Only describe, don’t explain.
~ Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
I’m not here to simplify, explain, cajole, or persuade—I am here to describe. That is my job. If you choose to ignore, deride, or evade this, that is your prerogative. It takes integrity to discern what the fool refuses to see. But for those who recognize that the tide of the argument has turned—despite the obfuscation, gaslighting, and sophistry—no explanation is needed.
The rationale behind why the term ‘unresolved’ is selected for use in this context, which encompasses a scope of phenomena, intelligences, and objects (artifacts, devices, materials, samples, DNA, trace analysis, etc.).
Unidentified is too open-ended, allowing for excessive noise and speculative inclusions. It carries a layman’s neutrality but lacks structured investigatory rigor.
Unexplained carries a false epistemic confidence, implying that all things are explainable given enough effort, which is not necessarily true. It also has a slight outsider connotation, as it’s often used by media and non-program observers.
Unresolved is an operational term—it signifies that cases are tracked within a structured, disciplined process and remain open until a determination can be made. This also signals that not all cases will be resolved, but the framework remains purposeful.
Slide 5 (below) is purposed to address 3 critical factors of engaging the NHI and broader issue:
- Humans are intentional and biased creatures – this imparts failure
- The public, social media, media, and government will crucify the team and team-members unnecessarily – this imparts failure
- The NHI themselves react to intentionality, and have the capability to quantum tunnel into our systems and influence their outcomes – this imparts failure
Resolution:
In refining this approach, it’s important to clarify how a Zero-Shot Lens, paired with an LLM framework – to form an Artificial Strategic Intelligence – provides a unique advantage in terms of all three challenges. Unlike traditional AI models that rely on extensive training data, a Zero-Shot AI module operates in real-time, adapting dynamically to new information, emerging patterns/habits/languages, and previously unseen engagement variables—without requiring pre-existing labels or predefined assumptions. They are able to interpret the ‘language’ of different stakeholders, including the NHI themselves.
This ZeroShot-ASI coupled capability is crucial for three key reasons:
- It allows our human team to self-correct cognitive biases, ensuring that our engagement model remains adaptive, rigorous, and resilient to manipulation.
- It helps manage the external perception of our work, protecting against misrepresentation, distortion, and external influence from media, government, and social narratives.
- It provides a structured mechanism to monitor NHI interaction with our processes—not only how they engage with us but also whether they are capable of influencing the ASI itself through non-traditional computational methods (e.g., quantum tunneling exploits).
This Slide 5 outlines our framework in acknowledging these three complex stakeholder layers—human, public/media, and NHI—and builds in intentional safeguards to maintain a neutral, structured, and strategically aware engagement model.
The Ethical Skeptic, “If You Know, You Know”; The Ethical Skeptic, WordPress, 17 Jan 2025; Web, https://theethicalskeptic.com/2025/01/17/if-you-know-you-know/
Did you make any unresolved observations when you were at sea?
Oh yes, several odd unidentified aerial phenomena and craft. We tracked and observed a craft flying at 35,000 ft, presenting no IFF squawk, pretending to be an airliner in an oceanic air traffic corridor. It accelerated from Mach 0.75 to Mach 8+ in a matter of seconds — when it noticed that we had noticed it, and were armed with anti-aircraft missiles. Had it both visually and on AEGIS radar.
It will be a triumph and relief when we get to the point we actually know something about all this.
I do hope that happens while I’m still around. Best of luck with the project.
We shall see how it goes. There is a lot of emotional opposition. And that is the problem, people who assume the answer, or a tolerance thereof, and get emotional when results don’t arrive which conform to their prior beliefs. Or when people examine the issue at all, and they get upset/indignant. Total hypocrisy. For me, I hold a suspicion, but am open (even will be relieved) to see it falsified. Suspicion does not equal expectation in this case. The answer will most likely be mindblowing in most any outcome. Their anger back in the 1970’s was more of a… Read more »
lol. WOW. I feel special. I guess twice isn’t a coincidence sometimes. I’m not at war and I’m a poor messenger. I’m not political but after seeing the tech used during elections, over my house, and possibly used harming people in weather events I had to try to get the message out. I’m only an old disabled/physical and vax injured grandma so I’m not a good messenger. I can barely type and read sometimes. I’m harmless. Lol. Just trying to put pieces together that they put out there. . I’m just trying to get info out there so eventually the… Read more »
It will probably take me a while to decode this information-rich description. I appreciate the implicate invitation to dive deeper.
I’m not sure what “Observe in Absence of Intentionality Effect” means. I’ve read “The Problem of Intent” where you write, We cannot define the boundary of the domain of intent, save by means of metaphysical speculation, Is that what you mean here by the “absence of intentionality effect”?
It means that yes, but four aspects, in development by our team:
1. Our intention influences the outcomes of what we endeavor to observe (bias, agency, and methodical cynicism – both conscious and unconscious)
2. The observer influences the universe being observed ( e.g. Wheeler’s choice, double slit, spooky action…)
3. We are now observing a domain where intent is present aside from simply the observer (new playing field which science is ill-equipped to handle), and
4. Our intent will influence the intent of the observed domain (a non-neutral observed domain).
TES
Thank you.
I dunno, but I think I take all the steps.
Not much presents to me, but I pay attention.
:-)