supercharged lightning. Here’s a post from his “former” blog, he has passed on, talking about this with a graph of ice ages related to magnetic excursions or pole flips. His books are well worth reading. If you were only going to read one, “Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps” was his later and would be better.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210319182414/https://www.evolutionaryleaps.com/2021/03/new-study-warns-magnetic-catastrophe-that-wiped-out-the-neanderthals-is-due-to-hit-again/
His books are great and have lots data but he did not know why this happens. Look at some of his blog on the Internet archive, he has all sorts of post and data on exactly what you seem to be talking about.
I have wondered if this is not tied to the Sun’s cycles. I have what may be a super silly hypothesis about Sun cycles based on an observation by a guy who religiously watches images from the satellites they have near the Sun. He noticed that there were large structures that appeared to be mountains on the Sun’s surface that lasted for more than one revolution, and he also postulated that the Sun’s higher temperature in the outer corona was due to large electric arcs. So I, taking this a little further, speculate that these “structures” or mountains of matter of heavier elements that are sponge like. Filled with hydrogen and heated, they rise to the top and create a sort of slag that keeps electrical charges from equalizing through sunspot flare currents. Over time this slag builds up causing sunspots which, being large electrical insulators like ceramics, stop the equalizing charges that we see as solar flares. This reduces the effective radiation of the Sun, lowers earth temperatures, and also lowers the magnetic field effects influencing earth from the Sun. We know these exist. Magnetic portals they call them. Anyways over time this causes ice ages. Then when the static charges build up enough electric arcs blow through the slag on the Sun and cause huge solar flares. Really big and in some cases the earth gets scorched by these. Lots of evidence for scorching in North America. The layer of black soot, the black matte, appeared the same time most all the large animals died.
Now I’m really going to stick my neck out here, so don’t laugh. We know there are very high electrostatic charges in the Earth’s atmosphere. There’s 400KV in between the ground and the top of clouds. There’s a group of people with a theory called “The Electric Universe” that say there are also very large electrostatic voltage differences in the solar system, galaxies, etc. So let’s expand on that idea by saying the Sun grows slag over time. Reducing the electrostatic charges, being equalized. This means the Sun would charge up like a huge capacitor, increasing the solar system’s electric charge. Now, the Earth moving through this larger field would create more current internally. Heating it up and causing volcanism until it restabilized it’s charges to the new electrostatic charge field of the more charged Sun. Yeah, I know. A bit contrived but not unlogical.
An even further out idea. When these super flares occur blasting off the huge built-up charge, this may be one of the ways that heavier elements are made and distributed into the solar system. Fusing elements in the slag and blowing them off the Sun.
Now all of this may be wrong, but it’s some ideas to think about and maybe something will come along to clear it up. My apologies for the length, but you’re the only one I’ve seen other than Robert W. Felix to talk about the earth heating up like this.
I found the link to your post here
https://www.rintrah.nl/the-revelation-of-john-a-warning-for-future-generations/
Interesting ideas! I’m thinking out loud, but if heavy element slag built up in random spots on the sun, the capacitance would built up in isolated spots. I’m wondering how the total net capacitance would increase if it’s in random pockets, and also how far the electric field would extend out from the Sun. Surely, there’s an equation for voltage magnitude vs distance. But, if changing static electrical effects do reach Earth (not just magnetic lines), it seems like it could induce eddy currents – which considering the size of the Earth, would be considerable. The whole process, the sloughing and core snapping back, could indeed by mostly tied to the Sun.
what constellation would this alignment have appeared in in 1565BC?
I found your magi from “the east” (Anatolia) very compelling. Also that they saw “His star” in the east. Matthew (and archaeology) tells us exactly where they came from. I can’t believe I never knew this before. Thank-you.
What is the defense from this form of social-cohesion assault by “thought leaders”?
“In the last days (a recurring condition) will come many false teachers, leading astray those who know not God.”
“God is Love”, so “knowable” for most people.
Inwardly seeking the way of love is a manifestation of wisdom, and opens a portal to divine-guidance in a person.
“Love” would guide people to safety, if allowed to.
Mechanisms of mRNA “vaccine” immune suppression in infection and cancer covered here:
https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/pfizer-aids-covid-and-cancer
Don’t get more of these shots, please.
Military management of the COVID-pandemic is detailed here:
https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/pandemic-martial-law
Have no illusions about being protected by the FDA under these arrangements.
In this evil age, it’s easier to get away with killing a million than with killing one, because one person is visible but a million people can be obscured in deliberately obfuscated statistics. I thank God for you and others who have labored so effectively to uncover what is being obscured.
A reckoning will come in this world and/or the next. I’ve not lost hope for either.
By the same token that big pharma says you cannot prove any deaths from mRNA gene altering injections, please show me one exact, verified, evidence based covid death.
In a similar vein, show ME one exact, verified, evidence-based vaccine-prevented death or hospitalization.
could your #12 be the planet which disintegrated to become the asteroid belt?
what if the planet phaeton became the asteroid belt in 1500bc or even 3000bc and the magi were waiting for the same alignment…and the astronomer who named the ex-planet 200 years ago knew more about ancient history than he let on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1561_celestial_phenomenon_over_Nuremberg and nuremburg has a chariot sculpture.is this the chariot of zeus which phaeton went joyriding in?..horses arent red but one of the four horses in revelation is red like the planet mars,perhaps this refers to this planetary alignment as well
what if the pyramids at giza do not represent the belt stars of orion(surely you would add betelgueuse and rigel), but really represent mars and mercury and jupiter?and it is another representation of this curious confluence.could amun(the hidden one) be phaeton
Hello TES, thank you for this most intriguing essay (and all the others – your writing is so very interesting). I had no idea what the topic was when I started reading, but by the end my heart was in full song.
I’ve noted previously in your “Our Story” section that you refer to yourself as an ‘ignostic atheist’. If I may I ask a personal question — has what you’ve learned in this particular investigation shifted that stance at all?
Kindest regards,
Sophie
Sophie,
I am glad that you liked the article. It was written to filter out the impatient and dogmatic – you passed the test, and got to the reward at the end. Which segues into what is an ignostic.
The article actually fits with ignosticism very well (and with gnosticism, for that matter). It just does not lend support to traditional religious monotheism – which I reject.
For a bit of an insight, see my article here: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/05/30/ignosticism/
And this one: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2020/03/08/post-stockholm-syndrome/
EVG
TES
Very interesting and we see again occult symbology being used just as it was used during WWII. Interesting that they are associating their rise with the coming of the ‘Final King’ while their logo also contains the 666 symbol.
‘The constellation of the Great One (or Final King) who is to come’.
The priesthood described here, could the Nazi leadership or the Khazarian elite be descended from them? If it took so long to deduce this that it must have been a part of someone’s heritage to use it.
Could Star 12 be a person and this be a birth date. The crescent moon does look a bit like a cradle. Will this alignment reappear ?
Excellent piece but…. there’s always a but:
The detailed analysis appears to take no account of the biblical narrative, except at the end where it mentions the ‘wise men’ almost as an afterthought.
Those imbued with biblical understanding will know the following Facts:
The Prophet Daniel, one of the chosen people captured when King Nebuchadnezzar sacked Jerusalem, was taken to Babylon (587BC), and became immensely wealthy. He gained the King’s trust and was given a position of power, second only to the king, in the greatest Empire of it’s time (homework for you – read the Book of Daniel).
He also saved the lives of all the Kings ‘wise men’ (sorcerers et al) and therefore became the pre-eminent wise man. When you really understand the Process of History, you begin to understand that this was all Yahweh’s plan. Since he was an eunuch, Daniel left his immense wealth to the Magi – with instructions to look to the stars and observe the rotations of Melchizedek (Jupiter) 7 x 70 rotations – why? Because Daniel had favoured status with Yahweh, he was instructed to set up the Magi to look for the configuration of stars in Leo and Virgo that would prefigure the coming of the Messiah – around 2BCE…! So well done for getting the date right!
The Magi – there were likely more than three delivered the gifts to Jesus which would then fund his missionary year (the gold was useful for their escape to Egypt for instance).
It also explains why the site mentioned was abandoned thereafter – because their job was done. Read the Magi story – Bethlehem star et al. The Magi turn up with Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh – for Jesus. And they are warned to return another way without seeing Herod – who wanted to kill the Messiah, and tried to shortly thereafter.
Michael Rood’s Book “The Chronological Gospels” explains how there were in fact 7 star signs during the birth of Jesus period starting in Aug 3 BCE(or -2 depending on your scale).
The 7th Conjunction is 13 Oct 2BCE. All of them involve the constellation Leo, Virgo and the Wandering Stars (they’re really not planets – sorry – the Heliocentric Model is simply a Jesuit Lie).
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NNBo_y_fjOF3wwi-VsCOcCNUeFqFINs
Which gets us to Biblical Astronomy (not the Satanic equivalent Astrology). The old wise men knew all about the the Signs in the stars (Genesis 1:14) but most have forgotten this knowledge and interpret it as Pagan rather that God-given – you piece wanders in that direction with all the follow up 666 symbology – which is in effect Satan usurping God’s messages – again.
Here’s the kicker for you: Revelation Chapter 12 verses 1-2 “The woman in Labour” or “Sign of the Son of Man”. Referenced all over the Old Testament and mentioned by Jesus in Matthew Ch 24 v30 as one of the signs to look out for in End Times…
Rev 12:1-2
“A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. 2 She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth”.
Matt 24:30
30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.
So Virgo, The Virgin, has a crown of 12 stars. Leo the Lion is above her in the Stars – and it has 9… so we need 3 more (wandering stars) – Mercury Venus and Mars. We also need the moon beneath her feet, clothed with the Sun. And she is giving birth t0 the King (Jupiter).
When did this configuration occur (it’s a once in 7000 year event)…. 23rd September 2017 – and people were looking for it.
Melissa RedPilltheWorld talks about it…
https://freedomforce.live/aiovg_videos/star-loops/
Planets are all aligned currently – as at end 2022 – as they were for 24 June 2022, when Roe v Wade was struck down and Q started posting again – all connected, all biblical…
Dominic-John,
Thanks for the expository and encouraging words! Can you give me more background on the quote below:
Yes, Jupiter is the cypher index to this alignment. However, I do not see astrology as Satanic. Only the abuse of the alignment and symbology itself. Whatever is good in this realm, evil will kill it, and then wear its skin as a costume. That is the nature of what we are to suffer.
Thanks for the help and insights as well!
EVG
TES
The WEF’s O’s with the lines also look suspicious like 3 numbers. 👀
It all sounds crazy, but now I can’t unsee the 666. To complete the wild theory , is it possible that the WEF logo is also a date?
Fascinating! Could this also be why the lion pops up so much in medieval European stories and art? Is it why it’s the symbol of England (and why he was Richard the “lionheart”)? For a continent that has no lions, they came up so much in European Christian art. Arthurian stories have lions randomly walking around in the nebulous forest outside of Camelot.
Relatedly, have you watched the Ancient Apocalypse series and/or are familiar with Graham Hancock’s work and, if so, what did you think of its assertions: 1) plausible / reasonable chance of prehistoric civilization; 2) cosmic hellfire reset; 3) legendary personages restart civilizations; 4) orthodox historians / archeologists contemptuously dismiss all the above.
I didn’t find the claims to be preposterous and the couple of articles I read on the interwebs warning people off from the show were so thin on content but so loud on headline that it only lent credence to the show.
A couple of overlapping ideas from your work echoed throughout the program (e.g. there was pretty special knowledge held by ancient people; the establishment’s boorish behavior).
Incredible Christmas Eve coincidence to share with y’all. I both printed out this article and watched “High Plains Drifter” for the first time yesterday — completely independently! I never had heard of the movie. I hadn’t read the article yet. I just hit play on Netflix for a little Christmas Eve cheer (?!) and then Christmas morning I pick up TES’ work and there it is, “Then you just live with it.”
Well done.
EVG
TES
Interesting, found on the internet:
Dr. Ernest Martin on page 66 of his book “The Star That Astonished the World”
Planetary conjunctions of May 19, 3 B.C. to December 25, 2 B.C.
Date Conjunction
May 19, 3 BC Mercury-Saturn
June 12, 3 BC Venus-Saturn
August 12, 3 BC Venus-Jupiter
August 31, 3 BC Mercury-Venus
September 14, 3 BC Jupiter Regulus
February 17, 2 BC Jupiter Regulus
May 8, 2 BC Jupiter Regulus
June 17, 2 BC Jupiter-Venus
August 26, 2 BC Mars-Jupiter
December 25, 2 BC Jupiter over Bethlehem,
seen from Jerusalem
In this table of planetary conjunctions we see that many significant astrological events occurred within 18 months from May 3 BC. to December 2 B.C.
Thanks Cor!
Have do you make of Michael Heiser’s different date? https://youtu.be/KRtOETgR-R8
https://nakedbiblepodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/NB-138-Transcript.pdf
Samael could not resist the temptation to pirate the Moon and Crescent icon. So, he placed LOT of value in it.
Angels are creatures of habit and compunction. One trick ponies. They are not supposed to own domains of creation.
TES
7 million men between the ages of 25 and 54 out of the labor force:
https://www.yahoo.com/video/most-chilling-metric-mike-rowe-150000193.html#:~:text=While%20the%20U.S.%20labor%20market,They've%20punched%20out.
I’m 74 and I feel like these younger men. I had built up a business for retirement that I knew I could manage into my 80s. It provided about half the retirement income of my wife and me.
Then they ran the pandemic hoax and the lockdowns killed my business.
When my state reopened, I faced the decision about starting to rebuild at my age, knowing I’d have years without an income, and decided not to do it. I decided I’d rather go join a shoplifting crew in San Francisco or Chicago or NYC than contribute one more penny to The Party.
I have joined the strike of these 7 million men. I actively look to sabotage The Party any way I can.
This makes me so sad. I treated 1000s of patients who were told to go home and sleep it off. I had delta in August of 2021 and from my couch essentially worked an outpatient ICU. There were herbs, supplements, off-label medications, medications that all contributed to none of my patients dying from COViD. I had to defend my actions against my medical board and they found “no violation”. Providing care that does not follow the narrative is a potential violation while now it is ethical to send people home to die if they did not get vaccinated? What did they do for those who were vaccinated and still got it? Nothing. It’s just very sad.
According to Stellarium, the Daytime Sextantids appear at pretty close to this location. Does it seem possible that a related meteor might have appeared particularly bright here?
It is a very dirt-strewn approach from deeper space no doubt.
I doubt a meteor as they live only a matter of seconds at most – but maybe a residual planetesimal which we do not know about. The contention that it came to rest over the stable where the Christ Child was, introduces a whole ‘nuther set of conjecture though…
Not sure how to handle that.
TES
There was certainly a unique phenomenon that appeared that morning. I suppose conjecture about necessarily transient occurrences is pointless. At some point this is just the sort of thing you have to take on faith and every possibility just because an entertaining but unprovable hypothesis.
Thanks for the objectively verifiable work you’ve done. We may never know exactly what those ancient observers saw but the math certainly pans out in favor of a staggering but believable co-incidence. God bless you.
Fun fact the Hindu swastik (not to be confused with Hitlers Hakencruz) is based on the position of the big dipper
https://spiritualpunx.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/2014821the-big-dipper-a-swastika-perhaps-where-the-symbol-began-on-earth/
The moon crescent star thing is probably linked to Islam as “Allah” was the name of the moon god pre-Islam.
This was a fascinating read. I offer some more speculations.
In Daniel 5:11-12, Daniel is described as follows:”There is a man in your kingdom in whom is the spirit of the holy gods. In the days of your father, light and understanding and wisdom like the wisdom of the gods were found in him, and King Nebuchadnezzar, your father—your father the king—made him chief of the magicians, enchanters, Chaldeans, and astrologers, because an excellent spirit, knowledge, and understanding to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems were found in this Daniel…”So, we have an exile from Judah in Israel, who has been appointed chief of the Magi and astrologers in Babylon. Babylon is much further south than Nemrut Dag, but I wonder, could a prophecy from the Babylonian Magi have traveled North?What would the conjunction and star #12 have looked like from Babylon? Is it possible that remnants of Magi in Babylon could also have seen the star? (Babylon a shadow of its former self in 1 BC)How does one follow a star? If it rises in the east, do you follow it by traveling west? Is there a starting point which leads to Jerusalem or Bethlehem?
David,
The Wisdom absolutely did follow the Babylonian Uruk migrations to Paddan Aram (Abraham’s father and mother) and then further to Macedonia. Those three cultures, Persian, Babylonia, and Greek were the targets of the unifying philosophy of Antiochus I. Thus, the tradition was handed down through mystery schools over 4,000 years most likely.
There are two ways in which one ‘Follows a star’. The first is to know the patron star of a city (the star directly overhead that city at the First Point of Aries) – one simply sets a mark on the horizon in the direction of that star, observed at twilight, and keep heading in that direction until the patron star is at Zenith, and you are at your destination. A method celestial navigation by Zenith-timing.
The second way is if the star was something other than a star, a comet, planetesimal, or something which science does not understand – concerning the nature of our natural realm. I suspect there is much more going on in the cosmos than we are aware of, or which we are allowed to know about. Ignorance is power for someone key here…
EVG
TES
So, the next question must be: If you navigate by star #12, assuming its hypothetical position is fixed in the celestial sphere, do you end up in Bethlehem? Or at least somewhere in Judea?
We would need one more data point on the star’s movement to begin with that avenue of speculation. But even if that star moved to zenith over Judea, it would not be precise enough to highlight one cave, stable, or building in that region. So, it ends up being a useless or dead-end clue in that regard.
TES
If we trust the gospel of Matthew, the star did not initially provide a precise location. The magi went to Jerusalem and asked Herod where they might find the newly-born “King of the Jews”, having “seen his star in the east”. Herod then asked his priests and scribes who told him Bethlehem, based on prophecy.
Only after leaving Herod does Matthew say that the star “which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.”
I think it’s reasonable to read this report the same way one might read a newspaper article about a technical subject. The author almost certainly did not understand celestial navigation nor astronomy, and wrote down what he *thought* he heard.
Very astute set of observations. Deductive, assuming Matthew is accurate to a basic degree…
1. The Magi did not know how to go about resolving the ‘last mile’ of their journey.
2. Then suddenly, they did, but only after their meeting with Herod (and partly with his help).
Both these contexts serve to negate a celestial zenith principle here.
TES
If I might be so bold, it occurs to me that we may all be looking at this completely backwards. Based on your analysis, the magi did not know what conjunction they were looking for–if they did, they could have simply calculated the date (as you point out). The anomalous “star” gave them the timing, and simply had to be watched for. The actual information was conveyed by the planetary conjunction and its location in Leo.
A hypothesis: The star gave the timing of the birth, not the location. The constellation gave the lineage of the king. The symbol of the Tribe of Judah (Joseph’s lineage) was the Lion. Herod’s priests placed the birth of the new king in Bethlehem. The magi followed this information and tracked down a 2-year-old boy, born on a specific day, in a specific town, in a specific tribe.
Very good Neil. Let me cogitate on that a bit.
TES
What if the star wasn’t an actual star, but was a veiled way to track the anticipated arrival of a visitor or visitors? That unique alignment serves as a type of clock – a clock offering a predictable schedule around which events over centuries could be planned for and known about. And that amazing alignment itself begs questions about its original “creation” (is it random?) or at the very least identification (how/why was it identified in the first place?).
Correct. A possibility.
Also, did the priests purposely place the star inside the Moon’s crescent, precisely to show that this was not a distant object in the first place. Maybe it was not a mistake. They knew that the dark part of the Moon in the sky was not transparent.
In Vedic astrology, Rahu & Ketu are termed “planets” despite being notional forces, points in space, and are described and represented in the same ways as existing real planets, even with anthropomorphic bronze murtis which people can make offerings to in order to propitiate them, similar to statues of Brihaspati (Jupiter) and Shani (Saturn). A notional Lordly star which exists only when that specific alignment exists, placed carefully in the only point in space in which no star can be seen (assuming they also discounted short-lived comets) seems similar. Thank you for this fascinating essay.
After making an earlier reply about notional points in space, and with something nagging me about “green stars,” I searched green light Moon and may have found the origin of the star: Fox News, “Mysterious light flashes on the Moon have been baffling researchers for decades”
These “transient lunar phenomena” are not the same as the green flash on the edge of a setting Sun or full Moon, they’re squarely on the surface, and range from green through to red and white.
These have been observed for centuries, for example, quoting the Wikipedia page for Transient Lunar Phenomena:
And according to Professor Rayan Hakal, they sometimes last for hours.
Possibly there was a time when these flashes were appearing for prolonged periods of time, or were reliable during certain seasons, or were most visible when the Moon was in the early crescent stages. Or, they were simply told there’d be a very visible star-like point of light within the usually black disc of the crescent Moon at a specific time, by the same source/s which tipped them off to watch out for this configuration in the first place.
Interesting Kerys… I like the outside-the-box thinking…
TES
My dad has cancer he underwent chemo to no avail he was forced to get vaccine in order to be admitted into the hospital for robotic surgery 44 lymph nodes removed large mass from colon at Piedmont Atlanta Hospital the cancer is not gone the vaccine wad a means to am end and $$$$$ in the medical care industry pockets May Hebrews 10:30 be the demise of All involved
How are you going to give a 200 tonne payload at EML1 a delta V of 9 km/s? That would require something like a SpaceX SuperHeavy booster. That same booster could send hundreds of nukes at the target from the Earth’s surface.
And hundreds of nukes will do nothing but turn 1 Earth-killing bolide, into 25 Earth-killing bolides still moving along the same orbit.
To roll a marble off a mountain top at a speed fast enough to kill a man, only requires a very tiny push. L1 is a mountain top. It does not require gigantic rockets – as the Earth and Moon gravity offer the kinetic potentials.
Sir,
Lately I have been looking at data pulled from the following 2 CDC sites:
https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/muzy-jte6/rows.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD
https://data.cdc.gov/api/views/3yf8-kanr/rows.csv?accessType=DOWNLOAD
These 2 sites have MMWR data back to Jan 2014 for each week since then until early Nov. ( their posts take a couple of weeks to upload). for 12 categories of causes of death, there is number of deaths due to that cause for each week. I’m sure you’ve looked at the same data sets. Here’s what I did with the data:
1. from the above addresses I downloaded all data for the following categories:
all-cause natural-cause sept neoplasm diabetes alzheimers pneumo respiratory nephrosis abnormal heart cerebro
for each week beginning in 2014 thru now.
2. Using the data from 2014 to 2019, for each of the 52 weeks of each year I calclulated the average to get the estimate mean number of deaths per million population for each cause. Also the Std. Dev. for each week (based only on the 6 years available)
3 . For each week starting in 2014 calculate the Z-score using the mean and Std.Dev. from step 2. and the number of deaths in each category (above), scaled by the estimated population for that week. The Z-score gives an estimate of how unusual it is to see data far from the mean, measured in std. deviations. The Z-score is supposed to be a Gaussian statistic…
Once all that is done, plotting the data is easy… The most interesting plot is for the Z-score of the deaths due to ‘Heart’. The Z-score for death due to heart problems is nicely constraint from 2014 thru 2021. But beyond 2021, the Z-score increases to more than 100 (Std.Dev.) – if ever there was a signal, this would be it, IMHO.
I know that the may be a number of reasons why the Z-score is way out of range, but I feel it is showing something that needs an explanation. I’m hoping that someone with your skills might take a look. I admit that I may have made an error, so I don’t want to claim I have truth.
I can upload or email the data and/or the .png plots and even the raku (perl6) code I used to download and process the data if you are interested.
Note that this is not VAERS data, but MMWR ( Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) data from the CDC website.
Tom Morgan
Thanks Tom,
Yes, I use those files, plus the files in the Wonder database – and run two separate analyses by two separate methods, and then compare the results.
Heart Related Deaths can be seen in this file from the Wonder data as well. The rate of heart related deaths was high during Covid, but is even higher now – with Covid at 1/8th of its former magnitude. There is indeed a problem.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/DFT-Chart-No-Covid-Diseases-of-Heart-IXX-and-Uncertain-Related-Disorders-RXX.png
Make sure that you included the R00-R99 heart related deaths as well in your query. Those are not in the muzy-jte6 file data under ‘Heart Related’ and serve to artificially reduce the trend over the last 32 weeks.
EVG
TES
What happened tot he embedded Twitter feed on your webpage?
The Widget that produces it, kept malfunctioning. WordPress does not support many of its past theme pages including the last two I have elected to use – in favor of minimalist formats (tediously almost all of them are minimalist). It takes hundreds of hours to migrate my page to what I call ‘kitten photo and muffin recipe blog’ formats (which is 98% of what they offer – all the same thing).
I can’t argue with the detailed scientific presentation of data in the article. I can, as a KC Chiefs fan since they have been in KC, say that there were a lot of crappy calls that helped the Raiders and hurt the Chiefs in their many games. Maybe you have to do a team vs.team analysis. Ben Davidson vs. Lenny Dawson is anecdotal, but not unique.
Great article
Can I just cut the Gordian Knot?
Filter baby from bathwater. Do your due diligence.
RSV is the Current Thing ( https://nitter.net/DrKate4Kids )
ES, any info on correlation RSV vs vax vs covid vs vaccinated_mothers vs ?
Key question. I have not seen any data which offers that perspective yet Princess. I am currently trying to see if the premature rise in flu visits, is actual, or simply people being more cautious about making sure it is not Covid right now.
TES
A response was being prepared by authorities. It was being whispered in private communications. Unfortunately, The Party has mandated what is truth, and until the people regain their power – we will not see the presence of actual science for the foreseeable future.
A Beast arises and takes control of the population. In his right hand he delivers the shot. Confusion disorientation for all. Control is achieved and they worship the Beast in rhythmic dance. It a mass hypnosis aided by the shot which causes confusion and disorientation. 2012 Olympic ceremony. predictive programming.
https://rumble.com/vqfn77-london-2012-olympic-ceremony-covid-19-similarities-mirrored.html
This makes so much sense to me right now. I keep thinking that people have become insanely intransigent. Totally incapable of thinking about any new information to the point that it’s practically suicidal. There’s been a lot of this for a while because of the political climate, but this is different. People whom one would think of as fairly intelligent can’t even acknowledge what the CDC has now publicly admitted. I repeatedly find myself thinking this shot made people stupider. It’s why you see people get shot, get covid, then go back for more shots. That makes no sense whatsoever to any reasonable person. The reports of excess deaths, myocarditis in kids? Means nothing to them. It’s dismaying.
In exhibit C2 your data shows excess deaths spiking upward in early 2019 and remains higher up to the detection of Covid-19. In Italy there was a study for something else, where they collected blood from September 2019 – March 2020 across Italy. They retrospectively went back and looked for antibodies for Covid. The earliest detection was September 3 2019 and in September 11.5% of people had antibodies to Covid-19. So in September of 2019 it was geographically dispersed and fairly well building up across Italy. Makes all those early to summer unconfirmed flu cases look suspicious. The difference between 2019 and 2020? They treated people in 2019 with anything they thought would work. Just an odd observation. Thx
Reminds me of an article in Biblical Archaeology Review, 1996, on apparent discovery of the Pishon River mentioned in Genesis 2 as one of the four rivers going into the garden of Eden. Starts in Havilah where “the gold of that land was good.” Looks to be western Saudi Arabia, crossing the Saudi peninsula, but dried up in 3rd mil BC. https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/22/4/3
or….
Examine Exhibit 1 of this article.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/02/24/a-curious-astrological-confluence/
Cannot the data be produced in both “as reported by attending physician” and “as adjudicated by CDC”?
This data displayed both ways should either be trivially identical or alarmingly disparate.
Also, can the official CDC procedures book be published so that any third party can reproduce from the raw data exactly what the CDC is producing? If not, why not? Can’t this be FOIAed along with related internal emails?
According to some, fructose in particular and sugar in general is a cause of cancer in that newly damaged cells can only feed on these sources. (As cancer cells form clusters they get more competent but initially they are dependent on fructose). Is this correct and does it partially outweigh the advantages described by you above?
It’s a fair challenge Carl,
I am not a fan of assigning blame for cancer, to any factor which DNA-based organisms are familiar with and have used successfully for hundreds of millions of years. Cancer arises because of something new – or something in chronic excess. If blood sugars are high, chronically – granted deleterious conditions can result from this. But what causes this excess blood sugar to begin with? I contend that it is a damage to the body’s control systems, and something which introduced this damage in particular, starting in the fall of 1995.
In the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s it was heart disease. Suddenly we replace all pesticides with glyphosate, and that malady drops, only to be replaced with autoimmune disorders, cancer, and diabetes (failure of the blood sugar control system).
my take :-)
TES
Yes, but. This vax and this virus predate Trumps presidency. This plan is far grander. We might become distracted in the election stuff. But don’t.
Faucci will Faucci. He learned in the HIV pandemic. He AZT’ ed them to death as he Remdesivir ed them to death when ventilators didn’t work during CV.
But he only a patsy playing a divisive part, an intentionally deceptive part, that successfully frightened a huge swath of people. To subjugate a people’s will, Make them confused, afraid, uncertain. Blind them with the science. Repeat it till they submit. We must protect the vulnerable becomes your mantra. Repeat it till all believe, we are protecting the vulnerable. They will beg for the Vax.
Never forget, THEY GAVE THE POISON SHOTS TO OUR PARENTS FIRST! The <65 with comorbidities begged to be 2nd. Mission accomplished! The rest are collateral damage. And they can be replaced with open borders.(also part of the PLAn.)
Never forget, they began making this vax right after SARS 2003. The mRNA angle was added later. There were lots of tests. Lots of rats and ferrets. The desired effects were very well known. Some say “all of the rats died!” But that is a twisting of the truth.
The truth is… none of them lived to collect their Social Security.
Wish I had read this one earlier! Opinions mean little. And I have one. All of Trump’s presidency read like a badly written play, where I felt I knew the ending. I am not certain how I got to that point. I never believed any of the contrived political BS against him, nor any of the medias puffery. So as 2020 approached… my gut knew everything felt wrong. I felt like I knew the ending of the play. The results were totally expected. The campaign contrasts illuminated the fake results in a swath of anger. January 6th and most of the 7th we (family of 6) were out of the media loop. Just a little internet snooping and it was abundantly clear… there were 2 narratives. One on the TV, and one that was supported by vast swaths of video. Mostly peaceful protestors, were punctuated with a few midsize groups of violent actors. And I use the term actors with purpose. All of the skirmishes that I saw early after the 6th… looked almost rehearsed or prepared. looking violent, without violence. Close your eyes and recall the peaceful and fiery BLM protests. See it? There was real certainty of death and destruction. Save the intentional shooting that marked the ending of this crappy play, death never looked certain on January 6th.
My opinion is that like Trump’s presidency was ordained from beginning to end, Biden -Harris presidency was ordained as well. It is all part of the grand and shitty play they have written to distract us as the greatest country fails. Divided they will conquer and grind us into the dust of history.
Trump never conceded, but I don’t think he will be back. 2000 mules wont make it into the news or a courtroom. “They” need Biden Harris to blame as the SHTF in an ACAN sort of way, I believe. Never forget Trumps veiled, or not so veiled, comment to Biden on the 25th amendment. Just another part of the poorly written play that is ahead. When Harris steps in, the SHTF. She and Biden are patsies. We must have patsies. When the Ponzi debt bubble pops, and the FED looks to be serious, there must be patsies. Like China and Pfizer et al for the CV and the Vax.
There is a lot more bad acting right ahead.
Your comment about embezzlers and intelligence cases reminds me of Dr Robert Malone’s recent article “mRNA Vaccines: The CIA and National Defense”. Malone attempts to explain the full court press to approve the vaccines and get them into billions of people. This is being driven by the CIA and DoD, who believe there is a pressing need to be able to manufacture vaccines very rapidly to counter the threat of bioweapons/bioterrorism. This also explains the disinformation campaign against cheap therapeutics like vitamin D, many of which are far more effective than the vaccines — but are beside the point.
Malone’s article is a must read, if only for the chilling anecdotes from someone close to being an insider:
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-the-cia-and-national?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
thank you for your very hard work and for the courage to address the elephant in the room. when can we look forward to seeing part-3?
Thanks for all your hard work. You have entirely smoked them out. The CDC should be outright disbanded, and those engaged in deliberate fraud should be aggressively prosecuted. They’re not merely useless, but a menace. We’re paying billions to fund a public health agency that is actually aiding, abetting, and obfuscating massive harm to the public’s health.
The reckoning is coming, and your expert witness will be a vital tool in bringing justice to these sociopaths.
thank you for all your hard work. I wish I was smart enough to understand more than the conclusions.
Ha! I always thought this “mystery” was not worth the trouble of getting into, as Soviets would have/had full control to all and any details.
It was indeed during the heady days of Soviet might.
Pattern solving. Anecdotal analysis. I cant unsee. then the pattern emerges. Upon which I can make early, accurate choices. almost always. of course, whilst listening to conspiracy truthers in case i missed an anecdote. which happens. because the truth will not be on the tv or in the newspaper, nor will the science tell the truth. and i dont have the time or the money to buy my own science. but the army of CT truthers always know. and bc TES is a rare find.
Thank you. I missed this one. Our garden is not large enough. individually we 6 seem alright. Collectively, USA if PFfkd.
Great article
Thank you, TES.
Thank You, Sir-Sleuth!
i am disseminating this via my blog and to a few others who have considerably more readers.
Timing might make a difference.
I would like to see more politicians taking stances, particularly in regards to COVID-19 “vaccination” for school-children.
Learning all this science about the spike and its microbiology,I feel a big paradigm shift coming
in the approach to disease,specifically neuro disease,
but also perhaps auto-immine disorders. From the vantage point of amyloidosis,
we could aggregate many singular disorders such as Alzheimers, Parkinsons, CJD, MS, ETOH and
HIV dementia, Lyme, toxoplasmosis, etc., and dare I add autism
(is there anywhere histopathology on a deceased autistic child’s brain looking for this evidence?),
and thus correlate common pathways of damage/pathogenesis.
It is possibly even illuminating to include myocarditis if the starting point was electroconduction disturbance.
{One Ring to Bind them All}
I was wondering how the working age population could experience a doubling of covid mortality in 2021 relative to 2020. You have explained it.
Of course, all covid case counts are inflated to begin with by about 60%.
There’s also the fact that the shots have been shown to increase your chances of getting COVID instead of reducing.
I found a very credible article supporting the contention of multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars paid by CMS to hospitals for covid patients. In some states, $200,000, $300,000, and more per covid patient. In New York, $12,000 per covid patient.
https://khn.org/news/furor-erupts-billions-going-to-hospitals-based-on-medicare-billings-not-covid-19/
In terms of economic collapse, from the conspiracy POV, this is all ‘helicopter’ money printed out of thin air, and the social aspect is to impoverish the taxpayer and enrich the favored= corporations. This is a ‘paradigm shift’ long predicted and happening now. Economic collapse has as many mechanisms at play as does the spike protein of the pandemic.
wow!
How can we get respected voices to corroborate and spread this series of articles?
Covid was in Pensacola mothers day 2019. I think it was here in the “late” flu surge feb 2018. They put the covid vax in the Fall 2017 flu shots, with lot numbers and social security nubers linked. they “discovered” only 9% efficacy of those lot numbers. they also knew who and how many perished after those “flu” lots were given, and the dose levels of those lots. so, They knew the expected results when april 2021 rollout started. This is not incompetence since april 2021. it is their plan.
No…we have a problem for allowing this corruption to continue putting all of us at risk from a deadly mRNA gene altering injection.
For exhibit 9A (thermocline) would be way more effective to plot in Kelvins and include atmosphere and space. That would highlight the magnitude of energy in the core versus sun’s “shallow” effect.
Is it is now it misleads us monkeys, suggesting the deep near 0°C would be an absence of energy where it is not.
That also struck my monkey brain. If deep water temperature reaches 0°C, phase change to ice, which floats to the surface, or?
So this now explains Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age? Was China producing tons of CO2 then as well?
Also, let us be precise in our terminology. Carbon is an atomic element and is a solid at room temperatures. Carbon Dioxide is gas. There is a difference. Us monkeys are mostly water and carbon. Be careful what you wish for.
Don’t waste your time on information coming from the military. There are hundreds of eyewitness accounts and instances of direct contact that make it obvious that “extraterrestrials” were here way before we were and have never left. They have also been working together with us in secret military projects for decades. Whistleblowers on this are too many to mention, just look!
Seems like a good article,but lacks life links for proof of,in my eye’s!
A propos Hanlon’s Razor, I agree that it is attractive but often can be misleading. Accordingly I suggest “Nolnah’s Rozar”: “Never attribute to stupidity that which can be adequately explained by malice”.
A person with the handle Pig Hogger suggested on Slashdot some time ago that “Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice”.
To which Charles T. Rubin has added: “Any sufficiently advanced benevolence may be indistinguishable from malevolence”.
The Ethical Skeptic’s Law (Four Principles) of Advanced Intelligence (Ignosticism)
I. Principle of Indistinguishability (vertical)
/philosophy : science : boundary conditions : limits for claims/ : any sufficiently advanced act of benevolence is indistinguishable from either malevolence or chance.
Finally.. proof that we’re not all crazy smh I’ll never forget back in 2014 the 0-3 Raiders had the 2-1 Pats on the ropes and like clockwork at the most pivotal drive of the game when McFadden looked to have iced the game for us, a holding call was levied against a rookie Gabe Jackson.. right on time. A rookie at the time, Carr’s next pass after the penalty was tipped at the line and intercepted… game New England.. the holding call against Gabe was about as much of a phantom hold as the one they just called on Malcom Koonce this past Monday night.. I’m sick of it
ANALYSIS REQUEST:
So I saw your chart on vax rate versus covid death rate, by county, for both 2020 and 2021. Could you do some more county by county analysis, but instead of covid death rates, look at excess death? (and don’t use 2020 or beyond in any baselines)
I say this because if a positive association between vax rate and excess deaths shows up there, then that would be very hard to dismiss, given the negative association you already showed for covid death rate One would expect healthier counties (higher vax rate) to have lower excess death, unless vaccines were extremely dangerous. Healthier counties may alo be richer and less affected by lockdowns, etc.
David,
Yes, this is achievable at the county level inside the Wonder database. I have run this by state, and found a mixed bag of results – nothing clear. But perhaps county level data would resolve some kind of Yule-Simpson confounding. It will take me some time – but should produce an interesting result.
EVG TES
It seems excess death calculations may be fairly sensitive to how baselines are defined:
https://jdee.substack.com/p/vaccines-and-death-part-5
Things to think about when defining and adjusting baselines:
Is the baseline period long enough? Population size, gender, or age distributions change over time? Were any unusual events present in a particular year (covid)? How similar were the flu seasons?, etc?
Well the issue would be twofold:
1. Baseline assembly method needs to be reasonably sound, but most of all should be consistent between all counties.
2. Excess will need to be expressed as a percentage of the county population – and that will be compared to %vaccine adoption – combining both 2 x Complete and Booster 1 and 2. So, if Full series is 67% and booster uptake is 12% and 3% respectively, then I will assign a value of 82% (67+12+3) – to reflect the starkness of the Booster contribution in this comparative between counties.
Addressing 1 and 2 will provide the soundness in comparative reference we need – even if there is a quibble over the method of building a baseline.
Started the concatenated query in my database 35 minutes ago and it is still building the ‘Non-Covid Natural Cause Deaths by County by MMWR Week’ table – crunching along at about 58% of data compiled so far. Arggghhh
TES
Update1: Well crap – it crashed sometime during the night – probably when my computer auto-sleep setting kicked in…
Will try again at the right time…. Each parsing of the data (have to assemble by means of a script) takes about 4 or 5 hours.
Update: Finally parsed the databases into bite sized units, and was able to assemble them into one functional section of my vaccination sensitivity module. Result: Strong association between Excess Non-Covid Natural Cause Mortality and percent of the population which is vaccinated. Forthcoming article now.
Here is the interim chart – while I work on all the re-checking and surrounding diligence/documentation, etc.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Excess-Non-Covid-Natural-Cause-Mortality-per-100K-by-Pct-Pop-Vaccinated.png
TES
Much gratitude!
Don’t forget to do the same for 2020 excess death curve (i.e. if negative association shows up in 2020 then there is no denying 2021 was the year of the problem intervention.)
Apologies if you already did that and just didn’t put labels. Not sure what denominator compression refers to. No need to explain here, as I am sure you will in an article.
One point about vaccines causing autism is that there are multiple ways vaccines might cause autism. One is through aluminum corroding the brain as Forrest Maready’s documentary Crooked exposed, another is through mercury poisoning, and another could be through genetic weapons. That means that if people work to stop autism by exposing how vaccines cause it, the people causing autism through vaccines might adapt by shifting the autism source to a new source. For example, they could switch from aluminum to mercury, or from mercury to aluminum which i believe already happened, or from aluminum to genetic weapons. I learned of this from the website jimstonefreelance.is but I think it is still quite relevant. Another tactic they might use is to stop putting autism causing agents in vaccines and wait a few years for it to be discovered that their new vaccines don’t have any known damaging agents in them, after which the skeptics would dismiss the exposure as a lie and call it debunked pseudoscience. The autism statistics wouldn’t change significantly because most of the kids would still have autism except the ones a few years old and younger, so the people causing this would say it’s a worthy sacrifice on their goals to achieve their greater goal of not getting the autism conspiracy exposed in all countries involved. One countermeasure to this would be if the vaccines that cause autism were preserved and acquired peacefully from those that distribute them so that any autism causing agents in them could be exposed, which would make the science open source. I think people should also consider the possibility that autism rates will cease to rise at a certain point when the people in charge of these vaccines decide that enough of the population has been dumbed down to a servile level because any more autism than that would simply start killing people, so there’s a limit to how much poisoning they can do without everyone becoming autistic and all people learning that the conspiracy is real. Those are all the points I can think of about vaccines as of now. I hope they were of some use.
I don’t remember where I saw it, but I remember one of your blogs saying that non-existence was defined as unobservable existence because nothing could be proven nonexistent inside a limited set of information. I found it an excellent ontological proof of life after death. I currently believe that ontological proof of life after death is the best proof of life after death for beings who believe ontology is primary in existence and that values and principles are not secondary to factual phenomenon. However, I have my own ontological proof of life after death which i discovered on my own. It is that anyone who ceases to exist can simply begin to exist again if they want to continue existing, which means that existence is an active action. I believe that the reason people keep existing when they cease to will themselves to exist is that Other beings will them to exist and that all wills are part of one greater Will, and therefore exist in a manner that lets them control one another in limited information domains. These Other beings include stars, planets, and forces of nature like gravitation. If they did not include them, then planets would not be able to pull in people through gravity and physics would re-assert themselves through willing the laws of physics to be maintained throughout all reality. The reason that people do not simply will themselves to exist again in this reality and appear immediately as visible ghosts after they re-exist is probably because they don’t want to expose people to Other domains of existence non-consensually before all beings in the reality in question consent to this phenomenon occuring. Additionally, I believe that beings have to know re-existence exists to re-exist in the afterlife, and that otherwise, all beings reincarnate into their parallel soul in the afterlife who is assigned to save them by creating an energy field in the area around themselves which their co-soul reincarnates into and is then restored to life and awakened from unconsciousness if they died when unconscious. The reason this automatic reincarnation is possible is because all souls are linked to each other and reincarnate as long as the reincarnatee is willing to connect their soul to somebody else in this way. If they are not willing, another afterlife soul immediately takes their place after being created for this purpose. It is a possibility that the afterlife beings could cease to consent to sustaining the souls of people, in which case they would have to re-exist on their own. However, I believe they would become conscious as ontological beings eventually by default even if they were killed when unconscious and not sustained, after which they would remember their appearances and possibly choose to sustain themselves in that form, or if they did not consent, they would remain formless ontological beings with their consent not being violated.
The difference between my idea of life after death and yours is that yours seemingly depends on at least one being in existence re-observing and sustaining anybody who dies in unobservable existence domains, so you seem to believe that their soul is resurrected by somebody else who wills them to continue existing. However, I think that this dependence is a good thing which proves that love exists. I think that only one being can possibly be the origin of the original miracle of existence existing at all, and that being is the Observer of all other beings in existence who sustains them and allows them to limitedly re-exist if they so choose and become independent. Self-sufficiency seems like a good thing to me but it still depends on an original Source to somebody’s existence, which to me is basically just God. It’s still a mystery to me how someone can begin to exist at will but I think it’s because their higher self has already made that choice and they have already made that choice at the moment they began existing unless they revoked it by becoming spiritually suicidal. I think there’s a way everyone won’t become independent after learning of this which is that individuals will want to sustain other spiritually and have them sustain them in case they die in a way they can’t or won’t re-exist from. This could be based on love or something. I personally believe that this self-sustenance capacity is a good thing because if it is good for people to love each other it must also be good for them to love themselves. Anyways, that’s about it for my idea. I think it is compatible with your idea of life after death and doesn’t have to be a different type of idea from it. I hope it was helpful.
Anti-vaxxers knew before the rollout that this gene therapy shot would decimate humanity, but we didn’t expect the shedding phenomenon. Unfortunately, I personally know of 5 unvaccinated women who had full-term stillborns this spring/summer in Northeast Ohio. My son was spared but his placenta had two abnormalities. (7th baby, first time having a problem). My midwife told me that it’s rare to see a normal placenta in 2022.
Thanks for your work. You add a lot of credibility to the “conspiracy theorist”.
I re-read your article and googled a few times in the past hr before digesting the table and graphic A somewhat. A shiver then went down my spine. Thanks very much for the brilliant work (art?)
Terence,
It took me a long time to ‘see’ the impossibility of Graphic A. Whatever intent developed it, they either did not care that it was detectable, or regarded such skill of detection as therefore meriting its entailed knowledge. If you are sharp enough to see this, then you deserve to see it – if you will.
Moreover, it is possible that this ‘intent’ was never meant to be hidden in the first place, and mankind is in a kind of captive state, where the concealment is malevolent, not natural. We just have a group of inmates who are in league with the prison guards, and don’t know any better.
Thanks for the feedback!
EVG
TES
Is it possible the ‘saline’ effect is shots that ‘missed’ the arm but recorded anyway
I am sure that happened at some point. We don’t know which specific mechanisms were practiced to what extent. All we know is the effect and that someone did indeed do something to create a saline/placebo effect in the numbers.
First sentence from the 2nd century Gospel of Truth: “The gospel of truth is joy for people who have received grace from the Father of Truth, that they might know Him through the power of the Logos.”
Ignosticism seems to mean having a truly open mind and heart to whatever transcends our senses and monkey minds…
The experience of grace (gift) is the starting point on the path to wisdom. “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” has nothing to do with fear but rather awestruck response to a burning bush, a flame of love, a miracle of healing, a deep peace while coming into the realm of a Presence in silence, an unexpected serendipity or synchronicity, a meeting of souls via deep friendship, a connection with a loving and intelligent negentropic energy in the universe…
Hi
Many thanks for your very interesting articles and work.
I strongly urge you to take a look at this commentary done by a lifelong gas turbine engineer who understands thermodynamics.
https://gvigurs.wordpress.com/2019/04/28/the-emperors-new-climate/
In particular see Page 14. The “greenhouse effect” has been widely misunderstood because we assume that the gas property of “emissivity” affects the radiative equilibrium temperature of the gas when it doesn’t.
Kirchoff’s law of thermal radiation – at equilibrium the gas emits as much as it absorbs. Fill the atmosphere with Co2 if you like and it won’t make a jot of difference to the radiative equilibrium temperature. The high surface temperature on Venus is also explained in this document “Planetary Atmospheres” without recourse to the madness of gaseous “thermal non-return valves”.
I’m not convinced by the argument in the link above to Vigurs, specifically by the calculations on page 14, because it assumes both zero temperature gradient and zero emissivity gradient. If you consider his “thin layer”, it is not reasonable to assume (even though it is “thin”) that there is no difference between temperature and emissivity at its upper and lower boundaries. Rather, a differential equation relating temperature, emissivity, and radiation flux density should be reached, in which both actual temperature and emissivity feature non-trivially.
Reason why lower emissions due to COVID did not show in CO2 concentrations: Global Monitoring Laboratory – Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases (noaa.gov)
Yes,
But this downturn in CO2 emission occurred during a northern hemisphere greening cycle. If it had happened at any other time, their argument might hold water, but not during a dynamic period. Therefore, just as each year’s CO2 production causes that same year’s greening cycle to be less effective at reducing carbon each spring, this downturn in carbon should have shown by a reduced vernal jump that spring as well, however it did not – instead we had a record vernal jump (which the article conveniently ignored). This was not written by someone who understands systems dynamics.
Finally, if their argument held water, there would be no May 2018 downturn in CO2 – yet there was.
By ignoring specific observation, one can ‘prove’ anything they want, scientifically.
TES
This is a fascinating article.
Looking at the Glyposhate chart (vs. autism) in on of the studies listed I have a hard time believing this is a major contributor. The autism increase trend clearly predates the widespread introduction.
I did wonder if you had considered paracetamol usage? https://www.greatplainslaboratory.com/articles-1/2015/11/13/evidence-that-increased-acetaminophen-use-in-genetically-vulnerable-children-appears-to-be-a-major-cause-of-the-epidemics-of-autism-attention-deficit-with-hyperactivity-and-asthma
https://www.genengnews.com/news/link-between-paacetamol-use-during-pregnancy-autism-and-adhd-symptoms-supported-by-new-study/
Take a look. I believe that several studies have found a correlation between usage (in pregnancy and also early life) and subsequent diagnosis but it is controversial because it is taken following fever which may itself be a contributor.
Direct hit! The simplest tell for any controversial truth is its censorship by the powers that be. On the flip side, big lies are invariably propagandized.
Keeping body fat down is all about metabolism. It stands to reason that one’s “idle speed” throughout the entire day and night can completely overwhelm any regular activities one can maintain without breaking down.
I have the metabolism of a roadrunner on crack, and would hardly be surprised if I burn more calories when asleep than the average American does in a day.
Mental activity counts, too. I’ve heard that chess players can burn 6,000 calories in a match. I’ve no simple way to verify that, but it makes sense. Competitive chess players need to train.
My diet is similar to yours, but more restrictive due to food allergies or sensitivities, and includes no common grains at all. I eat a very high fat, high calorie diet most of the time, except for fasting days about once every 4 days to a week, which usually precede workouts. My workout non-routine consists of a relatively active lifestyle, but doing only brief high-intensity interval and/or strength workouts every few days, treating strenuous activities such as shoveling heavy snow activities as workouts in themselves, and I can hardly even maintain my weight, let alone gain weight. My biggest challenge is figuring out how to build and maintain muscle mass without unduly compromising cardiovascular fitness and fat adaptation.
Pingback: “No Extreme Scenario Should Be Taken off the Table” – Klaus Schwab – Now or Never
It is indeed a crime against humanity. Back in the summer of 2020, Dr. Brownstein published the results of his drug-free nutritional and oxidative early treatment protocol, with which all 107 of his patients so treated – including a few that had been hospitalized – fully recovered within 9 days. No cytokine storms or long COVID. I used a similar home treatment protocol to get over COVID quickly and easily. And how did the government react? They ordered him to cease and desist from publicizing his protocol. https://www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com/_files/ugd/adf864_cc5004cfa84a46d3b1a0338d4308c42c.pdf
Abuse of Occam’s Razor is a pet peeve of mine, especially pertaining to actual conspiracies; which tend to be complex, and often prey upon simplistic thinking itself.
It has been stated that most who fancy themselves “skeptics” are actually true believers in the mainstream scientific consensus of the moment. It stands to reason that a true skeptic would actively encourage people to question what they say, and consider all evidence.
What can cause the most damage? Philosophers have answered this one best, in the variously attributed and probably ancient statement: “It’s not what we don’t know that gets us in the most trouble; but what we know that ain’t so.”
Modern technological capabilities have enabled crafty sociopaths to weaponize that great truth with a torrent of misinformation from sources people have been conditioned to trust, because most quite frankly cannot comprehend that others can be so evil or intelligent, well-intentioned people so manipulated and hoodwinked.
Excellent work. A consideration people tend to overlook is that anything that causes health issues can also contribute to mental issues that can contribute to suicides, criminal activities, misadventure, and very ill-advised actions that feed back into such issues.
Indeed, the cumulative excess deaths from a defined beginning point are most important, because, starkly stated, people cannot die twice. I would look to a point ahead of COVID at which the prec3eding death rates had been near the longer-term averages.
Can you post the list of non R0-R99 codes you used? Some of us have access to massive medicare and private claims datasets.
Andrew,
I used all of R00 – R99. However, I will tell you that the majority of the peak increase resided in R99 deaths in particular.
TES
Thanks for the great work. In my view your methology of data processing is 100% valid although I cannot judge how conservative the resulting numbers are. Its always difficult to work with differential data but looking at the graphs prior to 2020 verifies your approach.
One thought that is driving me crazy for a year now: if there is a systematic problem with the vaccines looking at the death data (which is the only data we have in germany) might only show the tip of the iceberg. Most people might just be injured to some degree which will not show up in these data bases in the short term (and hopefully also not in the long term). Is there a way to get hold of the data of health insurances and do the same stuff you did for the death data? No one in germany seems to be interested in this data – the goverment did not order an investigation or actively block requests to do so. In my eyes the health insurance data will show everything we need to know about the severity of the problem. Is there in any country a good data base? Can someone leak the raw data??
I hope that people in these companies find the courage…
Herbie,
Exactly correct. One dead person suggests thousands of injured bodies, and future deaths. 26,000 VAERS (US) deaths = tens of millions of injuries and future deaths. Some of the vaccine injury studies I have reviewed suggest a 15 – 30% prevalence of injury in the inoculated population (to varying degrees).
EVG
TES
I believe I saw one German health plan that put out numbers based on their claims for health care encounters that showed a major increase in visits that they were able to relate to vaccine complications. The extrapolation they did raised the specter of a very large number of vaccine injuries across the country since they were only using their own members.
Holy crap. It’s worse than I thought already. Some of the early studies (now largely scrubbed from the Internet) on mRNA “vaccines” showed that the animals did not start dying en masse until two years or so after the injections. January, 2023 will be two years since the first Facebook boomers started lining up for the Fauxi miracle science injections; convenient that he’s ducking out in December.
I’m hoping against hope that a lot of people received placebos, but anecdotally, it’s not looking that way; lots of people are dead or dying before my very eyes. We need to steel ourselves for what’s coming as it will be traumatic.
Are you familiar with the research regarding vegetable oils and their possible role in obesity and chronic disease? (Dr. Chris Knobbe has research correlating rise in vegetable oils with rise in Macular Degeneration https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCyxBCTERXg)
Brad Marshall (Fire In A Bottle), Tucker Goodrich (Yelling Stop) and of course Petro (Peter) Dobromyskj (Hyperlipid and who it appears to have started this line of thought) on the role of linoleic acid and reductive stress? (https://yelling-stop.blogspot.com/2022/08/interview-brad-marshall-tucker-goodrich.html)
I’m from India and live near heart hospital and i have never ever seen the parking lot this full, its overflowing.
In Asia, its happening a lot faster but no one to track as being third world, and pleasure centric society we just move onto next news, also we are physically more weaker and medical facilities are very bad.
Remember, India is 1.3 billion or entire population of North America and Europe COMBINED.
The PTB are smart to make sure people don’t pay attention and are diverting the central agenda to some other BIG POLITICAL NEWS.
Its over here…As people in the west says, Don’t end up being a stat..unfortunately for us, most of us in India don’t even reach that stage of actually being a number for anything, once we are dead, its just DEATH.
Could you please look into the data regarding what happens after multiple unit blood transfusions are given, especially since the vaccinated can donate blood? Given the fact that the LNP’s like to hunker down in the bone marrow, and that is where our red and white blood cells are made, I think you might find some alarming/interesting data just by pulling how many units a person received and then seeing what happens to them. We know the S protein hinders the hemoglobin from carrying oxygen to the organs. I think you will find the more units a person receives, the quicker they die.
Our entire blood supply is contaminated, and we need to have this conversation.
You would need access to an EMR, or perhaps even the military’s EMR…..this needs to be investigated.
Ringmaster,
You are absolutely right, and I am hot on this trail, yes.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Diseases-of-the-Blood-D50-D89-without-Covid.png
EVG
TES
Is there any way to pull up data on units transfused? This data is good, but just shows an increase in circulatory/bleeding disorders and not necessarily if the units transfused are part of the problem. So yes, the jabs could be a cause or contributor, but not the ONLY one……the units could exacerbate things.
I don’t think the CDC tracks units given……and you would need that to see what happens and if those units are a problem.
Hi,
I would like to join this discussion to acquire more information regarding blood transfusions. I’m aware of the fact that vaccinated can donate blood. Now I’m on the other end as I receive donated blood every month, due to an immune system condition. This means that I am not able to produce enough white blood cells.
Is there a correlation between people that receive white blood cell transfusions from people that have been vaccinated and people dying, the more units they receive?
I’ve been reading your graph but I don’t quite get it. Does it mean that there is an increasing number of people that have died due to complications after receiving blood transfusions? What about other circulatory or heart disorders after receiving blood transfusions?
Could taking the units exacerbate a medical condition and possibly lead to deaths? Is that what your graph is saying?
Jay,
No – the charts make no comment upon blood transfusions.
I don’t hold the qualifications, nor systems data to make an evaluation on blood transfusions with respect to introducing the spike protein mRNA into one’s body. On this one, I would find a doctor who is not captured by the Narrative and have them do a frank assessment – speak with a hematologist and cancer physician – as part of that deliberation.
The best of luck and outcomes on this Jay.
TES
Mitochondrial health:
Your post workout formula is great 👍
I got the message when covid treatments were denied because of politics. Medicines used safely for decades could not be obtained because a politician they didn’t like might be able to take credit. It was clear to me that public safety was the last thing on their minds. So I decided to become my own doctor and pharmacist. I, and I alone, take the full risk anyway. I bought meds from foreign sources and have them available at a moment’s notice should the need ever arise.
My body my choice, right? If this is a free country, any adult should be able to put anything they want in their own bodies. Most doctors are too lazy to even read about covid treatments. Why should I wait for an appointment, pay $400, and then be told nothing works. When I’m sick the last thing I want to do is drive around town and argue with people who amount to nothing but toll collector.
Have you looked at amputation statistics for 2021? Lower-limb ischemia can result in amputations of the feet.
Now let’s look at US mortality for 2021.
There’s a key puzzle piece overlooked by most statisticians. 2021 US mortality for 85+ y.o. declined 14%. Declined! And the 75-84 y.o. group also showed a mortality decline of about 2.8%. Despite those groups showing a declining mortality, deaths among the Big Three–heart disease, cancer, and stroke–were level from 2020. So most of the Big Three deaths had to come from those below 75 y.o. Which is very odd, since the Big Three are elderly causes of death, typically.
And working age mortality was up at least 17.5% (preliminary statistics)–that’s 137,500 more people dying, probably from the Big Three, which would keep the total statistics for the Big Three level wrt the US population. Something was aging people a lot. Something we aren’t supposed to discuss.
Here’s my source:
https://deadorkicking.com/death-statistics/us/2021/
Scroll to look at “United States Deaths by Age in 2021”
Yes covidpilot,
Hence the pull forward effect. Since our elders compose the vast majority of our death statistics, and since their death rate has declined post-covid, that means that the baseline for all deaths need decline for 2021/22/23+, in a sliding scale. By Oct 2023 (even though this is not reality) I have the taper of the PFE declining to zero.
Thus the PFE is
1. Accurate and probative as a principle.
2. Is suitably conservative.
Thanks!
EVG
TES
Perhaps death rates for the elderly declined due to lock downs, and thus not getting deadly medical care. Our medical system is the 3rd largest cause of death in this country: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us
I asked my doctor, a new grad, with her supervisor in the room: Do you recommend Vitamin D to your patients? It was a loaded question. I had been reading about how very few people with healthy vitamin D levels died of covid. They dodged the question, which I took to mean “no”. Both simply said they take small amounts — around 2000 IU.
Seen this?
Exhaustive study of German mortality data finds excess deaths tightly correlated with mass vaccination (eugyppius.com)
Two points. 1) You’ll notice the dates; enough said. 2) 6% drop in age 0-14 stat for 2020. Lockdown as knockdown for accidents, understandable. Curious if SIDS saw any fluctuation. Do you know?
First part above was coincident to your posting yesterday, so OBE here.
However, large favorable delta in 0-14. Did SIDS change at all?
We were looking at the SIDS numbers earlier this year, the data showed that during the height of the scamdemic, when people were not able to go to the hospital for other than emergencies, targeted childhood vax children missed those jabs and the SIDS rate plummeted.
What do you all think of how Pfizer bought out two different companies that specialize in autoimmune conditions and cancer treatment. They purchased these companies six months apart. One in mid 2021 and one at the end of 2021. Unbelievable. They know what the hell they’ve done. And unfortunately these people that got the shot signed away ANY right they had if something horrible does happen to them. Unfortunately 2 of my coworkers got breast cancer after their shots. One had lymph node surgery and the other is having her breasts removed and redone. She had no genetic precursors to breast cancer either. Got four shots though….
Yes, our immediate family member who did get the shot, suffered from it for 8 months enormously – and then capped that off with cancer.
HEY! You should make it easier to subscribe. The button is all the way at bottom and was a bit fubared, too.
Good analysis – can’t wait for the next installment.
Will do K. thanks!
Great work. I did a small quick model using a Gaussian Distribution over 9 years to see what the numbers would be each year for “events” given 80% of the total population vaccinated had active ingredients and would develop events similar to past other mRNA failed trials. 7,887 deaths per week is about 179% above my model for 2022. If the past is indeed playing out here, this excess deaths per week will increase by a factor of 9 over the next year. Most adverse events in past similar trials did not take place until year three. By year six, 84% of the cohort was positive for adverse events.
You may be interested in Mathew Crawford’s theory of wealth as a confounder to excess mortality analyses. https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/reanalysis-of-the-society-of-actuaries
A BIG YES…
Big things are in the works. I have also been invited to speak at a meeting of the ten largest insurers in the US. But things even bigger than that are underway.
TES
I sent you an email asking for some info about this….I am an actuary working within the life insurance industry….wondering if the audience could be expanded or more info on how to join that meeting.
I don’t know that I can attend. I am due to close an energy strategy about that time…
Still don’t have the travel dates set yet. But I have to prepare the strategy as well.
EVG
TES
Thank you for the work you do! Just read a blog post from Jeffrey Morris on your analysis, and I hope you will address his counter arguments – hard for the less statistically literate of us to know what to believe… :)
(https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/evaluating-claims-of-excess-cancer-deaths-in-the-usa-during-the-pandemic?postId=a23b342a-fc81-4da7-974d-2a28bd5e14dc&cid=14b46323-a40a-475f-9335-5db664724566)
I responded here in two threads. He biased every technique he could, in order to get the trend line to disappear. And in the end, he just had to plain delete it though a bit of sleight-of-hand. Then he tried to BS about science.
https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1563088192324390912?s=20&t=3VcD_AtXGcfHZmOrLazGOw
https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1563149749687300097?s=20&t=oOYC4DmwLtyivM58-cW3ow
Skimmed his presentation and summary, plus comments. Interesting comment that he made based upon his experience that cancer is a slow phenomenon. The news of late (this past year) is sporadic reports of insanely aggressive cancer due in theory to suppressed immune function. Granted, this is anecdotal, but life IS anecdotal while the data is being collected for later publication years later to possibly validate one’s senses. Individual action cannot wait for institutional consensus. Life doesn’t happen that way, except it is expected to be the new norm with covid+. If immune suppression is indeed in play, and if such tolerates aggressive disease, then why wouldn’t one expect to see fast cases? He waived any possibility of such a discussion. Imagine the possibilities if that one point were allowed to be discussed. It would topple the cart entirely and require the collection of new data to be thrown at alternate hypotheses. If true, we’re in a new world with a new baseline to be established.
Your analysis reads as one who is alerted to a suspicion and desires to have a public conversation in pursuit of a potentially necessary preventive/corrective action. Critics seem to have a rigid need for maintaining current heading, as though looking for clues or questioning the status quo is bad conduct. In all of this covid nonsense for the last two years, one thing had shone brightly: incuriosity. It simply does not exist in certain quarters. Nelsonian, if recollection serves.
There is no long term purpose for spinning the present reality. It’s like a public CFO engaging in embezzlement: who does he think he’s fooling? The final analysis will get him, eventually, so why bother? Similarly with this business. As with the CFO, an intelligent person blinded by something in his psyche can still be dumb to reality.
When the final analysis is done, there will have been unbelievable loss of life from covid, and virtually all of it will have been unforced errors by regulatory authorities. Forget about parsing covid disease from adverse pharma effects; they both reside in the same bucket of ownership. Both therapeutics and mRNA avoidance were quashed by the state and its sympathizers, so for statisticians to dump all cause of death on covid, complications, and downstream effects still implicates the perps. Amazingly, no one apparently focuses on the physics and physiology to predict what the new statistics should look like. But, perhaps such is to be expected with novelty.
Brilliantly stated evergreen. Some novel thoughts. Thank you.
EVG
TES
I just learned that my brother got jabbed and then got a blood clot in his brain. He survived, but I am not sure he is capable of seeing the link. Oh well…
Muchos Gracias, Senor Skeptic…
I’m sorry to be so late commenting and “liking” this extremely useful post.
You were featured on The Automatic Earth when you released this, and I’ve posted your work there before, having discovered you through another commenter there.
You have the count, I’m sure, but you are reaching some people, people who are paying attention.
I very much appreciated your Twitter posts when you were documenting the slow-motion trainwreck while it was happening. I got kicked off of Twitter and haven’t followed you as closely for a while, but the Bad Cat linked to this post. Your work has been and will continue to be of incalculable benefit to a world that has been subjected to an unprecedented coordinated assault. Your explanation here is clear and concise, and I look forward to future posts in the series.
Thanks Mark, sorry you got kicked off Twitter. Working on the second article now.
TES
An overall increase in deaths from “natural” causes was predicted by numerous researchers; some see this as an inevitable result of the free-floating spike proteins introduced into the body by the so-called mRNA “vaccines.” One of these researchers is Dr. Shankara Chetty. In an interview last November, he said the following:
To my thinking, your researches are substantiating Dr. Chetty’s predictions.
Source of the above quotation: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LukPaRDJHysl/
Do you have historical files for the R00-R99 data? Or just data that you downloaded at different times.
No, no historical files on R00-R99. Just data downloaded and the adjustments I make to that data (the method of which has not changed over the course).
TES
Synchronicity – I just finished a post I was working on titled “Houston we have a problem”. It is about a possible solution for ME/CFS which is seen in LongCovid and is likely similarly based in retinoid dysfunction due to viral/immune challenge. It effects liver enzymes permanently is the gist of the theory which overactivate vitamin A and carotenoids to Retinoic Acid for ever after. The fix is to stop eating those food sources fairly strictly, not easy, but it works. Or makes the big needed difference. My post – Houston, we have a problem. – by Jennifer Depew, R.D. (substack.com). I did add a follow up post with the first of your series. Our problems are related in my opinion.
Thanks Jennifer,
An excellent service here, for a condition which would be extraordinarily complex to figure out, even for a dietician or medical professional. Very timely. My task right now is to figure out how much of our excess death can be attributed to this type of Covid injury, and what it attributable to injury from the vaccine series. This however, I will keep in mind as a case example of the Covid injury challenge in the general population.
EVG
TES
Hi TES,
Very interesting analysis, perhaps you could look into this and see if you can tease a confirmation out of the CDC data?
https://expose-news.com/2022/08/22/female-children-57percent-increase-deaths-after-covid-vaccination/
Thank you for your great work and for saving lives by informing people. Reading this with a broken heart and unbearable sadness as we lost our beloved brother to aggressive t-cell lymphoma. He went through five months of nightmarish treatments before his death. He took the Moderna shots last year and had facial numbness and swollen lymph nodes after the 1st shot. I begged him not to get the 2nd shot, but his doctor gave him steroids and told him to get the 2nd! The same doctors misdiagnosed many symptoms he had during 2021 until he was finally diagnosed by a diff doctor this year. I can see how cancer deaths can now surface as it takes time for diagnosis and treatment before they are told, sadly, that there is nothing more that can be done.
O.M.G.
I am so sorry Sara. A lot of people read this article today. I celebrate this in memory of your brother tonight.
EVG
TES
Thank you. You may find this interesting. This is a conversation between oncologist Vinay Prada (@VPrasadMDMPH) and Dr. Bita Fakhri of UCSF. She explains how she wanted to join the lymphoma group at the hospital, but they did not have enough patients to justify another doctor. But now, they are getting so many referrals that they need more doctors. They both wonder what could have been the cause for the rise in patients, agent orange or something; they speculate laughingly! @ 42:56:
https://soundcloud.com/plenarysession/ep416
Anecdotally, my father has a tumor in his lung. It was diagnosed a few years ago and has been monitored with annual scans, never exhibiting any growth or changes. Dad got vaxxed and boosted with mRNA. Last month, his last scan showed that the tumor has grown. Theoretically, it might be unrelated to his vaccination, simply a coincidence.
Sorry to hear that Harper. I hope that things work out well for your Dad and your family in this!!
EVG
TES
We got my daughter her first \/ in anticipation of her visiting family (including immune compromised grandparents) in the summer of 2021. The very next day I started seeing the word “myocarditis” in relation to the \/. She never got her second, and will not if I have anything to say about it. Thank you for all you have done to bring these figures to the light.
How did glyphosate get into the food chain as early as you say? I thought it was when they told farmers to save money on grain drying by spraying just before harvest to kill the wheat in the field. Wasn’t that as part of CO2 climate change efforts or when oil prices were high?. In the UK I first heard about it in late 90’s and switched to organic bread, eventually making my own then largely giving it up. I know they used it as a pre emergent herbicide but it was always sold as biodegradable and there were months between application and harvest under that regime. I can’t bear thinking how much is incorporated into the grain in its last weeks of growth – its systemic after all. Of course the cartel says its safe and their tentacles go deep – a lecturer in ecology at Uni told my class its so safe you can bath in it. Mad.
How about surveying the non injected for comparison?
Thank you so much for doing this work.
TES – Do you have any thoughts about the persistent spikes across the various causes in 2018?
In the immortal words of LT Aldo Raine of Inglorious Basterds “Yeah, we got a word for that kinda odd in English. It’s called ‘suspicious’.”
It appears that the CDC has not redacted the 2017-2018 Flu report.
and
A record number of flu vaccines…hmmm
I’ve been waiting for this post since you started posting the MMWR data many months ago. I’m holding myself back from refreshing every 5 mins until part 2 is posted. ; ) I’m afraid that similarly to the data pointing to 2018 covid seeding parts of the world pre-Wuhan, this too will be conveniently ignored.
I’ll just reread your Raiders article in the meantime to get myself ready for more horrible NE PI calls prolonging game changing drives.
LOL!!! :-)
How does “about 5,000 younger Americans” dying per week from natural causes, excluding C-19, compare to pre-COVID? Or are you saying the average has increased by 5,000?
The ‘excess death’, so it is a differential rate or your latter contention.
Jeazhus fucking christ. I have had a gut feeling this is going on and keep finding bits and pieces of info here and there but your article really puts it all together. Glad I didn’t get the shots.
Worse than I thought. Thanks for this analysis.
Good article will be linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
Very thought provoking. I am an actuary with 40+ years of experience, including some on mortality assumption setting. I am somewhat versed with WONDER and other CDC data. I consider myself “skeptical” — for example I have not submitted to the mRNA gene therapy being called “vaccines”. It is hard to ignore or disagree with a couple things of anomalies that you have found: the neoplasm cause of death in the past year does seem very high, and the CDC system upgrade data issues, in my view can’t be explained by Hanson’s Razor.
However, let me poke at your article a bit — in order to help you perhaps make it better. Have you been able to look at these excess deaths by geographical region, state or county? I am wondering if the neoplasm excess deaths are really COVID. I have always been skeptical about cause of death data. However, I have trust in aggregate death data by region — even CDC data. Having done some poking around on usmortality.com — it seems that excess deaths vary significantly be state and seem to be correlated with COVID waves. If the neoplasm death rate changes are not relatively evenly split by state, or split in a way that are not highly correlated with “vaccine” uptake rates — perhaps the neoplasm deaths are COVID related.
I am eagerly awaiting the next installment in the series.
Indeed George I have done this ‘Neoplasm Excess Death by State’ – and it fits the average age of the state with extreme conformity. In other words, while SADS is hitting the 25 – 64 age group across the nation – cancer is hitting the oldest states hardest, first. That graphic will be in the next installment in the series – to show that this cancer outbreak is chaotic and asymmetric.
EVG
TES
Asia is clearly the “weak” point of the narrative, since day 1.
I know, I live in… Bangkok (Thailand).
Thailand was the first country to officially announce a Covid case outside China (january 7 2020).
In january 2020, more than 800 000 chinese tourists came in Thailand ! I remember, we had SEVERAL flights Wuhan->Bangkok PER DAY !
And ?
As you pointed you : nothing. Nothing happened (from a public health point of view). The whole year !
Actually, cases started to appear in South East Asia… in april 2021… when they began the “vaccination”, but that’s another debate.
In 2020, nothing made sense, and no one could or was willing to explain the cause of so many striking differences with Europe and America.
-Thailand population is just a little bit older than France’s
-Bangkok is a huge and polluted city, with crowded buses, trains, buildings, etc.
-Thai people have bad habits too (alcool, junk food etc.) and can have poor health (with “modern” diseases like diabetes, overweight etc.)
In october 2020, this study was like a ray of light :
“COVID-19 and Flu Pandemics Follow a Pattern: A Possible Cross-immunity in the Pandemic Origin and Graver Disease in Farther Regions”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568123/
It made sense : yes we had a kind of immunity in the whole region, compared to Europe and America (geographically far away). It was the only possible explanation…
Furthermore, another important point that shows the malevolence of China :
-they declared immediately the “war against Covid”… organized a huge show (Wuhan lockdown, and the building of an “hospital” in 7 days)… but… the lockdown was ridiculous compared to the size of the country !
Nothing happened in other megalopolis like Beijing, Shanghai etc.
So a “terrrible virus”, “ultra contagious”, that could “kill in a flash people” (several videos “leaked” from China, totally bogus, showing corpses on the streets and hospital corridors)… so dangerous that they need to fight a “war” against it… but only in Wuhan/Hubei ?
Not in the whole country ?
Brilliant, prescient, directly observed. Love it Chris.
TES
kill in a flash… i saw those videos. didnt make sense til now. Those videos were Vaxxine deaths. Not covid as suggested. looks just like all the current vax death videos. China was doing as it was told ordered to do. they are patsies. The vaxxine is a self spreading airborne vaxine. and the nano lipids also release the new self spreading variants 41 days after the shot. every variant came out of the shots and boosters. delta omi ba5… now ba6.
Hello. Fascinating work. I have a question : chart exhibit C “malignant neoplasms”.
Data :
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Weekly-Provisional-Counts-of-Deaths-by-State-and-S/muzy-jte6/data
Only 2 weeks (W2 2022, and W49 2021) have a total over 12 000.
But on the chart, it’s going over 12 000 after week 26 2022.
What am I reading wrong ?
You are looking at lagged (wrong) raw data. I am using the following lag taper from week -14 to -1
0.9867
0.9812
0.9799
0.9734
0.9689
0.9633
0.9578
0.9502
0.9421
0.9378
0.9134
0.8893
0.8023
0.6687
OK, I apologize. I didn’t understand that you were applying a model (“distribued lag model”, right ?) on top of the “provisional” data for the last 14 weeks.
So if I understand, because you follow those weekly reports since long time, you have noticed that the National Center for Health Statistics “revise” (upward) its data, systematically.
Hence, your model in order to quantify what the outcome of those revisions will be.
Am i correct ? I am not a all a “math” person, so I need time to understand. ;-)
Perhaps it would be a good idea to highlight this special period (14 weeks backward) on the chart for people like me.
Because i really thought that the uptick in 2022 was coming directly from the data published.
Last but not least, how well your model worked in the past ? And when the National Center for Health Statistics revises its data ? Every week, or let’s say 1 or 2 times per year ? Thanks.
Chris,
Look at the charts. The lag period is highlighted. I draw no inference from those first four weeks because of the risk in conjecture. I only look at the 5 week average and then backward in time. Even then I back off on the sigma I observe.
The uptick is coming from the data published. It is better than the data published. 1. More accurate. 2. More reliable.
In the past, actuals have come in higher about 80% of the time and lower about 20%. That of course is a performance which then feeds my lag models. If the data starts coming in lower, then I adjust my lag models to accommodate that.
TES
Anyone who isn’t saying, “Oh, shit,” is not paying attention.
As a former data crunching fed who witnessed firsthand the catastrophic lies of the 2000s, I thank you very much for all your analysis. Beginning in May 2020, I suspected that what we are experiencing is far worse than anything the 2000s gave us, and might be on par with 20th century totalitarians. Yikes…
Appreciate your sustained determination. Willing to help with data science, statistical methods, automation pipeline, strategizing next steps, etc. Hit me up if you’d like to chat. Thanks
The “antiwisdom of crowds” reminds me: “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.”
Did some crude math with mass of atmosphere, CO2 emissions by man, atomic weight of air and CO2. The reported annual 35 billion tons of CO2 emission would increase CO2 partial pressure in atmosphere by 0.13 ppm/a, which is 6% of the total yearly rate of increase (2.1 ppm/a)
Nah, I had bad sources (Billion being ambiguous). Updated calculations with wider sources gave results that align well with reported CO2 emissions and CO2 levels in atmosphere.
Based on some of your interests and work above, you may find Mario Buildreps’ work of interest: https://www.mariobuildreps.com/
You may be describing a mechanism which in particularly extreme (though still cyclical) moments contributes to the shifting of the geographic pole of the earth through crust displacement.
This is great, thank you. I have been thinking a lot recently about the role of community in supporting and scaffolding values and this has got me daydreaming about modes of interaction and team work that facilitate engagement with the kind of problems you’re writing about here.
Performance enhancing?
No Itien, LOL!! It is mostly a way to keep your body from going into mitochondrial suppression. :-)
That’s too bad. If this helps with blood flow, like sildenafil, then I assumed it could be a performance enhancer by increasing blood flow. I’m always looking for that performance edge. :)
A tour de force of exemplary research Ethical Skeptic. I am in complete agreement with the proposed time frame. Both myself and my partner were critically injured before the announcement of the supposed Covid Crisis. We were both hospitalized with life threatening blood and lung conditions which IMOP could not have been anything other than Covid 19. In both cases it took over a week in the hospital before we were allowed to return home.
I am so glad you made it out alive gambeir. The hospitals did not know to treat this as a thromboembolic and endothelial inflammation disease. Many people died from lack of treatment outside the hospital (or even in the hospital).
TES
I wish someone could do studies of early covid presence in Davis, CA. My son and his girlfriend were at UC Davis there in the fall of 2019. In October or so, a “flu” was going around. My son and GF got it in November, and both were fairly sick as respiratory illnesses go. The GF has asthma and she was worse off than he was. At one point she had to go to the ER and get a nebulizer to help her….I believe it delivered steroids to her lungs. She was also given….wait for this….Ivermectin. She was pretty sick for a couple of weeks, and recovering for a month. My son was really sick for about a week or two, then OK after that. When they first went to the UC Davis health clinic, the doctors said “Something weird is going around, we don’t know what it is.” I’m convinced it was Covid, although of course they never got tested at that point in time. I’ll add that UC Davis has so many Chinese students it almost looks like you are in China when on the campus…and a huge number of the students are from Wuhan.
Patrick Moore – a founder of Greenpeace – covered how this method is key to climate alarmism in his book ‘Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom’ – https://www.amazon.com/Fake-Invisible-Catastrophes-Threats-Doom-ebook/dp/B08T6FFY6S/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?crid=1YNFAEBRAH4YA&keywords=fake+invisible+catastrophes&qid=1658764056&sprefix=fake+invisible+catastrophes%2Caps%2C63&sr=8-2
You might appreciate Auron MacIntyre’s perspectives on the ‘managerial elite’ – he’s very focused on the political philosophy of what we’re seeing. https://youtu.be/41J59hg1_30
Your “Tyflocracu”, as described, will require an almost endless stream of at least middling-competent narcissists to man the wheels of government.
A feat of this magnitude boggles the mind.
How do you propose to recruit such a multitude of passingly-competent narcissists, for instance, in America?
:-)
Thanks for a very pleasant little trip down mystery-lane.
OMG, this is Gold
You mind if I steal the Swiss cheese model pic it’s 🔥
There is also an allusion in Quran about leveraging two sets of cultural traditions into inferential knowledge when Moses wanted to meet the most knowledgeable person on earth, Khidr. He was told to go to a place at the junction of two seas (Al Kahf, 18:60) which symbolically represented the wisdom of Khidr that comprised of the observable and the insight. Seeing with two eyes, through eyes and heart/mind. Is this insight the gnosis gained through following ethical skepticism? I apologize if it sounds basic or a transgression from the topic.
Basit,
Moses meeting the most wise person on Earth at the convergence of the two seas (the south point at Sharm Al Sheikh – Raas Mohammed) is excellent allegory, and yes it follows the wisdom of ethical skepticism, in that – once one has conjoined that which is known by faith, with that which is known by observational empiricism, both cease to be what they once were and are each transformed – becoming a new and expansive body of water altogether.
All the old Gods pass away and unify into one truth which always existed – yet, we were not prepared to know this until we were ready (gnosis). A new ocean, a new voyage.
Moses was so set upon such a journey that he contended “In order to get there, I will march forever if I have to…” And through the grace wrought by the determination of one man, many are indeed blessed.
I suspect that the truth is neither as easy, nor has hard, as we make it out to be.
EVG
TES
Thank you so much for your answer
The number of laborers needed to recover the easily reached gold would have been staggering. How does even a King prevent those workers from mining their own gold up river. It would seem impossible to keep a lid on that kind of easy access.
River recovery requires far fewer workers than shaft or placer mining.
Artisanal mining is what this type of poaching is called. Small groups and individuals gather small takes, and then use them to buy supplies or needed items. Eventually that gold ends up in circulation and is taken by the King. Each artisanal group can only access a small stretch of river before they tread on another tribal area or into areas where they do not know exactly where to look (and keep safe). It is a self-managing mine. Outsiders cannot come in and set up large-scale shop because they must traverse long stretches of river – amongst peoples who do not want them there. While the ore excavation is easy, the logistics and politics are very hard. Only a ruler can organize the chiefs to cooperate on the necessary logistics.
Even today it is very difficult, and miners returning from a couple years on the river are worn and beaten-looking upon arrival back home. Everyone one of them is ill or injured in some way typically.
Aaahhh… Ive learned more this morning… than a year in some shithole historu class…
Fez, Niger Musa trade routes gold… what did our military get from Sierra leon in 2013 ebola outbreak that it needed? Gold is only defense to fake money xollapse. Still puzzling that one.
i didn’t see any mention of testerone levels; have you had yours checked?
Have you heard of HGH secretagogues? Have you tried one?
What are the macro nutrient ratios of your daily eating?
Thermodynamically speaking, how do you explain the very large (huge, actually) delta in calories in, and calories expended?
The description of your daily intake does not come anywhere near the number of calories you claim to eat, unless you are eating a large amount of butter.
Do you think you are ingesting the required amount and kinds of nutrients, for a healthy existence?
This might sound like I am arguing or disagreeing with you, but I am not. I accept that you are suffering from a/some ailment/s, and just want to understand things better :). Maybe I am making assumptions that are untrue, or have misunderstood some things you have presented. You mentioned GLP-1 but not if you take it; is it not possible to correct for the damage you have suffered via supplements?
karl,
Thanks for the comments. Very lucid and salient.
I have tried the testosterone and HGH routes. Both just make my upper body, head, and feet more massive – this was not desirable – my upper body is already large enough from my years of swimming that I do not need to support so much structure into old age. A top-heavy old person is a ticking time bomb.
My fats, carbs, short chain fatty acids, proteins and phytonutrients are all in line – I track them. I did not outline every single thing I eat nor how many times I consume each as a snack – so one cannot derive calories from the list at face value – for instance, I have my post-workout drink in a separate article, and it is ~400 calories in itself. I do eat more grassfed butter than an average person yes, and put it in my coffee as well.
Thermodynamically speaking, and haven taken thermodynamics in engineering, the body is not like the steam cycle in a power plant. The body lets some calories pass through un-exploited when a normal gut biome is present. Some persons extract 80+% of the caloric availability and others extract 50 – 70% – Then there is the state of the cell mitochondria. If you have ever lost weight and tracked this closely, you will observe a 1000 calorie swing in rate of burn from favorable to disfavorable – this is fact. How do we then explain this swing in mitochondrial resistance thermodynamically as well? We can’t, because thermo is only the third or fourth rank principle at play here. Our bodies are not black boxes nor steam boilers.
Am I ingesting the required nutrient for existence? No… that is the point of this article, of course. If I did that via food, I would have to consume enough calories to force me to work out 2 to 3 hours per day – every day. Fortunately, for now, we have supplements. Fulvic acid is at the core of my added nutrient (soil humus and fulvic elements).
No, GLP-1 therapy is not available to my knowledge. But yes, supplements are key in helping correct body damage – however I cannot find one which promotes my intestinal and pancreatic cells to release glucagon.
I believe the fact that 35% of the nation has non-alcoholic fatty liver disease – is precisely because of this damage to the alpha cells of the pancreas. We fix that, and we fix obesity (but not overweight).
Hope that helps answer your questions!
TES
thanks for answering my questions. i had forgotten the body can slough off calories.
really enjoy your blog and let others know about it. especially liked your essay on the Earth’s core being the source of ocean heating. it’s shocking (but not surprising) that it hasn’t received more attention; it might if you could figure out a way for politicians to generate graft from it :P
LOL!!! :-)
TES says, “GLP-1 therapy is not available to my knowledge. But yes, supplements are key in helping correct body damage – however I cannot find one which promotes my intestinal and pancreatic cells to release glucagon”.
Does this mean that although TES has identified Glucagon as the missing piece of the puzzle, Glucagon ‘deficiency’ cannot be treated?
I was rail thin until my early 20s, extremely active, and massively hungry . Although I stayed active for many years (even during my youth alcohol years), from the early 90s (30yo) I slowly gained weight, gained chronic pain, and slowed activity, until now I am an overweight 230lb (65yo) where I ‘should’ be 195ish, and I’m still hungry! (And I’ve done 10, 7, 3 day water fasts but I always end up sick)
My doctors have been of little help, and suggest that Ozempic and others have too many side effects. But I already have unwanted effects of weight gain, tiredness, hunger, insomnia, etc, etc
Without recommending any GLP-1 product, is there a GLP-1 product that may be suggested as heading in the right direction?
In the meantime, I’m surprised to see nicotine may assist. Although, for no valid reason, my doctors say no to nicotine, I’ll try some 1mg spray or gum as a first step.
Rocket, similar challenge here. LIVER LIVER LIVER
Success essentials right now do not involve GLP-1 but rather glucagon suppressors, that cause liver dysregulation:
Eliminate Vitamin B6 from any supplementation (source of insomnia, weight stubborn, anxiety, doom feelings)
Eliminate any and all seed/nut oils (PUFAs) and seeds/nuts from your diet (causes the liver to shut down glucagon production, and metabolic rate)
Eliminate any and all even ‘good oil’ heavy-oil foods (chips/fries/fried foods) (overloads the digestive tract and puts a burden on the liver)
Take Creatine, CoQ10, and intermittently nicotine (to avoid habituation).
My wife has regular intestinal troubles and the ‘healthier’ she ate, the worse her troubles. It turned out she was susceptible to FODMAP, specifically galacto-oligosaccharides. Therefore, eating a half a cup of peas (or onion, mushrooms, inulin, & others) during a ‘healthy’ dinner would necessitate a trip to the hospital and a endoscopy/colonoscopy that showed nothing. After a bout of gut problem, she found the best relief for her gut was sugary confectionary (“Jersey Caramels” for the win).
I mention her story because, within TES reply, is a similar scenario… my wife and I have both been eating lots of ‘healthy’ nuts and seeds (adding to meals, drinks, snacks), and taking vitamin B6 (in B blends), which, it seems, may not be optimal for us if our regulatory systems are impaired.
My wife was thin until menopause. Then she used HRT patches and had to end those, and suffer with hot flashes, and weight gain – obviously involving an impaired regulatory system. (She recently stopped hot flashes when she caught a cold – they resumed after she recovered.)
In an internet full of confusing and overwhelming information (which adds to the doom moods), it is quite lightening to be enlightened with the TES information. Thanks for the ToDo and ToDon’t lists.
Your intellectual honesty is of such magnitude as i believed that i would never find in my life, beyond my own. I feel like i devouted christian by heart, not by knowledge, reading the New Testament for the first time, and finding in words everything he believes and lives by instinctively. Thank you so much for your divine work brother
Another great article that tackles matters that are generally ignored – because you would have to be “an unhealthy person” to even bring up such questions! Therefore: Disqualified! Q.e.d.
Them: “You wouldn’t even bring it up as a commendably healthy person, wouldn’t you ?!?”
I am far from being anything like an expert on these matters, but simple common sense and manifold observations show me that many people do many things that would be considered to be the cause of someone else’s fatness or unhealthiness – but in their cases, is not. And other things would do the reverse – all depending on circumstances and perspectives … specific persons, specific nutrition, specific perceptions of those who are evaluated and so on and so forth!
Monsieur Skeptic, you hve done your research and embodied it in your life.
One of the practices I see is that of time-restricted-eating, where a person intermittently fasts, at least 12 hours without calories, but up to 24-48 hours, which changes the metbolic state. The easiest way is to not eat or drink calories after a fairly early dinner. Studies show that people rapidly adapt and get less hungry at bedtime, not hungrier, as one would expect.
Part of time-restricted-eating is the mobilization of stored carbohydrates, freeing them up as fuel. Walking or other exercise before the first meal of the day increases that effect, and coffeedoes not hurt, may help a little, but just half a teaspoon of sugar or honey, please…
Insulin resistance is an underlying part of modern dis-ease. Insulin resistance is the causeof type-2 diabetes, but causes problems well before things get to that point. Insulin helps the cells absorb blood-sugar, which comes from starches and sugars in the diet. More starches and sugars (and even artificial sweeteners -GASP-) mke the body produce more insulin, and then to get resistant to it, making blood sugar rise, and making the pancreas release even more insulin, and creating a vicious loop. The pancreas fatigues as years pass. Insulin causes weight gain. Increased insulin levels seem to causean increase in inflammatory factors in the circulation, linked to arterial inflammation, heart disease and stroke…
You are working to make your body insulin-sensitive, and to lower your insulin levels, by your low-starch diet. Right after exercise, the cells have just used up their carbohydrate stores, so they welcome in blood sugar, and also proteins (amino-acids) without a rise in insulin levels. After exercise is a special moment in that way. Protein and starch at a late-breakfast/early-lunch, following exercise are welcomed with open-arms, and do not raise insulin levels. Only eating for 8-12 hours during the day, while active, and reducing carbohydrates with the evening meal, then exercising before the first meal, is a pattern that works better in a living human body.
It is also not a hard habit to keep up, and gets fairly easy after the first week.
Water only at night, not snacks. (New habit)
I’ll add that study data from the mid-1990s already showed that the cardiovascular health of “fit” fat people, based treadmill on exercise testing, was the same as of “fit” thinner people. It was just less common in the overweight.
We have learned a lot about vascular inflammation since January 2020, since it was the injury mechanism of so much of (pre-Omicron) COVID. Keeping vascular inflammation down requires normal vitamin-D levels. (If you are a surf lifeguard in Hawaii, you can skip this, you have plenty.). If you have not checked a vitamin-D level, ask for one at your next medical visit. You need not wait to begin 5000 IU per day supplement. If you are obese, or have no gallbladder, you are likely to need 10,00 units per day to get a normal level, and it may take a couple of months to rise to normal (30-100). Almost all Americans who are not in southern sun a lot have low vitamin-D levels. One of the lowest (4) that I ever measured was on a banker in Hawaii. She had bone pain. It got better promptly on vitamin-D.
Sleep deprivation also causes higher levels of inflammatory components in the blood. Get that sleep every night. This happens right away. Sleep deprivation causes increased appetite, too. (Oh, No!)
Fresh vegetables in season are the basis of a healthful diet. I grow ’em and eat ’em. Fermented foods have some special benefits and trick nutrients (like vitamin K2, for instance). Monsieur Skeptic includes some, as he mentioned.
All excellent wisdom as usual John. The glucagon-like-peptide testing that observed 15% body mass drop in people administered a therapeutic dose, is significant. It is the missing piece of the confusing/contradictory diabetes progression saga. The alpha cells go first, and cause hypoglycemia long before the beta cells go and create diabetes.
We need to head off diabetes with alpha-glucagon therapy – as a priority. But I doubt it will happen because that will absolutely destroy a $200 B dollar diet and obesity treatment industry.
Hi John,
I agree. Most are not accounting for the effects of circadian rhythms on metabolism. If you stop eating by 4pm, and combine with a lower carb diet (max 100g per day, ~35 g/meal), most can lose weight without trying. I have seen 90+ yo folks drop 20 pounds. The genes of metabolism shut off with the sun going down. The calories are not processed well at night, and get shunted into fat cells. Going to bed at night on an empty stomach is extremely effective for metabolic health and weight loss independent of activity/calorie restriction. However, society structures life to push eating to an evening /night time event. Hence, almost no one will follow this lifestyle.
The perfect product would be a no-calorie sweetener that overweight people would buy, which would secretly make them hungrier and guiltier and gain more weight…
…Bwahahahahahaa!!!
You are drinking it, now!
..Bwahahahahahaaa!!!
We are!!!
OOh! A favorite subject of mine. If I could write as well as you, I would have said these very things. Thank you.
Looks like «Define a question» is back again at in the winning position.
Its true the narcissist and the predator and many other pathologies are “possession”. Possession by complex, stubborn though form (a virtual being) built up to protect from what? There is only one thing animating the body. Feelings.
I would like to hear how you actually deal with this people in work life. Since right now the crazy 8 seem to occupy most of the positions of power.
Solving work problems is not near as hard as solving the problems created by the Crazy Eight.
In one firm I was in, a junior partner lay on his couch at home in depression for 3+ years, and I took on his client load for him. After 4 years of being paid his full salary to do this, he came back to the firm, was handed back all his clients, his position, and his exorbitant salary. He thereafter blamed his depression on ME (his peer). Then he left and went on a campaign to harm our business – after we carried his ass for four years at full salary – to do absolutely nothing. It was deranged, malevolent, and spiteful.
These people are possessed by more than emotion and feelings. They give permission for other influences to enter their lives and cause harm to those around them.
But of course, they are always the victim.
TES
This looks like it applies well to narcissits, also. When narcissists are “political leaders” they will be unable to correct major policy errors, and can be counted on by their financial backers to keep marching forward into any morass they enter with flags flying high.
Trudeau, Biden, BoJo, Macron and others come quickly to mind. Good investments!
For a very long time (since the beginning of recorded civilisation, in fact), thinking for yourself and being wary of groupthink has been the hallmark of great and independently minded thinkers. Nearly every great philosopher, artist or scientist worth their salt knew and ceaselessly communicated this to the world. This is as true for greek antiquity as it is for the 20th century.
In the last few years, however, the opposite “position” has finally broken into the intellectual mainstream (or maelstrom …) as not only viable, but increasingly mandatory. Yet, at the same time, our contemporary “thinkers” and intellectuals still celebrate and demonstratively glorify all those great minds of years and ages past, all those political and social dissenters that paved the way for a more open-minded and progressive society. As if they were their equivalents in our time – their peers in advancing human thinking and progress …
They sure do love their virtue signalling. It’s like the world has been turned upside down. They are the “system”, but they act like they fight “the system”. And most of them don’t even know it.
They truly have – to paraphrase a line from the Sopranos – created “dysentery among the ranks” …
Very good walking-a-mile-in-their-shoes…
“The sociopath predator allows a third-party agency which co-occupies their mind, to dictate their thinking for them – egging them onward and simultaneously then accusing and justifying them thereafter.”
My understanding was that the fibrinolytic properties of nattokinase and serrapeptidase only occur when ingested on an empty stomach?
Good point Mehen. I take another round of both during an empty stomach earlier in the day. I suppose it is the presence/type of protein in the food, since these catalyze fibrin proteins. The almond milk has some protein, as well as the coconut powder. I will have to research it some more.
Thank you. Essential knowledge, obfuscated by the Party.
Vitamin-D adequacy 9even optimization) is important for stabilization of clotting and reduction of endothelial inflammation. Levls of 30-100 are considered normal, but levels above 50-60 are likely ideal,especially for people with immune system dysfunction, like autoimmune disease (which COVID vaccination can induce). David Grimes MD is a medical expert on vitamin-D. Here is is site: http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/ His most recent post uses Public Health Canada cumulative data, subtracting one week from the succeeding week by groups, to determine:
“Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated increased from 9511 to 9512, an increase during the week of just one. Only 1 of the 227 Covid-19 deaths was a person who had not been vaccinated. Let this true but unpublicised fact sink in.”
I personally use fewer supplements, but grow a lot of fresh vegetables and prefer to eat what is fresh from the garden (or dried, frozen, pickled or canned garden-produce in winter).
One that I do use, which is purported to work well with vitamin-D, and which improves my bike riding uphill in Texas heat (discovered, noticed repeatedly upon running out) is “Vitamin K2” which is a group of polymers of different lengths of the basic unit, largely created by fermentation in certain foods, such as fermented soybeans, “natto”. The Life Extension brand products “Super K” and “Super K Elite” are good values. You have to be very careful to determine actual doses, which can be 100X less in some products in store. https://www.lifeextension.com/search#q=vitamin%20k2&t=coveo4A2453FD
Patrick Theut has done extensive research on Vitamin K, and his Koncentrated-K provides optimal doses of K1 and K2 (MK4 and MK7), etc. See https://www.k-vitamins.com/index.php?page=vitamin-k-home
The “wisdom of crowds” also won’t work too well if the jar of jelly beans is deceptive, such as if it contains a large hollow box concealed in the pile.
And if the size and shape of that box varies over time…
I’ve thought for a while now that Blondin’s tightrope is an excellent illustration between belief and faith.
Faith gets in the wheelbarrow.
thank you for not having a paywall. fascinating stuff.
becoming aware… the depth of the party, is astonishing.
The reach of the syndicates is now well into all aspects of our lives. I am constantly amazed at the resources my employer puts into activities that have no discernible impact on the manufacture, distribution and sales of our products. This all appears to pay homage to the virtue syndicates. I have yet to see how the accolades from various tribally aligned groups and making the top inclusive employer lists helps out the stock price when the investors all point that our fundamentals of our business are still the same as they ever where. I’m uncertain that when cyclic nature returns us to a trough all the of this overhead will recognized for the fat it is, and rather the leaders now addicted to the positive feedback for their duly displayed virtue will decide to cut into the sinew and bone.
You just described Louis Theroux’s entire career. Although he is a very high level participant and practitioner.
I have to wonder how robust current syndicates might be in the face of frequently-failing power grids and internet. I actually wonder this fairly often. Being more personally prepared for such eventualities brings to mind the further implications and ramifications.
Would it be the case that being the right-sized-and-distanced rural community would be better than being in a city, or on a remote “doomstead”?
My modest little homestead is a 2 hour drive from Austin, from San Antonio, from Houston, and farther from Dallas, has good soil, moderate weather, 6000 people, a railroad, mixed economy, and so on.
It has a name that causes a reflexive upturning of noses and scornful snorts (heh, heh, heh…).
I think that may be a protection or talisman of some sort, too.
Again, what happens to syndicates when everything starts breaking?
The ultimate destiny of all syndicates is to be broken. Usually through war.
But now I think most of them will rot from the inside out. We will see this with academia over the coming 30 years.
I always found this Substack attempt to coin a new epigraph annoying. Your opening paragraph explains why.
Subscribe to Astral Codex Ten
By Scott Alexander · Thousands of paid subscribers
P(A|B) = [P(A)*P(B|A)]/P(B), all the rest is commentary.
This blog and my Substack only serve to piss off the exact people who are its target. If the shoe fits…
TES
TES – My wording was unintentionally ambiguous. It seemed to make sense when I pasted the link and it was formatted. My apologies for the lack of precision.
Your blog entry brought clarity to my annoyance with the Astral Codex epigraph using Bayes as the arbitrator of knowledge.
Ohhhhh Ramkumar! My apologies as well. I should have detected the ambiguity and asked for clarity. Now I get it fully.
And yes, you are correct!
EVG
TES
It seems to be heading towards a crescendo. They excallated the Cold War to preemptive strikes and had to control the media to manage that. To hold the debt mountain together they have to break up Russia and extract its assets. They are now all in on that. covid was escalated to support the take over if the media and implement the control grid on people. How to stop this natural process of step by step, just one more, need more to stand still. Do we break up all power structures every seven years. Who takes charge of that. ? Some ideas. One term political appointments, rotating leadership, some positions by lottery, all legislation to have built in limit. One law one subject, automatic split and federation of business at a certain size (like an organism). More like Switzerland. One year military training and issued with AR for all 18-35 year olds. Local militia. Etc etc the Greeks and Romans thought about this as did the founding fathers.
Reading this long after discussion has stilled. Wonder about this with respect to the Covid injections. I am covered by Aetna, and have taken no injections. Aetna covered millions of Americans and must surely know which of those Americans have taken injections, and which haven’t. It would be trivial to divide the populations into random samples and see the results of the experiments of taking or not taking in the two populations, hopefully balanced by age. It should be simple to show from these data that the vaccinated group has a lower death rate. I could probably do that in excel.
This has not been done and the data must be present. Absence of evidence from these data is, by the embargo principle, evidence of absence, since the ability to conform to and confirm the narrative is obvious.
Yes, I have run this analysis several times with county-level data across the period in which the vaccine benefit should have been most manifest. No benefit shows up in terms of either cases or deaths. I cannot vouch for hospitalizations.
My first run of the study showed that higher population counties tended to have higher rates of vaccination and lower rates of Covid per 100 K persons in 2021 after the vaccine. This was initially exciting, however was deceptive – because when I ran the same analysis for the same timeframe in 2020 – I got the same exact result, by county. The vaccine had traveled back into time and saved lives even before it had been formulated!
When I adjusted for Age, and Population Denominator effect – I got a flat line, no trend, between highly vaccinated and low-vaccinated counties. They all had the same rate of Cases and Deaths in 2021 after the rollout of the vaccine to 50+% of the population.
The data by county was clear. It is also embargoed, yes.
EVG
TES
Do you have a link on your retroactive county study? I’ve about had it with the gaslighting and I’m doing something about it. I’m assigning my data-science-practicing grad students examples of Covid “misinformation” for them to “debunk” with the idea being that they’ll do the work, check the conclusions, and then decide what is in fact misinformation. That I expect them to tie up the resources of the people who regularly send me “safe and effective” propaganda at one school is an added benefit.
it seems that you were already on the investigative path that Covid has exposed for me. I originally thought “mRNA is such a bad technology that it’s besmirching the good name of childhood vaccination.” Your article on vaccinials is a companion to the book Dissolving Illusions (I can send you my scanned notes on it) in showing that vaccination should never have had a good name. I’m down to only supporting tetanus and diphtheria, and you cannot find real tetanus anymore.
I cannot unsee this stuff anymore.
True, you cannot find real tetanus anymore. I tried to get a tetanus shot in 2006 after a burn at my husband’s urging. I got a DTAP, and suffered an adverse reaction (longterm swelling, redness, etc.)
I turned off CNN more than 15 years ago. I turned off FOX 10 plus years ago. I found in my gut, what you have explained eloquently. Thank you for your tireless work. It is very difficult to find this trail. I wish there were a series of 20 second video clips you could develop for the masses. THAT would be a challenging mission. And perhaps, rewarding. I know that’s not what you do. Maybe a small, inexpensive millennial team could be assigned the task. With your oversight. Not what you do, but so many are lost.
Surrender to the narrative! Much easier than thinking for oneself!
https://www.amazon.com/Support-Current-Thing-Meme-T-Shirt/dp/B09VJYG61W?customId=B0752XJYNL&th=1
The “party” needs to be crashed !
Fascinating idea! And importantly, testable and potentially offers potential treatment/therapy modalities for those humble enough to seek improvement.
2000 Mules is up on Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iv6LTEPEHI5P/
“…anomalous creatures.” = Biden?
“This is the central purpose of the university system in America.” Perfect.
I really enjoyed this post. Thank you.
Thanks, and thanks for your readership Gwen
EVG
TES
I hate to litter your comments section, Friend, but the information-embargo dam is bursting.
https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/adenovirus-hepatitis-question?s=w
Embargoed information also includes this: The Vanden Bossche Warning. I am providing this video because I think you very much need to see it and, I hope, incorporate it in the information you offer your large audience, many of whom have the ability to understand it.
I read almost all your essays and Twitter posts but do not recall ever seeing you refer to what Vanden Bossche is saying. If I am mistaken, my apologies. If you think Vanden Bossche is wrong, I would very much like to know why. Personally, I am sure there is a very good chance he is right. If so, what he says is some of the most dangerous and dreadful embargoed covid information there is. Generally, he is being met with silence, one of the most effective embargo techniques, as I am sure you know.
the link did not work: https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-vanden-bossche-warning/ or here: https://americanbuddhist.net/2022/05/07/the-vanden-bossche-warning/ (this link includes a brief summary of his ideas)
ABN
I key in on Vanden Bossche’s thesis statement. “Those who are vaccinating, at best, are trading off severity of infection in the short term, for an increased susceptibility to the virus in the long term. This is not a suitable trade-off.”
Yes, I believe this is showing inside the stats I am providing, very clearly. I even question the ‘severity of infection in the short term’ – because there is no benefit from the vaccine in terms of cases, and no benefit in terms of deaths. So why would it only have benefit in terms of hospitalizations? If it reduces hospitalization by a factor of 8:1 as claimed in CDC touted studies, then there should have been an observable effect in reduced deaths by US county, by vaccination rate. And there was not. Counties on average which have twice the vaccination rate, experienced the exact same deaths per thousand as did the half-vaccinated counties.
Something is not correct in the small inductive hospitalization studies they did. The large population data should have shown this. This false initial inductive study, used to create propaganda, is becoming alarmingly common in our socialized version of science.
Good video ABN,
TES
“Among competing alternatives, all things being equal one should select for the alternative which is embargoed discussion or research.”
I think you could have written that a little more clearly:
“Among competing alternatives, all other things being equal, select the one for which discussion or research is embargoed”
On the specific topic of the article, I am dubious about the nine reasons for lying cited by Mr Ekman. He allows for “win or preserve the admiration of others” and for “avoid embarrassment”. He does not include “avoid loss of face”, presumably believing that it is covered by the other two. I’d contend that they are not. Anyone who has worked in the Far East, or with East Asians will vouch for the importance of keeping face in those societies.
I believe that its importance rests in people who may not know you personally will nevertheless expect you to hold certain views and behave in a certain way, just because of the position you hold. If you do not conform, they will think less of you, and you will lose face.
I think that one reason people lie is to avoid being thought of as a member of a group which is shunned by the crowd. Being regarded as a member of such a group causes loss of face and loss of credibility. Maybe that is the same as “to avoid being punished”, which Ekman cites as being the single most frequent cause of lying, but I’m not convinced.
How does this relate to the article? Well, you said “.Once an individual has attained a scarce membership … of a syndicate … preservation of the club (or syndicate) in the best interests of the individual, becomes paramount. Again, I’m not convinced. I suspect preservation of face, at an individual level, is more important than ongoing membership. If the face can be preserved by other means, membership may become irrelevant.
So, perhaps you have kept quiet about your doubts about the existence of anthropogenic climate change, but now that the war in Ukraine has shown the existential threat to Western European civilisation from relying on Russian gas, it’s OK to speak your mind and say that its time to build more nuclear reactors, and maybe even keep the old coal plants burning for a bit longer until nukes are on stream. See what I mean?
Harry,
Well said on all counts. I will use your version of The Razor – much more streamlined. I think the word ‘prefer’ as opposed to ‘select’ fits my aversion to making apothegms into decision heuristics better.
I could have brought an Asch Conformity model into the discussion, but it would have broached a much longer article discourse. The most streamlined way to get to the idea – that groups are MORE LIKELY to hold lies, not less – was the primary goal.
Thanks!
EVG
TES
Embargo material: “AnalF**k69”: Hunter Biden’s Password Revealed In Whistleblower Tell-Allhttps://www.zerohedge.com/political/analfk69-hunter-bidens-password-revealed-whistleblower-tell-all
Absolutely was embargoed.
Absolutely was relevant, salient, and true.
Great example. Thanks John
In late May 2019, my wife and I visited Naples, Italy. The owner of our rented apartment was Chinese and was recovering (she said) from the ‘flu. She had recently returned from visiting family in China. A few days later, I became ill and suffered what is now called ‘Covid 19’. The severe phase lasted about five days, during which I was bedridden and virtually drowning in my own mucus. This was followed by two weeks of coughing and general malaise. I now believe that it was Covid, brought to Italy by my Chinese host – in 2019.
I Knew it!! Thanks for proving it. Although the Raiders had their share of own goals (Marcus Allen finishing in KC? Really?)
Checking out the rest of your site. Very good, like it a lot.
As a physician who treated with repurposed antivirals from early 2020 (HCQ/Zn/Azithromycin+ Vit.D, then ivermectin/Zn/doxycycline + Vit D from August 2020)
I observed that there was a political war against these helpful treatments from the time that Donald Trump first advocated Dr.Zelenko’s useful protocol.
The delay of an ivermectin study until Omicron (mild) was dominant, and the start of treatment around day-6, when many were improving from Omicron, and the low dose and the omission of vitamin-D, doxycycline, zinc, quercetin, etc. would reasonably assure the lack of statistically significant benefit from ivermectin.
There is very good money to be made in carrying out scientific studies designed to fail.
It’s easy if you know what the facts truly are…
Absolutely savvy input. Thank you Doc.
EVG
TES
Perhaps it does not take a conspiracy. And yet if I were a budding conspirator who understood the mechanisms by which a fad can be generated, it would be tempting (too tempting to resist?) to hijack these very mechanisms to engineer my own fad. It appears that I need only control a significant portion of the media, as well as a few key apparatchiks and celebrities and Bob’s your uncle so to speak.
This is exactly what happens in the retail fashion cycle.
TES
Ingens Vanitatum summarizes nicely nearly every business meeting I have ever been in! Also, fairly early in the pandemic I read about the Uttar Pradesh province and their success with Ivermectin so I ordered some from India before the US clamped down on it. A few months after that I caught Covid from my daughter and took the Ivermectin according to the FLCCC protocol. I went from antigen + to antigen – in 12 days, never hypoxic or incapacitated, and no side effects.
Well done Kev…
If you have dysbiosis, IBS, or autoimmune disorders (asthma, thyroid, diabetes, etc.) you very likely might have saved your life with this smart move. Your own government was your worst enemy in this.
EVG
TES
I… collectively we… used to ignore the idiots on the left… and soldier on. Making a life, and paying our share…
Sometimes having personal debates with friends or coworkers was ok.
But… no longer.
Their collective power stifles debate and locks them is a vacuum.
I still try to ignore them. But in a new way.
I try to quietly walk away… but too often sneer and toss caustic rebuttals to the TV.
Without your expertise, my gut has served me well. Whats truly shocking, and almost depressing today… its all propaganda. All. Both sides in USA.
And I’m more aware, globally as well.
Its scary when I listen to some of Putins old interviews… and think he is more trustworthy than our leaders. He is brilliant. Reminds me of Newt Gingrich.
Thank you for the critical path. I deeply fear America is lost.
I wonder if the rise in excess deaths in working age Americans, noted by life insurance companies as a 3 sigma event, might be the upshot of the slightly rising graph you present, with a peak 9/11/2021.
Vaccine Adverse Events” and “otherwise unclassified”, Sir.
Hi ES
As usual, very interesting post. It made me think of Paulo Freire’s ‘Pedagogy of the Oppressed’ and some of Prof Denis Rancourt’s teaching techniques (essentially Freire’s).
Another point. The problem with autodidactics is that there are gaps in the their knowledge, usually this is compensated for by their inherent humble nature. But it can be a problem if they don’t realise they may have these gaps.
gyges,
Yes – ‘gaps in knowledge’ exposure is the domain of philosophy. Not to answer/fill those gaps, but to detect and manage them. Those well versed in philosophy know the gaps are there, those versed only in knowledge at the expense of philosophy fail to know they are there. Hence why we rarely have paradigm shifts among the autodidact – but frequently among the ‘experts’. The latter rarely perceives when they are wrong or the information set is vastly incomplete.
TES
This is exactly what we found in Trudeautopia (Canada):
https://c2cjournal.ca/2022/03/who-killed-granny-pandemic-death-protocols-in-canadas-long-term-care-facilities/
From the very beginning of the pandemic, it seems, there were plans in several countries to implement a system of population triage that included the administration of end-of-life drugs to those considered too old or frail for intensive (or, in some cases, even standard) Covid-19 medical treatment. We know that the associated protocols can induce death, and that they were sometimes employed on residents in public care who were not in immediate danger of death or even Covid-19-positive.
Just today I came across the Nebra Sky Disc (see image) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebra_sky_disc and it made me think of that sculpture of the lion. Don’t know if it is helpful at all, but the disk is said to depict the stars as they were during the 16th century BC. Was wondering if you knew of the disc and if it may have any relevance to the work you’re doing (which admittedly I hardly understand but am fascinated by nonetheless).
Bas, yes I have examined the imagery of the Nebra sky disc several times. My thought is that it was a navigational binnacle on a boat. But have not figured out whether or not it was a ‘home port’ sky, used for an aid at getting back home – even if the captain who held the resident knowledge of how to do so fell ill or was captured/killed, or a more specific navigational tool. The ‘sky boat’ at the bottom is the mid-summer sun’s analemma for Local Apparent Noon (one of the few daytime navigation tools), while the east and west arcs were for the azimuth of the rising and setting sun. The moon appears obvious in the casting, but I am not sure how it would be navigationally relevant since the Moon changes its position throughout each year and is tough to navigate from, without a detailed text reference.
A fine mystery nonetheless!
EVG
TES
Pingback: Truth Social and Starlink – The Connection | The Radio Patriot
The conformist group (“blue church” for instance) which creates straw-man arguments to deflate hypotheses which do not conform to group beliefs, and maintains group cohesion long enough, is ultimately at risk for a Jim Jones, “everybody has to drink the Kool-Aid at the same time” moment (IMHO)
Would you PLEASE, PLEASE, add a line for hybrid cars?!
Anita, not sure I’m going to have time to do that. I would need to investigate the types of hybrids in prevalent use, their usage profile habits and time spent on electrical drive or augmentation versus fuel consumed in the engine, and then the percent allocated to longer drive rural versus shorter drive urban use. Makes it a much tougher value chain to isolate. But I understand the question.
The essence would be – is the middle the ‘best of both worlds’ – and my instinct would suggest – “It depends”
EVG
TES
I’m finding that all of this goes back generations. If not for vigilant sceptics like you, we would be in worse shape. This crisis in science had to happen because reproducibility has been a problem for a long time. ‘The Economist’ published an article covering the problem in 2012-2013 and I was shocked to the core of how deep it was. Less than 40% of the published research stood the test of reproducibility.
“Correct scientists study correct things. Science is there to empirically confirm how correct they are.”
If you think the reproducibility crisis reflected terribly in scientific publications in general, you’d be shocked how much lower that 40% is when it comes to published medical and pharma research specifically.
As far as I was aware, Flat Earth theory was an academic exercise. It began with a knowing false proposition, “the earth is flat” and used this to test the laws of physics. To me it was and still is this dinner party academic exercise. “Oh, but the earth appears round because gravity increases towards the edge of the flat disc and so light is bent to make it appear round.” To which someone replies, “so what experiments would you use to falsify this …” and the conversation would go on etc etc … (Try it, it’s fun, and it tests your academic ability).
But then suddenly this exercise was misconstrued such that it meant the participants _did_ believe the earth was flat etc … As to when this happened, I don’t know? As to whether it was deliberate I don’t know but strongly suspect so, see https://htmlgiant.com/author-spotlight/david-berman-and-epistemological-closure-in-the-propaganda-state/ and draw your own inferences. The upshot of all of this … I simply ignore all discussions of this nature since it’s built upon a false premise set by some other.
Great input Gyges, thanks! I ignore it as well. There are zombie theories, the walking dead theories which have been falsified but are Lindy. Then there are also Frankenstein theories – not real, just cobbled together as a straw man – still walking around dead as well.
EVG
TES
This is in regard to the chart on the cerebrovascular death rates. My question is why would these appear to be seasonal, or cyclic. Is the flu shot or something related to the flu season impacting this death rate in past years? Same question about malignant neoplasm, why wouldn’t this be more linear, like the chart on non natural case of death. My area is computer science, so maybe there is a physiological explanation beyond my knowledge base.
I love all of your well researched and sourced charts that explain what is going on, and confirms what you predicted almost 2 years ago
Most deaths involve several mechanisms. What the NCHS tracks are two things: Underlying cause of death (UCOD) and multiple cause of death (MCOD). When we cite an underlying cause of death, often the timing of ‘when’ is pushed by a compounding factor. Many times that factor is a winter virus, or just the nature of winter stress on the body. One can still die of the etiology, but winters seem to attract those deaths like a magnet through these added compounding factors. Most CDC ICD-10 causes of death bear this same seasonality effect. But be aware that I trim off the lower part of the chart graph, so that the variance looks larger. Many of these seasonal variances are 2 – 5 %, so they are not large.
Hope that helps,
EVG
TES
It is amazing. Flat earth is so easily refuted but nobody will do their homework. This is only one of many conspiracy theories (geo-engineering is the most pernicious). The biggest danger I see is that they shred the legitimacy of many people who are legitimately skeptical about issues like vaccines.
I think that that is the real aim behind promoting these pseudo theories.
Agreed. I always thought that was why “Flat Earthers” suddenly appeared. We were clearly reaching people when it came to the lack of true safety science on vaccines. They needed to find new ways to neutralize us.
It’s notable that nowhere in the Bible does it say that drinking alcohol is a sin. There are those individuals who are told they must not do it (see John the Baptist). But this is a clear exception, which proves the rule that there is no general prohibition against all alcohol consumption. In fact, the most sacred ritual of Christianity involves drinking wine, and doing it for the forgiveness of sins. In the institution Christ Himself said of the cup, “this is my blood” and gave it to His disciples to drink. Certain denominations which are ostensibly committed to the Bible being the 100% inerrant, Word of God, go to great lengths to add words to and subtract words from it. You will hear the nonsense about the wine of the day being equivalent to grape juice. I am not surprised that people pick up on this. It’s total malarkey. These are man made rules, not commandments from God.
Tyler,
Correct on alcohol. Even the whole ‘set of sins’ thing is a red herring, and spiritual chewing gum. I began to distrust Paul as I read his diatribes about who was and who was not getting into heaven, early in my study of the Bible. The ‘Letters to’ he supposedly penned were not up to any kind of standard of wisdom about our world and how evil works. Whoever wrote them had not really done much in their life. The ‘sins’ were canned, missed the nature of true evil, and ran anathema to what Christ outlined.
I am not convinced that the entire ‘Road to Damascus’ thing was not the act of a double-agent in the first place. How does the old saying go? ‘The second best method of genocide of a group is through killing them, the best method is by becoming their leader.’
TES
Can you please elaborate on how you think Paul’s writings contradict Jesus? I am sure I will not agree on this, but I am interested to hear what you have to say. Particularly because it will lead me to study the Word more closely myself.
As Luke introduces:
What Luke is actually saying:
1. There were many differing opinions as to what went on
2. The recounts are all third-hand or worse
3. They had to be interpreted (fulfilled) according to our understanding (among us) – which means they re-wrote them according to how they understood spirituality in their sect
4. What I write and how I interpret the words/events, is now the truth of those words/events (even if they conflict with older manuscripts)
In other words, Luke exploited a rhetorical structure to make claims which allowed him to gloss over these actual problems in the story. He was manipulating the reader. And Luke was the MOST honest among the authors – by admitting this. The problem is that even this, the best account among the Gospels, is 150+ years after the fact. Why were all the previous written accounts destroyed? Writing was not invented in 100 ad – so this is a glaring issue. Not trivial in the least. The only reason no documents would exist from 35 to 150 ad, is if someone wanted them exterminated. That should be a big warning flag, and we just Pollyannishly ignore this HUGE problem. It is like not getting bank account balances from you accountant for 40 years, and then being handed your final account balances after 40 years of hard work, and you have $250 in the bank – plus they won’t tell you the starting account balance you inherited from your parents either. Something is glaringly wrong, and casts primary doubt on those who published the ‘new account’ – without authentication, they hold a 99% chance of lying on critical subtleties.
These are warning flags that a re-interpretation is underway, but placed into code. The confirmation of this, is that all competing scriptures were exterminated – without vetting/sign-off by first-hand witness. That too is a warning flag. Yet later writings in Turkey and the filtering of the Canonical Councils centuries later are accepted as Gospel? No, this is the same trick fake skepticism uses. Re-writing the laws and principles of philosophy to their favor, without your knowledge of their provenance or sound basis.
And Luke is the BEST we have.
Thus, it is more of philosophical change to which I object, from early New Testament to the times of the Anatolian Churches under Rome – so I don’t typically get into verse to verse semantic arguments – as that cedes too many assumptions before the argument has even begun. The verses are not reliable, as the speakers are not experienced in human nature, were not even close to being first hand witnesses, the semantics are poorly chosen, and finally the writers simply wrote what they and their sect wanted to hear. So unlike many, I do not hold the Bible as an inerrant document. This is what happens today after all. This applies to Genesis and the New Testament in particular. Changing ‘elohim’ to ‘Yahweh/Jehova’, or ‘Son of Man’ (the Gnostic scriptures use) to ‘Son of God’ centuries later for instance.
Moreover, the Bible writers cite the work of Christian salvation as finished at the Cross – and then outline centuries later how God is still angry after this completion milestone, and is still going to take his vengeance out on the world in The Revelation of John – this after having already punished man in Genesis too – so here we are paying for sin a total of eight times (Geneisis ‘Death’, Expulsion, Suffering, Tithe, Crucifixion, Suffering, Tithe, Wrath of Revelation, Lake of Fire) – How many friggin’ times is a hapless race supposed to be punished for a single mythical event? No mention is made of what will happen to the dark spirits which inhabit and enslave this world right now. That is a BIG hole in the story. Nelsonian ignorance. A flag that deception and a shift of blame, on the part of the actual guilty party, is underway. This too indicative of a brilliance-in-evil that is not fully comprehended by Paul nor the Canonical Councils.
Finally, they got this whole ‘Through one man did sin/death enter the world’ and ‘DNA vs The Flesh’ thing fatally incorrect. The whole house of cards collapses on that foundational stone. Man did not create sin-death after all. They sold us this bill of goods, while we were ignorant of the planet’s and life’s history. That’s a pretty critical trust-breaker. Selling such a principle of manipulation to a hapless uninformed victim is like stealing the pension of a widow, a despicable act. The worst of sins. It is akin to saying ‘You must earn God’s approval’ – before you can mentally broach the argument, ‘This ‘God’ must first earn my trust’.
And yet sinners still must follow the list of additional symbolic and mostly meaningless behaviors to keep out of God’s wrath after God’s work was suposedly finished, or they will lose this gift and cannot come back a second time. Paul was big on that.
This is called in ethics, a ‘bait and switch’. It is a method of manipulating a hapless party. It is a praxis of evil. A canned technique of extracting money and obedience under an irreconcilable offense (hence, why I wrote “The Riddle of Sin” and “The Awesome Insistence of Cataclysmic Mirage Theory (CMT)”). An evil which is much greater than ‘sloth, backbiting, envy, drunkenness, revelry, etc.’ and the shallow list of social pretense that Paul flippantly assembled.
I am not impressed by the overall integrity of the message. I get strong sense that a highly threatening and disruptive message was intercepted, corrupted and re-written, and all traces of the original were wiped out. This is what the Covidians did to us over the last two years. This is what oppressive authority always does – as lying is its native tongue. And the Bible is the product of this very same Authority.
The resulting work of philosophy derived from this quick re-issuance therefore of course, does not hold ethical water.
TES
Quite so –
What is most shocking to me is how normalized the sincere promotion of large-scale censorship has become among those who see themselves in the tradition of rationality and free thought.
They would quote Voltaire or Bertrand Russel or all the other great minds that are canonically counted among the guardians of enlightenment (well, at least the somewhat literate among them would/could quote them, if being literate is still a thing) … because they logically see themselves in the exalted intellectual tradition that fights superstition, obtuseness, prejudice and everything else that is not ethical and reasonable.
And what is ethical and reasonable? Well, exactly that which is what they think and say! They know that they are right. There is no question about that – but stupid humanity can’t wrap its stupid collective head around that, so they “have” to play unfair and viciously fight or even ban all that misguided dissent – to save humanity from itself! They know they are right (they never ever questioned their fundamental certainties), so if they have to resort to sophistry or even censorship … well, then it’s people’s own fault! How would they learn otherwise? If they can’t see reason, then they have to be forced to see reason!
And of course, all that is completely different from all the other cases of enforced conformity in human history – because THIS time, they know they are right! This time it’s different – obviously!
Every comparison to (or even mention of) group-think, propaganda or totalitarianism in this context would be completely absurd and a “conspiracy theory” …
They don’t – no, they can’t – see the irony of what they are doing. They don’t even have the slightest degree of self-awareness, let alone cultural-historical awareness of what they are doing. That it is increasingly coming from quarters that – historically – have been on the other (the “better”) side of the fence when it comes to freedom of thought is simply disgusting.
I love it TS,
“Any disposition that identifies my ideas about conspiracy theory as being wrong, is itself conspiracy theory.”
i had an exchange with a friend’s wife a few years back regarding my use of the word “retarded”
she argued that it is hurtful to those parents of mentally-challenged kids, i argued “but that’s not the definition i am employing for this particular word in this particular context. further, WHO is empowered to decide which words i may employ? and where may i find the constantly-updating list of words i am no longer permitted to utter?”
i am of the admittedly rigid opinion that freedom of speech includes lies, hatred, and fantastical conspiracy theory. only calls for violence or tangible threats should be censured.
Lies will eventually falsify themselves.
The biggest liar, no matter what truth they claim, is the one who will not let this process evolve and must insert themself inside it.
In regard to language – things like, ‘You ride on the short bus’ or ‘retarded’ – yeah, while we have that freedom absolutely, I tend to stay away from such pejoratives – and really focus on the specific stupid things people do…
EVG
TES
Pingback: My Sundown – Positiv Denken
I read this excellent piece when it came out. Have you figured in the much greater mass of the oceans compared to the atmosphere? The total mass of earth’s oceans is 1.4 × 1021 kg. The total mass of the earth’s atmosphere is 5 × 1019 kg. If you have written about this, please feel free to delete this comment.
10 to the 21st power vs 10 to the 19th power. Superscript was lost on posting
Yes, I thought that was what you were implying.
ABN, a great point,
I have addressed this in a benchmark which loosely holds that the ocean can hold 1000 times more heat content than an equivalent cube of atmosphere. However, that is cube-to-cube. Your context opens up to mass and specific heat – which I have not taken into account in this article.
Specific heat of water versus air and the ability to raise just the four or five bands of abyssal and surface would be a level of model constraint detailed data I don’t hold.
Great input!
TES
I got the following ratio: Mass of oceans (so, excluding lakes and rivers etc.) is 270 times the mass of atmosphere.
Hi,
Would you say, perhaps, that warming ocean currents are not the cause of giant sinkholes found in the Arctic permafrost?
https://www.theweathernetwork.com/en/news/climate/impacts/giant-sinkholes-found-forming-on-the-seafloor-in-northern-canada
Gloveraa, sinkholes on the seafloor are definitely caused by rising deep and abyssal ocean temperatures. But as well, if the asthenosphere is raised 20 degrees C, then the warmer Earth 40 – 600 meters down will accelerate the annual vernal outgassing of methane and cause sinkholes there as well, yes.
TES
Yes, I think I see.
Both the prevailing Climate Change Theory and your Climate Change Alternative Model have as objects the changing ocean temperature, regardless of how that was arrived at.
And, for my inquiry, vernal outgassing is provided as another plausible explanation by your reasoning.
Eloquent theory!
https://www.jenniferzengblog.com/home/flying-hiv
maybe even earlier, is this it?
This may be an old article, but it is a very important one. A great one, in fact …
Every “SCIENCE!”-screaming troglodyte should be confronted with these clear and concise clarifications. Too much stupid “science” gibberish muddles through by being ill-considered hogwash that is never challenged in the simple yet fundamental ways that it deserves!
Somehow I feel very much at home with this article :)
Today’s all too relevant, up-to-date forms of Propaganda, in all their intangibility, are perhaps my biggest and most “favourite” (yuck!) pet peeves of all. They are the omnipresent poison of modern thinking, tainting everything that is ever thought.
Lately, I have been deeply immersed in this troubling twilight world of horrors in which “skepticism” and rationality duke it out in the fields of inquiry that “skeptics” deem to be fair game … and I would be so much more impressed (by the “skeptics”, that is) if they would understand how ridiculously trite, mindless and stupid their “arguments” are. I could do so much better to convincingly “debunk” whatever there is to “debunk”, if I wanted to – if I wanted to be a disingenuous agent of general stultification.
Often it is just a matter of being able to read properly! But even that is too much to ask of them under most circumstances …
It is getting silly. There are limits to how much idiocy a decently developed human brain can take without getting grumpy. For me, those borders have been crossed a long time ago. But, regarding the last few years, I think there is something else developing that is also somewhat new (or newly implemented).
When – suddenly – all speak with one voice, then you can be sure that something is wrong. That “wrongness” is something I have felt/observed in so many areas for such a long time, although often in the abstract, that I presume to know it by now. But now – or in the last few years, to be exact – that quality has reached a new level of concreteness.
For the first time in my actual life, I viscerally fear for humanity …
I do fear for humanity as well, TS.
Science can harm, and when done for virtue – there are no unintended consequences.
Our educated, and guardians of science – are mere kabuki now.
Not a good combination.
TES
Thank you for the considered reply to my 2 questions. I appreciate your thought-provoking and detailed response. I am hoping that you will find time to address a couple of additional questions which might help me and others understand the timeframe as to when the first White-tailed Deer could possibly have contracted Covid-19 anywhere within the United States.
I have read elsewhere a belief that the SARS-CoV-2 virus may have been circulating in the US long before it was detected on January 18, 2020 in the State of Washington; this first documented case of Covid-19 was found in an individual who had just returned from Wuhan, China. And I realize that you have proposed that a less virulent strain of this same virus originated sometime in 2018 and spread throughout southeast Asia before somehow disappearing or becoming dormant. But I would like your assessment as to the likelihood that this low virulence strain of SARS-CoV-2 also could have been circulating within the United States AND infected a portion of its deer population before the more deadly form of this virus evolved and erupted into an outbreak in Wuhan, China during December 2019 (which subsequently spread worldwide as the Covid-19 pandemic).
If you do not believe it would be very likely that the earlier – less virulent – strain of SARS-CoV-2 both spread to the United States AND infected White-tailed Deer prior to December 2019, then how soon after the Wuhan outbreak do you believe it would be plausible for deer in the US to become infected with the strains of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the Covid-19 pandemic?
I have puzzled this in my mind since I read that deer throughout a fairly large portion of the US were discovered to harbor antibodies for the SARS2 virus. Upon reading your brilliant deduction that land application of human sewage sludge likely may be a primary cause of this novel wildlife infection, and after your kind response to one set of my questions, I realized that your opinion might be very helpful in providing a better understanding about the timeframe for the spread of Covid-19 to wildlife in the US.
Thanks again, and I look forward to your response.
Dan,
As I like to frame the context of questions, your is ‘salient, sequitur, and critical path’. I would love to have the answer to this. I can only address it abductively (best guess of likeliness) – so this does not make it but one idea.
The 2018 ancestor of Covid, which conferred immunity, did not hit the US hard. It ended its Hope-Simpson season and went mostly extinct before it really penetrated 35 final nations well. In similar fashion to Delta, which did the same thing. I think that SARS-CoV-2 virus loads probably did not rise to the level in Oct 2019, which would compete with Oct 2020. So the deer reflected minimal antibodies from that particular window of time. The deer might be analogous to Wuhan itself – which was the last bastion holdout in China, to get hit hard. Unfortunately by a much more deadly strain…
Now that I see the relative mildness of Omicron, my upset over this pathogen being hidden in 2018/19 has softened. There definitely were excess 2018/19 ‘flu’ death rises in the 2020/21-immnue nations – but it was at a low enough level where this could have snuck by, pretty much everyone except for the PLA lab which released it and the CCP which hid this, because the Party shall not be mocked. They still bear fault.
TES
I read with great interest your discussion of sewage sludge as a possible means for the spread of Covid-19 among White-tailed Deer, and wondered what evidence you may have found which addresses the likelihood that live virus could persist with sufficient viability in this medium to cause infection if subsequently contacted or inhaled when aerosolized. My preliminary investigation into studies and other research which may bear on this question led me to conclude that the viability of live viruses would be exceedingly low and thus unlikely to persist in sewage “sludge” – particularly if it was “digested” or “activated” as is normally done in the sanitary treatment of raw sewage. However, my research also discovered research which may have indicated a somewhat greater likelihood of persistence of live viruses in waters containing raw sewage, and I now recall there might be some studies which indicated the viablity of live viruses might extend for a number of hours (or perhaps a bit longer) within sewage-contaminated waters under certain outdoor environmental conditions.
In parallel to your observation that the spreading of SARS2-contaminated sewage sludge may be responsible for the recently detected evidence of Covid-19 infection in deer, have you considered that sewage settling ponds may also serve as a possible source of infection – many of which are unfenced (or “low” fenced), particularly so near rural towns & larger communities where sewage treatment facilities often are small and isolated? I’ve witnessed deer coming to browse along the edges of a couple of such facilities, and suspect that they may be able to drink from settling ponds at their edges (where sloping sides permit). Also, settling ponds may be a plausible means of infecting nearby wildlife via inhalation if live virus can be propagated from pond water by aerosol transmission (e.g., fog, evaporation, etc.), and perhaps (doubtfully?) also possible for infection to be caused by live virus that may be deposited onto foliage upon contact with and condensation of aerosol vapors and soon thereafter consumed by wildlife susceptible to this infective agent.
In addition, it’s not widely known but there is substantial trade in deer meat (venison) and antlers from “deer farms” or “wildlife farms” – which are allowed under the wildlife laws in most states. Plus, these “deer farms” are widespread, occurring in most every state – and many states have several. These businesses raise deer for meat, antlers,”trophy hunting” and to supply other “deer farms” or “hunting parks”. Several species of deer or elk are often sold or traded.
You can google “deer farms” and discover that these businesses have websites and sell their products on-line. A few even have “open houses” where they allow the public to come visit their deer enclosures; I’ve seen photos posted on a couple of “deer farm” websites which show families with kids standing next to tame deer (supposedly these tame deer were part of a regular tour offered as part of an “educational program” for that “deer farm”. I believe deer enclosures likely are visited by wild deer, who may browse next to confined animals (or come close when attracted during mating season). This would provide the opportunity for transmission of Covid-19, particularly if muzzle contact is possible but perhaps equally as likely via aerosol transmission of live virus through respiratory exchanges. In addition, the threat of disease transmission from confined deer to nearby cattle and livestock is significantly large enough that USDA and state governments require the owners of “deer farms” to have veterinary inspections of confinement facilities as well as provide proof of inoculations for each animal. However, I do not believe there is as yet a Covid-19 vaccination requirement for “farmed” deer, probably because a vaccine has not yet been developed and shown to be effective in deer or other wildlife (or even for pets?).
Sadly, there is an underground market “niche” in the exotic pet and wildlife trades that sell captive wildlife such as “deer fawns”. However, this illegal activity likely provides only a small and incidental risk in spreading the virus which causes Covid-19.
Dan,
Regarding question 1 ‘Can a live virus survive long in sewage sludge?’ – Covid is not a lone virus in sewage. It is not exposed to oxygen, halogens, or UV when in sludge – and more importantly, it acts like a bacteriophage – especially with dysbiosis constituents, Coprobacillus, Clostridium ramosum and Clostridium hathewayi, etc. It lives inside intestinal bacteria – and will stay alive as long as there are remnants of ACE2/MAS/G protein pathways, There is a reason why sewage sludge can only be used in the Fall, prior to the first freeze. Class B Biosolids are ‘mostly mitigated’ – not 100%. A virus works off the exception and can reactivate and multiply when disturbed by spraying or new moisture (as is added into Class B biosolids before spraying, in order to get it to fall), and not the rule – that is how evolution and viruses function – by the exception, not the rule. Humans think in terms of rules (constraints) – and that is Level I logic. Level II logic involves extraints and permissives. The logic and language of adaptation, survival, and evolution. We have no measures for live virus content in waterways and Class B Biosolids. It remains a danger and cannot be dismissed by abductive reasoning.
Regarding question 2 ‘Why not estuaries and deer farms.?’ A simple answer – Covid would have spread immediately and not have waited until Nov 2020. In Nov 2020, we saw that Covid (not just one clade but ALL human clades which were active before that time) spread in the deer population – they emulated humanity literally almost overnight (see Exhibit 1.1, both panels). If those two vectors were the means, it would have happened in April, not November – and only one or two early clades would have been present. Instead – the deer got all November 2020 clades, and all at the same time, and too late to be explained by a normal everyday of the year activity…. There is only one means by which they would suddenly get infected by ALL human clades simultaneously, in November and not April.
This is a Level II evidence set. One cannot solve this with Level I inference and abduction.
TES
Why did you not include nuclear as the power generation source?
Because, this is a comparison of EV’s fed by home solar, versus fossil fuels. Nuclear power is not in this value chain – but rather, increases or reduces its scale (potentially). Nuclear Power is it own value chain and would act as a red herring here (which I constantly see others exploit in order to lie to the public) – the whole reason for doing value chains is so as not to mix principles. My purpose is clarity in a complex subject, not over-complication for appearances’ sake.
TES
Deep Sea Octopi use geothermal vents to speed up birth cycles. According to this site, in their region there are vents with temps “as high as 10deg” that can speed the birth cycles up by 90%+.. They’ve only explored 1% of the region.
https://blog.therainforestsite.greatergood.com/octopus-eggs/
Figure 6 in this study indicates the correlation between the deep sea octopus birthing cycle and temperatures.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0103437
Their numbers are likely unfathomable. Their presence alone could trap heat in the bottom of the ocean, they could be moving rocks and expanding these vents.
“Clusters of deep-sea egg-brooding octopods associated
with warm fluid discharge: an ill-fated fragment of a
larger, discrete population?” Study link.
I’m far too lazy to look into more. But I found this rather interesting and relevant – people say that octopus numbers are growing because of global warming. I reckon they are right – but is it because these vents are getting warmer? Worth a thought.
Your piece is very provocative – I love things that challenge my preconceptions. I enjoyed the read and will check out some more of your work.
Sea warming is a geo-engineering plot by the Octopi… I knew it!!!
They are pretty darn smart. :-)
I suspect that this will be mocked as tinfoil-hat fantasy…
https://drjohnsblog.substack.com/p/mind-control-tech-advances?s=w
This research article by Spartacus follows upon others that reveal a deep intelligence investment in the technology of SARS-CoV-2, the engineered virus, now with variations, and genetic-engineering “vaccines” to help your body make spike protein itself, for months on end.
This explains a frighteningly plausible big picture of the road to Build Back Better World.
A Hypothetical Mind Control System
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part-iv-mind-control?s=r
Spartacus’ letter was incredible.
Since I previously posted a link to that “cognitive bias cheat sheet”, I should probably mention that such things can have the same problem as a “logical fallacies cheat sheet” in the hands of someone who is determined to explain away everything in terms of biases or logical fallacies.
Someone could either not be biased in the manner claimed, or be somewhat biased in the manner claimed, but still be correct about something.
I tend to think these things are more useful for people asking themselves “am I coming to this conclusion primarily due to bias?” Or “Is my reasoning erroneous here?” And not so useful as things to accuse other people of or dismiss ideas out-of-hand without further consideration.
As for the shortcomings of statistical models, all someone needs to do to experience this is get a paper trade account and try writing “low theoretical expiring ITM probability” (such as 1 sigma out) SPX index options on expiration day, then let them expire. They will most likely lose much more Monopoly money than they make relying entirely on that idea, even if they limit losses using short vertical spreads, especially if this is always done on expiration day.
I may seem somewhat like this but in reality it’s more like I’m playing devil’s advocate to get more information and I haven’t actually come to any conclusions.
People too determined to “debunk” everything are actually just exhibiting psychological denial.
At some point I came across this, which seems like it must be somewhat incomplete but seems like a pretty good summary of cognitive bias phenomena https://betterhumans.pub/cognitive-bias-cheat-sheet-55a472476b18
Perhaps there should be a term?
The press here attempted to copy the CCP tactic for denouncing unapproved narratives when they started using the term “fake news”, but this was promptly turned against them.
I wonder if there’s a better term though….
On the same note: Yeshuah = Iah saves?! Food for thought…
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
thank you for this mindblowing article (and for the other mindblowing articles of yours, by the way). It was a most stimulating read!
Now, I have read the article just yesterday and to be honest, I have not fully absorbed it yet. But I have noticed that in exhibit 14, you put star #12 inside the crescent moon, whereas in exhibits 16 and 17, you put it outside the crescent moon. Was there a reason for this? Because if star #12 was fully INSIDE the crescent moon, how could we even be able to see it? In this case, the moon would block our view on this star, would it not?
Now, here is a “far out” possibility: Star #12 might not have been a star after all. It might have been some kind of light which was flashed from a dark patch on the moon. In this case, it would have been totally correct to depict it INSIDE the crescent moon, as many (most? all?) ancient depictions in fact did. Maybe depicting the star OUTSIDE of the crescent moon was already a later distortion of historical fact, because having the star inside the crescent moon was considered “impossible”?!
Consider also that we seem to be talking about the same event which might have inspired the tale of the “star of Bethlehem”, which is of course linked to the God of the Old Testament. If we now compare the name of this God with the name of a certain egyptian lunar deity, Iah, which also simply was an egyptian word for “moon” – well, I don’t fully know what to make of it, to be honest. But it looks like an intriguing avenue for investigation to me.
In any case, you are way smarter than me, so make of that what you will! Just dropping this thought here. Maybe you find it as useful and interesting as I do.
Again, thank you for your work and for your tireless fight against pseudo-skepticism! I don’t know if there ever was a time where we needed voices like yours more than now.
Best regards,
Tobias
Thank you for the kind comments Tobias.
Yes, the odds of this actually being a ‘star’ are pretty low, as stars come replete with LOTS of gravity. I am leaving it open as to whether or not the light came from the moon or alongside it. Given that Star #12 is on the ecliptic, perhaps it is a body of our solar system which is not close enough to disrupt the orbits of the planets. But I do not have the answers to this.
We only know that these Magi saw something.
EVG TES
Bravo! I see that you also compose music in addition to definitively unraveling an astounding variety of subjects. If you put all your writings into one or more volumes of a philosophy/science/logic series, it will be read and studied for centuries.
Sorry to hear about your child. I have a vaccine injured child as well. Twenty one years ago, when my first child was just born, not even dry yet, the nurse ran up to her with several needles. I said what are those? She said one was vitamin K and the other Hepatitis B vaccine. I replied you can give the vitamin K but not the Hepatitis B. She got angry and tried to threaten me but I raised my voice and sternly lectured her that I was a physician, had recently gotten an 800 on my Immunology boards, and that my wife and child had zero risk of acquiring Hepatitis B. I lectured her with all the information that was fresh in my mind at the time concerning things like where Hepatitis B was endemic(Mexico and China), who was at risk(IV drug abusers), the timing of the injection and so forth. She finally barked “Are you refusing”?. I declared “Yes!” It was at that moment I realized that something had gone seriously wrong with the medical industry, particularly concerning vaccines. I brought my daughter to many of her pediatric visits and every single one was centered on more vaccine shots. I researched every disease individually and told the pediatrician I only wanted her to get one shot per visit. The pediatrician was annoyed but granted my wish. Then on one visit, the pediatrician came with the MMR and ChickenPox. I said okay to the MMR, but no to the chickenpox. She asked why. I responded that I had the chickenpox when I was a kid, as did every friend and family member I knew. It was a mild disease, barely noticeable, that was less disruptive than the common cold. Then she pulled out the big guns. You’re child will not be able to go to school! I capitulated and let my daughter get both. Well, starting the next day began the downward spiral, high fever, piercing screams and total body rash. My wife and I brought my daughter in to the pediatrician who would not treat her or even look at her. She just kept insisting the vaccine had nothing to do with it. I said I don’t care about that right now, do something. She did nothing. Ny daughter regressed, lost her speech and eye contact. We got very lucky because following years of top level nutrition, speech therapy and just pure luck she mostly recovered, now with residual learning disability, which is a constant stressor for her and us, but we count our blessings.
When I was a child I got all the required vaccines which was a total of maybe 5 or 6. None of them contained aluminum adjuvant and most I received after 3 years old. Through my entire childhood and adolescence I maybe encountered one person with a bee-sting allergy and maybe one with peanut allergy, but that was all. I knew one kid who had some type of mental impairment, the sister of a friend of mine, but it was something like severe cerebral palsy. I had never even heard of autism. Now, as an adult with grown children, I know dozens of people who have kids or grandkids with food allergies, around ten people who have autistic family members, and many other neuro/immunological problems. The only people I have met who know that there are true risks to vaccines all have seen it with their own eyes. I worry now for any future grandchildren I might have. After all, the Tobacco industry got away with their crimes for many decades before SO many people had lung cancer that every lawyer, judge and doctor personally knew a smoker who got lung cancer. Only then did the lawsuits end the charade. It wasn’t that smoking was suddenly proven to cause it. I fear that as a society we will ramp up the vaccine schedule until it mandates multiple yearly shots from birth. It won’t end until EVERY judge, lawyer, doctor, and politician has a family member who blatantly regressed in the weeks after a vaccine. Seeing is believing. Unfortunately that may be decades away, particularly with how the industry showed it’s propaganda power and governmental influence with this Covid blockbuster. I have a glimmer of hope that with terrific research, analysis and writing like The Ethical Skeptic did here, and others like JB Handley’s “How to End the Autism Epidemic”, that we could end this coming apocalypse sooner.
My goodness what an ordeal!!
If we take the chart I published recently, which showed 5,800 reduced infant deaths in 2020 attributable to a 15.5% reduction in vaccinations (Bramer, May 2020) – that gives us 37,400 children who die of infant vaccinations each year. If we take the VAERS injury to severe ratio of .0374 injuries/severe reaction – that gives us 1,000,500 severe reactions to vaccines every year.
If two thirds of those constitute life-long injury (as with my son) – that equates to 680,000 brain injuries every year out of 4,000,000 annual births – or 17% brain injury rate – EXACTLY what I observed at my son’s basketball games as the percentage of kids with encephalitic special needs (albeit most milder than my son’s).
EVG
TES
and that is the dog that didnt bark. beautiful analysis. it seems youve changed this article some a little? i read a yr plus ago. its clearer i think
it seems to me that current propaganda is highly targeted to emotional response
women seemingly dominate the profession of teaching children
children are being encouraged to “feel”, rather than “reason”
feelings are warm, reason is cold
i notice it a lot when speaking to the under-40 crowd: they say “i feel” when they should be saying “i think”, or “i believe” when relaying their version of information
i assume this is because their argument/information in this way becomes unassailable – “this is how i feel! my feelings aren’t wrong”
i blame women lol
Judging Intent – is indeed a way of judging-by-feeling, in advance of having any information at all. Also known as ‘everyone should do whatever the fuck I want’… Correct.
A nulla infantis, just by sophisticated psychology terms… (although I would contend this is not simply a female thing)
Good Point dth.
TES
Thx
Just going to add
Was use of “Its intent” in re The Conditions Of Flawed Information 2nd sentence intentional (lol)?
It jarred a bit due to the assertion intent is not attributable to info
Very good point – changed the sentence to be consistent. However, this is actual intent, rather than judged intent in that context now.
Thanks!
TES
Did you go above and beyond to make this coherent to mere mortals, or did I have moment of clarity or was better acquainted with the subject… because I think I understood everything.
I think you probably had a better grasp of this subject. The nuances of logic in the language were a bit tricky. The actual deception they are pulling off by altering the language so that the definition base is ‘lopsided’ is not easy to discern.
I am trying to think of a graphic I can use, in order to demonstrate how they are pulling this off… (Update Note: I think I have crafted what I wanted to say, into a chart, now inserted into the article)
Thanks for the readership!
EVG
TES
Great observation. Functioning propaganda in this day and age works this way, not in the crude Nazi-Germany/Soviet Union/North Korea way. And not only in grand ideological-political matters.
Perhaps the Wuhan lab employed one or more careless technicians causing multiple virus leaks over the years, with different variations of the virus each time. This could explain why an early mild variant could have spread in 2018 and not have been recognized as a Wuhan leak, and the recent more virulent strain caused conspicuous disease in Wuhan before it spread elsewhere.
I was quite suspicious at the beginning as to how Moderna could have gotten the full viral sequence so soon after the illness made headlines around December 2019, unless the Wuhan lab had the full sequence, gave it to Daszak or Fauci, who then gave it to Moderna.
Not a bad scenario plausibly explaining the genetic diversity. This I will keep in mind.
Thanks Kev
TES
I think maybe something is being overlooked here about a large structure on a mountain where observers make observations.
It seems likely to me that this wasn’t just an attempt to honor gods, but to communicate a message to them, then wait and watch for a response. It resembles a signal post, something which in human terms would be placed high up so that signal fires could be seen from another high place at a distance. Observers would also be watching for signals from other signal posts in the mundane human case.
An astonishing astronomical event would appear as clearly being a message from the sky, in response to the message from the ground, which would then be recorded for all to see later.
A similar pattern shows up in various “UFO cults” where gods are replaced with aliens. Cult members will create earth writing or use other means in an attempt to signal “the aliens”, then interpret UFO sightings as messages from the aliens in response to the messages from the humans. I haven’t spent much time looking into the exact beliefs but I’ve seen some videos of “ufo gatherings” where this seems to be what’s going on, and have read some descriptions of similar.
As for the flags, flags normally carry some sort of symbol of sovereignty or legitimacy. For example, the wheel on the Indian flag is a very old sovereignty symbol that goes back at least 2000+ years. I’m not sure how old it is based on carvings, but it is mentioned repeatedly in the Tipitaka which is usually considered to be 2,400 years old by Buddhists.
If this astonishing “message from the gods” was widely seen as a confirmation of approval and legitimacy, it would entirely make sense that a simplified depiction of the message would later be used as a symbol of legitimacy. Since the Ottomans eventually claimed Stewardship (kalafat) of the Islamic civilization, it would make sense that their legitimacy symbol would spread throughout the Islamic world as a sovereignty/legitimacy symbol even if the symbol didn’t originate with Islam. The same might have happened with the wheel if The Stewardship had been centered in India instead.
As for the WEF logo graphics, it’s possible that the design was imitated for similar sovereignty/legitimacy type reasons especially if the graphic artist was influenced by this symbolism, either via cultural background or familiarity.
Anyway, imagine what would happen if some aliens sent an unambiguously-from-aliens message in binary or something that essentially suggested that a particular government or ideology was the most legitimate one and the one everyone ought to imitate. Even today it would not be surprising if this message not only ended up in a museum somewhere to commemorate such a rare and surprising “first contact” event, but also on the flag of any xenophilic country or organization devoted to following the alien advice.
I think to ancient people it may have seemed something like this, just replace the aliens with gods.
This deacon contract is just …. fascinating. What more can you say about it?
Deacon hereby agrees that the Bible is the sole, inerrant, and final declaration of God to mankind, and to not regularly consume any material or information source which does not serve to reinforce such principle.
This part alone … God help you if you dare to read Shakespeare, Goethe or Tolkien – let alone Wittgenstein!
…
I have found that my own personal wounds have not only caused me more pain and harm than they deserve to, but also others. For a long time, I have been a happy human being, almost ashamed of my luck and welfare.
Then, after many years of joyful self-determination, the other side of existence made its harrowing acquaintance with me – and I suffered quite a bit; now I recognise the patterns that make up those confusing and often harmful existential mechanisms that you describe here, and I can’t even say that I know what it is that did it to me. I think it was/is me – but also everything: Myself, my world, circumstance and something akin to fate.
I am only an observer of myself – but I am also the doer, the perceiver, and the one who pays the bills, so to say … all at once. I hate to think of all the horror and cruelty that comes to so many people every day – and which is so much more powerful and horrible than what I have ever encountered. But even knowing a little bit of history is enough to freeze your blood with icy fear and disgust beyond comprehension …
And then we have today’s world. When it comes to not being in line with what is typically accepted as being conventional, I surely am qualified to say: Something is not quite right, despite all the assurances to the contrary by the “clergy” of modern technocracy.
And I am not talking about the shopworn pieces of wisdom that pretend to be questions and answers at the same time …
Not to mention that [brain=mind] does in no way explain away all the complex phenomena arising from “mind” – for example Dr. Marcus being a conscious being saying/writing what he does. Having the thoughts he has. Or all the other complex phenomena arising from minds existing, interacting and giving rise to new phenomena.
I certainly wouldn’t explain away a computer program just because it is a “property” of the computer. And we all know how mysteriously even those act and interact – and what they give rise to. And mind is even far more wondrous …
It isn’t even necessary for mind to be there “before” brain for it to be a miracle and the source of innumerable wonders. But we don’t know or understand nearly enough about it to make any definitive statements that masquerade as the be-all and end-all truth of it … we are not even close.
If mind is only an epiphenomenon, then we have a lot of epiphenomena discussing with other epiphenomena why they are just epiphenomena …
June 2021 cases curves from Latvia Estonia Australia “you wouldn’t believe the truth”… Hmmm… I keep saying Delta came from the Vax. Georgia got same delta hit as Latvia, Estonia, and Australia… And Delta is also symbol of change… The purpose was to change the minds of the younger and healthier… Delta killed my coworkers younger sons coworker. 2 of my coworkers age 32? and 42? Hospitalized by Delta. Our circle, N = 1500 last summer was mostly younger Delta cases. MIT article on multiple vaccine doses delivered by polymer encapsulates in nano cups that can release 41 days later… If they can make a virus that kills 50 percent of over 65 yrs, (SARS MERS) and Alpha predominantly over 65 yrs but lower percent… if… then they can make a virus that mostly sickens younger, and healthier. (i am sure 1918 was studied well) If they can make a vaccine that releases after 41 days… they can make a vaccine that releases after 180 days with thicker polymer nano cups. I keep saying, Delta came from the vax. Latvia Estonia Australia, and USA Georgia curves all 6 months after the vax rollout. Spars 2025 is coming… because 2026 is first year West promises can not be paid. The Pale horse is coming. Wailing and gnashing of teeth. , China is a patsy. FDA, Pfizer et al. is a patsy. Gates et al is a patsy. layers of deniability. Hubbert’s oil bell curve… Everything USA has done to keep oil in the ground for decades… because we will have to take it one day… Politics cant pay for the promises its made in the west. So the need to pay those promises must be eliminated. Spars 2025… Money and Oil are what Party and power must have, take defend.
You deserve a quality life. You deserve yourself, whole and intact.
Where did you get this idea? Who told you this truth and what are your reasons to believe it?
Nowhere in universe, in nature, outside of God created man in His image you can not say this stands. Right?!
I do not have to qualify a natural law, by making up a supreme entity who handed that natural law down. That actually weakens the basis of the natural law. It is far more competent to comprehend a natural law, without having it passed down to you.
Such laws should not come from enforcement by a superbeing. That violates the very nature of such a being.
No, you do not have to qualify a natural law. Yet I find the arguments that according to this law a human being is supposed to have a better life than ameba or a fox or a tree. Sure there are entities that are sentient, that are alive and on and on… Natural law for me does not make distinctions.
About the enforcement by superbeing. So true about violation of the nature of God. But is it true or is this just a word play.
According to my belief in God he offers and gives me freedom. Manipulation comes not from Him but from those that misuse His will. And yes to the means of gaining power.
Firstly, I want to say that much of these conversations are over my head. I originally found your website in regards to Covid, but as a Christian I was interested in other articles you wrote.
But, for this natural law, imho it truly can only come from God or passed down because otherwise it becomes relative. One person’s truth is another person’s lie. It is the reason why deformed babies were left to die in the woods, or disabled people killed.
again, I’m a novice, so I might not even be contributing to the real argument. :)
But it does sadden me that it seems you do not believe in God’s sons death for our salvation and sounds like it stems from this bad experience with the deacon position. FYI, I use to be a worship leader and I understand why they would do that. It’s not about power, it’s about representation imho. For ex. I had to tell the young teenage girls who were singing in the band to wear longer skirts (they were wearing very short mini skirts). It wasn’t a good representation and it was also a temptation for the men in the church. This is also of course relative, so I understand how some religions don’t care “come as you are” and some take it to the extreme “skirts down to the ankles”.
But in regards to your contract, while I fully don’t agree with the alcohol- UNLESS it is getting drunk which clearly is stated in the bible- it was about representing God’s church to others who would be looking to you as a godly leader. The contract was extreme though, but having a contract makes full sense and I think it is good, if there was a more balanced approach. For instance, “I will make it a priority to not engage in behavior that is against God’s word like getting drunk, watching porn, going against the commandments, etc. If I fail, I will come to God immediately to repent, and if I cannot then I must come to the elders to resign my position.” just my 2 cents :)
A focus on sin – has not made the world any better. Demons are enormously concerned with the sins and bad you have personally done – and they will let you know all about them. That does not make demons and djinn part of the light at all. Sin-mongering is a game foisted by a being who does not want man to alleviate suffering nor improve his lot in the Universe. It is spiritual chewing gum keeping a person constantly terrified and feckless – and is part of the overall prison-shtick we are held captive inside.
The accountability for sin falls upon the ruler of this world who has assumed the throne as God – that has to be re-solved first – or nothing good will ever happen – morality or not.
No, any religion authorized by this being to become a large institution… is not the truth.
The problem with this mindset is the time frame. Mom and dad won’t be here forever, then what? Starting out in your twenties is tough and it doesn’t get easier as you get older. As my Drill Instructor used to say, “Life is tough, and then you die.” It often sucked, but it was worth it. Yes, I am that old.
You are correct; however, this is no longer simply a mindset. This challenge did not exist 15 years ago and earlier. Genocide is different from simple ‘life is hard’. They are two distinct things. One person in the concentration camp should not say to the next, ‘Life is hard, suck it up…’ and just allow the condition to continue. Sometimes ‘sucking it up’ means confronting the concentration camp operators too.
Eventually, part of growing up is also standing up to authority and changing things… not just accepting it, ‘cuz’ you’re tough…’ There are more people being harmed than just you (the royal ‘you’ :-) ). Part of deception is trick a person into thinking that dilemmas are only a personal issue, when they are not. There is a broader principle at play, and when we are simply a nation of defeated individuals, ‘sucking it up’ all alone – that is how they pull off their craft.
Religions use this strategy very effectively.
Listening to the podcast you damn near have the voice and temperament to call NFL games if my ears don’t deceive me. :)
I hesitate to pose an obvious question:
Regulus being the heart of the Lion (Leo), and also being occulted by the moon, makes it a seemingly perfect choice for the position of ‘star #12’ on the horoscope itself – i.e. Regulus is bright, prominent, and in that position would seem to be aligned with the literal heart of the lion depicted, and also in a position to be occulted by the crescent moon.
Would you indulge why Regulus in the position of ‘star #12’ specifically devolves the rest into incoherence?
Could an alternative assignment matrix be resolved by swapping ‘star #12’ with Regulus and ‘star #10′ with Venus? This would account for the ’18’ (or rather 17 stars + 1 planet?) — and in the position of ‘star #10’, Venus is depicted as ‘below the legs’ and ‘hidden in shadow’ (of the lion’s leg and body) a potential allusion to its new phase.
Thank you for the generosity of your thought in any case, this article was intensely thought-provoking.
A great question Alex and well presented to boot!
I had not considered Venus as the potential resolution of the rear leg star, but I did try every way from Sunday to fit Star #12 as Regulus, because that would make so much sense relative to the Babylonian traditions, all the way back to the ‘Way of Enlil’ catalog of the stars. I came to the model assuming that Regulus need end up as Star #12 (being ‘The King’ and having its symbol be a star and crescent) and wound up in years (not full time of course) of trying to force it to be so. Finally I had to give up on that.
Four issues block, this excellent contention
1. Venus – if depicted, would have had 16 rays as a planet, as was the depiction habit of the Babylonian tradition.
2. Venus was too far below the ecliptic to be included in the drawing as a star.
3. Venus would have been included in the star conjunction listing above Leo’s back as well.
4. Once you shift Regulus to the right, to act as Star #12, and add Venus to help re-establish balance of the iconography, the entire 7-8-9-10 shoulder to leg alignment is now unresolvable, as is the rear haunch.
This also shows why I believe this to be a ‘snapshot’ of something exceptional, as opposed to a horoscope. If this was indeed the documentation of a past event, then all the planetary symbols would have been there making it clear, what this was.
My thoughts
TES :-)
sorry… tried to attatch image to comment but pushed post accidentally, then in frustration, pushed post a second time b4 i got it attached the 3rd time… rrrr
Milky Quest.
Aaaaahhh…
Chasing the Milky Way. We six lay huddled close on the old wooden dock, well before dawns light. Murmurs, whispers, gasps, and laughter. Frogs singing, owls calling. Our milky quest adorned by four shooting stars.. Aaaaahhh.
Wars, and rumors of wars. Brilliant sleuthing from ancient Magi to the WEF. Only 1 day before Russia, Ukraine. The King star will return. We will own nothing, and be happy… because he will allow us to buy and sell… if only we take the mark.
I recently stumbled across this podcast by a couple of Orthodox priests. This one on the Star of the Nativity is relevant to your post here. Lots of good history on views of astrology held by the ancients and in depth review of the magi. https://www.ancientfaith.com/podcasts/lordofspirits/taught_by_a_star
Is it possible that the Magi were capturing the last light of a dead star? IOW, somehow they had a prophesy of a “star” (i.e. object in the sky) going dark? So the commemoration was to let people know about Star #12’s existence and death? Maybe it’s winking out presaged some other event? Or could that be why they stopped their task? (Just spitballing, TES, in the event it might spark something sensical in you.) Cheers – and thanks for sharing.
Oh yes, that could have been a distant Super Nova, no doubt. It’s position right on the ecliptic is very very suspicious however. Could have been a comet – but even that would have been depicted differently. No conclusion, but a fine mystery nonetheless.
TES
Have you put any thought into the predicted date of the next such confluence (absent star #12)?
I have not yet run such a projection. When I get a chance, I will do so and update that to the article. I attempted a web search to find a listing of 3-star conjunctions, and of course all I get are astrology sites trying to sell me services. Since Mercury orbits very close to the Sun, the function will be mostly a harmonic between Jupiter and Mars, making it a less common, but still regular feature of solar positioning – more akin to the hands on a clock, as opposed to something astounding in and of itself.
Update: This particular conjunction happens once every 1,563 years. But it happens in Leo only once every 18,755 years. I inserted this analysis into the article.
TES
Correct.
Where were Saturn, Uranus and Neptune on that date? I know that these are not normally visible to the naked eye but perhaps that particular configuration of planets, light, angles etc, caused one of them to become visible for a brief moment just at the edge of the moon disc, and to the magi this glimpse seemed to be of a star/planet which arrived and then left. And perhaps the observatory had been built facing that direction because it had been previously noticed that it was a particularly fruitful direction in terms of angles of light of sun, moon, etc making the planets and stars more clearly visible?
None of those were in Leo at the time. No, if this was a conventional and frequent recurring phenomenon – they would have built no special accommodation in order to view it – and could have predicted it, rather than station people to watch for it over a hundred years or maybe even a lot longer. All the planets can be predicted. What they were looking for could not be – only its station of approach was known.
What about the Comet Swift-Tuttle? Regular August passage, 133 year orbit, Jupiter aligned, probably first observed in 322 BC, observed by the Chinese in 188BC and 69BC, causes the Persian Meteor Shower.
Perseid!
Swift Tuttle did not arrive during this one-day-long horoscope in 2 bc,
Isn’t it generally thought that the magi visited Jesus long after he was born? i.e., Herod killed male babies age 2 and under. So your finding would put the birth day in the range of 4 B.C., if this mystery object is the star recorded in the NT story.
The star did not just pop in and out in one day. Jupiter orbits a half cycle at 5.9 years. So an interloper might be faster and take 2 years itself, just to show where its CPA with Earth would be – and to figure out what city was under its Zenith. So, the reference point is not the first sighting of the star, but what happened thereafter – and of this we don’t have much information.
Are you an atheist?
I am an ignostic.
Thanks, TES.
I wasn’t familiar with the term “ignostic”, so did a quick search and this from Wiki seemed about right: “Ignosticism – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ignosticism is the belief that people should avoid taking a position on “the existence of God” until a concept of God has been defined.. Ignostics claim that the sound or row of alphabet letters “God” (with a capital “G”) is meaningless because they lack belief that any coherent definition has been presented.”
I would tend to agree with the last statement. It was a great help for me to learn that the Greek noun “theos” has the sense of “placer”. E.g., theme, theory, theater, and probably many other English words might have similar root implications.
Also you might find it interesting that in the biblical account when “God” instructed Moses to go to Pharaoh and deliver the message to “let My people go”, Moses asked who he should say sent him. The answer was to tell them YHWH sent him. Without going on too long here, I read an excellent examination of that ‘name’ and it has the sense of, will-be-ing-was. The opposite order of what I presume most of us would guess, seeing that the One out of Whom all is, is without beginning, exists now, and will exist interminably. But the order emphasizes the process into the future.
Love your work, and I sometimes recommend it on X, when it seems like someone would benefit from seeing it.
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170923.html significant?
People in science are more aware of these effects than you may suppose, at least some, but one doesn’t speak too openly about it. Funding is important.
Dr. Marcus probably has a proof that the universe as we know it is actually “physical” and not a construct of universal mind, a dream-of-God, as it were, but it is unlikely that he can formulate it adequately in words, or he might have done so.
It would not be a logical argument. As I understand things, there is not one.
It’s not even quite when the historical Jesus was likely born, is it. Just close(ish)…
Will do – the Spartacus letter was excellent. It opened a lot of people’s eyes.
TES
Hi TES,
Is is possible that omicron is much more mild relative to previous variants because it no longer has the section that resembles staphylococcal enterotoxin B? The most recent article I could find is this one https://www.cell.com/structure/fulltext/S0969-2126(21)00121-0?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0969212621001210%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
Regards,
AQ
Apologies, I missed the brief sentence where you already mentioned this, there’s no option to delete the redundant comment. Have you tried to get a journalist to publish your findings? I’m surprised by the lack of media coverage on the staphylococcal enterotoxin B superantigen section of SARS-COV-2, though I guess with most countries being economically dependent on China this is would ruffle too many feathers.
I see an odd coincidence in your “Zone I” map: Venezuela is in Zone I even though its neighbors are in Zone III. Cuba is also in Zone I, alone in the Zone II Caribbean. Two-thirds of the Zone I countries in and near the Americas are Communist countries. Why would a country’s governing ideology have any effect on whether its population has prior immunity to a virus, unless there was human action taken to make it that way?
See Exhibit 5.2 and think through this. ;-)
ES, I can only assume with your specific background that powers-that-be know who you are – have you felt any repercussions?
Yes.
What else are you referring to? I have for tinnitus for 5? years now. Getting worse.
When you sneeze, what happens to your tinnitus?
If you eliminate gluten from your diet, what happens to your tinnitus?
If you exercise and lose weight, what happens to your tinnitus?
If you apply essential oil helichrysum to your ear, what happens?
If this was hearing nerve damage, it could never increase over 5 or 10 seconds, and could never diminish 80% when intervention treatments are applied. Yet it does. That falsifies nerve trauma as its origin.
Many of the nerve trauma diagnoses come from person seeking military disability payments over the issue, ‘from loud noises’.
Good luck on addressing it…
TES
One might find that ‘microwave hearing’ (buzzing, ringing or pure tones – 1970s research started with Allen Frey) is the invisible source, and that a complete break from RF exposure for as many as four-seven days eliminates it, and upon return to civilization the ‘tinnitus’ (a catchall term in common parlance) returns within hours. We see this commonly among the electrically sensitive.
It was not your fault.
It was not your fault.
Faith slips into the heart and soul… when the mind can not comprehend. There is where you should look. it was not your fault.
Faith does not lead to religion. Religion leads to Faith. when its to big for words… Faith steps up. Pillars of creation… unavigatillion to 1…
to watch for the party which benefits… even if they dont exist… CV19… et al … hmmm… I see them… but its futile to resist them. Faucci Gates, China, FDA, CDC, WHO WEF… just patsies like Russia for decades.
aaaahhh…
Hello,
I shared this webpage with a professional biology server and someone had the following comments:
To pick a random example: “If those weighted contrast strengths are then summed as a total for 144 nucleotide sites, and shown as vectors on a spanning tree diagram (see upper right of Exhibit 7.11), they can be optimized into a single configuration of nodes (optimized spanning tree).47”
In other words, if I force all the variants to stem from one source the result is a single tree
I’m saying the ideas do not follow from each other It’s not coherent
Why only deer in the Midwest? Because the study was done in the Midwest
Why is there not delta? Because the study ended on Jan 6, 2021 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.31.466677v2
“One must remember two principles in this deliberation of how fast Covid, and in particular the Delta variant, spread globally. First, Covid vaccines do not stop the transmission of the virus, rather only serve to mitigate its severity in vaccinated individuals.”
No
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.14.21264959v1.full
“Moreover, take note that each main wave of SARS-CoV-2 inside a previously naive nation, generates a serum IgG antibody prevalence of around 12 – 18%”
No idea where this is coming from
“Lockdowns are not effective in the face of fecal-aerosol (<5 μm) transmitted viruses”
See China
“However the oldest variant of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant (which we will examine below in Question #7 b.), presented significant aspects of its progenitor genome (the forerunner which conferred immunity to much of the globe in 2018 and 2019), which indicated that it was originally serial passed inside a lab mouse environment. This makes the January 2018 lab leak a very likely hypothesis.22”
or far more likely a regular mouse
(this isn’t prrof it came from a mouse in any case)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355136936_The_twin-beginnings_of_COVID-19_in_Asia_and_Europe_-_One_prevails_quickly
this a conspiracy theory at the opposite end. was written by one researcher at a Chinese University and still is in preprint status. The odds of zoonotic emergence at two separate geographically separate locations at the almost the exact same time is nearly nil.
This is the consensus view
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34480864/
Could you please address these comments? Thanks!
Yes, Covid evolved independently, twice in the same exact year, from the same exact BANAL-52/20 source in Laos. 🙄 This is not just wrong it is not even wrong. The person can pass off bad genetics theory to the average layman, but not me. If they are implying Covid was lab generated then of course anything goes.
Appeal to ignorance – I only asked the question, this person made a declaration claim with no evidence.
While this is plausible as the reason, Delta began its spread in Oct 2020 – he missed that in the article. Again, answering a question with an unsubstantiated claim. Not done by professionals.
The critical path question they skipped by means of these two red herring ‘answers’ is “If deer exposure came from a point contact, how then did that point contact (or even a few) then spread an even representation of the various clades of Covid, in deer?” They skipped this for one of three reasons 1) they do not understand how deductive inference works, 2) they were cherry picking to find anecdotes to nit-nag, or 3) are really just that dense. In any case, not real impressed.
This is incorrect – refer to Omicron. Delta spread further after 66% vaccination, than Alpha did the same time during the previous year with no vaccination and very little prior immunity. I can find dozens of studies which support my statement. They are appealing to pluralistic ignorance alone here.
OK, at this point, especially after the opening response, I know I am not dealing with competence. There is no need to go any further in this. China did not stop the virus through NPI/lockdowns and the article documents this clearly – significant study has demonstrated this in the last months, and I show an immunity curve which falsifies this notion, in the article. This is a person pushing a political Narrative…
This was not a refutation, but rather a series of red herring and trivia points which were not crafted to address the core critical path of logic. An indication that the person does not know how to do this.
I would not listen to anything this person has to offer from a scientific standpoint. Please let me know which company this is so that I never accidentally use them as a vendor in any of my company’s work.
Thanks
EVG
TES
Could you please briefly address this genomics comment: “this a conspiracy theory at the opposite end.The odds of zoonotic emergence at two separate geographically separate locations at the almost the exact same time is nearly nil. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355136936_The_twin-beginnings_of_COVID-19_in_Asia_and_Europe_-_One_prevails_quickly
China is pushing heavily the narrative that SARS-COV-2 originated from elsewhere such as the US or Europe to shift blame. This research paper is interestingly written by one person only from a Chinese University. Then again I should probably look into the genomics myself – quite time consuming though.
I asked if it was possible that SARS-COV-2 origins could date back to 2018 in a researchers/PhD discord server, apologies for not being more clear.
I found a way to read deleted posts on the r/Coronavirus subreddit even if they get removed before anyone sees them, the censorship on anything pandemic related has become quite Orwellian – a lot of news/research articles that get removed are from reputable sources but go against the mainstream narrative. It’s been concerning seeing the lag time between an idea being treated as a conspiracy and the same idea being parroted in legacy media months to a year later.
These articles may be of interest to you:
https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/ Written for the average reader, useful for getting people to question the official narrative of pandemic origins
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs
Includes how the mRNA vaccines were designed on purpose to suppress interferon
https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(21)01450-4?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2589004221014504%3Fshowall%3Dtrue The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory
Thanks for your time!
Gotcha AQ…
Given the immunity taper curve (Exhibit 4.5), the new King George’s Island strains of Covid which were found in 2018 soil samples, and the fact that China hid all databases on prior variants, the likelihood that the virus was released anywhere other than China is nil (as they say). Now the research may have kicked off as a viral strain in the US in 2014… but this was from a Loas Bat virus BANAL-52 and 20 – on BLASTn searches, but highly modified with a furin cleavage and exact previous IP from other viruses. So it is 100% lab created. 100% lab released – in China…
The DG614 duality issue in Europe and Asia only serves to indicate that the precursor of Covid, arose earlier than Oct 2019, spread around the world and conferred immunity on 172 nations (Exhibit 4.5), and not that there was parallel biogenesis. See Exhibit 7.11.
The only arguments which remain are rhetorical.
I’ve read we, USA can hack computers and databases, and leave fingerprints of our enemies. “100% – in China” is the same kind of fingerprint that adds levels of Plausible Deniability. 2014… or way before… When I asked Military Intel customer who returned from there… What really happened over there??? “I cant tell you, but I can tell you, WE GOT WHAT WE NEEDED”… Didn’t make sense… unless one thinks we were studying the spread of more communicable variant… and or the use of a treatment or vaccine. SARS and MERS were trial runs…
Thank you. My gut is usually right. You explain it so well.
Scott Manzel
What do you recommend to do if we find ourselves in an argument with someone who does this? Is the only way to win not to play the game?
They are using the argument to promote themself, and harm you – rather than prosecute the subject at hand. Yes, ignore such people… Keep focused on construction of your argument, rather than detracting others’ or defeating any particular ongoing research.
Thank you, this is so true. Of course, one cannot really know which role one ends up playing in that perilous Pomplemoose Pass. I think I’ve probably played all parts. We all have our destinies, and end up choosing the passes that we consider worthy of defending. Often the problem may be that being the bagholder of a genuinely worthless bag (like a relationship gone sour) is just not something I am willing to do. And yet – being at all capable of choosing an ethical path would benefit greatly from some, or even much, practice. Are the battered wives of the world contributing to the moral stamina of the world? I do not know. I just have chosen to give wide berth to those kind of situations.Maybe being capable of ethical choices is about being capable of choice: seeing there is choice and then being able to enact something else than the path of least resistance. Wanting to look ethically good is, of course, one beauty contest that some want to participate in, but many traditions advise against competing in that line.
Yes, the perceived inability to choose or even its reality can enslave a person in their own battles. However, good and ethics are two different things. We need less good-posturing, to your point, and more ethical teaching. One of the core theses of ethical skepticism is that there is no such thing as ‘good’. There is only evil, our ability to identify it, and a. avoiding replicating it in our own lives, and b. standing in the gap for those who are harmed beyond their control. If these flags are regarded as a beauty contest, and cannot be framed, nor taught by example, then we are in a heap of trouble. People will think they are good, when there is no such thing, and use their good works and humility(TM) as excuse for their hidden depravity.
Define good or even ‘advising acceptable traditions’, and evil will wear that as a costume.
Mine was fairly rough argmax. I got Delta in August and had the requisite 5 days of cough, and 11 days of fever and diarrhea – after that was over, I was chronically low on SpO2 however. After my insistence, and changing doctors, I was finally prescribed apixaban (blood thinner), and that worked within 1 hour and 45 minutes – I immediately felt better. Took me 3 weeks to get my energy back though. I recognized it because I have macrocytic anemia being MTHFR – it was red blood cell count anemia.
The rest of the family, it was like a rough cold – two weeks of energy loss and cough. However two of our three oldest family members had to go into the hospital – all of them had been vaccinated because of their age. The one who is vaccinated but did not get Covid almost died from the vaccine. She is still battling its effects – she can no longer drive, and can no longer do housework, and is having extreme difficulty cooking – and it has been 9 months now. A sister in law also with metabolic disorder had to go into the hospital for two weeks and almost died. Heparin saved her life – but was administered too late. She is still suffering from the damage from the blood clots (what is falsely called ‘Long Covid’). They treated her too late – because ‘there was no treatment’.
Since I got late, but at least timely treatment – by watching my SpO2, I’ve had no ill after effects. No ‘Long Covid’.
This is why I contend there is very little actual ‘Long Covid’ – as if it were the fault of the virus. EUA Shadow, the real thromboembolitic malady is a result of state and Party enforced malpractice.
TES
As one who professes to be a former devout Christian, I’m somewhat surprised that you don’t recognize the fact that Jesus, as described in Scripture, breaks your definition of “god”. Namely, He WAS indeed held accountable (for the sins WE committed) AND He was all powerful (commanding even the winds and the waves with merely the power of His voice, and ultimately conquering even death itself). Further, I’m not sure I see how individuals who follow biblical Christianity are victims. We’ve been set free from the power of sin and have access to the infinite satisfaction only available through a relationship with our Creator and Savior. Ultimately, I get the impression the “Christianity” you interacted with was nothing like what is actually described in Scripture because Christ is the only true answer to the suffering found in the world. All other attempts at a solution either don’t actually solve the problem or minimize it (often both).
Are there charlatans, liars, and wicked people claiming the label of Christianity for themselves to cover up the evil they do? Without a doubt, yes, but slight alterations of the truth have always been used as weapons by evil people to get what they want through deception. That doesn’t mean Christianity is false though.
Tim,
I made no comment upon Jesus Christ. My commentary was upon the ‘God’ forced on us by Abrahamic religions, which includes of course, Christianity. Yes, this includes ALL of Christianity, even the ‘real’ ones. My comment was upon original sin, which was a false enslavement in the name of this false ‘God’.
In other words, this false character from the Bible.
In other words, original sin.
My view of Christ now, is the role he actually claimed in the scripture, the Son of Man, and not the role the double-agent ‘Paul’ assigned to him decades later in order to manipulate the Anatolian/Levant taxpaying provinces on behalf of Rome. So you may not fully grasp what my view of these things is.
TES :-)
On what basis are you calling these things false? Who/What defines what is true?
The self-integrity of the recount. How it bears consilience with other history, and the state of mankind’s suffering – through a life well exposed. How well does it mesh with other things I have observed, DNA, integrity, people’s desire for domination and control, ancient history and archaeology… etc.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/08/14/the-awesome-insistence-of-cataclysmic-mirage-theory-cmt/
I’m not a big fan of being lied to… Pretty much will push me away from anything else they have to offer.
The Abrahamic ‘God’ model has failed. And not just by a little bit…
TES
Yeah, if I were to presuppose death, suffering, and disease preexisted humans by billions of years, and was actually the most important part of the progress of living things to get to where we are now, then I’d 100% agree: the Bible is self-contradictory nonsense, and the god of the Bible is an evil, capricious, self-absorbed jerk.
Taking Scripture on its own terms though, rather than bringing a presupposed concept of reality to it, none of that is true.
There are other scriptures, older and more detailed than the Bible’s Genesis, and they frame ‘God’ in exactly this manner – metastasized insanity. I don’t bring anything to the Bible other than I will not surrender my own integrity in order to consider its lines. This is part of spiritual strength – not allowing dark spirits a foothold through rhetoric.
If it lies – it is lying. It is speaking in its native tongue.
Has nothing to do with me – I was taught these canned ‘put the burden on the victim’, ‘come to the scripture on its own terms’ arguments as well. The Bible bears the burden of proof, not me. That IS… coming to scripture on its own terms. It is making the claims, those are its terms.
TES
Now who’s the one lying? From the article you linked to above:
The basis of your critique is entirely based on the presupposition that evolution is true. But that certainly doesn’t come from Scripture. You brought that to Scripture.
Again with the canned understanding. ‘I brought ‘Evolution’ to the scripture.’ Whoooo… the big bad boogey man. I brought no such thing.
I raised DNA, neanderthals, and homo naledi – well established observations, regardless of creation or evolution – to the Bible’s very own terms. The Bible’s terms according to you are ‘it is inerrant and the Word of God’ and you are here to ensure that this is enforced upon me. Nonetheless, evolution or not, we met on that ground (those terms) and the Bible fell woefully short.
It lied. What you are asking of me now is to be stupid, not accommodating. And then you accuse me of lying because I won’t sacrifice my integrity upon your command to do so. The argument is over, and you are blocked for maliciousness.
You are pretending to me that you represent god. You got mad and attacked me because I did not accept this claim.
If there is no God, he would have to be created. Man’s evil has no bounds. I hear Alien abductees say Jesus was a real person but did not die on the cross. He died at Masada. They also say Alien’s believe in God not based on religion like humans but on science. Truth is hard to find.
You bent over backwards to make white guys complaining about reverse racism the same thing as women complaining about sexual harassment and black people complaining about out and out discrimination. Was the intent to skew the responses so they are all based on rightwing shibboleths, or was that subconscious?
No, I refused to bend over forwards and take the hosing from malicious leftists who seek genocide as their outcome. The days of you automatically claiming to be correct through virtue posing are over. You are not oppressed, you are not in-the-right – you are a genocide promoter, plain and simple. Your memorized and worn-out phrases (including your overused and pretentious term ‘shibboleth’) are untested brainless pablum passed as excuse to this generation of young women and men who are the victims of your blood lust.
There is harassment, there is discrimination. None of that lends you nor your argument any credibility whatsoever.
Great response.
Boom!
We have single party controlled academia and press to the tune of 90% or more at this point.
Major internet content hubs are even more single party controlled at this point.
It should be no surprise that serious problems are happening. The left has been radicalized by this single-party control just as it was previously in history. Proof from Pew is here: https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/pew-research-center-study-shows-that-democrats-have-shifted-to-the-extreme-left/
If you insist on rejecting anything that seems “right wing” to you then listen to this left wing professor instead http://righteousmind.com/viewpoint-diversity/
The truth is out there but similar to other single-party-control situations it’s not going to be easy to find or to admit until one day you’re forced to confront atrocities happening, after which all you can say is “but we didn’t know!”
History is not over. It’s quite dangerous that so many people seem to think it is.
How large do you think is this cohort & what do you advise your clients to do? And, if you were king, what should happen on a societal scale to fix things?
I’m 38 and also work in the IT field, though in a rather blue collar niche of it where I must regularly get my hands dirty and work outside and in otherwise industrial environments. As someone who loves to work with both my hands and my mind, and cannot stand being seated in an office, I love my job. I’ve been doing it for 16 years and I’m very good at it. I enjoy the people I work with, and they are appreciative of the work that I do to keep all of our systems and equipment running smoothly.
Now that I’m done tooting my own horn… When Covid first hit, and the so-called lockdowns began, nearly everyone of my friends and acquaintances of a similar age seemingly dropped off the face of the earth. Many people who I felt were socially just barely hanging on relished the excuse to withdraw back into their apartments or parents’ basements, quit their job or simply stop going, and wait for the government checks to roll in because they “weren’t essential.”
At one point one of my childhood friends called me just to see how I was doing. He had been a serial bartender/cook ever since we graduated high school, couch surfing or rooming with various similar layabouts in Seattle for the better part of 20 years.
The first thing he said to me was, “did you get your check yet?” I had heard about these so-called covid relief payments, but had no expectation of seeing one, nor did I want one. My friend was floored that I was still working and that I had multiple extended work travel trips in the queue.
What was he doing? Oh he bought a new Playstation with his covid relief check. Have I played any good games lately? Nope bro, haven’t. I have a wife, two kids, a house and acreage, and hobbies.
He wasn’t worried about his bar closing because if he couldn’t make rent, he would just move back in with his parents, who never really cleared out the two brothers’ rooms in the fully furnished basement with its own kitchen, a hot tub and a pool out back. His brother had already moved back in, so why shouldn’t he too – and eventually he did.
This seems to be so common with my generation now that as a full time employed parent, home owner, and father, I actually have a hard time meeting and making friends with other dads my age. There just aren’t that many here.
If I do befriend one, he will drop me as a friend the second I give a hint of minor non-leftist bias, such as exclaiming that perhaps BLM is a fraudulent money making scheme, and that perhaps burning down cities during a pandemic when millions of people have lost their jobs perhaps isn’t endearing to your cause, and may actually turn more people against you in the long run. “Wow, that’s racist, I didn’t know you thought that way… I think I need to go.” That was two years ago.
My generation is, quite frankly, fucked. Covid was our chance to shine and show that we could carry the weight of the world if the infirm, elderly, and weak could not swing it. We fumbled it hard.
Well stated real life summary of this article. Thank you Jeff!
EVG
TES :-)
I’m 64 years old. In conversation, my daughter can identify all the friction points I see. However, her conclusions are 180 degrees out (“without proof”). At 40 years old, she lives with her mother and complains that her mother doesn’t do enough. She complains that her state is too expensive but won’t leave because everywhere else is racist.
Your reply is worthy of being published as a standalone article. But more importantly, your perspective gives folks like me hope for an entire generation that seems to have fallen through the cracks created by their parents’ successes—they’ve become lazy and without value, or so I thought. Thank you.
Thanks for this, TES. I continue to hope that this is merely a generational cultural and societal “break”, rather than “breakdown”, although I am by no means certain this is the case.
However, it is sad to live through (I came of age in the late ’80s, when things were still hopeful and looking up). Even worse, is having two sons who are new adults being thrust into this era.
I only hope that their upbringing and education can steel them somewhat from the disconnect which is happening.
In past times when society reached the point at which we presently seem to find ourselves (where its members have become “factionalised”), it has taken some great upheaval to bring rationality back to the party. We can only hope that whatever happens next is not too deleterious for our societies.
In short, one might say that they have gone Galt…. Alas, often for cause.
My advice to the 24 yr old man in 2022:
Leave your parents. Love them but physically leave them. If you are a parent reading this and have a reaction of anxiety and objection, you are part of the problem. I know that sounds harsh and it will be. Moses’ mother put him in a basket in a river. Did she need a male around to grow up and protect her? Farm the land? She was a divorcee and alone. Keeping a son at home in todays age is not different than if Moses mother had kept him instead of placing him in the river. Guaranteed disaster vs possible disaster. Your parents are not immortal and cannot shelter offspring forever—dependency is unsustainable therefor destruction is inevitable. “Give your son a fish” vs handing him a pole and sending him on his way.
Move. Research places to move to. Find one smaller than your current. Become a bigger fish in a smaller pond. Don’t bring any of the toxic water your currently in with you and poison others well. “Start fresh”.
Create your own responsibilities and manage them. Start however small is necessary.
If you got a degree in a field that doesn’t want you, get into sales. Make money. Swallow your pride. Fall on your sword. Work two jobs. You can either front load your potential and energy by gassing it young or guarantee that future older you will be paying it in arrears. There is no prestige in being a FTL (failure to launch) despite what you see in tv, online, & media. Which brings you to….
Limit and vigorously curate online and tv consumption
Work out or join a team. Pickleball, table tennis, frisbee golf, trivia team, it doesn’t have to be slinging weights in a meathead gym. It could be as simple as joining a church mens group or volunteering as a dog shelter or Habitat for Humanity. You need other people in the world rooting for your health and prosperity that are not your parents. People who would recommend you to a co-worker as “someone they should meet”. Network. Online does not count. You’ve already proven with legitimate list you’re not “good on paper” so get off paper and get in person.
Respect yourself. Respect the people your interested in dating as a whole. Don’t put down you or what you want even as a mode of humor or depreciation.
Don’t do drugs. Period, period, period. Alcohol in moderation socially. Never alone.
Hate no one. Love yourself.
The world is full of land mines for everyone but some people experience seasons worse than others. If your saying it’s your season for despair or you’re out of vogue get nimble. Be a Jedi. May the force be with you.
Good stuff Zen!
I hope it’s helpful to someone.
One thing that’s under reported (among so many other underreported things) but worth mentioning is gender birth rates.
There are more boys being born in the US than girls. This is for many years now. My elementary school daughters are outnumbered by boys at least 15%. This has never in history been the case as far as I’ve read. We grew up being taught throughout schooling the world had more females than men! Today, they don’t teach gender ratios in school or mention it at all. I’ll get to why this matters.
As this new gen phenomenon ages into mating age, it will too obviously to ignore and become a buyers market for women. Women will not *need* to compete with other women for a male partner. Or for a job. They will be the rarer sex. Men pursuing high intellectual pursuits who traditionally waited longest “til they got their sh*t* together” to find a mate, often from a younger pool, will find that pool has shrunk doubly bc the younger male peers of those younger women will have already partnered, having grown up in classrooms with high male to female ratios. This is especially true of higher net worth schools. Private schools have the biggest male populations ever (bc IVF? Waiting longer? Gender selection w IVF? Idk) But this is unprecedented territory for humans. I’m not sure how it will map out over the next century…
But the point I’m raising for the hypothetical 24yr old man here is there are not and won’t be “plenty of fish in this sea” so making disposable of a good potential partner while young bc culture applauds you for it could be more than a bad idea. And parents of well to do boys, don’t run off a good character girl bc her socioeconomic background or lower education. You may need to encourage it, in fact. “Find new pools”. Be nimble. I’m not saying be urgent, because your tweet about brand perception holds true, but I am saying be serious sooner if you plan to ever be serious about partnership. Culture will never ask you to grow up and “begin adulting”, you have to acquire social situational awareness and be a self starter in this regard. Cultural Infantilism & subversion abound.
One wonders if the gender skew is a genetic phenomenon, an abortive phenomenon, a phenomenon of the demographics of self-selected “economic migrants,” or a combination thereof.
Either way, women are noncompetitive enough these days in terms of marriageability. I’m trying to help my friends of similar age find wives and it’s abysmal. My son’s Godfather and my best friend makes great money, is in great shape, looks decent and dresses well, and is generally masculine. Women continually turn up their noses at him citing how serious he is about his faith and how politically unhinged he is. Note: he didn’t even talk about politics. They did. And they were positively offended that he wasn’t frothing at the mouth to hate the orange guy.
Most women seem to take awful care of themselves, both in diet/exercise and basic presentability, have awful attitudes towards men (especially men on whom they depend such as husbands or fathers), and have no skills such as cooking, sewing, or homemaking. I won’t even mention past vices that most women have engaged in. My wife is the only woman in her family and local acquaintances who goes to confession. I scarcely have to imagine why. Either the recitation of wrongdoings for past sins would be unbearable in its severity, or they genuinely think they don’t have anything to apologize for.
I can only imagine how much worse things will get when women have a corner on the market. I’ll leave you with an example. Every high school had a video game club or anime club, or something similar. It attracted mostly unmasculine and poorly socialized boys. Every group would usually have one girls. They fawned over her and competed for her. She was rarely good looking, rarely took care of herself or presented herself well, and was often as dismissive to these boys as the vaunted and beautiful preppy girls. But she led them on just enough to maintain all of their attention. Welcome to the future of anime club token femoids.
There’s a lot of good advice here, but also some things that require potential clarification.
Sales truly is one of the last “make your own fate” options available to people, but it takes a lot of self-confidence and intrapersonal skills. These are two things zoomers and millennials struggle greatly with. Toastmasters can help greatly with one and regular extended conversations and interactions with strangers can help with the other.
Also, there are a lot of sleazy “direct sales” traps there to catch people. I found myself sitting in one such interview years ago because I was lazy and didn’t do my due diligence on the company since I had over 100 applications out. I turned up at a very crappy building with an illiterate receptionist and barely-literate sales associates walking around. In the lobby, which was also the waiting room, I was surrounded by people with hand tattoos in various stages of undress. I was the only one there in a suit, much less with a resume in hand. Suffice to say it was a brief interview and a polite but firm “thanks, I’m not interested” from me.
I’d also say that leaving home will do wonders for mental health, but only if done with a solid exit strategy. Calculated risks are altogether different than generic “taking a chance” risks. Renters want proof of employment, unless you’re moving into the room in between the crack den and the brothel. That comes with its own set of mental health issues. You could live at the motel 6 until you get a job, but again, not great for one’s state of mind. Also, you may well end up being neighbors with the crack dealer and the pimp again. Perhaps the two are one and the same and he offers a package deal. You get the idea.
Remote work offers a tantalizing ability to put away cash and live where you want with some travel or quarterly face-to-face appearances at the office. You can live anywhere with a decent internet connection, especially where land is cheap.
Also, I always preferred to be a Sith.
I’m not Gen Z, but Gen X. I was 24 before the turn of the century, and boy did things look bright. I was caught up in the dot com boom, and after my overzealous, overhyped, tech company went belly up at the end of 2000, I struck out on my own.
I worked like a dog in the IT consultancy field with small businesses, and grew until about 2008 as well. As I got older and more stressed, I began to shed customers, now totally burnt out, bullied by strange COVID mandates, and almost in a catatonic bemusement have resorted to watching the news about the world burning.
After almost 20 years of believing the hype about the American dream, I’ve come to find out after WWII, your average Joe had a pretty decent shot at it. Now, all bets are off.
Business owners, (especially small business owners) are the last folks in the world who give crap about equity, or value, it’s all about the bottom line. And no matter how skilled, conscientious, prompt, and polite, it’s still about the bottom line. Doesn’t matter how shiny your brochures are, or how nicely pressed your suit is, or what kind of dynamic synergies you’re going to implement, if your quote jeopardizes the bosses second meat freezer for the lake house you’re back to band-aiding!
My first revelation after about 10 years was all that nonsense about skill, hard work, and caring is sidelined for the bottom line.
My second revelation is that if your economy is based on Neo-Keynesian debt-money, you’re done before you ever get started. This impresses the value of ever worthless money upon humanity as a virtue. This is GREAT for those well established at the top, you have a burgeoning MASS of billions of people using the very best IN-BUILT survival instinct to claw their way to your organization over the bodies of those who didn’t make the cut. “Hey, learn to code!”
Progressives will shake a stick at Capitalism saying that it’s to blame for this phenomenon. But it’s not, it rests solely on the foundation of the money supply it uses, and that money supply is borne out of UN-natural solipsistic bankruptcy. It worked for a time with 2 billion people on the planet, but you can see as more warm bodies belly up for credit, the profligacy and struggle between those who have and the rest only increases.
The final straw that broke the camel’s back is the constant lies and coercion. Every 10 years some sort of calamitous event or war breaks out and the populace is told about some boogeyman who threatens the world, and it’s all a lie to bust up ingrained capital flows and make them flow in new directions. Nothing gets the money printers flowing like a war or pandemic!
What I realized after about 20 years of rat race, that _I_ was part of the problem, and by merely participating in wealth seeking I was perpetuating the firestorm of debt-money. So with conscience and freshly acquired burnout, I began firing customers. I now only maintain a few to keep the lights on and pay bills. It’s scary, because I burnt up my youth, and you’re always one accident away from calamity, but even with the best gold plated health care, would you want to go into a health care facility at this time?
There’s another institution perverted by endless debt-money!
We’ve all been hoodwinked into plantation style economics, it’s just now that the livestock are noticing the sound of the abattoir!
TES, I apologize for whining, but I find your views refreshing and heartening. Your blog is like a tiny distant light off in the distance during a terrible storm. It gives me hope that not all of humanity is consumed with baseless consumption. I also love the fact that I have to use the dictionary quite often as well! Thank you TES!
Wow… So aptly and eloquently framed.
Our woke culture will never get this… They will never comprehend the ill effects of their virtue play upon mankind. We promote the worst character and destroy the best.
Thank you for the kind words, and your readership.
EVG
TES :-)
They are sociopaths. They comprehend. It is a fun game to them. “Normal” people wonder why leaders bother with all the trouble of leading. Sociopaths wonder why anyone would just “get along” when they could be the one in charge.
Regarding points 41 and 42: What these mean is the men won’t fight. The ones who created this tell themselves that won’t matter because there won’t be a need or the drones will do it or they will make a back channel arrangement. They are wrong. The time always comes where the men must fight and if they don’t, society dies. The anointed ones will wonder what happened.
Carl,
I think what they are saying is ‘I will fight for a country which fights for me and all citizens, not for a totalitarian state which demeans and replaces me.’ They recognize the creeping third world status of the US – and they are not willing to lay down their life for that, because that is worse than what the ‘enemy’ proposes. Neither Russia nor China want us to be a third world nation – however The Party in control, does.
TES
:-)
Do you doubt that it’s Chinese money flowing a billion dollars at a time into our politicians’ pockets that have bought us wide-open borders? Russia and China hate us and would exterminate us down to the last infant in an instant if they could, but it would be messy and risky to act directly. Russia has a smaller economy than Brazil and can barely keep the lights on, but the Clintons chose to make China wealthy and powerful beyond Mao’s maddest dreams. We are betrayed. Everything the Left wants, every proposal they bring forward, points i. The exact same direction, makes America weak and poor and China strong and rich. The word we’re looking for here is treason.
The left betrayed America… I did not believe it when the original people saying this were screaming it back in the 90’s, preferring to be more middle-of-the-road politically. I supported Clinton and even Obama in the first election. But those days are over – I see the evil they did now. The Right was correct in the end. No that George W. Bush did us any favors. But the left just drove our collapse into overdrive.
Now we have to correct it.
There may be another factor….homeschooling. I saw an unconfirmed report that households with kids and at least one homeschooled child went from 4% to 11%. That is a huge increase that’s up over a million new households with homeschooled kids….and there would have to be an associated amount of adults leaving the workforce to manage that.
There is an associated number of young parents who pulled out of daycare due to the virus and/or restrictions. More out of the workforce to manage.
Numbers on this I have found difficult to confirm, but we may be also seeing a big shift to single families,
Mrb,
There may be some truth to this. I would call this part of the bifurcation of American culture – between the bigots and their victims. But this absolutely has to be part of it. Good point.
TES
:-)
The bifurcation has already happened. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/pew-research-center-study-shows-that-democrats-have-shifted-to-the-extreme-left/
Sadly, a lot of this is me too.
I lost my incredible job in 2008 and was never able to find full-time employment, worth my time ever again. I’ve done my thing ever since. I live on a beautiful lake in a home owned by my grandparents. While they are in pretty good shape, my grandfather is blind now, so I drive him to the gym or to his doctors’ appointments. I do the grocery shopping. I am happy to have them and they are happy to have me. I haven’t had health insurance since 2008. I haven’t needed it. I pay cash anytime I need to go to the doctor. I’ve never asked for government assistance, but since I don’t make a certain amount of money, they sent me a Medicaid card without me asking for one.
I hadn’t used the Medicaid card and never planned on using it.
I’m not one to mooch off the government.
I kept it though and am glad I did.
Last summer, I needed emergency surgery for a sudden allergy that made my throat seize completely. I showed a top-notch hospital in my neighborhood the card, and 2 hours later I had an incredible team of doctors fix me up and I went home. How much did that cost? Nothing.
In the past I would’ve felt guilty about that, I don’t anymore.
Over the years I thought about getting a part-time job, just to get out of the house, but when the scamdemic hit, there was no way I would be working anywhere. No mask and no shots for me.
I’d rather be homeless than taking those shots or wear a mask.
Working isn’t worth it. Getting up early in the morning for a job that pays nothing after inflation and taxes and gas prices and auto insurance, would be a negative for me financially, AND I’d be miserable.
I’d be working just to pay for the car, taxes and insurance. Working for nothing and negative.
Nordic,
Sorry you lost your incredible job in 2008. That machinated recession was part of the displacement and replacement plan unfortunately.
Keep strong!
EVG
TES :-)
Your story is very interesting. May I ask how do you pay the most basic bills like food, clothing, necessities? I assume your grandparents foot all the house bills but what about the rest?
Would the use of convalescent plasma injections instead of pharma stuff for passport yield both immunity and reduced AE in those states? Hope TES will see this comment
Woodruff,
I suppose it is plausible. Something was ‘injected’ – but did not cause harm. I am at a loss to figure out what ‘injected’ in quotes means…
EVG
TES :-)
TES,
As I’m not a Twitter user, I can’t ask this question in that medium (but I do read you there, so would not object if you found this question of interest and were to respond there).
My question is brief, I suspect the answer is not simple, but it may have profound implications: “Where did all the workers go?”
Try a web search for that term. It is an issue all around the world. Some of it may be accounted by reduced workforce mobility between cities and across borders, but that can hardly explain it all.
Recruiters who we speak with are almost starving, not due to a lack of employer clients, but due to a lack of candidates.
I have been in business for over 30 years, yet I have never seen this before.
Anto,
As a person who does corporate strategy, and faced some of these issues in doing planning for my clients – I hope at least, that I bear a clean and direct grasp of how the employment market is affected by certain factors. It may not be popular, but it is the truth.
So I answered your question with an entirely new article. Thanks for the idea!
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/02/08/where-have-all-the-workers-gone/
EVG
TES :-)
The term “low hanging fruit” makes me cringe because I’ve heard it repeated way too many times working at a company stuck at levels III and IV. Such a company can’t do much more than avoid going bankrupt and makes little to no difference in the long run.
This is a beautiful exposition of the problem. Some others have coined terms like “the hatchling” for the people apparently born yesterday why say “what is a nation then?”, “What is a border exactly” “In what way is porn different to looking at your girlfriend naked”. And “squirting squid ink” for those who scatter tangential arguments to deflect thinking about the main point. Also “motte and Bailey” is used for roughly the same thing of defending a far off boundary aggressively to stop any you getting anywhere near the weak centre of their argument. “We all have the potential to get a degree its just opportunity/ systemic racism that holds people back that’s accepted science, are you a nazi?”
Hello TES, I have been following you with great interest since the beginning of Covid. I have only recently come across your articles regarding the “Vaccinials”. Personally I find the initial creation of vaccines fascinating, but I made my own observations long ago that the increase in vaccination schedule has gone far beyond any ethical and moral provision for basic healthcare. I cannot remove financial bias from most of the current healthcare system initiatives in the UK. I use the term “healthcare” loosely as all I witness are people becoming slaves to prescription medicines without any improvement in quality of life. Exercise and nutrition are neglected in comparison.
My Mum helped advocate (voluntarily) for children and their parents, many of whom had similar stories to yourself and your son. I soon learned that the system is in no way designed to give these disabled children an improved quality of life, and any mention of vaccine injury was unheard. I’m not sure if you remember Andrew Wakefield and his comments regarding the MMR vaccine and autism. Whether he was right or not, I had never seen the media collectively gather and destroy someone for making an observation. Something I have seen more recently with Trump and the proposed election fraud, the buzz word mis-information and more currently the attention surrounding Joe Rogan. I have always questioned vaccines because I don’t see them as a silver bullet, they are not 100% safe and they are not 100% effective, and in many circumstances there are better alternative treatments, i.e repurposed drugs and even nutriceuticals. I chose not to vaccinate my son, my take being that if I come across an abundance of data that proves their safety and effectiveness then I can always then go and get him vaccinated, whereas the opposite is not necessarily true – I cannot unvaccinate him. Can I ask if there are any vaccines that you would still entertain, for example are there certain vaccines that you think the risk is justified. Kind regards, Craig
Craig,
A thoughtful and well expressed post. Yes, vaccines are not entirely effective – but more importantly, are not entirely safe, especially for a person under 3 year of age. The common set of persons and action which squelch this message are the same as those who covered up the election scam and find glee in censoring people over Covid.
I have had several vaccinations for work in Africa. Yellow Fever, Tetanus booster, Typhus, Hepatitis A, Tdap, etc. Many of these I received as part of government mandates in the regions in which I spent time. But my body has matured to the point where I cannot detect the incremental damage that these interventions effect in my cognitive and endocrine functions. Studies are showing that ‘frequent and early immune activation’ in rats causes ASD indications. I don’t know how much clearer a study can get than that… Yet, if I post it anywhere, I am in danger of being banned by this dark Cabal.
The world has definitely bifurcated over these issues. The totalitarians are back – and they won this time without a fight.
EVG
TES :-)
And from The Times Of Israel, better Vitamin D levels are now much better correlated with better health outcomes with Covid. Well let’s go directly to the study at the journal Plos One.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263069
Summarized from the Times of Israel. “Israeli study offers strongest proof yet of vitamin D’s power to fight COVIDBolstering previous research, scientists publish ‘remarkable’ data showing strong link between vitamin deficiency, prevalent in Israel, and death or serious illness among patients By Nathan Jeffa
Vitamin d from supplements runs the risk of eventual racing heart rate. But the body has multiple means to cut off excess vitamin d production from sunlight. Sperti sells a Vitamin D sunlamp that is FDA approved for vitamin d production. I utilize it. It’s main feature is that it produces UV-B and not UV-A light. UV-B produces vitamin d in the body, while UV-A does the tanning effect. They say that UV-B can generate skin cancer, but the non-melanoma kind. AV-A they say (which causes tanning) is linked to the Melanoma kind. I’m not in a position to cite the source of that information, but my recollection is clear on what I read on that point.
Hi Ethical Skeptic. Former president Trump and his wife got Covid and immediately they got treatment at a military facility and that treatment included vitamin d maybe zinc (the rest of what they received I forget) but they recovered very quickly. And at the start of the outbreak former CDC director Tom Frieden also urged people to maintain healthy vitamin levels. He thought it was a safe and helpful position to take.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/former-cdc-chief-tom-frieden-coronavirus-risk-may-be-reduced-with-vitamin-d
Many people I work with got sick from Covid (I work with mostly young people) and though some of them reported they had a rough time, everyone I had asked about how they were treated or what they were given … they weren’t given anything that I can remember. They might have had options if their breathing got real difficult, but they were given no set of instructions. Your anecdote of no treatment mirrors what I hear directly from others and what Jimmy Dore has also talked about.
However Jimmy Dore Comedy is covering the covid crisis with several orders of magnitude better information about Covid and the mandates than the mainstream media. Well, maybe that isn’t true… I don’t even watch the mainstream media as there are other news outlets that can engage in gutsy reporting. I’ve long ago given up on the mainstream media. Jimmy Dore does though sometimes appear on Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson. And though I kind of like them too, I am just not set up to watch that kind of news.
And Jimmy Dore reported that a judge took a firm stance on a company that wanted to take 75 years to fill an FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request about how its vaccine was developed and what the results of the trials etc were … (I hope I’m recollecting all this correctly) but the judge found that delay unacceptable.
These companies that have made tens of billions of dollars of profit … I believe they will continue to make profits. And the military (and those that produce what they consume) will continue to make big profits and the big tech companies will continue to make big profits. Jimmy Dore reported that it is now acceptable for the US government to propagandaize* the American people. (*awkward word above is mine not his.)
We will be told what to think. If there is any risk of damage to the elites, they might just manufacture a crisis or crises to get our attention off it and on to something else. It isn’t like we don’t have real problems anyways ….I know I can’t afford to pay off my personal share of the national debt. 30 trillion debt. Roughly take each trillion of that debt and multiply it by 3,000 to get the share that each of us carry on that national debt. (US population is 1/3 of a billion, so multiply by 3 (to bring the population to an equivalent of a billion) and then another thousand (to reach a trillion) and then multiply this by the number of trillions that our national debt is… so we have 3,000 times the 30(trillion number) and get $90,000 debt per person.)
In any case it is nice to see that someone (TES) understands a bit about what is going on in the world and is trying to keep everything from falling apart. Politics is complex, lots of things going on behind the scenes… most people understand real little of it.
But, I’ve got a lot of other stuff that I need to do… that I believe God called me to do or learn or whatever.
Nice to see though that you continue to make real good cases for whatever you are working on and that you present your arguments in a typically powerful way in accordance with the skills that you have.
I don’t have super-great interpersonal skills, my (now former to me) young-earth creationist pastor told me “I’m done…” with my aggressive opposition to all his anti-scientific viewpoints and flawed scriptural analysis. So I can barely get along with many Christians (though I am one) and I don’t want to fumble talking with you who is a skeptic, but one of an elite group who I got a lot of respect for. I won’t start naming the rest of some of these elite thinkers… but again high regards and it just seemed right for me to weigh in a little bit with a few of my thoughts on this topic that you had the courage and honesty to raise. (I’m cutting this short though.)
“However, Foucault argues the exercise of power in the service of maximizing life carries a dark underside. When the state is invested in protecting the life of the population, when the stakes are life itself, anything can be justified. Groups identified as the threat to the existence of the life of the nation or of humanity can be eradicated with impunity.” – Wikipedia – “Biopower”.
Foucalt here, begs the question. Government never merits the role of maximizing life – that is a ‘God’ role. Government is prohibited from shortening or degrading life without due process, nor may it deny those things necessary for a person to ensure their life, health, and happiness, even if those things carry risk or doubt (the levers of the huckster). If those things carry a long past record of abject harm and quick addiction, then they can be monitored under this ‘prohibited from shortening or degrading life’ charter.
Government must provide access under doubt, even to the risk of unknown harm.
This is a question of restraint of, not aggregation of, power. What Foucalt has stumbled upon here, is the problem of government, simply dressed in the problem of treatment.
was prohibited… i believe the rules have changed. Those who fail to see will be victims of said governments.
Can’t see how the COVID shots have had any positive effect. If most of the deaths and adverse reactions happen within the first 14 days after getting a COVID shot and then those people are categorized as ‘unvaccinated’ then the truth has been completely obfuscated.
More support for Sars-CoV-2 spreading earlier than we expected. From the reputable source, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway: «Researchers at Ahus has found antibodies against Covid-19 in pregnant women in Ahus’s vincinity going back to December 2019 – a month earlier than the first identified case of Covid-19 in Europe.»
«There is no systematized information about who the women who got Covid-19 are, and whether they had symptoms, yet it was possible to see that the women with detected antibodies before March 2020 were born in Norway, Eastern-Europe, Africa or the Middle-East.»
Translated by me from original source: https://www.ahus.no/nyheter/koronaviruset-kan-ha-vert-i-norge-allerede-i-2019
Link to manuscript: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/prevalence-of-antibodies-against-sarscov2-among-pregnant-women-in-norway-during-the-period-december-2019-through-december-2020/0178544CC4F04FC0A55C7B0BD5F28AB8
I found it interesting to notice that the birthcountries of affected individuals match up with with early spread as indicated in this post.
Covid was in Pensacola May 2019 Mothers day. BIL was required to mask for airborne virus at CVS minute clinic. He had bad asthma. They made him mask BC multiple patients from one airplane from Houston were and had sought treatments for fever dry cough and difficult breathing. Short breath… they knew it was airborne transmission on the plane.
Is there any potential genetic or other physical factors that cause one to contract COVID more easily or prevent them from contracting?
I’ve had friends who have gotten it and no one else in their household did. Then, many others have gotten it three or more times and of course others never had it at all.
I’ve read about the virus in untreated sewage water being aerosolized but how do some individuals inside that range of spray not fall ill?
The seeming randomness of transmission bothers me more than anything else.
Michel,
This disparate contagiousness bothers me as well. Everyone in our house got Delta all at once, while no one else on our street did. And we only were exposed one time. Aside from China there are 172 other nations which exhibited some kind of immunity to Covid. This is the most important statistic out there, and we ignore it.
The only thing which can produce the start differential between East and West, is prior immunity. An ancestor of Omicron swept the globe, and was much less deadly – and was tracked as a mild cold. But conferred immunity on all but 35 nations – who are the ones who got hit hard over the last 2 years.
EVG
TES :-)
Ok, this article is almost spooky to me, because it elucidates certain failures of myself – especially in a musical context – where psychology is paramount … how does one deal with others in this context without being a demanding tyrant?
So much wasted potential if you don‘t do everything yourself … but then, you need other people for many, many things (often very good friends!)!
I am certainly unable to do many technical things which nevertheless need an „outside perspective“, if you will. But then, you often lose the vision and bemoan its haphazard implementation … and you fail because you lose sight of the „critical path“ yourself because you are in a social situation, after all!
I also recognize the implications for everything else, which does nothing to make me feel better – but that is life.
In all areas there is this very different realm of real life experience and theoretical enthusiasm.
And talking heads don‘t know anything about that …
“Our choices are: the press-run state, or the state-run press. Sorry about that!” – Yarvin, Gray Mirror
This so-called “free press” only exists in our mythologies. You’re on the right track TES!
Let me start by saying I don’t understand the significance of your discoveries. I just don’t have the background. I took a detour into the Feynman method (thanks for that). If there was a 6th grade level write up, I would quickly become bored, but it might allow me to progress rapidly to an undergraduate level.
The earth and moon collide early in the creation of the solar system. The heat would be tremendous, and for a very long time. I would think the high temperature would destroy any DNA like molecules present on either planetary body before the crash. It might also boil away all the water. At some point after there has been enough cooling, other water-laden objects (comets?) could crash down and we would now have our oceans. The specially coded DNA arrives around the same time, and we believe that this would very unlikely have been created by chance.
The possibilities include, that the creating entity was waiting for the earth/moon crash, the cooling time period, and the water deposits. Or this entity was alerted that the conditions and timing were right. Or our entity accidentally came by at the right time. All very unlikely. I wish our species would spend more time researching faster propulsion methods, and less time on greed and violence.
That is just it…
The moon did not crash in to the Earth – we would have had a debris belt still present, especially at the four primary Lagrange points. Only an object the size of the Moon could import the volume of lower atomic number elements and life-support the Earth has in abundance. All the moon (a gigantic comet if you will) had to do, was come into orbit with the Earth – from there it would surrender its vaporizing or water-borne media to the Earth over the 60 million years necessary.
You made it past the 6th grade level on your own – and far further than that!
Thanks
EVG
TES
I would think even if you put debris in the Earth’s Lagrange points, after 4+ billion years enough other random debris from the early solar system would dislodge it all. If the Earth-Moon collision formation idea is correct, we should find leftover bits in the Main Asteroid belt.
We indeed should find residual particles from Theia. Once we establish an Omega Hypothesis however, we rarely will study anything that could serve to falsify it.
The 12 month running average of global mean temperature anomaly has an affine relationship with that of the rate of change of atmospheric CO2 concentration:
https://woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/mean:12/from:1979/derivative/plot/uah6/scale:0.18/offset:0.171
If one presumes a causal relationship, it is obvious the arrow of causality must be from temperature anomaly to CO2, and not the reverse. Otherwise, one must posit an absurd dynamic whereby the absolute CO2 concentration could increase to an arbitrary level, but the temperature anomaly would fall back to its initial level once CO2 stopped increasing.
Scaling the time series to match the variability also precisely matches the slope of the trend, so we cannot significantly reduce that scaling to allow significant influence from human emissions. Anthropogenic emissions simply join the much larger natural flows – it’s like peeing into a river.
Moreover, this relationship precludes significant positive aggregate influence of CO2 on terrestrial temperatures in the present climate state. Were that not the case, there would be a positive feedback loop in which temperatures rise, leading to more CO2, leading to higher temperature, and so forth ad-infinitum, or at least until some limiting influence counteracts the upward spiral. The integral nature of the feedback demands that such a positive feedback could not be stabilized even by T^4 radiative losses.
Bart, simply awesome! I’ve added a clip about this into the article at the appropriate point in the inference sequence…
Thanks!
EVG
TES :-)
This was the observation that got Dr. Murry Salby, the author of the most widely used climate textbook in the world pre-2000, declared a heretic, fired from his position at Macquarie University, and unpersoned. I argued this position for probably over a decade at places like WUWT, but gained only a small following and eventually tired of it. I’m just a lowly rocket scientist, not a climate establishmentarian, so there’s little chance I could make headway anywhere else, and I just grew tired of arguing with pinheads and left the game. FWIW, my own opinion of how this dynamic comes to be is summarized here. Additional heating from the Earth’s core would provide further impetus for it to unfold.
https://edberry.com/blog/climate/climate-co2-temp/why-our-co2-emissions-do-not-increase-atmosphere-co2/#comment-10993
BTW, really like your site. The discussion of the evolution of the omicron variant is outstanding, and has given me much food for thought.
If your thinking that this entire article explains what my prior comment is asking, then i ask if you can simplify it for me. lol.
I found you on Twitter and now am scrolling thru your website. I am not an intellectual, I only have a GED. Even still, I am determined to find something on here that I can comprehend. I mean it respectively. I find you interesting and want to know what you think about certain things, hence my determination to understand what you say.
Without embarrassment, even this article was far beyond my mental capacities to grasp. But this article did make me curious about what your thoughts would be on something, so i am hoping to ask you on here to find out.
“If you don’t believe in GOD, then how do you explain all creation and how it came to be? How can you explain how everything is perfectly designed with having a purpose. Every aspect being considered and leaving nothing ignored. From the smallest to the biggest all variables have a purpose that keeps the cycle continuing so we can exist. The trees are needed, the bees are needed, the manure from animals even fertilize the soil. And it’s all done effortlessly. The rain, the seed bearing plants that provide food, all designed for existence to be possible. I’m so curious what you will say. I’d be disappointed if you were to say everything just evolved like this and became synced together.
What does your deep dive say about this mystery of creation and how it can explained if a different way?
To me, the beginning of creation is too special that none other than a source greater than ourselves can duplicate it. It isn’t like the chair you sit on that someone crafted. The chair does nothing for our existence other than provide comfort…but take away the bees or the trees…that is the creation that i am in awe of. And this can only be from a source that’s greater than us and sits outside of His creation. The true definition to the meaning of ‘awe’. Many call this creator God. More amazing is He not only creates, but also give LIFE. I won’t even get into our DNA.
Excuse me, I started to go on a rant. Hopefully you will notice my comment and respond. If you do actually read this then I thank you for taking your time in doing so. Also, I always ask God for discernment and he brought me here. I don’t know why but i know you’re an important part of something big…like the trees and the bees are. He knows you, even if you don’t believe. :) People that see this comment are going to laugh and think I am crazy, but i don’t care. I’m tired of being afraid to say something or worry i will sound stupid. Silence caused us times that now feel uncertain and many of us feel something is happening, something that is causing us to fight as the underdogs and hoping if we only have a slingshot and rock we will bring the giant down. Im so dramatic. lol. Obviously, My comment has nothing to do with that looming above us, but is how i came across you and I feel it was for a reason. Time will tell. In the meantime please stay safe and keep flying under the radar. Very difficult to do these days, but somehow i think you will be fine.
Many thanks.
Michelle
Michelle,
What you present are two different arguments:
1. An intent of some sort, set the Universe into motion and ensured that it bore features which allowed for it to exist in equilibrium and further then to host various types and forms of intelligence.
2. ‘God’.
These are two different things. The social and religious definition of God, is wrong – therefore I reject it (and I am not obligated to provide knowledge which I do not possess, other than knowing what is false). Therefore I am an atheist technically. However, I am an ‘ignostic atheist’ – not the impotent concept created by high schoolers in the 20th Century.
That summary can be found below. Focus especially on “The The Ethical Skeptic’s Law of Advanced Intelligence (Ignosticism)”
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=13127&action=edit
No advanced degrees are required for this thinking. In fact, they tend to get in the way.
EVG and thanks for your readership!
TES :-)
I know this is an old post, but the link to the article is bad as it references your admin page and post number in word press’s interface. Would you be so kind as to post the actual link to the article you meant to post?
The amount of rabbit holes you have sent me down is astounding. You have forced me to reevaluate my world view on so many different levels. I too was raised in a heavily Christian household and have struggled with those beliefs as I transitioned to adulthood as they never fit just right. Your writings have become verbalizations of thoughts and ideas I could not solidify but have been on the fringe of my consciousness for years. I do not want to put you upon a pedestal, but certainly your logic has been a breath of fresh air, even if it makes me contemplate a future with ramifications so significant I struggle to cope.
Thanks for positive feedback, Greg…
I checked all the links and they are working for me.. which one is not linking for you?
TES
Well as I started typing a reply here, I just solved the issue. The link you have above in your response to Michelle from 3 years ago takes a regular web visitor like me without divine access to your WordPress admin login portal. You are more than likely logged in so that link properly redirects you appropriately to the article you wanted to share. I tried last night using the quote before the link in the default search on your site but didn’t get a good hit.
However I just realized I should have tried that quote in the master of indexing everything, Google. I now know what article you were linking to, it was this one: The Ethical Skeptic Statement of Faithhttps://theethicalskeptic.com/2014/09/20/
Cheers
The truth shall set you free – but it will be everything you never knew.
A very wise post.
And its essence will go unheeded by humanity for the foreseeable future …
I love this piece. I also love that you quoted Coach Tomlin in it! I may be slightly biased as a diehard Steelers fan, but I have always admired his ability to communicate or express his point in such a unique yet digestible manner. One of my favorite “Tomlinism’s” would be “The standard…..is the standard” along with “excuses are tools of the incompetent”. Excellent!
Sarah, I went to a recent Raider’s/Steelers game in Oakland – the actual camaraderie and bond (in general) between the Raider and Steeler fans was palpable. I suppose it has to do with the intense history. But now veterans of both franchises wear that history as a kind of expeditionary medal they share in common. It was rather odd.
EVG
TES
A smart fifth grader would understand this.
:-)
As a lifelong Raiders fan, I’d like to thank you for publishing this. I’ve seen bias against this organization for years/decades. Of course, when I talk about it it’s subjective. I’m glad that someone finally did an objective analysis.
For me Brad, I got tired of people telling me that I was just complaining about a loss (which is of course understandably what sports fans will do). In the case of the Raiders, I decided to look for myself, and found the situation even worse than I had perceived, by far.
Thanks for the kind words and readership!
TES
Book length essay on the obesity epidemic:
https://slimemoldtimemold.com/2021/07/07/a-chemical-hunger-part-i-mysteries/
A hypothesis I’d not yet come across.
I have skim read this, so forgive me if it’s been covered, but how do we explain milder versions circulating from early ‘18 and then becoming more severe? I thought viruses always tended to less severe with time? And how did omicron ‘hang about’ for such a long time before coming to the fore?
Yes, there was a segment speaking to this in section 7a.
In other words the virility gene by deduction, appeared several times. One did not source the other. So, the inference is that – a virus CAN and does get more virile with time.
Please note that this mutation group existed in Omicron but not in Wuhan. With that in mind, we now proceed to examine the curiosities entailed by the Omicron variant itself.
Reading this and now contemplating it is the closest I’ve ever come to getting kicked in the nuts.
Great stuff.
Within the last year or so I made a mind switch on UAPs after reading a small twitter comment by Robin Hanson. I can’t remember the comment exactly but it was something along the lines of him thinking it “unbelievable” that we don’t take the eyewitness testimony of those two pilots (the man and woman duo) seriously. It took something that small to knock me into alignment and get me thinking. The report didn’t come until later.
Are you familiar with this?:
https://grabbyaliens.com/
This entire site is a treasure trove. Keep on keeping on. Thanks.
I’ve always considered exotheory regarding aliens ‘as being analogous to us, and waiting to be ‘found’ ‘ as highly stacked and improbable. I prefer instead, the Parce-Ames equation I created (two friends from school & grad school who had some of these thoughts)…
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/10/02/the-fermi-paradox-is-babysitting-rubbish/
The odds are 1,000,000,000 to 1 that they will find us, well before we find them. In fact, if we apply that to the past, the greater likelihood is that they already have found us.
EVG
TES
I had to look up “exotheory” lol
I’ll have a look see at your link. I would have run into it eventually. I’m slowly getting through the site bit-by-bit. I do recall seeing something about before-human visitors perhaps being the current cause of UAP, but I hadn’t finished what I was reading as it was out of order. doh!
Even so… that’s an entirely new angle I hadn’t even considered. More fun for me.
Edit: Okay so it’s clear I am operating with a familiar controversy bias here. All of academia must be under its grasp.
Your description of pseudo-argument seems to be a description of what university students are actively taught to do.
Ive run into way too many Type II. Unfortunately they’ve usually been the ones in charge, and it’s usually not possible to convince them of anything because they don’t really understand what I’m talking about.
A Pakistani businessman that someone I know does some business with once remarked regarding the corruption levels between the US and Pakistan: “I finally figured out what the difference between the US and Pakistan is: In the US the corruption is built-in!”
What he seems to have been referring to is that, in developing countries, people don’t bother trying to get corrupt business practices enshrined in law as much due to weaker governance, but that doesn’t mean stronger governance eliminates corruption. Instead, the corruption gets negotiated into the legal and regulatory systems via regulatory capture and government capture.
Id also say that laws tend to not get enforced very seriously against anyone or any organization that’s “important” enough and this is still true in the US.
The sad fact is that the US is not as different from a “third world” country as people think it is. Most of the same systems phenomena still exist here but they will look different to average people, causing them to think that the phenomena are different than the same ones elsewhere when they are not completely different things.
Hey TES!
Very intriguing article, thank you.
I’ve studied a bit of biochem, and wrote the MCAT, but I think this will take me at least a month to really digest. On first read-through I’m not clear on the “primary map” and “secondary map” sections of “Third Codon Letter Left and Right-Handed 32-Slot Apportionment“. Anywhere you can point me for clarification? I’m not sure what the top-row doublet for each amino refers to, nor the two lines branching out of them.
Be warned, if you answer me now you encourage me to ask many more questions in the future!
Josh
Hey Joshua,
Compare the Primary Map column with the ‘handedness’ (it’s not chiralty per se, but rather logical handedness). It should become clear that the A-G third base slots are one hand, and the CT third base are the other hand. The problem is in selecting under such a discipline, one defeats nitrite chemical affiliations, and can only get around that conflict by logical selection, not chemistry interaction alone.
TES
:-)
Thanks for your reply!
I should have studied the graphic closer before asking my question. I wasn’t reading it correctly at all but now I see how the information in the “primary map” column is organized.
My first thought is that A and G are both purines, and C and T are both pyramidines so it doesn’t seem super strange that they could sub-in for one another. I’m 100% sure I’m not seeing the full picture though,
I don’t know what you mean by nitrite chemical affiliations here. I will be rereading this piece many times though and it will surely motivate me to study biochem more. Lately I’ve been more focused developing crypto apps.
I’d love to hear more of your thoughts on how there could be an incentivized distributed ledger involved here.
Thanks again,
Josh
Examine the CTGA-N Codon progression chart, it has all the flags inserted into it. It took me a LONG time to see the impossibility behind this chart, as opposed to the mere coincidence. Coincidence is ‘understanding’, impossibility requires comprehension.
https://i0.wp.com/theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Codon-2nd-Digit-to-Amino-Nucleon-Count-2021-opaque-Alt-1.png?ssl=1
For those who seem to think the ethics arguments are some sort of joke or political nitpicking that can be disregarded, try to imagine this going on:
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/euthanasia-program
and people trying to dismiss objections as some sort of pedantic nitpicking only relevant to “unscientific” philosophers.
The underlying philosophical cause of that incident, which was the origin of the Holocaust, was the idea that ethical claims are meaningless because they’re “unscientific”. Unfortunately we still have this underlying attitude in play today, and we can not refrain from ethical scrutiny or we will end up with the same thing not just happening again, but also further escalating.
This problem has not been solved either: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Trofim-Lysenko
Doctors need to be able to refuse to comply with unethical policy and need to be able to make their own medical decisions based on their own assessment of what is or isn’t valid science. Otherwise we end up in this same National Socialist authoritarian collectivist medical system situation yet again.
I say that but it seems like we already have when it comes to Covid response. Failure to address this bureaucratic ethical dysfunction will only make these problems worse.
This was stunning. Excellent. Bravo.
Thanks Chaz… :-)
I have compound heterozygous C677T and A1298C which it sounds like may be about the same as the MTHFR impairment of homozygous C677T alone. I’m only aware of this due to testing related to MDD (depression).
I didn’t know this impacted Covid symptoms at all so I’ll have to look into that more.
And the main current problem is that students are given the impression, even when not explicitly taught, that “history is over” and “everything is different now”. This is, in effect, the same as the usual “those pagans were barbaric but fortunately that’s all over with now that everyone is enlightened” claim that’s been made for who knows how many thousands of years.
Some things are different but everything is not. At least it’s getting more difficult to burn records.
Some of this is actually caused by environments that condition people to believe they can’t do anything without some sort of official “training” of some sort. An extreme example I encountered once was at a large animal shelter where the volunteer coordinator didn’t want to let anyone volunteer to take adoption promotional photos of dogs unless they had “dog training”, even though they weren’t handing the dogs at all (someone else with “dog training” would be doing that).
In this situation there seemed to be some job security concerns where some paid employees were worried about having their jobs replaced by volunteers if those volunteers were allowed to do some tasks that might otherwise be done by paid employees. (But they didn’t actually seem to be in danger of running out of work to do and some things were not getting done.)
Another issue is legal liability and “due diligence” requirements, or regulatory compliance requirements. While these things are inevitable and necessary a lot of the time, they represent absolute bare minimal checkboxes in a lot of cases and seem to end up conditioning some number of people into thinking they need “training” of some sort for every little thing.
Then people who aren’t very good at something, don’t think they can figure it out, or just don’t want to do something will use this as an excuse for why they can’t do it.
But I think the bigger problem is institutional systems that condition people into thinking they can’t do or understand anything without some sort of officially endorsed training. The same sort of institutions tend to also discourage questioning of whatever claims are being taught.
This is the key. Control of thought and embargoed information.
TES :-)
Can you list some names or elaborate further? The people I follow seem to be doing the work against the naked Emperors such as lawsuits, organizations to dispense early treatment, work to swing elections like VA’s or reopen schools.
I am speaking about the worn out list of self-proclaimed science representatives. A start can be found at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_skeptics
or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_skeptical_organizations
Loved the writing. I hope there will be much more.
This may be a bit late for another comment, but this is new (to me) information and it pertains to the fecal spread of COVID. This July 1, 2021 scholarly article appears to show SARS-CoV-2 behaving as a bacteriophage virus, infecting human gut microbiome bacteria and multiplying in feces over an extended period of time, continuing on in culture medium, and being reduced to zero by 4 particular antibiotics, but not by others.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8283343/
This reminded my of your argument for fecal-aerosol transmission in the spreading of the pandemic in agricultural regions spraying raw sewage.
From a recently read pre-print on a Bayesian Causal Impact statistical evaluation of vaccines and death rates across 145 countries:
“Untruth naturally afflicts historical information. There are various reasons that make this unavoidable. One of them is partisanship for opinions and schools. If the soul is impartial in receiving information, it devotes to that information the share of critical investigation the information deserves, and its truth or untruth thus becomes clear. However, if the soul is infected with partisanship for a particular opinion or sect, it accepts without a moment’s hesitation the information that is agreeable to it. Prejudice and partisanship obscure the critical faculty and preclude critical investigation. The result is that falsehoods are accepted and transmitted” (Muhammad ibn Khaldun al-Hadrami 1379, 1–2).
I love this article. It says so much that needs to be said.
The „simplicity“ of the indoctrinated mind is always a fun thing to think about … at least, as long as you still have the will to be amused – and not to be crushed by reality‘s bloodthirsty sense of irony: Because it is everywhere – in them, in you …
And sometimes, they are you … or they are everybody around you. Not so easy to ignore them then …
If anyone ever thinks that things could be simple AND true at the same time, she or he doesn‘t pay attention to the world that surrounds her or him …
How often has the inherent complexity of anything (and everything) ensured that nobody understands anything (and everything)?
I would wish for a simpler, clearer world that could be communicated more easily – but then, that could not possibly work, could it? That wouldn‘t be a real world …
We need to understand the incredible difficulty in conveying anything that is not trivial (and even then) … and that we live in a world of idiots.
Very well stated TS….
I find myself in a bizarre pandemonium where I see reason intertwined with absolute idiocy – which is begetting a bizarre form of newspeak „rationality“ …
And now it is more total than ever before ! And you don‘t even have to explain anything, because … it is so! Obviously!
… right? RIGHT?!?
I use android. There doesn’t seem to be a way to link or share this article. There is no internet menu because it is not a chrome or ddgo page and there seems to be no link or share buttons. Any ideas?
Right below the signature and the MLA recitation block, and before the citations, are the share buttons.
Comprehension requires time and a deliberate process, and at least above-average cognitive skills. The group of folks described by those traits lie closer to the right tail of the Bell curve.
“For every complex and thorny problem there is a simple and direct solution, which is wrong.”
Broadly disseminated explanations serve somebody’s interests. Whose?
Most people, for most of history have not understood most things. You need to cooperate more than understand, but you sure need to know where you’ll get food, water and fuel every winter.
“Grok” is a good word. :-)
TES, I have used this fine essay to explain something about langue and psychology. I hope you will take a look.
~A useful guide to understanding what FIML is
Thanks for all your Tweets and essays. I have enjoyed your work for a long time. ABN
ABN,
Meta-Linguistics (and I would assume non-verbal communication techniques as well) are absolutely key to interpersonal comprehension. An interesting application frontier!
Thanks!
TES :-)
Ahhh gotcha, sequitur and incremental logical next question!
In the chart inside the article, you can see that the sourced reference for the death-causes was published in April 2020. We knew that blood clots were causing 75% of the deaths back then – AND WE DID NOTHING… Because we wanted the vaccines to come to the rescue. So we sacrificed 400 – 600k people in order to promote that experiment.
TES :-)
This is excellent. Thank you!
The beauty of this proposition is that it easily explains far too much that I’ve had to “set aside” or “hand-wave” into semi-reasonable places. This includes not only pre-December-2019 facts that didn’t jibe, but all the post-2019 problems (like omicron) that bunch up on the various supposed release dates near the end of 2019.
BTW, thanks for informing us about your bout with omicron. I had delta around Thanksgiving 2021, and (almost certainly) Wuhan in January 2020. I am preparing for omicron, just in case. Your take on omicron’s lineage is a great explainer of too many things. I love the immunological irony of the “original immunity-conferrer” or its offspring swinging around to Naiveville for a second round against its sibling line.
If you can compose an “elevator pitch” of this idea, I promise to spread it like omicron, with links back to this post!
Elevator pitch
“When one examines the complete 144-slot genetic profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, it becomes clear that its lineage is a full two years older than even the first Covid virus in Wuhan, China. Not only did this ancestor of Omicron cause an outbreak across the world in 2018 and 2019, that was mistaken as an 8-fold higher rate of flu across the Asia-Pacific-Africa for those years, but its genetics reveal a robust history of lab mouse serial passes and lab-edited alleles. This proving that its 2018 release as a less-deadly immunity-builder prophylactic virus, and the subsequent release of the more-deadly Wuhan variant two years later, both originated from a weapons-grade bio-lab in China.
China set up a red herring for the world to ‘discover’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its local seafood wet market, suggesting an unfortunate but understandable accident was being thinly concealed. Now, the problem for China is, that unlike all the other variants, Omicron stuck around for some reason, and is now spilling the beans on the whole sordid affair.”
TES :-)
Thank you, thank you, thank you!!! :-D
This is the best formulation of the involuntary medical testing meme which I have seen. Does Dr. Malone read you?
I’m a COVID-treating MD, early treatment adopter since early 2020,before Trump mentioned it, fired at end of October for refusal to compy with mandatory COVID vaccination. I’ve currently got COVID, treating with ivermectin-based therapy, and got a resurgence of symptoms and a positive viral test a few days after completing a 5 day course of ivermectin. https://www.johndayblog.com/2022/01/covid-resurgence-off-ivermectin.html
Absolute best of wishes on your recovery John,
TES
Can you please discuss the experimental treatment Remdesevir
My husband was in hospital for 7 months and I feel he got worse with that medication and the only reason he is here with us is because God wants him to be here.
Eva,
The difficulty in assessing Remdesivir, is that it is a final-mile treatment. That means it is only applied to those who are at high risk of or are in the process of dying in the first place. Accordingly, it is going to show a high association with death statistically. It is like contending that ambulance drivers are murderers, by citing how many people died in the backseat of the vehicle they were driving. We don’t actually know for sure. So, I remain mute on Remdesivir. Sadly…
However, I do know that – by not treating dysbiosis (doxycycline), sepsis (antibiotics), microclots (apaxiban), pneumonia (prednisone), and endothelial inflammation (antinflammatories) – the majority of hospital deaths came from not treating persons prior to a hospital setting. Once they were in the hospital they usually had the grim reaper pushing their wheelchair to begin with – so the task Remdesivir had to accomplish was rather monumental by that time.
It’s like breaking your leg and sitting around for a week while it caught gangreen and sent you into sepsis, and then trying to have your orthopedic surgeon fix the sepsis… by that time it is too late. The orthopedic surgeon will be overmatched and cannot do their job as well.
my thoughts,
TES :-)
Yes
That is part of the problem.
He was not treated correctly for the pneumonia in the first place when he went to urgent care. The treatments that worked were kept from him, therefore, he just got worse . Giving him the Remdesevir just made him worse , then put on ventilator and ecmo causing all kinds of complications . Since my husband survived by the grace of God , the make it seem like if they would not have done that, he would have died . Yet, non of the doctors admit that medications that would have prevented him from getting worse from the onset of the symptoms would have prevented all this suffering .
The basic structure of the medical institution in the U.S. surely must be questioned and thoughtfully modified as a result of this situation. As a retired Engineer and Operations Manager who has had to deal with the medical establishment on my own and other’s behalf throughout my life, I have frequently disparaged the lack of independent, competitive and responsible thought within the medical community when compared to relatively pedestrian activities like manufacturing. While the members of the medical establishment should and do feel the pressure brought on by the credible threat of liability actions for malpractice (as we all do), many members within the medical establishment are also heavily controlled through their employment contracts, hospital privileges, etc., to follow dogma that is related to political goals. The clear pandemic example is the ban on prescribing anti-virals such ivermectin (which have proven highly successful elsewhere) through coercion and threats of removal of employment or necessary privileges for doing something that is logical, legal, in keeping with professional oaths and has an extremely low liability risk.
We must work to redesign the structure of the medical institution to remove these non-liability related methods of control so that we can free up competitive thought and actions within the community to allow it to progress at the rate of other human endeavors.
And as with most issues, our ‘educated’ hold the position that such a conspiracy could not exist. Someone would speak up or spill the beans.
I think the days of buying that rhetoric are over…
At least one thing came out of this two-year waste in humanity.
TES :-)
nixce
I’m very sorry what you and your family have gone through. And thank you for continuing to fight our humanity.
What is J A Q?
It was in bullet point #2 ‘Just Asking Questions’ – but I went ahead and added into the title of that section as well.
Thanks for reading!
TES :-)
I am going to recommend- for you based on what you wrote- adding daily nasal irrigation to the things you do. Since starting over a decade ago, haven’t needed to take an antihistamine for allergies. Since adding xylitol to the mix over 3 years ago- haven’t had cold or flu. OR- the dreaded covid. With several close exposures as defined by the CDC. During the covidiocy I’ve also added erythritol to the mix. Lots of different types of machines you can buy on Amazon. I’m currently using the Navage- the easiest so far. And followed a youtube video on how to bypass their “have to use our salt pods” features. 1/2 tsp baking soda, 1 tsp salt, 1 tsp of both the xylitol and erythritol, per one pint of warm water.
I also take most of the OTC supplements you have listed daily. And- my multi has the MDR of zinc, and my red meat consumption puts me well over the MDR. And B-100 which is a standard formulation across many brands. And vitamin E, which is also a good anti-coagulant.
Gospace, I am going to try it. Thanks!
TES :-)
B-100 never worked for me however – with my genetics, cheap B-vitamins which must go through the liver conjugation process first, in order to be used – only end up bringing me to malnutrition and severe health impacts. I have to use the food form, or ‘methylated’ or I suffer greatly.
Yes, taking Vit E.
This is long, but it’s how I cured a crippling sinus problem I had for years. I’ll tell you how to solve the problem. I had really bad sinus. Really bad. I read Jerry Pournelle who had the same and said a device like a water pic type thing would work. Well it did. Get one of these,
SinuPulse Elite Advanced Nasal Sinus Irrigation System
I found it works the best and last a long time. It’s not super cheap but compared to surgery or the suffering it’s super cheap. They’re like $80 USD.
http://pics.drugstore.com/prodimg/190008/900.jpg
It was a great relief. I could use a tank to wash out before bed but…it never really “fixed” things. Not that I was displeased. It made a huge difference. Now by reading about parasites and bacteria I got some ideas on how to improve the wash. So what I eventually did was add in additives to attack bacteria into the nose washing fluid. What I came up with I used in each tank.
1. About a spoon full of H2O@ (hydrogen peroxide). Stuff in drugstores(3%). Start at a lower level and work up to what you can stand.
2. I started with sea salt, a teaspoon and Sodium bicarbonate but eventually got the nose washing powder from wallmart in packages. Cheap and works. “Neilmed Sinus Rinse Premixed Packets”
3. I also added a disinfectant “Lugol’s 2% iodine”. I would add 5 to 6 drops to each tank. To kill off bacteria I added an artificial sugar. A teaspoon of Xylitol. Xylitol is gorged on by bacteria and it kills them off. So they say. If you eat a lot of Xylitol candy you will get massive gas. That’s the bacteria in the gut being trashed by the Xylitol.
4. Water I just used from the tap. Not the best plan. It’s better to use distilled OR to put water in the microwave for 10 minutes or so to get a vigorous boil. My thinking was I’m adding all these disinfectants so it’s ok but it’s not the right way.(the chlorine does burn but you get used to it)
5. Now I would put water in the tank and then add the ingredients while the thing was pumping. Aim the nozzle to the back of the tank so that all water is thoroughly mixed up. Let it run for a minute or so before washing.
6. DO NOT turn the power level down on the pump. It just throttles it and messes up the pump over time by over working it. To vary pressure to the nostril just move the thing back and do not jam it up your nostril. Do it over the sink and let the excess drain off.
7. Now my sinuses at first would be packed so I would just spray it up into the nostril without placing it firmly. After a while you could place it firmly in one nostril and it would run out the other. As you are doing so you could blow out the open nostril and blow this stuff out while spraying in one nostril. Then do the other.
8. After you clean it out fairly well then you could put in one nostril and close off the other with your finger. It would slowly pressure the fluid deep into the nasal cavity filling it. Make sure you clean with the open nostril technique well first so you are not just blowing that stuff up farther into the nostril. Of course be careful not to blow your sinus out. Do this and then let drain intermittently.
9. When I first started doing this sometimes I would need three, four tanks to clear out but after adding the extra ingredients I noticed. I WAS CURED. No not completely but mostly. It’s not like I don’t have normal sinus but I do not have to wash every night. Only every so often, months apart.
Sam J.’s theory of chronic sinus trouble,” The sinuses get bacteria or yeast lodged deep in the sinus cavity where they are hard to get out. They irritate the sinus causing a vast amount of sinus expectoration to try and dislodge them. The only way to make it stop is to wash out and kill off the bacteria in the sinus. Once this is done the sinus will go back to it’s original function and original drainage pattern”.
The reason I believe the above is correct is I used this sinus pump or one like it for over two years or more. It gave me great relief so I could sleep but my sinus would be filled back up by the end of the day. It was only after I added all these additives to kill off bacteria, or whatever was in my sinus, that within a maybe a few months I noticed I didn’t need to clean out my sinuses at all for really long periods of time like months.
I know this is long and most will wonder what I’m going on about but if you suffer from chronic sinus troubles and do this you will be one of the happiest persons ever to rid yourself of this scourge. Packed sinuses is horrible. Everyone I see with serious sinus problems I sit down and write down all this stuff for them. There’s no telling how many people, if they follow through, have been helped by this.
I am wondering why simple aspirin is not being recommended for blood thinning (some renegade scientists do) in the coagulation risk phase.
This is a great example of doctors being intimidated into not even recommending the easiest and safest treatments for Covid – in an effort to make sure that those who did not get vaccinated – got absolutely nothing, as a form of treatment.
The scope and scale of this vaccination program and the suppression of other treatment options could not be consistently manipulated by any distributed federation. That kind of control would require (1) a central coordinator of enormous power and pre-existing connections in every healthcare and reimbursement system, (2) a motivation strong enough to ignore the risk and consequences of discovery, and (3) an understanding that this process would span more than 2 years.
Certainly the US federal administrative government satisfies the first and third requirements, but my money is on the pharma powers because of the insidious and ubiquitous nature of the control and the sheer amount money to be made.
For me, the telling fact is the disclosure by Moderna in an SEC filing on February 11, 2020 seeking authority to issue 26 million new common shares based on an mRNA vaccine they were able to create in less than 6 days after the virus was identified in China. From the SEC filing:
”2019-nCoV was first identified in Wuhan, China on January 7, 2020.On January 13, 2020, the NIH and our infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for the 2019-nCoV vaccine and we mobilized toward clinical manufacture. As of February 7, 2020, the first clinical batch, including fill and finishing of vials, is complete. This mRNA vaccine was designed and manufactured in 25 days and is undergoing analytical testing prior to release to the NIH for use in their planned Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S.”
So big pharma with no prior knowledge of this virus went from 0 to a working vaccine batch in less than 30 days.
No doubt the feds aided and abetted, so one cannot eliminate a governmental role, but I’ll take pharma for the win.
Okiemike,
Exactly. If you examine the Moderna patent progression – it is one I am familiar with. Government will hand a technology to a private company under an MNCNDA, and the instruct them as to the patents they want. The Moderna patent strategy is one which is ‘linear, derived from no team basis in prior art, milestone driven, with a single objective using prior art of the government sponsor” – In other words it was like the rush to build the atomic bomb in WWII. There was driving force behind this.
There was a placeholder in the patent claims for ______________, until Feb 3 2020, where in SARS-CoV-2 was inserted. China did something and our intelligence services knew about it.
TES
:-)
The timeline almost compels the conclusion that Moderna participated in the virus iteration process.
Moderna bragged in an SEC filing in Feb 2020 that it had developed a complete and clinically testable vaccine for the SARS-2 COVID virus within 25 days of the publication of the virus genome. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001682852/000119312520033353/d871325d424b5.htm#supptoc871325_8 ;(page S18)
Moderna was seeking approval for the issuance of an additional 26 million shares of common stock, based in part on the creation of this vaccine.
Seems impossible to go from 0 to complete vaccine in 25 days without some inside knowledge regarding the genome.
This reminds me of some stuff that happened with Google when it was brand new. I can’t recall the exact timeline but they mysteriously went from distributed computing scalability problems to no problems very quickly when every other search engine had struggled with that for a few years. This was around the time some, uh, other stuff was going on.
The “scope and scale” of the Covid Scam CAN ONLY be COHERENTLY explained by recognizing that a cabal of psychopaths are ruling globally — see “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” at https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html
“2 weeks to flatten the curve has turned into…3 shots to feed your family!” — Unknown
I would disagree that “a cabal of psychopaths ruling globally” is the only explanation. In most cases I would say degenerate phenomena are better explained by game theory and social psychology. The players don’t need to be psychopaths either, only humans with conflicts of interest who can rationalize their convenient disregard somehow.
People tend to assume that things must happen due to hierarchical control by a single hierarchy led by one or more persons, because that’s what they tend to encounter on a smaller more everyday scale, but there are plenty of situations where this is not the case. For example, in game theory see coordination games such as assurance games. Multiple players can converge on the same square in the payoff matrix without direct communication, and they can do so for different reasons.
The main players will be individuals and groups, such as economic oligarchs, and groups of officers of various private and public sector organizations. But they don’t need to form a cabal as they can be independently pursuing an assurance game. There’s also likely to be a Byzantine Generals Problem.
Most of the population is operating at Lawrence Kohlberg’s Stage 3 or Stage 4, and will be subject to the phenomena shown in the Milgram Experiments and Asche Conformity Experiments. This is why it’s critical to solve these problems at the level where people are instructed from a position of authority and social approval.
But it’s harder to solve them if the problem is attributed to a single secret cabal of some sort when the problem is more complicated and most likely doesn’t have a single point of control.
However,
If you know that your actions can result entropically in harm – you are still taking those actions, regardless of the relative innocence of the first-order actions themselves. Secondary effects are always quotidie mortem. One is still accountable for knowing this.
I would agree entirely and this is especially true for those who wield extreme amounts of power and thus have extreme amounts of responsibility. Humanity can’t afford for such people to be doing everything primarily for their own personal convenience. The only thing that seems to help is stronger more robust accountability mechanisms, but the ease with which most people are deceived and manipulated seems to defeat accountability.
Hence, monstrous, large scale diabolical projects can occur without anything resembling a conspiracy. Can you direct me to any writings on this by yourself or others?
Dave,
I have written on this before. https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/03/30/it-does-not-take-a-conspiracy/
However, when one is in government – if one does not assess strategic alternatives and model prospective impacts – it is no different than conspiracy. Your responsibility is to know the ramifications of your actions. ‘Good’ or ‘Bad’ intentions do not cut it. There are only two states – know, or malfeasance through omission and clumsy commission.
The latter is monstrous – and allowing ignorance to be an excuse, will become the excuse of resort on the part of every despot.
EVG
TES
Ethical Skeptic already beat me to writing about it, but he’s a better writer than I am anyway.
Here’s an example paper I just found but haven’t read yet. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/COALITIONAL-GAMES-%2C-EXCESSIVE-COMPETITION-AND-A-OF-Ap-Roach/443ac5c3bb2651b117e0a0551d04a4a2bf74ebcc But that’s at least something that leads to more material.
Is there any other potentially deadly disease that the medical professional diagnoses you positive, then sends you home without a treatment plan? Telling the patient to take some OTC product to only soothe symptoms doesn’t count as a treatment plan.
And adding to that, in what universe is early treatment of any disease not preferable?
Brilliantly stated.
I would consider adding an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker like Losartan for endothelial protection, and Xarelto or similar Factor Xa inhibitor to help prevent any coagulopathy. Doses and frequency according to your medical resources.
The scope and scale of this vaccination program and the suppression of other treatment options could not be consistently manipulated by any distributed federation. That kind of control would require (1) a central coordinator of enormous power and pre-existing connections in every healthcare and reimbursement system, (2) a motivation strong enough to ignore the risk and consequences of discovery, and (3) an understanding that this process would span more than 2 years.
Certainly the US federal administrative government satisfies the first and third requirements, but my money is on the pharma powers because of the insidious and ubiquitous nature of the control and the sheer amount money to be made.
For me, the telling fact is the disclosure by Moderna in an SEC filing on February 11, 2020 seeking authority to issue 26 million new common shares based on an mRNA vaccine they were able to create in less than 6 days after the virus was identified in China. From the SEC filing:
”2019-nCoV was first identified in Wuhan, China on January 7, 2020.On January 13, 2020, the NIH and our infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for the 2019-nCoV vaccine and we mobilized toward clinical manufacture. As of February 7, 2020, the first clinical batch, including fill and finishing of vials, is complete. This mRNA vaccine was designed and manufactured in 25 days and is undergoing analytical testing prior to release to the NIH for use in their planned Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S.”
So big pharma with no prior knowledge of this virus went from 0 to a working vaccine batch in less than 30 days.
No doubt the feds aided and abetted, so one cannot eliminate a governmental role, but I’ll take pharma for the win.
Savvy…
You’re clearly correct, https://www.extremelyamerican.com/post/copy-of-eu-commision-chief-ursula-von-der-leyen-calls-for-throwing-out-the-nuremberg-code
Where might the genetic ‘target’ be chiefly represented?
Pleased to here of your recovery, beyond 3score and10 I expect to see a thinning of the ‘ranks’ but since the jabs began roughly a year ago the losses almost equal those of the whole previous decade, and all amongst the vaxxed. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/the-international-criminal-court-fighting-for-the-people-part-i/
Thanks to following your Twitter feed, I am on a daily regimen of nattokinese and methyl folate. I have ivermectin on hand, and most of the rest – will be researching how to get the rest.
Thank you for everything you have done these past 2 years.
Absolutely Aimee, you are welcome.
TES :-)
Hospitals in the western world followed the same script. Denial of early treatment, lockdown of nursing homes and euthanasia with respiratory depressants (midazepam in England, Rivotril in France), forced vaccinations.
The orders are easy to find as they’re called mandates which is the legal term used by the sect.
What is awful is that the medical profession has been taken hostage, often from within, either by political participation or simple brainwashing. In any case the whole medical industry is now completely discredited as either incompetent or malign, or both.
Early treatments are very effective indeed, and refusing to administer them is a crime against mankind.
PS: Thought there was something else missing from your diatribe…From your description it seems you were infected with the coronavirus, probably the Delta variant and then presented yourself to a clinic. At this point you become concerned that you were forced onto a path in which you elected not to be vaccinated.
But surely you made this decision far earlier – at a point when vaccines became available and you had not yet been infected?
That was the point at which you should have investigated your alternatives extensively. Once you made that decision you would be stuck with whatever treatment options were made available at that time – which may have included shortages of staff, shortages of beds, oxygen etc. Perhaps the only advantage to be gained would be that treatments continually improve in the light of information coming out of all the hospitals and treatment centres but the general overloading plus politicization of all issues related to Covid-19 could and did have many deleterious effects.
So I agree: You made your bed and you must sleep on it, however uncomfortable it might be!
You completely missed the logical calculus of the article.
There are effective treatments for COVID, especially at early stages, and through getting vitamin-D levels up into the normal range, so the immune system functions normally. John Day MD http://www.johndayblog.com
1. This knowledge of early treatment protocol need, was from April 2020. The medicinals have existed since 1916. This is pretty easy. My extended family’s ‘bed’ was made by one thing: a lack of outpatient and timely treatment availability after 18 months of research by public health officials. Criminal. This was a monstrous action. You are part of it.
2. Early treatment would have prevented hospital overloading and death. Those who squelched treatment, in favor of promoting SOLELY vaccine/no Treatment, are criminals with blood on their hands. We used the threat of death as the incentive to conform under the experiment. Also known as ‘Racketeering’. See my article on the same.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/12/27/the-intellectual-property-racketeering-litmus/
NO getting out of this… with virtue rhetoric. It was a crime, and is about to be prosecuted.
EthicalSkeptic,
Something I had forgot to mention regarding this: there seems to be a bureaucratic rule issue that creates a rules conflict between promoting treatment and approving the emergency use of a vaccine etc:
https://theconversation.com/what-are-emergency-use-authorizations-and-do-they-guarantee-that-a-vaccine-or-drug-is-safe-151178 (not what I would consider to be a very good article, but it points out some bureaucratic issues)
So it seems very much as though there was an effort to “debunk” any cheap low-tech treatments in order to gain EUA for experimental expensive/high-tech ones.
Then people die while waiting for the high tech experimental treatments and don’t receive what’s available because it’s all been “debunked” and lacks the liability cover of bureaucratic approval.
Thanks Jinn!
I modified the article with this wisdom you provided. I had not even thought along this angle.
EVG
TES
Sounds unbelievable that your attending physician made such a blunt statement: “There is no treatment. Go home and sleep it off. You should have gotten the vaccine.
~ Diagnosing Physician at Clinic, Aug 18 2021.
Is it possible that you attempted to engage him/her on the use of Ivermectin or something similar and raised his/her ire at having to deal with yet another recalcitrant antivaxxer? I have every sympathy with healthcare personnel who have spent the last two years trying to save lives under such appalling conditions – and then have to deal with such nonsense as demonstrated here.
You have done much better in the past and could do better in future.
What? NO…
No mention of any specific treatment or therapeutic was made at all. My statement which prompted the quip was, “I came in to get tested as soon as I felt a little bit off, that way I can get started on the right treatment approach as soon as possible.”
“There is no treat…. blah blah blah…”
His quip was the nonsense. Delay of treatment to the hospital alone is more than nonsense, it is a crime.
TES
You will find my post: OTC Rxs for Omicron, 12/23/21 useful and actionable
https://www.johndayblog.com/2021/12/otc-covid-rxs-for-omicron.html
John Day MD
Been following your research since spring 2020 (twitter). I knew of the death in your family yet had no idea you and other members were struggling for months with Covid/variants. Couldn’t thank you enough for all you are doing, and for The Kit.
Hi TES,
Amazing that the Harvard article has no mention of Ivermectin despite it being the most controversial & talked about treatment in 2021.
You write: “A decision was made to coerce me, without sufficient knowledge on my part nor my consent, into participating as a control-group member in an experiment evaluating test-group vaccines versus the action of withholding any and all treatment.”
I think you are on the same page with my thinking that to constitute an experiment you need more than just conditions consistent with experimental proceedures but also intentionality behind the process – someone controling the conditions have to have purposefully set up the conditions to run an experiment. So, who is that someone in this case?
Also, if it were an experiment, why the push to vaccinate absolutely everyone? Wouldn’t they want a good sized control group?
Thanks ~
Evan,
The push to vaccinate everyone was in part rhetorical as an argument, however real as an intent. They knew that a sizeable contingent of Americans would not accept the vaccine, so there would be plenty of control group members – no matter how hard they pushed vaccination. Still, vaccinating as many persons as possible was the real goal nonetheless. It is just that this goal would never realistically encroach upon the control group.
As for who? I do not know completely. However, The Party benefits politically both from the death of its enemies and the disenfranchisement of their children. This smacks very much of Party activity – to me.
My thoughts…
TES :-)
Thanks a lot for your thoughts on this.
There isn’t necessarily a single “who”. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_game
Each “player” can also be a group. Each player also does not need to necessarily “plot” or explicitly coordinate with other players. In some cases, players don’t even need to communicate, they just need to have access to the same information and follow the same payoff metric calculations.
An example of this last one is the stock market where a significant number of investors in a stock receive the earnings announcement and converge on the same decision to buy or sell using the same or similar valuation models. However, like the stock market, there could be a criminal conspiracy among some company executives to lie about earnings (conspiracy to commit securities fraud) in order to manipulate investors into not selling the stock and driving the price toward worthlessness.
Though it isn’t as easy to understand as securities fraud and fraudulent SEC filings, we are constantly being deceived for similar manipulative purposes; the “who”, “how”, or “why” is not nearly as obvious as the securities fraud scenario though.
But in any case, the “wisdom of crowds” doesn’t work when the gumball jar is hidden or the contents partially hidden etc. In that case, obtaining the correct count is obviously not the objective.
Well, you’ve got me going down a rabbit hole this evening… My rs1801133 = A/A, rs1801131 = T/T. I’m trying to independently evaluate your claims, and it’s rather difficult…
Edward,
Let me know what you find. But given your profile of AA and TT, you are homozygous for BOTH MTHFR alleles. This is important – past age 30 or so, you may find that you are experiencing boughts of excessive fatigue doing normal daily tasks. Or feeling like you are going to pass out or have a heart attack, just walking or sitting normally. These are indication of a lack of methylfolate and methlycobalamine. These are the active forms of vitamins B-9 and B-12, which cannot be supplied by grocery store vitamins. If you can find these at a health store or online (very common and cheap supplements), I would order them and test them under your tongue.
Prior to age 30, these are important for ANS, neural, mitochondrial, and muscle development. I needed this when I was younger, but unfortunately we did not have this knowledge then.
It will be critical that you take these, as soon as you are confident in the research you find.
It changed my life and the lives of many others I have told about this…
Good luck!
TES :-)
Thanks so much for all of your covid analysis, it’s been interesting and invaluable. Embarrassingly, I’m actually up now at 2:30 am after waking up from Niacin flush after taking it for the first time at 11:00 pm. The similarity to a bad sunburn sensation was remarkable. Reading up on my dosing error, the duration, etc led me back here and down a MTHFR rabbit hole of online research. Curious, does a rather strong flush response indicate anything on the probability of having MTHFR issues? Also, with a 3 yo on the autism spectrum I ran into a number of discussions of MTHFRs potential impact there. Any thoughts on whether that link has been validated? Thanks again
Badbisco,
I think that everyone gets the niacin flush. My ears start burning first, then face, then my arms, and the front of my legs. Yes, it feels like a sunburn. What I have noticed is that it is much stronger when niacin is taken on an empty stomach. I don’t think that the flush is stronger in MTHFR. But then I have not looked at that particular association.
MTHFR and ASD – yes, there is an association. Enough to where one should be screened for this allele before vaccine decisions are made. But in our Pollyanna science society, mere virtuous sounding words relate ultimate and unassailable truth, and not any kind of research. The sad state of monkey affairs in which we live.
One study (Sener, Oztop) found a 24 – 29% higher association to C677T, with an unreasonably small and heterozygous sample population of 98 people in Turkey and only 3 persons from any form of homozygous phenotype (the most informative). In other words, principal incompetence. Every parent on my neighborhood street could have conducted a more ethical and rigorous study. Sometimes these technicians fascinate themselves with irrelevancies about what μL PCR mix they used, what U/mL Taq DNA polymerase was applied, or that they used a statistical ‘Mann-Whitney U test’, when their core argument is less competent than a high school gymnasium science show exhibit – or worse.
If I had wanted to purposely obfuscate the issue, Sener-Oztop is the study I would have done. They arrogantly think that people cannot detect the incumbent dishonesty through the technical notation jargon.
Another study by Boris and Goldblatt showed a similar association to C677T. But cited that another polymorphism must be the root of the association, rather than simply this one. That may well be the case. But parents and independent researchers see both mechanism and association which small agenda-studies routinely work to filter out.
Thus, why ethical skepticism exists – to spot those who are spinning the agenda.
TES :-)
Thanks so much, I did 1000 mg on an empty stomach and was worse than any sunburn I’ve had.
Will plan to have the little one tested. I didn’t appreciate it was the standard vax combined with MTHFR that caused the potential ASD issues rather than just ongoing MYHFR causing issues. Sorry to bother for more research but do you know whether there’s evidence MTHFR oriented supplements can help ASD after the original generation of issues from vax? Have found a few anecdotal sites from parents but there’s a wide spectrum of ASD supplement/diet advice out there
TES You may be interested by this http://www.magniel.com/jse/B/vol0201B/vg040720.pdf where it’s suggested that outgassing of H/He from the core and subsequent reactions through the mantle create much of the heat, and explosive forces involved in vulcanism and earthquakes, that reaches the surface. It would imply that the same processes expressed in the atmosphere through vulcanism or in the oceans through both vulcanism and plates spreading cause both cooling and warming of the global climate.
This coincides quite well with my personal experience, and perhaps a cursory look at CDPH data from the time period. https://dontletitgo.substack.com/p/was-some-variant-circulating-in-2018
Amy, a key statement from your article:
Most of the Covid-Delta sufferers from August 2021 in our household are suffering an extraordinary mold allergy season this year, in terms of both severity and length. I suppose this has to do with heightened immunity systems.
I had IgG antibodies in July 2021, but was not ill with a CLI since June 2017. So I am not sure where I got the antibodies.
TES :-)
Mine was not really an article, so much as a compilation :)
The mold in my apartment back then was sampled & confirmed, multiple species and plenty of it. But what happened to me seemed exaggerated.
What IgG or other test might be useful at this point? It’s been nearly 3 years for me. n-antibody tests I’ve done have been negative, which I now understand now could be expected. But I wish I knew that before I decided to get the vaccine in the spring. I probably made matters worse by doing that. No more!
Oh my goodness! This is one of my graduate professors to the T. He was supposed to be the lead on curriculum development but instead stonewalled any improvements to the program. It was so frustrating as our curriculum was outdated. He also had astonishingly never produced his own research in 20 years–and got away with it, yet he would rip apart any doc students work without being constructive. He made excuses not to show up for my dissertation proposal and defense, which in a small department was pretty telling. By the way, we were the same age, but I had 24 years in the field.
That sounds like a nightmare. I hope you have fared well since Gena!
The measure of an out of control ego, is not in how people tend to regard themselves – but rather is measured in these subtle hints and behaviors.
TES :-)
I like to see myself as an autodidact, but it embarrasses me to acknowledge that there is more than a little of “the dark side” in my character.
Im a retired doctor, and see very clearly how our education pre-disposes us to regurgitating the errors of others and calling that “education”.
This happens when you have a high enough readership to attract the attention of government military-trolls.
They assign bot trolls, with an occasional NCO to throw in some human bits and rude answers. Occasionally, if called out as a bot in detail, by multiple commenters, they may have an intelligent human overseer (Captain of trolls) post some intellectual articles and say intellectual things in a hurt-yet-disparaging-guilt-inducing-way.
This is happening recently The Automatic Earth blog, which is an alternative financial (Peak Oil origins) blog, with a lot of focus on COVID related lies and manipulations, “Science”, vs. science, etc. lately. 12/13/21 blog comments: https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/12/debt-rattle-december-13-2021/page/2/ The second page of comments is where “deflationista”, “Captain Deflationista” this time (a rare honor in the comments section) comes in, and spends the rest of a busy day.
There were 4 pages of comments that day. I presume the military tracks traffic in real time and officers only attend when it is high.
I don’t rate this kind of expenditure of manpower or even droid-trolls on my humble blog, which is OK. http://www.johndayblog.com
Hello ES. I would like to express my humble gratitude to you for proposing such an elegant and incredibly important idea. I truly believe humankind has a responsibility to become guardians of the genetic legacy of our world by preventing these kinds of cataclysmic events. Our bi-annual crossing of the Taurid meteor stream is very concerning and political motivation seems non-existent, or more rightly described as ostriches hiding their heads in the ground… but a similar event to Tunguska over a populated area, unfortunately, may be what spurs the world’s nations and powerful private individuals into more decisive action and your idea may take fruit very quickly. Do you think it would also be worthwhile for our species to attempt to create a durable repository of our collective knowledge and technology for any survivors of a potential unavoidable cataclysm?
Shemsu,
Thank you for the kind words on my ELORA proposal article. We absolutely should keep a repository of our knowledge for the case of any potential cataclysm. I am relatively certain that we did this in the past as well. Unfortunately, those libraries were raided and plundered into non-existence and private collections. The trick will be the medium and fashion through which this might be accomplished. Perhaps laser-inscribed fireproof/waterproof Kevlar sheets of ‘paper’, which can both be read by human eyes, or scanned later into re-established computing systems.
Then if we were smart, we would bury this library under the ground and then stack a massive set of stones into a recognizable shape on top of the burial site. A stack which could never be swept away by a flood or fire, or asteroid impact within reason. Perhaps a mountain shape, but square and aligned to true north, so that it would be easily recognized as man-made. I wonder if such a thing exists?
hehe…
TES :-)
Thank you for your reply, it brought a very large smile to my face! I am not surprised you have already devoted some thought to the medium AND location for such information :-) Reuse of existing geoglyphs is practical and timeless while the Kevlar sheets would be ideal “protection” from the ravages of time. Again, many thanks for all you do!
One thought (of many) is why would the virus be a serious problem in Wuhan in the summer of 2019 if it had actually started in 2018? Is it a coincidence that the The WIV is there? Was it re-released or made worse to coincide with the World Military Games that were held there in October 2019?
It does seem likely that the powers that be already knew about the virus but why did it become serious again just before the American election and the need to re-set the world’s financial system?
Was it brought back to Wuhan in 2019 by Americans or did a ore serious variant ‘escape’ from the lab. Or (sorry, another thought), were there several places where it was released?
Munchy,
I don’t have the answers to all of that. The most parsimonious explanation is that a milder version of the virus was leaked, and the Chinese knew that it had been leaked, and fought it through silence and less drastic measures, hoping that it would just die out. But as this virus does, a new variant appeared in Wuhan in the Apr/May of 2019, and it was much deadlier. Since the Chinese were covering up the fact that they had accidentally released a bioweapon (not a vaccine test virus), they kept it silent and even clamped down on the Wuhan citizens to shut up. But by October, it was clear that they had to ethically tell the world community that this thing was not going away. So they set up a ruse. Exhibits 11.3 and 6.2 make it clear that, by my tally 254,000 Chinese had died of Covid by the time they announced it as a ‘novel’ virus. The Chinese blame this on the ‘flu’. Worst flu in their history by 8:1.
Exhibit 7.5 shows that the virus originally started in 2018 outside of Wuhan, by its genetic fingerprints. Wuhan itself was later – with lots more case fatality rate.
TES
:-)
Thank you for your thoughtful answer. But…If it started outside Wuhan, why was it Wuhan that was inflicted by a more serious strain in the summer of 2019? Nothing to do with the WIV or the Military Games being there? Quite a coincidence. I have heard that athletesarriving for the Games were greeted by largely deserted streets and people wearing masks. Many of them (the athletes) got sick and then of course went home, to countries all over the world.
Yes, I heard this about Wuhan as well. They were hit hard by Covid in June 2019. But as to why there and why later, I don’t yet entirely know. All I know is that China concealed something horrendous – and given the immunity curve, it happened well before 2019. The other shoe should drop here in 2022. However, given that lots of money is flowing – our officials may simply choose to look the other way.
China may well buy its way out of killing 7 million non-citizens and making the world a hell-hole, when it is all said and done.
TES
:-)
OK, thank you. Let’s hope they fall flat on their face when that other shoe drops next year.
“But by October, it was clear that they had to ethically tell the world community that this thing was not going away”
If this were the case, and it may very well be – the World Military Games where some athletes got sick would have been a terrific spreader event. There are articles (not sure if I am allowed to post them here) that months into the pandemic claim there may have been cases as early as early Nov in France. So..
This also seems relevant, and scary: https://harvard2thebighouse.substack.com/p/a-grin-without-a-cat
I read that article and the two golden silkworm articles. He claims covid 19 is a deattenuating LAV, and will eventually revert back to its full virulence. Hope he isn’t right about it. That would be really bad. What I can’t understand is where he came up with this stuff. I think he was in the NSA but went to prison for some bad shizzle. I don’t think he has a background in the sciences.
I have no background in anything close to this discussion; but I am curious, and perhaps you included it and I missed it; could the “mysterious outbreaks” that occurred on the cruise ships back in 2018 have been what is called Covid now?
Thanks for your research .
Mary,
Possible to even likely. Cruise ships provide an idea environment for fecal aerosol viruses to spread. The Diamond Princess comes to mind. Tons of wet food processing and delivery, miles of sewage and grey water pipes running all over the ship. Numerous drains and one-way valves to malfunction. A virus playground. 2018 would have easily been the older variant of Covid, yes.
TES
Thanks for all the work and information in this, fascinating and extremely helpful!
I asked Jonathan Latham to comment. He’s one of the authors of the covid-miner-passage hypothesis: https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/a-proposed-origin-for-sars-cov-2-and-the-covid-19-pandemic/
He disagrees with two points in the text:
and says “Omicron dates from late spring 2020”.
I don’t know enough about the science to critique either viewpoint…
Thanks Tim,
I disagree on Omicron linking to Clade 20B (Feb – Apr 2020). Yes that is where the line is drawn to in the GISAID charts, but that is only a placeholder, with hopes of confirmation, not a conclusion. There is no evolutionary track from 20B to Omicron at all. In fact the difference is 66 substitutions and 27 deletions. See Exhibit 7.10 – it outlays the proximity by 144 nucleotides evaluated for clades/variants. Deletions are very less common in short term RNA virus evolution as compared to silent, synonymous, AA substitution and insertion mutations – so these deletions in Omicron present a large problem. But if we simply ignore it, then of course any conclusion becomes viable – so we pose one which complies with a narrative, rather than the evidence.
Which is why I use the phrase ‘stuffing ten pounds of evolution into a two pound bag of narrative.’
That being said, there is ample evidence herein which would ostensibly support Jonathan’s hypothesis. Interesting.
But thanks for the feedback. If and when we get compelling deductive evidence that Omicron originated from an extant Clade – I will be the first to jump on board.
Thanks!
TES :-)
3/3. Another possible COV19 precursor:
US tourist deaths
Ex. The Fiji couple. David and Michelle Paul (30’s), from Fort Worth, Texas, fell ill two days into their vacation to Fiji, vac. from May 19 to 27, 2019.
Their symptoms were diarrhea, vomiting, numbness, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, and they both died, with ‘proper’ med / hosp. care. The husband was put on a ventilator. 5 ppl whom they had contact with were also hospitalised with similar symptoms, and 2 security guards and 2 med staff were put into isolation. (Links are to brief MSM, and the details I report are not all to be found in these links.)
https://bit.ly/3cw3J4x
https://yhoo.it/3xabCUZ
https://abcn.ws/3vhmI9G
https://fxn.ws/3pDywlj –> headline, mystery virus …:
“An investigation into the cause of their deaths is ongoing, but a recent WHO alert warns of a deadly influenza strain, including in Fiji where it is “particularly affecting young adults…” (alert not any longer at WHO site.)
Dominican Republic US tourist deaths, June 2019.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48665796
See list of US tourists who died (May 2019 or so) from: quote, pulmonary edema for several of them – struggling to breathe – death certif. respiratory issues – fluid in the lungs – respiratory failure – heart attack – respiratory issues – fluid in the lungs – resp. problems – pulmonary edema – resp. distress…
ex. no cause attributed: Allen was there with friends who said he complained about being hot at the pool before going to shower and lie down; he was found dead the next day.
the list goes back to 2018….:
https://cbsn.ws/2SrvwMH
see also
https://bit.ly/2SnREYh
Someone on another board posted “Noirette sees Covid everywhere!” :)
I see the links I posted don’t show as clickable, I tested 3 and copy-pasting them works.
Link shorteners not accepted?
2/3. Imho, the EVALI or VAPI, USA ‘vaping illness’ was almost certainly Covid or a precursor. As it was presented it had nothing to do with Covid. August 2019 -> peaked in September 2019 – died out in Jan. 2020 (i.e. was no longer diagnosed when COV19 ‘arose’ and became an ‘official’ diagnosis.) Almost 3K hospitalized cases and 68 (or so, nos. vary) ppl died, USA (a few cases Canada.) There have been various versions of symptoms, etc. Wiki has 2 entries giving some basics. Here CDC:
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html
Old ppl in nursing homes had ‘atypical pneumonia’, ‘lung injuries’ and younger ppl had ‘vaping illness’ and ‘lung injuries.’
1/3. A very good piece!
WHO was right from the start poised to ‘not blame China’, for several reasons.
The previous Dir. Gen. before Tedros was Margaret Chan, Chinese, she was hugely influential, ppl are left in place, networks of influence.
—— China is a Major donor.
——The WHO cannot ‘blame’ one country, one lab, one type of research, its role is to defuse conflict and oppositions in favor of an ‘internationalist, generalist, scientific’ (that is so-called scientific) consensus, which supposedly ‘does the least harm’ etc.
——The WHO is not an independent body, now counts on pleasing its funders, e.g. Gates Foundation as well as many others.
From a wider perspective, imho, the main actors in this COV19 story are not Nations, but a mix of Pols/Gvmt types, influential bodies in different countries, Corporations (e.g. Big Pharma, Med. circuits ..), particularly in the “West” as different groups seek to exploit crises for their own ‘competitive’ gain.
This touches many of the considerations of Samo Burja’s “Great Founder Theory” rather intimately. He goes into it quite well here https://samoburja.com/gft/
So the correct labeling format qualifies as “Homeopathic” in the US? It’s that easy?
And I was under the impression that Homeopathy was actually a form of “Energy Medicine” like Reiki.
Well, official definitions might differ from the expert opinion I was given in explanation…
Tony Fauci seems to fit so many of the descriptors I am reading in the discovery of your work…
Good work, and plenty of it, too.
So, Sir, how is it that you went into Engineering, rather than Law, or philosophy?
John,
I was in Advanced Placement high school English, Chemistry, & Physics at age 14, and even had the school create special courses for me thereafter, since they had no early graduation options at that time. My guidance counselor said ‘Since you are good at science, then engineering is the track you should take.’ I just bought that idea hook line and sinker, because I did not know any better. All I knew was that I loved science – and as well had been selected for a Navy ROTC scholarship, and they wanted Nuclear Engineers!!! So that is the program I was thrust into.
My father and brother were lawyers – but not philosophers for the most part. But I come from a long line of preachers on both sides (Swede Pentecostal and Scottish Protestant). So philosophy genes were bound to hit one of us. Lucky me… LOL!
TES
The author assumes that all kings will find such knowledge very useful. But what happens if the king or the victor wants to destroy all traces of past history and usher a new world ? In such cases, previous history is a dangerous burden.
Biblical world started from 4004 BC or so as per the religious fanatics. Islamic history of Saudi Arabia starts from 6th Century or so. The kings/ queens before that era is forgotten. Same happens in Indonesia to some extent where all kings became better after they got converted to Islam. Before that, they were all bad.
And sometimes, the disregard for ‘others knowledge’ is too much. It was reported some places that Spaniards in South America destroyed many codex/books of Aztec & other origin because these were not Christian (and therefore, garbage). Islamic invaders in India destroyed Nalanda University which burnt for six months.
Hence, I disagree with the article, especially with the specific assumption made.
Chakra,
Of course there are ample examples of both – but I disagree that you can claim exclusivity of principle here, and certainly neither is my article claiming exclusivity. I am extremely doubtful that all the documents about mankind’s history were burned, just because religious fanatics often wanted a clean slate. Those who conduct wars and affairs of state – do not get to such status by being true religious fanatics. They get there by putting on an act for the religious fanatics in some cases – but most of all by being wily and smart. And certainly would report back ‘destruction of all’ to an off-kilter leader. However, true leaders are innately curious. And if they kept documents for their own pleasures of knowledge, we would never know about it. There were just as many Alexander the Great’s as there were Diego de Landa’s.
Hence I disagree. Your assumption is an easy self-fulfilling prophecy. Whether documents were kept or destroyed, the same report would be made into posterity. Mine requires a knowledge of human nature and deception, so it does not rely upon guaranteed outcomes. Exclusive knowledge is more desirable for some than gold or position. Thus it will always be reported ‘destroyed’. That is how it gets its value.
How else are we to know, later in society, exactly what it is we are to not know, and how to not know it – if we indeed are 100% ignorant top to bottom. No, the presence of Nelsonian Knowledge tells me that there are those in power, who hold the ancient truths – and very likely the entailed documents as well.
TES
My point was – both the things are possible. Most real leaders will try their level best to keep the documents at their own vaults while very few might like to destroy it when the ‘knowledge’ is not useful to them, or even a a nuisance. One will also preserve things when he/she respects it. Bamiyan Buddha was destroyed by Taliban ofr being Un-Islamic & therefore not respectable or…. to be destroyed.
I am from a part of South east Asia which was colonialized by British. And I have seen the level of distortion in history etc. that has happened over time. Or even in the areas related to old history part.
Probably it comes from a concept that you have beautifully captured in this piece of poetry about Eagle, Horse etc. Same methodology is also used sometime by few so-called Marxist historians here.
Present is built on past. If one can erase the past, one can re-build it & control the present. Probably Orwell had similar comment somewhere. For someone with such mindset, destruction of past knowledge is very useful.
Hence the assumption that Every such ruler will preserve the past history/documents may not be correct one in every cases.
Old comment but what is 2 years against a 2000 year old mystery heh. The library contained texts relevant to every single proposed cause of destruction, so it seems unlikely it all would have been destroyed, even by fanatical regimes. Islam destroyed the indian texts because there was no possibility vedic texts would support their brand of the abrahamic egregore, same goes for the other abrahamic corporations and regional empires. In the case of the library they had bits of everything. Even if the contents were almost entirely destroyed, Christians would have likely taken biblical scripts, romans would have taken roman texts and jews would have taken jewish texts.
Thank you for this exhaustive investigation and documentation. I have just been made aware of this story by sharing of a link by a friend. I am surprised that I remained unaware of your work until now.
You mentioned deaths in a retirement center in Virginia in 2019, that you were aware, and referenced some counter-narrative. Was that a reference to the mysterious viral pneumonia deaths near Fort Detrick in June-July 2019, following which Ft. Detrick viral lab was closed for “breach, without harm” until November 2019?
I have had suspicion that the virus leaked from Ft. Detrick in Spring 2019, since around March 2020, predating (slightly) the Chinese suggestions. My most recent blog post about that is here: https://www.johndayblog.com/2021/06/fort-detrick.html
Canada also carried out this research, and famously had trouble with unauthorized sharing of samples with China by a couple of Chinese scientists.
I am not married to any narrative, but want to understand as well as I can. Facts are hard to come by.
I am a Family Physician, treating with repurposed antivirals and spearheading “my” clinic’s testing program, testing more than any other provider, until fired for non-vaccination in late October (after 18 years there). My independent analysis was “good” until it became increasingly “bad” and uncomfortable for the Federally Qualified Health Center.
I am a participant on Peter McCullough MD’s listserv and will forward this article there for consideration. I am apolitical, or politically skeptical, always voting for the most honest candidate, who always loses (Ross Perot, for instance).
A comment on The Automatic Earth made me aware of this piece. It is a site you should check out for COVID information, about the best, including many of the commenters.
https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/12/debt-rattle-december-5-2021/#post-94451
John Day MD
John
Thank you for the well thought-out response. First, let me say that I am saddened that you were fired for dissenting that the vaccine dangers are worth being injected by a vaccine which does not reduce transmission in the least (and might even enhance it). What you underwent is a human rights crime – of legendary proportion. The vaccine may have had some therapeutic benefits, and our older family members did get it and fared pretty well – but now those benefits are fading away.
I have had insiders offer me information on several situations. But the bottom line is – that in 2018 (or earlier) something was released in China which conferred immunity to SARS-CoV-2 – and nothing else – to China and all the nations surrounding it. This is a 35 to 1 signal, as strong as they come for this type of effect. It is undeniable. So, given the spread rate and data, this initial outbreak had to be in China. That does not of course eliminate a role on the part of UNC, Canada, Ft. Detrick, etc.
I will check out the site! Sounds fun.
Thanks for your readership,
TES :-)
Thank You, TES.
I would have been granted a conscience-exemption, had I requested one, but I did not do so.
I decided to “stand naked with the Jews”, as I put it, at the first indication of the creation of an underclass. (This was an unpopular historical reference, but fully warranted.)
I saw that as the only moral choice within a system which was taking this tack. We have seen where this tack leads in history.
This has been and still is a spiritual “test” for me, for which one need not posit “God”.
I do not see the future, even the fairly near future, but I have dark visions.
I know that I do not know.
Those who think they “know” are mistaken, as I see it.
I will admit to being dubious that you, seemingly one person, could have come up with this extensive intelligence-report, containing much information which is novel to me. I have been keeping up with this story for 2 full years , now.
I read some of your other essays, and there is a consistent human “voice”, with much original, and creative content.
(“BBROYGBVGW” as I learned in “Introduction to Engineering” back in 1976, before I quite that major for numerous reasons. I still built speakers and tube amps, but I would not have worked out at Raytheon, not at all…)
Thanks John,
When I read about your choice to side with the created underclass, or ‘stand naked with the Jews’, that hits near and dear to my heart. It takes a certain spark and courage to dissent at your risk, but do so on behalf of those who are targeted by the elite.
Yes, spiritual tests do not require one to be a theist in order to be beneficial and valid. The universe does not care what we believe about an old bearded anthropomorph. Its demands upon us are esoteric and reside elsewhere – and theist, agnostic, and atheist – those who are fervent in the distraction – miss this lesson entirely.
An honor sir,
TES
Have you seen the new website of Geert Vanden Bossche? https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/
I think your communities may have overlapping goals.
This reminds me of experiences in my favourite fields of zoology – specifically ichthyology, arachnology and vertebrate paleontology … although shark research is foremost among them.
These are gladly kept interests of my childhood, and they have given me joy ever since. You learn more, and you become even more fascinated with every new insight you discover.
Many things that have been commonly held for decades in these fields show to be not so true after all or, at least, not as simple as soon as in-the-field observations increase and become more widely shared among experts and well-informed laypeople (for example citizen scientists) with different viewpoints. True Type III experts don’t engage in semantic warfare – they are open to observations and the input of people who grasp the necessity of being matter-of-fact. They don’t accept abstracted beliefs, they are interested in observations and are very careful not to be too definite in the evaluation of their data. They always recognize the fundamental limitations of their (or anybody’s) inferences and don’t use anything as an intellectual sledgehammer. They have furthered our understanding of nature to a marvelous degree.
These may be fields that are not exactly fundamentally important for the human condition, but I love them – and this very interesting post reminded me of things that I think about when I deal with these topics, all the while staying on guard regarding the changing body of observational evidence and the general thinking that goes along with it.
I have to admit, though, that the generally benign and constructive tone that governs these research topics is so pleasant compared to the general discord of so many more controversial fields – even if there is a substantial difference of opinion!
Argmax, a well crafted note. I don’t mind disagreement or questions at all.
I have never found R(o), R(t), etc. even in relative form, to be of any use in modeling Covid. I think that someone wrote a PhD on the idea, and given the low level of challenge in the expertise vertical (and the fact that some expertise sets were not qualified to comment upon the genetics of pathogens and had to retreat into theoretical models alone), the model was never challenged to produce results. The model presupposes that there is no such thing as seasonality.
The pressures which result in this 10 month benchmark are not SEIR model in their orientation. If the SEIR model carried any merit at all – then Covid would have swept us in April – Aug of 2020 and have been done. I suspect the SEIR model to constitute out-and-out incompetence. It is much akin to economics – where the professionals bear enough knowledge to frame their analyses as successes, and that is it. Just randomness and obviousness after that.
The best benchmark I have used is the link I provided in the article: https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/CovidGS-Delta.jpg. This shows the 10 month run of Delta before it hit 95% of nations. Given that the Wuhan B.1 variant was in a community with HIGH prior immunity, and Delta was not, B.1 should have taken much longer to spread – in all facets of analysis, seasonality, herd immunity, transmissibility, population adjacency and demographic densities. This is why I do not believe the 2 months spread out of China – that too, a product of highly twisted SEIR models – tortured to result in exactly what China was asking us to produce.
There is no feasible way I can craft a 2 month spread explanation for B.1 – and this is fatal to the narrative. Also fatal to the narrative is the level of African and E65 – 180 prior immunity at 92% – neither of these ‘must explain’ observations happened by magic.
The current narrative involves magical explanations for both of these issues.
TES 8)
Thanks for this wonderful document, btw an excellent lecture on appropiate use of logic and science in the search of truth. Drawed up ‘Party Rules’ are frightening, real (pitifully) and an ominous treath for the humanity.
Indeed, The Party is creeping into power globally. And their enemy is anyone who competes for that power through competence or strong culture.
TES
Another fruit of the syndicate could be, the end justifies the means.
Ex 5.2-3 AP: interesting that African health officials are linking Covid avoidance to prior exposure to malaria and other parasitic diseases.
Yeah, I highly doubt they would get this robust an immunity from that. If that were the case, then HCoV’s would give even better immunity than malaria by far… and they don’t.
Grasping at straws. :-)
Exhibit 13.12….was that the period of time when health officials warned of a vaping crisis?
Part of it I believe so Roni, yes.
I’ve been following you since you started posting. Thank you for this! Please make it into a PDF I can download for a “history book” I’m making to pass on to my 4 children.
Sarah,
Thanks for the readership. If you open this article by itself (rather than the home page) by clicking on the title of the article, in Google Chrome, the three dots on the upper right hand side allow you to ‘Print/Save as PDF’. The resulting PDF is 65 pages long, based on their parsing algorithm – but it is a quick way to obtain a PDF of the entire page.
Hope that helps
TES :-)
this is a lot of information. Thank you for gathering all of this and sharing
The world needs to hold China accountable. This includes holding those American colluders accountable too. Daszak & Fauci.
Xi, agreed. Some of this was not unilateral as research initiative. But we need the genomes from China, by project – or they will retain culpability.
TES
Those “forced Church upbringings’ create many an agnostic or atheist.
“[…] one who seeks knowledge earnestly, falls into a category of innocence.” What a beautiful statement.
I remember an instance from my school days when someone tried to imbibe in the loosh (never heard that term before, what a strange concept …) by acting superior to a very nice girl with a more religious background than was usual for most students, arrogantly spouting the same old (technically true but o so tired) big Atheism stuff that was so clever to him and his intended audience and so obviously meant to humiliate her that even my quite non-religious friends were so disgusted by it that they shut him down. I wish I would have seen something like that more often since then, regarding many topics …
I also love the graphic with the lemmings … and the footnote!
Not a fan of the implication that Schopenhauer really always wanted to be right because of a text that was intended as an “anatomy” of Rechthaberei (know-it-all attitude) or sophistry which he despised and saw for what it is. But that is just a minor point and I don’t want to seem too fanboyish in that regard ;)
Another great article. Can’t wait for more!
Yeah – I may modify the language to be ‘Schopenhauer-esque’ so that the contrast is manifest.
Great article, as always! This works very well to expose the way in which these things are handled nowadays – and it is much clearer than Schopenhauer’s extremely sarcastic notes which were indeed compiled “from a stack of loose notes and not a completed work of philosophy” – not to mention published after his death (1864). He mentioned his manuscript somewhat dismissively in Parerga and Paralipomena, but didn’t want to finish and systematize it … but wanted others to build on it, LOL!
In the form in which it is presented here, it is unambiguous what this kind of sophistry truly is: The systematic poisoning of every potentially reasonable debate between two (or more) potentially reasonable human beings.
Great to see so many new articles, btw!
Absolutely TS… thanks for the feedback. I don’t get much of it, but the Google Analytics reports tell a completely different story. Lots of hits, lots of dwell time and lots of multiple page sessions. That is encouraging, even if my audience is the contemplative and quiet type.
8-)
TES
I sure am dwelling on your blog for long periods of time and reread many of its articles – because there is nothing like it. Speaking hypothetically, it would be a crushing loss to philosophy if it ever were to vanish into the ether. This may sound somewhat grandiose, but I really think that you can learn more from TheEthicalSkeptic.com than from any other contemporary source of philosophy.
It is like a compendium of truly rational independent thought, without the usual short-sighted badmouthing of everything even somewhat metaphysical-sounding, yet all the more rational for it. No stupid materialism vs. idealism or analytical vs. continental shenanigans – but lots of fundamental epistemology and criticism of common thinking, with an abundance of scientific and cultural competence (a surprisingly rare but necessary combination). It is also written in a time when something like it is badly, badly needed …
Pingback: Build Back Billionaire-less?: Democrats Push for Socialism & Social Engineering; Nix IRS $600 Snooping Plan (for Now)
Pingback: Build Back Billionaire-less?: Democrats Push for Socialism & Social Engineering; Nix IRS $600 Snooping Plan (for Now)
Sounds familiar. Pro-vaxxers anybody?
A sorry state of affairs. Most all fans, have no idea these games are manipulated this way. The NFL lost me as a fan and, I now throw the flag. Unsportsmanlike behavior, ejection from my life.
I’m a long-time reader/follower of your posts and just signed up to let you know how much I look forward to and appreciate your work. Just too timid to post. I love this topic. Thanks ES
0 comments? Really?
Well done ES!
Interesting the way you see this as part of a cabal.
I view it as simply a universal truth that all clergy and scholastics have a deep and irrational hatred of the laity. It’s ubiquitous, no matter how good the ministry of truth is, they will always search the Seven Seas to find the most insane and ridiculous pagans and infidels.
It’s a psychological reaction that the scholastic class have to the fact that monopolistic control over information is always corrosive to society. There’s no other reaction an expert can have to the fact that political power to the expert class is counterproductive – at least no other reaction that allows them to continue to occupy their station. And it’s not particular to midwits either – Dawkins and Weinberg are essentially cut from the same cloth as a Michael Shermer in this way.
Hello, have you ever heard of or looked into the Andy Cutler Protocol as a possible avenue to help your son? It seems the most realistic way to reverse someone with his type of vaccine injury.
I have used oral EDTA chelation successfully. We will give this a look. Thanks Joe!
TES :-)
Have you ever read the Oxford scholar John Henry Newman’s profound and eloquent Chapter 8 of his famous Apologia Pro Vita Sua, in which he discusses the riddle of human condition and what he sees as the best answer to it? I think you might find it intellectually stimulating.
Chapter 8: “General Answer to Mr Kingsley”: https://erenow.net/common/apologia-pro-vita-sua/8.php
Feel free to contact me if you like.
One very sad and annoying thing about Sagan and his most infamous quote (you know which one I mean): Even those who disagree with his barely informed pseudoskeptical antics seem to think that the latter is unsurpassably sound, even bordering on being a (meta-)physical law that needs to be constantly repeated.
What is an “extraordinary” claim? What is “extraordinary” evidence? Compared to what, “ordinary” claims and “ordinary” evidence? Who judges this? Who could possibly judge this?
“Extraordinary” claims are always those that the “judge” cannot possibly believe or even take seriously from the very beginning, no matter what. This is by default. And no evidence can ever be “extraordinary” enough to serve as evidence for such claims …
Of course, mere claims do not need any special evidence – only claims of having evidence … but let’s not go down that rabbit hole. People are clearly bewitched by the elegant sound of this quip.
I wish to add that you are one of the very few people I have ever heard daring to speak out against the infallibility of Carl Sagan … and all of those I know personally have learned that from me ;)
I’m thinking there’s a better example of this. The story of Adam and Eve is symbolic – a myth by which one “race” explained to itself why life was hard. The reason being: we wanted knowledge. If we hadn’t this knowledge of good and evil, we wouldn’t be suffering. Because we wouldn’t know any better. We wouldn’t feel shame (know we’re naked) we wouldn’t feel guilt or remorse. We would do what we want, and if someone kept us enslaved, we wouldn’t even realize that, because we wouldn’t be able to imagine that maybe we shouldn’t be enslaved. Awareness and moral conscience causes suffering. Humans have always wondered why they exist as they do. Certainly at some point during evolution they noticed they weren’t like other animals and asked themselves “why”? They made up a story to tell themselves about why they suffer. The immediate consequence to any other animal of doing “wrong” may involve negative physical conseqences, but only humans and their domesticated animals develop a sense of guilt.
I think a better example of the CMT would be the loss of personal freedom and privacy in the environment of the all-encompassing global “war on terror” perpetuated by the military industrial complex for the personal benefit of the ruling class.
Thanl you for this thought-provoking article. And thank you for the piece on “the dose makes the poison” I was finally able to shut up a pesticide industry advocate that’s probably used that phrase 45 times since I began interacting with him.
Susan,
The war on terror is a great example of CMT. Thanks! The reason why I cite the fable about original sin here, is to show that this type of enslavement by myth, is the oldest trick in the book. In addition, the epistemic and logical strength of the myth has nothing to do with how many people will obediently accept it.
Also glad you could make use of The Dose Makes the Poison. I wrote it specifically to refute the dimwits who spout this ignorance over and over.
Thanks for your readership!
TES :-)
Any “war on…” you name it: terror, drugs, cancer, AIDS, COVID-19, climate change.
The mechanism is older than writing. The shaman, or the tribe leader, shouts loudly through a threatening mask, instills fear, and the whole tribe surrenders.
Haven’t you seen the Tarzan movies? Yuyu Yuyu!
Rummaging through this amazing site, I have always felt the need to comment on this particular topic …
When it comes to reality (which seems to be a very peculiar and troubling realm for the pseudo-skeptic), there has been so much (and overwhelmingly informative) intelligence gathered over the last few decades regarding the “field” of UFOs (or UAPs) that it boggles the mind – considering its status as something that has only since recently been seen as deserving of a somewhat lukewarm attention in the eyes of those who don’t ignore it completely … despite reading the New York Times article (gasp!!!).
The implications are immense – whatever it is …
One has to really look at what is there to know anything about it (and yes, with a highly skeptical eye!) – and then you know one thing for certain: Something is there that needs the attention of more than a few people. And it is huge. The highly qualified people who have rendered testimony to the existence/occurence of this phenomenon are legion, and very intelligent people have devoted their life to studying it (Bruce Maccabee, Stanton Friedman, John Mack etc.).
The real question is not so much if there is anything worth studying, but what it is that we should study. What we should do.
In any case, it is not closing our eyes and singing “lalalalalalala” while making fun of those poor souls that have dared to witness something that is unusual and to tell their story. That would be callous and foolish. Just like claiming “it” was either Venus, swamp gas or pelicans – preferably all at the same time …
Tommy,
Great point! The argument is over and settled, something is there. In fact, my personal conclusion is that this presence (whatever it is) has been on Earth for some time. I have always considered writing a blog article entitled ‘The Things I Know’:
Beyond that, knowing that things cannot continue for mankind along the pathway which we have bungled, this situation cannot continue for much longer. The clock is ticking away…
These are the things I know.
TES :-)
I concur with you on every single point.:)
It is great to hear from you ! These are the things we know ;)
TES,
I don’t mean to sound ungrateful for the outstanding content that you have posted in the meanwhile, but I personally have been excitedly awaiting “The things I know” since you posted this comment. I would be deeply interested in some further explanation for the points you listed above!
Thomas,
I am not sure my readers are ready for such a thing. ;-)
EVG
TES
Normally, a post about UAPs would be the last one I’d click to read anywhere. However, considering the quality of many of your articles, I’d figure I’d look at this one. This comment on what you know really intrigues me especially considering your knockdown of the Fermi Paradox. Considering our limited experience, how can we really discover such unknowns without a manifest ‘revelation’ from said presence? Would I be ready to know such a thing? I think so. Perhaps knowing might cause some sort of madness. As it is, it remains there..like a splinter in the mind.
I just recently read in the comments that you and your family were ill…
I am so sorry for you and hope that everything is okay by now!
I am so looking forward to new articles of yours – they are always like a fresh breeze of clarion reason in this cloudy realm of existence. Your voice is needed!
I wish you the very best and hope that everyone is feeling better !!
Thanks Tommy,
Yes, everyone is 100% now. And with a good number of years of immunity now to the Delta-derived lineages of Covid.
However, in 3 or 4 years we will have another variant which will escape our IgG antibodies – and we shall see what happens then. Hopefully, that variant will turn out to be more like a common cold in severity.
Thanks for the reassuring feedback. I have several articles percolating around in my head – however am preparing to present a strategy proposal to an African Prime Minister – and am playing catch-up on my energy projects now. So it might be some time.
TES 8-)
This “Caesar’s Wife” concept for elections should be enshrined at the highest level, possibly even as a constitutional amendment.
But of course that will never happen because it would require a supermajority of legislators to essentially vote to place a very high burden of proof on the very system that installs them.
Have you come across Dr. Judy Wood’s book “Where Did The Towers Go?” ? It will conclusively demolish any idea that 9/11 was an unintended consequence of replacing Intellilgence heads in the decade before 2001 !
Poe has a law. Let him enforce it…
Good observations about the “Creator of the universe.”
it’s always good to back up to basics: let Poe show his evidence for how the physical world came into being by physical laws. Then let Poe show how inorganic matter created organic matter in the plausible time frames . Then let Poe show how humans “evolved” from life by providing convincing fossil evidence.
Then back to the Creator: why would He create a being who would defy Him? He didn’t have to create humans. He had other creatures including angels. Why didn’t He just create drones with no free will?
(Can ethics be forced?)
Was the tree of life about the Creator having food? What might a being who chooses evil do if he got ahold of the mechanisms to mimic the creation of life and reorder everything according to the created’s will….a spiked virus, for example? What is the Creator warning the created about here and why is this crucial? What exit strategy does the Creator provide the created should the created, by his non-divine nature, choose evil?
Can X create X?
All recognized points Lily… thank you for the feedback…
EVG
8)
https://dcfpress.com/the-globalist-treason-covid-19-to-steal-treasure-pivot-to-communism-opinion/
I didn’t read your latest until now. But I referenced your analysis earlier on Energy options.
We are over a similar target…you have better words and concepts to describe it all.
Jason, your write-up is awesome here. Thank-you for posting it.
TES – missing you online. Hoping/praying you are well.
Relatives and family (8+) with Delta Variant Covid across four households of our family (all local), and an all out family effort to get everyone well – lots of cooking and cleaning and making doctor trips. Just don’t have time to post right now.
Heavily focused on not letting my sister in law to get exposed to this variant.
Thanks for thinking of me Patti!
~EVG – TES
May their needs and yours be covered in the healing blood of Jesus.
Update:
All family members have recovered from Delta! We are out of the woods. 8)
In all, 18 family members had the Delta Variant sweep through.
1. Almost every case was basically a 10 to 14-day mild cold for each individual.
2. Our 5 most vulnerable family members did not come down with Covid at all, thankfully. I am not sure how that even happens, given how communicable the Delta Variant is – but it is what it is.
We plan a family celebration on Sunday. This put me weeks behind on a project startup – so will be back on the road after this. I plan to write a blog summary regarding this, but no real time for social media platforms.
As most know, I do not predict where Covid will go and what it will do. This Winter may be full of surprises (not a good thing)… So the answers are not in just yet – too many people who are certain that they know what-is-what right now. A dangerous lack of skepticism given the lives at stake this upcoming Winter season.
EVG ~TES
Your blog is great! Many of your ideas regarding de facto religious trickery have occurred to me in vague form and I sometimes attempt to describe them to people, but I lack the ability to describe them in such a detailed technical manner as you. So now I have some good articles to refer to.
Basically your blog has proven to me that I’m not alone in the universe when it comes to my concerns. I wish more people would read it.
My first visit to your blog. Fascinating – perfectly captures the current New Zealand government’s approach to social engineering.
TES – I have followed you since March of 2020 and you helped me remain a sane voice to other – thank you for that, for all you do.
I pray your family members are well and recovered.
I am no longer on twitter, but I come to check on your updates there daily. Our fight for truth continues. Onward!
Patti
Thanks Patti, and thanks for your readership,
They really screwed everyone by coercing panic over Covid. And those who sounded caution were spun as deniers of Covid and/or its impact – everyone acknowledged it was a serious situation. It was a very disappointing scenario, exposing the irrationality and gullibility of our populace now. Very sad. They have no idea what they lost.
TES
Thank you for sharing your knowledge and wisdom.
In myths, there can be astrological components. Do you see anything interesting in the cosmos?
Thank you Joy. I don’t really follow astrology or any form of divination or myth derived from the cosmos. Having been a navigator I am familiar with the constellations and various forms of Earth-orbit induced movements they exhibit. I also find the Leo Frieze at Nimrud Dag fascinating. But am still running analysis on that and contemplating its results.
TES
You graciously answered the question I didn’t even know how to ask. Thank you.
I look forward to your analysis.
Suppose you accepted the task to redesign the U.S. economy.
Your background fits the task fairly well; the economy is a system, it’s political, it’s technical, it’s an embodiment of our shared and competing values.
Even better (e.g. more fitting), the economy is stuffed full of “scientific” errors. They don’t call it the “dismal science” for nothing.
Naturally, you can’t do the job yourself; nobody can do whole job. So, this task would also be the mother of all G-H gap train-wrecks, right? All those SMEs that need to be integrated into a gestalt. Mighty big gestalt.
If you agree that the economy needs re-design, let’s liken it to a software devel project. Do we design:
Top-down? Probably not. Top likes things as they are, and will only change when it’s too late to move. Blockbuster.
Bottom up? Maybe, but “the bottom” is severelyunder-resourced, really diffused, well-ensconced atop Mount Stupid. Low rate of adaptation.
This is a very interesting systems engineering problem. And it’s as much a puzzle or game as it is a problem. The game aspect is “where to start?” or even “what is a generative system?”.
The technical aspect might be “what are the independent variables” or “what impact does technology have on economics, and what are the technological trends?” That’s the conventional, analytical part.
The really cool thing about this problem is the manufacturing of the gestalt. There’s plenty SMEs. But the gestalt – that kinda needs to become a “collective” gestalt in order for coherent action to happen … at any level/group size.
Given that you wrote this post on managing the G-H gap, it’s likely you’ve been tasked to re-build a gestalt. Is there industry practice that bears on this subject?
Very adept comment Tom,
While we had a Professional concentration and certification which raged for a while called, change managment – I am not sure that the essence of change has really caught on inside mankind’s gestalt. ‘Change’ is simply a code-word for ‘put my mafia in power’. True change is inevitable and should evolve under a passive method, rather than be forced by agency.
As far as what I would focus upon – there are three elements which serve as the foundation of global suffering. 1. Energy and its use, 2. Food/food technology, and 3. Health
1. Smaller/local energy plants based upon energy from waste, with carbon scrubbing, disposing of
100% of human sewage sludge (none should go to farms as fertilizer)
50% of animal waste
80% of municipal solid waste
75% of Class III industrial profiled waste
no methanogens allowed to go to dump/landfill
2. Investment in
small scale natural gas energy plants
cutting edge physics including fusion and various energy from plasma field technology
3. Cellularization/Regionalization of manufacturing
Limit the size of one single production operation
Limit the distance which one physical unit of product or food is allowed to be shipped
Place a tariff on product by distance it is shipped from ex-factory to end-use consumption
4. Localization/Incentive for small and regional farms
Create rating firms which analyze the nutrient content of agrifoods by farm, field and practice
Create a market which allows food to be sold based upon nutrient value and not appearance, protein, weight and moisture content
5. Create Integral Capital Cells
Establish innovation cities in each US subregion (Piedmont, Ozarks, Texas Hill Country, etc.) where small-scale capital for innovation and entrepreneurship is available
Limit the span of influence a corporation has inside an industry horizontal (not just vertical) – by a revamping of the Sherman and Clayton anti-trust laws to address a new era of both predation, offshoring and innovation.
6. De-Crony Health Services
Create a new intermediate healthcare layer which actually focuses on health, and uses HCP’s rather than the 1800’s model of ‘doctors and nurses’
Remove 60% of prescription inventories from controlled status (save for most dangerous/addictive, etc)
Place limits on pharmaceutical contributions to campaigns (conflict of interest on substances)
Those are just the starters… but decidedly a ‘bottom-up’ strategy – and complete reinvention of America’s Virtual Infrastructure.
TES 8)
TES – thanks for that thoughtful and rapid reply. I came across your site the other day from a link @ Naked Capitalism. Your post on ocean-heating was referenced there. I ranged upward from that post.
Over at NC, there’s an incipient/emergent discussion trend about redesigning an economy. It goes in fits and starts, everyone’s got their own take on what’s wrong and how to fix it…but there’s been a very noticeable uptick in urgency people are feeling. There’s also been some design talk, and some of the talk is pretty good.
Well-rounded talk, too. Plenty of good thinkers, very wide and quite deep talent pool.
I come at this “economic design” topic from the small end of the telescope: micro-economy, aka “household”. That’s where the agency (degrees of freedom to set and execute policy) is, so that’s where I like to operate.
My interest is to build capacity at the HH level. Capacity to imagine, design, resource, prototype/test, implement and then maybe promulgate product lines that either generate foreign exchange (money to buy stuff you don’t produce in-house) or produce products which can be substituted for national/int’nl supply chain products. In short, equip the HH to capture the benefits of their own productivity.
Thesis point: concentration of wealth is a _result_ of concentration of capacity. Transfer payments are giving the man a fish. Capacity creation is teaching the man to fish.
That’s a great altruistic goal, but you know enough about economics to understand how tough that is. Your remarks about anti-trust above evidence that awareness.
There’s another interesting thing about households: they constitute “final demand”. If the household doesn’t demand it, it doesn’t get built. (Gov’t expenditures contravening public interest are exceptions to this rule, and very big exceptions).
Households have to potential to function as a fulcrum, or pivot-point. Individually that don’t matter much, but in numbers they are decisive.
You can see why I’m so interested in the gestalt-building. To solve this rubik’s cube of viable HH scale production..this is going to take a lot of three-blind-mice and the elephant dialog, a lot of make-the-common-image-and-vernacular type work, in a context of weak team-member bonds – at least at the outset.
That’s why I’m casting about for some literature or pragmatic experience on the subject. I’ve been doing this ad-hoc, and the results are about what you’d expect.
Thanks again for all your ideas. I’ll put them to good use.
Keep up the great work. That piece on ocean currents, mystery heating, core iron and kinetic energy was very, very well-done. I don’t believe it yet – and shouldn’t – but I’ll be expecting the scientists to test your theory.
Thanks Tom,
Great feedback, and yes – if science tests my theory and finds it 0% valid, then I am good and am already onboard human methane/VOC/carbon mitigation efforts (which I surmise are 20 – 40% of the issue). If however they say, this was unnecessary as an alternative because we had already ruled that out – then I call bullshit, because they have not studied the alternative. And it is the necessary alternative.
TES 8)
I have been bullied with these methods in peer review of many of my scientific papers, all along my career. It was just a nightmare all the way. Wished had had this text when I started to explain to editors what was going on.
Please excuse my need to comment once again (I don’t want to clutter every second article on this blog with my remarks, although its quality leaves me no choice ;)) …
But this concept is so very important to understand – and you put it into words, as hard as it is! The cited examples should help to make it clear to many who read this, even to those who are not really comfortable with the very dry and fundamental kind of language that is necessary to precisely describe the conceptual connection that is discussed here (I don’t blame them …).
The thing is: It permeates everything … it thrives on its elusiveness … it shapes the world every second of every day … I also think that many small-scale, everyday problems between two or a few people (yes, even between different aspects of the same person!) correspond to this principle – and lead to insurmountable problems, especially on a larger scale.
Knowing (and understanding) Wittgenstein would shurely help, I suppose, but I`m afraid he is almost too clear and precise for the “taste of the times”! Clarity leaves little room for shadows …
I like that ‘Clarity leaves little room for shadows’ :-)
The G-H gap is very real. But you also have individuals who prosper in that gap. I learned early on that I was not a manager and hence was very lucky to work in an industry and company that valued pure technical expertise. I became a high level technical expert (direct report to the VP) where my task to was to bridge that G-H gap. For instance, when working with the investment arm, I could not make an investment happen in a company. I could push all I wanted but never make a deal go through. I could, however, kill a deal in an instant. My input into the investment decision, while not sufficient to make the deal (I didn’t get the business side) was sufficient to advise the H side that the technology wasn’t there. It was great to work those years without managing but still being in the decision mix. I had a blast as I got to work on the technical stuff (well architecture at least) and someone else got to do the design work. And I sat on VP staff discussions. Great work if you can get it :)
The true believer says:
“If you question things, entertain possibilities and don’t believe in our rock-solid certainties, then you obviously are an anti-intellectual, pseudoscientific believer in woo. Q.e.d.”
Note their obvious proselytizing zeal which is very often lacking in people who just want to explore the truth, as inconvenient as it may be …
This brings a warm feeling to my heart. There has never been anything in my intellectual life that I have hated as much as the typical modus operandi of “debunking” whole fields of inquiry by doing exactly the things that are exposed in this very succinct article.
But it is quite hard to put into words what it is the “debunkers” are doing – at least in a way that is somewhat understandable for the vast majority of people …
But perhaps things are slowly changing … ?
Things are changing. This article and the last one got MAJOR readership. People who are sincerely attempting to understand the difference between the work of debunkers like Joe Nickell, Brian Dunning, and Mick West, and actual scientific philosophy and method are asking key questions now. These guys are getting more refutation and outright rejection by the scientific community than ever before.
It is indeed a pleasure to witness.
The world is changing, much to their chagrin…
TES
That is good to hear. The last few years have been different, without a doubt, but I tend to be somewhat pessimistic about certain things, I guess. One specific symptom, for example, is the ever increasing usage of the term “conspiracy theory” for a myriad of things that are often only vaguely associated with something that is considered to be a forbidden topic or a discouraged way of thinking. It is like some kind of overeagerly concerted counter-reaction to the signs of the times …
Recent developments in certain “fringe” areas, on the other hand, fill me with optimism. So many people had to endure ridicule for so long, just for daring to be at least somewhat open-minded … but now, it seems, things aren’t as easy anymore for the magicians of rabid orthodoxy! It is also worth mentioning that many true scientists and philosophers NEVER were as close-minded as the public is constantly led to believe by those who control the narrative of the so-called scientific consensus
Best regards and keep up the good work!
I have felt in my gut the ‘BLINDING SCIENCE’ but we non scientists need more scientists to pull back this curtain! And the lie is just too big. The Phoenix will rise, but only from a heap of ashes. I hope I’m wrong…but I feel it in my gut.
Very interesting in light of the past year.
Where does the term “Omega Hypothesis” come from? Did you coin the term?
Yes, my term to distinguish a non-scientific socially enforced hypothesis from a real scientific hypothesis or null hypothesis.
J,
Yes, ‘Omega Hypothesis’ is a neologism necessary to describe a Lindy-sticky hypothesis which has been granted unmerited favor as the null, or as ‘truth’. An omega hypothesis is much harder to unseat than a typical scientific notion.
I created the term. However, I am not in the habit of making up terms unless I am forced to because nothing exists which can describe the principle. Of course if we have a word which suits the bill, I will use that. In this case, as is common with all facets of oppression – there was no word to describe the key principle involved.
TES
No evidence found… How many times have we heard that? The 2020 election comes to mind; along with,voter fraud allegations. Arizona, seems to be peeling back the onion though.
Reading this I thought “mmh that seems very much like the thing the so-called fact checkers do as well”.
Good point Paul, very similar. Both frame their activity as if it is legitimate – and both constitute a dishonest charade. One uses ‘fact’ in their title and often spins falsehoods, and the other uses ‘debunk’ in their title and spins official bunk.
Thanks for breaking apart this frustrating practice; I hope I re-read this.
No problem Robert. I hope that this is useful in freeing people from the Syndicate which has played a mind trick on us throughout the modern era.
TES :-)
One problem I notice with the excerpts you mention, and language used frequently surrounding the UAP situation, is the use of the term “Technology” to describe the extraordinary maneuvering capabilities of the objects. This term is loaded with too great of an assumption: that such objects are necessarily vehicles engineered by beings of one sort or another whether human or non.
I haven’t spent too much time reviewing reports but so far I haven’t seen anything that can rule out the possibility that these things could be naturally occurring somehow (inorganic life, etc) and their capabilities could be evolved rather than engineered. I think it’s a bad idea to fall prey to the usual anthropomorphic bias, that things must necessarily be designed by a being simply because we are beings who design things.
Since nobody has captured one of these things and put it in a cage to study its composition, or found anything that could suggest an origin, it seems that all anyone can study at the moment is behavior. The only reason this seems the least bit controversial is due to their observational rarity compared to the subjects of ordinary uncontroversial studies like ornithology.
Whatever they are they seem worth studying since analyzing their capabilities and hopefully their composition could lead to developing technology that better approximates their capabilities the same way aircraft were inspired by observing the flight of birds.
Interesting point CodeJinn,
They did use the term ‘Technology’ in the phrase ‘demonstrate advanced technology’ assessment lines. Technology is a very loaded term. One possibility which could exist in the Other/Non-human domain is non-technological forms of life, maybe inorganic, maybe not even based upon our DNA. Of course, a natural feature of our realm, but having evolved in their own context.
Yes, studying behavior is just one step removed from association by analogy. Not a great foothold, but I suppose the only step we’ve got scientifically right now.
My immediate concern along this path of reason, is that of all the creatures who are our cohabitants on this planet – they all tend to exhibit a consistent set of characteristics for their species. Birds act predictably like birds, bears like bears, viruses like viruses. These anomalous ‘things’ are not a case of Chekov’s Gun – as we cannot get a consistent set of observations to stick it seems at all. No matter what pattern we observe, it will be met with ample evidence of different patterns or even falsifying ones.
I suppose that the report writers either carried a Wittgenstein bias in the terminology, or perhaps they saw a broader footprint for the term ‘technology’ – ala my article, “The Peculiar Schema of DNA Codon’s Second Letter”?
Great food for thought nonetheless,
TES :-)
Regarding inorganic life and the DNA code article, the other possibility is that, rather than occurring in a purely natural manner as another example of “great entropy” in some exotic environment, an organic species such as ourselves could end up causing “machine abiogenesis” of some sort especially if this is set as an intentional goal for some reason. This would seem more likely because, while we don’t know of any exotic environment in reality that could somehow spawn inorganic life, we do know of one environment that appears to have spawned organic life that should be able to gain the capability to create machine/inorganic life very soon in evolutionary timescale terms. It’s a pretty reasonable extrapolation to say humans could cause this not too long from now, relatively speaking.
More speculative is if we assume we’re not unique, even if a species such as ours is infrequent and short lived (say only one tool/system-building species occurs in the galaxy every 1M years and goes extinct after 100,000 years), just one could cause some variety of “machine abiogenesis” spawning an ecosystem that far outlives its originators.
Anyway, terminology is a big problem. Other terminology I’d consider problematic: “aliens”, “intelligence”, “communicate”…. Due to pop culture, “Aliens” causes people to imagine something cartoonish or something that’s essentially just a funny-looking human with human cognition. This leads to either lack of seriousness or jumping to unsupported conclusions. Anyone serious ought to be thinking “autonomous object of unknown origin” until more is known. “Outer space” can’t even really be assumed as the origin.
”Intelligence” is a problem because people tend to assume human-like intelligence which includes a number of special-purpose cognitive modules that an arbitrary adaptive control system is highly unlikely to have if its environment is radically different. “Control system” ought to be the starting point then adding things like “stateful”, “adaptive”, “sophisticated” as evidence for those system characteristics are found.
”Communicate”, while not strictly wrong, tends to be loaded with assumptions regarding human cognitive capabilities like the Theory of Mind Mechanism which can’t be assumed of an arbitrary control system. Stimulus and response seem more appropriate. Even something that seems like communication may not be because you could be trying to “talk” to a stateless reflex automaton like a Chinese Room that was constructed as a camouflage facade.
The only proper way to deal with anything like this is to start with the most basic least loaded terms. The same sort of terms should be applicable to something more typical and expected, like a previously unseen foreign autonomous drone with unsurprising capabilities.
Wittgenstein would love your framing CodeJinn,
If you recall or ever saw the movie Conan the Barbarian with Arnold Schwarzenegger and James Earl Jones, there is a scene in the movie which goes like this.
Steel is only strong, machines are only strong – because we are allowed to interact with it/them only in a short relative timeframe. They only appear durable. But given enough time, steel is soft, vulnerable, and the machines derived from it are just as vulnerable. I have run a lab producing the hardest metals know to mankind. They are no match for flesh, biology. Flesh is much more powerful, in that it gives in the short timeframe (is soft) – yet is durable across the eons (is hard). Flesh is designed to be durable. It is only our own mortality which blinds us to this.
And given the 13 billion years allotted to craft a solution thus far, and given that someone came up with a talented and time-tested one, that flesh in the form of DNA based life proved out to be that solution, speaks volumes.
TES ;-)
In your Disclosure #1 you state that four categories were ruled out for the 143 unexplained incidents. You repeat this claim in Figure 1. But the report does not state or imply that any categories were ruled out for those 143. On the contrary, the report states:
“With the exception of the one instance where we determined with high confidence that the reported UAP was airborne clutter, specifically a deflating balloon, we currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations.”
In other words there is insufficient evidence in support of or against any of the four explanations. That does not mean those explanations were ruled out, just that they could not be ruled in.
So while I agree that this is a blow to armchair skeptics, the 143 incidents in the “Other” category could very well have one of the four conventional explanations – the report leaves open that possibility.
Will,
The statement “we currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations” is differentiated from the context in which you are attempting to use it. This ‘specific explanations’ means assignment of ‘specificity as to what the observation indeed IS via positiva‘. We do not posssess the information to make such ‘specific explanations’.
Figure 1 and the Report’s conclusions in contrast, are developed ‘categorically by via negativa‘. Two distinct methods of inference, and two distinct differences between the statement in quotes and what was issued by the Report as its conclusions.
In other words, we cannot explain what it IS – but we can indeed explain what it is NOT.
But yes, the Report is indeed inconclusive as to ‘specific explanations’ as it states, which is the correct assessment and approach to take. We do not possess the information necessary and sufficient to assign ‘specific explanations via positiva‘ (aliens, gods, advanced cryptic cultures, time travelers, etc). But the Report can and did, reduce the domain set of possible considerations. That is what is shown in Figure 1.
TES
Have only now come across your writings, and ask; have you read Millennial Hospitality by Charles James Hall which is a 6 volume set describing the experiences of a 20 yr old fresh out of university in 1965 who joins the USAF and gets assigned to Nellis AFB, and learns there are three alien species living on the planet, the most important being Tall White Aliens, with the associated knowledge that the US military have certainly known all about them from the 1950’s onwards? Considering your career description, surely you should by now have come into direct contact with these creatures?
Thanks argmax,
The purpose of the entire blog The Ethical Skeptic, is to teach this process of discovery – to the best I can draw from prior art on this subject, and the best lessons-learned that I can bring to the argument as well. The following blog articles exemplify this outline in philosophy:
The Five Types of Null Hypothesis Error https://theethicalskeptic.com/2015/08/17/the-four-types-of-null-hypothesis-fallacy/
The Nine Features of Great Philosophy https://theethicalskeptic.com/2016/08/05/the-seven-features-of-great-philosophy/
The Elements of Hypothesis https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/12/13/the-elements/
The Map of Inference https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/03/04/the-map-of-inference/
Torfuscation – Gaming Study Design to Effect an Outcome https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/04/15/torfuscation-gaming-study-design-to-effect-an-outcome/
Couple these with the understanding that the process of discovery involves a seldom heralded set of steps:
1. Data must be denatured into
2. Information, which must be transmuted into
3. Intelligence, which must be then framed into a series of
4. Statements of Propositional Logic along a Critical Path of Salient Questions, which then lend
5. Inference of varying mode, form, strength, and convergence – which then provide
6. Mutual Agreement among these inferences (consilience) and/or
7. Serve to Reduce the set of potential answers (deduction) and/or
8. Falsify critical alternatives.
All this of course, is the very purpose of this blog. If one applies calculus, heuristic, and Bayesian reduction – but does not grasp the above process – then they are not really practicing science; merely wearing a set of intimidating ornaments to appear the part.
Thank you for your readership and feedback!
TES :-)
Lack of empathy is a key one- and maybe the only one we nee to be aware of. As you may know- I have been diagnosed with ADHD, as have most of my friends. The trouble is that that causes a lot of accidental bad behaviour, but I don’t know anyone in my cohort who does not feel remorse for or try to make good these deeds. Yes our behaviour can be chaotic, but we do feel regret and empathy, and seek to make good.
If one genuinely feels shame for bad behaviour (lack of love for our fellow beings) then there is a problem.
A real, genuine psychopath does not have access to awareness of the way they make other people feel, and cannot regret it.
A healthy person seeks to bring everybody up and support them in their goal to reach their personal best. In Buddhism we call this bodhicitta.
I am revising my blog now, and the new “about page” covers this in discussing the “six perfections”.
https://atlassubluxation.wpcomstaging.com/about/
As does this page on body awareness and the five hindrances.
https://atlassubluxation.wpcomstaging.com/2021/05/26/individual-empowerment-and-being-your-own-doctor/
I mention this not as an attempt at conversion but as a discussion about concise advice. In particular I have found the short teachings on the 5 hindrances and the “brightly shining mind” transformative.
And you are right- the Bible meanders here and there !
This report could have used your definition and explanation of tyflocracy. It does a credible job of outlining the current iteration of a malevolent global tyflocracy using climate change to defeat western civilization through the destruction of the western petroleum/fossil fuel industry but didn’t know how to categorize it. Well worth the read.
https://albertainquiry.ca/sites/default/files/2021-01/Nemeth%20Report.pdf
https://albertainquiry.ca/sites/default/files/2021-01/Nemeth%20Report%20%28Supplement%29.pdf
Thank you for your excellent site.
Wazi
I don’t want to give away too much personal info, but I’ve been trying to get in contact with you Ethical Skeptic. I’m a Navy veteran and in early 2019 I was on deployment going back and forth between the Persian Gulf and South China Sea. I believe I contracted COVID in Thailand. I was sent off ship after dealing with severe flu like symptoms (never had anything like that in my life). Docs on the ship couldn’t figure it out so they sent me to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany. After about 15 blood draws, multiple urinalyses, and endoscopy and sample of my right lung aveola and interior fluid, they diagnosed me with Sarcoidosis. Is my skepticism about that diagnosis warranted?
Obviously not being a medical professional, I can only offer a layman’s perspective.
First order evidence: “In 2015, pulmonary sarcoidosis and interstitial lung disease affected 1.9 million people globally and they resulted in 122,000 deaths.” (Wikipedia: Sarcoidosis). The cause of Sarcoidosis is unknown. Be aware that creating a disease by its peculiar symptoms, is not a final taxonomy. It is much akin to diagnosing one with ‘fever-itis’ It really means nothing, just sounds authoritative.
a. It is very possible that you actually had sarcoidosis of course,
However, sarcoidosis and Covid can look exactly alike, to wit: “Sarcoid-like reaction in a patient recovering from coronavirus disease 19 pneumonia: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378473/”
b. It is very possible that a lot of people had similar symptoms globally, which were falsely diagnosed as sarcoidosis, because there was no virus (including existing hCoV’s) which could explain this symptoms set until Dec 2020:
i. blood ACE levels
ii. granulomata in the lungs
iii. interstitial lung impacts most common
iv. affects of the nervous system
v. unknown cause (prior to Dec 2019, they all would have had an ‘unknown cause’)
Except that only sarcoidosis is of an unknown cause, and Covid (which bears all these same symptoms) is of course now a known cause which can produce sarcoidosis.
In fact, if the sarcoidosis stats were tracked through 2019 – I daresay we would see a significant jump in the disease from 2010 to 2019… (*sounds of keyboard clacking away…*)
Aha and here it is: 30.5% jump in cases of Level 3 Sarcoidosis by 2019. http://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_summaries/2019/interstitial-lung-disease-and-pulmonary-sarcoidosis-level-3-cause
Your skepticism is highly warranted. Thank you for your service shipmate, and for your persistent mind.
TES 8)
I dealt with the illness for approximately a month and a half on the ship. This is a copy of the Clinical History provided: XXX is a xx yo male with 5 weeks of myalgias/arthralgias, fatigue, and ongoing fevers. His differential is broad, including many infectious and inflammatory causes. His labwork is suggestive of glomerulonephritis with preserved renal function (+RBC casts, microscopic hematuria; normal creatinine). His CBC shows a mild anemia. His CRP is suggestive of significant inflammation. CXR shows a persistent RLL infiltrate and apparent perihilar lymphadenopathy. At this time, the clinical picture is concerning for rheumatic disorders such as Wegener’s granulomatosis (persistent lung infiltrate, glomerulonephritis, constitutional symptoms) or other vasculitides. Among infectious causes, mycoplasma pneumonia can present with constitutional symptoms, but should have been treated by azithromycin. Endocarditis could present with ongoing fevers, though this patient is without a history of cardiac morbidities or IV drug use.
And correction to my last post, it was a bronchoscopy, not endoscopy. Sorry, medical terminology is not my strong suit.
Also, thank you for taking your time to respond.
Your first law is attributed to Einstein, who supposedly said, “Everything should be as simple as it can be, but not simpler”
The Bridgman Point yes – is equivalent, but also explains why the principle is true, rather than just that it is true.
But Einstein’s quote does not address the First Axiom itself.
This is a good criticism. It looks like a great opportunity to engage with Dunning to improve his analysis – potentially improve your own. Have you brought this post to Brian Dunning’s attention? If not, why not? What was his reaction? I assume he wasn’t receptive because there are no significant updates to his original blog post.
I spoke with him on Twitter to ask him if he would be available to assist undisciplined members of the UFO community in understanding how to develop a scientific hypothesis and discipline their evidence and inference approaches to be more in line with the critiques offered by skeptics. He said that his mission in life was not to help, rather to discredit the subject.
It was at that point that I understood he thought he was God, and it was just a matter of conferring truth and falsehood upon the unwashed. It was a role I could not undertake. I comment on such a mindset (not targeting Dunning himself of course) in the blog post: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2020/01/04/the-distinction-between-bias-and-agency/
TES :-)
Correct.
I was hoping to see your next installment by now but no such luck, so I thought I’d just dump some links I found poking around. I’m afraid all this is too far outside my area of expertise, so all I can really say about these things is that they got my attention more than anything else.
Thermodynamic dissipation theory of abiogenesis https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/2/37/2011/esd-2-37-2011.html
Thermodynamics and self-replication http://www.englandlab.com/uploads/7/8/0/3/7803054/2013jcpsrep.pdf
cases of adding energy reducing entropy https://phys.org/news/2021-04-entropy-reveal-exotic-effect-magic-angle.html
Self-organizing criticality in dynamical systems https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organized_criticality
Im not sure what to think of all this but figured I’d share it anyway. I’m not sure this implies anything one way or the other for whether or not the process started on earth.
Perhaps rather than crypto branding the code is for an organic tranceiver, a useful tool both for information gathering and for participating in coding changes which facillitate survival, a possible explanation for what some see as signs of intelligent design. The link is to a brief talk where McKenna makes his case, I was sure there was a similar story near the beggining of the Kavala, aeons in space-descending to Earth and causing life to blossom, but failed to find it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBZatEPUHIE 8.5min,
The ascendancy of complex life, relative to the solidification of Earth’s inner core-crystal is also interesting.
I find the long accumulation and slow compression to melt then cooling less and less appealing a model as time passes. Presently I favour a rather Velikovskian view that perhaps the iron cored planets began as the cores of stars, now gas giants. These released by the kinetic shock of a near miss and capture, the lesser spheres/moons being subsequent emitted cores smaller and with an ‘evolving’ elemental make up. Some cores exploded due to the braking effect and it’s kinetic consequences, asteroids/comets/ort, some captured and displaced from their orbits now circle beyond Neptune/Pluto. It’s a rather singular view but it allows for a considerably shorter timeline perhaps even an order of magnitude shorter in the formation process then a far more rapid colonisation/generation by/of complex life. The series of catastrophes implied may mean a far shorter geological record than currently allowed by Lyellian uniformitarianism. I’d more or less arrived here before I discovered that not only were we at the crossroads of M54 and the Milky Way but our solar system if of M54 would not be inclined at such an odd angle to it as it is to the Milky Way.
I have the inner core crystal as being, at birth, an iron/nickel alloy depleted of electrons, replete with hydrogen ions and surrounded by a thin ocean veneer of heavy metals, blanketed by the mantle elements we’re familiar with.
Hello ES, great article, did you review these articles yet?
https://informedchoicewa.org/education/its-here-the-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-study/
https://informedconsentdefense.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/petitioner-garner-full-report-filed.pdf
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/wp-content/uploads/Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Parts-I-IX-1.pdf
Regards
I had not! Thank you…
There is a strange existential fear when it comes to fundamental questions like this, especially among many (more conventional) scientists and “scientifically minded” laypersons … and most people never ever know that what they surely “know” is based on the shakiest of foundations. Or – to put it mildly – not as clear-cut and/or self-evident as they think …
Mysteries like this must be pondered – to say the least -, but they are rarely even identified as mysteries, let alone seriously investigated by people qualified to do so.
It is a strange problem, this general lack of perception of life’s fundamental mysteries, and there is a noticeable hostility towards exploring them among many who see themselves as the agents of reason. But usually you can identify those “hostiles” as people who desperately NEED their fundamental certainty of certain things … things which are non-negotiable, despite their chronic posturing as paragons of an impartial rationality that knows no bounds …
By the way, I LOVE that you made me think of Terrence McKenna! May he rest in peace – which very well may be his beloved Hyperspace …
To be clear , nothing here is untrue:
Federal control, is a given. The commerce clause will guarantee, you have no right to power generation on your own property.
Jeff,
From the material I could find, this is regulated by state and differs by each state. But this is a good point. In many states it is illegal to generate your own power, or disconnect from the grid. In my work inside energy, I have never been asked to assess this direction for the market – so I am not up to snuff on this issue. Best info I could find was: https://www.primalsurvivor.net/living-off-grid-legal/
Thanks!
TES :-)
This is great! I’m looking for the origin of the term “steel man” as used here. Any leads?
Simon Sorry,
I usually attribute principles to their originators if that is known. In the case of the term ‘steel man’ – just observed it to be in common circulation in forums and blogs. However, I have crafted my own flavor of it inside this lexicon, to differentiate it from simply ‘enhanced straw man’ arguing.
TES :-)
In your chart above, what criteria did you use to distinguish between, “Mild improvement”, “Moderate Improvement”, and “Feeling Good Again”?
I am fascinated by nutrition, and although I am not a scientist or a nutritionist, I love to read medical journals and study about diet. The problems I have found echo what you say here, that it is very difficult, if not impossible to reach recommended daily intake of nutrients (let alone the extra amounts you’ve determined that you need) through diet alone. Vitamin E, Zinc, and Magnesium are a good example. These are difficult to get in large amounts unless you eat very specific foods. I try to eat at least one serving of nuts and seeds a day. That helps a lot, but still doesn’t get me to the RDI amount. Does the average American eat nuts and seeds on a daily basis? I doubt it. I do, and yet I’m still probably not getting enough. How many people have blood pressure or heart disease issues because of poor intake of these micro-nutrients/minerals?
I appreciate your other article that described the human body as one best instruments largely ignored in the arsenal of scientific instruments. I’ve been trying to listen more to my body with what I’m eating and how it effects my mood. I’ve noticed that I feel more “awake” and “focused”, and less likely to be ravenously hungry during the day, when I drink a tall glass of grass fed milk, eat eggs, or eat red meat. It’s difficult to describe, but I tend to feel a sense of mental sluggishness or irritability without these foods. At best, I can infer that I’m lacking in B vitamins on a daily basis. And yet, my overall diet is “good”. I eat a decent amount of vegetables and fruit, whole grains, nuts and seeds, and try to avoid sugar and fast food, and don’t drink alcohol. I wonder if I am like you and just need more B vitamins for my brain to operate at it’s best.
I’ve found your blog to be thought-provoking and insightful, and I appreciate your broad interest in many different topics. Thank you again for your writings,
-Erik
Erik,
Actually, this series of color blocks is extrapolated from my testing different doses of B1, B2, NAD, methylcobalamine, and methylfolate. The remainder are assumed to follow this same taper. I started out by titrating cobalamine and folate alone to see at what point the increase in good feeling was no longer discernible. This was easy to accomplish because I felt like shit each day I did not take them. Feeling good again, was in essence this red ‘omega’ point. In other words 700% USRDA did not give me nearly the boost in well being as did the first 350% for B-12. That allowed me to define a rough ‘tip-in’ point for how much cobalamine I needed. In actuality now, I know that it is repeated consumption throughout the day under the tongue, and the continuity rather than dosage, which is more health-effective. The ‘mild improvement’ is an assumption, but is really that point at which the supplementation had no effect (still felt like shit), or was required every 4 hours throughout the day in order to perceive one. This same rough taper derived from fiddling with 5 nutrients, is then assumed to apply to all the remainder of the nutrients (which I think is sound).
Thank you for the feedback regarding the blog. I hope I have ‘upped my game’ across the years as my career has changed. Yes, as we age methylfolate and methylcobalamine in particular are not absorbed well. This leads to a form of anemia called socially ‘pernicious anemia’ which can be diagnosed as dysmorphic or macrocytic anemia by your doctor via a red blood cell assay. Essentially red blood cells become irregularly shaped (folded, too large, odd shaped, too small) and do not deliver oxygen, glucose and other factors to the cells as well as they once did. It is pandemic in its prevalence. And it is our fake skeptics who defend a non-science food industry who have caused this disease for the most part now.
TES :-)
McKenna has the ‘mushroom’ as the ultimate ethical being, having chosen to live on the waste products and corpses of of others rather than take life to live, and to propagate via spoors throughout the universe seeding life and forcing conciousness onto that life. He suggests that the casual ingestion of mushrooms growing on animal spore forced +changes in perception way back in ‘our’ days on the savanah. It’s an uncanny fit, as is the similarity to I Ching
Line F tryptophan-bock?
Yes, I wondered about the tryptophan (DMT precursor) connection too. I ponder the recurrence of the number 64 (64 DNA codons, 64 hexagrams, 64 squares on a chessboard where dark and light forces engage in an ancient battle…or is it a dance?) Mind as a mirror reflecting back on itself. Mind as transmitter and receiver. Mind as a magic lantern projecting moving images of itself, at play with colored balls.
My mind is absolutely blown. I had to read this article 3 times before this sentence jumped out at me:
“In other words, is what is contained in Graphic A a crypto-trademark? A cattle brand? Its branding iron being struck at the only point which functionally resides at the intersection of complexity and immutability inside a genome-in-common.”
It was in reading this that the light bulb turned on and I began to work backwards and begin to understand what your CTGA graph was attempting to tell us. I am still working through the list of items A – W… but wow.
So, does this mean you are an evolution advocate, or an intelligent design advocate, or what exactly? I noticed that you tossed gods and aliens out the window near the end. So where do your conclusions place your thinking? I know it is not in neat buckets like this, but I’m asking and genuinely curious.
MA
Mason,
I am an evolutionist and ignostic atheist. However I am not a proponent of abiogenesis for Earth. I am not an advocate of Intelligent Design or Irreducible Complexity. But I do not think that mankind has life (nor intelligent life) in the galaxy, or after death, figured out in the least. We are in for a huge surprise, due to our arrogance and willful blindness. Thus I am not a nihilist-atheist.
Ignostic atheism is the skepticism which dictates that ‘I do not know enough about our realm to make grand proclamations about it, nor do I even have words which could frame them even if I knew what grand proclamations to make in the first place. Therefore I am not agnostic – rather, silent.’
I only make noise when I have found something interesting (like above), and only infer as far as the evidence will take me (being very cautious of too much stacking of inductive inference).
Hope that makes sense, and I do appreciate the feedback,
TES :-)
Dear TES,
I have found your blog recently and it is a real treasure chest to look into. This article on DNA and origins of life is mind boggling.
Regarding your atheist ignostic position I have some questions to ask as I don’t understand it completely.
In the previous comment you say that humans didn’t figure out life and afterlife questions at all. For example, does that mean that you think that the Christian, Hindu or some other New Age theory of afterlife is real, or that all those versions are wrong? I ask that because in the article about this blog (https://theethicalskeptic.com/about-this-blog/) you say that you don’t believe in ghosts (as I understood it).
Quote from the about article: “Do I believe in Homeopathy, Bigfoot, UFO’s and ghosts; the ridiculous litmus tests of the Social Skepticism movement? No. I do not hold beliefs around these topics, in contrast to those who partake of fake skepticism.”
But, if the afterlife is a possibility to start with then some part of our personality (call it a ‘ghost’) should ‘survive’ the death. So, ignostic atheist position basically doesn’t discard possibly of the afterlife? Or ghosts? Correct me if I have understood it all wrong :)
Tom
Correct. The ignostic atheist is a person who claims that there is no difference between saying ‘there is a God’, ‘I don’t know if there is a God or not’, and ‘there is no such thing(s) as God’ – as they all constitute the same error:
A. Has dismissed the idea that Wittgenstein insufficient definitions and finite-bound observations from that finite realm can be used to describe something outside that realm; including describing it as an empty set. Therefore the Atheist is wrong in their insistence-belief.
B. Has dismissed the idea that Wittgenstein level foundational definitions exist to describe the concepts God, afterlife, good, ghosts, interdimensional, etc. Therefore an insistence-belief on knowing the answers to those definitions and extancy, is also wrong.
C. The ignostic is in favor of the ‘allow-for’ argument. The reality is that something exceptional very likely exists outside our frame of reference, but I do not pretend to know what that is. It may also very possibly be a very large domain, with all of it beyond our ability to comprehend.
From my ignosticism blog:
a gnostic (latin prefix a-) : ‘away from’ knowledge
The agnostic claims no personal suitable knowledge to form a belief
Between the Theist and Atheist, he does not presume to know which is correct
i gnostic (latin prefix in-) : ‘not’ knowledge
The ignostic says there exists no suitable knowledge to form a belief
Between the Theist, Agnostic, and Atheist, he contends that all three of them are wrong
Therefore I cannot afford the lax philosophy of ‘holding beliefs’ around these topics as a result. That would be presumptuous. However, I do Allow-for ideas, and can make observations as to what we do see. They do carry inference.
But inference and skilled intuition is not the same as a belief. Thus the statement ‘I don not hold beliefs around these topics’.
Hope that helps!
TES :-)
Thanks for the answer. I think that I understand your position a little bit better.
As far as I understand science it never gives as 100 percent certainty, but probability if something is real or not. Extrapolating from our current knowledge it would be fair to say probability for the afterlife/ghosts/ext is low, but we can’t be completely sure.
So, that would mean that you as an ignostic atheist would say something like: ‘I don’t have a belief on ghost, they probably don’t exist, but I keep an open mind and wait for further proof as there are unexplained sets of data that allow plurality of explanations in lack of definite answer.’ While ‘classic’ atheist would say: ‘Ghost are BS, laws of nature not allow them to exist. End of story’.
You got it Tom. Well stated.
If something extraordinary exists outside of our realm of observation, it very likely does not care whether or not I ‘believe’ or ‘refuse to believe’ in it. Things just are the way they are long before I ever got here, and the whole of broader reality does not revolve around what I personally think.
This should be the naturalist’s perspective.
TES :-)
I just wonder what would ultimate AI or super quantum computers extrapolate about the broader reality in the next decades… Or if the potential discovery of a new elemental force withholds scientific scrutiny… In the meantime atheist ignostic perspective seems to be a reasonable position to hold as it allows imaginative and creative speculation on reality without making definite conclusions…
You got it.
You can research any idea without prejudice, and be the enemy of no one.
TES
Thanks for the answers and clarifications. Is it possible to contact you by e-mail? If it is can you send me your e-mail, you can probably see mine as I have left it in the contact form.
Yes, my email is theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com
TES
Well, I don’t see any reason there why you can’t be Buddhist, or even Taoist, but it wouldn’t matter what you called it, except as a convenient opening for conversation.
“You” can know something unspeakable, too…
:-)
https://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Chittamatra
I Love this answer Mr. Ethical Skeptic.
Irrevocably true. What set truly empty in this finite realm? How may a finite language possibly describe what in the finite realm may not be true for an undefined, unknown other region neither foreign to, nor related to the world? For we do not even know this finite realm as we think we do. Yet, your masterful work which frankly nearly touches, that which cannot be known and to describe from our finite realm that which can “neither be known and more impossible to conceive of” is quite nearly in finite realms, at least this one….miraculous.
“We are in for a huge surprise…”
Reminded me of this (Song of Myself by Walt Whitman):
“…to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.”
I’m not convinced that a Party actually seeks control over the Overton Window, but rather seeks to exploit whatever a Cabal and Cathedral come up with in order to seize as much power as possible. Their main influence on it would be to cherry pick and enhance whatever 1) is now within the Overton window and 2) is useful for justifying power seizures/grabs. In other words I’m not sure they come up with anything new on their own, but if they find someone else at another syndicate coming up with something useful for gaining (or just wielding) power then they dump (usually government) money into it to promote it. They don’t seem to be the ones leading as much as they are the ones being lead, at least in Overton window terms.
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
I am a 21-year-old college student in the United States who just recently discovered your work. I have also read much of the work of Nassim Nicholas Taleb and I notice similarities in your understanding of the world and wide breadth of knowledge.
I consider it one of my central purposes in life to do the most that I can as a person to change this world for the better. My intuition tells me that a first step in this process is to become better educated and experienced. This would allow me to act more effectively and, perhaps more importantly, to avoid causing more harm than good in my efforts.
Can you offer any advice to a person my age who wants to dedicate their life to bringing about a more ethical and prosperous society?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
~Gabriel~
Gabriel,
What you describe here is the way I have spent my life, on a heart-felt quest to serve in the best way I knew how. I was raised on movies about World War II heroes and spies, fighting for our way of life. So that is where I started my journey. In the end, there is no completely just pathway – as no matter where you turn someone will be there converting the ideal you serve into selfish gain, and caring not whom they harm in the process. What you will find is that the demiurge of darkness uses wide-eyed unbridled enthusiasm to do good things, just as well or better than it can persons with ill intent. It has played the game much longer than have we. So we unfortunately spend a part of our life learning patience.
You are correct in your surmisal that “My intuition tells me that a first step in this process is to become better educated and experienced. This would allow me to act more effectively and, perhaps more importantly, to avoid causing more harm than good in my efforts.”
As best I can tell our early goals in life are to develop the wisdom to spot agency moving in the background, and rather than fight it, simply watch quietly and learn. Our work is our philosopher’s stone, or our tool in a martial art. But it is in fact, trivial in some regards. Be patient, as your challenge will be handed to you eventually. Not career challenge, as you can select that if you so choose and pursue it with earnest as well. We all have to earn an income and do well in our jobs/businesses – But what I refer to here is rather life-challenge; that which haunts you until your very end. The mission upon which you focus each and every day, and chase with all your skill and desire, regardless of being paid or not. That which is so important that you do not care whether or not you live or die in its service. That will come on its own. It might hit in your 20’s or it might not hit until your 60’s. Or it might even be one moment in time, or several – but you will know them when they happen, and not really before. The quantity of the stakes-at-hand is not an indicator as to that mission or moments’ value. Head count and dollars, don’t count.
My goals now focus around:
1. Hold to that spirit of higher wisdom which rings true in my heart above all else. Nurture it and listen every single day and moment.
2. Love those within my reach. Love being defined as ‘a reasoned commitment to serve’.
3. Develop new methods of flat market trade (food and consumer goods) which disempower cartels and parties.
4. Develop new methods of energy creation which disempower cartels and trusts.
My reason for 3 and 4 is that most suffering I have observed is A. Medical, B. Access to nutrition (not just calories and biomass) & clean water, and C. Access to cost-effective energy. I have finished my service under A. Now I hope to finish under B and C.
Ethical skepticism in the meantime, is the process (in part) of honing your ability to spot agency; agency in your own work and in others’. Especially the agency of darkness. It inhabits us all at times, and our goal is to see its virtual form working in the background behind otherwise well-intended and fallible people.
One of my favorite songs in the past contained these lyrics:
Everyday day, brings us closer. Every night, my soul sees
A troubled mankind, suffering blindly
So let the traces linger on. Many years have come and gone
Oh how lonely man has been, without a trace of the Traceless Friend
Memorizing heuristics and regurgitating established knowledge/formulas is entertaining, but not really how it is done. Faith-Courage is the ability to act effectively, when there is no script, no formula, no expert, no guidance – and the temptation to despair looms large.
The moments which require this arrive sometimes when you least expect them.
Well done and good luck!
TES :-)
Have been following you on Twitter since May ‘20 and appreciate this guide.
If you could expound on your December ‘20, February ‘21 tweets re flu vaccines, ALZ/dementia upswing, “something’s not right here”, Lewy Barr Philippine research, that would be helpful.
Also, any wisdom regarding the number of routine childhood vaccines (including flu when discharged from the hospital after birth, and soon, I fear, covid) would be also be appreciated. Thank you.
Where can I get a “delayed quantum eraser” for this?
“One third of the known history of the Universe has passed since this gift, and all we have produced with it are some violent fashionista monkeys.”
This made me chuckle quite a bit.
All the impossibility, and our parting gifts to the Universe maybe be a set of dull steak knives from Costco.
Thanks for a great read. The molecular and biochemical aspect of the origins of life, the sharing of distant genes, the redundancy and hidden gems in our own genome, and the immortal germ line at the expense of the somatic is anything but a dry read for me. Lately I have driven into that great poison, oxygen, and the controversial thoughts on its influence throughout the timelines you describe. Fascinating stuff.
Another great article, sir. As well, “Violent Fashionista Monkeys” would make a fine name for either a band, or possibly a political party.
Regarding the main Cathedral, here’s something you might want to see if you haven’t already:
https://righteousmind.com/viewpoint-diversity/
That page is old and I’m afraid that if updated it would look even worse now.
I consider this very dangerous, and not just from the point of generating pseudoscience but also actual ideological extremism (rather than “normal 10 years ago” being relabeled as “extremism”) which then gets propagated to elsewhere, such as the press. I just don’t see anything I can do about it, and the researchers trying to do something seem like they’re probably too outnumbered.
…which might lead later to a misunderstanding or manipulation of the material. Short, simply phrased sentences are prone to a whole host of potential problems with respect to interpretation.
First thing that comes to mind is the particular style of congressional “interrogations” at hearings. The apt style of “engineering” examination Q&A (ex. “I want a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer..)
Sir:
What information, should it arise, would you consider disproval of your method? Or your assumptions?
What would falsify your priors, in this specific case?
Regards,
Ike
Ike, key question of skepticism.
14 conventional occurrences/discoveries in series (all are required in this order), would merely reduce the inference from this set of data, from conclusively deductive (falsifying) to inductive (still evidence but weaker – weak enough for me to merely say ‘Ehh, that’s strange’ instead of write an article on it).
1) If we found a way for our LUCA organism to assemble XX nucleic acid codon structure inside 60 million years in a hostile environment, AND
2) That LUCA organism then could invent codon structure all over again based on different Standard Code XX Codon structures, AND
3) Then did this over and over such that over 2.1 x 10^12 codon structures were deployed into the crush of this hostile environment which was Earth (trillions of LUCA candidates were discovered in the crust of Mars for instance – all with different Codon XX word structures), AND
4) If a flawless chemical feedback could be established from the LUCA organism, such that the nucleic acids, all using different Codon structures (not like life biochemistry is now), could measure the nucleon count in its assigned amino acid molecule structure (a process which does not exist) by means of the process which assigned it its assigned amino acid, and this process got lucky enough to be flawless, AND
5) This process only selected for every other codon digit (a disciplined transcription nucleic acid-skipping process), without error and just happened to like a specific codon digit instead of the specific nucleic acid chemistry itself, AND
6) Once that life LUCA had become ubiquitous and the other trillion forms had died out, then nucleic acid assignments could still evolve such that a chemical bias towards or away from Nitrites and the various forms of N-O stem could be developed by second digit of the XX codon (again), AND
7) This second affinity did not disrupt the attainments from the first affinity because the mechanism in 4) above had gone away, AND
8) We found out that the Earth was much much older than we had thought, and there were an extra 4 billion years we missed in the aging data, AND
9) Then we found out that the Universe was actually 40 billion years old and not 13.2 as we had thought, AND
10) Then for some reason all this process ceased immediately and no affinity could be developed ever again (or the factor which introduced the mechanism for affinity of any kind to happen nucleon or N-O stem, went away itself)
11) Then and only then, the third XXX digit of the codon was added to this LUCA organism, AND
12) Accidentally multiple tryptophan, methionine start, and no-amino acid stop codes (were somehow detectable anyway) were pared OUT of their former slots, AND
13) Then, the stop codes were moved to the end by being displaced by this entire process, AND
14) Then all the chemistry and mechanisms which allowed all this to happen, were swept way in a cosmic catastrophe… but life one small pocket of LUCA, called Archaea surviving.
Then and only then…
That would neutralize *shrug say 10^10 of the remoteness and bring us down to 10^11 or 1 in a 100 billion chance of occurring without assistance.
or conversely, we have one or two MAJOR assumptions about life which we are missing or choosing to ignore.
Given the two choices Ockham’s Razor says that we select for ‘There is something MAJOR we are missing about this whole process scientifically’ which is not a “gap” in our knowledge – but rather the MAJORITY of the domain itself – option. As a skeptic, I choose this second option.
TES :-)
This is interesting since it does appear to suggest that abiogenesis might be more of a “outer space” phenomenon rather than a local planetary phenomenon, if I’m understanding this right. It’s just very difficult, based on what little I know anyway, to begin to guess how this would work. If something appears to be approaching impossibility based on what we know then lots of stuff we don’t know must be “rigging” the “game” somehow such that it’s not so close to impossible.
But what are your thoughts on the anthropic principle? If the chance of this code occurring is not somehow biased by unknown processes, or not biased enough, could it be that 1) our local area of the universe/galaxy/system/etc simply got insanely lucky and 2) the universe is just so massive beyond comprehension that it was guaranteed to happen somewhere and 3) we’re only around to notice it because, even if the odds were better than they “should” be somehow, we’re just here because this one area got lucky?
Basically I’m not sure whether this suggests that we’re totally or nearly alone in the universe in biological life terms, or whether it suggests that the whole universe, or at least the galaxy maybe, is teeming with DNA-based life.
Sorry for asking for conjecture beyond what we seem to have evidence for….
I am in the same boat Jinn,
We have a nice comfy 4.5 billion year timeline, which has taken every bit of its duration to produce some smart monkeys who wear clothes and throw bombs at each other. That is 34% of the known age of the Universe since the Inception Inflationary Event, just to produce violent talking monkeys.
If there indeed then are other places or forces which crafted this code in a separate context, when did they have time to evolve? The presence of this code, frozen into an object as old as the Moon, tells me that one of our grand assumptions in this play is highly flawed.
So all I can do is keep all credible options open and watch the probative nature of the evidence as it comes in.
But the code hints:
1) It is VERY old (perhaps ‘older’ than the Universe??? – given how slowly it propagates… and
2) The crafter of the code (if there is/was one) was a resident of the Universe, bound by its laws – and not a master thereof.
TES
My knowledge of cosmology is rather poor, but it sounds like all this tends to support the “fine-tuned universe” hypothesis as well as make it enormously more complicated to solve. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe
The current low-level problem seems to be this, which suggests (to me anyway) that the “free” physical parameters aren’t really free and are the way they are due to constrains from unknown physics:
If the DNA code would take longer to generate by process than the age of the universe then, unless I’m failing to understand this, then it may also be a result of constraints that “just exist” and they may be so complex that we’d never discover how they emerge from particle physics. This seems especially true if we don’t even know how independent the “independent” physical constants in particle physics actually are. We might be lucky just to figure that part out.
Since we are just some monkeys constantly afraid some other monkeys are going to steal our bananas, and we’re not really super intelligent, we’re constantly having to think in terms like stochastic processes that may be ultimately deterministic but are just so complex we have no other way to deal with the complexity. So we end up coming up with crazy ideas like zillions of universes getting generated with different constants and this is just the one that won the lottery for observers existing.
And of course nobody can falsify that unless they can find one or more other dead universes somehow. But this DNA thing is different because it should be happening inside the universe, not before/outside the universe, yet it is still strangely constrained.
So I guess what I’m getting at is, what are your thoughts regarding this coming from “mysterious physical constraints” vs “smart” non-random process?
(im kind of sleepy right now, so I hope I’m not rambling incoherently)
“We’re constantly having to think in terms like stochastic processes that may be ultimately deterministic but are just so complex we have no other way to deal with the complexity.”
Yes, we must create zillions of universes to resolve a problem which was only driven to complicatedness, by the limitations of our own thinking to begin with.
Brilliantly stated.
TES :-)
Quote TES: “The crafter of the code (if there is/was one) was a resident of the Universe, bound by its laws – and not a master thereof.”
How do you know it was not the Universe itself, as a living machine?
Your “resident” is of course “bound by its laws” if it’s the Universe itself.
The definition of ‘crafter’ (intent carrier) – may be even more exotic than that. I don’t presuppose an answer to any form or entity, only that intent is/does.
TES
I think you made a technical proof of a god.
A machine with intention.
I’ve been stuck on this notion of intention within evolution for many years now. It was something as simple as asking how does a lactating breast, even the most primitive version of one, evolve by random mutation? It would have to evolve in intermediary steps of non-functioning tissue, and being of no survival benefit, only a hinderance, it would never make it to full fruition.
Interesting article. I don’t understand much about DNA but I would like to comment generally on the probability of miracles.
It’s misleading to assume that any event occurred by chance. The probability of a particular snowflake falling “by chance” is impossibly small. But snowflakes are produced by a generative process which can be regarded as sampling from a complex probability distribution. The probability of any snow flake falling is high.
So if your point is that some unknown generative process must underly the codon table (as opposed to “by chance”) then I must agree because this a tautology.
Yes,
The probability measured here is not that ‘this specific’ codex was frozen in place, but that ‘any codex of this structure or higher’ was frozen into place. A snowflake is one instance only, selected from a uniform distribution wherein EVERY possibility is equally remote. So you will always get a remote-chance result.
This schema however is selected from a tight Chi-squared distribution, wherein the chance of ANY advanced symmetry whatsoever (not just one instance), is 1 in 1 x 10^-21.
So we are highly remiss if we conflate point probabilities inside a Uniform Distribution (snowflakes) with Cumulative Probabilities inside a Chi-squared distribution (Constrained Codices).
TES
Thanks for posting TES. I am having a difficulty trying to classify what the American Medical Association or the CDC is. These groups appear to me to span multiple classes.
To me:
The AMA would be a mafia.
The CDC would be a cathedral.
But as many readers have pointed out, there is always overlap.
TES
Just to initially keep me mobile in conversation with sskeptic crowdpleasers, that first paragraph did it for me.
the rest, of course, is worth the sit down to read.
I wrote this about 2 1/2 years ago….and your piece is much better, but did trigger the remembrance of a similar structure, but without the insightful definitions you always bring.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/3-groups-life-creators-victims-destroyers-jason-powers/
The link does not work. Do you still have the article ?
It does seem that there may be overlap between these categories. A cabal may control access to the realm of a particular idea, then influence a cartel to restrict books about that idea, the banning of this idea may become part of the official religious doctrine of the state (cathedral) or the political parties. It is sometimes difficult to figure out the cause and effect of these sorts of banned ideas among these groups. There is also a hierarchy of banned ideas. One can question certain ideas to a certain extent without having the full force of the syndicates coming down on you, even though the idea is verboten (e.g., global warming is not significantly man-made), at least today. But there are other ideas which you can’t even mention on blogs like this that bring down the wrath of all of the syndicate power structures onto you with the full force of society and the law.
Absolutely overlap Ed
See my work on The Tower of Wrong and The Omega Hypothesis as well. This is part of how the lie is enforced, short of the ‘wrath of all the syndicate power’ you aptly mention too.
Thanks!
TES
When bouncing billard balls, energy is not as important as momentum. Since this would not be an elastic collision, the momentum change would be ~half that of the normal case. Also, since the dirt would be spread out over the surface of the asteroid (slide 5), it’s not clear you get to choose the final momentum vector as much as you’d like. I mean, I like the idea in principle, but you really need to go through the physics in detail to prove it’d work.
Energy and momentum are directly related by the Newtonian principle E(k) = 1/2 mv2. By taking the calculus derivative of this, one gets p = mv. So separating the two is not a critical path of physics logic here. If the bolide impacts the dust – it inherits up to 100% of the momentum (kinetic energy) of that dust. A direct impact, or condition where the dust remains on the surface of the bolide = 100%, which is the reason to have an array of bags, like a shotgun pellet pattern. A direct hit will result in 90+% of the salvo’s kinetic energy (momentum) being imparted to the bolide.
In addition, the dust will most likely change the albedo of the bolide, thereby changing pressure from light from the sun, and altering its orbit over a long period.
They are related, but conservation of one does not imply the conservation of the other. See any high-school level mechanics article on elastic vs. inelastic collisons.
Granted, ELORA’s impactor array would involve a series of inelastic collisions, but ‘mechanics’ isn’t the only form of energy conservation at play here. These bags would alter the asteroid’s albedo, solar radiation pressure, and Yarkovsky signature, while delivering momentum through granular dynamics, not solid object inelasticity, featuring minimal recoil, and a permanent alteration of the asteroid mass (UNLIKE a pure inelastic collision). The chaotic kinetic energy from inelasticity which did exist would scatter particles across the asteroid’s surface, imparting momentum at various other locations by means of adherence effects through gravitational and electromagnetic forces. These complexities go far beyond high school physics, typically requiring several semesters of undergraduate engineering calculus to model effectively.
The difference between the Abrahamic religions and the Eastern religions is enormous. Defining religion is a tricky thing- but the Dalai Lama ( an acknowledged expert in the area of Buddhism and Tibetan Buddhism ) makes a couple of interesting comments- which are to some extent mutually contradictory:
1) That the purpose ofa religion should be to make it easier for us to manifest love for each other.
2) That one cant really call Buddhism a religion anyhow.
There are great difficulties in comparing these traditions as the same words are often used with different meanings. iIe heard Tibetan teachers use the word sin without showing evidence of understanding its Western meaning.
However the biggest difference between the Eastern and Western religions is that of authority.
The strongest statement ever made by the Buddha ( who was challenged by residents of a village who had seen one too many spiritual teachers of late ) was that we should put his teachings into practice and see if they worked.
Now that is the ONLY religion I have encountered that encourages independent decision making and it has been a great part of my skeptical journey. You CAN have your skeptical cake and eat it.
Great article on fact checkers. Very helpful in the broader context of today’s issues.
Paltering is such a lovely word in the context. it even feels dishonest.
It does! LOL!
Regarding your recent post on Bitcoin being a currency of capital, a suprency rather than money, may I reference the following article on Bitcoin? Please consider reading or even writing on it. Disclaimer: I do not own any crypto, neither Bitcoin nor any other.
https://crypto-anonymous-2021.medium.com/the-bit-short-inside-cryptos-doomsday-machine-f8dcf78a64d3
Crypto Anonymous published this article on Jan 14 on medium.com
The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine
Hey Pointer and thanks for following me on Twitter.
Yes, this idea of Suprency comes from my most recent infrastructure projects in energy, medical/pharma, food/agriculture, and markets. We trade in financial instruments (bonds, letters of credit, bank notes, performance bonds, insurables, etc.) which effect those elements and critical features which make things happen in each respective industry. When we draw a commission/fee off that trade activity, we are actually ‘converting’ that money into currency which we can use for travel expenses, ADP payroll funds, overhead and operations, rent, etc. Much like one might convert money from M3 to M1 in a Zurich trading account.
But the two forms of ‘$USD’ are not equal. The currency we trade to make those things happen, in no way behaves like the money we have in our business bank accounts. When we make purchases for our catalog inventory out of Europe/Asia, we hedge the respective currencies in order to keep the Open to Buy stable for planning purchases on cost of goods sold (COGS). Such is not the case with traded monies.
My supposition is that we need a new name for that currency which takes the place of gold, notes, and capital. My recent studies on black market currencies have led me to propose the idea for a supra-currency, suprency. That which allows activities like which my companies do, to transact without imparting obscene swings in the currency upon which our poor and middle class depend every day.
My suspicion is that Distributed Ledger Currency will fit that bill eventually. It will lose the ‘Crypto’ fascination, which will retreat to the black market. All this is distinct from ‘electronic cash’ as well. Currently we conflate all three into one thing and wonder why we are confused as to what is occurring.
After all, the purpose of strategy is to capture the grey market from the black market, not eliminate the black market. This principle of capturing the grey market bears ontological meaning as well. ;-)
Thanks!
TES
Thank you. It is not easy to follow your elaborations, but reading Huber’s Theory of Dominant Money was useful for me (sovereignmoney.eu, Dominant Monetary Theory Pt. 1). What I find generally lacking is not stressing the importance of whoever issues a currency benefits: it may cost you 1$ to counterfeit a 100$ note, but that yields a profit of 99$.
In value chain theory, it costs you $84.50 to counterfeit a $100 note. $1 in direct non-leverageable, $.5 in direct leverageable, $3 in indirect and depreciation leverageable expenses, and $80 in risk-token equivalents. Your gross margin is 95.5% and net margin is 15.5% – and it is net margin that must be matched to the value you deliver to your market chain, grey or black. They may disagree with your risk token ask price (reject your value provision) and put you out of business.
Now if we develop utility tokens for all these components of the value chain – you can see where this second tier of monetary unit will evolve to. Market trading dollars.
This is a rudimentary example from the basis of strategy work I have done for China, India, Africa, Middle East, and a couple trading markets, etc.
TES
Bespoke Truth
*Christian apologetics alert*
Arrival Bias – the tendency to tender more credibility or gravitas to information which is hot off the press or has just been introduced.
Very common with peer review articles. It’s seldom you see or hear anyone respond with skepticism to the latest peer review buzz
Commenting prematurely (still reading)
There is much left to be acknowledged and further studied with other various religious/tribal artifacts as well. Besides the appeal to ignorance and authority, there definitely is a strong appeal to religious superiority. ex. supposedly the Ark of the Covenant is on heavy lockdown in a desert cellar that competing authorities deny access too.
I have no aching hope that it is all true (the biblical story), however allowing researchers to illuminate artifactual details seems to be a denied basic right to humanity.
I’m reminded of the stor(-y,-ies) in recent documentaries (can’t remember exactly which ones) which were told by the crop and agri- farmers themselves about Monsanto reps buying fields nearby, and because they identified a few “misplaced” corn seed spread over the farmers line, that they were threatened with litigation if they didn’t comply to contract the engineered line. Seems there were a number of stories like that. Mad Cow disease was another one I believe, as it was recalled by a sheep farmer (?), after cloned sheep were shown to have contracted the disease, but the farmer’s sheep were forced passed testing and destroyed; later to find out there wasn’t a shred of the disease in her flock.
I’ll have to do a dig and retrace my steps on those.
But that certainly sounds like what Monsanto has been painted to be, an ugly extortion/racketeering monster.
This could apply as well to the supposed lab created coronavirus as well, no? whether it was at Wuhan Labs or South Texas, there is growing body of information that shows association with our interventions.
Whoops. (re: vaccine fact checker) I get the need for emergency push for meds and treatments, but therein lies the greater issue, right? We’ve suffered an emergency every year for the longest time due to agri, SAD/food/diet, artificial enviros….etc Crickets chirped every year from all other illnesses, and those med/health authorities that truly cared were hushed, scrutinized, and demonized. Business was business as usual, but somehow that changed in 2020.
Curious why they inserted Pres. Trumps remarks along with Dems. Was this sleight of hand a la ignorance? Any statement taken from voices of authority can be recycled. Christians charge to “fight the good fight” is in no way implying violence. The term “fight” or “fight like hell” can be and is used simply in context of debating, arguing, or deal making. Radical religious ideologues on the other hand, may use the term “fight” alongside “kill; destroy; eradicate”… in the literal sense. As far as I can tell, Trumps words are no more/less inciting to impassioned social radicals as any of the other statements made politicos or MSM voices(and the argument about his statements made minutes after being disingenuous, I don’t buy)
Pingback: Rural Hospitals: Closing Time. The Leverage Buyout Will Come of the US – Deep Center Field Press
Sites like this are more than reassuring. Sites such as this act as a lighthouse for disenfranchised, hopeless people who have been crushed by the totalitarian behavior of narcissists. This site not only proves there are rational, logical, like-minded people in America, but there is not a cult-like departure from knowledge itself in order to cultivate narcissistic supply from like-minded, “woke” people.
The Ethical Skeptic empirically proves that some numbers cannot be tweaked, tortured or manipulated into some bombastic headline on a major “news” network. Some information is above reproach and may be ethically, responsibly, compassionately used to educate the public.
To paraphrase Margaret Meade: it is parents’ job to teach their children HOW to think, not WHAT to think. This site has shown a better way to learn while not becoming a dictator of what to learn.
“He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee.”
Thanks TES for your analysis regarding electric vehicles. It is mindboggling how govt is pushing this idiocy. My hypothesis is that, under the guise of “sustainability”, progressives’ goals are to crowd us into urban areas in small apartments. They will do this, not by outright banning of current practices/things but by incrementally making them so expensive via over-regulation that you cannot afford them. I’m in Massachusetts and we have some of the highest electricity rates thanks to Democrat policies. They will not consider pipelines and they have shut down oil, coal, and nuclear plants without replacing them. The “pandemic” along with Antifa/BLM looting/arson/poor governance in urban areas has created an exodus from big cities. It will be interesting how this shakes out.
Sane people in blue areas would be wise to prepare to go off-grid if possible even if there is a potential threat from legislation. Solar panels/batteries, well water. There are blue states that will subsidize some of it, I recommend taking advantage of them for all you can. I used to work at a solar energy company in the 1980s. Even then, we supplied solar panels to an upper NY state house that was designed to be completely off the grid.
I’m including a couple of links that are critical of Germany’s Energiewende policies. Criticism include the intermittent nature of renewables and that impact, destruction of pristine habitat, killing of millions of birds and bats, noise pollution, economic toll on lower income people as well as squandering of taxpayer monies. This same nonsense is happening in Australia as well.
https://stopthesethings.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/1-6-_kompendium-der-energiewende_englisch_1.pdf
https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/high-costs-and-errors-of-german-transition-to-renewable-energy-a-920288.html
Dear TES,
Thankyou greatly for an informative read. I have only recently come across your work and it is a delight to read something that is clinically focussed on the thesis at hand.
I am curious if you have a source or could point to some of the underlying assumptions that lead to this conclusion?
I also wonder if the gridlock of the C’s will entail we give up mass personal ownership of cars in favour of a shared model where a fleet of automated vehicles pick and drop us at request. Vehicles are in themsleves highly inefficnet things.
Thanks!
RQ
RQ,
Thanks for the insightful set of questions.
Regarding the two fold question, first – there is not one engineering source for these estimates, as the energy crosses multiple hundred forms of transmission and transfer covered by numerous industry standards for line or kinetic/potential loss, in a theoretical optimal new capacity (not existing), I have to use some english, past experience on solar and other alternative energy projects, and some benchmarking. Of course, not a mere matter of asking the Electrical or Mechanical Engineers which IEEE Handbook 3000/3001 series standards for line loss to apply, as that will fall woefully short of reality inside a value chain.
In general the principle and relevant range of chain loss, is cited by the National Academy of Engineering, here: https://www.nap.edu/read/12204/#slide2
Of 100 units standard:
Plant loss at coal combustion = 62 units coal
Car loss at internal combustion = 68 units octane+ (https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Energy_loss#cite_note-RE1-2)
Line loss electrical = ~32 units
Line loss vehicle = 0 units
Ratio = 94/68 = 1.59 or a 38 – 43% kinetic loss when comparing the two value chains, in a new infrastructure. You can then see this by comparing the yellow bar factors in Table A (1.00 versus .62 and .59 for the first three value chains)
The small differential between hydrogen and electrical storage mediums is a guesstimate for now as I could not find a resource on that. I went ahead and added footnote 3 to reflect this calculation out of the spreadsheets – as it is critical path to the argument.
The second part of the question relates to aggregate energy needed – if we consume 100 units of power now to drive our vehicles by means of fuel, we will need to develop a network which supplies 75% (at a minimum) more energy than the fossil fuels did, when we cannot supply but 12% of our needs even now via renewable means. Realistically. In order to catch up and supply the needs of the nation’s fleet of autos, we would need to grow alternative energy in its various forms by a factor of 15-fold, in short order. I am not sure we have enough land and wind to create this (short of a type of nuclear) – having gone through the pain of developing these projects – they are difficult and take a lot of land, far from their demand points.
Finally, given the 6% annual inflation of auto insurance rates (and cost of a repair being used to take the place of old scheduled maintenance) – eventually we will be forced to share vehicles yes. I think it is an economic reality, as the risk and price of casualty are becoming too high for a wage earner to sustain.
Great questions….
TES
8-)
Sir:
While in our current circumstance I can foresee a wide range of unavoidable inflations in a wide range of areas as unavoidable…
…would you care to make any guesses as to the form large-scale war might take?
In the near term? Do you foresee them as being with any specific external ‘foe’? Or a specific internal foe? Or some combination?
While I agree with the directional trend, I’m as yet personally unclear how this is likely to play out. Do you have any range of speculations you might be wiling share?
As always, thanks for your analysis and commentary.
Ike,
My current contemplation revolves around the possibility that our nuclear weapons are not symptomatic of a conflict between Russia/US, US/China. Fear causes a given set of reactions which are different than greed for resources or power. I cannot shake the perception that some of our global evolution in current events stems from fear, and not global conflict.
The desperation to embargo specific subjects, which all seem innocent and unrelated. Perhaps they are not so innocent nor unrelated at all, but threatening. The wholesale silencing of humanity unless we say the correct things.
It appears to me that an empowered and informed humanity, appears to be the actual object of fear.
But why, and fear on whose part? I don’t know the answer to this. I expressed some of this sentiment when it first started to dawn upon me, in the post The Eagle The Ape The Horse and The Lion. https://theethicalskeptic.com/2017/07/13/the-eagle-the-ape-the-horse-and-the-lion/
The fear is now near to panic proportions. Panic causes mistakes. I watch like a spider for these mistakes.
The greatest likelihood is that I am wrong here, of course. But, as you might have perceived from my material. Just because I think it is likely, does not make it therefore likely. The reality is – that our realm bears a great deal of uncertainty – more than our experts will admit.
So, I watch.
TES :-)
Sir:
I read your post on the Eagle, the Ape, et all. I work with some regularity with Nick Hudson at PANDA. If you two are not already in touch, I think you should be.
I agree it’s beyond fear; panic has set in. I worked in Mozambique for a bit, about a decade after their civil war ended, where nothing worked and everyone eyed each other as a source of protein. There is something about the current tenor in the West that has a similar flavor to me.
The media is like hearing an animal howl 24/7 on every channel, and in every news article.
But exactly whom is panicking at the institutional level, and why, is not clear to me.
Do you think we are simply seeing a cyclical manifestation of psychogenic illness/hysteria? A nasty virus, with fear amplified and spread exponentially, due to advent of digital media?
What explains the near-religiously-fervent need to only express and discuss narrowly approved thoughts? And all this, in the fields of science and biology?
I’m reminded of the Plague of Athens, and the need of the Athenians, in their darkest times, to import new North African gods…given that their own gods had clearly abandoned them.
Are we panicking because we have no new gods to import? Is the pandemic-hysteria merely a symptom of the panic?
Thanks again for your work.
Who couldn’t love science, it’s magic and fun
when a mind such as you opens up such a ton.
Sci wriggles and rattles and weaves so about
it tingles, inspires and leads beyond doubt.
Numeric, she rules; proof, no mere plate of mutton,
the winner’s all skeptical folk you can’t button.
Love that you have considered the whole cost of electric vehicles. As a long time project manager, I have always pushed the idea that all costs must be included. For example include backup power costs in the wind and solar power benefits analysis.
The other side of this discussion on electric cars is the social one. People renting or without off street parking won’t have access to easy overnight charging without considerable infrastructure costs for charging stations all along our streets.
Combustion engines are becoming increasingly more efficient. For example the latest Toyota engines have a 40% thermal efficiency, nearly double what they were only a few years ago and indeed double many engines today. So by 2030 gasoline engine efficiency improvements will affect the economics of gasoline vs electric power.
So I see big social upheavals and resistance as we swap to electric power. Safe nuclear such as Thorium nuclear power seems the most likely to succeed. The energy required to manufacture solar panels and storage batteries for individual houses is I think greater than their lifetime output and an unaffordable capital investment for most people. And we haven’t even mentioned the rare metals required for electric motors and their batteries, the energy required to produce them and their low availability.
“One example of this is the lower current cost to charge a vehicle during reduced nighttime electricity rate-tiers, an advantage which exists now, however will not exist once electric vehicles proliferate past a certain tip-in point among consumers.”
This is wrong and extremely inaccurate.
What is in fact happening is that due to the excess of extremely cheap solar the afternoon power prices are lower than the nightly ones. And the trend will continue. We will heavily overbuild with solar. A heavy overbuild.
Check this out:
https://www.energy-storage.news/news/breakthrough-california-solar-plus-storage-project-bought-by-capital-dynami
How did you get 24 cents LCOE for solar/wind + batteries? That is 10 times more than the auctions.
Solar is not ‘extremely cheap’. Have you ever directed a solar farm strategy or financed a solar project, or other alternative energy strategy? I have. That article you sent is quoting tariffs, not prices. Surplus auction prices are exactly the measure which a value chain analysis does not use. At 2.4 cents per kWh the entire world’s energy problems are solved! Not.
The average cost to produce alternative energy in the US is ~9 to 13 cents per kilowatt hour wholesale (https://www.inspirecleanenergy.com/blog/clean-energy-101/cost-of-renewable-energy). The last three conventional PPA’s I have struck have been in the 4.1 to 4.3 c/kWh range. The last few alternative energy PPA’s I have struck are in the 11 – 15 c/kWh range (14.7 c/kWh right now for a nation). These level figures are the production basis by which a value chain should be loaded. Not spot pricing. Then add factoring for transmission loss, charging loss, depletion, conversion and use as a kinetic motion impetus… and you end up with the kinetic-converted LCOE – which is what I use here. This torque-to-torque index must be used if one is going to compare apples to apples with a gallon of gas, combusting.
You can argue the figure within a reasonable delta as it is a projection (being value chain normalized) – but you cannot say it is off by a factor of 10 x as that is not even in the basic-industry-knowledge ballpark.
My business power bills are in no way cheaper in the afternoon for our distribution centers and never have been, ever. They are much higher during the A/C and heat use PM shifts and there is no rate break in winter, even with charge-leveling.
TES
I enjoyed your article. You explained some aspects of the electric vehicle adoption issue in unique ways that I had not considered. I don’t disagree with your conclusion but I have one concern.
You stated that “The bottom line is that home/micro energy generation stands as the critical complement to a nationwide electric vehicle rollout strategy”. I am not convinced that utility-scale wind and solar generation much less home/micro energy generation is a viable option in high latitudes during the winter. New York’s Climate Act (https://wp.me/P8hgeb-ev) has identified the multi-day winter doldrum issue (https://wp.me/p8hgeb-vl) as a concern but has not as yet addressed how it will be handled. Without enormous over-building and investments in long-duration storage I don’t think they can propose a solution. When those costs come due, I suspect the Climate Act will have to be changed.
It is unfortunate that the idealogues insist on zero-emission targets. If they could live with hybrid vehicles concerns like this one and range anxiety go away. If they could accept an electric system using base-loaded nuclear and peaking natural gas with solar and wind fitting niche applications where appropriate, I would not be nearly as worried as I am about affordability and reliability. As you say solving the problem is less important than taking a price out of the hide of mankind.
Thank you Roger,
Now that is how a professional critique is framed, well done. Notice two things (which admittedly are highly cryptic in this writeup) which I alluded to, but could not possibly address in this article without distracting from and confusing the core message.
1. The energy displaced at the home solar/wind level is only that energy required to power two household vehicles each night (or three every third or so). So the context, without explicitly reminding the reader, is only that segment of household energy demand. All my business partners who use solar panels in New England and Great Lakes states confirm they derive enough power to charge their electric vehicles and well beyond. One who lives on Long Island only pays electrical bills in the three deepest months of winter. The rest of the time he is selling electricity to their utility. But in agreement with your assessment, that falsified what I understood about northern latitudes and solar power. It was indeed a surprise – and I have yet to investigate why the increase…
2. Notice that I purposely shifted the semantics to ‘home/micro’ – there are a host of other energy schemes in development right now which will allow energy to be generated/offset very quietly and locally, both in the home, for a suburb or neighborhood/small city. I am working with one of those technologies now. The days of gigantic power stations. 25 miles from demand, exploiting supposed economies of scale, feeding high tension power lines are not over, however the future involves modular/micro energy solutions which stem well beyond merely solar and wind. They will have to.
Excellent feedback, and thank you,
TES :-)
You are welcome and thank you for clarifying these points.
One item that’s missing from your analysis, unless I missed it, is the mechanical efficiency of internal combustion engines vs. electric motors in vehicles. The analysis should examine the equivalent mechanical energy created, not the stored energy in the gasoline/batteries. Perhaps you did say that, but it was unclear if you did.
If I understand what you are saying KS I have addressed it. I am comparing the kinetic energy produced as an index against existing internal combustion. I don’t have any calculations which pertain to the absolute stored energy. Stored energy again is only indexed relative to the line loss in electrical transmission. These would be at the ‘transfer haul’, ‘vehicle introduction’ and ‘storage medium’ nodes of the value chain. But they are relative to existing benchmarks – so no absolute values are calculated for stored/potential energy.
TES :-)
It’s no surprise to me that many of these traits are closely associated with the Social Skeptic …
What a nice compilation! Best regards to you!
TES, what’s your opinion on the the (mRNA) vaccines?
Even young people I know will be happy to get anything that is “approved” but I don’t see the cost-benefit being close to there for anyone who isn’t old or otherwise high risk. Especially I worry about young healthy people and potential long-term side-effects from such a new mechanism of vaccine.
P.S. Really appreciate this blog and your COVID work, both have shaped a lot of how I’ve thought this year.
Ryan,
I am withholding any conclusion on the Covid-19 vaccine until we see data. As you probably know I am gravely concerned that we vaccinate too much, for too little reason, and too early into a child’s life. Aside from that I am not against any vaccine which has been safety tested against a placebo over a retrospective time-series cohort which examines rates of auto-immune, ASD, encephalitis and cognitive-delay/impairment impacts between the cohorts through age 17. If we give Covid-19 to our 20 – 60 years old connector population (maximum impact to communicability, minimum cognitive and palsy impacts) and then treat that as a cohort and compare impacts, and find no difference – then I will be in support of the vaccine. However, we have so many in power who are so sure of themselves and their virtue, that I am cynical that any real science will ever be done on the matter (as usual). So, I watch and will gather my own statistics.
Thanks for your readership!
TES :-)
Would such studies be able to be done in an accelerated timeframe as the one we’re in?
My thinking is that they would have to take years if not decades to truly assess (e.g., auto-immune) impacts over time. So it goes to the practical question of should healthy young adults get a vaccine next year or not given all this uncertainty.
What was the verdict, TES?
Nik,
I cannot advise on that because I do not know a particular person’s situation, lifestyle, genetics, co-morbidity state, or other risks – I only know mine. I can only influence the decision for me.
TES
Thank you for the work you have done. I have depended on it to understand what is happening. I rarely comment but I have learned a great deal from both your Twitter feed and your website so Merry Christmas and thanks again.
An interesting insight into a somewhat alien system (for my German self, at least !)
At the very least, strange things are happening …
The language of this time is what worries me most – in fact, sometimes it is outright disturbing. It is hard to think rationally in this climate, with the constant feeling of (maybe?) being cheated on by some (false?) semblance of rationality …
Reality nowadays closely resembles an X-Files story arc, if you ask me – and that is just a popular culture reference …
We homeschool and I’m thinking this could be quite useful when our children reach middle/high school and we are covering logic.
Excellent article and website, ES. I have been closely following your unparalleled work on SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 for the past several months, and I was wondering whether there is any way (email address, etc.) I could contact you other than on Twitter. There is something I would like to share with you, but I do not have a Twitter account – thankfully, the app allows me to view your posts without logging in.
Darmon, you can contact me at theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com :-)
Excellent, thank you! I will get in touch soon. ;)
My son introduced me to your writing about the Covid virus. I found it quite interesting and enjoyed it as well as other writings of yours that I have read. It seems you have spent a lot of times coming up with answers to questions. One thing of consequence was your writing here about Paul’s statement concerning sin being introduced to humanity through one. And the consequences of that or non-consequences it seems. You stated somewhere that you had read through the Bible 6 times. Glad you did, maybe more by now. Hopefully one day you will find the answer to the question that this is all true regardless of the skepticism that exists concerning the revelation to humanity of the Creator. Science, to me seems to always prove that. Even with the brilliant minds that think differently. I can’t debate you, I don’t have the intellect. One day the answer to why Israel is still a nation after 4000+ years when all the other ancient ones have be assimilated into the world around them. I do really enjoy your writings. Keep it up.
Hi TES, I’ve made a discovery linking planets with very low axial tilt and sunspot activity corresponding to climate shifts on Earth. There’s a gap in the logic which predicts a very large planet outside of Neptune with an orbit of just ~88 years (Planet Nine). By coincidence, Mercury’s 88 day orbit is also predicted to be a cycle of increasing earth tides, perhaps hidden in the tidal gauge empirical data.
You looked into real world tidal range data and reported a significant increase. If you have the time and inclination, perhaps you could look for an 88 day signal in the numbers? It’s not really my thing but I’ll try it myself.
Iron Snow ?
Hi there, at one point I read a page where you linked to an analysis (yours or someone you respect) of data on the flu jab and it’s “effectiveness” as well as risk. Does anyone know where to find that? Thank you!
Be ethically skeptic. It is tougher to do this and takes more thought , but the results are amazing. For 8 years I have known of the quackery. I thank the ethical skeptic for leading me to start my research and writing.
The reality is modern agriculture is too “new” for Homo sapiens. The trend is continuing as we are on a plant based food phenom that will undoubtably lead to more misery. we are coming closer and closer to eating plastic than we are to a meat. Around 20 million years of evolution tells us our diet.
Ancel Keys was an evil man who started the “explosion” of profits in the medical industry. This shift makes so much money that we will continue to devolve if it goes unchecked. If left unchecked there is a paradigm shift happening that will continue to lead to a rather miserable devolution. Ancel’s evil showed these profiteers that large increase in users amongst multiple suppliers to alleviate vs cure, yields much larger profits. Learn to live in misery. This is especially true when the supplier with more money finds the cure for an ailment as the supplier that is making a lot more profits can pay off the law makers, and/or just create massive amounts of media that tell the exact opposite of the truth. A small local “grass fed only” cattle farmer vs big pharma, the government, and innocently biased bystanders.
The two primary principles I follow that have cured all of my ailments including overweight, joint pain, anxiety and depression.
1) practice fasting. We are meat eating fast eaters not 7 hour grazers. 1 meal per day increases autophagy which cleanses and helps to rid the body of carcinogens.
2) eat grass fed healthy animals and eat from nose to tail. Either that or supplements that are derived from grass fed animals and ultra healthy fatty grass fed meats.
Pingback: The Cruciality of Empathy and a Message of Hope for Those With Mental Illness and Other Misunderstood Conditions – pragmaticskepticism
Pingback: The Cruciality of Empathy and a Message of Hope for Those With Mental Illness and Other Misunderstood Conditions – pragmaticskepticism
Pingback: How to Detect an Evil Person – pragmaticskepticism
Wow, that’s horrible to hear about. Your daughter got a crushed cerebrum at birth and your son was made autistic by Dtap. You’re right that those responsible for creating situations where people suffer should be penalized while those lower down who are enduring the suffering should be rewarded to ease it, assuming i understood you correctly. The micro-issues of individuals suffering would occur much less though if the health agencies were held to standard and assumed to be wrong/responsible as the health of the nation they are responsible for declines, rather than assuming their own virtue as an Omega Hypothesis even while everything rapidly declines. The worst scenario is when they blame all the problems developing on either the population themselves making mistakes(what you noted they do on the obesity issue) or mere ‘random chance’. AKA, how they claim that Autism is being ‘diagnosed’ into being the leading neurodevelopmental disorder even over other disorders that scientists presumably admit are increasing for genuine non-diagnosis reasons. Sorry i don’t have a few specific examples of other neurodevelopmental disorders that are increasing for admitted genuine reasons which are still increasing less quickly than autism although you likely already know some. There is some discrepancy there though in that ADHD is likely also being increased by vaccinations so some other neurodevelopmental disorders may be argued to be ‘similarily increasing due to diagnosis’ or some other nonsense reason.
Anyway, it’s a great article, great logical stuff here. I am honestly surprised you aren’t just rich and able to retire at will. Presumably that would normally be the logical outcome in a society where value-units(money) were assigned based on produced value for society, not solely based on an often-wrong monetary system’s routine procedures. Clearly modern civilization does not function rationally. Well, I digress. Thanks for writing all this.
What is the specific proof that deforestation is causing 80% of climate change? Is much of that deforestation taking place in China, since you said they are a major contributor to global warming? I believe what you’re saying is right, but it’s hard to understand when you don’t make a citation for the deforestation claim. I see how certain things you said definitely line up with these claims, like Muslim socialist countries having all their people be forced to use wood or coal for fuel, or the trade routes often going to China and causing waste because they produce things wastefully and inefficiently, but I’m not seeing the big picture. I guess official statistics or scientific studies on this subject may be limited because it goes against the narrative, and i trust your reports of your personal experience, but if there is any big evidence you know about this, it would help me to see the big picture and help to just add clarity to your idea overall.
Aleatoric Casuistry : In other words, perhaps – “Anything’s possible” (?)
Akratic Trolling – when an advocate of an agenda plays the game wherein they will troll and provoke their perceived enemy, then suddenly retreat into the pure technical of science or atheism and adopt a holy or statesman facade when the perceived enemy objects to their behavior.
In some supplementary reading, Socrates claimed no one would willingly do this (“akrasia”); however, in the context of this type of trolling, the image that comes to mind is a manipulative schoolyard juvenile luring a new student unaware into a den of bullies.
Alright, i’m going to explain the average probability argument i talked about in another comment, although I am no expert and i’m not saying any of this is guaranteed truth, but it does certainly seem that it’s on the right trac.
Basically let’s say you’ve got 5000 cases of autism where the probability of each individual autism onset being by chance is 1 in 100. For example the 2 year old got autism the same day as the vaccination even though he only got 3 vaccinations that year, and yes i realize the probabilities are probably much lower than that in these cases and that you are probably right to say that most of the vaccine damage is going undetected. Now normally this equation of calculating the chance that they are ALL just chance is 0.01%x itself 5000 times in a row, and that is correct math. But something more important than that argument is the issue of the normal distribution. Basically here’s the issue:If these outliers are truly by chance, then there should be a proportion amount of extremely likely to be chance cases of autism.
There are 1.5 million or so diagnosed autistic kids in the USA. Take an extremely conservative and generous assumption of 15000 cases of autistic kids with 1 in 100 or less chance of it being onset by chance. 15’000×100 is 1.5 million. What that means is that 100% of the rest of the 1.5 million autism cases would have to have an infinitely near to 100% chance of being fully ‘random’ or non-vaccine caused for the math to balance out. If anything this argument should also be taken to another level. The pro forced vaxxers should calculate the probability distribution of autism cases and take a guess at what portion of them should seem extremely likely to be vaccine caused. All of these probabilities would have to add up in the end. It’s easier for me to think of this than explain it, but it should be clear that a 1 in 1000 chance autism case or a 1 in 100 or a 1 in 5 all matter and add up in the determination of whether vaccines sometimes cause autism. Pro vaccine forcers should figure out what the Average Probability is of someone getting autism soon after a vaccine too. And ‘soon’ does not have to just mean a day or two, it could mean weeks, it could even mean years, as long as the mathematical and anecdotal proof all lines up along with the science of how long these symptoms of damage take to show up depending on the person.
Sorry that it’s a bit hard for me to properly explain but I think you can basically intuit this idea i’m explaining to you. The plural of anecdote is data, and the number of certain types of anecdotes needed to show the invalidity of the null can seemingly be calculated in a more mathematical way and not just an intuitive common sense risk-mitigating way. Does that make sense? Do you think i have the gist of a good idea here or am I misunderstanding something?
Oh, I forgot one meme that could be applied to that hostage idea. Suppose the national leaders are too arrogant to consider such a hostage measure on themselves in some theoretical situation a year or later from now where tensions mount. Yet with Russia and the USA, Putin and Trump are Christians…Wouldn’t putting their life at risk for the greater good of the nation be like pulling a Jesus Maneuver or something, which means those Christian leaders should support it? Or are only divinely conceived entities or whatever allowed to do that? Lol. Again, it’s just a random idea, and may be tactically or otherwise wrong in some way i do not understand. It just seems like a good meme.
To be honest, based on Trump’s language in his October tweet about himself and Melania getting COVID, it may be possible that he already did something similar but to a lesser degree and purposefully infected himself and his family with the virus to show the nation that it was relatively harmless. Would be a pretty cool fact if that indeed happened. Trump is certainly no Jesus style figure or anythin, nonetheless, it would be very cool if that had happened. I know some say it would be morally and ethically dubious since technically people would screech that it’s wrong to put your family at risk, but if he truly knew it was harmless, honestly, it would have made sense to do. He should have used Hydroxychloroquine on himself to treat it though and as Toby Rogers said that was an extreme missed opportunity, but i think it would be very cool if in fact Trump got infected with COVID on purpose. Would also explain why it just happened to be at the beginning of October…And no, i don’t think he faked getting the virus as the liberals assume.
There was one other random idea i thought of that could be a useful means of stopping a nuclear war if it was seemingly getting closer, and the idea seems like it may now be possible due to the internet and mass communications. Basically, say a nuclear war ever seems like it’s just a tiny incident away from starting due to increasing tensions, you just have the leaders of the respective countries ready to nuke each other offer to send over some of their high level officials over as hostages to the other side so that neither side could be safe if a war broke out. I guess the leaders themselves could also offer to put themselves at risk as hostages, but that would be the most extreme measure. There’d be potential concerns about continuous monitoring and other technicalities to ensure there was no such thing as a body double swap possible but overall it feels like it could be important in the event of an imminent nuclear war and major international tensions for whatever. Really, the bigest danger is one side starting a pre emptive strike without the other side seeing in advance that war may be close. I think Noam Chompsky’s opinion about Russia and how close NATO tried to move to it after breaking past agreements to not move an inch past West Berlin may be partially correct and important in stopping a future war from breaking out. The basic point though is this hostage idea would be one way for world leaders and politicians to bear risk and all that as you so often like to say is good in different contexts. Again, this whole hostage anti nuclear war idea would kinda be an extreme measure and i’m certainly no expert on any of this so take it all with a big grain of salt. That said, it seems possible it could be a good thing.Civilization may be technologically ready for this. After all, we have already learned to do a lot of vital things on Zoom…Lol.
There’s one invention i forgot to mention that already exists which could possibly help the world:If tens of millions of people bought some kind of net gun or other reliable medium ranged non lethal weapon. Pepper spray and tasers aren’t quite the same since they don’t leave the person restrained after they’re knocked out and pepper spray doesn’t have the range. Granted in some civil war or invasion scenario people would probably need real ranged weapons like AR 15s or other things but the point is that this could change the gun debate even in countries like Europe where guns are banned in the name of safety. It’s because immobilizing someone doesn’t have to kill them, and even if tons of people had weapons like that, it wouldn’t be seen to be as violent as a gun. In cases where there are multiple attackers you would need more than one if it’s only able to fire once, but that would be possible for people to do in their homes, having multiple sitting around in case someone tries to break in. It would give people a gentler kind of force, although by no means does that mean their normal firearms should be restricted in any way. Tranquilizer rifles could be similar, but they require more aim, and it’s not like the dart would always get past clothing. They would be longer ranged though, and again, could help give people a gentler way to defend themselves that would have multiple key uses like not going to jail for stopping someone from invading your home and trying to kill you. Corrupt courts couldn’t lie and call you the bad guy if you didn’t kill anyone in the process of defending yourself. Hopefully that made sense or was of some use.
Great article! The cartel definitely is after our freedoms, you really really exposed it here. Again, I continually get the impression that you’re probably the smartest person on the internet. I feel like mentioning that this is a lot bigger than the USA alone, as important as the USA is to the world’s potential future freedom. H
Here’s a list of supposec coincidences:The Soviet Union fell in 1991. The European Union was founded in 1993. The organization that preceded the EU passed an overarching gun law that led to the banning of guns in most European states in the 1990s, starting in 1991. It seems like the communists started setting the stage for their future planned takeover the moment things collapsed for them in Russia. They just decided to do so by way of deception instead of open conquest plans, all in the name of giving ‘safety’ to the people. I mention Europe because that’s where the other G8 nuclear nations are except for India and Pakistan, and obviously, if the communists want to take over the world, they need to defeat all of the nuclear countries, and they would then inevitably plan to take them all on at once so they can’t be overwhelmed by any alliance. Israel also has nukes, but i honestly don’t get the impression they will prove to be an enemy of any future communist efforts at conquest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Firearms_Directive
The mass increase of vaccines in the USA and probably most of the European states ALSO correlates extremely closely to this 1991 date of Soviet Russia falling, although granted it was a bit earlier in the US in 1989, likely because the extent of communist ideology reached beyond just the Soviets in Russia physically. It’s not like they are a nationalist rooted ideology, they are about taking over anywhere they can, not about some specific regional area.
So, is all of that just a coincidence? I doubt it. The communists probably have involvement in all of these plans. The point is that this freedom issue goes far beyond merely the USA alone, and any communist takeover would probably involve an attack on all the G8 nuclear-armed Western nations at once except for Russia and China, who would probably be the ones actually invading to take over.Yes, Russia is supposedly not Communist anymore, but Putin a former KGB agent has been in charge for decades, and the Russians have still done many Communist style operations on their population like banning guns just as the Chinese did. As for India and Pakistan, i don’t know what the elite’s plan is with them and their nukes, but the general point should be clear. This is really extremely bad and the US is the core that has to stay free for the rest of the world to not fall to communism. Honestly, due to the unconstitiutional standing army status quo we have now which came into being due to Soviets, guns are not even good enough on their own to assure freedom, but their removal would make everything far far worse. Yes, I know some people say WW3 is impossible because any nuke launching would destroy the world, but that may not be fully true, and for all I know WW3 could happen without anyone launching nukes if the governments all know it would destroy the world.
Guns are also not the only thing on the list, they want to ban cars as well and force everyone to use automated ones that they can’t control, all in the name of ‘safety’, the same lying reasoning they used when banning guns. That could clearly be used for authoritarian technocratic domination that made nobody able to move without the government controlling where they went. The increase in focus on public transportation would be another parallel aspect to this. Mag lev trains have immense potential for good but China is using them to set up even tougher tyranny over everyone by centrally controlling their transport messes and creating a method for their troops to quickly move around.
It is also not just about the guns but the food, nobody controls their own food sources anymore unlike the past of the USA which means the communists could starve everyone they disliked to death by controlling the big stores and refusing to distribute food to those who don’t obey them. Food needs to be localized as much as possible to reduce tyranny and allow people to be independent. There’s only so much people could do in a short period of time although some inventions, if they had a few years to proliferate and become common place in society, could be game changers that made a communist takeover that much harder. Like this one i mentioned to you in an email:
https://inhabitat.com/the-green-wheel-is-a-nasa-inspired-rotary-hydroponic-garden/
What that means is that even food production can be modular now although obviously it also matters a lot that people can stockpile storable food like canned food which stays around, while refrigerators are very vulnerable because the communists could destroy weeks worth of food with power outages, that’s why it might be a big deal if everyone had a gas powered generator which let them locally supply electricity for a while without centralized power. Solar panels could also definitely help assuming they didn’t just turn off due to being programmed to do so. But the point is that if something like this became mainstream and had a few years for something to become widely used by everyone it would make everyone much more food independent, as long as they still had the electricity to keep growing the food. It is not just dependent on people living in a place that has soil outside they can grow a garden at, when many places in cities are completely unable to do that. This also means that you could have a situation where one company that builds these things builds a whole lot, grows the plants in them, and distributes them en mass, without there being a delay between people getting the device and being able to use food from it. Food production does NOT have to depend on weather or sunshine availability or what season it is anymore you just need electricity and one of these things. Obviously meat also matters a ton but that’s still not as easy to localize just yet and people would still be able to survive a good while off of grown vegetables and whatever less-perishable foods they have stored up.
The basic point is that in the past people often had a food source and weapons to keep them independent in one place, like in the 1800s in the US, even if the scarcity created by lack of technology kept them struggling to survive to some extent. We should be using the power of technology to create an abundance ASAP so that freedom is maximized and tyranny cannot be imposed on everyone. It doesn’t require some vast redesign of people’s homes or the cities and we could make it work with just the living environments we have now, so much critical tech is already modular and adaptable. There is also a lot of doom potential in certain technological developments like quadrocopter drones, which could lead to drones with guns being used against the population, shooting through windows and then killing the people inside the homes, but the point should be clear that there is so much potential for individual liberation. Past a certain point, everyone would have their own food source, potentially their own power source if solar or other modular sources get good enough or even just with gas and a lot of people with gas generators cooperating and sharing their oil in case they get low and storing up stockpiles of oil so their electricity can last for months in case of a crisis. And assuming the internet doesn’t go down like how they destroyed it in China and made it govt owned, the internet is giving everyone their own way to contact anyone on the planet or learn anything they want. True a lot of censorship happens on the internet but i think with proper innovations like people developing networks of contacts on various email services and other backup means of communicating as new social networks are also developed as they already are being made, trying to suppress free speech is going to be like playing whack a mole, the only true way to do it would be to cut the internet altogether, and people could potentially develop backup channels that bypass the internet by proper use of radio technology for example. It all depends on the details but the point is technology is indeed trending towards this trend of individual liberation and against the current system where people are essentially treated like cattle slaves who do not own their own food or means of self defense and often not even their own homes unlike the past where most of the US farmers were inevitably home owners due to the nature of farming. It all depends on how people use the technology and how long the USA’s track record of 150+ years of continuous internal peace can be maintained. Sorry if that was a bit disorganized. With the internet it’s also important to note that the language barrier dividing many countries may soon effectively fall apart as it’s already the case that people can easily get free apps to automatically translate pages on websites in other languages with relative accuracy, so the freedom of people to read information from other countries and communicate anywhere in the world may soon rapidly increase.
IMO, the current USA monetary banking debt system is basically a system of economic vampirism and musical chairs where everything is funneled up to the top which automatically owns everything because all money is created as debt that is for some reason ‘owed’ to the Federal Reserve despite them creating no value, and that’s the basis of the current danger to the world, which makes it so many inevitably fail for no structural scientifically sound reason. That just needs to stop. Finally, as already mentioned before, this all ties in with my belief that ‘freedom’ is not just some arbitrary meaningless value but that it’s the nature of life in general, that an afterlife does exist and people voluntarily choose to be born at one point or another to fulfill whatever goals they might have in life. So, making the world more free is just making it like any good part of the afterlife already is, and probably also how it’s meant to be, although meaning should always preferably be something individuals accept voluntarily as thinking otherwise is really something only authoritarians do. This also ties into the past of spiritualist or ‘moral’ ideas and how arguably Platonism was a huge mistake that mixed up largely good ideas of objective morality being real and the soul being immortal with scarcity-derived notions of authoritarian top down control that were incomptable with spiritualism. That part is reelvant because Nietzsche was probably right to say that Platonism set the ideological stage for Christianity or more specifically the version spread by Paul which probably did not at all correspond to the truth of what Jesus wanted if he was a real person with good intentions. As you roughly seem to have said in a response to a commentor about Christianity, it probably went from something along the lines of Jesus telling other Jewish people to believe in his golden rule peace and love based ideology because it will give them a clear conscience and land them a spot in Heaven, to Paul telling everyone they will burn for eternity or cease to exist if they don’t worship his new religion of Christianity. Like the key bad part of the Platonic ideology that seemingly got copied into Christianity was this idea that there is one God who created and controls all else and that people are born into limited physical lives as a punishment for some transgression of their ancestors, although granted that part may have been based on earlier religion, but you get the idea. There are many results of this belief in transcendent Good in the Platonic philosophy that IMO seriously contaminated the idea because it was seen in an authoritarian top down way. In the Republic he comes up with a whole lot of insane ideas like communism of men sharing all their wives in the ideal city as some means of forced eugenics, that the ruling class should not be allowed to own any property to prevent them from acting out of self interest, and the whole idea of the philosopher king promoting totalitarianism quite a lot. Karl Popper was probably right to say that it led to totalitarianism in the 19th century and i don’t know much about him but he has to have been smart if he invented the Popper Demarcation. A lot of the damage is probably resulting in things we didn’t see happen much, like major philosophers developing this form of ‘idealism’ further in a non authoritarian way that encouraged freedom for everyone. It probably was a significant reason Aristotle only ever talked about Ethics, and while many of Aristotle’s ideas were clearly great, that result may have contributed to the status quo where science decided reality was amoral and that there was no moral truth, only scientific truth. Again, sorry that I have some difficulty explaining this but it seems very important.
You seem to believe in spirituality and the existence of the afterlife, so that all goes back to this question of idealism when you get right down to it. My original philosophical discovery on this front relates to David Hume’s idea that one cannot derive an ought from an is. In that case no amount of proof of the afterlife shows that it ‘ought’ to exist on its own, you have to assume some form of transcendent idealism is true, and this also doubles in explaining how the soul could be immortal, because it might originate from the very purposefulness of its potential existence. It all goes back to the Euthyphro’s Dillemma proof of the probable existence of some objective ‘Good’ which in itself relied on the Socratic method of drawing out inevitable understanding and logical truth. But even if it was 100% true that it was objectively right for someone to act in a certain way, it also matters that they do it freely, which gets back to the parts which seem good about Stephen Molyneux’s idea of UPB. For example, it would seem counter intuitive to say that anyone should want anyone to do something without wanting to if they could also want to do the right thing. Preferring someone to do something as some direct or indirect ‘slave’ means you don’t prefer them to know the truth. Attempts by some thinker to say they are special and should be the one ordering others around then create a problem where they might end up in the exact same situation when someone else decides they’re the smarter/more special one. Even if in some cases like the draft in war it is necessary for force to be used for survival and moral ambiguity thus exists it doesn’t mean that force would ever be preferable. Your whole idea of Taoism and how you connected it to philosophy really resonate with my idea there and I appreciate how hard you have worked in developing philosophy. I would avoid talking about ancient philosophy if modern philosophers had independently reinvented the idea of objective good, moral truth, etc without dependency on an authoritarian God or top down control, but a whole lot of the famous ones seem to have done just that or gone the opposite way into atheism and nihilism. To me, a non authoritarian approach to spiritualism moral idealism and the search for objective good/transcendence is just necessary for the proper development of spiritualist thought and the proper material results that would emerge from a freedom-oriented society. Ethics in the way you have developed it is entirely compatible, as if moral truth is at the top of a theoretical hierarchy and ethics is us reasoning from managing chaotic situations to develop increasingly consistent moral philosophies from lower on the rung, then moral truth is just the goalpost we’re aiming at as we try to find reasons for life and freedom, the key is that nobody seeking philosophy tries to become an authoritarian arbiter of moral truth forcing their ideals on everyone else.
Anyway, I hope that roughly explained how my worldview all ties together with my view on this incredibly dangerous crisis of freedom we all seem to be in and the great potential for good and freedom the near term future may have. I tried to stay somewhat concrete with the early parts so that it would be sure to provide some level of value even if you may have already had some of those ideas already. Hope that helped.
Hi TES The third part of the spreading Atlantic ridge is in the Arctic, does the data show any seperate or extended influence for the most northern countries?
I suspect that the low activity of the sun and, for whatever reason, the consequent increase in incoming high energy radiation triggers activity near the core. I think it leads to the breakdown of iron generating hydrogen ions and alpha particles which set off a series of exothermic reactions, this leads to expansion and upwards pressure which follows the path of least resistance. Anyhow I previously pointed out what I thought were curious surface phenomenon aligned with Gakel ridge, now there seems to be something interesting occuring beneath Antarctica. What i see is a near simultaneous increase in strongly saline water emerging from beneath the ‘continent’ at both Ronne and Ross ice shelves, which I think is most easily explained by heating occuring at depth?
https://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/GLBhycomcice1-12/navo/antarcsss_nowcast_anim30d.gif
https://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/GLBhycomcice1-12/navo/rossictn_nowcast_anim30d.gif
From https://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/GLBhycomcice1-12/POLAR.html
Interesting, thanks. Have you ever considered tidal forcing, due to new physics and strong gravitational interaction at Earth’s core? Solid body Earth tides can push the oceans from beneath..
Curiously i came to the veiw that ocean currents are residuals of tides and/or persistent winds, so the idea that oceanic tides themselves are derived harmonics of crustal tides is not a great leap. On the kiss principle i like it.
There seem to be peaks of vulcanism around the times of Jupiter Saturn conjunctions, whether that has something to do with the suns, and consequently the planets displacement from their ‘normal’ em ‘field alignment’ leading to more incoming and an acceleration of reactions fluidising the outer core and hot plumes, enhancing hydrogen flow which when it scavenges oxygen causes electric charge to build, as in a capacitor, then surge up through the coherent structure of the laval network triggering exothermic reactions and expansion in those networks leading to that vulcanism is my present thinking. That would also, i’m guessing, soften up some parts of the crust allowing faults to ease and the possibility of coherent wave structures arisng in oceanic crust.
I think we underestimate tidal forces. The sun and everything else in the galaxy is locked in orbit around the galactic center 26,000 LY away. There are powerful forces involved. Yet, we humans seem to ignore this.
I’ve recently begun to think that most of the stars in this galaxy were spun off from the core, self similar in size like raindrops, and travel slowly away from their point of origin more like particles in the heliospheric current sheet, any orbtal appearance being the result of the core rotating. This would eliminate any need for dark matter to account for their similar orbital velocity, the orbital hypothesis being a perecty reasonable guess until the current sheet was discovered.
TES, is your email address theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com? I think i remember you saying that in one of these blogs in response to a comment, but i don’t remember, and it’d take a while to check every single blog listed on the site. Plus, although I realize you’re very busy, I feel like it would just be easier for me to be able to talk to you that way since I get it if you do not want to respond to too many different points on a blog site that is mostly about your opinion.
Yes that is my email TS.
It is difficult to respond in detail in the comments, as I cannot even muster a blog page right now, LOL!!
Thanks for all your thought and work!
TES
Thanks for the thank you. It really makes me feel better, to be honest, and reading this site has also helped me organize my opinions a lot better to the point that i’m finally producing valuable original insight, so thanks for that. So much of the vaccine safety/medical freedom content out there among other things is poorly explained and just doesn’t assemble it all together coherently. It’s the ‘News’ model vs the ‘Library/Database’ model, it’s a world of difference, although honestly libraries are just collections of unorganized data except by alphabet. This is much better than that since nearly everything included is clearly relevant and useful towards the overall purpose of trying to make the world a better place. I have rarely ever gotten the same feeling of organization as i do when reading this site anywhere else. There are only a few aspects where it doesn’t fully connect together, like your comments on Socialism, and your lack of mention of certain inherent problems of capitalism like cyclical consumption planned obsolescence and so on. I’m not going to go into detail here though as you seem to basically agree on most or all the important points and I definitely disagree with a lot of socialist ideas, i just think the talk about ideology often misses the central point of civilization in general trending towards one of two things. Either an increasingly free/prosperous civilization where past a certain critical point of development everyone might basically have all their needs met without anyone’s freedom being significantly hindered, or civilization itself just self destructing due to nukes or the environment or whatever else. The whole overall goal of an increasingly free world also matches with the spiritualist aspect extremely well as the afterlife, based on all the positive NDEs, is a pretty extreme version of people being free both to do what they want and to not have to deal with the indirect natural oppression of material needs. Overall, it seems like this whole way of thinking falls in line with what you are thinking too. This is not to say no order should exist, there should be laws, but all things being equal it’s preferable that people freely choose to do the right thing, whatever ‘right’ is, so laws would ideally become obsolete if people no longer needed to be compelled to follow them. So basically from this kind of perspective, a whole lot of common beliefs like ‘but everlasting fiery torture for bad people is good tho’ become really really stupid. There’s a sort of difficult to describe inevitable universalism that comes from having a consistent set of morals or ethics that seems pretty strongly present in this blog and that really just doesn’t quite compute from many nihilist and religious points of view. The way you disentangle questions of moral or ethical right or wrong from facts is very impressive and helped me refine my views a little. Hume was right, you can’t derive an Ought from an Is…But it’s not impossible that some elements of reality like the mechanics of the afterlife or the real world do derive from transcendent moral ‘Oughts’ and that you can therefore learn about an ‘Ought’ accurately because material reality reflects it. and even without that assumption, you can still derive them from each other and check for consistency. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave seems pretty apt for the whole question of how society ‘ought’ to work, with people trying to discover that To an extent, it might be impossible to fully and completely know ‘Oughts’ since we can’t help but think in terms of physical realities to some extent, but that in itself isn’t necessarily wrong. Perhaps we ‘ought’ not to fully understand without creating real life examples that help us understand indirectly through experience.
Lastly this whole Taoist approach to metaphysics you do has a really nice way of fitting with the afterlife evidence. It shows it’s not just about the evidence itself. For example someone could say ‘there is moral truth’ as a hard fact and try to prove it to someone, but that’s less meaningful than saying ‘if you believe x then you logically should believe y’ as a logical argument. It sort of lets the person reading/hearing voluntarily step into the thought process and direct it themselves instead of feeling attacked. This also ties in with the Ought-Is argument i was making. Sorry for rambling, but overall, thanks a lot for the thanks, it is really nice to hear that i’m actually making some sort of meaningful difference in providing original and useful ideas, this site overall has really helped me refine my way of thinking.
Quick check, i have sent you 7 emails since a few days ago. Are those showing up in your inbox? Just double checking since you didn’t respond, although I totally get it that you are very busy and I am just some random guy so it’s fine if it takes time or you have other stuff to do that’s more important. Just want to be sure they actually showed up, as i am an overly paranoid person even though i realize it probably makes zero logical sense for me to think there would be any reason they wouldn’t have shown up. Or maybe you just didn’t notice since you might receive tons of emails every day. Anyway, just asking, hopefully at least some things i said in them seemed of some importance or use.
I also realize that part of that sounds dumb and i’m not trying to sound self important or like i have an inflated ego or whatever by expressing fear of being censored in some way or another and not having an email reach you. Sorry if any of that came off wrong. And I’m not trying to say you have to respond since you probably have tons of more important things you’re doing. Anyways, again, sorry if anything sounded dumb there.
Actually that one probably didn’t tag you since it wasn’t a direct reply to your post. This one is. Either way, point is the same, please do read the emails i sent assuming they showed up in your inbox. The most important ones are all 3 from November 7th and the ones from Nov 9th 10th and 11th all six of which have some mention of the Project Zyphr conspiracy issue.
I must offer a correction to my claim that there are zero US studies: I checked Google to see if there were any, and according to CNN there is apparently just one study of autism in adults in the USA now which was done in 2020. Obviously it wasn’t out at the time of that meta analysis i referenced, which had only found the Brugha study.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/11/health/autism-adults-cdc-health/index.html
And this is the study abstract:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32390121/
Nonetheless, I do think my central points are very likely entirely right. Just leaving it at this to avoid wasting time until i can put together a more substantial follow up to my original post should one prove to be necessary.
…At least that’s what i would be saying, but there is something unfathomably off about the cnn article. They said the study authors PROJECTED ALL OF THE DATA from CDC data on autism rates in children…I repeat, projected all the data. Here’s the quote from CNN:
“For the survey of adults, the CDC team used estimates of autism among children and they projected that into an adult population using state data on mortality.”
“projected that into an adult population”
Omega hypothesis at its absolute peak…I’m seriously almost speechless at this. This is the only US study, and it is a complete farce.
I repeat, they projected and estimated it all with theoretical models based on data on autism rates in children. It is all completely theory based and they did no direct testing/checking of adults to see if there were really autistic adults. This is an unimaginably incompetent sham and disgrace. I’m almost speechless at this. In conclusion, it’s more like the total number of US studies on Autism in Adults is -1, not 0. 0 would be better than this absolute hoax of a study. Sure, the individual scientists may not have even realized what a hoax their study was, how it depended so closely on the unquestioned assumption that adult autism rates match those in children, but ignorance is no excuse. Anyway that’s it for the brief ‘correction’, I’ll say more once i have a substantial collection of researched/double checked arguments to say in proving adult autism is a hoax. Nonetheless, i just can’t help but be appalled at all this. It’s one thing to read you saying it, but going out and finding the hoax yourself is a whole other level.
P.S: The cherry on top of all this is that the abstract of the USA adult autism study CNN referenced does not state that they are projecting their models based on data from child autism rates, it just says how the model projection is done, they ‘buried the lead’ of the study by saying that it’s all theory and assumption that doesn’t double check with direct data. That’ key info is probably buried in the methodology, assuming this study’s full text is even publicly available beyond the abstract i just showed you. It’s just disgusting to deal with this. So i empathize with your whole struggle against ‘skeptic’ bullshit much more now.
This is truly amazing stuff, you’ve covered so many angles of consilience at a very thorough level. Thanks for the hard work. Clearly it’s beyond all reasonable reproach and more than sufficient on its own,mbut I’ve done some IMO decent amateur research on one particular angle you did not account for:Autism rates in adults. It is one rather important angle, as if vaccines given to children are largely what’s causing the autism, the theory would dictate that adults are far less autistic. Admittedly, Forrest Maready already covered a good deal of anecdotal and visible evidence of this sort with his Crooked documentary showing children were the ones with c Just going to get rapidly to the point on this one. Normally, you would think the Skeptics would feel compelled to research this angle with many large studies to prove that the Autism rates are the same in children and adults, but they do not. How many large scale studies would you guess they’ve done on it in the USA? 5? 2? 1? It would be reasonable for you to expect at least 10 good studies on adult autism prevalency must have occurred by now in the USA, but that would be wrong. The correct number is ZERO.
Before i go over this data and my research i just want to start with the conclusions. The basic point is that there is just no research on adult autism, probably because Big Pharma does not want to promote the research of it. There is ONE large scale study! Just one!(Brugha et al 2011) It is absolutely unbelievable how negligently the field has been treated. Anyway, hope this helps somewhat. Much of my analysis is again inductive but i think i provided pretty key points like the following:
-No, a majority of autistic adults are not undiagnosed/mild/etc, this is just bullshit made up to serve a poorly established claim that adult autism is the same as child autism
-If Adult Autism were the same as childhood autism we would see 25% of those autistic adults nonverbal. And since it’s supposed to be 1 in 50 adults autistic just like the kids, that would be 1 in 200 adults nonverbal unless they magically healed, aka, out of 200M adults in USA, 4M are supposed to be autistic, and out of those 4 million 1 MILLION adults would be nonverbal which is absolute horseshit and patently false. Again just induction but it is pretty obvious that the ‘All Autism across ages is the same’ hypothesis is bullshit
–There’s only 1 large scale autism study on adults and even a big journal like Nature couldn’t use it to claim all the autism was explained, Nature said only 43% of autism rise was explained even with that data in mind, and that was in 2011. BTW that was after the Brugha study from 2011
–If the Vaccination-Induced Autism Hypothesis is correct we should see strikingly lower autism rates in adults and Croen et al(2015) and its checking of 1.5M adults in the uk healthcare system found only 1’506 autistic, 0.1% prevalence instead of 2%, this conforms with the Vaccination Hypothesis and not the Diagnosis Hypothesis by an extreme margin. Brugha et al is arguably an outlier
-Key point, not all ‘Autism’ is the same, you can have a test that calls lots of people autistic(probably for minor quirks with tons of false positives imo) , but this is not the shit that cripples 90% of those who get it into not being able to function in adult society and maeks 25% of them unable to speak, if it was, then most of those adults who had it would not be undiagnosed and unaware, if it was not, then the autism in kids today is more severe as antivaxxers argue, you can’t have it both ways
Now onto the main argument. There have been 0 large scale studies of autistic adults in the USA for the last thirty years. I did the research, as far as i know in the entire history of autism research, there has been ONE large scale study of autistic adults that took place in the UK(Not the USA, which apparently doesn’t care) in 2011 by Terry Brugha. It’s the one that is cited in your autism society link when it claims that adults have the same rate of autism as children. Now, the study in itself seems to support the hypothesis, but it is only of ~7000 people. I will link the full study, which i have not thoroughly researched because i don’t have the real research skills needed to try to prove it is incorrect, so i’m going to assume perhaps there is at least some validity to it. But before I get to that, I’m going to link the meta-analysis of sorts from the IACC I found which links this study within it, because it provides a real key insight into the amazingly flawed rationales of Autism researchers. Here is the Brugha study:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/211276
And here is the important meta-analysis:
https://iacc.hhs.gov/meetings/iacc-meetings/2019/full-committee-meeting/april17/robison_autism_research.pdf
This meta analysis is where i first learned that there have been no large scale studies on autism in the USA at all, along with several other key points. Granted, the author prefaces by saying they don’t speak for the whole IACC despite being a member and that they are an autistic parent with an autistic child who has some level of bias. I don’t think they have any malicious intent or anything of the sort, but the limits of their analysis despite being a seemingly high level official show the limits of the research as a whole. I’m going to show some contradictions and big implications they don’t properly address. A lot of this is sadly on the inductive level because i’m not a scientist although my personal experience does bear out the conclusion that autism in adults is largely nonexistent compared to autism in children. Nonetheless, there is one key deductive fact by Croen et al(2015) that the meta-analyst here brushes over despite its critical importance so i will get to that if you give the time. Specifically, the point is that Terry Brugha’s study on 7000 or so adults may have found that 700 of them were ‘autistic'(likely very mild autism at worst, nothing like what’s seen in children), it is contradicted by a massive amount of data from Croen at al’s analysis of the health database in the UK. They do discuss this contradiction and propose possible inductive reasons why Croen et al finding 1/10th the expected rate of autism compared to Brugha’s study could be explained away, but the point is their reasons are flawed. They assume the default null hypothesis too easily without even realizing it. Here’s the gist of it:
Brugha et al studied 7000 people and found 700 autistic, but Croen at al looked at the health database of the whole UK and found that among 1.6 million adults in the healthcare system, 1’507 were diagnosed autistic, a 0.1% prevalence rate. The expected rate should’ve been 2% to match the 1 in 50 findings of Brugha et al, meaning there should’ve been at least 30’000 or so autistic adults. Robinson, the meta-analysis author, claimed that factors like autists having too mild autism to get diagnosed and actively avoiding diagnosis for fear of social stigma reduced the number of autists there. However, the key point is this, the Vaccination Hypothesis is fully consistent with these findings while the Diagnosis Hypothesis has to make giant assumptions to assume it all still fits together. A 0.1% prevalency rate is 1 in 1000. Now, according to the Vaccination Hypothesis and the CDC’s record of hardly having an idea of what autism was and rates likely being 1 in 10000 or less in the early 1980s, 1 in 1000 is still a major anomaly when not analyzed. Does the Vaccination Hypothesis expect that rate of autism in adults who largely aren’t getting the 47 or so vaccinations children do? Yes, before you point it out, I am assuming a similar rate of vaccination in the UK and will have to double check their autism rates compared to the USA’s, for now i assume those rates in children are similar along with their rates of vaccination. Short answer though is that yes the vaccination hypothesis would expect this. This is probably because of the routine yearly flu shots, even the adults are still getting those and those could be putting enough aluminum in their systems to do some damage and make it so there are 10x as many autistic adults as there probably used to be. But their autism is likely much more mild than that observed in children. Obviously, 25 to 50% of adults are not suddenly going nonverbal and becoming completely unable to live an independent life after yearly flu shots. Now if adults were at 1 in 100 autism rates, this would be solid evidence against the vaccination induced autism hypothesis since one would expect children to have far more due to their extreme vaccination schedule. But this is not the case for Croen et al’s data analysis. Another critical point needs to be observed, the Vaccination Hypothesis fits the data it most needs to fit that could contradict it the most thoroughly, the Croen et al study. Imagine for a moment if Croen et al confirmed 30K adults were autistic and that 1 in 50 UK adults were autistic. This would still not be at all the same as showing the severe autism epidemic in children doing massive damage is in any way the same thing, but it would be serious evidence against the vaccination hypothesis. Brugha et al on the other hand is just a single study which i don’t believe has been replicated. The 700 autistic people found in that study could be non-representative of the overall population, could be due to a ‘false positive’ where the testers represent very mild autism or introversion in the same way as the severe autism children are getting due to the sloppiness of autism research. Of course, it’s also important to note that there are far more adults in the UK than the total monitored by the healthcare system, but realisitcally only mild cases of autism could slip by the system, not this destructive epidemic seen in children. Moreover, if the autism rate really was 1 in 50 among all the adults in the UK, it is much harder to argue that this study looking at 1.5 million of them out of the 50 million or so adults there is not representative enough when it finds the adult autism rate at 0.1%. 0.1% x 2 would still be just 0.2%, you have to assume that literally 90% of the autistic adults are avoiding diagnosis to believe this nonsense, which again doesn’t make any sense as i further explain. I bet further checking would reveal the severity of those 1’507 to be very mild compared to what children are going through. Key point here is that there are certainly no nonverbal ones or else they would obviously not be functioning as adults…Source here on nonverbal rate:
https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/study-of-nonverbal-autism-must-go-beyond-words-experts-say/
25% nonverbal, aka can’t speak or function as a person.. Robinson’s stupid but understandably misinformed meta analysis even speculated about whether or not some autistic children become less severe in adulthood, he was so close to stepping on the obvious realization that something is afoot in the children. Obviously he didn’t know the nonverbal stat but it is obscene how ignorant these scientists are. Clearly the nonverbal are diagnosed most of the time. No, they do not just go into mental health institutions and not get diagnosed. They would’ve gotten diagnosed as kids if they were like that now as adults, they’d be in the database. Because they are non functional people.
I realize I ramble on, but the point should be pretty clear here. The meta analysis i showed you had to leap to several conclusions not decisively supported by all the data. There was just one study in favor of the even autism rate hypothesis. Moreover it’s not like the science was ‘settled’ on this issue just because Terry Brugha seemed to find something indicating that autism was at the same rates in adults as children, as much as i’ve obviously shown that it doesn’t make any sense since the severity is not even close to the same, as an elaboration of the central point you already argued. Here is a source showing the science was not ‘settled’ at the time of the Brugha study. Shortly after it was published, in the same year of 2011, Nature had an article about how 43% of the increase still couldn’t be explained by these theories including Brugha’s:
https://www.nature.com/news/2011/111102/full/479022a.html
And of course, they assumed that it couldn’t possibly be environmental despite all evidence to the contrary. Now we’re up to 1 in 37 in children or something like that. It’s no wonder that nobody’s bothering to duplicate the Brugha study, the numbers just keep going up. The narrative would fall apart like a house of cards. Last point about Croen et al’s findings and the meta analysis’s opinion of them. Robinson said that the rates being 1/10th or 1/20th what they should’ve been to match Brugha’s 1 in 50 rate made sense because most autistic diagnoses supposedly happen outside the insured healthcare system and few adults receive insurance paid autism healthcare services. However, on the contrary, those actually diagnosed in the insured healthcare system are probably diagnosed because they actually have problems. Compared to Brugha’s way of collecting data, it might be more likely to indicate actual harm is going on to the point that they sought a diagnosis for a clearly manifest problem. See the difference? Finding people and studying them for a possibly overly false positive test vs finding how many are actually in a healthcare database because their condition was causing them actual issues in life. One seems a lot more likely to avoid false positives IMO. I’m not arguing there was any malice or fraud in this on the part of the scientists, on the contrary, it seems more likely to me that this is a result of negligence and incompetence on the part of those studying adult autism prevalency, and Big Pharma refusing to promote this research at all.
Here’s a little context on the UK, the vaccination schecule there, which is around 37 vaccines if you count the multiple 6 in 1 shots as being similar to 6 vaccination events. If not, then it’s less, and it’s not like i have a chart like yours checking correlation between vaccine schedule there and autism rates, nonetheless i think it’s important to mention if you feel the need to research the context of the Brugha 2011 study any more.
http://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vk/uk-schedule
To go over an earlier point once again, when we look at the 1’506 out of 1.6 million adults in the UK healthcare database who were autistic, suppose that was NOT representative, what is the % chance of us happening to have a non representative sample? First let’s start with an extreme alternate scenario. Suppose 100% of UK adults were in the healthcare system and a similar autism proportion relative to the larger population was found. Obviously then there would be an effectively 0% chance of it being non representative. The essential claim Robinson made in his meta analysis on these results seemed to be that autism rates were 10x or even 20x lower than the supposed actual amount. So by that logic, of the 50 or so million adults in the UK, 1 in 50 must be autistic, therefore 1 million UK adults or at least 500 thousand are autistic, and only 1’506 out of this supposed 500K-1M number are diagnosed autistic. This part may be partly my misunderstanding as he seemed to be differentiating those insured and diagnosed with those just diagnosed in general. But it seems very off. For example let’s say there are 20k autistic adults in UK and we look at a sample size of ~35M adults as a result of multiplying 1.6M by 20, which only probably misses about 15M adults. You see the issue here? Even if all 20K autistic people are out there, that seems to imply this extremely large sample size of 1.6M is somehow 1/20th the size of what it should be. That’s too extreme for a sample size that big. I’m sorry I can’t properly explain it. Nonetheless it just doesn’t compute and as a result there is this crazy assumption that a gigantic sample of 1.6 MILLION adults is extremely biased to the point that it includes only a 20th of the true autism number. In my opinion at absolute most it could be off by half, which would still mean that it’s just a 0.2% autism prevalency rate in adults. The meta analysis i linked you does not bother to explain numerically and statistically how such a massive error could occur. It just makes no sense. Of course, I wish i had a more decisive set of data and could let’s say look at how many kids are diagnosed autistic in the database for kids and compare the two to show how many more kids are autistic, but i don’t know where to look to get that same giant sample that Croen et al did. Maybe someone already did the study, i don’t know. And of course, i would greatly prefer such a big database number of how many kids total are diagnosed autistic in the USA to complement your extensive research on the subject. If you have any such data it would be pretty great to know. Again, sorry that some of this may seem like ‘outsourcing’ because i am not a professional and can only go so far with this, i am not trying to offload work on you, i hope my independent deductions provided a good deal of new value which is not present anywhere else.
The bottom line here is that the meta analysis i referenced shows the contradictions in the little data there is on adult autism research, and that Croen et al’s data actually seems to be pretty strong evidence showing vaccinations may cause autism in children . Brugh et al(2011) is the only study in support of even autism rates between children and adults, and obviously, if that claim is disproven thoroughly, it could be a major blow proving that the vaccine skepticism movement is correct to oppose mandatory vaccinations that clearly damage their children. I do feel there is much more that can be done on this front though. Obviously more qualified experts should analyze studies like Brugha’s for flaws and attempt replication. Your charts on vaccination schedule correlations would be stronger if you could show the same thing in multiple countries, although i get why it would take a long time to do so and you are busy with COVID skepticism. But since this is a blog, not Twitter, I don’t feel like it’s wrong to compile things here in the meantime so it won’t go by the wayside and be forgotten. And I guess i should get to others more specialized in the autism area like the few medical professionals you follow on twitter who are pro medical freedom with vaccines.
Point is though, there is just no research on adult autism, probably because Big Pharma does not want to promote the research of it. There is ONE large scale study! Just one, as that IACC member admitted! It is absolutely unbelievable how negligently the topic has been treated. Anyway, hope this helps somewhat. Much of my analysis is again inductive but i think i provided pretty key points on one of the few angles you have not already extensively gone over.
It’s been fun writing these and i do hope my research laid out some key points. I feel like if this adult autism issue is blown open and proven there’s basically not going to be a single line of argument left for these fake skeptics on autism. I am developing a separate argument about the extreme value of anecdotal evidence and how to calculate a detailed probability of certain anecdotes like a parent seeing a child go from normal to autistic in 1 day after vax and add up the probabilities of these anecdotes to show the ridiculousness of the vaccine “Coincidence” theory, but i’m not fully set on probability math, which was also why i couldn’t completely explain my point about the sample size issue in Croen et al, IE, the sample size being so big that it couldn’t possibly be a massively flawed sample. Sorry for the issue in my probability argument on the Croen et al study and not being able to fully explain every element. But I will try to present a cohesive argument on these anecdotes and just how many of these crazy next day autism anecdotes you would need to show something is extremely likely to be damaging children.(Hint:As you might’ve guessed, the number of anecdotes logically needed is actually very small.) Good luck with your research!
I’m missing what X’ is identified as. “following Condition Statements 1 and X‘ are employed in abuse of the Knowledge Development Process”
I believe X’ is a wildcard reference to 2’, 3’, and 4’.
TES – Even the deepest, coldest parts of the ocean are getting warmer:
“This warming is much weaker than in the upper ocean, Meinen says, but he also notes that since warm water rises, it would take a lot of heat to generate even this little bit of warming so deep.”
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ocean-warming-deepest-coldest-temperature/amp
I’m convinced tidally increasing bottom currents are redistributing equatorial heat to higher latitudes.
Then how do you explain the final appearance of Our Lady at Fatima before the crowds (which was documented) and her messages to the three children?
I did not say that I was a nihilist. But not everything and everyone who says they are of God/saw God, is real or is honest.
Sincere question……What are your views of something or someone being of God/saw God who is real and honest?
That is a sincere question Roni.
I learned long ago that, what is indicated as inference inductively, is often not the same inference which is indicated deductively. This is called an Impasse of Contrathetic Inference. Therefore on all matters with very scant evidence, I hold out epoche’ on the issue – a lack of prejudice in either direction – along with an understanding of the circumstance when there exists no Wittgenstein level of definition – and that answers do not come as easily as we pretend they do. This is not the same as being ‘agnostic’.
Therefore – for anyone to claim that ‘the science suggests that there is no God’ – is both incoherent, and wrong even if it were coherent. Science does not comment upon ‘God’. I never trust the nihilist for this reason – they have not understood this ethical constraint in scinetific logic. So they are not to be trusted with even simple matters of science.
In addition, I know that researchers and the human mind, can be tricked. I do not necessarily know what is doing the tricking, save to say – that tricks are an important part of our realm.
Therefore I remain mute on such ‘I saw God’ contentions, as long as they do not want me to do something or pay money, because of this.
TES :-)
I understand your point of view. Thanks for replying/extending yourself. (And for your Twitter covid coverage.)
The question of what is meant by the word God is a difficult one. I say to annoy people- define me a God and i will refute him/ it for you.
Conceptions of the “Godhead” or of Brahma are far more tenable, but the standard Christian conception consists of a series of opposites. Male, all good- but created the Devil, all loving- but may send you to hell. It is very hard to make that model work- hence my playfully rude comment.
However the Hindu concept of a God who creates the big bang, then hides himself/ itself in every part of the universe is far more challenging and satisfying.Evolution becomes re assemblage of the bomb fragments!
Regardless of “whether we believe in god” there is plenty of evidence for psychic field events: ie Rupert Sheldrakes work on Dogs Who Know When Their Owners are Coming Home.
Many individuals have had clear premonitions of danger to themselves or others and have averted that danger. No mundane explanation has been available.
The evidence for near death experiences is now virtually overwhelming.So there is something going on in the psychic/field event area- and I think that it is probably driven by quantum entanglement rather than electromagnetic fields.
So regarding the “Fatima” event (Then how do you explain the final appearance of Our Lady at Fatima before the crowds (which was documented) and her messages to the three children?)- yes it could be a field event of some sort.
The philosopher and spiritual leader Ken Wilbur has discussed this sort of matter in detail- highlighting the experiences of Tibetan Buddhist practitioners who may see true visions of their Spiritual protector- say Mahakala, or Manjushri. These people have done a lot of visualisation and mantra training with these practices.
He comments though that you never get a Christian seeing these entities.
My proposition is that there is a spiritual- supramateerial world, but at least at its lower levels it manifests itself in forms familiar to the practitioner. A Catholic who has prayed a lot to Our Lady of Fatima is likely to see visions of Ftima, not Kali, Vishnu, or even KwanYin.
The specificity of the images could be explained by neuroplasticity type events.
Thoughtful post. Unfortunately, the evil-person factors sound like the job description for many self-serving politicians that are also most highlighted by fear-mongering, polarizing media. We desperately need open debates and ranked-choice or approval voting to encourage productive collaborations (not superficial or simplistic) within the rational midsection of the electorate. And to elect people who care more about the common good than themselves.
Brian, aptly put… I had not thought of it in this manner – but these can be translated to become a litmus test for removal from public service. Even and especially non-elected government officials – those who are causing many of our problems even now.
Litmus test. How to establish? Open debates and ranked-choice or approval voting would elect high-quality officials who would ensure removal of evil partisans from non-elected government offices. This feels like a root cause of self-serving, bloated, ineffective US governments at all levels. But not likely to be covered by superficial, self-serving mainstream media. What cause-and-effect metrics could highlight the problem (and opportunity for the common good) in a way that could not be ignored?
Just commenting to show that i’m the same person. There is a bit more that i didn’t say though.
1:Timing.
The timing shows it’s clearly conspiratorial. COVID started in December, just as the impeachment plans were wrapping up and ended 2 months later. Pandemics almost NEVER happen. There were THREE pandemics in the 20th century. What’s the chance that one just happens to show up right on time to distract the people after impeachment fails and Russiagate falls apart? Pretty much 0%. If it’d been a year earlier, all politicians would’ve had a new focus other than Russiagate and it’d have blown over as a non problem by 2020, making it not relevant during election year. Then Russiagate would’ve been blown through as it was, and all the corrupt Democrat big names would’ve been arrested by now. Obviously the same thing would’ve happened if COVID occured in 2021 or later as Russiagate perpetrators would be prosecuted and in jail and trump would be re-elected too soon for COVID to even start. So clearly it showed up at the PERFECT time for Democrats to have the best chance of election. When there is about a 3% chance every year for that year to be a pandemic-starting year based on 20th century and it just happens to be at the perfect time for them…Yeah, it was clearly unleashed on purpose.
2:Motive:
Obviously, to start a communist revolution by collapsing the economy with COVID, and then possibly unleashing yet another far far more deadly virus to kill off all dissidents while pretending that they were just natural casualties. BTW, here is another video another person mentioned to me on Twitter which perfectly lines up with this Proect Zyphr evidence. Note 5 and a half minutes in when China is mentioned as having handled the virus better with its lockdowns. This video was made in 2014, and they were pointing out a 2010 plan. So it seems that they had this in the works for a long time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30&feature=emb_title
This is just the next stage of the slippery slope started around 2001 with the international travel regulations, one more step towards the goal of controlling everything people do and monitoring their every act, creating a world government centered in Israel as the Project Zyphr video points out. Key points would probably include the Pope supporting the world government along with political leaders, that would be meant to get people to obey on a religious level. Probably, they would limit the internet as well, like how Russia is creating its own internet, and the endpoint would be the modern internet not existing in anything like its current form at all without going through lots of censorship. Like China but probably worse. The vaccination would inevitably also be used as a way to destroy people en mass, and that damage might then be blamed on the virus.
Or, perhaps it’s like this:The COVID vax will damage everyone and much of that damage will be blamed on a newly released plague. I don’t know, it seems plausible based on what is happening with vaccines. Obviously, the elite seeking communist dictatorship would not get these vaccinations and if anything the cure for any newly released plague may be kept for the elites from the start. I bet that Hydroxichloroquine is something they know about and use if they get COVID.
3:Nuclear war and all that
Things people should probably be worried about include nuclear war, and i think the public perception on nuclear war is extremely limited. People assume it can’t happen due to MAD. Probably wrong. I bet the governments have already invented nukes that only leave radiation for a few days, although unfortunately this is not my original idea. But it would make logical sense for them to do, and if they did it, we would have no way to know, since no government would ever reveal that they have such technology if it gives them an advantage. Maybe everyone already has it, or at least the most powerful countries among nuclear countries do. Now obviously, those among the elite in the USA doing a communist revolution do not want to be nuked. But the plan might involve them either purposefully not being targeted because they’re selling out their country or them escaping to somewhere else like Israel before it gets started. The point is that WW3 is very possible and is not just magically prevented in my opinion because of nukes. Now, you probably know much much much more than me on this and this is redundant, but I just say it because some people don’t believe WW3 could happen. The only difference is something like this COVID insanity or any upcoming plague to be released on the USA are steps that can be used against the population without starting a WW3, but some would call that insane because it could lead to one. Nonetheless, for these reasons, some people may be fine with starting one.
Of course, it is also important to talk about nuclear power plants. Even if the nuclear missles are no longer ‘dirty’ and able to ruin the world by exploding in large numbers, if WW3 goes a certain way, nuclear power plants could end up failing to be supplied with water and going critical like Fukushima. This could cause horrendous damage if 10s or 100s of Fukushima equivalent events happened, maybe enough to ruin the USA or the whole world with radiation as it spread on the wind. But it is possible that those who want WW3 think they can prevent that if they take over and are willing to take the risk to the whole planet. Or maybe they did not even think about that risk, and would unintentionally destroy life on earth as a result. Point is it seems like nuclear war could absolutely happen but the risk of the earth being ruined forever still exists even if a ‘safe’ nuclear war method has been invented. In any sane world, all the nukes would be either dismantled or on a 10 or 15 year timeline towards being dismantled by now, but it hasn’t happened, and humanity is still basically an ‘insane’ species rather than a sane one consciously heading towards a renewable steady state global civilization that could last indefinitely into the future without self destructing due to running out of resources or climate damage or anything else. And this completely sane proposition is almost certainly what the communists want to misleadingly/lyingly declare themselves as the necessary path to if they succeed in their plans, even though they just want tyranny that probably leads to world destruction, but you get the idea.
So, what needs to happen is that this quite possibly true “Project Zyphr” mass casualty event is prevented. If Trump gets re-elected, that is 4 more years of the US not starting wars and further destabilizing the world and tyrannical people not just shutting down everyone’s freedoms. In all likelihood, it would lead to the big corrupt individuals among the Democrats getting elected and more and more might be exposed from there. This is one of the most important elections ever and Trump really needs to win.
4:Extra, the long monologue about the world as a whole, skippable:
Honestly, it bears extreme worthiness of mentioning that the military industrial complex standard that has spread throughout the world is in complete violation of every principle the USA was founded on. People having guns was meant to be essentially equivalent levels of armament to the government, and there was in addition to that a rule against standing armies funded by taxpayers. Due to Communism in Russia and the cold war, standing armies became the norm after WW2 ended. Afterwards the USA has directly conquered and/or economically ruined country after country for decades in a nonstop trend of destruction. I would seriously recommend you view the part of the Zeitgeist documentaries describing “Confessions of an Economic Hitman”, as it shows the tendency of the US to economically dominate other countries and force them to implement central banks and adjustment policies that dominate them and put them in debt forever. All this is relevant to my main point because the current status quo wouldn’t have happened if Soviet Russia hadn’t been allowed to get nukes, the cold war happening was the major push behind the current world situation. Otherwise, nuclear disarmament could have been led by the USA and this nuclear crisis would be behind us if things had been handled right. Yes, Soviet Russia fell, but the nuclear crisis remained largely due to US and EU aggressiveness in placing missles near Russia’s borders and simply due to the vast stockpile of nukes that had already been built up by all nations involved by the time the soviets fell. It never should have gotten even close to that far. But this nuclear threat status quo is what allows all this tyranny, militarization of the police, and simply the giant incredibly threatening standing armies all over the world. Those should not be existing if civilization was somewhat sane. It used to be the case that the status quo was for the armies to be dismantled after the war was over, that was how it worked for the USA in the past. That was basically the whole point of the 2nd Amendment, for standing armies to not be the status quo, and all of that was the Founders explicitly trying to avoid making the same mistakes as the Romans in the past devolving from a republic into an empire, which is almost exactly what’s happened to the US now.
This anti standing army sentiment is just localization, as many many other things should be localized and not centralized in the hands of a few who could be corrupt. Corporations also fit this general mold and should not be allowed to just exponentially grow into total dominance as they often do, there is a real problem with that and cyclical consumption being allowed to control everything. I explained more in other comments but basically the inevitable trend of logic and science is towards Ephemeralization, doing more with less until you can do almost everything with nothing, and if communism doesn’t take over this will lead to maximized individual freedom. Additionally local communities and nations would become more and more self sufficient and attain a sort of ‘immortality’ or more accurately Steady State status as a civilization rather than being at risk of collapse due to structural chaos. Inevitably, if the world doesn’t collapse this would lead to a situation where anyone can communicate with anyone in the world or travel anywhere and be self sufficient to the extent they have almost all the resources they need to survive. The internet already frees communication to a ridiculous extent, and soon enough if not sabotaged into communism the renewable energy technologies will lead to everyone having vehicles that can travel long distance without difficulty, and once the energy grid is ‘complete’ and has all the sustainable infrastructure needed to continue on for decades without running out of resources, it won’t matter. Population growth is mostly going to be a non factor in the 1st world since it is in fact too low there and other countries like the 3rd world will curb their growth as education improves. So it’s all about whether nuclear war or the sixth mass extinction or whatever else will destroy everything first or if increasingly efficient science will lead to a ‘free’ world where everyone is increasingly self sufficient. And in this framework, a scarcity based civilization will increasingly stop working. Most businesses depend on cyclical consumption to survive, even the most honest and non ‘Crony’ capitalist business is inevitably going to need people to keep buying something every year so they can grow endlessly in profits. This endless growth doesn’t make sense, and it’s one point where the communists are right to criticize capitalism but then twist it into telling people to support tyranny. You see the problem? If someone makes a computer good enough that it will work for 30 years and nobody needs a new one, then they go out of business unless they make a new good to be consumed. And it’s generally the same with all products. Moreover, the localization of things like food production or energy production would put big oil or Monsanto out of business, and possibly cause an economic collapse as well. But it’s all arbitrary, it’s just monetary units. There is NO guideline in the system of capitalism itself forcing businesses or governments to keep the people healthy and happy and ensure things actually get better over time for the population. Obviously it all depends on who is in control and what matters is not the system but the results. But the point is still true that individual profit and gain alone does not act as some perfect driver of social good and happiness, what does is actual genuine efforts to make things better. In some cases, this overlaps, like when you have entrepeneurs like Steve Jobs or Henry Ford who sell inventions to the populace and generally improve their lives. But that is only true during the bursts of innovation, it’s the cyclical consumption maintenance afterwards that causes so much unnecessary waste because it’s not oriented towards improvement and efficiency.
All of that is probably tied to a large extent to the whole system of central banks we use now where all money begins as debt owed to a central bank by the government rather than as debt free currency that gains its value from the credibility of the government. The debt standard combined with the interest on that debt, makes it so there are always inevitable collapses and some people always fail to pay because there is not enough money in the system to pay all the interest on that debt. See the Zeitgeist documentaries for a more detailed explanation. Point is it can be made debt free as Lincoln was apparently going to do with the Greenback, and it can certainly be done without the use of Fractional Reserve Banking which makes it all much worse. If it were not for the system with debt as the basis of all money, things might be very different now. The current trend of companies doing whatever it takes to ensure consumers cyclically buy their goods despite the resultant massive waste might be much less pronounced, because the system wouldn’t be rigged to make it so everyone is doing whatever it takes to make as much profit as possible to avoid being the one who loses the musical chairs game that is the economy. Rather than the current cycles of debt and economic collapses dominating so much of the economy, you might see a lot more people become permanent home owners and this would start a sort of virtuous cycle which is already the case to some extent due to technological efficiency making civilization get better. For example, even if a company goes bankrupt, it doesn’t matter as much at all if the people working for the company are home owners themselves and aren’t going to be sucked back into the debt+interest cycle the moment their job goes through. Many less people would be living paycheck to paycheck, and people would be increasingly ‘self sufficient’ so to speak. If decentralization became more of a trend, the system would be much less vulnerable to sabotage or widespread failure because more people would have local businesses making everything that is needed. The technological realities would have serious effect in making more people wealthy like they did in the 60s for the “Boomers”, rather than the pure numbers based system of the economy telling everyone to starve even though the resources are still there. And if a Greenback like system had been around for a long time as i just outlined, then the transition to a steady state civilization much less dependent on an interconnected and interdependent monetary system would probably be a whole lot more steady and easy. Life would be more dependent on the realities of how much resources are available than economics in some Greenback-like system and as a result of the extreme abundance available due to technology there would be a whole lot less homeless or paycheck to paycheck people.
Concluding rant essay:
-Government tyranny is largely an aftereffect of the cold war which is an aftereffect of the Soviet Union probably mistakenly being left free to do what it wanted after WW2, and people are most likely INSUFFICIENTLY armed to be guarded against government tyranny at all as the 2nd amendment is supposed to guard them. In the past it was muskets vs muskets and maybe a few cannons that the government might have. Now it’s handguns and AR-15s vs people who’d presumably have body armor that works against AR-15s, and would also have APCS, tanks, and whole tons of other nonsense. What are bullets going to do against an armored personel carrier or a tank? Defense needed for that:Anti tank rocket launcher or something similarily ridiculous. And obviously, it would make no sense for the public to have access to fully automatic weapons, so you get how there’s a problem of escalation that started way back with WW2 and has been snowballing into being worse and worse ever since between the governments of different countries of the world. Although obviously the 2nd amendment is still extremely important in making it less easy for the government to impose tyranny, and if gun ownership at a mass level makes it so they would have to use bombs to kill everyone rather than simply getting them to meekly hand over the guns to a few guys, or if they would have to have tanks in the streets, it could still be a big difference.
-Everyone is being vaxxed(1 in 10K Autistic to 1 in 50 and rising in 30 years and so on) or otherwise poisoned into complaince, the US is a culture of poison. See the fast food culture, obesity epidemic, opiod epidemic, likely sabotaged mental health medications as well, among probably many other forms of poisoning including some forms of GMOs. Basically, practically everything that can be poisoned IS being poisoned in some way. And all of this happened sometime within the last six decades, VERY quickly.
-Western civ has 0 plans to continuously improve, on the contrary, 1st world western nations aim for continuous downward trends whether it’s replacing their native ethnic populations, filling everyone with poison, starting wars to destabilize the world, ruining the culture whether it’s the insane promiscuity thing they did in the 60s and onward or the transgender and homosexuality they’re promoting now along with the praise of clear states of damage like obesity/fatness all while denigrating the natives who are meant to be replaced, mass neurological doom is called ‘neurodiversity’ like the other kinds of negative ‘diversity’, the past of any given country is also retroactively either scorned or actively rewritten in Marxist style, in general, the only ‘progress’ is towards total destruction and rock bottom off the cliff. All in the name of equality a country will be totally replaced with immigrants(already has been practically half replaced if not arguably more than the stats show), it could and has been around 60 years without IQs of the immigrant population brought in going up and the Equality Hypothesis is still endlessly enforced as default because it MUST be that way for the status quo beliefs to remain. Meanwhile, the average IQ goes down and the level of the national debate decreases as a result of both this and the vaxxing among other things like the obesity epidemic, it’s a vicious cycle. If not for this nonsense the scientific community probably would’ve found out every mechanism behind IQ by now as well as the reason for the differences, but the progress cannot continue because the truth is too uncomfortable for anyone to want to look at the research. Even religions like Islam that clearly promote violence are ‘tolerated’ in the name of some hazy notion of equality. The Atheists are basically all sellouts to the corporate establishment like the Skeptics, their criticism is meaningless, while the Christians are tied into the same general sphere of bullshit that leads them to think of Muslims as fellow believers. Of course, Christianity is an oppression religion as well, but Muslim is quite openly a conquest religion, and these Muslims are allowed to just flood into Europe.
-The end trajectory of all of this is just towards destroying everything and dumbing everyone down to a meaningless level so they can be ruled over by a few elites using technology to control everything. It really can’t be said enough how horrible of an outcome the communist plan is. Everything of any value in civilization would essentially go into the gutter as all the values of freedom or meaning in life invented or re-discovered or re-invented since the Renaissance and the Enlightenment were removed from history and forgotten. The obvious best outcome for everyone is if civilization holds out for just 50 years longer and achieves the exponential progress towards individual liberation it is clearly trending towards, but some people just want to see it all burn.
-If a few key events happen in the next 20 or 30 years civilization will be headed on a track towards a probable space-bound future steady state civilization of exponential progress and superior systems of life and meaning, as the TZM documentaries and the ‘New Human Rights Movement’ book Peter Joseph made pretty accurately predict. Yeah, he has many left wing views, but plenty of intellectuals do. No, unlike he thinks, if civilization succeeds and we do not all end up in a climate-destroyed world or a nuked world or turned into communist microchipped Borgs or whatever else, we are not all just going to be the same shade of brown in a few generations. So clearly he buys the liberal beliefs in many major areas about race and the right wing. Regardless of that, I think he is genuine and wants things to be better, and that there are many important insights in there that you should see nonetheless if you haven’t already.
-I should write a bullet point about how there is clearly a metaphysical and spiritual level to all this, and it would be an essay, and there is enough about that that it could turn into a whole essay in itself. The basic gist is that i think I agree with many of your views on this, and that it’s as follows:Humans along with probably all life forms are fundamentally ‘free’ and being born is likely a choice from a pre-existent metaphysical dimension which nonetheless likely fits with the laws of physics as all the near death experiences seem to show. There are a whole lot of layers of evidence for this, and it’d take a while to list the sources. You’ve heard of Eben Alexander, but there’s more than just obvious anecdotal case. His case and many other experiences of ‘hyper reality’ and extreme senses in the afterlife fit with the idea that it is indeed a higher dimension where higher processing power should be expected in some transcendent brain that goes through the ‘reducing valve’ of our brain. What interests me more than just the clear examples i’ve seen but the actual theory of how it specifically works. Here’s an example of that through the disproof of the “Dying Brain” model of NDEs. I feel like it’s a good change of pace since I’m usually very persistent talking about the potential doom of situations like what’s going on with vaccines or potential election theft or whatever else. And i know you already know the general point of this is real anyways but it seems meaningful nonetheless.
https://www.near-death.com/science/articles/dying-brain-theory.html
As the article shows in detail the model does not work with experiences. If people were just dying brains trying to simulate comfort these experiences would be utterly impossible, you can’t get more data than ever from a dying brain, nor could you get cases where people gain impossible to know info and so on, and those cases do exist. It is also far more coherent on an ontological level as well to assume some transcendent non-dependent form of free will where everyone is essentially a ‘first mover’ independent of other phenomenon at some level of existence, than to say that consciousness is all just an emergent phenomenon that technically shouldn’t exist but somehow does due to material monism magical thinking. Although you already have laid that out, but still. I could go on and on about the debunking but it’s practically all there in that article. One critical point about the afterlife as a whole that this article does not argue is that it likely surpasses the processing power of the entire universe, which would make logical sense if our universe is at some level an ’emergent’ phenomenon of it and consciousness as a whole. And that would dovetail with all the indivdiual observations in NDES where people experience a sense of hyper reality in the afterlife. It even fits the idea of a ‘Simulation Hypothesis’ in a certain way. That is, normally a Simulation could only be created by something with sufficient processing power to simulate it. So, if the real universe is an emergent phenomenon and the afterlife is a higher level of reality independent of it, it would fit the theory if everyone who went there experienced a higher level of consciousness. Because they would’ve always already existed there in parallel their whole lives, and this is the key, it would be more like a ‘projection’ than hopping from one place to another, so the idea that nobody really dies would be sensible if a part of them was always in ‘heaven’ in the afterlife. No, i am not saying the universe is a simulation or that it could be shut off at a moment’s notice, but the idea is that all individual experiential accounts of the afterlife tend to perfectly fit with this logical law that dictates how a higher reality should realistically work. With the possible exception of people who experience going to a ‘Hell’ like place in an NDE, but in those cases, it would make sense if a higher level of processing could still be intentionally slowed down as punishment in some way.
So, I hope that source on NDEs and the proof of the afterlife was entertaining in some way as a bit of a relief from the ‘Downer’ I tend to be with these comments. It is important on a lot of levels, as the existence of an afterlife means a lot. Honestly afterlife is such a misleading label. “The Real World” might be a better one, considering that it is demonstrably of a more fundamental level of existence and more true to the purpose of life by default. Hmm. Not a great ring to that though. But i have a better idea. What about “Sunnyside”?
I mean, hear me out, people are logically still ‘in’ this higher dimension even when they are alive due to how the soul must logically work because the soul is not a ‘thing’ but a consciousness with a source in increasingly higher levels of existence, so if everyone has a transcendent higher dimensional source of consciousness and people may indeed even reincarnate multiple times based on all the accounts many people seem to have. Which woudl also be logically coherent if they incarnate from a higher level of existence the first time whether consciously or not, so afterlife definitely doesn’t fit. I bet many people even if they never reincarnated or anything like that would find it silly to call a lower level of life the real world. Instead, they’d call life on Earth the ‘Beforelife’. Especially since the afterlife would be the one lasting for eternity and the Earth life would be the one only lasting a little while. The one dominant in people’s minds would inevitably be the afterlife, meaning they don’t think of it as an afterthought, ergo, Earth life becomes the Beforelife.
BTW, I bet there are probably many humans who first became conscious as a human there and did not incarnate in the physical universe even once, and instead just decided they would just rather stay in Heaven until Earth is able to become a peaceful place. Or just stay in Heaven forever? I mean, if that’s how it works, i wouldn’t blame them. Unless there’s some law dictating that people have to be incarnated in a real world first, and maybe that would make sense, i don’t know.
Anyway, the paranormal/afterlife/etc essay still awaits being written in some separate comment, and i should probably look for a better place to post it in rather than this thread describing everything bad that’s going on in the real world. Would be out of place. But I do hope what I wrote about what is going on the real world was in some way helpful, most especially what I wrote about the ‘Project Zyphr’ video i posted previously, and even if that were not true, just the general risks up ahead i talked about of the apparent communist agenda. You are very exceptional in how much you have done in many areas and I’m glad to have been able to post in this blog so far, hopefully it was of some use or meaningful level of importance.
Have you heard of this article about the autism increase? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323837706_A_suppressed_report_of_millions_of_mainly_non-autistic_victims
Hi Ethical Skeptic.
How Helpful Another Great Article.
I Had To Say How Social Skeptic Trapped Us Foolishly About Something:
THEY DID Make Us Believing On Stupid, Untrue & Actually Ridiculous :: Science Results, Answers, Wisdom, Intelligence, Conclusions&Concludes, Methodology, Thinking Process, Eternal Deductions And So On 😡:🤬: . . : 😂:🤣❗️
Bye❕That’s All . .❣️. Enjoy Your Own Laugh Now , Dear E.S 🌙
And just to be perfectly clear, I do not believe any of the RussiaGate nonsense, i do believe it was all a hoax foisted on Trump. In other words I am basically 100% certain that Trump was unjustly persecuted for all that for years, and that means i am not saying that this source video i cited is right to say Trump is in on some conspiracy like outlined in the video, even though they did indeed say he was. But too much of the other claims perfectly line up with what is happening with COVID right now for it all to be fake in my opinion. The person who made the video was either unknowingly reading documents that had disinfo mixed with truth or mixed in the disinfo himself. If that is true then maybe it would be so that none of the vital information would get to the right people who needed to know, like people in the Trump administration, and so that they could be first to say the conspiracy theory and resultingly seem like the most reliable source that originated it, before anyone else did. Funneling anyone else who found this out or pieces of it into using him as a source. I don’t know.
The point is, too much of that video has proved to probably be true during 2020 for me to just dismiss all of it because of what it said about Trump. I feel like that context about Russiagate was necessary. Lastly, it seems like you may agree with the general idea that COVID might have originated as part of a plan, based on your tweets about the 1917 Russian Revolution.
https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1311342926056886274
That was an influence at the back of my mind to making me put the time into posting this conspiracy theory as well, as it seemed like you were open to the possibility that COVID may be part of a conspiracy intended to effect a communist uprising of sorts. But that’s all i have to say here. Hopefully something I said was helpful, even though I would like to believe no horrifying scenario will occur where some much deadlier virus is used to kill millions of people. It just feels necessary for me personally to consider the possibility, as the conditions have been created to get people ready for that absolute disaster scenario and subsequent tyranny.
I’m the same person as TrueSkeptic below, and I know you usually don’t respond to my comments, and maybe sometimes do not bother reading them either because you’re busy. Understandable. I usually comment about mandatory vaccination damage and original ideas i came up with surrounding that which seem important in showing the truth about how official pro vaxxer theories are complete nonsense, or ideas about society and how civilization should clearly be aiming for the end result of some stable steady state civilization in the future while still respecting individual rights and so on. For once, though, I found something which may be far more important in the short term than any of this vaccine information, as important as all that is. I’m usually adverse to posting anything too ‘conspiracy’-ish as TrueSkeptic, but in this case, i’m making an exception as this particular source has predicted an amazing number of events in the COVID pandemic this year. I know it may seem hard to believe at first but hopefully my mostly-accurate posts as TrueSkeptic have shown that i do have some actual evidence here, even if i am not 100% certain about the conclusion. As a side note, though, I do not expect you to actually approve the comment at all given how you don’t do conspiracy claims without full proof and probably also don’t want to let other people post conspiracy stuff on your blog. Honestly, that doesn’t matter at all to me as long as you actually read it and decide whether it makes any sense or not. As far as i’m aware the way these blog posts and comments work is that you have a choice between three options, approving the comment, leaving it awaiting approval, and deleting it, so you could just delete it if you think it’s all false and either approve it or leave it awaiting approval if you think it makes sense. If i’m misunderstanding this and you don’t have a delete button like that, then in that case i’d have no way to find out if you agree to any extent unless you approve it, but nonetheless, it does feel relatively worth it to post this.
Here is the 26 minute source video:
https://archive.org/details/davidgoldbergsfinalwordsclassifieddocsrevealdeadlyprojectzyphr
The source video was made in September 2019, and i know the date of creation was not somehow backdated/faked because i watched this many many months ago. Probably should’ve mentioned it to you much earlier, to be honest. The central point of the video is that David Goldberg, the person who made it, allegedly got access to documents showing a 2 step plan to track down USA dissidents saying the truth about Zionism and Israel among other things. Part 1 supposedly was to have controlled opposition channels either mostly saying the truth aside from key points like Israeli influence and Zionism and so on or a few that said the whole truth, and for the people commenting on the channels to be put on a list, although it would take time for them to figure out who was who since many people use anonymous accounts. He said at the time in September 2019 they were about 76% done and had about six months to go before they could initiate the second part. Now here is where things start to line up incredibly well with events that happened in real life. Six months after September 2019 was April 2020, when the COVID death counts ramped up immensely. This matches up completely with what Goldberg said. He said that phase 2, Proejct Zyphr, was to go beyond just silencing the critics of Israel and Israel’s influence in the US and so on and actually eliminate people directly. And he said that the plan was to make most of the deaths seem natural by making it seem as if they died of the flu, while a few of the top dissidents would be directly attacked. And all of this is supposedly going to go down in Winter of 2020 as far as he guessed, as then it could be said that it was the flu. He also claimed that these eliminations were going to happen during long power outages, which would make sense, as that would prevent people from saying what was happening on the internet. He said that he thought the number of people that were going to be killed was in the millions and that it could even be 15 million, maybe more. Meanwhile someone would be blamed for causing the blackouts, he said it could be blamed on Iran.
Again, he said all of this before anyone knew about COVID at all. It all lines up in retrospect, with how he said economic collapse would be used alongside pretending a lot of planned deaths were due to natural causes. If all this is really true and COVID is part of this plan, then in my opinion COVID is probably some sort of test run to get everyone used to lockdowns, seize more government power, and set up an inevitable economic collapse for the 1st world along with a lot of the rest of the world. Then when they think they’re ready, they’d unleash a truly deadly plague. According to what he said the releasing of any virus used for this would probably be started in December this year, since that’s when he said they would want to start killing people with some kind of infections. During that time, presumably some people in on this conspiracy would deliberately infect dissidents with that disease one way or another or just infect the neighborhoods they live in so they could be exterminated without anyone knowing it was targeted. He was saying that the deaths would be called flu deaths, but if this is an honest source he might not have known they were planning to release a plague, and it wouldn’t really make sense for so many deaths to happen without being blamed on some kind of deadly disease, not just a flu. The timing of when Project Zyphr was supposedly going to start(6 months after september 2019, cue April when COVID ramped up in infections/deaths massively), the recent events this year which clearly have built up an incoming economic collapse which Goldberg said would be caused as an excuse for starting a new world government once national currencies are dead, pretty much everything in it lines up. I know some of the things he said like that Trump is a Jew or a Freemason seem pretty outlandish, and I’m not saying everything in this is necessarily true, but a whole lot does seem to have come true already. The basic claim he made was that lots of people would be given a virus so the dissidents could be killed and power could be seized, and during a nationwide blackout a few of those right wingers against Israel who were the ones running successful/big channels/sites/etc exposing the truth would get vanned and taken to camps or something along those lines. This would all be meant to lead to some kind of world government centered in Israel, with all the big countries financially collapsing at once, and the means of how they want to get that collapse done is now pretty clear with this COVID insanity. For all i know, if this Project Zyphr in the US claim is true, it might also be planned for some other countries too, especially if the means used to kill all those dissidents is a virus.
Some of the official scientists have been prepping everyone for this narrative of millions and millions dying if COVID is allowed to run out of control. So maybe there is a plan behind that narrative being pushed so strongly, to get people used to the idea for when they actually do it, even if the number of people told everything is probably pretty low. Combined with an ensuing worldwide economic collapse and possibly a viral attack on the US that was blamed on some other country, all that could then start a war that essentially dissolves the USA as a country if the US loses, it all fits. The damage to the world would then probably be blamed on capitalism’s instability and inability to prepare for a virus if the conspiracy won, with the solution offered being an authoritarian one world government that prevents any future outbreaks world wars. As for how that would specifically play out, i don’t know. But it seems clear to me that all the setup is there for this to be possible, from the censorship to the economic doom to everyone being prepared for mass fear and so on.
I’d be glad to be wrong about all this and for December and all of 2021 to pass without any negative events but there’s just too much this conspiracy theory has gotten right already in predicting 2020. I don’t personally believe the claims he made about Trump being in on some negative conspiracy like this, even though he is extremely pro Israel to a ridiculous extent. So maybe whatever documents Goldberg got access to were misleading, or maybe he was also in on this supposed conspiracy and just partly lying so that the real truth would never be exposed to the right people who could take action about it. If there’s a >50% chance that most of this really is real, then you should probably know, assuming there’s any chance of anyone doing anything to stop it at this point. I don’t bother expecting any of this to get fully posted as a comment here, as it is completely understandable that your site generally speaking isn’t a ‘conspiracy site’, you don’t make any hard and precise claims unless you have 100% proof. Like how the vaccine article uses so many sources. However, if a large portion of this conspiracy theory seems at all plausible to you then you can just leave my comment as ‘awaiting approval’ rather than outright deleting it and then i will know whether or not you agreed if a long time later it is still not deleted. At least, that is how i think this works. I’ll double check and post some relatively filler comment on another article while using the same account name, and if you delete that one and leave this one awaiting approval then I guess i’ll know that my ideas weren’t completely dismissed. Either that or it doesn’t work that way and you don’t have a button to delete awaiting approval comments, but i would figure out either way. Frankly, I would rather that they all be wrong and easily dismissed, but as explained previously, all the evidence seems to line up indicating this may be a very real and very serious threatening situation coming up soon, even if some of the details are not right. Hopefully it all proves to be nonsense, but i’m not holding my breath. If it isn’t, i suppose what would have to happen is that any truly dangerous plague meant to be released on the people at the right time is found before it can be used and the people involved in preparing to use it are caught and so on. As i seriously doubt that any conspiracy like this could involve them suddenly saying Flu killed 15 million people this year in the USA. It would be more like a power grab/coup essentially.
Final note:It is a strange fact how coincidental some things seem to be in life. For example, how the Russian Revolution was just a year before the Spanish Flu. Coincidence? Or was it maybe intentionally released as a weapon? That part wasn’t my original idea, it was from a conspiracy site. However, there is one incredibly strange coincidence I’ll close this with. That took place roughly 100 years ago. In fact, the emergence date of COVID is only about 2 years off from being exactly 100 years later than when the Spanish Flu appeared And if COVID also corresponds to a sort of communist revolution attempt, that is extremely strange. Even if COVID was somehow released as part of a plan, the fact that it’s almost exactly 100 years later is just bizzare. I’m guessing that if it was planned to use COVID, it was not also planned to make it nearly perfectly line up. This is a case where I can’t help but feel that historical cycles are a thing on some metaphysical or supernatural level. It is just absolutely bizzare. Hopefully that doesn’t mean that any communist uprising associated with COVID in the US is successful, as that would be a total disaster for the world.
Hopefully something I said was helpful in showing the truth, I do think i presented all of this well. Please do watch the video. I’d rather be wrong, but if a good deal of this is right, then someone like you in a seemingly important position needs to see it. Assuming you read this far, thanks for reading.
TES – in undertanding MiHoDAL ( I followed the hyperlink and back), is an ES susceptible to this error by implication alone? In other words, by simply assuming a position of challenging a (presumably) false statement in light of multiple observations by presenting counter-information – does this count as a MiHoDeAL? When is the right time to “strike” back?
~James
Cool article. Never knew some illnesses were gamed by the system like that, with an artificial more dangerous version created as a result of the vaccination. Although at this point, saying you’re pro vaccine is completely meaningless. There’s essentially nothing being done to continuously prove all this is safe.
I would suggest you read his three entries related to ‘vaccinials’. He has also stated several times with caveat that he is pro-vaccine as the schedule was in the 80’s, versus the recommended schedule of today. The blogs on Vaccinials justify his advocation as well as his caution.
A foreign group that pretends to be the same as the natives leads in a ton of hostile immigrants that it calls oppressed when in reality those immigrants caused their own problems back in their native countries, and will bring those problems with them if allowed to go in and replace the native population/take control from them…
So what you’re saying is that basically, the USA is like this?
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XZ2tnim51cE/TpuuEPvay3I/AAAAAAAABGQ/pNoQDQqDp_A/s1600/battle_count.PNG
By the way, single point, short comment, just feels needed. I found what seems to be an original and pretty important counter argument to ‘But better ways of diagnosing autism must have caused the rise in Autism from 1 in 10’000 to 1 in 50 in 30 years’, one i haven’t seen made anywhere else, even here.
Clearly that diagnosis claim did nothing to deserve being the null hypothesis, other than being convenient. But to get to it quick, here is the obvious disproof i thought of:If better ways of diagnosing autism had been the cause, then the autism rate would’ve risen in SPIKES and leveled off mostly until a new improved way of finding autists was found and then spiked again when a new one was found! It could NOT have risen as a steady line! Furthermore, the somewhat steady line of autism rates increasing in your graph obviously dovetails with the increased vaccine counts as you showed and that just buries that argument completely. Finally, and this is important: Now that autism diagnosis is supposedly understood by the scientists, and has been understood for at least a decade, it should not be rising anymore whatsoever! If it is genetic and not contagious, there is NO reason it could ever steadily rise like that again once it was fully understood! Now, if autism was intentionally caused by vaccines, on the other hand, there is plenty of reason it would continue to somehow steadily hit more and more children…
Furthermore, consider this equally important disproof of the Diagnosis Hypothesis:If autism WAS being merely discovered more and had been in the same numbers all along, why would all the autistic people be children?!? If autism is just a genetic disorder of some sort then it should be evenly spread across old and young people. It should not be focused on children or more accurately those under 30 years old. Why would it be largely concentrated in children? Autism doesn’t go away as you get older, so there’s only one other reason, which would be that many more children started getting Autism recently. Children are the ones getting the most vaccines…So of course the damage is largest in those currently under 30 years old who have received these increased numbers of shots their whole lives. There’s probably still damage in people who are between 30 to 40 years old, as even the 40 year olds were 10 year olds back when the vaccine schedules first started ramping up, so they might’ve still gotten badly damaged during the timespan of 1990 to 2000. The group of people expected to be mostly undamaged by vaccines in my view would be those who are ~50 or older and have received few vaccinations since this got started in 1989. A pretty testable hypothesis IMO. I don’t have the solid data for this, but you might know of a way to show that the ones who are autistic are generally young for the most part which does not fit the ridiculous diagnosis ‘hypothesis’.
Anyway, clearly it is a ridiculous claim that autism just increased because better means of diagnosis were found. I think i have pretty decisively disproven that claim with this argument coupled with the excellent graph you made about the rise of autism correlating with the rise of the vaccine schedule. Haven’t seen this argument i just made argued by any other Anti Vaxxer source that i know of so I do feel at least semi confident this is original and uniquely helpful in some way in showing the truth about vaccines causing autism. It would feel fully complete if i had the proper data showing that the children and those under 30 years old are the lion’s share of the Autistic people as I’m hypothesizing, and you may have that data, so it feels important to mention to you in case it might lead to a big discovery like that.
Although, I do not feel like the fact that it’s mostly hitting kids is extremely controversial or needing of lots of proof. Most of the big autism stats talk about how it is largely becoming so epidemic in boys, not in ‘men’ in general. 1 in 47 boys and so on. Even so, I do think my argument would be that much more decisive if there was a clear statistic saying what % of men with Autism are <30 years old and so on, that would be an extra layer of consilience showing that it’s the increased vaccine schedule that’s caused all this.
To be fair, after a re-read it seems that you did address the nonsense diagnosis argument really thoroughly, and i wasn’t trying to say you didn’t. But you seem to have ‘buried the lead’ somewhat there, at least from my point of view, to the point where it takes thorough scanning to even see your one line where you said the curve was gentle and that the seeming ‘jumps’ in it do not correspond to increased/better diagnosis, if i remember right. My other points still seem correct and original though. AKA, what i said about the Average Age of Autistic people showing that it is caused by vaccines, or the continuous increase in Autism rates showing that better diagnosis methods are not the cause as those diagnosis methods were finished over a decade ago. Hopefully those two were clear, original, and helpful in adding extra consilience layers to really just drive it home to more people that autism is being caused by vaccines, not genetics.
Wished From ALL MY Heart 💜 That E.S Mastered Just Everything There Before Writing One Article For Us 😉‼️
[( 🧠 Rrghaahhh❕🥶🤣😂)]
I like what you write. May I recommend a writing method to simplify, clarify, and improve your written content? Omit the unnecessary use of “in order” in all instances of “in order to…” to read just “to…” as writing best practice. For reference, see https://prowritingaid.com/grammar/1000097/When-can-you-omit-in-order-in-a-sentence
Enjoy!
Rocko,
You are correct! I had 15 instances where I used “in order to”. Now realize that this document was not written as a single flow of continuity in story or sitting. When an essay is read in one sitting, these types of grammar habits become grating on the nerves, yes. But that was excessive nonetheless. However, I do have one exception to this wise grammar style:
When a conditional ‘to’ is used to introduce a new series or modify a series member – and avoid amphibology in the process. I kept 3 instances where this clarity in phrase was critical. For example, the second sentence below is an amphibology, not clear as to whether or not a modification of an existing series member has been introduced or the existing series is simply being continued. The second version is not correct – because it can be interpreted two ways.
Equivocation – the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning, sense, or use in professional context by glossing over which meaning is intended in the instance of usage, in order to misdefine, inappropriately include or exclude data in an argument.
Equivocation – the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning, sense, or use in professional context by glossing over which meaning is intended in the instance of usage, to misdefine, inappropriately include or exclude data in an argument.
Good stuff though, thanks
TES :-)
Honestly, the more i read of this the more utterly amazing it is to me how much actually relevant info is gathered here in one place. Obviously, that graph correlating the rise of vaccine schedules with autism rates is the best graph out there i know of, but that’s simply me knowing how much autism there is, not WHY and HOW people’s brains are damaged by the vaccines. Skeptics have infinitely high goal posts for any position but their own, so it always seemed to me that to argue any antivax position i had to not only have the evidence of correlation and lots of anecdotal cases, but also to show the exact mechanism or some similarly ridiculous set of standards. I got around to seeing Forrest Maready’s Crooked documentary recently and it was mind blowing. The observable evidence is RIGHT THERE on people’s crooked faces for anyone to see that vaccine damage is happening, it’s undeniable. Best vaccine documentary I’ve ever seen, to be honest. It lays out everything, the probable mechanism, the observable evidence any non professional can see, the anecdotal typical cases, the logic, everything. Well, everything except the ultra-critical correlations between vaccine schedules and autism as shown in your graphs and so on, but nobody’s perfect. Even in that regard, he had good graphs like when he was showing a case where scarlet fever diminished in the same way as other illnesses that got vaccinated did, even though it did not have a vaccine made for it. It seems like he focused more on the earliest cases of vaccines than recent times when it came to graphs he included in the documentary. But it doesn’t really matter. Bottom line is anyone seeing the documentary who didn’t quickly activate neurolinguistic programming and refuse to see the clear evidence would know that he is being honest and making a persuasive argument, and I am glad to have been able to indirectly figure out about Forrest Maready and his documentary from looking through your content. I’m going to just focus on one key point for this post to keep it from being too long, and it seems like a good complement to what your blog has already said about the damage caused by vaccine.
Basically, in this section I’ll be making the argument of lazy and hysterical mandatory vaxxers for them, only to show that the ideal attempt to prove vaccines work is still entirely wrong and incredibly lacking. The idea starts with looking at the vaccine schedules from 1990 to 2020 going up over 5x as you poitned out. What’s the improvement in health caused by this? Pro-vaxxers should be clear about how many lives they think have been saved by these increases in vaccine schedules. It’s like a math equation. First start with the proposed damage antivaxxers state is going on with their many anecdotal cases and more detailed proofs, of how many millions of people have been ruined or at least damaged. Then the pro vaxxers state how many millions all these extra shots are supposed to have helped. But they don’t do that. They always use emotional arguments accusing antivaxxers of evil and causing harm. They usually cite claims about polio being eradicated by vaccines, but this argument is extremely poor. One vaccine working wouldn’t prove that none of them are sabotaged, and Forrest Maready seemingly has evidence that even the polio shot had issues, being correlated with the original discovery of autism. Not sure on that. Either way you get the point. These increases in vaccine schedules to insane levels were not correlated with the sudden appearance of new diseases or illnesses. The amount of damage they have caused is far more than any potential benefit claimed of them. Honestly you can probably make a much more persuasive case than me on that point and look through what they’ve said about the benefits of that rapid increase in vaccine schedules from say 5 or so shots to 47 from 1989 to 2020. But the basic principle should be pretty clear. Let’s just look at the damage number you claimed, 15M-30M USA citizens over the last 30 years having gotten permanently brain damaged if i understand this right. Meanwhile the medical establishment make whatever claims they want, usually focusing on now eradicated diseases like smallpox or polio and saying how over a hundred million lives have been saved by vaccination as a result. They don’t specifically focus on the incredibly increased vaccine schedule for largely non lethal illnesses, because doing so would show how this vast forced increase in vaccination doesn’t correspond to some great reduction in deaths. I still think it would be very helpful if you could prove how their claims about risk mitigation are often wrong or simply misleading or not even made at all, and how the actual amount of damage caused far exceeds any benefit that would supposedly be granted by this increase in vaccine schedules. It simply frustrates me quite a bit that this sort of tyranny can be imposed willy nilly without a single consequence. “Polio smallpox etc gone” feels like the “Cases Cases Cases” of Vaccines if you know what i mean. A way to distract, and even that claim about polio may be wrong for all i know based on what Forrest Maready’s saying. But the point is it’s not the same. Vaccinations everyone gets aren’t the same when the disease isn’t going to be eradicated. Especially patently ridiculous things like young boys getting the HPV shot as mandatory. The point is, people were given far more shots without some massive reduction in child mortality as a result or anything of the sort. Measles was not going to wipe everyone out. At its absolute worst in the US, it killed about 1’500 people in a year. If you want a chart showing just how little of a positive impact the vaccine schedule increases made in the USA from 1989 to 2020, just look at this link, and have it start at 1990.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/deaths-caused-by-vaccine-preventable-diseases?time=1990..2017&country=~USA
Assuming this is correct, those vaccine schedule increases had very little positive effect. Basically nothing compared to the millions and millions ruined for life by them. The most generous possible estimate would be to say that 100% of the decline in that graph was due to the increase in vaccinations, and even if that was somehow true, here is how many American lives would’ve been saved as a result during that time period:Maybe somewhere around 35’000 in total. In all realistic likelihood, not even a fifth of that, since some people were going to die of tuberculosis either way. In fact, hepatitis B increased substantially for around a decade in that graph, seemingly showing the vaccine for it to be ineffective. The point is there is basically no death being caused by all these illnesses. Now a pro vaxxer might leap to the argument that this just means the minimum vaccination requirements were in place even before 1990 to ensure no substantial harm was happening, and that could be true, but that just defeats the entire argument for the vaccine schedules ramping up exponentially as they have. What was the point? Why did kids need so many more shots if it didn’t actually decrease the deaths from vaccine preventable diseases any substantial amount? Is there some other health factor that they’ll argue has improved as a result of increased vaccination during that period? I doubt it. The reality is that it just made medical companies a whole lot of money, and that the intent at the highest levels was to ruin people out of malice with autism and other inflicted ailments, along with profit motives satisfied by creating a more easily manipulated and unintelligent population.
Anyway, I hope that chart was informative enough. There is no argument for why mandatory vaccines needed to be increased so exponentially during that time period, it did not benefit the people in any substantial way. To me, including that aspect, doing the argument of the lazy pro-vaxxers for them and showing even the ideal attempt to argue to be wrong, just makes it that little bit better. What’s the benefit we’re all supposed to have gotten out of these forced shots? A few thousand lives saved, some more saved from getting a single brief case of an illness and then becoming immune for the rest of their lives? Again, many of these illnesses were already being vaccinated for BEFORE the vast increase in vaccine schedules. There wasn’t some epidemic of tens of thousand of people dying of child mortality as a result. In fact, i screened for that when investigating this official-seeming source. Checking from 1990 to 2020, i looked at the child mortality numbers for the USA from that source i got the previous graph from. It compares child mortality to a percent vaccinated for the Dtap shot. From 1980 to 2015, child mortality went down from 2% to 1%, while the overall Dtap vaccination percentage DECREASED. Now clearly, Dtap is just one set of vaccine preventable illnesses, but as previously explained, there are hardly any deaths to go around from all the vaccine preventable illnesses combined in the first place. So, it is pretty obvious that 1% drop was almost entirely not due to vaccines.
Pro vaxxers would probably then shift the argument to 3rd world countries or other places where the % vaccinated in any way has gone up substantially. But that is once again missing the point. The point is that the vaccines that do actually work have been in place for a long time, since at least 1990 and probably a while before. Meanwhile, the vast increase in vaccine amounts starting at around 1990 has not corresponded at all to actually reducing mortality rates from these illnesses. Instead, it has correlated with the unimaginable increase in Autism rates from essentially being altogether unknown to being 1 in 50 at best estimate and rising, in 30 years. That is not genetics, that is not ‘increased diagnoses’, it is mass vaccination poisoning as all the 1000s of anecdotes have showed.
Long argument short:The vaccine schedule increases have demonstrably done little to no good in reducing mortality rates for the past 30 years, they have demonstrably caused an unfathomable amount of harm on tens of millions in that same time span, and the mechanisms by which the harm occurs are becoming increasingly clear as documentaries like Crooked show. The only missing pieces of the puzzle are which groups started the sabotage with which vaccines, and how they can actually be caught and so on.
Anyway, that’s it. I hope my points all generally made sense and acted as new and useful ideas in addition to what you already outlined here. The claimed benefits for this massive ramp up in no way warrant mass enforced injections on all children, and the results that have ensued have been horrific. Good luck with what you are doing in enlightening people about this issue and other issues. You’ve really shown the truth here in a way better than practically any other antivax source I’ve read and I think this kind of knowledge you’ve shown could change the world if only more people knew the full set of facts.
As just one last brief extension of a missed point of the ‘what benefit did vaccine schedule expansion give from 1990 to 2020’ argument, let us look at another parallel issue:Obesity. Millions of people have their lives ruined by eating fast foods and so on that make people obese. The amount of damage caused by letting people eat these foods and letting businesses sell these clearly damaging foods is far far more than the few thousand deaths vaccine schedule expansion might’ve prevented in the last thirty years. If that kind of food hadn’t been allowed to become mainstream, the USA might be full of skinny and much healthier people today, rather than the land of the obese and fat.
So, the obvious question is this:What’s the goal post for ‘health harm’ where you step in and say the government decides what goes into people’s bodies and forces them to get injected? It makes no sense to on the one hand permit these damaging and ruining foods and on the other hand enforce so many extra vaccines when that increase in vaccines only prevented maybe a few thousand deaths, and caused millions of people to be braindamaged for life and ruined. If the government can enforce vaccines like that, it should be banning these toxic foods that are ruining the culture and character of people in the USA. Note that i am not saying that we should ban all cigarettes or anything. But honestly even I would be hard pressed to say it’d be universally bad if the government took at least some action against this fast food obesity epidemic that’s been ruining the USA for decades. It would’ve been far better if things had never been allowed to get this bad health wise for USA with everyone becoming fat and obese, it is insane.
That’s it for that. Just pointing out it’s totally hypocritical and ridiculous how this mandatory vaccine morality standard works. The harm from some of these fast foods has been truly immense and changed what the average American looks like and acts like horribly. It seems to me this ‘freedom’ is only allowed to people as long as they use freedom to harm themselves, and on the other hand, when free choice would let people avoid sabotaged toxic vaccines, it is prohibited in a tyrannical way. This shit is insane.
TES – the science community is slowly coming round to the idea that it’s the oceans warming and not the atmosphere: “Forest fires in Australia and California, droughts and water shortages in the Mediterranean—in the last few years, events such as these have become more frequent. Researchers attribute this to the fact that the tropics, the warm region surrounding the Equator, appear to be expanding. And that leads to the affected areas becoming hotter and drier….the reason for the expansion appears to be an altered warming of the ocean.”
https://phys.org/news/2020-09-major-wind-driven-ocean-currents-shifting.amp
Pingback: THE LAST DAYS | THE SAINT THEY CALLED ALLNIGHTS
Sometimes My Question Is Why We Know A Little Bit About Simple Things. So Simpler Once We Get More Rational.
For The Universe Size I Rather Doubt That The Answer Is:
All Will Be Someday Vanished As Never Existed ( A Yet-Admitted Explaining Way ). That Measures Aren’t Necessary.
But I Ignore If This Can Make A Total Sense 😅❕Thank You E.S❣️
Hi there, just found this blog and the story. I enjoy reading content published here. Regarding the story, it is a very interesting one as it shows how most of us would react in ‘paranormal’ instances. I would probably react as your friend… I just wonder what was happening in the house Kevin… Was it a real apparation or something else at hand? A lot of time has passed since the event was published, did you hear from Kevin about the event again and how he sees it today? Best regards, MF
“ Heck, 16 knots of wind are required to move an object floating on the water 1 knot (an object without a sail)”
Enjoyed the article. Thank you. A very minor point: a ‘knot’ is a measure of speed (a nautical mile per hour), not distance. I believe you intended to say the wind moved the floating object one nautical mile (nm = one minute of latitude).
No, I mean knot in speed (nautical mile per hour). A certain velocity of wind will produce a certain velocity of an object floating on the water. It is posed as it should be.
TES :-)
Pingback: Is the pandemic nearly over with? | Coldstreams Business and Tech
I have read through this page a number of times over the past few weeks to better grasp your methods and my understanding of this COVID-19 debacle has increased substantially. Thank you especially for your quite readable graphs.
I agree that, in too many ways, we have handled and continue to handle COVID incorrectly, but while most analysis focuses on what is being done incorrectly, little is said about a proper response to a virus. Briefly, how you think the USA (or any other country) should have responded to COVID in Feb/March of 2020? Keep everything open? Protect the elderly? And what would be the most prudent way to proceed today?
Increasing atmospheric temperature of Venus at mid-latitudes is possible by the exotic explanation of post-Einstein gravity theory. This possibility appears to have been omitted by the science community involved. Microbial life as a source of the phosphine detected is therefore a lot less likely, due to phosphine being produced in gas giants Jupiter and Saturn without biological processes.
The latest evidence that strong gravitational attraction exists between the centre of the Sun and the centre of the planets. A seismic anomaly and magnetic effect occur for just 30 seconds as the inner moon of Mars, Phobos, eclipses the solar disc. Note that the space probe and instruments are located on a flat equatorial plane.
https://youtu.be/8SMgn16qVI0
There’s extensive research on gravity anomalies occurring on Earth during solar eclipses.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allais_effect
Change in wobble axis of the Earth, polar motion, is likely also happening on Venus imo, due to changes of strong gravitational force felt by it’s exotic core: “The slow drift, about 20 m since 1900, is partly due to motions in the Earth’s core and mantle..” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_motion
Extra mantle outgassing of phosphine & hydrogen at 45° more likely than microbial life imo
https://phys.org/news/2019-12-earth-earthquakes-volcanic-eruptions-mount.html
A basic amino acid has now been found in the low mid-latitudes of Venus: “Like glycine, it was also detected more strongly at mid-latitudes.” This lends itself to equatorial cooling/mid-latitude warming hypothesis due to increasing exotic core interaction ”
https://t.co/sieMii5ze4
Firstly, thank you so much for making the resource of this website available! Just found it today and have already recommended it to my dad. Thought I’d see what was here on the topic of theism/atheism/agnosticism.
I agree that atheism is not a religion per se. However, atheism holds to unproven and empirically unprovable beliefs about the origin of the universe. It may not be a religion, but it is certainly therefore comparable to a faith, and it denies certain possibilities relating to cosmology, consciousness and biogenesis. It is, at the very least, a presupposition. Agnosticism seems to me a more intellectually honest approach, but ‘not knowing’, though a great place to begin, provides little joy as a destination.
The way I distinguish believers is by this delineation:
Atheism does not hold beliefs about the universe. Nihilism does this. The point of the article is that we conflate nihilism as atheism, when the former is a religion and the latter is a philosophy. Nihilism is a religion, however is not a faith, because it bears no hope in its religious tenets. Nihilism is an intellectual pretense, because it pretends to be based upon science. Faith, admits its baseless founding, yet is purposed aside from this to be genuine.
Thanks for reading!
TES
Dear EthicalSkeptic,
This is exactly the article which I newly followed later.
Just thanking you for such superior material.
And asking you only once about my own TicTac UFO ‘’ Evidence ‘’ , Paranoia & some hypothesis you noticed them on Twitter❣️🧠
Only Thank You Very Much ..❕❕
Dear EthicalSkeptic ,
Why You Do Not Create An Amazing Helpful Youtube Channel ?
Please Think At This❣️
You’ve done some excellent research. The increase in tidal range of 25% and increase in global ocean currents of at least 15% fits with the idea of increasing earth-tides. These are the solid body deformation of the crust due to gravity acting across the entire globe. The oceans are effectively pushed from underneath. These earth-tides can reach upto around a meter in equatorial regions. I propose that a careful satellite study should be undertaken to test whether these are increasing in amplitude. There have been studies which indicate the equatorial waters are cooling. Heat could be increasingly transferred to the mid & high latitudes.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/06/24/pacific-ocean-cold-tongue/
Loved This Certainty Or How Aliens Reject We ‘ Skeptic ‘.
I Even Did Not Ask About The EthicalSkeptic View & Opinion !
Sure When Aliens Too Purely Think Through Rational Way & Judging.
Interesting post, a few ideas, I suspect the changing tides have a great deal to do with the amount of Arctic waters driven south, these are ‘native’ to a tangential speed of perhaps 250kph and consequently hold fast to the east coast which has a much higher tangential speed, that is until it clashes with the Gulf stream which slowly overcomes it’s own inertia to leave the same coast around the Carolinas so the inertial pressure of the two build tides against the coast. The ocean currents may be speeding up due to a related cause, Atlantic waters are penetrating ever deeper into the Arctic and forcing previous inflows ever further around the continental slope. Right now it looks like they have forced themselves around Chukchi plateau and have induced the Pacific waters incoming from Bering into a current that circles into the center of Beaufort. Overcoming the inertia of the Arctic Ocean has been a slow process but perhaps it’s initial new state is being established as the incoming Atlantic waters build up the pressure on incumbent waters driving them, since they are near surface [50m+/-] whilst the waters replacing them flow into the depths. It also appears that the deep Atl. current that flows around northern Greenland [http://muenchow.cms.udel.edu/papers/29-4_munchow.pdf] is speeding up perhaps due to a ‘flywheel’ effect and as a consequence tidally modulated flows penetrate across northern Ellesmere and onwards. This is accelerating the opening up of the channels of the Canadian arctic archipelago through which the Beaufort ‘freshwater’ lens has begun to flow, so if the currents that serve up the Gulf stream are constant a period of higher low/high tides should follow.
I’ve begun to think that the Earths magnetic field is somewhat like a frozen z-pinch, this evolving since i discovered that ships use the same compass for both poles, that suggests a similarity of charge entering/leaving at either pole perhaps only differing in spin. If the z-pinch is the right model then we should expect outgoing forces at the equator somewhat like the south atlantic anomoly, except there should be two. Setting that aside when the sun is quiescent as at present the Earth is on the receiving end of more radiation and that is evidenced by northern/southern lights, what i suspect is that some fraction of that radiation is either reacting with heavy elements and causing small cascades of fission, or more likely it is reacting with the iron core and creating both denser elements and hydrogen ions. The hydrogen ions then percolate upwards scavenging oxygen from all possible sources and this creates a prolonged cascade of exothermic reactions catalysed by the supercritical water which metamorphoses rock as it permeates it and carries solutes ever upwards.
Here [https://earth.nullschool.net/#2020/08/20/1200Z/ocean/primary/waves/overlay=sea_surface_temp/orthographic=-42.86,82.60,699/loc=118.561,81.739] you’ll see a small cold anomaly directly above the crater/caldera[?] at the far end of Gakel ridge, by Laptev, if you move through the days you’ll see similar anomalies appearing all along that ridge, i’ve no idea what could be outgassing that cools the ocean surface so much as it evaporates.
I have come to the conclusion that the solid earth-tides are increasing in strength. This would have the affect of pushing the oceans from beneath, bringing extra warm bottom water from equatorial regions to both the Arctic & Antarctic Oceans.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide
It may be that Earth tides are increasing, if that’s the case then i would suspect the increased influx of high energy radiation is causing an uptick in the creation of hydrogen ions and a consequent increase in exothermic reactions softening up the mantle, and I’ve come to suspect that vulcanism associated with ‘low’ solar activity, or ensuing shortly after has had an unremarked affect on climate.
The higher sea level and higher low tides that affect the east coast are, in my view, associated with the lack of kinetic energy of those waters. The gulf waters arising off Africa are already slower than the local tangential speed and consequently move west, pushing into the north Atlantic uses up an enormous amount of inertia so those waters hold fast to the coast until the tangential speed begins to drop more rapidly, say 35N, similarly the Arctic waters have too little inertia and continue to have relatively less as they move south so they remain hard by the coast until they are forced off by more inert waters flowing in their wake, in this way a huge body of relatively inert water awaits sufficient energy input from the southern waters to push it far enough north for it to move east.
Alan, it took a while, but then altering ones understanding always does, but I’m ‘warming’ to the idea of oceanic tides being forced by earth-tides, and if the crust itself is heating up then why wouldn’t it ‘flex’ more. The Arctic ocean is clearly waking up, a process now accelerating with the loss of Barents sea ice and it’s dampening effect on atlantic current caught between it and the underlying bathymetry. Could this itself have been caused by increased tidal forcing? I made a gif to help me understand the tidal forcings/interplay involved a little better, https://giphy.com/gifs/fYT63Cq7JjGKourprU and this animation from Mercator illustrates how deep into the arctic atlantic waters have penetrated http://bulletin.mercator-ocean.fr/en/permalink/PSY4/animation/3/20200917/20201023/2/2
It seems there are two return currents evolving one from the depths north of the N.S.I and another from north of Wrangel-Chukchi rise both moving generally towards Fram so slowly making the arctic an extension/arm of the atlantic.
Thanks for your indulgence E.S.
I propose exotic matter at the cores of Jupiter’s moons is creating their mystery heat:
“Researchers might have to reconsider their understanding of how these ocean moons evolved and where most of their heat is coming from according to a new study in AGU’s journal Geophysical Research Letters suggests that these Galilean moons, might play a bigger role in the ebb and flow of each other’s tides than the big planet they orbit does because of a phenomenon called tidal resonance. This newly discovered relationship between the moons means researchers might have to reconsider their understanding of how these ocean moons evolved and where most of their heat is coming from.”
(I propose the same effect of Jupiter on Earth is increasing tidal energy which transports extra heat from the equatorial regions towards the polar regions)
https://dailygalaxy.com/2020/09/moon-power-subsurface-tides-on-jupiters-ocean-worlds-create-hotspots-for-life/amp/
This is fantastic. Now i’m going to read your other posts. One comment, and hopefully you will take this as constructive criticism, why in the world don’t you use the Oxford comma? :)
Thanks David,
I was taught by my AP English prof, in my university science undergrad curriculum that the Oxford Comma is used for technical and series writing – eg. “Your specification should indicate power phase, amplitude, voltage, watts, and peak demand.” However, when one is writing a triplicate in prose or poetry – the comma is considered duplicative with the last connector “and”, as well as utilitarian-gauche – eg. “Trevor longed for a break from the tumultuous pitching of the seas; pining over a distant happiness, home and hearth.”
However, you will find that habit prevails and memory fails in my consistency with such understanding. But great point!! Thanks.
TES
I can’t even believe how magnificent and beautiful your work is…. I just found you through the recommendation of J. C. Couey. .. this is the most amazing site….
What if the center of the Earth is not molten iron but plasma? Plasma which is ”heated” by the activity of the sun via induction.
Nice article.
How do you feel about the greenhouse effect?
I have a whole blog about how the greenhouse effect is nothing but geothermal flipped upside down. Care to comment?
http://phzoe.com/2019/12/25/why-is-venus-so-hot/
http://phzoe.com/2020/02/13/measuring-geothermal-a-revolutionary-hypothesis/
Thank you, -Zoe
Hey Zoe,
Great website! Yes, I too carried around the notion of the Greenhouse for decades. I held this from 1971 really, after reading Carl Sagan’s ‘Cosmic Connection’. Then of course all the science supporting the Greenhouse idea came AFTER the idea was promoted as true. Just like all the testing on the safety on Glyphosate was done AFTER it was already 40% of our pesticide use. Then we all started getting sick as a nation, and the lawsuits flew.
But this is how fake science or social skepticism is deployed – answer first, intimidation second, scant linear-inductive studies when they are forced to do them. No one has researched geothermal heat changes… not true field-deduction, only armchair and statistics ‘research’.
We have not examined the geothermal contribution ‘because we don’t have to… Watts/square meter blah blah’. This type of thinking has shown historically to be 90% sure to be wrong.
TES
“we don’t have to… Watts/square meter blah blah”
Ah, that is the biggest fraud of all time. I debunk this here:
http://phzoe.com/2020/05/22/equating-perpendicular-planes-is-plain-nonsense/
http://phzoe.com/2020/04/29/the-irrelevance-of-geothermal-heat-flux/
I split the recent warming between insolation (thru clouds) and geothermal:
http://phzoe.com/2020/03/11/40-years-of-climate-change/
Fourier was a geothermal denier before he ever saw a borehole temperature gradient. Mainstream climate scientists are all following a guy who had zero clue. How embarassing is that?
Thanks for replying. -Zoe
Dear Ethical Skeptic,
First of all, I’m sorry to hear that your son suffered injury and hope that your family manage to live fulfilling lives nonetheless. I also wanted to thank you for shining a light in this current time of collective madness – I’m refering to covid-19 and the reactions of governments worldwide.
I was wondering whether you have examined other environmental effects (time spent beind screens, exposure to chemicals, etc…) as possible cause for this decrease in IQ/increase in Brain injury? I do agree that absence of proof of risk doesn’t equal proof of absence of risks for vaccination, so the fact that other possible explanations exists doesn’t give a free pass to discard potential safety issue with medical treatments – but I’m still wondering to what extent mass vaccination is causing this issue vs other factors that evolved in the meantime.
Good point Maxime,
Well, the effect starts well before 3 years of age. So, this leads me to believe that it is ingested in some form. Not many 3 years olds or less are that heavily screen exposed. Environmental chemicals which both poison body endocrine systems as well as kill gut flora – those are a problem and definitely play into this with some overlap.
But we have a grand experiment going on here now with Covid:
– screen times are UP significantly
– eating habits are focused on the home and mass produced commercial foods
– vaccinations are put-off by a substantial to majority amount
SIDS, ASD, AutoImmune in our kids will drop accordingly… SIDS already has.
This is a deductive experiment. Watch those actors who purposely seek to hide its effect or even being spoken about. They are not honest, relying upon the principle that less testing/information is more sciencey.
TES
Thanks for the answer!
Regarding the natural experiment provided to us, intuitively I would think that (assuming vaccinations in the US resume in a close future) our ability to observe a drop will depend on the natural variability in the time to onset of symptoms from vaccination events (if there is a very large variability in the time from event to onset of symptoms compared to the duration of the “no-vaccine” phase, I have the impression that – under the hypothesis that there is a causal relationship between the two – the “missing” cases of SIDS, ASD, etc… will be “diluted” in time and could be hard to see), but yes if the cases drop this would definitely be of major interest. Do you have a reference for the evolution of SIDS?
Max
Pingback: Part of the heat is coming from beneath our feet |
.. Second Also Last.
Myself Accepted Which Is A More Serious Alternative & Which Is Not With Quite Difficulty.
.. But I Will Soon Enjoy 😉 Evident Reality & Real Skepticism❣️🧠
Honestly I Wondered A Lot About Aliens & Only Was Depended On My Most Emotional Theories.
Loved How .. EthicalSkeptic You Helped Me Retaking My Wonder Since More Magical ZeroConclusion & EmptyOfAnswer Beginning.
.. But Still Hungry About All It 🌀❕L.O.L.
Hi TES! Did you see this? – https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/study-shows-90-cases-tested-covid-positive-wrongly-diagnosed/
Your Twitter feed made the Gateway Pundit. Great stuff! Note, I posted about it at Skeptiko. Thank you for all you are doing… Chester
Hey Chester
I saw that! Yeah The Lemming Cycle was a big topic in the recent radio interview I did on the Todd Herman Show.
https://omny.fm/shows/the-todd-herman-show/independent-data-analyst-ethical-skeptic-joins-the
Hope to be back on Skeptiko soon, as we wind down from this national emergency and hopefully get back to business.
TES
You sounded very professional and came across well on the radio interview.
Thanks Alan!
A very thorough article. You are one of the few that is considering the core. One other person i know is Tom who has been voicing this for a while, the fact that is complete idiocy when it comes to global warming, to not admit for consideration the earth interior but only focus on the atmosphere when that only makes up like 0.0001% of the earth mass. His theory is slightly different to yours but sort of related.
Not sure if u have seen his work, but I wouldn’t mind getting your thoughts on it? His layman summary video is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lLgA9C1G4c . His paper on his core concept is http://nujournal.net/eccores1.pdf.
If his theory has any merit, the consequences is too frightening to fathom…
Thanks
I truly appreciate your genius. Your approach with information delivery is refreshing and respected.
I am having a bit of trouble understanding your figures. You have Died ‘Of’ numbers at 138,148 and Died ‘With at 57,034. Those 2 added together add up to 195,182 – which you list as CDC All-Causes Excess Total, but then you also have ‘Lockdown Fatalities at 50,094. Shouldn’t the All-Causes Total be the 195,182 + 50,094.
Adrian,
Take a look at the ‘Covid-19 Fatality Full Accountability Chart 1’ – It actually depicts the math in a 2-degree circle chart. Yeah, the numbers get convoluted, so I use circle charts to show both the logic and that the numbers round out to equal the entire sum of CDC excess all-cause deaths.
TES :-)
I didn’t notice that ‘5 million famine deaths’ number among this list on my first read. Thinking about it, it is just crazy. The same people who went into a frenzy at Trump for ‘locking down too late'(Of course, they weren’t screaming at him to do it until he’d already cut off china travel but whatever), and at the tens of thousands of corona deaths, are pretty silent about literally MILLIONS of people now being dead…I’m reading that correctly, right? 5 million people worldwide already died of famine as a result of the lockdowns affecting world economies? Although I’m assuming it’s spread out across the whole world, more particularly in 3rd world nations as you said where the exports going way down from the 1st world results in them lacking the food they need.
Anyway, gee. If the media was willing to support riots over a single person dying from having their neck kneeled on, how should they be reacting to 5 MILLION people dying? As for the insane “If even one person is saved it was worth it” people, I wonder if any of those people or those supporting the refugees in Europe noticed this little fact. If they were consistent with their attitude towards poverty and welfare in the USA shouldn’t they literally be calling it a second Holocaust at that rate? And although usually that kind of claim of fear that someone’s going to do that is just made by hysterical people, at least in death tolls, this really is kind of similar, even if spread out across many nations so there is no genocide level effect on any one place. 5 million is >>>>100’000 corona deaths in USA. Although as you showed the ‘true’ death toll of people who weren’t going to die in the same year either way was only 50K. 50K vs 5 million and counting.
There are a variety of ‘chain reaction’ effects that might not show up on statistics as damage caused by the lockdown, but exist nonetheless. For example, lockdown deaths, life years lost, # of jobs lost, suicide rates increasing after the lockdown, all this shows very much. But what about all the people who lost their jobs and therefore had no healthcare anymore and subsequently died of a condition they couldn’t treat without being able to pay for healthcare? That wouldn’t show up on the statistics, but there might be 1000s of people who died like that already in USA. They’d just show up as people who died of their various conditions without the fact that they lacked care due to the lockdown being marked down, I think. Plus, deaths are easily noticed by the system, but all sorts of psychological damage is inevitably taking place right now with many people, much of which will not be noticed. Think of all the people who might start taking anti depressants at this point due to the virus. An increase in drug use is a likely side effect that’s going to hit many people if this is allowed to continue, which could create new lasting addictions. But all these are indirect chain reactions. The real kicker are the problem reaction solution types of events that can be thrown down from above. In the interests of not making this a speculatory post, I’ll say nothing there that real life important people haven’t already said they are thinking about doing. The lockdown has already shown the hand of malicious people ruling the govt. They are fine with paralyzing the vital work needed to keep civilization functioning and basically throwing everyone into economic doom by force. Certain individuals like Alan “Literally Jab a Needle into your Arm” Dershowitz have already openly said what they want to do in response to the coronavirus, like force-vaccinating everyone. Literally directly injecting some unknown un-overseen substance into 300 million people without them having any choice in the matter or ability to independently check just what’s in it. Seriously, what are they going to say next? At this point, all former inhibitions of oppressive people seem off the table. A New Zealand style gun ban would not be surprising for Biden to push, it by definition already has precedent in New Zealand, and again, there are big name lawyers making these insane claims of injecting everyone in a country by force, adults included. Unprecedented insane things like that. In 2015 mass immigration was already allowed into Europe, which caused lots of problems for the native populations without them consenting to this at all. Even warmongering is not an unprecedented thing for American Presidents to do, and could happen if Biden becomes president, which could then be used to push lots more authoritarianism as a result of a war time culture, or mass immigration as an aftermath of that. Remember, Biden was IN FAVOR of the Iraq War, while Trump wasn’t. Sure, Trump wasn’t a politician at the time, but at least he is consistent on not being a warmonger. And this is not an ‘all wars are bad’ argument, Iraq was just clearly one of those in my opinion.
I feel like just summarizing addressing the topic of ‘Conspiracy Theories’, to show why what i am saying here is not contained by arbitrary assuptions. Generally speaking, conspiracy theories more often involve some kind of proposed metaphysical evil in the conspirators, and the conspirators not caring about whatever nation they control being successful. For example, the vaccine-autism conspiracy theory(and it’s true that the autism link exists) often involves some sort of perceived malice towards the whole USA population, with the aim of subjugating them like slaves so some elite group can rule everyone forever once they are all dumbed down. I’ll just say that although this autism epidemic is all real, and some of those delivering the damage probably just do so for the money or out of fear of disobeying a system of power, those actually behind it clearly must have some metaphysical or genetic or induced evil to them. Otherwise, it would not make sense. None of the insanity happening ‘makes sense’. If there was a secret conspiracy of rational people who were interested in having a future, they would be secretly conspiring to dismantle the nukes, prevent nuclear war situations, and even if they were really self interested, it would be the best option for them to INCREASE the cognitive health of the population in such a dangerous situation rather than damage it. For example, just not poisoning anyone and preventing them from accidentally poisoning themselves(like with the probable iq damage on the USA from lead in the gasoline from 1900-1970s as i outlined before) would be common sense, you’d think. They could also simply do nothing at all, and without cultural and physical poisons weighing everything down, the nations getting ruined by these autism epidemic style conspiracies would probably be far far better off by current day. And that would’ve been the way better decision for any conspiracy group.
Basically, the point is that none of this makes rational sense, but it is projection to the extreme to assume that malicious people really care about their own future in that same way that rational people do and that everyone’s innate sense of logic and good and evil is the same. Autism rates going from 1 in 10’000 to 1 in 40 and further would make sense if there was a malicious conspiracy designed to turn the populace into subservient slaves that cannot resist or outthink their new elites, that motive is pretty obvious at this point, as it is the clear end result being inflicted. And since it seems like it’s being done in all the 1st world countries at once, nobody escapes the impact. Same with these COVID lockdowns. Some people just want to dominate even if it means ruining everyone else economically and mentally. That just seems like the best summary.
Maybe I fall into the dimwit category you mentioned, but I think your analysis is well thought out. When I was in school I remember reading a hypothetical wherein thermal expansion of the ocean can occur due to a slowdown of subduction. As the cold, downgoing slab slows, isotherms previously established by a faster subduction rate begin to move up the downgoing slab allowing the slab and the deep ocean around it to warm, expand, and rise.
This is equivocation abuse with the word ‘belief’. You are using slang to enforce bad philosophy.
I am not saying that they are ‘wrong’, I am saying that they are using methods which could not possibly arrive at the answers they boast to holding. This is not a belief on my part, rather a procedural ethic. A standard of integrity. Holding my bank accountable to keep accurate balances of my money is not the same thing as ‘believing that they are crooks’. You are purposely conflating two different things.
One of them (theist and nihilist) might end up being right (upon some grand revelation at a later date), but if they did, it would only be by accident. This is the critical distinction between a ‘belief’ and a standard of skepticism. I am not criticizing their conclusion, rather their method of getting there.
Not a belief, therefore.
Great stuff, it really helped me learn! My favorites were the Great Repression term and Law of Large Numbers. My own little take on that Law of Large Numbers is that there is one key mistake which makes it all possible. People making these hysteria claims of doom should explain what threshold of death counts should occur for it to count as doom and use other examples of pandemics that are deadly. They need to have a clear set of standards rather than keeping all the criteria that make something a pandemic a mystery. That way they can be held accountable and be forced to be objective. Stakeholder Ethics also seems important here, but not quite the main point. It would be nice if the members of government could be held accountable for crimes against the population, but realistically, no amount of personal stakes for them can match the amount of damage inflicted by their incompetency or malice. Even if some people responsible for intentionally destroying everything went to jail for life or died for their crimes, assuming such malice is proven and found worthy of that, that would not undo the damage. So what matters more to me is just that these things don’t happen to begin with, although Stakeholder Ethics does have some very valid points in mitigating disasters as well. From a negative lens, Stakeholder Ethics means you should not enforce something unless you would suffer as a result, but from an opposite view, it could mean you should not enforce something without a track record of major personal positive contributions in the area you are enforcing things in, showing reliability and commitment to not doing harm. However, i think it is important to see Non Stakeholders as possible leaders as well with certain preconditions. For example, suppose the person who will suffer nothing and has no positive track record proposes a change, but it’s not being enforced on anyone, merely suggested, and isn’t something that would cause some issue if used. For example, a scientist invents the internet and it is eventually omnipresent. Even if he suffers nothing economically if it is lost, it doesn’t matter. Nobody was forced to use it. Economic pseudo forcing is another issue but I think this elaborates on your thought process a little further. Unfortunately, it doesn’t tend to be the case too often anymore that positive changes like that happen from non stakeholders and change the world for the better, and the world seems to be on a very negative downward trend in many ways.
Aside from all that though, there is one thing which really angers me. The greatest crime of all by the media and government is that they do not follow the most basic rules of any plan. It should always be explained what the possible risks are, especially when that risk happens to be enforced economic ruin for 10s of millions of people! Furthermore, they should be forced to say just how many months they expect they can sustain a lockdown without causing irreversible economic ruin. Instead they don’t even have to and do not even address the argument whatsoever! They get away with saying absolutely nothing about how they plan to avert economic disaster! It makes me seethe with anger at the fact that this can even occur.
Of course, the media has to make some comments about the future of the economy but they say stupid things like that they ‘don’t know’, and this is somehow permitted to continue regardless.
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-03-19/coronovirus-economic-fallout-crash
That was in March, and they were saying it was already a guaranteed recession. By the way there’s a fun fact in there. They cited this article saying unemployment was at a 50 year low.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/february-2020-jobs-report-department-of-labor-213308108.html
Note how they said Unemployment was at a 50 year low before this virus and the lockdown’s effects got started without saying any of the implications of that statement. I am reminded of that law you cited, maybe that Nassim Nicholas Taleb came up with first, i don’t remember what the law’s name was if it had one. It was a rule of thumb that says that universally, anyone who sees future possibilities and wards off a crisis will avert that crisis and promptly not be thanked whatsoever by the public because nobody else realized the truth that a disaster could’ve happened. AKA, Trump realized the economy wasn’t necessarily going to be great but managed to make the economy better than ever like he said was going to happen during his presidency, and gets 0 credit for succeeding with this campaign promise. Meanwhile, the many horribly incorrect statements and predictions by Democrats about Trump with Russiagate or other things like how he won’t fix the economy are put in the memory hole even though this should show a horrible track record of inaccuracy by them. It is disgusting.
Anyway, great stuff you’ve written here, this site is basically one of the best wealths of knowledge on the internet, it’s always fun continuing to learn from your tweets or other articles.
The Gaussian Blindness definition is GOLD: “I’ve got my head in the oven, and my ass in the fridge, so I’m OK.” :-)
I hope this isn’t a trap to catch out folks trying to think without state supervision. Thanks for all the work you put in on this. You’ve corrected a few errors in my own thought. I’m grateful.
LOL!!! Made my day Mark. :-)
The CDC database is still inaccessible, and the CDC site is wrong. We are not at “7.6% PIC”, but rather 4% Covid – 5 weeks now below the epidemic threshold of 5.8% for MMWR Week 42.
We are reducing unreported Covid Reserve again for the 3rd week straight – encouraging…
You wrote the above on twitter. How are you getting from 7.6% PIC to 4%. I am hoping to learn. I would very much like to believe we are out of pandemic/epidemic conditions.
CC, it was in the tweet itself. And this tweet which followed.
Completely makes sense.
I am hoping that we are below the level where this is a pandemic. Maybe the graph is complex. Can you do a graph that just shows two data points? The actual Covid deaths and the other?
You do amazing work on this by the way. Sorry.
Can you explain how the 5.8% floor number to qualify as a pandemic is arrived at?
Teach me.
Ignosticism is claiming a belief, because you claim atheists and theists don’t know what they’re talking about.
This is not true in the least. One always has the right to dissent to an imperious claim that is forced upon one as truth. Dissent is not a belief system, except in the eyes of those who wish to deny a human their right to dissent.
Silence Denial Fallacy – those who will deny one their silence, privacy or dissent, are in reality attempting to deny one their very existence.
I came by way of Twitter following your covid work there. I know you can’t possibly keep 500 blog posts updated but, have you seen any updated data on this post?
Additionally, any thoughts on the upcoming covid vaccine? I can see a “fasttracking” scenario playing out where the vaccine isn’t getting the “extreme evidence” of either safety or efficacy with regard to managing the actual vs perceived threat of the virus. The social pressure to be vaccinated could be profound- possibly even with school or work mandates driving things.
As a patient enemy of the US, I would simply enjoy such hilarious circumstances, be conservative on my own vaccine schedules, and wait things out.
Or if you were an impatient enemy of the US, you might create a test for a virus that doesn’t kill people, watch them light their economy of fire and then be aggressive in their vaccine schedules.
VII. Only we, along with our love and care for each other, are real.
Where did this come from? Why did you choose love and care, is hate not real also? Could it not be said, that love and care exist only in enough quantity to derive evolutionary benefits. Perhaps some people just need to be suckers for the benefit of all. We live in a scarcity economy, so it’s a race to get more resources, more power than everyone else, it just so happens a bit of love and care can give an advantage so it exists in just enough quantity to provide that advantage, so it is no more real than hate, and especially less real than the desire for power. [ To be clear, as an abrahamic theist who does not believe in a grampa in the sky, I don’t agree with the material outside of these brackets, I just don’t understand how you would come up with such a statement. Please don’t yell at me if you respond, I apologize in advance]
Hey allmen,
I never get upset at disagreement nor mere questions. Hate is real for those who are alive in this realm yes. It is as real as tables, dollar bills and one’s score in a video game.
But what we learn and add to our character, and whatever we carry with us in what comes after, if anything at all comes after, those are then real. Even if they end right at the moment of death, and our last fleeting thoughts are of our loved one’s and the challenges we have overcome – they are still the only real things.
Hate is a passing score in a video game, no matter what way you spin this realm.
TES :-)
I wrote up a second section to that a few days ago but accidentally deleted it with one wrong click. Just goes to show why i should be more careful. I don’t know if you’re reading these as you obviously have lots to do, but the reason I post them is essentially just because if there’s even a 10% chance or so that I actually provide original and useful information and it gets to you, that would make it 100% worth it for me to write this much. On your twitter, you mostly just post COVID graphs, and i don’t have the research knowledge to provide all that meaningful feedback there.
Anyway, my general point with the reference of those documentaries is to ty to establish first principles for what an ideal civilization would look like, and show by contrast how modern capitalism often contradicts it. And yes, I do know capitalism is sometimes good, and I’m not saying communism is the answer. But the point here is the principle of ideality. This can be seen in even everyday specific situations and become very relevant in normal capitalist society, not just some ideal theoretical future. For example, people often do not understand the vast harm that can occur when a country like the USA exports its manufacturing industries overseas. This would be easy for the public to understand if they saw the basic logic of the principles of “Localization” and “Ephemeralization”, the first being something the documentary author previously mentioned often goes over in his documentaries and books, and the second being something found out a long time ago by Buckminister Fuller. Specifically, it is always preferable to produce things locally where they are needed when all things are equal and this does not reduce efficiency. This reduces supply chains and increases self sufficiency as well. When countries put all their manufacturing overseas, they can be bankrupted by embargos or sudden crises far more easily, as their economy is increasingly based on immaterial services, not material goods which they can draw upon even if other nations decide to stop selling them the products of the manufacturing industries. Giving your manufacturing industries to other countries is basically like a human transplanting their arms away and expecting their brain and their speech alone to keep them eternally safe. Meanwhile the other guy/nation, now has much stronger arms and a weapon they built with them, and at some point you will give them your legs as well and you’ll no longer be able to do anything without foreign aid. At which point, you can have your loans called upon to be paid up and you are then seen as the bad guy/deserving of bankruptcy and all your citizens suffering serious consequences.
But there are much more obvious situations than that. Peak Oil is an incredibly important issue and we will be running out of oil in a few decades. So, energy grid localization is pretty important. Furthermore, if you just take localization and ephemeralization to their logical extremes, they are very synergistic. The more technology does with less, the easier it tends to be to localize. The more you localize, the less dependency there is. The ideal form of this would basically be “Localized Immortality/Independence” of any given good or service, where something like a renewable energy grid or manufacturing of cars or homes can be maintained indefinitely with only local resources. With cars, this would be electric cars being mass produced to the point where everyone could have one for cheap, and if they lasted 30 to 50 years without ever malfunctioning or breaking, the industry would be obsolete. No need to sell something everyone has in abundance. The same should apply one day with homes, as 1st world countries are already in sub-replacement population growth levels. There are already more people-less homes than homeless people, and the resources exist to make enough homes for everyone. It would be possible to obsolete apartments and give everyone a house, there are the technological resources, the economic system simply often acts as a shackle on them. Once again this would lead to abundance and the market for a now-abundant good becoming simply OBSOLETE. The same applies with food as well with the vertical farming, hydroponic technologies, and also even localized/portable food production methods possible with some methods like rotary farms. Rather than let big businesses control what’s in all the food, the natural end point of such food tech is to mass produce localized food abundance in every city/town to the point that control mechanisms can no longer be imposed from top down. Abundance is the opposite of the market system and it’s the natural end point of this technological revolution.
So in sum, mass producing enough homes for everyone, enough electric cars for everyone and a large surplus, and producing enough localized food sources for everyone are all technologically possible things, I think nobody can truly deny that. The limiting factor is economics, which thrives on scarcity and cyclical consumption of goods. That’s why the phones keep getting pumped out every 9 months with marginal improvements, despite the incredible waste caused by producing billions of phones every year just to get a little more profit. I am sure it could be possible to make smart phones for everyone that would work for 30 years without breaking. That’s why the batteries aren’t even allowed to be taken out a lot of the time, because they’re supposed to break and break the whole phone with them through planned obsolesence. It’s absolutely ridiculous. The internet is another thing tending towards localized abundance for everyone for free, which is why the censorship has gotten so ridiculous with all the tech companies clamping down on free speech. Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, etc. All united in censoring anything remotely right wing as shown with even middling figures getting banned from everything. Even the President himself gets censored on Twitter with warning messages hiding his tweets sometimes! And of course, i’m sure you know that a whole lot of Trump supporters are totally censored, and there are likely many cases where comments are ‘ghosted’ as well and made to seem to work yet not appear to anyone else. I’ve seen many testimonies on that and i don’t see reason to doubt the tech companies could do it. This is absolutely batshit insane. Point is though, things in abundance and easiness to produce tend towards Localization, Ephemeralization, and an effective ‘Immortality’ for the good or service produced by this confluence of factors. For food, there are storage limits on how long even canned food can last, but if our civilization was rational we’d still have lots of canned food stockpiled in all the cities and towns. Rather than so much food getting dumped and wasted, there would be big canned food stockpiles in the case of emergencies because the production capacity clearly exceeds consumption. For cars, it seems obvious that the whole industry could go obsolete in this way one day, and the oil industry often relies on starting foreign wars. As for Energy, please see the geothermal statements in the zeitgeist documentaries i mentioned. Maybe I’m wrong, but if Geothermal can provide for all the needed energy reserves, there’s no reason it shouldn’t have already been used to complete the whole grid. As far as I know, it seems that you simply need to dig deeper even if you aren’t on a geothermal hotspot. That means that if enough facilities were built, they could simply keep extracting heat forever as long as they could last decades easily. Suppose the grid was then 100% easily sustained by geothermal facilities positioned throughout the country. Well, the grid would be complete forever at that point. The only reason to add more would be if people didn’t trust the govt and wanted localized or modular power sources like solar in their homes, but the point is the grid should have been ‘completed’ by now without a reliance on nonrenewable resources. Arguments can be made for nuclear being a renewable energy source that isn’t intermittent, but if these Geothermal claims are really true, i see no reason why it couldn’t be simply used for everything. At that point, all the oil facilities would become obsolete. Furthermore the point remains about production capacity far exceeding what economics allows for. The system depends on cyclical consumption and therefore REQUIRES SCARCITY, there is no way around it.
If you do end up having the time, I would love to hear your opinion on these issues like Cyclical Consumption and scarcity dependence inherent to the market system. Can we achieve a post scarcity civilization? Do you think it’s scientifically possible to do certain things like completing the energy grid renewably with current tech? Do you agree with these claims about the inherent limits of capitalism? And yeah, i see how these could be used for an authoritarian technocracy argument, but i’m obviously not advocating for that, i think localization is the inevitable tendency which would lead to far greater freedoms than we have today. Imagine the entire middle class simply having a home of their own and not being in constant fear of going homeless/their family disintegrating due to economic forces often beyond their control. I do believe this is possible and could create a great society. Yes, some poor people are lazy, but the productive capacity allowed by technology would make that a non issue if used to its fullest extent.
If you want to know why i comment so much on this blog, it’s because I feel like i might be able to make much more of an impact commenting here than commenting on youtube channels or on twitter or in other areas where it’s likely people won’t read the whole opinion, and dissident opinions are often censored anyways on youtube/twitter/etc. It’s not only me commenting on the 10% or maybe just 1% chance that i might provide you some valuable insight or important point which might make exponentially more of a difference if it changes the mind of someone influential like you than whoever might be reading my comments anywhere else. It’s also because it helps me both store my thoughts in a coherent way and post them in a place where they migth be read by someone who fully understands them. In this way, it’s the optimal balance for me between internal thinking alone, which often leads me to boredom due to lack of apparent external results, and dialogue, which can produce a sense of futility if nobody who happens to read bothers listening or they just don’t get it due to knee jerk reactions. Or if nobody reads it. You get the idea. Sorry if this last segment was essentially a monologue of its own. I just am anticipating the possibility that you might be annoyed or not prefer me to comment on so many of yourindividual blogposts unlike most other commentors here seem to, if that seems like it takes up too much text space and detracts from the focus you want to be on your blog posts themselves. If you really don’t like it for that reason or some other, i’ll stop. Although, obviously you could just not approve the posts in the first place, but I feel it’s better to explain that part as I feel a need to know whether it’s just bothersome at this point or whether it’s fine for me to continue doing this.
I think a lot of this is really good work but that ‘Principle of Indistinguishability’ seems like a stretch. It puts the foundation of morality in a continuous flux where ‘lowly humans’ are unable to comprehend objective moral truth, even though I’m sure you didn’t intend for it to come off that way. In some cases, it would be correct that a complex form of benevolence would seem like malevolence or indifference, but that is most certainly not the case with ALL possible situations. For example, let’s just look at the most obvious moral evils like pedophillia or mass murders done purely for the sake of psychopaths enjoying the killing of people. Obviously, you can only go so far with this principle. Certain levels of evil can definitely be defined as such without the observers having to possess perfect knowledge of good and evil or anything of the sort. No level of increased intelligence or ‘divine’ status, even if one’s IQ went up to 4000 or something that ridiculous, can change logical consistencies and inconsistencies which normal people can observe to exist. So, evil can definitely be proven as real, and no explanation no matter how advanced can justify certain acts as somehow a grand act of benevolence.
All that said, I get that you are talking about debatably existing or not existing entities, whether they be God, aliens refusing to intervene in earthly affairs, or whatever else, and that this simple point I’m making about how some acts in the real world are verifiably and obviously evil is something you already know. I just object to your wording here because you talk about ‘any act’, and because I do think it is the case that even extremely advanced or even metaphysically ‘divine’ entities like any supposed Creator God can be judged by humans to an extent. For example, let’s just go with the easy examples. What if God randomly got angry at seeing a team he liked lose a sports game and then decided to destroy the universe, killing everyone in it? Or if he went all Jehovah Old Testament style and tortured everyone to death for eternity in some kind of metaphysical hell, good and bad people included? Clearly, that would be pretty stupid. Complex acts of seeming inaction in what seems to be critical situations of need only make sense to the extent that they can satisfy logical consistency and at least seem intuitively plausible. Let’s say God suddenly decided to send everyone in the universe diving into a fire pit for 1 billion years, or more accurately just a month until most of them lose sentience and any memory of their own identity under the endless pain, then sitting there and enjoying the show of the infinite torture session in heaven with a small host of spared people. That would undeniably be pretty evil. Or imagine if an alien race decided to use electronic technology to chip and eternally enslave all humans, then used genetic modification to make them unable to reproduce on their own, then basically removed all their unique traits and let them be sucked up into a cyborg hive mind situation sort of like the Borg in Star Trek, then started using them as pawns for whatever else they wanted to do. Pretty obviously, that would be very evil as well, and it wouldn’t matter if the aliens in question had 1 billion IQ or 10, the morality of it would still be the same. I just think that if we assume the premise that moral truth exists and can be discovered by logic and reason, it is indeed true that certain things are undeniably evil no matter what. And I know that all of that may indeed seem redundant or like something you already would have seen, but I think it’s important to say anyways.
To get to a slightly more original point here, to me, the most sensible position on any true morality, should we assume it exists, is that it is a pre-existent or rather eternal truth independent of the existence of spacetime. Ideally, all moral truths could connect logically in one coherent whole, and there would be a correct series of actions for all individuals in any given situation. Meanwhile, this also gives a more coherent explanation of why there is an afterlife. Many NDE testimonies do not explain where souls come from or why they are immortal/eternal. I get that most people wouldn’t understand and many are uninterested in the details, but I need to know. So, since most NDE testimonies simply don’t give those juicy deets, I feel a need to theorize on my own, which does give its own unique joy I guess compared to just hearing a truth from someone else. Basically, the TLDR of this little theory is that an individual soul being eternal could be partially explained by a person being meant to exist, their existence being eternal and possibly just meant to exist so other people can be more complete in general. Think of it like the four fundamental forces in nature being separate yet assumed by all scientists seeking a Unified Field Theory as being technically one-in-the-same Superforce. My interpretation of individual souls as eternal yet connected by a collective consciousness is different from the more scientific and strictly evidence-based Absolute Idealist/Idealist Monist perspective. Sticking strictly to science, it is hard to deny that Free Will exists, but it is not necessary to jump from the existence of Free Will to the existence of an Eternal Individualized Soul/FreeWillSource. It could still be the case that individual experience is more of a split/disassociated alter of the collective consciousness, although even the word ‘consciousness’ is wrong since that experience/will source need not be consciously aware of itself on a human or animal-like level. Nonetheless, I do make that logical leap based on my own experiences in life and do assume there is an extent of individual eternity in this. Another twist on that thought would be that there is also a layer of individuality in all morality;Even if someone has some transcendent purpose for existing, it is always preferable that they feel that purpose works for them. Transcendent moral systems are a sort of Hive Mind in a way, as while they seek an ideal where everyone works in harmony and their own individual purposes ideally add up to lesser or greater collective purposes ranging from individual 2 person friendships/love/other bonds/whatever else to the whole universe/all conscious beings and how they interact, but at the same time this is definitely in contrast to the Free Will aspect. In my opinion any transcendent moral truth has to win out in the end in importance for true morality to exist coherently, and individuals have freedom in the extent that they individually come to terms with their purpose/search for it and try to fulfill that to the best they can.
As a little side note on the morality mini essay, this idea of transcendent morality/purpose inevitably connecting with individuals leads to some core ideas which are applicable even for those who do not necessarily believe in an objectively true morality source. And no, it’s not the “Law must have a Law Giver” argument as Euthyphro’s Dilemma showed over 1000 years ago how even a God would have to have an objective basis for any purportedly objective morality to be so. The point is that morality and just logic itself seem to have an effect where even seeming anomalies in the moral system are dealt with in the same way. Even if an Atheist says they strongly disagree and believe everyone is meaningless or that at least some people exist meaninglessly/weren’t meant to exist, the key problem is that they talk about ideals or what is PREFERABLE on a FACTUAL basis. Which does not make sense. Honestly this meme summarizes the general idea I’m getting at best:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eb45e9PWoAEQdFH?format=jpg&name=medium
As much as I have many reasons to seriously dislike Stefan Molyneux, ranging from his mindless libertarian free market ideas ignoring serious externalities and the problems of American healthcare and capitalist danger to the environment in general, to his horrifying ‘Defooing’ advocacy he had made in the past(Basically he was telling young people believing in his philosophy that they should disassociate with their family forever since it’s a relationship they didn’t choose because they didn’t choose to be born), his idea of “Universally Preferable Behavior” makes a lot of sense to me. Nobody thinks it is universally preferable for everyone in the world to be a rapist, so everyone de facto believes in a form of UPB because they don’t want to get raped or murdered. Even those arguing in favor Dual or Multi-Tiered Morality Systems like caste systems or Nietzschean elitism against perceived as inferior classes/races/whatever, still logically have no choice but to believe in UPB. I do think it is incomplete and that logically there would be Universally Preferable Factual States of Existence and that this concept of Preferability(or more accurately, ideality) applies to objects as well as people. Even just using the Atheist Humanist reasoning it is generally preferable that humanity is able to exist and be sentient than, for example, if we lived in a reality where it wasn’t possible, or if there was no reality where it was possible. Molyneux does not talk about factual objective reality enough, probably because of the crazy libertarian beliefs. Basically, libertarian capitalism would only make sense in a reality where all humans were immortal and transcendent, choose to exist, had no externalities imposed on them, and all their interactions fully stemmed from voluntaristic principles. Of course, in that situation, Capitalism just wouldn’t last long anyways and they would transition into a rational resource based economy based on cooperation common good and individual freedoms far exceeding modern capitalism’s Wage Slave Liberty Allowances as well so it’s lose lose. My statements on capitalism here are not meant to advocate Communism(although they do imply the Preferability of a Utopian state of human existence) and only make sense in full context of what I said more clearly about Capitalism in the Post Stockholm Syndrome blog post. Let’s just say there are a lot of problems with Capitalism, regardless of the fact that many people in current day use that sentiment to push for a seeming ‘opposite’ of it which is in reality just Totalitarianism.
Anyway, I hope what i said about morality and transcendence and their inevitable relation makes sense and is with any luck a meaningful new perspective to you. I realize that i leave quite a few comments on your blogs and you are busy with many things, but to me, this is just the easiest way of getting this sort of information out in an organized manner, especially since you seem to be both someone who somehow has the time to occasionally respond to my blog comments and provides meaningful feedback. To me, the key point here is how the idea of moral justice is inescapable intertwined with the idea of an eternal soul, and one arguably doesn’t make sense without the other. For how can a soul be eternal if it does not have a reason it SHOULD exist? Yes, the individual will to exist could also be the reason, but a collective reason why that individual exists also seems important to me. All statements on the eternity or immortality of the soul are just statements of fact without a reason, and as a result lack meaning. Even if it’s undeniably true that someone has an eternal soul, that isn’t necessarily meaningful unless they have a reason to exist. Furthermore, any level of invincibility/eternity a soul might seem to have still is always going to be less than if it also has meaning as well which it derives its existence from. This also seems to apply vice versa, any level of meaning for someone to exist or any level of meaning why they should do some set of things is still always going to be incomplete without them actually existing or existing in a certain form or doing a certain set of things they are meant to do. I hope that makes some sense. To me it just seems like an inevitable truth that these logical arguments are in fact correct and remain eternally true regardless of factual realities about the true nature of individual souls or morality. It’s just a logical consistency argument about how it would work if it did exist even if we argue that moral truth is a fiction. In this way, certain moral truths are NOT dependent on evidence. In my opinion if I’m not being overly presumptive here, this line of thinking just outright SOLVES the Is-Ought dillemma lol. True, you cannot derive an Ought from an Is, but what if reality to a certain extent is meaningful and therefore the Is-es occasionally derive from the Oughts? In that case, one could see the reality of the Oughts by looking at the Is-es as long as one only uses Oughts in their arguments revolving around Oughts, aka, only using moral premises to derive moral conclusions. Then one just continuously checks the logical consistency of the moral conclusions one derives and sees if they work with each other, then continues to expand the moral conclusions further as long as they stay consistent. In this way objective morality can most certainly be derived even if some argue that it might all be ultimately baseless.
If I were to give the fallacy that all moral truths must be ultimately baseless and that one can therefore instantly reject all moral arguments a name, it’d be “Nihilist of the Gaps”. Sounds memey and cool to me to be honest, and it’d be a nice way to make fun of Nihilists. Just call them a Nihilist of the Gaps, that’ll be sure to trigger their NLP. As for what they’re doing, this behavior is an act of continuously moving the goalposts further back whenever nihilism fails to apply to a certain moral system which the nihilists agree is consistent with itself to some extent or another in ordering human behavior in a reasonable way good for everyone.” If your pathetic morality is consistent in one area or even in basically all human behavior in making people happy, just you wait you foolish little Moral kids! Nihilism-God/Nothingness is always the final background truth in the end, Ha Ha, if I am right about nihilism in one instance that means all your other wins are totally meaningless!” It’s just totally stupid and immature. Everyone basically knows morality is real. Moreover, Nihilist of the Gaps is indeed accurate in the same sense as God of the Gaps because there are more than enough examples like NDES and other incidents to give plenty of reason to believe there is indeed an ultimate moral truth behind the whole universe, and that there is reason and order to it all.
It really is basically as bad as the God of the Gaps fallacy, Nihilists are just too mentally constrained that their frontier of nihilism can indeed be pushed back in the same way as Creationism can be reduced in its possibility frontier. Derive one consistent set of morals, and a Nihilist will tell you to take it back further. If anything, even if someone somehow derived consistent morality that explained the correct actions for all people to take at every moment in history and all the increasingly more or less Ideal timelines branching off from those choice pathways, and the Nihilists agreed that it was internally consistent, they would just go back and say “But what about before the Big Bang? Ha, take that!” or something silly or childish like that. Basically, to put it in your helpful terms, morality being presumed as existing and deriving from an ultimate moral truth behind everything should honestly be the Null Hypothesis for anyone in a civilization who wants the civilization to function and work well for everyone, and the onus should be on the nihilists to prove all morality baseless. Even if morality WAS proven ultimately baseless past a certain level of complexity and unable to stay fully consistent past a certain point, that doesn’t make those lesser forms of interconnected harmonious morality suddenly not exist and no longer exist as Morality. That would only be the case for those willing to give up their morals the moment they became personally certain the universe or whatever else was ultimately baseless. Those who do not could still believe that morality indeed exists. And Atheists have not even come close to ontologically proving all morality or meaning is impossible. My argument would be that if there IS a moral truth underlying all existence, it would explain why anything even sprang into existence from nothingness in the first place. For just the passive state of “Fact” and Existence would probably only allow the continuation of an unending state of Nothingness without any change(For how can there be change without an Agent of Change/Consciousness, and isn’t Meaning probably just inevitable when you deal with consciousness anyways?), I would not be at all surprised if one day it is ontologically proven that a Meaning of sorts is inevitable for any possible universe or multiverse if there is one to have come into existence from nothingness in the first place. The universe or multiverse may also be somehow eternal but the same argument would probably apply. With Meaning one can see a reason why any creation would logically occur, while otherwise, there really doesn’t seem to be one. Rather, why is there ANY truth at all? Why are there even ontological facts or inevitabilities like how the fundamental forces would work if a universe existed? Why do we not live in a Zero Information Ontology where nothing ever existed nor did the concept of existence or consciousness either exist? Well, because that would be absurd and not make any sense, as the Truth of how reality works is generally just Eternal and an inescapable fact. Nonetheless I think that Atheists not even questioning such things is really stupid. And more importantly, I think that as much as some would condemn it as foolish, my argument for the logical inevitability of meaning for anything to exist might have a grain of truth in it. Of course, I am not saying that the universe would remain meaningless even if it somehow started as such, but I wonder if such an origin is really even possible in the first place from nothingness. To an extent the meaningfulness of the beginnings of the universe or reality may all be inevitably subjective, but I do think it’s worth wondering whether there is objectivity there to be rationally discovered.
Anyway I hope you liked the Nihilist of the Gaps meme in context with the general argument and the other meme i referenced. I would be glad to hear any thoughts you have on these ontological investigations and whether they could discover any new truth or not. I mean, i’d certainly be happy if i really had discovered new truth but I’m fine with just making the memes to be honest, assuming you had time/wanted to read it.
I have much to say about this very concise and accurate post which sums up the situation in the world right now, and it is effectively impossible for me to say all the relevant information in one comment. Therefore, assuming you get the time to read them, I’m going one subject at a time. This is not only for your ease of reading but simply to make it easier for others to read if they bother.
First of all, I think that as great of a summary as this is, it is essentially reactive in a major sense. This ties in with your view that exposing the inconsistencies, lies, and malevolent phenomenon surrounding controlling agents is a more truthful approach, and while that view is good in its own way, it’s not my way of doing things. That is fine, but I simply want to start by rephrasing everything you’ve said in the opposite order. My way of explaining things is to start by saying how the world should work and then explain how it has deviated from this possibility due to the actions of malevolent individuals.
To start, let’s explain what an ideal world would look like. I would go into my personal interpretation of just what it means for something to be ‘ideal’ in the first place, but what’s far more important and provable is the material reality of how the world can positively change. Many people could disagree on this. Many atheists would try to nag that none exists because of their nihilist philosophies, and Theists would impose their own theistic dogmas, but it is really just common sense. It’s common sense to the point where religions designed for common sense possessing people like Christianity always have to include some of this common sense in their dogmas for the brainwashing to work. Basically, an ideal world would be one that ran on reason and could last endlessly into the future without self-destructing, and it would be one where the people were free and safe. Most logical people can see the absurdity of the current nuclear situation if they try, but that is just an extension of an incredibly flawed society. Right now, a great portion of people are ‘wage slaves’ living from paycheck to paycheck just to make ends meet, and this state of affairs doesn’t affect the material reality of science. The necessary technology already exists to run the whole world on renewable energy and feed everyone. It would probably only take a few years at most to build the necessary power plants, food production facilities, and so on if just a small portion of the world’s people did the needed effort. The monetary system often is completely disconnected from the material world’s capabilities. In an economic collapse, nothing of physical value has actually disappeared. The factories don’t suddenly stop functioning. Instead, the badly designed system we use just stops functioning and everyone is laid off despite all the machines and all the people with the right knowledge and skills still being around. It’s because the current capitalist system dominant in the USA and other countries runs on endless competition between industries and all the inefficiencies, cyclical consumption, and stagnation incentivized by that system. An ideal system should seek maximum efficiency and human rights as far as possible, aiming to free people from unnecessary labor or external control. There are many necessary aspects, ranging from localizing production as much as possible to reduce energy waste, building a complete sustainable energy grid to obsolete environmentally harmful resources, localizing food production as well so individuals have control over what they eat and can ensure safety, etc. Disarmament of nuclear weapons and other civilization destroying technologies is also a key step which must be done on a global scale. The current economy effectively makes most people ‘wage slaves’, as they need to keep working in service jobs to buy necessary goods so they can avoid starving to death. The transition from an agricultural economy to a service based one allowed this slavery to occur, but it is by no means inevitable. It is even possible now to produce food completely locally within a city by using advanced technologies like vertical farms without even depending on food production elsewhere.. Not all resources can be produced locally, but it should be done whenever possible and efficient, as that maximizes freedom. Furthermore, changing to an economy not centered around money and scarcity based interactions would allow far greater personal freedom of movement. People could change where they lived within a country easily if the monetary system did not inhibit them so much. And no, this does not mean that ownership should become impossible. If anything, there would be far far more than enough homes and vehicles in total past a certain point, allowing people to move around freely. Do you see where I am going with this? The goal should be to obsolete this scarcity and create a culture of abundance, and even if some people disagree about the appropriate means to getting to an abundant and freer civilization, it should be obvious that it would be a desirable end goal. It should also be obvious how capitalism is fundamentally going to incline towards cyclical consumption rather than completion. In capitalism, slightly better cars or phones are built every year and sold over and over with the companies not aiming to produce anything truly revolutionary. In an actually decent society, we would be making the best possible cars and phones and so on and designing them to last as long as possible and be compatible with further innovations in technology all while minimizing waste and negative environmental externalities. This does not happen, and when it does, it only happens by accident. The internet, for example, is something which adds to individual freedom, and it obviously is not something that can or should be sold as a product. It’s a public utility and scarcity does not apply to it. This should all make it very clear that capitalism is fundamentally dependent on scarcity and inevitably perpetuates it. There are occasional innovators who use capitalism as a means to increase the freedom of the people, like Ford or others, but capitalism in itself is in no way designed to do that. That’s why the whole society is built around people paying off loans for homes, cars, etc, as if they all became property owners not subject to debt slavery, it would be harder to enslave them. At that point other means like the Tyflocracy methods you effectively described in another thread are employed to indirectly remove the property from these productive people through economics and force them to flee to another area where they are once again debt slaves. That’s what it’s all about. Meanwhile, the trend of mechanization is used in a negative fashion to take control of the food supply and so on with just a few corporations rather than liberate people from food worries. And this is not a joke, millions of people have starved to death or lost their livelihoods because of this sort of capitalistic routine, it is in fact horrifying compared to what we could easily have if we properly used machines to solve societal problems.
Plenty of people have knee jerk reactions on this subject, so just to clear those up, tI am not advocating Communism, nor am i advocating a centrally run Technocracy as some do when discussing the scarcity subject. Generally speaking, communism was just used as a means to achieving totalitarian power by groups who promised the underclass freedom and promptly crushed them under their control after getting the power they wanted. The goal in the USSR was to depose the current upper class and Russia and promptly replace it with a brutal dictatorship. Communism was not an actual honest effort to achieve a post-scarcity civilization of material abundance where everyone could prosper. That was just a lie to control the poor. On the other hand, many ‘socialist’ policies that the USA and capitalists in general despise have proven extremely effective in European countries. In particular, their healthcare systems are clearly far superior to the USA’s system and they do not overcharge people for 40x the actual material cost of a medical good or service. This is because those working in these healthcare systems are not incentivized to maintain sickness rather than actually cure diseases and illnesses. Again, cyclical consumption encourages the creation of needs, not the actual permanent resolution of problems. A great number of further problems exist with the current use of capitalism. For example, in banking, the money issued in countries is not actually based on the credbility of the government and its ability to solve physical problems. It is instead based on nothing, and in fact, all money is debt nowadays, even though that is not necessary. Debt-free currency has been done in the past and worked, as when all money comes from a loan from the government that has to be repaid with interest on top, it is a structural INEVITABILITY that some people are going to go bankrupt. The amount of debt to be paid off will ALWAYS exceed the amount of money people have availble due to the interest. Furthermore, when you add on fractional reserve banking the entire currency is rapidly devalued by inflation. If you want a more detailed explanation on these banking and monetary issues, you can simply view the documentary Zeitgeist Addendum. It clearly explains in its first hour how this works.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-M_kVZTf50
Zeitgeist Moving Forward, the sequel, can be found here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoyQtEWCBpY&t=5257s
It also gets at extremely critical issues on this subject, like how capitalism has encouraged the use of economic hit men and so on to subjugate foreign countries. The second portion of Zeitgeist Addendum and the second part of Moving Forward cover a far more important topic, which is what an ideal society would look like. Both of them easily make the top 5 most important documentaries i have ever seen in my life and I really think you should see them if you have not already. Granted, they don’t have a very clear mindset on how specifically to efficiently accomplish a transition, but that does not change the extreme relevance of these ideas. Even you watch Star Trek, I have looked at your Twitter account. Star Trek is indeed very ‘socialist’ but it is so because it follows a few common sense thoughts about how any rational utopian civilization should work. All people who dismiss Utopianism are pretty silly as no society truly makes sense when not put into context of what its goal is, and what most preferable end state it is meant to culminate in. In that sense, Utopianism is just rational, the only truly meaningful question about it is what the best means are to reach a Utopian state of civilization. Anyway, I do hope you either watch those documentaries or have already seen them. I’ll go on to explain my own personal interpretation of what truly is ideal in another post, but this explanation should make it more than clear enough what an ideal society would look like materially speaking. It would seek efficiency and to last indefinitely into the future all while continuously improving itself as much as possible, and the same would apply to all the people in it. I really can’t believe that the scientific mainstream doesn’t even tend to think about the end goal of civilization, it is utterly absurd. I do hope this explanation provided at least some new information to you or at least summarized it in a coherent way. My reason for that is that you seem extremely focused on exposing the rationale of malevolent groups you are against, and while that’s all fine and good, I do think it is also very important to give a solution and explain what an ideal society would look like. 100% accuracy is not at all needed, and earnest attempts to reach for that ideal are in fact unimaginably important right now. It does not matter if people have some metaphysical disagremeents about religion or ideology or anything else, as those would not change anything about the ideal nature of the aforementioned civilizational model, and by no means am i saying anything like that capitalism must be ‘banned’ like the Communists did. I’m saying it will become obsolete in time and nobody will see a reason to use it if the right steps are taken to ensure freedom, and that achieving that abundant world is what everyone would want if they thought about it a little harder and were given the right info.
Some of these captor tactics remind me strongly of the actions of Asimov’s Foundation to their neighbors. I am re-reading it for the first time in over twenty years and I am not enthused about the autoritarianism I find.
Hello Ethical Skeptic, I have a question about the following quote, “because of a certain method I used to eliminate calcium phosphate-LDL cholesterol plaque from my heart and brain blood vessels. I noticed a significant boost in my cognitive capabilities after the associated therapy.” May I ask what this therapy is that you use to reduce calcium phosphate – LDL cholestrol plaque?
EDTA and doxycycline. I have absolutely no knowledge, none whatsoever of what these two, taken in concert, will do.
Love your article. Seems to resonate with our current COVID environment. Thanks for thinking in a day when people have stopped thinking.
Pingback: Reliable and Probative – Ephektikoi
Just ran across this and it’s really fascinating. I’d love to know what your typical day of eating looks like, foods you avoid (other than grains) and foods you emphasize.
My daily diet
Grains = rice
Veggies = asparagus, cauliflower, green beans, broccoli, brussel sprouts, potato
Meat protein = salmon, chicken, turkey
snacks = almonds, sunflower seeds, organic corn tortilla chips, turkey, rice bread
oils: coconut, sunflower, grassfed cow butter
Avoid 100% – these foods make me physically sick
GMO Corn
Corn starch
Wheat derived preservatives & starches
Wheat
Soy
Soybean Oil
Canola/Cottonseed/Safflower/Corn Oils
Fructose/Sugar (use dextrose as sweetener)
High Fructose Corn Syrup
TES :-)
Thank you. That’s pretty similar to mine. My biggies I stay away from are grains other than rice (and normally brown rice) and any industrial seed oils. Grass fed butter, olive oil, coconut oil and sometimes avocado oil are used liberally. Lucky to have a friend who is a farmer and he sells pastured beef, pork and chicken.
This is quite a great deal of vital information. It would certainly explain just why the USA has so much obesity. It isn’t just natural. Once again, this assumption that it must all be natural places all the blame upon the potential victim. There is no double-checking process in these easy assumptions. Changes like the mass switch to GMO food should have been assumed potentially dangerous and screened for, but that didn’t happen. In the USA, nobody even gets to know what is in the food if the GMO food company does not want them to. A lesser russian roulette of sorts. And there is not a control group. In a more reasonable society, any massive change to a health or food system would not be allowed to become the vast supermajority of everything with no oversight, and there would be places where it isn’t done to double check. Basic science stuff. But it isn’t done, only reportedly by studies that are usually kept at a distance that nobody’s going to read anyways. Not experiential knowledge that anyone could see for themselves, like the portion of the country that eats x or y GMO getting all sick and obese and such.
In India, they literally make the GMO plants unable to reproduce so that all the farmers have to keep buying them from the company. And then spread those on purpose like a virus into other farms.
Yes, I know that ‘Not all GMOS are the same’, and some are inevitably non damaging, but it is no surprise that so many people are against all GMOS when the main GMO companies like Monsanto have clearly done evil things. Meanwhile, I am pretty sure plenty of American food is sabotaged even without GMOS in it, as there are all sorts of ways to make something unhealthy without using gene modification. This means those well meaning GMO Free farmers are often not going to make their food free of contaminants whatsoever as much as they want to. An ‘Organic’ farmer can say they are all GMO free but they are not going to trace their every ingredient back to its ultimate source and make sure it is free of contamination at every step along the way in the creation and distribution of each ingredient. Nor do they expect to need to, but that is just the way it is in a clearly sabotaged country like the USA. The FDA clearly does not trace all ingredients back to their ultimate sources when they won’t even let people know all ingredients in their food. Besides, two different versions of the same ingredient can be given the same label, but one can be made in a totally different yet very dangerous or unhealthy way compared to the other, and they will get the same label.
I am just saying, in summary of all this, that when a nation’s general stock of food goes from being 0% GMO up to 1994 to most of the grocery store food being GMOs soon afterwards. I am pretty sure that if you did a study of health in the US from 1970 to 1994 and compared it to the last 20 years, the pattern would be undeniable. This in combination with the vaccine sabotage conspiracy starting in 1989 i believe is just horrendously bad. People have knee jerk reactions on these subjects due to lack of research. The fact is there are plenty of reasons GMOs can be a major problem. The way they are used to enslave farmers in other nations and force them to use a monopolistic international corp like Monsanto’s products is a fact. Unless you want to prove that is wrong or something. The idea that such power centralization couldn’t possibly create a major systemic vulnerability where all any truly conspiratorial groups out to undermine a nation would have to do is just control the leadership of said monopolistic food corporations, and that these monopolies are infallibly good because capitalism is perfect and the Invisible Hand of Competition will solve it all, is just ridiculous. Capitalism is not a perfect system and so-called “Crony” Capitalism can emerge when people simply want to seize control of the market and win forever. They are also directly incentivized to do so by the system. No, this is not a ‘Socialism’ or ‘Communism’ advertisement, but the fact is that capitalism has no structural trait designed to make it actually solve people’s problems. Point is, yes, a ‘conspiracy’ can most certainly happen when power is so easily centralized into a few corporate hands, and the system is essentially all in favor of people doing this.
Last point. This is not even the totality of the health issue. GMOs, other possible food sabotage people might have no way of knowing about except through its effect, vaccination poisonings, they are all serious issues. It’s no wonder that with that confluence of GMOs and vaccines all starting up in the 90s that everything started becoming horrible then. Now, look at all the intellectuals you think of as intelligent, or simply at any other important and intelligent figure in the world today who has a key grasp on reality. What is their age?
My prediction:40s to early 60s at most. That’s the probable age of most smart and meaningful world figures, scientists, CEOS, etc, if my idea that lead did serious mental damage is correct. Why is that? Remember that lead was only removed from gasoline and other products starting in the 1970s. People born before then were probably badly damaged and remain damaged to this day. It seems like a pseudo-repeat of the Rome collapse scenario which was caused by the exact same heavy metal, lead. This part is very important, as literally everybody should know that it was lead that did Rome in, so any surface level ‘Skeptic’ claims that it only reduced IQ just a little bit in the USA should be treated with the great doubt they deserve based on obvious historical evidence. It’s not like lead suddenly became a non problem because hundreds of years have passed.
Of course,even though the lead is gone from gas and other products now starting in the 70s, because there are malevolent groups in influential positions we now have the vaccine and other health disasters instead to replace the accidental lead one, which as far as I know wasn’t started by a conspiracy. The key point is this. The only sliver of seemingly mostly ‘toxin free’ people alive today in the USA had birthdates that begin in the 1970s and ended in 1989 or so with the vaccine sabotage beginning. From that argument, we should expect the smartest and least brain damaged people today to be around 40-50 years old. I am sure you can double check that far more accurately than me with your knowledge of the world. But from just what I know, whether it’s a clearly genius guy like Elon Musk, or just one of the other seriously valuable intellectuals, they are all in their 40s or early 50s. There should be more 30 or 60 year old geniuses with similar influence but it doesn’t seem to be happening in the USA. People getting more skilled over time doesn’t seem like a good enough explanation here, either. I don’t have any strong evidence here, it’s just my intuitive judgement, but it seems true based on what i know, I am sure you can make a more detailed and valid judgement here.
I have no large variety of sources on this lead epidemic claim which must have great damage on the USA even now among ‘Boomers’, most of whom probably got damaged by it if it was really as prevalent in gasoline as i imagine. However, my initial low effort search really makes it seem that quite a lot of damage was done. Here’s one official source quoting an Indian study:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598508/
“After studying 74 children at 4–14 years of age, Bellinger et al. [23] found that IQ is inversely proportional blood lead levels, and IQ values dropped about 6 points with every 100 μg/L increase in the level of lead in the blood. A high level of lead in the blood has adverse effects on intellectual development in children.”
6 points each. And the abstract of that individual study shows it is incredibly bad over in India.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15875889/
It could literally drop your IQ 22 points if you were among the kids who had the most lead in their blood. Maybe America wasn’t as bad, but I don’t even know. The point is that lead was in gasoline and other products for decades and decades. This seems like it was a serious crisis that everyone has forgotten, even though logically speaking plenty of 60+ year old Americans could still be alive whose brains got damaged by the gasoline exhaust from cars driving by their schools or by their parent’s cars as they were possibly driven to school when they were from the ranges of 1 to 10 years old. I doubt it’s anywhere near as bad as the vaccine issue since those seem explicitly designed to ruin people, but it’s still serious and i can’t believe nobody talks about it.
So, the lead issue is probably pretty bad not only in its effects on the history of the USA and other nations, but even in its effects on present day people of the right age. Nor am i too keen to assume the government perfectly handled this, for all i know the ‘safe’ levels of lead were improperly figured out and some places in the USA might still have issues with lead in products. And if conspiratorial agents seeking to undermine the US have already been largely successful with vaccine sabotage, they might as well go all in with any other means of poisoning they can get away with, and probably have done so in totally undetected and unanticipated ways, if they have enough influence. A lot of possible “Unknown Unknown” problems as you have described that term before, which are still there regardless of people being aware of them or not. But I still want to keep the focus on lead, as it is something literally everyone who knows any history should know caused a lot of damage to the Romans and ruined them, and it still matters even know. It would still matter even if the leaded gasoline had stopped in 1945 because of the leftover gap of all the potential geniuses that might’ve happened before that and didn’t would be there, and who knows what good could’ve resulted from that not happening. But it’s particularly relevant since there are probably still a lot of living examples today of how there is basically just a tiny sliver of ‘safe’ unpoisoned people compared to what there should have been. Hopefully that all made sense. I feel like a clear understanding is needed of the full damage extent of both this and vaccine damage. Yes, Autism rates at 1 in 30 among babies nowadays compared to the old 1 in 10’000 are total insanity, but was there an Average IQ Drop too as a result of that damage? Or another average mental trait being reduced in a way not as easily measured? I just want to know what you think the best evidence is. It would also help if you had any more detailed sources on the lead issue but obviously vaccines are a bit more central. Your article about Vaccinials didn’t describe a lot of the issues you attributed to them. 17 in 66 or so suffering some form of visible cranial misdevelopment according to you, but what kind? I just want to know, as you know, then i’d actually be able to see the claimed damage signs and form patterns on my own. And in general, anyone else would be able to see, of course. What signs are there are visible cranial misdevelopment? Images would also help.
Hopefully that was all clear enough, I’m just trying to get numbers and images everyone can understand out of all this. Numbers like the average IQ drop caused by lead over the duration of its use in USA, the average damage caused by Autism during different times of its use, etc. You had a really good graph on the Vaccinials article, but it’d probably be a whole lot better if you could correlate it with other national trends and show just how it is impacting everything. My judgement on the Lead issue is that some average people in the 1800s sound like total geniuses compared to what I’ve seen of the 1900s. All the speeches I’ve ever read of Americans in the 1800 just sound way more intelligent than the ones I read today, and it’s not because those people didn’t have serious problems. They did, but their base attention span and intelligence just seems like it was much greater. Even the sentences people spoke at the time are simply far longer compared to what people use today. If anything, even their breath capacity itself was probably a lot larger as well for them to even be able to speak well for so long without issues. TV making everyone become much less literate is probably part of why modern culture seems worse, but maybe that was only a problem because their intelligence got lowered by lead in the first place.
And again, most of this is just my intuitive judgement, not based on some large body of evidence. It seems like it would be worth investigating, but I am pretty sure that literally nothing of the sort ever happens. Nobody does routine checks to see if the culture is becoming less intelligent or if there is some sign of a problem. It just seems ridiculous. The GMO issue is one thing but my main original point here is about Lead’s potential effects on the world today. I hope it made sense to you, and I would like to know what you think about lead damage in the recent past, if it is worse or not as bad as i am saying, or what.
Pingback: Found an interesting site – Ephektikoi
Pingback: Found an interesting site – Ephektikoi
“Observe in the graphic as well that 23 years prior to 2019, or in 1987, this flow patterning kicked into a discrete and sudden high gear.”
If I’m reading the sentence above correctly, there is either an arithmetic error or a typo. I think it should read 33 years instead of 23 (or alternatively you intended to type 1997 in a few places).
Thanks Dustin – character switch typo. 32 years. Much appreciated – and great job of reading. ~TES
Atheists often say they are not nihilists. However, many of them are just too lazy and uninterested as a result of the ambient nihilist conclusions in their mind to even bother developing or articulating any sort of positive value system, let alone conceive of any actual goals civilization should work towards. You have this long definition of the different types of nihilism, but at least to me the key points are as follows.
This nihilism is a major contributor towards the fear culture of today. I think the best argument pathway there is not to immediately get people to agree with generic labels like ‘Nihilist’ which they may define differently but to just get answers to specific concrete statements. People will usually be hostile and disagree if you try to define their thinking for them. But if you just ask if they believe free will exists, if they think any objective meaning to anything exists or might exist, if there is any driving purpose in their lives and if so what it is, if there is ‘right or wrong’ and what qualifies, and they answer, that pretty much answers everything. They could always go and say they believe there is no objective meaning but that meaning can be subjectively created, like the existentialists, but it is pretty important that they believe in free will for that to actually make coherent sense. So, the final step here would be to ask them what their definition of nihilism even is and to explain why they don’t count as a nihilist.
Of course, all of that would be fair game in the context of a more open minded world, but in real life based on your comments here, it seems many people can easily lose your job for even slightly varying with the Borg-style hive mind of material monist nihilism. This would mean that in effect, the only way to freely discuss such matters if your career is in any way science based would be, of course, through anonymous means, which often doesn’t really have the same desired impact. At least the nature of the internet allows that to happen, and not everyone is trapped in social hiveminds as a result, for as far as free speech on the internet isn’t censored. My final takeaway here is just how ridiculous that contradiction is. Were the people you knew in your career who could’ve caused you to lose face if you said anything at variance with material monism style ideology also often the same ones who said they were not nihilists? If so, that’s rather astonishing hypocrisy, i guess if ‘non nihilists’ care that little about anyone they know who disagrees with them it certainly says a lot about anyone who actually agrees with the Nihilist term. At least your blog isn’t subject to that kind of thing, this is all really great stuff.
That’s an interesting example, but I think more can be gained by refuting fake skeptics in a way that uses the flaws in their own reasoning first, not just evidence they failed to research or consider. And it is not just about refuting them, but showing bystanders how their own thinking collapses in on itself. To quickly get to the point, Brian’s theory collapses in on itself because the pilots would have eventually gotten a visual on the airplane and therefore not reported that it was a UFO. A momentary heat anomaly wouldn’t mean a thing in the long run, because commercial aircraft and anything else that isn’t a UFO will not just vanish from one’s radar range. They would’ve had sight of it for 10s of minutes, and would’ve certainly found out it was an aircraft, even if the Metabunk claimed anomaly confused them at first. You explaining that the anomaly couldn’t have even done so seems tangential in terms of effectiveness although obviously, it still proves that the reasoning is all wrong. I’m just saying that they failed at the most basic level in not following their own envisioned scenario through from start to finish, and that no firsthand knowlege of aviation is needed to know this is nonsense. If anything, i think a little bit of standardization is needed here in a similar fashion to the scientific method so that bad skeptics have no way of presenting things in a disordered, low-effort, and chaotic fashion. Basically, some sort of Skeptical Method or ‘Skepticism for Dummies’ guide that they can just fall back to when they conduct their ‘Skepticism’ so they actually do it correctly. It seems like you’ve done a lot of that kind of standardization really amazingly on this site too. I’m just saying, that this is could be a good argument tool to use on skeptics, to ask them what their standard Skeptical Method is and show just how any slightly decent one would automatically have guided them to the right answer.
Here is a moderate-effort example of a Skeptical Method, and it should really not be all that hard for ‘experts’ to have better ones:
1:The skeptic explains his hypothesis of a conventional event being misdiagnosed as something ‘woo’, and most importantly, the predicted results of this hypothesis. The hypothesis should begin with the common circumstance, NOT the ‘woo’, so that the focus is on why this is a normal event. So, this is an aircraft flight, which means the skeptic could check which airliners routinely fly over that area and request logs of if any fly over at that time. He would then have to explain why the airliner could get completely mistaken as a UFO, and the onus is on him to explain why a normal event turned into something ‘paranormal’, since 99.999% of plane flights are ‘normal’. Then the skeptic has to explain why something conveniently hides the plane or other conventional circumstance of flying things, whether an animal or a helicopter or who knows what else, at the exact moment when it would allow it to be spotted as UFO. Then if they just follow the train of logic obviously they find out it’d be a miracle for it to not be soon exposed as a plane.
2:The skeptic covers the opposing side and lists the expected results. Here this would be the UFO Hypothesis, with the expected result being that a UFO should suddenly appear out of the blue with little to no way to see it coming, move at unexplainable speeds and/or angles, and then immediately leave. If the skeptic is to ‘zoom out’ to the over arching UFO Hypothesis of how UFOs tend to be spotted, they would notice it is consistent. If a UFO pilot does not want to be monitored and/or possibly shot at with missles, whether they are an alien or some kind of human who for some reason has an ultra-advanced craft, then it is natural to expect that they would fly away immediately. So the length of observation is consistent. And if the Airplane Hypothesis was true then they would’ve just immediately seen a plane within seconds after that.
3:Synthesis, comparing the results and seeing which one is more predictive. The Skeptic Hypothesis here is very circumstantial while the UFO Hypothesis has the advantage of explaining a large number of sightings and subsequent disappearances of UFOs from military sight. If the skeptic wanted to go a step further, they would try comparing the average rate of UFO sightings with the Expected Rate that should occur if UFOs are all hoaxes. But I don’t believe they do this at all. Instead, they are reactionaries and respond to each event individually, which basically means they can’t construct a predictive or useful line of thought at all. The onus should be on the skeptic to not only ‘debunk’ individual incidents but start predicting them before they happen. For example, one ‘critical path’ method would be to check the places with the most UFO sightings and compare that to the proportions of UFO-logists or UFO believers living in those area, and the skeptics would predict that they’d be more common in those areas. This would open a refutation pathway if lots of observations consistently kept on getting reported by former non believers in UFOs in places where UFO-logists mostly don’t live. A correlation between the places where UFOlogists are and common sightings along with those sightings being by long time believers in UFOs wouldn’t necessarily prove that they are all hoaxes, since many normal people could be afraid to lose jobs by saying they believe in UFOs. But there could be further studies like trying to test for a correlation between low IQ or low education with being a claimed UFO observer, although, low education wouldn’t necessarily prove anything since you’d need to control for the possibility that well off people with high tier jobs have much more to lose by claiming to believe in UFOs. Addressing the fact that former high ranking military people including even Generals sometimes state a belief in UFOs would be pretty important too, since people like that have 100x more credibility than armchair skeptics. The point is though that many refutation pathways would open up if Skeptics did some research on this and they would make their general Argument falsifiable, rather than being endless reactionaries who don’t have any stakes in it.
The reason I think this happened is that the skeptic guy said it quickly vanished, which airplanes do not do. Which would leave only two possibilities left for him to logically claim:
A:All individuals involved were malicious liars or were misquoted/lied about for some unexplained UFO-logy reason which has no proof but the circular reasoning logic path that “They must have been since that can’t have happened”
B:The observation was true and they were not liars.
Since he didn’t want to resort to libel and get sued, he went with C:Hope the public is too stupid to think about or question this claim. I guess it’s no wonder that there doesn’t seem to be any coherent standard operating procedure to these Debunker types, they just throw together whatever shit seems like a good enough hobbled together nonsense claim, when it comes to the actually true claims at least. Seriously, though, I do think just a little bit of standardization would be the end of the closed minded skeptic movement, which is why they don’t do that. They cannot force themselves to argue in an even slightly fixed and logical way because that would remove their freedom to lie. I do feel like that is a strong solution in these matters, not just with skepticism itself, but with how real skeptics outline their arguments, in the way i outlined much earlier in the post.
Ethical skeptic, you often deal with important issues and right now I want to comment on two topics. This comment about asteroid interdiction is more important than people realize. The link I supplied earlier to an online NOVA episode called THE GREAT EXTINCTION was available for years. I’m assuming the traffic or attention generated after I posted a link in your comments to the video on YouTube happened to catch the attention of someone who was concerned about the financial benefit that NOVA could lose by having a video of theirs posted online. Shortly after this article went up, the video was taken off of YouTube because of the copyright violation. The video was left up for years prior. That is understandable and just from a strictly legal point of view but from a standpoint of understanding the collective threat we face, it only serves to keep people ignorant. Legends from ancient cultures about things glowing or shooting across the sky or hitting the earth, are understandably discounted and we don’t pay attention to such stories or fables. Unfortunately, as a result we don’t grasp the nuggets of truth, the true kernel of ancient stories or legends.
One example that has some support is Dr. Steven Collins and Dr. Latayne C. Scott’s book DISCOVERING THE CITY OF SODOM. Trinitite was found on one side of the pottery excavated at Tall el-Hammam. This is a serious archaeological excavation that can be found here. https://tallelhammam.com/ The link doesn’t quickly indicate the extraterrestrial overlap… and truthfully it will take some time to see it identified as what the researcher postulates as overlapping with the city of Sodom. Yet the researcher found the site and decided to excavate it based on biblical analyses. But what I want to stress is the asteroid or comet or comet fragment impact risk is greater than what we are typically aware of. Twice a year we go through meteor showers of what I think is the Taurid meteor stream. The little pieces of dust that enter our atmosphere create streaks of light that amuse us. These little particles came off something larger and larger pieces are thought to still exist. The Tunguska event in the early 1900’s leveled a forest region in Siberia. The Burkle crater in the Indian Ocean is a candidate for the fabled “Noah’s flood” and the speculated Amarah Crater correlates with the Meghalian(sp?) time period recently added into the geological time scale.(Near the site of the “tower of babel” that dispersed people and then led to the indo-European language development. (This is really complex stuff, correlating this with a Bible event, and I’ve yet to read the books I bought that deal with the scientific evidence. First most among the books is THE 2300 BC EVENT, three volumes that I’ve yet to but skim.) .
I’m asserting stuff has happened that didn’t get much attention in the past. Stuff will happen again too. I recollect some astronomers assert that we are underestimating the current risks of impacts by orders of magnitude.
Second topic: Vaccines. While usually helpful (if we encounter the disease it prevents), bad reactions have been documented. I’ll just add a link for your benefit. Occasionally you find a reporter with higher journalistic integrity, experience, and decency than others. Here is one I strongly believe is supperior to most reporters in all these categories.
http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-vaccination-debate
Though I’ve yet to read the article in question, the reporters ethics are if not unmatched by any other reporter, at least unsurpassed by any other reporter that I’m familiar with.
Again best wishes and I’m blessed to have been introduced to your writings.
Never mind what i said about the slowness of getting to the point, your statistic has good enough context.
This is well articulated, but not good for mass consumption and spread of information at all. I will pre-empt the objection that doing so would reduce your quality. You need not reduce quality, all you need do to vastly increase accessiblity is lead with your most key piece of evidence and ensure all readers immediately understand you are likely to be correct. For me, that piece of evidence was the increase in autism rates by more than tenfold as vaccine amounts increased. Clearly, that is not just ‘better testing’ and better testing methods have probably never produced such an increase in all of scientific history.
Your approach is also awfully aloof and unimpactful, which makes you seem detatched. I realize that this is necessary to an extent, but it remained that way throughout the entire article and really reduced the clarity of it all. All those afflicted with autism from these vaccines who don’t have the fortune of still being high-functioning in some way are effectively ruined for life. For all such people, it is effectively almost the same as if they had been directly killed by the shot. They might as well be dead already, barring some sort of miraculous autism cure in the future.
If the vaccinations had caused mass deaths to all those they mentally crippled for life to die instead, their families would’ve reacted, but they killed silently, and now a vast number of millenials effectively don’t have any meaningful degree of useful free will anymore. The insidious intent is even worse when one considers that any group(s) controlling the production and distribution of said sabotaged vaccines must expressly be aiming to target the young so that the difference in intellect is not noticed. It is not merely to hit people at their most vulnerable. I am sure a 20 vaccine schedule applied to adults would also cause very serious mental damage like it does to babies, even if to a lesser extent, but it would be impossible to pull off covertly. If 10 million US adults all sustained injury like that at once the conspiracy would be over in months. This means the groups behind this are quite literally preying on babies and effectively murdering them. That is as evil as you can get.
There is also a very important piece of evidence to be known here for showing the malicious intent. American citizens do not get the chance to know what is inside those vaccines for themselves. The scientific ‘skeptic’ types repeat a lie either knowingly or unknowingly, but there is no open source free knowledge here. Nobody can take one of those vaccines to some independent scientist and have their chemical contents checked by a non government source. Correct me if i am wrong but I am certain that is not allowed, regardless of the fact that there is no conceivable non-malicious reason for it not to be permitted. There isn’t much harm any malicious agent could do with an extremely weakened virus, so this seems to be a clear sign of malice at the top combined with mass ignorance among most of those involved in the distribution and administration of the vaccines.
This isn’t even the first time a widespread civilization has collapsed due to brain poisoning reducing intelligence among the upper class. It is a well known fact that Rome collapsed in large part because the Romans used lead in their aqueducts and thus damaged their brains. The fact that said poisoning wasn’t caused by a conspiracy is irrelevant. In fact, that makes Rome an even more relevant example, as their example shows that a civilization can unintentionally destroy itself by not being cautious about the contents of what it drinks. Americans have much more reason to be afraid.
There is definitely a very serious time limit for this problem to be stopped. If most ‘Boomers’ die off within the next 20 years, most of the intellectual capital needed to effectively lead a civilization is going to be gone. My personal guess would be that autism causing vaccines need to be completely eliminated within the next 10 years, or else the damage is going to be too great for there to be any chance at fixing this problem. After that, there needs to be a very big scientific effort working towards an autism cure, as otherwise even if new generations are not damaged it is not like the last 20 to 30 years worth of offspring are all going to magically heal themselves. Instead, the entire medical industry is built around prolonging suffering for profit. There essentially needs to be an equivalently immense effort to the Apollo Program but in the fields of medicine, cognitive science, education, etc, for the autism epidemic and similar crises of health and intelligence in the USA to be resolved before we all hit a tipping point of unavoidable civilizational collapse.
Now to get a little more personal:I personally know what it’s like to get autism from these vaccines and it is not pretty. I don’t think i’m ever really going to be fully content until all those responsible for these vaccines are proven responsible beyond doubt, executed, and then erased from existence, sent to some kind of hell, or whatever sort of fate we are all supposed to suffer on death. My most recurring experience with all this is that I keep going to sleep expecting to wake up normal the next day but it just does not happen and probably never will. Maintaining some sort of belief in an eternal afterlife is a cope method that many people try to one extent or another, me included, but you can never really be certain unless you’ve had some sort of revelatory experience for yourself, and that’s something i haven’t had the privilege of having. Meanwhile, a striking portion of people either have or pretend to have some delusion of religious justice, that Jesus will come and punish all ‘evil’ people for not believing in God, that the end of history is something that will come through a divine force:In short, they believe that human history is worthless and that there is no pressing need for scientific and moral progress, since God’ll just fix it all anyways. Otherwise, they believe God never existed and don’t even believe in their own free will, and thus abandon all hope or care for progress because they don’t think they’ll exist long enough to see it. Despite your cogent point that there both atheism and religion have serious flaws, it is very obvious that the world’s main religions are highly anti-science forces that effectively seek the end of human freedom. Whether through Christianity’s prophecy of the end of the world leading to a Jesus Dictatorship, Islam’s core doctrine of muslim world conquest leading them to an Allah Dictatorship, Judaism’s general nihilism and goal of a Yahweh Dictatorship, or even Buddhism’s nihilistic anti-natal philosophy that effectively says everyone should seek nirvana/extinguishment/nonexistence, most of the world’s religions are basically anti life and anti science. I know that none of this may exactly be news to you, but in my opinion, it is all necessary context to what i am saying.
The fact remains that if current trends continue, human history could end in total failure. That would mean it was all completely worthless in the end, even believers in reincarnation would be hard pressed to disagree if all the human races on earth end up destroyed by a nuclear war, barring some miraculous ressurection like the type the Christians believe in. Even if humans could return to some sort of physical existence in this universe once more after the possible destruction of life on earth, presuming some sort of non-malevolent alien races exist and could at some point or another facilitate their direct or indirect return, whether through ressurection, reincarnation, their re-cloning through leftover DNA,or something as simple as their re-population through already-abducted sustainable base populations of the various human races taken to other worlds by any benevolent aliens that might exist, or some combination of the above and any unforeseen methods; all of that doesn’t change that human history will end up pretty much entirely meaningless if Earth is made uninhabitable. It would take a miracle to fix the Earth if it was destroyed by nukes, and even now, the sixth mass extinction looks like it’s on course to cause serious damage to the ecosystem.
Personally, holding out some kind of hope of a transcendent layer of existence is my ‘cope method’ for even having a reason to think that people damaged by vaccines are even the same people as they were before at some layer of reality. If there isn’t some sort of ‘truth’ to how people are meant to live, then there wouldn’t be any meaning to the massive loss that is occuring all over the place in terms of intelligence. It’s too bad that believing in a soul doesn’t exactly make your brain conform to whatever you want it to do, and it really hits me and makes me wonder just how much ‘free will’ any people really have. In an ideal world, I think everyone would have unlimited free will and ability to choose their thoughts, but reality just isn’t like that. An autism cure would certainly help the world be just a little bit more free, though.
I hope you bothered reading this comment all the way through. To me, it would be dishonest and non-sensical to explain this argument of mine without saying all the relevant context in ideology and religion, and since you already cover all the mentioned topics, there isn’t a point in not saying it, in my opinion. I just think that this isn’t some mere ‘intellectual’ issue and that it had better all be exposed at some point in real life or it’ll all have been relatively pointless to even talk about it, and it only has real meaning to me when it shows a fragment of my true thoughts rather than a pointlessly disconnected single-topic issue of Autism and Vaccines alone. You do not fall into that single issue hole either and i see no reason to do so. Good luck with your blog efforts to awaken everyone on these issues.
Yes TS, I read it all the way through. Good points all the way from start to finish, and your stream of schema – had connected-ness which is familiar to the way in which my mind works as well. The key point being the time limit entailed inside the erosion of our collective or corporate intellect.
Most definitely not for mass consumption. It really deserves a book – and in that book almost a teaching about integrity as it relates to skepticism. Knowing that we do not know all, and choosing first to serve and protect your fellow citizen – is an instinct that our science communicators just do not possess. Instead, they choose something which is facile virtuous and run with that like a bulldog. And as we see with the Covid response, that typically does not work very well.
To me, skepticism is spiritual. It sounds as though you have hit that point of realization as well.
Thanks!
TES
Well, thanks for reading all that, it makes me feel good to be heard on this. Although I am definitely among the higher-functioning people who suspect they have symptoms of autism, not someone who basically can’t do anything, I can still absolutely see how a 10x worse version of the same issues I experience to an extent would be life devastating to some people, so it is still personal for me. Since Autism is the main topic of the thread i do want to mention a key little Autism takeaway i just came up with before side tracking with a paragraph or two in response about spirituality.
Pro-vaxxer parents of the world, OK, let us assume you’re right about every vaccine. 20 vaccines for babies is OK? Then take them all yourself 5 months before your baby is scheduled to take them to control for possible delayed side effects, and let the ‘Evil’ Anti Vaxxers of the world know the results. If you’re right about vaccines, no harm done, can’t ‘over vax’ yourself if even a baby is supposed to be able to take it. If you’re wrong, well, at least you saved the kid from taking the damage themselves.
Now of course objectively speaking if there were malicious agents working for a vaccine conspiracy directly responsible for delivering vaccines to every kid, then it would be possible to trick parents and swap out the contents for what the kid gets, if they were lied to. But that would require much more conspiracy networking than simply having some of the ones at the highest levels who produce the original versions be the ones who mess up the distribution chain and get many unwitting pawns to do it for them. For this reason it should be mandatory for all nurses/doctors/etc who administer these vaccines to take a very high number of vaccines like they make the babies do, to show proof of safety. If anything, the 20 vaccine schedule should’ve been rolled out for 5 years among a population of adults before it was ever used on babies but, of course, it wasn’t. It’s not like there was some pressing new virus threatening us all to encourage a new vaccine approach compared to the earlier vaccines, which probably couldn’t scientifically have been made in a way that was dangerous with the technology available in the 70s or something around then. Don’t quote me on that i have no data there although you might have some, but hopefully you get what i mean. Also,the Non Open Source point i made about people not being able to take home the shots (admittedly not originally my own, not going to name the source, although they didn’t precisely frame it in terms of open source values, but it’s still a vital point) still would apply in this case as well. What i mean here is that the parents could still theoretically be tricked into getting the wrong vaccines if they tried to be cautious for their kids and ask to take the same shots as them, and that’s only possible because there’s no way for them to make sure the ones they get would be the same ones their kids get when they don’t have a way to keep track of the shots themselves or verify the contents are the same.Although obviously as previously stated that would really require an omnipresent unrealistic comic book style conspiracy for the majority of the doctors determining vaccine contents to somehow be in on it, so realistically, if a lot of parents started making those sorts of demands of getting the same shots before vaxxing their kids, the vaccine conspiracy would probably fall apart.
The following opinion may be uninformed, but a confusing paradox arises which i genuinely don’t understand, and I am not sure how any Pro Vaxx doctor could counter argue this. There seems to be basically no reason that parents shouldn’t automatically get a take home copy of every vaccine shot their kid gets, if they are literally so harmless they can be administered to babies en mass. An extra like that would prove no harm was done, and if harm ever DID occur, then a control-group copy of the vaccine would be present right there in the family’s hands bring back to the doctors to test if something was wrong in it, or to whoever they wish to have test it. Instead, they all lie in the hands of the manufacturers and distributors, leaving it all up to them if malicious agents might swap things around at will. There is an abundance of materials to make these vaccines with so it cannot hurt profits that much to make one or two extras for each shot and in either case matters like public health really shouldn’t be so far in the hands of private corps anyways. The fact that there is a profit incentive in these areas just seems ridiculous, to be honest. I am all for private business when it works and allows more freedom for the people but this just doesn’t seem like one of those cases.
The only argument i could think of is that Pro Vaxxers will say anti vaxxers will start an evil conspiracy to damage their kids on purpose somehow to prove their evil anti vaxxer agenda and pin it on vaccines, but the fact is nobody has the means to do this. Even if you gave all the anti vaxxers or Pro-but-with-doubts Vaxxers vaccines and let them use them on their own, vaccines aren’t things that should be able to be made to cause mass damage. Moreover obviously most people have no interest in doing some evil conspiracy on their kids to prove their anti vaxx agenda is true for whatever reason. Meanwhile there would be a litmus test, if lots of people started refusing to vaxx the kids without taking the shot themselves first and a few years later autism rates vastly went down obviously that could be proof. There are also other options. If vaccines became widely available to the population without dependance on continuous buying from the medical corps, one person could be in possession of a whole lot of vaccines and then distribute their extras to other people in their neighborhood once time proves that the shots were safe. That would reduce dependence on a largely centrally controlled oligopolistic market source. Then people would also be safer from new rollouts of vaccines which they were fearful of being dangerous. They wouldn’t have to be ‘anti vaxxers’ if there were just a whole lot of vaccines over-produced that had proven safe for a long time the spares of which could keep getting depleted for a long time without people relying on new ones and cyclical consumption.
“Oh but anti vaxxers aren’t nurses, they can’t use vaccines or they’ll hurt their kids when they jab them!”Just switch over to the nasal spray type of vaccine where they send the virus up your nose, problem solved, for whichever diseases that works for at least which may be a whole lot. The problem is that this should not all be centrally controlled by either the government or financially incentivized institutions. Localization seems like a positive force here. I am no economist and don’t know ‘the answer’ or whether my ideas here are economically unviable, but generally it seems to often be better when people have more knowledge of what they’re getting and control over what they choose to get. Of course, it’s not like vaccines are the same as super old cars which can work forever and they have biological contents so they cannot be stored like that i suppose. But there could be a necessary standard of having multiple versions of the same shot available so that people who do not trust the new are free to choose the old, or at the very least more inspection of how it works and less financial incentive.
Closing Vaccine Note:It should simply be a law that in every individual case, the parents get the same shots as the kids before the kids do, preferably many months if not years ahead, as genetics differ from family to family and that’s therefore the best way of providing the most security in terms of knowing the kids will be safe from the vaccine. Yes, it would not account for issues like weaker child immune systems. But it would still be far more prudent and obvious common sense stuff than the craziness in the US today. This does not even require the public to believe there is a conspiracy although there obviously is one, it would be a realistic safeguard in a more reasonable world where people feared accidentally causing issues for their families. Of course more realistically anyone proposing such things will be called an anti vaxxer so the only real solution is showing the truth that there really is a conspiracy, but this is still a possibly useful example argument to show pro vaxxers how there is hypocrisy there with the different treatment of kids and adults.
Anyway, onto the spirituality point.
The spiritual point is central for me too not just in relation to coping methods, it is a prime basis for meaning in life, and can even offer an explanation of our ‘before’ life, not just an Afterlife and/or a next life if you believe in reincarnation.
My history with spirituality was not so much any kind of independent logical discovery at first but just finding convincing evidence online which seemed to indicate some people have gone to the afterlife and back with Near Death Experiences and similar phenomenon. Only later on when thinking started to make me see how this sort of idea could logically flow well did i start to transform what started as a (successful) coping method into my way of thinking about life. Although I figured out pretty much immediately that free will must have some sort of trasncendent source, and that it being derived from random matter doesn’t make sense, almost immediately, it took a while researching philosophy before i really understood all the implications.
Your one blog post on spirituality where you said that any freewill source in a determinist system must inevitably come from outside the system, that helped articulate my internal thoughts in a slightly better way than anything i had previously read on the subject, although some ideas i read in philosophy were similar. They just didn’t quite get at it in the same way. It’s the idea of the illusion of free will that is the strangest as it should simply be a ‘phenomenon’ of free will, not an illlusion dismissed a priori. I once reasoned that the universe should be full of fully unconscious free-willless automatons if it didn’t exist at all, who unobservedly walked and talked like they had free will but really didn’t inside. But even that now just seems silly. A ‘will-less’ reality should not suddenly conjure free will into existence as an illusion and have results that seem somehow to be exactly the same as what a Free Will Possessing universe looks like, there should be a way to tell them apart. Otherwise one must assume a sort of Bizzaro World universe where everything is predetermined to seem like its opposite and it somehow achieves this in mysterious ways without creating free will at all, all while not existing itself, which just seems like the most stupid and comical thing ever lol. There should be an ‘expected result’ without freewill and one with free will:Bare minimum, all AntiFreeWill believers should come up with one or more idea(s) of an alternate universe where Free will DID exist and explain how those possible universes contrast everything we see in the real world. Even though it would be impossible to examine these alternate possible universes or to check the rest of our own universe for ‘free willed’ beings with the way science is, it would at least be a whole lot more coherent of an argument if there was a Goal Post defining what type of evidence would prove it wrong.
Maybe what would convince them of free will is when consciousness seems to go outside the limits of the brain, like with verdical or transcendent experiences people have which seem to defy the limits of the brain/allow them to obtain info they shouldn’t or survive medical conditions that should result in permanent disability coma or death? IMO this is exactly what often occurs in real life in many people’s consistent anecdotal reports and real life events like survival of impossible medical conditions which cannot reasonably be attributed to chance, but I 100% get it why a very science focused blog like this would probably not have articles on supposed paranormal matters without very extensive proof and a fully 100% coherent hypothesis as to how it all is supposed to work in a non paranormal and scientific way. Whether or not you are convinced of any paranormal/afterlife phenomenon I can get why you might not want to set out an opinion without something like that. Assuming i’m guessing right about your opinions there of course.
Anyway thanks a lot for talking to me and i was glad to read your response, your blog is great and really really eye opening in pretty much EVERY important area. Seriously this is great stuff and ranks somewhere among the top 3 websites I have ever viewed in terms of logical consistency and importance. I mean, I’d probably put it as certainly at #1 or at least #2 but i don’t have a consistent enough understanding of everything i’ve ever read to have any certainty of what info source was the best, but yeah, i do really like this site, thanks for all the work you’ve done on this.
Something i forgot to say about vaccines. It is just a ‘why don’t you do this?’ argument to be thrown at obstinate pro vaxxers that shows vaccine scheduling is clearly non cautious and irrational. Sorry if this is more than you meant to respond to.
There is an easy way vaccines could be even further safely tested within a population. Not only do you have the parents take them first in the same regiments as the kids get long before they do, but you stagger the implementation with the kids. For example let’s say a new schedule is rolled out for children ages 1 through 10. What pro vaxxers could do is this. Only let one kid at a time have the new vaccine schedule, and even this is only 5 years after the parent got that schedule first. Then you wait a while to see if it was safe on the kid too. This already puts a safety margin between the kids and danger but it also makes it safer since in any given family if the combo of the parent’s genetics proves to make kids vulnerable when parents were not, only one kid has to suffer, even though that should already be very unlikely if both parents test safe. Then the other kids get the new schedule after the 1st kid tests safe, and you can stagger it kid by kid if the parents are paranoid, even if that means they might fall behind the schedule’s mandates. After all, it’s not like most vaccination schedule updates promise any major changes in survival expectancy. Preferably staggered progression after the parents would be beginning with an older kid who is not super young and vulnerable of course but progressing in staggered stages down the line to the youngest ones, although obviously, it may be unwise in itself to even attempt too many vaccines on infants in the first place when there’s no obvious benefit. If anything the 20 vaccine thing makes absolutely 0% sense in any conceivable universe until the kids are actually going to school and thus could have a more realistic chance of being exposed to viruses so it happening to infants is pure idiocy. And of course, this ‘staggered interval’ approach would be used with years to check for symptoms as you wisely said with the one graph i don’t quite remember that pointed out how not all damage happens right away.
Do you see what i’m going with here? The main point of the aforementioned Staggered Vaccine Interval approach is to create a localized and INTERNAL Control Group for each and every family so they do not have to rely on easily faked or badly conducted or lazy science based on ultra broad statistics. There would be the clearly healty kids, and the adult who took the vaccine and got ill effects, and then if anyone did get sick from the shot, it would only be one kid at a time. Of course this would not be the case with any ultra dangerous diseases but as far as i’m aware most of the dangerous vaccines are to non dangerous diseases anyways. Side note that would be logical as vaccine conspiracy creators would not want to make it so the common vaccines to actually lethal or very dangerous diseases are useless or sabotaged, so if they made only vaccines that are objectively unimportant sabotaged, they would not suffer. Furthermore, those highest in such a conspiracy would be very rich. That means sending kids to private school, and that then means the kids don’t have to get state mandated vaccines for public ed, correct me if i’m wrong about that. And if the private school has its own mandated vaccine schedule any conspiracy to manipulate those would be likely easier than changing what is supplied for vast numbers of public school students, and the rich, who are naturally more able to conduct conspiracies for obvious reasons, would have an easier time shielding their kids anyways with monetary payoffs and such.
Anyway back on track. As for the strategy i mentioned, it would give every family a warning of any future dangers and effectively negate most potential vaccine injuries, allowing far better foresight than any generic ‘statistic’ can provide. This is to me along the same lines as the gun rights argument in the USA but offers security from a medical standpoint combined with obvious foresight benefits. This could probably be far more advanced if organized at a local community level in individual towns or suburb neighborhoods and so on as then not everyone would need be cautious and just a few could probably prove the danger to everyone else in a wide area, but i digress, this is the basic concept.Hopefully that made sense. And maybe it is even a good idea if it were to occur in real life? Not that i want any anti vaxxers or vaccine aware to do it to either themselves or their kids because said vaccines truly are dangerous, and it’s all mandated by the state so it’s not like you get a choice about the scheudling anyways. However it would be a good thing in a post Vaccine Conspiracy world and it at least proves the pro vaxxers are utterly baseless in arguing they have any safety protocols at all.
I recall when reading about this study in Forbes, and sparring in the comment section about this contradiction:
“For parents who do notice a significant change in their child’s cognitive function and behaviour after a vaccination I encourage you to report these events immediately to your family physician and to the ‘Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System’.25
~ Dr. Guy D. Eslick, Professor of Cancer Epidemiology and Medical Statistics at The University of Sydney, Australia”.
How many studies which included VAERS data were included in the “meta-analysis”?
“They excluded studies that used the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System as their population because, as the authors note, there is a limitation of: high risk of bias including unverified reports, underreporting, inconsistent data quality, absence of an unvaccinated control group and many reports being filed in connection with litigation.”
So if you observe an injury, you should report it to a system that will insure it is excluded from any studies into vaccine injury?
Enjoying your presentations. What do you foresee as to “…participating in global action regarding climate change.”? What are your initial thoughts as to what needs to be done? Minimization? Adaptation?
I will be reading your blog as it is more light to the darkness.
1. Eliminate remote manufacturing in favor of regional
2. Eliminate conglomerate agriculture in favor of local
3. Cease driving shit all over the planet
4. Eliminate free decay of human and animal waste. Rout to waste to energy plants.
5. Carbon scrubbing
6. Smaller scale local Waste to Energy-Zero Landfill.
7. Energy storage technology advancements
My thoughts… TES
If ocean heating by the earth’s core is the root cause, doesn’t seem as if reducing man’s carbon emissions will have much effect. Why pay the large prices needed for mass carbon-reduction/elimination?
A fair point, Bob.
Population growth is another subject which cannot be discussed because of politics. If climate change is man made, then this is really the crux of the problem. Poor people tend to have large families, and poor people cannot be stopped from improving their lives with more resource intensive lifestyles. It would be inhumane and impossible to stop this.
Imagine what will happen over the next 100 years as billions of poor people get richer. They will clear forests for housing and roads, build factories for their consumer items, and open mines for the necessary manufacturing resources. The earth is in big trouble if this is not addressed. I would say because of population growth, climate change is already a lost cause no matter what westerners do.
The mainstream dogma and lies are really boring. I’m at the point where I think it’s pointless to address climate change unless population is the focus.
Climate change is not an issue. Solar flares wiping out the planet is. We need better models of the universe, especially the electro-magnetic sphere of the universe.
Also a plan is already underway to de-industrialize all the poor countries, and re-establish a social credit score with normalized energy tracking in carbon units with de facto elites having unlimited units through carbon trading.
A belated comment … this text
appear to bearecould be better worded in a blog whose author cares for scientific integrity.
Yes, the internet is full of such occurrences but it doesn’t necessarily mean that they belong here.
I have no idea what you are attempting to say here…
Pingback: CT021 - The Day We Debunk The Skeptics
Pingback: VILIJEM OKAM: Osnove intuitivnоg saznanja – Ira Pax
Well, as we all know, stable cultural or racial existence is not permitted in first world countries nowadays. People are allowed to exist as individuals for the brief time that human lifespans allowed(the briefness of which we are all becoming increasingly aware of thanks to the Internet and knowledge of history), but if they’re of a certain race, they apparently get the joy of having to contemplate the highly possible complete marginalization of not only their own racial group, but also most of their culture as well. According to what is promoted in the mainstream news media, this is all part and parcel of democracy, and all of it happening within mere decades of the entirely foreseeable future is the new normal.
Sarcasm aside, this is a very well written article, and you’ve spelled out major points of the current situation in some of the clearest terms I’ve ever seen.
This modern thinking about race is very much in the line of the ‘eye for an eye’ sort of justice you see in the Judeo Christian religions that dominate the world. The different European ethnic groups that formed the USA once committed genocide against Native Americans, so apparently, they need to go completely extinct. White European groups once started imperialism against other groups over a century ago, so now they apparently no longer have any right to a home state that protects their interests. Individualism combined with the atheism of today or the extreme religious beliefs have basically turned modern society into a death cult. You can’t want something as simple as your racial-cultural group to continue existing with its own country for hundreds of years or however long civilization can keep functioning in the future, since apparently, only individuals matter, not groups. Unless those groups don’t fall under the targeted elimination category, at least. There are pretty much no 1st world governments which have the prosperity, happiness, and also the continued existence of the people they represent as their open priority. People are replaced in priority by ideals, except those ideals often don’t actually exist or mean anything, or are just the embracing of nothingness and nihilism, and in any case, they aren’t applied in any positive way to the groups designated for removal/marginalization. I am sure that if they exist, any aliens out there would be utterly astounded at this fact when looking at the world from an objective perspective. The gist of it is that everyone is indoctrinated with this atheist worldview and its all seen as totally normal for this nihilism to be the norm:
“You do not exist. Pretty soon, you are going to vanish into nothingness, but even that ‘free will’ is a hoax, and regardless of any intuition you might have, your free will just an illusion. You are not allowed to want to exist, and if you happen to be white, you should just quietly wait for your entire group to become marginalized in your country within the foreseeable future. For the original sin of wanting any part of yourself to continue on after you die and being part of a group that once had some sort of negative impact on the rest of the world, your sentence is marginalization and eventual extinction. You don’t want to be forgotten? Too bad. Please just die already.”
It’s quite a bit of a double whammy culturally. Most religious people are told to think that the Rapture will come eventually and the human world will be destroyed, which means wanting their cultural/racial/etc group to continue effectively goes against their religion. The religion says it doesn’t matter anyways, since the ending in the nonsensical book is going to be the same no matter what happens before the Rapture. This is really just its own form of
nihilism as i am pretty sure you agree, based on what you have said about religion here. This all being mainstream is just as ridiculous as it gets. Anyway, that is enough of that, the rest of this post will not involve ranting about the nonsensicality of mainstream nihilistic culture.
Normally, trying to prove the nonexistence of free will would be a valid scientific effort, but as you outlined so well in another article, the skeptics don’t offer clear standards of evidence for what degree or type of cognitive function would prove to them the existence or likely existence of some form of free will. Even if that free will is merely the result of a circulation of electrical neurological impulses through the nervous system, or depending on interpretation, if free will itself is some sort of non-physical process that requires such a circulation of impulses for it to exist in the form of a personality, neither of these assumptions prove the free will’s nonexistence. The onus is also partly on the free will proponents to provide some kind of rigorous definition of free will if they want to prove its existence beyond a doubt in some verifiable way, but in reality, it’s even. Your conception of natural scientific judgement was very clear and concise and helped clarify some things to me. Science is neutral, so for all Science knows, Materialist Monism, Dualism, and even Idealist Monism are equally valid interpretations until superior evidence piles up for one interpretation over the other. Right now, Idealist Monism(that is, the view that all reality originates from consciousness in one way or another, although this is not to be conflated with the view that individual minds necessarily have any influence and certainly not that the world is the result of any kind of meaningful intent of any conscious beings) seems like the most coherent philosophical view on the world to me, even if it does not perfectly fit all the data available. Materialist Monism inherently contradicts individual experiences of consciousness and free will, and while Idealist Monism seems to have little predictive value in predicting why the cosmos forms in the way that it observably does, it at the very least doesn’t contradict what everyone can easily observe about their own mind via personal experience.
If you haven’t read Bernardo Kastrup’s article about idealist monism already, I highly recommend it.https://www.bernardokastrup.com/2018/12/why-world-is-imagined-summary.html
But overall, this article you made is just stunningly good work compiling all the factors plaguing modern society today. I can only imagine what the world might be like if, instead of every possible poison or negative effect being thrown into the pool that is society, there was a concerted effort to improve and solve all relevant societal issues as quickly and efficiently as possible with greatest respect possible to everyone’s freedoms. Actually increasing cognitive ability rather than destroying it, for example. It is an amazing fact that so many people today have conscious experiences which seemingly defy the physical limits of their brains. If that were actually researched and some sort of mechanism were searched for, the possibilities could be immensely beneficial. For example, if the ‘super conscious’ state that near death experiencers encounter could be artificially stimulated in any person through some sort of medical procedure involving either biochemical or electrical stimuli that was verified to not damage the brain, the visualization capabilities of the public at large could be vastly improved. Many of these NDE experiencers report remembering the experience for decades after without it fading at all, if i remember what i have researched on this correctly and am not somehow repeating a lie. In other words, it is possible research in these areas could elaborate ways to vastly improve cognitive function. It doesn’t matter if NDEs are somehow the product of the dying brain. That has already been falsified, in my opinion, see this link:
https://www.near-death.com/science/articles/dying-brain-theory.html
However, even if the dying brain hypothesis was true, that would have no bearing on a certain critical element. If it is true, then the brain alone can truly make these super-conscious experiences happen even in a dying or comatose state, it is rather amazingly powerful, and may hold far more potential than scientists believe it does today. Some people have trouble with visualization, and dreams can often be chaotic and random, so NDEs are truly a whole other ballpark of possibility here, complex simulations complete with a real time in depth environment that last minutes, provide intricate detail, everything, far more than what many people can do with intentional visualization in real life if they close their eyes and think. If anything, there should be a study done researching whether or not people with low visualization capabilities have them increased after an NDE, and if there is a correlation between high visualization ability and in depth NDEs and so on. That last one’s the kind of research pathway i’d look for if i was a Skeptic trying to prove Dying Brains were the only thing that could make NDEs, since it’d follow logically that a brain with weaker visualization ability should produce a hazier NDE or none at all. If not, then it might disprove that they have much or anything to do with the brain at all. Nonetheless, I am sure you get what i am saying. If there was more serious research done in actually trying to make the world better today rather than skeptics simply repeating trite things like that the brain is all there is, there might be major discoveries waiting. Even the most simple things surrounding taboo topics are apparently not done at all thanks to Skeptics. It is really just a shame.
Dear ES, I have a comment on bathing oneself in ice water when having a fever. I recently had a viral fever while traveling in the tropics. High fever for 4 days, didn’t want to do anything except sleep. I refused all suggestions I see a doctor, thinking the fever was killing the virus or bacteria or whatever was ailing me, as it may well have been doing.
By refusing to do anything except sleep, however, I was allowing the fever to kill me, I believe. My husband eventually didn’t listen when I said I didn’t want a doctor. They took me to emergency and immediately brought down the fever with an IV. I could feel it go down within a few seconds, and immediately felt alive again. It turns out I was severely dehydrated by doing nothing except sleep with a high fever.
I should also point out that I was only on the IV for about an hour. When I said I didn’t want to spend the night in the hospital, they pulled out the IV and sent me home. I could feel the fever come back immediately, but I was NEVER NEARLY SO SICK AGAIN. I believe that dropping the fever and thereby giving me the mental consciousness and willingness to drink fluids, saved my life.
It may well have been the intake of fluids and not the bringing down of the fever that made the difference. My point is that while feverish I was not compos mentis enough to help myself. MAYBE if I had bathed in ice water, I would have been. I’ll never know.
I think you have a great website here. I can’t understand it all, but I’ll work on it. I came to it because of the vaccine issue. Please devote your considerable mental powers to devising a way to ethically break through the brainwashing, or entrainment, or toxic altruism, or whatever it is that prevents people from properly evaluating the vaccine issue.
Thanks Alberta, and yes – there are times when the fever has to be directly handled. I will modify my wording accordingly… great point!
Thanks for the readership. :-)
TES
My father is/was a well-liked and succesful physician in my hometown (retired now, in his 70s), and quite a humanitarian one at that. He often made it clear in conversations we’ve had that much of what is going on in medicine – and especially in medical journalism – is highly problematic, bordering on the inhumane or even a travesty, depending on the topic/circumstances. There are trends that vanish as quickly as they arise, and often they are as ill-founded as they are widespread. And “science” is often just barely more than a buzzword, used to purport a semblance of soundness …
Pseudostatistical absurdities are probably the main culprit here, as is so often the case. And many people are suffering needlessly.
So well said TS. The only way in which I even ever heard of pernicious anemia was through a Twitter chat, where a person suggested methylfolate and cobalamine. I did not believe it until I was about to pass out at a conference. I took the two out of desperation (this had been growing worse for 25 years and was coming to a head – and had hurt my career). BOOM… In 10 minutes my life was changed. My doctor carries about as much credibility now with me as an average person on the street – except on specific corrective medicine protocols.
Science now, is a religious apologetic which our new inquisitionists use as scriptures they quote while they harm and kill our families.
I sincerely wish you the best and hope that you don’t suffer any more from such agonizing conditions! Everyone needs to find what is best for her/him and should not feel intimidated by some “authority” (what an absurdity!) that finds it appropriate to dictate a persons’s means to feel well. The “anecdotal” evidence for being well is all that is needed for the “anecdotal” entity that is a human being :)
And thank you for your reply!
Wonderful checklist!!
Thanks Blaine, and thanks for your readership!
TES
This is a fantastic post! Seriously, one of the best I’ve read here, and I am a long-time follower. For me it does lead to another question. Would this pertain to the animal world? I ask this because my wife and I are invested in lessening animal suffering as much as possible–not out of some sanctimonious crusade, but rather because we simply cannot bear to see animals in unnecessary pain (especially when so many people are indifferent to and/or cause the pain). We never presume a god-like status over the animals, or at least we don’t consciously. Would you mind extending your analysis to this situation? I would very much appreciate it. Thank you for all that you do here!
George,
Thanks for the kind feedback and readership. This is a core ethical question we raise inside the famine strategies, food market studies and market evolutions in which I have been involved. I am personally adamant about a ‘no suffering’ lifestyle and termination of life for livestock animals. I recognize fully that we have yet to even get to this destination as a first priority. The disease-induced pig shortage in China right now is serving to introduce a whole new host of horrific treatments of those animals in order to feed China.
Your question pertains more to ‘Do we even have to do this at all?’
I must offer up that while I admire the ethic, I cannot answer two questions:
1. Is this practicable as a supply chain/sourcing philosophy adequate to feed mankind? and
2. Is it enforceable? or will it simply serve to render back-lot horrors more common throughout the industry?
The bottom line: I have not arrived at a suitable answer on this. Save for the notion that perhaps, reproducing out of control is not an unconstrained human right. In all our endeavors – all rights come with responsibilities. Right now, mankind is out of control, and perhaps this is just a symptom of that insanity.
Thank you very much for your response! I am very intrigued about how to factor a “no suffering” policy into a larger worldview informed by the principles that you outline on this site. I feel as though the deep ecologists are often motivated by good intentions and often by good ideas. However, the modern world has changed the various ecologies of the world so drastically that, arguably, the notion of a natural context of life has been seriously compromised. A good example for us is the human relationship to dogs and cats. We rescue a lot of these creatures, especially cats. Thinking about recent co-evolution of canines and felines with humans is important, but how do we conceptualize the “proper” response of humans to, say, rampant feral animals in cities? “Trap/Neuter/Release” programs seem to work a bit, but there are larger issues at play here. I’ve even had serious discussions with scientists and scholars who seem to advocate for neutering all carnivorous animals so that the reduction of suffering on a larger scale can be accomplished. This notion seems to me to be a mixture of good intentions and serious alienation from the Darwinian world. Perhaps this is why the Gnostic cosmology makes so much sense to me, at least existentially: it speaks to a deep human suspicion that something fundamental is amiss with the cosmos. When the Christian poet T.S. Eliot writes, “Who devised the torment? / Love”, my gnostic sympathies kick in pretty quickly. Sorry for rambling, but this issue is very important to me. Thank you again for your feedback and Herculean efforts here to enlarge the scope of modern consciousness!
Am I missing an obvious reference in failing to understand what you mean by ‘Bias is Tau. Agency is Indigo.’?
No – not obvious to the casual reader Joe. One would have to read (and remember) Inflection Point Theory and the Dynamic of The Cheat, link below:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/10/20/inflection-point-theory-and-the-dynamic-of-the-cheat/
TES :-)
Man cannot live on one blog alone, but rather must learn to navigate the web of pushpins and string like an investigator.
Simple translation: follow the embedded hyper link 😁
My vocabulary and limited eloquence prevent me from expressing my truest high admiration and awe of this article and thus the author. THIS (article) has reached the level of mathematical/statistical detail as well as given names to phenomenon (Indigo and Tau) that I suspected would be necessary to present an objective case in the inebriated court of sports bar advocacy. Unfortunately the long standing rhetorical precedent of Jerry Springer coupled with the challenging nature of abstract, logic, and statistical probabilities increase the likelihood of summary dismissal in every such jurisdiction on the grounds of “blaaaaaah, {insert ignorant insult}”. I just wanted to let you know that your immense work here is appreciated. My hope is that the NFL corrects, and in a pipe dream admits, this bias rather than hide their actions via more irrelevant penalties in order to pad their “stats”.
Also very enlightening that the SCOTUS has sanctioned this mafia corruption by speciously allowing the game to be considered “entertainment” despite a preponderance of NFL and network marketing to the contrary as well as collateral evidence such as oddsmaking for legal gambling and the obvious belief of the players and coaches affecting their effort and intentions.
Profound thanks for your presenting this.
As a retired Navy Intelligence Officer and Raiders season ticket holder, I found your work compelling and disturbing, and found your background intriguing. A couple of questions: have you considered getting this peer-reviewed? And, in your opinion, does this study leave the NFL vulnerable to litigation? Regardless, I hope that the Competition Committee or league officiating office takes seriously your findings, because I am sure the Raiders will.
Hey Howard,
Do you recall the old Naval Intelligence Command government center buildings in Silver Hill Maryland/Wash DC? Those were such old crap. I had black dust on my desk every morning from the decrepit secure HVAC system. LOL!!! I feared for my lungs every time I had a long stint ‘back at the office’.
Peer review… hmmm. I supposed that it could be reviewed as such. But the Peer would have to understand the difference between a Petition for Plurality and a Petition for Consensus. This is more the former than the latter. It is simply an argument for the NFL to create a quality monitoring system that checks for systemic bias.
Litigation – one could argue that the NFL Raiders brand was irrevocably defamed and harmed – and show the proof in loss of ticket sales. Absolutely. However, I would think that they all had to sign a hold harmless in perpetuity agreement, just in order to have an NFL franchise to begin with. However, that can be broken…
TES
I do remember the old NIC building, before ONI, et al, moved into that shiny new building in the same terrible neighborhood. I feel fortunate to have never been stationed there, though i did do two DC tours. Hopefully, the NFL comes to terms with this issue. I suspect that your study will serve as a wake-up call to many.
Fantastic report. Just superb and a HUGE thank you for taking the time to research and publish this. Allow me to point out to you a couple things you may have already considered. The mathematical possibility that one team given all the changes throughout the years (coaching, players, schemes) would be by far and away penalized that much more than any other team in the league would seem to me to be indistinguishable from a miracle. In other words, an impossibility.
It’s important to note that just because a team wasn’t the most penalized team in the league it doesn’t mean the damage to said team wasn’t catastrophic. It’s good to see you pointed out that the Raiders were no less then 3rd though years 82-2019. I would suggest that, and have in my lifetime emphasized, that even though they didn’t lead the league in certain years that missing being at the top of the league in penalties by a handful of flags is akin to picking the fly dung out of the pepper.
The difference between top of the league in penalties and say 5th would be pretty much indistinguishable over a season. It is my contention that although it is important to put an emphasis and note how many times they have impossibly lead the league it is just as important for said reader to understand how even more impossible it is that they would be just shy of leading the league by a ultra small amount of infractions.
Sometimes teams don’t end up leading the league in penalties and miss by a penalty or three but lead the league in penalty yards. If one were to look at say the top 3-5 in penalties and included it in the research it would take what would be an already staggering figure and make it even more unbelievable.
No problem James,
I will be discussing this tomorrow on CBS Sports Radio show Silver and Black Tonight. Your contention that the tail function probability mathematics on the likelihood of all these years of penalties happening by chance, as being nigh-to-miraculous in their remoteness, is accurate. If this were a p-value, I think we would have proved that there is a bias against the Raiders beyond a shadow of doubt.
I think the trend for the future will be to watch both the PPP (Penalty per Play) and PPP Spread (Penalty per Play Detriment to Benefit Difference) each year from now on. That way the # ranking does not serve to cloud the issue of which team is consistently getting screwed. One can have a great NFL team and be highly penalized from being aggressive. But one cannot have a high PPP Spread every year, and ever hope to have a great NFL team.
The NFL needs to monitor this and ensure that their at-risk brands are served accordingly.
Thanks!
TES
I am not sure where it first hit me, maybe around the point where you talk about the difference between a Tau Point and Indigo Point Man, but it hit me anyway, this is one of the most friggin brilliant essays (??) I have ever read. I came here first looking for the NFL cheating study on the Raiders I had read about at RaidersBeat. But then I started reading the rest. Why are you not published? Or are you published and just are hiding out inside this blog thing? Regards, Andy
TES, thanks for a great article. as one who works in agriculture AND a Raider fan i found it riveting. I have often observed the absurdness of the cattle market in relation to number of “middle men” that beef goes through before it reaches the consumer..with each stage controlled by someone other than the producer (unless the producer has a retained ownership contract – which is not easy for most), in turn hurting the ranchers potential profits, or as you referred to as the Cartel cheat.
The mafia cheat of the Raiders (and in contrast the Patriots) was also compelling. What stood out for me this season was the Raiders vs. Chiefs game in KC. I dont recall the number of times the raiders were flagged, but what does stand out is that the Chiefs were not flagged at all – not one penalty! So the NFL is claiming the chiefs played a perfect game!?!? I wonder how many times that has happened and the outcomes of such a benefit….but maybe it doesn’t matter since the NFL has now admitted their product is for entertainment purposes only :)
I would be interested to see how individual Raiders players were penalized compared to when the switched teams. Someone like a DJ Hayden and penalties against while a raider vs as a member of Jags. Would be interesting to see if players, who in theory would still play “undisciplined”, are called the same once they switch teams.
Erik, not bad. Did they get better in terms of penalties after leaving the Raiders, or get worse by joining the Raiders, Additionally was it a sudden change or was there a learning curve. That would tell a great deal. Very astute!
TES
Also wanted to tell you this is a PHENOMENAL article. Absolutely amazing work. You are doing a service to the Raider Nation but quantifying what we have all known all along.
Would love to see the probability of Grudens video challenges as well. I think it’s 1 for 10 or something similar. Has to be the lowest success rate in the NFL (assumption obviously).
Again great work!
PS. Hayden had 35 penalties in his 4 years as a Raider. He has had only 10 combined penalties as a Lion and Jaguar over 3 years.
I went ahead and added a consolidated coaches index to the data, in order to bolster the hard evidence that coaches are more heavily penalized just for being the Raider coach. It tells what you cite here.
Fascinating and damning. Great read. Thanks again for what you are doing.
Please tell me you sent this to the NFL.
It is getting BIG exposure with Raiders and the NFL right now…
As a diehard Raider fan my entire life, this is something I always “knew”, however your data and info here is just the icing on the cake. I honestly feel like a scorned lover who just got the proof that their significant other has been cheating for decades. I’m sharing this as much as I can on NFL Facebook pages and the like… instead of reading it, people are just responding to me like I’m wearing a tin-foil hat. It would be nice if some legit news outlets would report on it. I feel calling the NFL out is the only way this will change. In the meantime, they’re basically the WWE
Rich… whether this is agency or simply bias, they are the WWE – just deceiving us and bilking us out of money in the process.
Fascinating article. The “Fourth Party” is often like a self-creating phenomenon that arises out of the bifurcation (and so its “solution”) – at least it seems so to me.
I’ve never liked Hegelian dialectics anyway ;)
Beautiful, as always. Since finding your site I’ve been feeling a little less alone in this strangest of worlds. Best wishes from Germany !
Tommy,
A pleasure, and glad that you have found the site useful. This is a strange world, indeed. I suppose that, once we remove the veneer of strangeness from lies – the only thing which will happen is that the truth will be found even stranger than were the lies themselves.
TES :-)
Thank you for your reply … and indeed, the truths one can encounter in life are most definitely stranger than all the abstract rationalizations that are usually employed to make sense of it all. I’m just glad someone like you exists – someone who sees through the pseudointellectual aggrandizement and intimidation tactics that rule so much of today’s Intelligentsia. You expose the mechanisms behind all that, which is no small accomplishment …
Very thought provoking. Thanks you for this thoughtful assessment. And I appreciate the comment/ caveat that ‘correlation do not imply causality”. Clearly avoid the fallacy of composition. The graphs (where one normally interprets the x-axis as time) could be define a smidge more clearly. A bigger graph would help. Of note; it is possibly the psychological pushback expressed in majority Islamic countries, to changes in perceived freedom as by-product of movements in judicial infrastructure (ok, imposing more strict Shariah schools i.e. Wahhabism) as a contributing facor for analysis. The difference in depiction being largely the statis v. process nature inherently “baked in” during compiling and interpreting statistics. You did excellent work combining extensive Pew research versus Happiness Index. I’ve tried to divine the conclusions incompletely (and sloppily because I have putty in my frontal lobes) but such combinations are by their very nature always a bit dicey.
Thanks for the feedback Chris – yes, the x-axis is a ranking of country by happiness – and is actually visually communicated by means of the blue line in each graphic (which does not change between the four graphs). So one has to examine both the axis and its projection into the graph in order to understand the x-axis fully. In other words this is not a Pearson Ordinality (abscissa, mantissa, R, R2, etc.) – which visually depicts a mathematical correlation between two independent variables.
Rather this is a an Associative Graphic (both indices bear an independent graph to themself), depicting the relationship between two factors which have already been established as in a dependent relationship. The graph simply demonstrates how this already established relationship plays out.
Yes, how this actually is precipitated is a separate discussion – and in my work overseas there are a number of reasons I have observed and think to contribute to this injustice on humanity – however, those would require more study before they can be asserted.
This reminds me very strongly of the tactics used by senior doctors in Australia, both those working closely with the pharmaceutical industry, and those of the doctors group styling themselves “Friends of Science in Medicine” .
Various celebrity skeptics in the USA (lets not give them anything to start a defamation action) with fancy sounding blogs and websites are probably doing even more damage in the US than their counterparts are in Australia.
While their arguments are supposedly very impressive in fact they offer no arguments at all. Just flim flam.
They continually appeal to authority and come down making their pronouncements from on high, never addressing the evidence proffered in debate. Apparently their seniority excuses them from debating anything inconvenient.
They have proved a serious threat to the viability of chiropractic and treatments like acupuncture and naturopathy.
It is a concern when they do this under the cover of the anonymity afforded by the web, but a more serious worry if they feel able to operate in broad daylight.
Thanks MiB! Good to see you again. And if it were only acupuncture, chiropractic and naturopathy – that would be one level of oppression. But the wholesale attempt to sell us our own nutrients and foods as ‘medicines’ under their control and distribution, is diabolical. Dark.
Wonderful chewy assessment for a ‘neologician’. Would enjoy a chance to discuss this from a semiotic perspective. Perhaps you could google my brief presentation I delivered at the Semiotic Society’s annual symposium found by googling “neologisms as signpost”. Again, appreciation for your academic efforts. (My name is Chris, I’m a gradual student at St Thomas University in Houston
Will find and read Chris, thanks! TES
Asteroid/Comet interdiction is a very important topic and you’ve given more thought to it than anyone I know. I’ve got a folder of links on the topic that I labeled, “Impact Hazard.”
The hypothesis that a comet or fragment thereof hit the North American Laurentia Ice Sheet some 12,850 years ago or so keeps racking up new supporting evidence though critics of the theory are holding sway on Wikipedia and Science Magazine, last I heard.
Giving new alarm to impact risks is a study that shows Centaurs, which are hundred+ kilometer icy objects that sometimes get flung by Jupiter into the inner solar system and then start disintegrating into multiple projectiles that cross earth’s orbit.
Here is an interview with an astronomer who has been working on this topic.
https://cosmictusk.com/cosmic-tusk-interview-1-dr-bill-napier/
And this is a NOVA episode now six years old or more that covers this topic. Much more evidence has come out to support the theory since then.
And then there are other papers that suggest that the Taurid Meteor Stream has some dangerous bands in it that contain large, yet hidden, potential bolides. Maybe I’ll enclose more links in another comment if it seems appropriate.
Sorry I forgot the link to the NOVA episode.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGbwzpQUtXk
Antonia Zamoro shows how the energy of this impact was dissipated by ejecting ice boulders that left there mark on shallow, earthquake liquefied ground and that the conical cavities point to the impact site.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM8bvhhFAB-Wmr-PeEVkGTA
Interesting article. I wonder what you think of this article by Alex Malpass, an interesting philosopher of religion who I’ve followed for a while that discusses something similar to what you described here (to be fair, it was in the context of a religious argument, the Kalam, but still interesting):
https://useofreason.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/the-semantics-of-nothing/
Great article – which touches on two things.
1. The equivocal nature of the word Nothing. Here we have basically broken down Nothing into its condition statement, such that logical truths can be assembled from its sub-component concepts. There is zero and there is the state of nothing – which are the two general sets of terms. Suddenly the term is useful again – provided one uses the more precise version.
2. But even more important, Alex has touched on the issue of intent. It is not the presence of creation or design in the cosmos which is our litmus – rather the role, contribution and presence of intent. This applies to ontology and well as to something as objective as genomics. I can rule out creation and intelligent design with good phylogenetics – but I cannot rule out intent. This is where our deliberation should reside ethically.
Intent is the foundation of cause and effect, as he cites…
But even more important, intent is sticky. It has a logical persistence which circumvents artificial limitations set up by boundaries of ‘design’ or ‘nothing’ or ’cause to effect’.
No matter which of those states I touch or effect, I am still left with intent as persistent in the set of Wittgenstein objects. This curious feature may stem from intent being substrate to our reality, or it may just be a quirky form of reality that ends at our Planck bounds like everything else… But one thing is for sure – while everything else has to end at that discrete bound – intent does not.
Which opens up myriad possibilities.
TES 8)
How do you define “intent” ? And how is it “the foundation of cause and effect”?
Key question! Intent is the will of an intelligence. Will alone is not enough.
A Robot has a will, but that is not the same as intent. Intent is bound inside the manufacturer of the robot, not the robot itself.
This can be delineated by the double slit experiment, wherein an observer with Intent to observe alters the experiment and forces the photon to either particle or wave observation.
The question arises – If I insert a robot into this dynamic and leave the robot unobserved, the robot might even have a will to observe the particle/wave effect at times, by manner of its random assignment protocol. However, this will not serve to alter the double slit experiment – As the double slit itself is nothing more than a simple robot to begin with – which by itself does not resolve the uncertainty state.
This provides the dividing line between intent and will.
TES
Ethical Skeptic,
I saw this on Twitter today and thought it sounded interesting. I have read your articles on and off over the years with varying amounts of comprehension and sporadic epiphany. So until today you were a casual read offering some good value for those who focus on the detail behind our skepticism and skeptic pretenders. You think differently.
But this post today on ELORA I found to be absolutely brilliant as a scheme to deflect asteroids. Fucking next level in its acumen. The fact that no one (to my knowledge) has come up with this, despite some of the best minds on the planet addressing this issue for decades – is commentary upon your work or whatever it is you do. This post today has erased any doubt in my mind that something extraordinary is going on inside your head. Either that or you have help from aliens – (and a staff of graphics artists).
An old fan, and a new appreciation. I put my email address on the comment form as well. I have a couple suggestions I would like to throw your way and get your feedback. Thanks!
Bill Claxton
Bill,
That is appreciated very much, I can tell you. Yes, my articles are not for the casual reader, nor even science enthusiast. But the feedback on the ELORA concept proposal is very comforting. I never know how ideas are going to be received. But this is one I have been working on for probably 13 years now.
I am flattered by your kind comments. Thanks for your readership, and yes – I will gladly take any suggestions you might have to offer. Did they pertain to the ELORA post, or to something else? My email is theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com.
Thanks for reading all these years!
TES
8)
Hi TES, I’m back! With my own blog, as you can see :) I have had some thoughts about the conversation we had.
In our discussion, it seems like what I was really trying to get at, but didn’t know what exactly to call it as I wasn’t that familiar with philosophy (and am still trying to work on it), was the epistemic regress problem. I was probably trying to address Foundationalism and arguing for Coherentism, hence my comment “What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.” I think what I trying to say “Imagine if we accept all the proposed axioms (e.g. of Rationalism, Emperiscism, ect.) as valid. Then we could use them to address each other and test which one is most coherent.” Of course, the problem was with my assumption that we could represent the infinitely many possible “worldviews” . It seems like when you said “Our knowledge is based upon observation, not beliefs ” we were talking past each other, with me coming from an internalist standpoint and you disagreeing.
Yes,
I see this now, as it relates more clearly what you were attempting to say. Now this approach, lending credibility to all sources of knowledge – and rather simply allowing accrued information to begin to falsify wayward ideas naturally… totally agree. This removes the philosophical argument from the context of belief. I get you now.
I use this principle early in the outline of Ethical Skepticism. One does not have to go around ‘debunking’ things. All you need do for 90% of bunk is to produce more information, and the bunk will step on its own dick eventually. The skeptic does not have to go around debunking things (which is an inverse negation way of declaring truth- without appearing to do so), as that is just another form of bad information itself. The fact that such a process might hit on a truth, is merely accidental (and used as a propaganda anecdote).
Glad to have you back and commenting. Two comments in one day for my blog!! LOL!!
Will check out your blog here soon.
TES
8)
Yeah I’m ambivalent about Foundationalism vs Coherentism. Of course, some have proposed a middle ground, which makes sense. I wonder what you think of probabilistic skepticism. I a while back read a book online defending that view and arguing for this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinitism
https://www.iep.utm.edu/inf-epis/
This too makes sense now. The progression of an epistemology should be both continuous and asymptotic. There should not be a circular or self-converging facet to the critical path of the progression of incremental risk in its development. This makes total sense, yes. Circularity and self convergence are indicative that someone either has an agenda or has gotten lazy, or both.
Makes a lot of sense. I would differ with the terms they have chosen to describe the principle, but it is a great observation. Very similar to the tenets I carry in evaluating whether or not a model has been manipulated/constrained into its answer.
Good Stuff
8)
“both continuous and asymptotic”
What is that? As in an asymptotic probability or risk -taking?
“There should not be a circular or self-converging facet to the critical path of the progression of incremental risk in its development.”
The critical path? As in the path used to support a hypothesis, or basically the
epistemic method?
Not exactly,
asymptotic is what I regard to be the correct word for ‘infinity’. An asymptote is ‘infinite for the relevant range’ – it does not circle back upon itself. It relates the perception that each step along a critical path of discovery is truly revelatory and not a rehash or reproduction of a previous understanding.
A critical path is the critical sequence of reasoning step by step, which might be used at a murder trial for instance. It is the salient and risk conserving pathway from entropy in understanding, all the way to resolution of that entropy, not in the most efficient, but rather the most effective manner. It too, should not circle back upon itself.
But yes, both involve series of hypothesis and resolution… with the goal of not ‘maximizing correctness, but rather minimizing catastrophic or circular wrongness’. It is the mistake of the fake skeptic, who seeks to maximize correctness – and does not perceive the mistake one makes under that method.
I think this is what the two references you cited were saying – but their terms were a certain school of terminology which I have not learned.
‘
David Atkinson and Jeanne Peijnenburg have defended such views pretty well, such as here:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-018-1883-8
What I was reading was their book “Fading Foundations: Probability and the Regress Problem”
Beautifully written and insightful article. Says the things we all carry in our gut, but probably don’t have the tools you do, in order to prove it out on paper. I am not sure I undertand the first chart, but I get the gist of what you have done here. I always questioned whether or not these polls were holding back on the issue a bit. And now I know. Thanks ethical skeptic. TW
Perry, after I read your gracious comment this morning, I modified the graphs a bit in order to hopefully make them a bit more understandable. The first graph is simply attempting to parse up the group of people who had never heard the term ‘UFO’ before (strange tho that might be) into who should be counted and who should not be counted, so that they are not double-represented in the exclusion group. Just a matter of parsimony in poll exclusion… hopefully that makes sense – and hopefully the graphics are a bit more straightforward and helpful now.
Thanks
TES :-)
I enjoyed reading your story. Im looking forward to read more of your posts.
Pingback: Glycine’s Myriad Health Benefits – Become Something New
“When I observe scientists or SSkeptics pretending to be experts on a broad array of subjects, I KNOW it is a load of baloney. They have not had enough time to gain this insight. It is a pretense and a masquerade”.
Indeed, it is almost farcical that people like the neurologist Stephen N can pretend to such an enormous amount of knowledge. It’s simply not feasible.
One pattern that I notice though is SSkeptics relying on sweeping statements as a form of bullying, aimed at forcing people to agree with them.
Yes, to them ‘skepticism’ is not a philosophical mindset of suspension, but rather a form of short-cut science conclusion, wherein answers are produced from one’s cubicle or basement. Those answers can then be pushed in lieu of actually having to use the scientific method. It is a wonderful trick.
“What Ockham’s Razor asks us to prefer is the straightforward over the complicated, not simple over the complex. Understanding the difference is absolutely essential to scientific literacy.”
What an extremely verbose way to make an argument that essentially boils down to semantics.
Case in point.
Note: if you have never designed an intricate system nor been held accountable for the results of a large project – then ‘complicated’ and ‘complex’ – along with ‘straightforward’ and ‘simple’ can seem like the same things. For example, complicated is ergodic and forward looking, complex is epistemological and examines back into time series. They are not the same. Not even close.
I sounds to me like you just learned a new word, ‘semantics’ – and simply glomed onto it in order to use it as a billy club on others.
But you have to have actually done something with your life, in order to discern this difference. Skeptics who do not discern this are called ‘useful idiots’. Understanding the difference is absolutely essential not only to scientific literacy, but human literacy as well.
You have a lot of hard learning ahead of you. Sorry.
It seems that the redoubtable Dr Novella will be a strong contender for the “ Physician who has done the most to harm human health” award !
The breadth of his opinions is matched only by their shallowness.
Pingback: Ethical Skepticism – Part 5 – The Real Ockham's Razor | The Ethical Skeptic
Pingback: The 9 Principles – MIT | studious silliness..
Hey Ethical Skeptic! Recognized you from Skeptiko-Forum. Fantastic well researched post! I learned a few things here which is great because I often see the same old arguments rehashed elsewhere. There’s some new stuff here that is really fascinating. I’m sorry to read that your own child has suffered a debilitating vaccine injury. Being born in the mid 80’s I wondered if my childhood asthma, migraines, and arthritis wasn’t also the result of vaccines.
My wife and I are about to have our first child and we will not vaccinate. We are already taking flak from some family members, and I’m sure things will only get harder. I wish more people could take a step back from the emotion and have a rational discussion about the issue.
I wrote this blog a while back after researching the flu vaccine because my wife was being forced to wear a mask for refusing the flu shot at the hospital she worked at even though she was in the IT dept in a separate building from patients and never saw patients. So much phony information out there from official sources… https://hurmanetar.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/cdc-flu-vaccine-propaganda/
Thanks Brandon!
Yes, I wish this issue was as easy as some of the medical profession makes it out to be. If a disease is deadly and highly contagious, then I am for vaccination in a very limited scope – knowing that I am assuaging one risk in favor of adopting another. That adopted risk does not disappear just because we refuse to look at it. Such is the nature of the world. There is no risk-free decision. But 53 vaccine events for all kids, on an issue with this extensive a risk domain? That is monumentally stupid, and no professional certification or degree can obviate such a poor decision on the part of our society and governing entities.
Thanks for stopping by and reading!
TES
https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/the-principles/
wonderFULL, i thank you for the introduction. how ya doin? – lee
I don’t know who you are, but damn this is good. I learned more in this one essay than in two semesters of B school. Thanks.
Thanks Barry – I did some updating today to give its message some more flow and cohesiveness as to how risk is applied in my experience doing Value Chain Strategies. Yes, this is not taught in Engineering nor Business schools, or at least not in this manner. I have worked in the past with my alma mater to understand this, but so far, only the vernacular is changing – not yet the understanding. But that is how it works.
The understanding of ignorance begins with Wittgenstein.
This Dr Krishna Kumari person thinks that she debunked every single spiritual experiences out there.
All evidence for ghosts and afterlife is just “pseudoscience and wishful thinking”.
Saying that those who look beyond materialistic/scientific explanations are avoiding the “truth” in order to deal with/feel better about life’s inevitable hardships.
By the looks of her blog, no one and nothing can convince her that there’s a greater reality than the depressing worldview of materialism.
https://kkartlab.in/m/group/discussion?id=2816864%3ATopic%3A156764
https://kkartlab.in/main/search/search?
q=Afterlife+
https://kkartlab.in/main/search/search?q=Ghosts+
And the link in one of her posts made me laugh:
https://actu.epfl.ch/news/neuroscientists-awaken-ghosts-hidden-in-our-cortex/
Just look at her answers on Quora. ( Quora is often full of materialist/skeptics ).
Every time she sees an OP having these experiences, NDEs, and seeing ghosts, she simply dismisses the OP as hallucinating and/or being mentally ill, the OP was looking for a spiritual explanation for comfort and to cope with the pain of illness/suffering/distress, that she has a “real scientific explanation” for it all, and links them to her page/blog. And if it turns out that she hasn’t fully explained it all, then “eventually science/neuroscience will”.
I call that “Materialism of the Gaps”
https://www.quora.com/profile/Steve-Brown-145
And this Steve Brown person is a bit more aggressive towards the OP’s questions about the supernatural and people looking beyond materialism.
Being very quick to say “no!” and “that’s ridiculous and fantasy, because real science proves it doesn’t and can’t exist.” to the possibility of a spiritual reality.
Atheist/materialists follow Krishna and Steve Brown around like little puppies online, because they act like they’re the “brave, rational, and critical thinking ones” accepting the cold harsh ‘reality’ of there being no spiritual world.
A lot materialists keep saying that they’re doing society a huge favor by promoting ‘hard, real materialistic science’, and getting rid of and debunking “harmful superstitions”, “myths”, NDEs, and afterlife.
I disagree with that.
I’ve heard that belief in these “harmful superstitions” helps some people recover faster from depression, cope with grief, job loss, deters suicide, less likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, ect.
A poster on Reddit even got depressed over the idea of materialism being true, and the spiritual realm being non existent.
A materialist’s response to this is usually “Suck it up, and face it. It’s reality. Yes, there is pain and suffering and it’s not fair, but that’s life.” Heck quite a few, if not many, get depressed over it.
I know I did, and I was miserable when I thought they were right at first.
But then I learned that they’ll never accept evidence for a world beyond the physical unless it meets their ‘standards’.
We can’t win with the materialists. And we definitely can’t win with Dr. Krishna Kumari Challa and Steve Brown.
Those two will probably discover and assume that my entire comment here is fear based/denial, or that my spiritual beliefs are being crushed.
But I don’t care.
Call it what they will if it lets materialists/atheists sleep at night.
Yes, they communicate science incorrectly.
1. Science measures in the material/observable because of its method of incremental critical path and not because it possesses a presupposed ontology.
2. The ‘Gaps’ in our understanding are large. Even inside the materially observable.
3. Science therefore makes no comment upon that which it has not addressed and observed. Nihilists do not fathom this.
4. Fake skeptics and religious nihilists presume to speak on behalf of science. Our job is to say ‘No. You do not speak for science, nor its conclusions. You are speaking for a religion which would like to control science, just like the last one did.’
I just stumbled upon a new book by Parag Jasani called Mechanisms of the mind, that came out in December last year in India.
https://www.amazon.com/Mechanisms-Mind-Parag-Jasani-ebook/dp/B07ML5QLVZ/ref=mp_s_a_1_fkmrnull_1?keywords=parag+jasani&qid=1555360675&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmrnull
I’ve never even heard of him, his book, or his websites until a few days ago.
http://www.consciousnessexplained.com
Parag Jasani seems completely convinced that he has solved all mysteries of consciousness by developing a model that has never been used before, called the DOS model, that explains how the mind develops and works, what causes dreams, why we’re all here, ect.
And that the mind is a product that emerged from natural selection and the brain.
That book and website should make hardcore desperate materialists/atheists happy now, because that must be evidence that all mystical experiences are really mental illnesses and hallucinations, and there’s no afterlife!
We can all finally stop searching, let go of spiritual and quantum woo, and throw away all of those afterlife evidence books, which are fear-based.
And forget OBEs and NDEs.
Sorry Jasani, but I’m not buying it.
Not because my “cherished spiritual beliefs are being shattered”, as some materialists like to say when you don’t agree.
But because I feel like I’ve seen this before.
He’s basically saying the same thing Daniel Dennett’s saying.
Just look at Consciousness Explained book by Dennett and then Jasani’s book.
Except Jasani has this “new systems thinking approach” on the brain to develop this DOS model. Maybe it’s just me.
Oh well. Whatever keeps the materialist fairy-tale fantasy alive and let’s them sleep at night, I guess.
But I think evidence for mind beyond brain is mounting up as we speak. Whether materialists and Jasani like/believe it or not.
Agreed Kano,
I do not consider the possibility of an afterlife, because of some quaint attachment to the idea – rather, because the evidence compels me to plurality and I cannot investigate its anti-thetical ‘proof of an absence’. From there, I want to put the magical aspects of the idea on trial and test its incremental assertions. Pseudoscience is the process of ignoring an alternative, because you have it all figured out before doing any science.
There is a statement in The Elements of Hypothesis to this effect: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/12/13/the-elements/
A hypothesis reduces, exposes and puts its magical assertion on trial.
A pseudo-hypothesis hides is magical assumptions woven into its epistemology and places nothing at risk thereafter.
Sol-nihilism is a religion which masquerades as a science, by not doing any science at all.
TES 8)
nice one ES. particularly enjoyerd yr dissecting of the “alien life” shell game that skeptics like to play. I wish you would include a reference to neil deGrasse tyson as I suspect he’s a major frontman for this blizzard of confusion.
Agreed Alex,
Yes, the Fermi Paradox and the Kardashev scale (both NDGT favorites) are just two the most celebrated examples of how we spin deception with regard to how an extraterrestrial intelligence might exist or manifest itself. I have developed a counter to the Fermi Paradox called the Parce-Ames Probability (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/10/02/the-fermi-paradox-is-babysitting-rubbish/). The dramatically large odds are that they will contact us, well before we contact or find any evidence of life in the cosmos. The dramatically large odd are also, that they have already done so.
In similar fashion, your show and website have indicated that advancement with regard to a civilization, does not necessarily relate directly and solely to its ability to harness large scale fusion energy (solar equivalents and the like). I think that the Kardashev scale is ridiculously presumptive in how it regards an enlightened civilization to advance.
The presumptive arrogance of both scales/arguments are demonstrative of the haphazard and oafish way in which we have approached this topic.
“Metaphysics is beyond that. It is not science. It is past science or un-scientific. Whether it is knowledge or wisdom is a cultural discussion, but not a scientific one. Any discussion attempting to suggest because a scientist utters a metaphysical statement that metaphysics is involved with science–does not pass any reasonable definition of scientific truth. By all means abandon scientific truth in the face of your fear and anxiety to embrace metaphysics–one is equivalent to another. Buddhism, quantum mechanical philosophical assertions, holy trinities. But science has a clear meaning. To deny that is… unreasonable.“
And
“There is no such consensus or a consensus on plausible and reproducible evidence on ESP, life after death, post-death conscientiousness, consciousness separate from biological activities (i.e. nerve impulses) etc. Of course, metaphysicists will always try to weasel-word these clear arguments into fuzzy assertions and non-facts masquerading as facts. I would welcome scientific proof of the expansion of knowledge”
Another thing. I believe I’ve read this from a commenter on a Josh Mitteldorf blog. It seems that “scientific truth” means materialism.
A lot of “skeptics” say the “if you think there’s something beyond the “scientific truth”, you’re scared of oblivion after death” mantra.
And I’m getting tired of it.
btw, the author of the blog the skeptic was commenting on, has been receiving many positive feedback, being a good scientist, ect.
But the second he started being open about the possibility of an afterlife, NDE, OBEs, and consciousness beyond the brain, he was automatically jumped on for ‘not being a good and real scientist’, denying ‘hard scientific truth and reality’, clinging to ‘flimsy evidence’ of NDEs and OBES, and throwing in metaphysical and quantum woo, in favor of comfort and wanting an afterlife to exist.
But hey. I guess you can’t please everybody. I stopped trying.
I vow to never interact with and visit the skeptics mentioned in my previous comment anymore. It only frustrates me and that’s not good for my delicate immune system
Thx for reading.
I need to get this off my chest.
This author, Catherine Giordano tries to explain OBEs and NDEs by using sources that aren’t new, such as hormone release, hormonal disruption, excess carbon dioxide, tricky memories, reaction to anesthetics, ect. The full list is in the article.
NDEs and OBEs aren’t the only pieces of evidence for an afterlife, but it seems as though she acts as if they are.
https://owlcation.com/stem/The-Truth-About-Near-Death-Experience-Scientific-Explanations
There are a a lot of comments questioning her article, saying that those explanations have been around for quite some time, that she was just quoting her favorite sources, and using the same materialist arguments over and over.
Her responses and her follower’s responses were that they were just delusional, denying harsh “truth”, and promoting woo science.
And when some commenters talked about their own experiences, her and her followers basically told them that they were just mentally ill, physically ill, and desperately longing for an afterlife.
She mentioned that her own friend had an NDE, but refused to talk about it.
And no wonder why she didn’t want to. Her friend knew that she was just going to dismiss it and say something like “there is no afterlife, you were just severely ill and scared of your own mortality”.
A lot of NDErs hesitate to talk about their experiences, for reasons mentioned above.
And this skeptic, Thomas Swan
https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Comfort-Theories-of-Religion
https://owlcation.com/humanities/Why-Do-people-Convert-to-Religion
Many skeptics throw the “You only believe in religion and an afterlife to cope with physical and emotional pain in life, illnesses, depression, injuries, and the fear of death. It’s just a coping mechanism.” card a lot.
Yes, I do find it comforting that when life’s obstacles get hard, and all of the physical pain and discomfort I’ve been going through ( I’m constantly sick and occasionally get depressed over the fact ) will be rewarded in the end. But that’s not the reason why I believe in an afterlife and question materialism. In fact I know there is a greater and more to reality than just materialism, because of the evidence, not because I can’t “cope with the harsh reality of there being none”.
I might accept accept this as a hypothesis of science, if they would mature it into a testable/prediction-heavy pathway of research. But they do not. It is what is called in science – heavy ex ante (religious wish). It matters not how ‘probable’ the idea is. That means it is accepted as proved without having to perform in any way. A thing known as pseudo-theory.
Now, it could be that this is the null hypothesis… I might even accept that. But a true scientist sets out to FALSIFY the null hypothesis and never ‘believes it’.
Such people betray that they have never once done any real science. Never been in a lab, never filed a patent. etc etc etc….
TES 8)
Do you think this means consciousness is all brain based?
https://owlcation.com/stem/Zombie-Brains
a recent peer-reviewed study
Kamo,
Thanks for this article. This is why I have published the Ethical Skeptic’s Map of Inference https://theethicalskeptic.com/2019/03/04/the-map-of-inference/
Be wary of ‘scientists’ who do not cite, nor recognize the limitations of the method of inference they are employing. To plug in a formaldehyde soaked, 20 year old brain and observe some circuitry firing (with no control measures) you don’t really understand, and then attribute that to equate to the person, memories and identity of the brain’s former owner – is religious wishful thinking. It makes for entertaining journalism. NDE’s are religious wishful thinking too, yes. They are both a form of inductive inference. However, that being said…
Plugging a 20 year dead brain in to a DC electrical current and then pretending that its mapping equates to what the mapping would have been 20 years ago (you don’t really hold that mapping) – is called linear induction.
Setting an orange sneaker outside an intensive care unit window in a hospital, and having a person who died come back and say ‘Hey, there was an orange sneaker on the ledge outside my ICU window’ – this is called falsification (all you need is one – and we have hundreds).
Falsification is a form of deductive inference and is 100 times more powerful and sound as a basis of inference as compared to linear induction. This is just to bad for the religious nihilist. Science does not prove their religion. One can prove ANYTHING by means of linear induction (modus praesens). The only thing even easier to effect as science is to the DISPROVE something by linear induction (modus absens).
What they have done in this article is this: Disproving a state or object by means of linear induction (modus absens) is just one RCH away from pseudoscience. If any bias or agency (religion) exists at all with the participants – then it IS pseudoscience. No matter how many lab coats are worn. No matter how many beeping oscilloscopes are wired in series. It is still pseudoscience.
They must address the prior art deductive inference work which has been done by doctors and nurses all over the planet. Or they don’t even hold a hypothesis, much less a claim to science.
TES 8)
Pingback: Measles and Vaccines: For Your Compassionate Consideration - The Thinking Moms' Revolution
TES, you think differently than most people. Or at least write differently anyways.
The story of your dad doesn’t directly connect with the story about philosophy. Yet in a sense it is like an electrical induction effect where current flowing through one wire causes current to flow through an adjacent wire. This for example is how power is transferred in a transformer to change voltage levels…
Your writings … sometimes they have higher levels of abstraction than I typically see elsewhere. Poetic.
And yet the topics you discuss are (at least they seem to me to be) high level scientific or philosophical ideas … and the vocabulary of them … I’m not familiar with.
Well, it was a worth a read anyways. Back to my day to day existence, like go clear some snow off my car…
You got it! Sometimes, having to explain the sympathetic themes is just wrong. If the reader cannot catch it, they probably should not be reading TES…
Electrical induction – a GREAT analogy… :-)
It is amazing how often people get things wrong and how misguided policies can wreak havoc on people.
We live in the modern age and we look down on the science and practices of earlier times. We ridicule people of a few generations ago for practicing bad science such as “bleeding” to cure people.
Yet with the backing of “science” … our modern age has produced a proliferation of new problems.
We have modern science and we now have an obesity epidemic in this country. (By the way I sent to the ethical skeptic email address at Yahoo on 12/21/2018 an email the touched upon some of what I learned from Dr. Jason Fung’s book THE OBESITY CODE.)
We also have been scared of skin cancer and have advised people not to get sunlight. And then we end up with an epidemic of vitamin d deficiency.
And here we are only talking about science.
I’m not going to try and make some over-arching point about honesty … there is so much to do. I still have to finish reading the book you recommended — The Art of Scientific Investigation. Following everything you write is difficult for I’m not familiar with the field. However seeing how dishonesty can infiltrate the esteemed bastion of science … it is a necessary skill. You are bit like what the Founding Fathers of the United States had envisioned in the role of the press. They recognized that the press was necessary to keep government officials more honest and accountable. With the ascendancy of the authority of science, you are doing a strategic work in exposing the many ways that academic and scientific “slight of hand” can misuse science for any number of nefarious motives. The motives range from “love of money,” “love of praise [from peers]” to unthinking hatred driven by indoctrination which can be termed “misguided zeal” and perhaps just laziness (an unwillingness to really investigate something before idly passing on flawed information.
Lots of battle lines in the ongoing war between truth and error. How many fronts have you opened in the battle against error and lies? You’ve got so many articles (blog posts) tackling error from so many angles.
My fronts:
Opposing dogmatic religions
Opposing dogmatic nihilism
Society understanding skepticism and how to treat challenging topics more fairly… instilling wonder again…
Changing the nature of trade between China and the US (harming the US)
Anthropogenic Carbon Contriubtion to Climate Change
Abuse of Climate Change for Political Gain
Encephalitic Injury to our Kids (whether vaccine or pesticide or other)
Toxification of our Food from Pesticides
Depletion of nutrient from our soil, killing the 5 classes of microflora, dilution of nutrient in our food
Well being of small and medium sized US famers & families
Endocrine and Autoimmune disorders and their impact epidemiologically
Taxation and Representation
National Resources and Corruption
National Infrastructure…
Changing understanding of competence and strategy in US Corporate culture
Global Food Security
A future for my two disabled kids….
A future for disabled kids of American parents who have not been as fortunate as have I….
Gad, exhausting just listing it. Five of these I have made enormous contribution to over the last three decades – and have finished my work therein. Very pleased with the impact globally. Some others I will never make an impact upon, it is just a discipline for me to hone my sharpness upon (a whetting stone). Some, are new avenues for me, which will occupy me for the coming decades…
Even though I reject many teachings of Abrahamism, I want to look back and say that I laid it on the line and did not sit still. I might be a Don Quixote in some of these areas – but in others I definitely was not.
I want, regardless of sin and forgiveness, to live a life that I could be proud of, nonetheless….
TES 8)
A few months ago I randomly opened one of the volumes of a partial set of books that I have called MESSAGES AND PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS. One of the papers (I can’t remember which) had expressed some thoughts that showed that it would be in everyone’s best interest to come to some compromise and avoid the Civil War. Certainly, in retrospect the South would have been better off to have just capitulated and come to some workable solution rather than to lose some many lives and so many of their cities in defense of slavery.
However emotions ran high and the US suffered some 300,000 deaths or so in this major war.
This just gets me thinking about the major issues of today where people are somewhat blinded.
Few people realize that the US population as a whole has failed to heading the warning of President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address. At this juncture there is almost universal support (within the United States) for whatever military activity the US engages in. Of particular concern to me is when promises are made and then not kept. At the fall of the Soviet Union repeated promises not to expand NATO one inch was made to Soviet/Russian leaders. That didn’t happen.
The Russians and some others are also upset because promises were made in the runup to authorizing air-strikes in Libya … that some feel were not kept.
All common sense would suggest that the Russians would be natural allies or partners since the strongest ascendant national power right now is to their South East. Are they worried? Of course.
And the weirdest of all things to me is that our Federal Government is not spending about 25 cents for every 25 cents it collects. The trajectory of this deficit spending is so concerning that even I can see that is unsustainable. Yet what plans are in place to address this national imbalance?
We are in the richest country in the world, and yet we aren’t paying our bills … instead passing the debt load to the next generation. I’m upset with Bible Believing Christians for fretting over some rare use of someone who thinks she or he is a gender that differs from what is on their birth certificate, while each of us have stolen about $66,000 from a future generation. Do we condone our own stealing?
Have we no morals? We are taxing the future generations with our debt … and we don’t represent them. How can we allow those not born yet to be represented? Time machines?
I agree with your points. Even your opposition to dogmatic religion should be a plus for any true religion. Why? Because if you oppose something that is true, they should be able to defend it – or upgrade their arguments. You would in fact be doing a favor to them. (Pardon my aside on this topic … I might be in that camp … yet as I’ve pointed out here long ago, I’ve strenuously opposed a number of errors that come from the evangelical camp. Other camps of Christianity have similar problems … I’m just not as familiar with “the terrain” and haven’t spent much efforts combating their errors.
I also look at what you wrote about global food security. It has crossed my mind that if there is ever a major volcanic eruption (Tambora size (which created “the year without a summer)) we might be suddenly faced with a worldwide decrease in food outputs. At this point in our modern society we have had the ability to ship grain and food from areas where there is abundant food production to areas where food production was wiped-out as in a drought condition. One major eruption might knock back food production for a while on a hemispheric scale.
Also, people don’t realize how insane some of the people who run for US president might be. If the last election did not go the way that it did … if US military policy had become one of establishing no-fly zones over a nation that was being protected a “nuclear superpower” …
Man, I just don’t think people think very much.
Though I’ve got no idea who you are and what you’ve accomplished … keep up the good work.
Oh and I forgot (more hobby)
DNA, evolution, origin of life, speciation and man’s ascendancy
TES
I could really have used some better editing in my last statement. One of my biggest mistakes was in that I should have said that the US federal government is spending 25 cents for every 15 cents it collects in taxes.
Also, I appreciate your statement in your first comment ” instilling wonder again…”
One of the drawbacks in the creation/evolution debate is that some evolutions may minimize “the difficult questions” for evolution and of course this doesn’t bode well for the sense of “wonder.” If your main goal is to teach evolution rather than “what is” you will focus on all the examples that illustrate evolution clearly. That is fine. However some things haven’t always fit well. I am suspecting that things like viruses have cross-pollinated some DNA and that the history of life isn’t always a result of lineage from an ancestor with gradual changing traits. I might be wrong … and I’m not attached to my theory … it is just that I haven’t seen all the evidence and I’m not sure whether the pertinent evidence to make a right conclusion has even been compiled and properly laid out yet.
Same thing though on the religious side. When people act like they have all the answers … they too are fighting against further research and discovery.
Love your efforts, most professional and credible site I’ve come across to date. Doing what needs to be done, thank you and best wishes for success!
I have one question concerning your pro-vaccine status. You make the case that because of smallpox and polio, one should be pro-vaccine in regard to these diseases. I just want to know how you know that these vaccines were indeed responsible for the decline in mortality and morbidity. Looking at all the downward disease trends, including diseases not associated with any vaccines, I can’t help but think that smallpox and polio would have experienced similar downward descents without the ultimate need for any vaccines. How do you know this isn’t the case and that vaccines were actually necessary and responsible?
And I can only wonder given the little, if any, symptomological difference between Smallpox and Pustular Eczema, how sure we can be that smallpox is even “eradicated.”
Hey John thanks,
There are four things which are required to combat a life threatening infectious disease from my work in developing nations: 1. Fresh local food and readily available clean water, 2. Sanitation and household practices, 3. Local medical care expertise and facilities and 4. Vaccines. Yes, the first three are already assumed under any program recommending vaccines, as those approaches will have 80+% of the total impact on both mortality and morbidity for a number of infectious diseases – but not all of them.
Smallpox is not identified by its symptoms, it is identified by the presence of a specific virus genome – variola, which is held in a vault at the CDC – its genome can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8184534. As of 1975, it is still highly communicable and still possesses a high rate of mortality. If there were a sudden outbreak of pustular eczema in a region (or 7 other ‘poxes’ as well), then an identification of smallpox can happen very fast. As well, there will be 30% deaths with smallpox – there will not be with eczema or the other ‘poxes’. Yes, if smallpox were out there – we would definitely know it 100%. Now has a variant of it mutated and become much less deadly? – I suppose that is possible, but we have not found that virus genome yet.
But the success of approaches 1 – 3 above should not be used as an argument to be anti-vaccine 100%. I worked remotely (not a big deal) to support the ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone and Guinea – and based upon the communicability curves at the onset (which I tracked by modeling exposure tiers – the communicability rate was 12% by mere proximity) – we dodged a BIG bullet there by practices 1 – 3. There was a chance that even those would not have contained the disease. It was rather scary.
That is the direct observation I have had thus far, but beyond that I am not a medical professional. My stakeholdership and role as a philosopher is to point out Ockham’s Razor sufficient errors made by bureaucracy and the resulting dangers to our kids, not step in and pretend to be a medical expert in their place. Philosophy can intervene when science makes mistakes of skepticism, but it cannot pretend to thereafter usurp and take the place of science from then on – as that is not the role of an ethical skeptic.
Thanks!
TES 8)
Thanks so much, I find myself agreeing with you in ways that feels totally great, given the all-too-rare presence of real reasonableness!
One more thing if time permits: I wonder if you would be interested in applying your philosophical abilities toward the findings of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hammer. I know you may initially think this to be a waste of your time (sorry, that’s admittedly something I would say to social skeptics to try and defend myself….it’s hard to brush off old wounds imparted from the “skeptic” belittling effect) but I feel that issues like vaccines and the overall standard medical model of disease management has sufficiently warranted an entire re-working of our understanding of disease, microbes, and the immune system, if such a reworking were possible. And if such a re-working were indeed provided with real evidence to affirm it, accomplished to a large degree in a scientifically validated proof, then why not go there and indulge in what may be a real, model-shattering, paradigm shift?
John, hmmmm… I have never heard these theories before. I will read the websites and ponder them. I have never focused on cancer, because fighting the autoimmune, endocrine and neurological diseases my family has faced, has been a full time research job. Ugghhh. Thanks! TES
Thanks so much for everything you have written and accomplished here with theethicalskeptic.com. Outstanding!
I would, however, question your assessment of small pox danger based on the historic research and analysis of Dr Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk in their book, Dissolving Illusions. Especially after considering their accounts of how the City of Leicester, England, in protest against the dangers of the small pox vaccine, handled this disease using early sanitation and isolation methods.
Humphries, in other works, has also described how the CDC attempted to reuse the stored smallpox vaccine on doctors and nurses just after 9/11 when there was a threat of a weaponized small pox attack, but the vaccine turned out to be far too dangerous/injurious to use at all. That inoculation program was quickly and quietly dropped.
‘Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines and the Forgotten History’ was a true red-pill book for me. So much I never knew, especially about small pox and polio.
For polio, I would also highly recommend, ‘The Moth in the Iron Lung’ by Forrest Maready.
Thanks again!
Len, will do. I am not there on such a conclusion, but am curious as to these resources – and hold open that our declarations of victory are not as clean as we advertise them (which is always the case). Thanks! :-)
This is why we need a Sarbannes-Oxley for vaccines (among other things). Those doing the “studies” must sign off on the results and be held accountable – it would help deter the outright fraud that comprises much of the vaccine research.
Thank you for a great post.
You bring up a great point – when vaccine programs are rolled out in developing nations, they are not ‘for profit’ programs. They are programs of mercy and those involved are not there to make a financial killing. In one of my company projects helping combat the Ebola crisis in Guinea and Sierra Leone in 2014, all our activities earn a purposeful $0 in revenue. It does not need to be this Draconian, however, there are ‘reimbursed real costs’ and ‘reimbursed fictitious costs’ – Even the latter should not be allowed wrt vaccines.
Thanks Anne
Fantastic, brilliant, intelligent read! Great fuel for those “intellectual” debates against those who claim anti-vaxxers are “anti-science.” When, in fact, nearly every ex or anti-vaxxer I know has done more hours/years of research than the average doctoral candidate. We didn’t just read that “one discredited study,” or see Jenny McCarthy on a talk show and go, “That’s it! No more vaccines!” Most of us had a personal experience that spurred additional research, a lot of it, which also opened our eyes to the fact that most of our pediatricians have not done any more than memorize the approved talking points.
However, there is a teeny typo in your second to last paragraph. I believe you used the word “must” instead of “much.” This was a beautiful post, and in no way is this a criticism. Your analysis of the medical and business sides of this topic is unparalleled. I just wanted to help you make sure it was perfect!
Thank you so much for your extensive research and incredible intellect. Your logic is airtight, and your other article explaining Fingerprint Signals is such a great way to take down the “correlation does not equal causation” argument that is so often parroted by anyone who is challenged by any scientific evidence contrary to the statements they’ve been told are absolute truths. Like “vaccines do not cause autism,” when in fact, legitimate studies have never been done on vaccines as they are used now, or any in combination. Even the IOM has equivocally stated that the evidence is insufficient to either accept or reject a causal relationship, meaning you cannot in good confidence make the absolute statement that they are not causative. It simply isn’t true as a proven fact.
Just as one cannot equivocally say, “vaccines definitely cause autism,” because the research hasn’t been done to establish this as a scientific fact either. Though one could argue the ingredients themselves have been positively correlated enough to establish a risk profile, and that this should absolutely be studied in a legitimate way, vs. these junk meta-analysis structures they’ve used to declare vaccines, as a monolith, do NOT cause autism. Even though the analysis most often cited, even by the CDC itself, contains no cited sources, no inclusion or exclusion criteria, no summary of the quality of studies used, no methodology, nor any other features that are required of a high-quality meta-analysis. Just a blanket statement that they have looked at studies of 1.2 million children and determined vaccines don’t cause autism. This is NOT how science works! It’s likely that the research does not exist due to lack of funding, unwillingness of the scientific community to challenge these statements (fear of being “Wakefielded”), and the career destroying efficiency of the agencies who’s interests are threatened by even mentioning the two things in a sentence.
Remember the wonderful quote from the HHS and FDA Federal Register from 1984 (two years before vaccine manufacturers were given legal immunity from any litigation that came from the harm their products caused). This statement was included in their Rules and Regulations:
“Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist.”
— Federal Register. Vol 49, No 107 June 1, 1984
The world needs more people like you – actual skeptics, who are not shills for the already mainstream collective. One is not a “skeptic” if they agree with what all of the propaganda tells everyone to believe. That makes one, by definition, a lemming. Someone who just reinforces the cognitive dissonance rather than challenging it, like you have here. Again, thank you for your work!
Thank you Emma for the kind words and the typo catch!
They have about a 1% progression curve of induction to support the statement that vaccines do not cause our spectrum of encephalophatic injury we observe today – NOT ONE SHRED of real science.
Yet we have – Necessity, Conservancy of Risk, Wittgenstein Definition, Parsimony, Address and Inform Duty Compliance, Supporting Intelligence and Physical/Physiological Mechanism. – ALL THE ELEMENTS OF SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS (see The Elements of Hypothesis ( https://theethicalskeptic.com/2018/12/13/the-elements/ ) reside in the hands of those issuing caution around massive employment of early and frequent immune activation as a panacea.
They have essentially nothing but media rhetoric. The problem is that it takes a certain level of acumen to be able to grasp this.
Acumen which our panacea-vaxxers do not possess.
Thanks!
TES 8)
Thank you for taking the time to help those of us without an understanding of corporate finance pierce the veil on vaccine profit claims.
Absolutely Jenn, and thanks for being a loyal reader.
:-) TES
I appreciate your main point. Your warning or admonishment is well taken and I like it.
Separately you have another well done comic analysis of the Road Runner cartoon.
How did you intend though to link the cartoon to the main point about us not being over-eager (my personal take-away) to engage skeptics?
It just seems like two separate points … each valid in their own domain … but the connection escapes me.
Respectfully, Tom
Good observation Thomas, I have thought about this too.
Both the skeptic and the skeptic victim are either the coyote or the road runner role player at any given time. I tried to assign consistently one to the other and it did not work.
The skeptic’s victim is the coyote when they regard that ‘catching the acceptance’ of skeptics is the obsessive goal – it becomes their downfall. You can ‘catch’ (neutralize) skeptics by simply not trying to catch their acceptance in the first place.
OR
The skeptic victim is the Road Runner. By ignoring the skeptic – who is simply in a scheme to catch (humiliate) you. You win by ignoring them and just keep doing what you do.
Either way, an obsession by one party or the other serves to make them The Coyote – and one need spot this and take appropriate action – both version of which involve ignoring the fake skeptic.
In either case as well, skeptics need you – however you do not need them.
TES 8)
Thanks for the lesson. Another historical lesson that might make the same point is the island hopping strategy employed by General Douglas MacArthur in the Pacific in World War II. He just skipped over fighting many Japanese held Islands and focused on a larger strategic goal.
And I just thought of another lesson, this one from the Bible. Jesus encountered opposition from a religious group called the Pharisees. Jesus basically told the disciples to ignore them. He said something like “Leave them alone. If the blind lead the blind they both fall into the ditch.”
In any case, the failures of the skeptics will (in time) relegate them to the dustbins of history.
And there is also an old Star Trek episode where a bad person (claiming to be a God) thrived on attention and at least a partial part of the response in the show, to the powerful entity was to ignore him and not give him the veneration he desired.
It is ironic that some skeptics as you see it, are engaged in something they are so much against when it comes to religion. I’ll conclude this quoting from your article. It probably isn’t true across the board with skeptics, but it is true often enough that we can’t give them a free pass, just because they claim to represent truth.
“You must worship me as the smartest, cede unto me the power of punishment (of both the public and scientists) – as I now represent science.”
And wow, WordPress switched me to their new ‘block’ blog editing management right as I published this. I had to learn blocks in one sitting. Geez….
Quickly skimmed the article here. Part on Einstein is funny. The other part … well it might be good for people who know a lot of this stuff already.
Yet there is good evidence that life appeared quickly on earth — as soon as it cooled enough to allow life. The question then is did it evolve really, really quickly?
I don’t have time to get into much here … it seems far more likely that the early life stages evolved elsewhere and extremophiles which can survive interplanetary transport knocked off other planets in bombardment etc… we’ve even seen rocks fly through our solar system that came from other star formations, some transport mechanism like this brought the seeds of life here.
It is also inconceivable that life would have evolved quickly here but not elsewhere earlier. And since our planet is less than five billion years old and billions of prior years existed for life to evolve elsewhere certainly simple life would have had the opportunity to evolve elsewhere first rather than in the first few million years here. And if it evolved elsewhere first various means and rocks flying between star systems would have brought life here.
As for the rest of what you are saying, I just have to wade through unfamiliar terminolgy on top of unfamiliar terminology and I can’t even remember the meaning of the new definitions by the time I see them again.
Sorry for commenting when I’ve not read the details of what you’ve written. Really busy right now in my line of work. Scripture says something like “He who answers a matter before he hears it — it is folly and shame to him.” Yet I know much like the other commentator that if I had read your material very deeply and repeatedly, I probably still would not be understanding it!
Then why I am posting this comment? I can’t understand myself sometimes.
LOL!! When I re-read my posts. I sometimes encounter the same dilemma. So I understand what the reader faces. But, while I am developing the material, I do have to be true to what I see at that time. The problem is that I am compressing the context of a book, into an article.. which never ends up being fair to the issue or its questions in the end. I just cannot tolerate publishing a high compliance, 3 paragraphs on a complex issue – which then gets pushed as truth thereafter. Even if the three paragraphs are written well, thesis encapsulated and would get an A in school – I cannot do that. As that is what has caused our Omega Hypotheses to proliferate to begin with. Enough said though… Bottom line… I read my stuff over and over, and I totally agree with you.
Sometimes it is like I am reading someone else’s material, for the first time. Asking myself, ‘what does this say?’ and ‘How the hell did I figure that out?’ When I do a study, I go into like a trance – like when a beagle is chasing a rabbit, and do not let up until the trail is unresolvable, or I broach a new understanding. BTW, I had a beagle when I was 16. And my father and I would take him out to hunt rabbits. He would circle them back around through the hills and gullies and thickets, and I would sit quietly with my 20 gauge, waiting on it to come scurrying by, so proud of how it had outsmarted the hound on its trail. Boom! Dead rabbit.
Once, I picked up the rabbit I had just shot, and let my beagle work its way around to where we were (there was no ‘calling’ a beagle off its trail once hot). I let my beagle come up and have at the rabbit for a good 3 or 4 minutes. He loved it. It was like a life accomplishment for him. He lounged like a hound, much more peacefully after that.
Sometimes just finding out something, which no one else has ever seen… or finding an answer to a question, even if the world does not accept it… or even if it was different than what you had suspected coming in to the research…. are very satisfying. Like my beagle finally getting to gnaw on his prey.
Good to see you again Thomas!
TES 8)
As for how you write, … we all have different roles to play in life and different audiences we need to play to. Even if we be playing the same game (take baseball as an example) we will have different roles and different abilities. A baseball team might have a power hitter and perhaps an agile shortstop. Making the fast runner who likes to bunt and steal bases, try to hit lots of home runs won’t work very well. I’m not the kind of person who does well memorizing lot’s of numbers and details. However I guess I’m OK at seeing larger picture things and my slow, slow mind will keep pondering some topics for years.
So yeah, I understand what it is like to think differently from most everyone else.
Can’t spend too much time here right now. I’ll need to get back to my routine. This is “harvest season” for those of who are in the package shipping business. Not too much spare time.
Note: I’ve started slowly reading through the book you recommended on THE ART OF SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION. It has got some fascinating thoughts in it. I haven’t got very far into it yet.
Maybe at some point I’ll email you at your TES email address (the only one I got!) and discuss the obesity epidemic. I found a book by Dr. Jason Fung THE OBESITY CODE to be fascinating and even hilarious. (I’m reading multiple books jumping back and forth among them.)
It is amazing how many lies I’ve bought into when it comes to obesity. (I’m not by any means obese, nor am I even overweight.) Yet I won’t tease the book … too busy now. Later perhaps I can email you after I finish the book.
Excellent Thomas, yeah we are in the midst of holiday shipping right now as well. Our peak to average is about 2.1 to 1 for the holiday versus the rest of the year. Actually smoother than some consumer goods companies.
Yes, that email is good for me… the yahoo one.
My only beef with TAOSI is that it makes the same mistake which most science method books make. That of thinking you are approaching a subject smart. Sometimes you just gotta approach a subject dumb and say “Toss that thing in there and see what happens”… I worked with my kid on a project just this week. They wanted us to ‘Formulate a Hypothesis’ first. I had to explain to the instructor that – this is not really what happens in a lab. The first thing you do is (within safety margins of course) – just try some shit, and watch what happens. Until you do that – what question do you even ask. the ‘formulate a hypothesis’ step might not come for months or even years….
Science is sometimes more about ‘Hold my beer’ than it is ‘my enormous knowledge of this subject has led me to the door step of a specific question with a specific answer, which trivially I do not happen to know…’ The latter… hmmmmm, yeah it’s science technically and procedurally…. but is it, ethically? Still thinking on that one….
Yeah, the Thomas Edison approach (“just try some shit”?) has had a few notable successes. Not to mention the invention of the light bulb! He tried some ten thousand times, or so the story goes. Or the book of Ecclesiastes says something about trying multiple things because you don’t know what will prosper. Yeah the book TAOSI does seem to highlight some very smart scientists who spend a lot of time thinking and then they finally do a perfectly thought out experiment… and he uses the example of Louis Pasteur and some other people.
And as far as “just try some shit” it reminds me of the field of archaeology. There is a saying in that field, “You don’t find what you’re looking for. You find what you find.”
Sometimes that isn’t true … but still we need humility in all this.
Admittedly, to toss in lawyerly caveats, Thomas Edison had some idea what he wanted to accomplish in building a light bulb, but he didn’t spend so much time theorizing about how to make one … that he neglected just diving right in and trying different things.
I have read this probably 2, maybe 3 times and still I am not sure that I get what you are saying. Let me see if I can give it a shot. I understand that there are at least two camps out there. Focusing in a bit, one believes evolution and one believes panspermia – that life was seeded here from the cosmos. But either life evolved on Earth or it evolved elsewhere. It’s pretty much that simple. You’ve put a lot of impressive looking work into these tables and charts, but I am not sure that they say anything really which diverts attention from this fact. Evolution is still a fact – confirmed in the fossil record. And now even DNA. Bacteria are not falling from the sky periodically to seed the Earth. If that was the case, wouldn’t we have all kinds of funky creatures and variations of DNA on the planet. I just don’t buy it.
Anyway, let me see if I can restate what you are saying. – – – Because the ‘code’ looks to be contrived, therefore it came from somewhere other than the Earth? I don’t buy this. But I do take your point that, I am not ruling it out in finality either. At some points in the article you allude to there being two arguments. With this I could agree basically until there is proof one way or another.
Anyway – have read off and on for a couple months. Your articles are getting pretty deep on average.
Hey Simpsonville? Thanks for reading. :-)
A couple points regarding your excellent comment.
1. Yes, I am petitioning for plurality, which is to say ‘We must move from one enforced view and into researching another additional view’ – and I am not suggesting we trash the old view, just that it bears inductive or maybe even deductive weakness. So yes, I work under the presumption of two models in mind simultaneously. If abiogenesis proves out in the end, I am all for that. If panspermia proves out, I am all for that too.
2. It is a very common mistake to conflate evolution, the observed history of speciation and the research into the mechanisms which have precipitated that speciation – inside one common genetic ascendancy… to confuse/conflate that scientific reality with research into the ORIGIN of life. These are two separate things. I am not commenting upon evolution. Evolution is a fact. However, how life began on Earth is a different matter. Abiogenesis is NOT evolution. Make sure that when you craft an assertion, it always hold the discipline of keeping the two separate. As far as panspermia and critters falling from the sky – I have no idea how often that might occur, if it occurred at all. I don’t imagine it would be a very frequent thing. And even if it were, we likely would never know. But you are right – all life on Earth stems from a common genetic lineage, so even if it is happening – it is not taking hold.
3. No, I am not saying that the code looks contrived. I am contending that the code bears 1) Unlikelihood, and 2) an elegant (and rational) symmetry and amino acid synchrony (is well arranged to support evolution through common-context mutations of the third digit of the codon, once deployed) which is an even more unlikely happenstance on top of its existence in the first place. Having a pile of auto parts fall out of the sky is one thing, having them bounce and assemble into a car before they hit the ground a second time is pushing credibility even further. Having that be the very first instance of a car – is even a third thing. Now, if the codon structure had ample time somewhere else, to develop this symmetry and synchrony – say a few billion years of its evolution on a couple other planets, and not the 100 – 200 myr timeframe we have available on Earth – well then I can buy that the code evolved somewhere else and was transported here by a comet or other interstellar vehicle. That is the essence of panspermia – but this extended conjecture is not a mechanism of the hypothesis itself, as it cannot be currently measured/tested. All we can test is – Did this have time to develop HERE. Yes, No.
I hope all that makes sense, and thanks for your comment and readership…
TES 8)
P.S. The charts are a lot, yes – but they served to open my eyes to the principles here. The classic codon tables do not do this at all. I had to make my own charts. It is just a necessary reality that they can end up hard to understand. Evolution is a fact, I agree. But I prefer to not make it into a religious doctrine which occludes my ability to observe science from that point on. (That is the whole message of the ‘Omega Hypothesis’ warning early in the article.)
OK, go easy on me. I am not a scientist or molecular biologist. So, I get that the origin of life is not the same thing as evolution. And you have confirmed that you hold abiogenesis open as an option.
But at a couple points in the article, you use the terms “deliberacy” and “prejudice”. So, I am not sure I can reconcile your claim to “I am not saying that the code looks contrived.” Are these not the same thing in essence? You also allude at one point to what you call intervention theory.
Finally, I reread the points you make about the code’s if you will, more startling symmetry. Would not the chemical nature of a two base codon, attract amino acid chemicals of particular types? charge, handedness, polarity, etc. Could that not possibly explain why there appears to be some direction inside these apparent symmetries?
Thanks
Simps,
Gotcha, and I understand, the set of terms equivocally overlap – so this is a sound question. By deliberacy and prejudice I mean the ergodicity which is incumbent with the structure of the codex itself. Both how it originated and what its result was in terms of the compatibility with amino acids converting into life. There is no question of ergodicity here. The idea of ‘contrived’ on the other hand, involves a principle called agency. I am not impling agency here in this petition. A system can feature ergodicity, but not necessarily as a result of agency. To contend agency, is the essence of intervention hypotheses. To add agency would constitute stacking of entities (a lot of them too – rendering that hypothesis weaker than even abiogenesis). This according to Ockham’s Razor (the real one).
Regarding your second point, since the DNA is separated by two chemical critical path invertentions, how would the chemistry of thymine for instance (the blue block) exclusively attract the nitric acid isomer of each amino acid? And why only the nitric acid isomers with more complex molecule bases? 1. The DNA base 2 is no where near the chemical in question, as it is only a LOGICAL association, not a chemical one so it cannot contain a feedback or association loop, and 2. There is no difference chemically, between C2H5NO2 and C5H11NO2. The NO2 is the active moiety. So there should have not been a synchrony progression, even if there were a direct chemical contact between the amino acid and the second base of the codon.
Excellent questions…. I may add these to the general commentary inside the article – thanks for broaching each one….
TES 8)
[Edit] P.S. I made the modifications to add address of these two excellent points, into the article. Thanks!!!
OK – good enough. I understand on that issue of what you call agency. You are not hinting that agency causes prejudice, etc. as you put it. That helps define those terms then.
But, forgive me if I have caught your logic in a bit of a catch-22 here. If you are contending that there is no way for a physical feedback loop (?) to provide a means for evolution of this code to occur, because the chemicals never mix and even if they did, the DNA does not have any way of knowing the chemical formula anyway, so how could it select for synchrony (correct?)
– yet at the same time it has all these characteristics of deliberate purpose and ergodicity then, – tell me how this could not have happened outside the contribution of an agency? Or are you cleverly selling agency as the only logical outcome of panspermia then?
Don’t get pissed at me, this is just where your logic is leading, if I am interpreting what you are saying accurately…
Chris
OK, I had to think about my reply to this a bit. First, no – I am not selling intervention theory. As I mentioned in my last comment, it is a highly stacked alternative which is way worse than even abiogenesis. So if I am stuck with intervention theory and abiogenesis – I choose abiogenesis as my pathway of research any time.
Now however, back to the ‘cleverly selling agency’. Yes I am that clever, Yes I see how it could be sold by this means. No I am not selling agency – and for specific disciplined reasons. The problem is that, panspermia INCLUDES the subset hypotheses of both agency, and no-agency. But in an effort to avoid this stacking of entities, I choose to not go there yet. For if I say ‘but there is NO agency, exclusively – I could be wrong, and I have no evidence for such a claim. So I cannot make it. Nor can I say the evidence ‘hints at agency and has falsified no agency’ – I could be wrong and I have no evidence for that claim either.
So all I can do at this time is say ‘panspermia appears to be the strongest explanation’ – not because it explains the most stuff, rather because it is the “necessary alternative to an enforced highly stacked doctrine, with the least features stacked under it of all choices.”
Then if the ALTERNATIVE leads to the observation of the fingerprints of agency… then the ALTERNATIVE does that, not me. I cannot force such a notion to either the pro nor con right now. Perhaps some other arena will contribute observations which help in this regard (consilience).
I hope that makes sense. It is where I am stuck – but I am stuck a mile or two down the road from where most of society is mired in mud today. I got a pleasant gnaw on the rabbit if you will (see my comment to Thomas earlier today, LOL!)
TES 8)
So I take it that at this stage none of the social skeptics have been caught in this net? This is nice to know though. It could turn into a very useful tool.
No, the verdict was issued under the context of purposeful negligence and scientific fraud. I do not think one could directly accuse an organization of malice and oppression until one has established negligence and/or fraud first, which they were attempting to cover for.
But, this does give social skeptic advocates, hired by corporate science, something to think about.
TES
I appreciate you sharing thoughts on so many topics. Since I am still a Christian and have a high regard for the Bible, please pardon that I won’t address your overall points … though I agree overall with your open-mindedness.
Just a specific or two I might like to comment on. Reading your comments about Luke, I can’t be sure that you are following all this correctly.
Your statement (complaining?) that Luke didn’t clearly state that he was with Jesus for five years or whatever … it leaves the impression that you saw some underhandedness in all this. Most Christian scholars and the people of the time would probably have assumed that Luke became converted at some point in Paul’s ministry.
In the book of Acts for example the author of the book is writing “we” finally in Acts chapter 16. “After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them. From Troas we put out to sea and sailed straight for Samothrace, and the next day we went on to Neapolis. From there we traveled to Philippi, a Roman colony and the leading city of that district of Macedonia. And we stayed there several days. On the Sabbath we went outside the city gate to the river, where we expected to find a place of prayer. We sat down and began to speak to the women who had gathered there. (Acts 16:10-13 NIV)
All these “we” statements indicated Luke was traveling with Paul.
There is to me then some historical clarity evident in the Book of Acts where it can be seen that Luke was traveling with Paul at some times and not at other times.
Other evidence for me for Luke being Greek (I heard it said that Luke is a Greek name.)
You made some point about Luke trying to write an “orderly” account. Whatever Luke had in mind by the word “orderly” I’m not in a position to tell you. Various ways that one mind figure the word “orderly” could be time order or perhaps an orderly way of clustering the teachings and actions of Jesus in a way to better illustrate his teachings. What if for example someone wrote a book about Warren Buffett and his investment teachings. Would it be best to lay out his teachings in the order they were stated by Warren Buffett or would it be better to lay out his teachings and investment actions in a way that would give the reader the most memorable and helpful way for the reader to grasp his teachings and implement them himself? Look at how chaotic the Book of Proverbs in the Old Testament seemed to have been composed. I’m probably one of the few people that sees some meaning to how the Proverbs were arranged. Yet, I’m not trying to get all complex here.
Your comment about the Olive leaf in the account of the flood in the book of Genesis, to me I can’t tell you what happened. I’m not a believer in a worldwide flood. Yet scripture does say the whole world was flooded. However could the word “world” or “earth” have been written in a less than universal way? Use it as a mark against the Bible if you wish. I see other instances like this one that indicates a less than universal usage of the word “world.”
And all the world came to Egypt to buy grain from Joseph, because the famine was severe everywhere. (Gen. 41:57 NIV)
I’ll tend to see a scripture like that as evidence of a more limited scope of the word “world” but I can also understand a bit how someone unfavorable to the Bible could instead say, “There are now two instances of the Bible incorrectly using the “world”!
Also I think your point is “great” in which you pointed out that Christians normally see God as sending people to hell if they don’t believe some statement in the Bible. I don’t hold to that viewpoint that people are judged by whether they are a Christian or not. (Many evangelical Christian teachers disagree with me on this point very strongly.) So, If I believe you are mistaken here … I concede that it is only because Christian teachers have taught error and you believed that this represented what scripture was teaching.
For me though a good way to look at how Jesus will judge the world (or not judge the world) is what Jesus said here. “And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. (Matt. 12:31-32 NIV)
I think you may be better off because you are honestly questioning things that don’t make sense to you, than someone who goes around teaching things they don’t believe to be true. To serve Jesus out of cowardice or desire to get a paycheck or fleece the sheep .. as opposed to you who come clean on your doubts and point out a vast array of errors that Christians teach … many don’t understand evolution or the age or the earth…
In any case, I think you are doing a great job. Your last post also dealing with body metabolism … these are things that have a great value. We might not immediately find the answers to all these things … but the ignorance that so many have that there is any problem at all is indeed a problem.
Again across the board, I’ve got a great deal of admiration for you.
It is immensely frustrating to not be able to learn everything … and perhaps I see little reason why you ought to spend much time studying scripture … so I don’t hold it against you that you didn’t see some things the same way I do in terms of the life of Luke.
At one time in American history a knowledge of scripture could be a useful point of common reference when people discuss ideas. At this point bringing up scripture is often very divisive. Yet still I find that sometimes even atheists or secular humanists see how powerful some teachings can be on certain topics and they give a nod or approval at how powerful certain portions of scripture are.
It seems like it has been months since I’ve last opened up the Bible to read it for enjoyment.
You TES don’t have to respond in too much depth. I know you have some interest in seeing the comment section better developed. Having said that (if you think it best) I don’t mind fielding some difficult questions from any of your readers. So please don’t feel that it would be rude to me to let anyone criticize me or my position. If anyone has any retorts or wishes to express any opinion about how idiotic something I wrote appears to be … I’m not shy about trying to deal with questions or objections in a respectful manner.
Yet your readers are probably of such a high quality, I am unlikely to get much in the way of low caliber pushback. But high quality push back? Maybe I’ll learn something from it. It was through debating that I eventually came to realize that evolution was certainly true and that punctuated creation episodes that I formerly subscribed to, wasn’t true.
I’ll welcome any pushback, but admittedly, if I am wrong on something I may not immediately change my position.
Normally if I’m wrong on something that I hold deeply, I’ll have to gradually get to the truth. Perhaps this might mean seeing weaknesses in my position, and eventually construct an alternative hypothesis and then eventually come to see old evidence in a new light.
Thomas,
A gentle hand on the tiller – this is the wise word of the sailor. This is what you expertly wield. I took up sailing to learn just those things: Wisdom in my decisions and gauging the weather, patience at the wind (In my older mindset it was more ‘thanking god for a favorable wind is the same as cussing him for a foreboding wind’), patience at the discipline of time, patience to enjoy the journey and not simply the destination – and finally the skill of a gentle hand on the tiller.
Well put on the scope of ‘Earth’ as it is plied in scripture. Indeed if the word Earth is derived from Eridu as I have heard – the the Whole Earth is a smaller area. There was a flood of the Arabian Peninsula (as we discussed before), and it did occur in the last 10,000 years. The flood receded and the Persian Gulf is simply the persistent part of that flood. The Epic of Gilgamesh records the flood in much greater detail than does the Bible. So I agree – all the test (burying an olive pit in rich soil) did for me was prove that a literal interpretation of the Bible as ‘a love letter written by god’ is simply not valid. It is a document of men, and men only.
Luke traveled with Paul in Acts, that puts him on the bad team. I do not believe Paul was ‘converted’ on the Road to Damascus. Paul was an agent of Rome, and had one mission ‘kill this budding religion or bring it under the subservience of Rome – one way or another” He tried executions, until he figured out that the best way to kill something, is to lead it. Paul went back to Rome and spent his life in luxury and the graces of a job well done. The whole shtick “Ohh, help me help me… Rome is persecuting me and my side hurts – I need a little wine, please send the tithe”…. that begs for a dash of doubt. People must have been very gullible. The Church thereafter became the twisted spectre of the shadow of Rome. They had long since discovered how to bring religions into the fold. Several of them are blended into today’s Christianity.
I don’t believe Paul (at all), and I don’t believe Luke (fully).
8) TES
You are always fascinating to read TES.
My unfamiliarity with the theory that Paul was a servant of Rome led me to do a few minutes of research and ultimately to the book available on Amazon titledI don’t believe Paul (at all) “Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus: Flavian Signature Edition by Joseph Atwill”. If anyone is interesting in learning more about the theory they can read some positive and negative reviews of the book on the Amazon website.
Do you have a source for your view that Paul’s message could be distilled as “Ohh, help me help me… Rome is persecuting me and my side hurts – I need a little wine, please send the tithe”?
I don’t wish to be contentious, and my knowledge of the Bible isn’t incredibly strong anymore for I’ve not studied it for some time now, for example it might have been years since I read through the New Testament — yet I remember enough of Paul’s writings to be aware that his only recommendation to drink wine was a personal letter to Timothy who was apparently getting sick drinking the water of the time. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard in the past people saying that if you go to Mexico “Don’t drink the water.” Maybe Timothy had some sensitivity to bacteria in water and Paul recommended to Timothy to drink a little bit of it with his water … all this is normally thought of today in terms of some specific health benefit …
The theory though of Paul being a Roman agent … I guess you can believe it if you want. However, this is just so uncharacteristic of the approach that you teach on your blog. Specifically … let me just stop here.
A long time ago when I used to read summaries of and listen to condensed version of business books, I read about a technique that a leader would employ in order to find out who would be willing to confront him when they believed he was in error. The CEO or boss would say something that he knew was outrageous and obviously wrong just to see who among the people there would have the guts to say “NO” to him who would tell him if he was wrong when it was obvious.
I’m seriously wondering if what you are writing now is at that level for some reason. And a few blog posts ago you made some comment about a theory that the Titanic was a switched out model of another ship, that sunk instead. There was at least one website that I found that did a good job of refuting that theory.
.
In any case that theory and this theory of Paul being a Roman agent… it is just nuts to me. The theory proposed by the author Joseph Atwill makes a bid deal on some similarities between the writings of Josephus and that of Paul or the gospels. However would it not make more sense to suppose that a people under Roman subjugation would have developed a specific type of deference or come to some similar code of conduct that would allow them to best adapt in Roman culture. Maybe it was across the board taught throughout the tiny Jewish nation to treat the Romans in certain ways to best adapt to and thrive under the Roman government. And even if it wasn’t taught, a certain type of convergent evolution would have taken place where people naturally find the same ways to please the Romans. Josephus was (I guess) trying to please his Roman superiors. Paul wrote about “being all things to all men” and was very keen to find common points of reference when he wrote the Greeks or Romans.
You are teaching Epoche or whatever and teaching the value of complexity and then … (I’m stymied) I’m getting simplistic statements like “Luke traveled with Paul in Acts, that puts him on the bad team.” Or “I don’t believe Paul (at all)” … I’m certainly missing the Ethical Skeptic who is master of nuance in the latter part of your comment. Paul’s letters are also filled with exhortations to not drink wine or eat meat if it is going to cause a brother to stumble. So, in this case your characterizations of Paul is causing my head to spin. Is that intentional? “Hey guys send money so I can buy some wine?”
Your leadership skills are at a level I don’t understand. It is almost funny that when someone is so good they can make a mistake and other people just assume it isn’t a mistake because they have such high respect for the one talking.
We’ll probably though just have to let each other have our different religious ideas (or non-ideas)?
To discuss this issue of Paul’s motivation in preaching we’d have to come to some agreement on what Paul actually wrote, what really happened in his life etc. For example, if Paul’s motivation to preach the gospel until he got stoned or flogged was to get a cushy retirement and drink wine. That makes no sense. You will need to extract all the hardship and zeal from Paul’s life to give him the motivation to keep going. You are also then asserting that Paul was preaching things he didn’t believe. That is a lot to get my head around.
At least I learned about another theory from your comment. And the stuff you are doing for health of the people of the world … that is also very important … Thanks for writing and challenging my brain!
Yes,
You are close on understanding epoche, but no, that is not it. You are not understanding how it relates to agency.
I have seen of course, the videos refuting the Olympic theory – but they are all inductive – and I do hold epoche on that and precisely because of that. My complaint is that I have not seen a Popperian standard of falsification of the idea. And plurality exists because a TRIAL was held over this issue, and an undetermined outcome resulted (so your implication that this is just me in a vacuum, is incorrect). So no, my epoche on this is not in violation of the evidence I have seen. Falsification of the idea that it is the Olympic on the bottom of the ocean can in straightforward manner be done, by one of three small rover craft actions… all three of which were specifically avoided. So, I cannot make a conclusion on the matter. A refusal to examine critical path data, is a sign of agency – and flags deceit… which segues into…
Theoretically, in a neutral setting, I might maintain epoche on the issue of Paul’s sincerity – and am willing to listen to lesser handed information – bust sadly we don’t have it. The witnesses were so impressed on this issue of mankind’s salvation that ALL of THEM neglected to do mankind the courtesy of jotting it down (save for possibly… possibly… John), or hiring a scribe, and therefore we cannot get lesser handed info. Paul crafted a good third of Christianity’s doctrine, and we just have to trust that he represented god (see 1 Timothy 1: 3-7)? No – once a person makes a claim to represent the truth-to-action (you must take action upon it), knowing that no more critical path evidence can be brought to bear – epoche is not mandatory – you are free to say ‘NO’. All we have here is agency (5th and higher handedness). So this is not a case of being able to pursue a critical path of query. So epoche no longer applies.
Moreover, remember, what I am describing as ‘the bad team’ here is a group who has a long and demonstrated history of bias, up-spin and agency. It is not just a couple verses which are the problem. Christianity is the ultimate wicker man. It can be re-adapted at any time to dodge any criticism. This is pseudo-theory and agency. Remember in the Epoche article I just wrote (which you cited I am in noncompliance upon), the principal point was to OPPOSE AGENCY – not just be neutral about everything – This group of people have demonstrated ill method, biased intent and fast and exotic conclusion. They are the opposite end of the spectrum of social skepticism. But let’s be clear – this is the bad team – and ample evidence is there to support this. There are two evils which a man may do, short of murder and rape, which are the worst evils one can commit. An evil once done, strips all epoche away as it pertains to agency.
I. Employ a man’s fear of the unknown to issue threats of hell at him.
II. Take possession of all the joys of life a man can have, pretend like you own or administer them as an agent of god, and sell those joys back to him at a price.
My words are a defense of knowledge and ethics in the case of Paul and Luke – they are establishing agency. Ethical skepticism opposes this. They are the bad team. There are just too many warning flags in the set of claims, so what you see as a bias, is simply rejecting a set of claims to authority on their part. There are holes in the story philosophically, and the holes get larger and larger as you extrapolate out from it, into the real world. I oppose this group, just as I oppose the cadre of science communicators. This is not a violation of epoche at all – epoche no longer applies because the critical path has led to a forced conclusion. I don’t hold epoche on the reality of gravity for instance – I am forced to the conclusion that I should not jump off a cliff. The same applies to Christianity. Epoche is reserved for subjects with true Ockham’s Razor plurality – Christianity is not one of those subjects. Otherwise, being neutral about everything, that would be Pyrrhonistic Skepticism and a denial of knowledge. That is NOT ethical skepticism. I do not have to remain neutral on everything, especially an appeal to authority from a group which spins a lie of agency.
Regarding Paul’s manipulative apologetics:
1st Corinthians 9:4 b “Do we not have the right to financial support?”
2nd Corinthians 12:7-9 “And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh” – yes, thorn in his ‘side’ became a cultural norm afterwards, but was not actually mentioned in his letters.
“Be no longer a drinker of water, but use a little wine for your stomach’s sake and your frequent infirmities.” – is not an admonition to ‘add a little wine into your water’ – again that is a wicker man apology from the 1880’s temperance movement. It is not different than a exhortation to use ‘rheumatiz medicine’. He drank wine, and while I am OK with that – again my point was that the apologetic around it is high handedness and agency. Wine was not the issue at all – it is the hint of agency.
So sorry, you have not framed my position and my words on this correctly.
8)
TES
May you prosper in your overall efforts to help people to think more clearly.
I’ve got an expensive Bible computer program and I can see how you choose an outlier (out of the normal translation) when it came to Paul manipulating people. !st Corinthians 9:4b which you cite as “Do we not have the right to financial support?” matches the NET translation “NET 1 Corinthians 9:4 Do we not have the right to financial support? (1 Cor. 9:4 NET) Yet the other 33 or so English translations AND the Greek texts focus on the idea of Paul asking if they have right to “food and drink” or “to eat and to drink.” Granted I can understand the point the NET translation is making, but still, taken to an extreme (as you seem to be suggesting) Paul was here arguing for lot’s of cash donations. Paul though was merely making a more modest point. I will choose to look at the other 33 translations or so and the Greek itself rather than your characterization of the right to a meal as “manipulative apologetics” and you do the same with 2 Corinthians 12:7-9. Paul was talking about the benefits of suffering in his case. He was saying that he personally benefited from hardship. You seem to be asserting that this was so that Paul could get rich (and you made some astonishing claim in your early comment that I dare not even quote…) However Paul goes on to write in the same chapter, “Now I am ready to visit you for the third time, and I will not be a burden to you, because what I want is not your possessions but you. After all, children should not have to save up for their parents, but parents for their children.
So I will very gladly spend for you everything I have and expend myself as well. If I love you more, will you love me less?
Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. (2 Cor. 12:14-16 NIV)
So the very letter in which Paul is talking about his ongoing sacrifice for the church in Corinth you somehow construe as evidence for him manipulating them into giving to him. He said he wasn’t going to take anything from them. He realized that his desire to do so was even offensive to some.
Also read what he wrote to the church in Thessalonica.
“For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example. We were not idle when we were with you, nor did we eat anyone’s food without paying for it. On the contrary, we worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you.
We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to offer ourselves as a model for you to imitate.” (2 Thess. 3:7-9 NIV)
Believe what you want my friend. Maybe you’ve read so much bad stuff from skeptics that you got a really bizarre notion of the life of Paul. Did you yourself really go through all those Bible translations till you found one that used the term “financial support” or did someone else craft this angle on Paul’s life and it somehow influenced your thinking?
Similarly I don’t find Paul threatening the church with hell as you suppose. Nor do I find that Paul claimed some agency or was attempting to sell joys of life back to the church at a price.
Believe whatever you want … but does it make sense that Paul was taking financial advantage of churches and then turned around and wrote them that he didn’t eat anyone’s food with paying for it and “worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you.”???
You wrote, “So sorry, you have not framed my position and my words on this correctly.”
You really think you are framing the life of the Apostle Paul correctly? You show him living a life of greed as an agent of Rome… as Spock on Star Trek might have replied… “Fascinating” or more likely he would question your logic.
Again your overall points have some merit in how Christianity has been practiced over the years. Paul himself warned that wolves would come in and devour the flock. Jesus warned against such things too. He repeatedly urged people to be on guard against hypocritical leaders.
I hope you’ll reconsider your view on Paul, and maybe you could spend more time reading scripture rather than reading crazy theories about scripture. Remember the skeptics that you disagree with on the issues of vaccinations etc… they aren’t automatically trustworthy when they criticize Christianity. Please don’t attempt to tell me you came to all these conclusions without outside agency…
Feel free to send me away or block me or whatever …
Thomas, OK – here is the NIV version, along with context of what Paul was actually saying:
But first let me say that I arrived at this position by actually reading the Bible, before I had ever once read any material critical of Paul. I observed agency – and never read any. I have never seen a ‘skeptic’ website which comments upon Paul. It was only until 10 years after I had this critique of the material that I first heard Christians who were also critical of it. I was shocked that such a thing even existed.
So here is the complete text in the NIV version (so as to falsify the claim that I sought out an ‘outlier’ translation)
Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not the result of my work in the Lord? Even though I may not be an apostle to others, surely I am to you! For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.
This is my defense to those who sit in judgment on me. Don’t we have the right to food and drink? Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephasa ? Or is it only I and Barnabas who lack the right to not work for a living?
Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard and does not eat its grapes? Who tends a flock and does not drink the milk? Do I say this merely on human authority? Doesn’t the Law say the same thing? For it is written in the Law of Moses: “Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain.”
His every sentence is about being compensated for his work. So the phrase ‘food and drink’ according to Strong’s Concordance is in the context of ‘exousia’ – the entitlement as an authority. Most of the translations extant are permissive and exculpatory, translated in the light of agency. So it is framed in the context of compensation. His next sentence demands the right of the church apostles, in authority. This is both a demand for compensation and a demand for authority.
Agency – includes the habit of dredging up religious defensive apologetics – in the face of something which is obviously flawed and under critical scrutiny.
This is not a crazy theory – the material is plain as day. So while yes, I did come up with it on my own (Paul himself mentions in this material that at least some of the classic apostles did not accept him). Have I not demonstrated that ability in my blog? Original ideas? Perhaps you missed this, or decided to forget it because it did not conform to your next ad hoc critique? You had this expensive Bible software and did not even read the adjacent material, where you could have seen that my translation context choice was correct? In the context, the phrase is idiomatically correct as ‘make a living’ and even could be translated ‘entitled to a living as your apostle’. The other translations which sugar coated his idiom here, contained agency. They sought for the reader to infer, for deceit.
In my opinion you are too focused on me, and not enough on the subject at hand. The subject is agency and reading the Bible with an ethical framework of skepticism. Not rejecting it simply because it speaks of god, rather because of the ways in which it does so, the methods used, the history of deception and the consequentialist outcomes of ignorance and violence.
As we used to say in the Navy – “Never polish a turd”. I am not gonna sugar coat Paul, nor polish this turd. It stinks, and there is little defense of it, save for one being brainwashed.
~ TES
Let me get this straight. You really believe that the Apostle Paul was a greedy materialist?
I never said, nor did I ever imply that Paul was a greedy materialist.
I think it is very, to majority, likely that Paul continued to be an agent of Rome after his conversion, who converted precisely because he was directed to change his tactics and means (by regional magistrate to publican magistrate encouragement) from one of violence and oppression (“But Saul was ravaging the church by entering house after house; dragging off both men and women, he committed them to prison”), and to conform very much to the prevailing process Rome applied to all other religions – Assimilation (eg. interpretatio graeca). Saul was not alone in these decisions, he had to work with magistrates and prefecture of Rome.
So this is not a stretch by any means. Further, that Paul enjoyed pension from both Rome in his role which it recognized, but as well from the Churches in Anatolia as their Pontiff – which enabled him to live comfortably in Roman retirement, under an aura of partial deception and lack of immediate accountability.
He was simply looking for early retirement upon the backs of his victims. I do not think he had a gilded chariot, mansion nor buried jar of coins. No.
Whatever you think of Paul, I get the impression that he was very argumentative. Do you agree? Before his “conversion” (using quotes for your sake), Paul intensely persecuted the Church. Then after his conversion he claimed that he annoyed the authorities in Damascus so that he had to slip out of the city via a window in the city wall to avoid arrest. He went to many synagogues and preached Jesus, to the point of making enemies. It was reported that he did a miracle in a certain city and had to argue with the crowd to not offer sacrifices to him.
His letters are argumentative in countering attempts to introduce things like circumcision and Sabbath keeping into the churches. He argued with Peter when Peter stopped eating with Gentiles. He got in a sharp argument with Barnabas when Paul refused to let Mark accompany him on a journey, while Barnabas insisted that they should take Mark.
His letters to the churches of Corinth and Galatia were also quite tough in tone.
Even his letter to the Romans contained an attack on the perceived hypocrisy of Jewish culture and then he also attacked Roman culture and its idol worshiping ways.
What is your opinion on whether Paul really took money from the Corinthians. Do you think his letter to them stating that he wasn’t taking anything from them … was that really what happened? Or maybe you agree that is likely that he didn’t take money, but somehow or other this was “a loss leader” like a sales pitch to get someone into the store to buy something below cost to make up the money later? You didn’t acknowledge or explain the scriptures where Paul said that he wasn’t taking money.
If memory serves me correctly, Paul and his fellow missionaries even stayed with someone who had the same trade he had. This provides interlocking evidence in support of the idea that Paul worked on his journeys while not preaching.
Regarding Paul arguing again: According to scripture when he was in Athens he was agitated by all the idols and went around arguing or talking to people about idols. Also in Ephesus he apparently was the target of a whole cadre of people in the religious trinkets trade who were suffering a loss of business because Paul had convinced a great number of people that “man made Gods are not Gods at all.” Scripture and history supports the idea that this city did get some money from religious pilgrims … perhaps a tourist industry of sorts.
It has been said that the only difference between Christians and atheists is “one God.” Christians don’t believe in any other Gods … and I’ve seen evidence that the early church was persecuted for being “atheists.” Indeed I think in India or other countries where there are a lot of Hindus they get upset that Christians don’t believe in their Gods… though admittedly it is likely the introduction of Jesus that is annoying to them. But Jews get along well with Hindus, for Jews don’t evangelize, nor do they engage in a lot of religious debate.
Oh well, this is a long comment and perhaps you’ll find something in it worth responding to.
In regards to Paul’s overall view on life as expressed in this passage do you see evidence of Paul taking away pleasures only to sell them back as a previous comment indicated?
——————-
18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.
19 The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery;
20 idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions
21 and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
23 gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
24 Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
25 Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit.
26 Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other. (Gal. 5:18-26 NIV)
——————-
Do you think Paul had “a gentle hand on the tiller” was he effective? I see him driven by passion. I also see you driven by passion.
Do you think Paul was too smart to believe in God? Did he believe what preached? Since I think you believe he was wrong, was he knowingly wrong? And what percentage of what you think he did was pro-Roman propaganda? What did someone say to the apostle Paul?
————–
9 Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting?
20 You are bringing some strange ideas to our ears, and we would like to know what they mean.” (Acts 17:19-20 NIV)
————–
This teaching of yours about Paul being under the influence of Rome… if true … I’d like to see what evidence you think supports it. Would the following scripture be considered adequate evidence for your thinking or are there other lines of evidence in scripture too?
——————-
NIV Titus 3:1 Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready to do whatever is good,
2 to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and always to be gentle toward everyone. (Tit. 3:1-2 NIV)
——————–
To me Thomas, (and the ‘loss-leader’ construct is not a bad analogy) Paul was our first virtue signaler in these cherry picked instances of correspondence. The fact that he did not take money in a particular location, and his need to point this out, tells me that the payment of money was de rigueur for both the church, and for Paul, and for other disciples for that matter. It seems rather odd that Peter would stop eating with Gentiles permanently (rather than under pressure from the ‘followers of James’), given the teaching that salvation was for all mankind. I do not think that they would abandon a core teaching of Christ (Luke 14: 16-24; Acts 10; 11:5-18), simply over perception’s sake. This criticism of Peter was very much akin to a political ad.
Paul spent too much time defending himself and pointing out examples wherein he was good, and suffered for the cause. Yet he spent very little actual time actually in the midst of and with his church. This does bother me. “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.” Paul was running for office. That much is clear. He was the Pontiff of Anatolia, and one must keep this in mind. The Kingdom of Comogene (Antiochus I and II) from which much of Anatolia sprung, considered itself separate from both Rome and the kingdoms of the Levant (including Syria). They held the belief that the Messiah was to originate from their esoteric wisdom tradition which had been handed down from Sumer (see the history of the Nimrud Dag celestial observatory, and the frieze of Leo and Regulus). This region held one of the greatest scroll libraries documenting the origin of mankind, according to the Egyptians. It was of course destroyed by religious military forces (as they always are). Which is precisely how Abrahamism was able to spin a whole new religion off this nascent ignorance. Modern Turkey, prior to the Islamic Saturation, was much still in this mindset even four decades ago. Sadly now, Islam is steadily erasing this staunch independence.
Paul sought to exploit this Anatolian bond, for his political gain. Paul completed three journeys there, post conversion. A limited exposure time in which one can put on any air. These were campaign trails. He was running for office. The verses you cite are a great example of Panduction – specific bad things done by the bad, but very general descriptives of good, when describing one’s self. Again, this is a habit of deception. Specific on others, general nebulous descriptives on self identity.
One does not shift from being a principal and violent but minor thugman, and Pharisee and to leader of the European Christian Realm, in just three short journeys, without BIG political sponsorship behind the scenes of the Federal Government, Rome. Comparatively, the real apostles – NONE reached this height, despite all their proximity to the Christ, and appointment by Christ himself. Very curious ~ to highly suspect indeed.
~TES
Well crafted response, by the way. ;-)
Yes Paul did criticize Peter. However in the context of The book of Galatians Paul was criticizing the Galatians very strongly for being influenced by those who were trying to obligate many aspects of Jewish law onto the church there. So perhaps rather than saying to the Galatians “You are all idiots” which he kind of was saying, Paul was pointing out that hey his criticism isn’t anything personal and he leveled the same criticism at the leader of the Church. You gotta admit the leap from how Judaism was practiced to how Christianity was practiced was a big leap. And if Paul didn’t provide much of the theological framework for Christianity’s separation from Judaism, then who did?
Despite the twelve apostles having been with Jesus for three and a half years … they didn’t have the intellectual background that Paul had. Paul had an international background. He could speak Greek, grew up in Tarsus. He was a Roman citizen which was very helpful in allowing him to preach in places and preach messages that were unpopular. Paul also had a background at some point of being taught by the famed leader Gamaliel. Incidentally it was Gamaliel who, according to the book of Acts, stopped the Sanhedrin from executing the Apostles.
You don’t see Paul’s mission as being possible without a lot of help. What though if he did get a lot of help? What if the help though was from God allowing him to perform miracles? This would have had some impressive effect and helped him spread the gospel.
Obviously though if he wasn’t performing miracles, then as you concluded a lot of what Paul and Luke wrote would or might have been fabrications.
I’ll need to concede then that if miracles were not possible, then your argument is bolstered. If Paul wasn’t getting help from God, then as you postulate the help he got from Roman officials would be more necessary to account for his successes.
With your permission, I’ll discontinue this line of discussion. My motivation is to help you focus on what you are good at … helping people to take a fresh look at so many issues of life. Also, I recognize the starting points of believing in miracles or not believing in miracles will greatly divert our beliefs on Paul etc.
You did a good job of framing the discussion in a way to appeal to me using scriptures about humility etc… and you were able to argue in such a way as to get in the head of a believer.
But still, I’m reading Paul a bit different than you are. I see Paul as saying he is the least of all the apostles and doesn’t even deserve to be called an apostle, because he persecuted the church. He calls himself “nothing.”
Each remark can be “spun” or given some explanation to promote a given viewpoint. Lawyers are masterful at this. They can make the good look bad and the bad look good.
What you need to be careful of though, is creating such a framework to view Paul, … remember stylistically I said you were similar to Paul in some of your defenses of your abilities?
Peter wrote the following about Paul’s writings.
———————-
15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him.
16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
(2 Pet. 3:15-16 NIV)
———————-
Now, Paul had a number of criticisms about himself, though as you said he complimented himself a lot (my awkward rephrase of your better worded description). Jesus though had infinitely greater claims about himself than Paul had about Paul. So the question comes down to accuracy of the claims. Was Jesus sent from God … etc? Jesus if not sent from God was a worse liar than Paul was — correct?
I really haven’t seen you criticize Jesus. I can’t prove that Jesus did miracles to a scientist. (And I’m probably not even the best person to make the case based on logic or any other reasoning that Jesus did miracles.) Still lot of miracles might have other explanations ranging from the power of positive thinking to other more metaphysical or strange ideas… etc. If such a thing is true would Paul naturally have less ability than Jesus in this regard? If Paul had such a gift or was perceived to have such a gift than does that lessen the need to have some Roman operation supporting Paul?
I realize I’ve tossed out a lot of ideas … but you toss a lot of thoughts around too.
The word “tossed” reminds me I wanted to eat some salad! We’ll continue or not continue this later. Either way “it is all good” as far as I’m concerned.
Another good response…
Let me just close then with this comment. Jesus sought to drive change away from an oppressive religion, by coming from the common midst of that religious group and giving his whole life for that cause. Paul on the other hand sought to take over a religion, by coming in from the outside and ended up, unlike all the other apostles chosen by Jesus, living in a nice retirement somewhere far away from the cause.
Two different types of skin in the game. This is how I differentiate pretend CEO’s and Executive Committees from the real thing, pretend skeptics from the real thing. Where have they come from, and where are they going…
TES 8)
I love the availability to all of the essential action: Go and look.
Thanks Jenn! :-)
I hope, being juxtaposed beside the Ketosis Lab Notes – Mitochondrial Suppression Disorder post, that it is both timely and not hypocritical.
Oppose Agency! Go and Look!
hehe….
~TES
Ethical Skeptic, this is really good material and work. I do not understand but like half of it, but I get the gist of what to do. Don’t you find this lifestyle extraordinarily tedious? Do you sustain it for years on end, or what? Just curious, Ellen.
Hey Ellen,
Thanks for the comments. The lifestyle is extraordinarily tiresome, but it is a sacrifice I must make. I have too much to accomplish, and I end up having to promote ideas, organizations and people (including myself) in this endeavor. Food, in the name of ‘efficiency’ has become a liability to much of humanity, and therefore has to be watched closely. From my thyroid panels and other hormone and body stats – the damage was done in the late 90’s to early 2000’s. So now I must fight the fight every single day – in order to stay at my preferred weight. Yes, there are exception days – on the order of 1 to 2 a month. When I go to my family gatherings, I don’t want to miss what my aunts have prepared. So I do make some exceptions of course. But when I travel – I do not eat what others prepare, and for the most part, make my own meals.
Having to consume about two thirds the calories of what I burn – ensuring that I hit this daily minimum shortfall of 650 calories, for most of the month is a chore – but it is fight, just like getting my graduate degree, and founding and growing companies – it is a fight. It must be fought essentially every single day. And that fight includes pointing out the fake skepticism which promotes cluelessness (cultivated ignorance) surrounding this issue on the part of many Americans (and increasingly, those overseas as well).
Thanks for commenting!
~TES :-)
“If you have never sat with African villagers at evening prayer, worked alongside followers of Ganesha in India, or held a person in your arms as they died …then you are not a skeptic”
… what do these things have to do with each other?
They are a symbolic grouping, not literal – demonstrating a heart for mankind and a willingness to go there and see for yourself, to take risk, to observe how one can help rather than assume, as well as a tolerance for where people are in their walk.
It’s distressing to realize that had I come across that Novella definition in another context, and before I encountered your work, or hell even now if I wasn’t paying careful attention, I would likely have been (would be) entirely drawn in by the “watchwords”. Thank you for taking the time to point out those definitional distinctions.
You are absolutely welcome Jennifer, and thank you for faithfully reading my blog. It is much appreciated. ~TES
I have no idea how I have missed this stie over the years. This shit is good. Keep up the good work, whoever you are. Cass
Thanks Cass, LOL!! ~TES
Hi,
I share a couple of links where I explain why the CICO theory is pseudoscience:
On the false causality of the CICO theory
The CICO theory is a conceptual mistake
I’m reminded of several other points where the religious impulse collides with science.
Some telescopes being built on mountaintops face opposition because they are holy sites … or something like that … maybe some ancestors buried up there or something like that.
The Mosque at the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem … they have enlarged the mosque facilities digging down … and throwing away any archaeological remains they find … just dumping it out rather than letting the ancient site be properly excavated. This got a lot of attention from the publication Biblical Archaeology Review in some past issues years ago.
Also use of stem cells from aborted babies/fetuses have been a subject of great controversy in years past. At one time it became a political issue and hence it got a lot of attention. However since new techniques to cultivate stem cells were found this issue has died down. However creating new life for technological purposes might raise some other issues.
Anyways good points about DNA and science being a collective benefit to the knowledge of all human beings.
Another controversial type of study is what about a person claiming to be descended from a famous person? One young man named Danny, for example, claims to be the son of a very famous person. This news story though is politicized … the best Biblical analogy would be to Abraham’s wife Sarah sending away another son of Abraham.
In the case of Danny the man who apparently was the father has a powerful wife who opposed having her husband have any relationship with his son.
In any case truth often takes a back seat to what narrative is being pushed. Often these issues ultimately, I suppose, come down to people with financial incentives to shade facts … suppress facts or whatever. Wars are started on false premises … as you said “humans lie” … and that is a sad fact that brings about a lot of carnage.
Little lies bring about bad science, bad reasoning, bad beliefs, “bad blood” (meaning hatred).
The same man who lied about the “Gulf of Tonkin” to get us involved in the Vietnam war was apparently responsible for having the Liberty ship attacked in a false attempt to make the Egyptians look responsible and get the US involved … reports are so crazy about the level the US intended to get involved I’ll not even repeat it.
From what I understand the massacre in Rwanda was also caused by some “false flag” attempt to start a war.
Lies keep people in the darkness from impending dangers … whistle blowers are often punished, those in power who lie often get away with it.
People often lack patience and interest to get to the truth. One powerful person wanting to drum up evidence to get in a war kept telling the intelligence agencies to “look again” his lack of patience can best be described as a “shoot first, ask questions later” approach. It was claimed some 17 intelligence agencies eventually came to support the conclusion that he wanted. Ironically, the guy when duck hunting “shot first” at what he thought was a duck … but blasted his friend with a shotgun … having never bothered to verify that his imagined duck was really a duck. It was a very famous incident … the friend fortunately survived. However the war the guy pushed so hard for had so many other unnecessary deaths. It appears to me we had an unnecessary and expensive disastrous war to align with a poetically (yet also tragic) wrong-headed blast of his shotgun at his friend.
Eisenhower in his farewell speech urged that the US public remain vigilant … instead now lies are again costing enormous amounts of money in huge, and often wasteful military expenditures … with the same people who approve of the spending later working for the companies they directed the huge amounts of tax payer money to go to, and in some or many cases the same businesses give huge contributions to those who vote for and approve of massive reckless and wasteful spending.
I remembered a Psalm where someone spoke about wanting peace but being among a large group of people who wanted war. Now that I looked at the Psalm I realize that the first part talks about lies.
The beauty of the Psalm therefore captures my attention and I sorry in a sense for quoting it (on this a skeptical forum) however the thoughts and the lament and desire for justice against the liars (or the warning to the liars) has such poetic power I’ll just quote it anyways. Please pardon my quoting it … I know the Bible has parts that urge wars … it gives straight up reasons … now wars are launched with underhanded subterfuge and deceitful tactics to convince people of the justice of such wars.
Psalm 120:1 A song of ascents. I call on the LORD in my distress, and he answers me.
2 Save me, LORD, from lying lips and from deceitful tongues.
3 What will he do to you, and what more besides, you deceitful tongue?
4 He will punish you with a warrior’s sharp arrows, with burning coals of the broom bush.
5 Woe to me that I dwell in Meshek, that I live among the tents of Kedar!
6 Too long have I lived among those who hate peace.
7 I am for peace; but when I speak, they are for war. (Ps. 120:1-7 NIV)
Verse 2 above is resonating with me. As you said lies everywhere … the drumbeat for war seems everywhere … this level of national arrogance is scaring me to death. One leader who appears to be a bully, is advocating the most sane levels of good international relations while his critics who call him a bully are actually wanting him to be more of hypocrite and go after a nation they think changed some election result.
There doesn’t seem to be many advocates for peace. Hysteria is gripping this country … the lies that you TES are calling attention to in the science fields … that is just the tip of iceberg … the flag on the top of a huge monstrous warship a civilization that is so steeped in lies, no one dares to even question the official narratives … no one dares question government spending anymore … media people and politicians and all people are such a part of the system they can hardly speak up without the fear they will suffer great losses.
Arrogance was a reason the Titanic sunk. Hatred, arrogance and lies and wimps who can’t speak the truth … they are all around us …everywhere.
Though you are across the isle from me on a few issues … I deeply admire your fierce fight for truth. A few good people shining a flashlight in the darkness can make a lot of difference and you are definitely one such person, in my opinion. Sorry, I suppose for being a relatively uneducated “groupie” hanging out on your blog commenting and going a bit off topic. There isn’t much out there in the way of deep solid thinkers who also have a deep desire to see things get better and have some skill and vision to push things in that direction.
Those who get too involved in the nitty-gritty often get drawn into foolish arguments. “Do not answer a fool according to his folly lest you be like him.” So many people don’t get into the morals or higher level thinking and spend too much time just exchanging insults.
You manage to maintain some intellectual altitude … see much or the entire battlefield of ideas and act in a somewhat strategically in the way you urge people to think.
From my perspective then as a Christian I ought to pray for you and give thanks to God for you taking such strong positions in countering errors and lies of all types. I realize you and other readers will see this as quaint or whatever but I’ve got deep respect for you and you are very gifted and I believe blessed with incredible intelligence and a good measure of fair-mindedness.
Even the Titanic may be a lie – it might be the Olympic which sank. I have yet to see any falsification of this – and have looked a LOT for it.
No, I do not see your position as quaint. A metaphysical selection is a modern and reasoned choice you are free to make. No judgement on that.
There were several world-events things I was directly involved in while in Intelligence. We lied. We lied on a regular basis, and at times we lied when we did not even have to. It was like a signature of power. I can lie, so I will lie. I would get back in the states after just having been there in the mix, only to find the US Media spouting an errant or significantly different story than that which really happened. I would be amazed at the layering and volume of the lies we were fed.
Good rant! 8-)
TES
Various translations of Ecclesiastes 5:8 all seem to do with tempering our reaction to all the injustice and the layers of injustice in the world.
I must admit it is hard to know what the best thing to do would be. During the time of the apostle Paul writing his letters, from what little I understand of the historical context Nero may have been ruling in Rome.
Paul sidestepped the natural human reaction to act like a cornered animal and he conducted himself with grace … his letters contained nothing about the political situation at hand. Yet Nero’s over-reaction may have been an opening for the spread of Christianity in Rome … somehow this defenseless sect conquered the Roman Empire. To what level Christian teachings effected the behavior of people in the empire … I don’t know much about such history. I may know less about the evolution of the Roman Empire from the time of Paul forward than most of your readers. So the prudent thing is to keep my mouth shut.
The few minutes that I spent looking at the Titanic/Olympic ship controversy … it was interesting – a nice momentary diversion. The known Olympic placement of portholes or window arrangements matching the submerged vessel rather than that of the Titanic… this is used to support the theory. Yet it is such a complex theory (at least it appears that way to me) there are many questions. One question involving the resurrection of Jesus was “where is the body” … with the little I know of this theory that you have looked at … now I’m wondering where is the Titanic if the ship that sunk was really the Olympic refurbished? Magicians can hide an elephant … pardon my light interest in the topic. Just like there is a branch of agnosticism called “Apatheists” people who really don’t care … in a sense looking into the issue you are discussing will be a waste of time for me … I guess.
Certainly there are fascinating issues and fascinating theories. William Shake-spear (leaving this misspelled ) I think it was skeptic Mark Twain that raised some issues about the writings worth looking into. Historical documents at the time, from a TV show I watched long ago … showed no contemporary mentions of him. Another well known writer at the time they can’t connect the popular author to his works that he wrote. Some arguments were that they could not have this writing being publicly identified with someone in the royal court … or something like that goes the arguments. I think Mark Twain felt that the supposed poor background of Shakespeare wasn’t compatible with the knowledge of court politics that was needed for the writings that he supposedly produced.
And some other book looking into the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor … well the evidence in that book apparently swayed some historians to think the surprise attack wasn’t a … (I’ll leave it at that for brevity sake as well as my limited knowledge…)
Fascinating things … things done that were kept hidden from the public. And yet Jesus made a call to holiness, to first take the plank out of my own eye before I can help others. He made a call or an exhortation to be merciful. Mercy and forgiveness and a recognition of the need to even love ones enemies is really the only way that people who are living in cruelty and lies and whatever other wrong things, can come to make a better change, make a difference. I mean there are people in power doing bad things, but without grace and mercy, they can’t step out of that field.
Oh well, that is what I personally have to do. That does not include making some list of wrongdoings by other people. (However I’ve seen at least one major Christian figure (now deceased) who claimed that he felt the Holy Spirit leading him to not be so politically involved. Later he relented, sending out a survey with “leading questions” designed to get answers in favor of getting into political slugfests and belittling the positions of unbelievers. So I’m certainly not out-of-the-woods yet personally. I’m thinking of James Dobson of Focus on the Family. He was into politics, stepped out of it and then later couldn’t contain himself and got back into making political statements.
There is so much political whining it is sometimes suffocating intellectually. One time listening to Sean Hannidy” I heard him remark that he never listens to his own radio programs. He said he can’t stand the sound of his voice … and I think he meant the complaining tone.
It is just so easy to get into mud-slinging etc … and so hard to do the things that are a benefit to culture and intelligence and promote respect etc…
The culture of the US is getting more divided politically … and if I get into that whining complaining frame of mind I won’t be helping things.
There is a better attitude for reaching across political isles and sometimes working together on important things. “One who loves a pure heart and who speaks with grace will have the king for a friend.” (Prov. 22:11 NIV) An alternate translation offered is “One who loves and has a pure heart…” Though that scripture isn’t an airtight thing because there are many reasons that it won’t be true … leaders may seek out people with power, money and influence to support them, for example. However as a matter of sense they will probably avoid treacherous people who will betray them, or who overly divisive and controversial … if they have sense that is.
In any case I have so far to go in terms of wisdom, knowledge, sense, productivity and numerous other areas. Scripture says “He who walks with the wise grows wise” and perhaps that is one reason that I follow your writings … you’ve got so many good thoughts to offer …. I’ve got so many things that I can learn from you … your careful thinking is inspiring to me. Also you manage apparent numerous activities (with businesses and family etc) and yet you still have some time to manage a reasonably well regarded blog and do it well…
When you are able to see the world through the correct end of binoculars, the worlds stares right back at you through the other end.
Ioannides has commented at length about the low replicability rate of biomedical science:
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Overall, quite apart form any biasses coming from funding sources (which are certainly substantial and serious) it is clear that one issue with research here is the acceptance of results with high p values skews the picture substantially.
As a rule a study will be regarded as yielding a positive if the this of the result being a chance finding is less than 0.05. In other words, many results are accepted even though there is only a 19/20 probability that it was not a chance finding.
This is at odds with the reluctance of the scientific community to accept other results that are uncomfortable (ie Swanson’s correlation of glyphosate load with liver and biliary cancer that had p values of the order of < 1/10,000).
So, greater (true) skepticism needs to be directed towards these large population studies that accept as positive weak findings.
Overall it is my impression that the insistence of very large studies in the biomedical world is a deliberate ploy to make it more difficult to research any treatment that will not generate a very profitable patent (ie a pharmaceutical).
MB,
I do see p-value impacts as a tool, much like a patent. Many people view patents as single, iron-clad documents which protect their invention or idea. This is not the case. Similarly, a p-value is regarded as the definitive threshold which falsifies the possibility that two sets of data are unrelated – therefor establishing a scientific truth. This misperception is the reason for our discomfort over the p-values themselves as of late. A p-value, like a patent, is only one brick in a wall. It suggests plurality or suggests we must look elsewhere, but never finishes the science in one execution. If a p-value finished the science at hand, then we would need our confidence interval table inputs to be set at .9997 or even the sixth sigma. But that too would be foolishness, because under that scenario, we could scarcely prove anything but gravity and that sunburns come from the sun. Even then the p-values would be suspect to some.
The reality in patenting is that control of a field of application or knowledge, requires an entire patent strategy to accomplish. I work under a 7 layer patent model, which once addressed by a series of interrelated and leveraging patents, begins to lock up a technology or an idea. I prosecute the field domain and its critical ideas as a strategy. I might have to issue 20, 40 patents in order to establish one lock on a single idea. In similar fashion, I may need 20 differing p-value results, on an array of related and interdependent questions, in order to begin to obtain a scientific direction. If I raise p-value thresholds, I weaken this process (science), AND show that I do not fully understand how science prosecution of a question works. Science is not just one test. A ‘patent’ is not simply one USP&TO claims filing.
The lockup of a patent domain, requires a strategy. Inventors are typically bad at strategy. The prosecution of a scientific question requires a strategy. Scientists are typically bad at strategy.
P-value amaurosis is the condition wherein we place more effort into the rigor of our mathematical derivation of likelihood, than we do into the question, its role in the larger question, and the critical path necessary in determining an answer in the first place.
The scientific version of pennywise-pound foolish.
Skepticism therefore, for me – is in observing the tradecraft of the lie – watching people like Steven Novella think that a p-value is one test and done or is ‘the probability that something is pure random chance’, tells me he has never really done any science – just talks about it a lot.
~TES
My last comment went to await moderation. Let’s see if this link will go through.
One of the points in your article dealt with the simplistic way that people often understand and argue about “climate change” which sent me on a multihour tangent.
However there is rather breaking news in geology (not sure how to sell that) however the Holocene now has a new geological statigraphic stage/age.
http://www.stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-news-and-meetings/119-collapse-of-civilizations-worldwide-defines-youngest-unit-of-the-geologic-time-scale
=========================
Collapse of civilizations worldwide defines youngest unit of the Geologic Time Scale
The Late Holocene Meghalayan Age, newly-ratified as the most recent unit of the Geologic Time Scale, began at the time when agricultural societies around the world experienced an abrupt and critical mega-drought and cooling 4,200 years ago. This key decision follows many years of research by Quaternary scientists, scrutinized and tested by the subcommissions of the International Commission on Stratigraphy under the chairmanship of Professor David Harper, Durham University, UK.
Agricultural-based societies that developed in several regions after the end of the last Ice Age were impacted severely by the 200-year climatic event that resulted in the collapse of civilizations and human migrations in Egypt, Greece, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, the Indus Valley, and the Yangtze River Valley. Evidence of the 4.2 kiloyear climatic event has been found on all seven continents. …
=========================
That is climate change …
Also added to the Holocene are two other ages.
=========================
Furthermore, it approved proposals for two other ages: the Middle Holocene Northgrippian Age and the Early Holocene Greenlandian Age with beginnings defined at climatic events that happened about 8,300 years and 11,700 years ago, respectively. The three ages comprise the Holocene Epoch, which represents the time since the end of the last Ice Age. The Commission then forwarded these proposals to its parent body, the IUGS, for consideration, and the executive committee of IUGS voted unanimously to ratify them.
=========================
People are getting excited about the added carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but most people are ignorant of climate change that has happened since humans have been on earth. I didn’t see any particular reason given for these climate change events that are embedded in the geological record. I guess I’ll have to find that out later and probably from a different source.
Yes,
Actually this should read ‘The Greenlandian Age (11,700 ya), Northgrippian Age (8,300 ya) and Meghalayan Age (4,200 ya) are comprised by the Holocene Epoch” not that they ‘comprise’ the Holocene. They compose the Holocene. That trivia aside, I do carry several concerns. The entire Holocene Epoch is characterized by mega-changes in climate and fauna throughout. I think it unwise for us to presume that in 1850, that all this change suddenly stopped, and thereafter only man impacted climate. If that were indeed the case, then we have defacto, by practice, established a fourth Holocene Age: Anthropostatic Age (170 ya) whereupon 11,500 years of much more dramatic climate change stopped and froze in place. So, why would we define a new Era and not name it? As a skeptic, that bothers me.
A second aspect of such science (not that I reject AGW, by any means) is that, we have not examined what has caused the climate dynamics of the Greelandian and Northgrippian Ages. Certainly we can attribute mankind’s activity to have impacted the Meghalayan Age. But something other than carbon technology, object impacts, solar cycle and orbital dynamics has precipitated this early Holocene’s ENORMOUS periodic climate change. And it has happened before, and on a regular basis. Our pretense that, that unknown factor has ceased, and handed its mantle off to mankind – is well, sorta stupid from a scientific standpoint.
There is an alternative which can explain that climate dynamic (‘Alternative 4: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2017/07/09/denial-and-pseudo-skepticism-are-not-the-same-thing/ ) – and is not incompatible with current pushes to eliminate fossil fuels – but we do not study it. This is what I mean by ‘dependent and incremental queries’ – we skipped the study of the cause of the Greenlandian and Northgrippian age temperature dynamics, which in process has caused chaos in our science of the study which depends upon those answers (AGW). We asked an out of sequence question, because of a political goal.
As a member of society I agree with that AGW goal (in fact I have a business focused on alternative green energies), but as a skeptic I disagree with a critical part of our science procedure on the matter.
The Riddle of Skepticism: “If I were wrong, would I even know it?” and “If I were wrong, would I be contributing to harm?”
~ TES
I can’t remember you making a typo before and I’m not saying that the following is a typo … it probably isn’t. However you pointed out that earlier humans would not have had a big impact on carbon then you went onto write, “But something other than carbon technology, object impacts, solar cycle and orbital dynamics has precipitated this early Holocene’s ENORMOUS periodic climate change.”
I can follow you in regards to your conclusion on “carbon technology” and “orbital dynamics” (if you are talking about ruling them out too) yet I’ve seen some evidence that links solar activity with at least some climate change. (One theory now postulates that two different sun cycles are taking place and that this will cause some decline in the sun’s output in the years ahead, however even this shouldn’t nearly match the earlier climate disruptions.) However, “object impacts” are in my estimation at the top of the list for other major climate change events. Huge volcanic eruptions also have effects on climate.
We are really in our infancy as far as recognizing and searching for moderate size impact events on the earth. IMO the evidence for impact at the YDB is very solid now. However, lesser events such as those that caused the flood that caused the Gilgamesh and Genesis stories (and other flood stories worldwide) has some tentative evidence supporting them. Particularly I’m thinking about the Burckle crater and from that Wikipedia page a link to another possible impact site called the Mahuika crater.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burckle_Crater
Trinitite and other evidence gives solid support for some extraterrestrial cause for the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah as in the Bible story. An archaeologist excavating Tall el-Hammam believes the destruction of this significant city to be the Biblical Sodom.
Although there is certainty about the destruction of the supposed Sodom being caused by an object from the air … it isn’t known if the entire object was just a very hot airburst. Other theories speculate that it impacted and excavated or created the Southern part of the Dead Sea and other theories claim that whatever caused the destruction of Sodom to have been one part of a string of objects that hit the earth …. and if I’m remembering correctly what I just read a few hours ago, another part hit India and another hit somewhere in China … If I’m remembering this all correctly.
I’m just saying, I see theories about “object impacts” being discussed and to me the science is rather young … and your link to your other fine article(blog) the mention in it of geonutrinos … it is leaving my head spinning. I think I need a nap.
Well that does bring up two points.
Volcanoes and celestial object impacts bring on temporary climate change in the form of lower temps. But what I am speaking of is a sudden and endogenous rise in temperatures which follows an epochal scale, which neither the impact nor volcano contribution can impart. This is a 90 – 120 kyr cycle, which is precipitated by a sudden rise in temps and atmospheric CO2. In a normal world, we should have answered questions about this cycle before pretending to know about the Anthropostatic Age. But, the argument that we had to take action, despite not having the full array of information was a compelling one nonetheless, and is the reason I have chosen to invest in green technologies as well. But the source of this 90/120 kyr cycle still perplexes me. We need to answer this.
Regarding a flood. I have spent many years in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, much of it traveling to and flying over, remote parts. It is absolutely clear to me that the Arabian peninsula was inundated by ocean water within the last 10,000 years. You can see the receding shoreline progressively from Riyadh regressing into the Empty Quarter and finally to the Arabian Gulf (you do not call it the ‘Persian Gulf’ there). You can observe the human habitation artifacts pulled from beneath the waters of the Arabian Gulf in the museums in Riyadh/Dubai/Dammam. This stands as another case of the nihilist/theist bifurcation obfuscating what is indeed reality. Nihilists deny that any flood at all occurred, and theists declare that the flood was 150 ft over the top of Mt. Everest. Between these two buffoonist a priori beliefs, we cannot get a word of truth in edgewise. There was a recent flood. It involved the Arabian tectonic plate dropping and then rising partly back up, leaving the ‘flood’ partly in place = The Arabian (Persian) Gulf.
The Epic of Gilgamesh tells a much more complete story of the flood than does the Bible. Whether fiction or not, in its origin, I think that the rising of the ‘black cloud with the morning rising sun shining upon it, and the fire of the gods scurrying about inside it’ – tells me some things that relate truth.
1. The cloud rose in the west
2. The cloud was of volcanic origin
3. The ‘loaves of bread in the morning and wheat chaff in the evening’ were bolides and cinder ash (mega-volcanic)
4. The ‘sea waters came over the mountain of Susa like an army’ – this was the Persian Gulf
There are five mega-volcanoes right in the direction where Utinapushtim relates that he saw the gigantic black cloud. This is the origin of much of the Rift Valley. I think that a westward mantle shift occurred, dropping the Arabian Tectonic plate, and causing the eruption of these super-volcanoes. When comparing the Epic of Gilgamesh with the Biblical story, the Epic relates much more ‘first hand witness’ earmarks, and predates the Biblical recount substantially.
Plus, in the Biblical account, Noah released a dove, which came back with an olive leaf in its beak, 43 days after the highest mountain tops had begun to emerge from the waters. Olive trees cannot survive even one day submerged in sea water – and a new olive tree takes 7 months to ‘come true’ and produce its first leaf.
So where did this olive leaf come from?
Inside the Biblical recount is enough information to hint that the story has been altered to reflect Jehovaist Theist ideas. Sad…
TES
Clearly as you assert the Genesis account of the flood isn’t that great as s scientific account.
The Genesis account of the flood is packed with the number seven, which is often used throughout scripture in the most disputed or storylike passages.
Genesis 7:2ff seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, …
Genesis 7:3 seven pairs of every kind of bird
Genesis 7:4 Seven days from now I will send rain…
Genesis 7:10 after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth
Genesis 7:11 In the six hundreth year of Noah’s life on the seventeenth day of the second month…
Genesis 8:4 on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat
Genesis 8:10 He waited seven more days and again sent out the dove…
Genesis 8:12 He waited seven more days and sent the dove out again…
Genesis 8:13 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry.
I’m very intrigued by the evidence that you claim to have seen for shorelines on Arabia.
I’m not sure what the mega-volcanoes in the area that you refer to are. The Burckle crater though, if it as thought … a crater would account for multiple huge tsunamis … perhaps leaving evidence in the form of shorelines. Though I think you would likely be able to distinguish between chevrons and shorelines.
In any case thanks as always for sharing your thoughts. It may prompt me to do further research on the subjects you brought up.
I’ve seen speculation that the abrupt warming of the world as clearly seen in the Greenland ice layers could have been the result of another impact in the ocean that primarily caused a lot of water to evaporate … somehow using the added water vapor as the greenhouse gas that the CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropolic Global Warming) advocates fear will kick global warming into overdrive. I’m not sure on all that … there might be another cause, as you suspect.
Gotta run though.
I’m not sure if wasn’t for the following archived website (The blogger died in 2010) that I would have ever went on a deeper study (or any study for that matter) into “climate change science.”
http://www.seablogger.com/
At some point I came across the following website which helped me see the some of the problems in what passes for climate change science.
In many ways it takes independent bloggers to sometimes get the bottom of issues. Here is a link where record heat can sometimes be traced to putting weather station equipment on top of buildings or putting the record keeping thermometers in airports (possibly even subject to jet engine heat!) for example.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/07/08/the-all-time-record-high-temperatures-for-los-angeles-are-the-result-of-a-faulty-weather-stations-and-should-be-disqualified/
However my personal experience with climate change alarmists helped make my skepticism about climate change advocates very clear to me.
However now the scientific community that follows the geology of the earth has now recognized some times of climate change into the Holocene. (Top left corner of the chart for those that don’t know what the Holocene is.)
http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2018-07.jpg
Unfortunately, I don’t yet understand them, the history of those times etc… So much to learn.
Which is why I like your approach of promoting a measure of open-mindedness when new evidence comes along.
One of the most popular people in the world said something like, “Climate change science is settled” but in truth we’ve got so much to learn …
For some reason the system failed to auto-approve this comment. It was in the queue, so I just approved it manually. Odd…. TES
The thing about people who love to mock others, is that they see conversations and research, not as a quest for truth but as a quest for status. So a mocker enjoys putting others down, because it makes himself feel superior by comparison.
One problem with this mindset is that when/if anyone comes along and points out new information or a new angle of thinking to the mocking skeptic, information such as a better analysis perhaps, then they aren’t looking at the value of what they can learn, they immediately think the person giving the new information is doing so in order to put him down. So this mocker does not easily learn new things when challenged, he is too emotionally wound up in seeing facts as things to hammer people with.
Is this way of thinking common in skeptic groups? I suppose some skeptics are looking at skeptic groups for support, such as might be found as a type of support group for those leaving a bad church or bad religion experience. On the other hand, people have different motivations for what they do …
A church or religious experience isn’t necessarily bad because of bad behavior from religious people … but theological systems and knowledge belief systems in a church can be demonstrably false OR there may be no room for people who want to ask questions … and this can stifle the intellectual life of people who need to use their minds deeper than other people do.
One wonders if this was a problem in Christianity from the start. Jesus speaking of whatever he was teaching said, “I thank you that you have hid these things from the wise and learned and revealed them to children [relatively simple folks]. Paul wrote the church in Corinth and said that there were not many wise or noble among them saying that God called the simple things of the world to shame the wise.
I’m not too sure about the history of the early church during the Roman Empire days. I heard or read something about them caring for the poor … but I’m not at all sure how wideespread all that was.
Most of your criticisms of some in the skeptic movement pertains equally well with the lack of thinking that permeates some fundamentalist religious groups. Probably that is why outsiders are increasingly starting to pin the label “fundamentalist” on some atheist thinkers … or hard-core skeptics types.
Each abandons honesty and a good conscience to simplistically quote from their book of dogmas, whether it be a religious text or as you mentioned some dictionary of skeptics that delineate what is pseudoscience…
Lot of people do more talking than thinking.
There is plenty of mystery. It follows that we should have a healthy dose of humility then …
I was going to mention some universally accepted good and I was going to use “love” which is deeply promoted with Christian scriptures. Looking through the secular humanist website to see what they say about love their ironically is only mention of it in their declaration. “Religions have made negative as well as positive contributions toward the development of human civilization. Although they have helped to build hospitals and schools and, at their best, have encouraged the spirit of love and charity, many have also caused human suffering by being intolerant of those who did not accept their dogmas or creeds.”
Source: https://secularhumanism.org/index.php/11
I’m a little disappointed they did not personally promote “love” in their document.
If the Chinese government model of control takes root throughout the world displacing democracy, they will be deeply at odds with the Secular Humanist Declaration which repeatedly pushes for Democratic society. However the Chinese government model will probably mesh well with other aspects of the Secular Humanist Declaration.
In any case your attack on so called “critical thinkers” quite well describes many religious fundamentalists.
And though Christianity might have “love” as a core teaching … you’ve said the same in one of your comments. That if there is mystery or truth at the heart of the universe or in the meaning of life, that it would have something to do with love.
Love can motivate people to think and do the hard work of figuring out difficult problems. Love can motivate people to stand out from the crowd when the crowd is wrong or just following some mass movement. Love can lead people to give an extra kidney or do other important things. Love can help people understand that they can have mercy to other people, knowing that the faults of others … well are often ingrained in the human condition and we all suffer from faults.
Love will help people realize that all sorts of vague intellectual ideas … well that is what they might remain until we tangibly make some progress, or prepare to make some progress in service to others.
Yet it is often so painful to help others who then will want to drag us into their lives and we are limited in what ways we can help such people.
So love is a good path but to maximize what we can do for others we need to avoid being the slave of any one person or group. I’m reminded of Jesus being urged to stay in many cities that he visited. He needed to go elsewhere though and not get locked into just helping a small group.
For all his faults, Bill Gates has a willingness and goal to help the largest amount of people possible. He was reportedly motivated to “give back” by his wealth investor friend Warren Buffett.
I’ve probably rambled on enough. And when it comes to judging people … I’m urged not to do so… and at no time during an active game do people rest on their laurels. Meaning I’ve got to press ahead … do more and probably comment on blogs less and send less long emails.
Yes – good ramble Thomas,
If, and it is a big if – because of the Principle of Indistinguishability – if there is mystery and a not-easily-replicated substrate to this realm, it has something to do with love. Dogma of all forms originate from one thing – fear. I see terrified people in churches, rambling the doctrine – and I see terrified ‘skeptics’ rambling the doctrine. So that raises the inevitable and familiar question, is fear the opposite of love? Many people postulate that apathy is the opposite of love, but for me- apathy is nothing but a stolid, stoic expression of resignation to fear. A costume one wears so they do not appear afraid, to themselves.
So, even though I do not regard the self-titled Apostle Paul as an example of how to live (I hold epoche on his ‘road to Damascus’ event), perhaps one of his quotes (if he wrote it) that I do appreciate from my childhood days would be, “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of strength, and of love, and of a sound mind.”
That is what my blog espouses. And if it does come in its origin from an intelligence substrate to our observable universe – then I am all for it. I make no claims therein, to the positive nor negative.
~TES
Hi TES,
As usual I appreciate your well-thought out response. Your comment about fear … it is something that I think people of truth likely struggle with. It was just a few days ago that I gave the issue quite a bit of thought. Because I’m a believer in God, I dealt with the issue by praying about it. I recognized that I can easily be misled by fear and I prayed that it would neither stop me from doing things I should do, nor make me do things I ought not to do. (I think I was focused on this for hours so, my little summary is barely a fraction of what I prayed and was concerned with. Most of my prayer though was about not being misled by fear … particularly wrong fear.)
Your bit of reasoning though brought to memory a saying attributed to Thomas Jefferson so I had to look it up.
“Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.”
https://mydesultoryblog.com/2010/11/thomas-jeffersons-question-with-boldness-in-full-context/
A search for the quote gave me the link above to provide some context to the quote.
Perhaps you would find the paragraphs that deal with moral philosophy and religion somewhat interesting. He addresses this in paragraph (or short sections) three and four.
I can’t think of anything super-profound in those paragraphs that necessarily warrants needing to read it. However the section on moral philosophy has me wondering if you would tend to agree or disagree with it. Particularly what do you think of “State a moral case to a ploughman and a professor. The former will decide it as well, & often better than the latter, because he has not been led astray by artificial rules.” Then Jefferson goes on to recommend reading some books on moral philosophy. He recommends one in particular. I’m surprised to think that outside of scripture, and works that serve to teach scriptural principles, I’ve not read anything on the topic. I have wanted to read a book on Lying by a leading atheist … Harris perhaps … but I haven’t had the money to make a purchase nor the motivation to request it or search the library for it.
Has your readings led you to read any books on moral philosophy (outside of bible stuff when you were young)? I’m also wondering if moral philosophy was a subject that was popular in the time of Jefferson but has become less popular now. I can’t rule out that I’ve been blind to the subject because of my Christian orientation … and I’ve automatically shut my eyes to books on the topic. Or maybe this topic has become subsumed under more modern topics … self-help or some other things. However even Franklin has written a lot of self-help for the common man in his Poor Richards writings …
Enough of my rambling … I express my appreciation in advance of whatever light, thoughts or experiences that you can share on these topics that I just raised.
Its learning/being both sides of the mirror:
love of wisdom|wisdom of love
You must have read my mind. I presented some data to a friend of a friend on Facebook, refuting in part a “pro science meme” that he had circulated on his page. My refutation was simply to deal with the first item on the meme- namely gluten and to comment that there was clear evidence that gluten could have neurotoxic properties (which there is-though it is not clear how common the issue is). The friend of friend demanded evidence, and I spent 30 minutes trawling through PubMed to find sufficient references of sufficient quality.
I was amused to see him brush all these aside without properly reviewing any of them. Almost a textbook list of your social skeptics list of defences. What intrigued me though was his inability to look at new information. This sort of information is relevant to all of us, as is the proper conduct of scientific medicine. We all have skin in that game, and we have to admit that health in the US, Britain, and Australia, and Canada is going downhill fast.
On reflection though- it is the fragility that was interesting. Maybe there was a cognitive deficit?
Now my blog deals with a subject that has been controversial for many years (atlas subluxation/upper cervical malalignment). The chiropractors have talked about it for decades, and they have plenty of evidence, though not of the large scale RCT type that is applicable to phaarmaceuticals.
However they have been bitterly attacked on all of the main “social skeptic” blogs, and by members of groups like “The Friends of Science In Medicine”.
These malalignments are very common and cause all sorts of problems, and I am about to write another piece discussing the evidence for compromise of brainstem bloodflow as caused by subluxations. With the advent of upright MRI we now have all the evidence we need (though it would be nice to run even bigger studies to nuance the findings better. We have not even touched the edges of detail for all the secondary conditions). The brainstem is the seat of consciousness. All the cortex adds is detail (speaking loosely).
These problems also cause a characteristic posture- kyphoscoliois- hunched over and a little twisted. You can spot it from 10 metres away.
Now I had difficulty with my old defence organisation over this matter, and was struck by the irony of arguing with 3 twisted old men (who clearly had the syndrome) about the non existence of the condition that was so clearly causing their cognitive impairment. I also note that one of the stalwarts in an Australian Organisation called “The Friends of science In Medicine” has it too (once I tracked down a photo of him).
I recently discovered though that the chiropractors have a saying “Sh*t subluxated people say”. Yep. I get it.
From my point of view though, there are a number of causes of cognitive impairment.
Ground floor- compromised brain stem blood flow, orthostatic intolerance (lower BP higher heart rate when sitting), scrambled input signals (see the blog) interfering with visual competence.
First floor- secondary immune/metabolic consequences of ground floor problems.
Second floor– an environment that no longer provides healthy food and that makes exercise difficult
Third floor- the difficulty in seeing that one is abnormal oneself– especially as the cognitive deficits come on slowly
Fourth Floor and top level:
Our academic institutions encourage obedience to authority rather than independent thinking.
What you and I are asking people to do does require mental energy, and it requires a degree of risk management. Breaking the habit of obedience, and learning to step up and make your own observations and do your own research is tough. It is even tougher if you have only half a brain available to you at the time.
However, within my profession the people remembered are the ones who did just that: Anton Semmelweiss, Sir William Osler etc. Individuals considering problems and weighing their individual experience without a committee to hide behind. However in a medico-scientific culture that encourages obedience and hierarchy, it takes a lot of energy to lift out of that paradigm.
My own case was straightforward- there was no adequate help for my problem- not even a differential diagnosis. It was a matter of being brave and accepting “Do, or die”.
The cognitive impairment issue is no fun. I get episodes of it when the alignment is bad– but at the time I identified my problem I was profoundly unwell. I honestly do not know how I stuck on the internet long enough to confirm the basic information I had been given. That was real cognitive impairment. So I do have sympathy for these poor confused skeptics.
MB
Great to have you comment on this last blog post. Ironic that three old men, were suffering from a cognitive impacting condition, which they denied from a basis of cognitive impairment to begin with. A play in microcosm of our reality as a culture.
Yes, perhaps I should best frame my hypoxia proposition more as exemplary, than suggest it as the basis for all cognitive impairment. Good point.
But it does elicit this problem of adopting skepticism as some kind of substitute for the ability to think. They call it ‘critical thinking’ – but I rarely witness anything of the sort inside its execution. It should be instead entitled ‘conformance protocols’ – a type of thinking welfare for those of impoverished cognition.
Great that you stuck it through to begin to resolve your own subluxation issues – and now can help others. Well done. I noticed my stooped shoulders and neck long ago – but have yet to address it. My son has the same thing going on. Perhaps we should look into it.
Thanks!
TES
“a type of thinking welfare for those of impoverished cognition.”
Nice.
Im going to have to lift my game to compete with that one :)
Everything you’ve said here is undoubtably true.
Quoting from Wikipedia about the book, “The Undoing Project” — “The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds is a 2016 nonfiction book by American author Michael Lewis, published by W.W. Norton. The Undoing Project explores the close partnership of Israeli psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, whose work on heuristics in judgment and decision-making demonstrated common errors of the human psyche, and how that partnership eventually broke apart. The book revisits Lewis’ interest in market inefficiencies, previously explored in his books Moneyball (2003), The Big Short (2010), and Flash Boys (2014). It was acclaimed by book critics.”
TES, you overlay a deep knowledge of science and awareness of human behavior over the simplest, timeless concepts such as that of humility, to give some clear demonstrations of very fundamental mistakes that are so damaging to our modern society. Keep up the good work.
The first paragraph of this comment is merely to point out that you have a style or intellectual rigidity (meant here in terms of strength) that matches that of some of the best reading on subjects of human behavior that I’ve ever read as applied specifically to the modern world.
And to oppose the thought that I might be saying you are in any way intellectually rigid or inflexible, you’ve got a great personality as well as deep awareness of your own intellectual limitations (again meant here in a good way … meaning you don’t go off “half-cocked” arguing stridently about things you know nothing about).
Obviously, too there are parallels to what you are pointing out in other fields too that exhibit flawed human thinking.
The anger you might felt in the “altitude chamber” might be a primitive animal reaction to be defensive … and you know that.
Human beings though have evolved further than animals and we probably have adopted such strategies to maintain dominance in social groups … much behavior of human beings in ingrained.
I appreciate you throwing light on such things and though you don’t say it in such words you are constantly urging us not to get too ahead of ourselves by taking positions that we haven’t adequately thought through. As human animals we sometimes are wired to take extreme positions to get ahead of the group we are in … to appear as the leader. We sometimes want to be seen as the most passionate or most dedicated to a particular cause of those in our group. (I hope my memory of all this that I previously concluded is still accurate.)
There is a biological risk to animals in standing apart from the group and doubting a course of action that the group had decided on. This is the risk of being ostracized for not being part of the group. However on the other hand, sometimes it is dangerous to follow the herd. Sometimes the leaders don’t care for the people they are supposed to be leading. They are looking out for themselves. People assume that the leaders are looking out for them and only too late do they realize they’ve been sold out.
One of the things you are doing is handing out glasses to people who need their vision improved. I appreciate you doing this. (This is metaphorical, so if you ever handed out glasses, I still don’t know who you are… it is entirely a co-incidence.)
Yeah Thomas, my encouragement for us to not get ahead of ourselves – that is mostly aimed at me. I research so many things, and use my skills developed in Intelligence, to begin to see things that might not be there. The key to spotting lions in the grass, generally is to test them – not ignore them. The latter action bears really disastrous black swan moments.
But if you have 100 lions in the grass, which do you test? One has to make their best call in such a circumstance – but to listen to voices which cannot see at all, proclaiming that ‘it’s all just lion faces in the grass’ – they are 99% correct, yet heeding their advice is the worst mistake a person who deals with risk, can make.
Thanks for the kind comments!
~ TES
Pattern recognition is a hazardous occupation.
It was – and is. But those who are good at it are promoted fast and paid very well.
Honestly engaging or debating people with a different viewpoint is often helpful in order to break out of a narrow way of thinking.
This YouTube video is likely too long for most folk to watch (something like three and half hours!) but in this podcast you can see Michael Shermer getting some push-back when he rather blindly resorted to his talking points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=39&v=tFlAFo78xoQ
Yet still at the end of the podcast Michael Shermer said some kind remarks to a man he was debating. So Michael does have some open-mindedness. He even corrected some material that another guest or partner of his in the debate espoused.
Often people only try to learn viewpoints that match their own. However they might be missing something if they don’t engage people with different viewpoints.
Traditionally a problem with spy satellites, is that they have a rather narrow field of view, often called a keyhole. We all are limited in the amount of material we can research and learn.
Additionally we often fail to see the weaknesses in the viewpoint of our own group. We often highly esteem our own teachers, and though we don’t really understand them, we assume they are correct. Our “teachers” may create “straw-man” arguments and we will not really know it – if we stay within our bubble.
Our teachers may give complex sounding arguments to refute some rather clear mistakes in the position of our group. We though mistake the complex arguments of our teachers as being adequate refutation of the errors of our group.
At some point I had to learn that complex sounding arguments that I don’t understand … I should not give them credence — I mean I can accept that people hold the views being espoused, but in the face of cross-examination a baffling argument can not be considered equal to a well-argued and well-reasoned presentation. Or it at least means I need to do more research…
And obviously everything you wrote as pertaining to skeptics … Christians need to get out of their bubbles and think independently too … and I write as one who was in such a bubble. And to whatever extent I am still in a bubble … there can be many reasons why I am still not where I need to be.
I remember one skeptic agreeing with a Christian who said, “The problem isn’t that Christianity has been tried and found wanting – it is that it hasn’t yet been tried.” How can one argue though with that? As in my last comment getting beyond a real basic level of Christianity to a level that is more skilled in righteousness … how far have Christians come? The writer of the book of Hebrews argued that Christians didn’t come very far.
I don’t want this response to be very long. It reminds me of what Jesus said. When it comes to people, “By their fruits you will know them.” Representatives of God can easily be and often are imposters looking to trick people. Representatives of science may also be imposters.
Sometimes this makes it very difficult for people to find truth – as science imposters might deflect attention away from themselves onto the easily discerned religious imposters who also are science imposters. And sometimes science imposters have espoused an air of triumphalism over some religious viewpoint. Historian Ron Numbers asserted that some proponents of Darwin, so captured the newly discovered science of Evolution and ended up driving away Christians who had been embracing evolution just because they were “triumphalist” in attitude over Christians. Christians should have been able to sort out there own thinking if it was important to them. In as much as people found evolution to be a superior creation account to what was in Genesis and starting using it as a tool to bash Christians, it merely dragged out the inevitable victory of the theory of evolution over the supposed historicity of the Genesis creation account. All kinds of charlatans were willing to exploit Christian zeal for financial gain or whatever other reason.
Ironically fundamentalist Christians and some zealous proponents of science found themselves congratulating their extremist opponents for saying there is no common ground between science and faith. It serves the propaganda purposes of both. I suppose that I can somewhat agree that there isn’t a lot of common ground … but using some flawed version of faith to refute science … or to use some philosophical version of science to refute faith in some grandiose way like saying “God is dead” or “What place then for a maker?” as if disproving God … these are all easily shown to be intellectual over-reach on the part of each proponent. Usually this shows people don’t even know their own supposed sphere of expertise very well.
Robert Jastrow commented about the intellectual over-reach of scientists being brought back to earth as they get to the top of the mountain to discover a band of theologians have been there for centuries.
Or some quote, I think I just read by Heisenberg stating the first sip from the cup of the natural sciences makes atheists but at the bottom of the cup God is waiting.
I doubt these men were Christians but we keep coming back to certain mysteries and some of these have been deeply debated for a long time. The Holy Bible, not everywhere but in some places, has God outside of time and space.
Whether this is was just some good philosophical musings of some great men (Bible writers) of the past, or some divine revelation or just inspired thinking … I’ll leave that question unanswered. If I know the answer or have guessed it correctly … few reading this would believe me.
A friend of mine told me I should get my own blog! Says I write him emails that are too long.
I’m not a superfan of Einstein. Yet there is a quote he made on the subject of science and religion … a quote that in general shows the blindness of religion and that so much science is “lame.”
Sole practitioners of either are missing something.
The blindness of religion which won’t engage science honestly is well-understood, certainly by most people reading your blog.
Yet science too, stretched to try and fill vacuums of morality … I mean perhaps it can be done… and you are doing a valiant effort at making science work for the betterment of mankind…
How can I say this? Though I’m not a scientist, and certainly not a mathematician, I understand that there are certain math formulas and branches of math that are better suited to answering certain challenges. For example in the movie HIDDEN FIGURES the US space agency NASA had certain difficult problems to solve and one of the people in the movie overseeing the planning of a space flight was annoyed that he could not find anyone in his group who knew (if I remember this correctly) a certain branch of calculus in order to properly plan when to initiate certain flight adjustments to the space vehicle.
I’m not going to push you into the realm of religion, but, it has a vast vocabulary in dealing with the type of problems you are up against. Jesus said, “”Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” (Matt. 23:15 NIV)
I can’t say that I know a clear path forward for you in incorporating faith and morals of Jesus and the Bible in order to better deal with tons of dishonesty in science. (What am I talking about people may wonder? From the science angle, it gets corrupted by mass hysteria and the swinging pendulums of personal opinion and human emotion. We don’t ask the right questions. As a species or as a nation we watch biased news sources and we get just a tiny fraction of the important information in the world. And yet even our culture falls pray for what one rather dated book called “Entertaining ourselves to death.” So in general we don’t learn science or truth, and what we learn is often flawed or biased, preferring instead fantasies … particularly when they make our intellectual opponents look rather stupid.
There is probably little love for science in our culture, and what love we have for science can easily be hijacked by people who have their own interest. What happens when science follows a business model? Or in religious language what about when mere monetary interests take root and the love for truth is squelched? Truth gets buried in science reports, perhaps studies are conducted in a flawed manner and certain results get culled out to create a skew in the data.
I’m sure you know that there is an overlap with what you are trying to accomplish — that is find truth in science and expose error … and that the same type of things have inspired people through the ages from ancient writings urging people to be honest, humble, skeptical, truth-seeking, kind etc…
Life is complex. I can understand that people will use science to be able fight wars and develop weapons. The whole idea of war is a difficult one to morally accept. Yet it can have some moral underpinnings. There is always some wickedness worth defeating. Yet war itself is … well I guess we all know… causes death and pain and misery.
Waging war may not only hurt the nation who loses (and wars can be costly to all sides) but it may hurt the consciences of those who engage in it. During the US-Mexican war the man we know as later general Grant remarked that “Never has a more unjust war been waged upon a weaker nation” (If I’m remembering his quote accurately enough.)
Sorry for the long divergent path here from the earlier discussion about science. Good science can produce good weapons. Good weapons may or may not be used justly. Good weapons theoretically can prevent war, by restraining others from fighting, or it may be a cause for war as some nation sees military opportunities.
Jerry A. Coyne in the December 4, 2013 issue of the New Republic decided to recast Einstein’s statement on religion and science as ““Science without profound curiosity won’t go anywhere, and religion without science is doubly crippled.”
Yet further up in the article he quoted Einstein as saying,”In this sense religion is the age-old endeavor of mankind to become clearly and completely conscious of these values and goals and constantly to strengthen and extend their effect. If one conceives of religion and science according to these definitions then a conflict between them appears impossible. For science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgments of all kinds remain necessary. Religion, on the other hand, deals only with evaluations of human thought and action: it cannot justifiably speak of facts and relationships between facts. According to this interpretation the well-known conflicts between religion and science in the past must all be ascribed to a misapprehension of the situation which has been described.”
Einsteins view satisfies neither atheist nor believer. He thought of Judaism and I suppose Christianity as “childish superstition.”
I conclude that Jerry A. Coyne took Einstein’s remark too far though in the atheist direction. If Einstein was saying that religion deals with “values and goals” and that “science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be” then I think Einstein wasn’t referring to his feeling of the scientists view of religion as being the “profound curiosity” Coyne thought of it as … but rather in this context the moral guidance that in a general way Einstein put in the realm of religion. Actually maybe Jerry was right. Looking at his article the closest context does support his view … but Einstein believed both in a religious sphere (though not some personal God) as well as in a religious feeling or awe as Cohen described. Einstein has said something about being awestruck “at the harmony of natural law” which was vastly superior to the thinking of humans.
Jerry made another comment too that intrigued me and I found a bit amusing because I hold a similar view in regard to religion … or what I have developed as my Bible guided worldview.
Jerry Coyne wrote,
=====================
Finally, I take issue with Einstein’s statement that the value of reason in understanding the world is a form of “profound faith.” As I wrote in Slate, this is confusing because the religious meaning of faith is “firm belief without substantial evidence,” while the scientist’s “faith” in the laws of physics is simply shorthand for “strong confidence, based on replicated evidence and experience, about how things are.” Further, we don’t have faith in reason: we use reason because it helps us find out things. It is in fact the only way we’ve made progress in understanding the universe. If other ways had proven valuable, like personal revelation or Ouiji boards, we’d use those, too.
=====================
Why do I find this amusing? C. S. Lewis wrote,
—
I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. C. S. Lewis
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/c_s_lewis_162523
—
Coyne uses reason to see the world through scientific means. I have a background in faith that helps me see things in terms of “love your neighbor as yourself” … I see failings of Christians and religion in this regard … wars and suppression of truth … but I also see Christian successes over time too in this regard. When the Roman Empire got overrun and taken over by what I think was illiterate people in the North, The Monks kept education going and copied down ancient manuscripts to give us the ancient Greek and Latin writings in addition to scripture. Hospitals and schools were initially started as religious operations for religious purposes. The abolition of slavery I understand to have had been strongly undertaken by religious people. I’m not saying this out of any deep knowledge of history, but the fight against slavery had a strong driving factor from the pulpits and from those who I suppose … there was some movie popular in Christian circles … Wilberforce … but I’m out of time and can’t confirm my impression that he was deeply religious of motivated by religion.
Still, Ethical Skeptic, I’m intrigued by your moral crusade to clean up science … and I’ll continue to follow your postings. You will though as with anyone who is countering great wickedness, have to continually work to use your anger against the great evil being done, without becoming overly angry at those who are engaging in this evil of misusing science. The Christian can perhaps work against the evil and be constrained by scriptures that say something like “Do not take vengeance, vengeance is mine, sayith the Lord.” Christians also sometimes obey Jesus’ command to “love your enemy” and this mitigates a bit of hatred toward them when practiced.
You’ve got lot’s of experience going for you in your battle against a whole range of both specific issues you weigh in on … as well your careful analyses of the theoretical frameworks of popularized and politicized and monetized science endeavors where truth often is thrown into back seat by people who have become fame seekers or vote getters or money grubbers.
I wonder if Jerry A. Coyne will see this comment (maybe he has some Google Alert or something when his name is mentioned) and wonder if he has views to share.
Thanks again Thomas, a well thought out and cited commentary. I concur with most of what you said. My only departure would line up as follows:
In Coyne and Einstein’s framings – they leave out the objective but also abductive realms of philosophy & skepticism, and how they distinguish from faith & religion. The way they have posed this is too much of a bifurcation to stand as a working principle. For instance:
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, because God said for us to do this’ – Religion
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, will be its own reward inside a high moral character’ – Faith
‘Loving your neighbor as yourself, as a principle produces stronger and more fulfilling societies’ – Philosophy
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, is ambiguous, unnecessarily permissive, overly simple, undefined, signals virtue and can be used to excuse a whole host of evil or to beat opponents over the head when they have done nothing wrong.’ – Ethical Skepticism (Skepticism)
‘ ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’, Sounds great, but science cannot comment on such a principle’ – Science
The realms of philosophy and skepticism are realms of abductive/inductive reason, in which we create standards (ethics) – which also do not require religion and faith to underpin them (morals). The differentiating feature is that philosophy can be vetted by testing (albeit over a longer period of testing than typical science). Faith and religion can never be tested as they constantly shift to accommodate any new or challenging information. This is called a Wicker Man principle. The ultimate special pleading, as it can always contort in response to any challenge thrown at it – in order to make that challenge moot or as constituting a straw man. Faith is always preserved. This is what makes it pseudo-theory; not existentially wrong itself nor wrong to undertake on a personal level; rather, wrong only when one no longer sees it as a personal metaphysical selection – instead as something now mandatory for everyone.
It is not that faith is illegitimate, rather – that its domain does not extend up and to being adjacent to the boundary of science, as Coyne and Einstein framed. Because in that role, faith or religion have pretended to the position of philosophy and skepticism. Unjustifiably so. Coyne and Einstein missed a LARGE part of our duty as mankind. But philosophy can hold both faith, religion and science accountable. It just has to prove out over time in such a role.
The whole of our realm is asking us, “Who the fuck are you?” Applied philosophy is where we answer that question back. I do what I do, through hard learned personal conviction, and not because someone told me it was good or mandatory. The latter is rarely the real thing. If I were a God, I would not be looking for the latter. I would yawn incessantly over the religious chatter.
But with regard to vengeance, pointing out what people are doing to harm others is not vengeance. Vengeance is an appeal to authority. But standing in the gap to counter evil actions – that is a fundamental right which even religions and God cannot take away.
We have to up our game as mankind. This is why we are alone at the present I believe…
~TES :)
Regarding the bifurcation of “love your neighbor as yourself”, I am tending to agree with you, but I’m not sure if you are quoting all the aspects because Coyne or Einstein has made the bifurcation and you think it is unnecessarily complex or you perhaps you are making such an argument tossing into your own view “Ethical Skepticism (Skepticism)” as representing your view. In which case I’ll concede that “love your neighbor as yourself” though valid as a general principle such as seeing yourself as part of a team and each part of the team should be taken into consideration… yet I see the over-simplicity of the idea. “I’d like a meal and am hungry, so therefore I should give to food to everyone else, even though they are not currently hungry.” So some pedantic approach that doesn’t take individuality into consideration is not that helpful, probably annoying etc… Yet criticizing the principle in general is probably a case of over-thinking a simple idea. The morality of that teaching is fine … but it is a good place to start thinking.
You say “We have to up our game as mankind.” It is similar to what the author of “Hebrews” wrote, “Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil. (Heb. 5:13-14 NIV)
It is just an argument that one can’t go from being a “selfish bastard” (though what being a bastard has to do with the morality of people in general is another question … lacking a father figure is sometimes equated with lessened good behavior … probably this idea got ingrained in the thinking of earlier people and our language still carries the imprint of that stereotype) — but people can’t go from being totally selfish to experienced in how to help others right off the bat. It takes experience and practice. The family unit ought to be a place people learn to work together.
Well I’ll leave that idea off for now and address another point.
You wrote the following. “Faith and religion can never be tested as they constantly shift to accommodate any new or challenging information. This is called a Wicker Man principle. The ultimate special pleading, as it can always contort in response to any challenge thrown at it – in order to make that challenge moot or as constituting a straw man. Faith is always preserved. This is what makes it pseudo-theory; not existentially wrong itself nor wrong to undertake on a personal level; rather, wrong only when one no longer sees it as a personal metaphysical selection – instead as something now mandatory for everyone.”
One thing about the Bible though is that is or purports to be a historical document. Having watched the movie Patterns of Evidence by film maker Tiomothy Mahoney, I watched him struggle with certain ideas in scripture. As he was given lots of evidence about the un-historicity (I’m coining a word … sure there is a better one though) of the Holy Bible, he encountered the viewpoint “Whether or not the stories of the Bible are true … they are true.” This could be what you are saying? The idea that the scriptures contain truths even if they are just stories is enough for many people to continue to have such faith.
However it does effect the zeal of people who hold such views. For the events in question Timothy Mahoney concluded there was Biblical evidence to uphold his faith in the historical nature of the Bible. Had he not found such evidence he would have been struggling with thinking that Jesus and the church got it all wrong.
However there are other points in scripture that I clearly see as being not true. We have “genre”.
And so as you said it again becomes difficult to disprove.
I’ll even go so far as to assert that in different times the Bible writers knew what they were writing was false. However, in my thinking they put in a code indicating this.
For example in the initial creation account in Genesis, the first line is Hebrew is seven words, the second line is fourteen words. The entire creation account of the world is a multiple of seven words. Other people even see the first verse as a multiple of seven letters adding to the pattern. Seven days of creation and seven times things are “good” in the account. Chance? Or intentionally worded that way?
Then we got all these long genealogies to the time of Noah. Each ends in a “0” or a “5” and then the other genealogical names end in numbers that can be gotten by adding a “7” to a number that ends in “0”s or “5”s. Other clear errors in scripture is Matthews Genealogy. Again whoever wrote the genealogy put in a statement that the genealogy had fourteen generations from this to then in three cases. Luke’s genealogy does the same thing, but doesn’t spell it out. Instead it uses a couple names in reverse order to link up Matthews genealogy to Luke’s genealogy at the junctures where the 14 generations occur. And so it was said that while Matthew had three groups of 14 Luke’s genealogy had two groups of 14 generations and one of 21 generations. This doesn’t prove a whole lot, except that clues were left to indicate a certain genre … that this is inaccurate … or make of it whatever you want.
The story of Jonah … I’ve heard it said that the Hebrew has a wave mimicking element to it. Fiction?
Ecclesiastes doesn’t come out and say it was written by Solomon. It hints around at it … but it is likely historical fiction. Song of Solomon makes no sense to me from a story point of view. Yet the imagery in it is helpful to understand the emotional intensity that people in love feel, the speeches deal with insecurity and are fine examples of how to make someone feel loved. The Jews reportedly had arguments about whether it should be in scripture and somehow concluded that this was a metaphor of God and Israel, but that doesn’t make sense to me. Paul seemed to perhaps parrot the idea talking about marriage as somehow being symbolic of Christ and the church.
The book of Daniel has all these prophecies, they closely resemble the history of the middle east from Daniel to perhaps the time the thing was fully written. Was it written beforehand? How can that be proved?
On the historical side … let’s look at the Book of Esther. Doesn’t even mention God (specifically). It is a remarkable tale of an attempted genocide against the Jewish people being thwarted. From what I understand there is no historical evidence for any of it. Yet if it isn’t true, why did Jews across the world from that time adopt the tradition described in the book? Why take it upon themselves to celebrate Purim, if there was no truth to the story?
There is a lot of stuff in the Bible and sorting out actual historical stuff or genre or whatever is difficult.
So whether looking at scripture and the need for us to up our game as a people, or just you seeing the need with your experience … skills developed in trying to do good … or whatever better terminology you can come up with … I think our hearts in likely in the same place.
Scripture in the Holy Bible raises a lot of questions and doubt in me … but it seems to outstrip all that with the meanings that I find … and I’m not sure how to explain all that.
“Principle of Indistinguishability: Any sufficiently advanced act of benevolence is indistinguishable from either malevolence or chance.”
Is it because we who are morally flawed can’t adequately grasp any benevolence that is beyond our understanding?
I mean if someone is running a marathon and some stranger on the sideline is offering water to the runners … we can understand that because it is part of our experience. But if someone offers something really outlandish … we can’t really know what is going on.
Minister at church was talking about the Apostle Paul’s second letter to the church in Corinth. Paul had to explain himself as to why he was NOT taking their money. It was offensive to some. Others were wondering if Paul was craftily skimming money that were intended as a donation to the poorer churches in Judea.
I’m not arguing with what you are saying. Probably it is more a reflection of how sad our human state is that we can’t distinguish “benevolence” from “malevolence” or “chance”.
If what you are saying is true, then we will never be able to recognize good done to us on a divine level from God. That will certain lock us into one of the categories of agnosticism — or ignosticism.
On another level you’ve probably been on the other end of this equation too. Ever try to help or hang out with someone … and that person can’t shake the idea the you actually intend good? I’ve had interaction with one paranoid person and as time went on every good deed was construed as some selfish attempt to take his stuff.
One very intelligent friend that I had who died a few decades ago said, “In the absence of evidence people will invariably accuse you of doing what they themselves would do in a similar situation.” He said a corollary to that is “You can learn a lot about a person by the things they accuse you of.”
I’m not nearly as negative as my friend was. Yet with some people suspicion can hijack their lives and cause unnecessary problems. Some millennia ago a King died and his son assumed the kingship. A king of another land sent emissaries to the new King to express condolences for that King had a good relationship with the deceased King and wanted to continue the national good relationship with the new heir to throne. The advisors though to the new King told him that they weren’t really sent to express condolences and wishes for a continued good relationship with the new King, but that they were in fact spies sent by the King to determine ways to invade the Kingdom.
I can see your point, though that sometimes good and bad can be indistinguishable. However the new King decided to humiliate the messengers and send them back deeply humiliated. As it turned out the mere paranoia of the new King and his advisors set in motion a decline in positive relations. Started an arms race of sorts where the New King realized that they were no longer on good terms with the King who sent emissaries … so they hired an army of another nation … and a war ensued that led to a defeat of that nation that originally didn’t accept condolences.
There was a manager at work that I respected. Over time I think he thought my respect was insincere and he became nasty at times. He got a promotion and is now (or was) a “lead manager”. Yet somehow conflict rose up between him and other managers … in part because this lead manager was firing so many people. He has taken either personal time off or was placed on leave … the story is still unfolding.
I understand being suspicious. A friend of mine told me that I don’t trust people enough.
However what was the basis or context of your comment? Was it that if God exists and is kind that we won’t actually be able to determine it apart from some special revelation?
I hope I’m adequately humble about all this. Though I consider that I have a great desire to follow God as revealed by Jesus… I’m such a novice in terms of doing good stuff, … I greatly appreciate your attempts for service to humanity in regard to the light you attempt to cast on the paths that the sheep of this world are on. No doubt there are educated sheep and uneducated sheep. Gullible sheep and proud sheep who repeat back dogmas they were told. Some sheep have some love and some sheep … well it is only sheep’s clothing that we see.
What though are to think as we see sheep dogs and wolves. I am sure the sheep are scared of both of them.
You are among the more aggressive sort … trying to right wrongs and do all you can stop all kinds of insanity that has so rooted itself in modern thinking.
There is a commercial on the radio where medicine of a hundred years or so ago is mocked, “leaches” as opposed to penicillin. Some humans like to think that humans who’ve been around for some 200,000 years or so have now finally got most things right, just about a few years ago.
Up to this time we’ve as a species been “mad” in so many ways. All of a sudden now we’ve got it right, or so we suppose.
Stay out of the sun … use sunscreen if you go out. Eat less salt. Don’t eat fat … eat lot’s of carbs. More and more vaccinations at younger and younger ages. Skip recess for kids so they can spend more time on core subjects. Away with any “right brain” activities for kids, don’t teach music or arts. Child can’t sit still in school?? we’ve got a medication for the kid.
Let’s power everything by electricity. What can go wrong? I’ve lost most of the readers here…
I wasn’t aware of how bad SOME things were in regards to vaccinations till I read your blog. (You aren’t arguing that vaccinations are wrong all across the board … you are arguing that safety processes are not being followed. You are pointing out that evaluations of affects of vaccinations are not being adequately done. Follow-up studies are not being done. The government agencies in charge of overseeing these things are very cozy with the companies making the products.
You could be like President Eisenhower who warned against the military being cozy with industry. However few listened to Eisenhower and the voices of reason are perhaps somewhat outspent by those who put profit over people.
In one of his writings Richard Dawkins felt the problems facing humanity are so bad that only religion can solve can them. (He talked about a certain thing called “superniceness” – if I am remembering this accurately.)
There is a country song that has playing the past few years. “The senioretes no caro when there’s no dannero” (botched the spelling). Lesson: many people only care when there is something in it for them or when they won’t lose anything personal.
Some people have to sacrifice for others. From a Christian perspective I want to do God’s will. I see a whole lot of people who aren’t Christian … who are rushing around mad. Can’t figure out who will make a good leader and who would get the country into a nuclear war. So many are afraid because they don’t want to get labeled.
A candidate running for office says that if she was elected she would violate another countries airspace to shoot down any planes that country or the planes of an invited nuclear superpower uses to drop bombs on territory that they were retaking from a terrorist organization. Arguably staged photos were presented of casualties resulting from such bombing. The candidate won the popular vote but not the electoral college and has been upset about losing. A prior president pointed out that if someone is so sensitive to go around complaining of election fraud that he would not have the emotional makeup to be President of the country.
Sorry to dump all this on your lap. Few realize how fragile things are. I’ve made such comments in reply to some blogs put up a by a pastor that pertain to a sermon given at a church I sometimes attend. Usually I don’t get a response.
Really what can or should one person do about the state of the world … and it’s rush into insanity?
You are setting aside some of your personal time to push for some sanity as you best see it. It seems like your life has been a fascinating and complex journey.
May you have many more fascinating times ahead. And to use a term that straddles the line between secular and religious — I wish you GodSpeed … though I have little idea what the phrase initially meant. Maybe it can tie in with your boating story … maybe it meant a fast journey on a boat?
Hey TD,
Yes, “If what you are saying is true, then we will never be able to recognize good done to us on a divine level from God. That will certain lock us into one of the categories of agnosticism — or ignosticism.” – Correct. This would be separate from our inability to discern each other’s motives – but certainly, if the principle arises with regard to intra-human relations – then how much more for any external party? Perhaps that is a reason they hide?
“In the absence of evidence people will invariably accuse you of doing what they themselves would do in a similar situation.” He said a corollary to that is “You can learn a lot about a person by the things they accuse you of.” – This is pretty good. Yes, I have had this repeatedly done to me over my early career. Teamsmanship was seen as divisive and plotting. But those who made the accusation were merely projecting themselves onto me. And their darkness showed up later – it just took time. These are great quotes, fairly reliable.
But the perspective I framed in the first component of the Law of Advanced Intelligence is – we overestimate our ability to grasp the motives, means and ways of any intelligence far above ours. It is our lack of development, not our propensity to mistrust, which limits us. We are not even to the point where we know enough to mistrust. LOL! We not only have a naturalistic gap inside which we insert ‘god’ but we don’t even know what that gap is… As I look at the universe, its precise and firm boundary conditions, I have no idea whatsoever whether intelligence is the substrate of that – and any claims to the pro or con – are just fantasy on the part of the atheist or theist.
Yes, if god existed and was benevolent – we would not know either condition. Which of course is the basis of ethical skepticism ‘If I were wrong, would I even know it?’ Until we get to the point where we CAN know it (or pieces on the road thereof), ignosticism is the only ethical pathway.
If a person takes the path of ignosticism, there is a certain discipline which shows inside that person. Those who adopt their ontology/cosmology fast, with lots of fanaticist fervor – they are the wolves. Easy to see once you have made the journey. But perhpas one of the biggest indicators (to me) is that the wolves cannot comprehend what you have to say. You can see them, but they cannot see you. A principle which extends far beyond our tiny human-sphere I suspect.
As always, thanks for the readership and kind words,
~TES
This is actually pretty damn good. I have never thought of these issues and spirituality in quite this way. While I am not about to claim myself as an ignostic, and my wife might shoot me if I did – this has to get some thought. Thanks for this shake up in thinking. Or maybe I should say ‘thanks a lot’ as not I am not gonna get this perspective out of my head. LOL. I have not heard this expressed in quite this way or detail before, and howdy is that refreshing at the veery least… so
Could I suggest an addition to The Law of Advanced Intelligence? Would an advanced intelligence be immutable? Would that be a property of such a being or force, if it existed? Immutability. VT
Thanks VT! I appreciate the comment on my work. This is a culmination of literally decades of thought, and TONS of mistakes which have been placed into this. I too had never heard this line of thought before.
Regarding immutability – that would be a characteristic of a god, or the placeholder thereof potentially as well. But when I speak of ‘Law’ of Advanced Intelligence, what I really mean is – the ways in which we regard the issues of any potential intelligence or lack thereof, which would be the substrate (or not) of our reality. The ‘Law’ does not presume a god, nor offer any putative characteristics of such a being. So, immutability would regarded as a characteristic of that entity (a definition which would violate the very Law itself – as Law III states that there is no such thing as an expert in god), and not of our thinking around that entity. Hope that makes sense? ~TES
Wow, this is pretty good. Just read this on my tablet while sitting on an airplane waiting for take off. Continue on! Please sir. Terry
Terry, very much appreciated. I have the plot in my head and some advance sketches – but since I am working, as it sounds like you are… it will take some time. Thanks for the feedback! ~ TES
Hey TES,
Robert from GMOWTF(dotcom) here, the Cornell sh!t-stirrer currently making a film about their Monsanto ties. I’m a huge fan and have been for a while… in fact, I could use your advice on the nature/narrative of my film, as you understand this stuff better than anyone.
I must, however, disagree ever-so-slightly with your assessment in the first few paragraphs of this piece – that a grain-based diet is the ’cause’ of chronic disease. I see this rhetoric passed around a LOT by very smart, aware, truly ethical skeptics and thinkers, but it indeed represents a bit of a trap. If I may:
The only diet proven to REVERSE heart disease (a scientific miracle in itself) is a (whole) grain-based, ideally low-fat, oil-free 100% plant-based diet with no meat, dairy, or processed vegetarian foods (fake cheese etc.) … the evidence for this is outstanding, replicable, replicated, and has real value for real people… like your father and mine, who recently died from heart disease as well, and might still be around if he wasn’t socially barred from this life-saving information by our propagandized world.
This same diet cures diabetes – a relatively easy disease to cure, but nothing works better, faster, than the plant-based approach. It also works on a host of other ailments, in fact, 15 of the top 16 leading causes of death would be ameliorated or outright stopped with a switch to a whole-food, plant-based diet.
It’s so easy to fall into the trap that
1) food pyramid is BAD (it of course, is)
2) grains at bottom of food pyramid
3) big ag grows grains en masse
4) GRAINS are the problem and cause these diseases!
I used to think this way too. That is, until witnessing with my own eyes people miraculously getting better eating whole grains, low fat, whole foods, whole plants, etc.
I think you’re FAR too intelligent to fall for this pseudo-conspiracy.
I’m not saying that:
-big ag is good (OBVIOUSLY)
-glyphosate is good and should be sprayed on grains (duh)
-grains are necessary for health, and one must eat them
-avoiding grains is a stupid idea (I in fact am starting to avoid them myself)
-other dietary approaches and experimentation don’t deserve merit or experimentation (I for one love nutritional science because it’s the most real, applicable, experimental science there is)
However, one CANNOT deny that there are people that are ALIVE today because they switched from meat, dairy, and processed foods to whole grains. This is a heart-healing diet, we literally see plaques reverse, and thus, heart disease vanish.
NO ONE needs to die from heart disease, ever. This is a simple fact of life we’ve learned through honest nutritional science.
The burden of proof is on ANY OTHER diet for showing this effect. So far, crickets, especially from the keto crowd, who obviously realize that heart disease is an achilles heel of their approach. I’d love to see the long-time keto follower who doesn’t have plaques in their arteries. Even mummified eskimos from thousands of years ago (no grains, pre-industry) had massive heart disease from the animal protein and fat in their diet!
You and I both know that no one is actually eating whole grains from the cornbelt. No agribusiness is getting rich from people switching to a T Colin Campbell diet and reversing their disease. They get sick from eating the PRODUCTS of this commodification, not the raw product: meat, dairy, corn syrup, vegetable oils, (biofuels too – stupid). In fact, the whole system would utterly collapse if we all miraculously shifted to a predominantly whole plant diet.
The real skeptic would be well-served to set aside this false accusation and fight the right targets: oils, processed foods, meat, dairy … ALL of these food groups are linked to heart disease and diabetes.
I’m not totally sold that cholesterol levels are the devil, by the way. There is plenty of nuance in my treatment of the subject. BUT it is extremely important to realize that the whole “cholesterol doesn’t matter!” meme is coming from people promoting terribly unhealthy (and environmentally devastating) diets that are actually killing people.
The longest lived, most disease free people on earth all ate majority of calories from starch (often grains). It’s important that we don’t forget this in favor of pet theories about nutrition and disease. It’s important we keep our level of skepticism in line with real world evidence affecting real world people – skin in the game.
Thanks for all that you do! I wish more free-thinkers would begin to realize the power of whole plant foods… even if their tastebuds put up a temporary protest. I’m still waiting to see people reverse heart disease on grass-fed beef and butter. I won’t hold my breath.
Bob,
What a great post! Yes, I do recall you and the Cornell discussions. Thanks for being a loyal follower and reader – I will strive to keep to my core principles yet make my writing a bit less dry, and more entertaining over the coming years. I have a small but fiercely loyal audience. And that is good. :-)
Meet your first keto-diet/MCT Oil/Butter, no grain, no soy, no canola, no cottonseed, no corn consuming person with ZERO heart disease. Me.
This is as certified by the head cardiologist at my nearest big city cardiac center, via catheterization/angioscope. In the middle of the procedure the head cardiologist ‘hmmm’d’ and said ‘You know TES, you have ZERO arterial plaque in your heart, anywhere – this is not right. Even 17 year-olds have plaque buildup of maybe 10% or so, but you have ZERO percent. You are doing something, and I want to know what it is.” I said “Doc, how do I rank as compared to all the patients you have seen as a percentile?” – to which he replied “I have performed over 10,000 catheterizations and heart surgeries, and I have NEVER found anyone with ZERO arterial plaque, so you are THE single exception. Please write up what you are doing and bring it in your follow up appointment.” I eat no wheat, no dairy (except some cheeses), no soy, no corn – my whole family suffers when we eat these foods. As well, I used doxycycline and EDTA for two years. As a skeptic I heard about what this formulation can do, so I tested it upon myself – and it worked. But you have to use BOTH – the testers did not want to test both (they feared everybody going crazy with this) so they used elemental pleading to show that either by itself does not work, which is correct. But doxycylcine and EDTA together reverse heart disease by killing the chlamydia pneumonae bacterium which exploits arterial inflammation and by chelating out the free calcium from the bloodstream which becomes an integral part of the plaque.
As well, I do medical and food strategies for nations. I see a pronounced diabetes schism in nations where cultures are highly bifurcated by food imports and practices. People who eat their indigenous diets of animal proteins and local plants, have very low diabetes rates – in contrast, the portion of the populations which import US grains have 50%+ rates of diabetes – for the same genetic profile of those who have low rates of diabetes thru consuming the traditional diet. And the urban populations are typically more physically active. There is one nation who imports US grains 100% where the diabetes rate is so high, that I flagged it as a strategic risk for the nation. 40 years ago there, hardly anyone had diabetes. In poor nations, those who are poor in rural settings have very low rates of diabetes. Those who are poor in urban settings have very high rates of diabetes – and the difference? These countries import Grade B US coarse grains. High in lipopolysaccharides.
But I had a strange thing occur when I quit wheat in 2004. My cholesterol, which had been chronically around 250-260 for 15 years, suddenly dropped to 110. My doctor asked me to increase my fat intake. I told him that I ate plenty of fats – but that I had quit wheat just 6 months earlier. It was the reduction in arterial inflammation which had caused this. Wheat inflames the arterial lining in some genetics (others can eat it fine), and causes it to release C-reactive protein 1 into the blood stream – where this signal is received by the liver – which in response releases LDL cholesterol as the patching and repair compound for inflamed arteries. This chronic inflammation causes a sustained LDL blood level – and combines with the calcium phosphate shell left behind by chlamydia pneumonae bacteria which infest the inflamed arterial walls. So LDL cholesterol AND calcium shards, together create arterial plaque. This is why the doxycycline and EDTA were so effective for me.
The New England Journal of medicine Aug 2004 cited what I believe to be the culprit – Lipopolysaccharides. The signature chemical on salmonella bacterium. Grasses use this signature chemical strategically to repel mold, bacteria and fungi. But in the human body – it signals to the Adaptive and Innate Immune Systems, the false presence of salmonella – and causes a sustained state of autoimmune inflammation. This – I believe – to be the link between diabetes and heart disease. A root cause of both. This wheat/grass chemical sensitivity is what releases the cholesterol in my genetics. This happens in dogs as well, and is the reason why they removed all wheat and corn fillers from dog food 15 years ago. Cows get around this chemical problem by having a two stage powerful stomach/acid process. We cannot eat grass nor wheat which has been highly hybridized with wild long-grasses (which is almost all of it now) to improve mega farming shelf lives – as it will give my genetics thyroid disease, pituitary disease and finally diabetes – through Hashimoto-like Innate Immune System dysfunction. So, the longer the shelf life of the wheat – the more dangerous it is to humans.
So I am investing in a solution for this dilemma – especially helping these developing nations with a lot of sick people – which will roll out over the next three years. But I cannot go into that. Suffice to say, we need to be eating safe gains – not dangerous grains. And we still have a long way to go. Farmers need to be compensated for growing digestible and safe grains, and not simply for how low they can make their operating costs become. This is killing hundreds of millions of people at this moment.
Thanks!
TES
Thanks so much for this in-depth dive! I’m def going to save and digest later as well.
I can tell we’d be friends lol, and I can see exactly why you’re so adept at calling out the fake skeptics! My whole start in this ‘realm’ was from losing my health and regaining it through personal observation/experimentation.
I’m very curious as to the outliers and exceptions when it comes to disease healing. A keto-vegan diet was shown to reverse heart disease as well, but was slower. There are all sorts of things that will slow/reverse heart disease for various reasons… I’m personally thrilled by the Chinese tonic herbs (reishi, which probably dovetails with the microbio/immune aspect of your approach nicely). I love weird techniques and isolated components of health, but at heart I’m a hippy who loves to keep things wholesome. I believe homeostasis and radiant health are attainable long-term through simple things, even if intervention is needed.
I say start from what we know works for almost everyone, and tailor from there. Caldwell’s heart disease reversal has been shown to be over 95% effective – a literal miracle. Even if we don’t stay on the diet forevermore, EVERYONE should know about this. The simplicity of it is amazing.
What do you think about TMAO and animal products? I feel the keto crowd can become a bit reductionist when it comes to the microbiome-heart disease thing. The funny thing is the vegans have the best microbiomes, and their flora produce almost no TMAO! This is huge for heart disease. It also makes me feel even stronger that animal protein is more a culprit than the fat. That’s what the bacteria putrify to create it. It literally drives plaque into our artery walls!
Totally agree about the lame grains going on today. Such terrible breeding programs and corporate paradigm severed us from the best food ever created by nature and humans. We don’t even know how bad it has become! That’s why to me, the seed savers are the real heros!
Thanks!
Rob
Ethical Skeptic, do you have an email? – WT
Yes WTomp,
It is
theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com
TES 🙂
Wow, tell us what you really think why don’t you? I think you shot down this aircraft with a 10 megaton nuclear missile. I don’t understand half of this stuff, but it sounds good.
Thanks cccP, I guess… *shrug*
I love it. Absolutely love this editorial. And while I do not totally grasp everything you said here (such as what predicate evidentia is???) – I get your overall message and what each point is. Well said Ethical Skeptic! Needs to be said.
(I am a lapsed MUFON member, but this gets me so fired up to start doing field investigation again!)
Bill
You can find an outline of terms in the Glossary at the top right hand side of each web page, or examine how it is used inside the Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation (can be found by the link in the right hand side panel – the brown icons). Praedicate Evidentia is a boast or implications as to the evidence backing a purportedly scientific claim or counter-claim.
Praedicate Evidentia – hyperbole in extrapolating or overestimating the gravitas of evidence supporting a specific claim, when only one examination of merit has been conducted, insufficient hypothesis reduction has been performed on the topic, a plurality of data exists but few questions have been asked, few dissenting or negative studies have been published, or few or no such studies have indeed been conducted at all.
Thanks for the positive comments!
TES
It is a worry that the public discourse has deteriorated to the point where this sort of piece is even thought worthy of consideration. The same sort of dynamic seems to have taken the universities (esp social sciences) in the US by storm.
George Orwell clearly flagged the dangers in “Politics and the English Language”. I hope he was not expecting that his contributions would improve matters. They have got worse, not better.
Clear thinking is a rarity.
Yes, the simpleton and methodical martial art of denial. It is used on a number of subjects in order to force social conclusions and agendas – in the name of science or skepticism. I am a lifelong observer and student, obviously. :-)
Just saw a catchy twitter comment. I have no way of knowing which postulated problem is worse though. Depends though on the situation. “Our problem is not so much the unanswered questions but the unquestioned answers out there.” This saying does though illuminate the need to be cautious about our unknown ignorance .. as you’ve been saying.
It is a great quote. It is not that knowledge is all uncertain – just that pseudo-theory is often never questioned.
The Ethical Skeptic, what strikes me in that quote “pseudo-theory is often never questioned” is that a wrong theory can have some very compelling arguments.
For example, we can easily question and see the errors of the flat earth people of the past. However at the time without understanding the law of gravity, numerous very compelling arguments were made against a round rotating earth. One very solid argument is that immense centripetal force of a rapidly world would throw everything off the surface of the planet. Remember if you don’t know about gravity, that would make a great deal of sense. Other arguments not knowing about gravity would raise the concerns that all the air in the universe, relatively static compared to the earth, would make very fast winds on the earth’s surface if the earth were spinning so fast. I mean it would seem sensible to think that if the earth were spinning as fast as it is that we would have to live underground just to not get blown away by really strong air currents.
Other things that seem sensible (when our knowledge is limited) is that there would be no energy source for “continental drift.” We know that radioactive decay inside the earth powers the convection of the mantle and that this drives the movement of the continents.
Another thing that seemed sensible at an earlier time was that our world could not be that old. If we don’t understand nuclear fusion (as was the case in the past) then the lifetime of the sun would be limited by how much combustible fuel could be in the sun before it would be exhausted.
On another note: yesterday I listened to a video of President Eisenhower’s “farewell speech” that he gave upon leaving office. While we are aware of his warnings about the “Military-Industrial Complex” he also had some warning about research. I can’t say that I fully understood his point. But his point did include a concern that government sponsored research would bend the development of research from a search for truth, to the pursuit of government grants. I hope I remember that accurately.
Anyway I appreciate what you have written over the years. I’ve got so much catching up to do to learn more of your thoughts etc…
T. E. Skeptic, this is now much easier to read. I have been reading comments in the past, but it required a work-around. I had to scroll the comments … a portion of the background was lighter and I had to scroll comments through the lighter part of the background to read the text.
You’ve made some kind replies to the two comments or so that I made in the past … I was just limited in my ability to reply in a way that would have added anything at that time.
Most people who write have a lot more experience in business-like and friendly correspondence. Even in my life and especially at work, I don’t engage in a whole lot of chit-chat. I’ll talk, but when the bottleneck to productivity gets cleared I’ll want to be working again. All that is to say that while I appreciate kind comments that you may make … I’m a bit at a loss how to respond. I’m not super socially adept nor am I really quick thinker, in terms of “speed” of thought.
Having said that, in comment blogs I often spend a lot of time thinking and working on things that I write … which makes me appear smarter than I actually am. Everyone is different. I’m not denigrating myself. You are an amazing student of people … you’ll probably be wondering about these things.
Counter-balancing my relative lack of email and social experience, as compared to most professional people who learn to email and write business things on a daily basis, is that I’ve had many years of commenting experience on several blogs and forums. I’ve had to work on my writing a lot in my life. I am very friendly/well acquainted with the delete or backspace button, for I write so much that isn’t worth having people read.
I look forward to seeing what happens in this format on this blog.
Now that I think about it, and you confirm that there was no way to read comments, except by using that illuminated band of sunlight in the background photo, my comment feature was pretty lame and unusable. I get a fair amount of readership nowadays, about 150 or so visitors and 10 or so links to various blogs, forums and comment modules per day – but not a lot of comments here. Maybe this will change.
TES
Charles/Thomas, I also have a couple questions when you get a chance… Are you reading the comments from the hard to read bottom of the blog post page? I have been reading/approving my comments from the WordPress Comments interface, which is easy to read – but I realize that comments are hard to read at the bottom of my blogs because of lack of contrast with the background. This has not traditionally been a comment heavy blog…
UPpdate: I just uploaded a Plugin ‘wpDiscuz’ to manage comments and make them visible at the bottom of each blog. We shall see how it goes with that.
TES
I meant also to raise one additional point. If, what you say is true – that pseudo-science can never be “a body of unacceptable knowledge” as you put it here, then what do we do with chronic bunk subjects and endless mysteries which fester on and on in blurry photos and hoaxes? Are we not to put these subjects out of their misery, with some sort of official commentary by skeptical scientists on the matter? Does your form of skepticism not tend to leave us in an endless cycle of “Epoche”, which gets us ultimately nowhere? – when resources wasted on so much crap, could be much better spent on examining real issues of scientific merit?
Your thoughts when you get a chance.
CP
Hello Charles P. While we wait for the Ethical Skeptic to give his response I have been thinking of some topics that have some bearing on some of the flaws of the skeptical movement. If I give a long answer it isn’t because there is anything particularly provocative about your question, but rather like a baseball player waiting for a particular pitch to cross the plate your expressed thoughts allow me to connect what I’ve been thinking about to what I’ve been pondering commenting about on the TES blog.
In particular your thoughts then about when to put a subject out of its misery as opposed to “an endless cycle of ‘Epoche’, which ultimately gets us nowhere?” is what I’ll venture a few thoughts on.
First off I think the Ethical Skeptic gave some very good guidance in his article. He wrote, “The question in the mind of the ethical skeptic should be ‘If I were wrong, would I even know it?” and “If I were wrong, would I be contributing to harm?”
So to use your example of “blurry photographs and hoaxes” … let’s deal with the “blurry photograph” angle first. In my mind, this will include 1) Big Foot photos 2) UFO photos 3) Loch Ness monster photos. Each of these topics, in my opinion will have little risk of contributing to harm. So while from a standpoint of debunking some TV show peddling a controversial theory … it will be interesting to learn the true facts about why the TV show peddling a theory might not be honest … probably very few people will die as a result.
Stakes get higher with other topics. “Vaccines save lives” — granted. But how about when they take lives or deprive people of their health and diminish their mental function? This also scientifically proven to happen. Whether it is just a few very serious cases or whether there are uncounted instances of lesser damage … damage not noted by researchers … this is a topic The Ethical Skeptic argues has a lot of bearing on our society. If the Ethical Skeptic is right with his chart in a prior post about a potential curved distribution of negative effects to vaccines … then we have a real serious problem that needs to be better understood and addressed.
Now back to when to put something out of it’s misery. This ought to be done in a positive way. What do I mean?
At one time I didn’t believe in evolution. After trying to understand the issue and honestly debate it … I read a book that Richard Dawkins wrote and his use of examples made the subject clearer to me and I then I embraced evolution.
Another topic that is highly politicized is “climate change.” I’ve been on both sides of this topic. I’ve even asked questions on one of the highly touted sites and met with extensive censorship, sloppy responses and ridicule. Perhaps in this instance, people were more eager to put what they felt was my flawed position “out of its misery” that they didn’t bother to address my concerns. As a result they made me more of an enemy — or rather they made me realize that they were not clear thinking and concerned individuals … my respect for the people I was hoping would change my view plummeted.
That isn’t to say that I’m not in favor of good ecological practices. For example if the climate trends warmer or colder, wildlife should have corridors to land or elevation levels where the habitat will allow them to live.
So in summary, as far as putting bad thinking out of its misery, let’s realize we don’t need to make enemies. It is better to teach a man how to think than perhaps to tell him what to believe. Tell someone what to think and he may have learned one thing. Teach someone how to think and you may have taught him many things.
If you want a good example of “where the rubber meets the road” in an intersection of an alternative theory from someone who was a target of skeptics, to where alternate science and alternate thinking sheds light on accepted theory. Watch the following YouTube video.
Joe Rogan Experience #961 – Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson & Michael Shermer
Michael Shermer made a misstep or two but he recovered nicely and kept his friendship with Joe Rogan the man who puts together the Video podcast. Also it shows how science advances … sometimes well outside established scientific channels.
The Joe Rogan episode mentioned above has some serious implications for us. If we don’t understand the past and the calamities that have taken place in human history then we will be surprised when history repeats itself. As it is, we humans evaluate the risk of danger from asteroids and comets to be extremely low. In the past few years though scientific modeling of the disruption of the orbits of the several hundred kilometer wide “Centaurs” that orbit in the Jupiter area provide additional source material for earth bombardment …
Also an outside the box thinker, Egyptologist David Rohl has made what appears to me to be an air-tight case that Egypt’s traditional chronology is off by hundreds of years. The first person to crack the Egyptian hieroglyphic language went to Egypt with a Bible and made a mismatch with a known Biblical event, Pharoah Shishak (plundering the temple treasure amassed by Solomon) with a Pharoah named Shoshank. Egyptian chronology (due to an attempt to use the Bible to date it) has been off ever since.
I say that David’s overthrowing of Egyptian chronology is “airtight” because his new chronology lines up with a mass of information … including astronomical observations like very rare patterns of eclipses recorded in other areas, patterns of new moons that line with up the right Pharoahs and not the traditional chronology.
The movie Patterns of Evidence in which film maker Timothy Mahoney wrestles with finding evidence of certain Bible Stories takes an interesting twist when he finally finds David Rohl. It is a very skeptic friendly movie …
From my own life, I know I’ve been wrong before. And as The Ethical Skeptic points out, how can we even know if we are wrong? Take for example the theory of plate tectonics. It required a generation of scientists to basically die out before the new theory was accepted. Same thing with the comet impact hypothesis on the North American ice sheet. Certain sloppy critiques of the hypothesis gained a lot of attention but the theory keeps getting stronger and stronger with more and more impact proxies found.
David Rohl believes that entire generation of Egyptologists will need to die out before a new chronology can be widely accepted as normative and true..
You’d think radiometric dating would answer these questions, but you’d be wrong. Filters are applied over the raw radiometric dating results to adjust for who knows what, but then we find that people don’t know that fact…so they give credence to current results, not knowing the filtered and adjusted radiometric dates been tweaked for the local conditions or for whatever reasons the scientists tweaked the results to make them acceptable to the Egyptologists.
I started reading the Ethical Skeptic a few months back. I was just getting comfortable joking around with my son calling stuff “pseudoscience” and then I read The Ethical Skeptic and he helped balance out a bit of my cockiness. I can hardly follow much of what he writes … it might be as close as I’ll ever get to a college education.
I apologize in as much as I might appear to have interjected myself into a personal discussion that you have addressed to The Ethical Skeptic however this is still public and The Ethical Skeptic is a busy guy … so if I gave a few thoughts that he might agree with … maybe I saved him some writing. Now he focus on answering your question about his Hanoverian style and “Johann Gottlieb Fichte” and other stuff.
Charles, Thomas has done an excellent job in responding to this valid concern you raise. I too am frustrated with chronic bunk subjects which just seem to waste everyone’s time and get us nowhere, decade after decade. But, as a researcher (who has actually funded studies and gets very upset when his money is wasted), and as a former lab head – I have found that, unleashing the dogs of denial by means of authority serves to impart much more damage than does any actual bunk subject itself.
The first rationale for this, is exactly what Thomas pointed out. Our concern is about our ability to know if we are wrong, and then to estimate harm which might result from such a condition. What we practice as a method to get the right answer inside one subject (bigfoot does not exist), may indeed as a method then cause a harmful mistake when used inside another topic (vaccines do not cause harm). I prefer to use the right method in all subjects, without passion and prejudice. An authority never really knows if they are wrong, because they rarely get any feedback on the quality of their thoughts and methods. And in considering themself an authority (or skeptical authority identifying bunk), they also fail to question their own thoughts or the harm that their conclusions might entail. Once in a position of authority as a lab director, or even a skeptic – I must guard against imperious assumptions (and my own ego) even more than I do bunk.
The second is the principle that ‘My trust is in the processes of science, not the null hypothesis itself’. Even if the null hypothesis is a parsimonious negation (which it often is), I do not treat its contention as a belief set then as well. One which compels me to start telling people that this negation is therefore now authority. This is known as an Imposterlösung Mechanism. A null hypothesis which has grown into status as a club belief or religion – because it is difficult to approach with epistemology. Bigfoot, UFO’s, the Loch Ness monster – I am not contending that these entities exist, but the null hypothesis has grown into an oppressive cult-like following; one with such power that, even if they did exist, we would never know it. And that concerns me more than does a hoax in support of any of them.
My third concern is Ockham’s Razor itself. “Plurality should not be posited without necessity.” There are two errors which arise from a club, citing something as being a ‘pseudoscience’ (and I take note that you did not use that word in your raising this point, and am curious about that??). 1. They are essentially changing Ockham’s Razor into “Plurality should not be posited” (even worse, based upon one’s current knowledge) – in other words “The Simplest Explanation tends to be the correct one” – which is highly misleading and imperious, except in cases of special pleading, and 2. Once necessity is raised, it should be served. If 750,000 people have directly (not subjectively) witnessed something, trust me – plurality has been raised. Our ability to ignore the necessity of plurality, is not a testament to our rationality nor critical thinking in the least.
Finally, what I have learned is that an outside club managing quality, never works. In fact quality checkers bear a higher failure rate typically than do the processes they are checking in the first place. You can hear me blather more about this in my post: Ethical Skepticism Part 8 – The Watchers Must Also be Watched (https://theethicalskeptic.com/2016/06/13/ethical-skepticism-part-8-the-watchers-must-also-be-watched/)
Anyway, that tends to be my criticism towards the declaring of wholesale subjects to be bunk. Hope it is at least coherent, if not making some sense… :)
Thanks
TES
Ethical Skeptic,
I must offer, that I have read a number of your posts over the last month or so. And while I disagree on several points with respect to the conclusions you draw, in the small number of issues where you do express personal opinions; I remain impressed with both your grasp of, and ability to express, skepticism in a way which I have not seen posed before. I have especially enjoyed this post, The Riddle of Skepticism, as well as your post regarding the nine features on good philosophy. I would say that some of the masters which I use in my instruction, could have used a lesson or two from you. Did you ever have anyone comment that you craft an argument in the style of one of the masters I teach, named Johann Gottlieb Fichte – a German Philosopher (your writing style is very Hanoverian I might add) – credited sometimes as the founder of German Idealism. He promoted the tripartate dialectic style you use – although you tend to slam your points home a bit harder than Fichte might. But, then again, you have cited an error in philosophy – and he merely incrementally developed it, (if I am to borrow some of your language here).
I teach an undergraduate level course in philosophy, with focus on the Age of Reason (hence my fascination with German philosophers) and will use some of your material in this Fall semester.
A pleasure reading your site.
Charles P
Charles, I am most flattered by your kind assessment. I do not know much about Hanoverian ‘style’ – but my ancestry is Scottish-Luxembourg, so it is sure to contain some influence in that regard. I am not a student of the classic philosophers. I had the classic courses in undergrad and grad school, but grew weary of Plato, Seneca and Socrates. This as much as anything turned me off to chasing the topic into the middle ages and beyond. While I do regard this as a weakness in my offering, I also consider it an advantage as well to have derived much of my philosophy organically. We are not simply looking at Plato’s allegory of shadows on the wall of a cave, as we (prisoners) are having interpretations of those shadows spun for us by people who stand to benefit from the interpretations themselves, or by even those who are the captors to begin with. So, the human heart is the first domain of skepticism for me. Only thereafter we can break free from the shadow fixation and observe what reality we can discern.
Nonetheless, hopefully what I have to say here can challenge the minds of your students to evaluate the processes by which we arrive at knowledge before (I am assuming they are young) they are brainwashed with the counterfeit version of it. I hope it can add value in that regard.
I will do some study on Johann Fichte as well. I get pinged for being too loquacious at times, not something I would anticipate from a German philosopher??? Perhaps it is the Pictish/Celtic in me. Poet Warrior (or at least my fantasy as such). LOL!!
Thanks again, and wow!
TES
An interesting reflection on “Evidence Based Medicine”- in the talk linked to below, at 18:20 onwards Dr Brock discusses meeting the couple who invented the term “evidence based medicine” and their discomfort at the way the term had been hijacked initially by insurance companies and used to avoid considering any therapy that is inconvenient for one reason or another.
Brock is a chiropractor/functional neurologist/ with an additional qualification as a nurse practitioner and will soon also be an allopathic doctor and PhD. He has felt it necessary to go to that extent to get round the barriers and restrictions to practice (via the “scope of practice” pretext) which have been established in the US. I suggest that is being done with a view to preserving the monopoly of allopathic medicine.
I am grateful that you made a window out of Walt Whitman’s poem, for those of us who are babes in the woods in matters and norms of logic, but sense in “critical path” something of electric value and use! : )
Absolutely Jennifer,
I love Uncle Walt. The segment is not an exact match to the idea of critical path – but then again, I am not sure that any snip of material from Leaves of Grass could be an exact match to simply one point. But there is not doubt that this segment of “Thoughts” parallels the central theme of ethical skepticism. I possess an aversion to pointing out the ‘bad people’ – but feel that in this instance, even the Captain of Alons! Alons! – and clarion call to challenge norms, had to undertake the ignis punga of pointing out the methods and results of those who are doing it incorrectly. That is not exactly the same as pointing out the bad people, based simply upon their beliefs I suppose.
~TES
As a person who believes in evolution, I can think of another parallel where modern people have got things so wrong. Skin color evolved as a natural sunscreen. Darker skin has been selected for where UV radiation is very strong and the skin can easily make vitamin d. In areas where UV radiation is lower or nearly absent very pale skin evolved so that people can make the maximum amount of vitamin d possible given limited UVB availability. Given that we spend so much time indoors we also fail to gradually tan when the seasons change. So when we do finally get out into the sun our pale skin gets burned, since our bodies haven’t had the chance to tan and produce protective melatonin.
However because people in authority in governments and singular interested Dermatologists with a singular focus on preventing skin cancer all we hear is that we need to avoid the sun. The flip side is that we lack the vitamin d that our ancestors produced.
I’m totally in agreement that vaccinations should be researched and studied. I’ll also add that there is strong evidence for a vitamin d component to many modern ailments … including autism. With vitamin d being necessary for the immune function to work optimally and so many children being vitamin d deficient, and most pregnant woman also lacking optimum vitamin d blood serum levels … I could go on an on. There is lot of really groundbreaking work on Vitamin D that is easily accessible at:
https://www.vitamindcouncil.org/
including a page specifically about the observed roles of vitamin d deficiency in autism, (some theoretical connections – or proposed methods by which vitamin d helps prevent autism, and then some ways in which vitamin d deficiency is correlated with autism — and correlations should be looked into as I think you might agree with.)
https://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health-conditions/autism/
Hey, (just to be funny) even a creationist can accept that God put people in certain areas where their skin color was optimal for the amount of sunlight received at that area.
However to be scientific again, consider that the people with strongest Jewish genes hailed from a group of Jews that lived in the blackest (skin color-wise) area of Africa. Reason being that the genes for extra melatonin were selected for (no doubt selected from the genes of those indigenous to the area) in order to prevent deaths from skin cancer, or you could say those with the lighter skin died off in larger numbers.
In the United States people with black skin color have higher rates of all the diseases that accompany being vitamin d deficient. Vitamin d interacts with lots of genes … and thus vitamin d deficiency creates a large amount of problems.
My wife used to call me a “Vitamin D evangelist.” At one time she was deficient and had a lot problems that were immediately alleviated when she supplemented with sufficient vitamin d. Then when she stopped taking it the problems came back. Then she took it again the problems went away. This happened several times till now she is fairly regular with her vitamin d supplements. Her symptoms were bone pains and a tendency to tilt over and almost fall.
I’ve been perusing your blog comments today for hours and possibly even annoying a Christian friend who is “a token Christian” who has been in the habit of kindly socializing with skeptics and he writes about science too … even in scientific journals and major newspapers from time to time … I probably/possibly annoyed him by sharing a bit too much about what seems to be happening to the skeptical movement … your articles are solid critiques … your link to Pharyngula’s blog which had another recent comment linking to some other skeptic going off about how some skeptics are supporting people who committed criminal activity … I had no idea what was going on …
Take care and I’m glad to see your incredible efforts to get to the truth … and knock out of the way those who suppress truth. I’ve even one of your blogs where you warned young people about some dangers of joining a religion. I came close to putting up a scripture there. Jesus criticized religious people for scouring the world to win a single convert and then making that convert twice as bad as even the ones spreading their religion.
I’m not saying that every instance of religious evangelism is that bad … but too much of it is. The God you rejected is not the God I serve. I’m not saying this in a disrespectful way. I would not and could not serve the God that acts the way most Christians describe. In any case, I’ll share theological thoughts at some point when/if you post about such a topic. There will probably be a tremendous amount of overlap with what you write and what I’ll write. In any case it is also good that you avoided religious enslavement and that you warn others against it too.
However you brought up some scientific issues … I’ll just let you know a lot has come out about vitamin d in the last decade or two. It will likely take you days of research to get up to speed. (It took me much longer, but the science is now more established and it should take you a lot less time.)
A decade or so ago I would spend some three hours a day reading new scientific findings that were being released. Maybe twice a week some new study of finding about vitamin d was coming out. Several years back a few people that I persuaded to take vitamin d had some annoying effects from it and stopped taking it … and I have largely stopped evangelizing vitamin d as a result.
Oh well.
So many issues that a concerned person can have. Particular geo-political stances or military positions can raise international tensions. Sometimes these seem to be raised more because a particular agency can get more funding if there is a plausible enemy.
From my Christian standpoint, anti-science Christians and Christians who suppress the meaning of Jesus parable of the Sheep and the Goats … these undercut lot’s of good that Christians should be doing. My blood pressure is going up just thinking about how obstinate Christians can be.
I’ve probably been sitting in this chair now for some six or eight hours and I can’t even bring myself to do the sensible thing and edit this. Too worked up to do a final reread. I’m thinking in part about know-it-all evangelist John MacArthur who I sent numerous letters to and even a two-part book set called THE GEOLOGICAL TIMESCALE 2012 2-VOLUME SET and never even got a reply.
Yet a few decades earlier I was in cult and when I sent them letters they responded and learned and started changing doctrines … even changed doctrines that I didn’t know needed changing. I’m not claiming to be the only or most important agent of change in that church … it is possible that i was a necessary part of the changes. Some people listen and some people don’t.
You are getting close to now having 200 blog articles written. I’ve read possibly 15 of them maybe only 5 to 7 of them totally. And the links provided lead elsewhere for more to learn. I guess I’ll be learning here for a long time. Aiming to read 1 a day might take me almost a year. Pardon the abrupt end to this comment.
With lot’s of respect,
TD
Awesome Comment Tom,
Yes, I take Vitamin D – 10,000 IU daily and monitor my blood levels once per year. I also drink fulvic/humic acid to replenish the nutrient lost in our hyper accerated plant growth (in depleted soil). And methylfotate, since I am MTHFR and suffered macrocytic anemia most of my life from getting useless folic acid shoved down my throat each day by the ‘there’s no difference’ zombies.
It is a battle. :-)
That’s a great graph- where did the data originate?
Thanks MB, I neglected to add those from my analytical work and into this blog entry. They were listed in the blog which originated the graph for the most part, but I have added them in as 9 specific sources I used in the analysis, as footnotes 1 – 9 in this blog, section 2, first paragraph. TES
As I said elsewhere, the very emphasis on double blind RCTs is a deliberate ploy to prevent entry into the health market.
Quite apart from the mischief caused by the pseudoskeptics, there is a place for a serious conversation about the value of small size trials- even n=1trials, and also the pre-eminence of double blind trials.
One problem is that many therapies really do not lend themselves to double blind trials (ie EMDR, neurobiofeedback), and some therapies (ie neurorehabilitation) are so individualised that it is difficult to make meaningful comparisons between cases to allow aggregation of data.
It is plain for all to see that the current preference for enormous prospective double blind RCTs has set up a situation where these studies are very expensive and can only be done if there is a reasonable chance of making your money back on a profitable patent.
Clearly that suits one segment of the health market. Of course that is just a coincidence. Isn’t it?
Yes, cherry sorting by the cost threshold of being able to craft reliable observations and results – a way of making it impossible for probative studies to be accepted as reliable. Very good point.
A 15 year old I respect, started following/commenting on your blog. Therefore I’m struggling too to read through all this. To paraphrase you, (from the (ABOUT section) this blog is written at a very intellectual level, and it requires a lot of specialized knowledge to follow what you are saying.
Please bear with me as I share some random thoughts. I thought of a few Biblical parallels to your writing. (I’m a Christian, who fully embraces science … and I’m probably as zealous or more so than you in opposing Young Earth Creationism, flood geology … and I’ve got little use for any “intelligent design” angles that seek to poke holes in evolution.) Still, I’ve only had one semester of college and that only in Graphic Design courses… many areas of my life are a “wreck” but no ones knows about it or cares. House needs repairs … for example. That is to say I’m a pretty normal lower-class blue collar guy.
However back to “Biblical parallels” — your recitation of reasons why you qualify as a Philosopher is an impressive list of accomplishments. Stylistically it reminds me of the list Paul wrote in 2 Corinthians 11. Even your escape from an African country seems to parallel what Paul wrote, “In Damascus the governor under King Aretas had the city of the Damascenes guarded in order to arrest me.
But I was lowered in a basket from a window in the wall and slipped through his hands.” (2 Cor. 11:32-33 NIV)
You grew up Christian so maybe the Bible stylistically influenced your writing – even these decades later. I”m not sure whether you intended it to appear that way, or perhaps the same genetic, behavioral traits that made Paul write the way he did, made you write the way you did. Both of you are appearing to undercut frauds. You are working against skeptical frauds while Paul was against religious frauds.
The second parallel I thought of, as it relates to you is a parallel with Jesus. (I’m not getting into what Jesus “really” taught, so if you’ve got a different historical viewpoint on Jesus, I”m not intentionally wading into that discussion) – however Jesus according to the Bible had a controversial mission that brought him into conflict with religions leaders of his day. He spoke in Parables, in part, to keep people from fully understanding what he was saying. By claiming to be the Son Of God he was putting himself in a situation where others would want to silence him.
So Jesus used parables to postpone / delay persecution and the death that he intended to suffer later.
You are similarly avoiding unnecessary conflict by using very specialized language with some philosophical jargon to avoid suffering for either/ yourself, others who rely on you (like people you work with or family members etc… ) or both. … I’m probably exaggerating the difficulty of understanding what you are thinking. I can follow your main arguments quite well (I think). It is possible that you could write in a more everyday level and get more readers but on the other hand it would expose you to a lot of stupid rants. I can think of one high profile debater who avoided amateur debates.
One parallel … Christian debater named William Lane Craig chooses to only debate people who have a PH. D. He once debated someone, and strung some points together and said ‘”therefore an atheist can not say “X”” to which the atheist just said “X — see I just said it.” William Lane Craig then decided to only debate people who had a PH. D.
No matter what ones belief system is there are lots of people who will go for cheap rhetorical victories.
I intend to keep following this blog and your twitter feed. Some of your retweets have been to other twitter accounts that I find most interesting. The volume of fascinating anthropological at this twitter feed of PaleoAnthropology is very interesting.
You could say that I find your wide-range of interests,- very interesting!
I oughta run for now. All the best,
Tom
Tom,
Wow. My heart is warmed and encouraged. So excellently written and flattering to say the least. I wish I really knew the apostle Paul or Jesus, so that I could draw some such comparisons – but I really myself, shy away from such things. Yes, I speak in methods and ethics, so as not to cast my lot into specific issues of the day – and get dragged down in some skeptic’s display of their martial art of denial. That produces nothing but more propaganda for them. Plus, if I can teach ethical skepticism, people will begin to discern these issues for themselves – without my persuasion on them at all. As for ‘biblical style’ – yeah, I read the whole Bible 5 times, and many parts of it hundreds of times, so it had to have an effect on me to at least some degree. But the majority of my writing style has been honed from writing articles and professional reports. Reporting to stockholders on the progress of a project or the critical issues with which the company must grapple.
Thanks for following my blog and twitter. Keep up with college – as it is critical.
Thanks again!
~TES
Thanks for the article, it points out a number of significant ways in which confusion can arise.
I do think, though, that it could have been taken a little further.
All theories are formulated in dependence upon a set of foundational beliefs.
For instance much science is conducted by Scientific materialists, who take it as a matter of faith that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter, ( and hence that there is no possibility of God or Paranormal phenomena).
Many others take a position based on the opposite idea.
It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption (Bertrand Russell tried very hard to prove that it was possible, and failed, later, I understand that Kurt Godel managed to develop a proof that Russell was attempting the impossible- though I find his work very heavy going).
What I am really saying is that good scientific method has to be based in a sound understanding of the assumptions on which we base our thinking.
A good example here is the neurologist Antonio Damasio’s book “Self comes to Mind”. He believes he has established that consciousness is a purely phenomenon. He has not donethat, but he has produced a very deep and instructive discussion on the way the brain animates the body and translates consciousness in to action.
MB,
Yes, I struggled with this article for a good 8 months before penning it. The struggle was over exactly this issue you have broached.
1. How does the soundness (validity of its premises) of the theory play into its role as pseudo-theory and
2. How does the ultimate verity of the theory relate to its status as pseudo-theory?
My conclusion was that they do not. The theory’s (hypothesis’) formality, soundness, logical calculus, etc. are well know facets of argument discourse. The irony which elicits this is the fact that a pseudo-theory can also mature into one day being a real theory – whereas a wrong idea can never mature into being right. The status of pseudo-theory pertains more to the idea – is this a hypothesis, ready for exercise under the scientific method – or is it merely a construct, which has been promoted to the status of a theory, or even truth – without due process?
So, pseudo-theory pertains more to the state of maturity of the idea (construct) in terms of its ability to be addressed by science, and NOT to its soundness, formality and logical calculus or truth. That comes later IF we have no promoted it to truth and into a state of exemption from vetting by science.
TES
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption”
I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?
Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?
(BTW, I did notice one problem with the idea:
Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”
Let it be X. X must validate itself or else it ,b
Correct re the falsifiability. Russell’s work was about mathematical models of course. Within that world, Riemannian Geometry is a good example. If I recall rightly the key defining assumption there is a model where parallel lines do intersect. Almost 40 years ago I read Russells autobiography. I know the outline of Godel’s work, but really no longer have the maths skills to understand it fully. Too many years of working in medicine (and conforming to treatment protocols that looked dodgy at the time, and have proven to be so) while being fully aware that to not conform would be risking medicolegal suicide, have blunted my higher faculties.
There may yet be a difference between mathematical systems and broader worldviews (though I have never seen that proven. A quantum physicist (don’t know who) said “Give me one miracle, and I can explain the world”. Back to our unfalsifiable primary hypothesis again.
The most sophisticated system of thought and philosophy I know (Buddhism) comes close to no assumptions- but it works on the idea that sentient beings know suffering. I guess that the assumption here might be that sentience is defied as awareness of the difference between suffering and happiness.
(Apologies, I posted it before it was ready)
… or else it, by definition, is not “the source of all of one’s knowledge” because there would be knowledge outside the system. So it is impossible to know that one’s worldview is true. Likewise, one cannot prove that one’s worldview is false because that would be knowledge outside the system.)
P.S besides the obvious – denying the possibility of knowledge (skepticism) – I have been
able to think of one possible solution to the problem which I shall explain subsequently.
See the thread below. What do you think?
“God, by definition, is that for which no greater can be conceived. God exists in the understanding. If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality. Therefore, God must exist.”
This is called an “Appeal to Plenitude” – it is a form of using the concept of infinity (of in this case, greatness) as a lever to ‘prove’ an argument. It is a form of pseudo-theory. It is rhetoric, a genetic fallacy and more specifically sophistry. I do not have permission in philosophy, to grasp at infinity as if it were an object, to insert into either a soundness or logical calculus modus ponens. It is not. In the same manner, ‘the supreme greatness’ is simply a code word for this same principle (plenitude/infinity). There are eight schools of thought on the role of infinity, inside philosophical assertions. Seven (and maybe eight) of them, reject the notion of infinity as a logical object.
Gödel should have known this – and by not possessing this basic element of philosophical discipline, disqualifies him as a philosopher in my eyes. It is as dramatic as not knowing about DNA. If you do not know about DNA, you should not be speculating about the origin of life. It is as simple as that. Not sure if that answers what you asked or not?
1. My solution that I referred to before is this:
What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable. What do you think?
2. “Not sure if that answers what you asked or not?”
Not clearly enough for me. My question was in reply to,
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption”
(Do you agree?)
I said,
“I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?
Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?”
Was Gödel’s proof along the lines of my argument? Which do you side more with, my argument or my solution?
And what does your comment have to do with what I am saying?
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption”
A ‘world view’ is a rhetorical concept, not a philosophical one. I cannot comment on it because it has no meaning. Science is based upon observations and an epistemic base.
I just do not understand these statements, what they mean, if they are related, sequitur or dependent, and why one would pose them all at the same time even if they were??? Gotta help me with these, as they are not coherent to me:
“What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.”
“I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?
Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?”
Was Gödel’s proof along the lines of my argument? Which do you side more with, my argument or my solution?”
“A ‘world view’ is a rhetorical concept, not a philosophical one. I cannot comment on it because it has no meaning. Science is based upon observations and an epistemic base.”
It sounds weird to say it has no meaning, not to mention that I said,
“Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge” ”
“I just do not understand these statements, what they mean, if they are related, sequitur or dependent, and why one would pose them all at the same time even if they were???”
I just do not understand that statement or what it means.
“What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.”
See above where l said,
“(BTW, I did notice one problem with the idea:
Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”
Let it be X. X must validate itself
… or else it, by definition, is not “the source of all of one’s knowledge” because there would be knowledge outside the system. So it is impossible to know that one’s worldview is true. Likewise, one cannot prove that one’s worldview is false because that would be knowledge outside the system.)”
“I guess that means not at least one assumption that is not falsifiable, right?”
I assumed that b/c of a conversation you had with Fred Emmer (sp?).
“Do you know what Russell’s attempted proof otherwise was?
And what was Gödel’s proof that it was impossible?”
I was responding 2 this:
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption (Bertrand Russell tried very hard to prove that it was possible, and failed, later, I understand that Kurt Godel managed to develop a proof that Russell was attempting the impossible- though I find his work very heavy going).”
Now I know that wasn’t you (if you had noticed, I was replying to you not MB. That’s because I didn’t know MindBody would still be on the spot and assumed that you might know).
“Was Gödel’s proof along the lines of my argument? Which do you side more with, my argument or my solution?”
This was my argument:
“(BTW, I did notice one problem with the idea:
Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”
Let it be X. X must validate itself
… or else it, by definition, is not “the source of all of one’s knowledge” because there would be knowledge outside the system. So it is impossible to know that one’s worldview is true. Likewise, one cannot prove that one’s worldview is false because that would be knowledge outside the system.)”
And this was my solution:
“What if all sources of knowledge were valid? Then all knowledge would by definition be from within the system which would allow the theory to be falsifiable.”
And I don’t understand what your comment about the “Appeal to Plenitude” had to do with what I was saying.
“…and why one would pose them all at the same time even if they were???”
How else would I ask?
‘Let us define a worldview as “a belief system which is the source of all of one’s knowledge”’
It is not a sound definition. The words, belief, system, all, worldview are all colloquial and rhetorical. They really do not have the meaning which you are ascribing to them.
Our knowledge is based upon observation and an epistemic set of replicable incremental risk extrapolations. None of these are assumptions, beliefs, nor are they really a ‘system’. Some people do make metaphysical selection choices above and beyond our base of science, and that is fine – but that tolerance of choice does not therefore impart one the permission to call ALL of observation and epistemology “belief systems” – as this is a misrepresentation.
It would be like a shoplifter, calling the legitimate shoppers in a store ‘fellow thieves’ – it is not the same context at all – just appears to do some of the same things (they both pick things off the shelf and walk out of the store – so the shoplifter desires the activity to be seen as one in the same). This is called a flaw of identity. A belief is not the same thing as an observation nor a replicable proved risk extrapolation. Even tho they might look like the same thing, as a ‘belief’ – in reality they are not.
“It is actually not possible to establish a world view that is not based on at least one assumption (Bertrand Russell tried very hard to prove that it was possible, and failed, later, I understand that Kurt Godel managed to develop a proof that Russell was attempting the impossible- though I find his work very heavy going).”
Gotcha. Now I understand. Again, it depends upon the equivocal use of the word ‘assumption’ – An assumption is a piece of proxy information which one uses to test an output variable. It is not the same thing as a input variable. When I run an exotic material test. My input variables are the material, the ion bath, the apparatus, the electrical current, etc. None of these are assumptions. They are input parameters, which are based upon replicable risk extrapolations which proved out in the past.
An assumption would be therefore, ‘I assume that the beta phase transition of titanium will be the same phase state change time as the beta phase transition of iron’ I do this as an incremental extrapolation of risk, so that I can test another output variable – the amount of heat required to make the phase state change. The assumption allows me to run a scenario. This is the scientific definition of assumption.
In the belief world, assumption means ‘final guess I have bought into without much evidence to support it’ In this regard, whether or not one can go through a rational life and avoid that misstep or risky step is again… an argument of plenitude. It is taking the extreme and irrelevant version of a matter and pressing it to its infinite end. It is rhetoric. :-)
The system in question, is scientific materialism, which really boils down to an underlying assumption (which I maybe carelessly labelled as a world view) that all conscious phenomena are epiphenomena of the collision of atoms and subatomic particles, according to rules which are all known to us.
It is a common view, and influential in many academic circles.
As you have correctly pointed out though: A ‘world view’ is a rhetorical concept, not a philosophical one. I cannot comment on it because it has no meaning. Science is based upon observations and an epistemic base.
Now the specific problem I have with the scientific materialist position is that it can only be maintained by ignoring evidence that does not fit in with it. That, of course is not scientific, but the world of science (at leastin Medicine) is full of dodgy curves of best fit, and illegitimately deleted outliers.
Now the specific problem I have with the scientific materialist position is that it can only be maintained by ignoring evidence that does not fit in with it. That, of course is not scientific, but the world of science (at leastin Medicine) is full of dodgy curves of best fit, and illegitimately deleted outliers.
Exactly MIB, one of the reasons why, while I am an epistemologist – I am not a materialist, nor a material determinist, nor a nihilist. I have run my own studies which have falsified each of these religions. Whether or not the angry people who use science as a way to work out their anger at (whomever) can catch up with that or not, I really do not know. But it does not matter. Yes, a common view, and insistence in academic circles.
Science is actually usually leaps ahead, and arriving at different conclusions, from those conclusion foisted by those who pretend to represent it.
“the angry people who use science as a way to work out their anger at (whomever)”— Nicely observed. There are hordes of them furiously trying to block any serious questioning about glyphosate, supplements, vaccines, whatever. To me they look like idolators.
LOL!! There are hordes of them. Hordes are achieved as the result of simple training systems.
This is why I work inside skepticism. I am not making a claim to represent science. I am however, making a claim to represent skepticism in defense of science (from malicious players, ‘idolators’ if you will, yes).
Every time I accidentally ingest corn and my face breaks out into 25 bleeding sores (which all started in 1996), if reminds me of the mission we are on, to defeat the pretenders who propped up this charade of science.
Tell me, what is wrong with what I am saying?
And if you disagreed with what MB said why didn’t you address it to him?
I did address my reply to him.
“It is not a sound definition.”
Then what is? The difference being what?
“None of these are assumptions, beliefs,”
One must still assume or believe in their validity.
“nor are they really a ‘system’.”
The difference being what?
Regardless of what you want to call it, my point is that any source of all knowledge must validate or falsify itself or else it by definition is not the source of all knowledge.
“Regardless of what you want to call it, my point is that any source of all knowledge must validate or falsify itself or else it by definition is not the source of all knowledge.”
Plenitude. It sounds like an argument to a layman, but it is not one. Infinity is not a logical object.
What is mute I gnosticism?
Mute Ignosticism – is the discipline which says ‘until we have a better definition of our realm, a better definition of consciousness and its relationship to this observable universe, until we have better definitions of god, spirit, afterlife, soul, existence, boundary conditions, the hard problem of consciousness, the incremental problem of my self, the observer effect, and more ethical research into the phenomena which we observe and ignore inside our social realm – until we have done our work on these things to an ethical standard, and not a pretend (religious) one – then I cannot make a conclusive comment nor even propose a salient and sequitur question regarding any of these matters.’
The difference between that and passive agnosticism (which is what?) is what?
And would you describe yourself as a mute ignostic? And why not as a passive agnostic?
Q: Does the treveleton consort with the variflax in the final realms of cojuntication, or is it merely the pneuquestroton alone? Please select one option.
Passive Agnostic: I do not know whether or not it is variflax cojuntication, or if it is merely pneuquestroton. Perhaps someday we will all know.
Theist: It is obvious to the honest heart that variflax consorts during cojuntication.
Nihilist: You are an idiot if you do not see the rationality of the pneuquestroton. There is no variflax, just like there is no cofluz bbrenge.
Mute Ignosticism: None of these terms bear any meaning, and the question is incoherent and agenda-laden in its crafting. Therefore I cannot make any comment inside this context of discussion.
I am an ignostic because the position is one of disciplined skepticism and clarity. A passive agnostic is simply undecided, wallowing in an incoherent bifurcation which was enforced on him without his awareness in the first place.
~TES
It’s only true skepticism when you have doubted all of your core beliefs. and it’s obvious you have not. try again
Examined your core assumptions; not ‘doubted your core beliefs’ (the latter is agenda-speak). And you have no means of ascertaining such a judgement from this blog post. None…
You are obviously offended by these tenets, which hints to me that you are a wholly bought into the poseur persona; a fake skeptic. You conflate doubt with skepticism and have no idea about any of my core assumptions beliefs and what I have done to challenge and examine them (of which I have challenged, examined and changed most ALL of them). Making a claim with ZERO evidence is not skepticism – it is the fake form which comes along with ‘methodical doubt’ as you just applied here. Nice try – but you failed the test miserably. When you graduate from high school, sign up for a course in philosophy, if you are able to choose college as your next step.
You can’t compare rankings with ratings, silly.
A ‘rating’ with a closed set domain of subjects is the same as a ‘ranking’ – and yes, when both rank and rate the entire domain of subjects, the two can indeed be compared. Unless you know of some alien civilization which you are implying should be inserted here to bust the domain rating back into relative-ness? No cigar for you, “silly”.
This is a great example of ‘hearing a statistical principle but not really understanding it’ (aka Mt. Stupid).
I note you cite American grain in particular, and then go on to provide an (unreferenced) link to what I think is a paper by Nancy Swanson et al on disease increases associated with Glyphosate.
I am sure that glyphosate residues are one of the big problems but there is great difficulty in finding out how widespread these residues are. In short the question is: do you have any information about the safety of non American grains?
I conducted a food strategy in a country where 100% of the wheat consumption was from heirloom traditional varietals. GM tech when only for profit and glyphosate were banned. The level of diabetes and obesity was 1%. This country used many varietals of ancient to 150 year old grains. I conducted another strategy in another country which employed a mixed set of practices. 65% of the country imported and consumed US grain, 35% lived a lifestyle where they did or could not consume US grains. Of the urban population who consumed US grains, the rate of diabetes/pre-diabetes was 50%+ in the adult population. Of the population who did not consume US grains, and instead consumed their traditional diets, the rate of diabetes was 1%. My leading construct is that traditional grains are not presenting the same problem as do US grains.
Glyphosate only works supporting food plants which are genetically modified to be mostly tolerant of it (they still accelerate 15 – 20% in their growth, but not enough to die). So, if your country does not grow GM food right now, then it does not use glyphosate on food; however it still may use glyphosate for other applications which contaminate the water and soil. You will have to see what your government agricultural & environmental ministry carries as data.
Yes, you are also correct – I had referenced that Swanson graphic in an older blog post and re-inserted the image here, thinking that it had the sourcing reference in the fine print. I have added the recitation info.
TES
Well said TES.
It’s now also in the scientific literature that something known as “obesogens” are also potentially causing obesity. The fat accumulation is initially protective as it keeps toxicants (like POPs) away from organs and tissues, but overtime these obesogens are released into the bloodstream and still cause harm. “Fat people are just lazy and inactive” is overly simplistic and does not apply to every case of excess weight gain. It’s being documented that maternal nutrition also influences eating behaviors and hunger through epigenetics. This is something out of the individual’s control yet it leads to behaviors that influence a disease that is commonly blamed on the person. Nutrition is extremely important in the role of weight gain and obesity especially considering the effect pro-inflammatory diets have on the body… And as you mentioned, a certain something added to the food supply has contributed to the problem. Negative shifts in gut bacteria are important in many diseases and we have to ask “How does the human body and brain respond, who is susceptible, and how do we treat this?”
You asked these questions and have found ways of modulating your diet in such a way that it promotes healing and resilience (anti-inflammatory). Well done.
8)
Thanks Pragmatic Skeptic! 8)
And thank you for the notice on the Scientific American article as well!
TES
Are you aware of the work done by Swanson et al looking at the correlation between glyphosate usage and increase in a number of modern diseases in the USA ?
https://www.organic-systems.org/journal/92/JOS_Volume-9_Number-2_Nov_2014-Swanson-et-al.pdf
Also a book was recently released in Canada called Poison Foods of North America – author Tony Mitra.
https://www.organic-systems.org/journal/92/JOS_Volume-9_Number-2_Nov_2014-Swanson-et-al.pdf
He has collected data from the Canadian government about glyphosate residues in foods on sale in Canada.
This issue is of great concern and,given the confidence intervals for the correlations noted in Swanso’s research I am certain that glyphosate must be a major driver of ill health.
The paper has been attacked by the social skeptics, but only in a roundabout way that avoids commenting on the main issues.
Social Skeptics are masters at avoiding the critical issues inside any argument. They focus on irrelevancy and could care less what core issues reside. Thank you for these two resources. I went ahead and clipped the abstract into the blog post if you do not mind. An excellent headline addition to this somewhat packed post. Thanks!
Pingback: Méta-liste de paralogismes – French Libertarian
Pingback: Scientific Consensus or Political Consensus? – pragmaticskepticism
Pingback: Scientific Consensus or Political Consensus? – pragmaticskepticism
Have seen this happen in multiple areas. The “Skeptics” are a shady dishonest network of people who will be “sketpical’ of anything you pay them to be skeptical of.
Max, they are “For Hire” – no doubt about it.
~TES
Pingback: Top 20 Countries with the World’s Highest Atheist & Agnostic population | Bug 2k
Pingback: Top 20 Countries with the World’s Highest Atheist & Agnostic population | 1234 Trump
Nihilism is not a religion it’s a form of skepticism (like atheism), so it’s is a disbelief not a belief. Atheism and nihilism definitely are not the same viewpoint,they are similar in that the are both denials and lack of belief in popular (and unfounded) claims, but the similarity stops there as they are obviously denials of different abstract concepts.
Nihilism is not a lack of belief. It is not a disbelief. It is a belief. What you have cited is a common special pleading equivocation used to work as a masquerade. Nihilism is also not a form of skepticism as it does not rely upon research, does not hold several options open at once, and considers a specific conclusion as rational and scientific conclusion. These are all incorrect religious apologetics.
Pingback: GMO Safety, Organic Farming, & Veterinary Discussion Blog
Pingback: Bulag sa Katotohanan | Dedicated Songs
Pingback: A Reply to the User “autistinquisitor” – pragmaticskepticism
Hello,
I saw your post on Skeptiko where you analyzed the EVPs that were recorded by a user named Matt. I was wondering if you could do the same analysis of three EVPs in one audio recording. Also, if you can compare the voice from a recording of a person while he was alive to the second EVP. Supposedly the second EVP is this lady’s dead son and the first EVP is Jesus! Both the EVPs and the recording of her son when she was alive can be found here http://channelingerik.com/the-sheila-show-and-more/
Ethan,
I bear an allow-for ethic on this type of matter and am not afraid to examine taboo subjects of this nature. Fake skeptics already hate me, and they cannot touch my career so I am free to think and investigate as the evidence leads.
That being said, I can certainly run the audio files through scrubbers and develop analytics around the measures, dynamics and ranges – but that type of analysis won’t address the subjective questions you are asking here. The software won’t tell me if the two voices in two separate mediums are a match to the same person. As well of course the software cannot tell me if the second voice is Jesus either. I would caution against using analytics to feign the appearance of scientific approaches where they do not actually have salience. That is an issue upon which agenda skeptics will pounce and (rightfully) declare that a person does not understand what they are doing.
All that being said, I will take a listen and see what jumps out of the media as interesting from a sound engineering perspective. Will that work?
TES 8-)
Ethan,
The first YouTube file is covered over with bike noise and one of those stock YouTube base and tweet backing tracks (scoops the middle so you can still hear the video but have music in the background if your mind is ADHD and you have to have rap backing for attention sake), so the sound was very muddy. Unfortunately however, what the bike noises and the rap beats do – is masque the sound so that the analytics cannot pull off a clean signal form of just the voice. A second consideration is that the voice is in an acoustic echo chamber (garage), so I would get a reverberating voice mixed in with the NON-reverberating music. This won’t allow me to filter out the high and low ranges in which the music plays, cleanly.
Then, the EVP track won’t download as the website is indicating that the EVP file is corrupted… ??? So I could not get access to the EVP file, nor listen to it.
If you have the original sound files for either the video, or the EVP track and can send them to me. I can give it another whirl. ???
TES
Pingback: Revealing Piped Pipers Breaking the Social Contract – GMOnion
Pingback: Social Skeptic Websites and the Lies They Tell – pragmaticskepticism
A better correlation would be to environmentalism. One of those Northern Europe countries has a city with the most bikers. Btw, I tried to read The World Is Flat, as you recommend, but could not get through it, because it is too cheerful. Try reading This Changes Everything instead.
Will do Paul! Thanks.
Reblogged this on pragmaticskepticism and commented:
Excellent work! I am never dissapointed by what The Ethical Skeptic brings to the table of philosophy and epistemology. Where can we grant TES the internet “winner’s award” for the most current revolutionary writings within the realm of philosophy that there is?
Great post! Pseudoskeptiks are the new mafia, the war against homeopathy, acupuncture, herbal, supplements and so, except Monsanto Round Up, “Science Based Medicine”, or the hard drugs. I never see any critique for this three products. In my country, Spain, the pseudoskeptiks close with violence the teach of homeopathy in universities. CSICOP make a cases, in a similar form of Tim Farley Whats the harm… It’s a very large history.
What is your opinion of this site?
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/03/debunking-pseudoskeptics-csicop-james.html
PD: Hey men, why not try change the background of your blog? The coments section is difficult to see. My eyes cry when I try read!.
Egger, thanks – I have considered changing the background. To date we have not sought to be much of a discussion site; rather more of a resource/reference. I would love to say ‘because we have plenty of those,’ but the sad reality is that we only have sites where brainwashing is enforced by fake skeptics.
I do have a link to the CSISOP site on my sidebar, to show that there is some solidarity against this fake representation of science – but of course a link does not necessarily imply that I agree with everything posted at those sites. 8)
I am not a conspiracy theorist, more a person who advises nations on corruption. So that makes me appear at times to be one. 8) TES
I came across this site while researching an article on misuse of regression models in research studies that claim to demostrate causality. However, I happen to be a very keen seeker of truth about dietary issues – for me a life and death matter – but I happen to teach computing and specifically topics related to human-computer interaction that include Interaction Design, User Experience Design, User Interface Design and Information Architecture. In this regard, the website could be improved. For one, most people these days (see stats from phone companies and Google) access the web via smartphones and tablets. This site is challenging to access from those devices and even from a computer. Consider simplifying it because it’s content is of great use. This diet issue is greatly fascinating to me. I live in the Great Rift Valley of Kenya and wonder, what if we got some Americans to live here and eat the rural diet for some months, would it change their well-being status? One America lady stayed around for a while and said she stopped her medication because the local food seemed to solve her digestive issues. I never understood how that could be explained but now I am seeing a very simple possible explaination. We may soon have dietary tourists or westerners who live outside their nation in “diet-safe” environments but continue working online for American firms…
Yes, this site is not optimally adjusted for phones. The pictures do not autoscale yet – which would be appropriate for tablets of smaller size. But I do proof read my articles on my iPad while I run on my treadmill, so they are very readable on that size or larger platform. I am trying to figure out how to autoscale images here shortly, which will be a great help for tablet readers. I watch my google analytics, and there are fewer phone and tablet readers than you might think. 68% of my readers access from desktop units. 22% from tablets, many of which are larger than my iPad. Only 10 – 15% access the site from a phone. If you are trying to hash though issues of scientific philosophy on your phone – god help you. But – I will say as well, I do use the Tree of Knowledge Obfuscation on my phone, in quick lookup circumstances – and it works great. I also finally found a comments engine which would work, just last month. So this is a long work in progress. That being said however, it is not supposed to look like every other blog out there. And believe me – every blog out there looks exactly alike to me. Written and appearing like a fourth grader’s textbook. I am not interested in attracting that readership.
Yes, my health improves when I spend time in India. My rosacea goes away and I feel better. But getting the agricultural corporations in America to listen to this is like asking our major banks to stop counting their money. It will never happen. We have to simply make it impossible for them to continue business under the current model.
Thanks for reading!
~TES
This is an incredible write up, TES. To add to what you wrote, here is more relevant science regarding the epidemic of autism:
Nevison, C. (2014). a comparison of temporal trends in United States autism prevalence to trends in suspected environmental factors. Environ Health, 13(73). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177682/
“The quantitative comparison of IDEA snapshot and constant-age tracking trend slopes suggests that ~75-80% of the tracked increase in autism since 1988 is due to an actual increase in the disorder rather than to changing diagnostic criteria.”
Dave, D., Fernandez, J. (2014). Rising autism prevalence: Real or displacing other mental disorders? Evidence from demand for auxiliary healthcare workers in California. Economic Inquiry. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.12137/abstract;jsessionid=EDA31CC40A2BC6358D480853F07EC7BC.f01t01
“These estimates suggest that at least part of the increase in autism diagnoses, about 50–65%, reflects an increase in the true prevalence of the disorder. (JEL L11, J2, J3)”
DeSoto et al. (2013). Professional opinion on the question of changes in autism incidence. Open Journal of Psychiatry. Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=30182
“Results suggest that among professional psychologists with a terminal degree (n=88), the majority believe that diagnostic changes can not fully account for the observed increase; 72% reported wither the true rate may have, or definitely has, increased.”
Hertz-Picciotto et al. (2009).UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute study shows California’s autism increase not due to better counting, diagnosis. UCDavis Health System. Retrieved from http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/welcome/features/20090218_autism_environment/
“Published in the January 2009 issue of the journal Epidemiology, results from the study also suggest that research should shift from genetics to the host of chemicals and infectious microbes in the environment that are likely at the root of changes in the neurodevelopment of California’s children.”
Reblogged this on pragmaticskepticism and commented:
Very intelligent work, once again, from the ethical skeptic. Social skeptics like Steven Novella and his followers are ignoring facts regarding the autism epidemic. It is also “funny” that these so called “experts” don’t even understand the pathophysiology of autism in the first place. Yet we see them making definitive assertions that when looked at closely, are demonstrably false. The public is waking up; our lives and the lives of our children have been riddled with languish, despondency, and devastation. We do not accept your lies.
Pingback: Foundation Works on Ethical Skepticism — The Ethical Skeptic | pragmaticskepticism
Pingback: Deception Through Abuse of the Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Fallacy | pragmaticskepticism
Hey man, what is your opinion of Edzard Ernst? I smell fraud from Ernst. Dr. Hann wrote important analysis.
Enjoy master.
http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/355916
Egger.
Ha! Dude! You hit me with a Meta-analysis right as I was writing my diatribe on meta-analyses. LOL! The blog has nothing to do with the study you sent. 8-) So take no messages from it. LOL!!!
I will be examining this study and the work of Ernst. Thanks!
TES 8)
Hi. Do you have an opinion on homeopathy? Thanks.
Hey Lee, great question.
I am mixed on Homeopathy. The treatment of sickness with ‘like condition’ based medicinals is not something I have studied. So I cannot comment upon that version of homeopathy. The treatment of conditions with ‘infinitesimal dilutions’ is something which I would have difficulty in understanding how it works – the problem is that I have never ever encountered that version of homeopathy in my entire life – so I have no idea if it is even real. It must be, somewhere because this is what the pundits keep bitching about. But the HPUS does not define homeopathy in this way. So, baffled there. Finally, the list of effective and commonly used public domain medicinals in the HPUS irritates the hell out of some powerful people. So, the question is, which of those three things is ‘homeopathy?’ Why the mismatch in definitions? I smell Wittgenstein Error at play.
I have created two blogs on my limited foray into homeopathy here, and while it is not a comprehensive research pathway by any stretch, it reveals enough for me to understand that an agenda, a well funded one, is underway to squelch probably all three of these definitions of homeopathy. When information is low, and propaganda is high – and the people being paid to create and enjoy that circumstance are seeking to remove human rights – something is wrong. The question, is why.
http://theethicalskeptic.com/2014/10/11/contrasting-the-usfda-and-social-skepticism-definitions-of-homeopathy/
http://theethicalskeptic.com/2011/02/23/anti-homeopathy_propaganda_proves_false/
So, I question movements based on the strawman of defining homeopathy as ‘infinitesimal dilutions.’ That is not how the HPUS defines the discipline.
When I look at the homeopathic medicinals on the shelf in the store, the only difference I find is that homeopathic remedies cost way less than the big pharma solutions which have purchased the eye level shelving slots. Otherwise they invariably turn out to be the same ingredients and the same mode, form and dose.
Thus, while I do not support homeopathy per se, I also do not trust the group decrying it at all. That is about as far as I have gotten with the subject. Sorry.
TES :)
Hey guys; My analysis of homeopathy and pseudoskeptis is avaliable:
hezeptikos.blogspot.com/2016/03/estafa-periodistica-2-el-informe-de.html
Best.
What is your opinion of the “extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence”?
Yes, excellent question. That Sagan quip is THE single most abused one-liner in the entire arsenal of fake skepticism. By promoting an observation to status as a ‘claim’ – one can then apply the fake ‘Occam’s Razor’ – declare the claim to not be simple, and dismiss it as if it were a THEORY. Poof – follow that by the ‘science has found no data for (praedicate evidentia)’ and you are a scientist-skeptic master black belt of denial. This is exactly how it works.
A magic trick. A deception.
I blogged on that here:
http://theethicalskeptic.com/2012/03/18/deskeption-observation-vs-claim-blurring/
and here:
http://theethicalskeptic.com/2015/05/17/why-sagan-is-wrong/
TES :)
Please look at this 1991 EPA memo about glyphosate. Notice that three of the toxicologists did not sign and wrote things like “DO NOT CONCUR”. They “explained away” clear evidence of tumor causation by glyphosate exposure. Their explanation does not make sense. This is a cover-up of a classic kind, by obfuscation and weasely language that “sounds smart” but in fact makes no sense.
http://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/chemicalsearch/chemical/foia/web/pdf/103601/103601-265.pdf
Pingback: Why consensus is the go-to argument around here - Page 2 - Mothering Forums
Please research the historical record.
History is to politics what data is to
physics. It is the empirical evidence writ
large. You will find the very fallacious
hollow claims, the automatic unthinking
presumption of the intellectual high ground
in the progressive era. This is merely the
latest manifestation of the totalitarian
ideology first,conceived in the 19th century.
I can assure you that familiarity with this
worldview and its history will yield predicative value. (They will be proned to infighting, should start happening within ten years or so.)The,scientism of which you speak was present in both communist and fascist thought. This is all there. Note: though these progressive tendencies usually stem from the left, this is not an endorsement of right wing politics as there exists a leftwing faction in democratic socialism that seems to avoid these problematic outcomes if history is any judge. Not advising you to adhere to any given worldview but only to read the available data should you choose. Rousseau and the French revolution through to Marxism in Russia to Mao, Rosenberg and NS etc. It explains all of this. Compliments on your insights.
Yes, you will find that I have some competent development along these lines in my posts: ‘What is Social Skepticism?”, “The Social Lie Called ‘Privilege’,” and “The Richeliean Appeal to Skepticism.” The Social Skepticism movement is totalitarian in nature, and political at its core. It has nothing to do with science. This is only a costume it wears. Once they are in power, history shows that they will kill any ‘scientists’ who dare to think differently than them.
Thanks for the compliments.
I expect that the notations above will fall on deaf ears and blind eyes. I have an I.Q. of well over 140 and found reading the above tedious. The text is obviously well considered and shows excellent thoughtfulness. However, most readers are neither literate enough or motivated enough to wade through the brilliance to glean the basic propositions set forth.
I once had a philosophy professor (PhD) who suggested to us that if we wanted to make a difference in the world we must speak and write to others as if we were addressing junior high school youth. If we are unable to condense our ideas to that level we would do well to move into the ivory towers of academia and not try to effect change with the masses. This holds true in this instance. I would like to see the sessions in greatly reduced vocabulary usage and clear brief points.
However, my mind is open and I wish you well with your endeavor. (:
Dr, Eastwood
Reverend and Dr. Eastwood,
I could not have written a better critique of my own work. Every point well taken. I too bear the curse of an IQ of 145+ (the test I took only went to 145). Having delivered an extraordinary amount of technical writing in my professional background, that certainly flavors my writing style. It does therefore become tedious and sometimes verbose or complex, through my attempts to be precise in the message related.
But I would counter, as I do in my inner monologue, with two things. First, the purpose of a blog is not simply to package writing for the average reader. We have literally thousands of cute kitty and muffin recipe or photography blogsites. The purpose of this blog is in part, to exorcise those thoughts which indwell me – raw and honest, and deliver them with a faithfulness which comforts the heart. To know that what stirs inside has finally been articulated, if not in the pages of the New York Times, then at least somewhere. Second, The Ethical Skeptic is not written for the casual thinker. My belief is that those who struggle, like me, to sincerely learn about this realm, are seeking something more than packaged easy philosophy. They need a referential resource, something to stimulate new thinking and which serves to lift understanding, not anchor it. Many of the people whom I critique in this material, cannot get through the material successfully. In other words, this is not writing for casual interest, rather a resource for those who are differentiated from the crowd, motivated to understand and grow. The right readers will grasp this, and carry away what they need, rest assured.
TES :)
My IQ is in the 130’s for my age group (~45). I’m doomed.
Dr. Eastwood, I understand your point, sometimes I must read the same paragraph 2 or 3 times over to fully grasp what is being conveyed by TES. However, I’d have it no other way. I find myself learning new words, new ideas, believing perhaps I need to raise my own bar. TES is a breath of fresh air from the grade school pablum trowled out daily by a one-sided media.
TES should keep it in academia rather than “the masses”? What an elitist point of view. The masses could stand to raise their own bar, rather than rush to the lowest common denominator as they’ve been trained to do the last 50 years. You might be surprised at what “the masses” are capable of.
Reblogged this on truthunveiledblog.
Great list! Do you have a link to the 121 topics social skeptics forbid? Vaccines and GMOs would be two of them.
Amazing work!
Hi! I’ve been reading on your site and this is one of the best (real) skeptical sites I have read. We see within the media on sites like “skepticalraptor” and “science based medicine” a plethora of pseudo-skeptic tactics and appeal to skepticism fallacies—your work and writings actually poetically display what these social skeptics do in their writings, and how they deem anything outside of their own belief sphere as being pseudoscience. They ignore contrary empirical evidence and label it as false without actually reading that deeply, and they are complete shills for actual pseudoscience given by money hungry organizations. I’m interested in your take on vaccines… I have been studying them a while and my family member is a scientist who is working in the field to expose pseudoscience from the pharmaceutical industry. There is mounds of toxological data showing why certain indivuals with genetic predispositions fall harm to neurotoxicity from vaccine-adjuvants like aluminum and thimerosal. I have all of the peer-reviewed data to give you, including a website that has a walk through on the autism vaccine science. It contains citations and sources for you to look at yourself and draw conclusions from, but there is so much evidence of harm it is no longer deniable. There are documents from the FOIA act of a transcript at simpsonwood where the CDC admits they knew thimerosal caused a higher increase of autism for African-Americans, and so on, scientists, doctors, immunologists, and more are currently battling this with real science, but the pseudoscience most people believe in is still in the way of progress. You may disagree with this, but at least read and research the material I’m going to give you. I was really impressed with your website and I looks forward to your input on everything I’m going to list. Feel free to ask me any questions… I also have a master rebuttal list to give for common arguments people make about vaccine adjuvants being safe, such as: “dose makes the poison”, “you injest more aluminum than is injected”, “what about diseases coming back since we only rely on vaccination?”, etc.
Now, for the science and walk through (citations and sources are on the page):
This explains the science behind why neurotoxic adjuvants induce encephalopathy and other biomarkers of autism, as well as other important information of relevance.
http://autismrawdata.net/1/post/2014/04/vaccines-cause-autism-science.html
Here is a master rebuttal list for common claims and talking points people frequently have:
http://autismrawdata.net/1/post/2014/01/rebuttals.html
Here is the information on the Simpsonwood transcript and documents:
http://autismrawdata.net/1/post/2011/11/simpsonwood.html
There is much, much more regarding this topic but this is a starting point for those interested in learning about the other side of this debate. I look forward to your input, and feel free to debate me or ask any questions!
Also:
Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/247218/
Also, I myself know people who were metal poisoned and suffered from chronic illness their entire lives. That is of course anecdotal, but my assumptions were proven when they got lab work. More people are leading toxic lives through pesticide and metal exposure, but they don’t know it. Anyone who dares to treat themselves outside of conventional medicine is called a quack and shunned, but I know people who went through chelation with DMSA and their lives are now turned around, one of those people were autistic. Studies have shown autistic children have a higher level of metals in their body, genetic susceptibilities, low brain glutathione, and methylation issues, as well as GI problems. I read your post about children suffering from immune problems and I can relate on a personal level through what I’ve observed in those around me and myself. Keep up the good work!
Alexis, please write me at theethicalskeptic@yahoo.com and I will respond to your posts. Thanks, TES
Hi, I just ran across your website, after looking up a source for Ignosticism. I am working on making a new kind of skepticism that is different from Scientific Skepticism as well. You can evaluate it, through either my website, (receptiveskepticism.com, or my facebook page (facebook.com/receptiveskepticism. I also have had a group for this project on facebook for about a year now, https://www.facebook.com/groups/925334447494947/
I like the ideals and the clear skeptical intellectual honesty. I share many of them. Though I take it in some different directions, and arrive at different conclusions than you. Still I see some idealistic alignment in many ways despite those differences. You seem like a person with whom some good conversations can be had.
Also, I am curious why you call a well-defined ideology, “Scientific Skepticism”, Social Skepticism? I can see some systemic basis for it, but I am more curious about why the authentic name is avoided.
Hey John!
Super, thanks for dropping by and checking out the material in a very thoughtful and sincere fashion. Like me, I am speculating that ignosticism makes a lot of sense for a receptive skeptic, and from the desire to not waste your time inside the bifurcation combat between the Atheists and the Religious.
What I am trying to say here in my blog, is that Scientific Skepticism, is a reasonable domain, an ‘allegiance to a set of professionally effective set of practice standards.’ This is the definition of ethics. Skepticism is a subset of this scientific practice. This is also called Ethical Skepticism. It is real, actual skepticism, free from its being mistaught or employed to deceive and control.
By providing clarity and contrast between that ethical approach to skepticism and the fake version of skepticism, I have chosen to call this non-science skepticism, Social Skepticism. Social Skepticism seeks to use SSkepticism as a battering ram to replace science, scientific skepticism, and enable a specific set of social goals. They could (beneath the loud propaganda) give a flip about science, understanding or discovery – instead, choosing to be activists for a specific set of political, oligarchy, social and religious causes which they wish to enforce in the name of science. These are the nasty, visible and vociferous voices which seek celebrity and tend to be very condemning of ideas and avenues of research. They are not receptive or ethical at all. They are not practicing science, nor skepticism.
Ethical Skepticism, I contend is synonymous with Scientific Skepticism (it is the mental discipline set I cultivate in my labs, engineering and research organizations), and I would imagine (before reading your material) equates to Receptive Skepticism. What I am doing, and I hope that you are attempting to accomplish as well, is to teach the uninitiated what is indeed true skepticism. The secret is, that it is not really new. It is just that we have been programmed with the fake form of Social Skepticism for so long, that we now no longer recognize Scientific/Ethical/Receptive Skepticism. It appears as new and radical thinking. Apparently you get that.
For me, by citing the oppressive and agenda-laden, as well as scientifically mistaken, version of skepticism called Social Skepticism, I hope to allow for younger minds – receptive minds – to understand that considering, pondering, discussing, and going out into the field and indeed researching even forbidden topics for which they will be ridiculed by the practitioners of this fake form, SSkepticism – ARE – scientific activities.
I will check out your site! Let’s keep up the discussion yes.
very best,
TES
Hi there,
Only came across your blog recently but I’ve found your posts to be incredibly insightful. I plan to go back and read through all the old posts and stay up to date with any new posts.
I used to be religious but am no longer a believer. At one point I was a fan of the ‘New Atheist’ movement but I had reservations, though I couldn’t articulate them. Your posts have helped me critically understand and articulate the differences between ethical skepticism and social skepticism.
Do you have any recommendations of books/sources to delve deeper into the ideas you talk about in your blog? What books/sources might provide a solid foundation for ethical skepticism? And what have been some of the books/sources that have made an impact/been influential on you?
Thanks
Hey samborn Welcome,
I too made the journey from sincere Christian, who sought god’s will for my life every night and morning – and eventually began to feel that the explanations I had been handed were indeed wrong. Later in graduate school, attending a debate between an evolutionist and a creationist, I spoke on a subject in defense of evolution. I was so prepared on the topic that I absolutely embarrassed the poor girl promoting creationism. I did not prepare my argument from the lever which exploited the ample scientific and phylogenic data in support of evolution; rather I took the approach of pointing out the weaknesses in the nature of her argument, eliciting the belt fed machine gun of propaganda she had been served – naming at least 3 fallacies per contention she had made, and pleading for her to go back and re-read what the Bible actually said – I could quote the scripture more fluently and accurately than she could in the few verses she attempted to stumble through on her note cards. It was the same stuff I had been fed as well. I knew it backwards and forwards – having read the Bible over 6 times, and memorized so much of it that I received an A on my open book undergrad theology Bible class, when I forgot to bring my Bible with me to the final exam. LOL!
But something bothered me about that debate for two decades, and I could not shake it. Perhaps it was the innocent and searching look in the young lady’s eyes, or perhaps (as I passed it off through that timeframe) it was a guilt over having betrayed the sincerity of my own youth, in exchange for intellectualism. Nonetheless, I had a nagging foot in each camp – my allegiance to the primacy of science, and my heartfelt desire to understand the true nature of humanity, its origins and the possibility of more than what we observe or choose to observe. This was the foundation of my original thinking on ethical skepticism. I truly and sincerely wanted to discover the answers…, and not be told them. I found as my career developed and I experienced more of this planet, I no longer wanted to destroy the opposition. Something bothered me about where I had been, and where I was heading.
I have run several research and advisory firms, as well as scientific labs – and develop scientific reports as an integral facet of my career. And in that regard I highly recommend the book “The Art of Scientific Writing” by Ebel, Bliefert, Russey. Probably the most beneficial chapters deal with the responsibility one carries in the delivery of 1. thought first, and 2. information second. Clean thinking can rescue clean information from crap. Crooked thinking will always convert clean data into garbage, even without the participant’s awareness. I like to measure the ability of my techs and researchers vis-à-vis their ability to craft a cogent, flowing, compelling and accurate Abstract. This shows me that they not only know the subject, but they know its philosophy as well. Other books and resources which have influenced me include Carl Sagan’s “The Cosmic Connection,” and “The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark” (although I actually found these treatises ironically to bear a venue for critiquing the social skepticism movement and some, not all, of Carl’s work in skepticism). As well, Nassim Taleb’s “The Black Swan” and Alan Bloom’s “The Closing of the American Mind.” The whole series of Isaac Asimov non-fiction, “The Road to Monticello” on the developing mind and life experience of Thomas Jefferson. Poetically, Walt Whitman “Leaves of Grass;” although it is almost smotheringly Americana in its delivery, belying virtually its keen message if one be offput by the syrup of setting. As well both books on the Art of War and Guerrilla Warfare by Sun Tzu and Mao Tse-Tung respectively. Then of course a steady diet of Plato’s Ethics, Aristotle and Nietzsche.
Perhaps, and in cliche’ form so, my best book on ethical skepticism has been my life. This indeed is unfortunate, because I cannot find a single book on “Ethical Skepticism” in the bevy of fake skeptics diatribes I have read. This genre of books make me sick to read, much like reading a religious polemic by !!!Max Lucado!!! or some propaganda outlet of just such a nature. A well written scientific report or patent, clear on observations and claims sets, replete with its own self-criticisms and cogent set of next steps, is probably a best sound treatise on Ethical Skepticism. Moreover, I have lived and done things that 99.99% of people never even get close to doing (and fully realize this is cliche in it offing). I will not outline all that here, of course; but safe to say that I have seen the gamut of extraordinary and outlandish observations which a man can make in this life. Perhaps my greatest teacher was being inside the deep bowels of the US and Middle Eastern intelligence community. I cannot outline that in detail, but suffice to say, I received a PhD in the art of deception, lying, propaganda and facade development – along with the skills of detecting counter-intelligence. I watched kingdoms build on complex lies, and kingdoms fall – not on the soundness of new facts – rather, the betrayal by an ally who already knew the facts, just as did everyone else. They all chose to live the lie, until it was time to adopt a new lie. Power enables lying. As a culture of man, we feast on a banquet of well planned deception and misdirection. My clearance was Black Top Secret and involved numerous compartments. And inside that structure I gained access to events and information, few get to see. What I learned – our world is not as it is portrayed, and we have been fed a steady diet of semi-truth for some time, as a people, a culture, a race.
One thing this has taught me is a love for the victims of the elaborate charade. The 4.5 billion people on this planet who are the abject sufferers – the losers in this spin contest. Yes, such a charade can indeed be pulled off, despite numerous whistle blowers – shot down by so called ‘skeptics.’ The urgent extant need is to begin to train the minds of our young to be able to detect both flim-flam based, as well as official, deception.
Thanks and keep coming – as I continue developing the blog, I will continue to hone my approach to this new type of thinking.
My intent is to write the first and best book on Ethical Skepticism. Sadly, and almost condemningly, it does not exist.
~TES
A thank you shout out to mothering.com and their quality forum membership for visiting here.
I will take the ‘overly loquacious’ advisement into account. :) I fully understand this. But I am a technical writer and the habit is hard to shake after delivering over 1200 reports to the international community. As such I find colloquial descriptions of principles – while much easier to read, often afford too much room for spin and misrepresentation by ill-meaning parties. And believe me, I have run into my share of them. Technical writing is much like legalese… it is purposely precise in fact and relation. It can at times appear as a pleonasm – but it is most often not.
~TES :)
I would question food putrefying in the gut but no-one gets it all right. A basic understanding of biology makes such an event unlikely. Producing excess gas, certainly; poorly digested food yes, but putrefying – rotting – no.
Homeopathy can be highly effective but you need someone who is a qualified Homeopathic doctor and who only practises Homeopathy. The complexity of the modality, I believe, makes it unsuited to being practised ‘on the side’ along with other treatments.
Thanks for the excellent input rosross! Respectfully, I do not think the modern studies on SIBO and dysbiosis agree with you (see Nutrients. 2012 Aug; 4(8): pp. 1095–1119. PMCID: PMC3448089: Diet-Induced Dysbiosis of the Intestinal Microbiota and the Effects on Immunity and Disease, K. Brown, D. DeCoffe, E. Molcan, and D.L. Gibson). Putrefaction therein, and in most of science is defined as any decomposition of proteins caused by bacterial or fungal activity – not normal for the human gut flora. SIBO (small intestine bacterial overgrowth) produces decomposition of proteins by foreign/abnormal bacterial or fungal action. This as opposed to digestion – the separation of prolaminates, fibrins, gluteins and nutrients by fermicutes, bacteriodetes and methanobrevibacter smithii (the three normal gut flora). Those are the only two biological alternatives available for the biotic decomposition of organic matter. Digestion, or putrefaction. So yes, it is putrefaction. This is the basic science behind dysbiosis and SIBO. ‘Poorly digested’ is a term from the middle ages, which has no objective reference.
But yes, my comment on homeopathy was not meant to condemn the subject, rather simply to illustrate that those in the Social Skepticism movement will paint you as a member of their broad Associative Condemnation group, simply because you ‘deny’ (dissent). Thanks and keep reading! :)
I think the use of the term putrefaction is problematic because it is commonly understood as a negative.
The process is of course one of ‘breaking down’ which is what the digestive process in the body does naturally. When the term putrefaction is used most people would think it was an unnatural and damaging process, i.e. rotting inside you.
There is a school of thought, in some areas of alternative health, that colonic therapy is required because of ‘rotting matter’ in the gut and this does not make sense to me given my basic but comprehensive understanding of biology.
A healthy body can deal with anything which is in the gut and does so and an unhealthy body may well have problems with digestion and absorption but it does not have ‘rotting matter’ in the gut in the way that some would claim. Hence I consider putrefaction to be a poor choice of word.
Poorly digested is the accurate word and while one can seek to reduce bodily function to the mechanics of science, the fact is that poor digestion is what is happening and that is the result of poor health.
Disease or dis-ease is the result of many factors including physical, mental, biological, physiological, psychological, emotional, spiritual, environmental, circumstantial and more although I realise a purely materialist reductionist approach would take issue with that.
I am not challenging you as an Ethical Sceptic, we should have more of it. I am a natural sceptic and I believe an ethical one – I question everything and demand of anything, that it makes sense based on both common sense and knowledge.
I actually did not see your comment on Homeopathy and so thought nothing about you in regard to it. I merely mentioned it because as a medical modality it embraces all sources of disease and given the nature of the gut and its connection to mind and emotions, is extremely effective in dealing with any disease of the gut.
I don’t think we are really disagreeing, except in terms of your choice of word.
I agree that putrefaction is a loaded word used to motivate dysbiosis patients into action; and in that regard the ‘rotting’ connotation is probably over-spin, and probably the reason they go with the term SIBO most often now. I have SIBO, but live a very healthy lifestyle and have for 15 years now after my health was damaged enormously by wheat consumption from 1996 through 2001. It was a sudden and dramatic onset without a change in lifestyle. Ceasing wheat, halted the enormous damage to my health. Now, I run 6 times a week, and I ceased consuming wheat, dairy, soy, canola and corn simply because they make me feel bad and bear a whole host of negative physical manifestations. As a result, I want better and more accountable science performed on these foods before I ever consider buying them or consuming them again – and this growing American citizen concern is not going to simply go away through the media application of shallow corporate and pseudo-scientific jargon.
But yes, we agree on the principle. :)
I am glad you found a path to health. That is what matters most.
Dear Skeptic,
Thoughtful, precise and very informative!
I magically came upon this site recently and love it.
The scheme you so diligently pointed out above has been my largest research endeavour, as of late!
I have read many pro-GMO op-eds and blogs and find the hubris and irrationality very disparaging. They rarely offer studies to back up statements and I often wonder how much higher an ego can float.
I appreciate the time and effort you put into to your blog.
I look forward to many more and for now I’m going to digest all your previous undertakings.
Cheers
EV,
Thanks for the encouraging input on The Ethical Skeptic and the post on glyphosate. I write the posts between trips to Africa, China and India – and sometimes while there as well, when the abject suffering from corruption gets to me, and overwhelms me. This next year I plan to be in Brazil, India, Vietnam, Germany, Switzerland, London and Beijing. These contrasts afford me a position which most of those in science do not have the luxury to experience.
I totally agree that the pro-GM/glyphosate media blitzes are written by the dilettante, mostly pushing duplicate propaganda, the science of which is WAY above their heads, which has been spun on their behalf by well funded truth-factories. I have personally met persons at these truth-factories, and believe me, the science is way above their heads as well. We are pitted, armed only with real science, ethics and human rights, against a $27 million a year funded propaganda mill – and untold dollars in legislative influence. Journalists who are more hooked into the politics and tendering the authorized side of the issue appearances for their bosses. Journalists who are terrified of losing their job. The articles rarely grasp issues of science, research, accountability or social responsibility. They mostly highlight the supposed wonders of productivity savings, lament about some theoretical famine of which they hold NO knowledge whatsoever – and how stupid you are if you take any stance against the unbridled employment of chemicals and nucleotide substitutions in our food. The rats did not die in 90 days, and they looked OK when I cut them open, so I did science. I can pretend that economies of scale can be re-spun as ‘technology savings’…. so it is all justified. After having worked for decades in science, impoverished and famine stricken cultures and in justifying technology based upon ‘productivity’ I know the bullshit which goes into those study-charades very well. I have critiqued hundreds of studies of this type and do stand as an expert in this field.
There is of course, no way to really do service to this subject in one blog article. It will always be woefully short on information. But I jam packed as much salient info into one condensed article as I reasonably could. :)
Keep reading as you get the chance to, and welcome. Those persons who quietly support The Ethical Skeptic might surprise you. ;)
LOL.. hilarious and at the same time absolutely true. I can relate because this was exactly my story as well. I figured the Betaine HCL just from reading a naturopathic website. Made a night and day difference.
Yeah Ravi, I scolded my GP and GE for this, and they took it well. (They both know to be well prepared when I come in for a visit, LOL!). I warned them that, from my perspective they are about to be flooded with a spate of HCL/Enzyme deficiency cases, making it harder to discern/catch the real dangerous stuff like cancer. The Gastroenterologist retorted that he is seeing at least 6 per day, as opposed to 10 years ago he would see 1 or 3 per week.* He applauded my desire to not undertake the prescriptions and was glad that I had good results from the HCL/Enzyme approach.
*Please note that my doctor’s experience matches data from the International Foundation for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, a 6 to 1 disorder ratio as compared to 1994. These are patients who are approaching the doctor from PAIN, and not the result of the medical system re-categorizing already existing visits into new classes of malady. Do not let ‘skeptics’ contend such an extraordinary claim without extensive falsification based evidence.
Ethical Skeptic, I suppose I don’t have to be the one to tell you how friggin’ good this list is. Please do not take this down, as I would like to link to it on a regular basis. I would suggest a fallacy, or whatever is the right way to call it, where a pseudo sceptic is trying to make themself look good by being overly aggressive in arguing? Is that covered here? Like a show of intimidation?
Terry
Terry, there are several which relate to this line of personal critical blindness or bias, in Misrepresentation of Self (Appeal to Skepticism), notably: Compositional Exclusion, Ergo Sum Veritas, Ergo Sum Scientia, Delusion of Superiority, to name a few. Glad you like the list. It is both a page here, where you commented, and a post as well so that it gets maximum exposure – and the fact that some people link, as you are intending here, back to the original post, posted before I made it a page because of its popularity. Have at it – it will always be here. I update it about every week as I gain more exposure to fallacious and biased thought either in my workplace, or in the social discourse. I do take suggestions too.
~TES :)
Is there a Delusion of Adequacy fallacy? I think that’s most of medicine;).
See Dunning-Kruger Effect.
What a Brilliant List. Thanks for compiling this!
Ok, so I’m sure I’m missing a lot of context (came across your blog while surfing), but I see a lot of generalization with little in the way of specificity or example. Nihilism – on your view, at least as expressed in this post – would have to entail some kind of active, participatory, or at least epistemic negation of reality as commonly and/or scientifically understood, and entail specific behaviors – possibly violent – intended to bring about or prove such negation. You use the word “imperious” seemingly to suggest there is some kind of ruthless dogmatism we should necessarily associate with nihilism. This runs counter to my own experience, and indeed to Albert Camus’ view on the absurdity of existence as a nihilistic concept.
A nihilist need not deny or reject science or scientific evidence as to the nature of the world we encounter. Although there may be some who do, I do not. We can remain committed to a metaphysics inclusive of the methodological naturalism inherent to scientific endeavor without abandoning the idea that doing so (or life itself) is ultimately a hopeless or meaningless exercise. Furthermore, even taking a strong existentialist position which denies reality as we conceive of it does not necessarily run counter to current or eventual developments in science or philosophy. That is, there is nothing inherently contradictory in recognizing how physical reality consists mainly of empty space in which atoms interact in purposeless ways to bring about the manifestation of reality as we think of it.
The bottom line is that, while I freely admit I’m not as well-educated on the subject as I should be, I don’t recognize the nihilism you describe here. Do you have examples of alleged nihilists who fit your description?
Hey J.C.
Thanks for surfing by. :) Yes, this is the sticky part of the argument. You missed that I am in agreement with Albert Camus – the blog post simply demonstrates the walk through the four forms of nihilism which supports his contentions. The cul-de-sac error of assuming ‘Fundamental Nihilism’ to constitute definition of nihilism. What I have tried to contrast in the post is a Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (and other subject reference) compliant set of terminology regarding the four forms of nihilism. Further therein, to contend that the traditional definition of nihilism (as Fundamental Nihilism, the form you context in your excellent comment) is useless. This is Camus’ view. You make two points, 1) Not sure you are comfortable with that definition of nihilism (Fundamental), and 2) would need some examples of my contended definition (Romantic/strong Metaphysical). I agree with both points – I am not comfortable with the definition of nihilism as you have presented it here (Fundamental), Nihilism’s “entail[ing] some kind of active, participatory, or at least epistemic negation of reality.” What I am contending in this progression of axioms, through Fundamental, Metaphysical, Romantic and Existential forms of nihilism, is that Fundamentalist Nihilism has no practical merit in philosophy and discourse. It is useless in terms of assembling an epistemic base to one’s philosophy. Practical Nihilism on the other hand, as we might call it, at the other end of the spectrum, the really useful version of it, is when one adheres to Romanticist/Existential Nihilism – They don’t reject reality, they simply ontologically deny a priori the existence of anything which they claim is tough to repeatedly measure in a lab setting. They don’t deny the existence of space, matter, energy and the laws which function inside our 11 dimensions of M-Brane; they simply reject you; promoting the teaching that you do not exist, as anything other than a bundle of firing neurons, that you are your own self-illusion, or rejecting anything you might find as meaningful – individual rights and freedoms are a trifling fantasy – all these domain sets do not exist. And that is great as a personal philosophical choice.
So in this post, practical Nihilism is defined as Romanticist (1′) in basis in that we choose those sets of domain to value, and strong Metaphysical (2ƒ’) as we choose those sets of domain to exclude as non-existent.” This is more akin to material monism, and is indeed not the definition of nihilism you have presented. I agree with your, and Camus’ point, in my blog post. I disagree that this is generalization however – it is developed with more specificity (albeit making it difficult to muddle through, LOL!) than any of the resources from which I sought reference; most blending these four forms of nihilism into one thing and one name. This blending approach frames the definition of Fundamental Nihilism a kind of poison pill, which renders the entire argument moot, back into the same cul-de-sac you, I and Camus just crawled out from.
Your second point pertains to examples of the imperious nature of today’s Nihilism. Holding to a personal philosophy of Romanticist and strong Metaphysical Nihilism is a fine personal choice. Very ethical. I consider this approach a valid alternative in my assessing of the reality of the universe. I contract/own scientific labs and conduct and manage much science research myself. But it is when I begin to insist that everyone else must also now adopt my choice of philosophy, that they too must be a material monist, atheist, and metaphysical naturalist (Nihilism in my definition comprises all of these disparate beliefs), that it becomes “imperious.” I insist that everyone be taught that what I might deny I could measure repeatedly (and accept to have been measured, by a club I belong to) in a lab setting, is the only reality – and that there are social penalties if one regards that statement as not true.
The examples? Imperious? The point of the blog is that today’s practical nihilists falsely advertise themselves as ‘atheists.’ You cannot walk 3 inches through online discourse or a professional STEM career without someone insisting (with social penalties) what an idiot you are if you investigate or ponder anything to do with ghosts, existence of advanced nearby life in the universe, the soul, alternative realms, the afterlife, spirituality, specific creatures, the sustained reality of love, or mind preceding ‘reality’ in any form. Yes, as STEM professional, this was enforced on me in my career. I had to keep my mouth shut, just as I did as a kid in church, or my career was in danger. Fortunately now, I am past where those career threats can harm me. But this is more than simply atheism (a personal belief about gods) – it is Nihilism – you don’t exist – nor does anything you hold as tendering meaning. This form of Nihilism is not supported by the evidence at all, it is imperiously enforced by those who hold its belief. It is a 1633 religion, just the instruments have gotten better, and we reject the physical violence and prison for the most part now.
Pingback: Porque la homeopatía no solo es nanomedicina II: | Homeopatía
(Please consider that English is not my native language)
Well, I consider myself a nihilist (probably I do not fit your definition) but I cannot relate to this post. I do not feel that there is nihilistic propaganda pushed on us (at least in Europe). I don’t see how science is nihilistic, I would rather call it utilitarian. One of the core tenets of nihilism is that there is no absolute (objective) truth (this is why Nihilism is a paradox; just like Buddhism) so I cannot understand how a real nihilist would ever be able to really force his believes on somebody. Unless you are relating to the “Anything goes – mentality”. But then again, why should the “higher powers” act in unison? Pretty sure they are not “real” nihilists then. As far as I am concerned, no nihilist has ever bridged the is-ought gap (which would require an axiom to serve as a point of reference; which in itself would be in grave contradistinction to the core tenet. A self-delusion; so you will never be able to go beyond good and evil). I guess it would be better to call them as they really are – namely materialists. Also some of the individuals who seek fame on different platforms (i.e. Youtube) or act as the voice of the atheist movement are merely “debunkers”. They just don’t have the wits to be skeptics. The more they shout the dumber they usually are (just personal experience).
BTW This blog seems really interesting. Will have to dig deeper.
Best wishes
Jay,
Thanks for the kind words, and to be fair – I am trying to tweak the definitions – or in reality frame them in more compatible fashion – so that the puzzle makes more sense. So that we understand who the debunkers are – and why they are wrong. So we can contrast them with people of conscience, who really hold to their philosophy. To not allow them a place to hide, and pretend that they are actually reasonable rational people of a different name (atheism, materialism, free thinkers, etc.).
You are fortunate that Nihilism is not pushed on you in Europe. Science is not nihilist, and it is utilitarian agreed – but Nihilists will pretend that science supports their religion, and will pretend to be materialists and atheists representing the opinion of science. A materialist depends upon the certainty of physical measures and an atheist does not believe in deities – neither of these comments upon or relates to the things which Nihilists seek to eliminate from social understanding through denial and debunking. Yes socially we have fallen for this ruse.
When you are referring to ‘no objective truth’ nihilist, you are referring to Fundamental Nihilism. While it is an intellectual lever, its practical application is null. So we can set Fundamental Nihilism on a museum shelf (as you cite, these types of nihilist don’t really exist) and use the term how it should really be employed…
Those who deny that any avenue of personal meaning can exist – only the authorized domain is to be considered – and than everything else is simply an illusion of neurofunction.
This is not a benign philosophy.
And your English is superb, as are your insights. Thank you!
TES :)
I like the term ignostic, but I would never use it myself because it almost always requires an explanation. Since I need the explanation, I might as well just explain what I am without the label. I have enough of those put onto me as it is.
Understandable. That has to be other main reason, aside from the quiet nature of the philosophy, as to why no one really has heard of it. As long as you are comfortable with people assuming that you are a Nihilist, then that makes total sense.
Me. I am not comfortable with people concluding that I am a Nihilist any more than them thinking that for some practice I have, certainly I must be a Christian.
I bristle at participating in promotion of the ignorance. Religions thrive on ignorance. If they do not know what an ignostic is, then you can smile and just have them look it up.
Thanks for a spot on observation tho….
:-)
There is definitely enough content both on this site and throughout the web to produce an engaging feature length documentary. We should get on this. When TPB is up again I’ll look around for some decent filmmaking software we should get on this.
Tal, this is exactly what I was thinking when I stepped back and looked at the poster after its final cut. It is almost a documentary media poster.
Haha, great minds and all that. Saw the poster and got all excited about a new documentary to watch. Definitely game to make this happen soon.
My sentiments exactly. Discovered your blog after wondering whether anybody else had noticed the hijacking of language that seems to be quite rampant in modern society: phrases like “I’m a skeptic” and “As a scientific minded person” coming from people with obvious bias, closed-mindedness and emotional investment in the status quo who consistently revert to basic ad hominems and straw man fallacies whenever challenged.
Spent a while searching and eventually found this blog, the only one of its kind as far as I know. A sigh of relief that this phenomenom has been noticed and analysed. A breath of fresh air consistently delivering quality content as well as strategies to deal with acolytes of the SSkepticism religion.
There seems to be a massive take over of the language going on to muddy the waters of intellecual discussion and keep the people in the dark.
Here are some of the terms I have noticed being hijacked:
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Public servants are now referred to as “Authorities”
Green
Equality
“Rape” which now has so many definitions that actual rape has become trivialised
Abuse
Democracy
Conspiracy now refers to “something that is untrue and goes against the status quo” or “this person is crazy” as opposed to its original definition
Offensive
Environmentally friendly
There are many more examples.
As always keep up the good work. To my fellow readers: Let’s not make Ethical Skeptic do all the work – jump into the conversation and let’s develop this community.
Again, thanks Taliesin. I hope you don’t mind that I echoed the quote from your comment up in the blog post upon which you commented. Let me know if that is OK. We are garnering some interest as the visitor count is growing very fast. You must be out pounding some big drum. :) Thank you very much. I suspect we are getting GM Food related traffic as well; and were my children and my neighbors’ children not suffering adult-style diseases from something deleterious in the nature of this last 20 years of food, I would probably not touch on the topic at all. I am pro-GM Technology – but even more I am pro my kids not suffering. But since this is one of the cause célèbre of the Social Skepticism movement, pretending how food science should work, and their work is directly harming my children, my self and my family – I will be vocal about that topic, as an aside from the charter of the blog.
Hehe… Democracy – A form of Monarchy in which only the most flamboyant, notorious, popular or good looking Royals succeed to throne or office of nobility.
Yes, administrative officials will continue to be promoted from the role of public servant to the offices of nobility and authority. This is the way socialism creeps into a successful economy and strangles it from within. The beneficiaries are always the same Royal class, mostly hidden in our modern era. And they are always supported by their sycophant SSkeptics.
Thanks, and great comment on the hijacking and equivocation being played inside our language.
~ TES
Did you create this infographic yourself?
If so, kudos man it is very impressive and now my desktop wallpaper.
LOL!! Yes, 70% of the fallacies have been noted from my career managing science labs and in economics, trade and engineering. The tree graphic I created while watching American football yesterday. Thanks! :)
I want it on my real wall.
Not to mention the hypocrisy of Al Gore stepping off a private plane to give a lecture on how the average working stiff should take the bus to work… because global warming. Oh and don’t forget to pay your global carbon tax, because Al needs a relaxing three month holiday at a private island resort from all this hard work… because global warming.
Yes we should look after the planet. Let’s plant some trees, or better yet, keep the ones we have and grow hemp instead since it’s so much more efficient. But then I suppose we’d lose jobs, and we can’t have that – because people need jobs. If people didn’t have jobs they’d do too much thinking, and we can’t have that either.
Don’t even get me started on the whole “job creation” mess. Automation should free people to live their lives (instead of freeing them to scrap it out to “make a living”, whatever the fuck that’s supposed to mean).
Taliesin, dead on.
I have spent most of my life under extraordinary pressure and ‘damn well better do it’ demands, not because we want excellence, but rather because we immaturely want to conquer as organizations and a society.
I got tired of spending 20 hour days fighting the cold war. I have witnessed for decades the real reasons behind the corporate demands for efficiency, and they are predatory and destructive. There are always spoils to be taken by cornering an industry vertically or horizontally – and it does not matter if you are oligarchy or socialist – the same people end up taking the money.
The net result of this is betrayal of our planet, arrogance and failed politics of conquest. The end state of this pathway of obedience is pushing a red button labelled “Nuke” – because we were only smart enough to follow the procedure and not question why.
~TES
I’m glad you eventually escaped. There are some good talks on youtube about cheaper and more equitable alternatives to welfare programs – things like the ‘negative income tax’ and the ‘guaranteed annual income’ which would serve to provide citizens with enough money to provide for their basic needs. Some people would be happy with that and wouldn’t work. Others would become captains of industry or pick up a job to pay for more of their wants, but would still get that $25,000 every year to cover basic needs. This way nobody would feel like they were being punished for working. Not only that, but something like 90% of all crime is financially motivated.
Welfare programs only serve to disincentivize low-pay unemployment ($300 pw for jumping though hoops vs $350 pw for 40hrs of mind-numbing boredom). If that benefit wasn’t cut you could be damned sure most of the people society calls ‘bludgers’ would pick up part time jobs right quick. They aren’t lazy, they’re just sensible and don’t see the point in working 40hrs a week for an extra $50. It’s basic business sense when you get right down to it.
This, and the fact that more and more people are waking up to the ponzi scheme that is fractional reserve private banking:
Science is based on the premise “Give us one free miracle, and we’ll explain all the rest.” LOL!!! I love it. A total statement of Ethical Skepticism. Thanks for the video Taliesin! ~TES
Any time brother, keep up the great work.
Rupert Sheldrake: The Science Delusion (TED Talk)
Bifurcation fallacy… nice to have a name to the face. I’ve noticed these being presented a lot recently:
– Alopathic medicine is the only alternative to disease.
– Hostile land grabs (Agenda 21) and more taxes extracted from the middle classses are the only way to combat global warming.
– Anthropogenic CO2 is the only explanation for global warming.
– Being anything other than a feminist makes you a mysoginist.
– Being anything other than an atheist makes you ineligible to participate in scientific discussion.
The list goes on.
Many thanks for the bigger picture presented here EthicalSceptic.
Pingback: Skeptics Challenged for Using Faux Science in Debunkery Attempts | Sam on Science
Currently going on an adventure through your back catalogue of articles, finding the sharp honesty of your observations very refreshing.
Always wondered why this new breed of “skeptics/atheists” seemed to irk me so.
Are you aware there is a sub-reddit called ‘conspiratard’ which considers every conspiracy ever written about impossible? It’s good for a laugh if nothing else.
Keep up the good work :)
Thanks Taliesin,
Adventure? LOL! I hope you enjoy what you read. I have found it refreshing to shrug off this bad brand of skepticism as well.
The intellectual resource to draw from is enormous. More to write about than can possibly be addressed in our 2 short years.
But we will keep it coming.
Thanks for reading. :)